Speaker 1: All right, glad you with us. Happy Monday toll free
Speaker 1: on numbers eight hundred and nine for one Sean you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. We've got
Speaker 1: the lawyers for the president coming up during the course
Speaker 1: of the program today. What a beat down Michael Vanderveen
Speaker 1: gave the CBS anchor. That was pretty amazing. And Bruce
Speaker 1: Canter also, David Shoone, he did the portion of the
Speaker 1: case where he literally lit up the whole room with
Speaker 1: the montage as he played. So we'll go through a
Speaker 1: lot of what was going on behind the scenes as
Speaker 1: we speak. Andrew Cuomo, the governor of New York, under
Speaker 1: huge pressure former Governor Pataki, now floating the idea that
Speaker 1: this cover up of the nursing home deaths is such
Speaker 1: a big deal that they want. He wants the state
Speaker 1: to take a hard look at at a recall effort,
Speaker 1: which New York does not have a means to do
Speaker 1: like California does. Cuomo is now out there trying to
Speaker 1: in this again. He's claiming it's not his fault. We've
Speaker 1: got to give a shout out to our friends in
Speaker 1: Texas today. As Joe Bistarti warned us late last week,
Speaker 1: things have gotten really bad down there weatherwise, with snow, low, low, low,
Speaker 1: historically low temperatures. You have pavement ice. They don't have
Speaker 1: anything that resembles a plow or sander or salting machines. Nothing.
Speaker 1: And there's a state of federal state of emergency has
Speaker 1: been declared in Texas. Governor abbitted Cruise. I spoke with
Speaker 1: both of them, and they're all over it. And but
Speaker 1: for those of you down there, it might be time
Speaker 1: to check on your elderly neighbors and friends. Make sure
Speaker 1: everybody's okay, everybody has enough heat, they're warm. Maybe you
Speaker 1: have a generator, you have an elderly neighbor, you might
Speaker 1: want to invite them in and get them nice and
Speaker 1: warm if their house is cold. They just don't prepare
Speaker 1: for things like this. Good news in the media front,
Speaker 1: and that being that Parlor is back, thank goodness, And
Speaker 1: they apparently have now have bypassed everything. Hold on anyway,
Speaker 1: but Parlor's back. They've resumed their social media app. They've
Speaker 1: secured a new new computer servers. Not a not an
Speaker 1: easy process from everything I know, Uh, you got YouTube.
Speaker 1: Not only were they not only were these big tech
Speaker 1: companies a lot of them cancel any story by the
Speaker 1: New York Post um but then then now deleting portions
Speaker 1: of the dislikes when people comment on Biden videos, Oh
Speaker 1: that's spam. Okay, can you prove it spam? I'd like
Speaker 1: to see. That is a big story I'm gonna I
Speaker 1: want to tell you about. There's a smoking gun email
Speaker 1: that has finally come out if John Durham is still
Speaker 1: awake and doing anything that resembles any real investigation. But anyway,
Speaker 1: it was an email from Komey to James Clapper in
Speaker 1: January of twenty seventeen. Now by that point, the FBI
Speaker 1: already knew, having interviewed Christopher Steele. Steele told them that, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I did this whole thing dossier thing to hell Pillory
Speaker 1: and remember Sally Yates and people who else said it.
Speaker 1: Andrew McCabe had said that without the dirty Russian dossier
Speaker 1: misinformation Clinton paid for dossier, we wouldn't have gotten the
Speaker 1: FISA warrants. Well, now we see in this email that
Speaker 1: Comey wrote to James Clapper, we're not able to sufficiently
Speaker 1: corroborate the reporting as it relates to the dossier that
Speaker 1: was that he signed three warrants four verifying the authenticity
Speaker 1: of the information. And he sent this email the day
Speaker 1: that he renewed the FISA application, the first renewal, and
Speaker 1: then he did one even after that. We're not able
Speaker 1: to sufficiently corroborate the reporting. Just the news dot com
Speaker 1: is reporting. Wow. Can you imagine that We've got a
Speaker 1: lot of news on the Biden agenda, which we're going
Speaker 1: to be getting into. Now he's going after your Second
Speaker 1: Amendment rights. Now they're refusing to call Israel an ally unbelievable.
Speaker 1: Then you got this Deputy Press Secretary was only suspended
Speaker 1: now apparently is now resigned. Then of course nobody pays
Speaker 1: attention to the Born Alive Infant Protection Act at Republicans
Speaker 1: Democratic senators refused to outlaw that. I mean, it's it's
Speaker 1: pretty sad. So and then we got this whole impeachment thing.
Speaker 1: And on top of it, then you got that Democrats
Speaker 1: cannot quit Donald Trump was a red state article. They
Speaker 1: can't quit him. Democrats have a new plan on how
Speaker 1: to get Trump after the acquittal that took place. Republicans, though,
Speaker 1: are now finally going on offense, which is a great thing.
Speaker 1: You have House Republicans demanding Nancy Pelosi answer some questions
Speaker 1: about the Capitol riot. Now, what have we learned? What
Speaker 1: was a big part of this whole snap impeachment collapse
Speaker 1: had to do with the fact that they rushed to judgment,
Speaker 1: They did no investigation, and they did their snap impeachment,
Speaker 1: no due process, no defense, no presumption of innocence of
Speaker 1: any kind. All right, that's that's a big problem that
Speaker 1: this is now going to open a door. It's going
Speaker 1: to be easy to impeach the president pretty much for
Speaker 1: any reason whatsoever. But rightly so, if the FBI knew,
Speaker 1: if court documents now show, if Congress want to Concio
Speaker 1: Cortes knew a week in advance that this was all
Speaker 1: likely to happen. They sent a letter guys like Jim
Speaker 1: Jordan and Devin Newness and Rodney Davis and a few others.
Speaker 1: James Comer to Pelosi saying that many more important questions
Speaker 1: about her responsibility. She's the head of the sergeant in
Speaker 1: arms in the in the house. Why if everybody else
Speaker 1: seemed to know, and the FBI knew, and even fake
Speaker 1: news outlets like the Washington Post and see an Enter
Speaker 1: reporting it, why didn't they do anything. I mean, this
Speaker 1: can't happen to this country in a post nine to
Speaker 1: eleven world, as I've been saying, So they're demanding answers
Speaker 1: for Pelosi on her security decisions. Mark Meadows was on
Speaker 1: My show Friday night and he confirmed no, the President
Speaker 1: offered days in advance to bring in the National Guard
Speaker 1: if they wanted it, and then the media is saying, no,
Speaker 1: that's not true. He well, okay, I've never known Mark
Speaker 1: Meadows to lie, especially on something as important of as that.
Speaker 1: There is great, frankly justified anger against Mitch McConnell, and
Speaker 1: Lindsey Graham was on Fox News Sunday dealing with this,
Speaker 1: and there's a even a poll out today. Look, if
Speaker 1: you fracture the Republican Party, which could happen, but if
Speaker 1: it did happen, it's it's it's not that the Democrats
Speaker 1: would love it, trust me. And as Lindsay said, I
Speaker 1: don't know who McConnell was trying to impress, but certainly
Speaker 1: wasn't the people that voted for him. He's right on
Speaker 1: that comment. And if Senate Republicans ever hoped to reclaim
Speaker 1: the majority, job one needs to be what I think
Speaker 1: probably getting new leadership. Considering that the leadership of the
Speaker 1: Republicans has lost touch with the base of their party.
Speaker 1: That's not going to end well for anybody. Graham said,
Speaker 1: I think Senator McConnell's speech he got a load off
Speaker 1: his chest, but unfortunately put a load on the back
Speaker 1: of Republicans. You know, that speech, you're going to see
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two campaigns against Republicans. And I would
Speaker 1: imagine if you're a Republican running in George Arizona, New Hampshire,
Speaker 1: where we have a chance to take back the Senate,
Speaker 1: they may be playing Senator McConnell's speech and asking you
Speaker 1: about it. Then he added, I think McConnell's speech was
Speaker 1: an outlier regarding how Republicans feel about this. Obviously, Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell is way out of touch. And you know, you
Speaker 1: need somebody that actually understands the base of their party
Speaker 1: and what people want, you know, And there's this one
Speaker 1: whole thing here that nobody seems to be getting. The
Speaker 1: whole process here should scare every American, starting with Pat
Speaker 1: Lahey presiding, a guy that already said on the record
Speaker 1: that he believed Donald Trump was guilty, How did he
Speaker 1: get to preside over this this shift show charade that
Speaker 1: took place. Now, it always was a predetermined outcome. I
Speaker 1: told you that I was right about that. We're not
Speaker 1: wrong about that. How did that happen? How does that
Speaker 1: in any way represent any fundamental fairness of any kind
Speaker 1: in terms of any type of of proceeding for somebody
Speaker 1: on an important question like impeachment. It was a big
Speaker 1: deal that John Roberts said, now, don't drag me into
Speaker 1: this post presidential impeachment shift show charade. I don't want
Speaker 1: any part of it. And he was right. All rules
Speaker 1: of evidence, evidentiary standards were thrown out the window, just eviscerated,
Speaker 1: you know. And when they started, when David Shoon started
Speaker 1: showing those montages of the incendiary, insurrectionist language of Democrats. Well,
Speaker 1: there's a point to be made here, and that is
Speaker 1: that if you apply these exact same standards that the
Speaker 1: Democrats are using, if you apply that too, Democrats, guess
Speaker 1: what they'd be impeached, including Kamala Harris, and they would
Speaker 1: be put on trial. And really, Joe, I want to
Speaker 1: beat the hell out of the president. That might rise
Speaker 1: to the level itself. Certainly, Chuck Schumerner's threats to Gorsage
Speaker 1: and Kavanaugh, but Kamala Harris after the police precinct burned
Speaker 1: to the ground Minneapolis, supporting a bail fund so that quote,
Speaker 1: insurrectionists that are arrested can get out of prison. And
Speaker 1: some did, and some committed a lot more crimes that
Speaker 1: we've chronicled here on this program, chronicled on TV, you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, it was a powerful case. Is you don't
Speaker 1: have snap impeachments like this is why you don't. And
Speaker 1: now that we know that it was pre planned and
Speaker 1: that all these groups is that a new one understood
Speaker 1: that it was pre planned. But if you apply the standards,
Speaker 1: it's exactly the same. I thought one of the funniest things.
Speaker 1: I mean, I never thought it would end the Democratic
Speaker 1: politicians fight fight fight, fight fight, fight, fight, fight, fight, fight, fight, fight, fight, fight, fight.
Speaker 1: We gotta fight, we gotta fight, we gotta fight. We
Speaker 1: gotta fight, fight like hell. We all gotta fight like hell.
Speaker 1: We're gonna I'm gonna fight like hell. Let's fight like hell.
Speaker 1: And it shows that they're not applying the same standards
Speaker 1: in in this case to other people. They just they're
Speaker 1: not and they won't and pup can feign all the
Speaker 1: moral outrage she wants. But she's part of the problem
Speaker 1: too with her comments about when the Wisconsin state capital,
Speaker 1: remember what took place there, and she was cheering that
Speaker 1: on herself at the time. The rules don't apply to Democrats.
