WEBVTT - Should We Retest Licensed Drivers Periodically?

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff from how stuff Works, Hey, brain Stuff,

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Vogel bomb here. If you drive a car, or

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>sometimes take cabs or lifts, or have ever been around cars,

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you've likely had at least a few frustrating or scary

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>experiences with really bad drivers. You know, erratic merging or

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>u turns, or casual disrespect for stop signs, speed limits

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>or pedestrian right of way, or perhaps not disrespect but ignorance.

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Of study conducted by GMAC Insurance, nearly one in five

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>drivers weren't able to pass a written test of basic

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>driving knowledge, the sort that license applicants take. But even

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>though most people passed, there were some glaring gaps in

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>critical areas. Of those tested, for example, couldn't name the

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>correct thing to do when approaching a yellow traffic light,

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and only one in four knew how to calculate the

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>safe distance for following a vehicle. And see the article

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>version of this story at how stuff works dot com

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>if you want to quiz yourself or acquiring experienced motorists

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to regularly demonstrate their competence isn't something that's ever been

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>conducted on a widespread basis in the US, where some

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>states didn't even require novice drivers to pass a road

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>test until the nineteen fifties. Only one state, Illinois, has

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>a law mandating road skills tests for licensed renewals, and

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that's only for motorists who have reached age seventy five.

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire once had a similar age related testing requirement,

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>but repealed it. In Pennsylvania randomly selects a small sample

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 1>of the states forty five and older drivers and requires

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>them to undergo additional medical and vision exams. Based on

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:35.839
<v Speaker 1>those results, they might have to take a driving test

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. Additionally, a handful of other states Iowa, Missouri, Michigan,

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and California, allow officials to selectively require road tests for

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>license holders whom they have reason to believe might be unsafe.

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>We spoke via email with Andrea Henry, director of Strategic

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Communications and Policy for the Iowa Department of Transportation. She

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>explained that in her state, quote drivers with valid licenses

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe to demonstrate their driving ability prior to renewal due

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to changes in their health. This includes physical and mobility conditions,

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as produced vision and cognitive issues. While data

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on how many retests are conducted wasn't available, most of

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>those drivers end up getting renewals anyway, though many have

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>restricted privileges such as a lower personal speed limit or

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>daytime driving. Only one obvious problem with regularly retesting experience drivers,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>who numbered around two hundred and ten million in two

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine, the most recent year for which Federal Highway

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Administration data was available, is that they'd have to get

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in line with all of those first time applicants. That

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 1>would create even longer lines of testing stations that already

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>have their hands full coping with nervous adolescents struggling to

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>perform complex maneuvers like the dreaded reverse two point turnabout

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>without hitting those little yellow cones. A lot of those

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>youthful license applicants end up coming back for retests themselves.

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>As of twenty eleven, in California, for example, forty two

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent of applicants flunked the knowledge test a

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>bombed out on the skills test. The worst knowledge test

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>performance was in Missouri, with a sixty one point four

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>percent failure rate, while mains would be motorists did the

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>worst in driving skills with not making the grade. In

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the US generally has driving tests that are a lot

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>easier than the ones used by the rest of the world.

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>In the Canadian province of British Columbia, for example, would

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>be drivers have to undergo forty five minutes of testing

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on several different types of road, and also must verbally

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>describe what specific road hazards are immediately beside their vehicles,

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>one block ahead and also behind them to test their awareness.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>There isn't a lot of evidence that additional testing over

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the years necessarily would improve safety on the roads, As

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety explains, studies have yielded

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>conflicting results on the question of whether age restrictions reduced

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the rate of crashes. In Illinois, they did, but in

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire they didn't. The rate of injury causing crashes

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>per one hundred million miles driven actually is highest among

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>teenage drivers, and then decrease and levels out for decades

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>before starting to rise again slightly among people in their

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>seventies and eighties. That's not the pattern that you would

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>see if many people saw their driving skills or knowledge

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>deteriorate significantly in middle age. We also spoke by email

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>with Jake Nelson and Triple As, Director of Traffic Safety

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Advocacy and research, he said. Retesting where if you fail

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the test, you lose the license, has been shown to

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>have zero safety impact on the drivers involved, and it

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>has been shown to reduce mobility by way of drivers

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>voluntarily giving up their licenses due to fear of getting

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>them taken away rather than any legitimate concerns about their driving.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>There's no justification through data and research for testing or

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>screening at a certain age one. Gary Biller, president of

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the National Motorists Association, which is a nationwide advocacy group,

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is similarly skeptical about the value of retesting experienced drivers,

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>he said via email. Safety statistics consistently show that the

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>accident rates of drivers seventy years of age and older

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>are not much different than those in the thirty five

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to six nine year age group. By contrast, drivers younger

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>than thirty five are at the highest risk of accident.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>That indicates a couple of things. One is that experience

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>behind the wheel is one of the most important factors

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>for safe driving. Another is its state requirements for the

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>renewal of driver's licenses are reasonable. Those requirements vary state

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>by state, but generally include more frequent re licensing and

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>vision tests. Once driver reaches sixty, seventy or seventy five

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 1>years of age. But Billard does think there could be

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>value in allowing officials the option of re examining certain

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 1>potentially problematic drivers. He said there should be an objective

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>process through which the licensing agency could be petitioned to

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>do an evaluation of a given license holder based on

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>firsthand knowledge of family members, a law enforcement agency, or

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the courts. In fairness, there should also be an appeal

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>process for the person who is in jeopardy of losing

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>his or her license or having it restricted. That approach

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>might offer some protection against the most clearly impaired potentially

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>dangerous drivers out there, but as for the driver who

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>violate the rules because they think they can get away

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>with it, you're probably just going to have to continue

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>to be wary of them. Today's episode written by Patrick

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Jake Tiger and produced by Tyler Clang for iHeart Radios

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works from one on this and lots of

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>other topics that will absolutely let you merge if you're

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>using your turn signal, visit our home planet how to

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>works dot com, and for more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeart Radio app Apple podcasts, or wherever you

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.