WEBVTT - The Creator Economy Grows Up: How Jellysmack Helps Talent Gain Scale

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Strictly Business Varieties, weekly podcast featuring conversations with

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>industry leaders about the business of media and entertainment. I'm

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Cynthia Lyttleton, co editor in chief of Variety Today. My

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>guest is Sean Atkins, president of Jellysmack. Jellysmack is a

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>prime example of a company that is active in an

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>emerging business sector that I have been watching with great interest.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>The creator economy, the wild West of social media personalities,

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is really starting to take shape as a content marketplace

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>unto itself. With market structure comes support and administrative services

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like those offered by Jellysmack. I'll let Atkins explain in

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>detail what Jellysmack offers its creator clients. It's a mix

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of talent scouting, marketing and content distribution services. Atkins brings

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>good perspective on how the creator economy is maturing thanks

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to his long resume as a digital leader in traditional media.

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Before joining Jellysmack in twenty twenty one, he worked as

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Chief Digital Officer for Discovery Communications and served a hitch

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>as president of MTV. He was also CEO of RTL's

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>Digital Video Group and senior vice president of New Media

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Programming for HBO. That's a title that signals how long

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>ago he held that job. Atkins and I spoke at

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Varieties Offices in late August, just a few days after

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>we both attended the Streamy Awards that recognize influencers and

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>digital creators. That event proved to be a jumping off

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>point for the conversation coming up right after this break,

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're back with a conversation about the creator economy

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>with Sean Atkins, president of jif Smack.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>What did you see on stage?

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 3>What did you see in the caliber of talent that

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 3>was at the event that said that tells you something

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 3>larger about the creator economy and where it stands right

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:14.839
<v Speaker 3>now in twenty twenty three.

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I think the first thing, as someone who's been

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 4>in both the creator economy and the traditional side of business,

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 4>is an indication of how much the industry is exploding matures.

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 4>It felt like I'd gone to the Emmys or the

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 4>Golden Globes or to the OSCAR that felt like a

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 4>traditional award show with the red carpets and people mingling

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 4>and sometimes too much alcohol given at the tables, alcohol

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 4>and cosplay. What could go on to say, you know

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 4>the same amount of like insider jokes that was happening there.

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 4>You saw, you saw talent that would have had huge

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 4>businesses for decades in the business and emerging ones. I

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 4>think the thing that was a little bit differentiated is

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 4>the absolute diversity of that talent base. Right. We talk

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 4>about in the traditional side of business with the desire

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 4>for diversity and the struggles we're having as an industry,

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 4>but you look at the streamings, they don't have that

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 4>problem at all. Right, Like, there was absolutely by type

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 4>of creators that were there, how seasoned they were, how

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 4>senior they were, they were new, they were old. You

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 4>had the entire operation kind of outlined there, and it

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 4>was really impressive to see now the whole industry come

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 4>together and get celebrated, but sort of the indication of

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 4>the level of maturity that's happening in the market.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 3>You could not you'd have to be blind not to

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 3>notice that the creator economy is creating all kinds of

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 3>lanes for all kinds of diverse talents.

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Some of the big.

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Winners were totally new names to me, I will completely acknowledged,

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 3>but you know, groups like AMP and RDC World were

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 3>very very clear that this is you know, truly grassroots

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 3>content that is being wheeled up by fandom and that

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 3>you could really see, you know, very writ large there,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, like like a traditional word show.

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 2>There were cheering sections.

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 3>But you could sense that in the way that you know,

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the streams again just as a microcosm has evolved, and

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>talent is getting up there and thanking their teams right

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 3>and their manager and it's you know, we can see

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 3>from our vantage point of variety covering the content business

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 3>in the last call it you know, probably accelerated by

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>the pandemic, like most everything else in our lives these days,

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 3>but the emergence of social media not just as a

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 3>platform for people to come out and then translate to

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 3>books and TV shows, but truly making serious a significant

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 3>living and a significant impact unto in social media, unto themselves.

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 3>How is that emergence of that economy? How is that

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 3>an opportunity for jellysmack Well.

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 4>I think the thing that first people need to understand

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 4>is that the scale of what's going on with talent

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 4>and with the businesses they're building and the career economy

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 4>is most people generally don't really understand it. Right, If

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 4>you think about the headline you might see in a

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 4>writing magazine like the Rock signs twenty million dollars deal

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 4>to be interfeated. That's a front page news that happens

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 4>like every day in the creator space with creators that

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 4>people have never heard of it. You know, you talk

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 4>about mister Peace, who's does very well, but there's you

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 4>look at the dude perfect team that has not only

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 4>a great digital business, they have a huge touring business.

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 4>You can look at other ones like Charlotte Doebray representives

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 4>a comedian who's not doing so on the platform. She's

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 4>actually self funding her own pilots in series to develop

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 4>for television. So there's this immense amount of kind of

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 4>success in capital for creators who actually completely control the

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 4>entire means of production and the means of distribution, which

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 4>really doesn't happen in the traditional media. So that's the

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 4>most fascinating thing you see. But the level below and

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 4>where Jellysmack comes in is with that explosion of talent

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 4>and the maturing of that business. Like any great entrepreneurial ecosystem,

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 4>whether you look at restaurants being minted, or you look

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 4>at real estate or anything that has a large entrepreneuri closs,

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 4>there's an infrastructure layer that has to exist so those

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 4>entrepreneurs can skip, because then the challenge for the creator class.

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 4>And I was actually having this conversation last night with

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 4>some people who are both actors and creators, and they

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 4>were talking about the difference between they started in the

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 4>acting side of the world and they were used to

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 4>like there as a DP, as an editor and all

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 4>this infrastructure, and then they became a creator and there's none.

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm setting up my ring line, They're sitting everything, And

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 4>they were talking about how it's probably easier to start

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 4>as a creator because you don't know that infrastructure exists,

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 4>so you sort of build this DNA and you own

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 4>all the means of production. But the contrary to that

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 4>is creators who grow up in that ECOSYSM have a

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 4>tendency to confuse the mean of production as the creative itself. Right,

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 4>So if you think you have to edit and write

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 4>and do everything to scale to multiple platforms, it's very complicated.

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Just like if you and I started a restaurant decided

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 4>we were also going to build an organic farm and

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 4>make silverware and build we would have a trouble scaling. Right.

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 4>That's where Jellysmack comes because creators are in that moment

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 4>right now where they're realizing like, oh, I got to

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 4>hire editors, or I need capital to build a studio,

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 4>or I want to build a merchandise line, or I

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 4>want to build a touring business. They need partners who

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 4>understand that scale, what that infrastructure needs to look like.

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 4>As what Jilly Smack does. We use all of our

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 4>AI and technology to develop services that identify these creators

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 4>at an early stage and then support them so they

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 4>can grow into real, viable businesses across multiple areas.

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 3>And where are you seeing outside of like you know,

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 3>signing a book deal, signing a TV show development pact

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 3>or something. Where where are you seeing those big, those

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 3>big twenty million level or you know, commensurate dollars.

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Where are you seeing those deals?

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 4>So the detail is so it's interesting. So this is

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 4>the thing I think gets a little bit confusing when

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 4>we look at the creator economy from a traditional media lens, right,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 4>because we look at it from an entertainment perspective, and

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 4>there is a sizeable amount of that. They're making videos,

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 4>so that makes sense, But the other things you have

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 4>to realize the creator economy is actually transversally impacting a

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 4>lot of different communities. And so when you talk about

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 4>a creator, they might be on YouTube and they get

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 4>ad revenue from YouTube, or they might get brand revenues, right,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 4>so they dual stream like they have a direct relationship

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 4>with brands. But then they might come from not like

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 4>an entertainment vertical, like for example, we have people who

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 4>are in the legal space and they make a ton

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 4>of money from referrals into their law firm. Or you

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 4>might have creators who for example, one creator who Blacaltes,

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 4>who has such a big business that she's got a

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 4>giant target retail partnership. Now, if you're looking for anything

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.239
<v Speaker 4>in the yoga space, but you can go through almost

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 4>every vertical you can think about, and there's a creator

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 4>with a very dominant position, whether it's real estate, you're

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 4>looking at legal, you're looking at retail. We have creators

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 4>like Patrick Starr who have big beauty lines. We have

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 4>creators like, for example, Karen Nate. They are creators who

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 4>do travel. Now, travel and traditional doesn't work that well anymore, right,

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 4>travel channel doesn't really do travel anymore. No, we don't

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 4>have people running around doing travel logs anymore. But in

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 4>there for their ecosystem and their audience. Not only do

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 4>they really have an audience who follows them for the

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 4>information of pro but they're so well now they have

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 4>an app and a business that helps people book travel

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 4>at a discounted rate. There's like something you wouldn't see

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 4>in a traditional meaning is where they use the power

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 4>of their distribution actually build whole business credibility and credibility

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 4>in those areas. And so it's really hard to find

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 4>actually a vertical that doesn't have creators pretty dominant in

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 4>almost any industry, Which is what the thing when people

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they understand the size of the impact

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 4>that's happening is it's not just in the media business,

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 4>literally happening to every industry at the same time.

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 3>So it sounds I mean, it's clearly it's clearly star

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 3>driven at the very top. You've got to have millions

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 3>of followers and it's got it. You've got to have

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 3>that personality. But it sounds like what you're saying is

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 3>you can make a kind of a call it a

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 3>middle class living, you know, a load to mid six

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 3>figures with some savvy and obviously some success and some luck.

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 2>But that does exist, or you can.

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 4>If you look at it from a pure media business. Right,

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 4>Media is media, Right, it has a power a lotl dynamic.

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 4>There is ten percent five percent depending which VERTICALI like

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 4>a thing as it correct has an outside control of

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 4>what's going on. The difference in the creator space is

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 4>that you can, to your point, you can build a

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 4>middle class lifestyle. I mean just even in Jellysmack, I

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 4>think it's about eighty percent of our clients have made

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 4>over two hundred and fifty thousand dollars, and we're an

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 4>ancillary business to them. We're not their core business. You

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 4>think about that like that, I think something like five

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 4>times the size of the media and US income, So

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 4>it's not small dollars. And again as an emerging market,

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:34.079
<v Speaker 4>right with ever growing consumption, ever growing creators coming into it.

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 4>The thing we know that happens as markets like the

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 4>middle class just starts to scale, right. I often tell

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 4>people like it's kind of like China. People used to

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 4>question twenty years ago, is China ever going to get

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 4>past the power al of the concentration on top? And

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 4>clearly we know the answer to that. The answer is yes,

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 4>is there middle class the size of the US middle class. No,

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 4>but will it be yes, And the same thing will

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 4>happen in the creator space over time, just because it

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 4>isn't only playing in the media space, right, because if

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 4>you're playing in the larger economies, know, ultimately you're talking

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 4>about essentially the creator space will impact everything in the GDP.

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 4>So it's hard to argue that that's not going to

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 4>have a pretty tremendous mid market impact over time. Yeah,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 4>there's correct.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Let me ask you, and just to boil it down,

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Jelly Smack fundamentally offers people like crucial marketing and distribution support.

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Would that be a fair character? Yeah? O.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 4>The way to think about it is that we are

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 4>a detection engine on AURA that finds creators who are

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 4>most likely to have their content either distribute to another

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 4>form of monetization or another platform. We got our beginning

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 4>because we're actually founded by three creators who are huge fans.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 4>I always have to clarify this from my American ads,

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 4>but football European not American. And you know, back in

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty sixteen when they founded a company and social video

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 4>isn't what we knew it today, they had antypothesis it

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 4>would become what it would be today low those many

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 4>years ago.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Business moves fast.

0:11:55.880 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 4>When we were both twenty the they thought to like, oh,

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 4>I think this is going to be a big opportunity,

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 4>but I also think that technology will be a big

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 4>way to grow it. And so they built to about

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 4>four billion streams in multiple verticals. So they started in football,

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 4>which I always said, and so the next logical one

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 4>they went into his beauty because that's what sports guys

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 4>do with the video gaming entertainment. So they really figured

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 4>out how to build content by identifying the type of

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 4>talent most likely to resonate across these platforms. That technology

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 4>is what other creators started coming to. Initially for Jelly'smack

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 4>go like, Hey, I'm struggling as an entrepreneur. I have

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 4>I'm completely dedicated to the algorithm and distribution of one platform.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 4>I spend every waking moment trying to speak to my

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 4>audience developed this business. Can you give me time, effort

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 4>and efficiency And so the big thing that Jelly Smack

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 4>ultimately says when we partner with our creators, like, look,

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 4>it's a big back end in terms of the tech

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 4>we can bring it. At the end of the day

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 4>when we give you is ability to de risk and

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 4>move your content to multiple platforms and ultimately expand your

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 4>business so that you can be not dependent on just

0:12:57.800 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 4>one source of income.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which versification is the standard? Is the standard business

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 2>across me?

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 3>So let me ask you, is there there's a selectivity

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 3>on your part. So there's also a talent almost a

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 3>talent scouting it's correct part on the part of Jelly Smack.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 4>The way to sort of think about it is that,

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, I always like to use analogies that our

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 4>own creators have used for me when they explain our

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 4>own business, and like, oh, that makes sense, I'm going

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 4>to use that. You know. One of them said is like, look,

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 4>you're a little bit like universal music. Right at the

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 4>end of the day. You sometimes find them when they're

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 4>busking in a subway, right. And we have creators we

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 4>found and we had like five fifty thousand subs and

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 4>we turn them into multimillion revenue companies in a matter

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 4>of like months. And then we have other creators like

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 4>mister Beasts or who have such scale or called the

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Taylor Swift as is the universal music, that have such

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 4>scale that they could kind of do if they wanted

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 4>to the complexity of what we do for them, but

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 4>they're like, I need a partner who has scale expertise,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 4>and so that's really the best way of talking about

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 4>Our detection systems are kind of like an A and

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 4>R group that are trying to find the talent, to

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 4>identify where they're most likely to be successful, and then

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 4>provide them to services to help them scale.

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 3>What I'm hearing you're saying is that you do a

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 3>lot of matchmaking. If you somebody that's big in the

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 3>beauty space, you find the beauty people and try to

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 3>try to bring that right.

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Now, you want to identify what the most likely thing

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 4>is because is interesting is that people ask us a

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 4>lot like what genre should I be in? And there's

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 4>actually kind of not an answer to that because it's like, well,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 4>it depends on.

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 2>What you can ask that question.

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 3>You may not be built to be a social media.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 4>The thing is all artists have a spark of something

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 4>they want to communicate. So I say, start there, what

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 4>are you? What do you want to do? I said,

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Because again, the thing that's fascining about the creator space,

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 4>like we have we have creators. Charlottever is a great

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 4>example of thin unbelievable talented community and absolutely talented writer,

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 4>absolutely incredible on camera, and but it's so successful in

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 4>our creator space, she's literally funding her own sitcom, right,

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 4>But you think about that from an empowerment of the

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 4>creative and an attachment to the autist with that sort

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 4>of changes in the dynamic. But at the same time,

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 4>we also have people in our thing and actually one

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 4>of the one the stream is right who do Invisible

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 4>People People is a five h three C charity and

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 4>just by passionately communicating about homelessness, which you would think

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 4>is not something I if I went to flon I

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 4>want to do a series on homelessness, they can be like, yeah, no, no,

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 4>it's going to watch it. But yet this person's found

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 4>a way to use the storytelling about the impact of

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 4>homelessness around the nation to build a large viewership that

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 4>is powering a business that's solving the problems that is covering,

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 4>but you wouldn't necessarily think about it as an entertainment vehicle.

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Right right. That's interesting.

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Can I drill down a little bit in terms of

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Jellysmax business. Do you work on like a commission basis?

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you work on a fee basis.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 4>With yes the answer because we play in so many

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 4>different lines of business and so many different verticals. So

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 4>you think about it, we go from helping you identify

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 4>an ID eight to all the way to distribution, marketing, promotion, infrastructure, financing,

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 4>so we basically play in the whole value chain. For

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 4>some of our creators, most of our products we have

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 4>a shared revels new model where we take the capital

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 4>risk on their behalf and then sharing the upside so

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 4>that we keep our interests alive. But all the cases

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 4>will take like a rev share of some sort of

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 4>split that we do. It's typically, I would say the

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 4>model it looks more like is probably like consumer products,

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 4>where essentially we have a relationship over a period of time,

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 4>where we have a licensing relationship up to some of

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 4>their intellectual profit or period of time, and then we

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 4>help them monetize it.

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 2>How many people do you have with jelly'smack now? How

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 2>many employees?

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 4>We have about five hundred people in our major centers

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 4>are Paris, where the founders are originally from London, New York,

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Las Vegas, and.

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>La Don't even think of scrolling away. We'll be right

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>back after this break and we're back with more from

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>JELLY'SMAC president Sean Atkins.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 3>There's so much right now you know in the ether

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 3>about the about the biggest of social media platforms.

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Obviously the you.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Know, the site formerly known as Twitter x has been

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 3>making a lot of moves. Where do you feel the Google's,

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 3>the Facebook's Youtubes? Where are they right now in this

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 3>moment of the creator economy? Do you feel like there's

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 3>an understanding that this is really starting to become its

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 3>own big thing unto itself.

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're really having a sudden epivity. They've

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 4>known for a long time, and you thinking about face,

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 4>I guess YouTube. They've been paying out billions and billions

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 4>of dollars to creators on an annual basis for over

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 4>a decade. Right now, you know, Facebook is on a

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 4>pace in a uh you just last announcedlash your reels

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 4>as a products is a year old and Mark just

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 4>said it makes ten billion dollars in revenue. That's like

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 4>it's a pretty incredible ramp in one year. So it's

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 4>more that they know they have a significant dependency or

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 4>symbiotic relationship depending on whose side you're asking you what

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 4>day in that dynamic and trying to figure out look

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 4>their business. They're trying to figure out how to maximize

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 4>their margins by leveraging creator content, and creators are always

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 4>trying to figure out how to sort of maximize their

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 4>margins against platforms who have a little bit more power

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 4>than they do in the dynamic. I think that for creators,

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 4>their biggest concern in the grand scheme of thing is

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.239
<v Speaker 4>we sort of pain we saw. I was like, how

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 4>do I manage multiple platforms at one time? And then

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 4>sort of what is always platform uncertainty right that they

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 4>their equivalent of in the television business or feature film business,

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 4>like your film doesn't work? Is a platform changes this algorithm?

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 4>One day? You were making success one day and the

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 4>next day you don't. Saw this happened with YouTube actually

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 4>did it to its own business this year, where it's like,

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm so worried about TikTok, I want to move a

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 4>significant amount of my traffic to short form. Right, So

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 4>you saw very significant players who are making millions of

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 4>dollars a year be like I just lost thirty percent

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 4>to my bottom line. This is a period of time.

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 4>This is a sequence of time. So I think more

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 4>of the debt it's creators are trying to navigate platforms. Well,

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 4>platforms are mostly trying to figure out two problems. One

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 4>is how do we manage in a world where we

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of like competition from other platforms because

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 4>people always assume they're like once YouTube, Facebook control things,

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 4>nothing that's going to be around again. And the TikTok exploded,

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 4>right seven years another platform comes are right, it comes,

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 4>it comes along, so right now, I'd say the video

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 4>platforms are all trying to figure out what do they

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 4>do about short form, right, and they're all doing different

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 4>levels of experimentation. I think that obviously TikTok TikTok is

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 4>doing with its systemic issues of like, well we're going

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 4>to be banned, are we're not going to be banned?

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 4>Or what's happening with us?

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 3>How do you see the kind of the dials going

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 3>between the amount of time people are spending on social

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 3>media on TikTok just purely watching on creator platform you know,

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 3>creator friendly platforms.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 4>There was a day where ninety percent of ad revenue

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 4>into newspapers. Yeah, yeah, because that's where attention was, right

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 4>and so it is in our that attention is moving

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 4>to social and to the creators, right. I think the

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 4>last thing is not like if you look at the

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 4>number one television network on televisions today and I'm closing

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 4>like the spots is YouTube television, not YouTube television the cable.

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 4>It's like YouTube the app is the number one television

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 4>network in the world. Right, And you're start to get

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 4>TikTok and avods and spots and fashionannels and all that stuff.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 4>So that's only going to continue. The second thing is,

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 4>and this is what we have a generational shift in consumption.

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 4>And that's one thing. But we're not at a one

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 4>gen We're now two generations into the shift. Right, So

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 4>people like me who are early adopters of digital consumption,

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 4>I have four teenagers, right, they only lived in a

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 4>world with totalitarian control. And if you looked at the

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 4>interests of my four kids of what they watch, they

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 4>have like nothing in common. Right, Like, sure, we'll sit

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 4>down where you know, we have a tradition as a

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 4>family we love Survivor. We sit down when it's why

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 4>do we watch Survivor? But the other ninety percent of

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 4>the time I picked up my phone and I showed

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 4>you what my kids are watching. Right, you'd be like

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 4>when kid's watching video game playthroughs, another one is watching

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 4>beauty hacks, another one just watches funny memes on TikTok.

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 4>That means that the that it always lags the advertiser

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 4>dollars always lag, but they always end up where attention is.

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 4>And so that is and is we're only debating what

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 4>the timeline is. And it reminds me I suspect you

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 4>recall this, remember when cable first started and they would

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 4>talk about most of the attention is moving every year

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 4>to cable more cable, but you see how much the

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 4>monetization was, like yo, but like, oh, the super Bowl

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 4>is getting you know, you're like why is And cable

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 4>to this day still cable systn't fully monetized at the

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 4>level of attention that it had versus broadcast. But it's

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 4>like ninety sid of the way there, and so the

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 4>same thing.

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Just going down and starting to on that other side.

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, cable is the one I might argue might have

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 4>one of the heaviest morphs in the space versus a

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of the other industries.

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is, and it's such a it's you know,

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 3>it's almost been whiplashing in terms of it was you know,

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 3>it was the way for the.

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 4>The greatest, the greatest cash machine, like by the way

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 4>I started my career espace.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 3>But I think I think there's an like around nineteen

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 3>eighty to twenty twenty is a bookend of of an

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 3>earnings machine that we will probably not see the likes

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 3>very soon. But but you know, even as we sit

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 3>here and speak it, in twelve twenty four months time,

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 3>somebody could have come up with something that you know,

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 3>blazes a trail that we can't even that we can't

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 3>even conceive of.

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Now that's how fast look and innovative this space is.

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 4>People talk about the machine or Cable, right we really

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 4>break it down into a financial person. They're talking about

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 4>the amazing margins that cable kicked off. Are you talking

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 4>about forty percent margins? Right where it's a production company

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 4>might t fifteen twenty percent. The thing is like, if

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 4>you look at creators, I look at creators doing forty fifty, sixty,

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 4>seventy percent margins. It's incredible what these businesses are doing

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 4>is why I always find it interesting. Look when I

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 4>was at MTV and people come in pips like I

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 4>found this new creator. Let's let's have them pitch a show,

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 4>and they picked unbelievably wonderful creative and then you'd show

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 4>them the economics of the deal you want to do

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 4>with them. I'm like, let me get this straight. I

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 4>do whatever I want creatively every single day. Yes, and

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 4>all the money accrues to me. Yes. But if I

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 4>come work for you, I got twenty people giving me

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 4>notes every single thing I do, Yes, and you're gonna

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 4>pay me like one one hundredth and I own none

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 4>of the rights. Yes, why would I do that? And

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:27.479
<v Speaker 4>so that's the other thing I think people don't understand

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 4>about their creators space. It's like, yes, there's creators who

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 4>want to do a traditional thing and this is part

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 4>of their story one hundred percent, I said. But I

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 4>think the other thing that people don't understand as a

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 4>lot in fact, you remember the person who won that

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Show of the Year. What she talked about is like,

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 4>I am making something that would never be green lip.

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.479
<v Speaker 4>That is an audience bigger than something that's never been

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 4>green lit. Yes, with seven people.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Michelle Kane of Challenge expected.

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Correct, and she's right, that is a minimum at least

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 4>a cable caliber quality show.

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's right. Dare show which would have not been.

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 4>Green lit, and she owns all the rights, had all

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 4>creative control as full relationship with So that's what I

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 4>think is really empowering to the creative class is that

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 4>you have this incredible thing that I don't think it's

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 4>an or. I think it's an ad. You can have

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 4>an ant. Yeah, you can have your creative passion and

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 4>be monetized and have a middle class lifestyle, and you

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 4>can do the traditional route at the same time. It

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 4>doesn't have to be you have to be one or

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 4>the other, or one is dependent on the other.

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 3>And in a world where streaming licensing deals are changing

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 3>quite a bit, they're not quite as rigid as they

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 3>have been. Somebody coming in with I own the format.

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 3>I own every stitch of every minute of content, every frame.

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 3>That person coming in, if they do want to do

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 3>a more traditional TV deal, is going to have a

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 3>lot more clout at the negotiating table than somebody that

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 3>only you know is only a star in their own show.

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, also, you have to transition that I still remember

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 4>when I was first started working and lef when reality

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 4>TV started, right, people are like, Uh, that's never going

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 4>to be thinking it's not going to be thing. Right,

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.199
<v Speaker 4>But that was the explosion of case production companies. So

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 4>which and again it is roll up of those cable

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 4>production companies. They're the biggest television production companies today, right, Fremantle, ITV, whatnot.

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 4>I said, but all of those companies were built in

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 4>a world where a broadcast hour was like four to

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 4>six million dollars and then cable companies like I'll pay

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 4>three hundred thousand bus and people like that's impossible, you

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 4>can't do it. But you saw like a ten times

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 4>the same thing's happening in digital. Right, You're just saying

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 4>the cost of production is coming down, but they'll to

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 4>lack the ability of having creative talent on a global

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 4>basis to be able to service that. And so what

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 4>I think one of the interesting opportunities for the traditional

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 4>channels that are getting squeezed on the cost side is

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 4>you're going to have like a nut like the cable

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 4>class came in, can produce what became the reality burned

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 4>and sort of help with that cost structure. The digital

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 4>teams are going to come in and have that same thing.

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 4>I was like, okay, well I could call a creator

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 4>to your point and like I can get eight what

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 4>looks like one of my primetime shows. I'm not paying

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 4>five hundred thousand an hour anymore, I'm paying one hundred

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 4>thousand and so I think it also the creator ecosystem,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 4>and they're that class has an ability to help the

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 4>traditional side to make sure that the kind of volume

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 4>of production is not going to go away.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean you're seeing there, you know, pulling a

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of personalities are coming there. Do you sometimes advise

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 3>people on you know, how that they shouldn't spend too

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 3>much on this piece of content? Do you do you

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 3>advise people sometimes on the margins, like if you you know,

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 3>if you do this to make it look good, you're

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 3>going to have to put in this much.

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Yea product justice, we.

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Have tire again, an entire tech team that's analyzing, uh,

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 4>what works, what formats, what lengths, what time on period?

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 4>And it all goes down to even you know. One

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 4>of our most frequent acquisitions, Network Media, is an entire

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 4>entity focused around us where they actually focus on finding

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 4>what I call entertainers. So not like not necessarily a kid,

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 4>I was playing video games and I became a Twitch creator,

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 4>but someone's like, oh, I was a a circus entertainer

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 4>or was a musicians like I want to get into

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 4>digital thing. And what they do is we teach them

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 4>and train them using all of our data, all the

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 4>best ways to make sure to make content that entertains

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 4>for the platform that you're on. And it's all completely data.

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they literally get a training update every single

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 4>day of literally what's working.

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much, John, I really appreciate you letting

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, letting me lob questions at you and telling

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 3>us about your business.

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 2>And it's a very fascinating.

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 3>Space and we definitely I definitely prize I call my

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 3>tour guides to helping me understand this. I know it's

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 3>important and I know it's important that Variety be on

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:34.239
<v Speaker 3>top of it.

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 2>So thank you for helping me do that.

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate it.

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. Be sure to leave us a review

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts and Amazon Music. We love to hear

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>from listeners. Please go to Variety dot com and sign

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>up for the free weekly Strictly Business newsletter, and don't

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>forget to tune in next week for another episode of

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Strictly Business.

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 3>M M

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 4>M HM