Speaker 1: The rules don't apply to Kamala Harris or Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: or Chuck Schumer or Maxine Waters. It looks like the
Speaker 1: censure movement has died. Nancy Pelosi said, no, he deserves
Speaker 1: much more than that. We we censure people for using
Speaker 1: the wrong stationary. I'm like, okay, and this is what
Speaker 1: this is what we get. This is what the American
Speaker 1: people get. Lindsey Graham's saying about this double standard on
Speaker 1: Fox News Sunday, Well, if you use their model, I
Speaker 1: don't know how Kamala Harris doesn't get impeached if the
Speaker 1: Republicans take over the House, because she actually bailed out rioters.
Speaker 1: So now we've opened up Pandora's box here, and it's
Speaker 1: sad for the country. He's right, but you know, and
Speaker 1: then I we had this this attorney for the President,
Speaker 1: Michael Vandervey. Oh man, it was just it was a
Speaker 1: brutal takedown of the CBS reporter um. Now for the
Speaker 1: Republican senators, the few of those that actually voted guilty,
Speaker 1: this massive backlash back in their home districts. Even though
Speaker 1: Richard Burr was leaving anyway. And then you have Senator
Speaker 1: Cassidy Louisiana, and then you had Pat Toomey, he's out
Speaker 1: as well. You know, they felt, I guess was politically
Speaker 1: safe for them. M That's another sad thing is that people.
Speaker 1: It just shows how corrupt the whole swamp is. You know,
Speaker 1: maybe we should do a one and done Congress one
Speaker 1: one one term as senator, maybe two terms as congressman
Speaker 1: or a woman, and then you're out term limit everybody
Speaker 1: so they don't spend all their time playing politics as
Speaker 1: we roll along. Sean Hannity Show, eight hundred nine four one, Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: you know, revenge and vengeance, forever Democrats and never Trumpers
Speaker 1: and the rest. You know, they just they cannot and
Speaker 1: I'm predicting right now. Donald Trump has been pretty quiet.
Speaker 1: He did release a statement Saturday, but the President has
Speaker 1: been pretty quiet. And the President, you know, did talk
Speaker 1: about the sad commentary in Our Time and that is
Speaker 1: when and this has gone on for the entirety of
Speaker 1: him running for office and his presidency. And you know,
Speaker 1: we now have a smoking gun email as just the
Speaker 1: news dot Com reports today on James Comey. He knew
Speaker 1: not to trust the dossier, but signed three applications saying
Speaker 1: it was verified, and now he's saying the opposite, saying
Speaker 1: he can't verify it. It's just sad. It's that one
Speaker 1: party can, in so many different ways abuse their power,
Speaker 1: be this corrupt. You know, look at the whole quid
Speaker 1: pro quo joe issue. You know, zero experience, You're making
Speaker 1: tens of millions of dollars, you know, at one point
Speaker 1: five billion dollars, Russian oligarchs, Kazakhstan oligarchs, be Resma, no
Speaker 1: experience whatsoever. And it is it is we've gotten to
Speaker 1: the point where all of this gets pushed under the
Speaker 1: rug and all these weak Republicans. This bothers me that
Speaker 1: go out there and where were they during Operation Crossfire Hurricane.
Speaker 1: Where were they fighting the last impeachment with truthful examples
Speaker 1: of abuse of power and cashing in on a family name.
Speaker 1: Where were they then? And And that's why I don't
Speaker 1: think they seem to understand why people are so angry
Speaker 1: about this, and also publicans have lost their fight. They
Speaker 1: could have learned a lot of lessons from Trump. Okay,
Speaker 1: you don't like his style, got it check, you don't
Speaker 1: like his tweeting check. But the American people liked that
Speaker 1: he gave promises, he followed through on them, he implement
Speaker 1: mended them every day, and he didn't back down on them.
Speaker 1: There's a lesson to be learned for any politician if
Speaker 1: you have views yours sincere, even Bernie Sanders isn't sincere
Speaker 1: all right, twenty five to the top of the hour.
Speaker 1: I don't know how Kamala Harris is going to feel
Speaker 1: about this. In Minneapolis, you have officials there. This is
Speaker 1: where this whole defund the police effort movement, if you will, started.
Speaker 1: They actually wanted to disband remember the entire police department.
Speaker 1: Then we found out the people voting that way. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: they were using taxpayer dollars to pay for their own
Speaker 1: private security. How ironic, right? Anyway, they're planning now in
Speaker 1: Minneapolis to spend six point four million to hire dozens
Speaker 1: of police officers at a time, and you still have
Speaker 1: city council members and activist groups advocating to replace the
Speaker 1: police department, which I believe they already cut, and they
Speaker 1: voted unanimously Friday to approve the additional funding the police requested.
Speaker 1: The department says it only has six hundred and thirty
Speaker 1: eight officers available to work, roughly two hundred fewer than usual.
Speaker 1: I wonder why who's going to want to work there?
Speaker 1: The mob continues to obsess, you know, and this is
Speaker 1: the great hypocrisy too. We can't ever allow what happened
Speaker 1: at the Capitol that ever happened again, I've been saying
Speaker 1: it every day and every night. You can't allow that.
Speaker 1: How did they breach that? And then the fact that
Speaker 1: we had intelligence and that at the FBI knew, and
Speaker 1: that congressmen and women knew apparently, according to Congresswoman Accio Cortez,
Speaker 1: well what did they all know? And when did they
Speaker 1: all know it? And why didn't they all say something?
Speaker 1: And if they did say something, who did they say
Speaker 1: it too? Because then we would have had the proper
Speaker 1: security to protect our capital, the people's House, our institutions,
Speaker 1: and yes, every elected official needs to be protected everyone.
Speaker 1: This isn't about politics. But you know, he just had.
Speaker 1: For example, by my account, we've had what ten left
Speaker 1: wing protests in New York City in the last what
Speaker 1: nine months? As you know, we had, you know, things,
Speaker 1: we're getting out of hand again. Police arrested eleven people
Speaker 1: in New York who allegedly bit a CoP's leg when
Speaker 1: an anti cop protest turned violet in New York City
Speaker 1: on Saturday, hundred people, I'm sorry. On Friday, one hundred
Speaker 1: people converged on Midtown, New York, defund the police, a
Speaker 1: demonstration organized, according to the New York Post by Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter. Six women four men charged with disorderly conduct
Speaker 1: obstructing government administration. One guy was arrested for kicking one
Speaker 1: officer in the foot while and biting another officer on
Speaker 1: his I okay, well they have no bail in New York.
Speaker 1: You know that means they arrest them, they put them
Speaker 1: in jail, they let them out. I mean, it's it's
Speaker 1: insane that this is happening. It's it's madness. And it's
Speaker 1: not just of course. In Portland, Portland you have you know,
Speaker 1: leftist activists pelting police now with snowballs. Well, I guess
Speaker 1: it's better than bricks and Molotov cocktails and better than
Speaker 1: frozen water bottles. Like we watched all summer, you had
Speaker 1: a hundred protests out there f and then you know
Speaker 1: asteris asterist ask us twelve you know that was in
Speaker 1: let's see in midtown Manhattan, and then you had F
Speaker 1: twelve are anti police terms that mean f the police
Speaker 1: a reference to some police TV show Adam twelve one
Speaker 1: Atom twelve one twelve. Remember that anyway, And like Barney
Speaker 1: Frank was another police Barney Miller rather was Barney Frank
Speaker 1: a former commerceman. Barney Miller was a former police show
Speaker 1: from New York City's twelfth Precinct. Anyway, that's apparently fairly
Speaker 1: well known. I didn't know it until I read it today.
Speaker 1: You still have Cuomo just you know, going out there.
Speaker 1: This is getting really bad for him. George Pataki, former governor,
Speaker 1: now thinks, yeah, the issue of you know, this nursing
Speaker 1: home death cover up should result in him being taken
Speaker 1: out of office. But they don't have any recall effort
Speaker 1: like they do out in California. And that's that's taken
Speaker 1: on a lot of urgency out there. There's now there's
Speaker 1: a lot of talk and a lot of studies that
Speaker 1: have been coming out of the damage that is done
Speaker 1: to people families. The AP had a big report that
Speaker 1: for many couples, for example, that we're going to be
Speaker 1: getting married, the pandemic as reeked havoc on their wedding plans,
Speaker 1: bolstering you know, I mean putting a lot stress on
Speaker 1: relationships where couples already married, it's posed a you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of new tests, some get closer, some people
Speaker 1: have you know, fallen apart, and marriages that that is
Speaker 1: now resulting in a lot of divorce around the country
Speaker 1: becoming an epidemic. As they give a lot of details
Speaker 1: in this piece. In December, Biden promised Americans that he
Speaker 1: would only call for masks until April. And anyway, that
Speaker 1: was his declaration. Remember he's gonna he's gonna vaccinate three
Speaker 1: hundred Americans in the summer. He said it twice last week,
Speaker 1: three hundred. We're gonna have four to six hundred million doses,
Speaker 1: but we're gonna be only gonna give the vaccine to
Speaker 1: three hundred. Um So people are pretty angry. Anyway. Cuomo
Speaker 1: now has Republicans and Democrats calling for his resignation in
Speaker 1: New York and there is one politician now calling for
Speaker 1: his emmy to be taken back. An Award wrote the
Speaker 1: book about leadership in the process, his longtime nemesis, Comrade
Speaker 1: de Blasio calling for a full accounting of Cuomo's alleged
Speaker 1: nursing home death cover up. I'm not even alleged at
Speaker 1: this point. Now we have a real whistleblower with a
Speaker 1: real identity that now has come forward and said, yeah,
Speaker 1: all of this is in fact has happened. So a
Speaker 1: lot going on there now, which you watched Joe Biden's agenda.
Speaker 1: You know it's funny because now the Democrats they want
Speaker 1: to they want to go into more investigations into Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: I found a pretty interesting Red States headline. They can't
Speaker 1: quit him. Democrat's new plan on how to get Donald
Speaker 1: Trump like Syria. We had another plan he's out of office.
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi ruled out censure because she said it's a
Speaker 1: slap in the face to the constitution. It lets everyone
Speaker 1: off the hook. And then she's we censor people for
Speaker 1: using stationary for the wrong purpose. Am okay. House Democrats
Speaker 1: issue a stark warning about their own party In twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two. Some Democrats see that This is not going
Speaker 1: good for them. Joe Biden's team, apparently behind the scenes,
Speaker 1: is in a bit of a panic because, you know,
Speaker 1: we're going to spend the entire first year of the
Speaker 1: Biden presidency, maybe the first two years, always talking about
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, meaning his Democratic supporters. I mean, if you
Speaker 1: look at Joe Biden's agenda, Senator of Blackburn, Marsha Blackburn
Speaker 1: of Tennessee warning Biden that China is not our friend
Speaker 1: when she said she hopes Joe Biden understands the threat
Speaker 1: that China is now posing. That's what former Secretary of
Speaker 1: State Mike Pompeio was saying as he was leaving that position.
Speaker 1: China is not our friend, she said, They are our adversary.
Speaker 1: They practice civil military fusion. You never know where one
Speaker 1: piece ends and the other begins. And he's you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of warning going out Biden to Congress. Now,
Speaker 1: this shouldn't surprise him at anybody. Remember he was gonna
Speaker 1: make Beto Bozo O'Rourke as guns are Daily Wire as
Speaker 1: a piece today about Biden to Congress and act major
Speaker 1: restrictions on the Second Amendment, on your Second Amendment rights, Well,
Speaker 1: that came up in the election too, demanding gun bands
Speaker 1: and new laws that will allow people to sue gun manufacturers.
Speaker 1: That's part of it. Why would you get to sue
Speaker 1: unless unless somehow the gun like backfires, it doesn't work properly.
Speaker 1: People that misuse a firearm, that is a crime. Why
Speaker 1: would you hold the manufacturer that sells the gun responsible
Speaker 1: with people that don't use Are you going to sue
Speaker 1: knife manufacturers or baseball bat manufacturers or tire iron manufacturers?
Speaker 1: If people misuse the products they are what they're intended for,
Speaker 1: let's say, target shooting, hunting, self protection. Right. He's now
Speaker 1: calling on Congress to enact these gun reforms, including requiring
Speaker 1: background checks on all gun sales, which pretty much happens now,
Speaker 1: banning every assault weapon with high capacity magazines, eliminating immunity
Speaker 1: for gun manufacturers. Now the way they define an assault weapon,
Speaker 1: that probably amounts to a call for banning all semi
Speaker 1: automatic firearms. There was no language included in the statement.
Speaker 1: And if gun owners are not allowed, are we going
Speaker 1: to be allowed to keep the guns we have? Or
Speaker 1: is this going to become a mandatory gun confiscation program.
Speaker 1: Can't wait to get the details on all of this.
Speaker 1: Jen Saki, the White House Press Secretary. You know, she's
Speaker 1: circling back apparently a lot. But you know, we saw
Speaker 1: what happened on day one when they was at the ambassador.
Speaker 1: Twitter account to Israel changed dramatically, and anyway, it looks
Speaker 1: like the hostilities. We're going back to the Obama Biden
Speaker 1: years on the treatment of Israel. There had been no
Speaker 1: president ever that had supported the state of Israel, the
Speaker 1: only democracy in the region, our top ally anyway, So
Speaker 1: now Biden is refusing to call say they're one of
Speaker 1: our best allies. How did Trump get all these these
Speaker 1: deals done with the Emirates, and you know, deals that
Speaker 1: were unthinkable because the Egyptians, Jordanians, the Saudis, the Emirates, Israel,
Speaker 1: the US have already figured out that a nuclear armed
Speaker 1: Iran and Iranian hegemony in the region is going to
Speaker 1: result in a disaster. Pretty scary times we live in. Then,
Speaker 1: of course, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act on Democratic
Speaker 1: senators refused to outlaw that, which is pretty sad. So
Speaker 1: Biden calling on a Congress to ban assault weapons and
Speaker 1: institute major gun restrictions. In Puerto Rico, the governor is
Speaker 1: saying Congress is morally obligated to act on the statehood vote.
Speaker 1: DC is probably first. Biden's DHS Department of Homeland Security
Speaker 1: is about to release twenty five thousand plus migrants into
Speaker 1: Texas and California communities. That's just the beginning of open
Speaker 1: borders and amnesty, which through executive order and bypassing an
Speaker 1: entire branch of government that Biden has been involved in
Speaker 1: that most people haven't been paying attention to. Texas Sheriff
Speaker 1: is saying clear evidence illegal immigration is soaring under Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Why not because people know that amnesty is coming. Why
Speaker 1: that's like an invitation. I'm not sure if people are
Speaker 1: following his masked mandate when the country is entered illegally
Speaker 1: Biden Polo season now or forcing the release of some
Speaker 1: migrants in West Texas in a border community there, and
Speaker 1: then they can't do their job. I mean, it's this
Speaker 1: is all the stuff we worried about, you know. The
Speaker 1: smoking gun on just thenews dot com on Coomy is
Speaker 1: pretty amazing because the very day he signed the first renewal, Remember,
Speaker 1: Comey signed the first FISA application unverifiable as it is,
Speaker 1: and it says that the type of a top of
Speaker 1: a FISA application verified. He signed that first one, you know,
Speaker 1: when Donald Trump was a candidate. Now, as Sally Yates
Speaker 1: has said and Andrew McCabe have said, without the dirty
Speaker 1: Russian misinformation dossier that Hillary paid for, there would have
Speaker 1: been no approval of the fise of the application. On
Speaker 1: the day he signed the first renewal, there were three renewals.
Speaker 1: He was writing James Clapper, we're not able to sufficient
Speaker 1: corroborate the reporting home he said about yes, the dirty
Speaker 1: dossier anyway, that was finally made public through open records
Speaker 1: lawsuit by the Southeastern Legal Foundation. Well that's a big
Speaker 1: deal because then he signed a third fise the application,
Speaker 1: the second renewal. I got to give a shout out
Speaker 1: to my buddy Dan Bongino and his partners a parlor.
Speaker 1: They have now resumed the social media app. That's good news,
Speaker 1: and the new CEO saying the platform will remain true
Speaker 1: to its free speech roots and has insulated itself from
Speaker 1: future cancel culture. I'm sure it wasn't easy to do,
Speaker 1: but for those of you that like to use social
Speaker 1: media on your own, I am banned by my staff.
Speaker 1: Linda never given me an explanation as to why I
Speaker 1: am banned. I think the audience knows. Why do you? Okay,
Speaker 1: what's the reason. Why should I say it? The audience
Speaker 1: already knows. The audience knows why I don't have any
Speaker 1: access to my social media accounts and I don't have
Speaker 1: an email. They know that. That's correct. Do you think
Speaker 1: they understand completely? I do? Actually, yeah, they probably do.
Speaker 1: They really, they're wonderful people. I don't even I couldn't
Speaker 1: get on if I wanted to. You guys have made
Speaker 1: it so I can't possibly get on anything. That's true,
Speaker 1: taking me years to perfect this, years and years. I'm
Speaker 1: very proud of this work. Oh man, can you put
Speaker 1: up like a disclaimer? Hannity has no No, Hannity has
Speaker 1: no access to his own social media accounts. Yeast thy staff,
Speaker 1: so they know. They know. Hannity dot com puts up
Speaker 1: great news every day that that's access to. You can't
Speaker 1: prevent that. You can see it and get it on
Speaker 1: my phone. You can read it. I can still run
Speaker 1: my head and staff. No, I don't have access to
Speaker 1: posting anything on it, that's correct. That's a good point.
Speaker 1: I have access to read it, that's right. Yes, I
Speaker 1: probably could have access to read my Twitter account. I
Speaker 1: just don't do it. This is true. You could reach
Speaker 1: place I want to be us on Twitter. I don't care.
Speaker 1: I just don't care. Days are fifty seven, the yay's
Speaker 1: are fifty seven, the nays are forties three. Two thirds
Speaker 1: of the senators President not having pretty guilty that he
Speaker 1: Senator judges that responded, Donald John Trump, former President of
Speaker 1: United States, is not guilty as charged the article's impeachment.
Speaker 1: All right. That was Pat Lakey on the acquittal of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump over the weekend, and it was a pretty
Speaker 1: These are are sad and dangerous times when you could
Speaker 1: literally now hold one party to one group of set
Speaker 1: of standards and another party another set of standards. It
Speaker 1: is extremely it's extraordinarily dangerous when evidentiary standards are completely bypassed.
Speaker 1: It's dangerous. When Pat Lahey is presiding over the shift show, Charadas,
Speaker 1: I call it, while he himself is ready on record
Speaker 1: saying Donald Trump is guilty. That doesn't represent anything that
Speaker 1: is that resembles due process, presumption of innocence in any way.
Speaker 1: None of these videotapes that were used by the House
Speaker 1: managers would ever have been admissible in a court of law.
Speaker 1: Now add to that, there's a great exchange between one
Speaker 1: of the president's attorneys, Michael Vanderveen as CBS anchors as well.
Speaker 1: You know, there's only a little thing, a little They
Speaker 1: literally altered evidence now that in any other real court
Speaker 1: of law, who would be considered a huge problem. Listen
Speaker 1: to how this exchange went down. Man, your question is
Speaker 1: I want to be clear for our viewer. Listen, I
Speaker 1: want to viewers about saying doctor and evidence. The media
Speaker 1: has to start telling the right story in this country.
Speaker 1: The media is trying to divide this country. You are
Speaker 1: blood thirsty for ratings, and as such, you're asking questions
Speaker 1: now that are already set up with a fact pattern.
Speaker 1: I can't believe you would ask me a question indicating
Speaker 1: that it's all right, just a doctor, a little bit
Speaker 1: of evidence. There's more stuff that we uncovered that they doctor.
Speaker 1: You have won the acquittal of your client. If you'd
Speaker 1: like to continue to talk about this conversation, we can
Speaker 1: have that discovered. But for me to ask a question,
Speaker 1: a slanting question, a slanted question that was set up
Speaker 1: to say it's okay for them to cheat. That was
Speaker 1: your question. Isn't for them to cheat a little bit
Speaker 1: said it was that's what you said. You got to
Speaker 1: live by your word. That's the problem. The media has
Speaker 1: to start living by the truth and not trying to
Speaker 1: create a narrative. Michael Vandervene, thank you for joining us.
Speaker 1: I do appreciate Yeah, okay, I see you taking off
Speaker 1: your microphone now, all right, joining us. Now, Bruce castors
Speaker 1: with us, Michael van derven Now, they had other whole
Speaker 1: other team of lawyers too that deserve to be recognized.
Speaker 1: And David Shone has been on this program many times. Uh, guys,
Speaker 1: welcome to the program. Um. You know, I first, I
Speaker 1: want to start with Bruce Um and Michael. You and
Speaker 1: Bruce are partners in this law firm. Correct, Yes, and yeah,
Speaker 1: you know I was critical of you on day one,
Speaker 1: and then when I got the context of what had
Speaker 1: actually happened, I felt like I was unfair to you
Speaker 1: based on you weren't scheduled to speak at that moment
Speaker 1: at that time, and it was I just got concerned
Speaker 1: because I felt like opening remarks would always be fairly
Speaker 1: scripted and tightened up. And now that I found out
Speaker 1: the circumstances surrounding it, I think my comments to you
Speaker 1: were unfair. So my humble apologies on that because what
Speaker 1: you guys were able to put together in ten days
Speaker 1: and then when this acquittal is is just a remarkable
Speaker 1: legal feat eight day seun we had. I'm the fake media,
Speaker 1: I got it wrong eight days. But you know, let
Speaker 1: me let me let me tell you about what happened
Speaker 1: that first day and explain what Bruce pulled off when
Speaker 1: we got into that Senate chamber and they put on
Speaker 1: two hours of video and audio, and you gotta understand,
Speaker 1: they got a Hollywood production company to put together audio
Speaker 1: and visual that would move people and play on people's
Speaker 1: sympathies rather than actually dealing with the facts and the
Speaker 1: allegations of what is incitement under a legal definition, uh,
Speaker 1: particularly as it pertains to impeachment. But what the and
Speaker 1: then one of the gentlemen presenting, you know, spoke of
Speaker 1: his um recently deceased child and injected a lot of
Speaker 1: personal emotion uh into into the into his presentation. When
Speaker 1: he stopped, the air in the room was really thick
Speaker 1: and full of emotion. So we walked out on our
Speaker 1: break and Bruce, uh you know, leading the team, said, look,
Speaker 1: I'm going to call an audible here we have to.
