Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center.
Speaker 2: Jack Armstrong, Joe Getty, arm Strong and Getty and he
Speaker 2: Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 3: How you doing.
Speaker 1: Happy Gallantine's Day? Which I just learned about Gallentine's Day.
Speaker 1: It's where the gals the day before Valentine's Day get
Speaker 1: together and go out for drinks or whatever. I guess
Speaker 1: it's been big for years and us dudes are just
Speaker 1: learning about it.
Speaker 3: I'm kind of skeptical of anything that contributes to the
Speaker 3: non couplization of human time. Interesting, but but there's part
Speaker 3: of me that thinks maybe woman kind has just recognized.
Speaker 3: You know, it seems like like we're really into this
Speaker 3: quote unquote holiday and the guys aren't so much. Maybe
Speaker 3: we all just get together and have a big time
Speaker 3: and the dudes can go do what they want.
Speaker 2: Yeah, huh.
Speaker 1: I think it might be the other I hadn't thought
Speaker 1: about it, but it might be a people are getting
Speaker 1: together in serious relationships so much less. There might be
Speaker 1: an awful lot of people out there like this is
Speaker 1: the way around it.
Speaker 3: Although Katie friends who are into it or married, so
Speaker 3: it could be both. Yeah, they're using it as as
Speaker 3: a day to just get together. All the girls and
Speaker 3: the husbands are going to go do their own thing.
Speaker 1: But I do we feel bad about that, but darn it.
Speaker 1: If that's what you need to do, I guess I'll
Speaker 1: just need to figure out something to do on my own. Yeah,
Speaker 1: me and my fish and pole and my body said,
Speaker 1: He'll be roight my couch and my TV alone thoughts
Speaker 1: and prayers, you guys, It's like, what's the comedian's named
Speaker 1: Shane Gillis who was in the bud Like commercial.
Speaker 3: The other day.
Speaker 1: Yeah, one of his routines is about how he lives
Speaker 1: with his girlfriend and after they have a loving relations
Speaker 1: he said, I know this sounds about it, but I
Speaker 1: just wanted to be gone, like as soon as we're done,
Speaker 1: swish she was gone, and the crowd aways groans like this.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, anyways says, oh yeah, I'm the only dude
Speaker 1: here that likes playing Xbox alone for five hours. But yeah,
Speaker 1: so away Gallentine's Day could work out for everyone. I'm
Speaker 1: glad it's catching on. So I've got an unbelievable example
Speaker 1: of bureaucracy. I think lots of people have dealt with
Speaker 1: this sort of thing, but apparently not enough.
Speaker 2: It should be discussed all the time.
Speaker 1: We all should knee jerk reflexively react to growing bureaucracies
Speaker 1: with horror because we've all dealt with them.
Speaker 3: DMV or whatever the hell it is. You go down
Speaker 3: to get some.
Speaker 1: Paperwork for a you know, a year, a year you're
Speaker 1: adding on a room to your house in certain states
Speaker 1: or whatever, you know, that sort of stuff. Sure, but
Speaker 1: at the federal level, Elon's been talking about it a
Speaker 1: lot here, he was a couple of days ago in
Speaker 1: the Oval Office.
Speaker 4: Does not to say that is good. There are good
Speaker 4: people who are in the federal bureaucracy. But you can't
Speaker 4: have an autonomous federal bureaucracy. You have to have one
Speaker 4: that's responsive to the people. That's the whole point of
Speaker 4: a democracy.
Speaker 3: And so.
Speaker 4: And if if you looked at this, if you asked
Speaker 4: to look at the bound US today and said, what
Speaker 4: do you think of the way things have turned out? Well,
Speaker 4: why we have this unelected, fourth unconstitutional branch of government,
Speaker 4: which which is the bureaucracy, which has in a lot
Speaker 4: of ways currently more power than any elected representative. And
Speaker 4: this is uh, there's not something that people want and
Speaker 4: it's not. It does not match the will of people.
Speaker 4: So it's just something we've got and we're going to fix.
Speaker 3: And if I might throw in just one added note,
Speaker 3: what he is describing is precisely what Thomas Jefferson was
Speaker 3: describing in the Declaration of Independence about how the king
Speaker 3: has sent hither swarms of bureaucrats. It's he uses a
Speaker 3: different word to waste our time in our money, and
Speaker 3: we've had enough.
Speaker 1: And Elon's dealing with that federal breocracy. But you have
Speaker 1: it at the state level and the county level and
Speaker 1: the city level also. And sure, before I get back
Speaker 1: to that, Jim Garrity tweeted out something yesterday.
Speaker 2: I thought it was good on the whole.
Speaker 1: Elon Musk and unelected taken over the blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: It is true that no one cast a ballot for
Speaker 1: Musk in twenty twenty four, but no one was in
Speaker 1: the president's cabot. No one in the president's cabinet was
Speaker 1: elected to their jobs other than the vice president. Back
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty, nobody voted to put Alejandro Maorcis in
Speaker 1: charge of the border. Nobody voted to put Anthony Blinkoln
Speaker 1: in charge of foreign policy or Jake Sullivan charge of
Speaker 1: national security, or Janet Yellen in charge of the economy, which,
Speaker 1: of course is an obvious point, but it's easy to
Speaker 1: DEMI god the whole Elon Musk unelected. Oh where where
Speaker 1: does he get off?
Speaker 3: Yeah, dumb people get the vote in America and that's
Speaker 3: who they're appealing to with a lot of it.
Speaker 1: I get angry reading this next thing just because and
Speaker 1: I didn't have but I've dealt with this sort of
Speaker 1: stuff before, we all have, and it makes me in sae.
Speaker 1: Remember when Gavin Knwsom a couple of weeks ago was saying.
Speaker 5: We're gonna cut the red tape the ridiculous bureaucracy.
Speaker 1: Your party built the red tape in the ridiculous bureaucracy.
Speaker 3: Yes, so.
Speaker 2: I don't know who Eric Spiegelman is, do you? But anyway,
Speaker 2: he's on.
Speaker 1: Twitter, and I often look at who's following them to
Speaker 1: get an idea of how big a deal they are.
Speaker 1: Bill Millusion of fox Berry Weiss follows him, So that's
Speaker 1: enough for me. He tweeted this out absolutely infuriating Palisades
Speaker 1: recovery story.
Speaker 2: That's the area where the horrible fires happened.
Speaker 3: In Los Angeles.
Speaker 1: My friend's mom's house burned down. His insurer asks for
Speaker 1: a copy the blueprints to process the claim. Well, starting
Speaker 1: there out of that just seems like an effort to
Speaker 1: deny or slow down lots of people who's got their
Speaker 1: blue prints handy for their house off the top of
Speaker 1: their head. Come on, anybody, I mean, unless your home
Speaker 1: was just built and you thought it'd be cool to
Speaker 1: hang on to them for some reason.
Speaker 3: I've got a really interesting story about how people get
Speaker 3: turned down for health insurance coverage almost never appeal. When
Speaker 3: they do, they're often successful, often successful. It's so clearly
Speaker 3: just a why don't we trip them up a little bit,
Speaker 3: delay a little bit, and see how many give up?
Speaker 1: I saw that article. I want you to talk more
Speaker 1: about that. I want to hear about that.
Speaker 4: Will do.
Speaker 1: My friend's mom house burned down. His insure asked for
Speaker 1: a copy of the blueprints to process the claim. The
Speaker 1: blueprints were in the house and they burned, But there's
Speaker 1: a copy on file with the Los Angeles Department of
Speaker 1: Building in Safety LADBS.
Speaker 3: That's a pretty good acronym, Los Angeles Department of Bullss.
Speaker 1: LADB, which requires a release letter from the architect to
Speaker 1: access the blueprints. Okay, Step one the insurer, which is
Speaker 1: not a government thing. That's of them trying to delay
Speaker 1: or deny and saying you got to get the blueprint.
Speaker 1: You go to the gut and their rule is you
Speaker 1: have to have a letter from the architect to get
Speaker 1: access to the blueprints.
Speaker 2: Here, I mean already I would be screaming and pulling
Speaker 2: my hair out.
Speaker 3: And if the architect is dead, you have to get
Speaker 3: permission from his estate to access the will to gain
Speaker 3: the architect's blueprints.
Speaker 1: But anyway, this person had it so Laedbs requires a
Speaker 1: release letter from the architect to give him his blueprints,
Speaker 1: which my friend provides.
Speaker 2: Well, good for you.
Speaker 3: I wouldn't have been able to do that.
Speaker 1: Whole process takes a week, so right there, you're already off.
Speaker 1: You've spent a week doing this. He goes to the
Speaker 1: DBS to get his blueprints, but they won't give them
Speaker 1: to him. Why because the architects signed the request paperwork
Speaker 1: on the wrong part of the page.
Speaker 2: The LADBS says.
Speaker 1: My friend needs to start the whole process over my
Speaker 1: friend of Jeck's. He says, the instructions just said the
Speaker 1: architect needs to sign the page, and he did that,
Speaker 1: the clerk says, but he signed over the seal he's
Speaker 1: supposed to sign next to the seal. My friend goes,
Speaker 1: so he signed it, the clerk says, but he signed
Speaker 1: the wrong part of the page. My friend, who's not
Speaker 1: me so didn't like go nuts and like blow up
Speaker 1: the building or something. Say, hasn't murdered him yet. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's go on, says, you know, my mom's house burned down,
Speaker 1: and every day this gets delayed is another day she
Speaker 1: can't get her claim processed. The clerk said, that's not
Speaker 1: my problem. Wow, that sort of thing. It makes me
Speaker 1: angry because I witnessed this the other day. Actually I was.
Speaker 1: I was at the city for something, and I saw
Speaker 1: somebody dealing with it and walk away sheepishly.
Speaker 2: I wish more people would get upset like me. I
Speaker 2: wish I wish fewer people would just I guess that's
Speaker 2: the way it works.
Speaker 1: I guess some nobody can tell me over some technically
Speaker 1: stupid reason that I can't do anything.
Speaker 2: Don't accept it.
Speaker 1: I don't know if it helps anything, but at least,
Speaker 1: and I always say, it's not your fault, you don't
Speaker 1: make the rules.
Speaker 2: But this is freaking ridiculous.
Speaker 3: Yes, yeah, and just that the sort of person who
Speaker 3: becomes a bureaue a cognitive bureaucracy and not only implements
Speaker 3: our cane and idiotic rules like that, but kind of
Speaker 3: enjoys them.
Speaker 2: All they do.
Speaker 3: They are a bane and they are a fungus on
Speaker 3: the skin of humanity.
Speaker 1: That's what makes bureaucracies what they are. Something in human nature.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I've ever had this, because I've
Speaker 1: never had a position like this. Maybe, yeah, it's human nature,
Speaker 1: so maybe I would do exactly the same thing. But
Speaker 1: it seems to be human nature that if you have
Speaker 1: a little bit of power over somebody, you really enjoy
Speaker 1: exercising it.
Speaker 2: That must just be the way we're built.
Speaker 1: So if you can say at the DMV, now you
Speaker 1: need a different form, you'll have to reapply or something
Speaker 1: like that, rather than like grab the form and hand
Speaker 1: it to them saying hey, I help you with that,
Speaker 1: you get an enjoyment out of that. Yes, it's too
Speaker 1: bad that that's part of human nature. It's a bad
Speaker 1: part of you. There's a lot of bad parts of
Speaker 1: human nature.
Speaker 3: But you know, let me go back to the original
Speaker 3: Thomas Jefferson. See if this rings true in your life.
Speaker 3: He has erected a multitude of new offices and sent
Speaker 3: hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat
Speaker 3: out their substance, meaning drain their finances for them. So
Speaker 3: clearly what we've done to ourselves.
Speaker 1: For the people in North Carolina trying to deal with
Speaker 1: their disaster, for the people in la dealing with their disaster,
Speaker 1: there's going to be the story I just read. There's
Speaker 1: already been the story I just read times thousands and
Speaker 1: thousands of examples just as infuriating of just making it
Speaker 1: really hard to get things done, which speaks to like
Speaker 1: why I said at the bank the other day, I
Speaker 1: hate the federal government, and they all looked at me
Speaker 1: like it was Timothy mcveag, because my interaction with the
Speaker 1: government is almost entirely you take money from me, or
Speaker 1: you slow me down from getting something to do.
Speaker 2: Those are my interactions. How about you?
Speaker 3: Right right? I don't want to drown in this stuff.
Speaker 3: Maybe we can put off the follow up until next hour.
Speaker 3: But a couple of different pieces of analysis have reached
Speaker 3: my eyes and ears describe the extent to which states
Speaker 3: and localities are so completely dependent on federal money. That's
Speaker 3: problem number one. Why is all that money going to
Speaker 3: DC and then we beg on bended knee for it
Speaker 3: to come back to us. It was here to begin with,
Speaker 3: wherever here happens to be for you. And secondly, how
Speaker 3: the flow of that money is siphoned off to cronies
Speaker 3: and fake charities and phony non governmental organizations or whatever.
Speaker 3: And it is just so clearly a money laundering, crony
Speaker 3: enriching program. And the fact that we the people have
Speaker 3: permitted this to happen because they get us with the
Speaker 3: moral arguments, they get us with the safety arguments, they
Speaker 3: get us with some civil rights arguments, and civil rights
Speaker 3: of course is a sacred and beautiful thing. But again
Speaker 3: they use moral arguments because they know you're a good person.
Speaker 3: They don't mean a stinking word of it. It's a
Speaker 3: way to accrue more power. Anyway, more on that to come.
Speaker 2: Breaking news.
Speaker 1: Senator Fetterman just said in an interview there isn't a
Speaker 1: constitutional crisis with the Trump administration.
Speaker 3: He's correct. Good for him.
Speaker 1: Scientists discovered a new particle that is supposed to be
Speaker 1: one of the most amazing discoveries in the history of mankind.
Speaker 1: I don't understand it. You won't understand it when we
Speaker 1: talk about it later. Among other things, stay here. The
Speaker 1: Philadelphia Eagles are set to hold their Super Bowl victory
Speaker 1: parade this week on Valentine's Day and what's being called
Speaker 1: the ultimate.
Speaker 3: Test for Philadelphia boyfriends.
Speaker 2: Babe, what if I go for just an hour or so?
Speaker 3: That's pretty funny, interesting timing for that. Yeah, I just
Speaker 3: I don't think either one of us know a lot
Speaker 3: of couples that are super into Valentine's Day. I know
Speaker 3: it exists. It must you can't get a seat at
Speaker 3: a restaurant.
Speaker 1: I'll save my Valentine's Day smack for tomorrow, all right, Sarhenos,
Speaker 1: I don't know if I had ever come across the
Speaker 1: word neutrino before yesterday. Ask your doctor about neutrino good
Speaker 1: God's constipation or erections lasting more than four hours A
Speaker 1: neutrinos Neutrino's nicknamed ghost particles. They're a tiny little particle.
Speaker 1: They're the most the second most abundant particle in the
Speaker 1: universe after particles of light photons.
Speaker 3: I'm not just gonna say after stupidity.
Speaker 2: I'm not pretending I understand any of this.
Speaker 1: By the way, UH, one hundred trillion neutrinos passed through
Speaker 1: your body every second without you even noticing.
Speaker 3: I've noticed, and I don't like it.
Speaker 1: I don't like it one bit. They're the most mysterious
Speaker 1: of elementary particles. They have no electric charge, almost no mass,
Speaker 1: and inter act only weekly with matter. They're special cosmic
Speaker 1: messengers us, bringing us unique information on the mechanisms involved
Speaker 1: in the most energetic phenomena in the world, like black
Speaker 1: holes and UH and the headline yesterday and this. Scientists
Speaker 1: say this is one of the most amazing discoveries in history.
Speaker 1: And I haven't got the slightest idea what it means
Speaker 1: or why. They detected the highest energy ghost particle ever seen.
Speaker 1: And they have no idea where it came from. It
Speaker 1: may have come from, like directly, very close to the
Speaker 1: beginning of the Big Bang to have this much energy.
Speaker 1: I read about this stuff and I always come away
Speaker 1: from it with the same thought. This could be one
Speaker 1: hundred percent legit or a complete fraud. And you're all laughing.
Speaker 3: At We told them we could measure new treos. We
Speaker 3: made it, and we told them, and we told them
Speaker 3: we found an extra bright one, and that gave us
Speaker 3: fifty million dollars fun. I'm telling you, these people fall
Speaker 3: for anything. It could be one or the other, and
Speaker 3: I would never have any idea, which so I just
Speaker 3: packed them on the back and say that's great.
Speaker 1: Scientists have detected the highest energy neutrino ghost particle ever seen.
Speaker 1: The particle arrived at Earth at nearly the speed of light,
Speaker 1: with thirty times the energy of the previous most energetic
Speaker 1: neutrino ever measured. This is the first solid evidence that
Speaker 1: neutrino's with such high.
Speaker 3: Energy can be produced in the universe.
Speaker 1: Uh And for some reason, the fact that it has
Speaker 1: this much energy packed into it means something extraordinary. And
Speaker 1: I read many paragraphs that's about this in the New
Speaker 1: York Times yesterday and I can't I didn't understand it
Speaker 1: enough to sum it.
Speaker 3: Up in any way whatsoever. But there you go. If
Speaker 3: we do achieve a thorough understanding of the most minute
Speaker 3: building blocks of the universe, will that help us get
Speaker 3: rid of the Department of Education, or help making or
Speaker 3: help stop having one group of religious fanatics want to
Speaker 3: murder in their sleep a.
Speaker 2: Different group of people for their religion.
Speaker 3: Right, Will it stop bureaucrats from preventing folks from rebuilding
Speaker 3: their homes after a fire. And again I value science.
Speaker 3: I suggest the scientists to go full speed ahead with
Speaker 3: that stuff.
Speaker 1: The energy of this neutrino was two hundred and twenty
Speaker 1: million billion electron volts, which seems like a lot.
Speaker 3: Again or five hundred horse power or big as an elephant.
Speaker 3: I don't know. I don't know. You can say anything
Speaker 3: you want and I will have the same reaction. Oh,
Speaker 3: there might be like six people on earth that could
Speaker 3: challenge that assertion, you know, and a million billion It
Speaker 3: could be no more than one point one million billion.
Speaker 3: In my opinion, this.
Speaker 2: What do we get into next?
Speaker 3: The jihad against Jews is a war against the west
Speaker 3: On College camp in Israel and the streets of Germany
Speaker 3: where at Jihati just ran down dozens of people.
Speaker 1: Yeah, today we are in a war, whether we know
Speaker 1: it or not. Neutrino is ain't gonna help that.
Speaker 3: Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 2: Two pieces.
Speaker 5: A kind of breaking news, Hams announced they will restart
Speaker 5: the deal that they made with Israel and give back
Speaker 5: a couple more hostages as was scheduled.
Speaker 2: Mi no no on Saturday. So that's back on there.
Speaker 1: But also overnight was the reporting in the Wall Street
Speaker 1: Journal our intelligence saying that Israel is planning to strike
Speaker 1: Iran hard and try to take out their nuclear facilities
Speaker 1: sometime this year. Who leaked that wine? If that's a
Speaker 1: good thing or bad thing, I don't have any idea.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it could go either way. It could be a
Speaker 3: great idea or be an inadvert I'm not an inadvert
Speaker 3: but an intentional leak by some anti trumpist in the
Speaker 3: State Department, who knows. Speaking of the Middle East, a
Speaker 3: couple of things that I found very very interesting. Number one,
Speaker 3: Trump's lunatic plan to turn Gaza into a resort Trump branded,
Speaker 3: I'm sure, and clear out all the Palestinians and build
Speaker 3: them nice tract houses in Jordan and the rest of it.
Speaker 3: And it was never clear exactly what he was trying
Speaker 3: to accomplish with that plan, because it's an impossibility. Well,
Speaker 3: four dimensional chests, you tell me. The leaders of Egypt
Speaker 3: and I think it was Jordan maybe another country came
Speaker 3: out and said, yo, whoa, whoa, whoa that Trump planned,
Speaker 3: let's come up with a serious alternative that all of
Speaker 3: the regional countries were gone together. I'm like wy you
Speaker 3: lazy bastards who've been shouting about the Palestinians all these
Speaker 3: years but never doing anything to help them. All of
Speaker 3: a sudden, Trump proposes, you know, Gaza Lago, and now
Speaker 3: you really want in, and you want to finance it,
Speaker 3: and I'll be darned.
Speaker 1: Okay, And even David Ignatius and the Washington Post believes
Speaker 1: that Trump is the main thing that changed this discussion.
Speaker 3: So a bit of a bridge to the main discussion.
Speaker 3: A British man was arrested for burning the Koran, and
Speaker 3: the police in Manchester posted name. Yes, wow, oh my god,
Speaker 3: Britain is so far gone. I've got a bunch of
Speaker 3: examples of that. We don't have time for it now,
Speaker 3: but they have gone fully woke and fully afraid of Islamism,
Speaker 3: so stay tuned. But anyway, they posted his name dated
Speaker 3: birth in the borough where he lives, so we can
Speaker 3: safely assume he'll be killed sooner or later Fatwa style,
Speaker 3: even if he gets off the charges, says the folks,
Speaker 3: say the folks in the Free Press.
Speaker 2: They released his name.
Speaker 3: Oh my god. Well, then they point out that an
Speaker 3: Iraqi refugee who's aware of the evils of Islamism was
Speaker 3: assassinated in Sweden last week. He burned the Quran in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty three, faced a constant drumbeat of threats, and
Speaker 3: finally they found him and murdered him. And then, as
Speaker 3: they point out, strange how you can burn Bibles, Torahs,
Speaker 3: even do cool pe art on the image of Christ,
Speaker 3: and you'll never be killed, You'll never be jailed, you'll
Speaker 3: never be protested at least not much. You might get
Speaker 3: a show at a downtown gallery. How is it one
Speaker 3: religion managed to scare us into such submission? Well, if
Speaker 3: you haven't read Michael Hallibec's submission, now is the time. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that it is a brilliant novel.
Speaker 1: It is, and it hinges on Marie la Penn ending
Speaker 1: up being elected leader of France, and that looks like
Speaker 1: that might happen soon. Actually, So is it against the law?
Speaker 1: If I burn a Bible in London, that's not against
Speaker 1: the law. But if I burn a Koran it is
Speaker 1: against the law.
Speaker 3: I don't know. I don't know the laws, but it
Speaker 3: generally isn't prosecuted because nobody pushes it right anyway, That
Speaker 3: all brings us to a piece by Andrew McCarthy, which
Speaker 3: I've been hanging on to for quite some time, looking
Speaker 3: for the right moment to unleash it. And interestingly it
Speaker 3: was written in November about the attacks on Jews in Amsterdam,
Speaker 3: which may or may not remember. Soccer game, hotels, people
Speaker 3: running for their lives, hiding out. I don't know if
Speaker 3: it sounds familiar. What's really interesting about it is it
Speaker 3: could have been written this morning about the twenty four
Speaker 3: year old Afghan refugee Jihati criminal who ran down dozens
Speaker 3: of people in Berlin. Was it today? And that is
Speaker 3: really going to royal German politics, which were already royaled.
Speaker 3: But McCarthy talking about the attacks in Amsterdam could have
Speaker 3: been talking about today, and he gets to his main point.
Speaker 3: This is not just a jihad against Jews. The war
Speaker 3: against Israel is the war of Jew hatred in Europe.
Speaker 3: Russia's war against Ukraine is materially supported by Iran, the
Speaker 3: jihadist maestro of the war against Israel. The Biden Harris
Speaker 3: administration's woeful failure of deterrence has ushered America's principal geopolitical adversaries,
Speaker 3: China and Russia, into positions of influence in the Middle East,
Speaker 3: and they see Sharia supremacists, including but not to their
Speaker 3: partners in Tehran, as major assets in their anti Western project.
Speaker 3: The jihad against Jews is a war against the West.
Speaker 3: And then he goes into a great deal of description
Speaker 3: and detail and it's really enlightening, and we'll post it.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure if it'll be pay well at Armstrong
Speaker 3: and Geddy dot com in the hot lengths, but I
Speaker 3: want to get to his general point, as I explained
Speaker 3: in these pages over a dozen years ago. He writes,
Speaker 3: voluntary apartheid is the Sharia sarrem supremacist strategy for conquest
Speaker 3: in Europe and North America. It was notably championed by
Speaker 3: Sheik Yusuf Karadawi, who Untila's death at age ninety six
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty two, is the world's most influential Sunni
Speaker 3: Sharia jurisprudent, the authority most revered by the Muslim Brotherhood
Speaker 3: and its Palestinian branch. Amas Voluntary apartheide aims to kill
Speaker 3: the West by means of its own lax immigration policies,
Speaker 3: which have devolved into collapsing border security, and just for
Speaker 3: a moment to depart from the theme. I'm reminded of
Speaker 3: people who think critical theory and wokism and all of
Speaker 3: that is like a conservative conspiracy theory. When the guys
Speaker 3: who came up with it wrote books that sold well,
Speaker 3: their names are on the spines. They describe precisely what
Speaker 3: they want to do and how they're going to do it,
Speaker 3: and that's what they're doing, but people don't know it.
Speaker 3: So this shak use of Karadawi, who I had not
Speaker 3: heard of, he has been explaining precisely what you're supposed
Speaker 3: to do. Karadawi encouraged Muslims to migrate on Moss to
Speaker 3: Europe and North America and there to gravitate into enclaves.
Speaker 3: Do not adapt and assimilate, put yourself into big Arab
Speaker 3: Muslim neighborhoods.
Speaker 1: When the Islamic pop because the West is the way
Speaker 1: it is currently. We will allow you to live your
Speaker 1: lifestyle because we think it would be somehow belligerent to
Speaker 1: make you live our lifestyle, which I see in my
Speaker 1: own town.
Speaker 3: Right. You know, as the saying goes, we demand liberty
Speaker 3: because that is according to your principles, and as soon
Speaker 3: as we're in charge, will deny liberty because that is
Speaker 3: according to our principles being exploited for our openness.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Christians, any sort of trad wives, Oh my god,
Speaker 1: that's a horror. But Muslims who make this happens in Davis, California.
Speaker 1: I see women walking around in the full beekeeper outfit,
Speaker 1: sometimes looking out the little slit.
Speaker 2: How do you allow that to happen?
Speaker 3: Yeah? Yeah, flying into SeaTac or the region Seattle Tacoma,
Speaker 3: where my daughter lives. I see it all the time
Speaker 3: in the neighborhood close to the airport, the full beekeeper
Speaker 3: all over the place. Anyway, So here is the specific instructions.
Speaker 3: Migrate in huge numbers to Europe and North America, gravitate
Speaker 3: into enclaves. When the Islamic population reached a critical mass,
Speaker 3: which needn't be very big. Five percent is more than enough,
Speaker 3: as the Bolsheviks could tell you, And he points out,
Speaker 3: Muslims would put pressure on the local authorities to recognize
Speaker 3: the de facto autonomy that they'd aggressively established. The Muslims
Speaker 3: demand would be to conduct their affairs in accordance with Shariah,
Speaker 3: Islam's scripturally rooted law and societal plan, which is antithetical
Speaker 3: to Western concepts of liberty, equality, private property, privacy, et cetera.
Speaker 3: By convincing Western leaders and decision makers of our right
Speaker 3: to live according to our faith ideologically, legislatively, and ethically.
Speaker 3: Caradawi reason that Muslims quote these are all quotes, would
Speaker 3: transverse an immense barrier in our quest for an Islamic state.
Speaker 3: Under the plan, the burgeoneting Islamic enclaves grow in number,
Speaker 3: spread in terms of territory controlled, and eventually connect the
Speaker 3: indigenous Westerners in and around these enclaves either conform or
Speaker 3: leave for all intents and purposes, Sharia supremacists become the sovereign.
Speaker 3: And Andy goes on for several more pages, which I
Speaker 3: would be delighted to read, but it's a little long,
Speaker 3: and maybe we'll return to it, and like our bedtime story,
Speaker 3: this time of the show for the next week.
Speaker 1: That is very like the book, much like the book Submission,
Speaker 1: which can't recommend highly enough.
Speaker 2: It's not like a nonfiction textbook.
Speaker 3: It is a breezy novel with sex scenes, but it's
Speaker 3: really interesting about how the takeover would happen and how
Speaker 3: easily it could happen, and it's all so mundane, bit
Speaker 3: by bit, administratively like Caradawi is suggesting, Yeah, just demand
Speaker 3: this and that and get this autonomy, that autonomy, grow
Speaker 3: the community connected with the one next to you. Then,
Speaker 3: for instance, tell Joe Biden that unless he cuts off Israel,
Speaker 3: you won't vote for him in Dearborn Michigan. Didn't work,
Speaker 3: but that's what they are trying to do.
Speaker 1: I always use the example of you can make fun
Speaker 1: of other religions, for instance, the Mormons. You can have
Speaker 1: a Broadway musical that wins all kinds of awards laughing
Speaker 1: at Mormons, but you can't make any jokes about Muslims
Speaker 1: because they'll get violent. Okay, So they get the Heckler's
Speaker 1: veto interesting Okay.
Speaker 3: And to get back to the point I made earlier,
Speaker 3: if you say, hey, this is precisely what they said
Speaker 3: they were going to do. They wrote books, their names
Speaker 3: are on the spine. Now they're doing it. Look at it.
Speaker 3: You will be called an islamophobe. That is part of
Speaker 3: the strategy too. We will exploit you using your principles,
Speaker 3: then we will enslave you according to our principles.
Speaker 1: Well, phobia being fear of if you're not afraid of
Speaker 1: a rational fear of Oh yeah, that's a good point.
Speaker 1: If you don't have a rational fear of fundamentalist Islam,
Speaker 1: you ain't paying attention. Right, it is a form of government. Well,
Speaker 1: we must respect people's religions.
Speaker 3: No, it's much more than a religion. It's not a
Speaker 3: personal religion like you're a present Bia. It's a way
Speaker 3: to organize all of society.
Speaker 2: Except most of the people who say that crap.
Speaker 1: You don't respect the most the majority religions of the country.
Speaker 1: You don't respect Catholics or Baptists or Mormons, me those people,
Speaker 1: it's part of the cult. There's zenophiles. If it is
Speaker 1: not American, not Christian, not Western. I love it and
Speaker 1: I'm in favor of it because that gives you some
Speaker 1: sort of intellectual you know, cachet in your college educated
Speaker 1: with useful degrees crowd, and you get rewarded socially for
Speaker 1: espousing those views.
Speaker 3: It's ridiculous, suicidal. And I tell you what, there's part
Speaker 3: of me that thinks, when I'm in a particularly grim mood,
Speaker 3: that if the West is that stupid and so steeped
Speaker 3: in self hatred, we deserve to lose.
Speaker 2: Ah.
Speaker 3: That's rough, not a lighter note. Well, everything's a lighter note.
Speaker 3: I can do another book recommendation.
Speaker 1: It's a anniversary today, it's the eighty year anniversary of
Speaker 1: the bombing of Dresden. You could read some sort of
Speaker 1: scholarly book about it, or you could read Slaughterhouse Five
Speaker 1: by Kurt Vonnegut.
Speaker 2: Which is another great book.
Speaker 3: It is indeed not a laugher. No, there is some
Speaker 3: rye humor in it, no doubt.
Speaker 2: But I paid my kid to read.
Speaker 3: It recently, like to you, or just to read it, just.
Speaker 2: To read it. I paid him to read it.
Speaker 3: This is one of those controversial stridups that I've heard about. Yeah,
Speaker 3: dollars for grades, that sort of thing.
Speaker 1: I paid him to read it, and then he had
Speaker 1: to do a book report or a book report where
Speaker 1: I just asked him questions, enough questions to make sure
Speaker 1: he actually read it.
Speaker 3: Unconventional odd. I'm sure we'll get harsh emails. But the
Speaker 3: book got read and the ideas got absorbed.
Speaker 1: And he wasn't watching YouTube. I gave him a couple
Speaker 1: of bucks. I don't know, we'll see. I'll look back
Speaker 1: on it from years now, and it was either a
Speaker 1: good idea or about idea. It's bold and innovative. There
Speaker 1: you go more all the way. Stay here, Hey, guys,
Speaker 1: listen to this.
Speaker 6: I read that two thousand passengers on Norwegian cruise lines
Speaker 6: just set sail on an eleven day naked cruise.
Speaker 3: Yeah, two thousand naked people.
Speaker 6: Plus a cruise is like someone asks how many different
Speaker 6: diseases can we have at one time?
Speaker 3: Nora virus? Syphilist.
Speaker 1: I don't understand some people's enthusiasm to be around other
Speaker 1: people naked.
Speaker 3: I don't get that.
Speaker 1: I'm as big a fan, like in a one on
Speaker 1: one situation with the right person, as anyone can be.
Speaker 1: But just in the general population, I just never had
Speaker 1: the slightest desire. I don't to each their own, I
Speaker 1: say stay away from me. I had one more thing
Speaker 1: I was gonna say.
Speaker 3: What was the other thing?
Speaker 1: I was gonna say? Valentine's Day? Naked cruises, neurovirus. Maybe it'll
Speaker 1: pop back into my head bribing sons to read Oh,
Speaker 1: I'll do it after this. So Katie texted this to
Speaker 1: the group yesterday. I thought it was kind of funny
Speaker 1: breaking down your different organizations and getting packages or information
Speaker 1: or whatever. Ups Your package is in your city on
Speaker 1: a truck driven by Mike. It will arrive at six
Speaker 1: twenty seven pm today, FedEx, your package is coming. You'll
Speaker 1: get it when we get there. Now, from my personal experience,
Speaker 1: it's the reverse. My personal experience, it's the opposite of that.
Speaker 1: But it doesn't ruin the joke USPS. That'd be the
Speaker 1: government postal service. What package Amazon were already inside your house?
Speaker 1: Check the bathroom?
Speaker 3: Yeah, no kidding.
Speaker 1: And Facebook, we know you were thinking about getting a
Speaker 1: toast oven yesterday. Here are twenty ads for toaster ovens. Yeah,
Speaker 1: truth of that. Also, we talk a lot about smartphones
Speaker 1: and staring at phones and all the sort of stuff
Speaker 1: that's changed and send smartphones. I was in a group
Speaker 1: yesterday with maybe the youngest person there was fifty. There's
Speaker 1: people between fifty and eighty five, not young people, And
Speaker 1: somebody brought up the topic of how much time they
Speaker 1: waste staring at their phone, like looking at YouTube videos,
Speaker 1: And every single person there between fifteen and eighty five
Speaker 1: is there, Oh yeah, I can't stop. I get to
Speaker 1: the end of the day and I think, or at
Speaker 1: the end of the afternoon and thank god, I wasted
Speaker 1: all my time. So it's not just young people. People
Speaker 1: who lived decades, sixty years without this technology, have getten
Speaker 1: sucked into it and now feel like you know, on
Speaker 1: a given day they wasted their day looking at this stuff.
Speaker 1: It might be the biggest problem mankind has.
Speaker 3: Here's here's an idea. Let's assemble Jesus and Buddha.
Speaker 1: George Washington got, I want Trump there Trump and asked them, actually,
Speaker 1: Trump would make Prince's enough.
Speaker 3: For the love of God. No, John Wayne, I'm sorry,
Speaker 3: now he's got me doing it.
Speaker 7: Fir Dale Earnhardt, Now got anyway, you get the greatest
Speaker 7: sages who have ever walked the earth, and you say
Speaker 7: to him, what do you think of human beings having
Speaker 7: pleasure available to them every second of every day?
Speaker 3: How do you think that would go? We'll start with
Speaker 3: you Jesus, but it'd be like why aim anyway? Uh,
Speaker 3: And all of those great sages would say the same thing. Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Speaker 3: That's a terrible idea. We're not meant to deal with that. No.
Speaker 1: It just struck me because it was an older crowd,
Speaker 1: this group having the same conversation that I witness with
Speaker 1: younger people. Except younger people don't have that conversation. They're
Speaker 1: perfectly okay with it. See, so I think all the
Speaker 1: people that lived in the before times, before you had
Speaker 1: a smartphone and everybody stared at the all time. We'll
Speaker 1: be dead soon and then there won't be anybody who
Speaker 1: ever ever was in a restaurant where people weren't staring
Speaker 1: at their phones, or a bus stop or anything like that,
Speaker 1: and it'll be over for good.
Speaker 3: Yes, Katie, Oh, I just I really.
Speaker 2: I irritated myself yesterday.
Speaker 3: I was watching a documentary that I was actually interested.
Speaker 2: In, but just the second that it lost my attention,
Speaker 2: I went to my phone and I had to rewind.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, yeah. Well the good news is in those
Speaker 3: after times that Jack was describing, when everybody's staring at
Speaker 3: their phones, nobody's going to get together and have sex.
Speaker 3: And then it won't matter because there will be very
Speaker 3: few human beings and we'll have the world of the
Speaker 3: beavers planning to the beavers.
Speaker 2: There's no way, no possible way. This is a positive development.
Speaker 1: They have people that are seventy two years old sitting
Speaker 1: around saying I wasted my day watching YouTube videos.
Speaker 2: That breaks my heart.
Speaker 3: I know, I know what have we done to ourselves?
Speaker 3: What I'm looking at you, Steve Jobs, We're built to
Speaker 3: enjoy pleasure, and the pleasure givers are getting better at it.
Speaker 1: That's the other problem. They're gonna be better at ten
Speaker 1: years from now.
Speaker 3: And Richard Armstrong and Getty