WEBVTT - Impeachment, Lawfare and Fallout

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>An hour two Sean Hannity Show, eight hundred nine to

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>four one, Shawn, if you want to be a part

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of the programmer, I sold a lot of news that

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to kind of sum up in this this

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Friday hour. One fascinating thing that is going to be

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting to watch unfold legally is after Tulsei Gabbard sent

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a criminal referral to the DOJ targeting the Inspector General

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and the CIA analyst whistleblower that wasn't a real whistleblower.

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>As it relates to the first impeachment, you got to

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>wonder is that going to be vacated? Can't it be vacated?

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>The Constitution doesn't say anything specifically about it. I believe

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 1>it was Andrew Jackson that had censure, and later Congress

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>removed that. I'm pretty sure it was him, and I

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>saw comments recently by Professor Alan Dershowitz, who has a

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>brand new book out which we're going to get to

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the topic of as well. Could President Trump constitutionally serve

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a third term? Just the title of it is going

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 1>to piss off so many people of cracks me out.

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Mahek Cook is with us as well, a senior national

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>security legal analysts for The Daily Signal. We're going to

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>get into the Iranian issue with both of them as well.

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to start on the law, considering they're both

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>brilliant on a professor, We'll start with you can the

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>president serve a third term? And could this Ukrainian impeachment

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>based on this new information be vacated?

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 2>They're both hard questions. It's never happened before, of course,

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 2>but I do think that in a criminal case, if

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>you discover evidence that was with Hell that would have

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>exculpated the defendant, he can get the indictment dismissed, he

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 2>can get the conviction reverse. So I think there's a

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 2>good argument that an impeachment can be undone as well,

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>if you find people who would have voted against the

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>impeachment had they gotten the information. And we know there

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>are several people who voted for impeachment to may very

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 2>well decide that they would have differently had they known

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>all the information that was withhealth from them. So I

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 2>think there's a strong case for it. There's no precedent.

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 2>You're right about Andrew Jackson. They did rescind a censure

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 2>application that was the Senate. This is the House, but

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>that is probably the closest thing we have to a precedent.

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I have now gone back and read the congressional debates

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 2>about impeachment, and I've read the Jefferson Manuel about the

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 2>House of Representatives, and I can find nothing either way.

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's a blank slate. And when you have a

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 2>blank slate, that's what good lawyers love. So I'm thinking

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>about it, and who knows, maybe we'll file something.

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>If I had to guess, you probably would. I know

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Jay Sekulo of the A C l J was involved

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in that impeachment case, and this was information he brought

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>up all the time based on what we know that

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen. And I think, my heck, if you

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, prior to president, if a case

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>comes before a judge and exculpatory information was withheld from

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the defense, that is usually very strong grounds for dismissal.

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>In this case, vacating no right.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And I've won a lot of cases on appeal

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>based on what's called the Brady or Jiglio Supreme Court

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 2>decisions would say that a conviction can't stand if information

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>that was material was withheld, And I think the same

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>arguments would apply to impeachment, which is a quazy criminal

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 2>proceeding that follows many of the rules. In fact, in

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 2>the Jefferson Manual it says that impeachment should follow generally

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the rules of criminal cases. So we have a little

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 2>bit of support there.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 3>What do you think, ma heck Cook Jehn.

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 4>I think this is going to be very difficult. There's

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 4>definitely a sculpatory evidence, and I think if we could

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 4>use Brady, that's a route towards reverse this record. I

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 4>also think there's an opportunity again for Congress and the

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 4>House to look at this. I know it would be

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 4>a symbolic move, but what about clearing the record that way?

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 4>So at least if we can't go through the legal route,

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 4>as Alan has outlined, then potentially at least the American

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 4>people know the truth and we can litigate this in

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 4>the American public because far too often it's mainstream media

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 4>that gets to have the final word. So I think

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 4>this should be really litigated in the House as well.

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 3>I agree it's that I think it would do.

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it would do very well there. All right,

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>moving on, let's get to this. Can the president serve

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a third term? The premise of Professor Dershowitz's book The Heck.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Before I get into more specificity with him, can Donald

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump go for a third term?