Speaker 1: We were about to do just two hours of a
Speaker 1: dry jurisdictional argument, which by the way, they'd already voted
Speaker 1: on like a week before, and we weren't going to
Speaker 1: win anyway. So Bruce said, I'm going to take about
Speaker 1: thirty minutes and and change the temperature in that room. David,
Speaker 1: trim yourself down for two hours to an hour and
Speaker 1: a half and win a roll that way. He had
Speaker 1: been working on his opening, but it wasn't due to
Speaker 1: be presented yet, so he hadn't finished it. Um, and
Speaker 1: as you saw, he just went up there, uh and um,
Speaker 1: you know, in a kind of a real person way,
Speaker 1: started to talking to him. Could have his tempo been
Speaker 1: better or his rhythm been better, sure, but what he
Speaker 1: went out there and did was a bold move. It
Speaker 1: was an experienced trial lawyer move, having read the room,
Speaker 1: and it was it achieved the effect. It was the
Speaker 1: right decision to achieved the effect, cooled down the room
Speaker 1: and allow us to proceed with the jurisdic jurisdictional argument.
Speaker 1: It worked. It may not have been the prettiest thing,
Speaker 1: but it worked. We would do it again. Um. It's
Speaker 1: just so unfortunate how the media you know, really just
Speaker 1: gave him a beating over it without having any real
Speaker 1: solid understand That ought to be my first clue anytime
Speaker 1: I echo anything in any manner that might be alignment
Speaker 1: with them, considering they're so wrong so often, and what
Speaker 1: note taken here? You know, I'm watching this whole trial, Bruce,
Speaker 1: and I'm watching. Let's see, they're staging of photoshoot, they're
Speaker 1: altering evidence. They and you guys did a great job,
Speaker 1: I thought with these montages that you put up of
Speaker 1: how what actually the President was saying on January sixth
Speaker 1: versus what the house managers showed because it was deceptive, selective,
Speaker 1: editing at a very high and sophisticated level. Again, nothing
Speaker 1: rules of evidence if applied, normal rules of evidence in
Speaker 1: a court of law, if applied, none of this would
Speaker 1: be admissible. Am I correct? Yeah, that's that's true. And
Speaker 1: worse than that, if Michael I had done that back home,
Speaker 1: that we'd be standing in front of the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: explaining to the Chief Justice why we shouldn't be thrown
Speaker 1: out of out of the are I mean, it's just
Speaker 1: awful stuff, and it's it's indicative of the the world
Speaker 1: of Alice in wonderland that we found ourselves in when
Speaker 1: we walked into the Capitol building. I watched this interview
Speaker 1: Michael very closely over the weekend with the CBS anchor,
Speaker 1: and I was you eviscerated her in terms of the arguments.
Speaker 1: I was blown away. And that doesn't happen enough in
Speaker 1: the media. Good for you, I'll tell you that that
Speaker 1: thing has gone viral. I mean, you know, I think
Speaker 1: I spoke what millions and millions of people around the
Speaker 1: world's feel, Sean, And you know, I actually, when I
Speaker 1: look back and I've seen the tape now myself, you know,
Speaker 1: with the time delay and that kind of thing, it
Speaker 1: appeared like we were talking over one another a little
Speaker 1: bit more than we weren't than we actually were. But
Speaker 1: it's really the content of what I said. I was saying.
Speaker 1: And know, the media when I was a kid, you
Speaker 1: watch the news and you get all the facts, and
Speaker 1: you know, not too much opinion, and it's kind of
Speaker 1: flipped a little bit, and and you know, I think
Speaker 1: the press just has to do a little bit of
Speaker 1: a self audit and you know, take be a little
Speaker 1: self reflective and see how they can help cool the
Speaker 1: passions in the nation. As well, and how they can
Speaker 1: help bring you know, the left and the right a
Speaker 1: little bit closer together, just to find the common ground
Speaker 1: of the national priorities and you know, really move us
Speaker 1: forward on infrastructure, and move us forward on the economy,
Speaker 1: and move us forward on Michael, I've been doing this
Speaker 1: economic equality, all that stuff. You know, I've been on
Speaker 1: thirty three years. I've been on Fox twenty five years.
Speaker 1: It's not happening. I mean, you think of Trump's presidency,
Speaker 1: and for three solid years we got nothing but a
Speaker 1: conspiracy theory, a full on hoax. Now that it has been,
Speaker 1: every single thing we reported on these shows of mine
Speaker 1: we got right. They got it wrong. They got Uva wrong,
Speaker 1: they got Duke Lacrosse wrong, they got Ferguson wrong, they
Speaker 1: got Baltimore UH, and Freddie Gray wrong, Richard Jewel wrong.
Speaker 1: I could keep going all day here, and I pride
Speaker 1: myself in getting things right. I'll tell you what we
Speaker 1: found down there was in a big way, Washington is
Speaker 1: broken and UM and UH. And they really catered to
Speaker 1: the media. I mean, they are so concerned down there
Speaker 1: about what the media cycle is and what they you know,
Speaker 1: how the media will react. We were all very surprised
Speaker 1: about you know, we're in the novice. We're not politicians.
Speaker 1: We're just the lawyers, were citizens and uh and you
Speaker 1: know we weren't we we weren't at dept at handling
Speaker 1: all of that, but you know we were first. I
Speaker 1: think as far as the Child team's perspective, you know,
Speaker 1: from Bill Brennan to to Bruce Caster and myself, you know,
Speaker 1: we were were all pull that. Um, what we did
Speaker 1: in defending the Constitution and defending Bedrock constitutional provisions that
Speaker 1: it set that Senate's eyes a little bit more focused on,
Speaker 1: you know, the problems that that that this country has
Speaker 1: moving forward in as I said, infrastructure or education. I
Speaker 1: know people on both sides of all these issues, but
Speaker 1: they need to work together and find the common ground.
Speaker 1: You know, UM, and any Democrat at any point ever
Speaker 1: come up to you and say you did a good job.
Speaker 1: I doubt it. Well they actually did. Actually you know what, UM,
Speaker 1: one person did one of the representatives hang on that
Speaker 1: we lost somebody I think we lost. Her name was
Speaker 1: Stacy Plasket. She actually gave a very smooth and uh,
Speaker 1: a very good presentation in her case, and she came
Speaker 1: up after a couple of days and introduced herself. UM.
Speaker 1: You know, it was complimentary of the efforts we were
Speaker 1: putting in. UM and you know the passionate zeal we had.
Speaker 1: We also gave her, um, you know, uh compliments and
Speaker 1: were civil with her. But you know, you're right. She
Speaker 1: she was the only one. She was a real class
Speaker 1: act um, Um, Miss Plaskett and uh. And it was
Speaker 1: refreshing for us. Yeah, you know, you would imagine the
Speaker 1: publics were very the Republicans were very hospitable to us.
Speaker 1: They were very polite. Um. The interaction we had with
Speaker 1: the Democrats directly, UM was almost non existent. There was
Speaker 1: a lot of back room channeling between um, you know,
Speaker 1: various staff members in this and that when we were
Speaker 1: talking about witness stipulation and whatnot. UM. But uh, you know,
Speaker 1: we're just we're just child lords. We went down there
Speaker 1: to do our case and get out of there and UM.
Speaker 1: And so you nearly ran into buzz saw with witnesses
Speaker 1: and we thought for an hour or two, I guess
Speaker 1: on Saturday that we had John. We we handle them
Speaker 1: on that they they they they were they were more
Speaker 1: afraid of witnesses than anybody. UM. And the whole silliness
Speaker 1: about and actually it's just unconfionable to say that we
Speaker 1: sent a letter to Donald Trump to have him come
Speaker 1: in and participate and to and to bring exculpatory evidence. Well,
Speaker 1: that's not the way it works. If they wanted mister
Speaker 1: Trump in there, they could have suppeated him, and they
Speaker 1: and they chose not to because they know they didn't
Speaker 1: have any right to and it would be the wrong
Speaker 1: thing to do in a judicial process. As far as
Speaker 1: him bringing exculpritory evidence, it's their burden. They made accusations
Speaker 1: that he insied incited the attack on the Capitol lead false.
Speaker 1: It was premeditated. It was pre and by people far
Speaker 1: on the right and far on the left, not where
Speaker 1: the mainstream of married ninety five percent of the American
Speaker 1: consciousness is. And they and they carried up there. Let
Speaker 1: me give let me give Bruce the last word here,
Speaker 1: because they're just running out of time in this segment.
Speaker 1: A lot more on TV on Hannity tonight. Both of
Speaker 1: you will join us. Bruce, you want to give the
Speaker 1: last word here. We were prepared for that issue with witnesses.
Speaker 1: We had made a list of three hundred plus witnesses.
Speaker 1: We had them all ready to go and even had
Speaker 1: their names down, and it was, in fact, if you
Speaker 1: look at the tape, when the witness issue came up,
Speaker 1: Mike and I leaned over and we were discussing, why
Speaker 1: don't we just stipulate to letting her say whatever she
Speaker 1: wants to say, because no one's going to believe anything
Speaker 1: she has to say anyway, because it's a triple hearsay,
Speaker 1: So so what let's just let it in. But that
Speaker 1: was a decision that we figured we need to take
Speaker 1: by the whole team, and so we took a breaking
Speaker 1: and that is ultimately the idea we floated, and ultimately
Speaker 1: that's the decision that they came down with. Thank you,
Speaker 1: Ruce cantor, thank you Michael Vanderveen will have you both
Speaker 1: on Haniday tonight. Congratulations, it was eight days and you
Speaker 1: guys were successful. Congratulations. Not an easy task for any attorneys.
Speaker 1: Thank you all right, twenty five to the top of
Speaker 1: the hour, eight hundred ninety four one, Sean, if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. One of
Speaker 1: the other things Linda G. Graham said about Mitch McConnell
Speaker 1: over the weekend, warning that McConnell's words and listen this
Speaker 1: is the Republican establishment in their minds. Now, there's a
Speaker 1: poll out today that about sixty five percent of Republicans
Speaker 1: actually want another party. If that happens and the party fractures,
Speaker 1: you got a huge problem. Okay, what's the huge problem
Speaker 1: is now you're siphoning all votes. Can it be done successfully? Yeah?
Speaker 1: But I think I truly believe that the establishment wing
Speaker 1: of the Republican Party, as embodied by the likes of
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell, that it would be for some reason they
Speaker 1: never they watched, but they didn't learn. And I'm not
Speaker 1: saying you have to take on Donald Trump's style. There's
Speaker 1: very few people like him. He's a disruptor, he's an iconoclass.
Speaker 1: But the agenda and also there's one important ingredient here
Speaker 1: that this is where they've never learned. Their lesson is that,
Speaker 1: you know a lot of politicians, both parties, they go
Speaker 1: to the swamp, they go to the sewer, maybe even
Speaker 1: have the best of intentions, and then they get there
Speaker 1: and then something happens. They love being called senator, they
Speaker 1: love being called congressmen, and then you get the swampy
Speaker 1: you know, the Gang of six, eight, ten, twelve or whatever.
