Speaker 1: An hour two Sean Hannity Show, eight hundred nine to
Speaker 1: four one, Shawn, if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the programmer, I sold a lot of news that
Speaker 1: we're going to kind of sum up in this this
Speaker 1: Friday hour. One fascinating thing that is going to be
Speaker 1: interesting to watch unfold legally is after Tulsei Gabbard sent
Speaker 1: a criminal referral to the DOJ targeting the Inspector General
Speaker 1: and the CIA analyst whistleblower that wasn't a real whistleblower.
Speaker 1: As it relates to the first impeachment, you got to
Speaker 1: wonder is that going to be vacated? Can't it be vacated?
Speaker 1: The Constitution doesn't say anything specifically about it. I believe
Speaker 1: it was Andrew Jackson that had censure, and later Congress
Speaker 1: removed that. I'm pretty sure it was him, and I
Speaker 1: saw comments recently by Professor Alan Dershowitz, who has a
Speaker 1: brand new book out which we're going to get to
Speaker 1: the topic of as well. Could President Trump constitutionally serve
Speaker 1: a third term? Just the title of it is going
Speaker 1: to piss off so many people of cracks me out.
Speaker 1: Mahek Cook is with us as well, a senior national
Speaker 1: security legal analysts for The Daily Signal. We're going to
Speaker 1: get into the Iranian issue with both of them as well.
Speaker 1: I want to start on the law, considering they're both
Speaker 1: brilliant on a professor, We'll start with you can the
Speaker 1: president serve a third term? And could this Ukrainian impeachment
Speaker 1: based on this new information be vacated?
Speaker 2: They're both hard questions. It's never happened before, of course,
Speaker 2: but I do think that in a criminal case, if
Speaker 2: you discover evidence that was with Hell that would have
Speaker 2: exculpated the defendant, he can get the indictment dismissed, he
Speaker 2: can get the conviction reverse. So I think there's a
Speaker 2: good argument that an impeachment can be undone as well,
Speaker 2: if you find people who would have voted against the
Speaker 2: impeachment had they gotten the information. And we know there
Speaker 2: are several people who voted for impeachment to may very
Speaker 2: well decide that they would have differently had they known
Speaker 2: all the information that was withhealth from them. So I
Speaker 2: think there's a strong case for it. There's no precedent.
Speaker 2: You're right about Andrew Jackson. They did rescind a censure
Speaker 2: application that was the Senate. This is the House, but
Speaker 2: that is probably the closest thing we have to a precedent.
Speaker 2: I have now gone back and read the congressional debates
Speaker 2: about impeachment, and I've read the Jefferson Manuel about the
Speaker 2: House of Representatives, and I can find nothing either way.
Speaker 2: So it's a blank slate. And when you have a
Speaker 2: blank slate, that's what good lawyers love. So I'm thinking
Speaker 2: about it, and who knows, maybe we'll file something.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 1: If I had to guess, you probably would. I know
Speaker 1: Jay Sekulo of the A C l J was involved
Speaker 1: in that impeachment case, and this was information he brought
Speaker 1: up all the time based on what we know that
Speaker 1: we haven't seen. And I think, my heck, if you
Speaker 1: look at you know, prior to president, if a case
Speaker 1: comes before a judge and exculpatory information was withheld from
Speaker 1: the defense, that is usually very strong grounds for dismissal.
Speaker 1: In this case, vacating no right.
Speaker 2: Yes, And I've won a lot of cases on appeal
Speaker 2: based on what's called the Brady or Jiglio Supreme Court
Speaker 2: decisions would say that a conviction can't stand if information
Speaker 2: that was material was withheld, And I think the same
Speaker 2: arguments would apply to impeachment, which is a quazy criminal
Speaker 2: proceeding that follows many of the rules. In fact, in
Speaker 2: the Jefferson Manual it says that impeachment should follow generally
Speaker 2: the rules of criminal cases. So we have a little
Speaker 2: bit of support there.
Speaker 3: What do you think, ma heck Cook Jehn.
Speaker 4: I think this is going to be very difficult. There's
Speaker 4: definitely a sculpatory evidence, and I think if we could
Speaker 4: use Brady, that's a route towards reverse this record. I
Speaker 4: also think there's an opportunity again for Congress and the
Speaker 4: House to look at this. I know it would be
Speaker 4: a symbolic move, but what about clearing the record that way?
Speaker 4: So at least if we can't go through the legal route,
Speaker 4: as Alan has outlined, then potentially at least the American
Speaker 4: people know the truth and we can litigate this in
Speaker 4: the American public because far too often it's mainstream media
Speaker 4: that gets to have the final word. So I think
Speaker 4: this should be really litigated in the House as well.
Speaker 3: I agree it's that I think it would do.
Speaker 1: I think it would do very well there. All right,
Speaker 1: moving on, let's get to this. Can the president serve
Speaker 1: a third term? The premise of Professor Dershowitz's book The Heck.
Speaker 1: Before I get into more specificity with him, can Donald
Speaker 1: Trump go for a third term?
Speaker 4: Look Sean. My personal feelings on this, taking off my
Speaker 4: legal hat is absolutely. I think what President Trump has
Speaker 4: done through this term alone, within a year plus in office,
Speaker 4: he has continued to dominate, whether it's safety and security
Speaker 4: at borders to delivering tax relief. We finally had tax
Speaker 4: Day come up and Americans are celebrating that the government
Speaker 4: isn't bankrupting us like they did under Joe Biden. But
Speaker 4: all that aside, all my politics aside. The twenty second
Speaker 4: Amendment says no person shall be elected to the office
Speaker 4: of the President more than twice.
Speaker 2: So I think unless.
Speaker 4: There's a clever argument, I stand by that. But I
Speaker 4: think that President Trump has paved a path for future
Speaker 4: leaders Jadie Vance, Marco Rubio. There's going to be a
Speaker 4: gamut of people on the right that actually can pick
Speaker 4: up the helm and lead just like Trump did.
Speaker 3: Professor Derisha, it's your thoughts.
Speaker 2: Yeah, unless there are clever arguments. Well, my book has
Speaker 2: seven clever arguments for why President Trump could So you
Speaker 2: say that.
Speaker 1: Very humbly, Professor I mean, with all due respect, go ahead,
Speaker 1: I'm kidding, no, I mean there.
Speaker 2: For example, if the vice presidency becomes vacant, the statutes
Speaker 2: in the twenty second and other amendments provide that the
Speaker 2: vice president can be appointed, can be appointed by the
Speaker 2: President with the consent of the Senate. And if Trump
Speaker 2: were to be appointed vice president to another president and
Speaker 2: then that president were to resign, being each die or whatever,
Speaker 2: he could then ascend to the presidency. The twenty second
Speaker 2: Amendment does not prohibit a president from serving, only from
Speaker 2: being elected. In fact, the framers of the twenty second
Speaker 2: Amendment were given proposals to say that a president couldn't serve,
Speaker 2: couldn't act, couldn't be and they turned them, all of
Speaker 2: them down, and they said, no, we're not going to
Speaker 2: do that. We're just going to say he can't be elected.
Speaker 2: And so there is a hole, a large hole in
Speaker 2: the twenty second Amendment, bigger than the new ballroom of
Speaker 2: the White House through which President Trump could serve a
Speaker 2: third term. Now would he do it? I was with
Speaker 2: him in the Oval office. I presented him with a
Speaker 2: cop be of my book and he got a good
Speaker 2: laugh out of it. And you know, he basically basically
Speaker 2: suggested that, you know, he's not thinking about that. But
Speaker 2: for example, if the Democrats were to nominate some terrible,
Speaker 2: terrible person like AOC or one of the other extreme radicals,
Speaker 2: people who they are now electing to the Senate, and
Speaker 2: Trump were to be told that the only way of
Speaker 2: defeating and destroying the country would be for him to
Speaker 2: serve a third term, he would he would, you know,
Speaker 2: he loves the country. He would be sympathetic to that,
Speaker 2: and he would call me and say, hey, what can
Speaker 2: we do to get me in for a third term?
Speaker 2: And I would give him. I would give him the advice,
Speaker 2: I give him the book.
Speaker 1: As long as we're talking about the presidency, some very
Speaker 1: interesting developments on the Democratic side. It looks like mister Nosho,
Speaker 1: Governor Gavin Newsom full time Trump stalker, Halftime Hannity stalker.
Speaker 1: Now we find Gavin Newsom's pack at one point five
Speaker 1: million dollars to buy copies of his book. Doesn't sound
Speaker 1: like he's very confident that any anyone would want to
Speaker 1: buy it on their own, although Katie Kirk and Gavin
Speaker 1: Doo agree that he's very handsome and that could be
Speaker 1: very troubling for him. In the campaign trail and also
Speaker 1: out in California, Chris Ruffo filmed encounters with transgender illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants outside of San Francisco, homeless shelter apparently getting taxpayer
Speaker 1: funded boob jobs, and sex change operations in California. Republicans
Speaker 1: now are all over these bluestates for keeping taxes on
Speaker 1: tips and overtime which the president had put in place,
Speaker 1: you know, and the scandals keep getting bigger and bigger
Speaker 1: into the billions of dollars of misappropriated funds for non
Speaker 1: existent daycare centers and non existent hospice care.
Speaker 4: Heck, cook, well, Sean, you're nailing a huge issue right now.
Speaker 4: It's the Democrat collapse you're talking about. Newsom, who's supposed
Speaker 4: to be the front runner would be president who got
Speaker 4: caught right buying two thirds of his best selling book,
Speaker 4: as he puts it, using pack money. I'd love to
Speaker 4: have the Justice Department look at this, because that looks
Speaker 4: like fest to me. And the worst part about this
Speaker 4: is this man wants to run the country when he
Speaker 4: can't even run an honest book launch, and we have
Speaker 4: the highest fraud in his state. But make no mistake,
Speaker 4: It's not just red blue states, it's red states. You
Speaker 4: and I have talked about fraud in Ohio and how
Speaker 4: people in charge here want to hide from it. Do
Speaker 4: you know I have visited dozens of daycares where we
Speaker 4: are sending federal money, state money included, and when I
Speaker 4: go there, there's no children in there sean, and I
Speaker 4: ask questions about where the money is going, and nobody
Speaker 4: wants to answer the questions. Most of the people are
Speaker 4: Somalians here speaking Somali, so how are you supposed to
Speaker 4: send your children to these daycares? But this is the
Speaker 4: biggest problem in America is what Elon did through DOJ.
Speaker 4: We have continued to rob from American taxpayers and government
Speaker 4: is complicit. And I don't care if you're a Republican
Speaker 4: or a Democrat today, It's happening anytime you have welfare.
Speaker 4: So Democrats are.
Speaker 5: Running from it.
Speaker 4: Republicans are just as complexe that I'm seeing it in
Speaker 4: the state of Ohio, where people refuse to take this seriously.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think we're all seeing it all right.
Speaker 1: We continue with Maheck Cook and Professor Alan Dershowitz. He
Speaker 1: has a new bookies launch. Did President Trump constitutionally serve
Speaker 1: at their term. I could just see the left bubble
Speaker 1: and fizzing like alca seltza in water. Anyway, our final
Speaker 1: moments would then and then your calls are coming up
Speaker 1: straight ahead as we continue this Friday. Do you think,
Speaker 1: Professor Dershowitz, that this in any way hurts Gavin's chances
Speaker 1: of securing the Democratic nomination.
Speaker 2: I do. I think the thing that hurts the most
Speaker 2: is that the Democratic Party today is because the most
Speaker 2: anti Israel party in the history of America. And you know,
Speaker 2: Democrats used to be able to count on pro Israel
Speaker 2: support and Jewish support. I just wrote an our bed
Speaker 2: piece that I've submitted saying why nobody who supports Israel,
Speaker 2: whether you're Jew, Christian, or Muslim, can in any way
Speaker 2: vote Democrat anymore? The Democratic Party has become the party
Speaker 2: that is most strongly post Israel, the becoming like the
Speaker 2: European left wing parties of England and other places that
Speaker 2: are automatic knee jerk opposition to Israel. And I think
Speaker 2: that's become a real liability for the Democratic Party. And
Speaker 2: by the way, Israel is the canary in the mind.
Speaker 2: The mind is America. And if you're opposed to Israel,
Speaker 2: which is fighting a defensive war. You're opposed to America.
Speaker 2: Look at Tom Friedman of the New York Times. He writes,
Speaker 2: he's on television the other day in which he says,
Speaker 2: I am born torn between supporting Iran, the worst terrorist
Speaker 2: country in history. I'm torn between supporting Iran or supporting
Speaker 2: America because Trump is so terrible in Natanya, who is
Speaker 2: so terrible? So I mean here, he is practically rooting
Speaker 2: for Iran. And that's what the Democratic Party is doing
Speaker 2: these days. And they're turning against America. They're turning against
Speaker 2: Western values, they're turning against Judeo Christian values. And I
Speaker 2: think a lot of American voters are going to understand
Speaker 2: that we're a centerist country and we don't want political
Speaker 2: leaders who are opposed to American values.
Speaker 1: What do you both think, ma Heck, I'll start with you.
Speaker 1: We both heard all these women come out and make
Speaker 1: very severe allegations in a couple of the instances outright
Speaker 1: rape by congressmen and former good manatorial candidate mister Fang
Speaker 1: Fang Eric Swolwell. I have found that their interviews were
Speaker 1: so believable and compelling, and there's so many people that
Speaker 1: I have a hard time believing if they told those
Speaker 1: stories that way before any jury, that they would get
Speaker 1: anything other than a conviction pretty immediately.
Speaker 3: Is his arrest likely imminent?
Speaker 4: The rest has to be imminent, Sean, because if the
Speaker 4: DOJ does not take this seriously, the rule of law
Speaker 4: is just going to evaporate. The Republican Party has spent
Speaker 4: four years saying nobody is above the law, just like Democrats,
Speaker 4: and now we're going to prove it. The worst part
Speaker 4: is about Swallow. He lectured America about President Trump's character
Speaker 4: for years, and now he's accused of drugging and raping women.
Speaker 4: And let me tell you, there's a digital footprint.
Speaker 5: It doesn't lie.
Speaker 4: There's going to be financial records that the FBI and
Speaker 4: dj can go through. They can look at his campaign
Speaker 4: finance and they can start looking at where these women
Speaker 4: were and continue to make this huge timeline. And I
Speaker 4: also think, Sean, there's many other women that are going
Speaker 4: to feel to speak out. The worst part about all
Speaker 4: of this is that Swawell, even Gallego who stood up
Speaker 4: at a press conference and cried, he said he didn't know.
Speaker 4: Just listen to their words.
Speaker 2: These Democrats aren'tlying.
Speaker 4: He then admitted in the same breath that everybody in
Speaker 4: Washington knew and heard these rumors. Well, look, if it's
Speaker 4: a pattern, it's no longer a rumor, and we have
Speaker 4: to start investigating it. These are the same Democrats that
Speaker 4: are holding hostage a congressional release of every sexual misconduct violation.
Speaker 4: And by the way, Republicans are complicit in this, we
Speaker 4: should be releasing that taxpayers are funding this. I mean,
Speaker 4: we have such a moral problem in America today and
Speaker 4: if we don't actually get justice for these women, it's
Speaker 4: going to keep happening. Sean, I've seen it firsthand. Men
Speaker 4: do not like taking no for any type of response
Speaker 4: from women when they hold power. I've been fortunate, though,
Speaker 4: I've been able to walk away from positions because I
Speaker 4: haven't cared about the money on the table. Many of
Speaker 4: these young interns, that's their livelihood.
Speaker 2: They're terrified.
Speaker 4: This is disgusting. It has to be done.
Speaker 1: There are just evil people in the world, and there
Speaker 1: are evil predators in the world, and it's just sad.
Speaker 1: And I found the credibility of these women to be
Speaker 1: on the highest level and the charge is so despicable
Speaker 1: that I can't imagine that this guy is gonna it's
Speaker 1: gonna avoid jail, but you never know with a jury. Anyway,
Speaker 1: We appreciate both of your kind of news roundup segment
Speaker 1: this Friday, eight hundred and ninety four one Shawn Maheck
Speaker 1: Cook and Professor Derschwitz is with us.
Speaker 3: Thank you both.
Speaker 6: The New Sean Hennity Show talking about what's right for
Speaker 6: America Weather renewed commitment to keep you up to date
Speaker 6: on the breaking news stories.
Speaker 1: You know, I knew I'd get a lot of blow
Speaker 1: by brush back. I've been doing this now. I started
Speaker 1: in radio in nineteen eighty seven, and you know when
Speaker 1: you take a strong position on a controversial issue that
Speaker 1: that sometimes you know that you're going to anger people. However,
Speaker 1: I think I have an obligation to my audience to
Speaker 1: be truthful. And when it comes to the controversy between
Speaker 1: the Pope Pope Leo and with Donald Trump and the
Speaker 1: Pope saying that God does not bless any conflict, I
Speaker 1: knew by taking that on that I would get people angry.
Speaker 1: And it has gotten people angry, and a lot of
Speaker 1: articles have been written and a lot of nasty comment.
Speaker 1: Who the heck is Sean Hannity to tell the pope
Speaker 1: that he does he needs to read the Bible. Well,
Speaker 1: I was pointing out that in the Bible, in the
Speaker 1: Bible consists of the Old and New Testament. He said,
Speaker 1: God does not bless any conflict. Now is the God
Speaker 1: of the Old Testament the same God of the New Testament.
Speaker 1: Did Jesus not come to fulfill the law? Did Jesus
Speaker 1: not come to do his father's will? Did Jesus not
Speaker 1: say I am my father?
Speaker 3: Are one?
Speaker 1: That would mean that God has not changed. When Moses
Speaker 1: saw the burning bush and he says, well, who should
Speaker 1: I say?
Speaker 3: Sent me? I am sent me? It's to me.
Speaker 1: My interpretation, and that of many theological scholars, would be
Speaker 1: that God always was, is, ever present, always will be.
Speaker 1: That God does not live in the space of time
Speaker 1: the way human beings do.
Speaker 3: But I knew i'd get blowback.
Speaker 1: I'm going to get some right now, Mike, and San
Speaker 1: Antonio disagrees with me.
Speaker 3: Mike, I am glad you called.
Speaker 1: Glad you're listening, and I'm.
Speaker 3: Appreciative of any constructive criticism. Go for it.
Speaker 7: How you doing, Sean. I'm a deacon in the Catholic
Speaker 7: Church in San Antonio, I've been listening to you forever,
Speaker 7: and I love you. I'll stay with you, But I
Speaker 7: do have a problem with your position on the Catholic
Speaker 7: Church being Catholic before and then the reason why you left.
Speaker 7: So I was just saying, you know, the way that
Speaker 7: you didn't agree with the way the church handled the scandal,
Speaker 7: but it's no different than Congressman Gonzales handling you know
Speaker 7: his predicament. Why don't I just leave the Republican Party?
Speaker 7: You know, I want to know what how you feel
Speaker 7: leaving the church. What did Jesus have to do with it?
Speaker 7: The Church is full of humans, and humans make mistakes,
Speaker 7: and so therefore let.
Speaker 1: Me ask you, did you hear the entirety of my comments?
Speaker 1: Because I went through I was an altar boy. I
Speaker 1: went to Catholic schools for twelve years. I studied in height,
Speaker 1: I went to a seminary for high school, I studied
Speaker 1: theology in Latin, went to Mass every day. I told
Speaker 1: I went into great detail how the Catholic Church formed
Speaker 1: a very solid foundation for me and my conscience, and
Speaker 1: I'm grateful to the Church. I talked about how much
Speaker 1: I loved the Mass and the Eucharist, and so on
Speaker 1: and so forth. Did you did you get all of that?
Speaker 1: Did you hear all of that?
Speaker 8: Dude?
Speaker 3: I do?
Speaker 7: But but again I feel that with your with your
Speaker 7: reach and the platform that you have, I felt that
Speaker 7: that was really a small reason to leave the church
Speaker 7: because it was something that humans did, and I don't
Speaker 7: understand what Jesus had to do with with I.
Speaker 3: Think it's broader than that though.
Speaker 1: Why or is it a fact or not that eleven
Speaker 1: or the twelve apostles were married. Jesus picked married men.
Speaker 1: Is it a fact that for the first twelve hundred
Speaker 1: or so years of the church that priests were allowed
Speaker 1: to marry? Yes, but that's that is a church given rule.
Speaker 1: You're a deacon, I bet you'd be a great candidate
Speaker 1: to be a priest, And unfortunately that rule has resulted
Speaker 1: in a very very small percent of the population that
Speaker 1: would like like to join the priestthood that otherwise would
Speaker 1: in my opinion, and that was a church decision on
Speaker 1: the corruption issue, it was for me, it was I
Speaker 1: just think that foundationally, I think it's probably rooted in
Speaker 1: that basically, if you applied, you became a priest, because
Speaker 1: I mean, you have a dwindling percentage of the population
Speaker 1: that want to live their lives unmarried. And I'm assuming
Speaker 1: that you probably got married, and you know, otherwise you
Speaker 1: probably My guess is, if you're a deacon, you probably
Speaker 1: would have been a priest.
Speaker 3: Am I wrong?
Speaker 7: Probably? Maybe not, because I became a deacon later in life.
Speaker 7: I already had children and grandchildren already, so it was
Speaker 7: just a I continued in the church because I was
Speaker 7: serving in the church, so it kind of led me
Speaker 7: to that. But I don't see that.
Speaker 1: Would you agree that the parishes knew about the sex scandals,
Speaker 1: and the bishops knew, and the cardinals.
Speaker 3: Knew, and Rome knew, and that there.
Speaker 1: Was collectively institutionally a major cover up and they still
Speaker 1: to this day have not really dealt with the scandal
Speaker 1: head on in the way that they should have.
Speaker 7: I do agree with you, But I also agree that
Speaker 7: the Republican Party hadn't handled everything in the way they should.
Speaker 1: But yet I don't I agree, But they're not the pope.
Speaker 1: But let me examine my criticism, and I think and
Speaker 1: I understand the pope. Look, Donald Trump is not the
Speaker 1: Pope Donald Trump. I mean, he's not the perfect human being,
Speaker 1: and a lot of people pointed that out to me,
Speaker 1: and I knew it would be pointed out to me. However,
Speaker 1: if you're the head of the Roman Catholic Church, your
Speaker 1: standard to me is very different than the standard of
Speaker 1: being a president. But that's a separate issue. But he
Speaker 1: made a very definitive statement. God does not bless any conflict.
Speaker 1: And the God of the Old Testament, you would agree
Speaker 1: with me, is the God of the New Testament.
Speaker 3: Correct, Correct? Okay?
Speaker 1: In the Bible, and the has over four hundred references
Speaker 1: to war, God authorizing, commanding, intervening in battles. I mean
Speaker 1: that's that's a fact.
Speaker 7: Correct, Yes, you're right. But my point is is that
Speaker 7: folpe can speak. That doesn't make him right.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean he's not unless he speaks ex cathedra,
Speaker 1: which would mean infallibility in those moments.
Speaker 3: Correct. My theology is still in there. Yeah, you had
Speaker 3: a boy.
Speaker 7: I'm proud of you.
Speaker 1: Okay, So I'm not saying this any different. The Catholic
Speaker 1: Church has done a lot of good for me in
Speaker 1: my life, and I am grateful, and I hope one
Speaker 1: day that they'll rectify this situation. And when they do,
Speaker 1: but if the Pope won't criticize the forty thousand protesters
Speaker 1: in Iran that was slaughtered by the Iranians.
Speaker 6: He won't.
Speaker 1: He won't criticize the number one state sponsor of terror.
Speaker 1: I know he doesn't want any nuclear weapons, but what
Speaker 1: about the country that's the number one state sponsor a
Speaker 1: terror that would threaten to use it against our He
Speaker 1: has a very different role than the president. I have
Speaker 1: not heard the Pope criticize the bombing by Iran in
Speaker 1: densely populated areas in Israel, or holy sites in Jerusalem,
Speaker 1: or Iran's oppression rape murder of innocent women, or their
Speaker 1: execution of gays and lesbians. You know, and I mean
Speaker 1: I knew what I knew when I took this issue on.
Speaker 1: I've been doing this long enough that I'd have a
Speaker 1: lot of people angry off at me. But I think
Speaker 1: I said I think I was fair in my commentary
Speaker 1: because the Catholic Church has enriched my life and it
Speaker 1: has put me on a path where I feel like
Speaker 1: my faith is the most important thing to me now
Speaker 1: in my life, and without that foundation it wouldn't be.
Speaker 1: I'm grateful to the Church for that reason, but I'm
Speaker 1: not in agreement with the Pope on this, and I
Speaker 1: think that presidents have very different jobs than popes do.
Speaker 1: And I think the Pope has a very radical left
Speaker 1: wing view, as evidenced by his Twitter account, which I
Speaker 1: went back and looked at in great detail, which is
Speaker 1: extraordinarily left wing before before I did this monologue yesterday. Oh,
Speaker 1: I mean, I like the respectful discussion. I'll give you
Speaker 1: the last word anyway.
Speaker 7: I agree with you, but I also think that the
Speaker 7: pope that's not his job, and he should refrain from
Speaker 7: making general comments. He doesn't have an army like we
Speaker 7: do to defend, you know, because I think he would
Speaker 7: set himself up. Maybe he started becoming political and condemning
Speaker 7: the acts of Iran and that type of thing. He's
Speaker 7: a sitting duck, just like Pope John Paul the Second was,
Speaker 7: so therefore, I think he should refrain from making comments
Speaker 7: like that. I agree with you, but I also think
Speaker 7: that with your with with your ability to reach countless people,
Speaker 7: I think that you can do more harm by good
Speaker 7: by leaving the church for reasons that Jesus couldn't control.
Speaker 7: He put it in the hands of humans, and they
Speaker 7: made mistakes, and he continued to make mistakes and.
Speaker 3: We've all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
Speaker 3: Fair enough.
Speaker 1: Yes, I do appreciate your thoughtful call. Good luck to
Speaker 1: you in your church, and thank you for serving you know,
Speaker 1: the people in your congregation, and I wish you all
Speaker 1: God's blessings. Thank you all right, quick break right back
Speaker 1: to our phones, eight ninety four one, Sean. If you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program this Friday
Speaker 1: as we continue.
Speaker 6: The final hour roundup is next. You do not want
Speaker 6: to miss it and stay tuned for the final hour
Speaker 6: free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: At back to busy phones. Call free it is eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four one, Sean. If you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. Andy in Michigan, Andy,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called?
Speaker 5: Great?
Speaker 8: Thank you for taking my call. Hey, just to let
Speaker 8: you know, thirty year listener, your show last night with
Speaker 8: Reverend Graham was awesome. The point I wanted to make
Speaker 8: was Jesus Christ created you know, blasphemy, and blasphemy is
Speaker 8: the only unforgivable sin. So if you if you go
Speaker 8: against the Holy Spirit and the teaching of the Holy Spirit,
Speaker 8: which this is going to probably irritate a few people,
Speaker 8: but I believe this Pope has done that. I think
Speaker 8: by him equating the Muslim Muslim religion equal to the
Speaker 8: Christian religion and then visiting their mosque undermines the Christian religion.
Speaker 8: So he's a fallible human being. He won't be saved
Speaker 8: any more than any of us. We all need to
Speaker 8: walk in the light of the Lord. Do what Jesus
Speaker 8: Christ commands us to do, which is to say, hey,
Speaker 8: I came here and died for all of our sins
Speaker 8: so that we could all be resurrected with the Word.
Speaker 8: And I'm concerned that this Pope has veered from that.
Speaker 1: Well, I've just got to tell you this, and I
Speaker 1: think this is very very important that Look, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to proselytize on this show. I mean, we've had
Speaker 1: a lot of fun with Linda and her hate list
Speaker 1: and what do we call it, Linda Terrianism, But in
Speaker 1: all seriousness, we are mind, body, and spirit. And my
Speaker 1: last word on this would be I would urge everybody
Speaker 1: to take good care of your mind. You richer mind
Speaker 1: you and richer body.
Speaker 3: You know. But I think we often neglect the soul.
Speaker 3: I've been guilty of it.
Speaker 1: In my life and now when I embrace it, I
Speaker 1: know I can be a better person and I encourage
Speaker 1: people to find their path, whatever it happens to be. Andy,
Speaker 1: appreciate you man. Thank you, Daniel Missouri. Next Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 5: Hi, Hey Gay, good to talk to you. Sean. A
Speaker 5: longtime listener, first time caller. I've been following you ever
Speaker 5: since the Hannity and Colmes days, back when I used
Speaker 5: to watch that with my dad. Calling today. Reason I'm
Speaker 5: calling is the segment you did yesterday with Nick I
Speaker 5: always mess up his name, Nick Fretus, about his new
Speaker 5: book about being a man and all the things that
Speaker 5: you need to do to be a man, to have
Speaker 5: a successful relationship, to attract a partner, and things like that,
Speaker 5: and one point I wanted to make something I always
Speaker 5: try to tell young men when you're looking for a relationship,
Speaker 5: when you're looking for marriage, the most important thing you
Speaker 5: can do and the most important thing you can have
Speaker 5: in that marriage is a marriage is always between three people.
Speaker 5: It's between the husband, the wife, and Jesus Christ. And
Speaker 5: you always have to have Jesus Christ at the center
Speaker 5: of that marriage. If you want to maintain you know
Speaker 5: that that healthy marriage, that healthy spirit, that that fruits
Speaker 5: of the spirit that you bring out in one another.
Speaker 5: And a brief story i'll share with you real quick
Speaker 5: of my experience with that is I served twenty one
Speaker 5: years in the Navy. I retired in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 5: and my last command was in Japan during COVID and
Speaker 5: I ended up being stuck over there for three years,
Speaker 5: separated from my wife while she was here with my
Speaker 5: son in the United States. And what kept our marriage
Speaker 5: together and strong through that whole thing was that Jesus
Speaker 5: Christ was always at the center of it.
Speaker 1: Listen, in those situations, you'd be shocked how many marriages
Speaker 1: fall apart. And I'm not being judgmental in any way.
Speaker 1: It just becomes very difficult for people. And I think
Speaker 1: it's those toughest moments in life. If you have faith,
Speaker 1: you exponentially will increase your odds of success. I mean,
Speaker 1: you're to be admired for you know that testimony my view, anyway,
Speaker 1: I've got to run Daniel, appreciate it.