WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: How Handwriting Analysis Works

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>M. Hey everybody, it's me Josh and for this week's

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Saturday Select Stuff you should know, I'm doing handwriting analysis.

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty awesome. It's from October two thirteen, and uh

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I just selected this one because I thought it dovetailed

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>nicely with our Secret Service episode this week. So enjoy.

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>M Welcome to Stuff you should Know from how Stuff

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Josh Clark, and there's Charles c V, Chuck Bryant and

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>this stuff you should know. Cherry's over there. That's right,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>we're all here. Yeah, we're at the ready for another

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>yet another forensics podcast. Yes we are. I thought we

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>were done. No, I don't know that wherever we're gonna

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>be done? He and Chuck not only are we never

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be finished. This one, like every other forensics

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>episode we've ever done, traces back to Alphonse Bertillon. Oh

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>is he the first dude? He's the guy he did fingerprinting,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he did um like facial characteristics. Yeah, the the mug shots, Yeah,

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>mug shots and um, what's it called the facial sketch

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>artist dree, police sketches and crime scene photography even um

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe so it's entirely possible. Well, we owe a great

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>debt to that man. Yeah, he was basically like he

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>had his finger on the pulse of like forensics. Yeah,

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>like every subdiscipline of the field of forensics. Like this

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>guy virtually started it at a Paris police station. Yeah,

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it would be you know, unless you were doing the

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>research and found out he was kind of a jerk. Yeah,

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>but who cares. Well, no, then you have to like

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of beef his character up and maybe he was

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>what is he like? Um, like he was alted or

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Does he need like an orphan to

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>come into his life? Elected with Gandhi? Remember that movie?

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, made him look like a saint. Uh. So

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I think at the very least people if not uh

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you may not be able to become forensics experts, but

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:19.399
<v Speaker 1>at the very least you can watch all those TV

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>shows now with a better understanding, right, you know? Is

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that what we're trying to do to help people better

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>watch TV? Chuck? Yes, have you ever written anything by hand?

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>You laugh? But think about this, Pale. There's a time

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that's coming when there's not gonna be much need whatsoever

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>for that. I know there is currently a legitimate debate

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>on whether or not to keep teaching cursive handwriting. Yeah,

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that the debate has been answered, and the

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>people who want to keep teaching cursive just haven't quite

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>accepted their fate yet. Those the answer, No, sure, Yeah,

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was looking at a copybooks, which we'll

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about in a second, um, And apparently the whole

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>point to teaching penmanship lie in the in the in

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>an era where if you had good penmanship, you were

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>like that was a part of business, Like you needed

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to look respectable, put together. Yeah, like your your business

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>transactions were carried out through handwriting too typically, and you

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>needed to have good, clean handwriting said a lot about

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>your character. This is also at a time when people

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>were burned to the steak for witchcraft shortly after, so

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you don't put that much stock into it,

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>but there was a point in time when like handwriting counted.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't count any longer. And I'm I'm not saying like,

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely not waving like the flag of glory over

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the corpse of cursive writing, right, I'm not. You're doing

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it right now? No, I don't mean to, And that's

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>why I said I'm not doing that because, yeah, I

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>guess what I'm saying is the writings on the wall,

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>as it were. I'm not necessarily about it now. It's

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the last thing anyone ever wrote in cursive was that

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>cursive is dead. Yeah, you know, I can say that.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't write by hand that much anymore, and um

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>when I do now, I get weird with it. I

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>leave out letters and have to go back and put

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>them in here. I'll write out of order, and even

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>this word I put c additional. I left out like

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>three letters and had to go back and put them in.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>But I do it really quickly. It's not like I'm stumped.

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>But um, like if I was writing in cursive, i'd

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>be stumped. Yeah, I tried to know how. I've tried

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to write cursive here there, just to see if I

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>still have it, and I do not lost it. I

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think I ever really had the Z. It's a

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>tough one, remember the Z. Yeah, I could write a

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Z right now, um spreak in uh okay, but yeah, anyway,

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it's weird. It's almost like a dyslexic thing happens now

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>when I write. You would use this spa. You could

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>spray pain and cursive. Z I could do that right now?

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I be better at spray painting and cursives

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>even writing it, yeah, because it'd be large and yeah yeah. Um,

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the point is its cursive is probably dead. Writing things

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>down by hand is becoming less and less. Um, what

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is that? I'm sorry everyone, I don't mean to interrupt myself,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>but Chuck has held up one of his pages of

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>notes and there's some weird writing on the back. What

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is that? You know? What? That is? My parents signatures?

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Because I was seeing if I could still duplicate them

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>as I could back in high school. You used to

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>do that? Sure? What for You're a good kid in

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>high school? What did you need to know your parents signatures?

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I would do. I was a good kid,

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>but I would skip school and class sometimes. What did

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>like go fishing with rad and Uh that's the thing.

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't good. I wasn't like doing drugs or drinking.

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I would skip school and like go fishing. Uh. And

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>then I would write notes then forge my parents signature,

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:58.359
<v Speaker 1>which is not right kids. But um, it wasn't like

0:05:58.400 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I was off being a vandal or anything. I was

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is catching some trout, catching some trout and beating foxes

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in the head of the hammer, huffing Scotch guard. But

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I used to could really do with my parents signature

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>spot on, and I was very proud of that. Yeah,

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 1>so how is it? How is it hold up comparing

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>before because I don't I don't have what's called an exemplar.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>My mom's little initial signature is still pretty right on

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>m T d MB, but my father's is UM. I

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>used to could do that one a lot better. That's

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a that's a fine signature. Can I see it all

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>more time? James Allen Bryant, that's a nice one. Yeah, huh,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>all right. You've never forged your parents signature? Don't know, uh,

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>neither one of them. I may have tried, I think

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember even practicing. I think because my dad seems

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>like just looking at it, it's highly duplicable. Um, but

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not really like you. You can you can tell that.

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I I want to say the person because I refer

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 1>to myself a third person A lot um was trying

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to recreate it. Just make a potato stamp and your set.

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I've never tried that one. You got your signature for

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>life with a potato snamp like you just carve out Yeah,

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you never did that in craft class. You carve out

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>something in a and press it on inc and a

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>potato and then press it on ink and you basically

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>can make your own stamp. No it makes sense. Yeah,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>potato stamps. No, we didn't make those. You missed out, buddy,

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>um chuck. I feel like we've kind of covered a

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of like points of handwriting analysis, little teasers before

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we start too. I think we should point out that

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about, and I was just made to

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>find on the internets that when you search handwriting analysis,

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>what comes up is actually graphology. Yeah, that's that comes

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>up a lot. Which if handwriting analysis, friends of handwriting

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>analysis is really struggling forging ahead to become a science,

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>graphology is quite happy to not be whatsoever. It's all, um,

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>very un scientific. That's like, can let me write down

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a sentence and you tell me what kind of person

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I am? Exactly Like if you write using small letters,

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you're actually afraid of the world and very self conscious

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and you want to hide or disappear. Or another example

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>is if um, like the first letters in your first

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and last name are big, your signature. Yeah, you you

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>crave attention or you think overly of yourself. None of

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this is founded at allever. It's HOKEM. Handwriting analysis while still,

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>like I said, struggling to be a science is um

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>much less. HOKEM has one fatal flaw that's possibly not fatal,

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's the same flaw that UM fingerprint analysis has.

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Subject subjectivity, that's right, which we'll talk about. But maybe

0:08:49.559 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>now is a good time for a message. But hey,

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>now we're back. Um, let's talk about handwriting analysis in

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>handwriting in general. Chuckers Okay, Um, well it's it's questioned

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>documents is the legal term for what they're analyzing. Yeah,

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not just handwriting. It could be like forgeries. Yeah, dude,

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>it could be a lot of stuff. These people UM

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>questioned document examiners q d s. Uh. They examined typewriting,

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 1>computer printed documents, photo copies, uh, decipherment of altered, obliterated,

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>or charred documents. Yeah, but that's a tough one. Um.

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Examination of inks and papers, erased entries, indented writings like

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you wrote something on a pad and ripped

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it up. Yeah. There's a whole division of people who

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>just rubbed pencils on a piece of paper to see

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 1>what comes up, counterfeit currency, and examination of commercially printed matter.

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So they're kind of all over the place, but the

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>sexy stuff is and a lot of times, just in

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the private sector, it's not even for forensics. It's hey,

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>examine the signature on this document, right, like, real it,

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>did Mickey Mantill sign this baseball? Yeah? Exactly. Yeah. But

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>what they're looking for, and what the entire field of

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>forensic handwriting analysis is based on, is called the principle

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of uniqueness, which has been around since at least the

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenties, and it is the idea that everybody has

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>their own brand of handwriting and that um, while maybe

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you make a cursive Z in a certain way, that

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I might make the same Z in the same way.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>If you take all of the characteristics that you have

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and put them together, you form a unique package. Your

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>handwriting is unique in that sense. So the individual weird

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>characteristics might be similar to other people's weird individual characteristics,

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>but you can't put twenty or thirty weird characteristics of

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>hand writing together and compared to anybody else's. And so

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>based on that, you should logically be able to look

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>at one person's handwriting and compared it to a sample

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of another person's handwriting or the same person's handwriting, and

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>see whether they match or whether they were written by

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>two different people based on the the number of differences

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>or similarities between the two samples. Boom, Yeah, so let's

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about handwriting. Yeah, and those are individual characteristics. Um.

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Before that, you have what's called or everyone has an

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>underlying style characteristic, and that is based on the fact

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>that when you were a little snot nose kid in school,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>they gave you what's called a copybook which had I know,

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>we all remember this words on one line and then

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>an empty line where you had to copy it and

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>make it look like that. And depending on where you

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>live and when you live and went to school, Uh,

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have a different copybook. So you're underlying style

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>characteristics are going to be based on this original copybook

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that you might have some similarities with people like for

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>me that grew up in the mid seventies and elementary

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>school in decapp County, Georgia. Right exactly because you use

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the same copybook. What's awesome is a handwriting analyst could

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you what copybook you used or where you were

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 1>from and when based on that that structural analysis. Yeah,

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine teachers even informed that somewhat you know,

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>individual instruction for sure, Yeah, because the teacher is going

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to be like, that's not in our and like smack

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>your knuckles and say try again. Um. So the copybook

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>how we learn to actually write handwriting UM is based

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>on or creates this um the style characteristic. Right. But

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>then once we actually learn how to produce a letter

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>using our hands, just through repetition, we start to add

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>our own style to it. Um. And that those are

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the individual characteristics. We stopped thinking about how to make

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the structure of a letter and we're thinking about, um,

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>how you know what we're actually writing about. Yeah. And

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to forensic examination, style characteristics aren't really

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>what's important. Maybe that could help rule out certain geographic

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>areas or something, but mainly what they're looking at are

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>those individual characteristics. That's that's kind of where the key

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is when you want to track down a purpose. Yeah,

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>because like we said, I mean the chances of the

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>same person having the same set of individual characteristic pretty much. Yeah. Uh.

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And here's the thing, they're not just looking for similarities.

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>They say in this article. It's probably easy for even

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a layman to look at two sentences and compare them

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, look, these letters are the same. What

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for are the differences, and there in lies

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the key the differences and two different pieces of text.

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>One is the exemplar, which is basically a comparison sample.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>The exemplar is a preview, this document that you've written

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in the past, written by a known author. Yeah, like, hey, Chuck,

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you wrote We found this diary entry for you from

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. This will be your exemplar. Now we

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 1>want you to write some stuff now exactly. Um. So

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that would be a requested exemplar if they asked you

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to write something now, um. But either way, they know

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that this came from you. So it's an exemplar, an

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>example document, and they use those to compare to the

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>question document. So whenever you're talking handwriting analysis, you have

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to have two kinds of documents. An exemplar in a

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>question document, that's right, you want to talk about Lindbergh

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for a minute, Yeah, a question document very frequently, um,

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is a ransom note. That's right. And in the case

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Lindbergh baby, which Grandpa Simpson everybody knows kidnapped,

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>um or is that's what it was. Yeah, Um, there

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>were fourteen ransom notes, yeah from uh. Well depends on

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>who you asked. A lot of people think Bruno Houtman

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was innocent, maybe an executed uh as an innocent man.

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But there was still fourteen ransom notes. Still fourteen notes. Yeah,

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And they when Bruno Holtman came in, they couldn't find,

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>um many exemplars from his past, so they said, well,

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>let's just get him in custody and have him write

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>some things down, right, And that's just put putting it lightly,

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>which that's fine, good idea procedurally speaking, that's a requested exemplar.

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>All right. The thing is the police had this guy

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>right until he was exhausted over and over again. Apparently

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't producing what they wanted him to produce. So

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they said, here see this ransom note, copy this, yea,

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and the guy did it. Um. And apparently every bit

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of handwriting analysis that they are a sample that they

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>got from this guy was coerced um and questionable as

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>questionable as the question document. That's right, Um, But he

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>was still convicted and executed, right, yeah, and who knows

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>if he was innocent or not. There's all kinds of

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>varying opinions on the Internet, of course, but at the

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>very least, the handwriting documents in his his samples that

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>he gave were definitely coerced and probably not the best

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>thing to put your case on. And that was an

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>early obstacle that handwriting analysis has had to overcome, was

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>creating procedures for the police to say if you're going

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to request an examplar, like, here's how you do it,

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>here's what to ask for. Do not show them the

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>question document, don't ask them to copy, just have them right.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why you should always cut your ransom note out

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>from the funny papers and individual letters. Plus it looks

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>cool and creepy. Yeah. Um, so, what what you're looking

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>for if you're going to compare things is not hey,

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the sentence and compared to the sentence, because

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't tell you much. You want numerous exemplars. You

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>want like ten documents that you can compare to ten

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>other documents. The reason behind that um is because when

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you write something, so you're writing a letter. When you

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>start you're all fresh faced and bushy tailed, and then

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>as you go further down the page, you get a

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>little more tired, a little more fatigued, and your writing

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>starts to fall apart. So you're never gonna write the

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>same way twice. Um, which even within a document, right,

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a characteristic in and of itself. What's more, Um,

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>starting a word with the letter A, you're probably going

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to produce that A differently than an A that comes

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a word or at the end. Yeah,

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I do that for sure. And like certain letters will connect, um,

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>but only certain letters, Like I might connect to my

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>T to my H in the middle of a word,

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, but not at the beginning that kind of thing. Uh.

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So what are they looking for, Well, they're looking for

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>several things are looking for They're looking for a letter form,

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>which is like, um, you know the curves, um, the

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>saw eyes of the letters. But you know, the relationship

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>between a letter that's supposed to be small like an

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>S and a letter that's supposed to be big like

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe an H. Yeah, even the width within a single letter,

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe the slant the slope, um, whether or not, like

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I talked about, you connect certain letters together links between them. Um.

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And then like we mentioned where that letter falls. So

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 1>if you want to analyze an A a lower case A,

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and we should point out to that, apparently you can't

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 1>analyze upper case letters only. Is that right? You can

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.719
<v Speaker 1>you can analyze those just against each other though, Okay,

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>upper case and lower case or like they yield nothing.

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right apparently. Um. But let's say you have a letter,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>a lower case A. You want to find within the

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>document an example of an A at the beginning, one

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in the middle, one at the end um and see

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>how those compared to each other before you even compare

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it to the other exemplar. Yeah, like, if you really

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>thorough in detailed stuff, it really is. It's it's like

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>very tedious words to super tedious, which we'll get into

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in a second exactly how tedious it is. But yeah,

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the point is, if you are a handwriting analyst, you're

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 1>not gonna put an A at the beginning of a

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>word next to an A or compare it to an

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>A in the middle of the word. They write two

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>different things as far as you're concerned. Yeah, you get

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>laughed at if you do that. In in class line forms,

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>another thing they look at um, how smooth it is,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>how dark it is, indicates what kind of pressure you're

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 1>you're using on the paper? How U Yeah, the speed

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>formatting of course, spacing between letters, spacing between words, um,

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>whether where your margins are. Like they'll give you a

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>blank sheet of paper that's not lined and see you know,

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>if you, like most people, typically the sentence will go

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>down if you don't have a line paper, or what

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of margins you just instinctively use, or if you're

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like a serial killer and you don't use margins. Yeah,

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's just pretty scribble all over the page. Yeah, they

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>just should just let you up right there, right exactly,

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Like that's you're basically confessing to something horrible. Where do

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>if it is line paper? Where if you make like

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a lower case why, how does the bottom of the

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Y or the G or the curse of Z intersect

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>with the line? How far down does it go? How

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>big your loops? Where do you cross your tea? It's

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>like it's mind numbingly details. Do you skip lines? Yeah?

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you dot your eyes with little hearts? That kind

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of thing, the bubble letters? I know some females it's

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.239
<v Speaker 1>still sort of right that way, not with the with

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the hearts, but definitely that very distinctive you can. Yeah,

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I got a lot of love notes like that, you know,

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in my day with the little heart eye. Yeah, and

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I would right back like the serial killer. Those were

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>my just like words on a single piece that they

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>do like you. It isn't a matter of fact, I'm

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>sitting outside of your house right now, I know what

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you're doing. Just a big, one long run on sentence. Um. Okay.

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So one thing that they will do, here's one method

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that they will use is they will actually create tables. Yeah,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>three tables and all of us what you want. So

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you make your first table. You start with the letter A,

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and you go through the the um question documents. Yeah,

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is all on the article by the way,

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>it's even has the little tables and the sample sentence

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>they used is I have your daughter. Yeah. It's kind

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of creepy, it was, but it was like appropriately creepy.

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Why couldn't they just put let's play some basketball. I

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>hadn't even thought of that. It seemed like, yeah, of course,

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I have your daughter. Okay, alright, what that says about?

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So the three tables? Uh so the first table, what

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna do is go through all the question documents

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to write start with the letter A.

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>If the letter A is present in the documentary, they're

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna put all the letters that are present in the documents.

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So for example, I have your daughter, UM has uh right, Well, no,

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>yes it does. But they they they sentence itself doesn't

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>have all the letters of the alphabet. So you're gonna

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>go through and figure out what letters are present in

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>your question document put those down one side, and then

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna go through, starting with the letter A, and

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>um find every different letter A. So if there's a

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>letter A that slants to the left, you're gonna put

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that down next to A in row one. And then

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.640
<v Speaker 1>if you've come across another A that science the left,

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:25.479
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna skip that one because you've already found it.

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>What the point is you're going to create a table

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of every characteristically different example of a particular letter yea.

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>And they're doing this with digital cameras, right, So in

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the article they did it by hand. They try to

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>recreate what the weird letter looked like. But yeah, they're

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>going to take a digital photo of just that letter

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and then compile it into a table. That's right. Uh.

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And at the end what they are doing is comparing

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the tables making sure they have a match for each

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>letter in the exemplar, right, because they went through the

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>question document, then they the exact same thing for the exemplar,

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and they put the two tables together and created a

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 1>third table. And from that third table they should be

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>able to see pretty clearly whether um, the person, whether

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the two things were written by the same person. And

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 1>so if you're an FBI analyst, you're gonna come up

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>with one of um five uh possible outcomes. There's identification,

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>where you're pretty much putting your career on the line

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>or your professional reputation on the line, say this is

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>written by the same person. There's may have, which means

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>that the similarities outweigh the differences, but you're still not

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a percent sure identification level. Sure, yeah, that's a real

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>woo way to go, right. There's no conclusion, which is

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>like the similarities and the differences are pretty much the same,

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>or um, there's just not enough evidence there or enough

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>material to go with. Then there's may not have, which

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>is the differences outweigh the similarities, but you're still not sure,

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a eimination where you're sure that they

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>weren't written by the same person, which is probably as

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>equally a bolder statement as they were. Yeah, you know,

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I imagine those are few and far between, the identification

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and eliminations in a major case, you know. Yeah. Um,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, So coming up, we have something on forgeries

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and simulation, like if you're trying to sniff someone off

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the gates. But first we have a message break. Okay,

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>So um, we're talking about simulation before we broke. And

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>that's like a big part of this is if you

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>give and I can't imagine, Like let's say someone like

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>an officer picked you up and of course you didn't

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>do anything, but they bring you into a room and

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they're like, we we need some handwritting examples. You can

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>be freaked out for sure, like how you're writing, and

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you're probably gonna write weird, um, or if you did

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>do it, you might try and fool them by writing

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>weird And by weird I mean different than you normally, right, yes, um,

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>not like he's in strange letters or something. Right, Yeah,

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna maybe um write a little more slowly or

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>just right, like bigger than you do, or smaller than

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you do, or just different. Um. I saw a picture

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of a ransom note, not a ransom note, a stick

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 1>up note, and like it was obviously done with like

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>squiggly lines and like words were purposely misspelled. Um, so

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that if they, if anybody ever did analyze the handwriting,

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>what they had wouldn't match up to any anyone's normal

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>hand that's a good idea. Yeah. So on the front

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the crime, you do the different handwriting, that's

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not bad. I didn't mean this any would be

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>bank robbers, but yes, but after the fact, if they

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>have the two things and you try to simulate different writing,

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty good at trying to determine whether or not

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you've done that. They are. I mean you you can

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>completely throw off handwriting analysis sure to where just where

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 1>you get a no conclusion at least right, Um, But

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>like you said, handwriting analysts you have ways for they

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>have ways of knowing whether you're simulating your handwriting. Yeah,

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and like you said, there'll be more pin lifts. Um,

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely be slower and basically they'll they'll root you out.

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Is not just writing naturally right, like at a normal

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 1>speed even right, because you're you're really putting a lot

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>of thought into the words you're writing rather than just

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>writing like you have nothing to hide exactly. UM. So

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>this is all good and well and fine, and it's

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:41.479
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate field. It's not always allowed in court though, because,

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like you said, it's subjective. Yeah, I want to say,

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know why I developed an affinity for

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>handwriting analysis because I think fingerprinting is b s frankly,

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and I remember saying pretty much that effect in the

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>fingerprinting episode. For some reason, handwriting analysis struck me as

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>more legit. Yeah, And I don't know why, but it did. UM.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And so I kind of looked around and found as

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>recently as June, they had a major national conference for

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>handwriting analysts that was UM. Its aim was to further

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the science and the measurements in the field in uh Gaithersburg, Maryland. Yeah,

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the Measurement Science and Standards and Forensic Handwriting Analysis Conference. UM.

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And I mean it's not a new the it's not

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a new field, and they've subjected it to scientific testing

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>like over the years. Like UM, the principle of uniqueness,

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the founding principle of handwriting analysis It's been tested many,

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>many times. One of the favorite tests they like to

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>do is to get identical twins to provide handwriting samples.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Same DNA, same environmental factor, same physiology, all of these

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>things that affect your handwriting, because I mean, like your

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>your handwriting is changed by the fine um motor neurons

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that you have in your in your body. If you're

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.959
<v Speaker 1>an identical twin, you're gonna be similar. You think your

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>handwriting would be similar. No handwriting analysts routinely can tell

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the difference between twins penmanship. Wow. Um, So they have

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>tested this stuff and they are I guess aware that

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>they it's not a fully scientific field, and they're taking

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>steps to make it more scientific. Yeah, because they want

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to protect their jobs and be they want it to

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>be like at the end of the day, they want

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it to be allowed in court. You know. They don't

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>want to be offered for podcast fodder. Oh I imagine.

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Also they don't want to put away any innocent people.

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Sure you know. Um, So let's talk about another brilliant plan.

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>If you want to be a forger of things, provide

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the both exemplars yourself. Right, this is pretty amazing. And

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy had a killer name Conrad. Code you could?

0:28:56.080 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>You could? Joe could Conrad? Could you? I think it's

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Conrade k u j A you all right? Conrade Coja,

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>let's call him that. The nineteen eighties, the Couge was

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a supposed collector of Nazi memorabilia. First of all, those

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>people freaked me out. You know remember American beauty. Yeah,

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>uh so he was a collector of this stuff. And um,

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a German publishing company he approached them and said, you

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>know what, I've got sixty handwritten journals written by tar

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Fur himself. Yea, they were found in a plane wreck,

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>just found him and they seemed to be genuine. And

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they paid him two point three million dollars. And uh

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this the same company, the German newspaper also owned that

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>publishing company. They printed stuff. They said, hey, let's syndicate

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>this out. The London Times said sure, we'll write about this.

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But they said, but you know what, we're the London Times.

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's get a handwriting analysts chow this stuff out. Three

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of them they had three like high end handwriting analysts

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>analyzed this stuff and all three of them said, yep, um,

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the same person wrote these samples, who wrote the diary,

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, these are these are Hitler's diaries. Yeah, because

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they got they got the exemplars that were supposedly written

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>by Hitler himself said it's the same thing. It was this.

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>These are legit, right, So cou Joe walks away with

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>cool two point three million in nineteen eighties dollars, no less,

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and the world has sixty previously unknown journals from Adolf Hitler.

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>We think within a year it was uncovered as a fraud.

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right, thanks to the London Times. Um. They used

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>ultra violet light examination and found out that the paper

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't around until a little bit of a problem. Anyone

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that knows Hitler knows that he died in Open your eyes, chuck. Uh.

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And then they did some more for in Success and

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>said the ink actually was applied on the paper about

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>twelve months ago, within the past year, and he's a fraud.

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And he wrote both sets and I don't know why

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they didn't check. And they said, well, we need some

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>real examples of Hitler's writing, and he's like, uh here, no,

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what they did. He had gotten I

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>think he was just that lucky wow that he had

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>flooded the market with fake Hitler handwriting, and so that

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the authenticated samples that they used as exemplars just happened

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to be ones that he'd also forged. So it passed

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the handwriting analysis. Handwriting Actually, handwriting analysis came out on

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>top in that instance, but it was still a fraud.

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>It was still a forgery. So amazing it came out

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on top as a technique, but overall it took kind

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of a hit because it's still failed. Unbelievable yet believable.

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>What about John Mark Carr? You remember him? Oh, dude, man,

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>And I gotta I gotta admit if there was ever

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a case of judging a book by its cover. When

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw that guy, I was like, yep, he did it.

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>He's the creepiest guy I've ever seen. He is creepy.

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>You got that right, Yeah, But he was creepy for

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>another reason, because of course we're talking about the John b. A.

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey case. He falsely confessed to killing John bin A Ramsey,

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>which I think he did it to get a free

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>ride from Thailand back to the US, I think so.

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he'd like the attention and everything too, but

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he just didn't have any money. And wanted

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to get back to the States, so he confessed to

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>John Benet's killing. Well, he's living as a trans woman now,

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>he is, and apparently trying to UM recruit six year

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>old and younger, preferably preferably brunette girls for a sex cult.

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Apparently he's just trying to found a sex cult. And

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I only saw this one article that was on several

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>different networks in June of like what was and I

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't see anything else after that. I think that is

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>very very grown up of you to say, because it

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is hearsay. One one accuser, Yeah, and it was somebody

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>who he was formerly close to, a girl he had

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>been engaged to UM who was saying she was coming

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>forward to try to protect people. But there was no

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>follow up, no nothing, So who knows, Chuck. It was

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>very good of you. But back to the handwriting part

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of this, he um. They compared the ransom note to

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of exemplars from his past. The Secret Service

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>does a lot of this, by the way, and Um.

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>One was a high school yearbook that he signed, and

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>one was a job application from Thailand and they couldn't

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>match it because it was inconclusive because the high school

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>year back yearbook was old and apparently in a quote

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>artistic writing style quote, So I don't know what that means.

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess he did, like you know, in high school,

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you do those like bubble letters. And then the job

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in Thailand he used all upper case letters and they

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't compare that to the ransom note because that was

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>both upper and lower. And then the the and A

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously sniffed him off the case. And he was not

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the guy. He was just weird. It was an odd duck. Yeah.

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they still never caught anyone, did they? No,

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>they never arrested anybody. Yeah. I think last thing I

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>heard was that the case was reopened and they thought

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they had enough evidence for the parents, but they didn't

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>or something to indict them. Oh yeah, that was a

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>few years back. Yeah, very sad um. And I don't

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>see why it was so hard to get these exemplars.

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it that tough to find handwriting examples from someone,

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>especially if they're not cooperating too well? I guess that's true. Like,

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, what do you have lying around that's

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>got your handwriting on it? I got a bunch of

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>notebooks and stuff with tons of stuff in there. Well

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>then you'd be an easy case. Alright, Well I better

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>not kild never kill anyone right anytime, so and keep

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 1>your nose clean. Um. What else you got? Um? I

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's about it for me. Well, there's the fish

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>system they're they're trying to h bring this into the

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>non subjective modern age. The forensic Information system for handwriting.

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>That basically they take a large body of handwritten material,

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>digitize it, and then plot it is arithmetic and geometric values.

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>So basically it'll be a numeric database, sort of like

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a fingerprint database. So instead of just having like this

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>big diary and a locker, you have an actual numeric

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>value that you can compare it to. Now, and that

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>just using computers is like flak jacket from criticism. I mean, really,

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the computers just carrying out program subjectivity, isn't it. Uh yeah,

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 1>probably so, But I mean it's really just a database.

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not saying that like any better way of doing things. Um.

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And I just saw this from two thousand nine. Um,

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of the same thing. There's in the Journal of

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Applied Cognitive Psychology. They did a test to see if

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>people differently when they're lying or not and they do.

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, they had them right, truthful sentences and lies

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and apparently right differently when you lie, the content of

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the sentence, whether it is a liar truthful, Yeah, changed

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the handwriting. Yeah, wow, that's really interesting. Yeah, so I

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:20.439
<v Speaker 1>don't I guess I could help with forensics for sure.

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>It could act as a sort of secondary lie detector

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 1>at least, right, you could be like I am the kidnapper, right,

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you have them right there, But I mean you couldn't.

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Then it's not for comparisons. If it doesn't work for yeah, well,

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't work out for comparison, you have a

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>handwritten confession. Pretty cool. And there's no schooling for this,

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you just really yeah like most of

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>their most of this forensic stuff, it's all just like

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>training job. Yeah, but there's certification. Well there's no college program, no,

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think you still have to become certified. I

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 1>don't think you have to. I think like you can

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>advertise in the Internet and just be Joe Schmo then

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>writing analyze that kind of thing. But I think, um,

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>there is a certification or creditation out there. Okay, it

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 1>says that, um, the training period is a minimum of

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>two years of full time training under the tutelage of

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>a qualified expert, a wizard. So yeah, forensics, the game continues. Nice. Uh,

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>let's see you got anything else. No, we still have

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to cover shadow analysis and smell yeah, smelly people. Yeah. Uh.

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know more about forensics, you should

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>type that word into the search bar. It will bring

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>up this handwriting analysis um article and a ton of

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>other stuff. Uh just typed in, like I said, to

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:40.959
<v Speaker 1>the search bar how stuff works dot com? And since

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 1>I said search bar, it's time for listener mail. Yeah. Man,

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this email from a feminist lesbian. Okay,

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>self described guys, your timing is amazing. I'm listening to

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>old episodes and I listened to micro Loans yesterday. It's

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>amazing how lined up my universe is with you guys

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um, so I guess she was into micro

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Loans or something. Um, it's a I love you, guys,

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to the point where my mental tape, the dialogue that

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>plays in one's head is sometimes even in your voice.

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>As a northern feminist and lesbian, I was leary of

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>two Southern dudes educating me. But I poo poo, all

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 1>your critics. So she listened to us. She's like, what

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are these bumpkin hate? See, it's gonna teach me. I'm

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a feminist lesbian from the north. She Poopoo's is that

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>once you get the hand of your dry wit and humor,

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 1>you are the most awesome and epic truth tellers who

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:39.240
<v Speaker 1>have grace, dignity, and a humility about your own mistakes

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and limitations that I find unparalleled. You embrace all people's

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>choices and lives, and you are silly to boot. I

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>must say that I just learned so much and I

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>have fun. Whatever you're talking about relates to my life

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and your excellent teachers. I sit outside by the river

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 1>in the back of my house draw or place you

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:06.399
<v Speaker 1>do go Dodoku, So it's the most difficult word and

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to pronounce it is when if you don't learn it right.

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>The first puzzle that game right right with people plank

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>you predict what number is gonna go in where it's

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty neat. You should try it all right, It's it's challenging.

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you like crosswords? I love crosswords. You will like

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this not the exact same thing by any stretch, and

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it definitely includes some some math, but um, you'll like it.

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>If you like crosswords, give it a shot. So she

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>plays this out by the river and listens to us

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for hours after long days. Uh. In short, everyone needs

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to be nice because I am all knowing and I

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>say you are wonderful. Words can hurt your kind decent

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>human beings first and foremost, and being in the public

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 1>eye makes people forget that. So they're And that is

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>from Karen Shaw and Western Maths. Nice. Thanks a lot,

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Karin Shaw. That was a very very nice letter. Thank you. Yeah,

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>like I picture her out there by the river playing

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that sudoku weird game sudoku okay suduko sidokuk. It ends

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with you now it ends with an Oh, no it

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't unless you mispelled it. She spelled it s u

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>d u k o suduko. I think it's so doku. Yeah,

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>we'll agree to disagree. Uh again, thank you very much

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for that very nice letter. UM, if you want to

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>send us a very nice letter or criticism, we we

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>have a thick skin after all these years. Um, you

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>can tweet to us at s Y s K podcast.

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>We will tweet back at you angrily probably and rally

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>everybody else against you um. You can join us on

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Facebook dot com, where Chuck will comment on your post.

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Make you feel bad if you make us feel bad, Right, Chuck,

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>he's a master at that. It's good for more on

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics. Does it How stuff

0:40:55.160 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 1>works dot com