WEBVTT - Architect Norman Foster on Why the West Struggles to Build Big

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Why isn't Joe?

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 2>You know? I spend a lot of my time doing

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 2>interior design. Yes, I've bored you, I'm sure, with a

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of thoughts on this topic. But then it struck

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 2>me recently that actually what I'm doing is not really

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 2>interior design. It's actually just interior decorating because I'm not

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>really changing the structure of a particular house. I don't

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 2>like doing that, in part because I'm lazy and I

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>hate construction mess, but also because it's a lot harder

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 2>to change the particular design of a house than it

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>is to just get new fabric for the windows or

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>a new paint color. There are more real world constraints.

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I can confirm having looked over from time to time,

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, when they sit next to each other. I

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 4>can confirm having you looked at you, say, like looking

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 4>out wallpaper and vintage wallpaper that you might be acquiring.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 4>But no, I have not heard of you sort of

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 4>talk about, you know, knocking down big walls or whatever

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 4>inside your home. Although I certainly. You know in New

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 4>York City, you know people who do that and they

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 4>hire an architect as part of They'll buy two condos

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 4>or something like that and can join them and hire

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 4>an architect and so forth. That's a different level. It's

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 4>a different level of constraints and obligations.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is the other thing I've been thinking. Am

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I a product of my time? Because so much of

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the cultural emphasis nowadays seems to be on interior design

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 2>and what the inside of a building looks like versus

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the exterior. And I think if I had been do

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, thinking about these things in like the nineties

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 2>or the eighties, I would be much more into architecture.

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 4>It's really interesting thought. And I hadn't really thought of

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 4>it that way, But that makes a lot of sense.

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 4>And you know, my uninformed gut is like, oh, does

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 4>social media make it? Other people are just much more

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 4>obsessed with the interior design of a building, the specific

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 4>esthetic choices that are made. But of course, on the

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 4>other hand, we work at Bloomberg. We have a big

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 4>office in.

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 2>London, many beautiful buildings.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Many beautiful buildings, lots of glass New London HQ, absolutely

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 4>gorgeous building et cetera. And so we do live surrounded

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 4>in this world that the world we live in is

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 4>one that was built by architects or designed by architects.

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, And this was the other thing I was thinking

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>about architecture in relation to economics is when it's done well,

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful building ends up being a public good. Right.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>It can boost an entire neighborhood, it can revive a

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>particular city, it can improve the flow of traffic, improve

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>energy efficiency, do all these things. But so many buildings

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>are still designed by private developers, and I'm not sure

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 2>they're always incentivized to do beautiful design in that way. Like,

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 2>how do you incentivize a private develop to do something

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 2>that ends up being a public good.

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 4>It's a fascinating question. I hadn't really thought of it

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 4>framed in that. But like, for example, again, like the

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 4>new JP Morgan building in New York City.

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 2>I like it.

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't I don't work there, but I think it's

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 4>like a cool addition the skyline, it blinks, et cetera.

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of cool things, But how do you

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 4>design how do you incentivize the public good as a

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 4>good way to frame it?

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, since you mentioned the JP Morgan building that is

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 2>a bit perfect, Yes, a huge clue. So we do,

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 2>in fact have the perfect guest for today's show. We

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 2>are going to be speaking to a very famous architect,

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Lord Norman Foster. He is of course the founder of

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Foster and Partners, and we are here with him in Madrid.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 4>In uh in his studio and his foundation.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for coming on the show. Thank

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 2>you so How much of architecture is about dealing with

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 2>real world constraints because I always think there's not just

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>physics and finance, but you're also dealing with things like

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 2>zoning and I guess in the UK you're also dealing

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 2>with listing requirements and things like that. How much does

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 2>that constrain you.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 3>It's totally rooted in the process of design, so you

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>cannot separate. Design is really a response to constraints and

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 3>whether those constraints come from the codes, whether they come

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 3>from the requirements for the building. Because a building is

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 3>a response to a need, it then takes on more layers. Yes,

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 3>it's in the public domain, but it's shaped by constraints,

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 3>by needs. It's a response. So if you don't have

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 3>those constraints, if you don't have those demands if you

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 3>don't have to meet certain requirements performance. Some of those

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 3>are tangible, you can measure them. Some are less obvious,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 3>more subconscious, perhaps below the surface, but nonetheless. So it's

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 3>a design is a response to needs.

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 4>We're in this gorgeous building of yours, and we were

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 4>just looking that you know, over there on the show

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 4>of Dirt for a series of wood samples, for example,

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 4>different types of wood from different ustry.

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Wood plumb would at.

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 4>The highest levels of architecture to do a great building.

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 4>How much do you does the architect really need to know?

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 4>I guess maybe material science, or at least the true

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 4>nature of specific materials.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the more that you know about the issues

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 3>around any assignment, the more you're empowered as a designer.