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 4>Look Sean. My personal feelings on this, taking off my

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 4>legal hat is absolutely. I think what President Trump has

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 4>done through this term alone, within a year plus in office,

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 4>he has continued to dominate, whether it's safety and security

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 4>at borders to delivering tax relief. We finally had tax

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Day come up and Americans are celebrating that the government

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 4>isn't bankrupting us like they did under Joe Biden. But

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 4>all that aside, all my politics aside. The twenty second

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.119
<v Speaker 4>Amendment says no person shall be elected to the office

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 4>of the President more than twice.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 2>So I think unless.

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 4>There's a clever argument, I stand by that. But I

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 4>think that President Trump has paved a path for future

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 4>leaders Jadie Vance, Marco Rubio. There's going to be a

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 4>gamut of people on the right that actually can pick

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 4>up the helm and lead just like Trump did.

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Professor Derisha, it's your thoughts.

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, unless there are clever arguments. Well, my book has

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 2>seven clever arguments for why President Trump could So you

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 2>say that.

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Very humbly, Professor I mean, with all due respect, go ahead,

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm kidding, no, I mean there.

0:05:53.480 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 2>For example, if the vice presidency becomes vacant, the statutes

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>in the twenty second and other amendments provide that the

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 2>vice president can be appointed, can be appointed by the

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 2>President with the consent of the Senate. And if Trump

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 2>were to be appointed vice president to another president and

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 2>then that president were to resign, being each die or whatever,

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 2>he could then ascend to the presidency. The twenty second

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Amendment does not prohibit a president from serving, only from

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 2>being elected. In fact, the framers of the twenty second

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Amendment were given proposals to say that a president couldn't serve,

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 2>couldn't act, couldn't be and they turned them, all of

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 2>them down, and they said, no, we're not going to

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 2>do that. We're just going to say he can't be elected.

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 2>And so there is a hole, a large hole in

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 2>the twenty second Amendment, bigger than the new ballroom of

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 2>the White House through which President Trump could serve a

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 2>third term. Now would he do it? I was with

0:06:58.000 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 2>him in the Oval office. I presented him with a

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 2>cop be of my book and he got a good

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 2>laugh out of it. And you know, he basically basically

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>suggested that, you know, he's not thinking about that. But

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 2>for example, if the Democrats were to nominate some terrible,

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 2>terrible person like AOC or one of the other extreme radicals,

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 2>people who they are now electing to the Senate, and

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump were to be told that the only way of

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 2>defeating and destroying the country would be for him to

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 2>serve a third term, he would he would, you know,

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 2>he loves the country. He would be sympathetic to that,

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and he would call me and say, hey, what can

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 2>we do to get me in for a third term?

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 2>And I would give him. I would give him the advice,

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:39.239
<v Speaker 2>I give him the book.

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>As long as we're talking about the presidency, some very

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting developments on the Democratic side. It looks like mister Nosho,

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Governor Gavin Newsom full time Trump stalker, Halftime Hannity stalker.

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Now we find Gavin Newsom's pack at one point five

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>million dollars to buy copies of his book. Doesn't sound

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like he's very confident that any anyone would want to

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>buy it on their own, although Katie Kirk and Gavin

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Doo agree that he's very handsome and that could be

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>very troubling for him. In the campaign trail and also

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>out in California, Chris Ruffo filmed encounters with transgender illegal

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>immigrants outside of San Francisco, homeless shelter apparently getting taxpayer

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>funded boob jobs, and sex change operations in California. Republicans

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>now are all over these bluestates for keeping taxes on

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>tips and overtime which the president had put in place,

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the scandals keep getting bigger and bigger

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>into the billions of dollars of misappropriated funds for non

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>existent daycare centers and non existent hospice care.

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Heck, cook, well, Sean, you're nailing a huge issue right now.

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 4>It's the Democrat collapse you're talking about. Newsom, who's supposed

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 4>to be the front runner would be president who got

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 4>caught right buying two thirds of his best selling book,

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 4>as he puts it, using pack money. I'd love to

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 4>have the Justice Department look at this, because that looks

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 4>like fest to me. And the worst part about this

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 4>is this man wants to run the country when he

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 4>can't even run an honest book launch, and we have

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 4>the highest fraud in his state. But make no mistake,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 4>It's not just red blue states, it's red states. You

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 4>and I have talked about fraud in Ohio and how

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.599
<v Speaker 4>people in charge here want to hide from it. Do

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 4>you know I have visited dozens of daycares where we

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 4>are sending federal money, state money included, and when I

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 4>go there, there's no children in there sean, and I

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 4>ask questions about where the money is going, and nobody

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 4>wants to answer the questions. Most of the people are

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Somalians here speaking Somali, so how are you supposed to

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 4>send your children to these daycares? But this is the

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 4>biggest problem in America is what Elon did through DOJ.

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 4>We have continued to rob from American taxpayers and government

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 4>is complicit. And I don't care if you're a Republican

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 4>or a Democrat today, It's happening anytime you have welfare.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 4>So Democrats are.

0:09:59.080 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 5>Running from it.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 4>Republicans are just as complexe that I'm seeing it in

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 4>the state of Ohio, where people refuse to take this seriously.

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think we're all seeing it all right.

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>We continue with Maheck Cook and Professor Alan Dershowitz. He

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>has a new bookies launch. Did President Trump constitutionally serve

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>at their term. I could just see the left bubble

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and fizzing like alca seltza in water. Anyway, our final

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>moments would then and then your calls are coming up

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>straight ahead as we continue this Friday. Do you think,

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Professor Dershowitz, that this in any way hurts Gavin's chances

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of securing the Democratic nomination.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 2>I do. I think the thing that hurts the most

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 2>is that the Democratic Party today is because the most

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 2>anti Israel party in the history of America. And you know,

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Democrats used to be able to count on pro Israel

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 2>support and Jewish support. I just wrote an our bed

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 2>piece that I've submitted saying why nobody who supports Israel,

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 2>whether you're Jew, Christian, or Muslim, can in any way

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>vote Democrat anymore? The Democratic Party has become the party

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 2>that is most strongly post Israel, the becoming like the

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 2>European left wing parties of England and other places that

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 2>are automatic knee jerk opposition to Israel. And I think

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>that's become a real liability for the Democratic Party. And

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 2>by the way, Israel is the canary in the mind.

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 2>The mind is America. And if you're opposed to Israel,

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 2>which is fighting a defensive war. You're opposed to America.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Look at Tom Friedman of the New York Times. He writes,

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>he's on television the other day in which he says,

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 2>I am born torn between supporting Iran, the worst terrorist

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 2>country in history. I'm torn between supporting Iran or supporting

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 2>America because Trump is so terrible in Natanya, who is

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 2>so terrible? So I mean here, he is practically rooting

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>for Iran. And that's what the Democratic Party is doing

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>these days. And they're turning against America. They're turning against

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Western values, they're turning against Judeo Christian values. And I

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of American voters are going to understand

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 2>that we're a centerist country and we don't want political

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 2>leaders who are opposed to American values.

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>What do you both think, ma Heck, I'll start with you.

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>We both heard all these women come out and make

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 1>very severe allegations in a couple of the instances outright

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>rape by congressmen and former good manatorial candidate mister Fang

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Fang Eric Swolwell. I have found that their interviews were

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>so believable and compelling, and there's so many people that

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a hard time believing if they told those

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>stories that way before any jury, that they would get

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.599
<v Speaker 1>anything other than a conviction pretty immediately.

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Is his arrest likely imminent?

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 4>The rest has to be imminent, Sean, because if the

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 4>DOJ does not take this seriously, the rule of law

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 4>is just going to evaporate. The Republican Party has spent

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 4>four years saying nobody is above the law, just like Democrats,

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 4>and now we're going to prove it. The worst part

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 4>is about Swallow. He lectured America about President Trump's character

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 4>for years, and now he's accused of drugging and raping women.

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 4>And let me tell you, there's a digital footprint.

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't lie.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 4>There's going to be financial records that the FBI and

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 4>dj can go through. They can look at his campaign

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 4>finance and they can start looking at where these women

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 4>were and continue to make this huge timeline. And I

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 4>also think, Sean, there's many other women that are going

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 4>to feel to speak out. The worst part about all

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 4>of this is that Swawell, even Gallego who stood up

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 4>at a press conference and cried, he said he didn't know.

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Just listen to their words.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 2>These Democrats aren'tlying.

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 4>He then admitted in the same breath that everybody in

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Washington knew and heard these rumors. Well, look, if it's

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 4>a pattern, it's no longer a rumor, and we have

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 4>to start investigating it. These are the same Democrats that

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 4>are holding hostage a congressional release of every sexual misconduct violation.

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, Republicans are complicit in this, we

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 4>should be releasing that taxpayers are funding this. I mean,

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 4>we have such a moral problem in America today and

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 4>if we don't actually get justice for these women, it's

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 4>going to keep happening. Sean, I've seen it firsthand. Men

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 4>do not like taking no for any type of response

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 4>from women when they hold power. I've been fortunate, though,

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 4>I've been able to walk away from positions because I

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 4>haven't cared about the money on the table. Many of

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 4>these young interns, that's their livelihood.

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 2>They're terrified.

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 4>This is disgusting. It has to be done.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>There are just evil people in the world, and there

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>are evil predators in the world, and it's just sad.

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And I found the credibility of these women to be

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>on the highest level and the charge is so despicable

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that I can't imagine that this guy is gonna it's

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna avoid jail, but you never know with a jury. Anyway,

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate both of your kind of news roundup segment

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>this Friday, eight hundred and ninety four one Shawn Maheck

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Cook and Professor Derschwitz is with us.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Thank you both.

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 6>The New Sean Hennity Show talking about what's right for

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 6>America Weather renewed commitment to keep you up to date

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 6>on the breaking news stories.

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I knew I'd get a lot of blow

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>by brush back. I've been doing this now. I started

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in radio in nineteen eighty seven, and you know when

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you take a strong position on a controversial issue that

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes you know that you're going to anger people. However,

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I have an obligation to my audience to

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>be truthful. And when it comes to the controversy between

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the Pope Pope Leo and with Donald Trump and the

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Pope saying that God does not bless any conflict, I

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>knew by taking that on that I would get people angry.

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And it has gotten people angry, and a lot of

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>articles have been written and a lot of nasty comment.

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Who the heck is Sean Hannity to tell the pope

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that he does he needs to read the Bible. Well,

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I was pointing out that in the Bible, in the

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Bible consists of the Old and New Testament. He said,

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>God does not bless any conflict. Now is the God

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Old Testament the same God of the New Testament.

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Did Jesus not come to fulfill the law? Did Jesus

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>not come to do his father's will? Did Jesus not

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>say I am my father?

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Are one?

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>That would mean that God has not changed. When Moses

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>saw the burning bush and he says, well, who should

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I say?

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Sent me? I am sent me? It's to me.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>My interpretation, and that of many theological scholars, would be

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that God always was, is, ever present, always will be.

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>That God does not live in the space of time

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the way human beings do.

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 3>But I knew i'd get blowback.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get some right now, Mike, and San

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Antonio disagrees with me.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Mike, I am glad you called.

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Glad you're listening, and I'm.

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Appreciative of any constructive criticism. Go for it.

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 7>How you doing, Sean. I'm a deacon in the Catholic

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 7>Church in San Antonio, I've been listening to you forever,

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 7>and I love you. I'll stay with you, But I

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 7>do have a problem with your position on the Catholic

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 7>Church being Catholic before and then the reason why you left.

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 7>So I was just saying, you know, the way that

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 7>you didn't agree with the way the church handled the scandal,

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 7>but it's no different than Congressman Gonzales handling you know

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 7>his predicament. Why don't I just leave the Republican Party?

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 7>You know, I want to know what how you feel

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 7>leaving the church. What did Jesus have to do with it?

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 7>The Church is full of humans, and humans make mistakes,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 7>and so therefore let.

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Me ask you, did you hear the entirety of my comments?

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Because I went through I was an altar boy. I

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:51.959
<v Speaker 1>went to Catholic schools for twelve years. I studied in height,

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I went to a seminary for high school, I studied

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>theology in Latin, went to Mass every day. I told

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I went into great detail how the Catholic Church formed

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a very solid foundation for me and my conscience, and

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm grateful to the Church. I talked about how much

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I loved the Mass and the Eucharist, and so on

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. Did you did you get all of that?

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Did you hear all of that?

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 8>Dude?

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 3>I do?

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 7>But but again I feel that with your with your

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 7>reach and the platform that you have, I felt that

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 7>that was really a small reason to leave the church

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 7>because it was something that humans did, and I don't

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 7>understand what Jesus had to do with with I.

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Think it's broader than that though.

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Why or is it a fact or not that eleven

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>or the twelve apostles were married. Jesus picked married men.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it a fact that for the first twelve hundred

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>or so years of the church that priests were allowed

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to marry? Yes, but that's that is a church given rule.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You're a deacon, I bet you'd be a great candidate

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a priest, And unfortunately that rule has resulted

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in a very very small percent of the population that

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>would like like to join the priestthood that otherwise would

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, and that was a church decision on

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the corruption issue, it was for me, it was I

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>just think that foundationally, I think it's probably rooted in

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that basically, if you applied, you became a priest, because

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have a dwindling percentage of the population

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>that want to live their lives unmarried. And I'm assuming

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that you probably got married, and you know, otherwise you

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>probably My guess is, if you're a deacon, you probably

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>would have been a priest.

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Am I wrong?

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 7>Probably? Maybe not, because I became a deacon later in life.

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 7>I already had children and grandchildren already, so it was

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 7>just a I continued in the church because I was

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 7>serving in the church, so it kind of led me

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 7>to that. But I don't see that.

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>Would you agree that the parishes knew about the sex scandals,

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and the bishops knew, and the cardinals.

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Knew, and Rome knew, and that there.

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Was collectively institutionally a major cover up and they still

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to this day have not really dealt with the scandal

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>head on in the way that they should have.

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 7>I do agree with you, But I also agree that

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 7>the Republican Party hadn't handled everything in the way they should.

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>But yet I don't I agree, But they're not the pope.

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>But let me examine my criticism, and I think and

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I understand the pope. Look, Donald Trump is not the

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Pope Donald Trump. I mean, he's not the perfect human being,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people pointed that out to me,

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and I knew it would be pointed out to me. However,

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're the head of the Roman Catholic Church, your

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>standard to me is very different than the standard of

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>being a president. But that's a separate issue. But he

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>made a very definitive statement. God does not bless any conflict.

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And the God of the Old Testament, you would agree

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>with me, is the God of the New Testament.

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Correct, Correct? Okay?

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>In the Bible, and the has over four hundred references

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to war, God authorizing, commanding, intervening in battles. I mean

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a fact.

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 7>Correct, Yes, you're right. But my point is is that

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 7>folpe can speak. That doesn't make him right.

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean he's not unless he speaks ex cathedra,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>which would mean infallibility in those moments.

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Correct. My theology is still in there. Yeah, you had

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 3>a boy.

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 7>I'm proud of you.

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I'm not saying this any different. The Catholic

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Church has done a lot of good for me in

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>my life, and I am grateful, and I hope one

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>day that they'll rectify this situation. And when they do,

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but if the Pope won't criticize the forty thousand protesters

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in Iran that was slaughtered by the Iranians.

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 6>He won't.

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>He won't criticize the number one state sponsor of terror.

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>I know he doesn't want any nuclear weapons, but what

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>about the country that's the number one state sponsor a

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 1>terror that would threaten to use it against our He

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>has a very different role than the president. I have

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>not heard the Pope criticize the bombing by Iran in

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>densely populated areas in Israel, or holy sites in Jerusalem,

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>or Iran's oppression rape murder of innocent women, or their

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>execution of gays and lesbians. You know, and I mean

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I knew what I knew when I took this issue on.

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing this long enough that I'd have a

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of people angry off at me. But I think

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I said I think I was fair in my commentary

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>because the Catholic Church has enriched my life and it

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>has put me on a path where I feel like

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>my faith is the most important thing to me now

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in my life, and without that foundation it wouldn't be.

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm grateful to the Church for that reason, but I'm

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>not in agreement with the Pope on this, and I

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>think that presidents have very different jobs than popes do.

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Pope has a very radical left

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>wing view, as evidenced by his Twitter account, which I

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>went back and looked at in great detail, which is

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily left wing before before I did this monologue yesterday. Oh,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I like the respectful discussion. I'll give you

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the last word anyway.

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 7>I agree with you, but I also think that the

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 7>pope that's not his job, and he should refrain from

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 7>making general comments. He doesn't have an army like we

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 7>do to defend, you know, because I think he would

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 7>set himself up. Maybe he started becoming political and condemning

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 7>the acts of Iran and that type of thing. He's

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 7>a sitting duck, just like Pope John Paul the Second was,

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 7>so therefore, I think he should refrain from making comments

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 7>like that. I agree with you, but I also think

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 7>that with your with with your ability to reach countless people,

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 7>I think that you can do more harm by good

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 7>by leaving the church for reasons that Jesus couldn't control.

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:56.719
<v Speaker 7>He put it in the hands of humans, and they

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 7>made mistakes, and he continued to make mistakes and.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 3>We've all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Fair enough.

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I do appreciate your thoughtful call. Good luck to

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you in your church, and thank you for serving you know,

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the people in your congregation, and I wish you all

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>God's blessings. Thank you all right, quick break right back

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to our phones, eight ninety four one, Sean. If you

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:18.959
<v Speaker 1>want to be a part of the program this Friday

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 1>as we continue.

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 6>The final hour roundup is next. You do not want

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 6>to miss it and stay tuned for the final hour

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 6>free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>At back to busy phones. Call free it is eight

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and nine four one, Sean. If you want to

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>be a part of the program. Andy in Michigan, Andy,

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>how are you glad you called?

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 5>Great?

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 8>Thank you for taking my call. Hey, just to let

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 8>you know, thirty year listener, your show last night with

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 8>Reverend Graham was awesome. The point I wanted to make

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 8>was Jesus Christ created you know, blasphemy, and blasphemy is

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 8>the only unforgivable sin. So if you if you go

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 8>against the Holy Spirit and the teaching of the Holy Spirit,

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 8>which this is going to probably irritate a few people,

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 8>but I believe this Pope has done that. I think

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 8>by him equating the Muslim Muslim religion equal to the

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 8>Christian religion and then visiting their mosque undermines the Christian religion.

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 8>So he's a fallible human being. He won't be saved

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 8>any more than any of us. We all need to

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 8>walk in the light of the Lord. Do what Jesus

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 8>Christ commands us to do, which is to say, hey,

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 8>I came here and died for all of our sins

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 8>so that we could all be resurrected with the Word.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 8>And I'm concerned that this Pope has veered from that.

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, I've just got to tell you this, and I

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>think this is very very important that Look, I'm not

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.239
<v Speaker 1>going to proselytize on this show. I mean, we've had

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun with Linda and her hate list

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 1>and what do we call it, Linda Terrianism, But in

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>all seriousness, we are mind, body, and spirit. And my

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>last word on this would be I would urge everybody

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to take good care of your mind. You richer mind

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:42.479
<v Speaker 1>you and richer body.

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 3>You know. But I think we often neglect the soul.

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 3>I've been guilty of it.

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.479
<v Speaker 1>In my life and now when I embrace it, I

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>know I can be a better person and I encourage

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>people to find their path, whatever it happens to be. Andy,

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you man. Thank you, Daniel Missouri. Next Sean Hennity Show.

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 5>Hi, Hey Gay, good to talk to you. Sean. A

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 5>longtime listener, first time caller. I've been following you ever

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 5>since the Hannity and Colmes days, back when I used

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 5>to watch that with my dad. Calling today. Reason I'm

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 5>calling is the segment you did yesterday with Nick I

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 5>always mess up his name, Nick Fretus, about his new

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 5>book about being a man and all the things that

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 5>you need to do to be a man, to have

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 5>a successful relationship, to attract a partner, and things like that,

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 5>and one point I wanted to make something I always

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 5>try to tell young men when you're looking for a relationship,

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 5>when you're looking for marriage, the most important thing you

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 5>can do and the most important thing you can have

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 5>in that marriage is a marriage is always between three people.

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.479
<v Speaker 5>It's between the husband, the wife, and Jesus Christ. And

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 5>you always have to have Jesus Christ at the center

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 5>of that marriage. If you want to maintain you know

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 5>that that healthy marriage, that healthy spirit, that that fruits

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:56.959
<v Speaker 5>of the spirit that you bring out in one another.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 5>And a brief story i'll share with you real quick

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 5>of my experience with that is I served twenty one

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 5>years in the Navy. I retired in twenty twenty two,

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 5>and my last command was in Japan during COVID and

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 5>I ended up being stuck over there for three years,

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 5>separated from my wife while she was here with my

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 5>son in the United States. And what kept our marriage

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 5>together and strong through that whole thing was that Jesus

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 5>Christ was always at the center of it.

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Listen, in those situations, you'd be shocked how many marriages

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>fall apart. And I'm not being judgmental in any way.

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>It just becomes very difficult for people. And I think

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it's those toughest moments in life. If you have faith,

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you exponentially will increase your odds of success. I mean,

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:46.479
<v Speaker 1>you're to be admired for you know that testimony my view, anyway,

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got to run Daniel, appreciate it.