Speaker 1: Deals that are Republicans pretty much caving, and Republicans never
Speaker 1: unite and have the same commitment to fight like the
Speaker 1: entire Democratic Party, and people are fed up with it.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think the great is the example of
Speaker 1: what I'm saying is all those show votes in the
Speaker 1: House of Representatives to repeal and replace Obamacare. Well that's
Speaker 1: what Obama was president, and Obama would never sign that
Speaker 1: into law. But then when they had the chance to
Speaker 1: do it, they didn't get it done. They didn't even
Speaker 1: have a plan that they all were united behind, already
Speaker 1: ready to go. And we had given them so many
Speaker 1: suggestions Concierge's care for every American health savings accounts, catastrophic
Speaker 1: insurance coupled with Concierge's care like like Atlas MD and
Speaker 1: doctor Josh Humber Wichita, Kansas. And then the Senate in
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen they vote straight line Republicans, Yes, we would
Speaker 1: repeal Obamacare's ritch straight repeal bill. Then seven of those
Speaker 1: Republican senators two years later, when it mattered and Donald
Speaker 1: Trump would have signed it, they were nowhere to be found.
Speaker 1: They switched their votes. And this you know, and programmed
Speaker 1: to rightly point out that McConnell to load on Republicans
Speaker 1: back with his anti Trump speech after this whole thing
Speaker 1: went on. Is just completely out of touch with where
Speaker 1: his party is. And had there been a vote, I
Speaker 1: would argue, if there's a vote among Republicans, do you
Speaker 1: believe in America first, make America great again that agenda
Speaker 1: or you want Mitch McConnell. I think he's out of touch.
Speaker 1: He probably would lose nine to ten if he even
Speaker 1: could get ten percent. And it's sad that, you know,
Speaker 1: Republican why didn't he Where was he during the entire
Speaker 1: crossfire Hurricane Russia, collusion, lie conspiracy theories? Where where was he?
Speaker 1: Where was Senator John Thune? Where were most of these Republicans? Senators?
Speaker 1: They were quiet, staying off TV, saying nothing. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's it's it's sad. Democrats they're a lot better at
Speaker 1: staying united and fighting than Republicans are. But that is
Speaker 1: that old style establishment republican Ism is a by gone
Speaker 1: error at this point. You know, it's funny because conservatives
Speaker 1: were told often well, for the good of the party,
Speaker 1: you know, well, it's a lesser of two evils, vote
Speaker 1: for John McCain, a liberal Republican or are you gonna
Speaker 1: get Barack Obama? Okay? I John McCain was not my
Speaker 1: first choice, but John McCain was a lot better than
Speaker 1: Barack Obama. Same with Mitt Romney. All right, let's go
Speaker 1: to the great state of Florida, where everybody seems to
Speaker 1: be moving these days, especially out of New York. David, Hi,
Speaker 1: how are you. You're on the Sean Hannity Show. I'm
Speaker 1: doing great, Sean, thanks for taking my call. So I
Speaker 1: was seeing your show on Friday and you played a
Speaker 1: clip by Cuomo. He was basically bragging about his states
Speaker 1: numbers for the coronavirus, and I was like, that doesn't
Speaker 1: sound right. So I went to the CDC website and
Speaker 1: you know, Sean, what do you know? He was right?
Speaker 1: And that is because the states numbers for coronavirus's death
Speaker 1: her one hundred thousand are separated from the city of
Speaker 1: New York. And if you combine those numbers to together,
Speaker 1: would it shock you to know that he's either number
Speaker 1: one or number two Union? I mean that just I
Speaker 1: would love for you to follow up. You know, that's
Speaker 1: one thing I had not picked up on. Nobody said,
Speaker 1: but I tell you this effort now to remove him
Speaker 1: is real. This is now taken on a momentum in
Speaker 1: the state of New York. Former Governor of New York
Speaker 1: George Pataki literally floating the idea of removing Cuomo from
Speaker 1: office and saying that you know, his conduct regarding this
Speaker 1: nursing home cover up has been reprehensible and that you know,
Speaker 1: the cover up of nursing home death. And he said,
Speaker 1: I think it would be appropriate to take a hard
Speaker 1: look at the idea of removing Cuomo from office with
Speaker 1: a recall movement. We see it now. It's taken on
Speaker 1: a ton of momentum out in California. But unlike California,
Speaker 1: New York has no legal procedure for recalling elected officials
Speaker 1: in the middle of their term, and a serious effort
Speaker 1: to create such a process was instigated by Patak. He
Speaker 1: pushed for a constitutional amendment years ago. Didn't happen. But
Speaker 1: I mean that there is a lot of anger here.
Speaker 1: Biden now is telling Americans that they're gonna have to
Speaker 1: wear face masks until twenty twenty two. A record high
Speaker 1: number of Oh, go ahead, yes, sir Sean. They're talking about,
Speaker 1: you know, shutting the state of Florida down and I'm
Speaker 1: just laughing, you know, I mean, it's we Our governor
Speaker 1: did everything you should do. He didn't shut the economy down.
Speaker 1: He put lockdowns on nursing homes to protect our elderly.
Speaker 1: It's just it's just one more example where the left
Speaker 1: absolutely abuses statistics and the fact checkers. You know, the
Speaker 1: lady the other day who went viral for going from
Speaker 1: paying sixty dollars for her sons died her first son's
Speaker 1: influence to three hundred dollars on't if you saw that story?
Speaker 1: So I clicked on it, watched the video this woman's
Speaker 1: and tears paying hundreds of dollars more? Would should be
Speaker 1: surprised that Facebook check a fact check that isn't that fascinating?
Speaker 1: And they wanted to correct the fact that Biden had
Speaker 1: not actually rescinded this, He just put it on hold.
Speaker 1: That's really easy to say when you're sitting in a
Speaker 1: Facebook fact check office or wherever you are, and it's
Speaker 1: really easy to say, oh, that's not that bad. Well,
Speaker 1: that's great for you when you don't have to pay
Speaker 1: thousands of dollars a more. Just my point is is
Speaker 1: the amount of bias's I knew it was bad, but
Speaker 1: it's getting unreal. Shot, And I'm grateful for you, and
Speaker 1: I'm thankful for you. I'm thankful to be here every day,
Speaker 1: trust me, and we're on to fire every second of
Speaker 1: every day. All right, Dave, appreciate it by Cuomo. Now,
Speaker 1: this is bipartisan condemnation he's getting, and many calls for
Speaker 1: his resignation. And you have politicos now saying he should
Speaker 1: give his Emmy award back, and even Deblasio no their
Speaker 1: natural enemies, and he's calling for a full accounting of
Speaker 1: all of this. And what a New York business is
Speaker 1: doing well. They're following New York residence and getting the
Speaker 1: hell out of Dodge and moving their businesses down to
Speaker 1: Florida too. Mike and Ohio, Hey Mike, how are you?
Speaker 1: Hey Sean, I'm doing well. How are you doing. I'm good? Sorry,
Speaker 1: what's going on? Yeah, thank you for your time. I
Speaker 1: appreciate it. You know, everybody's running around right now just
Speaker 1: wondering how to use Trump. You know, he's been acquitted
Speaker 1: and such. I've got an idea and I think it's
Speaker 1: pretty strong. I think you run Donald Trump for a
Speaker 1: house seat. You run Donald Trump in a House seat
Speaker 1: in a red district somewhere. I mean, the Democrats have
Speaker 1: been able to get an AOC in there, They've been
Speaker 1: able to get it to leave in there, They've been
Speaker 1: able to get who knows who they wanted in there.
Speaker 1: But you run Donald Trump for a House seat, and
Speaker 1: right now, in today's political climate, it is the best
Speaker 1: place for him to sit. And then you dangle the carrot.
Speaker 1: You dangle the carrot in front of seventy four million
Speaker 1: people that Donald Trump is going to be your next
Speaker 1: Speaker of the House. And if we can win five seats,
Speaker 1: five seats is all we need. Shawn. You know, we
Speaker 1: got to figure out a way to pull seventy four
Speaker 1: million voters together. And the way you pull seventy four
Speaker 1: million voters together you put Donald Trump back on a ballot.
Speaker 1: It's interesting what you're saying. Look, there's no president though,
Speaker 1: that is ever ever going to and I'm not trying
Speaker 1: to be insulting to House members, that is ever going
Speaker 1: to say, Okay, let me run for the House. Now
Speaker 1: that I've run for president and I've been press it's
Speaker 1: not unprecedented, Seahn John Adams was, I've been very aware,
Speaker 1: but it's just I don't. Knowing Donald Trump as well
Speaker 1: as I do, I don't think that would be an
Speaker 1: option for him. Look, he was he was clear, He's
Speaker 1: been very quiet. He put out a statement on Saturday
Speaker 1: after the acquittal, and and it was clear in that
Speaker 1: statement that he has a lot to share in the
Speaker 1: months ahead. And I think he's been given a little
Speaker 1: bit of time for some I think self reflection. I
Speaker 1: think a little time to let all this pass, and
Speaker 1: a little time to you know, watch. It's not going
Speaker 1: to be long until people start saying miss me yet
Speaker 1: hashtag Trump twenty twenty four. I could see that happening
Speaker 1: any day. And because the policies as we've been going
Speaker 1: over Joe Biden are so radically left, that's where we
Speaker 1: have to get rid of. I mean, I'm really worried
Speaker 1: about twenty twenty two. I'm not worried about twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1: I'm worried about twenty twenty two. And to to make
Speaker 1: a move like that, it would be the boldest, strongest. Listen.
Speaker 1: I love I love creative thinking. It's it's pretty, it's
Speaker 1: pretty genius and innovative on your party. I give you
Speaker 1: a lot of credit. I do because you're thinking through it.
Speaker 1: I don't think that would happen. I think he's either
Speaker 1: going to make a decision run again or not run again,
Speaker 1: and not when that decision comes, I don't know. It's
Speaker 1: from the GOP standpoint, why wouldn't you put your best
Speaker 1: player on the field for a must win game. A
Speaker 1: must win game is in twenty two we have to
Speaker 1: win the House and or the Senate, preferably both. If
Speaker 1: he gets up and breaths on any given day, the
Speaker 1: media is going to cover it that he I think
Speaker 1: he is already the most powerful force today. He is
Speaker 1: in the Republican Party, and I think he'll main so,
Speaker 1: and he has indicated in the past that he's focused
Speaker 1: on twenty twenty two, and I think we'll probably be
Speaker 1: out helping a lot of people in a lot of ways. Again,
Speaker 1: I don't have a crystal ball, can't say, but I
Speaker 1: think that's what his intention is. And honestly, after four
Speaker 1: or five never ending years of running, you know, a
Speaker 1: thousand miles an hour every second of every day, I
Speaker 1: think he probably is taking a well deserved break. And
Speaker 1: you know, I wouldn't I wouldn't doubt at some point
Speaker 1: a book comes out and he tells his story when
Speaker 1: he's ready, you'll do it. I mean, it's kind of
Speaker 1: very uncharacteristic to him to be quiet this long. And
Speaker 1: I'm sure when he does talk, he's gonna have a
Speaker 1: lot to say, knowing him as well as I do.
