WEBVTT - China Reopens Borders, Freight Innovations, Markets

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find a Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>at bloemberg dot com slash podcast. Kathy End whistles with

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>us moment Stanley, Managing Director, Cathy, it is always a

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>joy to speak to you. And in these holiday thin

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>trading sorts of days, why are we seeing stocks under

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure on a moment that we start to talk about

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>China reopening. I think that there's a lot going on,

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a lot of hangover from the inflation.

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Interest rates um, you know, continue to to creep up. Uh.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And also I would also say that we're not taking

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>into account which is the big point, company earnings. The

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>earnings are going to be a real issue going into

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter and that hasn't been priced in the

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>market yet. So we've priced in what the feed is done,

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but we have in price in with the corporations have

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>done yet and asked China's opening, and that's you know,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of a big deal, but it's not big enough

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to move the market the way everyone's hoping it would. Kathy,

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just reading your note this morning, boy, your Parrish,

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love your note here. Fire was the

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>FED and raising rates ice is a resulting downward earnings revisions,

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>um and that gets you too. Maybe you know the

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>SMP can dip down to three thousand and just just

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>so you know, folks, the SMPS at und right here,

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's a big move. So, Kathy, what do you

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>think they're earnings risk really is in the smpis looking forward?

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>What is the downside in your mind? Well, the downside

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is that that the companies have been kicking the can.

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>We were expecting them to come out with more realistic

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>forward earnings last quarter and they didn't. So now that

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>means it's going to come out this coming up quarter.

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>And what what that means is we've got higher interest rates,

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>so companies have to pay more to borrow. We have

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>consumers who might be a little bit more concerned about spending,

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>so that's also going to hit the bottom line of corporations.

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>And the final thing is it's the cost of good

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>sold it's it's going up and somebody's going to have

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to take that into account. It doesn't look like the

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>consumers are going to be buying into it, which means

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the corporations have to start to take part of the

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>hit along with maybe raising some of the prices. I mean,

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about inflation, because the end of last week

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>was the readings that looked like inflation was going in

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the direction of travel that people wanted to see. Yes,

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to go faster, stronger, but we are starting

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to see a cooling in inflation. How optimistic argue that

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that remains the direction of travel from a consumer perspective.

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually am optimistic that the inflation is going to

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>cool um definitely by you know, second half of the year,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>and that will help somewhat. But the problem is it's

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be hitting the consumers now and they are

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>running out of all of the extra money that they

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>had to spend. They're putting things on credit cards. It's

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>going to become a real problem next quarter, quarter after

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and from that standpoint, even though inflation will be cooling,

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it's still going to take the consumer a little bit

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of a time to you know, step back in and

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>start buying again, Kathy, tough year four. Stocks were all

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>aware of that, but it was an unprecedented tough year

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>for bonds here. I'm looking at the two year though

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>four point three four point three six should be buying

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>some bonds here. Absolutely, we we like bonds over stocks

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.839
<v Speaker 1>for for sure. And I will say when you look

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>at the return of bonds this past year with corporate bonds,

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>meaty bonds, I mean double digit losses in in bonds

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is you know, It's been unheard of for quite a

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>long time, so it is a good buying opportunity. We

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>started talking about buying bonds midyear and it's been paying off.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think going into tree as well. Where else

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>can you get these nice, you know, returns and without

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the volatility. I think we're past the volatility and the bonds,

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so you'll get the return without the volatility and just

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.119
<v Speaker 1>clip your coupons for the time being, Kathy, I want

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to ask you, let's go gloss off full, what are

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the upside risks toward of this as a great piece

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>out by Tom Onnic from an economic perspective, thinking about

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>where some of the upside the things that we're not

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>planning on on the might look more positive. I mean,

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, maybe in the long term, this China

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>reopening will be that where are you ensuring that you

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>don't lose the upside as well as protecting yourself to

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the downside? Um? Absolutely, I think we have to. You know,

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we have short term and long term views, right so

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>short term it looks a little bit more negative. Long

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>term is always a more positive view. We want our

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>clients to be invested for the long term, but we

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>also don't want to start jumping in before we think

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it's too soon. A stock market has always been a

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>leading indicator of where the economy is going, and it

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>will be one of the first things to come back

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>quickly and fiercely before the economy turns. So what we

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>don't want to happen is people to lose sight of

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that and wait until everything is picture perfect before they

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>start investing in the market. Again. That's why we like

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>dollar cost averaging in these types of markets. That's why

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we like also taking advantage of dips and buying the dips,

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>because if you're a long term investor and you've got

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a long term view, then you do want to buy

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>at these lower prices today. How about high yield. You know,

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind taking a little risk out there, Kathy,

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>but in the face of recession, would be unwise to

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>search for yield in the high yield market. Now you're

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>talking to a girl who worked in the corporate bonds

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>so um. You know, I did see quite a bit

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>of high yield UM companies go into default in bankruptcies,

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>so it is a possibility no corporates here. You always

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>have that issue. So for right now, I'm I'm keeping

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>my clients away from the riskier, higher yielding UM bonds

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and sticking with the more investment grade. Alright, good stuff.

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate that getting a good outlook for these markets.

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Kathy and twist On Morgan Stanley, managing director. Ready to

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>say on the show today is Robert Felt is the

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 1>founder and c of n Ride. Now and Ride developed

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>self driving and electric trucks and of course the software

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>systems that help them to use to monitor deliveries. And Robert,

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating to have some time with you today. We

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you, of course founded the business in Stockholm. Talk

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to us about what you've seen and the customers that

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you start to talk to, the Coca colas, the Little,

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the A b inbevs. The Mulla musks. How are these

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>companies looking at supply chain bottlenecks in the future. First

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of all, thank you for having me. I think it's

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating point in the overall economy right now because

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>what from our perspective, what we are seeing is that

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't really see that slow down happening right now.

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>A few of our customers, of course are seeing taking

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a longer time to make decision, But overall, for the

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>transition here to electric and an autonomous I think there

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>is a clear engagement there and I think that overall

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the consumer it will a little bit of downturn of

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 1>the economy is not really starting to hit yet, and

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what we are at least saying. So people are

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>still doing business, and I think that a little bit

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of some sectoris we are a little bit less, But

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>overall I think it's uh, we're not in a recession yet.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>We might be in next year, but overall it's still

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people doing business. Robert, I know your

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.559
<v Speaker 1>company recently raised five million dollars in equity in debt.

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you what are the use of proceeds there now?

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>But for us it's about scaling and more and more

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>installing more capacity for doing a transport together with our customers.

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>So we are deploying a lot of electric and autonomous

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>transport vehicles as well as transport and the charging infrastructure

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to support it. You are currently of course prevalent across Europe, Sweden, Germany,

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the Benelucks and indeed in the United States. What all, China,

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>What all of that five million dollars that you now

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>get to put to work? Is it about global expansion?

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it about alleviating some of those pressure points we've

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>grown to know and to hate. I think it's something

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of a very interesting overall is that the supply chain

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>for electric trucks as well as chargers and the whole

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure for all the constant electric and autonomous transport is

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>still to be actually created. So I think that China

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>has a key point in being the supplier there. I mean,

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they come to we are in a very weird position

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>from historically, but China, and my view, is actually leader

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of the electric both batteries as well,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of engines and also the maturity ecosystem

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to electrification. So for us it's China

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is an extremely important part of that supply. I think

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that the Western hemisphere needs to focus for it clearly

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to sort of say, catch up to the maturity of

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese ecosystem when it comes to electrification and optimization. Robert,

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of, you know, how much road

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>freight on a global basis contributes to uh, you know,

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Global CEO two and kind of it feels like it's

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a big contributor and it really is right for some

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>innovation one. I mean globally, it's that between seven to

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of global City two emissions come for heavy

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>road freight transport. And we are still in the same

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem that was created more than a hundred years ago

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>now and I think that we're digital, electric and autonomous technology.

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>We have the potential to actually rewrite that. And it's

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>not about the size of the battery. It's not about

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>creating a better truck. It's about creating a new infrastructure

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>for transport. And if you do, we see that between

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>four of electric should be electric driven by the business

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>case today, Robert, I'm gonna ask a sensitive question, but

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of course you're based well, you're helping found this business

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in Sweden and Germany in the Benelux countries that care

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>an awful lot about climate change and the like. But

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the US has been known to be somewhat behind Europe

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, and of late many have felt particularly

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in the supply chain headaches, particularly in the energy crisis. Look,

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>just put that to one side. At the moment, we

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>need to drill, baby, drill. We need to ensure that

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we've got energy security rather than this transition. How much

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>has that help or hindered your business as we felt

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that effect at all. I I'm actually a little bit

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>opposite to you than what you're stating in there. I

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>think that this will happen first in the US due

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that it is driven by the business case.

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what we see from customers of the customers

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>in the US is that electrification is the best business case.

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.719
<v Speaker 1>If there is something that I I love with the

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>US market, as if there is a business case, it

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>will happen. I think that the European market are still

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>struggling to change and make that change happen. But from

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>our perspective, we're seeing a clear engagement and back to

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>energy security. The electric grid is more reliable than the

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>prices of oil, and even if we have some fluctuations,

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and especially in Europe right now, it's actually a way

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of mitigating the dependencies of oil. And I think that

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>if you have both those, it's better solution and it's

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a cheaper solution. This transition will go very quickly. So Robert,

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I think I get the whole EV thing. I just

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>drove my first e V for Dee fifty truck. Was

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>very cool, but I'm not so sure about this whole

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>automation thing. Explain your approach now. I actually I share

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>your view there as well. I think that we have

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>been chasing literally flying goats over the last ten years

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in the automotive industry, and I think that Google and

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Weymoux has been pioneering the whole industry, and I think

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that they've done and set the standard that's going to

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>be the standard, but it's going to take a long

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>time before it's actually bean we can actually deploy it

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>on rail roads. And that approach, that's our pure silicon

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>value approach, has been a challenge since the start because

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it requires literally us to chase our own tail for

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>the whole industry. When we started the company, we took

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a different approach, and our ambition since the start has

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>been to do bit by bit, find the right applications

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and find the right business cases to scale autonomous because

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look at a lot of other industries and

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other applications, for instance in factories and warehouses,

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing autonomous electric transport for more than thirty

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>years now, and that's we'd take a different approach. So

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that the technology why the industry has been

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>pushing it, but I think when it comes to actually

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>finding use cases and real applications to it, it actually

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>has lacked a bit. And I think that's hopefully what

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we add to the equation. All right, Robert, great stuff.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate you taking a few minutes bring us up

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to speed on what you guys are doing over at

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and right Robert falk and Wright, a founder and CEO.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>It used to say that Coustin brushed gears with us

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Iron g chief economist. Long time since I've spoken to you,

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so it is such a joy. I think you're out

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>there in Frankfurt in between this holiday time talk to

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>us about what China means for you from a global

0:12:55.920 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>economic perspective. This reopening story, well, it means lot. It

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>means supply chain frictions in the very short run, because

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we have lifted restrictions right now, but it means we're

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>going to see many, many sick cases, many sicknesses, and

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that will probably mean that people simply cannot show up

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>in the factories. But in the medium term, and that

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>we talked probably end of Q one two three, this

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>clearly means that supply chain friction should go away much

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>paster than we initially thought because China is really giving

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>up on on zero covit and that is good news

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>for the global economy. As we are, you know, we

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>are looking into a recession in Europe in two thousand

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, we even look into a recession in the US.

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 1>If China would now really start to recover starting second

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>quarter two twenty three, this could help the global economy

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot. So Carston talked to us from the European

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>perspective what this means, because that you know, such a

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>big trading partner with the European Union and China, where

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>where you know the first for some impacts on the

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>European economy. From yeah, I think in the in the

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>very part term, um, I think that even lifting all

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the restrictions means that there will be more supply chain frictions.

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm really looking into European industry and probably having

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>more supply chain frictions over the winter. And the winter

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>is already going to be a tough economic one in Europe.

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But then when we get out of the winter, when

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>when when China is then somehow settling into this new

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>post euro covered reality. Um, this would clearly benefit the

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>European industry, the European companies that are so dependent on

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>input goods from from China. And showing some sort of statistics,

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I think in Germany more than fifty percent of the

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing sectors say that they are one way or the

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>other depending on China. So clearly Germany but also Europe

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>needs a growing Chinese economy. May he live in interesting

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>times is the Chinese proverb actually that you quote at

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the top of your note. And boy have we lived

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in interesting times in the last few years, but also

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in two and it's been not just a story of China,

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>not just a story of global disruption, but notably one

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of Russia, Ukraine, of the impact on energy markets and

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the impact of the devastation that's reaked upon Europe in particular,

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm interested at this moment as to whether you

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>see with the warmest snap the weather slightly more temperate

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in Europe than we were expecting. There has been an

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>easing off of concerns around energy supply chains there, but

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to us longer term about how will your comfort

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>levels look for Europe as an economy with respect to energy.

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I found out that actually it is not a proverb,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>but it is a curse to start with. But we're

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at at Europe and I think the picture changes

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>by the week. Just one or two weeks ago we

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>were saying this was actually a cold winter spell hitting

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the entire region, or we saw happening as well. I

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>think a week ago consumption gap consumption in Europe was

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly above historical averages. Again, so now it's turning around

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and we we we saw a temperature ship by almost

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty degrees, going from minus ten sellers to plus ten sellingers.

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.359
<v Speaker 1>So this would clearly help the reduction in gas consumption.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think in any case shows us that there

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>will not be an energy supply issue through this winter.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>What we still have is an energy price crisis in Europe.

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Um and it will. It will determine how severe this

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>winter recession will be. So it currently looks, I think

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit more positive, so that this recession is going

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a mild recession. But what is even more

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>important in my view, especially for Europe, is what's going

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen in the second half of two thousand twenty three.

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Here we have many forecasters saying that Europe would return

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to pre growth or pre pre crisis growth levels. And

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bit more cautious because I think we are

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>still living in a period of high energy prices, We're

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>still living in a period of structural change to global trade.

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a bit more concerned that the year of

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>will really experience a more subdued recovery in the second

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>half of twenty three and also in two thousand twenty

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>four the many currently expects. Carson, we recently had the

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Japan of all banks, kind of throwing the

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>talent signal that it was opened higher rates and to

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>fight inflation. So you know, along with the Bank of England,

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the e c B, and of course the US feder

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Reserve Bank. What do you think the next move is

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for this federal Reserve Bank? Given what we know now

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>about economic conditions and now maybe another little data point

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>with China reopening. You know, you wouldn't argue that if

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if the Bank of Japan, of all the central banks

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>start to become really concerned about inflation, I think there

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>has to be a serious issue. And that's standime was

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the big story of two thousand twenty two. UM. I

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>think that the Bank of Japan is also likely to

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>join this UM, this group of western central banks UM

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>with hiking interest rates. UM. So the only quite with

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of Japan now starts what we see, what

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we see other central banks, particularly the FED, really making

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a pause or even stopping the hiking cycle already in

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter, we think they will. We think the

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Fed is gone a step in Q one. We I

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's become a bit more doubtful about the ECB

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>because the e c B has been talking very harkishly

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>UM since the last meeting. Is over the last couple

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>of days, it looks very likely if the ECB is

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>going further than the fact that we will see more

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>rate hikes coming in Europe even when the FEDS stops.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I think interested and the big story for the second

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>half two thousand twenty three will be whether central banks

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>will actually dare cutting rates again or whether we will

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>really stay at a higher level for longer. I mean,

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it's worth saying that, of course the US has manages

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>get its rates up a little slightly greater paced higher

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>levels all told us as easy b already. But is

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that why do the Federal Reserve have the bandwidth to

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 1>slow down in the first quarter that inflation is going

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 1>in the direction it wants to. Is it more that's

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 1>now seeing a bond market that doesn't have the bias

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that it was used to. Particularly we start to see

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>borrowing costs in Japan actually maybe even look attractive to

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese by themselves, I think. Um. In terms of

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that said, what what's going to happen is that inflation

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to come down faster than the FAT itself

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>probably expects um. And that has to do with the

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>real estate market, has to do also with the entire

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>inflation basket. So if the real estate market in the

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>US that really starts to correct, and we see first

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the data points and you know suggesting that this is happening,

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>headline inflation will come down very quickly. And this is

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>then the big reason to pass. Turning back to to Japan,

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>here we do have an economy that that could benefit

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.959
<v Speaker 1>from the opening up of China. Here we have an

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>economy that is not suffering, as for example, the European

0:19:55.560 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>economy from higher commodity and energy prices um. This is

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>an economy in which fiscal policy has done the tough work,

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think for for almost two decades UM. So therefore

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it is likely that we will see the first policy

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>rate high in Japan coming up. So, Carson, I have

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the Paul Sweeney Personal Inflation Index, otherwise known as a

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>daily national average gasoline price, and it's down the three

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars and ten cents per gallon here, down from the

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>peak of five dollars UM. So here in the US

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>at least inflation is in fact it has peaked, it

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 1>is coming down. You can look across a several different

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>metrics give us a sense of how it is in Europe.

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect it to be more more sticky in Europe? Yeah.

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>If I look at Carson Justice personal inflation in next,

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>which is sons partaty more than only gasoline prices UM,

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we are somewhere close to the peak. And

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in in the first quarter of twenty three, we will

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>see that Eurozone headline inflation will start to come down

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>as energy prices are somewhat lower. As it is also

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting harder for companies to really pass through

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the higher production costs to two consumers, so we'll see

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a gradual retreatment by by inflamation. But still this means

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that I think on average inflation in the Eurozone will

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>will come in at between six or seven percent in

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty three. That is a lot and awesome.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Means that there is an enormous, enormous pressure on purchasing

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>power or the loss in purchasing power of European citizens. Alright,

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. We really appreciate getting your perspective there, Carston Razinski.

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>He is the chief economist for I n G. Let's

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about it over the Charles, the Buses All Society

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>General Equity Strategist, Charles, it is wonderful to have some

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>time with you. Happy holidays. Talk to us about well,

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>when you are looking at a potential China reopening, what

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>makes you think that the market is going to trade sideways? Well, look,

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a balance between the news flow with

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the China reopening, which is somewhat of a posity but

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>also issues the valuation side, And as far as the

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>US is concerned, valuations being back on center stage is

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>not slee a good thing. Um, if you think of

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>it this way, you know, Europe is actually be outperforming

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 1>this year despite the US massively going down. So for me,

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of an US in theory. But what

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it shows that at last, and that's the good news

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for three, valuations start to matter. We've ended twenty five

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>years of falling bond deals which went plods, people buying

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>growth stops. Where's growth the US not Europe? And now

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the end of that long cyclement. Still at last,

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>valuations and visit again today mean that so yes and

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Europe gonna have a good time. Charles. You know, some

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>folks are concerned, still concerned about earnings risk in this

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>market in how do you view earnings in SMP? How

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>much downside might there still be? Okay, overall flat on

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the earth, But that's I think the Roses scenario most

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>likely down sort of just single digits. Um, So earning

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is at gonna go down. There's gonna be downgrades, um,

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you know across the board in many regions of the world.

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that is expected. What we need is to

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>see where there are pockets where investor sentiment is too

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>thin devious sleep the volumes of anything today, so it's

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>far too thredraw many conclusions, but certainly what we are

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking to um such just some places you

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>can think of Japanese banks on the back of the

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>last weeks new show, or some cycicals in Europe, we're

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>actually values not fine, so I thinks we'll go down.

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>We'll know this, yeah, price then not across the fro

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the individual you just mentioned. I

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think I heard you say Japanese banks there, but financials

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>more broadly have been surprisingly underperforming, I mean down even

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>though you have pushed higher. I'm interested in can you

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>speak as broad brush as industry groups. Can you still

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>say energy is gonna outperform like it did in this year?

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's up to some six percent

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>here to day, whereas everything else is in the red?

