WEBVTT - Jake Sullivan

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the president's closest advisors is Jake Sullivan. He

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>was the nationals curity advisor and the second youngest person

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to hold that job at the age of forty three.

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I sat down with him recently here in the executive

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>office building to discuss a wide range of international issues

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and national security issues affecting the president and our country.

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>So let me get right to the heart of Ukraine.

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>If I could ask you, is there any chance of

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a resolution in Ukraine matter anytime the foreseeable future? Any

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>possibility of a truce or some kind of agreement that

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you think could end this war in the next few

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>months or so? You never say never. There's always a

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>chance and we've been clear from the beginning that we

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>would support a diplomatic solution that vindicated Ukraine's right to

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>sovereignty and territorial integrity. But the odds of it in

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the next few months, I think, are quite low. On China,

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the President United States has not met with G G

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Ping for covid related reasons, but there isn't possibility they

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>might meet in the upcoming meeting. Do you have any

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>plans to have a UM agreement or any kind of

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>proposed settlements of any issues that are now ongoing between

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the two countries, or is it just more more or

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>less and meet and greet with no advanced planning of

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>any great consequence? Well, right now there's no meeting planned but,

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>as you say, they will both be in Bali, Indonesia,

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for the g twenty in November and it would afford

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for the two of them to sit down

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in person. Actually, despite the fact that they've spent a

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of time together when Joe Biden was vice president,

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>they've not met in person since President Biden became president,

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's because Si jimping has basically not left China

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>in two years due to covid nineteen. So this would

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>be their first real chance to sit face to face

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and talk through the full range of issues in the relationship.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't expect major agreements to come out of that,

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but if they do actually sit and again that's hasn't

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>been decided Um, I would expect that we would see

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>some progress on some issues where the two countries interest

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>DU align. As we talk today, it's come out that

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>President Putin will be meeting with President Shei Jiping, most

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>likely somewhere in Europe not too long from now. was

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that a surprise to you, and what do you think

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be talking about? Well, it's not a surprise.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>President she and President Putin have met frequently over the

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>course of each of their tenure and in fact President

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Putin went to Beijing earlier this year and met in

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>person with president she in February when they rolled out

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>this new partnership between the two countries. So I think

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that they'll talk about the full range of issues in

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>their relationship. But I would note two things. First, before

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>president she goes to Uzbekistan to meet with President Uh

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Putin on the sidelines of another summit, he's going to Kazakhstan,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and Kazakhstan is a place where actually China and Russia

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>compete for influence. So it's an indication that this is

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>a relationship not without its complications. And then second, China

0:02:55.120 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>has actually stood back from fully getting in the hind

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the Russians when it comes to their war in Ukraine.

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>We have not seen them provide large scale support in

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of weapons or industrial scale efforts to undermine western sanctions.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So from our perspective, this relationship is something that bears

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>close watching, but again, is not without its complications. As

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>we talk, if there's also reports that North Korea is

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>selling weapons to Russia, was that a surprise to the administration? Well,

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what it indicates actually is that Russia doesn't have a

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of options. It appears to be running short of

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>its own munitions. It looks around the world and doesn't

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>find a lot of countries willing to sell it munition,

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>so it has to look to states like Iran and

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>North Korea to get ammunition and other forms of weaponry

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to be able to sustain its conflict in Ukraine. This

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is not, in our view, a demonstration of strength by Russia.

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Now the negotiations with Iran to restore, if that's the

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>right verb, the nuclear agreement is ongoing. It's been going

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>going for quite some time. Do you see any resolution

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of that in the near future, and not in the

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>coming days? Uh, the Iranians have come back with a

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>set of counter proposals which we are still taking a

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>look at, but it doesn't suggest that an agreement is

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>uh imminent right away. That being said, we do believe

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that there still is a pathway to a compliance for

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>compliance returned to the J C P O a. We

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>will continue to work on that with our partners, particularly

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>our European partners, and if Iran is prepared to do

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>its part to get back into the J C P

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>O A, we stand ready to do so. And as

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 1>we talk, the new Prime Minister of UK has been announced.

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Previously involved in foreign policy. H Have you met her before?

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I have met her before. I've met her here in

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the White House, right down the hall from where we

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>are right now, when she was foreign secretary. She's transitioned

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>from being essentially their secretary of state to being their

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>prime minister and actually just yesterday President Biden had the

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to have a long phone call with her just

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>hours after she had assumed her new position. And do

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you expect any change in the UK US policy as

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 1>a result of her becoming prime minister? At a foundational level? No, uh,

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a special relationship. The two of

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>them reaffirmed their commitment to the strength and vitality of

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the U S UK alliance and I think on all

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of the major issues, whether it's Russia or China or

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>iron you'll see the same kind of Um, deep consultation

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and engagement between the two countries that you've seen before,

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>regardless of whose president, regardless of whose prime minister. So

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect that there will be any fundamental changes

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in the relationship. But you know, there will be issues

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that we have to work through, of course, as there

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>always are. Now, as we talk, the U N General

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Assembly will be meeting not too long from now in

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>New York, as it does every year. Um, do you

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think the U N has still a useful purpose in diplomacy,

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't seem to be able to solve any problems?

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Ongoing war problems that we now see in us are

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine or Russia. What do you think is the U

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>N's main purpose at this point? Well, the UN actually

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>has proved its continued effectiveness in actually being able to

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>bring about diplomatic agreements in very difficult circumstances. I'll give

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you just two examples from the past few months. First,

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>on Russia Ukraine. It was the U N Secretary General,

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Guterres, who played a central role in getting a

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>deal between Russia and Ukraine for the export of grain

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 1>from both Ukrainian ports and Russian ports in the Black Sea.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That's helping the entire world with respect to lowering food

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>prices and expanding access to food stuffs at a critical moment. Second,

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it was a UN mediator, working with our US envoy,

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the Saudis and marats and the Yemenis who helped produce,

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year, a ceasefire in the war and Yemen,

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>which had been the worst humanitarian catastrophe in the world.

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>That ceasefire is now going on six months, the longest

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>period of peace in seven years in Yemen, and the

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>UN played a key role in that. So it is

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>not without its difficulties and complications. It is a big

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy in need of constant reform, but the UN is

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>still there on key issues, in diplomacy, in delivering on

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>global health, Global Food Security and other issues, and all

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of that will be on display in New York in

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>two weeks now. Recently the president made a major speech

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on democracy, and in it he talked about the values

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of democracy, which is large part of our foreign policy,

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>which is to promote democracy around the world. Our events

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in the United States or the last year or so

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>making it more difficult for the US to stay to

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>other countries looking how wonderful our democracy has worked, and

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>therefore you should be following some of the things we

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>do well. It does require a degree of humility. I

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>mean the United States does need to acknowledge that we

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>have our own difficulties and challenges within our own democracy,

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>even as we tout and promote democratic institutions, rule of

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>law human rights around the world. But I think President

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Biden is actually a very good messenger for that, someone

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>who can speak honestly and clearly to the American people

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>about the strains in our democracy and then someone who

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>can speak honestly and clearly to the world about how,

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>despite all of its imperfections, democracy remains the best form

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of government for delivering for citizens and for promoting human dignity.

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a moment about your own background. You are

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>not generally out there promoting your background. It's quite impressive

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and I just want to let people know about it

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit. You grew up in Minnesota, that's right, and

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess you were a superstar in elementary school, junior

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>high school, high school. You're a president of your class,

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>President Student Government. Is there anything you failed to do

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>in high school that you wanted to do? Well, uh,

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't win all the cross country races that I

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to win. I guess. Yeah, but you went to Yale. Yeah,

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and Yale you must have done. Reasonaly, while you were

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>elected as a Rhodes scholar and from Oxford, you later

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>came back and went to Yale law school and you

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>were a top editor there and became a Supreme Court

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>clerk for Justice Brier. So did you, when you're having

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>this career, do you ever think that you could make

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a mistake or your career could kind of go off

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the deep end or something, because everything was working out

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>perfectly well? It's true that I have had these incredible opportunities,

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but at every one of those stages I went through

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the same fears and growing pains and slip ups and

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>stumbles that everybody did. And you know, that was true

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>with respect to academic work that was far from perfect.

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>It was true with respect to relationships that didn't work out.

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's I I had what I think was,

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, an incredibly lucky childhood and upbringing, but one

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that it was not too different from the way a

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of other people who grew up in the Midwest

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen eighties and and then, you know, got

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to have these chances. Your father and mother, what did

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they do? So my father worked on the business side

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Minneapolis Star Tribune, which was the major newspaper

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in Minneapolis. My mother was a teacher and a guidance

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>counselor in the Minneapolis public schools. And I'm one of five.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm the second of five kids and we all went

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Minneapolis public schools, graduated from Southwest High School.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And your siblings do they say look, you're too good,

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you're a Rhodes scholar, you're a Yett Law Journal and

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>everything are there's no sibling rivalries. I mean actually, I

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>would say my sister is probably the most impressive among us.

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>She's a pediatrician. She was a two sports division one

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>athlete and Um, she's got five kids, uh, and is

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>currently working at the Department of Health and Human Services

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>on covid nineteen and other UM pandemic responses. So I'm

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>like kind of middle of the pack in terms of

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>my siblings. There was another person who was a Rhodes scholar,

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>went the law school who became President United States, Bill Clinton.

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So have you ever thought of running for office yourself?

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I used to think about it but honestly, over the

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>course of the years I think my skills are better

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>suited to public service in a not elected format Um

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'd rather help other people who I think would

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>be better suited for actually running for office these talk

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>for a moment about what it's like to be the

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>nation security advisor. The NA security advisor office was set up,

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>I think, in the Eisenhower administration, more or less, though

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>President Truman had a Nashecurity advisor as well. Your job,

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>as they get in early every day, make sure there's

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>no crisis or there is a crisis, tell the president.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing the president early in the morning and

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>briefing him? Is that what you do, as as many

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>have done before? Yes, so in the morning we have

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>something called the President's daily brief that takes place in

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the Oval Office and it's myself, my two deputies and

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>then the director of national intelligence who are there every day,

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and then we also bring in other cabinet members depending

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on what the subjects are being briefed so that he

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>gets the president gets exposure to his full national security

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>team over the course of the week and we talked

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to him about things that have developed overnight around the

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>world and we also talked to him about longer term

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>trends that he expresses interest in and wants to stay

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>on top of. So it's a mix of both the

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>immediate term and the long term and it gives him

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a full picture of the challenges and Opportunities in the

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 1>world for American form. And then, during a typical day,

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>do you see him a couple other times and do

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you see him at the end of the day as well? Well,

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to take yesterday as an example, in

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>addition to the PDB UH Secretary B Lincoln and I

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>had the opportunity to just sit with him informally uh

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>for a little while before the cabinet meeting so we

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>could talk through a kind of tick list of issues

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that had been building up over the course of the

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks. And then later in the afternoon

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we had this call with the British Prime Minister and

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and that involved some amount of time to talk through

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>what he wanted to accomplish in that phone call, what

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we expected she would say to him, and then I

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sat there with him while he did the phone call.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So that would be a typical day seeing the president

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>two three times and then spending time with the other

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>principles of the National Security Council the the cabinet secretary,

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of Defense, the secretary of the Treasury and the

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State and talking through the big decisions that

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we would need to tee up for the president to

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>make on everything from global food security to Taiwan to

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the chips act, you know, the new law that's been

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>passed to invest in advanced microchips here in the United States.

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>We cover the waterfront. So sometimes presidents I observe lose

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>their temper and they yell ums. President Biden a yeller

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>when he's not happy, or he just calmly just says

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>here's what I think. He's not a yeller. Uh. You know,

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he's somebody who is disciplined and direct and holds us

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to a high standard and he will challenge us to

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we have nailed down the details of

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>everything we are presenting to him and if we haven't,

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>he'll tell us do better. But he does so in

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a totally respectful, straightforward way, the same way that everybody

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>has seen him in public life. So when I work

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in the White House under President Carter, there were frequent

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>disputes between the secretaries, Si Vance and the NASCUR advisor.

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Is a big Braginsky, and it's a great tradition. It

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>seems in our government that the secretary of state the

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>NASCUR advisor are always sparring one where the other leaking

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to the press. In this administration I haven't seen a

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of leaks from your office or the secretary's Office

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>uh criticizing the other person's office. So how have you

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>avoided that problem? Well, a lot of it has to

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>do which is deep mutual respect and straight up friendship

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>between myself and the secretary state. Tony and I've known

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>each other for years. We're good friends. Are Families or friends? Um,

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that there aren't debates. We don't have

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>disputes because we have it an open operating style. I

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>think we both try to be nice people, but we

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>do have debates. We disagree on certain issues and the

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that I take very seriously is my responsibility to

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>run a process that is open, humane, fair, transparent, H

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and above board, and I try to do that so

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that his perspective, the Secretary Defense is perspective, the Attorney

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>General Perspective, depending on the issue, are all teed up

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to the president in a way in which they get

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>their say and then we work it out, and that has,

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in my view, work quite effectively over the course of

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the past nineteen months and I consider it one of

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the central uh responsibilities of my position to ensure that

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that process is fair and effective. What would you like

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to see as your legacy, or what the ININTIATION's legacy

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>would be as a result of what you're doing? I

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>would say um to basic foundations to the legacy that

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I would like to leave working, obviously on behalf of

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the president. First is to leave our alliances with like

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>minded democracies at a high water mark in Europe, in

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of Pacific and elsewhere around the world, because

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>those are the force multipliers for everything we do, whether

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's competition with China or trying to solve the challenge

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of climate change. And the second is making sure that

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>our national security enterprise is investing in the sources of

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>American strength at home, and the chips act is a

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>great example of that. or a young person who might

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>like to have a career like yours, what would you recommend?

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>How can you prepare to be an abscured advisor or

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to serve your government in some way? The biggest piece

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of advice I try to give young people is um

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to reject certitude. What I mean by that is that

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>no matter how good you think your argument is, or

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>your policy position or your proposed course of action, it

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly has weaknesses or blind spots, and you should

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge those. I think actually sometimes saying you know what,

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong, you were right, is actually a more

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>powerful show of intellectual strength than just sticking firmly by

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>your position. Doesn't mean you should compromise your principles or

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>your values, but the easy decisions do not rise to

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the White House. The hard decisions do, and those hard

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>decisions have two sides Um that are not a hundred zero.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>You see a lot of people in Washington saying I

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>was wrong. No, I think that's I think that's a

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>problem and I think the people who do people are

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>willing to change their minds, update their assumptions, alter their

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>perspective based on new information or new developments in the world.

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Those are the people that lead the best mark on

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>history and, even more importantly, those are the people who

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>are a pleasure to work with. Let's go around the

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>world for a couple of trouble spots. North Korea, Um,

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and a progress so on getting them to give up

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>their nuclear testing or is that difficult to do? It's difficult, obviously.

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Through multiple presidents, going back to the Clinton administration, the

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>North Koreans have continued to move forward with their nuclear

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>weapons program in the course of the past year they

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have conducted a number of long range missile tests. We

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>have been warning about the possibility of a seventh nuclear

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>test testivate nuclear weapon, and we still think that that

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is something that is likely to happen in the coming months.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>We have also indicated to the North Koreans that we

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>are prepared to sit down in a serious way to

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>conduct diplomacy to, on a step by step basis, work

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>towards the nuclearization of Korean Peninsula. So far, the North

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>grants have evince no interest in that. China and Taiwan,

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of rhetoric from the U S side,

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of rhetoric from the Chinese side, vision any

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>real problem occurring where the Chinese might actually invade Taiwan.

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it remains a distinct threat that there could

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:21.479
<v Speaker 1>be a military contingency around Taiwan and the People's Republic

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 1>of China has actually stated as official policy that it

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>is not taking the invasion of Taiwan off the table,

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that that remains one of the potential options for the

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>reunification of Taiwan. Their position has been changing over time

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their disturbance of the status quo across

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the Taiwan Strait actions that they are taking with their

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>military to undermine peace and stability. The American position has

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>remained steadfast and consistent. One China Policy Taiwan Relations Act,

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>three joint communic caves that we agreed with China back

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties, seventies and eighties that laid out that,

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>from our perspective, there should be no unilateral changes to

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the status quo across the Taiwan straight we continue to

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>believe that and we will continue to push back against

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>any effort to change the status quo by force. Now

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>there is legislation now moving forward through Congress to kind

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of toughen up the existing support the US has for Taiwan.

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.959
<v Speaker 1>This administration adopted a position on that legislation yet. Well,

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually gonna have the opportunity later today, literally later today,

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to go up to the hill to talk to some

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>members about this legislation. I'd prefer to have the opportunity

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>to lay it out for them before I lay it

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.239
<v Speaker 1>out on TV, but I will just say this. There

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>are elements of that legislation with respect to how we

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>can strengthen our security assistance for Taiwan that are quite

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.959
<v Speaker 1>effective and robust that will improve Taiwan security. There are

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>other elements that give us some concern. Let's go back

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>to Ukraine for a moment. In hindsight, which was always

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is there anything the administration could have done to prevent

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Putin from invading or told the allies more forcefully that

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the invasion was going to occur, to convince them, because

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>it seems as if they didn't really believe it was

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>going to happen? What would you have done, or would

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you think you should have done in hindsight, if anything,

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>differently than you did? Given that we're still in the

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>middle of this unfolding crisis, it's hard to get the

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of level of perspective to look back and say, Hey,

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe we could have done this instead of that. There's

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>always something you could improve upon. I would never say

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, we did everything absolutely perfectly, but six

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>months into this invasion I'm fairly well convinced that Putin

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>was going to do this no matter what, that he

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>considered this central to his legacy as president of Russia

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and he was not going to be knocked off course.

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that was going to stop him was

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the physical might of the Ukrainian forces, holding back his

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>ability to take Kiev and take other major cities, backed

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>by the weapons that we provided them. That was the

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>strategy we executed. I think we executed it well and

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Ukraine is in a position now today to

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>ensure that they will remain a strong, sovereign, viable independent state,

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>even as they continue to try to resist Russian aggression

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 1>on a portion of their territory. In terms of the Allies, Um,

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we took unprecedented measures, quite novel measures, to

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>declassify information, to make presentations both to our allies and

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to the international community, and I think over time that

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>actually did build a sense of unity that continues to

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>this day. An Allied Unity, Trans Atlantic unity, has been

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a huge thorn in the side for Vladimir Putinus. He's

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>tried to to break that and tried to to produce

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a weaker, less cohesive NATO, when in fact what he's

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten as the exact opposite. So what you're referring to,

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, is that, to my surprise, when I was

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>reading the New York Times about this was going on,

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>information that seemed like it was white old UH information

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>was declassified and, in effect given to the press about

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the troop movements of the Russians. Was that a complicated

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>decision to come to, controversial within the administration, to say

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we're going to declassify and leak our best intelligence about

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>what the Russians are doing? It definitely took a whole

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>process of us thinking about all of the risks and

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>benefits of doing that, especially since it was uncharted territory,

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and that involved me sitting with our intelligence professionals, are diplomats,

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately with the president to bless a strategy that

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>would involve the systematic declassification of information so that no

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>one would be surprised and so that Russia could not

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>try to generate pretexts for what it was doing. And

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>I think it turned out to be an effective method

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of putting Russia on the back foot, putting the Western

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>alliance on the front foot and giving us the opportunity

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>to build a coalition that is currently supporting Ukraine. So

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>as I said earlier, hindsight's always in hindsight. Would you

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have um actual Afghanistan differently than the way you did it? Well,

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, um, anytime you have

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>a circumstance where you're ending a twenty year war, with

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years of decisions and mistakes that have piled up

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>through multiple administrations, the exit would not be easy. There

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>was no clean, easy exit and I think the strategic

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>decision to go to end that war after twenty years

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely the correct decision. Where there are things that

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we could have done differently, I think the answer to

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that is always yes, and there will be time, as

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I end up looking back and reflecting on that period,

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>to pinpoint what some of those might have been. But

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>from my perspective, the underlying decision to end the war

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in Afghanistan, which the president took, I think, in a

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>quite courageous way, was the correct decision and one year later,

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to me, Um, it is the time that has passed

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is only reinforced the correctness of that. To many people

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>held your job have a burnout after a few years. Um,

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you look like you're in good shape and you're young.

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>You're the second youngest person ever have this job. so

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you anticipate doing this for an entire four year period

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of this first term? If there was another term, let's

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>say this four year period of time. Well, I serve

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>at the pleasure of the president, but I feel passionate

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>about the work that I'm doing. I feel blessed to

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>be part of this team. I feel blessed to be

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>able to serve President Biden and I'd like to keep

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>doing it. Thanks for listening. To hear more of my interviews,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you can subscribe and download my podcast on spotify, apple

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen.