WEBVTT - Alex Karp: Silicon Valley Broke Its Promise to America

0:00:09.740 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>The Builders is a production of Kaleidoscope and iHeart, presented

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:18.820
<v Speaker 1>by Ramp. Ramp is a financial operations platform that helps

0:00:18.940 --> 0:00:23.090
<v Speaker 1>ambitious companies manage their finances so their teams can spend

0:00:23.140 --> 0:00:26.970
<v Speaker 1>less time chasing receipts and approvals and more time bringing

0:00:27.110 --> 0:00:32.250
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary ideas to life. I'm Walter Isaacs, and welcome to

0:00:32.270 --> 0:00:36.470
<v Speaker 1>The Builders, my series of conversations with the most consequential

0:00:36.550 --> 0:00:42.269
<v Speaker 1>minds shaping our future. In the years after September 11th,

0:00:42.550 --> 0:00:47.190
<v Speaker 1>Peter Thiel began thinking about a new problem. At PayPal,

0:00:47.390 --> 0:00:51.330
<v Speaker 1>he and his colleagues had developed software that could identify

0:00:51.510 --> 0:00:56.790
<v Speaker 1>fraud by finding patterns hidden across enormous amounts of information.

0:00:57.330 --> 0:01:02.110
<v Speaker 1>Could a similar system help intelligence agencies discover threats before

0:01:02.170 --> 0:01:06.250
<v Speaker 1>another attack? The idea became Palantir.

0:01:06.590 --> 0:01:09.910
<v Speaker 2>Palantir is a leader in analyzing data, a skill that's

0:01:09.950 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 2>at the heart of the economy and surveillance.

0:01:12.610 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 3>Demonstrators are accusing the data analysis firm Palantir of working

0:01:17.340 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 3>with ICE.

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>To lead the company, Thiel turned to an old friend

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>from Stanford Law School, Alex Karp.

0:01:25.980 --> 0:01:28.819
<v Speaker 2>Palantir's leader, Alex Karp, is an intellectual known for his

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:30.780
<v Speaker 2>big hair and bigger personality.

0:01:30.860 --> 0:01:35.300
<v Speaker 4>Having Karp A self-described socialist running this company gave people

0:01:35.459 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 4>some assurance that the company could be trusted.

0:01:38.500 --> 0:01:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Karp was an unusual choice to run a technology company.

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.220
<v Speaker 1>While others were building code, he spent his 20s studying

0:01:46.340 --> 0:01:49.900
<v Speaker 1>neoclassical social theory and philosophy in Frankfurt.

0:01:50.380 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Karp had no background in computer science or business when

0:01:53.390 --> 0:01:57.510
<v Speaker 4>he joined Palantir in the early 2000s, and yet 20-plus

0:01:57.550 --> 0:02:00.130
<v Speaker 4>years later, he has turned this company into a $ 400

0:02:00.090 --> 0:02:00.650
<v Speaker 4>billion colossus.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Alex Karp occupies an unusual intersection. Philosophy and warfare. Silicon

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Valley innovation and national security. So I wanted to ask him,

0:02:14.780 --> 0:02:18.780
<v Speaker 1>who should be trusted with systems this powerful? Can artificial

0:02:18.820 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>intelligence make governments and militaries more effective without making them

0:02:23.860 --> 0:02:28.500
<v Speaker 1>less accountable? How do we defend an open society without

0:02:28.700 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>building the machinery of a surveillance state? Here's my conversation

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:40.100
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Karp. Alex Karp, welcome to The Builders.

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Very nice to be here. A huge honor.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of my theories in biography is that

0:02:44.660 --> 0:02:47.590
<v Speaker 1>it's all about dad. So tell me first about your father.

0:02:49.430 --> 0:02:57.050
<v Speaker 3>Well, my dad, he's a very smart person, very shaped

0:02:57.550 --> 0:03:05.220
<v Speaker 3>by the combination of his... German-Jewish mother passing away very early.

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 3>And I think my parents were very much in love.

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>But it was not a coincidence that my dad married

0:03:13.300 --> 0:03:21.630
<v Speaker 3>a jarringly talented, excruciatingly talented, somewhat difficult black woman. I

0:03:21.669 --> 0:03:25.550
<v Speaker 3>think he loved the fact that it poked his stepmother,

0:03:25.570 --> 0:03:29.649
<v Speaker 3>who was more status conscious, in the eye. But my

0:03:29.690 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 3>mom My mom is enormously just capturing in her level

0:03:35.780 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 3>of talent, artistic talent. But the thing about my parents,

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 3>they hate it when I say this, but both my

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 3>parents should be, it's kind of weird that I'm the

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 3>most famous one. Put it this way, had they been

0:03:48.300 --> 0:03:49.860
<v Speaker 3>more what I think they could have been, they would

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.900
<v Speaker 3>have not have birthed me. And I had this discomfort

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:58.690
<v Speaker 3>about the fact that this family that exploded in a

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 3>messy divorce And with parents that are complicated, created an

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:08.460
<v Speaker 3>artifact that is ideally morphed for building essentially pound here.

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:13.050
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's like if you take someone like me

0:04:13.090 --> 0:04:16.849
<v Speaker 3>and you put it in this chaotic environment where you

0:04:16.870 --> 0:04:20.169
<v Speaker 3>had the feeling you're on your own and you're subconsciously

0:04:20.230 --> 0:04:25.490
<v Speaker 3>or partially consciously misaligned with your parents, you can get

0:04:25.529 --> 0:04:29.070
<v Speaker 3>a deeper trust in your own ability to survive. but

0:04:29.130 --> 0:04:32.060
<v Speaker 3>maybe a latent mistrust of structures.

0:04:32.690 --> 0:04:36.180
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about dyslexia. How did being dyslexic give you

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>wings to fly?

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 3>You always have to walk back from where you are

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.780
<v Speaker 3>to see where it got you. Like I viewed it

0:04:43.860 --> 0:04:45.980
<v Speaker 3>as a, I mean, I was in the closet about

0:04:46.020 --> 0:04:49.260
<v Speaker 3>being dyslexic until like six years ago. And then I

0:04:49.300 --> 0:04:52.260
<v Speaker 3>just got tired. Honestly, I got frustrated. And then I

0:04:52.380 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of told a buddy of mine. And then from there,

0:04:54.380 --> 0:04:57.020
<v Speaker 3>I just kind of, but you know, it's interesting for me,

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.380
<v Speaker 3>to watch how people derided everything we did, derided everything

0:05:01.420 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 3>I said, and now basically copy it verbatim. Now, why

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 3>does that happen? It happens because they're looking for a playbook.

0:05:11.580 --> 0:05:13.900
<v Speaker 3>If you're dyslexic, the way I define it, at least,

0:05:14.100 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 3>because it's a broad term, I define it as having

0:05:16.940 --> 0:05:23.510
<v Speaker 3>a non-one-to-one relationship with the taxonomy of a language, written taxonomy.

0:05:24.010 --> 0:05:26.870
<v Speaker 3>So even now, if you read and I read, there's

0:05:26.910 --> 0:05:29.030
<v Speaker 3>more of a translation function, even though I did a

0:05:29.050 --> 0:05:31.550
<v Speaker 3>PhD and I still do a lot of, end up

0:05:31.670 --> 0:05:34.610
<v Speaker 3>doing a lot of the writing at Palantir. But why

0:05:34.670 --> 0:05:38.590
<v Speaker 3>is that important? Because language, of course, you prefer not

0:05:38.630 --> 0:05:42.310
<v Speaker 3>to be dyslexic, but the truth is, if you are dyslexic,

0:05:42.710 --> 0:05:46.630
<v Speaker 3>you're not colonized by the broader culture. So when I'm

0:05:46.670 --> 0:05:49.610
<v Speaker 3>interacting with the broader culture or with a tech problem

0:05:50.089 --> 0:05:53.050
<v Speaker 3>or with any problem, I'm interacting with the problem as

0:05:53.089 --> 0:05:55.270
<v Speaker 3>it is. So how were we able to build the

0:05:55.330 --> 0:06:00.450
<v Speaker 3>anti-terror product Okay, that product changed the history of Europe.

0:06:01.230 --> 0:06:05.050
<v Speaker 3>We've stopped hundreds of terror attacks, some of which would

0:06:05.110 --> 0:06:07.630
<v Speaker 3>have happened in other places, but many of which would

0:06:07.650 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 3>have happened in Europe. Think of the Europe you would

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 3>have if that had happened. And then later, our product

0:06:13.140 --> 0:06:15.060
<v Speaker 3>is fundamental to the defense of Ukraine.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.380
<v Speaker 1>Well, wait, explain to me how that comes from being

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>either not colonized.

0:06:18.900 --> 0:06:21.849
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so first of all, if you go to school

0:06:21.890 --> 0:06:24.469
<v Speaker 3>on how to learn software, build a software company, you

0:06:24.510 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 3>would have learned build a product that's not very valuable

0:06:27.420 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 3>to the client where they're addicted to it, then hire

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.340
<v Speaker 3>lots of salespeople and get lots of people to buy

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 3>it against their will. And that's how you build a software.

0:06:36.260 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 3>And then the derivative of that is it's a simple

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.350
<v Speaker 3>but addicting product. So it doesn't really create value, but

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.210
<v Speaker 3>it's hard to get rid of. It's like a venereal disease.

0:06:45.810 --> 0:06:48.430
<v Speaker 3>Easy to get, maybe hard to get rid of. And

0:06:48.490 --> 0:06:51.650
<v Speaker 3>what you had to avoid at all costs is anything

0:06:51.690 --> 0:06:54.830
<v Speaker 3>that looked like labor. We spent three years building a

0:06:54.890 --> 0:06:56.740
<v Speaker 3>product That was valuable.

