WEBVTT - William Janeway on What's Needed for the Innovation Economy

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.439
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Radio this weekend. On the podcast, I have an extra

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>special guest. His name is Bill Janeway, and he is

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the author of the Innovation Economy. He was an early

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>guest where quite bluntly, I really didn't know what the

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>hell I was doing, And I think this conversation is

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>far more detailed than in depth if you are at

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>all interested in venture capital, technology investing UH and the

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>role of both the Defense and Intelligence agencies specifically and

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the federal government generally in impacting venture investing technology long

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>form investing where there may not be an immediate payoff,

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately you end up with a really significant set

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of payoffs. Whether we're talking about UH, the Interstate highway system,

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the cross continental railroads, the space um race for the Moon,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>all of these things had no immediate expected payoff, but

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>long term they've delivered a tremendous amount of value. And

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the intersection between technology, venture capitalism, and economics UH is

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>something that Professor Janeway specializes in. I think you'll find

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this conversation absolutely fascinating. So, with no further ado my

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Bill Janeway, I'm Barry rit Halts. You're listening

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>today is Bill Janeway. He has a storied background in

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>both economics and venture capital. He helped to create b

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>e A Systems, which connects software apps to database. Had

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you invested about fifty million dollars into b e A,

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>UH when Bill started putting money into it, it would

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>have become over six billion dollars in six years. He

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is an affiliated lecturer of Economics at the University of Cambridge,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>where he teaches a class venture Capital in the Innovation Economy.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>He's a senior advisor at Warburg Pincus, where he helped

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>build technology investing platform there for over thirty years. He's

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on the board of the US Social Science Research Council,

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the governing board for the Institute of New Economics, the

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Field Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences. UH. No less

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a character than Mark Andresen called him a key creator

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of the modern venture capital world. He is also the

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>author of Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy, Markets, Speculation,

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and the State. Bill Janeway, Welcome back to Bloomberg. It

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is great to be back here, Barry, especially with you.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>That is quite the curriculum. Vita and I. We left

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a ton of it off. We'll talk a little bit

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about B E A systems in a bit. I want

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to start with your academic background in economics, your val

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Victorian Princeton. You get your doctorate from Cambridge and economics.

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you go from that to venture capital? Well,

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>actually it's a closer connection than I knew at the

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>time it would be. When I got to Cambridge, I

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>was studying under the students, the top students who had

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>been taught by John Maynard Kean's and I wrote my

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>dissertation for Richard Khan, who invented the multiplier as a

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>way of looking at the impact of government spending or

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>taxes on the macro economy. But all of the work

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that I did there, everything I learned there was about

0:03:53.880 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>decision making under conditions of uncertainty, decision making by investors, workers, consumers, businessmen,

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>politicians who cannot know what the full consequences of their

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>actions are gonna be. Now, isn't that effectively every actor

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in the economy? You got it. But by the time

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I finished my doctorate and was thinking I would pursue

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>a course in economics and academic economics. It turned out

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that economics was converting itself for a long generation into

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a kind of mechanical process of cranking out the efficient

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>outcome on the assumption that everybody knew everything that's The

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>marketplace itself is already reflecting all the information that's available,

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and therefore, hey, nobody can really beat the market consistently

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>over time, or or so Chicago, Pharma and French and

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>right across the whole economy. The rational expectations hypothesis said,

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>government can't have any lasting impact on the economy because

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>people in the economy will react an offset whatever it

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>tries to do. In any case, I decided that at

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the ripe old age of seven, I could not take

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>this stuff and spend my life pumping it into the

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>brains of innocent undergraduate. So I went on. I went

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>on what I talk of as my my thirty five

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>years sabbatical, where in the trenches of venture capital that

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I evolved in through joining an extraordinary firm whose core

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>competence was understanding the science based industries, from chemicals to pharmaceuticals,

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to electronics to computing, I discovered that what I learned

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>at Cambridge as an academic economist, was directly relevant to

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>try and to frame the sword of decisions and the

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of ways of protecting yourself, your investors, and the

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs you are backing from the necessary ignorance of operating

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>at the frontier of technology. So that's pretty fascinating. I

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>want to push back on the concept that, hey, this

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>efficient market hypothesis really doesn't get it right. A perfect

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>example I read over the weekend while I was doing

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a little research for for our conversation. Some people have

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>been wondering why the US tax cuts haven't had a

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>larger impact on either employment or wages or R and D.

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And the most interesting explanation I came across was, well,

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:40.119
<v Speaker 1>everybody has already operated on the basis that they're tax havens,

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and this thirty corporate tax rate is no big deal anyway.

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>We're all paying uh, eighteen percent or less. Therefore, a

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>giant corporate tax cut has much less of an impact

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>than you would imagine, true or false? And what does

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that say about your belief that, hey, maybe the market

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is less efficient than we think. For first, I think

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that's correct. I don't think the average of about eight,

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>not thirty, and of course, particularly the digital companies that

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>can move their cash flows and their assets around by

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>keys on a computer. They're not manufacturing steel and build locomotives,

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just code. Very mobile, they're very mobile. Second, however,

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the tax cut has had a significant substantial impact unavailable

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>accessible cash flow, not reported earnings. So that but what's

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>happened to that cash flow? And this is something again

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>about the nature of the stock market, That cash flow

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>has overwhelmingly been devoted Apple being the most extreme example.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Stock buybacks and dividends, that not not raising wages for workers,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>not investing in the new stuff, but but putting more

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>money in the in the pockets of stockholders, which you

0:07:54.960 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>know is a rational response of management, particularly when their stockholders,

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>who are increasingly index funds, are necessarily very short term

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>oriented and the executives are also short term oriented. Hey,

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>we we eliminated the agency problem by tying their compensation

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to the stock price. So so you go on this

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty year walk about, and you spend some time in

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>um Wearburg Pankis, you spent some time at Eberstaaten company.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>What prompted you to say, Hey, this venture capital thing,

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be big one day I want to stay

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>involved in. You know, it's funny. It was actually a

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>crossover from being an economist to being a venture capitalist

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in the In the mid late seventies, when I was

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>a kid on Wall Street, I was really interested in

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>the kind of longer term strategic issues around the economy.

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>There had been a big fiasco. One of the first

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>attempts to use computers to model the economy, not just

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>modeled the they modeled the world came out of M

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I T and was kind of a fiasco, was called

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the Limits of Growth Study for the Club of Rome,

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and this was referenced in your book. Absolutely absolutely. But

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the the the young guys at M I T who

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>have been caught up in this, they learned a big

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:18.479
<v Speaker 1>lesson and they set out using computers to build very detailed,

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>very granular, local models of economic behavior. And I stumbled

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 1>on these guys as I was trying to find out

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>how to think about and how to handle the consequences

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of the first oil crisis, which blew up all the

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>econometric models. They were useless because all the important variables

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, from interest rates to exchange rates to

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>inflation rates had just been blown out. Of the historical database.

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I found these young guys and I got a message.

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>The message was, Hey, this is what computers are interesting about.

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not just being a flexible typewriter or or being

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a faster or more flexible adding machine. You can build

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>simulations and explore the behavior of the world. That got

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>me interested in computers. From there, the first wave of

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, the first wave of the hypeer artificial intelligence

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that got me out to Xerox Park, the kind of

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the haven for the most creative people in the computing world.

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to a friendship with John Ceelee Brown, who was

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>on his way to becoming director of Xerox Park, I

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>got immersed ahead of the game, a kind of kind

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of unfair advantage and seeing where computing was gonna go.

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to circle back to what you said about

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the Xerox Research Center. Um that gave us things like

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the graphical user interface, the mouse. Essentially that was Steve

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>jobs is aha moment that led to the first Macintosh.

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You said it gave you an unfair advantage. Expand on

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that it gave me the unfair advantage of seeing that

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>can puting computers were not which were dominated by the

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>IBM main frames with a secondary center in the digital

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>equipment mini computers and the competitors with digital equipment. These

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>were very centralized systems. They had dumb terminals, green screens.

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't do any local work. Everything went back to

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the main frame or the mini computer to be processed.

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It was a very rigid, inflexible and of course, because

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>each of these systems were proprietary, if you were a

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>digital equipment customer, let alone an IBM customer, you have

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to buy everything from them, and believe me, they made

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>money on that. So it was a giant centralized system

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the modern between phones and laptops and iPads,

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we have a completely decentralized system. Although theoretically, as we

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>moved to the cloud, we're kind of moving back a

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>little interesting, but but in a very different way. But

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll come back. That's a good point. Let's hold that thought.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>What you could see at Deox Park were computers being

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>networked together with special functions that they could be optimized for.

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>While the machine in front of you was designed to

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>be helpful, but you know, it was map to how

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>people work, and it was much too expensive and Xerox

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>management back in on the East Coast. UH couldn't get

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>their heads around the notion of making the kind of

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>high risk, long term investments, So companies like Adobe in

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>three comm were founded by people who left Xerox Park.

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>That kind of raises the question, why did they even

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>have a Xerox Park At least with a T and

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>T and Bell Labs later loosened, they were using their

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>own research to build out new products or were they

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>up to a point? There was a deal, a T

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and T in nineteen fifty six kind of deal with

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>what was then an economically active government unlike where we

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>are today, right back when it was a legitimate legal

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and the deal was it could keep its monopoly on

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>long distance telephones if any technology developed at Bell Labs

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>that was not directly used for communications would be licensed

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>on a fair and non discriminatory basis to the world.

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's where Unix came from. That's where a whole

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>raft of innovative technologies that had general purpose use, not

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>just for communications, were given to the world, given to

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>academic researchers, given to companies that were learning how to

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>what to do with this stuff, and laying the basis

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>for the digital revolution. That began to emerge in the

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.599
<v Speaker 1>early so that that government deal with A T and

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>T was very different than what xerox parks deal was.

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>They they just didn't know what to do with that. Well,

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>two things one um neither today, T and T. They

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>licensed it. They the big deal they cut with the

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>government in where they gave up the long distance monopoly

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and they broke up the company in return for the

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to use the technology and go out and compete

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>with IBM and Digital demonstrated that I, A, T and

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>T had no ability to compete in commercial markets. Xerox

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is a different story. Xerox Is monopoly was based on patents,

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>patents for this phenomenal ability to make copies very low cost,

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and it generated an enormous amount of cash. It was

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of innovator's dilemma. However, the existing business

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>was so good and so certain that when one of

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the young guys from the park would come east and say,

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I got a great idea for a business plan. Just

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>give me twenty million bucks and in five years I'm

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a three million dollar business and it will

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>be profitable and it'll be worth you know, a billion

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars and they look at them and say, wait a second,

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that is so high risk. We could take that same

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty million bucks and we'll hire a bunch of additional

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>engineers and salesmen. We know exactly what the return is

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be. Go back, go back to your cave.

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>And they had they finally worked out, but it took

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a long time. In the late eighties, they worked out that.

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, if they just did a deal with the

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>young entrepreneurs and took twenty percent of the company in

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>return for giving them the intellectual property, the patents, and

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>then let him go out and find venture capital. Xerox

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't trying to build the business. It was a beneficiary

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of the work that had been done on its nickel

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>out at Yaks Park. That actually worked in a couple

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of really valuable businesses. What came out of that documentum

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, Major Company, they missed a ton of stuff.

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>They took all Adobe going down the lift. It was

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>just the first two a's. What else came out of

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that Apple they never had a chance to invest in.

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>That was That was Apple. That was Steve Jobs being

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the brilliant opportunist he was. And but it took him

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>ten years. It took the corporate bureaucrats back in Stanford

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>ten years to work out that would better to own

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>something versus of nothing. So let's let's talk about another

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>institution that came up with a similar idea, and that

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is the n S, A, C, I, A, D O D.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Going back to the age of DARPA and DARPA net.

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Why are our national security agencies so interested in startups

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and technology? How much of this stuff actually finds its

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>way into real world spy versus by usage? Well, there's

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>no question that from speech recognition to the geographical positioning

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>satellites and onto all of the machine learning technologies. Uh,

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the U S intelligence agencies have been major funders of

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>upstream research. Um. That goes back a long way. Of course,

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the page rank algorithm. A couple of graduate students at

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Stanford got a grant from the NSF which was directly

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>related to the n S as interest in being able

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to do efficient search of what people were doing and

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>saying on the Internet. Um. So there's there's a history

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>there that goes back to the fifties. That's that's ironic

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>given that Google just rejected I mean, essentially they own

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>their own existence to the intelligence agencies? Is that is that?

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Am I overselling that a little bit? Well? I think

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that that kind There was a link certainly to the NSF.

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean the funding for the research work as graduate

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>students that produced the page rank algorithm that was the

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>basis for Google came from the National Science Foundation. The

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>complex history, however, of how from silicon to software and

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>then onto the Internet, all of the fundamental building blocks

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of the digital revolution were initially the consequence of upstream

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>research financed by the government, and the government as the

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>first customer for this stuff when it was still immature,

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>when it was too expensive and too unreliable for commercial use.

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>That changed. That changed, Big changes took place between nineteen

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>eight three. On the one hand, in night the PC

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>revolution began to take off, and the commercial markets began

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to be bigger, whether it was for whether it was

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>for microsop microprocessors or for software, bigger than the government market. Second,

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a bill was passed through Congress which said that DARPA

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>had to justify every dollar it invested in terms of

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>its direct military significance. It hadn't been that way before,

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>but a much broader much. You know, there's a There's

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a great line from the from the play that became

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Hello Dolly, Dolly says, you know, money is like manure.

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>For it to do any good, you've got to spread

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it around. And that's what DARPA did. DARPA was an

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary institution, particularly in the years from the from Sputnik,

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>which was why it was found in nineteen fifties seven

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>eight through the nineteen seventies. Seems kind of shortsighted to uh,

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to cancel it. Let's let's talk about Warburg Pinkis because

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you've been affiliated with them for a long time. You're

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a senior adviser there. You helped to build their technology,

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>research and investing platform. Uh, tell us what brought you

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>to Warburg back in what I've known the firm for

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>almost a decade. Warburg Pinkers was one of the original firms.

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>It was the largest founding member of the National Venture

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Capital Association. Was founded by two extraordinary men, Lionel Pinkis

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>and John Vogelstein, who had an idea going back to

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the sixties that when when when the investment banking and

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>brokerage firms in Wall Street, you know, they did deals

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and they do a movie deal and they do uh

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>an oil deal and roll one off and everyone in

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a while they do us at a black box any

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>gravity machine tech deal that was going to cure cancer,

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but it was very amateurish. Lionel and John had very

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:11.719
<v Speaker 1>simple idea, if you actually focus your attention, all of

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>your attention on those investments, understand the context, the business issues,

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the business model, the competitive situation, you would likely to

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>do a little better than just throwing money against the wall.

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>So the firm had been when I joined, the firm

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was already more than twenty years old. It had not

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>been an active investor in technology. It had followed the

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>founding great firms like Kleiner Perkins, Asset Management, the Silicon

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Valley firms. But as they had raised the first billion

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar fund that anybody had raised, they decided that maybe

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>they should try to invest in technology the way they

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>invested everywhere else. As the lead strategic partner with management,

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>I had spent the previous ten years building an investment

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>practice of raising money for private companies. Sounds a little

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>bit like unicorns, but a big difference private companies from

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors. Based on our our firm, the Eberstat Firm

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>deep work in understanding the science based industries. I had

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>come to John Vogelstein at Warburg Pinks again and again

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with really interesting companies, but that required passive investment, no control,

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>no board seat. And John would again and again tell me,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, this looks like a really interesting business, it's

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>not an investment for Warburg Pinkers. In the mid eight

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we sold our firm to a British merchant bank as

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>brokerage commissions, and our business model came under stress. And

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>it became clear after a time that if I was

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>going to do what I've been learning to do, I

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>had to go someplace else. So John and I had lunch,

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>We talked through we we just finished each other's sentences,

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and I landed at Warburg pink Is in AD eight

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at a wonderful time. Sure you're you're looking at the

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>late eighties in the early nineties. That is the golden

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>era of go down the list, semiconductors, software, mobile, and

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that's still early days of biotech and judgments and things

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>like that, exactly right. And the technologies that I'd been

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>exposed to a Xerox park and then I've done some

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>investing in from Eberstat secondarily sort of supporting our institutional

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>clients as they made the investments. Now, these were beginning

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to mature. So for ten years, from late eighties eighty

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>nine right through into the heart of the Internet dot

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>com bubble, we invested. We searched out as many ways

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>as we could find from making a big strategic bet.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And the bet was IBM dominance of commercial computing was vulnerable, exposed,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and we can help them lose their monopoly control. And

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>so we invested at the level of the the underlying

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure software that's b e A, in Veritas Enterprise Applications,

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>three or four companies, and we I think got a

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>major shift in the most important industry that now exists.

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>We got it right at the right time. So did

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I get the numbers about b e A correct, because

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>they're just astonishing. Fifty four million dollars invested into b

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>A six years later become six point five billion. Is

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that about right? Well, it is right, But there's a

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a PostScript. Because John Voglostein was a great student

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of markets, and he studied He knew bubbles come, bubbles

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>go when's when it's too good to be true, it's

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>too good to be true. I had actually written my

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>doctoral dissertation on nine to thirty one, so in a sense,

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>i'd seen the movie before two. So beginning in about

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we had this portfolio that represented something like two million invested,

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.719
<v Speaker 1>and we just started liquidating everything we could into the bubble.

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>We owned so much of b A that we only

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>got five percent out all right before the bubble ended.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>But there was still another five six million that came

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>out later, so it actually with more than seven billion

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>on the on the five but a little longer time.

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>That's just astonishing. My guest today is Bill Janeway. He

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is the author of The Innovation Economy, which there is

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a new edition of and and let's talk about the

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>differences between the original edition, which came out five six

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>years ago exactly right, and the new edition. Given what's

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>been going on in the modern world of social networks Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn,

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>go down the whole list, how has the universe of

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>digital companies changed versus what you were looking at back

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties or the well, the first edition of

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the book was, frankly a kind of celebration of this

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily constructive partnership between the public sector and particularly the

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Defense Department and with DARPA as this point of the

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>spear and the private sector including the entrepreneurs and venture

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 1>capitalists like me. But looking looking back from the last

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>six to twelve months, something really fundamental has changed. The

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>digital revolution, which began to reach maturity thanks to the

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary speculative funding of the late nineties the end of

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century. By the way, Dan Gross has an

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 1>amusing book called pop White, bubbles are eventually good for

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy. That's exactly what you're referring to. Is if

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you're laying fiber optic at some ungodly amount per mile

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and then that company goes bust, well, at least we

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>still have the cable laid and somebody buys a cheap

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>out of bankruptcy. Just like the railroads a hundred years before,

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>or computers or televisions or automobiles, every new industry seems

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to go through that boom and bus phase. A lot,

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of bubbles leave you with nothing

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but ranch houses in the in the Nevada Desert. Financial

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>bubbles don't leave you with the same, not quite the

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>same as technology. When the banking system, the credit system,

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>when they when they pop. The consequences are horrible. When

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just in the public market, in the stock market

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and it pops, there's no leverage, so so the But

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>in any case, in any case, what's happened. What's clear

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>over the last five years, the digital revolution has taken

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on a momentum of its own. It's running out of control,

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>no longer needs support and subsidy from the public sector.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>On the contrary, it's attacking the authority of the state

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>at every level from the most Is it the companies

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and the platforms themselves or is it the end users

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>who have found ways to manipulate these platforms, perhaps for

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the occasional nefarious uh objective, As Johnny Cash famously said,

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>why do I have to choose? Of course, it's both.

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>It's both the disruption of micro markets like the New

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>York market for transportation or accommodation. But on the other hand,

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it was this i T revolution, this digital revolution, that

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>enabled the second Great globalization, the integration of financial markets,

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>critical to the financial crisis of two thousand and eight,

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>just by the way as the telegraph and the steamship

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>produced the first Great globalization at the end of the

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century, But this is happening at a very special time.

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>It's happening when the hard work over a long generation

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of some very smart, committed people who knew they were

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 1>doing the right thing by their light to render the

0:27:55.760 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>government illegitimate as an economic agent. But has in that so,

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>let me push back on you at least a little bit,

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't There always been a group of people who and

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps we know them more intimately these days, because

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing is a secret. But there were always survivalists, and

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>there were always radical anarchists, and there were always people,

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I grew up with the moon landing when

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>I was in grammar school, and it seemed almost like

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>immediately it was, oh, that wasn't real. That was fake.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>There's always been, but they've been disparate and not organized

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that in nineteen Another thing that happened in nineteen two,

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan said, government isn't the solution. Government is the problem.

