WEBVTT - Who Is This Year's Let Down Players?

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening. Friends

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Forever show. Start listening to us, or suffer the consequences.

0:00:43.760 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, yeah as well? Great or by Bayne f

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>God s Francis. All ladies and gentlemen, yours what is up? Everybody?

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome inside Studio thirty four. This is the Fantasy Best

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. I am Frank Stanfeld. We're live on the

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>sport Screen TV Network. Thank you for watching on Zumo, Pluto,

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Stir and YouTube as well. I'm gonna get into a

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>lot from today. We have some fantasy baseball news and

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>notes to talk about. Greg Sauceman hopefully will be joining

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>me at some point here on the show as well.

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday we played a little bit who is this Year's Blank?

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>We did it from a positive perspective. We looked at

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>some potential breakout players, maybe a closure that can surprise

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>us late in drafts today. None of that not gonna

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>We're not looking at the positive anymore. We've done the

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. Now we gotta get into the bad stuff.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>We gotta look at the other side. Who is this

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>year's rank. Well, look at an early round hitter that

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>might be able to let us down this upcoming season.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>We might look into, uh, We're not might. We are

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>going to look into an early round starting pitcher that

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>might let us down here in as well. And we'll

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>also get into an early round closer who could potentially

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lose his job early on in the season. Again, this

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>is the Fantasy BFS live on a hump day here

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Sports Grid Network. We're gonna get into some

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of the news and notes in the Fantasy Baseball world.

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Franklin Barretto, Josh James, some Lorda's Guriel notes as well.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that all here on the Fantasy BFFs right

0:02:47.200 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>after this news day update done by Sean Gstamon Sports

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Grade News Update, I'm John Blossomtia with your PFF news update. Alright,

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>major League Baseball news. The Cubs are committed to batting

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris Bryant leadoff. The announced that Earlier this week, also

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>some news that Red Sox have agreed to a minor

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:27.399
<v Speaker 1>league deal with catcher Jonathan lou Croix. Now some other

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 1>baseball news making waves. That is Rob Manfred, the MLB Commissioner,

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday with called Ravage of ESPN a long interview,

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>he made some mistakes, notably calling the World Series Trophy

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a piece of metal. Well, Rob Manfred corrected that mistake,

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and he spoke about it today. In an effort to

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>make a rhetorical point, I referred to the World Series

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Trophy in a disrespectful way, and I want to apologize

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>for that. There's no excuse for it. Um, I made

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a mistake. I was trying to make a point, but

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I should have made it in a more effective way.

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And again I want to apologize. Florida also making news,

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Lebron Jade's Los Angeles Lakers superstar called out Rob man

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Fred said listen to your players. He was upset about

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the cheating scandal. He went on say, listen. I know

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't play baseball, but I am in sports, and

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I know if someone cheated me out of winning the

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>title and I found out about it, I would be effing.

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I rate and quote that's Lebron James so not making

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it easier on rob Man tread. That's for sure, all right,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>some NBA news. It's official. Jonathan b Line is out

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>as Cleveland Cavs head coach. He went forty losses. He

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>had fourteen wins in just a half season. He did

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>sign a five year deal, but they negotiated out he

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>will be paid just for the time served in a

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit more on the first year of that deal.

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>So Jonathan b Line out as coach of the Cleveland Cavaliers. JB.

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Bickerstaff takes over. That will be as soon as tomorrow

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>when the players get BA. So that is your BFFs

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>news update out back. So Frank standfold in the studio,

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>take it away, Frank, thanks launch on. Appreciate the news update.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You might have saw a little flash across the screen.

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>The screen there, you know that was somebody consider him

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a superhero. I consider him my co host. It is

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Greg Sussman now joining the party. Greggy. I did you

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sleep last night? But it's all right, man, I slept

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>all right better than the night before, which is a plus.

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Feel good man, feeling good? How din to be here?

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of fun to things to talk about today,

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm decided to do so. Frank, Happy hump Day

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>to you, but happy Wednesday. We got some Thursday, which

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>is the frustrating part. I wish it were Thursday. I said,

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that's frustrating. Not Thursday yet. No, not there yet. But

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on today, Frank and I wanted to

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>get into some of it before we got into, uh,

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the players that we are avoiding this year. Not all

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the players were avoiding the whole show on that, like

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the players that really can pin appointment, Like you know what,

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the guy I don't want, probably not gonna

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>have this guy on my team right exactly before we

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>do that. The guy that I asked you about previously

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>was lorda Scariel. I know, Frank, can you tell me

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>if I should like this player because he's in a

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>line of that we like as Vladimir Gurero Junior has

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>not Davi Chett Jr. And he's hit right in the

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>middle of it, and he's gonna have multiple position eligibility.

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna hit third and now it comes out here

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe the first basement. Sometimes he's gonna play some second

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Mason outfield, Like dude, this guy could be good. People

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>seem to like his brother Juley Gariel, So Frank, should

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I like Lorda Scuriel. I am interested in Lorda Scuriel.

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>You look at the lineup as you mentioned, Greg, everyone's

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>excited about Bobichette and Vladimir Guerrero Junior as well as

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>well as Cavin Biggio. Right, so we have a bunch

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of second generation players here on this team. It's a

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>good line of good ballpark to hit in, and there

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>are other really good ballparks to hit in in the

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>American League East as well. I'm I'm slightly interested in

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Lord A's Greilo. The problem is the a DP where

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>he's going right now. There's a lot of players that

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I also like in that range. So in the month

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of February, he's going around pick one thirty five, so

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to take him. Oh that's you, Uli Gurio.

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, Lord Gurria, Dan just command f the Guria

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>can't do that one fifty three going right around Salvador Perez,

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>who was a catcher target of mine, Greg, Not surprise,

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>he's ancient. You know, I love my oldies. Orde Polanco,

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Scott Kingery, Byron Buxton, Like every other player, he was

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a fair range to be to be part of. Last year,

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>he played just eighty four games and hit twenty whole runs. Frank,

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>if he played hundred and sixty eight games, he would

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>have home runs. That's what he was closed on pace

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>four and he doesn't have to do that. He made

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially half a season at twenty home runs. If here's

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>something we can get legitimately thirty five home runs at

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this spot middle linfield eligibility potentially, I'm interested. So you

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>asked me the other day, why did he struggle in

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:01.679
<v Speaker 1>the second half? That's correct, and I'm trying to figure

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that out of myself and I'm looking at it right now.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>The hard hit rate dropped a little bit in the

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>second half, not enough to really make a difference. I mean,

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>he was still over hard contact rate in the second

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>half of the season. His line drive rate went down

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>about three percent. He started hitting more groundballs that seems

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>like an issue. Went from thirty eight percent groundball rate

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in the first half to forty two percent in the

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>second half, and his home run to fly ball ratio

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>dropped massively in the first half ten point eight percent

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of the season, so it shouldn't

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 1>have dropped off that much based on this hard contact rate.

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>So there are there are, there are still questions when

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Lord as Guriel of this upcoming season, right,

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>so that I don't know that possible. I don't know

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what that's like, an indifferent that TBD TB d on

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on Lord of Gouriel to be determined to be determined

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>on Lord. Okay, next for us here fright today, Chris Bryant,

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>A hey, cool hit and leadoff? Is that changing any

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>for you? Uh? Doesn't really? I mean he's a good

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>O b P uh contributors, so I guess that makes sense.

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>He obviously has a really good eye at the plate.

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Look at his career nearly twelve percent walk great, that

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense. Three five O b P

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in his career. The problem greg from a fantasy perspective,

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and I guess we kind of have to just accept

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.599
<v Speaker 1>it at this point is he's been batting second the

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>past couple of years, so as RBI output has already

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>been down recently last year seventy seven r b I.

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>The year before that fifty two, of course, he was hurt,

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>only played a hundred and two games in eighteen uh

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and then seventy three RBI back in seen. He has

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>not had more than seventy seven ribbies in a single

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>season since. Interesting. I think that if you told the

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>average baseball fan that about Chris Bryant, wouldn't you get that? Yeah,

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like they would get surprised that. So, um, that's something

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that you just have to keep in consideration. I don't

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>think I'm ever gonna own Chris Bryant. Just you know

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>where he's going in that fifth round range altar, get

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 1>a Manny Machado around there. I usually look at a

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>first basement around there, someone like jose A Brew you know,

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I like jose A Brady a Ton and like he's

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a fine you know, three category contributor. Maybe gives your

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>home runs, gives your runs, but to eight two Like

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a good batting average, it's not a great batting

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>average doesn't help you in RB. I doesn't give you

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>stolen basis. Chris Bryant is fine, probably a better points

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>league player, probably a better O b P format. I

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>know that you played in ob P format. So where

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>where walks count? Someone something in the league like that,

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where you should be targeting Chris Bryant,

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>but did you go before the break? One more piece

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of news before we get to that commercial, and that

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>is Frankly Briano four top prospect for the Open Age.

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>We heard about him for years as a short stop

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>prospect and he's just twenty four years old, and maybe

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna fits the Rafie Devers category we're talking about yesterday.

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>He's just twenty four years old and it's probably the

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>favorites to be the starting second Nation. Jerrickson profile is

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>now in San Diego. We talked off how we kind

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.079
<v Speaker 1>of like Jackson profile this year in San Diego. What

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>about guy that's replacing only to potentially replace him in

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Franklin Rodo. It's like a base interesting power speed combination.

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Look at what he did last year, nineteen homers in

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen steels with the batting average in Triple A. He

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>has played about eighty games at the major league level

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and has a one eight nine batting average. I wish

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the A's would just give him the opportunity they are

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>just let him play. I think they are on little

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more about, you know, looking over his shoulder. Given an opportunity,

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it will be interesting to see what they do with

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Matteo as well. He's out of options. All right,

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>at good point there, all right, more on the way next,

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna havefs. Want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire.

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts,

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more. Save ten

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo dot com backslash dunk to more. Frank and

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I finally another plan that we lived together. This is good.

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>We like a lot of players together. We don't normally.

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>The problem is, don't steal basis. If nobody steals basis,

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we don't normally like these many players

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Um, I'm trying to be open mind.

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Best of these old guys. The year they were finally

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>on the same page. Like last place, guaranteed, I don't agree.

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Like last year. We thought we had a plan and

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we did very, very poorly. We didn't do poorly. We did.

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Actually looked back at the notes that I had for

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:42.959
<v Speaker 1>that auction going into that night. We wound up with

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those players, and we were prepared for sure.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>We had a plan. We extuecute. We had Ronald Dacunia

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty damn good. He was awesome. You know what. We

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>also hadvor Bauer. We executed the plan. You can say

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot about us. We went in the auction of

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the plan and we executed it. Yes, I'm pretty sure

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>our plan was to piss eybody else in the off

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in the auction, not a year before exactly what we did.

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I let me piece the people off last year. Year

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 1>before we pisched people off. I would do that last year.

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I was too nice last year. It was part of

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>my problem. So we have to go full Carlos Correa.

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>We got to go into the auction. And I think

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it's told on he. I think I should just like

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>walk in front of Collette and just like shut I mouth,

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>like if he doesn't hear you, like just seven, that's

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>not like that. Yes, let's walk right up to him.

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy right here. Later year in the industry, like

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't, I've said people like me. I don't care.

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll be the guy we like Frank, we don't like Greg? Alright,

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>cool that works? You like the good cop backgup? Sure so,

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Mark Canna. But people I think are probably gonna start

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to hate us just by associated. Hate me by association

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a two years agoin anyway, Mark Canna, we're in, yes,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth fifth outfielder in the Rodal League. Love. I'm mean

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Kell Martin, you're on him? Like Kell Martin, he's still basis.

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Mhmm about pen not many Greg? What about Adam burto Mondescy? Greg?

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>You don't like him? Well? How about Time of the VR?

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't help this? Like Jonathan VR, I don't really

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>liked really Okay, wonder what an I want to get

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to you before we figure out who this year's blank is?

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>UH was Josh James. He was a hype guy for

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a litt while last spring, and then it was clear

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't really gonna be in the rotation on that

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I called Brad Peacock all Spring got that right, and

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately he couldn't survive as a star. He kept getting

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>hurt and this year Dusty Baker is not even messing

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>with him. So Josh Jams to be the rotation. The

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>cool thing now that Josh James could stay in the

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>rotation if he wins the job. You know Dusty Baker's

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw him at the for a hundred, right. There's

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>no like Eat England or Pitch liand It when it

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to Josh James this year. You don't think James

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Quick is gonna have any input on not wearing out

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the arm and shoulder of Josh James. G No, No,

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Dusty Baker, old school manager. We definitely couldn't

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>give an f man. Look. It'll be crazy to see

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>if to actually do something that with someone like Lands

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of Colors, because the guy obviously has dealt with a

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of injuries. And I would be surprised if my

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Colors more than Josh James was great last year in

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a swing man role, more so in Release sixty one

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and pitched k per nine over fourteen last year. The

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>underlying numbers three seven, seven x fit, sixteen percent swinging

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>strike rate and back in eighteen. Greg The reason why

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>people liked him going into last year's season in twenty

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen was eighteen made seventeen starts at triple a three

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>forty er, a one o nine whip twelve point nine

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>case per nine does struggle a little bit with the walks,

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and Craig Mish actually revealed this to me earlier today.

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Apparently he had a problem with sleep apnea, which they

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>just figured out a couple of years ago, which is

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>why he can throw harder. Now he can potentially go

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>deeper into games as well. So if you're looking for

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a deep sleeper, late round flyer, you're sleepers. He did

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>there unintended of what I was going for. But if

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you're doing one of these drafted holds right now, I

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>would look at Josh James as someone who does have

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>massive strike out upside. And for reference, he went in

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the twenty first round of the NFBC Draft Champions Draft

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that I am doing right now. Greg, Okay, Josh James,

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I think he has a good spray.

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I see the adv rising for him. Yeah, he's already

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>on the move. He was, you know, I think probably

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>outside the top thirty rounds last week when I did

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a draft, and again he went in round twenty one.

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens with Forest Whitley, because I think

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance you know, he could be called up

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>early this season if he performs. He wasn't good last year,

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>was not good last year, and he was hurt last year.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So he does have some obstacles to overcome to get

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>into the Houston Astros rotation. But as of now, it

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>looks like Josh James is the front runner for that

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>five spot. Josh James somebody we are definitely looking at.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I also just kind of stumble upon somebody named Harold Castro.

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>You know who that is? Yes, the outfielder for the

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Miami Marlins. Greg That's incorrect. Harold Castro's one thing. He's

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>an outfielder all the Detroit Tigers must be Harold. Who

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>am I thinking of? Hold Ramirez? Harold Ramirez the answer,

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>So confidently I'm gonna get Harold Ramirez A Harold Castro

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>mixed up. Harold Castro last year played nineties seven games

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Tigers. Is o BP was missed that one?

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>It was three oh five? Is is it would be

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, like his average is nine one.

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>He had five home runs. His strikeout totenter point three percent.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>He's one percentage. It was two point four percent. Great

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>open the second half. Harold Castro. There you go. Let's

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>let's just do a whole show of Greg Suston finds

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>things out on fangrafts that happened last year in the

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>baseball season. It's a fun show. It's bunch of last

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the roster resource page for the Tigers

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. He is not in the lineup. He is

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>not on the bench. They released Harold Castro. We're gonna

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have to do some Harold Castro recent Yes, crack about that.

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow on the show, I will ask him about Harold Castro. Alright, fantastic.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Let me move on. Two names I do know and

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that includes a four Marlin, Jean car a little Stanton.

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Last year, he was drafting as a second round pick

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in his second season in the Ronson. A lot of

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>people expect the huge things. They were wrong. He played

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>like twelve games for this team and earned the ire

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of Frank Staffel forever Frankie Don. Carlos Stanton claimed yesterday

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he's ready to rock. There are no limitations on him

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and says, yeah, well, the age of a bunch this year.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you back in Jian Carlos Stanton, I am not

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in on Jihan Carlos Stanton. Again, I liked to target

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>batting average and stolen bases early on in my drafts,

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and John Carlos Stanton is still going in that fourth

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>fifth round range. And look, if everything breaks right for him,

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, his ninety fifth percentile outcome is he's probably

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>hitting over fifty home runs with a ton of RBIs

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in one of the best lineups in baseball, one of

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the best hitting ballparks in baseball. But I personally have

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>question marks and skepticism when it comes to the health.

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>How healthy can he be for this upcoming season and

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of his career. You know, he played

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>eighteen games last year. He has another season. He played

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and nineteen games the year before that, seventy

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>four games from eighteen he missed a total of seven games.

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>If you get that out of stating, then he is

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>going to pay off his value. But I just have

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>question marks about the health Greg. I mean, can him

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and judge guys that are built the way that they are,

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>can they withstand the course of an entire season that

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>with a shoulder injury last year and knee injury last year,

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna have any Jihn Carlos Statin. If you're

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>swinging for the fences and you want to go for

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>upside in your middle rounds, go ahead, But personally I

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>prefer someone who is just safer than John Carlos. It's

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>funny because he's a guy that really fits the mold

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of what you learned last year, right, a guy that

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>can finish as a first round pick that everyone's down

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>on for one reason or not. I got it. You

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't like him two years again, you didn't like him

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>last year. Um at the draft and there's so many injuries,

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Like he is that type of guy. He is that

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>type of player like Clayton Kershaw last season. I understand

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>why you're so down on him. Yet at Modica has

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>pointing this out on Twitter too. How many seasons you

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you're probably looking at the stand grafts page right now.

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>How many seasons? And again, if the names Greg would

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>just want to strangle me. But of course when he

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>does it fun How many seasons do you think John

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Stanton has over forty home runs? Greg three outside

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>one it was the year he hit fifty nine. That's

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>like really interesting, stant So he hit thirty eight in

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>his first season with the Yankees. He has another season

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>with He has two other seasons with thirty seven. If

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>you just haven't gotten enough consistency out of gian Carlos

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>stan If you're somebody who likes to take risks early

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>on in your draft and you're looking for someone who

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>can you know, outperform their ADP, I'm not going to

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>doubt that from Stanton. He has huge upside. I also

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>think that he is incredible downside as well. UM, I

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>won't be targeting him. But if you want that upside

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth fifth round range and Stanton is your guy,

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>But who is this year's gian Carlos Stanton? Who's going

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to let us down like Stanton did? We're gonna answer

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that question in a game. We like to call who

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is this year's Giancarlos Stanton? Familiar faces? One out place

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and there you got one out face its pay Who's

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>this year's gian Carlos Stanton? Frank, Yesterday we talked a

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>lot about Aaron Judge and his injuries and how you're

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit nervous about him. Is he's someone that

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>could be this year's gian Carlos Stanton. I think that

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge can be in this category of someone that's

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>going in the early rounds and the second third round

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>range that can let you down this upcoming season. Not

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>really a target of mind. But I'm gonna go in

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a different direction, Craig. I'm gonna go with jose Altuban.

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>It has nothing to do with the buzzers, with the

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>cheating scandal, with tattoo Gate. Uh. Is it in script?

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Is it in print? I don't care about any of

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. I'm looking purely at the production from jose

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Al Tube last year, and there are things looking into

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>his profile last night, Greg that stood out to me,

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and in a negative way. His fifteen percent strikeout rate

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>last year was a career high for jose Al tub

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>His seven and a half percent walk great was his

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>lowest since two thousand and fifteen. He did hit two

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight last year. His expected batting average was to

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a D two. That was the lowest it has been

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in any of the past four seasons. Uh. He's dealt

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>with a ton of leg injuries the past couple of years.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>He had a knee injury, he had some surgery on

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that two years ago, had a hamstring injury last year.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>He missed sixty three games over the past two seasons,

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and I could see the knee, the hamstring one of

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>those injuries flaring up again this year. He doesn't run anymore,

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't really contribute anything in stolen bases. I

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.479
<v Speaker 1>think he'll still be a fine player. I don't think

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna come back, you know, coming aywhere close to

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the power he put up last year, or anywhere close

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to the stolen basis that he used to give. You.

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So likely hit to ninety something like that. Twenty five

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>home runs. He hits in a good lineup, so the

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>runs and RBI should be solid, but maybe five to

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>ten stolen basis. I'm just really not depending on anything there.

0:22:57.560 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that there's actually a pretty good chance

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>that he misses time, which fits that mold of you know,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>an early round pick who lets you down because of

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 1>production and missing time. I think Hosale two is one

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of those players you were'tay last year, as you said,

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>because you didn't think he was going to run me

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>because of that hipping jury that he was badly. He

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>thought the power go down really like he had to

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>get a good year. He had a crazy second half,

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty two home runs with p s. Greg that was

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks to a twenty five percent home run the five

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>ball ratio. We're talking about the juice ball. Zal Tova

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is someone who strikes me as a beneficiary of the

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>juice ball. His previous season high was fourteen point six

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>percent in terms of home run the fly ball ratio.

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>That's second half to me from last year. It just

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>looks a little bit flukey. Greg. I get it, man,

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I get it. So for me, I know I thought

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you seconds before the break, but for me, I just

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>want to point out for Nanotis, like I got, it's

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty years old. Save it for after the break. Creg

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>will do it. Coming back, I'll tell you exactly why

0:23:52.119 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you're wrong on Fernando Tatis. This the break. Then oh oh,

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>coming back after the break, we're gonna I'm gonna tell

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you why Fordano Taxis is not this year's don Carlo Stanton.

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into some pitching as well here on the BFS.

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com. Optimizer and the

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts,

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more. Save ten

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily Rodal dot com backslash dunk to learn more. Alright,

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so during the break, for those wondering the names that

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I brought up to Frank for randomly in baseball, we're

0:24:52.560 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>uh Yoska, Hernandez, Ryan McMahon, von Bigio. Is there another there? Yes,

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Tim Anderson, Mr Anderson. Visa's interesting. I like, come on, Visa.

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>He almost hits too many flyballs, Greg. He kind of

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>has the Reese Hoskins syndrome. So here's two many flyballs,

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>don't hit the hard and his hard in percentage um

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of like thirty three and a

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>half percent. But the reason why you like him, which

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to remind everyone, because everyone's league is different, Greg,

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you play in the league where walks matter, where OBIP matters,

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and in a league like that, Cavon video is much

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>better because he's probably going to hit two thirty five.

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So he hits two thirty four last year and his

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>o b P was three sixty four exactly. That is

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I was telling you this during the break. He's great

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>about COmON, Frank, he had sixteen homers, fourteen stolen masis

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:52.719
<v Speaker 1>fourteen for fourteen. That's correct. I like, come on, Visia's

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna having He's gonna be He's just made the list.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>He has made the list. And again he is great

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>for ob p leagues. Uh, he's a right in points

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>leads because he's still going to strike out a decent amount.

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>But if you play in a standard five by five

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>rod or a categories league that counts batting average, he's

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>going to hurt your batting average. And I was telling

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Greg this during the break. I mean, his approach is

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he's almost too passive. Greg. He has a really good

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 1>eye at the play. He likes to take a lot

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of pitches. He likes to draw a lot of walks.

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>But at times he almost takes too many pitches, like

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>he lets the good pitch go by in order of

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, working the count and getting the opposing pictures

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>pitch count up. And because of that, you know, often

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>times it leads to him striking out. And you know,

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>he he doesn't have to hit less five ball as

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>why I like to see him decreased that long a

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit. You gotta decrease oftentimes for begging guys to

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>increase our launch angle. If you're out there watching what

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>you decrease the launch angle just a little bit. I

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>do like the power speed combination though, Greg it we

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>should draft him if we get solid batting average, you know,

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and sure I have no problem with that. I can.

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>That can be our fifteen and twenty steals there, Greg.

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what That's what we're just talking about. That's what

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to find, all right, Vambizia, let's go potentially

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>on the BFF list, but definitely on Greg se Definitely

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>on my list, all right, someone that I'm a little

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>bit cautious about having on my list. I know it's

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>not fun for Nanotatis twenty one years old. UH is

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>what he will play at for UH. The season turn

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty one at the beginning of January, and now he's

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>burst onto the scene. Last year he was absolutely incredible

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>with twenty two home runs and sixteen steals, struck out

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>about thirty percent at the time, walked about eight percent

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time, but only playing eighty four games as

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>he did battle injury everyone's very very high on in

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the hardy percentage, about forty two percent last year. I'm

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>simply worried about his ability to stay healthy, Frank, because

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we have not seen we have not seen that yet

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>at the major league level. I'm worried about the juice

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>ball a little bit with him if he comes back

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>down to earth here. I know in the minors obviously

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>he's had a ton of power. I don't know. I

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>just think when you're drafting him in the first round,

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>he needs to give you. This is what you need

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>of him as I first round pick. Do you get that? Know?

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the average was he was amazing last Steamer

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>likes that things so Greg Steamer has Fernando Tatis projected

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>for thirty home runs and stolen basis that his first

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>round with a two sixty five batting average. You'd like

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to see a better batting average, Greg. I'll just say

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>two words when it comes to Fernando Tatis, Javier Bias.

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>He reminds me so much of Javier Bias, because I

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>know what you don't like about him. It's the plate discipline.

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>You look at the swinging strike rate, it's not good.

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>He chases so many pitches out of the zone. You

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>don't like the plate discipline when it comes to Fernando Tatis,

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>but I'm telling you I have been burned by players

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like this before, doubting somebody like a Javier Bayaz, and

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Fernando Tatis just fits that mold where this is the

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>player who he is. He's going to swing and miss

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot, he's going to chase pitches out of the zone,

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but he's also going to make spectacular things happen just

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>because he is an uber athlete and he is an

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>extremely talented baseball player as well, So you can't It's

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it's tough, Greg, because you know, you kind of gotta

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>pick and choose when you want to use the data

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and when you kind of have to just look at

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the talent of a player in the prospect pedigree. And

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I understand, you know, there's no exact science to this

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on on when you can do that and when you can't.

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>But given as much talent as he has, the hype,

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the prospect pedigree, what we saw last year, you know,

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I almost kind of throw his plate discipline out the window, Greg,

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's gonna be good for a two

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy five to two eighty batting average this year, thirty

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>home runs, close to twenty five steals and and again

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>if he does that, you know he's going to pay

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>off that first round price tag. All right. Last year,

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in the first round around the first tier of pictures,

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>did you have the Trevor Bower. We drafted Trevor Bawer.

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>He was our ace, Frank. He didn't go well. He

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>was traded mid season Cincinnati. It didn't get better. And

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>now you could not be more off on Trevor Bower

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:53.479
<v Speaker 1>this year. I tried to talking you into him a

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>bit because I told you you can't let your pass

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>biases affect your team this year, and you're doing that.

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Let Trevor Bauer. Well, I'm also doing it with Trevor

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Bauer because he has one season where he hasn't had

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>an e r A over four. So you tell me

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>what's the aberration when it comes to Trevor Bauer in

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>he had a two to one e r A with

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a one o nine whip. Every other season in his

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>career he has had at least a four point one

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>eight e r A and at least a one point

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to five whip. So you tell me what's the aberration.

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>What's the outlier when it comes to Trevor Bauer in

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>his career, it's undoubtedly. I think that he is very talented,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But I also think that he tinkers too much. He

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>thinks too much when he's on the mountain. He's a hothead.

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>We saw last year he took the ball and launched

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it into center field over the batter's eye in Kansas City.

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>The guys is absolutely out of his mind. He cares

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>more about what Rob Manford is doing and what people

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>are saying and the Houston astros cheating scandal than just

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>honing his craft and becoming the best picture that he

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>possibly can. I understand the upside is tantalizing, and you

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>look at the swinging miss off and his strikeout upside.

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I get all of that, but until you have owned

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Bauer, you do not understand what it means who

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>actually lived through the experience that is Trevor Bauer. So

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I will say, Greg, the people who I believe are

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in on Trevor Bauer this year outside of you are

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>people who haven't owned him in the past. Yeah, I don't.

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I just I understand the reasons you don't like Trevor Bauer.

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I I do. It's very it's very, very frustrating last year.

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>But I do think he's smart. I do think he

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>carries all these people that are praising he's almost too smart,

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>All these people that are praising Garrett Cole for like

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the work he's putting in a Yankee camp and all

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>these cameras, all these changes are making like you gotta

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciate what Bauer does too. If it works, it works

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>for Gerrit Cole, it doesn't work for Trevor Bauer. He

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>can tinker as much as he wants. It doesn't work.

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.959
<v Speaker 1>It worked one season in his career. And Greg, let

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>me remind you that when you stay over to Cincinnati,

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>his ear ray with six point three nine in the

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Great American Small Park is where he's pitching this year, Greg, Cincinnati,

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But that was Trevor Bauer. And question that we need

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to ask for this year is who is this year's

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>very valor? Only a milliar faces? Look at that face,

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>happ one face, I'm gonna get started here light It

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like he wants to all right, I'm gonna go

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>with you, Darvish and Michael Florio is not gonna be

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>happy to hear that because drafted him on his Tout

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Wars team. He tweeted out, He's gonna be higher on you,

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Darvish than anybody else. And I understand. You know what

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>he did in the second half. And it's not just

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the second half, Greg, it was really the first eight

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>starts where he was god awful. I remember terrific downstairs

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in the pit us watching the start against the Miami

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Marlins where he had like five shutout endings. It's great

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>he allowed to earned run, not shut out for one

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>hit endings allowed and earned run because he had six.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Remember I remember that vivids six the baseball seasons when

0:32:57.920 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Frank doesn't talk to anybody in the pit. He just

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>sit there, like, Frank, we needed to work. He's like

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>watching watching you Darvish suck. That's exactly it. Uh. The

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>walks were out of control his first eight starts. His

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>walks per nine was eight point one walks for nine.

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that makes uh, that makes that makes Robbie

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Ray look like massa harro Tanaka basically in terms of

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>command eight walks per nine and his first eight starts, Greg,

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and basically after that start against the Miami Marlins, That's

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>where it all turned around. His final twenty three starts

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg two three six one e r A one point

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>four six walks per nine, nearly twelve strikeouts per nine,

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>groundball rate, nearly a fourteen percent swinging strike rate. I mean,

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>his finals twenty three starts last year, he was phenomenal.

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>The question is, Frank, why don't you like you Darvish?

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Why is he this year's Trevor Bauer? Well? Is he

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to keep up what he did over

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>those twenty three starts? Greig? Is he gonna be able

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to stay healthy? That's a huge part of the equation.

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>It comes to you, Darvish. Last year it came out

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that he was, you know, pitching through another injury. It

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>was like a forearm injury laid on in the season.

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>He also had all the success because of a cutter

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that he you know, used over at the time. Greg.

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>He never used it more than seventeen percent of the

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>time ever in a single season in his career. So

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is he going to maintain his gains in command and control?

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Is he going to use his cutter as much this

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 1>upcoming season? Is he going to be able to stay healthy?

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>He also changed his mechanics up. He like had a

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:33.919
<v Speaker 1>different arm angle that he was throwing from last year

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and that really helped his success. Is that going to

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>carry over? There's just there's so many moving parts. It's

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 1>almost like everything came together for Darvish over those final

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty three games that he pitched Greg and I just

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if all of those things, every one of

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>those aspects is going to come together once again. And

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>because of that, I'm likely not going to have any

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of you darbish just here. I haven't in like one

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>keeper league just because he's a late round keeper. But

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 1>outside of that, in that fourth round range, I'll likely

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>take a Chris Paddock or Louis Severina over him someone

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>like that. I don't think I'm gonna own much two diversits.

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I agree to taking Seberino, I know, you know, like

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>no Sergard. I take snider Guard over him as well.

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Another name that kind of fits his Bill Frank. He

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 1>is Clayton Kershaw and Kershaw had this bounce back year

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in many aspects. Last year did your hundred seventy innings

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and going sixteen and five. He started off the year

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>slightly late. Everyone's very nervous, um saying that Kershaw was

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 1>playing on Biden time, borrow time rather right, that back

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>injury is gonna come back to bite him. He didn't walk?

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Were these what any batters? Ever? Last year? Two point

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>oh seven was the walks for nine? Last year the

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Kaper nine at a down right not or hyper senage

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>rather Kiper nine. Yeah, nine point five four last season,

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought the if you look at the Babbage here

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty two, it's really low to Clayton Kershaw. The extrap

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>had him at three point five. It's obviously very good.

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But for all the reasons that people didn't like Clinton

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Kershaw going into last year, and you can take the

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>same case that that doesn't change. He's still on that

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>bar of the time with his back still, He's still

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>with the Dodgers where they have all these other options

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that they will rest him. I think you could like

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Clayton k Shaw. That's fine, but you shouldn't think just

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>jump back in both throttle and thinks the eastern he

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was from years ago. Kershaw and the closers. Next, I

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire, dunk on

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>dominate on Fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 1>pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the most

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 1>accurate projections in NBA DFS plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>lake swap support and much more safe ten percent on

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>road dot Com backslash dunk to learn more. All right

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>back here, vffs, we're gonna talking about anybody random. During

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that break, it was more Clayton Kershel lot Castle here

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I talked towards the end, which is good. Johnthan v

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Are also got brought up, but it was mostly sticking

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to Clayton Kershaw and Frank as I had a dove

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in a little deeper here. His fastball velocity was the

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>worst of his career last year at ninety point four

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>miles per hour on average. Slider also went down from

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the year prior eight six point nine. Eighty six point

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>nine was the average lassity, although he did get more

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>swinging stripes on it. As you told me. You know,

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think for Clayton Kershaw he has to reinvent himself,

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and I know he said that he did last year.

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>He has to invent himself because he's not the same

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>picture that he was in the prime of his career.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>He's trending the wrong direction and if he does, he's

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be effective. But is he a Tier one starter?

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>He's Is he the eleventh starting pitcher off the board?

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Is he should he be your ace? I don't think

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so anymore. I agree I would not want him as

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>my SP one, But where he's going right now in

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the fourth round, third, fourth round, around that range, if

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you get him as your SP two, I'm fine with

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that because I think he's still gonna give you. You

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>have to Trevor Bauer as you're one. Last year, yes,

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and that was a mistake. And know what I'm saying,

0:37:58.000 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>he's the same thing will happen with Kershaw. It will

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>be a miss stake, not necessarily because again he reinvented

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:06.320
<v Speaker 1>himself last year. As you mentioned the fastball velocity, he's

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at the that that fastball velocity.

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>It really dipped back down in eighteen and went down

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to nine point nine, which was the lowest of his career,

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and that was almost like a shock to him. He's like,

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>how do I learn how to pitch right that? With

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a fastball velocity this low, and I think he figured

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 1>out how to do that in nineteen. You look at

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the other skills as well. The chase rate back up

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to thirty five percent, that was his highest mark since

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fourteen. His swinging strike rate twelve point

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. That was an almost two percent increase from eighteen.

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Not where he was in his prime years, but it's

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>still very good. Thirteen percent is a very good mark

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for a starting pitcher as well. The red flags that

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I have noticed, you still have to worry about the health.

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>You're right, like, that's not going away. But I wouldn't

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>depend on him for two innings. If I'm projecting Kershaw

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>likely a hundred and seventy two hundred and eighty innings

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>pitched of a you know, three five r A, which

0:38:57.120 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is a very good picture. And again it's I think

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a really really good sp two. I just probably

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want him as my sp one. The other red

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>flag that I noticed, Greg was that the slugging percentage

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>against both his curveball and his slider last year was

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a career high. So with the fastball velocity going down

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>last year for Kershaw and the slugging percentage going up

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on his breaking pitches. He's basically a three pitch pitcher,

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>basketball slider curve. If people are starting to hit those

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>harder and slug those a little bit more, and his

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:31.320
<v Speaker 1>fastball already is decreasing in velocity, and there is a

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:33.879
<v Speaker 1>chance that the performance could just take a step back.

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So I understand what you're saying. There are red flags there.

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't mind him as my sp two. I wouldn't

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 1>want him to anchor my staff. I do think he's

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:44.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you a hundred and seventy very equality endings.

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>But you have to keep in the back of your

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>mind that there was a chance that he gets hurt again,

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>or the production just takes a step back due to

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>age and and the fact that people are starting to

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 1>hit his breaking stuff a little bit better. As you said,

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Frankie Um, you don't on him as you were Ace,

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And you also mentioned in the past that you don't

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>really like that tier or starting pictures. You'd rather wait

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a round her too, and go into the Louis Seberino,

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paddock, no synder Guard, crop of guys, Aaronola, you darbish,

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Zach Grinky, That crew which goes a couple of rounds

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>later than Kershaw, so you'd probably just not take a

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:21.439
<v Speaker 1>picture there, right, Yeah, in the third round, third fourth

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>round range where you often have to take Kershaw. I

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of the hitters there. Um, how your

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 1>bios someone that I'm targeting a lot, someone like a

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Kettle Marte, even a Kessen Hero we were talking about

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>during the break. I'll target a lot of those hitters

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, I wind up picking up like

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a Chris Paddock and Noah synder Guard, uh, Louis Seberino,

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>someone like that. All right, so let me move on

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.919
<v Speaker 1>now to the closer that we're trying to figure out.

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.359
<v Speaker 1>And this last year, at this time, one of the

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>top closers off the board, if not the top closer

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.439
<v Speaker 1>off the board. Well, that was Blake China. Lake Tchina

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 1>came over from Washington to Oakland the Shawn Doolittle Um

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Matson trade and late China was ever think we

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted it to be. For years with Washington, he was spectacular.

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:06.240
<v Speaker 1>For the Oakland A's down the stretch, he was immaculate,

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and then last year he got hurt and never refounded,

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>never regained it. And Liam Hendricks took over and was

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>awesome in his place, but they train and was so

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>bad that he got cut by the A's. They didn't

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>want to pay him what it was going to cost

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:22.919
<v Speaker 1>to bring him back, so they caught him. He goes

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Dodgers to be the set up man for

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Kenley Jansen, and Janson goes down, all right, well, we

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 1>know the handcuffs. It's clearly Blake China. But Frank, what

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>happened they China? And last year? Where did it go wrong? Um? Look,

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Blake triinan last year, this is

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>someone who we've seen kind of have that upside before

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>pitching with the Washington Nationals, was never really able to

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 1>put it all together, and then he did exactly that

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen. I mentioned earlier in the show that for

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you Darvish, in that second half, everything just came together

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and worked out so perfectly. It was a perfect storm

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>for him, and I think for Blake Trying, that's exactly

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>what happened in eighteen, and that's why we really liked

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:03.240
<v Speaker 1>him in nineteen. But then these strikeouts went down massively

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>last year, Greg the swinging strike create went from eighteen

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>percent to twelve and a half percent you could not find.

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>The strikes on the walks went from two point four

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>per nine eighteen two over five per nine. So a

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of those things together, you're walking more batters, you're

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>not getting at swings as many swings and misses as

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>many strikeouts. That means people are putting the ball in play.

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And when they're putting the ball in play with runners

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on base via the walk, Greg, that's obviously going to

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>lead to disastrous things. And that's exactly what happened with

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>with Blake Trindon last year. Al Right, fair enough, but

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the question isn't it what happened Blake trying and last year? Frank?

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>It's who shouna be late training? This year? In a

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>game we like to call, who is this year's Blake tried?

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 1>In familiar faces? Also realized for this board are s

0:42:56.600 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 1>for who's this year's right? This year's in it? You're

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the grammar guy, so who's his years? Yeah? Noted for Sandra, understandable. Alright,

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>So who is this year's plays Trina? For me? I

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of already alluded to it. It's Liam Hendricks, the

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>guy that actually replays Blake Trina last season as the

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>closer for the Oakland A's. Listen, being a reliever, it's volatile.

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>We know that. Being a dominant closer, it just doesn't

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.399
<v Speaker 1>have an offer often. Leam dricks is thirty one years old.

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 1>He spent time with the Twins, he spent time with

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the Blue Jays, the Royals, and last year he was

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>dominant with the Oakland Athletics. A cap for nine or

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>kid third over thirteen point one three. That was freaking awesome.

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Last year the walks will still over to not great

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>for a closer. The r A was one point eight.

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:49.399
<v Speaker 1>What was the X fift you asked, three point to one.

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a career season for Liam Andrews, one where

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 1>he finally stayed healthy for the most part and pitched

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:57.360
<v Speaker 1>over eighty innings as a closer for the A's. And

0:43:57.480 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>my confident he could do this again, Well, he's really good.

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Ineventeen every other year he was kind of fine. So no, Frank,

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not confident that he do this again. I'm not

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>confident to take him where he's being drafted as one

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of the top tier closer as your first closer off

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the board. I'd rather go in a more short thing.

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather go to a different direction and trust and

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Manderson did it. I don't even think that I have

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to give you one, Greg, because I feel like this

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:22.399
<v Speaker 1>is the perfect dance. I mean, coming from Blake trying?

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Who is this year? Is Blake trying? And well, yeah,

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the guy who replaced him in Liam Hendricks. I

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>love this call as well. I will say, you know,

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>how did he get as many strikeouts as he did

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:33.800
<v Speaker 1>last year? How did that swinging strike rate go to

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a career high seventeen per cent? Well, he didn't prove

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the fastball velocity by two miles per hour, right, So

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 1>he was throwing ninety four miles per hour back in

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 1>eighteen up that to nineties six and a half miles

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>per hour in twenty nineteen. So he didn't make improvements

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 1>in the velocity. Uh, started getting more chases, started getting

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>more swings and misses. But you're right, Greg, A one

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 1>point eight zero e r A the year before that,

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 1>ar A over four the year before of that, the

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>area over four, twenty six, three seven six e r A.

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I have my doubts when it comes to Liam Hendricks

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 1>for all the reasons that you mentioned. Can he maintain

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that velocity is he gonna get as many swings and

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 1>misses this year. I don't know that they have great

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:18.759
<v Speaker 1>options in the in the bullpen to replace him. I

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:21.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's like, use Merrow Petite, who's like the setup

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:24.319
<v Speaker 1>man in Oakland right now, pulling that up for you.

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Yet use Merrow Petite. They have Joaquin Storia who is

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a former closer. Remember the name lu Travino because this

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is someone who was a couple of years ago and

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>he's still in that bullpen. So maybe you know he's

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>someone who gets an opportunity here, Greg, are you sure

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you want me to give you one? Because I feel

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>like Liam Hendricks is just you know, if you don't

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 1>want I can't even don't have to more Liam Hendris

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for a moment um. His nickname is Slider because he's Australian.

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>He is Australian, that is true. So he got slide up.

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>His fastball went up. He was he mentioned this, but

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 1>it was the high velocity of his career last year.

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Has a hard He threw his fastball lastie over ninety

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>six miles per hour. He had never been over ninety

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:06.359
<v Speaker 1>four and a half four in his career. The most

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 1>part or any four point nine, he got you, but

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>ninety six and a half way harder than ever than

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the fastball before. So he did make some changes obviously

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to somehow get more velocity there. And he maintained that

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the question. It's the only year that he's ever

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>averaged more than ninety four point nine, more than ninety

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:23.800
<v Speaker 1>four miles per hour on his fastball, so can He

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>maintained that, all right, Greig, I'll give you have to

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's all gonna come full certain don't have to

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in a second. Give you a random player if you

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>want to tell me what you think about Teoscar who

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>names this year? Leam Hendricks is being drafted as a

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>top five closer, but by Team BFF, right, someone was

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:44.839
<v Speaker 1>being drafted as a top ten closer, and someone who

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I've heard he drafted unfortunately um names Paxton is Kenley

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Jansen Emley Jansen of the Los Angeles Dodgers, and I

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of missed that first closer round. I'd like to

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 1>get Ken Giles as my first closerre in a lot

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of drafts, maybe a Roberto Osuna, but those guys were

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>already gone, and so I looked at the fallback option

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Kenley Jansen. What I'm worried about

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is if the strike house are down, Greg. They went

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>from over fourteen case for nine seventeen down to ten

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eighteen, and it bounced back up a

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit to eleven in two thousand nineteen. But he's

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>not the player that he once was. One three two

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 1>e r A back in two thousand seventeen. It's gone

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>up to three oh one last year three seven one

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 1>e r A four Kenley Jansen. He also had a

0:47:29.760 --> 0:47:31.959
<v Speaker 1>bad second half the r A in the second half

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>over four one to five whip his line drive ry

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>went up ten percent. And to bring it all full circle, Greg,

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you know who's going to take the job from Kenley

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Jansen's exactly right, man. So look, if you are jaking

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Kenley Jansen right now and you want to handcuff them,

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:50.399
<v Speaker 1>just make sure you get lake training, because this year's

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 1>lake training is Kenley Jansen. Did you did you get

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I wanted to. He went a couple of

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 1>picks before us, and then we end up getting Daniel Hudson, who,

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:03.359
<v Speaker 1>all right, there there might get some saves there out

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 1>there in Washington. Get saves in Washington a lot of

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 1>people think Shawn Doodle is also the closes are all

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden again yea Husson Hudson husband will still

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>out the World Series. Yeah, it seems like pretty good.

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he was good. By the way, you're the second

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 1>highest left on base percentage in baseball last year? Do

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>not you maintain it? Rafty veteran Greg, Come on, he

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>can wiggle out of those damns. I don't think so.

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>It's Farrell, it's coast to coast. I want to think

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Seawan and Alex Down's their Sandra as well, Frank Staff, Greg, Susan.

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>What did it all get tomorrow? We hope I want

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:43.839
<v Speaker 1>to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:50.720
<v Speaker 1>on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:53.800
<v Speaker 1>with Daily rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate

0:48:53.880 --> 0:48:57.720
<v Speaker 1>projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>lake swap support, and much more safe percent on winning

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily Rodo

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:08.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com backslash Dunk to learn more. H