WEBVTT - CVS Ousts CEO, China Data, Netflix Earnings

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on afocarplaying and broyd Outo with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 2>One of the big stock stories of to day is CBS,

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 2>the healthcare company. CBS stocks down today. Management change is

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 2>never a good thing. We wanted to get to the

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 2>bottom of it because a lot of people don't really

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>know what CBS is. It's not CBS the television network.

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 2>It's c and Victor and s CBS. Jonathan Palmer, he

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 2>knows what's going on. He's a senior healthcare anles for

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence. Hey, Jonathan, thanks so much for joining us.

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I know you know this company. Well, can you tell

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 2>us what CBS is and why the stock is down today?

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>What's going on there?

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Paul, thanks for having me on. So you know,

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 3>most people think of CBS as their corner drug store,

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 3>but really it's a far bigger healthcare company in the

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 3>ecosystem than just that pharmacy that you see around your corner.

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 3>They own the benefits manager Etna, and they also own

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 3>what's called a large PBM, a pharmacy benefit manager called

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 3>care Mark. So really it's a vertically integrated enterprise that

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, most people knows their corner pharmacy, but actually

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 3>has a far bigger reach through the insurance side of

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 3>the business as well. So the stocks down today. They

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 3>pre announced earnings that missed. They announced the management change.

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 3>The CEO has left. They're calling it a resignation, but

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 3>this was really probably the last straw in her tenure,

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 3>and they promoted the head of care Mark, the benefits

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 3>manager and a longtime employee to become the new CEO.

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 4>Talk us through the build up to this management change

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 4>what was going on exactly.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So the story of CBS, or the narrative on

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 3>the stock, has been one of missed expectations. You know,

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>they've been trying to get back to the double digit

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 3>EPs growth and they've put that out in the in

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the outer years, and they keep pulling back on that guidance,

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, both reaching that milestone, but also every year

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 3>they've been kind of missing their EPs guidance, and so

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 3>they'd already revised guidance down last year they revised guidance

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 3>down with two Q earnings last quarter, and so really

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a question of execution. The CEO just

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 3>hasn't executed on the game plan that she has spoused,

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and so they've got little they can do to kind

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 3>of turn the story around other than making the management change.

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 2>Thirty seconds, Jonathan, do you think it can be done

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 2>and in what timeframe?

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 3>I do, you know, I think it's going to take

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of blocking and tackling. But the hard part

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 3>about this business is it's based on contracts, and contracts

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 3>are typically two to three years, and so it's going

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 3>to take it take some time to work through the

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 3>headwinds that they're facing and their benefits business on the

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 3>pharmacy side. But these can be overcome.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, Jonathan, thanks so much for joining us. Jonathan Palmer,

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 2>senior healthcare analyso Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us via zoom talking

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 2>about CBS Health the economics of the healthcare business. I

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 2>don't pretend to understand that. I think one of the

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 2>most complex businesses to analyze. So we're glad we have

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 2>a smart people like Jonathan Parker.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 5>The cupons are good.

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 4>The coupons are good. Coupons we get some really good

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 4>coupons for CBS through our CBS care Mark.

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but in New York City, in New York City Weekly, exactly,

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 2>you believe it, exactly. There you go, stock off eight

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 2>and a half percent today. So again, maybe this is

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a kitchen sink moment for the company,

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 2>and Jonathan Palmer suggested there is a path towards improved

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 2>profitability there, So we'll see how they do their.

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>China it's front center, not just for folks that invest

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>in China or in emerging markets, but it's one could

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>argue as the second largest economy in world. Everybody has

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 2>to have a view on China. Our next guest, does

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Urar DiPippo, Senior geoeconomics analyst for Bloomberg Economics, joins us Geron.

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess the question a lot of people have as

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 2>it releas to China is are their fiscal and monetary

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 2>moves to support this economy? Are they enough? What do

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 2>you think at this stage?

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 6>So they've already announced monetary policies a few weeks ago,

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 6>those by their centers are fairly aggressive. The big question

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 6>is how big will the fiscal policies be. They the

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 6>Ministry of Finance had a press conference on Saturday where

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 6>reporters asked many questions, but they didn't provide any actual number.

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 6>The reason for that is that in China, they actually

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 6>need the legislator to approve any change in fiscal policy

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 6>like government borrowing. They won't be meeting until probably late October,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 6>possibly early November, so we don't actually know, but I

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 6>think that the general consensus is that there was sort

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 6>of this initial euphoria in late September, which explains the

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 6>massive stock market rally, that they were going to do

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 6>this big bang stimulus. They kind of are on the

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 6>monetary side, but it's not exactly clear yet whether they're

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 6>going to do it on the fiscal side. But what

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 6>sort of qualitatively what they're saying suggests that the early

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 6>hopes of doing sort of a big consumer oriented fiscal

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 6>stimulus that's likely not going to happen, but we're still

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 6>waiting for the top line number.

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 4>So what does this all mean for investors who are

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 4>interested in equities in China?