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>That view sat down with the entrepreneurs of Silicon Valley.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Intel wouldn't have existed without the government. Was the solution

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to how do you do a startup into a capital intensive,

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>massively strategic industry that nonetheless needs time and support from

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a collaborative customer as well as the benefit of the

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>upstream research funding and silicon processing and all that stuff.

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>The flip side we had, you know, in two thousand

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and eight, when the world came to an end, for

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>about three months, the government was there around the world,

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>from from London to Beijing to New York to Wall Street.

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>If you if you remember in October o eight when

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the TARP was first proposed on a Monday in Congress

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and some of the Libertarians shot it down. Markets collapse,

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and by that Friday it's scared Senators, fed chiefs, congressmen

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>enough that by Friday that said, all right, dollars. But

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>as soon as there was a floor under the financial

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>crisis and its economic collapse, then we were back to

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the world in which the govern meant exists only to

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>screw up markets that otherwise give you the efficient outcome.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And that misses the point, the whole point of the

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>economics of innovation. The whole point is that you need

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>sources of funding that are not focused on immediate economic value,

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that have a long term strategic purpose. And what we've

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>lost now it's two things from the rendering the government

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and legitimate one very limited if any ability to respond

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to the forces of globalization in a way that which

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is damaging the constituents. Many of them don't know that

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no other source of support. That's looking backwards, but

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it's also there's a problem looking forward if we're going

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to organize globally any kind of coherent response to climate change,

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>which may I stipulate is real. It's not a Chinese hoax.

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I saw a tweet that said, it's just a Chinese house.

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>If we're gonna for we need exactly the same kind

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of upstream funding, upstream commitment to research, to technology development,

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to support of the deployment that we got with the

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>digital revolution. We're not doing it. We've we've abdicated. The

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese are doing it. And that's why the biggest message

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>from where my book stands today is that we may,

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>looking forward over the next generation, have the opportunity to

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>see only the second, only the second passage of leadership

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of the innovation economy from the incumbent dominant nation now

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States a hundred years ago, hundred and twenty

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>years ago Britain, to a new leader. So let's talk.

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's delve into that, because there you raised two really

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting issues about China, climate change and technology. I would

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>be remiss if I did not address the first is

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you talk about having a government entity that can think

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>long term and make these long investments. That is not

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the description of the United States. That is the description

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of China. Whether it's their science funding, whether it's their

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure there, high speed rail, go down the list. It

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>looks like China has said, hey, I'll be happy to

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>jump into the void that the United States is leaving leaving,

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's technology, politics, you name it. They're stepping up.

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is not something they've done previously other than

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that little genghis content. But short of that, China has

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>been very happy to be isolationist. These roles seem to

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>be reversing. Is that Is that a fair assess? I

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>think it is. I I see it in the work

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that is being done to understand the strategic investments China's making.

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And not just in China. They're bringing yeah, exactly in Africa,

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in in Southern Europe, they're making major investments in transforming

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the energy infrastructure of those parts of the world. Um,

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the you do get some people saying, you know, the

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Chinese are almost embarrassed because they thought it was going

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to take another twenty or thirty years before they could

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>challenge us. Who knew we were gonna just see that

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>leadership mantlet. The second issue I have to bring up is,

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>so let's stipulate climate change is real. It mankind causes it.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>You look at the history of the industrial evolution forward,

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we're spewing out all this carbon. And yet when we

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>look at technology, the ability to move to wind, solar, geothermal, title,

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they're just the sources of energy seemed to be um

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the cost differential versus cheap carbon based is going from.

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>It used to be hugely expensive and only a handful

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of of zealots did it. Then it became a little

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>more competitive, and now why would you use coal when

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>alternatives are just are cheaper and cleaner. But we still

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>need we need some really innovative new technology, particularly energy

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>storage for sources of energy that are intermittent. Did you

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>did you read recently about the UM I think it

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was the professor at M I T who came up

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>with a methodology of pulling carbon out of the atmosphere.

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And actually it's more of a chemical than a technology.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Now if that proves, But let's let's let's roll things

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>back to Okay, the transistor has been invented the night.

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 1>The notion that you can use solid devices with particular properties,

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>not vacuum tubes, to douce to switch signals, is that

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>our idea is out there. Nobody knows how to actually

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 1>turn that into working machines that can function at scale.

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>IBM makes a bet. BET's on a material called germanium.

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Physicists will tell you germanium from a purely theoretical perspective's right,

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>because the electrons moved through it better than silicon exactly.

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>But absolute bear to produce at scale, and silicon is

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>easy to and and and the guys in Washington put

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 1>out a whole bunch of experiments. And it turns out

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that this little, this little oil field instrument company in Houston,

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Texas Instruments, works out how to process silicon. It's not

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>quite as good theoretically, but practically it's much better. Scales

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>up tremendously, and it scales up in response to government

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>orders when the government doesn't care that it's really expensive

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's putting, you know, it's building the memory systems

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 1>for the guidance systems for the Minuteman missile. But then

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they do something else they actually broke or a deal

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>between IBM and t I. The technology gets transferred to

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>IBM and return for IBM, giving t I a big order.

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the kind of active intervention based on intelligent experimentation

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 1>we should be doing. R p E, which has got

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>barely two hundred and fIF the million dollars of funding

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Darpen today still has over three billions. If we were

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 1>doing this seriously, and we had somebody at the Department

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of Energy with a mission not to protect the coal

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 1>industry with all of its fifty employees, UM, we would

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 1>be doing the same kind of experimentation every imaginable form

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>of battery technology, the science of energy chemical conversion. We

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>need a new Manhattan project for this sort of thing.

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>We have been speaking with Bill Janeway. He is the

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>author of Doing Venture Capital in the Innovation Economy. We

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>love your comments, feedback and suggestions right to us at

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. Be sure and

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 1>check out my daily column on Bloomberg dot com. You

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>can follow me on Twitter at rit Holts. I'm Barry

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>rit Holts. You're listening to Master's in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the podcast. Bill, Thank you so much for

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>doing this, UM I have I'm so glad the run

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of questions I had you and I didn't get to

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>any of them, which is always a good sign of

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>a good conversation because you say something and it sends

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 1>me off in a different direction. So I I appreciate

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>your ability to UM to help guide where where this

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation UH is going. And you certainly have a illustrious

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>enough career. There's not a lot of stuff that you

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen. I know you're not big into biotech, but

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:51.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty much anything involving software, electronics, semiconductors. You were right

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>there in the middle of that throughout the whole UH,

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the whole run, well it was. It was a great

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>time to get engaged in the as as. Wait a second,

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to stop you. What is that watch? Oh?

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>That is a yellow time X. I think it costs

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>eleven dollars by When I first saw it on your wrist,

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I assumed, oh, that's an Apple watch, and then you

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>flipped it over and I'm like, wait a second, an

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Apple watch forty one years ago. Yeah, I traded an

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>addiction to nicotine for an obsessive compulsion for running. Okay,

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and so my default is a running watch, and I

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>have a good watch. I have a couple of decent watches.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>But this is sort of what I put on in

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the morning and take off if I'm going to a

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>fancy dinner party in the evening. And you know what

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>if I if I drop it off the side of

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>a rowboat, can you still replace it? Are they still

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 1>making Yeah? They still. You go into any running store

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and you'll find something like this. Just go for the

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>bottom end. I don't have the bus. Yeah. If I

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 1>want to know how my heart's doing, you know, I

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>just take my pulse. I don't need a two hundred

0:38:55.239 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and fifty dollars five hundred dollar, thousand dollar. Let's see

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what my pulse is. So my pulse, I'm all excited.

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>My pulse is eighty three centing. He are talking. It's

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>been an exciting conversation. If I concentrate, I could get

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 1>it down to the low sixties. But I really have

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to bore the audience and just ll out. But here,

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>let's see what what that just got it down to? Um? No,

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 1>still there you go. So you take your pulse. You

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>literally just count Yeah, all right, but analog, you know, analog.

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's adequate, but truly analog. That's the first digital

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>watch that's truly analysts holding your fingers on your on

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>your wrist, that's an analog readout. So so you you

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>started really full born too. The VC side in the

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>late eighties, was it in my imagination. It's hard today

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was easy then throw a dart. You're gonna

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>find a company that's gonna make money. You know. I'll

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you what's really interesting, because this is now I'm

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna put on my academic hat. There there's been a

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of academic research on venture capital, and I'm a

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>student of it, and I've contributed to it and i

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>teach it. So I'm really I really know this data

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>and I know the analysis of the data. There are

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>two overwhelming what they call statistical stylized facts about the

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>history of venture capital. It's about since nineteen eighty that's

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 1>when we can start to have real data. The first

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is there's incredible skew in the returns, meaning that it's

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a fat head and a long tail, a handful of

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>giant winners. Now are you talking about the companies You're

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about the venture funds. First, I'm talking about the

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>venture funds. If you take all the venture funds that

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>have ever been raised and invested since nineteen eighty, a

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>ridiculously small number of those funds have delivered all of

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the excess return versus the Natstack index. But here's the

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>second fact, and this is distinctive, if not unique, to

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>venture capital. There is what they call the academics called

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:09.720
<v Speaker 1>persistence in the returns. In other words, firm X raises

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for fund one, and the performance of fund one predicts

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the performance of fund too. And let me flesh that

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit. So fun one does well, so

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a institutions throw money at them. They're not wasting a

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of time, energy resources trying to raise money because

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>people want part of that. But more importantly, the deal

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:34.959
<v Speaker 1>flow that they get to look at it. They get

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>first choice everywhere exactly. So that's Kleiner Perkins. Let's go

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>down the list. Well, it evolves over time. It evolves

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:45.919
<v Speaker 1>over time, andres and Horowitz was not on that list,

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 1>didn't um and and firms go through changes. I will

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>give uh. You know in the in the nineties, Benchmark

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was founded and they've generated the twenty year record now

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:04.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, really consistent partners. One well, Sequoia goes way back.

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 1>They've now expanded there were you know, they've really increased

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the scale of the firm and the fund, and they're

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>investing globally, so we'll have to seek and they maintain

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 1>with a somewhat different profile the kind of outstanding results

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they've had for a generation. Firms also go through generational

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>shifts and leadership, but by and large, the point about

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>this is if you're if you're if you're trustee of

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>a pension fund, and the and the consultants come and

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you, you know, you've got to play venture capital.

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Over time, you're gonna add incremental return to the portfolio.

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>The answer is, if you can get into the venture

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>funds that don't need your money, do it the best funds,

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>but don't just have a you know, three percent allocation

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>for a twenty billion dollar fund that has to be

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>invested in venture capital because there's a you know, there's

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>some really good stuff. In economics, there's a concept called

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>adverse selection sure which means if they need your money,

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to give it to them. You don't

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>want to be a member of any club that will

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have you. So by the way that data set, both

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the persistency side and the fat headlong tail side is

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>true for the hedge fund world, it's true for the

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 1>private equity world, and arguably it's true for the world

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of public companies if you're not indexing but buying individual

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>stocks of We used to think a disproportionate amount of

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>returns came from a small number of companies. The most

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>recent data, and I wrote about this some time ago

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:45.479
<v Speaker 1>based on somebody else's study, it's even narrower than we thought.

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a tiny percentage of companies delivering more than half

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of the returns. It's it's amazing. Well go that goes

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:55.400
<v Speaker 1>with this, this institutional change in the market, the rise

0:43:55.520 --> 0:44:00.399
<v Speaker 1>of people managing other people's money, right where if don't

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 1>do at least as well as the index guess what

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>their clients their investors take their money away. And then,

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, when more and more of that institutional money

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is passive index funds, you're, by charter, by contract, you

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>can't be a contrarian. So what it means is, you know, cumulatively,

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you get more momentum investing, more hurting behavior. At the

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 1>same time, we've had this extraordinary phenomenon since two thousand,

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the number of public companies in the United States, as

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's half of what it was thousand is about,

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 1>which is that's kind of kind of hilarious. There was

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful book in the mid nineties by a I

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:44.360
<v Speaker 1>want to say, Cornell professor Robert Frank. I'm sure I

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:47.840
<v Speaker 1>can find it if I just if I just clicked.

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>But it was called The Winner Take All Society, and

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it looks at things like UM athletes and movies and

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>just how you end up with this just unbelievable concentration

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 1>UM yep, Johnson School of Management at Cordell Robert H. Frank. Now,

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>remember the columnist Robert Frank is a different, different person.

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>But we see that across Overville, these alternative investment platforms.

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 1>If you're not in the top let's call a ten,

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're more or less spending a lot of

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 1>money for a very low probability of retire. But now

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that feeds into one of the phenomena that actually got

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:40.000
<v Speaker 1>me back into looking at this whole process, that intersection

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of government and the stock market and the market economy,

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 1>which what I call the three player game and in

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>my in my books and my lectures. It got me

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>going back into it was this amazing phenomenon, the unicorns,

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the unicorn bubble, the Airbnb, the Ubers, the parin nos,

0:45:56.719 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 1>go down the list, the the well what to those?

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Just are Uber? We know is private? Airbnb they haven't

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:08.840
<v Speaker 1>their private, They're still private. Who else is on that list? There? Actually?

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>If you, if you, if you actually were to go

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to Google, huh and type in unicorns tech unicorns just

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 1>unicorns just just straight up well Airbnb, you know they

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>in the in the data. Airbnb is usually counted in

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 1>accommodation and not as a tech company. But it's something

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:30.279
<v Speaker 1>like two hundred and fifty globally. So the first first

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>one that comes up is unicorn, Wikipedia about the um

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the mythological unicorn. With the second one is Fortune list

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:48.919
<v Speaker 1>of uh unicorns and it's Uber, Ziomi, Airbnb, Palantier, Well,

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Snapchat is no longer private, China, Internet plus SpaceX Pinterest.

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's see the full list. This is already a little dated.

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I've seen one that we were i I. It's something

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>over two hundred globally private companies valued at more than

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:13.239
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars. There the tons so that raises a

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>really interesting question, Um, and it goes back to you

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:22.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the DARPA VC funds is barely three billion dollars.

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not a VC funds, but it's a research fund

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>that that sort of looks and it's now much more

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>heavily towards military technology, not the general purpose investing that

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 1>used to be. Exactly, But what do you make of

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the funds? Like soft bank has a hundred billion dollar funds,

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a lot of capital. There are two things.

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>What one is they used a substantial hunk of that

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>money to help buy ARM not exactly a venture investment,

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge ARM holding as a semiconductor it's really it's

0:47:56.200 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it's an intellectual property company that licenses architectures for the

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>devices that dominate the mobile phone business, along with qualcom Um.

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:09.400
<v Speaker 1>But they also they put five hundred million dollars into

0:48:09.880 --> 0:48:15.239
<v Speaker 1>a no revenue start up that is a game proposals

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to deliver a platform for computer games called Remarkably enough,

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the company is called Improbable. I didn't make it up.

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Five hundred million dollars half a billion dollars. Do you

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>have any idea what you can do the kind of

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:36.840
<v Speaker 1>party you can have with half a billion dollars. Well,

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing ten million dollar deals, where you're taking

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>depending whether you're early stage or late stage, whether you're

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>taking ten percent or you could. You know, I would

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>rather roll the dice with fifty companies than one. Exactly,

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the point given given the again that fat headlong tail.

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>To get one of the winners, you have to, you know,

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to. There's a pony in here somewhere, right,

0:49:01.680 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but you gotta. That's why they call it spray and

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.520
<v Speaker 1>pray to A Couple of different things have gone have

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:10.280
<v Speaker 1>gone on pray and prey. So one is the cost

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of launching a startup has dropped like a stone. Two guys,

0:49:14.200 --> 0:49:16.799
<v Speaker 1>a laptop and an internet connection is for someone else.

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Destroy software, open source software, rent your computer cycles and

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 1>your storage from Amazon. You only pay as you use it.

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So getting something out and onto the net cost nothing.

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:30.479
<v Speaker 1>So that the old days of ten or twenty million

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars just to set up a firm, that's right gone.

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:37.279
<v Speaker 1>So lots and lots of startups. But the cost of

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>building a business, the cost of getting to scale, and

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the way these companies are doing it by not by

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>generating cash, by selling services and products to customers, but

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>by issuing securities to investors while they give away free

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to get users. So that's Spotify, and that's

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:01.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. You know, it's Airbnb had a business model

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:05.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty much from the beginning, and Uber lost a billion

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars last quarter in cash now, but they're making it

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>up in volume, so it all wokes out. When I

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>was growing up in the business, my mentor was a

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 1>guy called Fred Adler. Nobody remembers Fred anymore. He was

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 1>first generation investment venture capitalist, a lawyer who knew how

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to turn around companies, and he had a He had

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a motto. It was corporate happiness is positive cash flow. Right.

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:32.239
<v Speaker 1>What it means is if if, if, if, what you're

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 1>getting paid by your customers generates more cash than the

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:38.959
<v Speaker 1>cost to deliver the goods or service. Two things happen.

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:42.279
<v Speaker 1>One you have a validation that what you're doing is

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 1>economically worthwhile, and two you're liberated from dependence on the

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:50.040
<v Speaker 1>capital markets, which are there when they're there, and when

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not there you start. Now, what's weird about this

0:50:53.840 --> 0:50:58.839
<v Speaker 1>unicorn bubble is that it's institutional investors who are used

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to buying liquidity in the market, who are on the

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:07.640
<v Speaker 1>one hand, prepared to accept so much more risk to

0:51:07.719 --> 0:51:10.239
<v Speaker 1>get a return in the zero real risk free rate

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:13.560
<v Speaker 1>environment would you've had for almost ten years, and on

0:51:13.600 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, are paying premium values relative to the

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:21.320
<v Speaker 1>existing public companies, you know, the Googles and the facebooks

0:51:21.360 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to get access for What they say is you know,

0:51:23.600 --> 0:51:27.480
<v Speaker 1>fomo fear of missing out because as you this goes

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to saying that the returns are

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:33.879
<v Speaker 1>so concentrated. But instead of saying, well, I'm gonna put

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, a million bucks into fifty startups and hope

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that two or three or four of them blow out,

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and I write a million, but the five million gets

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 1>me big, big returns. They're writing checks that are fifty

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 1>five million to play that game and and and a

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:54.839
<v Speaker 1>rich valuations. Not they're not early stage in that tree ridge,

0:51:55.120 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and so they're exposed to I mean, the the unicorn bubble,

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like all bubbles, will end. That's the law of bubbles.

0:52:01.400 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Bubbles end um. And you can see two different ways

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it can end. One is that the FED indeed normalizes rates,

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:17.760
<v Speaker 1>which they seem to be in the process of credit

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 1>spreads open up and it becomes possible to get, you know,

0:52:21.800 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 1>a real return of five, six seven percent as an

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:30.279
<v Speaker 1>institution investing in you know, TRIPLEB bonds um which will

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of money shift money within the financial system.

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>The other is that you have you know, a fraud

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:43.360
<v Speaker 1>like thearas. You have the genius, the incredible genius and

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>energy of Elon Musk. Now, let's say, subject to some

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:54.319
<v Speaker 1>closer scrutiny, SpaceX, Boring Company or Tesla or whatever he's

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>cranking them out. And if there's a cumulative drumbeat a

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>companies that promised unbelievable transformational technology to the world failing

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to meet those expectations, that changes you know how you

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 1>know better than I how market psychology, how investors shift

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the frame and the lens through which they're looking at investments.

0:53:20.239 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 1>So so let's let's explore that a little bit because

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:26.360
<v Speaker 1>my pet thesis is there's just so much damn money

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:30.000
<v Speaker 1>slashing around that it's always looking for a home. And

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:33.080
<v Speaker 1>when you say to somebody, hey, tenure, I could get you,

0:53:33.080 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, two point two percent or wherever it will

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be by the time this broadcast. I don't want two percent.

