WEBVTT - Lots More on How CHIPS Act Money Got Awarded

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. That's cool that they're

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>all standing desks though.

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 2>It is nice.

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they have like a little switch on the right

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 3>side that like it's because I when I had when

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 3>I asked for a standing desk in New York, I

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 3>got like a platform that was maybe a quarter the

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 3>size of my actual desk, yeah, which they put like

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 3>the screens basically, yeah, And I was like, this gives

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 3>me no workspace.

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>And then you have to like bend down if you

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>want to like write a notepad and paper.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, So the DC desk definitely win on that front.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 3>I think San Francisco are maybe the same, but I

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 3>haven't paid enough attention in other offices.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to try a standing desk one day,

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>but I don't want to like loom over Joe Weird.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm intimidated enough.

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 2>But I think I'd be.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Annoyed if I was sat down and then like someone

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>was standing next to me. I don't know, I think

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it would feel well.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 3>It is a little bit of a posturing thing, I think.

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:00.959
<v Speaker 3>And when I had a standing desk in New York,

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 3>I would like forget it existed for three weeks and

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 3>then I would make a whole show of standing for

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 3>an entire day and people are like, you never stand, Like,

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 3>what are you standing?

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 4>I did a deadlift one two, Jimmy, Okay, go.

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Y up, Marges.

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 4>This isn't after School Special, except.

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>I've decided I'm going to base my entire personality going

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>forward on campaigning for a strategic pork reserve in the US.

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Where's the best in posta?

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>These are the important question?

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Is that robots taking over the world.

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 5>I think that like in a couple of years, the

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 5>AI will do a really good job of making the

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 5>odd lotch podcast, And people say, I don't really need

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 5>to listen to Joe and Tracy anymore, But we do

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 5>have the perfect welcome to lots More where we catch

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 5>up with friends about what's going on right now.

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Because even when Odd Lots is over, there's always lots

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>More and.

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 4>We really do have the perfect guest.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about Chips, right, Chips.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 2>I hope.

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, that's what I know about.

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 5>So, uh, how's it going, McKenzie?

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I am doing well. How are you guys doing great?

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm coming off of like the busiest month of

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Chips news efforts.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>You've had a lot of scoops. I feel like I

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like I've seen your byline quite a lot.

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 3>There have been a couple of busy weeks and I'm yeah,

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 3>now I'm like recuperating. But unfortunately this is not I

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 3>mean fortunately, but unfortunately for my sleep schedule. This is

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 3>not a beat that really seems to ever rest.

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 5>So is all the chips sech money now dispersed? Like

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 5>where are we because it sort of feels like we

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 5>were like an end of.

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Some stage here.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 3>I would say we're at the end of stage one.

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Commerce Secretary Gino Raimondo referred to it as the bottom

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 3>of the second inning at a Semaphore event in DC.

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Recently, the department.

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Has burned through about eighty five percent of the direct

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 3>grant funding that they set aside to convince them conducting

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 3>manufacturers to build more factories in the US. But that

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 3>doesn't mean that the money's actually out the door. These

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 3>are all preliminary agreements. There are seven agreements and ounce

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 3>so far, and then there's three and a half billion

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 3>set aside for this military chips program that we can

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 3>get into that all accounts for, Like eighty five percent

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 3>of the money is spoken for nearly eighty five percent.

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 2>But now all these.

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Companies are entering these months long due diligence stages to

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 3>actually reach a final term sheet, and then the money

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 3>will only be dispersed when they hit key construction and

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 3>production benchmarks, So it will actually take several years for

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>all of the money to get out the door. And

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 3>none of these companies have seen a single dime yet.

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So we are speaking to our Bloomberg Collie Chips expert

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and reporter Mackenzie Hawkins. She's been on the show before,

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but we're trying to get an update on all these

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>latest semiconductor headlines because I again going back to what

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I was saying earlier, there happened a lot of them

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of flying around and it's sort of hard to

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>keep track. But I think the one that is probably

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>freshest in my mind is the Intel drama. Can you

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe talk a little bit about that, Mackenzie. I want

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to understand, like, why does it count as drama the

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>whole It seems to be very dramatic for people in

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>this space. What's going on here?

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 3>So a bit over a month ago, Intel one the

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 3>largest grant from the ships ACKed program eight and a

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:30.799
<v Speaker 3>half billion dollars to support construction projects spanning four states,

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 3>including this megafab that they're trying to build in Ohio,

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 3>this massive expansion in Arizona. They have an advanced packaging

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 3>project in New Mexico, which is the technology that fits

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 3>chips together for use, and this really big R and

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 3>D effort and organ which is where all of their

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 3>R and D is housed. Intel has in many ways

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 3>been a focal point of this program. It's the only

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 3>US company that makes cutting edge logic semiconductor chips. Its

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 3>main rivals in that space would be Taiwan Semi conduct

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Manufacturing Company and South Korea's Samsung, which also received billions

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 3>and billions of dollars in ships ACKed grants over the

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 3>past couple of months. But as the American leader and

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 3>as you know, CEO, Pat Gelsinger has been so vocal

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 3>about the chips ACKed from you know, encouraging the Biden

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>administration and lawmakers to pass in the first place, you know,

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 3>wanting to be the first company to get a really

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 3>big award, which you know is the fourth company to

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 3>get an award in general, but the first company to

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>ink you know, multiple billions of dollars eight and a

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 3>half billion dollars. There's been a lot of back and

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 3>forth between officials and Intel over how much money this

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 3>company should get.

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of drama.

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Ensued in late February early March. So Intel's award was

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be announced like the last Monday in February,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 3>was tentatively scheduled, and it was rescheduled for some White.

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>House scheduling reasons.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 3>And that Thursday, the Pentagon informed the Commerce Department that

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 3>they would be pulling out of their two and a

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 3>half billion dollar commitment to this program called Secure Enclave.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Now that's the three and a half billion dollar program

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 3>for military chips that I referenced earlier. So originally the

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 3>Commerce Department was supposed to put a billion, the Pentagon

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 3>was supposed to put two point five billion, And the

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 3>idea is that this would be dedicated government funding to

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 3>produce cutting edge semiconductors with military and intelligence applications. And

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Intel was the sole intended recipient of that funding. But

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 3>when the Pentagon pulled out of their portion, lawmakers then

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 3>who were coming up actually against a government shutdown, They

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 3>were trying to move appropriations bills for pretty much every

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 3>single major federal agency that weekend. This single item whether

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 3>to make the Commerce Department pay the full three and

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 3>a half billion out of chipsacked funding drag negotiations over

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 3>this broader budget and spending package several additional days. Ultimately,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 3>lawmakers directed the Commerce Department to spend three and a

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>half billion dollars out of a total thirty nine billion

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 3>dollars on this program from military chips, which we've reported

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Intel is the sole intended recipient.

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, I just like.

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 5>Don't understand, like, you know, okay, you have this pot

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 5>of money in different agencies within the government, Like how

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 5>does the Defense Department You're like, you know what, We're

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 5>not going to pay. We're just like, we're not doing this.

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 5>I don't even understand how that happens, Like it does

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 5>not seem like a very coordinated, unified government to something

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 5>can just be like thrown up at the last second.

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Like that, Oh well you said on me, Joe. I

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 3>mean certainly there are folks on the hill who are

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 3>very very upset about this. You might imagine that the

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Commerce Department, which has you know, they stood up a

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 3>two hundred person team spanning everybody from bankers who came

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 3>down from Wall Street to career bureaucrats in Washington to

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 3>semiconductor industry experts to decide, Okay, we have thirty nine

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in grants, plus there's some loans and loan

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 3>guarantees and a tax credit program that will also provide

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>significant funding in the companies, but thirty nine billion dollar

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 3>and direct grants. Our goal is to get twenty percent

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 3>of advanced logic tips produced in the US by the

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>end of the decade. We want ship making clusters at

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 3>least two of them to be bought back to the US,

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 3>and we want to reduce reliance on Asia and better

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 3>compete with China. So I mean, these folks have been

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 3>working round the clock for months and months to figure

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 3>out which companies have the most viable projects, how much

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 3>money should be given to each company. And they think

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 3>that they have a certain amount of money, and then

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 3>they have two and a half billion dollars less of that,

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 3>and so that triggers a whole other round of negotiations

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 3>where they have to figure out, Okay, where are we

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 3>going to pull this two and a half billion from?

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 5>So did some entity get two and a half billion

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 5>less than they might have expected?

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 3>So we're still actually seeing the fallout. One direct consequence,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 3>it seems, is that the Commerce Department scrapped a funding

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 3>opportunity and application process for commercial R and D facilities.

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 3>So they released applications over a year ago for large

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 3>scale manufacturing projects the type that we're seeing from Intel,

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 3>from TSMC, from Samsung. There's also a smaller application process

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 3>where they've set aside five hundred million dollars, so really

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 3>a small amount of this overall funding pool for manufacturing

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 3>projects and supply chain projects with under three hundred million

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 3>in expenditors from the company. There was originally intended to

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>be a third application process still from that thirty nine

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar funding pool for commercial research and development projects,

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 3>and they canceled that in late March. They attributed that

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 3>to the recent congressional appropriations decision, which was a reference

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 3>to this Secure Enclave program. And we've already actually started

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 3>to see some industry fallout. Applied Materials had planned to

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 3>build a four billion dollar R and D facility in California.

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 2>They're now saying, we're not so sure.

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So you touched on the reasoning for the Secure Enclave project,

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think there's been quite a lot of criticism

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>over like why have it at all? And I was

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>reading I can't remember where it was, but there was

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a quote from it was a Department of Defense person

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>or a Congressional aid or something, and they basically said,

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we have systems for getting the military the sensitive chips

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 1>that they need already, which sounds very ominous. It sounds

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>very like we have ways of dealing with you kind of,

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But why do you need to carve out that special

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>funding for military applications at all?

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a great question.

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 3>There is certainly a lot of disagreement in Washington about

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 3>whether this program is necessary and whether it's smart to

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 3>rely on one singular company. There's a separate program that's

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 3>existed for quite some time called a Trusted Foundry program,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 3>where basically US officials go and vet a factory, say okay,

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 3>this is secure, we trust it as part of a

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 3>military and intelligence supply chain. And the biggest company that's

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 3>part of that program is Global Foundriies. And so when

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 3>we first reported this whole Pentagon Commerce Congress funding squabble,

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Global Founderies went on the record and talk to.

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Us about it.

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 3>So there are certainly folks here who think it's not

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 3>a great idea to align on one company. It's also

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe not a great idea to rely on of the

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 3>three big logic chip makers, the company that lags behind

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 3>its peers. But there's an acceptance that if we're going

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 3>to do this, if we're going to have this secure

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 3>facility within a facility for chips that are going into

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 3>our most sensitive intelligence military applications, they have to come

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 3>from an American company. So if you want a dedicated

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 3>supply chain for cutting edge chips for the Pentagon, you

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 3>almost have to go to Intel. And so that's the

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 3>question that folks have been wrestling with, and I think

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 3>that it points to a broader reality sort of shaping

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 3>the entire chips program, is that, you know, Intel has

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 3>fallen off over the past decade and a half in

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 3>terms of its technology advancement compared to TSMC and SMSUNG,

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 3>but it's also the only American company that competes at

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 3>the cutting edge in logic chips. And so you know,

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 3>while there is all this back and forth, Raimondo, the

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Commerce Secretary, has all so called Intel an American champion company.

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 3>In some ways, the US government doesn't have a choice

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 3>but to make and tell the face of this program,

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 3>but they've also tried to be very clear that this

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 3>is not a subsidy program that's for just one company.

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 3>The goal is not to spread the money to thin

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 3>so that it's ineffective, but to strategically try to secure

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 3>investments from the top manufacturers all over the world. And

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 3>the US is actually the only country of you know,

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 3>dozens of governments that are doing similar semiconductor substy efforts,

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 3>the US is the only one secure investments from the

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 3>top five chip companies. So that does speak volumes about

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the interest that you know, global competitors in this space

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 3>have in American funding opportunities and in the growing semi

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 3>conductor ecosystem here.

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 5>You know, there was a big story recently, I think

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.359
<v Speaker 5>it's in the rest of world about TSMC in Arizona,

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 5>but there's you know, this is a big concern generally,

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 5>which is like, Okay, it's great, we're going to build

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 5>all these factories, but what about local environmental regulations, what

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 5>about labor regulation, what about lack of.

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Talent, etc.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 5>To do all this stuff? Like generally, what is your

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.719
<v Speaker 5>sense about these various big the big projects that are

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 5>going up in terms of like essentially how hard we

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 5>make it for them in this country to build new things.

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 3>It's a very real concern. I mean, you know, hypothetical

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 3>money is great, but these factories actually have to get built,

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 3>and we have seen some hiccups along the way. I

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 3>mean there have been delays at TSMC, there was a

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 3>delay at Samsung. The companies, of course say that, you know,

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 3>these are tens of billions of dollars worth of capital expenditures.

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 3>These are projects that take years to stand up. Moving

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 3>our timeline back by a quarter maybe isn't that big

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 3>of a deal, but you know, to the TSMC example

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 3>in particular, the company had a lot of issues with

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 3>local unions in Arizona over the summer. They said in

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 3>July that they were delaying the start of production at

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 3>their first of what is now three fabs that they're

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 3>building in Arizona because there are not enough skilled workers

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 3>in Arizona. And this was specifically workers who are going

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 3>to install the most high end equipment, equipment that TSMC says,

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>we've actually only had experience installing in Taiwan, so we

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 3>need to bring Taiwanese workers over to help handle this.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 3>You might imagine that did not go over particularly well

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 3>with the Arizona Building and Trades Council. There was a

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 3>petition to stop the Taiwanese workers from coming. There were

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of allegations of safety and mismanagement issues. Those

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 3>are somewhat resolved in Arizona. The Building and Trades Council

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 3>and the company reached a labor accord in December, and

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 3>their construction as of now is on schedule with that

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 3>delayed timeline for the first fab, which is set to

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 3>open in twenty twenty five. They're also building a second facility.

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Originally that was supposed to open in twenty twenty six.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 3>They said in January that it would open in twenty

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven or twenty twenty eight. We now know that

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 3>it'll be in twenty twenty eight. They're evaluating market conditions.

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 3>They also said that the level of technology they'd produce

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 3>would depend on the level of US grants that they receive.

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 3>They are going to produce their most.

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Cutting edge technology in Arizona.

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 3>So there's, you know, maybe some feeling in Washington that

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 3>was part of a negotiating tactic, but they have certainly

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 3>seen delays. You know, the second company to receive a

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 3>chips ACKed award Microchip Technology a couple of days later

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 3>said that they were going to shut down their factory

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 3>for a couple of weeks because they're trying to match

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 3>market demand. And you know, their concern is not finishing

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 3>the expansion that the federal government is funding. Their concern

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 3>is meeting their customers where they are. This is an

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 3>industry that goes through crazy booms and crazy bus and

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 3>so whether this is all funny money or real money

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 3>will depend on whether the companies see sufficient demand for

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the chips that they are going to produce. You know,

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Micron has said we could spend up to one hundred

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in upstate New York to produce high bandwidth

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 3>memory chips. Right now, we're committing to fifty, we're committing

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 3>to two fabs. Certainly, local officials in New York would

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 3>like to see a sprawling semic conductor complex that at

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 3>umployed nine thousand people. They might get half of that from.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>This was always sort of one of the criticisms of

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this particular project, the idea that yes, you can build

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>fabs and spend billions of dollars doing it, but if

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the customers aren't there, or if there isn't a reliable

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>source of demand, then it doesn't really amount to a

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>sustainable business model. Have you seen anything like on the

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>policy side in terms of addressing that aspect of it.

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Are people talking about that a little bit more in

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>recent months?

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's certainly a recognition, you know, especially when

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>we get stories coming out about delays at these major projects.

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 3>There's a recognition that it's not going to be a

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 3>linear path to the US producing some significant market share

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 3>of advanced semiconductors. There's also a recognition that this artificial

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 3>intelligence boom is going to drive massive global demand for

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 3>these chips. I mean, you have some key executives in

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 3>that space. Sam Altman and OpenAI of course come to

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 3>mind saying, you know, we need as many of these

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 3>chips as we can get. Altman is on a tear raising,

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, billions and billions of dollars to try to

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 3>stand up factories across the world to produce these chips.

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know that there's necessarily concern here that

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden interest is going.

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 2>To drop off.

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 3>But there are also so many different types of semiconductor

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 3>technology that this program is trying to fund that each

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 3>deal with their own market conditions. So, you know, we

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 3>spent a lot of time talking about advanced semiconductors, like

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 3>the type that Intel and TSMC are going to manufacture,

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 3>but there are also older generation chips, the type that

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 3>still go in your phone and your fridge and in

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 3>weapons systems, and there is a smaller amount of money

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 3>in the chips actually the side for that, but the

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 3>government is still going to try to find production of

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 3>those chips as well.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 5>This is what I wanted to ask you about because

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 5>one of the ironies here, one of the strange things

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 5>is sort of I think chip vulnerability. I'm sure people

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 5>in the space have been talking about it for a

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 5>long time, but I think it came on many people's

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 5>radar in twenty twenty when the car companies couldn't get

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 5>ships and couldn't make cars.

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Those are not definitely when it came on our radar.

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, certainly us.

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 5>Maybe I'm just projecting on everyone else, but okay, came

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 5>on the outlaws radar. Those are not particularly advanced chips

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.719
<v Speaker 5>that the car companies couldn't get. They're like pretty lagging edge,

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 5>And there is does seem to be this other concern

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 5>that the real risk is not that the US gets

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 5>cut off from the leading ed chips, but that the

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 5>Chinese companies, which maybe not be at the cutting edge

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 5>because they don't have the same access to you know

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 5>whatever ASML's equipment, but they're doing extremely well. It sounds

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 5>like in the lagging edge chips like in many areas,

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 5>probably much more cost competitive than the current options that

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 5>you know for whatever. How much concern is there in

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 5>DC that's like, okay, this project, Yes, it's a you

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 5>know that twenty percent market share in leading edge technology,

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 5>but meanwhile we have this big sort of bubbling dependency

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 5>and challenge on the lagging edge side, which goes into

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 5>every product we use.

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 3>The short answer is there's a lot of concern. The

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Director of the National Economic Council, Lalel Brainerd has been

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 3>talking about Chinese overcapacity in a range of sectors. That

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 3>was a big theme of the Treasury Secretary's recent trip

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 3>to China, and older generation or so called legacy chips

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 3>are certainly a part of that. You know, the US

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 3>cut China off from the most advanced semiconductor chips and

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 3>semiconductor manufacturing equipment in twenty twenty two, with these sweeping

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 3>export controls. Then they got Japan and the Netherlands, two

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 3>key allies in the supply chain, on board, with relatively

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 3>the same type of restrictions, although there are some key

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 3>differences in loopholes that officials are now pressing. The US

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 3>officials are now pressing allies to try to close those.

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 3>China's response was, Okay, We're going to double down where

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 3>we can. You know, they had already been building massive,

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 3>massive semiconductor manufacturing capacity. The many experts say that US

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 3>restrictions only incentivize them to double down on that. They're

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 3>still pursuing the cutting edge. You know, we spent a

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of time this year also thinking about Huawei and

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 3>their chip making ambitions. Their top chip maker, Smith has

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 3>reached a seven nanometer capacity, which is certainly considered advanced.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Not quite as advanced.

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 3>As you know, the type of chips that will be

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 3>made in the US, but ahead o where the US

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 3>wanted China to be. But China is outpacing the rest

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 3>of the world multiple times over in capacity for older

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 3>generation chips. The US is actually weighing tariffs on Chinese

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 3>chip makers that produce these chips because they say, if

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 3>China dumps these chips on global markets. This could be

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 3>disastrous for US companies that also manufacture them. I mean,

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 3>Texas Instruments is a big one, Global foundry is a

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 3>big one. But the reality is that is not where

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 3>the lions share of the money from the Chips Act

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 3>is going. So you have this tariffs based approach, you

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 3>also have some domestic subsidies. There's sort of a two

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars set aside specifically for older generation ships in

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the US Substate program. RAYMONDO has said that they will

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 3>do quote multiples of that. They're already actually almost at

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 3>that amount. They've allocated nearly like one point six one

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 3>point seven billion to an older generation or legacy chips

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 3>so far. But it's a limited pool of money. You

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 3>have to decide where you're going to spend it. And

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 3>they also US officials feel a real and pressing threat

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 3>of having the capacity for advanced chips concentrated in Asia.

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 3>To go back to your question about environmental permitting, I

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 3>spoke with Congressman Mike McCall about this yesterday, because there

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.239
<v Speaker 3>was this effort in Congress last year to exempt some

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 3>of these major projects from federal environmental permitting standards over

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 3>concerns that Raymondo told me could delay projects for months,

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 3>if not years. That effort died because of it died

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 3>last year because of some actually internal Republican opposition. It

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 3>seems that there's maybe some new life being breathed into

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 3>that bill now. But this was really striking to me

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 3>what the Congressman said, if China invades Taiwan and TSMC,

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 3>we can't be filling out environmental compliance paperwork. And that's

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 3>really the threat that the US feels on this is that,

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, such a large share of the most advanced

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 3>tips in the world or manufacturing in Taiwan that is

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 3>one of the most geopolitically risky regions in the world,

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 3>and if we lost access to those chips, the global

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 3>economy woul grind.

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 5>To a halt.

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe, I think I mentioned this to you, but while

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you were visiting your mom recently, I went to go

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 1>visit my dad, which means I am now full of

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>right wing talking points. But I had the most surreal

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation with him where he was complaining that the US

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make enough stuff anymore. And then I asked him

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>when he thought about things like the Chips Act or

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Infrastructure Act and things like that, and then he

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>started he basically started complaining that the money hadn't been

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>spent yet, which for someone who was complaining about the

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>deficit like five minutes before, was kind of yeah, surreal,

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I would put it. But Ken, no, no, not at all.

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Although actually that reminds me. My mom did listen to

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a recent episode, the one we did on agriculture, and

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>she got mad at me because she said that I did,

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in fact have fresh fruit in my school lunches, not

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>just fruit roll ups. So I feel the need to

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>correct the record there, Mom, in case you're listening, thank

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>you for the berries that I did in fact have

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in my lunch. Anyway, Mackenzie, I kind of wanted to

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>ask you about the politic politicization aspect of all of this,

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>like how much is that kind of complicating some of

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the story and some of the roll out, like it

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>was a Bible part is in. You know, it had

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan support, the Chips Act, But it feels like as

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the money is actually getting dispersed, politics are creeping back

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>into it.

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 2>That's certainly the case.

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the most recent announcement was a six point

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 3>one billion dollar grant for Micron, which is also in

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 3>line to receive more.

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Than that in loans.

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 3>And President Biden, when he went to upstate New York

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 3>to announce that, called out Republicans who had been taking

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 3>credit for the project coming to Upstate New York but

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 3>voted against the Chips Act. You know, this was a

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 3>bipartisan piece of legislation. There have been squabbles throughout from

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 3>key champions saying, Okay, why are we giving so much

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 3>to X company? Should we really be thinking about building

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 3>child care facilities and having labor peace agreements if our

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 3>concern is this is a national security program and we

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 3>actually need to get the money out the door. You know,

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 3>it's people like to take credit for things that seem

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 3>to be successful. Senator Chuck Schumer, the Majority leader, his

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 3>press really about the Micron award called it Schumer's Chips

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 3>and Science Act. There are certainly senators who would say, actually,

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.239
<v Speaker 3>I was very involved as well. You know, this is

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 3>a major part of the Biden administration's economic message. It's

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 3>not just the Ship's Act. There's also the Inflation Reduction Act,

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 3>which is a signature climate law, and the bipartisan Infrastructure Law,

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 3>and these sort of three legs of the stool, if

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 3>you will, are the core pillars of Bidenomics. This massive

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 3>wave of industrial policy in a way that the US

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 3>hasn't really pursued for over a generation. And there are

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 3>lots of different goals attached. You know, Chips and science

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 3>passed in a bipartisan way because it is a national

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 3>security program. You know, we've discussed the risks that US

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 3>leaders feel both on the lagging edge, you know, mature

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 3>ship side, and also on the cutting edge side with

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 3>that concentration in East Asia. But it's also an economic

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 3>revitalization program. It's a jobs program, you know, by and

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 3>talks about how he wants these to be good jobs,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 3>good paying jobs, good paying union jobs. There's actually an

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 3>effort to reach a labor peace agreement for this massive

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 3>micron facility. It would be only the third chip facility

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 3>in the country to have a union if they're successful.

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 5>Okay, it's the bottom of the second inning.

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, your job never ends. What's next? What are

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 4>you watching for next?

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, they still have some money to spend.

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you know, these four big grants are certainly going

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 3>to catch the most attention, but there's about six billion

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.719
<v Speaker 3>dollars left. That's not a small amount of money, right,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 3>and they need to make really strategic decisions about Okay,

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 3>there are you know, a couple of big names still

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 3>floating out there that you know, maybe we'll get some

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 3>larger awards, but then there are six hundred statements of

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 3>interest in this funding.

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're talking.

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 3>About a lot of smaller skill projects. You know, there's

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 3>all this conversation about this sort of valley of death

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 3>in tech entrepreneurship. You know, we we support stuff that's

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 3>ready for commercial production. There's also this cutting edge R

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 3>and D that's happening. But what about companies that are

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 3>just trying to get over the line, just trying to

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 3>be able to stand up their factory, you know, employing

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 3>forty people, employing one hundred people, making one hundred and

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 3>fifty million dollar investment in the US, rather than a

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 3>sixty five billion dollar investment in the US, which is

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 3>what TSMC is doing. And so there will be a

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 3>second wave of awards and a lot smaller denominations.

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 2>So that's one thing.

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.959
<v Speaker 3>I think the permitting, the environmental permitting is a really

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 3>big deal. Certainly if this permitting exemption actually has the

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 3>life that Mike McCall thinks that it does. That would

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 3>solve a lot of headaches for companies. It would also

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 3>probably catch a lot of flat from environmental groups who

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 3>point out rightfully so that this is an industry that

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 3>uses toxic chemicals, that has a carbon footprint that's expected

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 3>to double by twenty thirty. We need to be thinking

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 3>about the environmental and sustainability costs with this dustrial build out.

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 3>But whether companies are able to navigate permitting processes at

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 3>the federal and at the state and local level will

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 3>directly affect when these factories are able to open. And

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 3>I would say maybe the biggest thing is workforce development,

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 3>which is not something that we've touched on a ton,

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 3>but is probably the single thing that comes up the

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 3>most when I talk to everyone from executives down to

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:28.719
<v Speaker 3>administrators of community college programs. There was a great story,

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 3>a great piece in the Washington Post recently about workforce

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 3>training efforts for semiconductor technicians in Arizona, and there are

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 3>lots of different approaches here. One that was mentioned in

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 3>that story was this so called quick Start program, which

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.239
<v Speaker 3>is like a two week training program that Intel has

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 3>worked to set up with community colleges in the area

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 3>because you know, this is very high tech stuff, but

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't necessarily require a PhD to work in these factories.

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's all different types of workers that are

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 3>needed to make these projects successful. Technician training program, you know,

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 3>got a ton of national press when it was first announced.

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 3>I visited in i want to say September or October,

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 3>and I was told that only twenty percent of the

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 3>graduates of that program had secured positions because of the

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 3>simple fact that these factories are not yet open and

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 3>these are two week training programs, and so you can

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 3>imagine somebody who does this training program in twenty twenty

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 3>three and then, you know, three years later, when there

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 3>is an abundance of factory jobs available, they.

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Don't remember what they learned in two weeks.

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 3>There's also efforts to do much longer, you know, year

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 3>long training programs. There are efforts to you know, get

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 3>young kids excited about semi conductor manufacturing. You know, there's

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 3>all this talk about this is not like the sexy

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 3>thing to work in in tech, and people are trying to.

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:48.239
<v Speaker 2>Make it the sexy thing to work in.

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 3>There is a lot of workforce efforts happening on you know,

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 3>we talked a lot about the three thirty nine billion

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 3>dollar Chips Act program. There's eleven billion dollars at aside

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 3>for research and development, and there are a lot of

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 3>workforce efforts that they're trying to say up on that front.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 3>But you know, the US is tens of thousands of

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 3>workers short, and these factories will not produce chips if

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 3>there are not people to staff them.

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel like fab factories trying to get over the line.

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It's very relatable. They're just trying to get over the line.

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 5>Tracy, Have I told you my idea for a name

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 5>of a semiconductor company?

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>No, what, Well, I'm not.

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.959
<v Speaker 5>It would be it would be called Fabulous Semiconductors, but

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 5>the U would be like an apostrophe, would look like

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 5>Fabless Semiconductors. I think that'd be a really cool name

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 5>for a company, don't you think?

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>All Right, if someone ends up using that, you're going

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to have to like pay a copyright due to Joe.

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Or maybe fabu less.

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 5>I think actually that would probably be the fabu Less

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 5>would be the name of my fabulous Simmi.

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, okay, well, maybe you can apply to the Chips

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Act for some fund.

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 5>Just on the basis, on the basis of having a

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 5>good name itself.

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, do it all right?

0:30:57.920 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, best of luck, you have six hundred competitors.

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 5>Lots More is produced by Carmen Rodriguez and Dashel Bennett,

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 5>with help from Moses Ondam and Kill Brooks.

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Our sound engineer is Blake Maples. Sage Bauman is the

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>head of Bloomberg Podcasts.

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Please rate, review, and subscribe to Odd, Lots and lots

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.479
<v Speaker 5>More on your favorite podcast platforms.

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And remember that Bloomberg subscribers can listen to all our

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>podcasts ad free by connecting through Apple Podcasts. Thanks for listening.