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Or do you have to be stock specific rather than

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>sector specific. Look, if you take the case of financials,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>as you've pointed out, to find rising fields, they've had

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>appalling performance. What was the missing block. Missing block was

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 1>economic growth, real growth. If you don't have real growth,

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.719
<v Speaker 1>rule banking sector, your insurance will not necessarily grow. And

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>so our expectations that at some point can start to

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>turn from an economic prospectivitience of real growth not none

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>at all. And so financials in that you know circumstances

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>could not perform. If you get the energy sector, what

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it had for it was really totals shareholder returns diffidence

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because buybacks more than tend to say yield in a

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>number of socks. So there has been a combination of

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>do you have the valuation angel, yes or no? Energy

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>todly have it? Banks had it? Sure has had it,

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>but are you missing something growth? And if it's missing,

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't have performance. Our hope is that you start

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to see turn running real growth. Some of these reflation traits,

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:21.479
<v Speaker 1>not staculation traits, do not perform. And Charles, you mentioned energy,

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm looking at some of these names like

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>excellent and a lot of these things are fifty six.

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Have I missed that trade? Um the bulk of it, Yes,

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll still long that. I felt was still think that

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the cash generation that they offered

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the total she all returned that they offered on both

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>sides of the Atlantic. Then I think, yes, that's still

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>centered that we're happy to to hold. Where in globally

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>speaking at the moment, Charles is underrated. Do you think

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>number one, the European consumer. What we've seen is a

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>massive prise in the risks, remember around anything which had

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to do with Europe on the back of the war

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and so people went away from the europe differency,

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>from booms from European equities, and what we are seeing

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>currently is that we seem to be going through that

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>winter in a choppy way, but morale than scathed. And

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly what we have in Europe is one trilling euros

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of access savings that stopped to be spent. And if

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>look in terms of valuations, these guys tread at six,

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>not one six, but six zero percent discounts to the

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>stables sectors. So definitely it's a star general. People have

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>rushed away thinking that the European consume was dead. It's

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not the case. And what we've seen is the rebound

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of the past few months. We think this has further

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to go. Charles. Really since a great financial crisis and

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets, you know, the leading group has been technology,

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the fang stocks are more broadly defined tech.

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>In a rising interest rate environment? Can that still be

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the case? Is this market maybe it starts to move

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>higher at some point next year. Can techt be a

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>leader or not in a rising interest rate environment? The

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>answer is no. The reason behind it is that the

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>gap evaluation has to narrow because valuations, as it was

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>starting earler own, start to matter. What you've seen today

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in the case of some of the ev names, we're

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioning the supplying change, disruptions here and there, what happens

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at the back of the COVID policy in China used

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to being be easy, some of these fears. That's one

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>side of the equation. The issue I have a look

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>at the US market is that just five stops have

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>been accounting for the bulk of the performance of the

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>index because situation performance is massive in the West, and

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we still have a lot of gap in evaluation there.

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>When you're close of the equity zero, you don't care

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>paying of the growth. When things start to be expensive

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.719
<v Speaker 1>terms of financing this, think of stack, think of some

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of the techniques. Then valuation of need that the rotation

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>out of the expensive names, and you're putting on the

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>screen here that now's that pass for them to go.

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>What then, as we see interest rates rise, as we

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>start to see the consumer maybe under pressures and waiting

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>for some sort of growth, is it? I mean consumer

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>discretionary down, consumer staples up? Are we are we in

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>any way betting on a US consumer in the way

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're thinking maybe the European consumer is underrated now.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>The way I look at it in the US is

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that I've much law advised. Some of the industrial names

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in the US supposed to consumer names. I think some

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of the financing conditions in the US can be fried

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Gile thinking in a ploye market. It's still a kind

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of a question mark. And what really what they need

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>eventually in the end is the pivot from the FED

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and cut in rates. What the US industrials names need

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is obviously a raid cut, but they need is growth

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>trade to come back. And I think the news flow

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>from China today goes to lost this. So if you

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>think of it, industrials in the US is supposed to

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the consumer. In Europe, more of the consumer think of

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it also, not the inflation reduction acts some of the

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>big moves on the policy front that we've seen in

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the US context really suggesting that many comp corporates will

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>benefit from that spending from the state um in the

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>West in terms of financing the green transition, and that's

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>one of our key convictions. Maybe surprisingly the US will

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>be in place of green transition in twenty twenty three.

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not just about the European Green Deal, all right,

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>great stuff, Charles, Well, appreciate you taking a few minutes

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of time there to check in with us. Charles day

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Bus Swan Society is General equity strategist. Joining us via

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>zoom from Parish There. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews of

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller N seventy three and

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>on Fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.