WEBVTT - 5/10 Part 2: Florio Friday, add or drop, waivers, Pete Alonso’s goatee, and more... 0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you 0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160 want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, 0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080 download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy 0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760 Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also, 0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320 if you want to watch the video of this podcast, 0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000 check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope 0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079 and type in you guessed Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find 0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.480 us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're 0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:36.920 listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Let me just 0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:51.400 become best friends. Fantasy best friends forever. How number two? 0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.600 Fantasy best Friends forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network. That's Frank Stamp. 0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:59.560 I am good. Excuse joint is always by well nobody 0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.200 you got he gone closer. Clos are not here today. 0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.880 But the surprise is we have a replacement for the closer. 0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:12.760 Really we do. We have someone that is taking the 0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.679 place of the closer. Cris Venture today for hour two? 0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.600 Who would that be? Shall you reveal him? Surprise reveal yourself? 0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:25.600 It's my what do you know? Two hours like sticking 0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:27.959 around for hour and never two? Today he's making up 0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.960 for last week. Mike, welcome back, Thank you, greg Ya. 0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.000 I was gonna say when you were hinting the surprise. 0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:34.440 I knew what it was. I was like, but you 0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.959 normally say goodbot me an hour one, and then Greggy, 0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.240 being the professional that he is, says goodbye to me 0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:40.920 an hour one. Of course I did. I had to 0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.800 say goodbye. You know, I was kind of freaking out. 0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:44.800 I thought that they were gonna disconnect you downstairs because 0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:46.720 we didn't tell anyone else that you were staying on. 0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.080 So I'm like, they're actually gonna disconnect you, and then 0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.160 you're gonna text me and be like, well, what's this happened? 0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.280 But you guys are on top of it. Try our best. 0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.040 We we we all try our best. Job downstairs, Good 0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.920 job downstairs. It's Mike Floria here for over two today, 0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.559 so I'm excited to talk to Mike Moore. I mentioned 0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.520 during the break about Joe Musgrove and I said, drop 0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:12.400 Joe mustro which is a little bit crazy. But last 0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.919 night was his worst start to date of this season. 0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:21.120 He got absolutely wrecked against St. Louis, wrecked enough that 0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.200 Michael Waka was able to get a win. How about that, Frank, 0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.240 Michael Waka gotta win. I don't like to see that. Well, 0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:28.720 I guess if you're a Cardinals fan, you love it. 0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.239 But as Rhodo World said, I'm going to read directly 0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.360 Joe Musk Joe Musgrove got taken out behind the wood 0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.160 shed and beating up for eight earned runs three another 0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.240 guy that they hate. They hated Danny Santana and now 0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.920 they hate Joe. They normally love Joe Musgrove. But I 0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:46.800 read that this morning and was like, what does that 0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.799 even mean? Taken outside of the woods, it's old. Lastly, 0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:51.239 it is what it is when they taken out the 0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.840 wood shed and let her go. This time they take 0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.200 it out the wood shed and beat him. His wildness 0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.680 came back to burn him badly in this one. He 0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.120 went with a one point five four ERA A and 0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.040 now has a four point two zero r A after 0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.000 two back to back terrible starts, three losses in a 0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:15.200 row for Joe Musgrove. Are you getting nervous, Frank, Not entirely. Look, 0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:16.800 you don't want to see this with any of your 0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:18.359 starting pictures. But we knew that there was gonna be 0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.239 some regression at some point. He wasn't gonna pitch to 0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.880 a sub to e r A the entire season. The 0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.399 velocity a little bit down this year as well. So 0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.639 we when we talked to Nick Paulic a Picture List 0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.680 about this, we said, look, he still has some tougher 0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.200 matchups coming up. He's gonna have to face the tough 0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.480 n L Central teams. He's gonna have to face the Cubs, 0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.600 the Cardinals. The Cardinals last night, you saw what they 0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.160 just did to him. He's gonna have to face the 0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.360 Brewers as well. His last time out against Oakland, another 0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.600 really bad start. He only went two and two thirds, 0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:48.120 seven runs, five earned, two walks, one strikeout, five walks 0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.760 sis today. I mean, that's just not like Joe Musgrove 0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.560 we've seen at times, but all throughout the minors, this 0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.160 was a guy that prided himself in having good command, 0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.520 didn't walk anybody greg And for most of his starts 0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.160 this year, he's for every start except for yesterday, he's 0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.280 been two walks or less. So that's something that he 0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.640 does have to he has to rein that in. He's 0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:09.880 not a guy that has like the best stuff where 0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:11.600 he can afford to walk guys and still get out 0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.400 of it. But you know, like something that we've always 0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.280 said about Joe must Grove was that we want him 0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:17.960 to use the slider. We want him to use the slider, 0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.000 And so I look into the pitch uses last night, 0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.400 and obviously he didn't throw that many pitches because he 0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.800 only lasted three innings, but the percentage of pitches was. 0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.279 I noticed the slider usage has been down, and it 0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.159 has been down for like the past couple of starts. 0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.839 So a little bit of frustration here for Joe must Grove. 0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:34.960 I just added him to the list because I had 0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.279 a few people asked me already, did you drop Joe 0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.760 must Grove? Me personally, No, I'm not dropping him. He 0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.760 saw what his upside could be earlier on in the season, 0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.320 um and then I think last night was obviously just 0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.040 one of his worst performances of the year. What do 0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.400 you think about Joe Musgrove, Mikey, I'm kicking myself a 0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.000 little bit for not selling high because I was advocating 0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.520 that on my Patreon page. I was saying, his velocity 0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.000 is down from last year and it continues to be down. 0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.280 But then when we were seeing the results at like 0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.560 I was seeing all the excitement from other fantasy analysts, 0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.320 I was like, all right, something like everything that we 0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.520 thought about this guy the upside, it's hitting nine. I 0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.120 held on to him, but as a drop candidate in 0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.560 no way. I mean, two bad starts don't overpower the 0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.680 five really good ones that he had. We were talking 0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.560 people on Twitter at least we're talking about like Joe 0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.800 Musgrove being the Pirates best picture. So that shows you 0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.080 how how well he was pitching. Early in the year, 0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.320 we knew regression was coming. But now I think there's 0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.200 gonna be some regression coming in the other direction. His 0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:34.680 strip let strand rate is fifty percent. That's entirely too low. 0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.479 It's gonna come back up. And as that as that 0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:39.719 rises the r A, I think we'll get more closer 0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.240 towards the fit, which is at two point nine eight. 0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.320 The only bad side is there's gonna be some other 0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.720 negative regression as his home running fly ball rate is 0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.200 entirely too low at two point six percent, so that's 0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.440 gonna climb back up. Must Grove, I think is kind 0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.640 of what we valued him as heading into the year. 0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:56.919 He's not what he was the last month, and I 0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:58.920 don't well the first month of the season, I don't 0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:00.440 think he is what he is the last two weeks. 0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.680 I think he's in the middle of those performances, and 0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.200 there's no way I'm dropping him. Yeah, I agree with that. 0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.160 I think he's probably in that maybe low n SP three, 0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.159 probably more of an SP four top forty starting pitchers. Still, 0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:15.680 I'm gonna give up some home runs, the two point 0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:17.880 six percent home in the fly ball ratio, especially those 0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.000 games against the Brewers. Like, honestly, I might just bench 0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:21.560 him in those starts against the Brewers. I don't like 0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.040 starting anyone against the Brewers, to be perfectly honest with you. 0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.720 So there's gonna be there's gonna be some tough games. 0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.640 But the strand rate is a little bit low right now. 0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:33.520 I would say he probably settles in like a three 0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.200 six maybe three seven e r A kind of guy. 0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:38.960 The fit is two point nine eight. The e r 0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.280 A right now is four point two. I think we've 0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.320 probably meet somewhere in the middle, maybe closer to where 0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.160 his ear A is right now. Greg, probably like in 0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.800 that three seven range. I agree, there's some regression coming 0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.120 clearly for Joe Muskrow. I'm not dropping him yet. Oh, 0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.560 this is very, very frustrating. He's proven, as you said, Florio, 0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.040 that he may be the pirates best pitcher. And he's 0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.040 certainly the healthiest picture right now. Well, Chris Roger and 0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.360 James and Tian on the aisle. What's odd is, like 0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.760 I said, his velo is still down, like it's almost 0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.040 three miles per hour lower than what it was last year. 0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.480 But oddly enough, his last two outings is worst of 0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.280 the year sized velocity of the year. That is very random. 0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.280 That's quite strange, actually, But he's also struggled with command 0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:17.920 in his past two starts, So I wonder if he's 0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:19.760 like reaching back and trying a little bit hard to 0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.280 trying to throw harder, and maybe it's affecting his command. 0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.000 And I'm just I'm trying to put the puzzle pieces 0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.080 together here. What annoys me is, at least to my knowledge, 0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.720 I don't think anyone has asked him like, hey, what's 0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.080 up with the velocity, like why is it down so 0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.200 much from last year? I haven't seen anything on it either. 0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.480 And it's not like it's it's not like it's just 0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.040 down like before the last two starts where he threw 0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.559 average nine, it was a year he was averaging ninety 0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:51.800 four last year. True, weird. We have one share of 0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.280 Joe Musgrove together. G D d Obviously it's a fifteen 0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.880 team league, so we're just holding on. But yeah, it sucks. 0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:58.560 I mean we had we've had some real big blow 0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:00.760 ups this week. I imagine you have a team Greg 0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.920 that has Trevor Bauer, McHugh and Joe Musgrove. You can 0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.600 just you wave goodbye to this week. It's been a 0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.840 very frustrating week for me overall. Man, I think this 0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:10.960 week of Fantasy from the beginning has been terrible for you. 0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.760 Joe with the mustache, he showed me after Chris Paddock 0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.840 right through that gem. His team ear A this week 0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:20.840 is over seven because he had a lot of those 0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.720 guys that you said. So in the pit League, I'm 0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.640 going up against Yang, who is is very excited. He's 0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.720 been looking forward to since matchup to play me. If 0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.840 he beats me, he gets to come on the BFS 0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:32.959 on Monday. I will set that up, even though I 0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:34.640 would have allowed him to come on the show anyway, 0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.040 but he never asked. But he is absolutely destroying me 0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.480 right now. Uh, my team chose a wrong week to 0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.760 forget to play baseball, Mike. I have a collective one 0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.160 eight seven batting average, and I believe my ear A 0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.800 is hovering somewhere around ten. I did have Trevor Bauer 0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.120 and I didn't have Colin McHugh, so it's not great. 0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:56.040 That's just an all around eight point eight point six 0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.000 to e r a one point six to seven batting average, 0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.360 and I would is the third place team coming into 0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.439 this week, So I don't have a bad team. It's 0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.200 just everyone forgot to play baseball. It's crazy. You need 0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.560 your pictures to face your hitters or vice versus. So 0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.760 one of them figures it out. I got Wheeler against 0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.920 the Marlins tonight, and I have Erod against Seattle, so 0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:14.719 see if we can write the ship a little bit. 0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.160 Good luck. Hey, Zach Wheeler against the Marlins. You want 0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:22.800 to talk about first favorable start of the year too, Yeah, 0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:27.160 he's had one of the toughest competitions. Mike, where where 0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:28.800 did you look up? I know you were able to 0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.520 see like opposing ops against pictures so far this season. 0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:34.640 I would imagine that Jack Flaherty is pretty high on 0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.960 that list. He's he's had some some pretty tough matchups. 0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:38.880 I know Zach Wheeler was up there to where where'd 0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.680 you find that stuff? It's on Baseball Prospectus. If you 0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.679 give me like a minute or two, I could pull 0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:45.559 it up and tell you who leads the league in it. Now. 0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.680 That's that's Ops against Grady. So you can see which 0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.480 starting pictures have faced the toughest matchups, which might help 0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.280 identify some by local targets who if they haven't pitched 0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.080 up to their expectations, like Jack Flaherty for example, or 0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.960 Zach we Er. Um. You can kind of use this 0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.000 tool to help you figure out, all right, well, they've 0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.839 had some really tough matchups, so let Mike find what 0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:12.320 should I set the in eng limit at UM fifty 0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:19.600 too much? Too much? Let's all right, you guys can talk. 0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:21.360 I'm pulling it up right now. All right, I'm trying 0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.360 to look at um, who's next up on the drop 0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.520 list or ad list? Rather who's next of one? Unless 0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.280 I want to talk about basically whatever list do you want? Greig? 0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:30.920 What what do you want to do? It's all about you. 0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.480 It's Greg's world. We're just living in it. I appreciate that. UM. 0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.640 We mentioned Chris Bassett earlier in the week. I guess 0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:38.880 it's worth mentioning again. Now that's people look to do 0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.920 their waivers on Sunday. Chris Bassett's pretty legit man, and 0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.240 I know he allowed three runs yesterday, but gives you 0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.719 some length as well. I mean, you go seven and 0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.520 two thirds and he's pitched seven hits, three earned runs, 0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.120 nine strikeouts. Like, guy has thirty one strikeouts in twenty 0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.640 four and two thirds endings pitched in eleven k per nine, 0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.959 two point five walks per nine. Right now, you've got 0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:00.920 a T five five ear he's got a three point 0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.560 one seven xfit. A lot of people talking about Chris 0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.480 Bassett on Twitter right now. I know Moredca is a 0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.199 big fan of his thirty one point six percent strike 0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.600 out rate, a twenty four point five percent K minus 0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.839 walk percentage right now, and he has a swinging strike 0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:20.559 rate of twelve percent. I mean, Chris Bassett, you should 0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.200 be own in twelve team leagues, not not just deeper 0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:23.600 leagu you should be own in twelve I said this 0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.079 Earli in the weeks like Chris Bassett, Yeah, he should be. 0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.560 He's he's up there with the g LEO group, Brandon Woodruff. 0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.079 I mean, we'll mention him a two star pitcher. I'd 0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.520 imagine he's owned in plenty of leagues already right now. 0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.040 But I think Chris Basses up there is one of 0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.080 the top starting pitcher ads this week. Chris Bassett definitely 0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.480 one of the top starting pitcher adds this week. Considered 0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.720 getting him in there. Florio, do you have the information 0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.760 that we're looking for? Yeah, it's it's odd. It's changed 0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.640 a lot since I've last looked, and both Flaherty and Wheeler, 0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.240 who were like very high up like two weeks ago 0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.840 somehow or not even in the top thirty anymore. And 0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:02.160 that's very surprising to me because outside of facing the 0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.920 like Wheelers, since then, his face like the Phillies, the 0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.439 Reds and the the Brewers. So I didn't expect it 0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:10.760 to be that bad. And Flaherty, I know he's had to, 0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.319 you know, face the gauntlet of the Brewers three times already. 0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:18.360 Flaherty is thirty one right now, Wheeler is fifty three 0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:24.120 and the leader his Felix Hernandez, poor King Felix Man. 0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.880 I feel bad for King Felix. Mike who Who's Who's 0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.040 the top ten on that list? So it's Felix, Trevor K. Hill. 0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.160 These are the interesting names here, Garrett Cole and very 0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.480 Lander back to back at three and four. Then you've 0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.680 got Sampson at five, Carrasco six, Mantas seven, Bundy eight, 0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.319 Tyson Ross nine, and Matt Harvey ten because a lot 0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:46.840 of tough opponents in the a O West right now, Greggy, 0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.840 there your names on that list. Carrasco, by low my man, 0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:54.160 Frankie Mantas, Mike, have you turned around on Frankie Mantas, Toss. 0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:56.800 I'm still not as high as you guys are, No, 0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:01.680 come on, sorry. Bunny is an interesting one too, because 0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.440 like the swinging strikes are great, They're always there, and 0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.679 he clearly has had some tough matchups, but he's always 0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:08.200 gonna have tough match up because he plays in the 0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:13.920 American League East. But man, we're Dylan Bundy, Grego swinging 0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.199 strike Creg. I've never been a Dylan Bundy guy. Never. 0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:18.440 He's very bad. It was never really part of it. 0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.240 I mean there was like one half season where he 0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.439 was awesome. He's very very bad. Strike outs are there, 0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.520 but outside of that, he's one of those pictures that, yeah, 0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:26.880 he either he either gets you to strike out or 0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:28.520 you hit a home run off with him, like there's 0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.280 no one between. It's hard hit percent. I just so 0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.320 interesting for Dylan Bundy man pour guy plays for the 0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.280 Orioles art to succeed. Not great. I mean here we 0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:45.520 are telling um me Jhn means exactly. M hmm, come on, 0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.280 don't poopoo. John means now, Greg, I'm trying to build 0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.440 a line up for tonight's vandal contest. Rather, why don't 0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:52.040 you just do that after the show, Gregg, you guys 0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.679 are I'm into it now? Though, No, I would rather 0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:56.800 just we do Weekend Waivers. That's the name of the show. 0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.000 It's not. The name of the show is not Greg 0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:00.920 makes his lineup on air. The name of the show 0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:06.680 is Floral Friday Weekend Waivers. All right, it was Friday 0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.559 and I am here here, so we should probably utilize him. 0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.840 Two of the three things are accurate. I don't know, Greggy, 0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:16.880 it seems like you're being a little voted here my 0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.880 vote of my voter. Alright, move on there. I don't know, 0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:23.800 all right. A J. Mintzer continues to suck. Needs a 0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.640 nicer word, but sure, he continues to suck. Did you 0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.960 drop him? Yeah? I think Luke Luke Jackson is the 0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:33.560 closer right now there. I mean he was brought in 0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:35.440 last night and then I understand he gave up that 0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.400 home run, but Minter came in in the tent and 0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.480 blew the game again, so I don't I don't think 0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.080 that that's going to change after one bad performance. Also, 0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.320 maybe it's a flaw. I'm like thinking, but if I 0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.840 receie like a closer gives up a solo home run 0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.280 rather than like, you know, actually blows a save, like 0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.560 like giving up a bunch of hits, to me, I'm 0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.640 more likely to give a pass, especially in today's day 0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.320 and age. So I think Jackson's the closer there until 0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.800 they probably get in the Kimbroll sweepstake on June three. 0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.320 But until then, oh, I think it's Jackson's job. Yeah. 0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.320 I tweeted about this last night too. I hope every 0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.000 team that opts not to sign Craig Kimbro right now 0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.120 just keeps blowing saves. I know that they're the draft 0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:13.760 pick is attached him right now, so we're waiting for 0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.880 the MLB Draft to pass by. I would agree that 0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.240 Luke Jackson has a pretty good stuff too. Case for 0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.320 nine over ten this year to six five e r A, 0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.120 the underlying number is very good for him as well. Uh, 0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.440 and there was you know they didn't even hesitate. It 0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.160 was they went to him in the ninth any one 0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:28.600 run game. It was a two to one game. He 0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.640 gives up a solo home run. I do agree with 0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.400 what Mike said. You know, it's not like a Page 0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.120 or Stroke situation the other day where he just walks 0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.000 everybody walks in. Like the game tying run against the Marlins, 0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:40.480 doesn't even get an out. The guy gave up a 0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.680 home run and that was basically I think he gave 0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.000 up like one hit actor that as well. It was 0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.840 Adam Jones. But overall, it doesn't look like Luke Jackson 0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.600 is the guy. Great if he's still out there, how 0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.680 aggressive are you on him? Knowing that Craig Kimbroll could 0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:55.360 be the closer for the team amongs from. This just 0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.320 seems like a mess to me. Again, maybe not the 0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:01.080 mess of Chicago is, but a mess. Nonetheless, Luke Jackson 0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.480 blue yesterday for the first time. UM Kimbera is still 0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.800 out there. I know we're not past June second yet 0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.440 when he could become uh he signed without draft pick compensation, 0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.880 but I don't see Luke Jackson just taking the job 0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.240 running away with it in all honesty, So I don't 0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.080 want to short term he but but why not? He 0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.840 He had their coming into this week, He had their 0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.200 last to save up except for the one that month 0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.520 he had to save on a Sunday. The Monday, they 0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.600 came out before the game and said Jackson and Mentor 0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.440 are unavailable and Webb got to save. The next save 0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.880 opportunity was last Sunday. It went to Jackson, and then 0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.840 they went to Jackson again last night. Like, I don't 0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:39.000 understand why we're very hesitant to buy in that Jackson 0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.440 is the closer. I would just have Craig Kimberl in 0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.240 the back of my mind. That's what I would worry about. 0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.320 It's not really a fault of Luke Jackson's it would 0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.280 It would just be I I expect this team to 0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.600 be in on Craig Kimberl. I mean, among others. I'm 0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:52.440 sure there will be other teams that won his services 0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.280 as well, maybe the Red Sox again, maybe the Chicago Cubs, 0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.480 but um yeah, the Braves are probably one of the 0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.360 leading candidates that can use Craig Kimberll. So I do 0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.680 worry about that for Luke Jaxon, But overall, I just 0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.159 write out the numbers been pretty damn good and and 0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:10.119 eight mentor has been uh got awful? Jaxon only percent 0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:14.159 owned on Yahoo breaks that number be higher probably but 0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:22.119 not like significantly deeper leaves yep, Okay, we'll take a 0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.440 break here when we come back or Florida to start 0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.280 putres to the weekend. Let's see that. Do you start 0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:33.640 pitchers next week? Lose weight now? Go to fat one 0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.800 dot com. Lose that unwanted belly fat today and get 0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.399 free information at fat one dot com. Fit in the 0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.439 dress or pets or bathing suits you've always wanted to 0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.439 go to fat one dot com. Lose ten, twenty or 0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.080 more pounds immediately go to fat one hundred dot com 0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.080 for free information on how you can lose weight. Go 0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:59.600 to fat one dot com fat dot com. That's fat 0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.760 one hundred dot com. What's your I R S problem? 0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.919 Do you owe back taxes? Is there a lead placed 0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.720 on your property? Have your bank accounts been frozen or seized? 0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.760 Have your wages been garnished? Are you being audited by 0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.600 the I R S? Are they sending you letters that 0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.560 demand actions and have urgent due dates? Well? Solving your 0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.359 tax problems is as easy as calling taxes three to one. 0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.680 The I r S is the largest collection agency in 0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.080 the world. You need the best representation to give you 0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:36.000 peace of mind. You need experienced professionals that can cut 0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.320 through the red tape and stop the collection process. If 0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.480 you have a serious problem with the I r S 0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.120 called the taxes three to one network today, we'll get 0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:49.320 them off your back. Eight hundred nine six one thirty 0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.240 six thirty one, eight hundred nine six one thirty six 0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.520 thirty one eight hundred nine six one thirty six thirty one, 0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:04.399 eight hundred nine six one six three one Fantasy Sports Today. 0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.679 Kendrick's it's not really sexy name and fantasy because he 0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.160 doesn't really wow you with you know, his strikeout rate. 0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:14.240 So yeah, so, but you can't argue against what he's 0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.280 done throughout his career two point one three r A. 0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:18.879 But what you expect more from him is you know, 0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.879 mid three range v E r A. Actually his career 0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:23.760 you are a I'm looking at his three point one 0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.800 So cups Starting Pitching has been coming on as a 0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.679 lady Saturday's eight am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking 0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:45.399 on your popular podcast Providers. I was working on my UH, 0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.400