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for a six, seven, ten whatever. So first

0:53:44.960 --> 0:53:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is all this capital the reason a fraud like Tharakhous

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:52.399
<v Speaker 1>could get was it nine million dollars in funding? I'm

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>doing that off the top. I think it was a

0:53:54.120 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 1>bit like it was still huge and you know whatever,

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it was reality distortion fee old. It certainly is the

0:54:01.480 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that there is a huge amount of money around now.

0:54:03.760 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>The two things to say about that. One is the

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>thing about liquidity is the more you needed, the less

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 1>there is liquidity comes there. Remember with the liquidity in

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the buyout market in two thousand and six, Remember that

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 1>buy out of the Texas Utility Company Electric Utility Company?

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:26.359
<v Speaker 1>But was it forty billion dollars? Some ungodly number? And

0:54:27.640 --> 0:54:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in September two thousand and eight you couldn't scrape two

0:54:31.120 --> 0:54:37.040
<v Speaker 1>nickels together. So the perception of it is this sort

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of self validating process. There's so much money around today

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that we can exsume it will always be around until

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:49.520
<v Speaker 1>guess what it's not. That's where I think the real

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 1>challenge for the entrepreneurs and the core investors in these unicorns,

0:54:55.719 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 1>because the process of learning how to generate to pay

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 1>your bills because your customers are giving you more money

0:55:03.400 --> 0:55:07.239
<v Speaker 1>than you're paying out to serve them. That is a

0:55:07.360 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>really hard discipline to learn. And if you're being able

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to raise one billion, two billion, three billion a year,

0:55:14.920 --> 0:55:20.319
<v Speaker 1>giving up almost no control, giving up minimal amounts of ownership,

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:24.840
<v Speaker 1>minimal dilution, boy, that's that's that's the best heroin you

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:27.719
<v Speaker 1>could ever have. So when you look at let's hold

0:55:27.760 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 1>thereinos aside, because clearly it was a fraud, right, I mean,

0:55:30.719 --> 0:55:32.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe it started as a fraud. And if

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you haven't read the book Bad Blood, it was delfe

0:55:34.880 --> 0:55:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I read the newspaper columns in real time. Um, but

0:55:38.160 --> 0:55:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the book reveals stuff about it that the columns did

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:45.480
<v Speaker 1>not like. The board of directors was a did you

0:55:45.520 --> 0:55:48.759
<v Speaker 1>know they had no voting shares that she had, Elizabeth,

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and that you know there were no people from a

0:55:52.160 --> 0:55:56.040
<v Speaker 1>medical device biotech healthcare background on the board, at least

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>at first. With all respect to too great public service

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Henry Kissinger and George Sultz, if you're ever given an

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:07.520
<v Speaker 1>investment opportunity, we have two members of the board who

0:56:07.520 --> 0:56:12.760
<v Speaker 1>are former secretaries of State in their nineties, politely say

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:16.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you and pass on by. There were people have

0:56:16.680 --> 0:56:21.160
<v Speaker 1>accused me of um having hindsight bias in this, but

0:56:21.400 --> 0:56:25.279
<v Speaker 1>there were some fairly obvious red flags, that being one

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:30.719
<v Speaker 1>of them. Nobody, every single VC that specialized in medtech, healthcare,

0:56:31.200 --> 0:56:35.800
<v Speaker 1>biosciences took a hard pass. That's a screaming red flag.

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Talk to any humatologists in the world and they will

0:56:39.880 --> 0:56:41.839
<v Speaker 1>tell you. And I'm not a humatologist, and I don't

0:56:41.840 --> 0:56:43.839
<v Speaker 1>play one on television, but I do know some very

0:56:43.840 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 1>good academic ones. You cannot run the full panel of

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:52.319
<v Speaker 1>bloods that they do when they put that needle in

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:55.520
<v Speaker 1>your take it a full vial of that blood. You

0:56:55.520 --> 0:56:57.720
<v Speaker 1>can't get that out of a drop of capillary blood

0:56:57.719 --> 0:57:02.400
<v Speaker 1>from your face. The process of ricking your finger um

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 1>introduces interstitial tissue and liquids and contaminants, So even if

0:57:08.280 --> 0:57:12.759
<v Speaker 1>you had enough blood, it's contaminated blood. But let's the

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:15.360
<v Speaker 1>what I'm more interested in, and what I think is

0:57:15.440 --> 0:57:21.680
<v Speaker 1>much more significant, is that these digital platforms and marketplaces,

0:57:21.720 --> 0:57:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they are disruptive. They are creating opportunities for commerce on

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a radically different basis. So we're talking about Airbnb and

0:57:30.800 --> 0:57:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Uber and lift and anything that is using the digital,

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:39.480
<v Speaker 1>especially mobile interface that's a giant computer in your pocket

0:57:39.520 --> 0:57:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to turn things into a different um economic value proposition.

0:57:45.360 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a fascinating an It also brings up, however, another

0:57:49.520 --> 0:57:53.480
<v Speaker 1>aspect of where the digital revolution is. I said it

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:55.440
<v Speaker 1>was attacking the authority of the statement. Of course, a

0:57:55.440 --> 0:57:57.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of that's happening at the local level. It's not

0:57:57.800 --> 0:58:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not now talking about grand strategy and or

0:58:01.400 --> 0:58:03.240
<v Speaker 1>or the you know, the future of the planet and

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:07.320
<v Speaker 1>climate change and all that. The problem here, and this

0:58:07.360 --> 0:58:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is a problem for investors, is that too many of

0:58:11.360 --> 0:58:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the genius entrepreneurs who know that they are creating a

0:58:15.440 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>new world have zero interest in understanding how we got

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to this world that they're disrupting. And what that means

0:58:25.480 --> 0:58:28.960
<v Speaker 1>is that again and again and again they pay no

0:58:29.040 --> 0:58:35.560
<v Speaker 1>attention or they dismiss the existing ecosystem, which includes regulatory

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but not just political and state regulations, practices, culture. A

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:45.400
<v Speaker 1>black cab driver in London is not the same thing

0:58:46.000 --> 0:58:49.480
<v Speaker 1>as a cab driver in San Francisco operating a totally

0:58:49.480 --> 0:58:53.600
<v Speaker 1>different environment, meaning that that's highly regulated. They have to

0:58:53.640 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>pass the tests to be a cab driver. They're incredibly knowledgeable,

0:58:57.800 --> 0:59:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and they have a standing in the culture that's just

0:59:00.960 --> 0:59:05.840
<v Speaker 1>different in kind. So what happens when these disruptive which

0:59:05.880 --> 0:59:08.880
<v Speaker 1>which are much more efficient economically, no question about that,

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and much more efficient technologically, but they run into these frictions,

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:18.120
<v Speaker 1>these political and regulatory frictions. It slows things down. Now,

0:59:18.440 --> 0:59:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're promising to change the world and you have

0:59:21.240 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 1>investors investing in you in pursuit of that rate of

0:59:26.280 --> 0:59:30.720
<v Speaker 1>return that comes from a successful revolution, and you get

0:59:30.760 --> 0:59:33.520
<v Speaker 1>delayed by a year or two year, but that it

0:59:33.600 --> 0:59:37.959
<v Speaker 1>just kills the present value of that hope for home

0:59:38.080 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 1>run future. So it feeds back into the investment proposition

0:59:44.400 --> 0:59:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking at today and you're trying to value today.

0:59:47.960 --> 0:59:49.960
<v Speaker 1>So let me let me get more specific, because I

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:52.760
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure I understand that. So you have

0:59:53.200 --> 0:59:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a set of a regulatory environment and a set of

0:59:57.040 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 1>cultural background in a place like London, and that doesn't

1:00:01.800 --> 1:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily make it all that vulnerable to an outfit like Uber,

1:00:07.800 --> 1:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>because their cab drivers are valued members of society who

1:00:13.120 --> 1:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>contribute more than mere transportation. There an active part of

1:00:18.400 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the history and the lore of London. Compare and contrast

1:00:21.240 --> 1:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>with New York City, where I've made the case and

1:00:25.480 --> 1:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a stretch that you had a

1:00:29.160 --> 1:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>artificially created monopoly, the number of medallions kept low, the

1:00:33.640 --> 1:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>serve quality service terrible. Good luck funding cab in the

1:00:37.320 --> 1:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>rain at rush hour. The first moment anything happens, there

1:00:40.640 --> 1:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>are no cabs. I I kind of have gotten the

1:00:44.080 --> 1:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>sense that the New York City Council and the medallion

1:00:48.640 --> 1:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>owners conspired to create to artificially constrained market forces, and

1:00:54.200 --> 1:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>as soon as Uber came along, it exploded because at

1:00:57.640 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a certain point the market will not be denied. Exactly right, Barry,

1:01:01.000 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you're absolutely right. But the point is exactly

1:01:03.880 --> 1:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that you need and it took Uber has an Airbnb

1:01:07.720 --> 1:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>has been doing a better job of understanding that these

1:01:11.520 --> 1:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>each local market that they go into has to be

1:01:14.000 --> 1:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evaluated its own terms, with its own history, and adapt

1:01:17.800 --> 1:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>there too. And not all the regulations A lot of

1:01:20.640 --> 1:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>them are, but not all the regulations are monopolists. Rents seeking.

1:01:24.760 --> 1:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a reason why if you're having people

1:01:27.440 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>stay in your apartment, you want to have a fire

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>extinguisher and something like if your neighbors are living there,

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>they board an apartment, they weren't buying into a hotel.

1:01:38.320 --> 1:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a completely legiti exactly right. So my my point

1:01:41.920 --> 1:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>here is only that, in addition to all the stem

1:01:46.360 --> 1:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>discipline science, technology, engineering, mathematics that we all focus on,

1:01:50.880 --> 1:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is the secret for the future. A little more teaching

1:01:54.400 --> 1:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in history, a little more even reading relevant historical novels,

1:02:00.800 --> 1:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a little learning about the political the evolution of regulations

1:02:06.200 --> 1:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in particular domains, particular regimes. It could be very helpful

1:02:11.080 --> 1:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>for the entrepreneur, or at least their financial investor, who's

1:02:14.440 --> 1:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to give them a strategic sense of where to

1:02:17.480 --> 1:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>bob and where do weave and how to maximize the

1:02:21.320 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>likelihood that their transformational technology will convert into long term

1:02:26.880 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>economic value. So when when you're looking at a possible

1:02:30.440 --> 1:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>investment in a startup and you're looking at the entrepreneurs,

1:02:34.080 --> 1:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>do you find that a lot of these folks are

1:02:36.280 --> 1:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>one dimensional. They have their tech skills, they've come up

1:02:39.680 --> 1:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>with something that seems interesting, but they're lacking a broader

1:02:43.440 --> 1:02:46.439
<v Speaker 1>world view. Well, you know, I'm I'm I'm at more

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>than one remove away from this. I'm not running the

1:02:49.920 --> 1:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>portfolio and I have it for years, um, but I

1:02:53.360 --> 1:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>do stay tuned in. In particular, you mentioned in introducing me, Uh,

1:02:58.720 --> 1:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm Tim o'ry. He's outside director at O'Reilly media,

1:03:02.840 --> 1:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Tim is just which is you Oley Media has and

1:03:06.640 --> 1:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly the throw weight in terms of insight foresight that

1:03:11.760 --> 1:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Tim has demonstrated over a long generation. And by the way,

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>let me just fleck his book with the amusing title

1:03:18.440 --> 1:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>w t F What's the Future? Uh? Is a great

1:03:21.920 --> 1:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>guide to reading the digital revolution as it has unwound,

1:03:27.640 --> 1:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>as it has evolved over the last couple of years,

1:03:30.080 --> 1:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years, um, Tim, Tim has the exactly what

1:03:35.480 --> 1:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about, a deep interest in the history and

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>not just the technical history, but the cultural and political

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>history of that we are transforming. UH. And you know,

1:03:49.680 --> 1:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this is not the first time that there's been a

1:03:52.320 --> 1:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>political backlash from new technology. William Jennings Bryan, the populist

1:03:57.600 --> 1:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>movement at the end of the nineteenth century. Was there

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>sponsor the railroads? How about the Mathusians. Isn't that a

1:04:03.320 --> 1:04:06.919
<v Speaker 1>giant rush back against you know, we'll never be able

1:04:06.920 --> 1:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to feed ourselves, so the there is now a giant

1:04:11.880 --> 1:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>political pushback. You know, big tech is a target. UH.

1:04:15.960 --> 1:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Some of it has been invited by a kind of

1:04:19.440 --> 1:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>arrogance that goes with it. I say, it goes with

1:04:22.120 --> 1:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the territory of being the source, the leader, the manager,

1:04:26.440 --> 1:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the driver of transformational technology into the economy. But it

1:04:33.520 --> 1:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>will be best for everyone if there's a more deeper

1:04:37.040 --> 1:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the world that is being disrupted, not just

1:04:42.240 --> 1:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the forces of disruption. And you know, frankly,

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>let me let me chew that over a sec Better

1:04:49.480 --> 1:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a more complete understanding of the world being

1:04:53.680 --> 1:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>disrupted than just the disruptive forces themselves, right, exactly right,

1:04:59.600 --> 1:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that's and that's what this new edition of my book

1:05:02.840 --> 1:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is really trying to deliver, and to deliver to audiences

1:05:07.080 --> 1:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that include those disruptors. It will be better for our

1:05:11.000 --> 1:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>whole system and will certainly be better for us to

1:05:13.560 --> 1:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>have a you know, a better chance of responding to

1:05:16.680 --> 1:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese challenge, which ain't going away. Um, of course

1:05:21.080 --> 1:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>this comes at a peculiar moment in American history and

1:05:24.560 --> 1:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>American politics, and peculiar to say the least. I mean,

1:05:28.920 --> 1:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that's and and you know how long this persists, how

1:05:32.840 --> 1:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>long we have I've got to I got to share

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>with you because I know you know how to read

1:05:39.600 --> 1:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the net one of the more maybe most frustrating things

1:05:46.000 --> 1:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you can do. Right now, Let's go to Google type

1:05:49.840 --> 1:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in the letters o s t P that stands for

1:05:52.840 --> 1:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Office of Science and Technology Policy, and you'll see white

1:05:58.320 --> 1:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>House dot OSTP dot gov. Right, if you bring that up, well,

1:06:05.120 --> 1:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask you to just let it sit there on

1:06:07.360 --> 1:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the Google screen. White white House dot gov is the

1:06:10.760 --> 1:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>first thing that comes up. Right. Now, look down the

1:06:13.240 --> 1:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>list and you'll find something that says OSTP dot Obama archive.

1:06:18.560 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the third thing. So the second thing is Wikipedia. Okay,

1:06:23.360 --> 1:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Now go and click on the OSTP dot Obama archive, right,

1:06:28.400 --> 1:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>John Holden, Director, and you'll see that that's how it

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what it looked like on January telling me this has

1:06:36.000 --> 1:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>not been updated. No, I'm telling you that this is

1:06:38.640 --> 1:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>frozen because that's the way it was and that's why

1:06:40.600 --> 1:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it's in the Obama archive. But if you go through it,

1:06:43.800 --> 1:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you'll see that there's program after program, people and initiatives

1:06:47.360 --> 1:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and conferences and all that. Now, after looking at that,

1:06:52.080 --> 1:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>now go and look at here's a November one article

1:06:57.800 --> 1:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trumps Science Office is a ghost town. So go

1:07:01.200 --> 1:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and look at OSTP dout gub white House dot OSTP

1:07:04.400 --> 1:07:06.959
<v Speaker 1>dot gov. Al Right, just click the original. Just click

1:07:07.000 --> 1:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the original, uh engagement at it's a one pager. That's

1:07:12.520 --> 1:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that's it, there's no there's no there's no links. There

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>are no links. That's all there is. That's it. So

1:07:18.440 --> 1:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>another word science and technology not not exciting to this group,

1:07:22.520 --> 1:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist. You know, if you look at the list

1:07:26.240 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of unfilled positions. And I'm not sure if if my

1:07:30.360 --> 1:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>original viewpoint on this is correct. I used to think

1:07:33.920 --> 1:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>he was running just for a branding exercise. He made

1:07:37.360 --> 1:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>most of his money, read him Um O'Brien's book, Trump Nation.

1:07:42.560 --> 1:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Most of his wealth came from the t and forward

1:07:47.080 --> 1:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>election where there was a ton of branding opportunities. What

1:07:51.920 --> 1:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>have you. I suspected that he was an interest in winning,

1:07:55.600 --> 1:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that this was just a great gift from the media

1:07:59.280 --> 1:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and pub listening machine. And because most people run have

1:08:03.600 --> 1:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>their list of here's everyone we're gonna put in. The

1:08:05.800 --> 1:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>fact it's a year later and they still have all

1:08:07.920 --> 1:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>these unfilled roles kind of makes me think that he

1:08:11.640 --> 1:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't expecting to win. That said, now that you're there,

1:08:16.200 --> 1:08:18.559
<v Speaker 1>perhaps you may want to fill some of these slots. Well,

1:08:18.600 --> 1:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what's going on at the E p A.

1:08:23.040 --> 1:08:26.519
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, we're recording this in between the

1:08:26.560 --> 1:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>weekend of the G seven events and the right before

1:08:30.120 --> 1:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the summit with North Korea. So if there has subsequently

1:08:34.280 --> 1:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>been a nuclear war, that by the time this broadcast,

1:08:38.280 --> 1:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>neither of us anticipated that correct or or or the

1:08:42.320 --> 1:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>other thing, a complete nu de nuclearization. I don't think

1:08:45.360 --> 1:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>either of us are expected that. I'll tell you I'm

1:08:48.080 --> 1:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not. I'm not born to be. I go

1:08:51.240 --> 1:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>practice as a political prognosticator. You read all about that

1:08:55.400 --> 1:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in so many different places. I have those I respect,

1:08:57.960 --> 1:09:00.519
<v Speaker 1>those I don't respect, But I will this and this.

1:09:00.640 --> 1:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I have some expertise. And if you're going

1:09:03.640 --> 1:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to maintain if a nation is going to maintain leadership

1:09:07.800 --> 1:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in taking science, deriving from it working technology, and converting

1:09:14.080 --> 1:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>that technology into job creating, profit generating real business, then

1:09:22.479 --> 1:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>one player in that game has to be a legitimate, honest,

1:09:27.800 --> 1:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>functioning government. Without there you go, you know, but that

1:09:34.800 --> 1:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>some people legitimately that's the idiotic pushback, I know, And

1:09:38.320 --> 1:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that's why going back into that using winners and losers.

1:09:42.160 --> 1:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, that's what going back into that history

1:09:44.880 --> 1:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Defense Department in DARPA and silicon and software

1:09:48.320 --> 1:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and microprocessors and the Internet. That's why it's so important

1:09:52.760 --> 1:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>going back to the history of how we tied the

1:09:55.800 --> 1:10:00.479
<v Speaker 1>nation together with Transcontinental Railroads by taking nine of the

1:10:00.640 --> 1:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>land area of the lower forty eight states and giving

1:10:04.280 --> 1:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it as a gift to subsidize the building of the

1:10:07.720 --> 1:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Transcontinental Railroads. We built the interstate highway system. We built

1:10:13.040 --> 1:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it under a Republican president. By the way, the legislation

1:10:17.640 --> 1:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>was called the National Defense Transportation Act. It was legitimate

1:10:22.080 --> 1:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>because they designed it so that every bridge was high

1:10:25.720 --> 1:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>enough that a transporter carrying an Atlas first generation intercontinental

1:10:31.400 --> 1:10:35.559
<v Speaker 1>ballistic missile could be driven along the interstate. And that

1:10:35.720 --> 1:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>made the investment in the public transportation network for the country,

1:10:41.439 --> 1:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>made it politically legitimate. And am I misremembering this or

1:10:44.680 --> 1:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is this just the myth? Every fifth mile of the

1:10:47.680 --> 1:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>interstate highway system how to be a straight mile that

1:10:50.560 --> 1:10:53.519
<v Speaker 1>could double as a runway in an emergency. You know,

1:10:53.600 --> 1:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that. As a fact. I liked the concept.

1:10:56.720 --> 1:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>It certainly was. There was a sense there that public

1:11:01.479 --> 1:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>investment for the public good was legitimate, appropriate and what

1:11:06.720 --> 1:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>do you call it? You didn't have to call it socialism,

1:11:08.960 --> 1:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>was just it was for the public good. The multiplier

1:11:11.240 --> 1:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>effect of the interstate highway system is still being effected.

1:11:14.080 --> 1:11:16.599
<v Speaker 1>This felt to this day. All right, so I only

1:11:16.600 --> 1:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>have you for a finite amount of time. Let me

1:11:18.800 --> 1:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>jump to some of my favorite questions that we ask

1:11:22.280 --> 1:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all our guests. Tell us the most important thing we

1:11:25.960 --> 1:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you. Well, let's see, I guess the

1:11:34.880 --> 1:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>most important thing that you probably don't know is that

1:11:38.080 --> 1:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>when I was forty five, I ran a one nineteen

1:11:41.680 --> 1:11:45.639
<v Speaker 1>half marathon in the fifty nine minute ten miler. And

1:11:45.680 --> 1:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>then that was the summer fifty in a ten mile.

1:11:48.720 --> 1:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good. That's under six minutes. Not bad for

1:11:51.439 --> 1:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>at five year old. Oh that's damn good. And ex smoker.

1:11:55.640 --> 1:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And and then I made this fundamental decision because on

1:12:01.360 --> 1:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, I was joining Warburg pain Kiss after

1:12:04.240 --> 1:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been serving out my contract after we sold the

1:12:07.240 --> 1:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Upper stat firm, and I knew that was gonna be

1:12:09.880 --> 1:12:13.599
<v Speaker 1>a full time job. And on the other hand, my

1:12:13.640 --> 1:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>wife was running a consulting business, and I had worked

1:12:16.320 --> 1:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>out that if we really wanted to have a kid,

1:12:18.560 --> 1:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>staying in the same city as her her doctor suggested

1:12:21.720 --> 1:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>was probably a useful enabling friend. And so we were

1:12:26.160 --> 1:12:30.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a kid. And I decided that you could

1:12:30.479 --> 1:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>have a full time job, you could try to be

1:12:32.840 --> 1:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a decent parent, and you could run competitively at the

1:12:37.360 --> 1:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>club level of New York two out of three. That

1:12:42.520 --> 1:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the matter, that's very funny. You

1:12:44.600 --> 1:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned one of your mentors earlier. Tell us repeat their name,

1:12:48.760 --> 1:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>and what other folks influence your perspective? Critical influence on

1:12:53.560 --> 1:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>my perspective, as I say, was Fred Adler. Uh. Fred

1:12:59.160 --> 1:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Fred came from backstreets of Brooklyn, got went went from

1:13:02.840 --> 1:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn College to Harvard Law School, joined actually one of

1:13:07.720 --> 1:13:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the leading Catholic law firms in New York, and discovered

1:13:10.920 --> 1:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>he was a terrific turnaround artist and put together the

1:13:14.439 --> 1:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>financing for the second successful mini computer company, Data General,

1:13:19.720 --> 1:13:22.519
<v Speaker 1>back you know now forty five years ago. He and

1:13:22.560 --> 1:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I connected. We collaborated effectively a lot about that in

1:13:26.040 --> 1:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>my book. Uh. He was a tough guy, and uh,

1:13:30.720 --> 1:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I used to He used to tell me that I

1:13:32.200 --> 1:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>was really good at admitting my mistakes. And I used

1:13:34.800 --> 1:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell him that the only compliment he ever gave

1:13:36.960 --> 1:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>me was he never offered me a job. But then

1:13:40.560 --> 1:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>then in the mid eighties, when I was really engaged

1:13:43.479 --> 1:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in this new swinging world of information technology through through

1:13:48.400 --> 1:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>my my cousin who was out in St. Louis. He'd

1:13:51.040 --> 1:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>been at Monsanto. I met one of the most remarkable

1:13:54.560 --> 1:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>figures in the second half of the twentieth century, Himan Minsky. Oh,

1:13:58.240 --> 1:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, Hi Menski was a Maverick renegade. He'd gotten

1:14:02.120 --> 1:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>his his doctorated at Harvard under the great Joseph Shampeter.

1:14:07.160 --> 1:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>But he he didn't follow. He refused to follow the

1:14:10.760 --> 1:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>new line of efficient markets and stability right, and he

1:14:17.240 --> 1:14:19.519
<v Speaker 1>never put it into math, which made it hard for

1:14:19.600 --> 1:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>him to be expected accepted. But in all of us

1:14:22.960 --> 1:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>by the mainstream economists, who all suffer from a horrible

1:14:27.439 --> 1:14:31.479
<v Speaker 1>sense of physics penis envy, it's it's that I think

1:14:31.479 --> 1:14:35.439
<v Speaker 1>they've over mathsized economics. But I got to know, I

1:14:35.479 --> 1:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>got to know and right right. And he came east.

1:14:39.320 --> 1:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>He wound up at Leon Levy's Institute at Bard College,

1:14:42.960 --> 1:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and I used to go there in the late eighties

1:14:45.320 --> 1:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and sort of play hookey from venture capital. But it

1:14:48.960 --> 1:14:51.439
<v Speaker 1>made me, gave me the chance to think and to

1:14:51.760 --> 1:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>interact with somebody who was deeply engaged in understanding the

1:14:57.439 --> 1:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>dynamics of the financial system. And as you say, how

1:15:01.640 --> 1:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>stability breeds instability, how confidence becomes overconfidence becomes overlending and

1:15:07.560 --> 1:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>leads to a crisis, and that that is going to

1:15:10.160 --> 1:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on the real economy. It's not just

1:15:12.400 --> 1:15:15.799
<v Speaker 1>happening off there on the markets. And that was a huge,

1:15:16.320 --> 1:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>huge benefit of course, going into the world of the

1:15:20.360 --> 1:15:23.639
<v Speaker 1>last fifteen years. It's unfortunate he didn't live long enough

1:15:23.920 --> 1:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to see his his research and his writings all come true.

1:15:28.960 --> 1:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Just just amazing. UM. Any venture capitalists influenced the way

1:15:32.880 --> 1:15:37.559
<v Speaker 1>you look at the world of VC investing, I meaning

1:15:37.640 --> 1:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>back in the day when oh yeah, sure. In addition

1:15:41.000 --> 1:15:44.759
<v Speaker 1>to fred Um, one of the most phenomenally successful venture

1:15:44.800 --> 1:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>capitalists ever was Arthur Rock, who was the early investor

1:15:49.560 --> 1:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>into Intel, if I'm remembering correctly. Intel, he put the

1:15:53.280 --> 1:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>financing together originally for fair Child Semikin, which was the predecessor,

1:15:57.760 --> 1:16:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Which was the predecessor. He was investor in Scientific Data Systems,

1:16:02.680 --> 1:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>which was another one of the the first generation many

1:16:06.280 --> 1:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>computer companies, was brought by Xerox, the first It was

1:16:09.640 --> 1:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the first billion dollar exit in the history of the

1:16:11.960 --> 1:16:15.839
<v Speaker 1>venture capital industry. UM and of course he was along

1:16:15.880 --> 1:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>with the venture arm of the Rockefeller family, he was

1:16:18.720 --> 1:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the original investors in Apple. UM. So I hope you

1:16:23.040 --> 1:16:28.439
<v Speaker 1>still invested. Um that that that's a that's a fascinating run.

1:16:29.200 --> 1:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about books, because you mentioned a few. Um,

1:16:34.320 --> 1:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>this is everybody's favorite question. Tell us your favorite books VC, economics, fiction, nonfiction.

1:16:41.240 --> 1:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. What do you read and what do

1:16:43.080 --> 1:16:45.719
<v Speaker 1>you think other people should read? Well, I I mentioned

1:16:45.760 --> 1:16:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Tim O'Reilly's WTF, WTF what's the future there? They know?

1:16:52.479 --> 1:16:54.519
<v Speaker 1>I've been. I read a lot of history. I read

1:16:54.560 --> 1:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of history. I've been just stumbled on an

1:16:57.720 --> 1:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary book that I should have and existed, and I

1:17:00.760 --> 1:17:02.479
<v Speaker 1>wish I had because I sure would have used it

1:17:02.520 --> 1:17:04.479
<v Speaker 1>in my book and I will be using it in

1:17:04.520 --> 1:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>my economics course at Cambridge. It's called Funding a Revolution.

1:17:09.240 --> 1:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>It was published in at the peak of the Internet

1:17:13.720 --> 1:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>bubble by the National Academies of Sciences. It's a detailed,

1:17:20.120 --> 1:17:26.519
<v Speaker 1>granular report on each program through which the United States

1:17:26.560 --> 1:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>government created the digital revolution. It's you know, it's not

1:17:30.439 --> 1:17:33.400
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. Perhaps I found it riveting because you had

1:17:33.439 --> 1:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the people, the names, the programs, where they came from,

1:17:36.800 --> 1:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>where they went. Um. But then on the other hand, UM,

1:17:41.240 --> 1:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I read the Harvard historian then Beckert wrote a book

1:17:48.640 --> 1:17:54.599
<v Speaker 1>on the cotton industry that the cotton textile industry, which

1:17:55.160 --> 1:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>came out about five years ago or so. It is

1:17:58.200 --> 1:18:04.559
<v Speaker 1>an amazing examination of the first global industry, again, an

1:18:04.600 --> 1:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>industry which critically depended on the power of states two

1:18:12.200 --> 1:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>create the sources, the the the raw cotton coming in,

1:18:17.800 --> 1:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and the dynamism of entrepreneurs and speculative capital. Let me

1:18:23.439 --> 1:18:25.519
<v Speaker 1>ask you about a couple of books, because you you

1:18:25.600 --> 1:18:29.559
<v Speaker 1>made me think about a few. Not Andy Groves, only

1:18:29.600 --> 1:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the paranoids survived, But there was a book on the

1:18:33.120 --> 1:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>history of Intel along with Rock and Fairchild Semi is

1:18:41.240 --> 1:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it inside Intel? Could have been. I think that's the

1:18:44.280 --> 1:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>book that really tracks the history. I thought that was fascinating.

1:18:48.479 --> 1:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you you read that. I don't

1:18:50.400 --> 1:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>know that one. I do know the you know, the

1:18:52.960 --> 1:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Fumbling the Future at Xerox, which tells the story. It's

1:18:57.160 --> 1:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty um, it's pretty tough. And then what about have

1:19:01.360 --> 1:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you read Scott Galloway's The Four Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon?

1:19:06.880 --> 1:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You know? I read. I read a lot of academic

1:19:10.080 --> 1:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>papers and I and that's one of the reasons I

1:19:13.280 --> 1:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>uh teach the course in a way. It forces me

1:19:15.920 --> 1:19:18.479
<v Speaker 1>to stay up with the literature. And you know something

1:19:18.520 --> 1:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we haven't talked about, but this is a message I

1:19:20.600 --> 1:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted to deliver. UM two thousand and eight was a crisis.

1:19:25.800 --> 1:19:28.599
<v Speaker 1>It was shocking, and it almost brought the world economy down.

1:19:28.800 --> 1:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But for economics as a discipline, for finance as a discipline,

1:19:33.760 --> 1:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it was the gift that keeps on giving. It has

1:19:36.400 --> 1:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>shocked those disciplines out of a kind of complacent assumption

1:19:41.680 --> 1:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that the market will always deliver the right answer, reliably

1:19:45.800 --> 1:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and with resilience, and it is generated a body of

1:19:50.280 --> 1:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>growing body, a much more realistic and relevant academic work

1:19:55.479 --> 1:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>based on a shift of focus from pure theory towards

1:19:59.439 --> 1:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>impure goal analysis. Economics gets its own Minsky moment. Yeah,

1:20:04.600 --> 1:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right, quite quite fascinating. Tell us about a

1:20:07.800 --> 1:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>time you failed and what you learned from these ah,

1:20:12.200 --> 1:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>more than one learning by failing? Um, Well, i'll tell

1:20:16.360 --> 1:20:19.799
<v Speaker 1>you the stories in the book. UM. When we were

1:20:19.800 --> 1:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>working how to win, one of the passages towards investing

1:20:24.000 --> 1:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and helping IBM ceased to be a monopoly came through

1:20:28.360 --> 1:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a company that we started. Right around this was when

1:20:34.080 --> 1:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the European Community, the Single Market was created, and we

1:20:38.280 --> 1:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>we we hooked up with a couple of American entrepreneurs

1:20:42.000 --> 1:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>who knew the European computer commercial computing industry really well,

1:20:46.600 --> 1:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and they have perceived it was a kind of a

1:20:48.880 --> 1:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>hole in the market. In the US, you had a

1:20:51.360 --> 1:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>host of new companies, software companies that were delivering tools

1:20:56.280 --> 1:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for making it easier and more efficient and more productive

1:21:00.080 --> 1:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to use a big IBM machine, and that their technology,

1:21:05.439 --> 1:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>their products didn't get to Europe because they were too

1:21:07.680 --> 1:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>small to build a European channel. So the idea was

1:21:12.040 --> 1:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we would get together. We would buy a set of

1:21:15.280 --> 1:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>service companies that provided people to the IBM data centers

1:21:20.640 --> 1:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and spread across all of industrial Europe, just the way

1:21:24.080 --> 1:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it was in the US, and then we would bring

1:21:27.240 --> 1:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>into them products that we licensed from those American companies,

1:21:31.960 --> 1:21:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and that way we would build a pen European business.

1:21:36.080 --> 1:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>It was called easy soft Um. There were three entirely separate,

1:21:42.240 --> 1:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>independent reasons why this was a really bad idea. The

1:21:47.760 --> 1:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>first was between doing a project as a service company

1:21:53.360 --> 1:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and walking away and selling a product that you are

1:21:57.240 --> 1:22:00.479
<v Speaker 1>responsible for and you have to support is talk and

1:22:00.680 --> 1:22:05.559
<v Speaker 1>cheese and very different, totally different. Second, those companies in

1:22:05.600 --> 1:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the US, there were three things that could happen to them.

1:22:07.800 --> 1:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>The people we were licensing product from one. They could

1:22:11.240 --> 1:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>grow up and succeed and get big and want to

1:22:13.320 --> 1:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>take their products back too. They could fail completely and

1:22:18.720 --> 1:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>we were well and but we were stuck supporting the

1:22:20.960 --> 1:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>product without the tech the techies who had built it,

1:22:24.120 --> 1:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>or three halfway in between. They could be bought by

1:22:27.680 --> 1:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Computer Associates, a really big, ugly company at that time,

1:22:31.400 --> 1:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and that was the worst of all. And one of each,

1:22:33.200 --> 1:22:36.759
<v Speaker 1>at least one of each happened. And then the final

1:22:36.800 --> 1:22:40.799
<v Speaker 1>reason was it turned out that the IBM data center

1:22:41.439 --> 1:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>was no longer a rich, vibrant, growing market. It was stagnating,

1:22:46.200 --> 1:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it was declining. That lesson was worth all the money

1:22:50.240 --> 1:22:53.839
<v Speaker 1>we wrote off in easy Soft because it said, now's

1:22:53.880 --> 1:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the time, Now we can go at IBM. What sort

1:22:58.240 --> 1:23:00.599
<v Speaker 1>of advice would you give to a millennial or someone

1:23:00.680 --> 1:23:07.599
<v Speaker 1>just beginning their career who is thinking about technology, venture capital, etcetera. Well,

1:23:07.640 --> 1:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a way I've already given it. Um.

1:23:10.080 --> 1:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, half of all the male undergraduates at Stanford

1:23:14.880 --> 1:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>are taking computer science, I think more than that of

1:23:17.640 --> 1:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the m I t. You don't have to tell him

1:23:19.280 --> 1:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to take computer science. What I would say is, along

1:23:23.080 --> 1:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>with your computer science, along with your double a read history,

1:23:28.760 --> 1:23:33.439
<v Speaker 1>read the history of economics, but also politics, broadened their

1:23:33.439 --> 1:23:36.559
<v Speaker 1>outlook for in your outlook and look for you know,

1:23:36.640 --> 1:23:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the great novels. I'll tell you if more people had

1:23:39.439 --> 1:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>read Trollops the Way we Live now, which is about

1:23:42.880 --> 1:23:47.839
<v Speaker 1>a fraud ster operating in the context of technology financial

1:23:47.880 --> 1:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>speculation about technology a hundred and fifty years ago, you know,

1:23:51.800 --> 1:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>we might not have had Fewer people would have followed

1:23:54.680 --> 1:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Bernie made off right right, And and our final question,

1:24:00.760 --> 1:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>what do you know about the world's of venture investing

1:24:03.360 --> 1:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>today that you wish you knew thirty or forty years

1:24:06.240 --> 1:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>ago when you first started exploring this space? Well, I

1:24:09.920 --> 1:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>guess when I first started, I didn't perhaps have enough

1:24:15.640 --> 1:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>appreciation that the terms of the relationship with the entrepreneur

1:24:21.400 --> 1:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>matters so so much. And one of the things I

1:24:24.960 --> 1:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>worry about now. You know, you can see that there's

1:24:28.760 --> 1:24:30.759
<v Speaker 1>been this sort of shift in the terms of trade.

1:24:30.920 --> 1:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>They used to say the golden rule is he who

1:24:32.840 --> 1:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>has the gold rules makes the rule. Right, Yeah, but

1:24:35.280 --> 1:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case when you're talking about the founders.

1:24:38.120 --> 1:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether it's Elizabeth Holmes, the voting share, there's

1:24:44.400 --> 1:24:46.519
<v Speaker 1>some there can be you know, you can see that

1:24:46.600 --> 1:24:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a Google and a Facebook with all that's going on

1:24:49.120 --> 1:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in Facebook, because they're exempt from real governance by stockholders

1:24:55.800 --> 1:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>because of the ownership stake of the controlling stock by

1:25:00.680 --> 1:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook or with Page and Bryan at Google, right they

1:25:06.080 --> 1:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>can they can't afford to make upstream investments in science

1:25:09.920 --> 1:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that other companies are not able to. They're supposed to

1:25:14.120 --> 1:25:16.559
<v Speaker 1>take their cash, any extra cash they have, and use

1:25:16.640 --> 1:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it to buy backstock. So I think that there's a

1:25:21.320 --> 1:25:27.519
<v Speaker 1>challenge here because by and large, I actually do think

1:25:27.600 --> 1:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that Serge Brand and Larry Page have done a pretty

1:25:29.840 --> 1:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>damn good job, certainly of building a great company and

1:25:33.040 --> 1:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of exploring where they can invest this cash flow for

1:25:37.000 --> 1:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the future. They've been brilliant acquirers of relevant technology. Look

1:25:41.840 --> 1:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>at YouTube Spectacular or or for that matter, all of

1:25:45.720 --> 1:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the all of the mobile technology Android another home run

1:25:50.080 --> 1:25:54.599
<v Speaker 1>Maps was brought unbelievable. The person behind Google Maps actually

1:25:54.640 --> 1:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just has a book coming out, Yeah, Never Lost Again

1:25:58.040 --> 1:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>or something along those Just Win. So, you know, but

1:26:00.960 --> 1:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is something I had to learn

1:26:03.920 --> 1:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>by doing learn the hard way in the job. We

1:26:09.040 --> 1:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have been speaking with Bill Janeway. The Innovation Economy New

1:26:13.280 --> 1:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>edition is out with a whole digital um. Addition, if

1:26:18.080 --> 1:26:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this conversation, we'll be sure and look up

1:26:20.880 --> 1:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>an inch or down an inch on Apple iTunes, Bloomberg

1:26:24.680 --> 1:26:29.479
<v Speaker 1>dot com, Stitcher, overcast, wherever finer podcasts are sold, and

1:26:29.520 --> 1:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you could see any of the other two hundred or

1:26:31.800 --> 1:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>so such conversations that we've had previously. We love your comments, feedback,

1:26:37.439 --> 1:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>end suggestions right to us at m IB podcast at

1:26:41.400 --> 1:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot net. Check out my daily column on Bloomberg

1:26:44.960 --> 1:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Follow me on Twitter at rid Holtz. I

1:26:47.600 --> 1:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>would be remiss if I did not thank the crack

1:26:49.960 --> 1:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>staff that helps put together these podcasts each week. Taylor

1:26:53.960 --> 1:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Riggs is our booker slash producer. Medina Parwana is my

1:26:58.040 --> 1:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>audio engineer. Michael ad Nick is our head of research.

1:27:02.320 --> 1:27:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Retolts. You've been listening to Master's in Business

1:27:06.280 --> 1:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.