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 3>So that has led me over decades to promote a

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>particular way of designing, which is counterintuitive. It's against everything

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 3>that we're taught in a school of architecture or engineering,

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 3>and that is you bring all the disciplines to get

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 3>around a table and you work from the outset together. Now,

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 3>a critic of that will say that sounds like a

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 3>committee architecture. It's not. I mean, basically, the team is

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 3>going to be involved in that project. So if the

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 3>architect designs and then hands it over to the engineer

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 3>to make it stand up, to make it hot when

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 3>it's cold outside, and the reverse, you lose the opportunity

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 3>of the feedback. If you get that at the outset,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 3>the designers are more empowered and the designers are really

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 3>a wider team. But that needs a process of re education.

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 3>Because engineers have been taught show me what you want,

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll make it work. Architects have been taught that they

0:06:55.240 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 3>should design in isolation. It goes further. Architects are taught

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 3>about doing a building in isolation. A city outside is

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 3>a street. You could argue the street is the essence

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 3>of the traditional city. Architects and urbanists are not talked

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 3>about designing streets. So planners are taught in terms of zoning,

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the legalities, architects have talked about individual buildings.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 3>So in a way, we have to reassess how we

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 3>educate and in our terms we re educate whether it's

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 3>here in a foundation preparing civic leaders for the future,

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 3>enabling them to be able to tell the difference between fashion, prejudice,

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:49.239
<v Speaker 3>style and data and evidence and the same is true

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 3>in terms of a building or a city plan.

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Joe brought up the wood samples. I can't help but

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 2>notice that the majority of items in this room are

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>related to transportations, so cars and jets and trains as well.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 2>I also read the city and the city, but I

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 2>also read in an older interview, I think someone asked

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 2>you your favorite building and you replied a jumbo jet.

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you have an interest in engineering? Should you have

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 2>been an engineer instead of an architect?

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I love flight, I love automobiles, and I think that

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 3>as designers we get our inspirations from many different directions.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 3>I was deliberately being tongue in cheek in terms of

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 3>the jumper jet, but what I really wanted to do

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 3>was to get the audience thinking in a different way

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 3>about a jumper because when you think about it, it's

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 3>a restaurant, it's a cinema, it's a hotel, and all

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 3>the while it's moving from one place to the other.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 3>And also to start to think about the miracle flight.

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's still an extraordinary magic that these machines,

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 3>which are weighing tons, can somehow, by lumbering along the runway,

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 3>suddenly levitate and then transports vast distances. And I think

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 3>there are also a lot of lessons in terms of

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 3>the built world, in other words, how can we use

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>harness technology to improve the quality of life.

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm really fascinated by this idea of Okay, so one

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 4>might think that an architect is someone who draws clients

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 4>draws sketches on a piece of paper, and then maybe

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 4>there is an engineering firm, and then there's a construction firm,

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 4>and then so forth. I'm fascinated by this idea, and

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 4>it rings true with other discussions we have. You know,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 4>we talk to traders, for example, and there's obviously a

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 4>difference between thinking in your head and a good trade

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 4>versus what it actually takes.

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 2>Time.

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Literally, this morning, I was sitting around a table with

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 3>a group of us as architects here in the foundation

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 3>on a project, alongside the individual who would be going

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 3>to build that building, and we're saying, well, the next

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 3>stage is to do this, we really have to have

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 3>the environmental engineer, we have to have this structural engineer,

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 3>and that will be the next meeting. So that was

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the first meeting. Now we were able to go so far,

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 3>but only so far, and we recognize the need to

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 3>have those other skills on board. Now we could have

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 3>and it would have been absolutely traditional. We could adjust

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 3>collectively designed that building and then just passed it on,

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 3>But there would be so many lost opportunities because if

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 3>you think of a building as an integration of systems,

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean if I I tried to bring this back

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 3>to the world of automotive design, and I found myself

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 3>trying to communicate that this principle to a group of

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 3>automotive engineers, not just the engineers, but those who were

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 3>making the cars. And the example that I took was

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 3>a point in time in the nineteen thirties went pretty well.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 3>All of the cars, any production car followed a certain pattern.

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 3>It was a chassis and then a body on top

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 3>of that, which was a shell to enclose and protect

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 3>the occupants from the rain, the elements from nature. And

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 3>then at one point a car emerged it was the

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Chrysler Airflow, and the body became not just a shell,

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 3>it became an integral part of the structure. So the

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 3>car was lighter and the car was immensely stronger. The

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 3>promotional video of that time they pushed the car off

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 3>the top of the mountain, and it kind of rolled

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 3>and rolled and landed four square. Somebody comes out of

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 3>the bushes, demonstrates that the opens the door, gets in

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 3>and drives away. The point is then that the two

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 3>separate systems of the shell and the chassis have merged

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 3>into one element, which is doing both jobs better. So

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 3>it's doing more with less. Now imagine that we're talking

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 3>about the exterior of a building, heating and cooling it.

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 3>If you think of integrated design, then you're going to

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 3>end up if all those skills are working together, you

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 3>can really do a system approach to design. You can

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 3>start to get things doing duty, performing more less components,

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 3>higher performance, more quality, and better quality of life. Whether

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 3>that principle, whether it's in a city or a building,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 3>is all of that is to a social end.

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 2>How do you think about the social end of buildings

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 2>when you're given a particular project. So I know that

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 2>you often do public buildings, and I imagine that you

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>are in dialogue with cities and states around the world

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 2>when you're doing those. But when you're given a private

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 2>assignment such as a JP Morgan building or a Bloomberg office,

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 2>how do you think about the public good aspect?

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Of design, thinking simultaneously of how that building works from

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 3>the inside out, and you're also thinking simultaneously from the

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 3>outside inn because arguably there are two completely separate groups

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 3>of people private inside public outside, but the building is

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 3>in the public domain. So if I took the headquarters

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 3>of Bloomberg, then an early decision was to intersect the

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 3>building with Wattling Street. Watling Street was the old Roman

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 3>road opposite. If you acknowledged that, and you continued that

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 3>and it became an arcade through the building and you

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 3>had connectivity over that arcade, then simultaneously you were breaking

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 3>down the scale of the building. It was then more

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 3>human and the public spaces bringing in an artist to

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 3>create water benches. That was also double duty the system's

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 3>approach providing security, but it wasn't an ugly bollard you

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 3>didn't notice providing security. It was also bringing people together.

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Then the arcade is an opportunity to introduce shops and

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 3>stuff that is working with the Bloomberg philosophy of encouraging

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 3>the neighborhood to benefit from this private entity coming into

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the community, rather than it being an island and killing

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 3>off the traders. It's encouraging local traders. Now, everything I've

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 3>described then is working to the benefit of the interior

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 3>of the building, and the facades are starting to be

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 3>able to breathe and pour lots of fresh air into

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the building. So it's making the building a healthier building.

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 3>But it's also on the exterior, not another glass box.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a combination of bronze and the local stone, local stone,

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the stone of the adjoining buildings. So it's working environmentally

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 3>in terms of sustainability, it's reducing energy, it's creating a

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 3>healthier building for the occupants. And then because it's deep

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 3>and low, it's not pushing into the sky, so it

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 3>is reverential to the historic buildings around it of the

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 3>same mass. But at the same time it's creating horizontality,

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 3>and horizontality is good for communication, and Bloomberg is about communication.

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Now I could describe another kind of building for a

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 3>completely different kind of how can I say, client body

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 3>also in the high tech business, so if I go

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 3>to Beijing, if I talk about a building there, the

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 3>company ethos is totally different. It's about competition between groups,

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 3>so it's the poll opposite, and I could describe that. Indeed,

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 3>the point that I'm making is that as I take

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 3>you through these decisions, the way that they overlap and interact,

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 3>you start to realize that the process of design is

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 3>about balancing, it's about reconciling. It's about creating something which

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 3>is simultaneously working in the public domain, working for a visitor,

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 3>working for those inside when they come outside.

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, since you alluded to it, and now I'm particularly

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 4>particularly curious about it, I imagine that in the decades ahead,

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, there will still be new JP Morgan headquarters,

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 4>new Bloomberg headquarters, et cetera, but there is probably going

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 4>to be a lot more megaprojects still coming out of

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 4>Asia or Beijing or China specifically. And so when you

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 4>describe that environment is different, what should the architects of

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 4>the future know about working in these markets?

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 3>First of all, I mean I took the example of

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 3>the building in China. That same need could be anywhere,

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 3>it just happened to be in China. So you could

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 3>have in China exactly the same requirements as a building

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 3>like JP Morgan or Bloomberg, although of course no two

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 3>buildings are like. I mean, each is specific to its

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 3>own organization. The values of those organizations, the aspirations of

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 3>those who've created them, whether they're an individual like Mike

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg in Bloomberg, whether it's Steve Jobs with Apple, or

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 3>whether it's much more corporate, more anonymous, But nonetheless there

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>are those values. I would say that common to any

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 3>building anywhere is how do you anticipate the future? So

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 3>if I go back to an early building which recently

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 3>celebrated its half century, and that was the Willis Faber

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Building in Ipswich and insurance headquarters. And in the life

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 3>of that building, that building had a high degree of flexibility,

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 3>and nobody in their wildest dreams anticipated that that flexibility

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 3>would be used. But in no time at all after

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 3>it opened, it opened with typewriters, and in no time

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 3>that building, and it was the only building in the

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 3>insurance industry which was as a headquarters able to adapt.

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 3>It adapted to the digital revelu to screens. And the

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 3>same was true of the Hong Kong Bank, the Hong

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Kong Bank, which I also recently went to their fortieth

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 3>anniversary as opposed to Willis Favor and their fiftieth anniversary,

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 3>so literally a few weeks ago, I was there at

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 3>that celebration and the same thing there. That building, quite

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 3>radical at the time and still in many ways radical.

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Took the traditional central core of a tower, which contained

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 3>the structure, the vertical circulation, the bathroom's mechanical plant, took

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 3>all that fragmented it put it at the sides of big,

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 3>open loft things. Nobody anticipated that in the life of

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 3>that building, in the early life, there would be something

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 3>known as a trading floor, where you need clear line

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 3>of sight. That wasn't a need in the nineteen late

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 3>nineteen seventies when the competition for that building, but it

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 3>was able to absorb. So I think that the whole

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 3>thing about the future is that by design you can,

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.959
<v Speaker 3>if I say that, you create a building for the

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 3>needs of today with an awareness of the past, but

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 3>to as far as you're able to anticipate the future,

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 3>which is largely unknown. But the perhaps in terms of

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:34.479
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure having been backwards and forwards to Asia, and if

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 3>I say China more specifically over the last thirty years,

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean the changes that I've seen, which interestingly I

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 3>was communicating earlier this week to the Bloomberg event audience

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 3>here and sharing that experience with them and showing them

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 3>the China when I first went there and it's foggy,

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 3>it's misty, you can't see the cities now unbelievable, I

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 3>mean clean air, ninety percent of the vehicles electric, and

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 3>an extraordinary amount of green. I mean Shanghai is fifty percent,

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Beijing fifty percent green. That's happened over the last few decades.

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 3>And in terms of connectivity, just over fifty four thousand

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 3>kilometers of high speed train two hundred and twenty miles

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 3>an hour, three hundred and fifty kilometers an hour connecting.

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 3>By this, ninety seven percent of Chinese cities on a

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 3>pig day, thirteen million travelers achieved in sixteen years. And

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 3>in the UK they gave up on the London to Manchester.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>It goes as far as Birmingham. Short term ism. They

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 3>have a department for leveling up. The ultimate leveling up

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 3>is connectivity. They just didn't get it. And that fifty

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:19.239
<v Speaker 3>four thousand kilometers is more than the rest of the

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 3>world put together by a huge margin.

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think certain countries And you brought up

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 2>the UK there, but you could possibly say the same

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 2>for the US as well. Why do you think certain

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 2>countries big?

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Because at every stage in the emergence, the emergence of

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 3>a nation, whether that is the United Kingdom in its

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 3>empire days, the Industrial Revolution. It led the world. We're

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 3>still trading right now on that. I mean, the Thames

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 3>Embankment was a response to cholera. It created, if you like,

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 3>systems thinking and doing more with less. It also introduced

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 3>below ground high speed public transport. It cleaned up the Thames.

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 3>So that period you had the expression of that civic

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 3>pride I started. I started work at the age of

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 3>sixteen in Manchester Town Hall, which was the ultimate statement

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 3>of civic pride. And it was a competition and Waterhouse

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 3>won that competition. That was my first experience of architecture.

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 3>It took me a little longer to eventually discover that

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 3>I could study architecture. So I was a late starter

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 3>at the age of twenty one. But I can remember

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 3>vividly right now details of that building. I mean, that

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 3>really lifted my spirit. So that whether it was the

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 3>great train stations, and of course today it's the great airports.

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 3>So if you really want to see that the most

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 3>advanced airports in the world, where do you go? I mean,

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 3>it's obvious we know where you go.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Right there's a mockup.

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 3>There's a huge model immediately behind us here. The Basing

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 3>Airport was built in five years now. At the same

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 3>time I drew a parallel with Terminal five, which I

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 3>think took twenty years and was the fraction of the

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 3>size and is really a sort of band aid on

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 3>top of Heathrow, which is still embedded in the heart

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 3>of you overfly metropolis together. So there are a lot

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 3>of messages perhaps mixed up in these analogies and comparisons.

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 4>No, it makes sense, and I didn't necessarily expect the

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 4>interview to go in dis direction. But I'm actually just

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.959
<v Speaker 4>going to press you further on this specific point, which is,

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 4>what is your diagnosis of why certain countries do seem

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 4>to have given up? Was there a moment when you

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 4>felt it, for example, in the UK, was there a

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 4>moment where you felt the ambition is not the same

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 4>as it once worth.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting. I'm working on a project right now, and

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:19.719
<v Speaker 3>so I'm with a team of relatively young architects, and

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 3>so I'm saying, well, in terms of domes, of course,

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 3>it would be interesting to make a comparison with a

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 3>particular dome in the Festival of Britain nineteen fifty one,

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 3>and everybody looked at me quizzically and I said, but

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 3>you've never heard of it, because nobody ever heard of it.

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 3>So I said, well, check it out and the next

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 3>meeting will talk about it. The next meeting they came

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 3>back and said, why didn't we know about that? This

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.959
<v Speaker 3>was nineteen fifty one. It was the biggest dome in

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 3>the world. It was demolih for political reasons. Interestingly, so

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 3>they were in awe and the images, I mean no extraordinary.

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 3>So nineteen fifty one was it more or less hard

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 3>on the heels of World War II, and Brittain was

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 3>in true austerity mode. You still had rationing, so you

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 3>had a little book and when you went to buy

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 3>food or clothes then you could only buy depending on

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 3>the number of coupons like postage stamps that you'd got left.

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 3>But that period was the first nuclear power station, was

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 3>the first commercial jet. It was the de Havelan Comet

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 3>was in terms of cars created the R type Bentley

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and twenty miles an hour hour on hour.

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 3>It costs twice two houses at that time, the semi detached,

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 3>So this was an extraordinary era. Now since then for

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 3>a whole variety of reasons, many of them political. It's

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 3>no longer the leading at that level of innovation, manufacturing

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 3>and so on, and that factors are quite complex. Some

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 3>of them are political and others social. So you do

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 3>have this sicklical and you can look at the rise

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 3>and for the Empires and the relationship between the way

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 3>in which that might be celebrated, either through the technology

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 3>or the architecture of the time, and the architecture of

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the Festal of Britain at that time was absolutely extraordinary.

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 3>And that was the achievement of one administration. But literally

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 3>when the next administration came down, for whatever reason, I

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 3>would surmise that it was seen as a threat. So

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 3>it was amout. The only element which is still standing

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 3>on the South on the South Bank, and you know

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 3>there is the Festival Hall, of course, but that was

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 3>part of that of that creation.

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I had no idea. Yeah, that's fascinating. Since you brought

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>up rationing, how do budgets work for buildings? If I'm

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 2>a client of Foster and Partners, one can dream and

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I come to you and I say I want to

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 2>build a building. Do I present you with a particular

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 2>figure or a range, or do you study my needs

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 2>and then you come back with a suggested buddy.

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 3>There's no absolute way around this. I mean, it may

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 3>be that the budget is absolutely fake. We have that

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 3>amount of money, how can we optimize how can we

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 3>maximize the value. Well, first of all, there is not

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 3>the relationship that you would expect between quality and how

0:29:58.600 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 3>much you spend on a building.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Hmm.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 3>There are so many buildings I could point to where

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 3>a fortune's been spent and you just wouldn't near You

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't want to go near that building. There are buildings

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 3>where they're noble buildings and they were built on very

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 3>very tight budget. So quality is an attitude of mine.

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 3>It's not how much you spend, it's how wisely you

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 3>spend it. So that is philosophical, but it's tangible in

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 3>terms of the end results. So you may have somebody

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 3>who says that's it. This is my this is my resource.

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 3>And there are three resources and one is the most valuable.

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 3>So you have money, you have time, because time is

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 3>also money. The longer you spend on your project, most

0:30:56.840 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 3>likely the lower you've actually going to get. Because so

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.719
<v Speaker 3>that in many ways, when you can do something faster

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 3>within reasonable limits, then you're maximizing. Often if you have

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 3>a fixed amount of time and you draw that out

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 3>and draw it out, the money is losing over that bit.

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:25.239
<v Speaker 3>But the third resource is creative energy, and that is

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 3>far and away the most valuable because that's going to

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 3>determine what you get for your money. So we know

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 3>what happens with whoever comes along and their pot is fixed.

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 3>What if they don't know, then I think you have

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 3>the importance of simulating or modeling and saying if you

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 3>go in this direction, then it's going to cost you that.

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 3>If you go in this direction is going to cost

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 3>you that. And in many ways, if again, if I

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:59.479
<v Speaker 3>try and find a simple analogy, if you take a car,

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 3>the base cost of that car in many cases is

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 3>relatively low. The cost of driving it out of the showroom,

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 3>depending on the extras that you have either agreed or

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 3>brought into, is going to change the cost of driving

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 3>that car out of the showroom. And in many cases

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 3>that is obviously true of a building. So it's a

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 3>part of the creative process to actually define that budget.

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 3>But notwithstanding illusions, the reality is that cost is always

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 3>a factor. But the important thing is also, and it's overlooked,

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 3>it's not just the cost of how much it costs

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 3>to buy that building, how much does it cost to

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 3>run and then over the lifetime of that project, the

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 3>decision to spend that amount of money on that kind

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 3>of building or another kind of building. So, for example,

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 3>how do you put a price on the ability of

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the Hong Kong Bank to be able to introduce that

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 3>dealer's flow, or for Willie's Faber not to have to

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 3>build another building because they can incorporate the new digital technology.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 3>How do you put a price on that? And how

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 3>do you put a price on a building which significantly

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 3>improves productivity because in the longer scheme of things, the

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 3>first cost of a building is a relatively small proportion

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 3>of the bigger financial pature.

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned creative energy, and of course one of your

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:08.720
<v Speaker 4>famous relatively recent buildings that, of course, the big circular

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 4>building for Apple. And that's a strange situation, I imagine, because

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 4>here is a company that is also known for an

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.439
<v Speaker 4>insane amount of creative creative energy in more or less

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 4>the same realm as yourself of visual design, right, et cetera.

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Was that a unique experience or distinct experience to work

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 4>on a building for a company whose main thing is

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:36.320
<v Speaker 4>also in large part visual aesthetics.

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think it was, because I don't think

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 3>that ever came into it. So Steve had the ability

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.280
<v Speaker 3>to be able to be on his hands and knees

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 3>worrying about the detail of a plug in a socket

0:34:55.920 --> 0:35:03.280
<v Speaker 3>and at the same time be sensitive to the big picture.

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 3>And I think that that there are relatively few people

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 3>that you come in contact who have that appreciation of

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 3>the importance of scale. Mike Bloomberg, by the way, and

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not just saying that is another individual who has

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 3>in any conversation will challenge a tiny detail or like

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 3>the idea of having a wooden floor, and then all

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 3>kinds of things follow from that. But obviously is a

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 3>big picture person which which we know and we take

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 3>for granted less. And so perhaps Mike's ability to challenge

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 3>a lifting consultant about the elevators and so on, so

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 3>and I have to say that's fantastic. I mean, the

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 3>most most interesting individuals to work with those who challenge,

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 3>there's no question. And the more that you do have

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:12.720
<v Speaker 3>that ability to challenge each other in the process, then

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 3>arguably the better the end end result.

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, you mentioned productivity earlier, and this is slightly

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 2>tangential to architecture, but I would be very curious to

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 2>get your thoughts. We've seen productivity gains in virtually every

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 2>industry on Earth in recent decades, except famously the construction industry.

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 2>In the US, construction has lagged behind in terms of productivity.

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure it's a similar story in the UK

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 2>and perhaps some other countries around the world. Do you

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 2>have a theory for why that is? Why hasn't construction

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 2>I guess developed as much as a lot of other

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 2>industries technologically.

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 3>I think that some societies, and it's interesting we were

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:06.280
<v Speaker 3>talking earlier about Asia China. There is a book called

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Breakneck by.

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 2>He's been on this podcast many times.

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 3>And as you know, the thesis behind that book is

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 3>that China is hierarchically, is run by engineers and they're

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 3>about doing things, and America is run by lawyers and

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 3>they don't have necessarily the same priorities. And I think

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 3>that that's perhaps an extreme example of the fact that

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 3>some societies the status is associated with the ability to

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 3>make of craft. Switzerland has that, so in Switzerland the

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 3>cabinet maker. Those who make have that standing in society.

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 3>If I go to the United Kingdom on a building side,

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:16.760
<v Speaker 3>it's probably likely to be polic speaking. Why polic speaking,

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 3>because those craft skills are still alive and well in Poland,

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 3>and they've been exported. And we talked earlier about that

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 3>time in nineteen fifty one when I was sixteen and

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 3>was I sixteen in nine Yes, now, in that in

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 3>the period between now and then, you had and this

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 3>is not a criticism of one particular party or one individual,

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 3>but Margaret Thatcher, who did a whole number of positive things.

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 3>One of the negative things was to dismember the industrial

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 3>base of the United Kingdom, and not surprisingly, perhaps then

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 3>the status of those who make accordingly suffered. So I

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 3>think that the rather complex answer to your question is

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:27.839
<v Speaker 3>that some societies encourage and and noble. And I mean

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting. I mean, my daughter is just graduating from

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Yale in architecture and one of the great things about

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 3>the Yeir School of Architecture is, unlike I think any

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 3>school that I know, in the first year, they make

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 3>a building, They design a building, and then they make.

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 2>It, they actually build it.

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 3>They actually build it I mean, obviously they have supervision

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 3>from skilled builders, and then it it's handed over and

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 3>a family lives in it and they see the success

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 3>or otherwise of their endeavors, which is absolutely fantastic and

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 3>one of the reasons why. And here I you know

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 3>that I'm a graduate of Yale, so I'm a Yale alumni,

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 3>so I have a certain But the point that I

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 3>was going to make was that my daughter called me

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 3>and said, I just started work on the building. I'm

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 3>on a building site, and she said, you know what,

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 3>for the first time, I really appreciate manual workers. I

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:43.399
<v Speaker 3>know what it is, and it's that you know, the

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 3>the making of something. I mean, when you go on

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 3>a building site you think, is this ever going to

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 3>turn into something that can be habitable? Is muddy boots.

0:40:56.440 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 3>And part of the practice we were talking about, or

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 3>indeed anything, whether it's here in the foundation doing a project,

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:10.280
<v Speaker 3>whether it's in the practice, it's we push. You get

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 3>on the building site, you get the hard hat on,

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 3>you get into the factories, you engage with those. This

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 3>is not fashionable. This is not necessarily taught. Yeo School

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 3>of Architecture an exception, and there is a nobility in

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 3>making it, and there should be in the same way

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 3>you know that those who protect us, those who keep

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:37.320
<v Speaker 3>us healthy, that they should have a much higher standing

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 3>in society.

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 4>This sort of leads to my next question, and it

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 4>kind of relates to, I guess the sort of cliche

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 4>what should young architects or aspiring architects think go about?

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 4>But one dimension that I'm particularly interested in is, Okay,

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 4>you talk about how in the ideal scenario, the engineers,

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 4>the construction firm, the architects, they're all there from the beginning.

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 4>That's not handoff, and that sounds really good, great, and

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 4>it seems to.

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Old, but you're breaking down silos too.

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 4>On the other hand, that model also means that when

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 4>you know the client comes with the budget, the architect

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 4>just gets one slice of it right And so perhaps

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, architects in the US it's sort of famous

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:19.959
<v Speaker 4>for as professionals on like say doctors, lawyers, et cetera.

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 4>They're not paid as well as others. And maybe it's

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 4>because you know they're sharing, they're sharing the pie with

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 4>many other entities. What should aspiring architects think about to

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 4>just have like a satisfied career, but also a remunerat

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 4>or remunerative career that can sustain themselves.

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:42.840
<v Speaker 3>No, you're absolutely right. I think that it's it's rooted

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 3>in the birth of the profession, which was always an

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 3>aristocratic element. It was always a kind of gentleman's pursuit,

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 3>and that may have been appropriate at a point where

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 3>architecture it was a very very tiny slice of the

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 3>buildings that society needed. So it was your cathedrals, it

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 3>was your maybe your town halls, but the whole I mean,

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the hospital was most likely a converted other kind of building.

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Airports didn't exist, railway stations didn't exist. So the whole

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 3>building spectrum has grown, but in many ways the importance

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 3>of the architecture as an integral part of that and

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 3>a decisive part, because design determines so much of the outcome,

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 3>the cost of a building, the performance of a building,

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 3>how much it meets the needs of the public at large,

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 3>or the everything we've been talking about that is underappreciated,

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 3>it's undervalued, and it's underpaid. And those of us who

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:14.800
<v Speaker 3>are able, we try to do what we can to

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:22.399
<v Speaker 3>change that. That you're needing, really to bring in the

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 3>profession at an earlier stage of decision making.

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure this question will not be unexpected for you,

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:34.320
<v Speaker 2>but what happens to architects in the age of AI,

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Because you could mount a very clear argument that if

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:41.360
<v Speaker 2>we have new technology that's able to do pretty much everything,

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 2>including potentially modeling and designing buildings to very specific specs

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 2>and needs, that that will mean that architects are perhaps

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 2>even less well remunerated than they are now.

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:58.399
<v Speaker 3>I could argue an opposite point that if you could

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:02.960
<v Speaker 3>do more with les if you had the enhancement of

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:09.399
<v Speaker 3>such a tool. But if I go back to square one,

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 3>AI is not something that happened yesterday. It's been evolving

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:22.320
<v Speaker 3>gradually over time, gaining momentum, gaining awareness in the same

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 3>way that the whole issue of sustainability. Sustainability was at

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 3>the core of the practice when it emerged in the

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:34.359
<v Speaker 3>nineteen sixties. You could argue the rest of the world

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 3>has finally caught up with that. But many of the

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 3>things that we were doing back then were fringe activity.

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Now their mainstream. They're in everybody's from page headline. And

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 3>if artificial intelligence is the accumulation of everything that has

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 3>gone before, then some of the most interesting things that

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:04.800
<v Speaker 3>we've done architecturally have not gone before. So the points

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 3>that I was making about creating a tower without a

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:14.800
<v Speaker 3>central core and taking that central core, artificial intelligence is

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 3>not going to tell you about that is going to

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:22.880
<v Speaker 3>tell you everything that it knows about central court buildings.

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:28.480
<v Speaker 3>So artificial intelligence is accumulated history. What is history, It's

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the past. So that is going to make it even

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 3>more important for those who use all the advantages of

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:49.320
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence but are not inhibitedly dependent on it. Maybe

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 3>it's a bit like going into the home of Steve

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Jobs and finding a rare book on a pedestal. The

0:46:56.360 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 3>rare book becomes even more in the digital age.

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 4>I have one last question. I don't I have no

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 4>idea if you like the term or find the term

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 4>starkitect annoying or not. But you know, when you see

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 4>a list of them, you're one of them. But there

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 4>is a generation of them who the people who are

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 4>called starkitects, And there doesn't seem to be a lot

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 4>of new names. And I'm curious, if you perceive the

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:26.400
<v Speaker 4>next century, could there be another person to the extent

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 4>that anyone ever knows the names of architects. It's always

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:31.839
<v Speaker 4>going to be somewhat narrow, But will there be architects

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.840
<v Speaker 4>who emerge in the next century that everyone knows the

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 4>name of, or has something changed such that that individual

0:47:38.160 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 4>won't be a pop culture figure.

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 3>In the same way, I'm often invoking buildings from the

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 3>past for their importance, not just in terms of nostalgia,

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:56.439
<v Speaker 3>but for the lessons that we can learn from them.

0:47:57.239 --> 0:48:04.839
<v Speaker 3>So if I take the solar powered community of an

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 3>educational institute like Masdar, which is totally solar powered in

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the desert, that was only made possible by applying the

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 3>lessons from an architecture of the past which didn't have

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 3>access to instant electrical energy to power air conditioning. So

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:29.840
<v Speaker 3>it was about scaling streets for people and not cars,

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 3>creating shadow orientation. It was about evaporative cooling, which meant

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 3>bringing in vegetation. It was about colonnades for shade. It

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 3>was about layering a building. It was about capturing the

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 3>cool air at a height above and funneling it through

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:54.759
<v Speaker 3>wind towers and so on. Applying all of those lessons

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 3>and then the technology of our age so able to

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 3>demonstrate that you can have the living qualities that we

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 3>take for granted. But solar powered in a very very

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:13.920
<v Speaker 3>hostile environment. So that is learning from an architecture without architects.

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Obviously those architects were there, they didn't have a name.

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:23.720
<v Speaker 3>It was more anonymous. If you fast forward, yes, names

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 3>are known. I think your star architect really inevitably, some

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 3>architects do the kinds of buildings that attract attention. But

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 3>also if I take and you know you're looking at

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 3>me when you're using that word, but but I would,

0:49:44.560 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 3>I would like to take you to a little building

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:50.560
<v Speaker 3>in Manchester called Maggie's, which is a cancer research station.

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 3>I like to take you to a small chapel which

0:49:53.760 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 3>is the tiniest building that we've done on an island

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 3>in Venice. And each in these different ways, particularly the

0:50:01.600 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Maggie or some of the hospital health work that we've done,

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 3>is in its impact really really significant. But it's not

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 3>necessarily newsworthy because it doesn't happen to be pace the

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:19.400
<v Speaker 3>model behind us, the biggest of its kind at that time,

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 3>or the highest of its kind, or if it's MEO

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:27.920
<v Speaker 3>fired up. So in many ways, what is newsworthy is

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 3>necessarily what is the most important of its time.

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 4>We'll definitely take you up on that tour.

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 3>If that's a real offering, absolutely.

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:39.799
<v Speaker 2>All right, Norman Foster, thank you so much for coming

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:41.239
<v Speaker 2>on odd Lots really enjoyed it.

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Joe.

0:50:55.840 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 2>That was a fascinating discussion. I feel like I have

0:50:58.760 --> 0:51:01.239
<v Speaker 2>a new appreciation of arche texture, not that I didn't

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:03.800
<v Speaker 2>appreciate buildings before. Sure, maybe I should say I feel

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 2>inspired to start knocking down walls in my own my

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 2>own house.

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Go for it, Tracy, I think you should. You know,

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 4>I have to say I did not expect that conversation

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:17.320
<v Speaker 4>to really veer so much into like political economy basically

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 4>and some of the you know, to discuss the econom

0:51:21.320 --> 0:51:25.080
<v Speaker 4>or why basically countries like the UK and the US

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:29.239
<v Speaker 4>decided to stop attempting to build great things, and the

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 4>connection between the era of building great things and consumer rationing,

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:36.400
<v Speaker 4>and of course, you know, China building a lot of

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 4>great things, also famous for financial oppression of various sorts.

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 4>So I was not expecting to hear like that crisp

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:46.279
<v Speaker 4>economic idea that we talk about a lot articulated in

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 4>this particular conversation.

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 2>By Norman Foster. Yeah.

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:52.640
<v Speaker 4>No, I also not expecting didn't read the den lingo.

0:51:53.440 --> 0:51:56.839
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Yeah, what a reference. We'll have to tell

0:51:56.920 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Dan about that.

0:51:57.680 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, the other thing I was thinking, going back to

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the interview we did with Allentown Mayor Matt Turk, was

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 2>this idea of small scale manufacturing. And I don't think

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 2>he used this specific term dignity at work, but this

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:15.680
<v Speaker 2>idea of you know, making things and then making the

0:52:15.800 --> 0:52:19.880
<v Speaker 2>job of making things desirable, allowing people to like be

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 2>close to where they're working and things like that. And

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:26.719
<v Speaker 2>you could see some parallels with the construction industry today, right,

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Like you want people to feel proud making things, and

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 2>you want the process of making things to actually be

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:35.280
<v Speaker 2>an enjoyable one.

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Everybody wants those glistening like Shenzen skylands, but nobody.

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 2>No one wants to build them.

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 4>No one wants to allocate those societal resources to be

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:49.400
<v Speaker 4>part of the you know, the construction crew that does that.

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:52.400
<v Speaker 4>That seems like the one of the big challenges of

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:52.799
<v Speaker 4>our time.

0:52:52.960 --> 0:52:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, shall we leave it there.

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:55.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's leave it there.

0:52:55.320 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the Audults podcast. I'm

0:52:58.080 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Tracy Alaway. You can follow me at Talloway and I'm

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Jill Wisenthal.

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 4>You can follow me at The Stalwart. Follow our producers

0:53:04.560 --> 0:53:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand dash Ol Bennett at Dashbot,

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Killbrooks at Kilbrooks and Kevin Lozano at Kevin Lloyd Lozano.

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:14.399
<v Speaker 4>And for more odd Loots content, go to Bloomberg dot

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 4>com slash od lots, where we have a daily newsletter

0:53:17.160 --> 0:53:19.399
<v Speaker 4>and all of our episodes and you can chat about

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:21.840
<v Speaker 4>all these topics twenty four to seven in our discord

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:24.240
<v Speaker 4>discord dot gg slash od lots.

0:53:24.680 --> 0:53:26.839
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy Odlots, if you like it when

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 2>we take the occasional foray into architecture, then please leave

0:53:30.520 --> 0:53:33.840
<v Speaker 2>us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 2>if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

0:53:36.280 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 2>all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 2>to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts

0:53:41.680 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 2>and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening