WEBVTT - Sarah Longwell & Sen. Chris Murphy

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:12.239
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds. And House Republicans have voted not to

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>release the met Gates ethics report, surprising no one. We

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>have a great hill for you today the Focus Group podcast.

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Longwell stops by to talk focus groups. Then we'll

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to Senator Chris Murphy about how Democrats can win

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>on economic populism.

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>But first the news, Somalie, the TikTok ban just got

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>struck down by a lower court and now it's heading

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>to the Supreme Court. What are you seeing here?

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So they can't ban it? Or they can ban.

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>No, they can ban it.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>And want me to do some explaining, Yes, Jesse, you

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:52.919
<v Speaker 1>since you are the TikToker in the relationship here and

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you send me tiktoks and I can't figure out how

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to watch them. And I am the boomer and you

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>here are the zoomer. I'm the boomer, is eight months

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>older that you're. Yes, Yes, it's explained to us, I'm

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the boomer. Yes, explain to us how the Chinese government

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>controls what we see on TikTok go.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So Now this lower court has said that TikTok

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 2>has to sell if they want to remain in the

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 2>United States or else they will be abanned in mid January.

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 2>So what now happens is the Supreme Court decides whether

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 2>they will take up this case or not. If they do,

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>that buys TikTok a whole bunch of time potentially, if

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 2>their will lawyers do the right maneuvers. If they don't

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 2>take it up, which is entirely possible, TikTok will be

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 2>forced to sell. There's many, many, many rich people and

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.919
<v Speaker 2>corporations salivating at the idea of buying this, including people

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 2>like mister Wonderful from Shark Tank and Microsoft.

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>That's more than I have ever wanted to know about TikTok.

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see what happens. Hard to imagine that anything

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>good happens with a Trump presidency about to start, but

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>we will see, right, Jesse Cannon, we will see, and

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>TikTok will still exist for many moons to come.

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Somali, two friends of ours, Noah Schuckman and a Swin.

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 2>They have a very Actually, this was the funnest article

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I read all week about how Eric Adams is doing

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 2>anything we could all see, which is kissing trump sass

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 2>for a pardon.

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>As someone who interviewed Eric Adams this week on Morning Joe,

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>he's very fit. And also, yes, it seems very clear

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>that Eric Adams has realized that he can get pardoned.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the thing you have to remember

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 1>about Eric Adams and also about everyone else. Donald Trump

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is completely transactional. If you say on television, oh this

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. He's kind of a good guy and so handsome.

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>He sees it and then you he'll let you do

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what you want. So like we saw this at the

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>deal Book conference. We saw Jeff Bezos being like, Donald

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump is going to be great. This is all going

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to be great. You know, this is just trying to

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>manipulate him into getting what you want. Will it work?

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe in the short term, it'll work for Jeff Bezos.

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>As we all know on this podcast. We all know,

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>like ask Rudy Giuliani, how it works out for you?

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>It never works out. Well. Everything Trump touches dies. You know,

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it may take a little longer now that he's going

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>back into the White House, but this is absolutely one

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent the case. And you know, but anyway, Adams

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>has decided, and look, Adams is a guy with not

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of options, right, He's got these federal indictments.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>He supposedly has more indictments coming though, who knows. He's

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly up to no good and he really wants to

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>stay Mayor. So you know, he's thinking that if he

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>can get Trump to pardon him, he can stay in

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the arena a little longer. And you know, it's not

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>an insane I mean, it's morally an ethically very corrupt,

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's not an insane theory. And I think in

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>my work for him.

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a funny thing because it serves both sides effectively,

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 2>as Adams wants to keep on cry big and he

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 2>wants to not go to jail and Trump be loves

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 2>when somebody gravels and kisses his ass.

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny because it's like I was listening

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to him on the show when I'm watching him and

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking to myself, he's like explaining about how these

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>federal indictments are twisting the law to come after him,

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we've had all these conversations about like

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>should the law be the same for everyone. I actually

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>listened to this very smart New Yorker podcast that had

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>this lawyer. I'm not sure she's right where she was

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about maybe it would have been better just not

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to even try to prosecute Trump because it just, you know,

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it had it because as the appearance of being political

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in itself. Again, I don't know what the answer is.

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a lawyer, but it just struck me that

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>what Adams is doing is he's really trying to manipulate

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>what is him doing illegal stuff and make it sound

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>political in order to appeal to Trump and make this

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>case that it's all the same. And you know this

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>is we're down this posts post truth rabbit hole.

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 2>So, Malia, you know who I want in charge of

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 2>making elector overform. It's definitely not Donald Trump.

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I know who you don't want to try so Donald

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Trump again, Like, this guy just wants to get his

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>hands on elections so badly, and should we be surprised

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>this is what he says to Trump. Okay, so he's

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>in New York and he is he is accepting an award.

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the idea of giving this guy awards

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>like that is what it is. If you want something

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>from Donald Trump, give him an award. He was accepting

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>an award from Fox Nation. The award is called Patriot

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Year. That's Patriot of the Year award. Okay,

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>he is the this year. There is no patriot. Who

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is a bigger patriot? Then Thrice indicted, Right, fine, you

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>know that guy. He's the Patriot of the Year. It

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>was a long island event, it was not even in Manhattan,

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>organized by Fox Nation. On Thursday, he accepted the award.

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, this is even I'm sorry, this gets worse.

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Accepted the award designed to resemble the American flag because

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>he is, after all, the Patriot of the year. After

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a live performance of what other song could it be?

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>This guy's his favorite. I even didn't have any idea

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>who the fuck this was, but now I know, and

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>I wish I didn't live performance of Lee Greenwood's God

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Bless the USA, and that is Donald Trump's favorite song.

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>If you have a phone, you should google Lee Greenwood

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>because he is either twenty or one hundred and fifty

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>years old. It's impossible to tell. He has had some

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of incredible facial whatever, and he looks like he

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>could be twenty five or eighty.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I like that, mister Trump. Did his usual speaking

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 2>ambiguously at saying nothing of We're going to do things

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 2>that have really needed for a long time.

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>The man murders English. But he did mention. He complained

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>about the California law. In California, they just passed a

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>law that you're not even allowed to ask a voter

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>for voter ida. Think of that. If you ask a

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>voter for their voter Ida, you're committing a crime. We're

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>going to get the whole country straightened out. Yeah, no

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>better way to get the whole country straightened out than

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the stop corruption. Police are going to make sure that

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>all the corruption doesn't happen, and you just have to

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>pay them.

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Somali. When I think of people who earn things in

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 2>a meritocracy, you know what I think of Donald Trump's cabinet.

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is nepo nepo And again, nothing wrong with nepotism.

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump wants his cabinet nominees to earn their confirmations

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>on their own. That's how he works, right. But on Friday,

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>he was wanted to give an adaboy to Pete Hagsas

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you'll remember Pete heggsas a weekend morning television host and

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>also multiple divorcee likes a couple beers. He's got the

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Kavanaugh just like beer situation.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 2>I really liked the detail of him drinking ten warm

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>flat beers at ten am. That was a really good story.

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>You know how many panels I've been on or places

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been where people have been like repeating that thing

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>about him drinking all the flat beers. I have been

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>sober twenties at seven years. I don't think it's not bad.

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I get it, man, like I get it.

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you've forgotten how bad flat war beer taste. But

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 2>as somebody who tasted at this summer, let me tell you,

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:55.599
<v Speaker 2>I don't want it.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>It does a job. Nobody is drinking for a taste here. Okay,

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that is not true.

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I love the taste of a Budweiser a Corona this summer.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Well that's because you're not an alcohol But the rest

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of us will drink our beer. I mean we won't

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>because I'm sober. But flat beer not flat beer? Who cares?

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Trump is very excited that Haig Seth is

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>fighting back. He told an advisor beats biting like cow.

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if he said fighting or fighting. He's a

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>fighter again. I want to point out that, from what

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we understand, and again this could be reported wrong, was

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>not in the room, but that Donald Trump picked him

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>because he looked like he should be director of the

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>d D. Now they're saying he's not going to jump out,

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that hag Set is going to make it through. We'll see.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, it is still December and Trump

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>is not even president yet, so let's see what happens.

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Sarah long While is publisher of The Bulwark and the

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>host of the Focus Group podcast. Welcome back to Fast Politics,

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Longwhile.

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Well being here.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>The first thing I want to talk to you about

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>is I have so much I want to talk to

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you about. Was that after this selection happened, I went

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>through this process of like trying to figure out what

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I got wrong and how my own wish casting sort

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of clouded my judgment, and how, you know, just sort

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 1>of the litany of ways in which I could perhaps

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>like get information more clearly. I thought everyone was doing that.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>It turned out that everyone was just trying to tell

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>each other what they had gotten wrong. I feel like

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you are thoughtful, introspective in a way that not many

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>people are. Is there something wrong with us for being

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that way.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Look, I do think that there are some real hopium

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 3>merchants out there. Yeah, And I think that because the

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 3>hopium merchants were a little more right in twenty twenty two,

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 3>most people over listened to them in twenty twenty four.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 3>And I will say, I mean, I'm happy to do

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.359
<v Speaker 3>my own sort of pundit accountability.

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you have. I just remember the two

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of you, and even and Tim especially was like, you know,

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>he was like, we sort of know she's better off

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>than he is, but it's not entirely clear to me

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that either of them can win.

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, going into the election, I was like, look, if

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm using the focus groups, I could make the case

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 3>either way, because part of what happened was it was

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 3>so dismal when it was Joe Biden that we saw

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 3>this huge uptick for her, but it was never clear

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 3>whether that was going to be enough because the hole

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 3>that they were digging out of with Joe Biden, and

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 3>this is where look at people were mad when I

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 3>was like, he's got to drop out, He's got to

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 3>drop out. But I cannot tell you how much the

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 3>data going back to like twenty twenty one like after

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 3>basically Afghanistan and the Delta researchers like Joe Biden never recovered.

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>He was deeply unpopular.

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 3>People thought he was too old, and whether you like

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 3>that or not, it's just true. And him running and

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 3>not allowing for a robust Democratic primary that could separate

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 3>from him was I think the fatal error. And I'll

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 3>tell you, the focus groups were so different going into

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty four than they were in twenty. Like in twenty twenty,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I felt sure he was going to win, and actually,

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, Trump overperformed I think our expectations back in

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty. But here's one of the things that I

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 3>also would point to as just a It wasn't a

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 3>blind spot because I knew about it, but I wasn't

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 3>quite sure what emphasis to put on it. So I

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 3>was spent a lot of time talking to Trump to

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Biden voters. So people have voted for Trump and sixteen

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 3>and then Biden in twenty to see if they were

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 3>going to stick with him, And the thing was the

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 3>majority were, but we were always losing one or two people.

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure we talked about that last time, because that

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 3>was like the dominant piece of evidence, was there was

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 3>always a little bit of backsliding, and so the question was,

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 3>then could Kamala Harris pick up some new people to

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 3>offset that backsliding, And that didn't happen, and in fact,

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Trump picked up a bunch of sort of newish people

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 3>or low info or people are just are low propensity, right,

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 3>they don't vote in a lot of elections, or they

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 3>just turn out for presidentials. That is who he has

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 3>always dominated with. And on the election day, when I

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 3>saw how high turnout was, that used to be a

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 3>good sign for Democrats, but it's not. It was I

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 3>knew it was like, oh, no, turnout, super high. That's

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 3>better for Trump because Democrats are kind of maxing out.

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 3>They got these college educated suburban voters in their trade,

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 3>but they're maxing out on those voters and there's only

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 3>so many of them. There are way more non college

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 3>working class voters who vote just in presidential elections. And

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 3>that's where Donald Trump and Donald Trump overperformed this time.

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Any other Republican, like other Republicans aren't turning those people out,

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 3>but Donald Trump does.

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, you had states like Arizona where there

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>were real Diego Trump voters. Oh yeah, absolutely, and in Wisconsin,

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tammy Ball went, you know, which is wild.

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but those are people who look at her and say,

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 3>or look at Diego and say, I don't know, this

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 3>person seems like a working you know that they will

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 3>be a good sort of for the working class. But

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 3>they also like Trump. Look, the guy's been a celebrity,

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 3>he's been with us for decades. People have voted for

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 3>him now many times, and so they feel slightly different

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 3>about him. He pulls in a real cross category a

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 3>voter and including you know, one of the things that's

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 3>been in that we've been doing a lot of postgame

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 3>with the focus groups. And I also want to just

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 3>say from the qualitative side, I felt like, look, I

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 3>felt like both the polling and the qualitative side sort

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 3>of told us on all guys, this could go either way.

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 3>And it's like tough sledding, Like tough sledding for the Democrats.

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>When I've been writing about my own accountability, what, I've

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>been surprised that the polls were really underestimated Trump. They

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>underestimated Trump in every election he's run at now. Yeah,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>but the polls just they can't model for like how

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the turnout's going to be, and so when he's able

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to sort of supercharge these low propensity voters. That's what

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>he's done every single time.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 3>And also I do think the polling was picking up

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 3>on a lot of the things that we saw, oh,

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 3>which was like the massive slide with Hispanics, the somewhat

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>slide with black voters, and she was able to shore

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 3>something up. And let me just say a word about

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris. She saved Democrats from an absolute wipeout. She

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 3>really did. Joe Biden was going to lead Democrats to

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 3>a historic wipeout, and she fought it back to a

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 3>place where now Republicans are going to have maybe a

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 3>three seat majority in the House, like they can't do

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 3>anything with a three seat majority, and they're going to

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 3>have a few seat majority in the Senate. But like

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 3>in terms of Republicans doing sort of big things together congressionally,

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 3>they probably are going to have a really tough time.

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 3>She kept it really narrow. But anyone who says, oh, well,

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden, you know, would have won, let me tell

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 3>you something, there's literally not one shread of evidence to

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 3>support that, not a shred. I think the only shread

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 3>of evidence there is to support is that if Joe

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Biden had gotten out a lot earlier and either allowed

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 3>for a Democratic primer or given Kamala Harris more time

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 3>to sort of get better at it, to let people

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 3>know her more, that that might have made a difference.

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 3>But that's the only real difference that I think could

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 3>have been made.

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I wonder a lot if some of Joe Biden's problem,

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>not a governing problem, but a re election problem, started

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>with his administration's intentionally boring doing no media, don't write.

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 3>About us thing like I wonder if that mushroomed. Well,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 3>here's the thing Democrats going forward, if they learn one

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 3>lesson from this, people are going to sort of try

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 3>to categorize thing that I should have gone on Joe Rogan,

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 3>it was the podcast election, Okay. Sure. What it really

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 3>means is you can no longer do politics without being

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 3>very good at having a communication strategy. There is no

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 3>way that you and I weren't talking about this on

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 3>your show, because I have been beside myself for the

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 3>entire Biden administration about the fact that they are not

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 3>out there talking. I was like, look, and Joe Biden

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 3>was allows the communicator, right, he was too old, and

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 3>so he didn't have the ability to like communicate Strong'm like,

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 3>but I was like, where are all the surrogates? Where

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 3>is everybody? Else? Where's the mountain of people? Like the

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 3>way that JD. Vance and Donald Trump just went on

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 3>everything were everywhere talking to people directly, Like that allowed

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 3>the mainstream media like they can't define Donald Trump and

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 3>you can people say, you know, he did this or that.

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 3>But like if people will get to hear him directly

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 3>and they say, well, he doesn't sound like Hitler, Pamla

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Harris needs to be able to be like, well, I

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 3>don't sound like somebody who can't form a sentence, right,

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 3>You've got to be there to puncture the way the

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 3>other side is trying to define you directly with voters

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 3>and so sort of the everything everywhere, all at once

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 3>strategy has to be how people communicate and they have

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 3>to be able to do it authentically. And so if

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 3>you can't walk shore footed into all kinds of spaces,

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 3>non traditional spaces, unfriendly spaces, like you can't do politics anymore.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Like you've got to be able to do that.

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's really the issue is Like by

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the time he had gotten there, that that White House

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't really do a lot of communicating. They one offer

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>up either the president or the vice president very much.

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And so in that vacuum, Trump was able to fill

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that vacuum throughout the entire Yes.

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Trump had constant counterprogramming, and he also locked up the

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 3>nomination so early, like man was he able he was

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 3>able to run a campaign early he dominated that primary.

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, there was I mean, like Joe Biden took

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 3>a pass on like.

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>A Super Bowl interview. No I don't we do it here?

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Why we do it?

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 3>But that communications problem and this is the other thing,

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 3>like you have to be able to communicate sort of

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty four to seven, Like you can't just run a

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 3>campaign right at the end and be like, well this

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 3>is when people pay attention. You also have to be

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 3>able to say, Okay, why didn't anybody know what the

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 3>Biden administration did? Why didn't they know about Because I

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 3>get yelled at on Twitter sometimes they're like, well, Joe

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 3>Biden was a great present. Hear jblast my buddy. So

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 3>as you know, Joe Biden passed all these big legislatives.

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, yeah, but nobody knows about him.

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 3>And that's the problem.

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>The idea that these people don't know about any stuff

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that happened is in itself, you know, that ultimately is

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden's why Joe Biden.

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Didn't get reelected, right, Yeah, that's right.

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 4>It's why he was unpopular.

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 3>It's why they were able to push him out once

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 3>it became clear he was absolutely not up to the job.

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 3>But there's also a bunch of other reasons I just

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 3>want to throw out there that I hear all over

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 3>the focus groups, and some of them are things like

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 3>people didn't like the fact that there wasn't a primary,

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Like the fact that it just went from Joe Biden

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 3>to Kamala Harris without sort of input rubbed a lot

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 3>of people the wrong way. The other thing is, even

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 3>though RFK was only getting you know, two or three

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 3>percent nationally, there was this cross section of voters that

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 3>I think ultimately might have been kind of determinative. I've

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 3>heard a lot of this where people are like, you know,

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I voted for RFK and for Elon and for Tulsi

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 3>and like Trump last, but like, there is this red

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 3>pilled voter. It's not a Republican voter. It is a

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 3>red pilled voter who honestly probably was like kind of

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 3>a Democrat for a long time, a casual one who

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 3>was brought over by the anti establishment sort of red

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 3>pilled people that Donald Trump was surrounding himself with. He

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 3>was able to pull just enough people away from Democrats.

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 3>With those sort of people, at the end of the year,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 3>you curve of politics. And look, this has long been

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 3>a feature of Trump where I talked to a lot

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 3>of Bernie voters who voted for Trump after voting for

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Bernie in a Democratic primary, and he has just been

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 3>able to pull those voters away by being a really

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 3>unworthodox candidate.

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, I mean, I hate it, but I think

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that is absolutely correct. Democrats were the establishment party. It's

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>not just establishment, I think in terms of them trying

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to be defenders of democracy, they got a little bit

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up in kind of the defenders of the status quo.

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And then also though one of the things you hear

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>from voters all the time, which is a shift in

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>voters where they now say I don't want a regular

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>politician like they like Trump because he's not a regular politician.

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And even when Kamala Harris to them like technically sounded

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>good and she was, they were like, yeah, you know,

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't sound like the way they stay sound, but

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>they did. She did sound like a regular politician to them.

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>She didn't have a clear message that broke through to them.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>And so that's where it was a Now now, as

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.959
<v Speaker 1>a result, we're in an extremely dangerous place. What now

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>right now is we're going to look at four more

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>years of Trump. Now.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I want to say a couple things though, really quickly.

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 3>One is that Trump is going to be a lame

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 3>duck president. And I'm seeing a lot of fear from people,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pre surrender, a lot of chilling effect,

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 3>and like the and that is a thing we cannot

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 3>allow to happen, Like people are going to have to

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 3>find It's funny. I've heard that the phrase all my life.

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, the only thing we have to fear is

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 3>fear itself. But I don't think I ever understood it

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 3>until now, watching the way people are engaging with the fear,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 3>and the fact is like, we don't need hashtag resist,

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 3>We need like real courage and strength in this moment

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 3>to push forward. We got to find a way to organize.

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 3>And I was just talking to George Conway for the

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 3>pod and I was asking him, like, should Biden issue

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 3>blanket pardons for people like Liz Cheney or Fauci And

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 3>he said no, No, like that is that's not a

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 3>good way to use use the pardon power. But what

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 3>we should do is get on war footing, like we

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 3>need to raise money for we need to get make

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 3>sure people have access to lawyers, and we need to

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 3>fight the fight. And I personally believe that offense is

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 3>always the best defense, right, Like, they got to govern now,

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 3>especially with these guys. Yeah, these are a bunch of

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 3>ego maniacal narcissists who are going to fight with each other.

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 3>Like governing's hard sometimes when you're in the opposition, it

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 3>can be a little easier, and you just let them.

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Let them own this. They've got to pass a budget

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 3>bill right out of the gate. They got to fund

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 3>the government. Let me tell you what, that's good luck

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 3>with your three vote majority though, Mike Johnson and so Democrats,

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 3>But Democrats should not bail them out. Look, I'm a

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 3>big norms values institutions person, but I also believe that

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 3>you can play political hardball, and Democrats should and they

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 3>should not build Republicans out voters ask them to run

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 3>the government, so let them. I think that Democrats should

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 3>be thinking about what their red lines are. Where are

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 3>the places they should fight, and where are the places

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 3>they should let voters get the full experience of what

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 3>they've asked for.

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>It's true. I think that's a really good point. Blame

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to us sort of what you think Democrats should be

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>focused on? Like it in my mind it's norms and institutions.

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think the red line should be?

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it should be rule of law on elections, right,

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 3>like you want to make sure on the other side

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 3>of Trump's four years we still have free and fair elections, right.

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.360
<v Speaker 3>We want a correction in twenty twenty six. I think

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 3>we can get it. You want to protect the rule

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 3>of law as best you can, because this is going

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 3>to be the most corrupt administration of our lifetime.

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>People need to.

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Get familiar with the word cacistocracy because I'm not sure

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 3>the answer to this, and I don't want to be

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 3>pollyannish at all about what we might be facing. I

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 3>think cash Betel is a very scary thing. I think

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Pete Heggs that's very like these are scary people, but

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 3>they're also all like dopes out to enrich themselves, and

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 3>so the extent to which retribution might quickly become just

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 3>a big sense of corruption and them all trying to

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 3>sort of get what's theirs is something I think we

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 3>very much could see. But I do think that Democrats

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 3>need to pick new leaders right, like the new next

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 3>generation has to rise up here, should define themselves in

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 3>opposition to what's about to happen. And I'm talking about

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 3>picking really smart people to lead the DNC. Like I'm

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 3>a big fan of Ben Wickler, know him personally. I

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 3>think he's really good strategically and we're not even I'm

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 3>not even with them on some of the policy stuff,

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 3>but I just think he knows what he's doing and

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 3>knows how to bring the factions of the Democratic Party together.

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a lot of deep bench and rising stars,

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 3>and I hope they all start to stand up and

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 3>show an alternative Like the Republicans did this. They spent

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 3>the four years of the Biden administration in an opposition

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 3>that allowed people to be like, this is what the

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 3>opposition look like, It's who the players are. Democrats need

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 3>to do that too, and so leaders need to emerge now,

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 3>and I hope that they are smarter yet than just

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 3>sort of hashtag resistant that they figure out how to

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 3>really do the important stuff on guardrails, but also like

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 3>rethinking their communication strategy, Like you've got a few really

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 3>good communicators, but the way in which communication is going

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 3>to go down as the biggest failure of the Biden years,

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 3>and they got a correct that real fast.

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Communication, it's not a legislative problem, no, I.

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Mean, look, Joe Biden did a bunch of good, big

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 3>bipartisan things, Like if I had to go back and

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 3>relitigate the Democrats coming out and doing HR one as

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 3>one of their big attempts at legislative stuff rather than

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 3>reigning and executive power after we had just seen that. Like,

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 3>I just think there's a lot of failures in twenty

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty one, the biggest ones being on the Republican side

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 3>who refused to hold Trump accountable after the January sixth

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 3>insurrection and his attempt his refusal to engage in a

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 3>peaceful transfer power. But I also think Democrats chose a

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 3>bunch of boneheaded legislative things to do out of the

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 3>gate that were not that like sort of missed the

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 3>fact that we could end up in this snapback moment.

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 3>But look in terms of infrastructure and some of the

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 3>other things Joe Biden did, those were good bills that

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 3>they should have gotten credit for that they just couldn't

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 3>communicate to the voters about you know, is going to

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 3>get credit for it. Trump Trump's going to get the

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 3>benefits of all the infrastructure money as it rolls in.

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>If you're wanting these Republican senators and you're trying to

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>think of, like who are the ones who, like you

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like have spine and might stand up for things.

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 3>I think Collins has been not always good, but I

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 3>think she's been overly maligned, and I think we're going

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 3>to see some good things from Rakowski and Collins. But

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 3>there's also a bunch of senators you don't know their names.

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 3>That's they are the ones that sit in the back

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 3>and like try to keep their heads down and do

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 3>decent things.

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike grounds Langford too, I mean he's famous, yeah.

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Langford, who's very conservative, but he's like, oh, he's an

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 3>institution's guy. And you're even already seeing I think there

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 3>was an overly defeatist attitude about Trump's nominations, and like

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 3>they are now quietly killing them. And so I think

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 3>that that is good and that you know, they don't

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 3>want to do it publicly. They're not you know, profiles

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 3>and courage, but they are right now putting their foot

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 3>down in some places, or at least and I even

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Joni Ernst, I think when she said we had a

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 3>frank exchange of views with Pete Hegseth, I hope he

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 3>told her about how women shouldn't be in the military,

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 3>since she is herself a military veteran. So like I

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 3>just I think there are ways in which the Senate

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 3>might be a little better than what people originally thought.

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 1>No, that was my take too, and I was happy

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to see it, and I wanted people to stop engaging

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>in that defeatist attitude and instead say, you know, this

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is their job and they're expected to do it because

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, however, if they want to do it like

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>total cowards, which it seems like they do, then that's

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 1>fine too. As long as they do it, that's right.

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Long, Well, thank you. I was just really glad

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to get to talk this through with you, so.

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Thanks, love it, Thanks so much for having me.

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Chris Murphy is the junior senator from Connecticut. Welcome back,

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to Fast Politics. Senator Murphy Grey All, Yah, good. I mean,

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>all things considered, I want you to talk about this

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>theory that you've been working on about where Democrats should

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>go next.

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I listen. I don't think any of us have

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 4>the complete case yet, but I mean, my underlying premise

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 4>is that we got skunked, and it'd be a real

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 4>mistake for us to think that there are minor adjustments

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 4>that will fix our brand and try to grow our coalition.

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, maybe I'm a little overly focused on the Senate,

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 4>but right now our ceiling is fifty two seats in

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 4>the Senate because we are not competitive any longer in

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 4>places that just a nanosecond ago we were competitive in,

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 4>like Ohio and Florida and Missouri and Iowa. So it

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 4>feels to me like we've got to do a real

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 4>hard assessment of why we claim to be the party

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 4>of poor people and working people, and working people and

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 4>poor people aren't voting for us. That sounds like we're

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 4>not listening to the people we actually represent. You know,

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 4>My early theory of the case is this that we

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 4>have become the party of the status quo. We're the

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 4>party that defends the establishment, and the Republican Party has

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 4>become the party to attack the status quo. That up

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 4>ends fifty plus years of political paradigm. And there's a

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 4>lot of different paths to once again become the true

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 4>progressive change party, but I would argue it starts by

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 4>being a real pugilistic populist party, meaning we attack power,

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 4>we name who has power, and we are really transparent

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 4>in the ways that we call for the elites to

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 4>lose power and for regular people to get it. That

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 4>means naming names, that means making people inside our coalition uncomfortable.

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 4>And then the second part is make that economic populism,

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 4>that breakup of concentrated power the tentpole of the party

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 4>and allow anybody in who is going to fight with

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 4>us to break up the monopolies, to control the tech companies,

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 4>to cap prescription drug prices, tax billionaires. That means, if

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 4>you're not lined up with us on one hundred percent

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 4>of our social and cultural issues as well as other

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 4>hot buttons like guns and climate, we're going to let

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 4>you in the tent. We're going to allow for some

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 4>disagreement and less litmus tests. That's a hard thing for

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 4>our party because we have come to apply a whole

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 4>bunch of litmus tests, and that has meant that our

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 4>coalition has shrunk, not expanded. It has meant that a

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 4>lot of kind of conservative poor people don't feel like

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 4>they find a home with us. So that's my early

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 4>analysis here. And I don't claim to have all the answers.

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm not one hundred percent sure I'm right, but I

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 4>don't think we have a lot of time to sort

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 4>of natlegates. I think we got to fix things pretty

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 4>fast because the train's coming.

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's so funny, because I mean, funny is

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the wrong word here, but it's interesting because Jed

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>here writes for The Nation as very lefty, basically said

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing about this election. He said Democrats

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>became the status quo party when you look at the

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers and you look at the sort of underperformance among

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>working people in urban areas. What Harris did was she

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of policy proposals, and she actually tried

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>really hard to talk about a lot of implementation of

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>those policy proposals. So my question is, I wonder how

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>much of that was his inability to communicate from an

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>early on, Like all Trump does is communicate. He doesn't

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>do policy, he doesn't do anything else but communicate. Meanwhile,

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrats just did not communicate very much despite doing a

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of economic populism. I mean, the legislation was almost

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>FDR style.

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, there's a couple of things to say

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 4>about that. First, people want you to relate to the

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 4>way that they are feeling. They actually want you to

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 4>spend some time listening to them and talking to them

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 4>about the problem and the injustice. Now Trump is one

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent diagnosed, complain about the problem, complain about the injustice.

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 4>He offers no solutions, and it's like really frustrating for

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 4>policy wonk Democrats when Trump gets away with it. But

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 4>it's because human psychology wants to be heard, and the

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 4>way that you know you've been heard is to listen

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 4>to somebody be outraged about the injustice that you're experiencing.

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 4>So take prescription drug prices. It's an outrage. People feel

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 4>it's an outrage. Democrats spend like twenty percent of our

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 4>time talking about the outrage, in eighty percent of our

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 4>time explaining the solution, which by the way, is kind

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 4>of a small ball adjust the market solution, a different

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 4>way to negotiate prices with the existing drug companies. We

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 4>should be shooting eighty percent of our time talking about

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 4>the problem, talking about the drug companies who are screwing Americans,

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 4>naming the exact CEOs, the exact companies hauling them before Congress,

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 4>and twenty percent of our time talking about the solution.

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 4>So we just communicate the wrong way. It doesn't match

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 4>up with how people actually perceive the world and think

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 4>about problems. And I agree with you that Harris had

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of really good policy proposals on the economy.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 4>And again i'm with you, like I think this was

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 4>a hard campaign for her to whim given that she's

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 4>shoved into it with a really short calendar. I'm not

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 4>sure that if she did everything right, she was going

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 4>to win.

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you have to wonder, like Democrats have run two

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>very competent women like there is may not just be

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>their personalities, right, It may just be the innate misogyny

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of American life.

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean that that might be true, but I

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.479
<v Speaker 4>don't know. That sounds to me like a little bit

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 4>of an invitation to not be engaged in a real

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:23.479
<v Speaker 4>hard to look at our policy. I mean, you can

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 4>say it's misogyny and racism, and you know what, throw

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 4>up our hands.

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Except the one thing I would say is like, it's

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously not racism because Americans have elected a black president.

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So like there's one thing that both of these. And again,

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to put you on this because it's

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>not relevant to what you're talking about. But I just

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>think that the fact that we can't even talk about it,

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and I see it everywhere, and I just wonder why.

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that there's an inability to talk about it.

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 4>And of course there are voters out there who are

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 4>unwilling to vote for a woman to be president of

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 4>the United States. There were also many young women who

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 4>probably showed up because there was a moment on the

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 4>balance It may be that the misogyny outweighs the excitement

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 4>factor of electing the first woman president. But I do

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.240
<v Speaker 4>think that there's weight on both sides of the balance sheet.

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 4>But there's another similarity between the Harris campaign and the

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 4>Clinton campaign. Neither of them made the economy and populist

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 4>economics the centerpiece of the campaign. The centerpiece of the

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 4>Clinton campaign, and I know this because I got the

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 4>talking points for the last two months. Was Donald Trump's

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 4>recklessness and outrageousness. The tenpole of the Harris campaign was democracy.

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 4>That's why Liz Cheney is campaigning with her in the

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 4>end because in this Chaney disagrees with her on the economy,

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 4>disagrees with her on raising taxes on billionaires, but agrees

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:51.240
<v Speaker 4>with their on democracy. And so there's also that similarity

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 4>that both of those campaigns decide that they are not

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 4>going to organize the campaign around attacking economic power, and

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 4>I just think we probably need to learn that lesson.

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>First talk to us about what that would look like.

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>So there's like the status issue, this Hofstadt or status issue.

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Whereas Trump was able to somehow convince voters again that

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>he was a working man's candidate, right, that there was

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>some of that going on.

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Sure again in a short campaign. I think it was

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 4>very difficult for them to try to unmask his fake populism.

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 4>But somebody was just in my office earlier today giving

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 4>me a good example of how the campaign would have

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 4>been different if you made economic populism and attacking corporate

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 4>power the centerpiece of the campaign. This person was saying,

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 4>you remember the part in the campaign where Mark Cuban,

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 4>who's one of her primary surrogates comes out and agrees

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 4>that Lena Khan to be fired. And it kind of

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 4>was swept under the rug right by the Harris campaign.

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 4>It was an opportunity to create a fight with a friend,

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 4>right right, right right, go after somebody that you know,

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.439
<v Speaker 4>you consider, you know, part of your club and say no, no,

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 4>you're just wrong about this, Like I'm sorry, I like

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Mark Cuban and I'm glad that he's out there campaigning

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 4>for me, but a hell no, I am not dismantling

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 4>the structure that breaks up corporate power. If you want

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 4>to support me, then you got to know that I'm

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 4>coming after the big corporations. And if you want to

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 4>be a part of this campaign, you better sign up

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 4>for kicking the shit out of the corporations that are

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 4>screwing regular Americans. On board, Mark, or you're not on board,

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 4>Like that would have been a moment, right if you

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 4>were organizing the campaign around the issue of attacking corporate

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 4>power and consolidated economic power. And again, I think they

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 4>ran a really good campaign. This is all in retrospect,

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 4>This is all like hindsight. I think they ran a

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 4>really good campaign. But that's an example of how that

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 4>campaign would look differently.

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I also think like separating herself from Biden was okay too.

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>There were things possible to do, but it was very hard.

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>For a long time, I thought you shouldn't go on

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>places like to because of any number of reasons. But

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:08.439
<v Speaker 1>now I actually believe that Democrats are giving up spaces

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 1>where they could actually win hearts and minds. Those clips

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that Trump produced from Joe Rogan, like almost seventy million

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>people watch them, Like that is insane.

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this is again this idea that we have litmus

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 4>tests right, that we're we're not looking for voters that

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 4>don't line up with us on all of our hot

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 4>button issues. We don't talk to media personalities that don't

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 4>line up with us on all of our issues. You

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 4>and I maybe talked about this. But a year and

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 4>a half ago, there was this conservative song that went

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 4>viral called rich Men North of Richmond, and it was

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 4>this singer who talked about, you know, the soul listness

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 4>of work and low wages and concerted corporate power. He

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:57.280
<v Speaker 4>had some conservative tropes in that song about welfare queens.

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 4>He had at least one QAnon reference. You could tell

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 4>that this was not a guy who was like lined

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 4>up with all of the progressive priorities, but he clearly

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.479
<v Speaker 4>cared about the shape of the economy in the justice

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 4>of the economy. And I kind of went online and

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:12.399
<v Speaker 4>was like, Hey, let's talk to this guy. Let's talk

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 4>to his followers, like this sounds like a group of

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 4>people who should be in a conversation with us. And

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 4>I got like shouted down online by the online left

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:22.879
<v Speaker 4>who was like, no, he doesn't agree with us on everything.

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to talk to him.

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>He's a racist.

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 4>People that listen to him a racists. They're not part

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 4>of our club. And so I just think we made

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 4>a decision to not convert, Like we made a decision

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 4>that if you don't agree with me right now and everything,

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to be in a conversation with you.

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 4>That's not how you build a movement. You build a

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 4>movement not by just going and getting everybody who already

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 4>agrees with you, but talking to people who don't agree

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 4>with you and trying to get them in the tent

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 4>based on some area of alignment, and then once they're

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 4>in the tent, trying to convince them to get a

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 4>little bit closer to you on the things that you

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 4>don't agree on.

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I do think one of the things that Trump did

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that was really successful was he took into the tent

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>RFK Junior, and RFK Junior brought a lot of women,

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>and you know, these are largely again I don't want

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to be patronizing here, but these are women who are

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit skeptical of a lot of the modern

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>medicine that I so prize as a person who lives

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in the year twenty twenty four. But I mean that

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>was a huge group who had never had anyone ever

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>appeal to them, and RFK galvanized them, and then Donald

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump invited them into his tent. I mean, now, morally

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 1>this is dicey, but there are certainly less moral groups.

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this group is I think they're being taken

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 1>advantage of a little bit. But I do think that

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>this illustrates the idea.

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I do. I'd have to sort of think through

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 4>whether I agree with you as to how much of

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 4>a vote GET or RFK Junior was. There's a judgmentalism

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 4>that people attached to us that doesn't exist in Trump's world,

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 4>and you know, I think that that comes with kind sequences.

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 4>People are a little afraid to be part of our

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 4>coalition because they feel like if they use the wrong word,

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:11.800
<v Speaker 4>they talk about gender in a nineteen ninety eight way,

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, they'll be pushed at to the side of shame.

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 4>So I do think we've got to understand that people

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 4>are a little afraid sometimes to be part of our

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 4>coalition because they're worried that we're too judgmental about language

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 4>and about folks who don't agree with us universally.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>So what would be the solve for that?

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 4>To first of all, just go to groups of people

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 4>that don't agree with us, to be in conversations with

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Joe Rogan's audience. Go to church groups where there's, you know,

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 4>some sense of selflessness and commitment to community, where you

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 4>might find economic populists who want to be part of

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 4>our club. To nominate candidates who don't line up with

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 4>us on the twelve most important issues, to do important

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 4>things that signal that we want to be a more

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 4>inclusive party again.

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So can we talk about that Nebraska Senate candidate?

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 4>Sure? I mean I wasn't deeply involved in that race.

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Certainly not. It was and Democrats were not involved in it,

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't run as a Democrat, but I did

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>interview him, and you know, he was an independent, but

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it was like a purely work the campaign and he

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>did ultimately get crushed by the millions of dollars that

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans put in for deb Fisher. But it struck

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>me that this was a guy who was really running

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a totally worker focused campaign.

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:42.720
<v Speaker 4>A worker focused campaign, a campaign that talked about economic power,

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 4>that talked about government playing a role to smooth out

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 4>the rough edges of the economy, but a campaign that

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 4>was really focused on that message. He ran further ahead

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:58.360
<v Speaker 4>of Kamala Harris than any other Senate candidate in the country.

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, maybe part of that is that he had

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:03.399
<v Speaker 4>that independent brand, but I think a lot of it

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 4>was that he was, you know, engaging in this kind

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 4>of big ten populism that I think is the key

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 4>to winning. I don't get the sense that people who

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 4>maybe you know, didn't supporting us all weapons ban, or

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 4>were a little squishy on climate or you know, maybe

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:24.240
<v Speaker 4>weren't on board with, you know, our positions on abortion

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 4>or gay rights. I don't think that they felt like

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 4>they couldn't be part of his coalition. And that's what

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm gunning for and frankly, I think that had he

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 4>been elected, even with the votes of folks who are

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:38.320
<v Speaker 4>anti choice or not on board with you know, gay rights,

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 4>it would have been really good to have somebody like

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 4>that representing Nebraska who would be then in a position

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 4>of power to be in a conversation with folks who

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 4>then might be more willing to listen to somebody somebody's

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 4>argument on why climate matters, on why assault weapons ban

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 4>isn't so scary. That's why you should be open to

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 4>bringing people who don't always degree with you into the coalition.

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for taking the time, Senator Chris Murphy.

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks n No Mo Execond, Jesse Cannon.

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 2>My junk past. One of the things that has a

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 2>lot of us going hmm is that all the Republicans

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 2>keep saying Elon won Trump the election, and we're starting

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 2>to see some details of why they're seeing that. Of

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 2>all the scummy things he did in this election, what

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 2>are you seeing here.

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk. He poured twenty million dollars into a mysterious

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>superpack called the RBG Pack, which launched ads, and they

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>were ads that were in the name of RBG. Rise

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Bader Ginsburg, who she had a chance to resign when

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>she was under Obama when she was eighty and she'd

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>had cancer. She did not take it and she stayed

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in She died in office and was replaced by Amy

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Coney Barrett, who is a conservative now, and they were

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 1>able to overturn movieweight. So this is another way the

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Conservatives love to own the Libs by delighting in the

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:15.320
<v Speaker 1>way they have overturned, you know, just taken away things

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>from women, and this will be no different. That's it

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune in every Monday, Wednesday,

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Thursday and Saturday to hear the best minds and politics

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>make sense of all this chaos. If you enjoy this podcast,

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>please send it to a friend and keep the conversation going.

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.