Speaker 1: All right, back to our busy telephones. Let's say, Hi
Speaker 1: Henry in New Jersey. We got a minute Henry for you.
Speaker 1: Hi Sean. First thing, God bless you, Rush, Thank you
Speaker 1: all you guys are really working for us this country,
Speaker 1: and we really appreciate it. And prayers especially for Russian Trump. Anyway, anyway,
Speaker 1: I could talk to you for an hour if I mean,
Speaker 1: but I know, I know, I can't. Um. You know,
Speaker 1: I've been interested interested in politics for over fifty years.
Speaker 1: I'm your age, but my dad got me into politics.
Speaker 1: The Republicans have never done what they've said they were
Speaker 1: going to do in all those fifty years. Trump's the
Speaker 1: only one that has. And uh, you know, I don't
Speaker 1: know whether the Republicans are cowards, they're stupid, or they're
Speaker 1: complicit in all this because uh, you know, Trump showed
Speaker 1: them how to fight and they just don't know how.
Speaker 1: They still don't know how. They still don't know how.
Speaker 1: I agree with you one hundred percent. They don't know how.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you. There's another part of it too. It's
Speaker 1: hard to fight. And there's a side of being in
Speaker 1: the public eye that I've lived through my whole career.
Speaker 1: I promise you that's not pleasant. And having a cancel
Speaker 1: culture that has existed pretty much all my career. Um,
Speaker 1: that is real, being under attack, under fire all the time.
Speaker 1: It's you know, a lot of people don't have the
Speaker 1: stomach for this, and I do, and Donald Trump does,
Speaker 1: and there are you know, notice how few senators ever
Speaker 1: go on television. Do you think that we don't reach
Speaker 1: out to them? We do, They don't want to come.
Speaker 1: They there, and there's a there's a lot of timidity
Speaker 1: in them. There's a lot of fear in them. Doesn't
Speaker 1: mean some of them are in good people. It just
Speaker 1: means that it is what it is. They're not there
Speaker 1: to fight. Um that you heard the montage that went
Speaker 1: on ten minutes long in the trial. Democrats fight fight,
Speaker 1: fight fight like hell, Fight like hell, Fight like hell,
Speaker 1: fight fight, fight fight like hell. Fight you. They seem
Speaker 1: to have more of a willingness to go in, go
Speaker 1: in hard and Republicans, you know, lay back, and it's
Speaker 1: unfortunate because the only way you're gonna get things done
Speaker 1: is you've you've got to convince people that your ideas
Speaker 1: will work. I believe conservatism, lower taxes, energy independence, less bureaucracy,
Speaker 1: secure boarders, better schools, law and order, safety, security, constitutional justices,
Speaker 1: free and fair trade, and piece through strength as a
Speaker 1: winning agenda. I don't think it's hard. Go out and
Speaker 1: tell the American people what you're gonna do, then do it,
Speaker 1: and then run again saying I got I kept my word.
Speaker 1: That's how you know politicians should be. But it seems
Speaker 1: they make it a lot more complicated. Anyway, my friend,
Speaker 1: thank you for a good call. When we come back,
Speaker 1: David Shown, he's the one that laid out all of
Speaker 1: that videotape in the trunk defense on Friday, he will
Speaker 1: join us and explain all coming up as we continue
Speaker 1: straight ahead, all right, news round up in information overload
Speaker 1: hour eight hundred and nine four one sewn if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. Now, we
Speaker 1: have spoken with the attorneys that got the acquittal over
Speaker 1: the weekend, and this latest impeachment shift shows charade which
Speaker 1: we all told you from the beginning. It was a
Speaker 1: predetermined outcome. A friend of this program, our friend David shown,
Speaker 1: literally whacked the Democrats with incredible montages for lack of evidence.
Speaker 1: And you know, one of the big issues here is, well,
Speaker 1: if the FBI knew, as now we know from court
Speaker 1: documents and FBI investigators and Congress Homan Acacio Cortez and
Speaker 1: even the mob the media as we have been telling
Speaker 1: you reporting that oh yeah, they this was all planned
Speaker 1: in advance. Here's what David played last at the end
Speaker 1: of last week. The house managers, facing a significant lack
Speaker 1: of evidence, turned off into press reports and rumors during
Speaker 1: these proceedings, claims that would never meet the evidentiary standards
Speaker 1: of any court. In fact, they even relied on the
Speaker 1: words of Andrew Feinberg, a reporter who recently worked for Sputnik,
Speaker 1: the Russian propaganda outlet. You saw it posted. By the way,
Speaker 1: the report they cited was completely refuted. The frequency with
Speaker 1: which house managers relied on unproven media reports shocked me
Speaker 1: as I sat in this chamber and listened to this.
Speaker 1: And there's a lot that we don't know yet about
Speaker 1: what happened that day. According to those around him at
Speaker 1: the time reportedly responded Trump, reportedly, reports across all major
Speaker 1: media outlets major news networks, including Fox News reported reported
Speaker 1: reportedly summoned reportedly reportedly not accidental, according to reports, President
Speaker 1: Trump was reportedly who reportedly spoke to the Guard and
Speaker 1: was widely reported media reports. According to reports, reported reportedly
Speaker 1: as any trial lawyer will tell you reportedly is a
Speaker 1: euphemism for I have no real evidence. Reportedly, there's not
Speaker 1: the standard in any American setting in which any semblance
Speaker 1: of due process is afforded, and accused reportedly isn't even
Speaker 1: here is some circumstantial evidence. It is exactly as reliable
Speaker 1: as I googled this for you. And if you're worried
Speaker 1: you might ever be tried based on this type of evidence,
Speaker 1: don't be. You get more due process than this when
Speaker 1: you fight a parking ticket. Wow. Powerful statement. David Shone,
Speaker 1: civil rights attorney who joins us now. Honestly, as soon
Speaker 1: as you have finished, I don't know which ones I
Speaker 1: like bet are like the ten minute fight fight Fight, Fight, Fight, Fight,
Speaker 1: fight fight like Hell, filight hell fightlight Hell, fight like Hell,
Speaker 1: or the Democrat's own insurrectionist incitement language themselves or if
Speaker 1: I like this one. But this is why David, you
Speaker 1: don't do snap impeachments reportedly reportedly, this is why you
Speaker 1: don't do snap impeachments for reportedly. Well, you're exactly right.
Speaker 1: But the first point I want to make is you've
Speaker 1: paide me a supreme compliment because I learned this from
Speaker 1: the master from studying your shows to do this so effectively,
Speaker 1: And it's not a gimmick. It's using people's own words
Speaker 1: to demonstrate exactly what the facts are. And people seem
Speaker 1: to get it better when they see it in living color. Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is a real part of the snap in judgment
Speaker 1: snap impeachment. Can you imagine the idea of impeaching a
Speaker 1: president of the United States based on this? Guy Feinberg
Speaker 1: or media sources and the house managers told the Senate
Speaker 1: that we just don't have all the facts, while at
Speaker 1: the same time Jamie Raskin told them this is a
Speaker 1: very fact intensive investigation. You need to consider all the facts.
Speaker 1: That is a horrible abuse of this politicized, weaponized impeachment process.
Speaker 1: Never should have happened. The American people deserve much better
Speaker 1: than this. Yeah, and this is the frustrating part of
Speaker 1: all of this, never mind, I could not believe Mitch
Speaker 1: mc connell's comments and take on this and the idea
Speaker 1: that and this was I thought brought out by you
Speaker 1: as well. If this is going to be the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party standard, you can't have two standards, David. You got
Speaker 1: to hold every person in elected office accountable. They've got
Speaker 1: to be held to the same exact standard. Now, if
Speaker 1: you mentioned Maxie Waters, or you mentioned Chuck Schumer, you
Speaker 1: mentioned Kamala Harris, and I can keep going. They would
Speaker 1: all they would all be impeached and put on trial
Speaker 1: based on their own standards. And that too. You made
Speaker 1: a great point approving well listen, you know there was
Speaker 1: a question during the I wasn't able to tend to
Speaker 1: question answer period because of my sabbath observance, but I
Speaker 1: was able to hear one or two of the questions
Speaker 1: before the sabbath began, and one of them was a
Speaker 1: question Ted Cruz and others asked, and that was whether
Speaker 1: it was thought to encourage incitement when a public official
Speaker 1: bails out the rioters. I think the answer that our
Speaker 1: side gave was just yes, but that wasn't adequate. The
Speaker 1: real answer to that is, you know what Donald Trump
Speaker 1: has been a law and order president for the entire
Speaker 1: term he was in office. He gave a consistent message
Speaker 1: for law and order all the way through. When you
Speaker 1: have Democratic members of the Senate, Congress, House, other public
Speaker 1: officials on the Democratic side appearing to endorse or support
Speaker 1: or justify or otherwise bailout rioters and that sort of thing,
Speaker 1: it sends a very different message. And the message there
Speaker 1: is violence can be okay. That can be the message
Speaker 1: violence cannot be okay in political advocacy, well agreed. And
Speaker 1: you know what that was where conservatives were consistent and
Speaker 1: Democrats weren't because all summer long, as the rioting went
Speaker 1: forward in this country and major cities, day after day,
Speaker 1: night after night, there was not only was there not
Speaker 1: widespread condemnation, the silence was deafening. And then Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: they're not going to stop. They shouldn't stop. We shouldn't stop.
Speaker 1: You you'd take note on both levels, you beware, I'm
Speaker 1: like okay. And then fund, you know, then supporting a
Speaker 1: bell fund to get rioters out of jail so they
Speaker 1: could rejoin their comrades in the insurrectionist activities. If we
Speaker 1: applied the standards to Kamala Harris, would she be impeached
Speaker 1: and would she be put on trial? Sure, if you
Speaker 1: applied the same standard, I mean, you'd have more than
Speaker 1: a handful of folks on the Democratic side being impeached.
Speaker 1: And I don't think that's the right answer either, But
Speaker 1: that's it just illustrates also why this there never should
Speaker 1: have been this impeachment proceeding. With all due respect, I mean,
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell was way at a line, way off base,
Speaker 1: and what he said, there's no possible way anyone could
Speaker 1: come to that conclusion, to the conclusion that this speech
Speaker 1: or any other conduct by the president incited a riot.
Speaker 1: Number one because it's not true. And number two because
Speaker 1: at a very minimum they've acknowledged they don't have the facts.
Speaker 1: The facts are just starting to come out about a
Speaker 1: completely separate agenda planning by very bad, vicious criminals. You
Speaker 1: took on Jamie Raskin from the Democratic House managers that
Speaker 1: were making their case and the Senate floor, and Jamie Raskin,
Speaker 1: interestingly himself, on his third day in Congress, stood up
Speaker 1: to oppose Donald Trump's election. Oh he wanted his own audit.
Speaker 1: Pretty interesting hypocrisy, but also you hit him on his
Speaker 1: you know, for staging this photo shoot with the New
Speaker 1: York Times and the manufactured tweets. Let's play it. We
Speaker 1: have reason to believe that the house managers created false
Speaker 1: representations of tweets, and the lack of due process means
Speaker 1: there was no opportunity to review or verify the accuracy.
Speaker 1: Consider these facts. The house managers, proud of their work
Speaker 1: on the Snap impeachment, staged numerous photo shoots of their preparations.
Speaker 1: In one of those, Manager Raskin is scene here at
Speaker 1: his desk reviewing two tweets side by side. The image
Speaker 1: on his screen claims to show that President Trump had
Speaker 1: retweeted one of those tweets. Now, members of the Senate,
Speaker 1: let's look closely at this screen, because obviously Manager Raskin
Speaker 1: considered it important enough that he invited the New York
Speaker 1: Times to watch him watching it. Now, what's wrong with
Speaker 1: this image? Actually, there are three things very wrong with it.
Speaker 1: Look at the date on the very bottom of the
Speaker 1: screen a Manager Raskin's computer screen. When we zoom into
Speaker 1: the picture, the date that appears is January third, two thousand, twenty,
Speaker 1: not two twenty one. Why is that date wrong? Because
Speaker 1: this is not a real screenshot that he's working with.
Speaker 1: This is a recreation of a tweet, and you got
Speaker 1: the date wrong when you manufactured this graphic. You did
Speaker 1: not disclose that this is a manufactured graphic and not
Speaker 1: a real screenshot of a tweet. Not to be fair,
Speaker 1: the house managers caught this error before showing the image
Speaker 1: on the Senate floor, so you never saw it when
Speaker 1: it was presented to you. Wow. I mean, how do
Speaker 1: you manufacture evidence like that? I mean it all started
Speaker 1: out where the presiding judge in the case said already
Speaker 1: predetermined and stated publicly his vote for guilt. That wouldn't happen.
Speaker 1: You talked about evidentiary standards, you know, admissibility of evidence.
Speaker 1: None of this would be admissible in any any real
Speaker 1: court of law, would it? David? Absolutely not? And I
Speaker 1: think the first point you made there is probably the
Speaker 1: most important. Can you any American imagine facing any proceeding
Speaker 1: in which your life or liberty is an issue? And
Speaker 1: here what was at stake was trying an effort to
Speaker 1: bar President Trump from ever running for office again and
Speaker 1: to disenfranchise over seventy four million voters who voted for
Speaker 1: him and would want to cast their vote again. And
Speaker 1: for these proceedings, they had a judge of the fine
Speaker 1: fellow this center Lais and a fine man that spoke
Speaker 1: to him during but he issued a press statement, but listen.
Speaker 1: He on January twenty seventh, he entered an oath, and
Speaker 1: the oath said he swears to be impartial in his
Speaker 1: consideration of these issues. Except two weeks earlier, in the
Speaker 1: thirteenth of January, he issued a press release in which
Speaker 1: he said President Trump is definitely guilty, and he's going
Speaker 1: to vote to convict, and everybody else, including Mitch McConnell
Speaker 1: and the Republicans, have to vote to convict. Then, he said,
Speaker 1: as a judge in the case, who has all decisions
Speaker 1: on evidence that comes in, and as a juror who
Speaker 1: has a vote on an acquittal or conviction, that doesn't
Speaker 1: happen in this country. You know, I watch all of
Speaker 1: this and I just cannot believe that this is our country. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I can. I cannot believe that we've descended into a
Speaker 1: process where there's no due process, there's no no assumption
Speaker 1: presumption of innocence. There there is not equal application of standards,
Speaker 1: like there's no equal application of laws. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: you've been all over with us this whole issue of
Speaker 1: the deep state, and you know, the biggest abuse of
Speaker 1: power corruption scandal. Nobody's paying attention today to the fact
Speaker 1: that in a January twenty seventh email to James Clapper,
Speaker 1: the Intelligence chief, the former FBI Director Comy, you know,
Speaker 1: the very day he signed Defies a surveillance warrant saying
Speaker 1: everything's verified, and Christopher Steele's dossier remember Andrew McCabe, no dossier,
Speaker 1: no FIES application, and writing Obama's outgoing intelligence community chief,
Speaker 1: a very different assessment of the British spies intelligence on
Speaker 1: Russia collusion. We're not able to sufficiently corroborate the reporting
Speaker 1: he wrote in his email to James Clapper that was
Speaker 1: declassified and made public. I mean, this is the smoking
Speaker 1: gun email. But then he presented it not only had
Speaker 1: previously signed DEFIES application, signed one that day and signed
Speaker 1: a third one knowing that they couldn't independently corroborate it.
Speaker 1: And now we know that Steele denied it was its
Speaker 1: voracity and the subsource denied its voracity. That's America. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm glad you do the parallel by the way,
Speaker 1: because I do think there is one here. My first
Speaker 1: reaction was the Democrats just seemed to be tone deaf.
Speaker 1: You had a Moller commission in which the head of
Speaker 1: the commission was a partner in the law firm that
Speaker 1: represents Hillary Clinton. He put on there the most bias
Speaker 1: of folks who politically biased folks. He put on his
Speaker 1: commission a lawyer who personally represented Hillary Clinton in her
Speaker 1: email scandal, and of all things, an investigations implicating the
Speaker 1: president of the United States. They put Andrew Weissman as
Speaker 1: the lead investigator, who's simply, in my view, the most
Speaker 1: ethically bankrupt prosecutor I have ever encountered in thirty six years.
Speaker 1: That's the thought. What can you expect the American people
Speaker 1: to believe from a commission like that? Now you see
Speaker 1: this impeachment, no due process. You tell us you don't
Speaker 1: have the facts, but they should convictim and borrow from
Speaker 1: all because anyway, but it goes beyond being tone deaf.
Speaker 1: It goes it's an utter disregard for the American public. Frankly,
Speaker 1: it's saying, we don't need you to worry about integrity
Speaker 1: of the process or anything like that. Just listen to
Speaker 1: what we tell you. We're going to be vicious enemies
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump, and we're going to use your constitution
Speaker 1: and your process to go after your president. But don't
Speaker 1: worry about it. Just trust us. We're doing what's best
Speaker 1: for you. That's a horrible, un American approach. Oh, good
Speaker 1: job to you, Good job to everyone on your team.
Speaker 1: And I know you didn't even have a lot of
Speaker 1: time to prepare. I mean, unbelievable. Thank you, David shown
Speaker 1: as always eight hundred and nine four one sean our
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number, all right, twenty five nounce at
Speaker 1: the top of the hour, eight hundred and nine four
Speaker 1: one sewn. You want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: Lindsey Graham said a lot on Fox News Sunday this weekend.
Speaker 1: Number one, you know, if we did a poll, ask
Speaker 1: yourself and the poll was okay, do you support Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell's version of republican Ism old established wing or do
Speaker 1: you support Donald Trump's America First agenda? If a poll
Speaker 1: was taken today, what would the number be? Eighty five
Speaker 1: ninety percent Trump maga America First. I mean, it's it's unbelievable.
Speaker 1: It's that the Republican Party just has this. The establishment
Speaker 1: wing of the Republican Party just never seems to learn
Speaker 1: what it is that the American people want, and what
Speaker 1: the American people want is not complicated. We talked all
Speaker 1: about it last week. And the other thing about Republicans
Speaker 1: is they never seem to know how to fight. Where
Speaker 1: where were most of these Republicans during this whole deep
Speaker 1: state FISA application, FISA abuse, premeditated fraud, Russia collusion, lies,
Speaker 1: Ukrainian hoaxes. Where were they? How come with all of
Speaker 1: the tape that we have from let's see Schumer, Pelosi,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, Maamala Harris, all the tape we have Maxie Waters,
Speaker 1: where are they ever holding Democrats to the same standards
Speaker 1: that they're holding Republicans too? Why don't they ever do that? Anyway?
Speaker 1: Here's Lindsay Grammy was on Fox News Sunday talking about Okay,
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, you apply the same standard as I've been saying.
Speaker 1: Guess what she gets impeached and put on trial. He's
Speaker 1: the first president the ever impeached, be impeached without a lawyer,
Speaker 1: without a witness, with our ability to confront those against
Speaker 1: him and the trial record was a complete joke. Heresay
Speaker 1: upon hearsay, And we've opened Pandora's box to future presidents.
Speaker 1: And if you use this model, I don't know how
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris doesn't get impeached at the Republicans take over
Speaker 1: the House because she actually belled out rioters and one
Speaker 1: of the rioters went back to the streets and broke
Speaker 1: somebody's head open. So we've opened Pandora's box here, And
Speaker 1: I'm sad for the country. Okay, is it? They're not
Speaker 1: gonna stop. This is right after the police precinct burned
Speaker 1: the ground in the middle of writing. That's been that
Speaker 1: was breaking out over the country Minneapolis early in the time,
Speaker 1: and raising money for people that go out and yeah,
Speaker 1: then commit more crimes because we don't keep them in
Speaker 1: jail because the bail fund that she was a part of.
Speaker 1: All Right, a lot of you want to wag in.
Speaker 1: Let's make that happen. Let us say Mo, the liberal
Speaker 1: from Brooklyn. This is Mo. Mo has been calling the
Speaker 1: show for years. Moe thinks I'm the most dangerous guy
Speaker 1: in America. Do you still believe that, Sean? You get
Speaker 1: more dangerous by the day, My friend, if I was
Speaker 1: that dangerous than Donald Trump would have won the last
Speaker 1: election and he'd be president right now. If apparently I'm
Speaker 1: not as all powerful as you would you would suggest
Speaker 1: that I am. Well, Sean, I picked the election on
Speaker 1: at ten thirty on election night when I saw what
Speaker 1: was happening in Arizona and Nevada, and yeah, there wasn't
Speaker 1: much anybody could do. You know, Donald put himself on
Speaker 1: the line, and you know, I don't know how many
Speaker 1: votes we won by, but it was at least seven million.
Speaker 1: And you know the problem is, and even you should
Speaker 1: be concerned about this. And Democrats, you know, as long
Speaker 1: as they got the result they wanted. But when the laws,
Speaker 1: the statutory language says the partisan observers should be able
Speaker 1: to watch the vote count start to finish and it
Speaker 1: doesn't happen, that should concern you. When a when a
Speaker 1: state constitution like Pennsylvania has very strict limits on mail
Speaker 1: and voting, and then they don't they bypassed their own constitution,
Speaker 1: that should concern you. Same with Wisconsin state law. Go ahead,
Speaker 1: Sean Man, I was a poll watcher. I know what
Speaker 1: happens at the polls I've been there. Voting should be
Speaker 1: much more accessible to Americans, all Americans. And about voter ID,
Speaker 1: do you support voter ID? No, I don't support voter
Speaker 1: ID because my mother was able to vote. She's ninety eight.
Speaker 1: She has no VALOT, she has no valid ide. Your mom. Well,
Speaker 1: we can get your mom valid ID. I promised there's
Speaker 1: a way to do it in New York where you are.
Speaker 1: That's fairly easy, even if she doesn't want a driver's license.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure you'd be in the loving son that
Speaker 1: you are, you would help your ninety eight year old,
Speaker 1: wonderful mom. I already talked to Chuck Schumer. He said
Speaker 1: he'd take care of it if we needed it. We
Speaker 1: were more concerned about her the last time she left
Speaker 1: the country. They weren't going to let her back in
Speaker 1: because she only had her citizenship papers from nineteen forty
Speaker 1: eight with her maiden name. Oh yeah, yeah, we gotta
Speaker 1: get your We gotta get your poor momm up to
Speaker 1: speed with some ID. I think you can't get into
Speaker 1: a Democratic national convention without photo idea? Did you know
Speaker 1: that you can't get Look, Suan, I work in secure
Speaker 1: places all the time. I know what the idea is.
Speaker 1: He'd be nice. So if we want integrity and confidence
Speaker 1: in election results. We should have voter ID, we should
Speaker 1: have chain of custody, very strict, rigorous standards. Um, I
Speaker 1: think I think mail in voting, if you're gonna do it,
Speaker 1: you gotta have voter ID. We need real signature verification.
Speaker 1: And I think that's to protect the integrity on both sides,
Speaker 1: so that people will have confidence in election results. And
Speaker 1: I think that would be a good thing for the country,
Speaker 1: don't you. Well, I agree that election should be above
Speaker 1: and well, you know, there's always been. It's a famous
Speaker 1: story of Kennedy. Well, Nancy Pelosi complained bitterly that twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen was stolen. Hillary said that Trump was an illegitimate president.
Speaker 1: Stacy Abrams still hasn't conceded her race. I don't see
Speaker 1: anybody upset about them complaining. Did you did you know
Speaker 1: what happened with Kennedy and West Virginia when he was running?
Speaker 1: How about Kennedy? Yeah? How about Kennedy in Illinois? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know all about it. In West Virginia, his campaign
Speaker 1: manager sped through every small town in West Virginia and
Speaker 1: gave the sheriff five grand if he get them to
Speaker 1: vote for Kennedy and they won. So you approve of
Speaker 1: such things? Is that what you're saying, Moe from Brooklyn?
Speaker 1: What's that you approve of this? Well? I I think
Speaker 1: elections should be run fairly, and well you can't. How
Speaker 1: do you then? If you want them fair? Partisan observers
Speaker 1: should observe, chain of custody should be respected, signature verification
Speaker 1: and voter ID. It's pretty simple. It's not that it's
Speaker 1: not that rigorous a standard, Sean. Everybody knows what happens
Speaker 1: at the polls. You know, the lady who I go
Speaker 1: in and side assigned over for thirty years. I look
Speaker 1: at my signature over all the years I vote, is
Speaker 1: they're all different. Sub I'm never gonna I'm never gonna
Speaker 1: change your mind, but I'm trying. I've been trying, Moe
Speaker 1: for years. All Right, you'll give you the last word.
Speaker 1: The last squord I gotta say to is Sean, is
Speaker 1: I am so happy that you've done so well over
Speaker 1: the years since we've been talking. And I'm really proud
Speaker 1: and happy whenever I get a chance to call in
Speaker 1: and say hi to Yet, you know, I can't hate Mo.
Speaker 1: For the people in this audience. MO has been calling
Speaker 1: me for years, and we've been arguing for years, and
Speaker 1: I still look. There's something about the quality of your voice.
Speaker 1: It's just the sincerity that is infuriatingly nice. All Right,
Speaker 1: we God bless you, my friend. God bless your mom too. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's say hi, let's let's go to Texas. Maybe we
Speaker 1: can get some some reasonable viewpoints in Texas. Andrew, how
Speaker 1: are you. I'm good, Sean. Thank you for thank you
Speaker 1: for you do for a country every day. Man. And
Speaker 1: that previous college just reminded me of your dates with
Speaker 1: Alan Colmes. It was it was pretty cool just to
Speaker 1: just to hear that. Being By the way, we're praying
Speaker 1: for our friends in Texas. I know you guys. The
Speaker 1: temperatures are really low, the streets are really dangerous in
Speaker 1: a lot of places. A lot of prayers for our
Speaker 1: friends in Texas, and uh, hang in there. The temperature
Speaker 1: will come back and melt the ice and etc. Well
Speaker 1: we appreciate that. Yeah, we've got about five inches of
Speaker 1: snow down here in San Antonio and some ice too,
Speaker 1: so we're not used to that. But now I know,
Speaker 1: I know, and be careful with that ice. If it's
Speaker 1: on the pavement. You can't see it and so driving
Speaker 1: it can be treacherous. Just be careful. You know, if
Speaker 1: there's an older person living on your block, maybe you
Speaker 1: go make sure check in on and make sure they're okay.
Speaker 1: Maybe they if that power goes out, maybe you can
Speaker 1: lend them a space heater if you have one. Just
Speaker 1: you know, everybody helps everybody. Well, we will do that, man,
Speaker 1: Thank you, Thank you, Sean. What else is on your mind? Well,
Speaker 1: my question is I understand that since the acquittal this weekend,
Speaker 1: I'm looking at this in two parts. One, since Justice
Speaker 1: Roberts didn't preside and Senator Lahy is not Chief Chief Justice,
Speaker 1: we understand it is unconstitutional. But my big question is
Speaker 1: is that how is it that we can go forward,
Speaker 1: either as the American people or as you know, representatives
Speaker 1: and senators in Congress where they can bring a litigation
Speaker 1: suit all the way to the Supreme Court to clarify
Speaker 1: how Congress can impeach presents going forward. And the reason
Speaker 1: why I'm saying this is because I know we can't
Speaker 1: do anything about it now, but looking to the future,
Speaker 1: I know that's very murky, you know, in the Constitution
Speaker 1: of how how it has to be and it's very
Speaker 1: limited on the language of explanation of impeachment. So it's like,
Speaker 1: we can just impeach just to impeach. And what it
Speaker 1: does is it makes our country weaker, and it also
Speaker 1: makes our country weaker in the eyes of our enemies
Speaker 1: because we are just playing this political game. And then,
Speaker 1: you know, say in two years, we don't like what's
Speaker 1: going on and the Republicans get back in, we can
Speaker 1: just impeach you know, Joe Biden, we can impeach you know,
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, We can impeach whoever we want. And I think,
Speaker 1: you know, we're setting a dangerous precedence going forward, um
Speaker 1: and not understanding the integrity of why it was it
Speaker 1: was done to begin with with our founding fathers. Look,
Speaker 1: is this all dangerous? Have we now? Have we now
Speaker 1: opened Pandora's box that impeachment is going to be at
Speaker 1: the drop of the hat if there was, If if
Speaker 1: the same standards used by Democrats where used by Republicans
Speaker 1: against Democrats, the answer would be yes. Do I expect
Speaker 1: Republicans will ever do that? No? You know, the one
Speaker 1: thing they didn't never learn from Trump is that you
Speaker 1: gotta fight hard, and Trump fought them hard. That's one
Speaker 1: of the main reasons he's so hated and exposed Republicans
Speaker 1: and Democrats Listen. I would argue that Donald Trump's election
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen was as much about the Republican Party
Speaker 1: being weak and feckless and visionless and incapable of keeping
Speaker 1: promises that it created the door, the opportunity, the path
Speaker 1: for a disruptor to knock out seventeen other prominent Republicans
Speaker 1: win the nomination and then win the presidency. And you
Speaker 1: can see the passion by which people support Donald Trump
Speaker 1: in large park because he made promises, he kept him
Speaker 1: and he fights back. Now a lot of people are
Speaker 1: offended by him fighting back, and they feigned their outrage
Speaker 1: in the media, but Democrats usually stay pretty united. That's
Speaker 1: one big distinct. Anyway, Hang in there in Texas to Andrew.
Speaker 1: Praying for our friends down there, Eric and the socialist
Speaker 1: utopia of California. Next, Eric, how are you. I'm doing good, Sean,
Speaker 1: Thank you very much, and thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Try to keep it quick here so and
Speaker 1: get your answer first of all. Yeah, socialist California, but
Speaker 1: I'm not one of them. But we have to get
Speaker 1: out of here one way, one way or the other.
Speaker 1: But after the just complete sham of the impeachment and
Speaker 1: stolen election, my wife and I are you know, we're
Speaker 1: very conservative Republican patriots, but we are thinking of leaving
Speaker 1: America and we're not actors. And let me give you
Speaker 1: a quick background before I get your opinion on this. Um,
Speaker 1: my dad and my uncle were freedom fighters in the
Speaker 1: Hungarian Revolution of nineteen fifty six and they literally had
Speaker 1: to escape or they would have been killed for sure.
Speaker 1: And they did come here as legal refugees, became legal citizens,
Speaker 1: you know, the whole whole whole nine yards. Um. I've
Speaker 1: been going to Hungary since I was aged seven, so
Speaker 1: I grew up in a communist country. And um, besides,
Speaker 1: besides the election and the impeachment, Uh, just all the
Speaker 1: hatred and division in this country. And I don't see
Speaker 1: it going away going away anytime soon. UM. I mean,
Speaker 1: we're just we're just heartbroken. It's what that happened, you know. Okay,
Speaker 1: go ahead, sir, I'm sorry. Now in Hungary, UH, they
Speaker 1: have probably some of the safest borders in the world.
Speaker 1: Freedom of speech, capitalism, you know, no PC, none of
Speaker 1: the new words every day like canceled culture. I can
Speaker 1: you know, I can't even keep up. You know, it'd
Speaker 1: be like moving back to the thirties forties, and you know,
Speaker 1: we just want peace. And let me look, I don't
Speaker 1: have a lot of time, and I want to give
Speaker 1: you a full answer because you deserve one. I would
Speaker 1: rather fix this country because I don't think there's a
Speaker 1: better place on the face of the earth in America,
Speaker 1: and we need a strong America for the world to succeed.
Speaker 1: There's been plenty of articles written about the fact that
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, you know, we have more Americans now doing
Speaker 1: exactly what you're suggesting. The first half of twenty twenty
Speaker 1: broke a record of five thousand, four hundred and nine
Speaker 1: Americans again the first six months. They gave up their
Speaker 1: citizenship for a variety of reasons, and a lot of
Speaker 1: you know, it's taxes, its regulations, it's a lot of reasons.
Speaker 1: And I'd rather fix the country. I think the left
Speaker 1: is already overreaching, and I'd rather keep all hands on deck,
Speaker 1: focus on the things that we as conservatives know would
Speaker 1: work and be good for the American people, and to fight.
Speaker 1: To quote, all of the Democrats in a ten minute
Speaker 1: montage played last week. Fight and fight with all you've
Speaker 1: got for the principles that guide this country to success
Speaker 1: and prosperity and freedom. Liberty. The cause of liberty and
Speaker 1: freedom is it never stops. I would like to stay
Speaker 1: the United States of America. That's my first choice by far.
Speaker 1: All right, Hannity tonight, say edbr nine Eastern Fox News.
Speaker 1: We're loaded up. We have the three attorneys for Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: David Shoon, Bruce Caster, and Michael vander ven who had
Speaker 1: a big fight. Man, it was g just eviscerated this
Speaker 1: anchor on CBS over. Oh, just a little bit of
Speaker 1: manipulation of evidence. Okay, it's actually funny. We'll show it
Speaker 1: to you. Don Junior tonight, Dan Bongino tonight, Jason Chaffitz,
Speaker 1: Matt Gates, Janis Dean on the coronavirus New York Scandal.
Speaker 1: Nine Eastern say edbr. Hannity, Fox will see you then,
Speaker 1: thanks for being with us. Back here tomorrow,