WEBVTT - Carnival CEO Sees Records and Strong Demand

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Wait inside from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business, finance and

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week Podcast with Carol Messer

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Hey, we want to get to one company, definitely on

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 2>our radar. We're talking about Carnival. Shares were down as

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 2>much as six and a half percent, the most intra

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>day since early August. The cruise line operator forecasted adjusted

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 2>EBIT up for the fourth quarter of about one point

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 2>fourteen billion, slightly below consensus estimates of one point fifteen billion.

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Earning support also reflected a weaker outlook for netfields in

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the current quarter, although I will say analysts seem pretty

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>upbeat about the outlook for this company, and I should

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>say shares of Carnival right now, Tim just down about

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 2>one point two percent.

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:58.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, great to be back with us.

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Josh Weinstein, President CEO, Chief Climate Officer of Carnival Corporation

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 4>with us from Carnival HQ down in Miami. Josh, good

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 4>to have you with us this afternoon. I want to

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 4>talk about the bottom line. Eighth quarter of bottom line

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 4>beats for you all, investors, still focusing on that slightly

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 4>blow consensus outlook for adjusted IBAD stock not as down,

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 4>not down as much now as it was earlier in

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 4>the day. As Carol just mentioned, tell us about the

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 4>quarter that was and perhaps most importantly, the outlook.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 3>What are you seeing?

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, hi, thanks for thanks for having me. I don't

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 5>usually follow the fit chairman. This is a big this

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 5>is a big thrill home to go check out Jack White,

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 5>White and Nashville.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for your patience. We so appreciate it.

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 6>That always interesting.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, we'll talk about the third quarter first, and as

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 5>I've been able to say for the last several quarters,

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 5>it's record you know, we just hit a record for revenues,

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 5>for revenue, yields, for operating income, customer deposits, bookings two

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 5>years out, so right up and down our business. It's

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 5>it's records and strong demand. So we ended the third

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 5>quarter up about eight point seven percent in our yield

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 5>year over year, which was strong. And the same time,

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 5>we held our cost flat, which was which is also

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 5>good to note, and that resulted in, like I said,

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 5>a record quarter. And as we were able to adjust

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 5>our full year guidance. We did that for the third

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 5>time this year, and it's going to take us up

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 5>to about six billion dollars of EBITDA, which again, to

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 5>use a broken record word, it's a record, and so

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 5>we're expecting much more as we get into the fourth

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 5>quarter and then beyond.

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 6>You know, Ja.

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Powell Fed chair obviously that you just listened to. I

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 2>am curious, Josh if in terms of macro, what matters

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>in terms of FED policy for you and what's going

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 2>on in terms of the interest rate environment. He did

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 2>also talk about the savings rate, suggesting consumers can continue spending,

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 2>which we want to get into too in terms of

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 2>it seems like consumers are certainly still spending on cruises.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 2>But give us macro, give us consumer spending. How you

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 2>would describe it all?

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 5>Well, for us, the word's going to be robust, you know.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we've been living through this cycle with everybody else.

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 5>We've lived through the high inflation, We've lived in the

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 5>high interest rate environment, and now we see inflation down,

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 5>we see the FED taking action to start reducing that

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 5>interest rate environment. And through all of it, what we've

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 5>been seeing is robust demand, and because of our business.

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, first of all, it's a global business. As

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, we have a portfolio of brands that are

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 5>really world class all over the all over the world.

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 5>And what we see is strong demand depending no matter

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 5>how you slice it, whether it's geographic, whether it's contemporary

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 5>versus more premium. We're seeing that strength and we see

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 5>it in the results. We see it in the on

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 5>board spending levels. You know, as part of our third

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.839
<v Speaker 5>quarter results. It's not just about the ticket revenue which

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 5>was taken anywhere from you know, six months to up

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 5>to two years in advance, but what's the actual on

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 5>board spending environment, which is much more real time.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 6>And the fact is our onboard spending.

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 5>For this past quarter was up over six percent year

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 5>over year, and that's actually an acceleration because in the

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 5>second quarter it was up closer to four percent year

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 5>over year.

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 6>So what we're.

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 5>Seeing is is consumers that are healthy, that still want

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 5>to spend on experiences.

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 6>And as you've probably heard me say before, we.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Are an unparalleled value, right, we are a better value

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 5>to land. I remember being in the offices with you

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 5>in December talking about my hotel stay. Not only are

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 5>we unparalleled in the value. We are unparalleled in the

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 5>experience that we give to people. You get value for

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 5>what you pay for, and we deliver on that guest

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 5>experience like nobody else.

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.679
<v Speaker 4>So, Josh, are you seeing any weakness across any part

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 4>of the portfolio of brands right now from any segment.

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Of the consumer?

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 5>Now, we're really not no pullback whatsoever now, you know.

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean, as a matter of fact, if you look

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 5>at our twenty twenty five booked position, it's higher in

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 5>price and occupancy than it's ever been at the same

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 5>point in time. When you look at twenty twenty five,

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 5>we're higher in every single quarter price and occupancy. So

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 5>things are moving in continuing to move in the right direction.

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 6>And I think it's I think you know, cruise is

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 6>cruises tiny.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 5>Right at the end of the day, we're the biggest

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 5>cruise company in the world, but if you take the

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 5>whole cruise industry, it's only about two percent of the

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 5>overall vacation market.

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 6>So we are a.

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 5>Very tiny segment in a huge market with a lot

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 5>of room to grow. Because we're getting the word out,

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 5>we are being more effective in communicating the value and

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 5>communicating the experience and really differentiating our brands so that

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 5>they get a cut through and it means something to people,

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 5>and that's paying dividends.

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about the cost side of the equation,

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>as you just said, and I read too that nearly

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 2>half of twenty twenty five bookings are done at record

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 2>ticket prices. The cost equation. You guys are a floating

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>city once you're at on the water, are food you know,

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 2>meals labor. Tell us what you're seeing in terms of

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the cost side of the equation.

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 5>Josh, yeah, So it's good news there too. You know,

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 5>we are seeing that deacceleration of deceleration part of me

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 5>of inflation, and we're actually just today able to take

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 5>our cost guidance for the full year down from up

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 5>four and a half percent on a unit basis to

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 5>up three and a half percent on a unit basis,

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 5>So we're making good progress there. We are seeing the

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 5>benefit of a lot of hundreds and hundreds of activities

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 5>that we're doing across our brands, taking little bits of efficiency,

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 5>better sourcing savings when we can, and it adds up

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 5>given our scale, So all things are starting to move

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 5>in the right direction on the cost side, which is

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 5>very different, obviously than what we've been experiencing along with

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 5>everybody else as we went through that inflationary cycle.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of the inflationary cycle, I'm wondering about the pricing

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 4>power from your perspective. If you're going to be able

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 4>to continue to raise prices in your view next year

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 4>and year after year.

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 5>You know, that's certainly the goal. You know, at the

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 5>beginning of this year, when we were talking about our

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 5>guidance for the first time, there were a lot of

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 5>folks that were saying, oh, yeah, but you know, when

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 5>you get to the fourth quarter of twenty twenty four.

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 5>You took your pricing up in twenty twenty three ten

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 5>and a half percent. That was our results last fourth quarter.

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 5>You're not going to be able to top that. And

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 5>we just came out with guidance today for the fourth

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 5>quarter where our yields are going to be up five percent,

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 5>the majority of which is more price. So we feel

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 5>very good about what we're doing in our ability to

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 5>manage the booking curve, increase our demand profile, and ultimately

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 5>deliver on board as we always do.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 2>What keeps you up at night, barring another global pandemic, No,

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>but seriously, you've been rosy for a while, and I'm

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 2>just curious. It does sound like some really strong metrics,

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 2>And I said, reading some of the analysts commentary, they

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>feel the same way. But I'm just curious, what's the

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>difficult part of what you guys do. I mean, you're

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 2>ordering new ships, you're adding to that. Tell us, Josh, like,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 2>where is it that you get concerns? Is it the

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 2>election outcome? I'm just curious.

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 6>No, I think those types of things are temporal.

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 5>And you know, I mean, truthfully, after living through what

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 5>we lived through in twenty twenty and twenty twenty one

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 5>and getting getting back from literally a pause to where

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 5>we are today, there's really not much that that keeps

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 5>me up at night. Truthfully, that's within our control. I mean,

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the day, you know, in a

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 5>two year period we went from negative ibadata up over

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 5>six billion in EVA da Son. I don't see much

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 5>within our control that we can't we can't push forward,

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 5>and you know that's showing. I mean, just just in

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 5>this year alone, we came out with guidance in December

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 5>for the first time and we said our yields will

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 5>be up about eight and a half percent. Now we're

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 5>saying up close to ten and a half percent. We

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 5>said costs would be up four and a half percent,

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 5>now they're going to be up three and a half percent.

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 5>We said our return on investing capital will be up

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 5>nine percent, and now we're saying, no, it's ten and

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 5>a half percent, which is a five improvement year over year.

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 5>So I think we're making real good decisions. We've got

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 5>an amazing team all over the world with all of

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 5>our world class brands really driving the business forward, and

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, I just think we're just starting to scratch

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 5>that potential. We are really focused on just doing the

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 5>basics better and better, and it's working.

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Josh, you're also chief Climate Officer at Carnival Corporation.

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned things that we're in your control. One thing

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 4>that's not in your control is the weather. Is the climate.

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 4>The connection between weather and climate. The two are not

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 4>the same, but the two are certainly linked. Many Americans,

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 4>millions of Americans are still cleaning up after Helene in

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 4>multiple states. It's killed more than one hundred people. Many

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 4>are still missing at this point. How do you think

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 4>about climate change in your role? How do you think

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 4>about planning for an uncertain future.

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, first of all, our heart, our sympathy goes out

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 5>to all those impacted by Helene. I mean, it is

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 5>a tragedy unfolding, and we have a lot of connections

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 5>to a lot of those local communities.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 6>So that's first and foremost.

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 5>As far as the bigger picture goes, you know, we

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 5>understand that the world is evolving rapidly. We need to

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 5>do our part, and we need to plan for the future.

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 5>And when it comes to doing our part, we are

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 5>we are steadfast in our in our in our drive

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 5>to reduce our own carbon footprint and do what we

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 5>can to make the world.

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 6>A better place.

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 5>We have We are thirty five percent bigger today than

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 5>we were in twenty eleven, and we admit this year

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 5>we will emit ten percent less absolute greenhouse gas emissions

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 5>than we did in twenty eleven. Even though we are

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 5>thirty five percent bigger today, it's because we understand the

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 5>importance of doing what we can to drive that sustainability agenda.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 5>And as far as preparing for the future, that goes

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 5>into all of our decision making. You know, when we're

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 5>talking about the ships that we're building, when we're talking

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 5>about the destinations that we develop, how can we develop

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 5>them in a way that they can deal with whatever

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 5>that environmental landscape is not five years from now, but

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 5>twenty years from now, in thirty years from now, And

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 5>keep leaning into technology, keep doing our part to figure

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 5>out how we can we can we can reduce our

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 5>consumption every single year.

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 6>That's the goal.

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>And I'm assuming that's incorporated to when you guys build out,

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 2>whether it was Grand Turk or I'm thinking about Celebration

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Key right that opens up in summer of twenty twenty five.

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Just the revenue and cost impact of that debut tell

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 2>us attle bit about the dynamics around that one.

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it is going to be It is going to

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 5>be pretty special, you know, twenty twenty five. We open

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 5>up in July of twenty twenty five, and then we atause.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 5>You go through a ramp up phase as we as

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 5>we learn and we figure out what works, what doesn't work,

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 5>and how we tweak and it really is going to

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 5>bear fruit in a significant way in twenty twenty six

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 5>when we have nineteen Carnival Cruise Line ships that are

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 5>going to be a reaching celebration key from I think

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 5>about ten different homeports in the Night States, so not

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 5>only is that going to be a boost to our

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 5>ticket revenue, is going to be a boost to the

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 5>spending and the destination.

