WEBVTT - More Mail

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey, ann yo, Ty, listen if you haven't already joined

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>stitch your Premium, it's the perfect time. You get completely

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>ad free episodes of hundreds of good ones like Comedy

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Bang Bang, I Know You Like That? Love It WTF

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>with Mark Maron How Did This Get Made? You also

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>get twenty one thousand hours of exclusive content damn. New

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>exclusive originals like Marvel's Wolverine and Isa Ray's Fruit are

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>launching every week for Stitcher Premium. If you love podcasts,

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you are truly missing out if you don't get in

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>on this right now. When you listen to ad free

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>episodes on stitchr Premium, your favorite podcasters also get paid, yes,

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>which is a big deal. Help support your favorite shows

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and join Stitcher Premium today. Get a free month of

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>listening by going to Stitcherpremium dot com and use the

0:00:54.120 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>promo code verbal. Welcome to the Solid Verbal. I'm that

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>for me, I'm a man, I'm forty. I've heard so

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>many players say what I want to be happy? You

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>want to be happy?

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 2>For day?

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Edith State is that? Whoo whoo and don and tie.

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Solid Verbal, Boys and girls, my

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>name is Ty Hildebrand. Joining me over there and beautiful

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and why see my man Dan Rubinstein, Sir, how's it going?

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Coach Ben Waugh wants to know before we get into anything,

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 2>whoa WHOA come in hot, before we get into where

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 2>you can find the solid verbal, what we're doing the

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 2>rest of the month in summer, what places you can

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 2>follow us. He wants to know what is Tie's pregame

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 2>ritual before the podcast. He always starts strong with great energy,

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 2>wondering how he gets so jacked up. Tie, This is

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 2>me speaking, Yeah, be four right, be truthful.

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, did I tell you I made the switch

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>over from Lacroix to Bubbly spark Water.

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, Lacroix does have sparkles, isn't it.

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I think they're basically the same thing. But I'm drinking

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a Bubbly right now, an Apple Bubbly, which I've never

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:10.399
<v Speaker 1>tried before, and it tastes pretty good.

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Is that a full routine?

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's not really a routine. I'm always excited to

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>speak with you, Daniel. Okay, what did you do today

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to Oh? I see where you're going with this. Yeah,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>there may have been a bathroom situation prior to hitting

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to hitting record today.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think this is going to be a great show.

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>I have so much faith in the entertainment value and

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 2>just the freedom that you're feeling right now.

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>The impurities are out. I am ready to roll. I

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>feel liberated. How about you? What is your pregame ritual?

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I had half a box of crackers, some Trader Joe sushi,

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of water. And listen to is it

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Camille Cabello? I think it's Camilla Camimila Cabello. Yeah, I

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>listened to Havana eight and a half times. Camila Cabello,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 2>you're into this. I don't like pop music, tie, I

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 2>don't like modern I don't like the youth music. But

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 2>when I do, who do I like it?

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Well? Now I'm in you may, by the way here

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of an echo on my end because

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the studio, the new studio in the new place, is

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>functional but not acoustically treated in the manner that we

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>demand here as the pre eminent college football podcast. So

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm in the new digs here. And because I

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>am where I am, I've got a little bit of

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a longer commute to the mysterious day job, which means

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>more time to imbibe ingest and really think about the

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>pop music that the youth are listening to nowadays. So

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping that in a few short weeks I can

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>be back up to speed where I need to be.

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So you've moved in, just about moved in? Yeah, just about.

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>You're sleeping in the new house, sleeping in the new place.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, you get the always like fun like first

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 2>wake up, like wait where am I?

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 2>No, had one of those.

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm still having those exactly.

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So what are people listening to right now?

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Why do not? It's what I'm saying, I need to

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>get myself back up to show you need your bearings.

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you're listening to the Solid Verbal that's ty. I'm

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Dan Soliverbal dot com. There will be a new website

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 2>probably in the next month ish.

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Yep, it's coming.

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there will be merch up in the next hopefully

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 2>two to three weeks ish. That's the goal. We've got

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of fun shows. Plan soliverbal at gmail dot com,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.559
<v Speaker 2>Follow us at solid Verbal, like us on Facebook Solid Verbal.

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 2>We have spillover Q and a too many questions. Last

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 2>time we asked for a couple more so we have

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 2>more questions there. We have some news to go over.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 2>We have housekeeping to address. Yes, you moved into a

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 2>new house. I was just in Mexico City. It's all happening.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 2>George is dead. This is Jerry's Call me back, George Steinbrenner, Jerry,

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 2>call me back. Yeah, So that's all I have.

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, thank you everyone out there for tuning

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in when we last left our hero. That's you, Dan,

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Dan Rubinstein. You had a great show that you put

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>together with Mike Gould Junior. Big thanks to him for

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>being a good sport, not only in dealing with our

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>secret verbal madness, but also in coming on and answering

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>what I thought were some really personal questions about gaining

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and losing weight as an offensive lineman. You really cut

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to the deep stuff there, man. So that was a

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>good show. Hope everyone appreciated it. As Dan mentioned, we've

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>got pages upon pages from our last Q and A show.

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 1>We just didn't feel right about not addressing as many

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of these questions that remained after our last Q and

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>A broadcast. So here we are also late May. It's

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>late May. Yeah, we're getting into, as I said to

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>you earlier this week, the territory where we can actually

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>see a pathway through to the start of the season.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Speak for yourself, ty, I am, I'm just looking for

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 2>a pathway to a water park at this morning. Well,

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I just want to enjoy my summer. I can see

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>all of you at the what is it? It's the

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin Dell's. Do you know about the Wisconsin Dell's. Sure,

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 2>it's like a water park city. So that's all I

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>care about right now. College football will be there in

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 2>late August.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>We will get to our housekeeping stuff here in just

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, as well as our present thing sponsors

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for the evening. But Daniel, let's talk. I'm not going

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to play the breaking news sound if only because of

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>two reasons. A. I don't have the soundboard, I don't

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>know what box it's in, and B I don't think

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>this quite warrants breaking news. Let's say it's just talking

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>points that we want to use to lead into Yeah,

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll wear Q and A. Well, you put these together,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna I'm gonna ask you to elaborate, because

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>my guess is you've got more formed thoughts on the matter.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>But as we know, with Jim Harbaugh and the Michigan

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>football program, they've been doing this international tour thing. Mm hmm.

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>At the start of now, the last two seasons it

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>went to Italy year ago. Just got back from France.

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>They've made their selection as to where they're going to

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>be going in twenty nineteen, and that country is It

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>appears to be South Africa. South This is cut.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this Johannesberg and Cape Down. I guess it came

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 2>out that a booster, I forget who the booster was

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 2>paid for the trip to roam. It's pretty cool. This

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 2>seems pretty sweet to me. But yeah, that's he He

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 2>went on the radio and said that's where Michigan's gonna

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 2>head next year. And I would love to go to

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 2>South Africa. I would. I mean this is it can

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>only be a positive thing. If you're a college kid,

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 2>you get to go abroad. So I'm a fan. Have

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>you been to South Africa?

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Did you?

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Have you gone abroad in college?

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I've never flown over the Atlantic Ocean.

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Ty, we got to get you as a stowaway.

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not yet. That'd be great.

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a Michigan trip.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not against it, by the way, I'm just saying

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's never I know, I know, I don't know.

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Solid wife Kate just gotta get on kayak, get to

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 2>get on Google flights.

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if South Africa would be my first selection,

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's no disrespect to South Africa. I'd probably take

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a trip if I were a Michigan player it were

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>given to me for free. Yeah, that's a great opportunity.

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think I would probably want to knock out

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Europe before I moved to other continents.

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Will you go to Europe this summer?

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>This summer? This summer, dude, I bought a house. We're staying.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>We're staying put for the duration of you know, the

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>summer here.

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh, okay, we'll go over the other ocean. Because a

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin nose tackle, if he's not a nose tackle, God bless.

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 2>But I'm pretty sure a Wisconsin nose tackle over the

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Pacific Ocean is from Hawaii. Did you see the slow

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 2>motion backflip from a three hundred and thirty six pound

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 2>man on the beach?

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Incredible? Absolutely incredible.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I it is basically I will. I know I will

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 2>never be able to do the other physical feat that

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I find to be impossible. I could probably do a

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 2>backflip with some training, but the the videos of guys

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>jumping out of pools onto the deck.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that I.

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Can't get enough of. I am nowhere near a backflip.

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm nowhere near three hund than thirty six pounds. I

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>guess that would be God. I waited at about bucks

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 2>seventy two the other day. What how much time would

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 2>it take you with something important on the line to learn?

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>How much time would it take for you to train

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 2>and complete a standing backflip?

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, the answer to that your current weight. Yeah, the

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>answer to that question is contingent on how close I

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>can get to a backflip.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, I assume you would just jump up and flop back.

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, I don't. I don't. Gosh, I don't know

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>if I could make it ninety degrees, let alone three

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty. If I give you a month, Oh God,

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>could I do it in a month? I could probably

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>get pretty close in a month. Okay, I don't know.

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>How about you?

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Big where its No, it would take me like six

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 2>or seven weeks, eight weeks, a couple months.

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>That's an excellent question, tweet us. That's solid verbal.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 2>How long would it take you?

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's like a physical trainer or a former g

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that listens to the show that can offer some insight

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on this one. How long would it take me to go,

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>for my current state into about place where I could

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>do a backflip?

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 2>That is so, I don't know if this will serve him. Obviously,

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 2>there's a huge degree of athleticism from this nose tackle.

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 2>If he is able to backflip over a goal line

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 2>situation to do like a reverse LeVar leap, it's all

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>worth it.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I'll be roundbreaking to go to that

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to that extent, and let me add something else here.

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a totally different league when you're talking about just

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>doing a backflip versus doing the thing where you jump

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>out of the pool. I just wouldn't make that. I'm

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>not equating the two. I think jumping out of a

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>pool is an alienability. I don't know how anyone's able

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to do that, right.

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I think this standing backflip is so much cooler. Last

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>year the big thing was quarterbacks throwing to guys on

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 2>jet skis or water skiing, whatever it was.

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>This is so so so so much better. Tie.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 2>It is impossibly better. So that's all I have with

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 2>backflip stuff I do. There is a serious story if

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 2>we can get into it real please please. A jury

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 2>ruled that Todd McNair, former running backs coach for USC,

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 2>who was singled out in the nc DOUBLEA sanctions, he

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>was given a year show cause. He has then now

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 2>in turn sued the NCUBLEA, and it made its way

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 2>past the number of panels because the NCAA has wanted

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 2>to throw the case out, but it finally made it

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 2>to a trial. And of course his accusation was that

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:37.599
<v Speaker 2>he was unfairly singled out and that he the NCUABLEA

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 2>acted recklessly and defamed him and caused him to not

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 2>work since twenty eleven, and he was suing the NCUBLEA

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>for acting recklessly in their imposition of sanctions as it

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 2>relates to Reggie Bush and Lloyd Lake, the marketing guy,

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and he was suing them for twenty seven million dollars.

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of money, by the way, it's a lot.

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Of money, saying it led to depression and it hurt

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 2>his finances to a crazy degree, all of which seem

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 2>like within the realm of possibility, given that he hasn't

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 2>been able to work and had worked his way up

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 2>to USC. There was an issue there was a lot

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 2>that was in the case that was shown that the

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 2>nc DOUBLEA was acting in a negligent fashion. I think,

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 2>with the benefit of hindsight, it is very clear that

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the NCUBA acted crazy, harsh towards USC given the evidence

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 2>that they had or didn't have, and USC should not

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 2>have received the degree of sanctions that they've received. But

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I guess his attorneys were not able to prove to

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, to hit that burden that, because defamation is

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>a very difficult thing to reach, that he was indeed

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>worthy of receiving the award that he was seeking. So

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that the jury said that they felt bad

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and in no way sort of blessed how the NCUBA acted,

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 2>but the burden was too high and he was not

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 2>rewarded for twenty seven mili.

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple streams of thought on this matter,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>none of which are as serious as they probably should be.

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>The first is that this is still going on. Yeah,

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>it's still going on. Todd mcnaer has been out of

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>football since like twenty ten, twenty eleven, yeah, something like,

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's been a while since this whole thing.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>First off, it makes me feel old, mm hmm, you know,

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>because this stems back to the whole Reggie Bush thing,

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>which of course was a very big deal for a while,

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and I tend to agree that USC really got the

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>short end of the stick on that matter. But the

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's still going on, I'm sure is going

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to be news to a lot of people if you

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't already read this. Yes, there were aspects of this

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>whole thing that were still going on. The second is

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that twenty seven millions a lot of money. By no

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>means that my skilled in the ways of you know,

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>legal things, legal eues, if you want to call it that,

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>sure the law, I would just like more information on

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>how you come to that figure.

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's a calculation of you know, if

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 2>he had continued to move up the coaching ranks, how

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 2>much he potents much he could right, Lloyd Lake did

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 2>not testify, which I think it seems hurt his case that,

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, his lawyers could debunk a lot of what

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Lloyd Lake might have to say, and he was interviewed

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 2>in a sort of misleading way. So it sucks to

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 2>hear because I really had hoped that he would have

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 2>received some sort of settlement for the way everything was handled.

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>By a pretty terrible committee of infractions on the NCAA's front.

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious as to how you get to that number.

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not criticizing the number. I'm just genuinely curious

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>as to how you get there. And then my final point,

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you sort of stole the thunder a little bit, But

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>does Lloyd Lake does a gentleman by the name of

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Lloyd Lake not sound like a marketing guru. It does

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>sound like if you were going to invent a fictitious

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>character that was going to be a marketing guru, a

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>name like Lloyd Lake would have to be on the.

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I mean it does.

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like a fake name too, right, exactly like

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 2>you were pulled over and sir, what's your name? And

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 2>you look at something and you look at a magazine

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 2>in your car that's like, oh, it's Lake Michigan, right,

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 2>and you're next to a lake. And yes, it does

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 2>sound a little bit misleading, but man, it's a tough

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 2>break for Todd MS.

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Tough break, tough break, all right. The other news that

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned a couple shows ago, quarterback transfers were in

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>full on quarterback transfer season. Mm hmm. I don't know

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>if there have been more lately or if we just

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>hear more about them now, but the grad transfer thing

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>has obviously been a pretty big deal, not just grad transfers,

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>but transfers in general. Five star quarterbacks, highly regarded quarterbacks

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>go to a school there's a logjam at quarterback. They

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously want to play, so they move on. The two

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>names that we have spiked out here are Joe Burrow,

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>who transferred away from Ohio State and is now going

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to LSU.

0:15:58.600 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes has our will grad?

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes? Correct? And Hunter Johnson. Hunter Johnson a former five

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>star quarterback recruit, he signed on with Clemson. Clemson's quarterback

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>situation has obviously gotten very very muddied now given the

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that Trevor Lawrence has gone there. Kelly Bryant is

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>presumed the starter as of now. Hunter Johnson, native of Indiana,

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>really had no place on that totem pole at least

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>if reports are to be believed. And it sounds as

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>if he is considering either Purdue or Northwestern as his

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>next stop.

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he has some connection to Northwestern, but yeah

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 2>in Indiana, Native Indiana just got a grad transfer. I

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 2>think it's a full grad transfer. Maybe it's such a transfer.

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Transfer from Brandon Dawkins of Arizona Purdue would make sense

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>given what Jeff Brohm has done with quarterbacks over the

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 2>course of his career. Will he be long for West Lafayette.

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't bet on it at this point, but yeah,

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 2>and it sort of. And the Joe Burrow thing makes

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 2>sense obviously, Ohio State's recruited number of talent the quarterbacks.

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 2>He did not win the starting job. It appears Dwayne

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Haskins is in the driver's seat for that after Burrow

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 2>got hurt as the onset of twenty seventeen, and Dwayne

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Haskins did look very good against Michigan in relief of j. T.

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Barrett when he went down briefly. So Louisiana State University

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 2>is where Joe Burrow ends up. Joe Burrow fight be good.

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 2>Nobody really knows people are winning the spring game stats.

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 2>But the good news is that I don't think anybody

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>at LSU was all that confident in what they had

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.719
<v Speaker 2>in the quarterback room. You know, there are names that

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 2>were recruited with certain cachet, but Joe Burrow, at least

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 2>in terms of adding numbers to just you need to

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 2>take as many shots as possible to find a quarterback

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 2>that will work out. And LSU has, you know, gone

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 2>through some things these past couple of years, a lot

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 2>of that that roster has been overhauled, you know, a

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 2>lot of attrition, especially some struggles on the offensive line,

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 2>losing a couple of big names at receiver, at running back.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 2>So it's a new look LSU team, whatever the case is,

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 2>if Joe Burrow starts or not. But I think it

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 2>seems like a good move for all. There's a lot

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 2>of hype around his name. I'm not it's good positive

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 2>why goodbye association. Yeah, we talked about this a couple

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 2>of weeks ago. Hey he went to Ohio State. Mm

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 2>hmm ls.

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>You could definitely use a shot in the arm in

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback department. It's been lacking for a while.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 2>What's sort of interesting at the same time is grad

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 2>transfer quarterbacks. People are going to just immediately point to

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 2>Russell Wilson, who was good, I wouldn't say excellent at

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 2>NC State, but maybe that was the system that he

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 2>was in with Tom O'Brien. But he obviously had an enormous,

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 2>enormous year leading Wisconsin to the Rose Bowl and I

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 2>think was the most efficient quarterback in the country. Vernon

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Adams moving up a level was obviously very successful for Oregon,

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 2>but by and large, grad transfer quarterbacks after spending three

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 2>or four years at a school and then jumping to

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 2>a new place. It is not a situation littered with successes.

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Do not besmirch the name of malikue Zaire Dan exactly,

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>ty exactly.

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 2>So it's interesting. I mean Max Brown not not exactly

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 2>world theater at pitt So, I you know what, listen,

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 2>hoping for the best for everybody involved, but yeah, it's

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 2>not an automatic thing. And then now people are saying

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Hurts might take another year, hopefully graduate early, and

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 2>then leave if he doesn't get this job. And there

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 2>was a story about did you see the Tuas story? Yeah,

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 2>came out if he didn't play in the National Championship.

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 2>And you know, when he arrived at Alabama, there was

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 2>some some growing pains. And he's from Hawaii, He's going

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.959
<v Speaker 2>to Tuscaloose, Alabama. I know his family moved to Alabama.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 2>But it's it's tough, man.

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of hot takes out there, Dan, a lot

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of hot takes.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 2>The only thing I will say, and I tweeted this out,

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 2>is that I hope on some level, because I have

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 2>no problem with quarterbacks committing somewhere and then realizing that

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 2>the situation isn't great and doing whatever they can to

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 2>better their own situation, hopefully of their future, and going

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 2>somewhere else, I hope that maybe there's more time and

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe they speak to more people in trying to find

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 2>the best possible fit instead of just the best possible name.

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, we talked, We talked on our Howe Recruiting Work

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>show about that. Right, that was one of the key tenants.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Budd talked about that. Yeah, Bud talked about it. Lindsay

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Theory talked about it. Weah McQuay talked about it. There

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>really is this romanticism involved with going to the biggest

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>school out there, and for many kids it may not

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>be the best selection. You got to pick the school

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that's right for you. You got to pick the system that's

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>right for you. We talked a little bit to Todd

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Boyd about that very topic. He didn't want. He was

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>very very set on the kind of system he wanted

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to play in. That helped guide his recruitment. Now changed.

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It changed once you got on campus. But the point

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>is he at least had a sense of self. He

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>knew where he wanted to go and thought he might

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to apply his skills in a certain way.

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that always goes on. I think

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>some kids really get taken by the process, and that

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>could be part of why we're seeing so many transfers

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>as of late. I don't know, but to your point, yeah,

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I think a little bit of due diligence up front

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to help counsel these kids in proper direction might be

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>best for all parties involved.

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I still remember I think Aaron Murray and Zach

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Mettenberger were in the same class yep at Georgia.

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Yep, yep.

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 2>And that's fine. And like I understand the will to

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 2>compete and the belief in yourself that nobody is better

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 2>than you. But you also, you know, you have to

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.719
<v Speaker 2>look at certain realities. I want to say at this point,

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Washington has four blue chip quarterbacks, great problem to have.

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Don't blame Washington for taking that many. I think Texas

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 2>may have four blue chip quarterbacks on its roster right now.

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 2>They obviously Sam Ellinger and Shane Bochelle. Then a couple

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 2>of freshmen incoming. But it's interesting to me that there

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 2>isn't a little bit more of a pragmatic attitude about

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 2>you know what, there's a senior there, there's a good

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 2>quarterback coach there. You know, maybe instead of going to USC,

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I go to Cal. Maybe instead of going to Texas,

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I go to Kansas State. There that they're you know,

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 2>if if Kansas State is a place you want to go,

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 2>if Cal is a place you want to go, I'd

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 2>be interested to know if guys are going to be

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more careful about.

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>The situations they put themselves in. Don't be Nate Montana.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Don't be Nate Montana. Don't be Nate Montana. For transfers,

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, if memory serves, that was at the final

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>he started at Notre Dame. Then he went to a

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>small school. Then I think he went back to Notre Dame,

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and then he actually did go to Montana, and then

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he went somewhere else. Uh, West Virginia Wesleyan.

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Is that where he ended up.

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where he ended up. Don't do that, Okay,

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>don't you want to go to a question. Let's go

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to a question where should we start all right.

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh, let's go to I like this quotquestion just because

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 2>we are probably not going to address it in nearly

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>the detail.

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul rache Reich.

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Once probably anticipates what is the upside downside of Stephen

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 2>or Stevie? He calls it Monteze. I like that, Stevie Montes.

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I am rolling back that all year long.

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 2>The cornerback of Colorado. Is he capable of being a

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 2>top four or five quarterback in the PAC twelve.

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So the qualifier here is in the PAC twelve. In

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the PAC twelve, a top four or five quarterback in

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the PAC twelve. Let's talk about the quarterbacks in the

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.239
<v Speaker 1>PAC twelve. Let's all right. So we've obviously got your

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>boy Justin Herbert up.

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So in order, who would you say is the

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 2>best returning quarterback in the PAC twelve right now? I

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 2>think it's obvious it's a Jake Browning.

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>An it's Jake Browning. Yeah, it is Jake Browning. But

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>we've also got Justin Herbert up there in the north.

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>The Stanford quarterback situation's up at either Kaja Costello mm hmm.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's three right there.

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I'd say Manny Wilkins is Anny Wilkins ahead is interesting.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 2>It's still in Tempe.

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Arizona quarterback situations intriguing to me.

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Khalil Tate, I think is probably ahead of Justin. Herbert's

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 2>probably the second best right now, the best quarterback in

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 2>terms of the Heisman potential because of his all around ability.

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 2>So if there's a one A, one B situation with Tate, Browning, Herbert, Wilkins, Costello,

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 2>the problem with Stevie Montes.

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Definitely going to be Stevie all year.

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I would have expected him to have a better year

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 2>last year if he were capable of being up top

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 2>four or five, because of what he had in the

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 2>backfield with Philip Lindsay, the receivers that returned last year. Obviously,

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the defense took some hits with the loss of a

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>number of big players from that twenty sixteen squad, but

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I would have expected more given what he had around

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 2>him last year. So I will probably say also depending

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 2>on what happens at UCLA with Chip Kelly and Wilton

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Spade or whoever ends up playing the majority of the

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 2>year under center for the Bruins with JT. Daniels or

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, Jack Sears, whoever starts for USC. It's it's

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 2>going for him to be tough to crack that top

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 2>half of the conference.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Is he in front of Ross Bowers in the Bower Hour? Yes,

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>he is in front of the Bower Hour. Then you know,

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously a tragic and unknown situation at Washington States with

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Luke Fox moving on to the NFL and

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the tragedy of Tyler Helenski and their uncertainty. I know

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>they've got a freshman coming in that they're pretty high

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>on it. I think his name is Camon, not Cameron, right,

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Cammon, Camon. I think it's Cammon.

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 2>He is ahead of the Bower Hour. And then Utah situation,

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the Tyler Huntley started out really nicely, and I know

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 2>they've got a pretty promising true freshman coming in who

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 2>stuck with Utah blue chip kid, but that's nothing I

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 2>can really count on at the moment.

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think I put Huntley in front of in

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>front of Stevie, in.

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 2>Front of Stevie Montes. Yeah, ah, he got kind of

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 2>sloppy with the ball light, but that's fine. So yeah,

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I'd say top six seven somewhere in there.

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Stevie Montes, I love you Paul.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 2>That's Stevie Montes. We got another question about I think

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 2>divisional quarterbacks this time. Oh, this is from Matt. I

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 2>put this in today. We got the question today, when

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 2>was the last time the SEC's quarterbacks were this good?

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 2>I actually first read this as SEC East quarterbacks, which

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I had an answer for. But when was the last

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 2>time the SEC's quarterbacks? And the quarterback situation? I mean

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 2>there's across the conference. I'd say it's pretty good. Jared's

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 2>did Amuel?

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So what do we got? We got Tua at Alabama

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>presumed Tua or Hurtz. Yeah, Drew Locke at Missouri. I

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>saw there was another question about Drew Locke for Heisman?

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that could that be a thing? I guess, I

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>mean it's may Why not Jared Stidham had I thought

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good campaign last year. Nick Fitzgerald at Mississippi State,

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>who for me is the sleeper given their coaching turnover

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and what could go on down there? Jake from at Georgia,

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>where do we go next? I get like Jake Bentley

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>or Jordan Tamo at Ole miss Or intriguing.

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean those are totally Yeah. I like both of

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 2>those players. I like Tambo maybe a little bit more.

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>We got a bunch of names here that I think

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Cole Kelly is like six foot nine.

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we've managed to hit all of the

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 2>good quarterbacks.

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So it's a not a big Kyle Shermer guy.

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a much improved situation, is the answer to this question.

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's been a while since I thought we could

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 1>go at least halfway through the conference feeling as confident

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>as we do at the quarterpot.

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I would say it's probably twenty thirteen. With the collection

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 2>of guys who were strong, I would say strong in

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 2>the SEC. So that's doctor Bow yep, Johnny Manziel, right,

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I had to start with doctor Bow. Johnny Manziel had

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 2>a ridiculous year the year before, Aaron Murray was a senior.

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 2>In twenty thirteen, Aj mcchaeron was a senior. Zach Mettenberger

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 2>was really good for LSU. Connor Shaw had a fantastic year.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I think he had. I'm looking at the numbers in front,

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 2>so I don't have to say I think eighteen touchdowns

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 2>to one pick was efficient doing it. Nick Marshall not

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 2>a huge thrower, but maybe underrated thrower for Auburn as

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 2>they won the SEC. And then yeah, the duo casual

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 2>address James Franklin and baby Matty Mock when he was

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 2>still good.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's right.

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they combined twenty twenty or twenty touchdowns to four picks.

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 2>That was a good year.

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Did you say it that? The Baby Matty Mock when

0:28:58.640 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>he was still good?

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was a freshman and he was still good

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 2>because he did not go in n upward trajection.

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>On the way we expected.

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Did it? No, it did not. And then you also

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 2>had an underwhelming deck and an underwhelming Josh Dobbs. So

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 2>even the guys who were underwhelming, and Brandon Allen didn't

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 2>have a particularly good year that year. So even those

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 2>three guys who were underwhelming were still throwing a ton

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 2>of passes in the SEC. I think twenty thirteen is

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the time.

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Arkansas built their whole offense around Brandon Allen. Like hell

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>yeah later, so great, Okay, good question.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the answer.

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, where are we going next?

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Oh some guy asked us about ties.

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to the non football questions questions, how do

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 2>you feel about Virginia Tech and Notre Dame or the

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Virginia Tech Notre Dame game, given the similar questions starting

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 2>both programs returning quarterbacks the year this year, excuse me,

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 2>and the game is in October. Do you think that

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 2>it will have a market impact on the course of

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 2>each team's season? Well, without knowing what happens before then, sure,

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit difficult, But I actually it's a it's

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 2>a particularly interesting question because those two teams at the outset.

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, at the at the end of last year,

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 2>we went into the season saying, oh, this new quarterback

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 2>real intriguing. You know, Josh Jackson had a good game

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 2>against West Virginia to open the season. Brandon Wimbush looked

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 2>pretty strong opening up the year, and then, for whatever reason,

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 2>these two quarterbacks coached by what are known to be

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty good offensive mines, got worse over the course of

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 2>the season, despite also having what I think we're both

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 2>really good defenses.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, I feel better about Josh Jackson

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback. If I could trade Wimbush for Jackson, I

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>would take that trade, and a heartbeat, really I would.

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I would. He at least looks comfortable throwing the football.

0:30:56.280 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Wimbush never did. He never got any better on the whole, though,

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I have fewer questions about Notre Dame than I do

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Tech. Virginia Tech turns a lot over on both

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>sides of the football Notre Dames. Notre Dame's defense should

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>be really solid. They lost their defensive coordinator, which hurts, right.

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I think They've got the talent to again perform at

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a very high level defensively, so I'm fine with where

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>they're at as a defensive unit. I think they'll be

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>very good. But Virginia Tech lost some headliners really at

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>all three levels of their defense. Bud Foster will get

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>them whipped into shape before long, but I have more

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>questions on that side of the football because of those losses.

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I have questions offensively. They haven't really used their running

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>back position that well in I don't know, five years.

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably mixing up my years, but it's been a

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>while since I felt good about what they did at

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the running back position consistently year in and year out.

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that's some questions to answer on

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that front. They lose a pretty big piece at wide

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>receipt I think is going to take some time to

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>sort out, and Josh Jackson to your point was not

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>any kind of model for consistency in his first season,

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>so I.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Have surprisingly similarly years statistically. Yeah, yeah, I think verse.

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 2>I want to say this is verse, yeah, versus winning

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 2>record FBS teams. Josh Jackson had a rating of one

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, Brandon Wimbush one nineteen. Josh Jackson seven point

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 2>two yards per attempt, Brandon Wimbush six point eight. I'm

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 2>still on still Randon, which had more touchdown pass.

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm still taking Josh Jackson, Josh Josh Jackson, excuse me

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>because I had to watch Wimbush all last.

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Year, So you're just going more of the unknown. Yeah,

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 2>at least you don't know what you're getting into.

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Wimbush is probably a better runner, I'll give him that,

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh definitely. But Josh Jackson is pretty mobile, and I

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>at least know that he looks a little bit more

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>comfortable in the pocket. I know that. So I watching

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the Virginia Tech football So yeah, I and look the other.

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>The only other point I'll add here is I don't

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>know how it affects both teams moving forward, but I

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>know that the situational play would be to go Virginia

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Tech in that game. I don't know if there'll be

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a home dog or not.

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Where are they playing the game? That in Blacksburg or

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 2>is it in like DC or something.

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure where the game's at, but it is

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the week after Notre Dame is home against Stanford, and

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that game's.

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Always coo ooh, bodyblow theory tie.

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Exactly a week after Stanford comes to town, then Notre

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Dame goes on the road to somewhere. Whether it's Blacksburg

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>or somewhere else, I don't know, but the smart money

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>would be on Virginia Tech in that game if they're

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a home dog of some sort.

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Mike and Houston years it takes for Chad Morris to

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 2>get a winning record at Arkansas. Or the number of

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 2>tacos Dan eight while in Mexico City.

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>How long were you in Mexico City.

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 2>I was in Mexico City Thursday night, Friday, Saturday, most

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 2>of Sunday.

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So you at least eight three tacos. I didn't check

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the Instagram feed, but you at least date three in

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the period of time you were there. I had many tacos. Yeah,

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he's saying number of years versus number of tacos. Yeah,

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I would I would put tacos ahead of the years. Oh,

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>because they might have a win. It here four years,

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>three years, it might be gone. They might have a

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>winning record this.

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Year they very well met. I think their schedule is

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 2>particularly impossible.

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.399
<v Speaker 1>It's tough. They're on the cusp this right, like seven

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to five. I think is is a reasonable goal for

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen. I probably had.

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 2>If you're also going to include times where I was

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 2>served a dish and then a side of tortillos tortillas

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.439
<v Speaker 2>with the option of making tacos, which I always took,

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 2>I probably had no less than a dozen fifteen.

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Why why did you go to Mexico City, By the way,

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>did we talk about this? Sure?

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 2>I went to Mexico City because it's great. Okay, it's

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>inexpensive to fly there and back. I played under three

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars. My friend Dave had never been, obviously, camera

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 2>guy Dave. It's inexpensive to stay there. The people are

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 2>super nice, the weather is great. It's seven thousand feet up,

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 2>so there aren't bugs, or at least they're not mosquitos

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 2>in the way that there are other places when it's

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 2>warmer in Mexico. The food is tremendous. The the exchange

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 2>rate is great, like an uber across town is like

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 2>three dollars. But I can't recommend Mexico City an off tie.

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Interesting and you know Spanish that I usually do you

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>know Spanish?

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 2>See of course of West though. Next question, I seriously

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 2>go to Mexico City. If you haven't, you should. Let's

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 2>go to Let's go to l elle hi l. This

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 2>is particularly relevant because you are in the midst of

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 2>moving and setting up your new studio. What's the best

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 2>piece of advice you've received about running a podcast.

0:35:55.440 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>That we've received? Yes, ooh, I've always been asked this

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>question sort of the other way around. What's the for

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you to give it? Yeah, what's the best bit of

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>advice that you would give? Would and the best bit

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>of advice is always to buy the best microphone you

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>can afford. That's that's the best advice you can you could.

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 2>And record consistently, be dependable.

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>The best advice that we've received about run the podcast.

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 2>You're in a lot of different secret paid for podcast

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 2>forums looking about bit rates, right, we know a good

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 2>number of podcasters.

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of hard to pinpoint it because we got

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.439
<v Speaker 1>rolling on this train very early. We were doing this

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>literally before podcasting was a word, So it's it's kind

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of tough to pinpoint one thing we've grown up with it.

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the one that I always come back to

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is just be authentic, you know. I think I think

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for the people that have met us or will meet

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>us in the future, you will find, maybe to great dismay,

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that Dan and I are very similar in person than

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we are when we're recording the show. Sure, and I

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>like to think that on some level that has played

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>into the success that we've had with the verbal you know,

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>being ourselves has really worked out for the better. So

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I if I had to pick something, I guess just

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:13.959
<v Speaker 1>be authentic. That usually that usually tends to come through.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I remember twenty eleven when we were at grant Land.

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Dave Jacoby was our producer, and we'd send episodes and

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 2>sometimes we'd hear back, sometimes we wouldn't, just in terms

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 2>of getting feedback, and I remember early on he said

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 2>he laughed hysterically when we started doing Nick Foles and

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 2>a Losing Effort, right, and he was like, you don't

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 2>need to read stats. People can check box scores. That's fine,

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 2>but like if something is like a thing to you, like,

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 2>go into the brevity of the sports. So I feel

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 2>like we've done a good job with that, just making

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 2>fun of ridiculous things like Nick Foles and a losing effort,

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 2>or how to talk to your kids about an undefeated Iowa.

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, everything that you know can be a thing.

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 2>We try to make it a thing that if it

0:37:57.280 --> 0:37:57.919
<v Speaker 2>makes us laugh.

0:37:58.040 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Also, don't buy a yetty. I don't know if it.

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Do not buy a blue Yetty.

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>No, that's my advice, all right.

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel particularly strongly about that, but I does.

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel very strongly about that. We have sponsors here

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that we need to discuss, dan Oh, who do we have.

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if in your current situation this would

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>be useful or not. Okay, But as you know, every

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>business needs great people always, and everyone is in search

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:23.399
<v Speaker 1>of a better way to find them. That's where zip

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>recruiter comes in, dan Oh. You don't want to be

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a business out there where you're posting your job online.

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You're praying that the right people see it. Zip Recruiter

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 1>has built a platform that finds the right job candidates

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 1>for you. They identify people with the right experience. It

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>invites them to apply to your job. Dan. So theoretically,

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>if you were looking for work, if you post a resume,

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you might receive an invitation. Hey, apply for this great job.

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what zip recruiter does, Dan. Their invitations have revolutionized

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>how businesses can find their next hire. Eighty percent employers

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 1>who post a job on ZipRecruiter will get a quality

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>candidate through their site in just one day. The even

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>spotlight the strongest applications you receive, so you never miss

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>a great match. The right candidates are out there. ZipRecruiter

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>promises to help you find them. Businesses of all shapes

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and size use ZipRecruiter for their hiring needs. Our listeners

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 1>can try it for free. Try it for free just

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>go to ZipRecruiter dot com slash solid. That's ZipRecruiter dot

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>com slash solid, ZipRecruiter dot com slash solid. It is

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely the smartest way to hire. Also brought to you

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 1>tonight by our new friends over at light Stream like

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>shream Dan, tell me more. When do you want to

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>start paying less interest on your credit card debt immediately? Yeah?

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>How about now? Damn it? Get a credit card consolidation

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>loan from light Stream the reward customers who have good

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>credit with a great interest rate no fees. You hear that,

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>no listen, then get a credit card consolidation loan from

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>five point four to nine APR. With auto pay, you

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>can save thousands of dollars in interest. Application is one

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent online. You can even get all your funds

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as soon as today and get this, our listeners are

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:29.399
<v Speaker 1>going to get an additional interest rate discount on top

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of light Streams already low rates. The only way to

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>get this discount is go to lightstream dot com slash

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Solid so l I d Okay, light Stream l I

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>g h T S t R e a M, Lightstream

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>dot Com slash Solid course. As with all things financial,

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.320
<v Speaker 1>subject to credit approval, The rate includes one point five

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:56.240
<v Speaker 1>percent autopay discount, available only when you select autopay prior

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to loan. The funding terms and conditions apply, offers us

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to change without notice. Visit lightstream dot com for all

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the important information about limits on their loans and same

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:08.760
<v Speaker 1>day funding. You know the drill, but it's a pretty

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>good deal. You get a at a discount by using

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>our offer code Whitstream dot com slash Solid Do it

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Where are we going next.