0:06:56.860 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:06:57.060 --> 0:06:59.669
<v Speaker 3>So then you get to what is value. We said

0:06:59.730 --> 0:07:02.850
<v Speaker 3>value is both that you stop the terror attacks and

0:07:02.910 --> 0:07:04.110
<v Speaker 3>you protect civil liberties.

0:07:04.589 --> 0:07:04.849
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:07:05.529 --> 0:07:08.470
<v Speaker 3>That already you had two factions, one that wanted to

0:07:08.529 --> 0:07:11.370
<v Speaker 3>stop terror attacks and one that wanted to protect civil liberties.

0:07:12.330 --> 0:07:15.870
<v Speaker 3>So the problem was to build that product, you had

0:07:15.910 --> 0:07:19.470
<v Speaker 3>to violate every single norm of how you build software.

0:07:20.310 --> 0:07:22.790
<v Speaker 3>And then the biggest norm we violated is it took

0:07:22.910 --> 0:07:27.460
<v Speaker 3>three years really roughly without revenue. Three years, no revenue.

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 3>So you would have to be completely, basically insane to

0:07:33.370 --> 0:07:36.890
<v Speaker 3>do that. And I do think it took a neurodivergent

0:07:37.050 --> 0:07:39.510
<v Speaker 3>person at the helm to fight for that. People are

0:07:39.530 --> 0:07:42.490
<v Speaker 3>always like, I often get these comments in private from

0:07:42.530 --> 0:07:45.490
<v Speaker 3>business executives. Can you teach me how to be unpopular?

0:07:46.150 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 3>We're oddly kind of popular right now. But I don't

0:07:50.020 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 3>think it's possible because what they're really asking me to

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.570
<v Speaker 3>teach them is to be dyslexic. to look at the material,

0:07:57.150 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 3>digest it, but it's not inside me.

0:08:00.260 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>You clearly grew up feeling a bit of an outsider,

0:08:03.820 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>another theory I have about biography. And being an outsider

0:08:06.900 --> 0:08:09.500
<v Speaker 1>can be a superpower in some ways in the sense

0:08:09.540 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that you aren't trying to fit in.

0:08:11.380 --> 0:08:13.650
<v Speaker 3>Or maybe you've tried to fit in, but it's failed.

0:08:13.990 --> 0:08:14.530
<v Speaker 1>Did you try?

0:08:15.810 --> 0:08:21.170
<v Speaker 3>No, but I think human beings as a species want

0:08:21.230 --> 0:08:23.850
<v Speaker 3>to fit in. And I think most of us who

0:08:24.470 --> 0:08:28.650
<v Speaker 3>are not trying, subconsciously realize it would have failed to try.

0:08:29.110 --> 0:08:31.970
<v Speaker 1>To what extent does that help you, say, as opposed

0:08:32.010 --> 0:08:33.829
<v Speaker 1>to somebody like me who kind of feels, oh, I've

0:08:33.890 --> 0:08:36.910
<v Speaker 1>always fit in, good childhood, want to get along?

0:08:36.950 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Jewish guy in New Orleans. Yeah, I'm not sure

0:08:39.910 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 3>that's true because you would not be able to write

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.459
<v Speaker 3>the things you've written if you were purely an insider.

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.220
<v Speaker 3>But in any case, it's not me interviewing you. But

0:08:48.260 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 3>if I were interviewing you, I'd push back on that statement. No,

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.140
<v Speaker 3>I think being an outsider, I don't think you get

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:58.140
<v Speaker 3>Palantir or my life story. It's very unlikely you're going

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.100
<v Speaker 3>to get it as an insider. And I think the

0:09:00.179 --> 0:09:06.130
<v Speaker 3>inside track is overworn and not working. And then I

0:09:06.309 --> 0:09:08.710
<v Speaker 3>think if you link it to what we've built at Palantir,

0:09:08.750 --> 0:09:11.950
<v Speaker 3>the culture, the aesthetics, the products, there's not a single

0:09:11.990 --> 0:09:15.010
<v Speaker 3>thing we've done that an insider would ever do. And

0:09:15.090 --> 0:09:19.150
<v Speaker 3>most outsiders are pretending to be outsiders. Since there's so

0:09:19.190 --> 0:09:21.949
<v Speaker 3>much value in being an outsider, you have lots of

0:09:21.970 --> 0:09:23.470
<v Speaker 3>people who are like fake outsiders.

0:09:24.250 --> 0:09:25.350
<v Speaker 1>But that's not you.

0:09:25.850 --> 0:09:28.590
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, I think people like me would, I'd

0:09:28.730 --> 0:09:31.500
<v Speaker 3>love to go on an insider vacation. Give me like

0:09:31.510 --> 0:09:33.740
<v Speaker 3>the eight weeks a year where I can be an insider.

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.300
<v Speaker 3>And again, I know it'd be totally stupid, but like

0:09:37.340 --> 0:09:41.260
<v Speaker 3>I want to be reborn as like a, my reborn

0:09:41.380 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 3>fantasy is Catholic, Bavarian, veterinarian.

0:09:45.390 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, getting to Bavaria and to a related concept, which

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:54.610
<v Speaker 1>is a collaborationist instinct that's in the human species. You

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.590
<v Speaker 1>wrote about the Nazis when you were in graduate school,

0:09:57.630 --> 0:09:57.900
<v Speaker 1>was it?

0:09:58.130 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 3>I wrote about... It was... was a critique of Heidegger.

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 3>For better or worse, it'd be hard to say Heidegger

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.579
<v Speaker 3>was not one of the two or three most important

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.740
<v Speaker 3>philosophers in the last couple hundred years, along with other people,

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:17.870
<v Speaker 3>maybe Wittgenstein. Heidegger developed a form of phenomenology, which is

0:10:18.090 --> 0:10:21.530
<v Speaker 3>a fancy way of explaining the how things in the

0:10:21.570 --> 0:10:24.110
<v Speaker 3>world could impute value onto the world. And there's many

0:10:24.150 --> 0:10:27.450
<v Speaker 3>different forms. His advisor was Husserl, who was Jewish. Heidegger

0:10:27.830 --> 0:10:33.650
<v Speaker 3>became Bernardin's supporter of Hitler. Even though his mistress Hannah

0:10:33.670 --> 0:10:37.500
<v Speaker 3>Arendt was Jewish and his advisor was Jewish. And I

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 3>think Heideggerian philosophy is the most important political philosophy, I think,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 3>for worse in the West now, because most political movements

0:10:49.700 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 3>that I would call regressive far right, meaning they want

0:10:53.460 --> 0:10:57.030
<v Speaker 3>to regress to something that obviously has never worked on

0:10:57.070 --> 0:11:00.070
<v Speaker 3>the far right and on the far left, pretend to

0:11:00.110 --> 0:11:03.109
<v Speaker 3>be Marxist, certainly on the left, but are actually Heideggerian.

0:11:03.929 --> 0:11:07.670
<v Speaker 3>And that's why I've been very early and for years saying, like,

0:11:07.710 --> 0:11:10.130
<v Speaker 3>I'm still an unhappy Democrat. I've been warning the Democrats

0:11:10.170 --> 0:11:13.340
<v Speaker 3>that a faction of their party is actually not progressive.

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.790
<v Speaker 3>They call themselves progressive, but then they want a form

0:11:17.830 --> 0:11:25.670
<v Speaker 3>of communitarian economy that looks futile. It's not even actually socialist.

0:11:26.970 --> 0:11:29.969
<v Speaker 3>And they pretend to be isolationist when they're actually just

0:11:30.010 --> 0:11:34.390
<v Speaker 3>focused on the groups they're uncomfortable with. That's a right-wing party.

0:11:35.450 --> 0:11:38.650
<v Speaker 3>So in any case, I wrote about Heidegger. Now, the

0:11:38.690 --> 0:11:40.610
<v Speaker 3>truth is also I wanted to get out of jail.

0:11:40.730 --> 0:11:43.670
<v Speaker 3>I realized halfway through my dissertation, this is not for me.

0:11:44.050 --> 0:11:46.170
<v Speaker 3>I need to go and build something. To your thing,

0:11:46.210 --> 0:11:51.290
<v Speaker 3>I'm a builder. The interesting thing about builders is it's elliptical.

0:11:51.650 --> 0:11:54.830
<v Speaker 3>So the people you've written about, Steve Jobs, Elon Musk,

0:11:55.690 --> 0:11:58.030
<v Speaker 3>I think you will find in every case, it's a

0:11:58.090 --> 0:12:04.990
<v Speaker 3>combination of an outsider with an aesthetic proclivity that is

0:12:05.429 --> 0:12:11.030
<v Speaker 3>as much humanities as tech. I think objectively, although most

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:17.340
<v Speaker 3>people in tech would disagree, it's more aesthetic world importance.

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:21.949
<v Speaker 3>and business acumen than tech, which is why the tech

0:12:21.970 --> 0:12:24.750
<v Speaker 3>companies are built here and not unfortunately in Germany or France,

0:12:25.230 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 3>because it's not that we're smarter, but we are producing

0:12:29.890 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 3>that shape person. And part of it is most of

0:12:32.140 --> 0:12:37.460
<v Speaker 3>the people building things here, their great grandparents or parents,

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.290
<v Speaker 3>or they themselves opted to come here. That's already a

0:12:41.300 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 3>big step.

0:12:42.950 --> 0:12:45.209
<v Speaker 1>Why did you found Palantir? What was the point of it?

0:12:45.910 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, my version of why I founded it

0:12:49.059 --> 0:12:52.459
<v Speaker 3>was I knew Peter in law school.

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Peter Thiel.