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 6>And then to the point we were just talking about,

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 6>you know.

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 5>The proximity to the United States is phenomenal from a

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 5>fuel spend and carbon emission standpoint. Because it's so close,

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 5>we can go slower and shorter distances to get there.

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 5>So we are very much looking forward to its introduction.

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, great stuff. As always, you're a gem for

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 2>being so patient, So appreciate it, Josh, look forward to

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 2>next time. Josh Weinstein. He's the president, CEO, and chief

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Climate Officer of Carnival Corporation, joining us from Carnival's headquarters

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 2>in Miami.

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay, well from a Carnival too, well Harvard, because right

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 4>now we got a conversation about Harvard's endowment. It's a

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 4>kind of in house hedge fund. It's been long revered, envied,

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 4>and at fifty point seven billion dollars that's as of

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 4>June of last year, it remains the biggest and higher ed,

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 4>but it may not be for long. A big reason

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 4>why carol It's money managers have under performed and lost

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 4>its investing.

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Edge all right, so let's get to this Bloomberg exclusive.

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>It also is today's Bloomberg Big Take. It's among the

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 2>most read on the Bloomberg terminal as we speak. Let's

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 2>get into it. Bloomberg News Higher education finance reporter Janet Louren.

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 2>She is with us in studio. Jenet, great story. First

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 2>step though, the Harvard Endowment. It's place among university endowments historically.

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 2>Let's just set the scene. I mean, this has been

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>a big one, an iconic one.

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 7>Yes, it's definitely an iconic one. It's still the largest

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 7>college fund in America and it will be probably for

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 7>a bit. It was built up with donations that started

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 7>at the founding of Harvard, and it goes back to

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 7>sixteen thirty six. You think of the principle of compounding interests.

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 7>You know, they've had these gifts for hundreds of years.

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 7>They've you know, accumulated and grown. And in nineteen seventy four,

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 7>Harvard decided to create a separate management company called the

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 7>Harvard Management Company or HMC, that runs the endowment. They're

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 7>in the Boston fed it's actually a few isles from campus.

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 7>And really when they started thinking about how should we

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 7>invest our money. It traditionally had always been stocks and bonds,

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 7>and they really weren't the envy of the world at all.

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 7>They were just sort of kind of playing vanilla. And

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 7>later a guy by the name of Jack Meyer decided,

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, we had this very long term horizon, we

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 7>could invest in things that are a little bit more

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 7>risky and a liquid and they built up a staff.

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 7>He hired the best managers. They had outstanding performance, and

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 7>they paid them for this outstanding performance. In some years,

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 7>you know, managers were paid twenty five million dollars because

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, they were beating everybody. Yeah, and then there

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 7>were some complaints that this is unseemly for a nonprofit university,

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 7>and the class of sixty nine famously complained, and Jack

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 7>Meyer ended up leaving a lot of people left. They

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 7>created their own spinoffs, and it really hasn't been the

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 7>same since then.

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 4>We can't talk about Ivy League endowments without talking about

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Yale's endowment and the legendary David Swinson, who died back

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty one. Talk a little bit about the

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 4>differences between the Yale Endowment and the Harvard Endowment and

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 4>why you illustrate that in the piece.

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 7>So Harvard hired their own staff and the more than

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 7>two hundred traders worked there, and they did amazing. They

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 7>were amazing investors. And Yale, David Swinson came around in

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 7>eighty six. Jack came in nineteen ninety, and David Swinson

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 7>had it at a different model. They didn't have hundreds

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 7>of employees. They had a small number of employees, but

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 7>they farmed their money out to outside managers and they

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 7>were paying those fees you've heard the famous two and twenty,

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 7>but they weren't paying them to their staff. And they

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 7>built these long relationships with outside investment firms and they

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 7>seeded some of them. And as you know, private equity

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 7>takes a long time to make money. Not going to

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 7>put money in a fund and expect a huge return

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 7>next year. There's this thing called the Jay curve where

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 7>you're not going to be making money for years and years.

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 7>And then you know LinkedIn. Yale had this famous LinkedIn

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 7>investment where they put in eight million dollars and they

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 7>earned like eighty four million dollars. But it takes time.

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 7>And while Yale was doing their thing, Harvard was doing

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 7>their thing. And Harvard changed their model and now in

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 7>some ways, they've adopted what Yale and Princeton and MIT

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 7>have has did for years and years and years before,

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 7>and they're kind of playing catch up. And now they've

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 7>increased their allocation to private equity. It was sixteen percent

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 7>around twenty seventeen. Today in the most recent report thirty

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 7>nine percent. We know it's not a great time to

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 7>be expecting returns from private equity, right, So and at

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 7>the same time, Harvard decreased their allocation to us you know,

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 7>to public equities.

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 2>So just got that forty five seconds left here. So,

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is it a case of because you contrast

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 2>what happened at Yale that David Swenson was there for

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 2>such a long time, Harvard had a lot of different

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 2>managers popping in and out. I mean, what's our net

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 2>takeaway or like what happens next?

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 8>Now?

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, what are you watching for?

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 7>We're waiting for their returns when they come out in

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 7>a few weeks and we'll see. I mean, they're very

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 7>dependent on the endowment. About thirty seven percent of their

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 7>budget comes from the endowment, and we're expecting, you know,

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 7>potentially lower fundraising this year.

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's pretty fascinating. I feel like all of the

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 2>financial The finance is really of universities right now on

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 2>everybody's radar in a big way. We'd even get into

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 2>the role of politics because.

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 3>How much a cost to go there factor? Yeah, well, that's.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 2>That's what kind of blows my mind when it's almost

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 2>forty percent of the endowment is for the budget, and

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 2>yet we know costs in terms of tuition keep going

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 2>up and up and up. So it's just, you know,

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 2>the math on all of this is kind of mind blowing.

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 2>Jet Lauren Killer story again, higher education financial reporter at

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News. As we said, it's the Bloomberg Big Take.

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>It's among our most read on the Bloomberg terminal on

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 2>this Monday. It's also a Bloomberg exclusive.

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, card Play and and Brout Auto with a

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business act or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 3>How think you can say this every day?

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Lots going on in the world today, Yeah, just a

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 4>little bit. I think it's fair to say SoftBank's Vision

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Fund planning to invest five hundred million dollars in open Ai.

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 4>This is part of a larger funding round. This is

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 4>according to the information citing a person familiar with the deal,

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 4>that's part of a rays of six point five billion dollars.

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 4>It would value open Ai at one hundred and fifty

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars of Bloomberg previously reported. Also, California Governor Gavin

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 4>Newsom has vetoed what would have become one of the

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 4>most comprehensive policies governing the safety of AI in the US.

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 4>For all Things AI and technology, we turned to Max chafter.

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 2>His name Max Aichapter.

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 4>He is really he knows it all. He's Bloomberg Business

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 4>Week columnist. He's also contributed to the Elinink podcast. He's

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 4>the author of the contrarian Peter Teel and Silicon Valley's

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 4>Pursuit of Power. He's here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.239
<v Speaker 4>I'll go back to Carol's comment on our planning call

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 4>a little earlier today, when Paul said, our producer, Paul

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 4>said six point five billion dollars.

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 3>She said, what six point five billion dollars.

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 4>We're not talking about evaluation, We're talking about actual cash

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 4>that they're going to be using.

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 8>That's the money that they are trying to raise, and

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 8>they need it. And that is what is so interesting

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 8>about both about this business and about the field in general.

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 8>It's this is in a situation where open a I

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 8>mean part of the situations investors really want wanted in

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 8>on this company. But this is a company that's burning

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 8>huge amounts of cash to run CHATCHYPT and to and

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 8>to create the models that they are you know that

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 8>that will be in their mind, the next generation model.

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 8>So the company really needs money and and quickly. Frankly,

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 8>because because these the servers and the chips that these

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 8>things run on are so expensive and use so much

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 8>power to run.

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm laughing because I use chat GPT for the dumbest,

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 4>dumbest things. Last night I was like, uh Chat, I

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 4>opened chat CHIPTM like uh marinad for chicken breast, literally

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 4>something I can google. But I'm like, you know what,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna do it on chat gipt and I'm gonna

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 4>cost them money.

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 8>Well, and we don't know the exact numbers, I don't

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 8>off the top of my head, but but it's definitely

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 8>a much more expensive search on chat gipt than it

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 8>is on Google. So like that, you know, the decision

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 8>to do that is you know, if and if you're

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 8>doing it regularly, like you are probably not a money

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 8>maker for for open Ai. And there are many, many,

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 8>many people in this position now. The company, the plan

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 8>is basically twofold find ways to do what they're doing

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 8>cheaper and get people to pay more. So right now

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 8>Chat Gipt costs like twenty dollars a month for their

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 8>you know, paid membership. I think the plan is to

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 8>slowly get the price up because.

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 6>They need to.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 8>Frankly, and the same thing is gonna happen with a

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 8>lot of these generative AI tools. You're gonna see price

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 8>increases in the coming years because you know, with the

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 8>current price of energy and the current price of GPUs

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 8>the chips that are used to train and run these models,

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 8>it cannot be done profitably at the current Well that's what.

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 2>As I'm listening, like, so is there a business model

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 2>that works going forward?

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 6>You know?

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 8>I think if you ask the people who are investing

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 8>in this, Masa's son Masi Yoshi Sun or Thrive Capital,

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 8>which is another one of the companies that is a

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 8>rumor to be in on this deal. Also, people talking

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 8>about Microsoft and video. The people who believe in open

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 8>AI and in this field think that you're going to

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 8>get cheaper models, you're going to get cheaper chips, and

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 8>you're going to get so much demand. This is gonna

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 8>be such a crucial part of business, right that people

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 8>are going to pay for it. And I think that

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 8>the jury is out on that to some extent. It's

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 8>it's not clear that you're going to want to pay

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.239
<v Speaker 8>you know, like ten twenty thirty forty dollars more a

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 8>month for like Microsoft Word if it has generative IAI

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 8>features than you are now. But that is like the

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 8>bull case is that it's so valuable that that's what

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 8>people are doing.

0:21:58.400 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Is it so valuable?

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Those like is it so valuable? Like do we yet

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 2>know the payoff?

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 7>No?

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 8>The barecase against all of these things is number one,

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 8>it's not clear outside of like writing spam emails, doing

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 8>kind of marketing, maybe like certain kinds of very quick

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 8>news story like a handful of areas where baking PowerPoint

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 8>presentations of like a handful of areas where it's clearly helpful,

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 8>but beyond that, it's not clear that it's super helpful

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 8>or super useful, and it's also not clear that these

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 8>AI companies have enough differentiation because there are lots of competitors.

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 8>Opening I can't just raise its prices, it can't just

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 8>double its prices. Because you have Facebook essentially giving away

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 8>it's its algorithms. You have a bunch of different players

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 8>all offering very very similar products.

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Help us understand Microsoft's relationship with open ai because they're

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 4>the company's largest investor, but they're also working on their

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 4>own products that could be competitors to what open ai

0:22:58.840 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 4>is doing.

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think Microsoft has a very big interest

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 8>in open ai both as as the biggest investor. You know,

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 8>they have a big equity stake. They've also put a

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 8>ton of money into this company already, you know, more

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 8>than ten billion dollars and you know, if this round closes,

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 8>probably more than that. But you know, Microsoft obviously this

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 8>is it's they need to hedge their betch. They think

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.719
<v Speaker 8>this is an important field. They also have like a

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 8>gigantic AI research arm already, so it's not like they're

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 8>gonna sit still, but they are very much, you know,

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 8>working closely with open ai like this is probably the

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 8>most important part of their AI strategy.

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 4>Is the AI are the AI tools that you get

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 4>within Microsoft's suite of products are those built by open

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 4>ai or powered by open ai, or those separate completely.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 8>You have to look at exactly what Microsoft says, because

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 8>they've at times have made it sort of hard to tell.

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 8>My sense is that they are mostly offering products that

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 8>are powered by open Ai and the importantly, they are

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 8>also reselling open AI's technology to companies. Now that for

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 8>a while seemed like a big important differentiator that Microsoft

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 8>ha but now open ai is also, as I believe

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 8>we and others have reported, they are also selling their

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 8>sort of like corporate offering directly. So there is a

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 8>sense that there's some competition. But again, these companies are

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 8>their their fortunes are very closely tied together. I don't

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 8>think they both need each other. It's not like they're

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 8>going to turn into like cut through competitors overnight.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Max Any chance that this is just a bust when

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden done as we continue to figure out,

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I understand the uses of generative AI, but

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I just wonder we focus so much on this one company,

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm just curious what you're hearing with in

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 2>the industry.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 8>Yes, it definitely could be a bust. You're you're seeing

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 8>people on Wall Street, including some sophisticated people. Uh, start

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 8>to start to point out like some of the issues

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 8>that I'm bringing up, which is that you know, the

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 8>economics just aren't there yet. Also, you know, anytime you're

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 8>in a competitive situation in a hot market with a

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 8>lot of smart players, like it isn't it's never like

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 8>a sure thing that the market leader, which is open

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.719
<v Speaker 8>Ai at the moment, is going to be the ultimate winner.

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 8>So both the market needs to prove out. And this

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 8>is a competitive market with a lot of people with

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 8>a lot of resources who are also playing.

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.959
<v Speaker 4>The names for our audience to keep an eye on Microsoft,

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Meta Anthropic, open aim I, who am I missing?

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 9>Google?

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 8>And X Frankly, and if you're looking to tell a

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 8>story about what the challenges are for with open ai,

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 8>you could start with X which is Elon Musk's thing.

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 8>You know, x ai did not exist eighteen months ago,

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 8>and he and in a very short amount of time

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 8>Elon Musk has built essentially like a credible competitor. Now

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 8>maybe maybe there's some differences, but but again it shows

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 8>you just how competitive it is, how small the moat

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 8>is that these companies have you.

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Rock Max Chafkin, Bloomberg BusinessWeek columnist. You are listening and

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 2>watching Bloomberg Business Week.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting two pm Eastern on Applecar Play and

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business Ad. You can also

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty well with

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the You and.

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 2>General Assembly in session, lots of global leaders in town.

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 2>We spent a lot of time last week talking to

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 2>individuals about climate change, and even with the focus on

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 2>renewables and green energy, coal is still the biggest source

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 2>of electricity, accounting for a thirty five percent of the

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 2>world's generation in twenty twenty three last year. That is

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 2>according to the climate think tank ember. I think we

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 2>pointed this out last time we had this guest done

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 2>great to have back with us in this time in studio.

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Randall Atkins, Founder, chairman CEO Ramco Resources. It's a publicly

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 2>held company, six hundred and four million dollar market camp

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 2>company that produces metallurgical coal that's the type of coal

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.640
<v Speaker 2>used in steelmaking and as we talked about last time,

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the company is exploring domestic production of rare earth elements,

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 2>something we talk about a lot. Welcome, welcome back, Great

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 2>to have you in studio, Glad.

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 10>To be here.

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 4>How are you.

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 10>I'm fine for a Monday.

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of what we say. Hey, listen, we made

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 2>a point. I want to start here just because we

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 2>made a point last time of talking about the coal

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 2>that is used for electric electrical generation electricity generation. We

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 2>talked about thermal coal. You produce metallurgical coal. So just

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 2>before we get into it, remind everybody of the difference,

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 2>because I think it's important.

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 10>So we kind of view coal as having sort of

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 10>three legs to a stool. One is for energy, which

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 10>is thermal coal, one is for steel making, which is

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 10>metallurgic coal. And the third, which is kind of an

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 10>emerging field we call coal to products are cold critical minerals.

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 10>And that's, frankly, the route that we've sort of trail

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 10>blazed a bit by working on things like rare earth

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 10>elements and critical minerals and use of coal to make

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 10>carbon products.

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 4>What's the connection between coal and rare earths?

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 10>Well before we were able to discover a large deposit,

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 10>and ioming it was theoretically possible that rare earth would

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 10>be contained within coal in some different types of concentrations.

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Meaning you'd find a depositive coal inside that depositive coal

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 4>would be.

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 10>Rare earth, correct in higher concentrations that will normally be

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 10>found just as a base context within the Earth's crust.

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 10>The trick is with rare earth, they're everywhere. They're not

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 10>frankly so rare, but the concentration level is what makes

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 10>it commercially feasible. And we have found frankly higher concentrations

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 10>in our coal of heavy and medium rare earths magnetic

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 10>rare earths than have been found, according to our friends

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 10>at the Department of Energy, any place outside of Western China.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 10>So that's what's the unique part about our particular deposit.

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Which talk to us about your emphasis and stress in

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 2>terms of the business that you want to focus on.

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 10>Sure, well, we've right now got a you know, our

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 10>primary business across metallurgic coal, that's our bread and butter.

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 10>We kind of stumbled into the rare earth business, so

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 10>to speak, accidentally. But now that we have been advised

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 10>that we've got such a significant deposit, which might have,

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 10>you know, very important strategic implications, certainly for the US

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 10>that we have now decided to swing into that with

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 10>as much emphasis as we can.

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 2>What aide you get from the government US government in

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>all of this when they sometimes look at something like this,

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we talk about this with semiconductors, you know,

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 2>national security. I'm just curious if you get an assist

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 2>or what's the conversations on that level?

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 10>So they started different levels. So you know, we originally

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 10>actually found the rare Earth because we provided samples to

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 10>one of the Department of Energy's national labs that was

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 10>trying to do an assessment for the Defense Department, and

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 10>that's how we discovered we had a significant deposit. We

0:29:55.640 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 10>have got various grants and partnerships with various labs of

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 10>the national of the Department of Energy. Actually today we

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 10>announced we've hired as our director of Technology a gentleman

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 10>who joins us from the research arm of the Defense

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 10>Department called DARPA. And so we would expect as we

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 10>go further and basically add more dimension to what we're doing,

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 10>that we very conceivably will be working with the government

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 10>in a number of different capacities.

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 4>What are the rare earths that you found in the deposit,

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 4>and how do you extract them from the coal?

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 3>How do you separate them?

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 2>What's the cost of doing that?

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 10>Those are three great questions. So the rare earths that

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 10>we've found are as I said, the heavy and medium

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 10>magnetic rare earths, which have wonderful Latin names that I

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 10>will probably butcher. But the other two elements that we found,

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 10>which aren't really rare earth, they're critical minerals called germanium

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 10>and gallium. They're very important frankly for defense related technologies, semiconductors, etc.

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 10>How do you extract the rar ears from coal? That

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 10>is the process that you actually engage in when you

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 10>go beyond the initial throwing your hat in the air

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 10>that you've actually found them. We're in the middle of

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 10>that now, which is arduous because they're majored in parts

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 10>per million, so it's like almost trying to find things

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 10>the size of a blood cell.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Wait, so have you done it yet or no? Done

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 2>what separate out the We.

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 10>Have separated them out in various sizes right now. But

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 10>what we're doing we actually have engaged a company called

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 10>floor which is a major engineering group that also has

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 10>a large critical materials group to actually help us determine

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 10>the right process to use and then prove up the economics,

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 10>which we expect to have back by the end of

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 10>this year. So there are all sorts of different routes

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 10>that you can take, depending upon not only the chemistry

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 10>but the metallurgic and the metellergic mineral behind the actual rare.

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 3>At the deposit.

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Would you would would it involve burning the coal and

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 4>then what's left after the coal burns or is there

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 4>a different process.

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Help us take us back to geology class.

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 10>Sure, no perfect idea. So it will involve some form

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 10>of either combustion or paralysis of the coal, because you

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 10>need to separate the rare earth from being commingled within

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 10>the carbon within the coal. And how that's done on

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 10>what scale dependence on really where the deposits are, because

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 10>we may be dealing in concentrations of rare earth which

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 10>might not be huge in terms of material mass, but

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 10>might be large in terms of the quantity of rare earth.

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 10>So it's not like we would be creating enough coal

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 10>that we power a power planet something like that. It

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 10>would be much more confined.

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Two things I'm curious about, so there is a business

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 2>case to be made for doing it. You guys have

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 2>figured out that it's not going to cost so much

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 2>that it doesn't make sense to do so I'm curious

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit more about that. What's also the impact on

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>the environment.

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 10>Sure, so the business case is one that I said,

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 10>we're developing the precise techno economic study, or they call

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 10>it a scoping study, which will be available by the

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 10>end of the year.

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 2>You're working on it.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 10>We're working on it. But the interesting thing from a

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 10>business standpoint, from an overall dimension, the Chinese have been

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 10>trying to put anybody out of business that gets into

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 10>the rare earth business. They have a monopoly. They ruthlessly

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 10>fight to maintain that monopoly and have done predatory pricing

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 10>all over the world to try to drive anybody else.

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 2>It boost a lot of production. We actually have a

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg opinion piece that gets into cobalt and lithium specifically

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 2>the same ideal. Yeah, that we've seen prices plunged by

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 2>more than seventy five percent because the Chinese miners have

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 2>boosted production.

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 10>Sure, and even today, actually DARP is putting a conference

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 10>on that involves how the United States could assist in

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 10>creating sort of almost a pricing index that would stabilize

0:33:56.400 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 10>the rare earth market, which is clearly not happening today.

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 2>So okay, so you're studying the cost the business equation.

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 2>You're kind of figuring it out in terms of the

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 2>economic and not the environmental impact.

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 10>Sure, the environmental impact I had a thing too, sure

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 10>will be will be very limited. I mean, the nice

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 10>thing about coal, even if.

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 2>You're burning it and stuff, that's limited.

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 10>Well, here's here's the here's the trick there on rare earth.

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 10>Most rare earths are found in hard minerals cobalt, lithium, uranium,

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 10>et cetera, which are number one radioactive. So that creates

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 10>issues in terms of mining it, but more importantly in

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 10>terms of processing it, which is why most rare earths

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 10>are shipped to China to be processed, which needless to say,

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 10>is not helpful for the United States. So by virtue

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 10>of using coal as the feedstock, that in itself is

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 10>much more environmentally benign, and we are not going to

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 10>be burning it in sufficient quantity that would create a

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 10>sort of a smokestack effect, if you will. We'll be

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 10>doing it almost like a kiln type operation. And the

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 10>interesting thing is a lot of the carbon that would

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 10>be thrown off from the coal we intend to try

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 10>to use to make carbon products like synthetic graph height

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 10>and graphene and carbon fiber precursors. These are things that

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 10>we were working on with the government way before we

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 10>ever got involved in the rarer space.

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 4>What happens if the rareerfs don't pan out? What happens

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 4>if you can't figure out a way to make it

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 4>work financially if.

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 10>The rarers don't pan out? Actually, as I said, we'll

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 10>go back to what our original intent was, which was

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 10>to use coal as a feedstock to make carbon products.

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 10>Because the Chinese have also basically put an export stop

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 10>on synthetic graph height in regular graph height. So there's

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 10>a great demand for graph fight right now, which is

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 10>ninety five percent of the anodes and batteries. So that's

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 10>our next product, if you will that we'll be working

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 10>in respective.

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 2>So what do you anticipate rendall that in. I don't

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 2>know whether it's twelve months, whether it's two years, what

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the product mix is for your company, because it sounds

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 2>like you guys are still kind of figuring out some things.

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 2>We've got about a minute or so less.

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 3>You've bet so very shortly.

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 10>We will still be at least in terms of cash

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 10>flow dominantly a metallurgic coal company. We're actually growing. We're

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 10>probably one of the few coal companies that actually has

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 10>of last year, we will double in size between now

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 10>in the next say three years. That's the metallurgic side

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 10>and the rarer side. As you said, we're sort of

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 10>figuring it out as we go along. Our Our hope

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 10>is to basically be in a position to start a

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:37.919
<v Speaker 10>demonstration facility this coming spring, and that will then prove

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 10>out the economics and the techniques that we can use

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 10>to then take it into a larger commercial venture. I

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 10>think as soon as we start that will be probably

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 10>getting a lot of assistance along the way because it

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 10>will have such a potentially strategic impact on the United States.

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Does just forgive me twenty twenty five seconds the election outcome?

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Does it matter for you guys as a business the

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 2>election outcome? Who's in the White House?

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 10>I fix from from the standpoint of critical minerals and

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.399
<v Speaker 10>rare earth, it does not, because again, it has such

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 10>strategic national security significance that you've seen both the Democrats

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 10>and the Republicans almost in tandem, try to push for

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 10>more legislation encouraging development.

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Of those All right, well, so appreciate gatting more time

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 2>with you. We were fascinating the first time around. So

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:27.959
<v Speaker 2>really great to have you in studio. Rind Atkins, Founder

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 2>chairman CEO Aramico Resources joining us right here in studio, Mac.

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 8>The journal.

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 7>How about you let me drive?

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, honey, please, I'll.

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 6>I want to try.

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.720
<v Speaker 8>It's a good question.

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 3>This is the drive to the globes dot com effect.

0:37:55.880 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 4>Well, Dan on Bloomberg Radio, it's Bloomberg Business Week and Carol,

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 4>can you believe it?

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:04.240
<v Speaker 3>It's that time?

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, quarter, I'm so ready to be done with.

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Done with the quarter. Read to be done with the quarter.

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm done to be I'm ready to be done with

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the court. Although I like the summer quarter.

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, just making sure I'm rarely done with the quarter.

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:17.919
<v Speaker 2>Twelve months a year, defeated by four three months makes quarter.

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 3>It's a quarter to date for the S and P

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:20.720
<v Speaker 3>five hundred five percent.

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Well done, well done quarter. All right, let's see what

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 2>our next guest has to say back with This is

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 2>called speed CEO and portfolio manager it's Meed Capital Management,

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 2>joining us from Phoenix. The SMEED Value Fund, by the way,

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 2>has returned fourteen percent on average annually, putting it in

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 2>the ninety fourth percentile according to our data. Hey, how

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 2>are you good?

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 9>To see you guys?

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 6>How are you.

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're doing okay. Just kind of going from day

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 2>to day data point to data point. Tell us little

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 2>bit about flows. What are you seeing? What does it

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 2>tell you about the investment environment?

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think I think there's much ado about nothing

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 9>for most investors is what we've seen. Most people are

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 9>very much happy and comfortable in whatever they're doing already.

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 9>And I think the only problem with that is if

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 9>you look at two data points that really stand out

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 9>to US, household ownership of stocks as reported by the

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 9>Saint Louis Federal Reserve or what they call the FRED data,

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 9>it's never been higher, and the only problem with that

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 9>is that bodes very poorly for forward returns. The other

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 9>thing I would mention that I was just in Asia

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 9>for two weeks visiting with investors, and when I go

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.720
<v Speaker 9>to Thailand and the institutional investors there own seventy percent

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 9>of their total equities in US equities, it shows as

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 9>the FED has been reporting that the foreign ownership of

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 9>US equities has never been higher as well, that those

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 9>are just contrary indicators relative to history.

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Why are those contra indicators?

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, if you use the household data as an example

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 9>to him, the correlation coefficient between that ownership and the

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 9>forwarder turns the S and P is like negative point

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 9>eight two to negative point eight five, depending on when

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 9>you're looking at the data. So it shows you it's

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:58.319
<v Speaker 9>negatively correlated at this level of ownership. The last time

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 9>we had this was ninety nine, was anywhere near this,

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 9>and it was negative one percent for ten years. Nominally,

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 9>that doesn't count inflation, you know, in that it was

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 9>negative real returns for the S and P five hundred

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 9>and So I find it interesting that the households are

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 9>comfortable owning a lot of their equity or learning a

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 9>lot a lot of their assets and equities, while they

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 9>foreign institutions, foreign owners, you name it, are doing the

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 9>same thing at the same time. How differentiated is that globally?

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 9>And I would argue that's not good for global equity investors.

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, Okay, So then what are you anticipating in terms

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 2>of the US market for the rest of the year

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:37.399
<v Speaker 2>we've got We talked about being in the fourth quarter here,

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:39.359
<v Speaker 2>do you anticipate that we just kind of mark time

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 2>a little bit or or what?

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you know what, whether it's marketing time or we

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 9>you know, as we always do, we go through bool

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 9>markets and bear markets, you know, whether it's that or

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 9>starting a nice bear market, it's a it's a harbinger

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 9>of what's not going to be good going forward. And

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 9>this is coming right at a time where you know,

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 9>people are pretty at home with the idea that you know,

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 9>the FED is kind of quelched inflation at least in

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 9>the interim. I was actually just having a really fun

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:09.400
<v Speaker 9>discussion with Wilbur Ross earlier today because I'm going to

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 9>be interviewing him in a few weeks, and he's got

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 9>a really interesting book out called Risks in Return, where

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, the idea being that in the old guns

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 9>and butter debate, Like Tim, you know, Tim and I

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 9>my brother, Tim's brother, and I went to college at

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.479
<v Speaker 9>Women College. In witmen College economics classes, you learned about

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 9>guns and butter. This is guns and Butter two point zero,

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:30.839
<v Speaker 9>And that was some of the discussion I was having

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 9>with Wilbur Ross. And it makes me very excited to

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 9>read his book. But I just say that because the

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 9>idea that the fiscal spending goes on and yet inflation disappears,

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 9>I think that's adorable. And I don't think it's the

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 9>Fed's fault. It's the politics fault. But fiscal largesse is

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 9>a thing of this era.

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you mentioned Wilbur Ross.

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 4>We got to talk politics, Cole, because we are You're

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 4>in a swing state.

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.799
<v Speaker 3>You get a lot of ads for I am the

0:41:57.840 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 3>swing state. Yeah, you get a lot of ads.

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 4>For Harris and Trump in Arizona where you are. You

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 4>also mentioned Wilbur Ross, who was United States Secretary of

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 4>Commerce during the Trump administration. How are you thinking about

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 4>the election in terms of investing, in terms of what

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 4>you're doing with your portfolios?

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, I think the more important short term thing

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 9>in any discussion is whether in the doubleheader today the

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 9>Mets or the Braves will lose two games and send

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:29.240
<v Speaker 9>my Diamondbacks to the playoffs. But that's a whole separate issue.

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 9>To your point about elections, it looks very close. It

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 9>looks like a dead heat. I also think locally, you're

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 9>going to see a lot of split ticket So for example,

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 9>you know, Carrie Lake against Reuben Diego in the Senate,

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 9>she looks like a sheer loser at this point. And

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 9>so I think it's interesting to see in a swing

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 9>state like this, where you're not going to see a

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 9>down the ticket vote really kind of chopping up to

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:53.479
<v Speaker 9>who they like as candidates. And I think it also

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 9>highlights in a state like Arizona how important candidates are.

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 9>If you have bad candidates, you will lose elections. And

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 9>I think both part of are losing that and figuring

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 9>that out across states. So I think Arizona is a

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 9>pretty good Petri dish for what's going on in the country,

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:08.479
<v Speaker 9>which is, we look like we have a dead heat

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 9>right now. And you know, if you ask me who's

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 9>going to win, I don't know. I just do know

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 9>that fiscal spending will be the priority of either candidate,

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 9>which again I think flows back to, you know, the

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 9>idea of guns and butter two point Oh it's here

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 9>to stay, all right.

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about some names that you like top holdings.

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at your value fund energy names are certainly there.

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:32.879
<v Speaker 2>You like Occidental, you continue to like it. Also. Another

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:35.359
<v Speaker 2>one is Sonovo's energy.

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, Yeah, the returns on capital we're getting in the

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 9>space are very attractive. And you know, as we all know,

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 9>it's a cyclical business, so it moves around with the commodity.

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 9>But the positive is price regulates supply, and so as

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 9>price has gone down, you're gonna see less reinvestment in

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 9>the space. And what I like about it is people

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 9>build up their ideas of what's going on based on

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 9>what goes on in markets. And I always tell people

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 9>they say, well, what's the price of oil telling us

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 9>about the future, And pardon my cruelty with this, but

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 9>the answer is nothing, you idiot. It just tells us

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:08.759
<v Speaker 9>about where buyers and sellers are meeting today. And so

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 9>I think there's been a lot of discussion aboute around

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 9>weak China in the last month, followed by immediately this

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 9>idea that was posed the ft that the Saudis would be,

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, leaving the idea of one hundred dollars a

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 9>barrel oil. I think that's completely hearsay. But we like

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 9>the returns in the business. We like how depressed the

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 9>multiples are here at this juncture on book multiples, not

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 9>even looking at free cash, and that's just that's so

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 9>far away from what people are paying for other stocks,

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:35.719
<v Speaker 9>you know, particularly big Captech in the S and P.

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 9>It's a different game. But again go back to the

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 9>other ears of guns and butter. Like the seventies, you

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 9>may double digit and energy and the S and P

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 9>lost real money. We're just it's a different world, and

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:49.320
<v Speaker 9>I don't think people are really thinking about the risks present.

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 9>There's a lot of risk. That's what the equity investors

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 9>are missing.

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Hey, listen, just got about forty five seconds left here.

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:57.760
<v Speaker 2>You kicked it off saying I'm just back from Asia.

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 2>What was the story around? I guess Asia generally, but

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 2>more specifically about China, especially coming off of all the stimulus.

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 2>And forgive me because it's just about thirty seconds here.

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, they don't have any clue what's going on there,

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 9>more than anybody else in the United States does. They

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 9>ask me, as a kid from Seattle, Washington, whether the

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 9>Hong Kong stocks at bottom. That's bizarre. Here's what I

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 9>will say. I think people are really missing out on

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:21.320
<v Speaker 9>what can go on below the serface. The S and

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:24.840
<v Speaker 9>P or Go Watch unicredits deal. They're going to close

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 9>on Commerce Bank and no one cares and money's being

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 9>made in Europe and banking, and so I think there's

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:31.319
<v Speaker 9>just great things to go out and make money. Picking

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 9>stocks on it's below the service, it's not in the index.

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 2>New money coming in, money going out. Ten seconds. Do

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 2>you see more money come in or people cashing out

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 2>right now?

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 9>But money, money's going to raise because as long as

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 9>you're doing what's differentiated, you can go raise capital. And

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 9>that's what we're continuing to see. If you do what

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 9>the old value people did, you're not going to raise

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 9>any money.

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 2>All right, Gonna leave it there. Hey, Cole, good to

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 2>check in with you. Cole Smeed, CEO portfolio manager at

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 2>SMED Capital Management, joining us from Phoenix, PA.

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:03.239
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Vis This Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:10.720
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal