WEBVTT - Is computer addiction a thing?

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, San Francisco, we're coming back to see you. Yes,

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>our second year in a row. We're gonna be going

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to s F Sketch Fest. I'd like to think it's

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the premier comedy festival in the United States. Probably well

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in the world, you think, so, yeah, what about Beijing? Nope,

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a close second. For a second. Well,

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>we love San Francisco, we love performing there. Everyone is

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>always so kind to us. And by San Francisco we

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>mean the entire Bay area of course. Yeah, so we

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>will be there doing our thing for a one time

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>only show on Sunday, January one pm. Yeah, it's the

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>rare Sunday afternoon. We're like the NFL of podcasters. Yeah right,

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what I've always thought. So all you have

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to do is go to the SF Sketch Fest site,

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>look at the old calendar, and there are tons of

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>great people performing. Oh yeah, So I suggest like just

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>doubling down and getting tickets to all kinds of good

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>shows for sure, and hurry up and get tickets to ours,

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>because they've only been on sale for a week or

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so and they're already half sold out. That's right, So

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>please hurry San Francisco. Please hurry. Welcome to Stuff you

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>should know from How Stuff Works dot Com. Hey, and

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, and there's Charles W.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Bryant, and there's Jerry over there. So this is

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know the Computer addiction episode. Yeah. So

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 1>computer addiction, as it turns out, is many things. Mhm uh.

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna include smartphone addiction in this as computer addiction.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah for sure, because this was written before there were

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>computers in people's pockets. But it is porn addiction. It

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is online porn. Yeah, um, yeah, exactly. Um. Is there

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>any other way there's gent Well, that's like when when

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>poor Fred Willard went to uh like a a porno

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>theater and was caught or something, and like everybody felt

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>so bad because everyone loves for Fred Willard and it

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like some big scandal. Everyone's just like, oh, poor Fred.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Somebody needs to like explain to him how this has

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>done these days, Like you don't need to leave your house.

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>How are there even porno theaters? Least? I don't know.

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it like kitchy retro vintage kind of thing. Maybe

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I would go to one of those okay, just as

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to go look around and be like, hey,

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>nice to meet you. I was just wanting to shake

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>your hand. Won't be shaking hands, but I think it

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>would be interesting. Like, you know, this is what it

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>was like in the nineteen seventies, you know on Times Square.

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna find me a porno theater. I'm

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>totally going. You know, Georgia Theater used to be one.

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>That's how it started out in Athens. I don't think

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I knew that. And then God burned it down a

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>few years back because of that, and Dave Matthews built

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it back up. I remember when he used to play there,

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>like it seems like every three months. When like I

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>was in school there before he was a big deal.

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I was like, who are these guys? Why is her

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>name always up on that marquee? They said, you'll understand Sunday.

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I still don't. When is that day coming? Uh? Well,

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>now it's not going to if it hasn't yet. So

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it is porn addiction. It is uh maybe gambling addiction,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>video game addiction, gaming addiction for sure, social media addiction,

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>YouTube addiction. Yeah, and all a lot of things wrapped

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>up under this big banner of computer addiction, right, and

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>everything you just UM mentioned is what's called collectively computer

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>mediated communication, right. Or there's another subgroup called Internet Addiction disorder.

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And we should point out right here that none of this,

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>there's some controversy with some of this, and none of

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it is officially listed yet. Still, as far as I

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>can tell, no, there was a push to get UM

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>computer addiction of some form or another, at least Internet

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Addiction Disorder UM put into the d s M five,

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>which they put together a couple of years back, the

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>American Psychological Association UM. But they said, no, we should

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>do a show just on that because yeah, well no

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the DSM period because I was looking at the year

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>because I was curious when the next one was due,

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and then I looked at him throughout time, and I

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think there is unless I'm wrong. It didn't look

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>like there was any like set like every ten years

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna put one out. No, I don't know what

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>schedule it's it's on. Maybe when enough of the stuff

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>turns out to be bunk. Yeah, They're like, I was

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>probably write this thing. Yeah maybe so like, yeah, homosexuality

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't comparable to insanity any longer. We should probably rewrite

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the handbook, you know. And I wonder if they make

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>addendums or if it's just like, Nope, it's locked the

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>next until the next one comes out you're insane because

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gay, But then the next day it comes out

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, you're cud anyway. So they tried to

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>get something like that in the DSM five and and

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it did not correct. Apparently. What I saw is that

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a basically a note in there that says, like,

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we understand that this is a thing that people are researching,

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to keep an eye on it, and

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it just needs more what we need to do more

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>research on it. It's just too misunderstood or not well

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>understood enough to morerant being included as which is how

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>it should work. Like, because all the different studies I

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>looked at was they're all pretty lame, to be honest.

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a ton of them though, right, Yeah, but everyone

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw was and we'll go over and was like

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>we asked twenty people question I saw. I saw others

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that were legitimate. Um, And there are also apparently a

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of neurological studies as well, because there's a big

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>controversy not just in whether, um, you could actually be

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>addicted to computers or if it's just an impulsive of

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>failure to control your impulses. Um. So people say, well,

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they're just lazy, they just want to sit around in

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>front of a computer all day. That doesn't make them addicted.

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that what all addiction is? Though? Is it failure

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to control your impulse? No, I should go back and

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>re listen. You could. And I think some people make

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the case that behavioral addictions, which are non substance addictions,

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>are failures to control your impulse. Right. Other groups say, no,

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it's way off. These behaviors are still releasing dopamine in

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>your brain. Um, in which case that it's following the

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>same mechanism of addiction that heroin or cocaine creates. It's

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>just a behavior. So there's still kind of like got

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of budding heads over that even which,

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>of course, then that means that something as a morphous

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is Internet addiction disorder couldn't possibly be agreed upon at

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>this point. Uh. And you can tell this article is

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>dated too because it talks about instant messaging. So every

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>time it said that, I just crossed it out and

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>put texting nice. It's kind of the new I am. So.

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>One other thing that got me too is I went

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and looked at the citation. It was written in two

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven. And what's scary though, is a lot of

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the stuff he's describing is taken as like totally normal

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and among the general population in the West. Now, yeah,

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you know it is. It is pretty interesting. Um, all right, Well,

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously if we're talking about the smartphones and computers, laptops, desktops,

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever your device. Um, we are talking about basically if

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you look down the list of of what happens if

0:07:55.400 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you are quote computer addicted in quote, it's basically the

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>same as any alcohol or drug addiction. Um, do you

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>stay on the computer front? It's longer than intended or

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>not noticed? Notice the passage of time. You could say

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that with drugs. Uh. Do you make conscious efforts to

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>cut back on computer time and repeatedly fail? That's a

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>big one, big one. Uh. Do you think about your

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>computer a lot when you're not using it or constantly

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>look forward to the next opportunity use it? Drugs and alcohol?

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>That is why I don't play video games in Yeah,

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in like seven whenever the Clone Wars with that episode

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>one who knows Okay, well whatever episode, the one with

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>jar Jar binks, probably the greatest Star Wars character ever created. Um,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the that video game that came out in association with it,

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I found myself like thinking about how to play it

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>better when I wasn't playing it, and I was like

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>was this on the PlayStation? And uh, I was like

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this is this is no way to live. I'm not

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>doing this anymore. So I stopped playing games altogether. Well,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>they definitely like I think anyone who ever played a

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of Tetris had Tetras streams or would look at

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the world in some ways as a Tetris grid. Um,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>some games really have a knack for getting into your

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>crawl that way. Like you know, I've been playing a

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of I can't even think of the name of

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 1>it now. Um, they're very immersive, you know, dude, Especially now.

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean like that that Star Wars game was was cruddy. Yeah,

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Like I that wasn't the first and only game I'd

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>ever played. I'd played plenty of other games, and I

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>could tell you that was not a good game, But

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I still that I think that made it even more

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Its strengthened my resolve even more that Like, if I

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was sitting there thinking about how to play this cruddy

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>game better, Um, I should probably just stop playing games altogether. Yeah,

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>so you haven't played any games since? Yeah, I don't

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>play a lot. I think I've mentioned this before. I'll

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>usually get every couple of years, I'll get one game

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the best reviewed game, and I will play that

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>obsessively for a little while then quit. So I'm sure

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you have like track the progress of games these days,

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and now that we're starting to move into virtual reality,

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like you're we're gonna be totally lost as a species. Alright.

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>So continuing on how it mirrors drug addiction, UM, hiding

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the extent of your computer used from family and friends. Yeah,

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that's totally use a computer as an escape when feeling

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>depressed or stressed. That one, to me is kind of like, Okay,

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't see that as a sign of addiction.

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>But this is a grabstor article, so I'll take it

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>as gospel fact. I was a scrabstor too, all right.

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Um missing events or um failing at non computer tasks

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>because you're on the computer, poor job performance, family activities.

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>You miss that family reunion because you're playing jar jar

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>banks charge r binks is candy crush, bonanza rodeo uh.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>And then it could lead to things like marital problems,

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>um negative consequences, getting in trouble at work. The same

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>can be said of alcohol and drugs for almost all

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>these Bryant uh. And then sadly, there have been cases

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>where computer addicted or gaming addicted people have either died

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 1>or had their children neglected such that they either had

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>health problems or died. And if you look it up,

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>just look up gaming death or game binge death and

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they are all kinds of stories. It seems like it

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>seems like Taiwan is one of the worst. Taiwan had

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>two two people die within two weeks of each other

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>from gaming binges in two thousand. Yeah. Well they had

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>three total, and I think all three were in internet

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 1>cafes even so, not even at home where they can't be,

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, disturbed, this out in public. Yeah, and apparently

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>one guy was laying there for ten hours before they

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>realized and another I couldn't believe this. One other um

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>note that I saw in this article was that when

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the police and the paramedics came in to retrieve this

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>dead body from the internet cafe. The other people playing

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't even stop. I think they just were basically didn't

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>even pay attention to the fact that a dead body

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>was being removed from the internet cafe. So there's a

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>book called Death by Video Game and um, it's actually

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>not new. This is this happened in the nineteen eighties.

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Even ever since, there have been games. People have played

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>them until they died. And Uh, I was just curious

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>about Taiwan. And the author basically says Taiwan in particular,

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>um at these internet cafes, which is a cheap way

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to get online and stay online. Yeah, so they've got

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>these cafes. There's a lot of smoking going on in there,

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of caffeine drinking. Um, the humidity in the

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>country is really tough. And basically says all of this

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>adds up to UM and you know, of course you're

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>not eating well, you're not exercising at all, uh, and

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>all of this adds up to really increased likelihoods of

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>things like blood clots and UM. Because you think, like,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>how do you literally die from like a nineteen hour

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>bench of a video game? It's it's all the other

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>things that go into how you've treated your body really

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>neglect essentially. Yeah, I mean, a blood clot makes sense

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. I saw exhaustion. I'm like, is this the

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen nineties. You don't die of exhaustion from sitting around.

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you die of the vapors, you know, blood clot?

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I get that makes sense, And it does too because

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>your legs are sitting there immobilized. Um, so of course

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you could get a blood clot. Pulmonary thrombosis, right yeah,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>or pulmonary Yeah, pulmonary thrombosis not good, not good at

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>all because it travels to your heart or your brain,

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, your World Warcraft character is

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>just standing there not doing anything because you're debt. Uh.

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're saying though about this article being

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>written a while ago and then hearing it to today,

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>because it says even when people do interact with friends,

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>they may become irritable because they're away from their computer.

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And now people aren't away from their computer ever because

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of the smartphone. And it's just morphed into this thing

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>where it's just accepted that it's okay to be having

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with someone while they're looking at something else right, right,

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And I mean the idea that you're sitting there physically

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>with somebody and they're hanging out online with other people. Um,

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's who they're actually hanging out with, even though

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>they're physically with you in the room. Yeah, it's weird,

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>but that's become basically, I mean, that's accepted behavior now. Yeah,

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's not hard to step back one degree

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and say this is odd. Yeah, And I wonder what

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the long term, Like we're right in the infancy of

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this thing, Like what are things going to be like

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in fifty years. I was in a bar the other

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>night getting some take out dinner for the family, take

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>out beer, I don't know, take out food, bar, restaurant,

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and um, and I got this place all the time

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and go sit out the bar, order drink, order the food,

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>have my one drink, and get the food to go.

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm there for like twenty five minutes, thirty minutes maybe.

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And I I used to love going to sitting down

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in a bar and talking to strangers next to me,

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>striking like the good bar conversation is, like it's the best.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And I sat down I was between these two dudes.

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I looked at my left, I was staring on his phone.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Looked at my right, I was staring at his phone.

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>People beside them were staring at their phones. Nobody was

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>talking to each other. So I ended up having a

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>good conversation with the bartender, which was fine. How Yukowski,

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>yesk of you. Yeah, that's true, But um, I don't know, man,

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it just depressed me. Yeah, no, I know what you mean.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>When you step back and look around and stuff like that,

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you can make the case that they're still connecting with

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>whoever they're talking to, who they'd rather be talking to.

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess right, And that's actually I mean, that was

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that that Ed touches on in

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the negative effects of this is that you you start

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to prefer your online friends. Well, I mean, there are

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's entirely possible that your online friends are better friends

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>from the people you're surrounded with in real life, you know.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know that that's necessarily a drawback, but

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>there is definitely a case to be made in plenty

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of studies that suggest that we are growing ironically more

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>socially isolated the more connected we become. Yeah, but also

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>get the feeling that in that bar, if I would

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>have said, hey, man, like, let's get a conversation going,

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of course I wouldn't do it that offer, because it

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>would have been that's a great conversation, sir, would you

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>like to speak with me? Hey man, let's get a conversation.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But if I got a conversation going and these people

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>put their phones away for a minute, they might be like, oh,

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.479
<v Speaker 1>well this, you know, I'd rather be talking to this guy.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Because a lot of times, I mean, we're assuming people

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are interacting with friends on social media. It might be

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>watching cat videos or reading uh news sites angry about

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the election, just feeding into their anger over and over

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 1>and over. Um, they might be like, dude, thank you

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>for talking to me. And because that was so much

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>more pleasurable than like, it's sort of the de facto

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>go to of well, I have thirty seconds to stand

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>here and wait for the elevator, right, so let me

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>check my social meds. The thing is, I don't necessarily

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I think that the more we are

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>drawn into our devices to communicate with others, the harder

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it becomes to talk to somebody who says, hey, let's

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>get a conversation. Go no, no no, I agree. In real life,

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, you know, I think they would

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>if people did it, though they might be surprised and delighted, like, wait,

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>I can still do this, you know, not me. I

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>find I'm failing at it more and more these days.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So it just makes me feel So we're getting way

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>into the opinion category and where irking a few people.

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a break, all right, we are back with

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>facts and figures, okay. So um. One of the other

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>things that struck me to chuck was was that losing

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>losing touch with the people in your physical life in

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>favor of people online that you're friends with. You're also,

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of cases doing way more spectacular things

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>with the people online than your in your real life,

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>like going into simulated combat. You know. That's that you

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>do interesting stuff with the people you're ine online with

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>rather than you know, um well, especially if you lead

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of a boring life, you know, and that's all subjective,

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, but um, I don't know if your life

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is really boring. Everybody can um. I saw this ESPN

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Outside the Lines episode on this wrestler at University of Michigan,

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Go Wolverines. Name is Marshall Carpenter and I think he

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>was a twin if I'm not mistaken. But he would

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>spend eight to fourteen hours a day gaming on his

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>computer and was done. Like he washed out of wrestling,

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>quit Michigan and went to rehab and like had a

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>guy come into his house every day to rehab him

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>out of it. Uh. And there was a football player too,

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>named Quinn pitcock Um that quit the NFL. He played

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>one season for the Colts because he was playing Call

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of Duty and only wanted to play Call of Duty.

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>It's sad, but it's it is like, how can that?

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>How can you not call that an addiction? You know right? No,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's true. And examples like that are the ones that

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the people point to say, yes, there is such a

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>thing as computer addiction, and it does have pronounced effects

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>not just on you know, your NFL career, but if

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you're just an everyday schmo, it can have pronounced effects

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on your relationships to like for example, um, yes, you

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>might prefer your online friends who you're playing Call of

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Duty with to your wife, but you are married to

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>your wife and if you neglect or ignore her long

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>enough in favor of your friends for call of duty, Um,

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>she may divorce you. And there's actually there's never been

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>from what I've seen, a study that definitively showed it,

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Um that yes, uh, online time equals higher divorce rates.

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>But I found one that came pretty close, as a

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen study that appeared in Computers in Human

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Behavior a journal, and it found a two point one

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>eight percent to a four point three two percent. Those

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>those like decimal points that you know it's legitimate, um,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>And that that level rise in divorce rates correlated with

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a annual increase in Facebook use in a given area

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 1>in the US. Right, So every that Facebook increased up

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to four percent and change, Um, there was a four

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>percent and change increase in the divorce rate for that

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>area too. It's entirely possible the two had nothing to

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>do with one another. It's also entirely possible that yeah,

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>it totally did. Yeah. But then there are people that

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>say that. Um. The people that say that, well, it's

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>no different than sitting down and watching TV every night

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for four or five hours. Well, you can be addicted

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to television too, I think, um, but I think the

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>internet is a bit more immersive than TV, especially especially

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>because you don't interact with the TV the way you

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>do online usually, right unless your Elvis and Bob Goolays

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>on TV and you with your hand going, was it

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Bob Goulay? It used to drive him when oh Man

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Will Ferrell, the Bob thing was so great, remember that. Yeah,

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know who was on TV when Elvis shot it.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes he would just be like with the TV

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't enough. He'd shoot his toaster or the dishwasher. Yeah,

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Robert grew because he would see Gooley everywhere. Wow. Yeah,

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>els is on a lot of drugs. Yeah, but they

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>were legal. God bless my grandmother, God rest her soul.

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>She you know. They were from Memphis, and it was

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>always like, oh, Elvis, you know, he was still Memphis's son.

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Like all his doctors, they had him going every which way.

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 1>His doctors killed him. He was a big, big fat junkie.

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>He loved his drugs. I don't want to like be

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the one to break it to you, so I never did.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I just let her think that. What's funny is that

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:58.479
<v Speaker 1>horribly ironic um but also hysterically ironic thing that he

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>hated drug dealers. Like he would get wasted on prescription

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>drugs and get so worked up thinking about drug dealers

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>living in his town and you want to go shoot him,

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and his boys would have to like restrain him and

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>calm him down. So he didn't drug dealers sit down

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to put this under your tongue on biggie sit back then,

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Well didn't he wasn't he like an honorary d A

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>guy from Nixon. He tried to make it. I think

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they know there's that famous picture of him shaking hands

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>with Nixon. He got that that meeting arranged. Nixon didn't

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>wanted to happen because he's like, this is a preposterous

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna make this guy d E agent. But

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>Elvis was offering himself as a d E, a undercover agent,

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>because he could get closer to the hippies and all that. Um,

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And she was like, here's your junior badge. Anything I

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>can do, just let me know. Man. Uh, there's a

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>movie out about that now that I want to see

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 1>that Elvison Nixon meeting. Yeah, yeah, I haven't seen it yet. Um. Alright,

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>So back to I was not expecting to Nixon to

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>make an appearance in this that wasn't either. I did

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>find one study. This is Dr Susan Mueller at the

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>University of Maryland, Go Turps. She asked two hundred students

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to abstain from all media for twenty four hours, called

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it twenty four hours unplugged. Had a colon in there.

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Even there's like a lot of that too. There's like

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>camps in Japan, they have fasting camps, they call him

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>where like you're just away from anything technological or connected.

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.239
<v Speaker 1>See that's great. Yeah, I don't think it's great if

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you're one of the poor teenagers whose parents put you there.

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I bet at the end of the week, though, you

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>get these great stories about how like I hated it

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>going in, but you know, I made these new friends

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and and then they're probably something, are like this was

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the worst experience, right. Uh. But she basically just had

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>these kids, these students describe things and what it was

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>like wasn't super scientific, but um all of them said

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>that they were I could not function without it. And

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>they across the board, all two hundred, Like there wasn't

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a single person that said like, oh that was nice.

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>All of them are like this was one of the

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>worst twenty for our periods of my life lately. Uh.

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 1>But then you also make the argument like this is

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>how we communicate these days, is how we get our news.

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Is how we can communicate through work? Uh, Like you

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 1>can't just take away everything like that and say all

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>right now, relearn everything you know and over this twenty

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>four hour period or keep up in modern society. Yeah,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so it wasn't the most fair thing to do. It

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>seems like drawing it out over time might have been

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>more useful than twenty four hours or something. But and

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it also raises another point of contention as far as

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>determining what constitutes computer addiction. Um, the computer is not

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and inherently um useless or evil thing, right, Like Egg

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>compares it to Heroin, Like you're you could legitimately sit

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>around and use a computer for ten hours in a

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>day in a very useful manner. Yeah, you got a

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>deadline for work or something. Um, you sit around and

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>shoot Heroin for ten hours. You're not accomplishing anything. You

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>can point to that and be like, no, that's not

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not objectively good in any way, shape or form. Right. Um,

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>with a computer, you can be like, yeah, you could

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be sitting there playing candy crushed for ten hours straight,

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>or you could be um researching new things or learning

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a new language, or getting work done or whatever. So

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you can point to yes, if someone

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>sits down at a computer for ten straight hours, their

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>computer addicts. But the whole it muddies the whole thing,

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the usefulness of the computer and the ubiquity and necessity

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of using a computer for long stretches muddies the whole

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>definition of what constitutes computer addiction. Well. Yeah, and while

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they have determined and actually shown in the brain scans

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that it actually lights up areas similar to drug addiction

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and reward centers, it doesn't render those uh, brain centers useless.

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Like when you do the heroine the heroine, which is

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, another way of saying what you

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.719
<v Speaker 1>were saying, when you ride the horse. That's that what

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>they call it. I think that's what they call it.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>In the seventies, I was chasing the dragon or is

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that something? Okay, there's this great MST three K episode

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and early one with Joel and they were like injecting

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a monkey with something and one of them, I don't

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>remember who said it. They go, yes, they're a little

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>horse for a little monkey. Alright, U should we take

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>another break? All right, we'll come back and we'll talk

0:27:36.280 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>specifically about um, social media addiction right after this. Al right,

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>social meds, as Hodgeman calls it, well, he ended up

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>calling it so means by the it is a new,

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>brand new world with social media. And I think a

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of the online addiction now is centered around studying

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>things like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, snapchat. A prediction. I guess

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it's probably a better way to put it. Yeah, it's

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a good point. So they've been studying for a little while.

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand twelve, Uh, some researchers from University of

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Bergen did a study where they looked at Facebook dependency

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and they said that the very nature of the site

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is problematic and that, uh they found that the brain,

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the parts of the brain associated with preservation of the

0:28:53.320 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>social reputation are what's at play there. And um, basically

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and this stuff that you sent me and I found

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>other stuff too, the very way that those sites are

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>structured are to get you addicted to them. Yeah. Yeah,

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>so there's this whole thing. Um, there's basically it's called

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>behavioral design. There's a guy named b. J. Fogg who's

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a experimental psychologist slash computer scientist and he runs a

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>uh what's called the Persuasive Technology Lab at Stanford. And

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this guy is like a guru god out there, UM

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>who basically has taken this concept that yes, you can

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have a great idea, Yes you can have a killer app.

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes you can, UM have wonderful technology, but it doesn't

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>amount to anything unless you get somebody to use it

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and to use it a lot, to make a habit

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>out of using it. And there's this Basically there's a

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>push right now to make technology purposefully as addictive as possible,

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>literally addictive. And we're at a point right now with

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the way the apps are designed where cigarettes were back

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in like the seventies when they started adding things like

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>ammonia and sugar to increase the amount of effect that

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>nicotine had on the brain to make them more addictive.

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the point we're at with the apps that are

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>being created, and it's all based on how they're designed. Yeah.

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>This UM. This one researcher called n. I. R. Near

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>ell e Y a L great name. UM wrote a

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>book called Hooked Colon How to Build Habit Forming Products.

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>UM basically said it starts with this trigger, and the hook,

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>which is in the case of social media and Facebook,

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is lonely, loneliness, boredom or stress. Okay, so that's the

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>hook that they get you with a board the standing

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>there at the elevator for a minute. Hey, it's so sad,

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's actually your Facebook feed. Are you standing the

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.959
<v Speaker 1>line in the grocery store. Don't talk to the nice

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>lady next to you. Ignore that little kid making cute faces.

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>She didn't want to talk to you anyway. So you're

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>bored and that's how they get you going. That's how

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>they get you cooked, to begin with that initial little trigger,

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but then it goes from there. So so I think

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that I think boredom would constitute a motivation that will

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>motivate you. Right. The trigger is something like, um, if

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:20.719
<v Speaker 1>you open up Facebook and there's the news feed and

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>there's like all these different stories or your friends like something,

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and so you are activated too. You're motivated by boredom

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to go seek out the news feed. The news feed

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>itself are are triggers that you click and then all

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden you are immersed in your Facebook app. Yes,

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and fogs actually come up with this kind of shorthand

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>formula for it. It's um B equals M A T

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so behavior the behavior that you're after, which is interacting

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>with Facebook, is what Facebook wants you to do. UM

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's where motivation, So you're motivated by boredom. Ability, it's

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>very easy to open up the app on your phone.

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>You're able to low hanging fruit is what we call it.

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>UM and a trigger all come together. So the triggers,

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>say is the news feed. The ability is just opening

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>up the Facebook app, and then the motivation is boredom.

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But there are plenty of other motivations. There's plenty of

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>other abilities, there's plenty of other triggers. And what they

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>found out is that the key seems to be ability,

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>where if you make it as easy as possible for

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a person to do something, they're likely to do it,

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and once they do it, you can start getting them

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to do it over and over, so a behavior becomes

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a habit. Yeah, that's the key, that's the point. That's

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>what they're after, and that's how they're designing apps these

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>days to make habitual. Yeah. Well, the Facebook in particular,

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's no accident that the UM what's it called

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>not the alert but the notification is in red. Um.

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a color that they found draws like a more

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>immediate reaction in response. That's what stop sign is red um.

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>That's why I read like is read. That's why the

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook alerts are read, so I'm read when I'm mad. Uh.

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>This other guy, UM, what's his first name something Harris. Uh.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>This is sort of the depressing part. He says. You

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>might say to yourself, it's my responsibility to exert self

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>control when it comes to things like getting on Facebook. Uh,

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>he said, But that's not acknowledging the fact that there

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are a thousand people on the other side of that

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>screen whose job it is to break down whatever responsibility

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you can maintain. Yeah, which is I mean, that's just

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>dead on. And this guy knows his name is Tristan Harris.

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>He actually spent time under studying under B. J. Fogg,

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's kind of gone the opposite way. Um, he's saying, Hey,

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we actually, um are doing something kind of nefarious here.

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>We should really kind of cool it with the behavioral stuff.

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So he's kind of launched a push for people to

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>rely on technology less or to resist interesting the use

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of technology in their lives. So basically there's I mean,

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>some of it comes up in this article by ed

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to UM, like doing things like setting alarms and when

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the alarm goes off, your computers off, you just turn

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it off UM, or just allotting certain parts of the

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>day to UM using your computer, your phone. But I

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>mean it may have worked in two thousand seven, it's

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>just getting harder and harder today. Like we were saying before,

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>have you ever been on LinkedIn? Yeah, I've got like

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a time. It's totally neglected, like all LinkedIn accounts. I

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>know some people are super into it. I think I

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>get by the way. People I'm not on LinkedIn, never

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>have been nothing against it, don't even fully understand what

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it is. But I don't need any more LinkedIn invites

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not on it. I get them all the time.

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 1>But when LinkedIn launched UM, apparently they had a hub

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and spoke icon to represent visually what your network was,

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>how big it was, and they said that that was

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a very intentional thing. When you look at it, that

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>trigger just say like, well look at my wheel. It's lame.

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't have people see him a wheel like that. Yeah,

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I connect, connect connect to people. Yeah, like fog says.

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>He's like, yeah, people couldn't think have people thinking they

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>were losers. Yeah, so yeah, they started using the site

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>like crazy. Well I'm surprised, I mean, Facebook says how

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 1>many friends you have. I'm kind of surprised that's not

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>featured a little more prominently, like you know, and or

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>even represented in terms of popularity. I'm quite sure that

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they studied that extensively and found that it actually like

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a reduction in Facebook. So they they guarantee that that

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't Yeah, that wasn't something they overlooked. Yeah, because it

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:44.919
<v Speaker 1>seems obvious that they would be like you would click

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>on someone's profile and it would be like this is

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>so and so they're super popular and he says he's

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a hero, You're a zero. Uh and then sadly, I'm

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>not on Snapchat at all. But m dude, the US

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Snapchat is one of the most difficult things you could

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>ever try to do. Well, they said in here. They

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>said that Facebook's um behavioral design makes like it's cute

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>compared to what Snapchat is doing. Yeah, like Facebook, if

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 1>you send someone um a note, right, you get some

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of alert when they read your note. Yeah, well,

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>not an alert, but you can see like a little

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>check mark like so and so rick as at this time.

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>So that sets it up for a social obligation for

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the person who received the note to respond because they

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>know that you know that they've read it now, yeah,

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>or you see it as they've you know, like they

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>saw this thing three days ago. That's responded. That motivates

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the behavior. Yes, that's that's built in design. Snapchat has

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a feature that displays how many days in a row

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>two people have snapped each other and then actually does

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 1>reward you with like emojis and things. Right, people love gamification. Yeah,

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that's basically what it is. Right. Yeah. So they said

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>what Facebook doing is just like kids play compared to

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>what they're trying to do. It's app chat and other

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>apps in the future. Right this uh, this, it's I

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>think an Atlantic article that that that pulls from. Um.

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 1>They were saying that there's reports of people who are

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>on the snapchat streaks of like X number of consecutive days.

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to break their streak, so if they

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.720
<v Speaker 1>know they're going to be away from their device or whatever,

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll give their password and log into a friend to

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>have them snapchat the other friends, so that the streak

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>will be unbroken, which I mean if you step back,

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's plenty of people who are like, so, who cares,

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>It's fine, this is the way the world is now.

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Some some teenagers are snapchatting each other because so that

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they can get emojis? Is that really that wrong? And

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the legitimate response, and that is I mean, and

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that is At the same time, though, I really feel

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like there's um, there's a lot of shirking of responsibility

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>for taking the human species in a certain direction without

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the human species being largely aware of it. We'll see.

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>That's where that's exactly crystallizes my problem with it. It's

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>not that sure, that is sort of the world now

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's what people do, but it's the fact that

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we're being manipulated into doing so behind the scenes when

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they have those meetings and they're like, hey, what if

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook feed? What if they auto played these videos?

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So before you know it, you're watching a video that

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you didn't even want to watch, and then you're watching

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>another one, like so let's put in the AutoPlay feature. Uh,

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And they call it hair is called it the bottomless bowl,

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that infinite stream that you get sucked into because they

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>found there was a study where people eat sev more

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 1>soup out of a self refilling bowl, a regular bowl

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>without even realizing they've eaten more. I want to see

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>that bowl. They just can't too. You just keep eating

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the soup. And that's essentially what they're doing on Facebook

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and your other social media. Social media feeds is um

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is you get sucked in before you know it, and

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>then a half hour has gone by, like you rationalize yourself, like,

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can just go check um I sent

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>her for in request or a message. Just it'll take

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.240
<v Speaker 1>two seconds. Let me just check and see if they responded.

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Twenty five minutes later, they found is twenty five minutes

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is the average time that you it takes you to

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:19.919
<v Speaker 1>get back to what you were doing because you get

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>distracted because of that feed. You know, I've never been

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:26.479
<v Speaker 1>more aware of how often I checked Twitter than I

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.280
<v Speaker 1>was when I was checking Twitter while I was researching

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this article. Just nothing to do with thing, anything. Randomly,

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd just go open up Twitter and look nothing, no change,

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing worth seeing. It's it is bizarre the habits you

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>can form from it. So what do you do? Chuck

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>if you want out besides having to completely faster unplug

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Well, like you were talking about the if

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>you are if you I should say, if you are

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>a bona fide computer addict. Oh, I mean you can

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>go through a legit twelve step program like you go

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>through rehab. There are people out there doing that. So

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 1>if you feel like you need that, or you're someone

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in your family needs that, like have an intervention like

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>these cases are I was talking about. Like this wrestler,

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gaming fourteen hours a day. Your life is suffering

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, in many ways, like there's just no

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>way getting around it. No, there's not. Because again, like

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not getting exercise, you're not eating right, you're creating

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 1>um uh, blood clots in your legs, you're you're not

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with the people who are you're physically around with.

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course there's problems. Um you could also Uh, this

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 1>one was good. I thought you can put the computer

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>in the high traffic area of the house, That is

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a good one. Instead of being up there in your

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 1>bedroom in the closet looking like a guy from reefer madness. Yeah,

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>sit out in the open where someone might distract you

0:40:56.600 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>into a human interaction, right, or being will to keep

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>tabs on, Like, Uh, you've been at the computer for

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>six hours, now, what's your problem. Yeah, I'm working, Okay,

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll keep going. Yeah, And I mean I find that

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:12.839
<v Speaker 1>our lives are and I'm sure you're the same way.

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>They're busy enough to wear I mean I don't have

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>time to do that. What six hours at the at

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the six and eight hours of of funning. Oh yeah,

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 1>when we do our research and our work online. But

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like I can't play Fallout for eight hours. You know,

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I have responsibilities. But the fewer responsibilities you have, I guess,

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the more prone you are. I think there was Yeah,

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:39.879
<v Speaker 1>if you're born with a silver spoon in your mouth,

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>your toast when it comes to gaming. Yeah, that's true. Um.

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 1>It says here that study people who are more anxious

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and socially insecure appreciate the easy ways to communicate via

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the social meds. But on the other hand, people who

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>are more organized and ambitious were at a decreased risk

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of tech related addiction. Uh. And we just use it,

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, use it for the things they need it for.

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd say that characterizes me. Yeah, it's the tool aside

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 1>from checking Twitter. What else? Man you got anything else?

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I got one more thing. I just saw this good

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 1>um artic. Well, it was an article as a research

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>paper Internet Addiction colon, A brief summary of research and

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:34.320
<v Speaker 1>practice from Hillary Cash Lazette, Ray and Stealing Alexander Winkler. Um.

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>And I just read the summation. But it's interesting they said,

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>from our practical perspective, the different types of I a D.

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the Internet addiction disorder. Uh, they fit into one

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>category due to various uh, internet specific commonalities. So you

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about porn addiction or gaming and addiction, or any

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of these various addictions except probably social media in some

0:42:56.120 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 1>ways because anonymity and riskless interaction or two of them. Uh.

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And then commonalities and the underlying behavior which is avoidant

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:08.320
<v Speaker 1>sphere pleasure and entertainment. And then the overlapping systems I'm sorry,

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>symptoms increased amount of time spent online and preoccupation and

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 1>other signs of addiction. But in the end they say,

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, more research, more research, more research, that's what

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we need, which I mean, of course, it's coming like

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>this is probably the premier addiction of the twenty one century.

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, we seem to be looking at it

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is less and less of an addiction and more and

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>more of normal life. So I don't know, maybe there

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>will be less study of it. I'm just gonna encourage

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 1>people to you don't have to go out and and

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 1>give up everything, but just try to spend a little

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>more time talking to people. Yeah, it's just go to

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody and say, hey, make conversation with me just a

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit here and there, just and that always. Or

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 1>let's get a conversation going pet pepper and into your

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>life here and there and see if it does not

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>provide reward. Yeah. Another good one that I've found at

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 1>least makes you COGNI is in of it is when

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you are standing there waiting for that elevator or whatever

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 1>and you go to grab your phone, just think and

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>stop yourself at least do it to just poke yourself

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>for fun. Think of it as a gun. Yeah, and

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get tackled for waving it around in public.

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to do some of this lately to where

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I do just start talking to people and it freaks

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 1>people out a little bit these days, Yeah, whereas it

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:28.879
<v Speaker 1>definitely I don't remember it freaking people out like when

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 1>I was in college. Yeah, I think you're right. Yeah,

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely changed. And it's like, white, what do you want?

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>What are you talking to me? If you want to

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>talk to somebody who wasn't around, you had to go

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:42.439
<v Speaker 1>to a pay phone back in your day. They still

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 1>have those. I see him from time to time. Their

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:49.479
<v Speaker 1>neat It's like being in a living museum. Uh well,

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think either one of us have anything else. Instead,

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 1>we're going to suggest that you go on the house

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Type in a search bar computer

0:44:56.640 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>addiction if you want to know more about this. Um,

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:01.879
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of others if you can look up to. Uh.

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 1>And since I said search bar in there somewhere, it's

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 1>time for a listener mail. Uh yeah, And hey, sorry

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>if it was a little soap boxy on that one.

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to get to soap boxy. But I

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of miss folks talking to folks. You know, we'll

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to you. He just tapped me on the shoulder.

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna call this uh syntax um beef.

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, small issue I had with the syntax episode

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and discussing the colonial American reaction to levies like the

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 1>sugar tax, you dismissed the purpose of the taxes making

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the king richer. It is a common misconception that the

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 1>taxes were imposed on the colonies arbitrarily, and this was

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 1>certainly the patriot narrative used to support independence go Pats,

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but in fact, the taxes were levied to cover the

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>cost of the devastating French and Indian War, which the

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>colony survived only due to the British army's resistance. Revisionist

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>history nowadays tends to focus on the without representation part

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of the no tax should request, as well as the

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>effects of other laws such as forbidding settlement in the

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Appalachian regions and restriction of trade, rather than taxes alone.

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But I want to clear it up because portraying King

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 1>George five is greedy ignores legitimate political motives on the

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the British Empire, dropping ignored in the revolutionary narrative.

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Did this be email come from the UK? No? Oklahoma? Okay, okay,

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>right so close. I love the show. Keep up a

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>good work, guy, Sincerely, Thomas from Oklahoma. Thanks a lot, Thomas,

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:33.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks for setting us straight. Um. Yeah, I think we

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:36.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of just did the Nickel sketch of the King.

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty easy to fall into that trap. Sure,

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:42.239
<v Speaker 1>that's what they teach us in school exactly. You want

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to get pushed drawn by the King England. No, I

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 1>saw Schoolhouse Rock. That was a jerk Schoolhouse Rock with

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black. No, that was school Love Rock. Oh, that's right.

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:57.719
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get in touch with me or Chuck,

0:46:57.800 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you can hang out with me on Twitter at John

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Show Them Clark. You can also look us up at

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 1>s Y s K podcast. You can hang out with

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Chuck on Facebook at Charles W. Chuck Bryant, or Facebook

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:09.399
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Stuff you Should Know. You can send

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 1>us an email to stuff Podcasts at how stuff Works

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com and has always hang out with us at

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:16.359
<v Speaker 1>her home on the web. Stuff you Should Know dot

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:47:25.800 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it how stuff Works dot com