0:12:53.300 --> 0:12:57.329
<v Speaker 3>Peter Thiel. We had this– we just– I was doing

0:12:57.370 --> 0:12:59.770
<v Speaker 3>no work. Peter, I think, was doing much more work

0:12:59.809 --> 0:13:02.990
<v Speaker 3>than I, but we were in the same section and

0:13:03.070 --> 0:13:06.010
<v Speaker 3>in the same dorm, which was like the dorm you

0:13:06.050 --> 0:13:07.430
<v Speaker 3>were at if you didn't have a lot of money.

0:13:08.110 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 3>And then we were both intellectually very curious. He came

0:13:11.580 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 3>to me and was like, we have this idea to

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:18.030
<v Speaker 3>bring a methodology that was used at PayPal– to the

0:13:18.070 --> 0:13:21.230
<v Speaker 3>Intel space because basically it had worked to cut down

0:13:21.270 --> 0:13:24.309
<v Speaker 3>cyber fraud and they obviously aren't good at this kind

0:13:24.350 --> 0:13:28.210
<v Speaker 3>of tech. And I thought this is wildly interesting. Peter

0:13:28.510 --> 0:13:33.340
<v Speaker 3>is wildly compelling. And then I just said, yes. I

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 3>joined because I thought the idea, look, you can take

0:13:39.140 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 3>a jingoistic version of America, like everything. Of course, we've

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 3>made mistakes. And some of those mistakes are hard to

0:13:46.740 --> 0:13:52.740
<v Speaker 3>understand in retrospect. Mistakes around integration, respect, I mean, you know,

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 3>it could obviously, slavery, I think not paying enough attention

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:03.490
<v Speaker 3>to class and not having the national project be stronger.

0:14:04.130 --> 0:14:07.110
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of lists, but in my view, in

0:14:07.130 --> 0:14:11.589
<v Speaker 3>the view of, I think most Americans, there's no project

0:14:11.610 --> 0:14:14.670
<v Speaker 3>at scale. So you can't really compare America to like,

0:14:15.340 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Sweden of the 70s, right? This is like a completely

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 3>different the time completely homogeneous culture.

0:14:23.060 --> 0:14:25.500
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying the diversity of America make.

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:29.250
<v Speaker 3>With the size? It's a size and grandeur of our

0:14:29.330 --> 0:14:34.470
<v Speaker 3>project and the fact that we have this Constitution That

0:14:34.870 --> 0:14:39.270
<v Speaker 3>is still it's still fresh like, you know the first

0:14:39.930 --> 0:14:43.150
<v Speaker 3>in my view the Second Amendment and the Fourth Amendment

0:14:43.370 --> 0:14:47.610
<v Speaker 3>so write a free speech and which basically also is

0:14:47.670 --> 0:14:50.570
<v Speaker 3>a stand-in for free to decide your own religion, which

0:14:50.650 --> 0:14:54.290
<v Speaker 3>is very radical. The Second Amendment, okay, I don't believe

0:14:54.330 --> 0:14:58.710
<v Speaker 3>we should allow plastic. 50 cal guns roaming through the streets, okay,

0:14:59.470 --> 0:15:02.510
<v Speaker 3>but I do believe that it's crucial to allow citizens

0:15:02.590 --> 0:15:07.490
<v Speaker 3>the right to bear arms because it's often reframed as self-defense,

0:15:07.530 --> 0:15:10.970
<v Speaker 3>which I'm also in favor of, but it's really about

0:15:11.250 --> 0:15:16.390
<v Speaker 3>putting the government on its back heel. about mandating what

0:15:16.850 --> 0:15:18.310
<v Speaker 3>official policies would be.

0:15:18.710 --> 0:15:21.050
<v Speaker 1>Well, the Fourth Amendment pushes you back a bit.

0:15:21.310 --> 0:15:22.750
<v Speaker 3>I know, and I'm going to get to that, but

0:15:22.850 --> 0:15:24.510
<v Speaker 3>I just want to say, I just want to underscore,

0:15:25.190 --> 0:15:28.290
<v Speaker 3>and again, I actually think, I've never been a neocon.

0:15:28.630 --> 0:15:31.170
<v Speaker 3>I never thought it made sense to make, like the

0:15:31.210 --> 0:15:36.650
<v Speaker 3>Muslim world, we have many Muslim country partners. It runs

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.340
<v Speaker 3>very well, and I'm not, of course, I want a

0:15:39.380 --> 0:15:42.060
<v Speaker 3>different kind of government. I actually As much as I'm

0:15:42.140 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 3>on the other side of the CCP, I want America

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.660
<v Speaker 3>to win more than I'm interested in how they run

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 3>their world. It seems to, they believe, I've never been

0:15:52.060 --> 0:15:54.730
<v Speaker 3>of that school. But we have an ability, I can

0:15:54.770 --> 0:15:57.790
<v Speaker 3>say whatever I want here, and there is no government

0:15:57.810 --> 0:16:00.810
<v Speaker 3>sanction to what I say. Okay, the Second Amendment does

0:16:00.850 --> 0:16:03.490
<v Speaker 3>not exist, to my knowledge, anywhere else in the world.

0:16:04.210 --> 0:16:09.190
<v Speaker 3>So First and Second still exist. enormously radical. But all

0:16:09.210 --> 0:16:11.990
<v Speaker 3>of that as necessary as it would be first and

0:16:12.030 --> 0:16:15.290
<v Speaker 3>second is not sufficient if you don't protect people's rights

0:16:15.370 --> 0:16:18.390
<v Speaker 3>to privacy. And you could say, okay, well, the fourth amendment,

0:16:18.630 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 3>you don't need the fourth. I mean, I think people

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.510
<v Speaker 3>would say this abroad in many countries. You don't need

0:16:23.530 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 3>the fourth amendment to protect your right of thought.

0:16:26.780 --> 0:16:26.940
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 3>But it's not true because we're language driven beings. If

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 3>you can't articulate your thought in some form, even as

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.220
<v Speaker 3>a dyslexic, is it a thought? What is a thought

0:16:37.260 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 3>that can't be articulated? Can a thought be extended, manipulated,

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 3>changed productively or non-productively without its articulation in the thing,

0:16:47.250 --> 0:16:49.570
<v Speaker 3>formative thing that makes us human and is allowed us

0:16:49.590 --> 0:16:49.990
<v Speaker 3>to advance?

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.370
<v Speaker 1>Spoken like somebody who's read a lot of Heidegger and Wittgenstein.

0:16:53.610 --> 0:16:57.230
<v Speaker 3>Well, and where it's true. And this is why the

0:16:57.270 --> 0:17:01.610
<v Speaker 3>Fourth Amendment, the ability is so crucial. One of the

0:17:01.650 --> 0:17:04.710
<v Speaker 3>most vile and stupid attacks on Palantir has been that

0:17:04.750 --> 0:17:08.180
<v Speaker 3>we're somehow anti Fourth Amendment. No, our products are actually

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.110
<v Speaker 3>built around the protection. And the only way you could

0:17:11.250 --> 0:17:13.270
<v Speaker 3>use AI now is with one of our products where

0:17:13.310 --> 0:17:17.109
<v Speaker 3>you protect these rights. And so, but they're vital to

0:17:17.250 --> 0:17:19.810
<v Speaker 3>us as what makes us human, which is exactly why

0:17:20.350 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 3>regressive political movements go after the Fourth Amendment. They want

0:17:24.500 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 3>to eviscerate these things because they're a Fourth Amendment for

0:17:28.380 --> 0:17:33.380
<v Speaker 3>you is their retrograde ideology that that will force you, everyone,

0:17:33.460 --> 0:17:39.540
<v Speaker 3>to be standard, cut out, same thing, non-neurodivergent, non-sovereign, non-individual.

0:17:39.780 --> 0:17:43.700
<v Speaker 3>And that's why they cannot stand America or the way

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.290
<v Speaker 3>it's set up, because our principles are set up to

0:17:47.350 --> 0:17:50.670
<v Speaker 3>build builders. One of the major reasons we have a

0:17:50.710 --> 0:17:54.410
<v Speaker 3>tech scene, unlike any other country, is because our Constitution

0:17:54.510 --> 0:17:55.449
<v Speaker 3>is built for builders.

0:17:56.830 --> 0:18:00.170
<v Speaker 1>Don't go anywhere. There's a lot more right after this break.

0:18:13.460 --> 0:18:16.060
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about the Fourth Amendment, right to privacy.

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So many people would be talking about Palantir, the cameras,

0:18:20.060 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>gathering information on us. Doesn't that impinge on our right

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to privacy or do we over-index on privacy?

0:18:26.500 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:18:26.740 --> 0:18:30.590
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, one of the things I think

0:18:30.710 --> 0:18:35.090
<v Speaker 3>Europe got right was basically the European constitutional order focuses

0:18:35.130 --> 0:18:38.570
<v Speaker 3>on privacy both in the commercial and in the government context.

0:18:39.410 --> 0:18:39.950
<v Speaker 1>In America.

0:18:41.130 --> 0:18:45.250
<v Speaker 3>Our constitution protects against government overreach. And I would say culturally,

0:18:45.450 --> 0:18:48.060
<v Speaker 3>I think we're not sensitive enough to commercial overreach.

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.649
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all my students say they don't mind Google knowing

0:18:50.690 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>everything about them, but they don't want the government to

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:54.660
<v Speaker 1>know everything about them, which is odd.

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I'm in favor of them not wanting government

0:18:59.380 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 3>to know everything about them. They're underestimating. Basically, what they're

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:07.100
<v Speaker 3>often imputing is, I don't care what commercial companies know

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.850
<v Speaker 3>about me because that's my choice, which, by the way,

0:19:09.859 --> 0:19:14.260
<v Speaker 3>it is, obviously. But they're thinking of their opinions as

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:18.060
<v Speaker 3>being wholly their own. And at best, your opinions are

0:19:18.100 --> 0:19:24.340
<v Speaker 3>a dialogue between your ideas and the outside consensus view.

0:19:25.060 --> 0:19:31.609
<v Speaker 3>They're underestimating how much their thoughts are being influenced by

0:19:31.730 --> 0:19:36.469
<v Speaker 3>the tech products they're interacting with. And because they underestimate that,

0:19:36.510 --> 0:19:38.449
<v Speaker 3>they don't understand the way in which they should be

0:19:38.490 --> 0:19:43.010
<v Speaker 3>more concerned about privacy. Where I'm sympathetic with some of

0:19:43.090 --> 0:19:46.220
<v Speaker 3>our critics of Palantir, they've got the Palantir part wrong.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.510
<v Speaker 3>But you'll see like Palantir surveillance state, blah, blah, blah. blah.

0:19:50.550 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 3>The Palantir stuff is technically and in practice the inverse

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 3>of what they think by the most extreme amount of

0:19:58.580 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 3>any other tech company. The part that they're actually right

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:06.100
<v Speaker 3>about is that if you have companies controlling all data,

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.350
<v Speaker 3>they will control what you think or think. heavily influence

0:20:10.369 --> 0:20:10.830
<v Speaker 3>what you think.

0:20:11.150 --> 0:20:14.750
<v Speaker 1>But isn't Palantir part of a surveillance culture? And there's

0:20:14.770 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>an upside to that, but also maybe a loss of autonomy?

0:20:21.980 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 3>Of course, you have to get a definition of what

0:20:23.700 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 3>we mean by surveillance. If you are an enemy of

0:20:27.180 --> 0:20:30.300
<v Speaker 3>the US shooting at the US or planning to shoot

0:20:30.340 --> 0:20:33.340
<v Speaker 3>at the US or trying to stop people who are

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.750
<v Speaker 3>coming into your country to dismantle something you're doing that's

0:20:36.810 --> 0:20:38.550
<v Speaker 3>nefarious and bad. Okay, there are a lot of people

0:20:38.570 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 3>who don't agree, but okay. Yes, our products are used

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 3>to make.

0:20:43.140 --> 0:20:44.859
<v Speaker 1>But what about when I'm walking down the streets of

0:20:44.900 --> 0:20:48.420
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans and you have a system there that says, okay,

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.100
<v Speaker 1>here's where Walter was?

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the domestic surveillance is where the issue comes in.

0:20:55.859 --> 0:20:59.169
<v Speaker 3>In a weird way, Palantir is used heavily in France

0:20:59.950 --> 0:21:04.270
<v Speaker 3>and in other places in Europe where we're contractually not

0:21:04.290 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 3>allowed to mention There's a difference between surveillance under the

0:21:08.500 --> 0:21:12.659
<v Speaker 3>context of a legal mandate and surveillance where there's no

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.220
<v Speaker 3>legal mandate. And this distinction is actually both politically, morally,

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:20.530
<v Speaker 3>and technically important. So I think the political morality, most

0:21:20.570 --> 0:21:23.389
<v Speaker 3>people get that. But it's very hard to build a

0:21:23.430 --> 0:21:26.710
<v Speaker 3>product that, for example, in the European context, can only

0:21:26.770 --> 0:21:29.310
<v Speaker 3>keep data where there's a warrant and then purchase it

0:21:29.430 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 3>where the warrant expires. The hard part is, You have warrant,

0:21:35.570 --> 0:21:39.490
<v Speaker 3>warrant disappears. What happens to the data? Our products allow

0:21:39.550 --> 0:21:42.270
<v Speaker 3>you to work in conformity with that. Some people say

0:21:42.310 --> 0:21:46.970
<v Speaker 3>that's still surveillance. You're surveilling someone the courts decide is

0:21:47.010 --> 0:21:50.270
<v Speaker 3>a criminal. I think there you get into where I

0:21:50.310 --> 0:21:53.090
<v Speaker 3>would say, you know, you have people that are so pro,

0:21:53.170 --> 0:21:56.590
<v Speaker 3>you have the right version caricatured where they're like, just

0:21:56.650 --> 0:22:00.700
<v Speaker 3>kill the terrorists and criminals. Okay, that's not a society

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 3>most of us want to live in. You have the

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.100
<v Speaker 3>left version that I think just brings the right, which is, no,

0:22:06.260 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 3>we're not going to surveil known hardened criminals. And where

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:15.139
<v Speaker 3>our product is used most effectively is in Europe on

0:22:15.380 --> 0:22:23.570
<v Speaker 3>criminal gains, professional criminals, meaning they're organized and trained. I

0:22:23.630 --> 0:22:27.070
<v Speaker 3>imagine on border enforcement, because it's all done by professional

0:22:27.109 --> 0:22:30.270
<v Speaker 3>criminals to get people in, and on anti-terror, like on

0:22:30.310 --> 0:22:34.530
<v Speaker 3>terrorism cases. And There you have, in the case of

0:22:34.590 --> 0:22:38.470
<v Speaker 3>domestic intel, you have essentially something like a probable cause

0:22:39.170 --> 0:22:41.740
<v Speaker 3>and a construct that allows you to legally do it.

0:22:42.070 --> 0:22:46.730
<v Speaker 3>So in practice, is a form of law enforcement, I

0:22:46.770 --> 0:22:50.300
<v Speaker 3>think 90% of society supports. And I would say the 10%

0:22:50.300 --> 0:22:53.780
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't is basically going to get us some form

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 3>of fascism. If the terrorist attacks in Europe that we

0:22:56.619 --> 0:22:59.580
<v Speaker 3>had prevented had happened, you would have some form of

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.140
<v Speaker 3>Far left or far right fascism would amount to basically

0:23:03.180 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 3>the same thing. You are tracked all the time.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.700
<v Speaker 1>Let me broaden it a bit more philosophical, not just

0:23:08.740 --> 0:23:12.850
<v Speaker 1>to Palantir, but the technology we have today has enormous

0:23:12.930 --> 0:23:17.070
<v Speaker 1>amounts of sort of data gathering capabilities, cameras and visuals

0:23:17.130 --> 0:23:20.790
<v Speaker 1>and facial recognition. It also has now with AI an

0:23:20.869 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 1>enormous ability to draw things from that data. Do you

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>think this whole explosion of data collection... combined with AI

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.020
<v Speaker 1>in some ways impinges on personal autonomy?

0:23:34.100 --> 0:23:39.460
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, obviously it can and it will if you

0:23:39.740 --> 0:23:43.369
<v Speaker 3>don't push against it. So now we go into AI debate.

0:23:44.470 --> 0:23:48.110
<v Speaker 3>AI is, in my view, best conceived as a raw

0:23:48.150 --> 0:23:52.629
<v Speaker 3>material that can be processed for good or bad, broadly speaking.

0:23:53.090 --> 0:23:56.770
<v Speaker 3>So one of the most negative ways you could harness

0:23:56.810 --> 0:24:04.379
<v Speaker 3>these powers is for surveillance. I would argue that most

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.740
<v Speaker 3>of that is going to happen in the commercial context,

0:24:07.450 --> 0:24:09.830
<v Speaker 3>not in the government context, but it could happen in

0:24:09.850 --> 0:24:13.070
<v Speaker 3>the government context. And I'm very in favor of actual, like,

0:24:13.090 --> 0:24:15.270
<v Speaker 3>I think we should restrict some of these technologies. Like,

0:24:15.550 --> 0:24:18.189
<v Speaker 3>for example, if you just take AI that we use

0:24:18.230 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 3>on the battlefield, we should have legislation that prevents that

0:24:21.980 --> 0:24:25.540
<v Speaker 3>technology from being used domestically. We need it on the battlefield.

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.060
<v Speaker 3>We have no choice because our adversaries are building stuff.

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 3>And if we don't build it, we're going to be

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 3>just demolished. And I would say if you're anti-war, in

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 3>my humble opinion, looking at any part of history, you

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.060
<v Speaker 3>have to have a strong military. So the idea you're

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.100
<v Speaker 3>going to weaken the military and have more peace is

0:24:42.100 --> 0:24:45.020
<v Speaker 3>a fantasy of people who are half idiots or actually

0:24:45.060 --> 0:24:48.420
<v Speaker 3>who want war. But then the domestic part that you're

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:52.330
<v Speaker 3>flagging is a very real issue. What are the technologies

0:24:52.369 --> 0:24:55.530
<v Speaker 3>we're going to unleash? Like again, the famous, you know,

0:24:55.609 --> 0:25:00.350
<v Speaker 3>fascist countries have no crime, no crime. When the Nazis

0:25:00.369 --> 0:25:03.810
<v Speaker 3>had power, the only crimes that were committed were by them.

0:25:05.490 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 3>That's how it works. There is only one criminal band.

0:25:08.460 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 3>It's the government. And there will be no other criminal band,

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:13.260
<v Speaker 3>and they will take people out and shoot them, and

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:17.060
<v Speaker 3>lo and behold, there's no crime. And in order to

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:18.790
<v Speaker 3>do that, they shoot a lot of innocent people too.

0:25:19.910 --> 0:25:23.030
<v Speaker 3>Criminals are rational actors, and probably they're the people who

0:25:23.070 --> 0:25:26.020
<v Speaker 3>get shot the least. The people get shot the most

0:25:26.060 --> 0:25:29.129
<v Speaker 3>are people with political views like me, honestly. That's if

0:25:29.170 --> 0:25:31.570
<v Speaker 3>you go tie this back to my outsider thing. I

0:25:31.770 --> 0:25:35.629
<v Speaker 3>always thought from the time I can remember thinking I

0:25:35.670 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 3>will be the first person on the wall. And I

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 3>believe I will be the first or second person on

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 3>the wall if we have no crime. You know, because

0:25:45.420 --> 0:25:48.479
<v Speaker 3>the first thing that they do is define you as

0:25:48.570 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 3>the people with an actual view. I'm talking about things

0:25:51.340 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 3>that like kind of things I say that are outside

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.010
<v Speaker 3>the norm and are transgressive and building a company or

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.990
<v Speaker 3>having too much money or if you don't protect the

0:26:00.030 --> 0:26:04.390
<v Speaker 3>rights of the people you don't like, the unapologetically, unambitionally

0:26:04.490 --> 0:26:08.010
<v Speaker 3>opinionated people that also have money, you're going to end

0:26:08.109 --> 0:26:12.890
<v Speaker 3>up with a country run heavily influenced by the extremes.

0:26:13.109 --> 0:26:17.530
<v Speaker 3>Like take Wealth Tax. There are class inequities in the

0:26:17.590 --> 0:26:20.169
<v Speaker 3>society that have to be addressed. And AI is going

0:26:20.190 --> 0:26:22.970
<v Speaker 3>to exacerbate them. I mean, I believe AI will create

0:26:23.130 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 3>more jobs or higher quality jobs, especially for working class

0:26:27.380 --> 0:26:29.969
<v Speaker 3>vocational people. And many people are going to get retrained.

0:26:30.020 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 3>But even if their salaries go up twice inflation, they're

0:26:34.020 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 3>unlikely to stay at pace with people who are in

0:26:37.380 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 3>tech and in AI because those people could be 10, 20,

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:41.139
<v Speaker 3>50 times wealthier.

0:26:41.700 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:26:42.980 --> 0:26:46.459
<v Speaker 3>Then the reaction to this, is to impose something that

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 3>just hurts the wealthy, it doesn't help the poor. And

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 3>by the way, it's going to hurt the middle class

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 3>for lots of reasons.

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, wait a minute. If you agree that AI is

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>going to lead to greater disparities of wealth, then you

0:26:56.700 --> 0:26:59.340
<v Speaker 1>go back in history, 1890s, we had just as big

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.260
<v Speaker 1>of a tech boom, led to great disparities of wealth.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Isn't there some reason to say, let's put more in

0:27:05.580 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the commons? Let's reduce the disparity of wealth?

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.139
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'm saying. You have to do something. What

0:27:12.580 --> 0:27:16.010
<v Speaker 3>do you do? Well, my version would be, you go to,

0:27:16.130 --> 0:27:20.510
<v Speaker 3>you basically say, you have a 50% death tax. I

0:27:20.530 --> 0:27:23.930
<v Speaker 3>would go to people and say, okay, for every point

0:27:24.050 --> 0:27:26.629
<v Speaker 3>you pay in, you can have some point. So you

0:27:26.670 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 3>could basically, you pay 25% now, but the government can

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:34.179
<v Speaker 3>only collect by doing half as much waste identification. Because

0:27:34.540 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 3>the less legitimate critique I agree with, most people agree with,

0:27:37.460 --> 0:27:40.260
<v Speaker 3>is you can't have people becoming 100 times wealthier when

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 3>they're already billionaires and everyone else is becoming 5% wealthier, okay?

0:27:44.430 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's legitimate. The legitimate critique of the people who

0:27:49.260 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 3>are economically literate is, yes, but this isn't really going

0:27:53.500 --> 0:27:56.660
<v Speaker 3>to help people. Half of it is being wasted. So

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 3>the way I would propose it is, great, you have

0:27:59.140 --> 0:28:01.209
<v Speaker 3>to tackle both. And it's the same thing as you

0:28:01.250 --> 0:28:04.830
<v Speaker 3>have to protect civil liberties and fight terrorists. The other

0:28:04.850 --> 0:28:07.209
<v Speaker 3>problem with the wealth tax, by the way, that for

0:28:07.250 --> 0:28:11.210
<v Speaker 3>some reason people haven't talked about is to enforce a

0:28:11.250 --> 0:28:14.880
<v Speaker 3>wealth tax, you're going to need surveillance. Because I'm going

0:28:14.900 --> 0:28:17.260
<v Speaker 3>to need to know that, you know, what is the

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 3>bench in your house in New Orleans worth?

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave aside the practicalities, which seem very impractical at

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>assessing each person's wealth and taxing it.

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, let me just on this one point push back.

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 3>They're not impractical with AI. It's exactly the point you

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 3>were making. They're not impractical with AI. AI could impute

0:28:36.260 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 3>every single thing you own, especially with all the data

0:28:39.100 --> 0:28:40.700
<v Speaker 3>about it. It can impute the things.

0:28:40.570 --> 0:28:42.550
<v Speaker 1>You can buy. Well, then what's wrong with then taxing

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:43.290
<v Speaker 1>people's wealth?

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.470
<v Speaker 3>Because it does not, A, doesn't help the poor. It

0:28:47.530 --> 0:28:50.970
<v Speaker 3>breaks consensus in the society. It breaks the tech culture

0:28:51.030 --> 0:28:53.270
<v Speaker 3>because people are illiquid. So all those have been talked about.

0:28:53.750 --> 0:28:58.180
<v Speaker 3>And the logical consequence of it is surveillance into your

0:28:58.220 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 3>personal life.

0:28:59.020 --> 0:29:01.100
<v Speaker 1>So give me a good palantir way to say we

0:29:01.140 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have too much economic disparity. We want to have more

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>common ground in our society. How do you do it?

0:29:07.300 --> 0:29:10.230
<v Speaker 1>besides maybe more government efficiency being the trade-off?

0:29:10.250 --> 0:29:13.630
<v Speaker 3>You basically do a trade-off where taxation goes up. I

0:29:13.650 --> 0:29:15.770
<v Speaker 3>gave you my version, but any other version besides a

0:29:15.790 --> 0:29:19.230
<v Speaker 3>wealth tax, it goes up under the condition that for

0:29:19.410 --> 0:29:22.970
<v Speaker 3>every unit of tax you raise, a half of unit

0:29:22.990 --> 0:29:27.430
<v Speaker 3>of waste is identified. And that transfers a lot more

0:29:27.630 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 3>to the government because the problem, you're trying to solve

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 3>two problems. The inequity, which is a problem, and the inequity,

0:29:36.780 --> 0:29:38.770
<v Speaker 3>Which is also a problem which is how do you

0:29:38.810 --> 0:29:39.969
<v Speaker 3>make the life of a poor person?

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Better?

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.420
<v Speaker 3>They're not the same problem. So you have one problem,

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.930
<v Speaker 3>which is it's not fair for me to become 20,

0:29:45.930 --> 0:29:49.420
<v Speaker 3>50 times wealthier and for you to become 5% wealthier.

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 3>That's not fair.

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:51.260
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.780
<v Speaker 3>That's one problem. It's not at all correlated to the

0:29:54.940 --> 0:29:58.510
<v Speaker 3>other problem inherently, which is Neither you nor I are

0:29:58.550 --> 0:30:01.750
<v Speaker 3>a working class person in the city. That's a problem

0:30:01.770 --> 0:30:04.410
<v Speaker 3>that has to be solved too. And the interesting thing

0:30:04.490 --> 0:30:08.550
<v Speaker 3>about the proposals, mostly from the left here, but also

0:30:08.610 --> 0:30:11.050
<v Speaker 3>honestly from the far right, is it only cares about

0:30:11.070 --> 0:30:16.050
<v Speaker 3>problem one. When a proposal is only focused on one side,

0:30:16.270 --> 0:30:21.230
<v Speaker 3>whether it's civil liberties or anti-terror or surveillance and AI

0:30:21.310 --> 0:30:23.530
<v Speaker 3>without like the good and the bad, the problem is

0:30:23.630 --> 0:30:26.490
<v Speaker 3>it's always both. AI is both a force for good

0:30:26.650 --> 0:30:28.890
<v Speaker 3>and bad. The reason why we have to do it

0:30:28.900 --> 0:30:31.550
<v Speaker 3>is because we have adversaries and our adversaries are going

0:30:31.590 --> 0:30:35.410
<v Speaker 3>to do this. And if they own this technology, they

0:30:35.450 --> 0:30:37.790
<v Speaker 3>will change how the world works. That's not good for humanity.

0:30:37.850 --> 0:30:41.070
<v Speaker 3>It's not good for us. It's the same thing on surveillance.

0:30:41.610 --> 0:30:45.790
<v Speaker 3>It's like, does anti-surveillance mean we can't have a border?

0:30:46.030 --> 0:30:50.030
<v Speaker 3>Does anti-surveillance mean we can't stop trained, hardened terrorist networks?

0:30:50.350 --> 0:30:53.740
<v Speaker 3>Does it mean We can't identify spies who are stealing

0:30:53.780 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 3>our IP, who are trained adversaries who've gone to school

0:30:57.700 --> 0:30:59.340
<v Speaker 3>and are at the best spy service in the world.

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 3>They're stealing our stuff. Can we not stop them? Because

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:03.620
<v Speaker 3>I can tell you that isn't going to work without,

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.140
<v Speaker 3>you know, you're going to need technology and you're going

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 3>to need to know how to do this.

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.620
<v Speaker 3>And then you have the same thing with wealth. How

0:31:10.660 --> 0:31:13.130
<v Speaker 3>do you do this where you actually have a fair

0:31:13.190 --> 0:31:16.990
<v Speaker 3>society because wealthy people are not becoming a hundred times

0:31:17.050 --> 0:31:19.510
<v Speaker 3>wealthier where the Delta is so large. How do you

0:31:19.550 --> 0:31:22.110
<v Speaker 3>do it as an addendum, which is not talked about enough,

0:31:22.370 --> 0:31:24.890
<v Speaker 3>where you don't expand their surveillance state? And then how

0:31:24.930 --> 0:31:28.090
<v Speaker 3>do you do it last, but I think most importantly,

0:31:28.490 --> 0:31:31.230
<v Speaker 3>which somehow no one seems to care about, does a

0:31:31.270 --> 0:31:34.790
<v Speaker 3>taking wealth from the wealthy, does it actually end up

0:31:34.970 --> 0:31:37.950
<v Speaker 3>in any material way that helps the poor, which somehow

0:31:38.030 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 3>no one cares about? But again, these things are very

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 3>much linked. I'm in favor of people like me paying

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 3>a greater share under the condition that it doesn't destroy

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.479
<v Speaker 3>American tech, which a wealth tax would do, does not

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:58.020
<v Speaker 3>expand the surveillance state, which it absolutely would do. And

0:31:58.540 --> 0:32:03.420
<v Speaker 3>it lands in a way that helps working class and

0:32:04.490 --> 0:32:09.090
<v Speaker 3>upper middle class and below. If you pick one, you

0:32:09.170 --> 0:32:12.210
<v Speaker 3>just divide society. And the people who pay for that

0:32:12.250 --> 0:32:16.470
<v Speaker 3>division are the people who have no voice. And de facto,

0:32:16.490 --> 0:32:19.100
<v Speaker 3>you have no voice in the society if you're actually poor.

0:32:20.290 --> 0:32:23.330
<v Speaker 3>Because the people repping you are interested in killing the wealthy.

0:32:23.650 --> 0:32:25.730
<v Speaker 3>They're not interested in helping the poor, structurally.

0:32:26.490 --> 0:32:32.270
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk more about digital training on information surveillance. In

0:32:32.390 --> 0:32:35.970
<v Speaker 1>some ways, you've been talking very strongly about digital sovereignty now,

0:32:35.990 --> 0:32:39.490
<v Speaker 1>that the big LLM companies are not only sucking up

0:32:39.550 --> 0:32:43.020
<v Speaker 1>all our data and training, they're doing it without our permission.

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:46.020
<v Speaker 1>They're building on the back of us. Well, U.S.

0:32:46.060 --> 0:32:50.470
<v Speaker 3>Enterprises are livid, enraged, apoplectic companies. I don't know what the...

0:32:51.390 --> 0:32:54.230
<v Speaker 3>Because what they've discovered is they're paying a lot of

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.100
<v Speaker 3>money for a product that has not created a lot

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 3>of value.

0:32:58.240 --> 0:32:59.479
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about LLMs at the moment?

0:32:59.500 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, LLMs. And then, lo and behold, you find that

0:33:04.340 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 3>while you're paying them a lot of money, you're actually

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.100
<v Speaker 3>paying for them, training the model. How are they training

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.590
<v Speaker 3>the model? They train the model on your data, what's

0:33:11.700 --> 0:33:16.150
<v Speaker 3>data's most valuable data that's proprietary. De facto, this is

0:33:16.190 --> 0:33:19.150
<v Speaker 3>what happens if you use any of these products without essentially.

0:33:20.050 --> 0:33:23.110
<v Speaker 1>Sounds in some ways like the old McKinsey and Company's

0:33:23.170 --> 0:33:24.370
<v Speaker 1>management consultants.

0:33:24.830 --> 0:33:29.060
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but think times 5 million and then it actually

0:33:29.100 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 3>shows up and your business is theirs. And they're particularly

0:33:32.140 --> 0:33:39.630
<v Speaker 3>angry at Anthropic. It's funny. I feel like I spend 10%

0:33:39.630 --> 0:33:42.850
<v Speaker 3>of my day explaining to enterprises, Dario is not the

0:33:42.890 --> 0:33:47.150
<v Speaker 3>caricature that you think. He's not Lord Vader. And they ask, well,

0:33:47.190 --> 0:33:49.740
<v Speaker 3>if they're so ethical, how can they take my data

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 3>and turn it into a product that's competing against me

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:53.900
<v Speaker 3>while I'm paying for it?

0:33:53.900 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So how does Palantir fight against that?

0:33:56.380 --> 0:34:00.940
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, the secret of Palantir that is

0:34:01.030 --> 0:34:05.170
<v Speaker 3>most obvious and most hard to replicate is we actually

0:34:05.250 --> 0:34:08.870
<v Speaker 3>are aligned with the interests of our partners. So mostly,

0:34:08.950 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 3>we're educating. People are asking us, well, how do we

0:34:12.180 --> 0:34:14.739
<v Speaker 3>do this? What do the contracts look like? How do

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 3>we interact with closed models, open models? We're publishing document

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.660
<v Speaker 3>after document after document, not just for our clients and partners.

0:34:22.660 --> 0:34:29.810
<v Speaker 3>With our clients and partners, they use what's broadly called

0:34:29.850 --> 0:34:33.069
<v Speaker 3>an ontology now, a concept that we developed that was

0:34:33.130 --> 0:34:35.529
<v Speaker 3>also derided that now everybody talks about. But you can

0:34:35.550 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 3>think of an ontology as a contextual framework where that

0:34:42.219 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 3>contextual framework is de facto what you're doing. You're taking

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 3>random things I'm saying and putting them into a frame

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.340
<v Speaker 3>where somebody would find this interesting and intelligible. So basically

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:56.090
<v Speaker 3>the ontology is both a alpha creator, meaning it takes

0:34:56.110 --> 0:34:58.930
<v Speaker 3>these raw products and makes them valuable, and then a

0:34:58.969 --> 0:35:03.230
<v Speaker 3>protective layer, which means you can interact with it without

0:35:03.370 --> 0:35:07.529
<v Speaker 3>being burned. But the larger point of the sovereignty thing

0:35:07.610 --> 0:35:14.390
<v Speaker 3>is we believe in sovereign institutions and sovereign individuals, then

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.850
<v Speaker 3>how do you apply that? Well, you know, that's complicated,

0:35:17.930 --> 0:35:20.969
<v Speaker 3>but in the end, you know, whether it's vis-a-vis consumer

0:35:21.030 --> 0:35:24.049
<v Speaker 3>or vis-a-vis government, it should still end up being, there's

0:35:24.330 --> 0:35:27.529
<v Speaker 3>an imputed version of a First Amendment and a Fourth

0:35:27.590 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Amendment in your life. And then there's a national version,

0:35:30.739 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 3>like in the stuff we're doing at the Department of War,

0:35:34.620 --> 0:35:38.339
<v Speaker 3>which is very powerful, or the stuff that's being used

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.469
<v Speaker 3>in Ukraine or in Israel, They have ways of doing

0:35:41.510 --> 0:35:43.930
<v Speaker 3>things and data sets and ways of understanding the data

0:35:43.969 --> 0:35:46.110
<v Speaker 3>and ways of implementing it on the battlefield that no

0:35:46.170 --> 0:35:47.670
<v Speaker 3>one else should understand.

0:35:48.410 --> 0:35:51.510
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, by the way, that more American companies

0:35:51.550 --> 0:35:57.630
<v Speaker 1>should be willing to enlist in our military and national ambitions?

0:35:58.350 --> 0:36:00.969
<v Speaker 1>And what do you think of when Anthropic or even

0:36:01.030 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Google or people say, no, no, no, we don't want

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of this?

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:09.209
<v Speaker 3>The Silicon Valley is a wondrous, unique country. The world

0:36:09.270 --> 0:36:13.529
<v Speaker 3>is jealous of place for good reason. It is a

0:36:14.590 --> 0:36:21.090
<v Speaker 3>highly insulated island. The only institution that a super majority

0:36:21.110 --> 0:36:24.870
<v Speaker 3>of Americans think is indisputably noble in this country is

0:36:24.890 --> 0:36:25.610
<v Speaker 3>the U.S. military.

0:36:25.810 --> 0:36:27.830
<v Speaker 1>And the valley was born out.

0:36:27.550 --> 0:36:27.770
<v Speaker 2>Of the U.S.

0:36:27.770 --> 0:36:28.210
<v Speaker 1>Military.

0:36:28.250 --> 0:36:30.870
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's a hypocrisy. It would not even exist without

0:36:30.890 --> 0:36:33.770
<v Speaker 3>the U.S. military. Thank you for reminding everyone of this.

0:36:34.489 --> 0:36:39.710
<v Speaker 3>The valley was built as a hybrid. Basically, university, government, capital.

0:36:39.810 --> 0:36:41.370
<v Speaker 1>A Vannevar Bush model. Yeah.

0:36:41.510 --> 0:36:47.780
<v Speaker 3>It was mostly Stanford, the government, various departments, and people

0:36:47.860 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 3>who came up with the venture model.

0:36:49.860 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And so what happened?

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:53.540
<v Speaker 3>Well, a lot happened and we made a lot of

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:58.259
<v Speaker 3>mistakes where I do think the government lost its coolness.

