WEBVTT - Top MBA Programs Target Diversity for Real-Life Case Studies

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. You are listening to Bloomberg

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Carol Master along with Shinali Bassik here in

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>our interactive broker studio. Let's get to a little bit

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>more on COVID and the vaccine because top of mine

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Sali mentioned it earlier. We've got President Bush his push

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>to begin offering third doses of Visor's vaccine, facing the

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>first of two crucial tests. Advisers to the FDA meeting

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>today to talk about whether booster shots should be offered

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to most Americans. So the process moving forward today, we

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>are expecting some type of vote expected later this afternoon.

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's see what's top of mind for Dr Ian

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>LUs Bader, his clinical Professor Medicine at n y U

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Land Going. He joined us once again on the phone

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. Hey, Ian, good to have you

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>back with us. How are you. I'm good, Happy Friday,

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and welcome back Caros, Thank you, thank you. I got

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>a needed break and it's good to be back. But

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like so many of the same stories

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that I left are still here, understandably, So how do

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you see the way forward when it comes to this pandemic?

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You and I UH and Tim and our team have

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>been talking to you a lot. What's next here? So

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a big debate about the third dost or the

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or the booster dose for COVID, and you know who,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>what and when is really the question. A lot of

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this data is based on Israel, where you know, they

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>had a relationship with the fiser and they got their

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccines very early, really December in January. It's not earlier

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>last year, so it's been almost a year. And what

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they are noting is really the effectiveness of the vaccine

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>is dropping from about to about and that's both due

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to dropping antibody levels, which we know happens after a while,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and also mutations, you know in the virus. This was

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to the alpha variant. The delta variant actually has a

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>different confirmation of the spike protein, and so based on

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a number of issues, including a much higher viral load

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of with delta, people are asymptomatic and often have very

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>very high levels. So that's really what we're seeing, and

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>concern about transfer. I mean, in other words, you're not

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>getting sick, but you're now have ability to pass COVID around. Yes,

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's certainly one of the elements. So that's

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>really what we're seeing in Israel, and really what we're

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>seeing here is that the majority of people who've been

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated are not getting very sick at all. A small

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>sent are and in Israel and here as well, the

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>small percent of people who've been vaccinated. Actually in Israel

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it's about half the hospitalized patients had two vaccines. They

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>typically have heart disease or lung disease, diabetes, hypertension, they

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>have a number of other issues, and so it is

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>likely if we're going to do a booster, it should

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>be in those susceptible groups. You know, we know that

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the third vaccine really does raise antibodies. The question is

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change anything? Will it really change hospitalization and death rates?

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's really the question. And then the question also

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>comes up, what about side effects or potential side effects

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>months or years down the line. So what do you

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>make of the meeting today of the FDA advisors and

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>what will come out of it? How fast can we

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>expect decisions to be made by the Biden administration and

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>then guidance given to the bulk of the country. You know, candidly,

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we need more data. We really should have

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>been all along the way doing a variety of our

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>own studies, both on the MR and A vaccines and

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>patient populations, monoclonal antibodies, UM other drugs and other treatments,

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, for COVID, we we really should be a

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>leader instead of relying on other data. My bet is

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that they are going to say it's absolutely reasonable for

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>people the IMMO compromised people with underlying diseases, but I

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to wait on advising it for a

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>big group of people. First of all, we know a

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of people now really have very high endibody levels,

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and what we don't know is we'll even

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>higher antibody levels really make a significant difference. We before

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we subject people to the potential risk of a third vaccine,

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we really should know. Does a higher antibody level really

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>change an outcome? That's really the question. This is a

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>really big week with so many people going back to school,

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So what are you expecting for the next buple of weeks.

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean that there may be a lot more cases?

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And does that um really start to change the calculus

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of how people think about this disease. You know, even

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>though we're getting closer to what we used to think

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of her immunity is right vaccinations. Seventy Americans have had

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.119
<v Speaker 1>at least one vaccine. There's a group of about fifty

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>or sixty million people who you know, remain unvaccinated, although

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>slowly that seeming to chip down. I think we are

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to see a rise in COVID cases

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>really in the unvaccinated, and I think everyone ultimately is

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be exposed to delta. It's highly contagious, but

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I think most people who are vaccinated will have either

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>minimal or no symptoms. They'll have a cost, they'll have

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a cold, and if they don't get tested, they may

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>never even really know. And I think eventually we will

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>all build up antibodies to that, and unless there's a

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>new mutation, I think we will sort of learn to

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>live with delta, you know, one that group of fifty

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>million people you know, wind up getting it. Now. Of

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>course there will be some hospitalizations and deaths in the unvaccinated,

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>but that at this point is a relatively small percent

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of the population. Well, and it is interesting. I thought

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the point you made about a third dose. We don't

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily know all the side effects of getting one, and

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that's just something to consider as they as they move forward.

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Certainly regulators, Um, Dr Lusbader, sit tight, We'll come back.

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Dr Ian los Bader, where you're talking with on this

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Friday's clinical professor of medicine over at n y U

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Landgoing Medical Center on the phone in New York City?

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready Shinale to get a third booster? I

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>would like it as soon as possible, like him would

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be like, I want it yesterday. UM. I do like

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>that they're gathering more information because I think we're getting

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>pieces from different parties, and you know, we know, right

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>data is important to really understanding maybe what's to come. Definitely,

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the best move? Definitely, but people are back in

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>full force. It definitely feels like it definitely feels it.

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Are you are listening to Bloomberg this week on this Friday,

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser, Shinali Bassik, and we'll be back in just

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a moment right here on Bloomberg Radio. Let's get right

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>back to Dr Ian los Beta, clinical professor of Medicine

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>at n y U Landgown, still with us on the

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>phone in New York City. So Dr ls Beder, one

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that really caught my attention when you said, you know,

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't know the side effects of a third possible dose.

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean we are still learning in real time about

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>these vaccines and about you know, the impact it has

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>on our body. What are the concerns that kind of

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>an overdosing of a COVID vaccine could mean? So, you know,

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>everything in life is a risk and a benefit ratio

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever decisions we make, and certainly being unprotected against COVID

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is not a smart thing to do, because we do

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>know that about a third of patients have long COVID,

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>so we do our best to protect the issue was

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>raised about influenza absolutely. Flu shots, although not perfectly effective,

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly can be very helpful. You know, we're starting to

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>give that now, so that's important. We certainly know the

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>two vaccines are really reduced of for COVID, certainly reduced

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the risk of death and hospitalization. We don't know that

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>much about the third vaccine. We certainly know a small

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>percentage of people who get the m R and A

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>shots um can have other issues myocarditis, pericardius or neurologic issues. Yes,

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it is a very small number, and overall, the the

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the vaccine over overrides really the risks. But

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.719
<v Speaker 1>people should know that these are not risk free vaccines. Importantly,

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>side effects can occur. Importantly, Also, the vaccines are different

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and differences are emerging across them. How do you parse

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>what's most important when it comes to the differences between

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the vaccines themselves. So at this point, um, it does

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 1>little like the Maderna m R and A vaccines really

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>do give a little bit longer lasting protection. Part of

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that might be the time interval, right, So initially we

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>were giving a three week interval between a fiser and

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>four weeks with the Maderna. It does turn out that

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe that gap between the first two shots really can

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>give you longer lasting protection. J and J initially did

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>not have numbers quite as high, but over time it

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>does seem to help. And that also seems to be

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>boosted if you give an MR and a vaccine several

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>weeks or months after the the J and J. So

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it does look like for the majority of people, of

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>healthy people, they are pretty well protected. I want to say,

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>whither without approval At this point, people can go into

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:54.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, local pharmacies. I've got patients who get their vaccines.

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It really so there's no one preventing that. But it

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>really has to be a recommendation B on the science

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>behind it. And I don't think we really know other

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>than saying that vulnerable people elderly diabetes, I mean it

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was suppressed. They're the risk of getting delta and complications

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 1>are much higher than your average person who's otherwise healthy,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>who's who has already had two vaccines. Kitty Gratfeld was

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>on with me yesterday at Bloomberg and she she only

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>actually talked about people she knows. You just walked into

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>pharmacies and like, I need a shot. It was a

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>third shot, and they just did it. It happened to

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>me in front of me the other day, did it, Yes,

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>so we know it's happening. Well, go ahead, people if

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>they want to get it, you know you can do it.

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>And people who don't want vaccines, you know. Obviously we're

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not yet forcing people to do that in the United States. Um,

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think we should wait for more data. And

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's an emergency at this point. If

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you're otherwise healthy, it is not a panic to get

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a third booster at this time. Hey, real quickly thirty

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>seconds here? You know, China can't seem to get a break.

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>There is so where where there's tons of people, lots

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 1>of vaccines have been given out. They contract data points

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like no other uh probably country. Their problems tell tell

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you what about this virus? And again just got about

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. Well, I'm not sure how effective the sign

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of VAC vaccine really is and they maybe having other

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>mutations that they're not testing for. We need to do

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a better job. In general. There are new nasal vaccines

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>for COVID that are being worked on. There are a

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of different approaches that we really need to make

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>efforts that may be equally or more effective for new mutations.

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>The data out of China could be a new mutation

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>or could just be a less effective vaccine. All right, good,

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>great always Ian, thank you, thank you, thank you. Have

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful and safe weekend. Dr Ian las Bader, clinical

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Professor of Medicine at n y U Land, going on

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the phone in New York City. The more I learned,

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>the more I feel like I don't know, but he helps.

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>He does help clarify a lot. Though. You're listening to

0:11:56.280 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, you know we often

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>reference something being a great business school case study. We

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to that a lot here on Bloomberg Business Week. Case

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>studies now part of business school's efforts to improve diversity.

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into it. It's all part of the coverage

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Weeks annual survey and coverage of the

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>world's top NBA program. So let's get into it with

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week, getor Joe Weber here in our Interactive

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>broker studio, and also with us Bloomberg News Higher Education

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Finance reporter Janet Lauren on the phone, in New York

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>City case studies right at the heart of like getting

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>an m b A. And yet yeah, well, and it

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is a topic that we think about it the magazine

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I like in some of our our most

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>noteworthy stories to to sort of our version case studies.

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>And so I thought this was a really interesting story,

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>um that Janet was able to contribute to the package.

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Because you go to business school, what do you what

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>do you learn? Yeah? That's to me. Yeah, well, the

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>case studies really the DNA of that experience, right, and

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>as you as we've all known for the past uh

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>from all of our amazing reporting from the past year,

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like, all right, this is a lot of white

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and male stuff, right, so so let's shake up the

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>case study, right, So Janale, what does that end up

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>looking like? Oh? Well, what's so interesting? And I'm curious

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>to see what Janet found here. But to the point,

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of you know, if you're going

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>into retail, you will find more case studies where women

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>have become the CEO turned things around. But when it

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>comes to other more hardcore areas of finance where women

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have not really dominated yet, like quant finance, I mean

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>even the class. It was like two women in most

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of my classes. So and very few case studies that

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>involved women because the women have not risen to the

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO level in those industries yet. So, Janet, how are

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>they changing this? Well, it doesn't have to be the

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>CEO to be a compelling character in a case study.

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>For example, the one we mentioned in our story was

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>rosal And Fox of John Dear, the tractor agriculture manufacturer UM.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And she was the first black woman manager of a factory,

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and that was a compelling enough reason for Harvard to

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>feature her as a case study. That's why that was interesting.

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I always think about case studies as being

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>these huge big blow ups or problems or or you know,

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's usually involving the C suite and the CEO or something.

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>But as you point out, there are some really great

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>stories case studies and lessons to be learned by people UM.

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Certainly diversity UH and diverse people maybe lower on UH

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the career ladder, but they're still leaders and

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>still facing challenges, and they're still dealing with with issues

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and problems, and it's you know, you can learn as

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>much from somebody who may not be the CEO by

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>listening to their experience. And if you read the case

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>study of Rosalind Fox, you know you could hear about

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the isolation she you know, she experienced while living in

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a small town of in Wisconsin a six months people.

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And she was recruited by John Dear and you know

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the things she was concerned about

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in going and taking the job. In another case studying

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned UM. Stanford, in addition to Harvard, has been

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of outreach and just asking their alumni

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and asking faculty members to reach out and find other

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>UM potential protagonists with diverse backgrounds. And Stanford featured you know,

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a woman who runs a car dealership, a black woman

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>who runs a car dealership in Dayton, Ohio. Um, and

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>she's the second generation running that card dealership. And uh,

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that was an interesting case study for Stanford,

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, which bears mentioning. Stanford number one in our

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>tanking of NBA UH NBA schools, UH programs. Um. Yeah,

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I here's my big question. So so interesting Stanford number

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>one in networking, number one in compensation, such great things,

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're not among the top ten when it comes

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to diversity. I don't want to be super tough on

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>these business schools because I've got to say they're not

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>doing horrible, all right, I mean they are top twenty.

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say, when I went to business school,

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I was more pleased with the diversity than I wasn't

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>even in college. So Joel, how did I mean, how

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>did you guys even think about how to approach diversity

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in these programs as you guys did this for the

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>first time. Well, the it's all driven by survey, right,

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and so it ends up being thousands and thousands and

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>thousands of surveys, and that is our data point, right, like,

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever those responses are what we build that around recognizing

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that this was such an important thing that we wanted

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to actually help acknowledge in the schools are recognized that

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a challenge here, but they're also doing things about it.

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we effectively, you know, centered the survey

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>questions on UM. But you know what what that ties into,

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think is also what this article of Janet's reflect

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>which is that case study about John Dear didn't come

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>from a professor, right when did you come from? Janet?

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>It came from a student, and that students said I

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>want to be reflected in these case studies. And she

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>she spoke up and she suggested Rosalind Fox. Rosalind was

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>not her manager, but she was someone who mentored her

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>at John Deere and Low and behold she became a

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>case study. And Harvard is mandating and it's required first

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>year NBA courses that every every course have a protagonist

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>with a diverse background. So what I like about that

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>she just shows this relationship that I think the business

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>schools are really they're leaning into their own students, right,

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and they recognize that their own students can help them

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>solve these problems, and that surfaces new material that they

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't otherwise have been able to have. So I just

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>thought that was a really really clever insight into what

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>makes business schools also special, right, And like we we've

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>gotten to so many of these business schools together, and

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>it's like that network that is the network effect, right

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>for all these people together, and you you talk about

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the problems and solutions and you create better leaders out

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of it, right, Exactly What's interesting We talked about brands

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>all the time and how customers are pushing brands and

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>companies right to be were diverse or were sensitive to

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the environment. What's interesting, though, Janet is a student pushing this,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, to get a more diverse case study. Yet

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in your story you point out that it might be

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>unclear whether professors will embrace it equally. What did you

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>hear about that? So? Um so the professor that I

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>spoke with at U C. L A. Had talked about how,

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a decade ago, you know, in a

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>psychology course, he had brought in um diverse people in

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>his in his discussions and case studies, and he said

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>students were wondering, well, why why are you Why are

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you including this? It doesn't really feel relevant. And now

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>a decade later, you know, students are really asking for it.

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>But the question is book, If you're a business school

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>professor and you've been teaching a class for decades, you

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>know you that add more work for you to change

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>out your case studies. You know, it's a lot of

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>work to find case studies to to you know, have

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>to teach them, and they may not want to switch

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>up their courses if you know you've got an oldie,

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>but goody, you know who who's going to replace that?

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>And it takes effort on that time unto students keep

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>answering these surveys that you're doing, Joel and saying this

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is what we want. You know, that's exactly right. And

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's also why we've continued to just champion this

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>this ranking because like the students end up being the

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>engine that drives it, they become alumni. The alumni also

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>are a big part of who do takes part in

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>these surveys. The more you do that, the more it

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>actually helps everything. Joe, Well, we're gonna have more offshoots

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of certainly the Business Week coverage in the magazine that's

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in weeks to come. Joe Weber, thank you so much.

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Have a great weekend. Editor Bloomberg Business Week. Here in

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>our studio, Janet Laura and check her out at Janet

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Lauren on Twitter, Higher education finance reporter at Bloomberg News.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>You can find her story too at business week dot com.

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Let's get in

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to it. Our check on the cryptocurrency world. We've got

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a company that is developing digital tools to merge the

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>traditional capital markets and crypto assets here to tell us

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>more and Jale and I've been talking behind the scenes.

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a million questions for Alec Flenberg you see

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of Nimbus. He's on the phone in New York City, Alex. UM,

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 1>so great to have you here with Shinali and myself.

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I've been reading about your company, and

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be quite honest with you. UM, I'm

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a little confused, so tell me exactly what you guys do.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So so good afternoon, ladies, and thank you so much

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>for having me on the show. It's a real pleasure. UM.

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And I hope and I hope. Well, I think there's

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>only a ten minute segment, so a million questions going

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty tough. Try to speak. Well, have you

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>back again, UM, So what do we do? We we

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>are firmly fixed in providing solutions within the decentralized finance space.

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>What does that really just mean in layman's terms, all

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we've been doing, uh, you know,

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>in the centralized standard eyes general uh financial services space

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and the lending space. UM, in the traditional trading space,

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be looking to do exactly the same

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>things and leveraging what the team's you know, multiple decades.

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say at least every every single leader on

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>this team has at least three decades in the UH

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>centralized you know, standardized financial services space. So we're looking

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>to bring that experience to the decentralized space. What does

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that mean. Yeah, So decentralized finance. One way, I try

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to explain it to people and tell me how you

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>make the comparison. The centralized finance reminds me a lot

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of peer to peer lending, where there's a human being

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>on the other side somewhere. Um, how does this actually work?

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And how do you compare it to just peer to

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>peer lending like we've seen the last several years, right,

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So so so peer to peer lending. So peer to

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>peer lending is one component of the centralized finance, right

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and and that's also how we've we're starting, you know,

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>from the tools designs that we're implementing. So we're we're

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>actually provided two main apps, right, One that's for lending

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and borrowing h with you know, through peer to peer

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>UH and also the exchange of currency off exchange so

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have any fees associated with it. And

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>also because we're not an exchange. We're doing it off exchange. Um,

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible to hack us, right, So, so there's a

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>great risk metrics there. But from a peer to peer perspective, uh,

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>there's very little difference between what decentralized finances and peer

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to peer is providing versus what the last two decades

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of the lending clubs and and the prospers uh that

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>they've done. Except they've done it off change and we're

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>doing it on change. So why is it better? Why

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is it better? So I'll tell you sees ultimately, Ultimately, ultimately,

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>if we think about all of the decentralized activity that

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen over the last twenty or so years, starting

0:22:58.080 --> 0:22:59.959
<v Speaker 1>from you know, I mean you know mean no long

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>we're having to call a broker in order to get

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>an executioner to get a quote. Right. Uh, When when

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that deessentralization happened and we started being able to trade

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>from our phones and our laptops without having to me

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that call. Remember, transparency uh was it was a big

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>part of that. But also primarily it was the spees

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I drove that if I don't if I don't have

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to use a broker, I can do the same things

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>without those seas, and that's driving this industry as wend

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>so magical lower fees per peer learning. But the reality

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>too is there's a lot of risk involved. How do

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you get comfortable with lending and barrowing two people you

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know without actually insurance? By the way, like, where's

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the oversight? Who? All? Right? Right? So I'm very happy

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>he said that because Look, one of the thing, one

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons I keep harping on the fact that

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the leadership of this team has spent their lifetime, you know,

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I've spent twenty seven years in the in the you know,

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in the real standardized you know, centralized financial services. The

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>reason I keep harping on that is because you're there

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>is a tremendous amount of risk, inherent risk in doing

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it on chain or off chain. Right. The reason why

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it's so important to pick products that are being developed

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>by folks with our level of experience is that we're

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>not looking to dethrone traditional finance, right, We're not looking

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>There are no you know, to us, you know, the standardized, generalized,

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>centralized banking sector. They're not the enemy. And let's let's

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>be realistic, ladies, you know, just because we're calling it

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a disruption. Just because we're calling it as an industry

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>decentralization move doesn't mean that this traditional banking institutions and

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>alternative assets institutions are not going into the space. They

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to go into the space very very heavily,

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and they bring with them a tremendous amount of experience

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and and liquidity. So we're actually providing that level of

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>experience and oversight to the community as well. Alex just

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>quickly got about forty twonds left here. I mean, my

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>understanding is you guys are moving towards a listing on

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>on with American Stock Exchange. So is the plan or

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe is it ultimately that you end up being linked up,

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>bought out by merged with one of the traditional financial

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street houses. And again just quickly so so I'll

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you, being a compliance officer for many years, there's

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>no way that I could actually even speak to that.

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>But I am going to tell you that you are

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>right that we are. We are moving very heavily uh

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to bring in a k y C n m L

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and get registered in the state or for for global purposes,

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, because we do feel that there's a good

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>balance to actually do that but but yeah, that's that's

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly the direction of all right, we still have nine

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand questions to ask you, but we'll do that next time.

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Alex thinks so much. Alex Lemberg, CEO at Nimbus, on

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:50.479
<v Speaker 1>the phone in New York City. I'm a journal now,

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive. No, no, no, all right, please,

0:25:55.680 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the right I want to try question. This

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is the drive to the globe. Give thanks, We'll try

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>us down on Bloomberg Radio. Let's get to it. We've

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>just got about ten nine minutes left in today's trading session.

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>We're hovering around our worst levels of the day. We

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>are on track for a second down week when it

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>comes to US equities. Let's get to it with Ryan Kelly,

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Senior VP portfolio manager at Hennessey Funds with us on

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the phone in Raleigh, North Carolina. Among the funds he

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>helps manage, the Hennessy Gas Utility Fund up about eleven

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>year to date, putting it in the eighty second percentile

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>among its peers. That's according to Bloomberg Data. Ryan, the

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>energy story is certainly one that we've been watching this week.

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>How are you and how do you see that? Group? Hi? Good,

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to be on again. Good to hear from you and

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the group. Utility group has certainly been lagging this year

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>last year as well, but that's usually the time when

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we think it starts to get a little bit more interesting. UM.

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>This is a group that we like for many reasons. Uh.

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>It has good dividend yields, it has a nice long

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>term uh projection of earnings, it's pretty stable earnings. These

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>are companies that we need no matter what. It's a

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>central part of the economy. UM. And yes, they have

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>been sort of pushed to the side last year and

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this year, but this also makes it at this point

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>much more compelling valuation. They're trading at about a three

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>multiple discount to the SMP five. Generally they actually trade

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just slight premium to the SMP. But you know, there's

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>been so much money going into all the other sectors

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>of the market and too. You know, last year is

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>all about large cap it was about technology. Uh. This year, Uh,

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the sectors that really got hammered last year,

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>such as financials and energy, they've come flying back this year.

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, something like utilities, we think it is

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>still a really good long term holding for long term investors,

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>So how much are you rushing the safety now? You

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>made this comment about how these are companies that will

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>do well no matter what. We've seen a few days

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of slight full pullbacks in SMP in the last week

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>or so. Are you looking for safety now? Well? I think, UM,

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've seen a little pullback, we're still only

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>about two and a half percent off the highs give

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>or take. UM. This is such a resilient market. It's

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to to tell, you know, if we are

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>going to have that next big correction that everybody talks

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>about UM. And you know we've seen it again and

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>again for the last year. Ever, every time that there's

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.239
<v Speaker 1>a pullback, it takes on average five days to hit

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a new high UM. So UM, you know, things seem

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a little different maybe this time, but potentially not. No,

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this is more of UM. I like to talk about

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>utilities in this space a little bit more long term

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, in that we are entering there is a

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive side, which you mentioned, but we're entering really the

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>first endings i'd say, of a very very long term

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>transformative UM expansion for many of these companies UM driven

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>by clean energy, driven by new technologies driven by electrification.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>If we are going to get to a space a

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>place where we have you know, say, um, many more

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles on the on the road, and many more

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>appliances being you know, you using electricity. I've seen studies

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that show that we're going to need an electrical grid

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>which is two times bigger than it is right now,

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>which means what good things for natural gas? It means

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:50.959
<v Speaker 1>it means good things for a few things we have

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in this fund. We have utilities in general, so it's

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>really good for electric utilities. This is a long term

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>runway of growth and utilities in general, whether it's natural

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>gas or electric. Um. These are the companies that when

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they invest in their infrastructure. This infrastructure a huge word

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>right now. When Capex goes up, longer term earnings per

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>share go up, but it causes growth rate and earnings

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>per share when they have to spend more to reinvest

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in our infrastructure and to get bigger. Is there right?

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>One thing I do wonder though increasingly Snolly knows it.

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>She covers it, She talks about it all the time

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>about you know, e s G on Wall Street among

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors, you know, looking for kind of a greener

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>way forward, greener it's a little vague I think right now,

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>because there aren't really true standards out there when it

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to regulators and what it means. But I mean,

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>do you see in the near future that you're gonna

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>have to pivot more because institutional investors will demand it.

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Investors will demand it that your investments reflect a cleaner

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>way forward when it comes to the impact on the environment. Well,

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's certainly that that that pressure

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that's happening already, and that that's not only from institutional

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>investors and other investors, it's also from the companies themselves. UM,

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>many utilities themselves. Uh. They are pushing for whether or

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>not the government is or you know, politically we're moving

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:16.719
<v Speaker 1>that way or not. They are pushing for net zero

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>type emissions by twenty fifty duke energy down in my area,

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for instance. So that movement is happening, and that does

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>mean a whole lot of investment for many decades to come.

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think personally, the way that we believe is that, um,

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be really hard to go to straight

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>on full renewables, and natural gas is a very good

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>complementary energy source to renewables, because you know, there are

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>certain times when we have to have a large scale

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>quickly turned on electricity generation, and natural gas is a

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>very good way to do that. You know you own

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Berkshire as well. For me, Caroline, I love watching the

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Berkshire bets. What do you want? What do you want

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett to be doing with all that extra money? Well,

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting question. So, UM, the the way that

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this fund is run, it is a fund which is

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>primarily invested in any company, most of companies that are

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>natural gas distribution companies. Now Berkshire Hathaway obviously does not

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>sound like one at all, Um, but they have a

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>very large company within their structure called min American, which

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is a utility company and energy company. So that's why

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's in the fund. UM, and it happens to be,

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, market cap weighted funds, so it's UM one

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of the largest holdings in the stand. Well, good to

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>get some time with you. This is certainly a topic

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking a lot about more generally when it

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to energy and just kind of watching several hotspots

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>around the world when it comes to energy crunches. Ryan,

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Ryan, Kelly, He's portfolio manager at

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Hennessy Funds on the from Raleigh. Thanks for listening to

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to our

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News