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 6>So I mean it was a good day for equities

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 6>in China. The two big things that happened today were

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 6>they put out their Q three data, which is generally

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 6>above consensus, and how well it did, including for GDP.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 6>The other thing that might have helped for the stock

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 6>market was that the PBAC reiterated that it has these

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 6>these swap facilities, including to help companies buy back shares,

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 6>which then puts up the stock market. In general. The

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 6>stock market has done well over the last few weeks,

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 6>but over the past year not so much. The Chinese

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 6>stock market has sort of a feast or famine tendency

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 6>when it comes to sort of boom and bus. This

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.559
<v Speaker 6>has happened over the past decade or so. It often

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 6>sort of appears to underperform. Then there's a lot of euphoria,

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 6>and then a lot of that is often based on

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 6>what the government is doing. So I think what everyone

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 6>is waiting for now is again, what is the actual

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 6>top line number for fiscal fiscal stimulus, Because if it

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 6>comes in below expectations. The rally, which has already given

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 6>up some of its gains, could give up even more.

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 6>But if it's actually at that level three trillion R

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 6>and B, maybe more than you could see some upside.

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Gerard, I see that the China GDP numbers recently

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 2>came out at rows four point six percent from last year.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>That's the slowest pace in six quarters. Is there still

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 2>room to go in terms of decelerating booth or economists

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 2>out there are they saying, hey, maybe we're atur near

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the bottom.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 6>So at Bloomerg Economics, we think they're probably at the

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 6>bottom in terms of top line GDP growth, And in

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 6>general the data was fairly good, so industrial production, retail sales,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 6>fixed ass and investment were all just slightly above the consensus.

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 6>But the sort of broader bad news is that those

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 6>things are still generally below the sequential trend. So consumption,

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 6>particularly retail sales, is still well below its pre pandemic trend.

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 6>And the bottom line is that even though the sort

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 6>of top line number might have bottomed out, the economy

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 6>needs more stimulus and that's what everyone's waiting for. And

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 6>the big thing in particular, it's really two that are

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 6>related one is the property sector with the government that

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 6>intends to stabilize probably through stabilizing the purchases, not investment

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 6>or prices per se. And the other thing that's related

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 6>to that is consumption or consumer confidence, which is integral

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 6>linked to the property sector, which is where people have

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 6>their savings.

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 4>So what further risks are out there, especially as we

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 4>dig a bit deeper into the property market that they

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 4>did say has still yet to stabilize.

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, so in the property sector, I mean, the main

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 6>thing is that one of them is that the property

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 6>developers are still in a tough spot. They are in

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 6>the process of recapitalizing banks in parts of the banks

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 6>can lend to the property developers and help stabilize that,

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 6>but ultimately you have to get sales back, you have

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 6>to basically get the confidence back in. And what's tricky

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 6>for the Chinese government is they actually wanted to deflate

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 6>the property center. It was a property bubble. They have

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 6>deflated it. It needed to happen, But then what they

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 6>don't want to do is reinflate it to restabilize the economy.

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 6>So they're walking a sort of a tightrope at the moment.

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>With that, what are the next data points that we

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 2>need to be looking for for China here.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 6>I mean we would be the high frequency indicators like

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 6>PMIS or in general things like retail sales. The thing

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 6>that the event to look forward to would be the

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 6>National People's Congress meeting that will be happening probably in

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 6>a few weeks, and that is when they'll announce the

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 6>big stimulus or whatever the number is.

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>That'll be interesting to see because a lot of folks

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of I think investments are weighing in

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 2>large part on what the Chinese government will do. We here, Gerard,

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining us. Gerard to Pippo, senior

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 2>geoeconomics fist for Bloomberg Economics, giving us the latest on

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>the monetary fiscal stimulus in China. Again, the GDP last

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 2>period rows four point six percent from last year, but

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 2>that was the slowest pace in six years.

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on focarplaying and broud Otto

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Our good friends over at Netflix and FLX is the

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 2>ticker symbol. They reported numbers last night, beat the streets,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 2>some good guidance, some good discussion around kind of the

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 2>growth out look. The stock's up ten percent today fifty

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 2>two week hig. I'm guessing that's probably close to on

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>an all time high three hundred and twenty five billion

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 2>dollar market cap. I don't know what's going on there,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Keith rag and Othin does because she's the analyst of

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence who follows Netflix. Boy, what happened last night?

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 2>What did Netflix report? Ethan?

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Netflix had an actually very very high quality earnings

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 7>report last night, Paul. So they were up on subscriber metrics.

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 7>They came in ahead of consensus. But I think really

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 7>what excited the street was they were ahead in terms

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 7>of guidance both for the fourth quarter revenue guidance as

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 7>well as operating margin guidance, and their outlook for twenty

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 7>twenty five was slightly ahead of consensus. And mind you,

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 7>it was slightly ahead of consensus just based on subscriber growth.

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 7>So the two big growth levers that you know, everybody

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 7>was expecting they would pull. One was, of course, the

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 7>ad business that doesn't look like it's going to be

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 7>a huge contributor in twenty twenty five looks more like

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 7>a twenty twenty six event. And then, of course the thing,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 7>the event that we were all waiting for, which was

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 7>you know, a price increase on their standard plan in

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 7>the US, and they didn't announce that. And so the

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 7>fact that they're able to guide to double digit, solid

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 7>double digit revenue growth without pulling any of those growth

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 7>levers just tells us that there's a lot more Jews

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 7>left in this business, even with you know, just playing subscriber.

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Growth, right, good news coming out of this report. Where

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 4>are some areas that they could have done better? Is

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 4>there any areas that people are critiquing?

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 7>I think the areas that people are critiquing is really

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 7>just the lack of disclosure around advertising. And one can

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 7>understand why they are holding their cards close to their chest.