0:36:58.969 --> 0:37:04.110
<v Speaker 3>I think Elon, I believe Palantir and others, Palantir graduates

0:37:04.650 --> 0:37:08.330
<v Speaker 3>have helped bring that back. in the context of defense,

0:37:08.630 --> 0:37:12.990
<v Speaker 3>defense tech, defense tech adjacent. But I think a wave

0:37:13.210 --> 0:37:17.790
<v Speaker 3>entered this country that's unfortunate, where one of the ways

0:37:17.830 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 3>you can signal to your community you're smart is by

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 3>being craven, meaning you make other people feel smart while

0:37:26.820 --> 0:37:30.930
<v Speaker 3>you transfer their IP to you. And That model has

0:37:30.950 --> 0:37:33.950
<v Speaker 3>been very, very successful and the unit economics of it

0:37:34.110 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 3>are very good, like unusually good. If you're a venture

0:37:38.060 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 3>capitalist or you're involved in this, you can make a hundred,

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:44.739
<v Speaker 3>a thousand times your money. And by the way, that

0:37:44.860 --> 0:37:47.980
<v Speaker 3>leads also to things that are legitimately good. If there

0:37:48.020 --> 0:37:50.890
<v Speaker 3>was not so much wealth creation in the Valley, the

0:37:51.030 --> 0:37:55.430
<v Speaker 3>bastard misfits, Palantir being the best example of this, would

0:37:55.489 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 3>never be able to raise money. We raise money on

0:37:57.640 --> 0:37:59.469
<v Speaker 3>the back of the fact that everyone's getting wealthy, but

0:37:59.489 --> 0:38:00.790
<v Speaker 3>we are the last people to get the money.

0:38:01.370 --> 0:38:05.630
<v Speaker 1>Go back to this notion of technology engineering being in

0:38:05.790 --> 0:38:06.990
<v Speaker 1>service of a greater.

0:38:07.030 --> 0:38:14.810
<v Speaker 3>But by breaking the explicit or definitely tacit covenant between

0:38:14.910 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 3>wealth creation and creation of value, you break other tacit

0:38:20.300 --> 0:38:23.740
<v Speaker 3>covenants in the society, meaning you get to get wealthy

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 3>and we'll leave you alone. With your vast wealth because

0:38:27.820 --> 0:38:30.219
<v Speaker 3>you're also creating value in the society. And if you

0:38:30.260 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 3>break that, you end up with a fracturing of the society.

0:38:32.540 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So show me how we broke it. In other words,

0:38:34.260 --> 0:38:37.739
<v Speaker 1>was the wealth creation done on frivolous, dumb things that

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't add a lot of value?

0:38:39.489 --> 0:38:41.469
<v Speaker 3>I think these things do create value. But if you're

0:38:41.510 --> 0:38:46.650
<v Speaker 3>the average, say you're sitting in Louisiana and you're a carpenter,

0:38:49.110 --> 0:38:53.230
<v Speaker 3>do you feel like your life is better, materially better

0:38:53.290 --> 0:38:55.110
<v Speaker 3>than it was 30 years ago? I don't think so.

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:59.299
<v Speaker 3>And so I think right or wrong, I think the

0:38:59.340 --> 0:39:02.860
<v Speaker 3>perception is more right than wrong. Your perception is a

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.140
<v Speaker 3>small group of people have gotten 100, 200 times wealthier

0:39:06.820 --> 0:39:08.259
<v Speaker 3>and your life hasn't changed that much.

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's based on consumerism and ads.

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Consumerism, ads. But in the end of the day, these

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:20.830
<v Speaker 3>things become micro subcultures and they're very divisionary where everyone

0:39:20.870 --> 0:39:23.950
<v Speaker 3>in that microculture is in the culture because they are

0:39:23.989 --> 0:39:27.250
<v Speaker 3>the same. But the differences that keep you, get you

0:39:27.310 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 3>kicked out of the culture, get smaller and smaller and smaller. Witness,

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 3>many Democrats refused to accept me as a Democrat because

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:35.900
<v Speaker 3>I thought they were part of the party that was

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 3>going nuts. But we're struggling to find commonalities. Okay, so

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:45.710
<v Speaker 3>that's the backdrop. Then AI comes, you're taking already a

0:39:45.930 --> 0:39:49.609
<v Speaker 3>fire that's burning and you're dumping gasoline on every part

0:39:49.650 --> 0:39:52.580
<v Speaker 3>of it. because the people who are running these labs

0:39:53.540 --> 0:39:57.339
<v Speaker 3>are saying, your life is gonna suck. Okay, so it's not,

0:39:57.900 --> 0:40:00.460
<v Speaker 3>by the way, the people doing most damage here, in

0:40:00.500 --> 0:40:04.190
<v Speaker 3>a normal political movement, you'd have the people doing the

0:40:04.230 --> 0:40:06.630
<v Speaker 3>movement saying, hey, this is gonna be good. No, you

0:40:06.650 --> 0:40:08.710
<v Speaker 3>have the people in the movement like, your house is

0:40:08.730 --> 0:40:13.049
<v Speaker 3>gonna suck. You're gonna have no job. And when you

0:40:13.090 --> 0:40:15.689
<v Speaker 3>have no job, you can rely on me To give

0:40:15.750 --> 0:40:17.739
<v Speaker 3>you money, oh, but by the way, I'm going to

0:40:17.780 --> 0:40:18.220
<v Speaker 3>be worth it.

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:21.180
<v Speaker 1>Well, it seems we've lost actually two things. One, your

0:40:21.219 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>life will be much better, that we're not just creating

0:40:23.620 --> 0:40:27.700
<v Speaker 1>some consumerism, ad-driven stuff. And secondly, a national ambition, a

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>national greatness. Both those things seem to have been lost.

0:40:30.300 --> 0:40:33.549
<v Speaker 3>And they're very linked because if you have a national ambition,

0:40:34.050 --> 0:40:36.370
<v Speaker 3>you have to talk about things that will actually make

0:40:36.410 --> 0:40:40.310
<v Speaker 3>your life better today, tomorrow. Not about the way how

0:40:40.350 --> 0:40:42.390
<v Speaker 3>bad your life is going to be, building a dream

0:40:42.430 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 3>that you don't belong to. And by the way, they're

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 3>linked because part of the reason the Valley goes so

0:40:47.580 --> 0:40:49.940
<v Speaker 3>wrong on these things is they're not talking to anyone

0:40:49.980 --> 0:40:52.930
<v Speaker 3>in America and they don't care. There's like it's an island.

0:40:53.210 --> 0:40:54.330
<v Speaker 3>On that island, you're cool.

0:40:57.690 --> 0:41:18.739
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back after this quick break. talk about

0:41:18.780 --> 0:41:22.299
<v Speaker 1>the anti-government sentiment, especially coming out of the 60s and

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:27.290
<v Speaker 1>70s in Silicon Valley, but there's a strong anti-government sentiment

0:41:27.469 --> 0:41:30.230
<v Speaker 1>on the right now. Where's that come from and is

0:41:30.270 --> 0:41:30.910
<v Speaker 1>that dangerous?

0:41:31.730 --> 0:41:34.469
<v Speaker 3>Well, again, you know, I, we at Palantir are always

0:41:34.530 --> 0:41:37.489
<v Speaker 3>interested in what is the legitimate version of maybe a

0:41:37.530 --> 0:41:41.910
<v Speaker 3>retrograde argument. So let me start with If you have

0:41:41.950 --> 0:41:44.690
<v Speaker 3>a rise of a powerful technology that could be used

0:41:44.770 --> 0:41:48.270
<v Speaker 3>to abuse you, used to undermine the imputed rights that

0:41:48.330 --> 0:41:53.969
<v Speaker 3>you actually have under our Constitution, directly or indirectly, and

0:41:54.010 --> 0:41:58.009
<v Speaker 3>you've seen mismanagement of issues, call it COVID, which I

0:41:58.070 --> 0:42:00.529
<v Speaker 3>think most people would say in some form or another

0:42:00.610 --> 0:42:09.439
<v Speaker 3>was mismanaged, and you have no national purpose measurement, maybe

0:42:09.460 --> 0:42:12.620
<v Speaker 3>the the lowest I've ever seen. So you have high

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:17.180
<v Speaker 3>mistrust in government. You have low national purpose. You feel

0:42:17.219 --> 0:42:19.720
<v Speaker 3>like people who claim to believe in things are just liars.

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:24.580
<v Speaker 3>And you have the people who are doing the best

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 3>seem to be not so tethered to you. You'd be

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:31.230
<v Speaker 3>a little bit weird if you didn't have skepticism of

0:42:31.270 --> 0:42:36.350
<v Speaker 3>the government. Now, where I think it's very nonproductive, again,

0:42:36.370 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 3>on the right and on the left, but I Again,

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:41.940
<v Speaker 3>just for clarity, I think the right you're referring to

0:42:42.060 --> 0:42:45.259
<v Speaker 3>and the left I'm referring to are not actually right.

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:47.989
<v Speaker 3>So I think that right is actually left and the

0:42:48.030 --> 0:42:50.650
<v Speaker 3>left is actually right. And that's one of the reasons

0:42:50.670 --> 0:42:55.650
<v Speaker 3>like fascist movements tend to do this. It's somehow very charismatic.

0:42:55.950 --> 0:42:57.170
<v Speaker 1>Did you learn that in Germany?

0:42:58.310 --> 0:43:02.690
<v Speaker 3>Well, I spent a lot of time with Nazis, ex-Nazis,

0:43:03.290 --> 0:43:06.130
<v Speaker 3>when I was in Germany because I wanted to understand

0:43:06.170 --> 0:43:07.950
<v Speaker 3>like real ex-Nazis. You had to go to the countryside

0:43:07.969 --> 0:43:10.370
<v Speaker 3>to meet them. Because in the city, there were no ex-Nazis.

0:43:10.450 --> 0:43:13.020
<v Speaker 3>Everybody was like, we hated Hitler. Just in the country,

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 3>people were honest about it. And most of the people who,

0:43:17.739 --> 0:43:22.100
<v Speaker 3>I actually think that the anti-Semitism was a motivation, but

0:43:22.140 --> 0:43:25.049
<v Speaker 3>I'm honestly, for the record, I think a lot of

0:43:25.070 --> 0:43:29.270
<v Speaker 3>the motivation was that's not our battle than overt anti-Semitism.

