WEBVTT - Surveillance: Credit Opportunities With Watson

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast Hometown Keene. Along with

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa are Brownwitz Jayleie, we bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best an economics, finance, investment and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Fine Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg termament. Let's talk about

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this bond market as well. If you're just tuning in,

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you have got a bond market with your tire on

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>tens by four basis points to about one forty eight,

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>just short of one fifty. Joining us now to discuss this,

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Marilyn Watson had a global fundamental fixed income strategy at

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>black Rock. Marilyn, let's start with Chairman Pale and work

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>our way toward into this bond market, treasuries into credit.

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Did you sense a big shift yesterday from the chairman?

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We did censor shift, so I think sickly obviously the

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>end of the last week. Um, you know, we saw

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this very much sure, a risk of tone with the

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>new variant coming to We're leading to you know, a

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of uncertainty back in the markets. Um. And

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that led to you know, investors being obviously

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more cautious going into chair Powell and

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>his testimony. And I do think it did surprise the

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>markets a little bit. And we have been saying for

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>some time that we think, you know, the Fed really

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't a position now where they can accelerate the taper

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>where next year they can start to even um, you know,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe raise rates maybe two or even three times, depending

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on how this new variant shapes out. But I think

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the market was caught a little bit off guard, just

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>given the volatility that we've seen over the past few

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>days with the negative news you know, around COVID. But

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.199
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of the overall trajecture of the market,

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that's where it had been heading. I think it was

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>just surprising given the context of the past few days.

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>The q has been very important for signaling, signaling to

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the broader economy and to financial markets. Were Mary and

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder what an accelerated QUI taper would actually

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>mean for this market. You Rick read above, Miller have

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>made the point repeatedly over the last several months that

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this would be canceled out at the

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>taper at the Treasury. But if we accelerate things. Does

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it have a bigger impact, Well, I think on the

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>margin it has a small impact. But the fact is

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that when they are still continuing to purchase assets, even

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 1>as they wind down the amount that they hold, then

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're still actually supporting and they're still providing

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a very very loose accommodative montry policy. They're still continuing

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to buy assets. So even if they sort of accelerate

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit, we think that the level of

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>accommodation at the moment is so high, and particularly I

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>think yesterday we did start to hear a lot more

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>caution from Chair Powell around just the very high levels

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of inflation that you know, are potentially becoming more persistent.

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a factor that the Fed are

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>now starting to really include in the forward guidance, and

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe they just starting to shift the tone

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit as we do go into you know,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the the FOMC meeting in a couple of weeks time,

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be key for market participants to

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>really see you know, the timing around the que tapering,

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>but also the time being around any potential rating increase

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I think given the high levels of

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>inflation that we've talked about a lot. Given the fact

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that the tone has shifted around that it could be

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit more persistent than so far we've been hearing

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>from the Fed. Um. I do think it's important. One

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>reason why perhaps Fredshire Powell feels important is because markets

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>are letting him make these moves, to make these signals

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>without getting disrupted too much. And I take a look

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at credit nothing like the tape re tantrum going to

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>back to but still nonetheless you are seeing money getting

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>withdrawn from the high yeald debt market and slowly see

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>yield creep higher the worst performance for that debt going

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>back to September. Is this a buying opportunity or a

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>warning sign for what's to come? Um? I mean I

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>think potentially, if you exclude the current uncertainty around the

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>new COVID variant, it could be a buying opportunity. When

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you think that, of course, as you expect to see

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Muntro policy normalize a little bit. Um And

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we have seen obviously, um, you know, the yield and

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>treasuries and Greece, we've started to see spreads widen. We

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>are seeing now better opportunities and better evaluations in higher

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>quality credit, so we have seen some investors sort of

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>go up the credit quality spectrum. We have also when

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about how yield, we're continuing to see investors

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.119
<v Speaker 1>as well um still continuing to prefer the loan market

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in many cases given the floating right structure. So I

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>think again, as the market is put you know, really

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>starting to position itself for a little bit more normalization,

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>although we're far from normal um in this environment, and

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>as we do see these you know, ongoing levels of

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>inflation that are persisting through until next year, then I

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>do think we do we are seeing more dispersion also

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>in the sectors that are seeing you know, better prices

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but evaluations. So I think it's a buying opportunity, but

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think also investors are being you know, particularly cautious

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>as we're going to year end. Liquidity isn't particularly great

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, and as we do have this you know,

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>higher uncertainty as we're discussing around the new COVID variant,

0:04:56.240 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>around petition, potentially measures to you know, limit restriction on movement, etcetera.

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of unknowns, but there could be

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>potentially buying opportunities. What an end of the year, Mounting,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>fantastic to catch up with you send out best to

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the team as always Mountain, what's in there? Black Rock?

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Right now? On fixed income, Bob Michael joins us here

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>for a good conversation to says how to global fixed

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>income currency commodities of JP. JP Morgan Asset Management barely

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>describes the ability here do you buy the dip in bonds?

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally confused about what to do with full faith

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and credit or just credit right now? Do you clip

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the coupon? Do you buy it? Or do you just

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>go to cash? Which is it? You sell government bonds

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and you buy credit. There's been a tremendous repricing, You've

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>had a flattening of the Yelk curve. There's a lot

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>of concern that the Fed is going to move too

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>quickly for the market and will lead to recession. And

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that's ultimately why thev has inverted. That's nonsense. They're miles

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>away from anything that looks normal, and I think this

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity to get rid of any remaining government

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>bonds you have and then go back into the credit markets,

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>go back into investment grade and high yield. You can

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>do it in US and you can do it in Europe,

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and those are the things that you're buying on sale.

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Well that word normal, What does that word mean anymore? Well,

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>for me who's been around for four decades, it means

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>getting the central banks out of the market and leaving

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it to people like me to price. And there's a

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>very different operating model than what we're used to from

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the central banks. Um, when I started the business, the

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>central banks extended credit to the banking system and they

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>controlled the cost of funding, and then they relied on

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the banks to extend credit into the economy. Now they're

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>controlling the cost of funding across the entire economy. It's

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>gone too far. It's got to stop, and participants in

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the market like myself have to get involved again. Well

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a design, Is it a full cost? What makes

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it a fuecast? What makes it a forecast is j

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>PAL yesterday and j PAL saying it's time for them

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to exit the market, which I think they're going to do.

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>They should announce uh that they're going to double the

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>pace of of tape ring, so they should be out

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of the market by March, and then we should see

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>rate hikes pretty soon after that, So they're going to

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>start that journey to normal, and we're going to help

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>them on that path. All right, You're gonna help them

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>on that path. So so completely egourgeous of you. I

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>do wonder that when you say it's a buying opportunity

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>for credit, particularly riskier credit, why this is a good

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>entry point given the fact that we are still so

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>vastly below where we were before the pandemic when it

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>comes to yields, why is this an opportunity at four

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>point eight percent a coupon on a junk pond. For

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a number of things. For one, corporate profitability still remains

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>very high. Companies have a lot of financial flexibility, and

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the companies were talking to don't see any significant drop

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>off in aggregate final demands, so their top line is

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>going to grow. They do see the input cost pressures

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're starting to pass some of those along, and

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way they've been raising dividends and buying back shares.

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>They can dial that down a bit if they need to.

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>But right now we're looking at a consumer that's flesh

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>with cash, that's out there spending. Yeah, there may be

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>some headwinds from the O Macron variant will see over

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of weeks and couple of months, But

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>for now, corporate profitability looks pretty good. I want to

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be a part of that. Well, but do you really

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>think central bankers will ever get out of this market

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and let people like you truly price it or is

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>there sort of an implicit put that if things get

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>volatile enough, they'll step right back in. Well, that's the debate.

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I start off by saying, I'm I'm used to one model,

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>but when I look around our trading floor, um a

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>very large percentage of the people only know the current model,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>which has existed since two thousand and nine, where central

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>banks do intervene in all sectors of the bond market.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So now I think it's a tool that they've learned

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to deploy. It's not going to go away anytime soon,

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to have to gauge that with all

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the other tools that they have. And yes, financial conditions

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>indicators are one of the reasons that you buy dips

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in risk assets. As long as they look at those things,

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they're back stopping the markets. Michael with his JP Morgan

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 1>here on radio and television, Bob, I'm not going to

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>get you in trouble on China. Somebody else at JP

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Morgan is some challenges this week on China, But I

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>am gonna ask you about the Pacific rim and about

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the great miss our David Wilson notices inequities internationals failed.

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you do with the international paper right now?

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean Turkey, but what do you do with

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the JP Morgan opportunity in international fixed income? You go

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for it. And we've had a lot of conversations about

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, specifically emerging market equities, and how earnings for

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>companies across Asia in particular have come in higher than

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>anyone anticipated a year ago. The stocks have gone nowhere,

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>They've even drifted down compared to the double digit recurrens

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>returns in the developed markets. Next year is probably the

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>year that stock prices catch up to earnings, but earnings

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>are still going to look pretty good. So yes, we're

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>also buying credit across a pack in China and across

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the emerging markets. Is Europe a piece of that as well,

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Bob Um, Yes, and and and in fact Um we

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>were looking over the last couple of days of going

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>back into the European Bank sector. Uh, particularly UH, the

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>alternative the additional tier one securities and the lower tier

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>two securities, so the bank hybrid securities. Um. So we

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 1>do see some opportunities there as well. You know, I

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>have some speculations. So let me finish with this question.

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>What did you think of cham and Pal making that

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>move a week after secure and renomination? Bob? Did that

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>stand that to you? It's so well, the easiest path

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>for him would have been to do nothing and coast

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>through the hearings on his reappointment and to suddenly start

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the tapering process disrupt the markets. Um to me is

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is taking some risk. What I want to know is

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what changed from Monday to Tuesday and what's going to

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>change today from yesterday? Yeah, I couldn't agree more Tom.

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>It's been a month since they announced tape rink and

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>now we're having a conversation. What's changed in a month

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>for him to say, you know what, maybe we should

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>accelerate things. What do you see here is a grizzled

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>pro like Bob Michael getting right down to the nitty

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>gritty what changed in twenty four hours? And that's the

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>whipsofe for people who are not in the game. On

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 1>this John, we're all talking about the market action. We're

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>forgetting about the losses earned and made over the last

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hours. Is I really wonder what the carnage

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is up there? So my final question to Bob Michael

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Thomas usually football related, so we'll keep it consistent in

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>remain in Georgia, not Alabama, Georgia this weekend, Bob. Confidence

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>level so I want to understand from your perspective tends

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:21.479
<v Speaker 1>back to two or another championship for Liverpool. Another championship

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>for Liverpool to they are a goal scoring machine. Well,

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Michael JP Mark and asset management in the flesh, Bob,

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>It's good to see you joining us now, not just

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on the global economy, but on the pandemic. Lauren Spoon,

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the chief economist at the O E C. D AND's

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>typically I've come straight to you on a forecast, a

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>call for US growth for Europe et center. I want

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to come to you on a number you guys have

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>put out this morning. Vaccinations are key for the recovery.

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>They would only cost fifty billion dollars. Fifty billion the

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>context of how much we've spent over the last eighteen

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>months is nothing. How do you get there? How do

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you get to that number? So so the way we've

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>getting to that number, sorry about this. Basically, you know,

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the fifty billion is what's been estimating by Covax and

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>all the related institution um. The ten trillion is actually

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>what the twenty has been providing into fiscal support to

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy, two people, to firms, to jobs. So when

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>when you balance things out, ten trillion for supporting our

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>economy going through the pandemic, you know, compared with the

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty tiny fifty billion to bring the vaccine to the

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>entire world population, that looks completely disproportionate. Well, right now

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with the omicron variant, the idea that Africa

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 1>has an incredibly low vaccination rate. Have you heard from

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>member nations that they're accelerating, doubling down some of their

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>aid to try to distribute vaccines in Africa and in

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>other places that are really underserved. So yeah, with our

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Health Department here A, the O, E, C D, and

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the Trade Department, notice that it's very difficult to bring

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 1>it to Africa, as you say, it's where the rate

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of vaccination is very low. There's a huge logistic questions,

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>right bringing not only the vaccine, but being able to

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>keep it at the right temperature and then distribute it

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>around UM. So that that's where I think a lot

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of the effort now has has to focus on. But

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>not only if we go back to the O E

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>c D UM and that's what we should this morning.

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Even within O E C D countries and advanced economies,

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>some countries have very low vaccination rate and that's an

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>issue because as we've seen for example in some of

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern European countries, UM, they just had led them

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to put in place restrictions to mobility and economic activity. Again,

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>so really, you know, expanding vaccination, making sure people get

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>double or triple vaxed is key to a sustain recovery.

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>In the meant time, Lawrence, there is a problem when

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the hiking cycle for the Federal Reserve,

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about the Bank of England going to

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a similar type of mode at the same time that

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you are seeing the potential for additional variants to slow

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy. What's the risk that we get a slow

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>down in economic growth at the same time as surging

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>inflation and central banks being forced to tighten into that UM. So, look,

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of uncertainty um, and there is no question

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's new variant is adding to this uncertainty. Now,

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we're very clear about is there's

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>no one size fit all policy. The inflation in the

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>US is very different from the inflation you may see

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in Asia, for example, in China or India. It's again

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>very different from the one you see in the continental

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you are or in the UK UM And for that reasons,

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we have a very clear message. If inflation tensions mostly

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>from the supply side, then sents for banks who looks

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>through when you have a lot of momentum in the recovery,

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>excess demand, un employment back where it was, then Yeah,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>normalizing the monitory policy is not something that's extraordinary and

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>should be done. Lawrence tim Kin in Good morning to

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you on radio and television, Lawrence Mooonwether. So the O

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>E c D as they reassess the global economy will

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>do that again with key economic data today, including a

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>d P. Lawrence I did a very careful study of

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>John Byrne Murdock's magnificent work at the ft on cases

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and particularly deaths from COVID. The vector, the trend called

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the log vector of Germany, Austria and Switzerland is nothing

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>short of grim. Can O E. C D extrampolate out

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the trends that we see in death from COVID or

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>do you sit back and wait for more data? Look

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>at Good morning to you and thanks for the invitation again,

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>um Adeo CD. You know, we're economists. So what we

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>do is we take into a the uncertainty that has

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>increased with the period with the emergence of the new volant.

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>We take into a condy uncertainty that has increased because

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the LATA is developing faster in countries where there's less vaccination,

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and we factored that in. But I think that's that's

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the base we can do again. We've warned about the

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty that was coming from the lack of vaccination. We've

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>warned about the threat that this total imbalance between countries

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>very vaccinated and those where they are just might be

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>or where the vaccines has not gone yet was creating,

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and the risk that's creating this what's happening now is

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>it's just a reminder that we need to find this

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion you know that that that will help us

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and all these imbalances and and there's stress that the

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>various is creating on the global economy. Lawrence, always good

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. Thanks for being with this morning,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence Burning that of the A c D. We're staggering

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>here on Bloomberg surveillance and particularly with our aviation coverage

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>from story to story. Guy Johnson has led our coverage

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>on airlines, on jets, on the Transatlantic, on the global

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>and joins us now and Guy, I do understand that

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>with our wonderful guests, the key question is the new

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Manchester United and how they'll do with Arsenal this weekend.

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, it's getting the planes in the air.

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a I think that's gonna be a critical question

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>for shy Wi. Yeah, let we can. We can start

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>on the football I Alsenal match to unite it. That's

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>what Tom wants to know about. Are we live Yeah,

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Arsenal of course, Okay, we have an answer. Yes, Okay,

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>let's let's talk about what this is going on now

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that we've we've cleared that one up. Um O Macron

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to say what impacts is theyre having on the business. Well,

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just reminded that we met twenty three days ago

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>outside of Terminal three at Heathrow for historic day of

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>opening up the corridor between the UK and the US

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>joint synchronized takeoff. And here we are twenty three days

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>later and we have a new variant. UM. I think

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it's early days on this one. My intuition tells me

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that it is probably more transmissible, maybe not as severe,

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>just based on the patterns. This just didn't emerge for

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>five days ago. It probably emerged a few weeks ago,

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>possibly in October. UM. We've changed adapted, of course South

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Africa's shut down, although there was a flight right now

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in the air from South Africa back to the UK

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.239
<v Speaker 1>where people needed to quarantine. So we'll we'll deal with it.

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, this industry has shown resiliency and so are we.

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>The governments have reacted much more quickly in this time.

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>He has that surprised you be? Is that the right

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>soil wrong thing to do? It hasn't surprised me, and

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the wrong thing to do in the

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:11.959
<v Speaker 1>sense that travel is so omnipresent in our lives and

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>if you can, you know, kind of put a combination

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of politics and pandemic, airlines is the easy target for

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>changing of signals to the public, so I wasn't surprised.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we should evaluate the situation quickly, and what

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling my team and telling the government in the

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>UK is as quickly as you introduced those measures. If

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>things turn out that they are not as significant, take

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>them back immediately as well testing opening up orders, removal

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of of red less countries. Do laias told that the

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>North Atlantic may be shut down again? I am not

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that concerned about that, based on the comments that President

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Biden made a few days ago, which in my mind

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>were the most calm of the political leaders out there.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at the formation. This should be data driven

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and then we make the calls. And travel is not

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the way to stop a pandemic. This variant is now

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>everywhere in the world. Everybody understands that. So shutting borders

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>hurts thousands and millions of people, of course over the

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>festive period, but businesses and GDP is reliant on it

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and we need every single piece of help that we

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.479
<v Speaker 1>can get, and travel enables that. What has what does

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the North Atlantic look like since November eight um? What

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of load facts is if you've been experiencing what

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>does pricing look like. What does pricing look like around

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the holidays? Has Business Travels given me a kind of

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a data dump as to kind of what it does

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>look like since then? And I will try and be

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>organized in my comments on the data dump. UM. So,

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>first post the eight tremendous bookings across the Atlantic UM,

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen load factors building very nicely close in

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in December, and we will probably be still flying anywhere

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>between six load factors. On the week post the eight,

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't get a seat on a Virgin Atlantic from

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>London to the US. The variant has changed this a bit,

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think we're neutral in the December period, so

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.959
<v Speaker 1>new bookings are offsetting cancelations, and there have been cancelations,

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>of course people want to do that. But for Easter

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and UM and the summer, we're still building momentum and

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>still building load factors UM and if you look at

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the expected January load factor is trailing quite nicely anywhere

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>in the s some flights up to so overall I

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>would say very good response to the opening of the borders.

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>The Armicron of course a dampening effect, but not enough

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>as a long haul carrier focused across the Atlantic neutral

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>at this point? What are the states of the finally,

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>what are the states? What is the states of your

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>finances at the moment? If I can spit that out, Um,

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>there is a suggestion that maybe you're in talks again

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>with the shareholders to raise some more money. Can you

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.479
<v Speaker 1>confirm will deny that. Are you comfortable in terms of

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>where you are with with the balance sheet right now?

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>There was talk of an I p O. You haven't come.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>You've never confirmed that to me? Is there're still talk

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 1>of an I p O? Is that a discussion that

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is happening. So first of all, I'll start with the

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>important thing. We were trailing ahead of our plans by

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a significant margin leading up to the month of November

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and December, so we have a cushion. Any airline executive

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>is thinking about their capital structure and raising capital. We

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are never short of needing more capital. All options remain

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>on the table and we are exploring them, um robustly.

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But I am very confident that Virgin Atlantic will have

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a very good balance sheet going into the recovery phase

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>that really starts in December and on to the sumber

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of two. Also know by how many versus Matchester here

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't. I'm going for a win to one,

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>surprise win, surprise win to one Arsenal overmatch the United Shy. Wise,

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Virgin Atlantic has spoken song. Thank to you,

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Guy Johnson, Thanks so much. Of course, man, you was

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>so much change going on right now. This is the

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>from seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine am

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 1>for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud,

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course on the terminal. I'm

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Tom keene In. This is Bloomberg