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 7>So this is still a very small business. They have

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 7>not disclosed the number of subscribers that they have on

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 7>the ad tear and that's you know, color that investors

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 7>and the whole investment community has kind of been looking

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 7>for for a long time. But they did give us

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 7>some qualitative kind of guidelines, right, They said that, yes,

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 7>we are growing pretty fast, but it's off a small base.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 7>Don't expect the advertising business to be a huge growth

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 7>driver in twenty twenty five, but I think come twenty

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 7>twenty six, that completely changes.

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Where we on programming budgets Keith, because I think one

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 2>of the things that you and you and I worked together,

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 2>we were just shocked at the early days of Netflix

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and the types of money they were willing to spend,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 2>the billions of dollars they're willing to spend on their

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 2>programming budget, and that forced everybody else to kind of

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 2>keep pace. Where are they with their spending their spending strategy.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 2>Do they have to keep spending to get subscribers?

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 7>I think they do, but they're doing it in a

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 7>much more intelligent, much more efficient way. And the ROI

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 7>on the content spend has absolutely, you know, increased so

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 7>so much, Paul, And that's just because you know, it's

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 7>been a function of just the operating leverage that they

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 7>have in the model, with the scale and the way

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 7>that they're able to spread those costs over you know,

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 7>a two hundred and eighty five million subscriber base. So

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, yes, there has been some content cost rationalization

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 7>across the board, including Netflix, They are still spending about

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 7>seventeen billion dollars this year on content, which makes them

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 7>one of the biggest spenders in the streaming space. They

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 7>are planning to increase their budget a little bit going forward,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 7>so I think closed about eighteen billion dollars in twenty

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 7>twenty five is what the general estimate is. But then again,

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 7>remember they are looking to build out an AD business,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 7>and for ads you do need to invest in different

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 7>kinds of programming, not really the entertainment programming. It probably

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 7>has to be more a live sports or a live

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 7>events type of strategy, and they I think are willing

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 7>to kind of splurge on that to really build up

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 7>and scale up that AD business.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 4>How's the debt looking on their balance sheet? I know

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 4>there are big spenders, especially as we think about all

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 4>the shows and the movies that they're rolling out. Are

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 4>they staying above water?

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 7>Oh, very very much so. They have about fourteen billion

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 7>dollars in debt, but remember they have over seven billion

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 7>dollars in cash on there on their balance sheet and

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 7>they're going to throw out, you know, six billion this year.

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 7>So absolutely in very very good shape.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 2>So the sixty four thousand dollars question geetha which I'm

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 2>sure you get asked by your institutional investor clients all

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the time, is how about everybody else? When you see

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 2>a Netflix quarter like this, you're like, boy, how's everybody

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 2>else can to compete against these guys in the streaming world?

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 2>What are you saying to them?

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so they definitely Netflix has definitely won the streaming wars.

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 7>They're going to keep it that way. You know, we

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 7>know that they have about ten percent of all viewing

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 7>time in the United States, so they obviously see much

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 7>more upside for themselves to kind of grow. And I

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 7>think that's exactly what's going to happen, you know, as

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 7>they have more and more plans, you know, cheaper plans

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 7>with of course the advertising based here, and of course

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 7>as they have more and more must have content. So

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 7>there's definitely the competitive intensity is absolutely easing, which allows

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 7>them to be a dominant player. But I think also

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 7>Netflix is really showing the other players how it's done.

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 7>So one of the big points that came out yesterday

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 7>from their earnings report was the fact that they've increased margins.

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 7>Remember at the start of twenty twenty four they said

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 7>twenty two percent operating margin. Yesterday, they're saying twenty seven

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 7>percent operating margin for twenty twenty four. And remember, Paul,

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean you know this, well, the Bogie has always

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 7>been about thirty thirty five percent margins, and it looks

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 7>like they're going to be able to get there in

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 7>the next couple of years. So this is going to

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 7>be and probably even more profitable model than the traditional

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 7>TV model, which is great news.

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Well can am I I'm not seeing that or are

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 2>we going to see that with some of the other

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 2>traditional media companies which are still chasing profitability Because you

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 2>say it can be done, I'd go out there and

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 2>take a flyer on Warner Brothers, Discovery. I take a

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 2>flyer maybe even on Power Amount. If you're saying that

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 2>model can be profitable, yeah, it.

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 7>Can be profitable, but of course it depends on so

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 7>many other factors. I think Disney is definitely in the

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 7>strongest position to kind of replicate this success. The other

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 7>is not so much because again, you know, scale is

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 7>going to be a huge issue for them, Marketing costs

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 7>is going to be a huge issue for them. They

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 7>just don't have that cloud or the firepower that you know,

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 7>Netflix and Disney kind of have with their IP and

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 7>their franchises.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, after these results, it seems like a bit

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 4>of a positive start so far. When we're thinking about

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 4>those sort of former fameing names. What is the next

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 4>thing that investors are looking for? Has the company talked

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 4>anything about new projects that they're rolling out? What are

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 4>investors on the watch for?

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so the new projects right now? Rah. Of course,

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 7>the big thing that everybody has kind of got their

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 7>hat hanging on is the advertising business and how big

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 7>that can potentially be when it takes off in a

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 7>big way. They also, of course again are making this

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 7>big you know splash or this big foray into live events.

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 7>So you have you know, the NFL games that are

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 7>going to come up, you have that Jake Paul Versus

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 7>Mike Tyson event. The question is how many more of

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 7>those are they going to do and will those actually

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 7>be a big you know, needle mover for them, and

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 7>then of course you would have them kind of taken

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, these baby steps in the in the gaming

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 7>industry again not necessarily been a game changer so far,

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 7>but over time it certainly can be. So they have

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 7>these different ancillary revenue streams that can definitely build uh

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 7>and kind of increase their not only their catalog of content,

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 7>but also their competitive positioning as in strengthening their competitive positioning.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 8>I need I need some tips on how to get

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 8>around the sharing.

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Well that's the thing. I mean, getha, that's sharing thing.

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Please?

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 2>That's that that helps them out.

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 7>Right them out huge, big time, big time, one hundred

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 7>million subscribe versus the opportunity that they outlined there.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 2>So they've identified that. The Tucker offspring, I think is

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 2>the dead beats like me to get around I know,

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 2>all right, thanks so much. Keith wrong an oath and

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 2>she's a medias for Bloomberg Intelligence. And I'll notice what's.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 8>The Netflix nowadays?

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 2>Since I don't get it anymore? Oh you you were

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 2>cripping off one of your kids.

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 8>No, I'm not going to make yourself. It's called sharing,

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 8>right is carring?

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 2>Thank you? Sweeny shocked when this happened. Oh, I like

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 2>they were calling like all like, Dad, would you do

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>you cut us off?

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 5>Said?

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I didn't cut you off.

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 4>My dad was like, I don't even know how to

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 4>work this cut it off.

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 2>That's why we own the stock. It's one of the

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 2>many reasons for Dead beats like you were off the

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 2>doll So so that's important. And the advertising, is Keitha said,

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 2>is a you know, twenty five twenty six event that

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 2>investors can hold their hats on as they look for

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 2>growth to continue to support that multiple.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>There you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Android Outo with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>station Just Say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 2>SAMAS officials they have confirmed the dethical maas leader Yagat Sinwar,

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 2>who was said to be the architect behind October seventh

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 2>attack order. Today, President Joe Biden spoke on Sinewar's death,

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 2>seeing it as a quote moment of justice and quote

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 2>while also renewing the call for a cease fire dealist

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 2>take a listen.

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 9>The death of leader AMAS represents a moment of justice.

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 9>He had the blood of Americans and Israelis, Palestinians in Germany,

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 9>and so many others on his hands. I told the

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 9>Prime Minister Visil yesterday, let's also make this moment an

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 9>opportunity to seek a path to piece a better future

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 9>in Gaza without Amas.

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 2>All right, That was President Biden earlier today speaking about

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 2>the death of Sinwar's death, again calling it a moment

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 2>of justice. Let's break it down a little bit farther.

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 2>We talked geopolitics in the Middle East. Some smart voices

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 2>help us out there. Jonathan Schanzer, He's the senior vice

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 2>president for research. He's at the non partisan Foundation for

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Defense of Democracies think tank. Joins us from Washington, DC

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 2>via zoom. Jonathan, what do you make of this latest news?

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the Israeli seemed to be quite successful targeting

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 2>leaders of Hamas and Hesbola. What do you think their

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 2>strategy is right now?

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 10>Well, first, I think we need to acknowledge something that

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 10>yesterday's strike against Sinwar was dumb luck. The Israelis have

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 10>pulled off a lot of serious operations and places like

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 10>Lebanon and Iran. In Gaza, this was the result of

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 10>a couple of younger IDF soldiers simply happenstance falling upon

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 10>Sinhwar's position. After a brief altercation, they called in a

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 10>tank strike and ended up killing him. Really just a

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 10>remarkable turn of events. But what the Israelis have done,

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 10>you know, outside of this particular strike that killed Sinowar

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 10>is they have just been using their intelligence advantage. They've

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 10>been using their technology advantage to effectively evisceerate Hamas. They've

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 10>got his balla on the ropes. They're now preparing for

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 10>a strike against the Iranians. I think the expectation there

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 10>is they're going to take away some of Iran's capabilities.

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 10>This has been not the war that the Israelis wanted

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 10>to fight. It's been a war of attrition. It's been

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 10>fought in some cases on their turf that runs one

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 10>hundred and eighty degrees away from their doctrine, which is

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 10>fighting fast wars on other people's turf. But I do

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 10>you get the sense right now that through these precisions, strikes,

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 10>through the technology, through their comparative advantage, they're starting to

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 10>gain the upper hand against the Iranians and six or

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 10>seven in other proxies, which is truly a formidable axis

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 10>that they are fighting. But you do get a sense

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 10>that they're starting to make some headway.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 4>Jonathan, this war has been going on for over a year.

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 4>What chapter are we in? How much closer Are we

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 4>to a truce? What are people saying?

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Look, I think there's a possibility of possibly getting

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 10>to a truce with Hamas because they've just been eviscerated, right,

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I think they have to at some point

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 10>understand that fighting is just not worth it any longer,

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 10>not for the people of Gaza, not for the organization itself.

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 10>They're still holding one hundred and one hostages, including I

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 10>believe seven Americans right now. A deal can be cut

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 10>that would end the fighting in Gaza. But I think

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 10>we need to all be clear about something. This seven

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 10>front war that the Iranians are waging against Israel, that's

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 10>going to keep going, and we're seeing it now. His

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 10>Ballas declared that they're going to up the ante and

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 10>possibly use more advanced weapons against Israel than we've seen

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 10>so far deployed in that theater. The Huthi's are still

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 10>at it, the SAI militias in Iraq and Syria are

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 10>still at it. Various terrorist groups that have been attacking

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 10>Israel out of the West Bank they're still at it.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 10>And then of course there's Iran itself, which recently lobbed

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 10>one hundred and eighty one ballistic missiles at Israel in

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 10>one night. So this war is going to continue on

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 10>other fronts. But certainly it would be welcome to see

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 10>the fighting finally stop in Gaza. It would be a

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 10>welcome relief for the people of Gaza, who really do

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 10>I think, need to see that place go under some

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 10>serious reconstruction, both politically and physically. That needs to happen

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 10>sooner rather than later. But the war, the broader war

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 10>in the Middle East, is going to continue.

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Jonathan, it seems like, you know, in this year

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 2>that there's been this hostilities in Middle East, it's gone

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 2>from a limited war in Hamas to simply you know,

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 2>evistrate Hamas and get the hostages back to a much

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 2>much broader regional conflict, something that the US wanted to

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 2>avoid here. But it feels like the Israelis recognize this

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 2>as a moment in time where they can settle everything

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 2>everywhere in the region. Is that what you're thinking at

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>this point?

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 10>Look, you know, I think first to frame this properly,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 10>you have to understand that what started with Hamas, it

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 10>was never about you know, Hamas versus Israel, or Israel

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 10>versus the Palestinians, or you know, a war in Gaza.

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 10>This was an Iranian proxy hamas you know, waging more

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 10>against Israel and then opening up multiple fronts at once,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 10>and so now we're seeing all those fronts, it's become

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 10>even more clear. I think it was a clarifying the

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 10>moment yesterday. With sinwar gone, you begin to see that

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 10>these other fronts haven't stopped. If anything, they may actually

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 10>only get hotter. And so I think for many of

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 10>us here in the West, it was kind of an

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 10>aha moment where we say, Okay, wow, this really is

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 10>a wider war in Iran is behind it now? Israel

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 10>I think has some choices in front of it, right,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 10>it can try to fight to a ceasefire in Lebanon

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 10>where you know, maybe his Bala is forced to withdraw

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 10>above the Latani River, which is you know, what was

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 10>enshrined the international law after the last war in two

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 10>thousand and six. But it doesn't solve for all of

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 10>the other challenges that Israel still facing, these Sheite militias

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 10>that have been firing drones and rockets and missiles at

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 10>Israel over the last year. There's still a problem. The

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 10>regime itself is still the big problem, and the biggest

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 10>problem of all is that Iran is still flirting with

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 10>that nuclear weapon. They may use all of this as

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 10>a distraction to make a dash to that bomb, and

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 10>then the entire map changes. In the Middle East. You've

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 10>got basically a regime that is as malign as North

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 10>Korea in the heart of the Middle East, threatening to

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 10>pull the trigger at any time, and using, by the way,

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 10>in nuke as the ultimate insurance policy to be able

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 10>to continue the kind of mayhem that we've been watching.

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 10>So the Israelis, I think, are looking at all these

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 10>and I think they're clear eyed about it. They see

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 10>the need to bring down the regime in Iran. I

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 10>don't know if they can do so without help from

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 10>the United States or maybe more importantly, help from the

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 10>Iranian people. These are people that truly hate their regime,

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 10>and I think we're now starting to see a strategy

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 10>take shape where the Israelis. The Israeli Prime Minister spoke

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 10>directly to the Iranian people a little bit more than

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 10>a week ago, enlisting them in the battle against their

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 10>mutual enemy.

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan, thanks so much for giving us a few minutes

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 2>of your time. Really appreciated. Jonathan Schanzer, Senior vice president

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 2>for research at the non partisan Foundation for Defensive Democracies.

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 2>That's a think tank in Washington, DC. There are a

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 2>lot of smart people out there that help us understand

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 2>what's going on in a very difficult part of the world.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate getting few minutes of Jonathan's time there.

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty Normal.

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 2>Linda sitting in for Alex Steele. I am Paul Sweeney.

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 2>We're live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. We're

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 2>streaming live on YouTube as well. To check us out there.

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Sylvia Jablonski joins us. She's a chief executive officer and

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>chief investment officer Defiance ETFs. So we're gonna talk to

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 2>market with Sylvia, and I also want to talk ETFs

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 2>because I'm just continue to be shocked at the amount

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 2>of money going into the ETF space. It's one of

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the great stories of my during my career on Wall

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Street to see the fun flow there. Sylvia, thanks so

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 2>much for joining us here. We've got a lot of

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 2>economic data that looks pretty solid. Maybe a lot of

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 2>folks in that soft landing camp, I think they're feeling

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty comfortable with that kind of backdrop. Where are you

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 2>telling your clients to all k capital these days?

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 11>Hi, Paul, Thanks for having me, And first of all,

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 11>I would like to have a best but to whiz

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 11>her on the jersey you are with that sounds like

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 11>a lot of fun. Yeah, I think you know, I

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 11>think the markets are in a good spot, right we

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 11>it all kind of started, the momentum restarted, I should say,

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 11>with that job's number that looked a little bit better

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 11>after concerns of the report prior. Inflation is looking good.

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 11>So we have the situation now where monetary policy is

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 11>becoming a little bit more favorable. We have steady jobs,

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 11>we have wage growth, we have consumer sentiment, you know,

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 11>pretty solid, and consumer spending and then earnings earnings are

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 11>holding up, right, So while valuations are high, companies are

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 11>proving that they're profitable and that they're continuing to grow.

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 11>So it does feel a little bit like a goldilocks

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 11>market right now, particularly you know, we're going into that

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.959
<v Speaker 11>seasonally strong time of year next month, we have an

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 11>election year. I think it's it's going to be a

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 11>pretty good ending to the you know, to the S

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 11>and P five hundred and NASDAC, and so where do

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 11>you allocate? You know, whenever the market pulls back on

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 11>dips and AI stocks, I always buy them. We've talked

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 11>about that. You know, a lot of people probably already

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 11>know my picks there right then, videos the AMD's super

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 11>micro micro strategies. But I'm also starting to allocate to XMAG.

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 11>So the other two hundred and ninety three stocks in

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 11>the S and P five hundred that are kind of

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 11>forgotten over the last couple of years, I think they're

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 11>going to start having their day in the sun.

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 4>What areas are you avoiding?

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 11>You know, I think the breath is increasing in the market,

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.719
<v Speaker 11>and I think that the overall market is starting to perform.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 11>So it's not that I'm necessarily avoiding a particular sector.

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 11>I think if I look at the MAG seven for example,

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 11>actually there's only two of them that are now outperforming

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 11>the S and P five hundred, and that's Nvidia and

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 11>Meta and the others, although Apple might have picked up

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 11>after the last couple of days, but the others are

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 11>kind of slowing down in terms of outperformance, and so

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 11>I'm not really looking to pick up like the classic

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 11>mag seven. But that's not to say that I'm selling

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 11>the positions that I already have. I think if I

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 11>just put new money to work, I'm going to be

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 11>a little bit more thoughtful about where I diversify it,

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 11>and that probably will be away from some of these

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 11>names that have flown high.

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 2>You've got excellon in your notes here. That's the name

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 2>we don't talk about, I think enough here John Tucker

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and I were just talking about oil coming back down

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 2>now below seventy dollars a hour for WTA crude oil.

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 2>What's the investor call on Exxon.

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean that's why I like it, right. I

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 11>think it's it's come down quite a bit. But if

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 11>you look at what's going on in the rest of

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 11>the world, to me, this is this is a bit

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 11>of a you know, a bit of a diversifier to

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 11>the portfolio. First of all, it's again it's not the

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 11>Max seven. It's in that four ninety three it's a

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 11>strong company with a solid balance sheet. They pay a dividend,

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 11>and I think the company's also well positioned, you know,

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 11>whether whether or not. Of course, they're tied to oil

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:27.479
<v Speaker 11>and whatnot, but I think that they're doing a lot

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 11>of investing in kind of you know, green energy and

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 11>going climate neutral to twenty fifty, they'll be big players

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 11>in that space because I think they've learned that they

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 11>have to be evolved. So I just like that company overall.

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 11>But I do think that oil is going to be

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 11>a story. You know, there's so much going on in

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 11>the Middle East right now. I don't think it's necessarily

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 11>over and that's an impetus for potentially oil to spike

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 11>throughout the months coming ahead. And then the other thing is,

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 11>you know China, if we keep seeing China, if we

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 11>see that stimulus there and we see the second largest

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 11>economy in the world growing. You know, they're one of

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 11>the biggest consumers of X products, and so I think

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 11>that that company has a shot of growing.

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 4>Here talk to me about healthcare. I know this is

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.959
<v Speaker 4>an area that can get really nitty, griny and niche,

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 4>but what's going on?

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 11>So healthcare again, this goes to my to my ex

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 11>mag right, if you look at if you look at

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 11>the MAG seven and then kind of start going down

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 11>the list and start trying to look at the companies

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 11>that are outperforming the S and P five hundred. You know,

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 11>Eli Lie Lily is one of them. Can't talk today.

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 11>I think you know, part of that is is the

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 11>GLP one craze and the weight loss drugs, and you

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 11>have you know, Novo and Lily playing in that space.

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 11>But that company in particular has a big portfolio of drugs,

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 11>whether it's Manjaro, whether it's you know, cancer drugs and

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 11>FDA trials, Alzheimer's disease drugs on trials and things like this.

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 11>But I think it's a macro story that's starting to

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 11>play out. To be honest, I thought that these companies,

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 11>these you know, big pharma companies would do better than

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 11>they have sooner than they have. They're getting some steam now,

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 11>but you know, you have this massive aging baby boom

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 11>population people started to consume medical services and you know,

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 11>these these products post COVID. I think that's going to continue.

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 11>And just strong balance sheet. They pay a nice dividend,

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 11>good diversifier, you know, defensive play for the market. So

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 11>I do think it's worth looking at Sylvia.

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, when I was growing up on Wall Street,

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 2>it was all about the mutual funds. Now, the funds

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 2>flows over the last decade plus have just been extraordinary

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 2>to this new rapper called the ETFs at your platform

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 2>defines ETFs. What are you seeing today trips of funds

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 2>flows and kind of where are they going?

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean this was our best year yet. I

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 11>think it was the best year yet for the ETF industry.

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 11>I know you guys have Eric talking about that pretty

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 11>regularly out there, but it's it's a multi trillion dollar

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 11>business and state of the world now. And if you

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 11>look at you know, these big mutual fund companies, I mean,

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 11>they're all trying to figure out how they can do

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 11>these conversions to ETF products because I think it's the

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 11>way of the future. I mean, I'll say something bold.

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 11>I don't think that you know, I have young kids.

0:31:58.560 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 11>I don't think that they'll know what a mutual fund

0:31:59.960 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 11>is by the time they're teenagers right when they invest.

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 11>I mean, it'll be some it'll be like a you know,

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 11>rotary phone or something like that. But I just think

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 11>ETFs are a better product. Right, you can trade them

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 11>throughout the day. They're transparent, and they're a lot cheaper,

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 11>I think the days of expensive mutual funds, I mean,

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 11>give or take a few. Like the market leaders, it's

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 11>just like have their client base. I think they'll have

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 11>it for a while, but you kind of have to

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 11>adapt and go you know, cheaper, more transparent, unless it's

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 11>like a super sophisticated active strategy, but that probably still

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 11>works better than an ETF forepper. So I think growth

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 11>continues there.

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but when I was, they're not as profitable to me.

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 2>When I'm trading for Salomon Brothers, I'm wearing Stanley back

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 2>in the day.

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 11>You're not going to make its much money as an advisor,

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 11>that's for sure. And that's you know, but I think

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 11>if you you know, the good news is that the

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 11>types of ETFs that are out there are are more interesting.

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 11>You know, there's a lot of great thematic products, options

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 11>based products and things like this, and so an advisor

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 11>I think can now be you know, really providing a

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 11>good service by alerting ret tell clients of theirs that

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 11>there's all this other stuff out there that they can

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 11>get exposure to, including bitcoin, right, I mean Bitcoin wasn't

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 11>a thing a few years ago within an ETF product.

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 11>Now people are putting it in their IRA, so it's

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 11>a different world.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 2>It is a different world, and as you mentioned, it

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 2>is arguably much better for investors, and that's the most

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 2>important thing. Sovia Jablonski, thanks so much for joining us

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 2>chief executive officer and chief investment Officer for Defiance at ETFs.

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station Just

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Romelina sitting in for Alex Deel poul Swinging. You live

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 2>here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. I'm going to

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 2>get right to our next guest here. A very cool

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 2>story here, Roland Martineque, CEO of Data Bank. Data Bank

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 2>is a private company. Tell us what you guys do

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 2>role because I think a lot of people are really

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 2>interested in your business.

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 5>Sure be here.

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 12>Thanks for having me so, data Bank we're a US

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 12>based company. We're a data center developer, data center. So

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 12>we have over seventy data centers in twenty seven markets,

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 12>giving us the largest geographic footprint of data centers in America.

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 12>A data center, I like to say, if you know,

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 12>it's basically the foundation for technology adoption. Right, you think

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 12>about anything on your phone, anything on your computer, it

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 12>basically originates and terminates in a data center. So we

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:29.280
<v Speaker 12>support over twenty five hundred customers, you know, from the

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 12>major hyperscalers to major enterprises to smaller businesses that want

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 12>to put their critical data, their applications, their services inside

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 12>a hard and facility that a data center. Because obviously

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 12>in today's world, everyone's really dependent on on their digital footprint.

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Throw me a few names of your customers.

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 12>So Amazon, Google, Netflix, JP, Morgan, just A and C Bank, Carnival, Cruiser.

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, so even simple people like Nora, and I know,

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 2>nor is much smarter than is the real estate business.

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I know that the data center business is a good business, booming,

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 2>really good business. Some people want to invest with you

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and you just raise some capital. Talk to us about that.

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So one thing about data centers is they're really expensive. Right,

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 12>you know, we measure everything in power. We call it,

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 12>you know, by the megawatt, which is a million watts.

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 12>It costs about ten to twelve million dollars per megawat

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 12>to build out data centers, and we're building data centers

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 12>that are sixty megawats, seventy two megawats, forty megawatts. So

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 12>you know, we're now in the kind of the billions

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 12>range when it comes to these investments across the sector.

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 12>So this week we announced that we had raised two

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 12>billion of equity capital with Aussie Super which is an

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 12>Australian pension fund, as our new lead investor, with a

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 12>one point five billion dollar commitment.

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 4>So, I mean, the tech industry moves fast and breaks things,

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 4>but if you think about the utility industry, it's a

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 4>bit slower and tries never to break anything at all. Obviously,

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 4>you work as the middleman here. I'm curious, how do

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.280
<v Speaker 4>you manage the relationships between both ends.

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's a great question. Yeah, these two kind of

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 12>galaxies are really colliding now.

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 12>Obviously we always were good partners with utilities, but over

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 12>the last twenty four months, with the advent of generative AI,

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 12>the demand for data center capacity has just skyrocketed. To

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 12>give you some example, in twenty twenty let's say twenty

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 12>twenty one RIP. Before chat GPT, there was probably about

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 12>a gigawats seven hundred and fifty megawatts of absorption in

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.439
<v Speaker 12>the United States for new data center capacity. This year,

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 12>the estimate is six gigawatts of new data center capacity

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 12>will be absorbed. So our relationships with ver utilities are critical.

