WEBVTT - Thursday night preview, Inside Injuries w/ Dr. A, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever M Do To Do? Did D Do Do Do? Do?

0:00:54.200 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do? Do? Don Too Yeah is as the

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever here on the Fantasy Sports alongside

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Franky Stamfull. I am Grege. What's going on abouday? Greggy here?

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>We are getting ready for week nine? Who had dr

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>A on the show today talking a lot of injury updates,

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of injury updates in this games. Man to

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a Slaver and actor between the Raiders in the San

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Francisco forty Niners, the Battle of the Bay Area to

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be a fun one. Raiders three point Dogs the night

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. I don't get it, to be honest

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>with you, I didn't get really confused by I didn't

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>get it even before the c. J. Bethard injury. Yeah,

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it means nothing to me, Like I don't get it

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>because maybe I'm wrong. Like Derek carrs like a competent right, Well,

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>he moved the ball down the field. He's thrown for

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of yards this year. The team just struggles

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone. They haven't actually scored a lot

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of points. Look, there's no way around this. Both teams

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>are bad. Like they're both one win teams, very bad. Like,

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt about that. The Raiders are a better

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>team the forty niners. Right now, easily it's lost to

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals. They don't have a quarterback. Their quarterbacks someone

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>named Nick Mullins. I don't know who that is, Chris Mullins,

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>because Chris Mullins probably not. That's the point. I don't

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>know who Nick Mullins is. Looking up, there's no S

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>on the end of Chris. No, it's Chris Mullin and

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>it's spelled in an eye. He's still a coach for St.

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 1>John's as so this guy evidently with the Southern Miss

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>he went undrafted. Here's era you're scouting reporter Nick Mullins

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>potential starting quarterback tonight for the forty nine. He was

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>signed to a reserve future contract this past January. He

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>was waived in September of this year, then resigned from

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the act of roster once Jimmy g got hurt. Do

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, because I actually do know the answer to this,

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>do you know who Nick mullins backup is tonight? If

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>he does start and c J bat there doesn't play clipboard?

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Jesus no, good guess. I feel like he's everywhere, like

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>he's just kind of like, uh not clipboard Jesus, um uh,

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>this is out there. It's one of those guys, one

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>of those guys. One of those guys start in the

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>NFL every year and you can't understand how I know.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>I have a few names that are kind of like

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>rattling around in my mind. Drew Stanton, no guest, excellent

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>guess that was the one that was my game, that

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>was the report. Jesus Andrew Stanton are like classics. How

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>do these guys end up starting games? What they do?

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Stands in Cleveland like something. Oh and a great guest

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. He's in Philly. We were looking for Tom Savage.

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately we're looking for Tom Sava. You know what, I'd

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>probably start Tom Savage. Yeah, like over Nick Mullin. He

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>started a game. He's the opening name starter last year

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for he was Opening Day. That's where we're going with.

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, I mean regardless, I'm with you here. I'm

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>with you here on hammering the Raiders tonight to win

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this game. I mean even with c J. Beffort, I

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>just didn't understand. Again, both teams are bad. I think

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders are a little bit less bad. I guess

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna go with here. But you know, they

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>actually have a few more weapons. Matt Breda banged up.

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>He's banged up every single week. He still finds a

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>way to play every single week. Obviously we'll get more

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>from dr A on that, but just I think a

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>little better overall weapons. Offensive line played well for the

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Raiders last week. Doug Martin ran the ball well aside

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>from that fumble. Janalen Richard doing his thing. They have

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>a mishmash of wide receivers right now. The forday Niners

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>can't cover anybody. Um yeah, I'm with you, I'm on

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. C J. Beethard plays I'll take the over

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't play. It's like the under I think

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that is actually a difference maker between them

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>scoring like an extra touch on in this game. It

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is the first time in his life c J has

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>ever been called a different speaker. Yeah. Well, when the

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>total is forty five and a half on a Thursday

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>night football game, Greg, you know, I love to hammer

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the names. It's really funny. Nick Boland starts, how can

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we depend on the Raiders to score more than like

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>ten points? You know what's really funny is that when

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we started doing this on Thursday nights, always love the under,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>always of the unknowned Thursday nights. Yeah, but there's been

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a change though. Like last last year, ugly there was

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>no points being scared. The pendulum has swung in the

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>other way this season. Absolutely agree. It's, you know, it's

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>too short of a week now. Defenses can't recover. It's

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>it's not enough time to gain plan for your opponent.

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>You just I mean, we've seen a lot of big

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>plays happen on Thursday night. Um, there's just there's just

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points being scored right now. The pendulum

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>has swung the other way, So you know, last Friday,

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I came here and I said, look, we need to

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>hammer the over in every single Thursday night. Yeah, yeah, definitely,

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Nick Mullins is the starting quarterback. Do you have any

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>faith in that guy scoring points tonight? No idea, no idea. Unbelievable.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna start somebody named Nick Mullins tonight. The question becomes,

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and I have I do have this on my team?

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Morris tonight? That rid up practicing limited? You know

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that ankle still bother uh. He most practicing in a

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>limited fashion. He's bothered and hampered as well. Was you

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>start Alfred Morris tonight? Is there any way you can

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>do that? I brought him up during the Waiver Wire

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>show in case Matt Breeda doesn't play in this game.

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>That's really the only way Brita could be as limited

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>or missed the entire week and still end up getting fifteen,

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, to eighteen touches. So what he did this

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>past week, so you know, if he plays, I'm just

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>going to trust that they're going to give him the

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>line's share of carries unless he gets hurt within game,

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and obviously we can't predict that. Totally totally agree with him. Yeah,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on the San Francisco side outside of Brita as like

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>high end flex maybe low d RB two, just because

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>there's six teams on a by and it is a

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>good match up against the Raiders. George Kittle is probably

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the only other startable fantasy option in this game. Mark

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>he's Goodwin. I know he had the loan reception last

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>week that he went to the house fifty yard touchdown,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but you can't depend on that. His targets have been

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>all over the place, especially with the quarterback situation up

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in the air. I don't want anything to do with

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine weapons outside of George Kittle and maybe

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt Breidae on the Raiders of things. I mean, there

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a few guys here. I inc. I

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>have Doug Martin starting as a flex option. Certainly, Jaylen

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Richard definitely in PPR. He's a low n RB two

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in half he's half and nine. He's I think he's

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a flex option. Um, same thing goes with's for Doug Martin.

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>The forty Niners run defense actually started the year very well,

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>but they've kind of fallen off here. So I like

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>those two guys. Again, it's really just the running backs

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in the tight ends. If you look at it on

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the football. Here the forty Niners, George Kittle,

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders Jared Cook, I mean, top five tight end

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>this year in terms of fantasy production. He's the one

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>constant weekend and week out in this Raiders offense. For

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers, it's a good matchup. You want to

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>like it. But Hotty Nelson t share Joty Nelson, we

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>can't trust uh saying you can't can't trust anybody from

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Nelson and Brandon la Fell to the architect Seth Roberts.

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of just all right, this guy is gonna

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>get five targets forty yards. Who do you trust to

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>offer you upside out of that group? Um, each one

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of these guys is not I would I would try

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and find anybody else as a wide receiver three, even

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with the six teams on a buy. Yeah, I'm totally

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>with you. This is complete desperation. Nocaud. I know you

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>want to target San Francisco, and it really could be anyone.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>It could be Jordy, it could be the architect. I'm

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>not banging on LaFell and marquetis Brian at this point, Um,

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>so you're desperate. What I feel most comfortable with probably

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Um then then Seth Roberts. But this is so frustrating.

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>You look at this matchup for the Raiders wide receivers tonight.

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>The past four games again against the posing wide receivers,

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners defense has allowed six touchdowns to wide

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 1>receivers over the last four games, so they've been getting torched.

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You look at the past three games specifically, these are

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>PPR points to opposing teams wide receiver corps forty four

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>point three last week to the Cardinals, which Josh Rosent

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>throwing in the football thirties, seven point one to the

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Rams actually kind of limited the Rams, which

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is that was just a girly game. And then in

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Week six against Green Bay fifty three point four fantasy

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>pp OUR points to opposing wide receivers obviously two sixty

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>four yards and two touchdounds. That was MVS had a

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 1>big game there, Davante Adams had a big game. It's

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup. There's just what do you trust out

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of the out of the Raiders wide receivers. I wouldn't

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>want to do. Yeah, I just suck. It's it's too hard,

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's too hard to figure out. I agree, it sucks.

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It sucks. If it's somewhere else, probably had no choice.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>That's Thursday Night football for you. Oh man? Uh? And

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I know these last two Thursday nightsill this week on?

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Who do we get on Monday Night? Oh? The Cowboys?

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>How Boys? Titans? You know, I begged the football gods

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 1>to stop giving us ut like Texas football teams in

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>prime time. There's a little bit more luster around this

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 1>game because we get to see the debut of a

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Mari Cooper. But still it's not great by any means.

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you know who the week ten? Looking at it

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>matchup for Monday Night football is, Greg, Look, I'm gonna

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>pull it up right now. Actually, no, no, before you

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 1>look at it, please just guess. I don't know. I know,

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess it. So I know after that we we

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>got we got Kansas City. It's potentially worse than tonight's game,

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>serious Monday Night. So I know we have Kansas City

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.599
<v Speaker 1>and l A and the week the week after that

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>or the two weeks after that, so that would be amazing.

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>In Mexico City, they really want to. This is like

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a this is classic like w W E booking, right,

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Like they tear you down before they give you the

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>main event. So Week eleven, Monday Night Football, you're saying,

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we have rams and cheese one of those two weeks. Yeah,

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Week ten, I'm telling you they're tearing you down. Do

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what Thursday Night football is a Week ten?

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I do not think it's the Panthers and somebody. It

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>is solid game Carolina and Pittsburgh. Good game. That's more

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>than AIDS good game. It's a very good game. So

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we're happy with that game. We're happy with that. But

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 1>this is what they're doing. It's like one week we'll

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>give you a great matchup, right, and we will give

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you Let me think about this. It's a terrible game,

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you're telling me Mondaynight football. Monday Night football? Is it?

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>The Giants and the Niners. That's exactly rushed it? So

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>so bad? Is that? And look that sucks? It should

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>have been good man. The Giants got to be able

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to flex out, like we gotta we have to find

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>a well, you know what Sunday night is. By the way,

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>this Sunday night, no the night next week. This Sunday

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Night is great. The Battle of the Goats. Do you

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>see Aaron Rodgers comments on that. He said, you know,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>one guy has five rings, the other has one. There's

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>not much of a discussion. Love it. At least he

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>knows that's um. Dallas is back in prime time vision.

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Eagles Dallas, Eagle Dallas really southa night football. We really

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>have to get over this America's team thing. I mean,

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 1>it's true they do bring the best ratings. I hate

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to say it, but yeah, because they have the most

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>fans for no reason either. Sorry, I'm sorry, Corey. Why

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>do thank you to the most man? The Cowboys are

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>not a fun team to watch. They're just not. They

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>played good defense and they run the football. I mean

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>they're it's not They're not exciting games, No, Sarah, they're not.

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 1>It might be close games, especially against the Eagles. I

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>understand why they're doing it. NFC is up for grabs

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, like whatever, hm m hm um. All right,

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And I said a much more than football. No, there's

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>not much when dr A coming up, by the way,

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>so we could jump into like quarterback or Titan rankings

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>if you just want to like throw it out there

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>for now. I don't. I don't want to do that.

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>A little bit later on in the show, he's totally

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>honest with you. Let's go over some of the headlines.

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>How about that some of the non um non Thursday

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>preview someone like the injury guys that we're gonna talk about, right,

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>like whether these guys are practicing or not? We do that. Yeah,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.599
<v Speaker 1>we have anyone out yet. Yeah, so let's get into that.

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>K QT Kicky Cutie is returning. He was clear to practice,

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>which means he should be good to go for the

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>games in a limited fashion yesterday. Yeah, so that's really good, uh,

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>for him and for the Texans. You you thought he

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>would not be active, he said yesterday he did not

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 1>expect him to be active for this game. Have the

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>opinions changed? Oh slightly? I mean, you know, I want

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>to see how he goes to practice for the rest

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of the week, because just because you practice once doesn't

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>mean that you're gonna play. I mean, we saw a

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago Dalvin Cook practice on Wednesday, a

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>full practice, and he hasn't played for the next two games.

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 1>So just because you practice doesn't mean that you're gonna go.

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 1>So I haven't necessarily changed my opinion on it. Yet,

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 1>let's see what happens the next two days. Okay, also

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>returning imagined this yesterday Cooper Cup cleared for practice and

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they sat and then set on Sunday that if this

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is a playoff game, he would have played on that

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>past Sunday. I was like, it doesn't necessarily mean it's

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>coming back next week. And then dude plays what he

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>thought was um, but now he practiced elemented fashion yesterday

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. He looks to be good to go for Sunday.

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Would you get Cooper Cup back in your lineup? Yeah, definitely,

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>he's a He's gonna be a wide receiver to just

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>based on the match up here. And I know the

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Saints defense has actually played better as of late. The

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>addition of Eli Apple obviously strengthens their cornerbacks, their their

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>secondary Marshawn Lattimore has bounced back here. Um, yeah, defense

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is just playing better. But a sixty point game total

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>between the Rams and the Saints in the Dome, there's

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot of points scored off Cooper Cup plays.

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>He's a mid range wide receiver too. Okay, Um, yeah,

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>there you go. The mid range wide receiver to returning

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is Cooper Cup which is fantastic news, bad news for

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>us with Josh Reynolds. Hey the way, who are we

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>getting those waiver wire? By the way, haven't look we

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>h we scooped up both Detroit Lions wide receivers being

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>t J. Jones and Brandon Powell for for dirt cheap

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>grades such a Floria thing. Look, I'm telling you these

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>are how deep do these rosters go? There? They're like

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>two man rosters, so like they're deep. The waiver wire

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is bad, like it's Barren Quincy noon. He was out there.

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was a sneaky ad. He went for

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred bucks. This isn't a thousand dollar budget.

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>You know we have? We have, We still have over

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty of our budget left. I just asked for one

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>favor this week. Looking at our starting lineup, I only

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>want to take out one guy. Like the story lineup

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>looks good, it looks strong. I haven't even said it.

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought you did. I might have. But there's one

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>guy I want to take out. I think I did

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>say I don't like him. Taylor Gabe, can I start whoever?

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to? Taylor Gabriel, give me. The only option

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that we really have though, is Marcus Valdo Scantling. That's

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>who I'm putting in at New England m v S.

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>It's going right into a lot of frank I'm excited

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>about that. I don't have a problem with that because

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Gabriel not only dealing with an injury, but at

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo gonna be cold weather there. It's gonna be a

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>defensive game, not a lot of points scored on either side.

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>He could potentially be matched up with her Davious White

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>as well if Alan Robinson doesn't play. Yes, So I'm

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>alright taking Taylor Gabriel al for Marquez Bald I'm pumped

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>about who are you playing? I do like Anthony Miller.

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Though I like Anthony Miller in that matchup, bills have

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>been eaten up by slot receivers. We just do that. No,

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just talking about within that game, because you know,

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm poo pooing the Bears passing attack. But I actually

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>do like Anthony Miller as a sneaky wide receiver. Three

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this week, Yeah, I'm insured to see uh Florio's article

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that comes out today. Shame was plugged for Florio was shameful. Plug.

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>That was shame full plug. He were playing its pretty good. Yeah, No,

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a big match up because we're also four

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and four. He was very could be something that potentially

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>matters for this thing. This is not good for us.

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>He's lineup. I already kind of looked at it. I

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't feel like that's scared. But can I just tell

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you to look at it? Aaron Rodgers looking at it?

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the quarterback Aaron Rodgers. All right, we have Cam

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Newton against Tampa Bay. I like that matchup running backs

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>carry On Johnson and Melvin Gordon. Alright, theoretic returning, so

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna take some reception from carry On and the

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Vikings have been pretty good against the run. I think

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>he's canceled out by mark Ingram. Melvin Gordon is obviously

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>better than Adrian Peterson, but it's a good matchup for

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Peterson against the Falcons too. I don't I don't mind

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>where we're at right now? Does it get a lot worse.

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>We're in a good spot here, all right, We're in

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>let's us. We have our Antonio Brown versus Davante Adams.

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>That's potentially a wash. Robert Woods against his tray Kwon Smith.

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I like our matchup a lot more mvs. Against Allen Robinson.

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't even know if Allen Robinson is gonna play,

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and even if he does, we just talked about how

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>whoever's the number one wide receiver in that game is

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna see you Davious White in a defensive battle. So mvs.

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Over Allen Robinson, we have grown against Kyle rough who

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're basically the same person at the point

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>they will suck er all right. I like his Tariko

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and better than our Aaron Jones. I like Aaron Jones

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is a fight. Yeah, we're in a good spot. Don't

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>worry about pounded. Feeling much better now, appreciate Go next.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Dr A from Inside Injuries joins the program and give

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>us the latest on all the injuries around the league.

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Franks Damville, Greg. So you're Fantasy DFS back after this

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rhodo dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you premier advice. We play every day,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Roado dot Com optimized in minutes, building, optimized line up

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for cash games and turneys learned from the game's best

0:17:51.600 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>DFS players joined Daily rohdo dot com. It just read

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a report by the way about Randy Orton saying, you know,

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he's in Saudi Arabia and like, what do you feel like?

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>John C didn't show up? He's like does he even

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Wressell anymore? And like yeah, and they were just like listening.

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I got five kids, the babe. Yet, that's a load

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of money to come here. I'll go where they tell

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>me to go. Who's that other dudes who his whole

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>stick was kids? That's Randy. I got five kids. I

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>got five kids. I got Yeah, I gotta do my thing,

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? With like multiple women too? Yeah, he's married

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>kind so I think you know he's had like a

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 1>weird background randyo. Yeah, we'll get in that off the air.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>But like he I think he's had like two wives.

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't like multiple multiple we're both of them like

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 1>within the w W kind of No. No, I don't

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>know either of them were. Yeah, it could be wrong

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about that. Maybe he had a fling with one of them.

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>He definitely definitely could have all right, I don't know

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>who I don't know. All right, again, we'll talk about

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it off here on. Yeah, we're gonna talk to dr

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>from Inside Injuries. It's going on, Doc, how are you guys?

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to see what the injury angle was here,

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, with that conversation, but I couldn't come up

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>with anything. Oh, we were just trying to maybe you do.

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you know who ran new Orton marriage? Who's your

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite wrestler? Doctor? Unfortunately, there's not many injuries in wrestling.

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Injuries and wrestling. What are you talking about? Fake injuries, Greg,

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Fake injuries? Yes, so, unfortunately it's hard to protect fake injuries.

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>They're not fake. There's major concussions, there are born a

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>c l s. Roman reins has Lukenia. Doc Lukenia very sad, laughing.

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Let's get in. Let's get into some real

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>injuries on the NFL field, which you can help us with.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>We ended last segment talking about Cooper Cup and his

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>return from injury. Um, it's been a couple of weeks,

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>we believe. Virginia told us last week he had a

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>great two sprain m c l um. He expects to

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>return this week. Is that too soon? It is? It's Uh,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it's too soon. It's a great to m c l

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>s brain. You know, these things take longer to heal.

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>He's putting himself an extra jeopardy by doing that. Right now,

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>we're showing that he is fifty and so week ten

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>he'll be back up to eight percent, which is at

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>peak health and our system. So he is still twenty

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>seven percentage points away from being completely ready to go,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and his injury risk is there's no reason why he

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>should be starting this week. Um, he would be putting

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>in and be jeopard jeopardizing the rest of the season

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>if he does come back this week. It's so interesting

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's literally the Raiders are the Raiders. The Rams

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>are eight. No here, if you if no, there's no

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>reason to exactly would rush him back for one week?

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>If you just see him for one extra week, you'll

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>be fine because it's a match up with the Saints.

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>You're probably right, and they have something to prove here.

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You probably the reason, probably right, But I'm with dr like,

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>why would you rush the guy back? You're thinking about

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the long haul and I know you know the Rams

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>keep making these additions. They added Dante Fowler. Eventually they're

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a keep to lead back. People are talking about,

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Rams potentially going undefeated sixteen and no,

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean you almost want to lose a game at

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>some point. You don't want to go into the playoffs

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.719
<v Speaker 1>undefeated because it just creates a lot of pressure. Um,

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>speaking of pressure, Wow, tonight's game, I mean two teams

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that both don't seem like they want to win. But

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>from the from the horty Niners side here, uh C J.

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Bethard is quote fifty fifty exactly with a with a

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>risk injury. And then Matt Reed just continues to deal

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>with this ankle injury. But every single week it's like

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>he barely practices, but he still plays and he's like

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>mildly effective. So what do you have on those two

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>guys or the forty Niners games tonight against the Raiders.

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So quarterback wise, this is a throwing risk injury. So

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>even if it's only a grade one, Um, you know,

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a throwing hand injury. This makes it so

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>much more worse than it, you know, than kind of

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the minor classification that it's given. Um, you know, do

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you guys may be surprised of what I'm about to say,

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>but This takes a while to heal. If you're talking

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>about healing this type of injury, it is a optimal

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>covery time of three weeks, okay to really get this,

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>because the moment he feels a little pain on throwing

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>within the game, it's pretty much downhill from there, and

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's a Grade one injury to the throwing hand

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>slash wrist. Week eleven is where we see it right now.

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>He is he right now, he's not even a fifty

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in our mind that risk. It's at elevated injury risk.

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know that's where he is, Matt Brida. You

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.239
<v Speaker 1>know again, we're all we've been saying over and over

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>week ten, week ten, week ten, and he keeps coming

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>back and playing and having really ineffective uh types of starts.

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>And it's because you know, he is he's not at

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>peak health and he's at high injury risk and he

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>needs to stay So that is no stay off the field.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So his numbers get back into that peak health above

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>eight percent type of mark, and he's just slowly getting

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>there because he continues to play, and he continues to

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>set himself back every time he plays through this type

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of injury. So I have two takes here. Greg, even

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it sucks for Matt Brida because it's a great matchup.

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Over the last month, the Oakland Raiders have allowed the

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to opposing running backs, so it's a

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>great matchup for Brida. I have a feeling that they're

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna just rush him back out there again, because that's

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>what he's continued to do. Um, But I look, he's

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in the flex discussion for tonight. As for the forty Niners,

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised if beth Or doesn't play. But

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>here's your hot take, Greg. Nick Mullins gets either knocked

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>out or bench. At some point, Tom Savage leads a

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick back tonight, You're gonna see it's gonna be

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>like the wildest Thursday Night game of all Bryan Fitzpatrick, Wow, Okay,

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>took a step back at that. By the way, Um, Frank,

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>my body asked me a question regardless of Thursday, my game.

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you give a quick as to be great,

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>he asked Savante Parker, DeShawn Jackson, David Moore, and Mark

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>He's Goodwin picked two. How does this affect Oh, Marky's good? Well,

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>he's out of that discussion. It was who Devantae Parker,

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Deshan Jackson, even more Davanta Parker. All right, you way

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>up against the Jets. I'll go dr right, you heard it?

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>You think about it's my friend. Um, we thought you

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>dry from inside injuries and Doc, we saw that Tyreek

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Hill return to practice this yesterday and there's a big

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>scare about if he would be good to go. What

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>is his injury and how serious is it? Grade one

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>groin injury wide receiver? You know, doesn't you know? Hamstring

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>injuries are much worse for wide receivers. So this grade

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>one groin he should he'll takes two weeks, Okay, so

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you know I know he's full. He did full practice Wednesday,

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>which is a good sign. However, we really and strongly

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>don't believe he should play this week. He should give

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a week rest and come back on week at week ten,

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>because he's at sixty right now by game time, Um,

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't. I think they're playing Sunday, right,

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs playing Sunday? Yes? Right? Yeah, So by so by Sunday,

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll be at seventy seventy Um, you know,

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>so one more week he'll be well above eight percent

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>back to peak health. But if he comes back this week,

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>he won't be anywhere near where he should be. So yeah,

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>one more week is what we're recommending. And I like

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the sound of that too. Chris Venture downstairs licking at

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>his shop for Sammy Watkins. Uh, and of course this

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the game where we get excited

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>about Watkins and he lets us down. Of course. Uh dr,

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about Sony Michelle. Uh, you know,

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously still dealing with this knee injury. I feel like

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the smartest thing to do is to just rest him

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>through thereby. I believe this team has a week eleven

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>by Like it sucks for fantasy, but kind of going

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>back to what we've talked about with the other running

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>backs all season long, like, especially running backs of this

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>calibert just give your guys the opportunity to heal and

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>get healthy, especially for a team like the Patriots want

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to make a run deep into the postseason. So, Sony Michelle,

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>do we expect him this week? And if he does play,

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>what level of of effectiveness will he be at? The

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>pathway that the Patriots should take? Is is such an

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't any sense to deter off this path. They

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>have a week eleven by. This is perfect. He's supposed

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to come back and under our algorithms and metrics alan

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>week eleven, so he really actually gets another week to rest.

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are winning, you know, they want him to be

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>deep into the season. There is no rhyme or reason

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>why he shouldn't come back until week twelve. After the

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>week eleven by, give him some more time to rest,

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>being careful, be safe. Will they do that? That's that's

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the question. Do we see him this week and especially

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in a match against the Packers kind of similar situation

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>to the to the Rams playing Cooper Cup. You probably

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want to play Sony Michelle. I fear the Patriots,

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>but if you kind of want to put your foot

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in the ground and you know, prove that you can

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>hang with you know, the upper echelon teams in the NFL,

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they might want to go out there and

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>hammer the Packers and maybe they're thinking is to do that,

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>we need Sony Michelle in the field. But you may

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you may lose Sony Michelle for the rest of the

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>year if you do. That's the thing. I mean, I

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>agree with Dr A. But the thing is, do the

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Patriots agree. That's that's the question that we'll find out.

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>See what We'll see what he does in the next

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of days of practice. If he doesn't play, did

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>he played, Cordarrel Patterson, Ah, Man, that's just that's got

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in the deepest of Lee's you. I mean you,

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>your whole team pretty much has to be in a buy.

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want to depend on that. We're talking to

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr A from Inside Injuries. Doc imagined Tyree Hill being

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.479
<v Speaker 1>out or later leaving a game early this past Sunday. Well,

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>also in a sneaky way, Savon Diggs left the game

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>early on Sunday and he did not practice yesterday. What's

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the latest you're reading and hearing on him? So? Um,

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>second quarter last game, he did suffer this rib injury.

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>We're listing in as a Grade one. UM. I most

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>likely he did receive pain management and got back into

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the game. He had a great game last week, so um,

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it didn't really impact him, but didn't practice Wednesday. I

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>think the Vikings are sort of touch and go on

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this UM. We're recommending that he takes because wide receivers

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>get hit in the thorax area, the chest area, and

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>so if they know, if the opposing team knows that

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>someone's playing to a rib injury. The rule of thumb

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is is when you tackle a guy, go at that

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>rib injury. Unfortunately, that's just the way it is. In

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>order to prevent that, they should rest him a week.

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>He's at injury risk right now. The reason why is

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>because of of the hits that wide receivers take to

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>their chest area. And so one more week he should

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>completely recover. It's a Grade one injury. It's not a

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>fracture or anything like that. He just needs time to

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>heal and to get you know, to get past this point.

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>If he does play this week, look out for the

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>first four or five hits and then boom, he may

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>be on the sideline for the rest of the game.

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And Stefon Digs typically a guy who has been injury

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>prone theast couple of years. So healthy for the most

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>part this year, but yeah, the Vikings need to protect

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>him from himself to especially in what is not a

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>great matchup going up against the Detroit Lion. Stefon Diggs

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>typically plays on the outside. It seems like he would

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>be shadowed by Darius Slay a lot in that game.

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>We know Adam Feeling it plays predominantly the slot the

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>season where he has dominated, and cover corners don't typically

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>move into the slot, so I don't expect that to happen. Doc.

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about another mark Kee wide

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>receiver here, and that's Mike Evans who actually didn't practice

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday due to a knee injury. What's the latest

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>on Mike Evans and should we expect him this week?

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So other than hamstring injuries, knee injuries are you know,

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the second most impactful to wide receivers. Um. And so

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a grade one knee injury. Didn't practice Wednesday,

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>as you said, UM, and the optic recovery for this

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is two weeks. So right now, conservatively week ten is

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>when he should come back. And you know that they're

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of downplaying this injury, but based on all of

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>his previous stats and previous injury history, you know, we're

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>only showing him right now at by game time, UM,

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you know he should be back up to you know,

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe ten percent less than peak, probably be up in

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.239
<v Speaker 1>above average category. But if you really want to wait

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>till he gets the peak, it will be week ten,

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>not week nine. So, um, you know, that's really kind

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of the situation there. I mean, if they can afford it,

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>they should be they should rest him for a week

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and come back week ten. I assume there's no way

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they rest him, right, Frank, Yeah, I mean, look, the Bucks,

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks need him if they if they have any yeah,

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to have any opportunity against the Carolina Panthers. But I

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>will say, going back to what you asked me the

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>question earlier, I think the change to right Fitzpatrick helps

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Deshan Jackson and maybe the fact that Mike Evans is

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>not a percent also helps Deshan Jackson, who wanted to

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>get traded at the deadline, but that didn't happen. So

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to answer your buddy's question, Deshan Jackson is definitely one

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of them. And depending on Dr A's next answer, that

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is how we're going to feel about Vanta Parker. Because Doc,

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about Kenny Stills, who didn't

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>play last week, but now it looks like he's been

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>practicing in limited fashion. Do we expect Kenny Stills to

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.479
<v Speaker 1>go this week? Because obviously that would affect the fancy

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>output of one Davanta Parker. So that's a duel. It's

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a two two part answer. So, uh, you know, so

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>this particular injury is a groin injury. It's a grade

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>one groin um. You know, he injured in week seven

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's a minor groin injury. And for wide receivers

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that healed this pretty quickly when they rest, and he

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>has rested, you know, and so two weeks recovery. He

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he's for this particular injury, we're projecting week nine, so

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he's on track for that. However, before the injury started,

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>he was already at elevated injury risk and close to

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>high injury risk, so we kind of predicted this injury

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And now because of this injury, he's

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>not coming back to normal numbers. He's at the highest.

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get his seven right now, and that's where

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>he is. And so if he comes back and plays,

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>which he should, he'll be at seventy three percent. He

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>won't be at peak health. And guests, get look at

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this number. Twenty nine percent injury risk in this next

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>game coming up, that's a one in the three chance

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>almost to get injured again. So he is a great player,

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, but you know, don't be surprised if he

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>will get injured in this game. It's just because of

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>his history and you know his player nucleus and his

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>injury injuries that he sustained previously. It's just the way

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it is. But his groin injury will be healed. Greg,

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to I want to correct what I what

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I said before when I was asking Dry about Stills,

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>because there was there were reports this here that he

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>did practice, and updated that report and said that he

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't practice. So he was around, but it was he's around.

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I think even if he's on the field this week,

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he's more of a decoy than anything problem. I like

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Devanta Parker, especially in this matchup against the Jets. Over

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the last month, the Jets have allowed the fourth most

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to opposing wide receivers. So I'll go with

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Deshan Jackson and DeVante Parker To answer your buddy's question. Okay,

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a good answer. Inside injury supports that answer. There

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you go, Doc, just a couple more for you, and

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get into some of these young running backs.

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Royce Freeman missed last week with Denver. We saw DeVante

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Booker get a chance to step up with will Royce

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Freeman play this week for the Broncos. Well, he shouldn't, um,

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, grade two high ankle spraining. It's not a

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>soft tissue or grade one. This is actually level to

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the level of a grade two. Uh. You know injured

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>week seven, um, and he missed week and he's did

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't practice on Wednesday, so this is a typical

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>four week recovery time. He was low injury risk and

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>peak health before this injury, so he can get back

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to peak health right now because of his you know,

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>limited injury history. He's he's back into low injury risk,

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>but his his performance prediction is fifty four percent right now,

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>so he's nowhere near completely the peak health yet. And

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so that fifty can get up to you just have

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to wait till week eleven. Unfortunately. Well that's not unfortunate,

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>actually it's Yeah, that helps you because you're a DeVante

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>booker owner. Uh and yeah, this match up against the Texans,

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we just saw what he did last week. He ran

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>very effectively. You know, he'll probably be in that ten

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen touch range again. So he comes in as

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a as a low ind flex option against the Texans.

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay once again a high end RB two. Not

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>as good of a matchup this week, but we still do.

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Like Philip Lindsay, I want to ask you about my

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>j E. T S Jets Jet Jets, Quincy and Noon

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Wa not practice on Wednesday, still dealing with this ankle injury.

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, they gave him like a two to four

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>week timetable. Obviously he's been injury prone in the past

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>two Um, we expect Quincy Num back this week or

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>is he still a couple of weeks away? Yeah, I

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>mean for this particular injury, it's a great two high

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>ankle sprain and uh, we're looking at week ten, so

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>he shouldn't come back at week nine. But this is

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy unfortunately, Um, you know, he's had multitude of injuries.

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>His player nucleus looks like it's busting out of its

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>seems there's so many injuries in the past. He was

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>high injury risk before this injury and he's gonna stay

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>there at he's at forty injury risk right now and

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>below average at forty one of performance prediction. This is

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>a guy if he plays this week, even if he's

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>potentially healed in week ten or you know in week

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 1>ten from this particular high ankle spraining, this is a

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>guy we would call in fantasy terms that you've got

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to get off your roster. You have to find value

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>for him with somebody else. So it looks like Quincy Nuon,

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna play this week if you're still holding Ontom.

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I think for PPR, we saw what he did earlier

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in the year when he got all those targets. So

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>even if he plays, don't trust him this week, but

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe come next week's time again, I'm just

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna continue to hammer down on on Chris Herndon this

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>week as the bye week replacement tight end um. The

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins have a lot of five touchdowns of tight ends

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>over the last three game. I'm knowing with the German

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>crushing after being burned for the last ye weeks, I

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 1>only bring up Chris Herndon because he's the only Jets

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 1>pass catcher that you want to rely on in this matchup.

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, dr A, we appreciate the time. Thank you

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Man. Thanks guys, have a

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>good week. Awesome. There you go. Week ten. Dr A

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>approved is your answer to my butey, There you go.

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Davante Parker. He's he's gonna be really mad at United Mark.

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>He's giving scores. On to the next one. Okay, indeed,

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>where do we come back? We reveal Frankie's quarterback and

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>tight end rankings. To take your telephone calls at eight

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>four or four eight four three six eight seven nine.

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Come on back, will you? If you're someone that needs

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports advice every day, the Fantasy Sports Right Network

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>has you covered. When you download the n T S

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Y Sports Radio Network GAP, you get the top fantasy

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 1>advice every single day right through the weekend. Be sure

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 1>to listen to our weekend warriors like College Football Today.

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to College Football Today Weekend Fantasy Update. They called

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>me the Fantasy Jesus in this league is never short

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of exciting at I T L and it's so much more.

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Download the Fantasy Sports Radio Network GAP in the iTunes

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and Google Play Store now and keep the best fantasy

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>experts right in your pocket all day long and all

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>week long. Fantasy Best Friends Forever. Fantasy Sports Radio Network

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>here to remind you that if you enjoy playing daily

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports but are sick of dealing with professionals using

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>algorithms to select hundreds of line of centuries charlotrons builder

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>tool at my Booky dot a G. Forget having a

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>creat multiple lineups, ditch the hassholes, do with late lot

0:36:57.360 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 1>of scratches and avoid experts winning ninety reverent of the money.

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's the players that you want without salary caps.

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And if you sign up for a new account using

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the promo code f n t S why you can

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>receive a fifty possibonus. No more deal withbly not line

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>up scratches, No experts are committed against, just even the

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>problem that you choose. Go to my bookie dot AG

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>into the promo code f n t S why you

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:18.919
<v Speaker 1>sign up and choose your matchups using the props field

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 1>your tool and that's my Bookie dot a G. The

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>promo code is f n t S hy eight four

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>four eight four three six seven nine eight four four

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>eight four three six a seven nine Philip. Those phone

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 1>lines will get to you and all of your questions,

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>uh during the next twenty minutes program Frankie inside our

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>YouTube chat right now, any glaring questions. Yeah, this one

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>comes from Danny. How to say the next tame Let's

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>just go with Danny Avendola. Who is taller, Frank or

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Gregg Frank am? I yeah, slightly right? Whatever should we

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>like stand up so people could see your five ten? Yes? Ish?

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>All right? So undoubtedly me yea, would you drop yelled

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 1>in for Josh Adams. Jeremy McMahon is asking Jeremy what

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy meek Man? Okay? Cool? When I dropped t J

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 1>yelled in for Josh Adams? No not? Why is that? Well?

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Someone could be the early downs back coming out of

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the by, or he could be fourth. Good point yelling

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 1>could be first or third. So so there you go.

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>That just kind of shows you the wide range of

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>possibilities when it comes to both running backs. I'm with Greg,

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll keep t J yelled in. There are boy Leland

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>asks Chris Carson, Chris Carson, Nick Chubb, Austin Ekela or

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle. Yeah, I'm gonna go with I like Chris

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Carson for sure. Based on the usage and how often

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks a running the football, Greg, do you realize

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that no team in football is running the ball more

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:04.400
<v Speaker 1>than Seattle Seahawks. I did know that the time they

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>don't pass the ball crazy don't pass absolutely crazy. I

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 1>will go with Chris Carson, and who are the other options?

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson, Nick Chubb, Austin Ekela going Nick Chubb against

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Kensey it's it's Chubb and Carson. Both are inside my

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen. This week running Down, Ryan Stevens asked Marvin

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Jones or Tyler Lockett. Tyler Lockett's been getting it done.

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>He's just not seeing a ton of targets. Tougher matchup

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 1>for Marvin Jones. We don't know who's going to see

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Rohads, whether it' Tim or Kenny Golladay. But based

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>on the way his targets have been trending up and

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Golden Tate is out of town, more

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for Marvin Jones, I'll take him. Okay, all right,

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>That's one of those where you have to weigh opportunity

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and target share versus the matchup Tyler Lockett. I mean,

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>not a great matchup by any means either. The Charger

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>secondary is pretty good, but I would say it's a

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It's an easier matchup for Locket, but there's more targets,

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>more opportunity for Marvin Jones. Okay, Um do one more

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>from chat before we get to your rankings this week,

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>David Moore or m v S. So we were just

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Chargers secondary, who are pretty much middle

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>of the pack in it against wide receivers this year.

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:23.919
<v Speaker 1>UM more points expected to be scored in the Patriots game.

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, this is a tough one because you know,

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like like you said, and we brought up David Moore,

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his targets had pretty much been right on

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:34.760
<v Speaker 1>par with Doug Baldwin and Tyler Lockett the past three games.

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Like there, it's it's a wide receiver by committee there.

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 1>The thing is yep, and you trust that in a

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>game with the fifty three and a half total or

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty I think fifty six and a half more points

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>expected in the Packers. Um, it's risky just because we

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>only have that one week sample of all these Packers

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>being healthy together. I'll take markets Valdi Scandling though it's close.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>It's good job by you like that. Let's get the

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 1>phone line four four four three six seven nine eight

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:05.959
<v Speaker 1>four four eight four three six seven nine. Will begin

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:10.720
<v Speaker 1>with West in California. What's up West? Hey, good morning, fellas.

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>What's going on in much man needed some help with

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>my flex. You know, I got a Thursday night game

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>with one of my players, and um, I got my

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>lineup set up, and um, I just wanted to see

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>if you guys could help me adjust that if if

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>need be. But um, okay, So I ended up picking

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>up D J. Moore, Um you know, off the wire

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I got. I picked up Kick Cutie too, he was

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>on there as well. And you know I got my

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:43.879
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers are A J. Green who's on the by,

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>And um I got Davante Adams playing in the in

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the in the number one. Al Right, so what was

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>your flex profit? Great? Your lot is awesome. Well what's

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 1>the flex question? Oh? Okay, So in my flex right now,

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 1>I have Breda as an option or uh the only

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>other player that I have available is uh O J. Howard.

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.280
<v Speaker 1>And I know it's not you know, it's not always

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a good thing to play two tight ends. But if

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I would have did that last week, I would have

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 1>had more of a better chance to win last week

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>if I had played all J. Howard. Yeah. But yeah,

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 1>but what format is this? Uh? Full PPR? This is

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a great question because as I mentioned, it's

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a good matchup for Matt Breeded tonight, but you

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 1>risk him re injuring himself. O J. Howard, who typically

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>plays better with Ryan Fitzpatrick going up against the Panthers,

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:42.280
<v Speaker 1>who I don't know if you realize this, Greig allowed

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the most fantasy points to opposing tight ends this year.

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed five touchdowns to be scored. They've also allowed

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 1>two games with over a hundred receiving yards allowed to

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. I think I just kind of talked myself

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>into O. J. Howard. I know it's crazy to run

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the two tight ends set, but I'm kind of worried

0:42:57.320 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 1>about either this game getting out of hand tonight, you know,

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt Breed to re injuring himself, um, just the overall

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 1>effectiveness of the forty Niners offense. I'll take O J. Howard,

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>who gets Ryan Fitzpatrick back as his quarterback. Yeah. I

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 1>think I would too, especially with question with Nick. It

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>was a surprisingly good question because Nick Bollin's at quarterback,

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.359
<v Speaker 1>potentially Matt Brita, who could leave the game any moment.

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I like Breeda, he was healthy, I would start Breeda,

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 1>but he literally could play one play and done. With

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that angle, it's risky though, because it's a good matchup

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that one player could go for like a fifty yard touchdown.

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I might change my mind. It sucks, I might change

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>my mind. The Panthers are allowing the most fantasy points

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to opposing tight ends. Um, I don't know if West

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is still there, and I would like to know who

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>was other tight ends because you know, maybe the other

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>tight end isn't all that great. Um. Yeah, I'm using O. J. Howard.

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm using J. Howard and point Breda. All right, you

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to call into the frenzy to get the

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>deciding vote there, Breed, I'm sorry, man, I'm talking myself

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>into Howard. Let's go to Jonathan in North Carolina. What's up, Jonathan? Hey, guys,

0:43:55.200 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I gotta similar situation involvement tonight. Um, due to obviously

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of buys this week, I'm running the Corey

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Parsons Special twelve personnel at the moment, two tight ends. Um,

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a little worried about George Kittle Um fair enough,

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty pretty heavily. And I'm just worried about

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Nick Mullins possibly playing to night and you know, laying

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 1>an egg really al right, So what's your question. I

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:31.479
<v Speaker 1>guess yeah, really, I'm it's killing me on Thursday because

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:33.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody that I have available that's not on a bias

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>questionable you know, Randall cop Kiki, q Ta, Peyton Barber,

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Davin Cook. I'm sure he's not gonna play it and

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 1>played all year. Um, I feel like I don't have

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a better option. But well, well, hold on, well I

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 1>think you do. Little Let's let's talk about this, right.

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 1>If your option is that the flex with George Kittle

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>versus Randall, Cobb or Q and three of those four

0:44:56.239 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>guys are gonna play, I believe right, so onlier to

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>side between Kittle and those guys, is that is that

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the only decision you have to make one of those

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>guys or George Kid here's your other tight end? Is

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>my other tight end? Yeah, it hasn't been great one.

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not had one great I'm gonna be honest with you.

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna start Kiddle at tight end. I'm gonna start

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 1>kidding Burton as well. Even if Nick Mollin's place, he's

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna need a safety valve middle of the field. George Kittle,

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>good match up against the Raiders, just got torched by

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the Colts last week allowed three touchdowns to their tight ends.

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with you. I'm I'm gonna start Kiddle at

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>tight end. Yeah, I'm gonna st Kittle at tight end

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. And I think for the flex question, we'll

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:41.399
<v Speaker 1>see how it goes. I'm gonna lean toward Peyton Barber obviously, Frank,

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:44.479
<v Speaker 1>you know why you don't want a Thursday night player

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in your flex. Absolutely not Kiddle at the tight end.

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:51.479
<v Speaker 1>And then Sunday you can decide between Trey Burton, Dalvin Cook,

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Peyton Barber. But you know, as more information comes out

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:56.360
<v Speaker 1>whether these guys are going to play. Look, you know

0:45:56.440 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't like Peyton Barber. I've made that known all year.

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But he's you know, he just got eighteen carries last week.

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Going up against Carolina, the offense will be able to

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>move the fall the ball with Ryan Fitzpatrick at quarterback,

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>so he could be a viable flex option, especially one

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that I would start over Trey Burton. Use Kittle tonight

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in the titant, don't. That's that's why I haven't set

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:18.959
<v Speaker 1>up now. I just I guess I kind of needed

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>that the pep talk. Man. We're here for John. You

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>just have to push, pushing towards the let's go out

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 1>next to Zach and he usedly, what's going on? Jack?

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:33.719
<v Speaker 1>What's that? Guys? I got a question? Sure? I got

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>um two spot I want? I don't know who to start?

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Um see, I got duck Ball one, Lasha McCoy, who

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 1>else McCoy, Um, Randall, cop Uh Godwin and uh the

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Smith kid in the New Orleans Two people all right?

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Two people Doug Ball, Lashawn McCoy, Randall, cob Or Chris

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Dwin or Trey Kwan Smith? Two out of those? What

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 1>format is this? Uh? Four point four point PPR so

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:14.800
<v Speaker 1>full point ppr. Oh Man, I wanted to use the

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 1>saw McCoy right out of the gate because but he

0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>faces the and it's gonna be gonna move. That's just

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a brutal game. But last week he led

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the team in targets, led the team in reception, Heaterman.

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>It was the only way, Peterman, So I assume you're

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>not using McCoy, Greg the one guy with the one

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 1>guy I'm using and I'm locking in first because Godwin,

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:38.359
<v Speaker 1>like Evans, is banged up. Rabbits Patrick is gonna throw

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the ball a lot like who's Godwin a lot this week. Yeah,

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that's a good call. Um, Doug Baldwin. Again,

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna continue to talk about the Seahawks wide receivers.

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:50.319
<v Speaker 1>They just kind of spread the ball out to everybody. Um,

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're actually expecting more points than I than

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought in this game between the Chargers

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 1>and the Seahawks, I would just Baldwin as of right now,

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I would I would lock in Baldwin and Chris Godwin,

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cobb. Packers wide receiver snaps were kind of all

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 1>over the place last week. McCoy bad match up against

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, Peterman starting and track Kuan Smith. You know,

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I understand the allure of trade Kwan Smith. He's young,

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>he's filling in for the Tedgain rolls. Tedgain was a

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 1>top thirty six wide receiver one year ago. But you

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:22.919
<v Speaker 1>look at the way that this Saints offense and team

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>has been trending, defense, playing better, they're running the football more.

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I understand there's a huge game total in this one

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:31.839
<v Speaker 1>between the Rams and the Saints. I'm not on trade

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Kwan Smith the way that everybody else's. He's had one

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:36.760
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal game. There's no doubt about that. It was against

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Washington on Monday Night football, so the whole world got

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to see it. But I'm not in on track Kwan

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Smith the way that everybody else is a agreed dude.

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like Jim Sons love this track k Smith

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. I don't get it. I really don't because

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:51.759
<v Speaker 1>people people still think that Drew Brees is going to

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:53.240
<v Speaker 1>be the Drew Brees from earlier on in the season.

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>They've already gone back to when we were questioning whether

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:00.879
<v Speaker 1>we should start Josh McCown or were Breeze last year.

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:03.279
<v Speaker 1>The answer is Josh McCown, and then you know, I

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:04.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see that. We're back there. But the

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:06.919
<v Speaker 1>past three games hasn't thrown the ball more than thirty

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>times in each one of these games. They're back to

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:11.239
<v Speaker 1>playing good defense and running the football. I like the

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 1>under in this contest, Greig sixty points between the Saints

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and the Ramp. I told you this yesterday. You said,

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you say, don't do that. I think we see a

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of I think we see a lot of running

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of Football League. With that, we're gonna

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>sign on YouTube for today. We're still gonna take your

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 1>calls to the end of the show. That's cool with you.

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you have anything else you need to get out?

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, so take your calls through the rest of

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the program, but come up next on our YouTube stream

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is Corey Parson, Jim Day and Chris Ventra. They're the

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 1>host of the Fantasy Football Frenzy for us. Is venture

0:49:40.280 --> 0:49:42.840
<v Speaker 1>allowed to talk today? We'll find out you're listening to

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. Subscribe, give us five stars, lead a comment,

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 1>were strongly appreciate it, and for next week, for tomorrow

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 1>will be of course live back here at this time

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:53.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Pursuit Networks. That would be exciting. I will

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>go live here for the next five minutes or so.

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>We continue on the phone lines franking eight four four

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 1>eight four three six seven nine, and we go to

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Tom the Long Island. What's up Tom? Hey, guys, how's

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it going? What's going on? Man? All right? Yep, here's

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a question. Um, it's a half point PPR. Should I

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:13.959
<v Speaker 1>drop I just heard you guys talking about this. Should

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I drop Taylor Gabriel and pick up Anthony Miller or

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 1>m VS for this week? Going forward? My other three

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:27.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers A poop up key y and Juju. But

0:50:27.520 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 1>going forward, I was I was did not thrown it? Yeah,

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's actually good. I think in his scenario

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>with those three wide receivers, you're trying to set up

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a long term You're you're not worried about this week

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>because you start those three guys this you Stron Hilton,

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna buy Um. You're starting Jujue, You're starting cup

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Um this week. So for the last spot, you got mvs.

0:50:47.920 --> 0:50:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Gabriel, Anthony Miller number one. Would you drop Gabriel

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for Miller? Would you drop Gabriel for mvs? Would you

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:56.320
<v Speaker 1>just have Gabriel? What would you do? Yes? So Taylor

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel's production and his usage has gone down since Anthony

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 1>has returned. I mean, it's back to back games for

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Miller with at least seven targets. Again, they're using

0:51:04.760 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 1>him more so out of the slot and continue to

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:09.000
<v Speaker 1>hammer this home this year as well. This is the

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:11.800
<v Speaker 1>year of the slot receiver. They liked Anthony Miller a

0:51:11.840 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>lot coming into the season and it's been a direct

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:17.719
<v Speaker 1>correlation with him returning and Taylor Gabriel's production going down.

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And also once Alan Robinson returns as well, it's just

0:51:20.239 --> 0:51:22.840
<v Speaker 1>another amounts of feed in this offense. I actually do

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 1>like Anthony Miller Moore moving forward the Packers wide receivers,

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:30.960
<v Speaker 1>while MVS did play the second most amount of snaps

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:33.400
<v Speaker 1>at the wide receiver position for them. I mean, it

0:51:33.480 --> 0:51:35.839
<v Speaker 1>could kind of just be a hoth hand approach. Could

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 1>be one week Torono Allison, one week Randall Cob We

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 1>like MVS, you know, I would. I would choose Anthony

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Miller of this group. Greig, I think I really would too.

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Am I just buying too much into the past two weeks?

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:47.239
<v Speaker 1>So I just I like the fact that he's being

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 1>used in the slot. He's had a safe floor targets

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the past two weeks. The Matt Naggie offense has been

0:51:52.760 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a fun one. I don't expect much scoring in this

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 1>game against the Bills, but again we're talking about the

0:51:58.080 --> 0:52:00.040
<v Speaker 1>long term. I think Anthony Millers kind of said to

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:03.399
<v Speaker 1>have a nice second half here four four eight four

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 1>three season. I agree with especially in the slot. I

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, and that's why I like him as well.

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's go out to California or back to California. Let's

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:19.359
<v Speaker 1>talk at Johnny. What's up Johnny? Gregory are you guys

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 1>doing don Actually got two questions where you go lower

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the lower us a little bit? Oh, I got two questions.

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:38.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, I have a running back situation I need

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to see. I got Nick Chubb, carry on Johnson, Kenyan

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Drake and Chris Carson. I need to start to all right,

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a good crewe. That's a standard standard. Non people

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 1>are very interesting. All right. I have my two franks.

0:53:02.040 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Those are the rankings that I have done. Right now,

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:06.239
<v Speaker 1>let's do the same time. It is Nick Chubb and

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson. I agree with you. That's exactly where I'm

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 1>going with. Those are the two. It's a good matchup

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>for Kansas City. I know, I kind of want to

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:15.399
<v Speaker 1>see a wait and see approach with Baker Mayfield because

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they're gonna throw the ball much.

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna try and keep Patrick Mahomes off

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the field, and to do that, they're gonna run the

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>football a lot. They I think they take a conservative

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:24.880
<v Speaker 1>approach in this game. They feed Nick Chubb. It's a

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:27.400
<v Speaker 1>good matchup against the Chiefs. Chris Carson. You look at

0:53:27.440 --> 0:53:29.600
<v Speaker 1>his usage, the way that the Seahawks offensive line is

0:53:29.600 --> 0:53:31.719
<v Speaker 1>playing right now, I'm gonna use him, but I will

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 1>say all four of those guys are ranked between twelve

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and twenty for me, so it is very close. Oh cool.

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And then my other situation was either start fitz Magic

0:53:43.960 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 1>or I start Trabisky fits Magic or true Whisky fits

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick is a top ten quarterback for me. This week,

0:53:51.440 --> 0:53:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bill's defense has played well, only a thirty seven

0:53:53.600 --> 0:53:55.799
<v Speaker 1>point total in that game. I'm gonna use fitz Matic alright,

0:53:55.840 --> 0:53:58.640
<v Speaker 1>fits Magic because he's the gun slinger. I like tis,

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like the barriers those deeved There's nothing to sneeze at.

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 1>As a Patriots will tell you, Tom Brady, you get

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:05.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing in that game. For Frank Staffle, I'm Greg Saucemon.

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Footle Friendsie comes your way next. Thank you so

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 1>much for watching the Fantasy best Friends Forever. We'll do

0:54:10.160 --> 0:54:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it all go tomorrow, we hope