WEBVTT - Tech News: Hackers, National Security and You

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>are you. It's time for the tech news for Thursday

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>October nineteenth, twenty twenty three, and we're going to start

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>off with some tech in national security concerns here in

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States. So this week the Five Eyes Alliance

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>met at Stanford University to discuss matters of tech and security.

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the Five Eyes Alliance sounds like something

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>out of you know, a Sherlock Holmes novel or maybe

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Game of Thrones or something, but in fact, it's a

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>group that consists of representatives from the United States, the

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. And they discussed

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>current and future threats to safety and innovation, and the

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>general consensus was that China is the largest threat in

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that regard. The group cited instances of Chinese hackers infiltrating

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>computer systems, as well as of actual spies conducting industrial espionage,

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>and of various attempts to compromise business insiders, all in

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>an effort to steal intellectual property and tech secrets. Much

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>was made of the fact that China has an enormous

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>program centered on state backed hacking projects, a program that's

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>larger than all other nations combined in fact, and that

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>China has directed operatives to focus on emerging technologies, including

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff like quantum computing and artificial intelligence. The representatives also

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>warned that the emergence of generative AI could help hackers

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>create more efficient attacks, making their efforts even more effective.

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>The meeting concluded with representatives warning the audience that this

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is something all governments and businesses will need to be

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>aware of or else they will run the risk of

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>being caught unawares. Sounds like a real fun group. On

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a related note, the US government has updated its export

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>rules and added restrictions on the types of processors that

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>companies are allowed to ship to China. As it stands,

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>big companies like AMD, Nvidia, and Intel are not allowed

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to ship their high end processors to China unless they

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>first secure an export license from the US Department of Commerce.

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>That actually includes Nvidia's g Force RTX forty ninety graphics cards,

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think most people would associate that with high

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>end computer gaming. But as we've seen, powerful GPUs could

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>be put to work doing all sorts of processing besides,

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, making puddles of water all reflective in sessions

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of call of duty or whatever. Further, the rules mean

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that companies will not be able to rely on Chinese

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing to make these products. And since a lot of

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:02.119
<v Speaker 1>chip manufacturing, or the very least chip assembly, will take

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>place in China, that's going to push these companies to

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>pivot to find alternatives that in turn is likely to

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>impact the cost of production. And I think we all

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 1>know that that's probably going to mean for us down

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the road that we're going to be paying higher prices

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>for these chips for ourselves in the products that we

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>were purchasing. China is not the only country that's on

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the US's list of no nos when it comes to exports.

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>There's also the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, and Saudi Arabia.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>All will require that companies first secure and export license

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>with the US Department of Commerce before they can legally

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:45.839
<v Speaker 1>send those high performing chips to those destinations. A couple

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, a hacker leaked stolen information from the

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>genetic testing company twenty three and meters, So according to

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the company, the suspicion is the hacker used a technique

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>called credential stuffing, So that's when a hacker is able

0:03:59.960 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to pull data from other breaches and then uses that

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>data to try and match user names and emails and

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>stolen passwords for other services and try combinations of them

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>so they can see if someone's used the same password

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>at multiple locations, which is why you should not do that.

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Do not use the same password or even just a

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>small group of passwords for all of your services. You

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>should have a unique password for every single service, because

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it's bad enough. If one of your accounts gets hacked,

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that's terrible. It is a horrible hassle and it can

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>really have a negative impact on you and your livelihood.

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>But it can turn into a total disaster if it

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>turns out the now the people who did that attack

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>have the keys to all your stuff because you use

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>the same log in and password for everything. Well, now

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that some hacker has done this again and the new

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>leak includes millions of data points about twenty three and

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 1>Me's customers, it's big news. The information covers around four

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>million people, and the hacker posted the information on a

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>forum known as a Hive of Scum and Villainy a

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>hacker forum, and it has the imposing name Beach Forums.

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Trust me, it's scarier than it sounds anyway. The hacker

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>claims that the records include information on people from very

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>wealthy backgrounds. Twenty three and Me has informed users that

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they should both update their passwords and also enable multi

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>factor authentication. According to tech Crunch, twenty three and meter

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>quote blamed the incident on its customers for reusing passwords

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and an opt in feature called DNA relatives, which allows

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>users to see the data of other opted end users

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>whose genetic data matches theirs. End quote. So, in other words,

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and Me is saying you should stop reusing

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>your passwords so much, you're the reason why this attack worked.

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>But they're also like, oh, and also, we have this

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>option in our service that if you turn it on,

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>means that hackers could potentially use your account to scrape

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>other accounts. So other accounts that might be very well

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>protected as far as passwords go, they could still be

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable because of this opt in feature. So really everyone's

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>at fault. I guess a lot of victim blaming going

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>around over at twenty three and me. But anyway, that's

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the update on that story. The Washington Post published an

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>article with advice on what people can do if they

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>are worried about the twenty three and me breach. The

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>article also expanded a little bit on the attack itself.

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>They said that the hacker was specifically calling out the

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that the breach included many Jewish people in it,

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and considering world events right now, that is particularly sinister,

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like that has an edge to it in my mind.

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>The suggestions in the article include pretty much the same

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>steps that twenty three and Me suggested. You know, select

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a unique, impossible to guess password for the service and

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>for every other service. It should not be a password

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that you've used anywhere else, and the article goes on

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that users who are really concerned can ask

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and me to delete all information about you

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>from their servers. It also points out that only a

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>few states in the United States have laws that compel

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a company to follow through on those requests, and those

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>states are California, Colorado, and Virginia, which leaves forty seven

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>states that you know don't have a law that does that.

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>But requesting the deletion within the service will then prompt

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>them to send you a confirmation email, and then you

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have to, you know, click in the confirmation email to

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>confirm that yes, you want all of your data delete it.

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And even then, twenty three and me will keep some

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>information due to quote unquote legal and lab requirements. However,

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>when asked to elaborate on that, twenty three and Me

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>did not expound upon the nature of that data. So

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exactly what they do retain, but they

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>do retain something, not truly that they delete all of

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the user data. The article also suggests that perhaps you

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>should resist sharing genetic information in general, which you know,

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>not very helpful because the cat is already out of

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the bag. Like I get it, like saying you shouldn't

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>have done that, But you know what, saying you shouldn't

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>have done that doesn't help anybody because the person who

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>did it already knows they shouldn't have done it. It's

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.559
<v Speaker 1>just a whole superiority thing. It's one of my pet peeves.

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm getting head up about it. Like the

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I told you so, nature doesn't It doesn't help anything.

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>It just makes you look like a jerk. I know

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>because I used to say it all the time and

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I was a jerk and some days I still am. Anyway,

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I also think sharing genetic information isn't a very good idea.

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>But we also live in a world where companies are

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>constantly conditioning us to share more information about ourselves, right, Like,

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what all of social media is predicated upon, is

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>us sharing information about ourselves, and we kind of get

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a little reward for that by the way, people who

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, engage with the stuff we post, and in

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, all we're really doing is feeding the machine,

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>which is a big ol' yuck. So yeah, I also

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think that you should share your genetic data on,

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>especially on a platform that is, you know, publicly viewable.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>But I also think we all need to kind of

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>take a step back on how much we're sharing online anyway,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 1>because what we're really doing is just you know, lining

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the pockets of these companies with lots of more, lots

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>more money because they can advertise to us more effectively.

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>But all right, that's enough soap boxing. Let's let's keep

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>on going. Our next story might have you questioning what

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the I in CIA actually stands for. Now, for the record.

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>The CIA is the central intelligence agency here in the

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>United States. The main job of the CIA is to

0:09:54.800 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>protect US national security, primarily through gathering and analyzing foreign intelligence.

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, earlier this month, the CIA included a link

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>in its bio on x, you know, the service formerly

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>known as Twitter, and the link was meant to take

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>people to a CIA run channel on telegram uh And

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>it was meant so that for people who have intelligence

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that is important to national security, they could have a

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>secure and private way to contact someone at the CIA

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and share the information. So what you're supposed to do

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is use tour the tor browser and you clandestinely contact

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the CIA over the dark web. But there was a

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>problem because the restrictions on biolink on x meant that

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>when this was posted, the address for that telegram channel

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>got cut off a bit, so, in other words, it

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>was no longer the actual telegram channel for the CIA.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>If you were to try and go to that telegram channel,

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you would find that it went to an unclaimed channel,

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>which meant someone could claim it and then pose as

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the CIA. A man named Kevin mcshehon noticed this problem

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and took the steps to register the channel before a

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>malicious actor could do it. And he even posted a

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>message that revealed that if you did go to that

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>telegram channel, that it was not an official CIA channel

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and said do not share sensitive information with anyone, and

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>he listed it both in English and in Cyrillic. The

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>CIA has since addressed the problem by ensuring that the

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>full address for the real telegram channel is appearing in

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the ex bio. And as I read about this in Motherboard,

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>the title of the article suggests that the problem was

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 1>due to a flaw in X, but I think I

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>would be more inclined to wag by thinker at the

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>CIA for not double checking that the address that appeared

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in the bio was in fact the correct one. So yeah,

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it may be because the limitation on bio length and

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>X caused it to happen, But that seems like that's

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>something you should triple check is correct before you just

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>walk away. Okay, we've got other news stories to cover today.

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to that, let's take a quick break. Okay,

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So the media outlet New Scientist posted an article last

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>week that I did not see until today, but I

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 1>figure it's an important one to bring up because we're

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about security and hackers a lot. In today's episode,

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a cryptography expert named Daniel Bernstein, who works at the

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>University of Illinois, Chicago, came forward to say that the

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>US National Security Agency, the NSA, has been pushing to

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>influence the adoption of standards related to post quantum cryptography,

0:12:56.000 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or nis T,

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>refutes this accusation. So essentially, what Bernstein is saying is

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that the NSA wants to shape these standards, which would

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>then weaken cryptography, because otherwise quantum cryptography could potentially be

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>so strong that the NSA would not be able to

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>crack it. And the NSA is all about reading stuff

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>that you didn't intend the NSA to read. You might remember,

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the NSA has a pretty nasty track record of finding

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>ways to intercept communications. This was a huge scandal like

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago, and that capability also led to abuse.

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm reminded of stories about how some people on NSA's

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>staff would use these tools that were meant to do

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>things like detect potential terrorists, cell communications, things like that,

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>but they were using the tools to do stuff like

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>snoop on people they knew, like an ex romantic partner

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're using these these government level surveillance tools for

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff, And you know that obviously wasn't

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the intended purpose for the tools. But it turns out

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a tool is only trustworthy if the person who's using

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it is also trustworthy, and people can be total jerkfaces.

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Bernstein maintains that the NIST is not being transparent when

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes to establishing these standards and that the consequences

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of this could be unreliable security measures moving forward. That

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, if the NSA essentially has the equivalent of

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a back door to get into these otherwise encrypted communication channels,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that means other people could potentially find their way through

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>those back doors too. It. Like I've always said, this,

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>putting a back door into a security system means you

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>no longer have a secure system, just full stop. Like,

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of creating a secure system is to

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>not have ways for people to get in that aren't

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>through specific checkpoints. So I still feel that way about this.

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Earlier this week, US Senator Michael Bennett sent a letter

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to Google, TikTok X, and Meta regarding how these platforms

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>are handling the influx of misinformation in the wake of

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the war between Israel and hamas As. I'm sure you

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>know there's been a surge in that kind of content

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>across all of social media, and Bennett has accused the

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>respective algorithms of these platforms of amplifying that signal and

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>quote contributing to a dangerous cycle of outrage, engagement, and

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>redistribution end quote. Bennett is seeking information on the policies

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and processes each platform follows to combat misinformation, though whatever

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>those might be, they are clearly not sufficient, at least

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>according to Bennett. In his letter, he writes, quote, the

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>mountain of false content clearly demonstrates that your current policies

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and protocols are inadequate end quote. Bennett also criticized how Google, Meta,

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and X have all made cuts, sometimes drastic ones, to

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the various teams dedicated to detecting and removing disinformation and

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>hate speech. While I feel the Senator is making some

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>legitimate criticisms, I'm not sure what follow up there's going

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to be from all of this. If you are in

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand or the Philippines and you're not already on

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>X formerly known as Twitter, pretty soon you're gonna have

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to pay admission if you do want to join, and

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that's because X is going to require a one dollar

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>annual subscription fee for new users starting in those countries. Now,

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>according to X, this is to discourage bot farms. Only

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>by paying the fee will the account be able to

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>post and interact with other posts. If you don't pay

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the fee, you can follow folks on Twitter and you

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>can read posts on Twitter, but you can't interact with them,

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and you can't post anything yourself. So you might be asking,

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, they're starting in New Zealand and the Philippines,

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>does that mean that's where all the bot farms are. No,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>It's just these are serving as a testing ground for

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>this new policy, and then the thought is, assuming it works,

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that policy will roll out to other countries. Now, X

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>says this is not intended to be a revenue generator,

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm inclined to believe them. I mean, at one

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar per user per year, I think it's pretty fair

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to say that's not a revenue generator. Instead, what this

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is meant to be as a deterrent for people who

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>want to run armies of spambots, because if they want

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>all those spambots to be able to post and that's

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the only way that spambots are useful. Then they have

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to pay a dollar for every single one of those spambots.

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you're trying to coordinate a campaign that has

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>thousands of spam bots, that's thousands of dollars out of

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>your pocket to do it. So while I'm not crazy

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>about this idea, I do think the strategy could potentially

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>work for X and it doesn't put a hefty burden

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>on most new users. Most folks can cough up a

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.959
<v Speaker 1>dollar for a year's subscription to being able to use Twitter,

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and if it means that it cuts back on the

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>spam armies, then that's a good thing. So I often

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>am very critical of X, but in this case, I

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think it might actually make sense switching gears, as it were,

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to a different elon Musk company Tesla held an earnings

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>call this week, and Musk gave an update on the

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>long delayed cyber truck. Now, we first heard about this

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>concept way back in twenty nineteen, and since then a

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have put in a pre order for one,

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>like a million customers have reserved a cyber truck, and

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like folks are going to have to keep

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>on waiting. At least a lot of them are because

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Musk says that Tesla will start to deliver cyber trucks

0:18:55.960 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>to customers beginning on November thirtieth, So that's good, but

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.959
<v Speaker 1>it will take quite a bit longer before Tesla can

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>ramp up manufacturing to meet demand. In fact, Musk said,

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the goal is that they're hoping the company can get

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>up to manufacturing two hundred and fifty thousand cyber trucks

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>per year. That's not even likely to be reached until

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.719
<v Speaker 1>after twenty twenty four. And because you've got a million

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>people who have put a reservation on the cyber truck,

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that means it's going to take several years before Tesla

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>can even meet the demand of pre orders. And that,

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, that's assuming everybody wants to keep their pre

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>order on their truck. But yeah, just because you have

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a pre order, it may mean you're still like three

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>years out from being able to get your vehicle or more.

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Musk said that quote we dug our own grave with

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the cyber truck end quote. I think that was apparent

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>when during a demonstration of how strong the cyber truck's

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>windows are, they shattered the Windows anyway. During the call,

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Musk also gave a somewhat pessimistic view on where the

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>global economy is going in general. Will also ways to

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>bring down the price on Tesla vehicles. They said, we've

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>got to get the costs to come down. And that

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>makes sense because there are also a lot more auto

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>companies that are making vehicles that now compete directly with

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the ones that Tesla manufactures. And it's not just Tesla.

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It's having to face a tough economy. Both Apple and

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft are seeing declines. There's a decline in MacBook shipments

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that one analyst has pointed to. Windows eleven adoption is

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>trailing well behind what Windows ten did, So we're seeing

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>these issues throughout the tech space. Okay, well, this brings

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>us to the end of the episode. I do have

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of article recommendations for you. First up as

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>a piece from ap news dot Com titled Fuji's Rapper

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>says lawyer's use of AI helped tank his case, pushes

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>for new trial. I just think that's interesting. One, it's

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fuji is Two, it's not the first time we've

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>heard how AI being used in a trial setting has

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>not gone According to Plan. The other piece I recommend

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is by Emon Javers and Page Tortorelli of CNBC. That

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>one's titled The Secret Life of Jimmy Jeong, who Stole

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and lost more than three billion dollars. That story involves cryptocurrency,

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>stealing money from the Silk Road, living like a rock star,

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>being the victim of a break in like it's got everything.

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>There's also a documentary that CNBC has released called How

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>To Steal and Lose more Than three Billion in Bitcoin.

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Both of those are well worth checking out. And that's

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>it for this week. I will talk to you again

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.