0:43:29.290 --> 0:43:33.009
<v Speaker 3>It was the charisma of Hitler to them and the

0:43:33.050 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 3>national abuse of a national mandate, which is justified. and

0:43:36.980 --> 0:43:40.100
<v Speaker 3>abuse of patriotism, which is necessary to humans. And you

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 3>see this, why is the regressionary left and the regressionary

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:48.540
<v Speaker 3>right very different movements? Why are they so charismatic to

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 3>their peers? It's because if you go to the right,

0:43:53.170 --> 0:43:57.190
<v Speaker 3>which has been indoctrinated with a capitalism is always good,

0:43:57.410 --> 0:44:02.149
<v Speaker 3>which is a simplistic thing, the correct narrative is it's

0:44:02.770 --> 0:44:05.690
<v Speaker 3>better than the alternatives. That's very different than it solves

0:44:05.730 --> 0:44:13.210
<v Speaker 3>all problems. And the classic right of center institutions sell

0:44:13.270 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 3>capitalism as it solves all problems, when in fact that's

0:44:17.940 --> 0:44:21.660
<v Speaker 3>obviously wrong. It solves problems that other systems don't solve

0:44:21.700 --> 0:44:23.980
<v Speaker 3>in a way they don't solve them and therefore is better,

0:44:24.060 --> 0:44:25.980
<v Speaker 3>but it has negative externalities.

0:44:26.100 --> 0:44:26.500
<v Speaker 1>Such as?

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:38.300
<v Speaker 3>Egregious wealth dislocations. that then obviously impinge on political power

0:44:38.820 --> 0:44:44.219
<v Speaker 3>and a dislocation of societies and narrative because you're not

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:46.219
<v Speaker 3>living in the same world if you have a billion

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:49.469
<v Speaker 3>dollars or if you have $ 100 in your account. Capitalism

0:44:49.510 --> 0:44:55.129
<v Speaker 3>inherently assigns a dollar value to human life, and that

0:44:55.310 --> 0:44:59.450
<v Speaker 3>dollar value is a derivative of your net worth. If

0:44:59.510 --> 0:45:02.350
<v Speaker 3>you get hit by a car and you go to court,

0:45:03.090 --> 0:45:06.469
<v Speaker 3>The driver hits you, will pay a different sum, presumably,

0:45:06.510 --> 0:45:09.290
<v Speaker 3>depending on whether it's you or a working class person,

0:45:09.350 --> 0:45:12.029
<v Speaker 3>unemployed or me. So it inherently does that.

0:45:12.710 --> 0:45:15.549
<v Speaker 1>Let me end then with a question on what you

0:45:15.590 --> 0:45:17.700
<v Speaker 1>just talked about, which is what does it mean to

0:45:17.739 --> 0:45:20.259
<v Speaker 1>be human? And you look at, you know, I'll go

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to Creech Air Force Base where they now have drones

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and you've worked with that quite a bit where humans

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:28.900
<v Speaker 1>are almost not in the loop anymore. That to me

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 1>seems a bit of a metaphor of what we're facing

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:35.730
<v Speaker 1>with this new technology, is to what extent do humans

0:45:36.110 --> 0:45:38.150
<v Speaker 1>not only have to be in the loop on things

0:45:38.210 --> 0:45:44.210
<v Speaker 1>like systems, but to what extent when there's intelligence and

0:45:44.250 --> 0:45:47.810
<v Speaker 1>maybe even consciousness in machines, what is the role of humans?

0:45:47.870 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, what is special about humans when our core capacity

0:45:54.680 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 3>and our claim to superiority has been our cognitive intelligence. Yeah,

0:46:01.180 --> 0:46:04.859
<v Speaker 3>but what happens when we birth a species where that's

0:46:04.900 --> 0:46:08.730
<v Speaker 3>no longer true. And this is where I, again, think

0:46:08.810 --> 0:46:13.310
<v Speaker 3>the founding fathers of our country were something beyond genius

0:46:13.410 --> 0:46:17.549
<v Speaker 3>level wisdom people, because you have a different setup in

0:46:17.770 --> 0:46:23.940
<v Speaker 3>Europe where the constitution is birthed by parliamentarians. Our rights,

0:46:24.540 --> 0:46:28.060
<v Speaker 3>according to our constitution in this country, are given to

0:46:28.140 --> 0:46:32.980
<v Speaker 3>us because of a granting and presupposition of a higher figure.

0:46:33.000 --> 0:46:36.620
<v Speaker 3>That means there is something in the human spirit as

0:46:37.469 --> 0:46:41.350
<v Speaker 3>protected under law and internalized by Americans, a reason why

0:46:41.410 --> 0:46:45.530
<v Speaker 3>I'm very skeptical of bringing open migration because it's very special,

0:46:46.270 --> 0:46:49.509
<v Speaker 3>where we believe deep in our hearts because of what

0:46:49.550 --> 0:46:52.110
<v Speaker 3>we were given in this country, that there is something

0:46:52.230 --> 0:46:56.240
<v Speaker 3>in us above and beyond just our ability to speak

0:46:56.500 --> 0:46:59.990
<v Speaker 3>and our cognitive abilities, which at some point will be surpassed,

0:47:00.430 --> 0:47:04.890
<v Speaker 3>which is called human, which is artistic, individual, particular, special,

0:47:05.430 --> 0:47:10.190
<v Speaker 3>and more valuable and needs to be protected. And that setup,

0:47:10.230 --> 0:47:12.770
<v Speaker 3>for lack of a better word, is unique to this country.

0:47:13.489 --> 0:47:15.720
<v Speaker 3>And we should make sure we fight to keep it.

0:47:17.130 --> 0:47:18.629
<v Speaker 1>Alex Karp, thank you so much.

0:47:18.969 --> 0:47:19.310
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:47:19.330 --> 0:47:28.380
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Alex Karp is hard to pin down. In

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:32.100
<v Speaker 1>some ways, he's cast with the other tech bros that

0:47:32.420 --> 0:47:36.339
<v Speaker 1>are on the right or libertarian, but he's not that way.

0:47:36.860 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>In many ways, his philosophy and his politics are unpredictable,

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but he has a strong sense that when we build

0:47:46.180 --> 0:47:49.460
<v Speaker 1>new machinery and new technology, it's got to be in

0:47:49.580 --> 0:47:53.009
<v Speaker 1>service of our republic, in service of our nation, in

0:47:53.070 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 1>service of our democracy. And that's something that hadn't really

0:47:57.580 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 1>been part of the ethos of Silicon Valley for the

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:04.820
<v Speaker 1>past 50 years. It's clear to me that Alex Karp

0:48:04.910 --> 0:48:08.069
<v Speaker 1>is different. And I think he's being sincere. But what

0:48:08.130 --> 0:48:11.810
<v Speaker 1>I keep coming back to is the trade-off that people

0:48:11.850 --> 0:48:16.489
<v Speaker 1>like Karp force on us. He's intellectually honest about surveillance,

0:48:16.550 --> 0:48:20.620
<v Speaker 1>about Palantir, about the government using these tools. But the

0:48:20.660 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm left wondering is whether a man this rational

0:48:24.350 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 1>This comfortable-with-trade-offs the rest of us might flinch at fully

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:34.419
<v Speaker 1>appreciates the fears people have about the surveillance state. That's

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:38.380
<v Speaker 1>it for today's episode. I'm Walter Isaacson. I'll see you

0:48:38.420 --> 0:48:39.940
<v Speaker 1>next time on The Builders.

0:48:42.300 --> 0:48:45.500
<v Speaker 5>The Builders is a Kaleidoscope and iHeart production. This series

0:48:45.580 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 5>is hosted by Walter Isaacson. It's executive produced for Kaleidoscope

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:53.700
<v Speaker 5>by Oswald Lishen, David Weisbord, and Mangesh Hetikadur. Sheena Ozaki

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:57.860
<v Speaker 5>is the producer. Julia Nutter is supervising producer. Eva Zorich

0:48:57.900 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 5>is our consulting producer. Fact-checking by Eamon Whalen. Research by

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:06.420
<v Speaker 5>Gloria Thiel. Maria Paz Mendez-Hodes is head of video. Marketing

0:49:06.500 --> 0:49:10.590
<v Speaker 5>by Christy Mirabal and Elle Liu. Production support by Dara

0:49:10.630 --> 0:49:15.070
<v Speaker 5>Look Potts. Music for the series was created by Spencer Stevenson, a.k.a.

0:49:15.110 --> 0:49:16.089
<v Speaker 3>Botany, and it was.

0:49:16.070 --> 0:49:19.450
<v Speaker 5>Mixed by Steve Bone. From iHeart, the series is EP'd

0:49:19.530 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 5>by Alistair. Perry and Katrina Norvell. Special thanks to Bob Pittman,

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Conal Byrne, Will Pearson, John Sykes, Nikki Etorre, Carrie Lieberman,

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:33.739
<v Speaker 5>Binky Urban, Julia Prosser, Jeremy Blum, Alison Goldberger, WYES, and

0:49:33.910 --> 0:49:37.130
<v Speaker 5>ASL Studios. For more from Walter Isaacson, be sure to

0:49:37.150 --> 0:49:39.989
<v Speaker 5>check out his newest paperback, The Innovators, How a Group

0:49:40.010 --> 0:49:44.410
<v Speaker 5>of Hackers, Geniuses, and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution. It's

0:49:44.430 --> 0:49:47.320
<v Speaker 5>available wherever fine books are sold. And for more videos

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:50.270
<v Speaker 5>and podcasts from the Frontiers of Discovery, be sure to

0:49:50.310 --> 0:49:52.280
<v Speaker 5>check out kaleidoscope.nyc.