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 12>And yes, they are more on the slow moving side, right.

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 12>They're utilities that are regulated. They think of things in

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 12>ten year cycles. Meanwhile our customers think of things in

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 12>twelve month cycles. So there's a lot of activity going

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 12>on there. But the utilities are, you know, working hard

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 12>to try to figure out how they're going to meet

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 12>the expected demand of AI over the coming decade.

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 2>So what do you do when you develop a data

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 2>center g you us assume the utilities can be there

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 2>to support you, or do you build your own power there?

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Like John Tucker lakes to talk about these small.

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, you couldn't build your own power, Like if a

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.720
<v Speaker 8>littleminum produce al CoA had to build its own power

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 8>its own dam in the wherever it was. But you

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 8>can't do something.

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 12>Like that technically, you can, I mean that self generation, right,

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.280
<v Speaker 12>that is becoming a topic that is much more discussed

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 12>now than it was before.

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 5>But ultimately, what we do is, you know, before we.

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 12>Acquire land, we're already working with the utilities to understand

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 12>where they have capacity on their platform.

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:34.439
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 12>We look for, you know, transmission lines that obviously carry

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 12>the electrons, and then we'll buy a land kind of

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 12>in close proximity to those transmission lines so that we

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:46.720
<v Speaker 12>can tap into them to grab power. And that's exactly

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 12>what we did with the three announcements we made this year.

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 12>We're building a four hundred and eighty megawat data center

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 12>campus in Texas South Dallas. We worked with Encore there

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 12>to identify that spot. We're building one hundred and twenty

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 12>megawat data center campus in Atlanta. We worked with Georgia

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 12>Power to again identify a suitable location.

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:07.479
<v Speaker 5>And then we're building one hundred and ninety two.

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 12>Mega walk campus in Culpepper, Virginia, which is about fifty

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 12>miles south of kind of data center.

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 8>Ally as when are you eyeing nuclear plants?

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:17.919
<v Speaker 12>No, most of the power here is kind of there's

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 12>a it's a grid mix, right, So like in Texas,

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 12>you know, Encore is you know, very proactive in terms

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 12>of connecting new generation there, believe it or not. As

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 12>an example, you know, on any given sunny day in Texas,

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 12>you know, forty five percent of the power is coming

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 12>from solar, wind and batteries. So there's been a huge

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 12>investment in those kind of renewable power generation sources.

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 2>You get in Dallas, right we are. We just had

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 2>a story your pension. You've got a pension problem in

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:50.360
<v Speaker 2>your city, right and like an incredibly unfunded pension. And

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 2>I looked at this story. I like, there's a million

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 2>companies like your smart young companies fucking to Texas, fucking

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 2>to Dallas. I don't know how you guys got yourself

0:38:57.960 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 2>in that pickle in the city of Dallas. But that's

0:38:59.880 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 2>another story for another time. So talk to us about

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 2>this investment here. I mean, what are the Australians are they?

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Did they see this as an AI play for them?

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 2>What's the angle for them?

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 12>I mean what's great about our business is that, you know,

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 12>we're really a pick and shoble business, right. You know,

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 12>data centers are agnostic. It doesn't matter what technology you

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 12>put into a data center. All that matters is that

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 12>people consume technology That's what I love about our business

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 12>that you know, we're really indexed to technology adoption, and

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 12>I would argue humans are addicted to technology, right, and

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 12>that because of that, we think there's going to be

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 12>you know, long term demand. So so you know, these

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 12>investments are very long term investments. You know, we build

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 12>a data center, you know, we expected to have an

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 12>operational life of thirty to forty years. In fact, you know,

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 12>there's the data center sector really has only been around

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 12>for about twenty five years, so you still have assets

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 12>that were.

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:52.320
<v Speaker 5>Built in the nineties.

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 12>They're in the dot com bubble that are still relevant

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 12>and active today. So Australian Super they're looking to support

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.280
<v Speaker 12>us as we build out this eight hundred and fifty

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 12>megawatts that I just described over these three campuses, and

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 12>this equity will help us build those facilities.

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's insatiable demand right now in the market.

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 4>How are you all thinking about sustainability, I know you

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 4>mentioned renewable power.

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so the good news is is that you know,

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 12>there's a commitment with the sector, and there's a commitment

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 12>from the largest consumers of data center capacity, which are

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 12>the hyperscalers, to a renewable future, so ourselves obviously all

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:29.240
<v Speaker 12>the major hyperscalers, we all have kind.

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 5>Of carbon neutral net zero goals.

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 12>Ours is for twenty thirty and the major hyperscalers are

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:40.720
<v Speaker 12>also in that range. You know, they are the largest consumers.

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 5>Of renewable energy in the world.

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 12>I've just read recently because of Google's announcement about that

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 12>nuclear that they consume fourteen gigawatts of renewable energy. So

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 12>these companies have a corporate commitment to renewables and that

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 12>creates a demand signal for people to invest because they

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 12>know there's going to be a buyer for that product.

0:40:57.880 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Ro thank you so much for coming in. Really appreciate it.

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating story. Raoul Martineck. He is the CEO of a

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 2>Data bank. Is the company sup private company based down

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 2>in Dallas, Texas, the data center of business.

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Boy.

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 2>I know that's a great business. So interesting story there.

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Of course.

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app Tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Terminal