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Gary wants us to deep dive Navy football. Okay, Hi,

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna give you the platform. You said you had

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 2>a long, extended, detailed monologue.

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Can I may make a mission on the program?

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 2>You may?

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>How big is the show that we do? You don't

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>have to give numbers, but we're relatively big podcast, right sure.

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>For whatever reason, over the course of the last decade,

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we've gained a certain amount of credibility talking about college football.

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>People actually listen. They they they sometimes say we have

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>expert opinions, right, Uh huh. I still cannot say the

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>name of the Navy head football coach, can you monololoone?

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I cannot say that word Neil. We've been doing this

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and eight. I cannot say that that.

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:08.359
<v Speaker 2>Word Neo Nieu mata mata lolo lolo Neo matalolo.

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Neiu matalolo. That was pretty good, I can. I can

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>do it phonetically like that, but you can't do a

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation now. Well, we're going through the rigors of the

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:20.320
<v Speaker 1>show that we do. I will not get Nia matalolo

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>correct when I have to think about it quickly. I've

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>never been able to say it.

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 2>On the big stage during the season. If Navy blows

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 2>out UCF or something in a crazy upset, you will

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 2>not be able to say credit to Kenya Montolo. No

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 2>now prepared, he got the middies.

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 1>We're show about honesty here. I've always had trouble with

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that word. I've also had trouble with words such as

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 1>globe tomatoes, which is neither here nor there. Sure I

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 1>had to issues with words, but yeah, that's a pretty

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:49.320
<v Speaker 1>big one for me.

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 2>So Navy season last year was super weird. They started

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:55.359
<v Speaker 2>five and oh they lose six to seven. They blow

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Virginia out in their bowl game. They lost a bunch

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 2>of close games, which is fairly unusual usually a team

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 2>like Navy, or specifically Navy, you know, as we've seen them,

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:07.240
<v Speaker 2>especially against better teams a couple of years ago against

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Houston edging them out in an upset in Annapolis. Navy

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't generally lose close games, and they ended up losing

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of close games last year. Butt Tye, so

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 2>he's a butt. They have Malcolm Perry. Malcolm Perry is

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 2>real good. He played like a versatile role last year.

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, slot back running backs took some under center

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 2>he's like the no brainer quarterback coming in this year.

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 2>The defense improved last year, should be fine this year.

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 2>They've got some pretty decent teams on the schedule once

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 2>again in the in the American but they should be

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 2>like they have Notre Dame and they're due to beat

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame. That's just how it works. Ye, when you

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 2>watch Navy football, they're due. I don't remember where they're

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 2>playing that game this year, but it's probably not Annapolis.

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:56.839
<v Speaker 2>They have Army in Philly coming off that weird snow

0:43:56.880 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 2>game last year. U SEF with a new coach they

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:04.800
<v Speaker 2>have I don't think South Florida's on their regular season schedule.

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 2>But outside of that, Houston is a good defense. That's

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 2>a defense that can hang with them. And outside of that,

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati should be improved. Lehigh is always dangerous tie you

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 2>know that. I know that you can get into that

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 2>game for nineteen dollars right now. Temple should be improved,

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 2>but this should be a comfortable Bowl team in twenty

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 2>eighteen given the talent that they especially return at quarterback.

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I'm gonna go with they.

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Need to complete more passes. They were really kind of

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 2>garbage through the air. Last year, and.

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:39.919
<v Speaker 1>Let me credit ken Neo Matalolo. Boom Neo Motalolo. It's

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>too easy for the model of consistency that he is

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 1>implemented at Navy football. You know, it might not be

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the kind of program gonna go like ten wins every year,

0:44:51.880 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>but they are way more consistent now than I think

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people expect it when he took that

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:58.359
<v Speaker 1>job over. He's done a tremendous job.

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 2>An I am genuinely bough. We have not seen him

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 2>at a bigger place. That Oregon State didn't hire him,

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 2>that Arizona didn't hire him, buckling to alleged buckling to

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 2>pressure from some of the players the didn't want to

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:14.240
<v Speaker 2>play in that system or a system or any system

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:16.440
<v Speaker 2>that ken Neio Modolola may have been coaching because of

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 2>his background with the sort of flexbone triple option. I

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 2>think that was short sighted. I think he could succeed,

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, on a huge, huge level. I really am

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 2>rooting for him to get that opportunity somewhere.

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, where are we going next? Let's go to

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:34.279
<v Speaker 1>also Gary. Let's stick with you so many Gary's here.

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 2>He's getting married in a few weeks. Suit is all

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:40.399
<v Speaker 2>figured out, except he's undecided on a tie bar versus

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 2>no tie bars. You wear a tie bar?

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 1>A tie bar? I did not know?

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, neither did I.

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 2>At your wedding, I've been told they're out of fashion,

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 2>but then I still see them here and there. He's

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 2>wearing a three piece suit. Should he be wearing a

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 2>tie bar? The answer is a clear no.

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I think we're team no tie bar.

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay with a tie bar ordinarily. But if you

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 2>have the vest on which keeps your tie, you know,

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 2>secure to your person tucked in, it's it's redundant.

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't need the tie bar. Go go clean with it. Yep,

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>next question, tie We.

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 2>Got some really good ones here, because this is still

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 2>a spillover from last last time we did these.

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you want me to pick a question out?

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I want you to pick a question. Oh, okay, let's.

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Say buh buh. This one from Zach A very easy one.

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>In your wheelhouse? What is the worst tailgate food?

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 2>Anything that's not handheld? Okay, I do not want to

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 2>hold a plate and utensils, because then I have to

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 2>find a place to put down my drink. I want

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 2>to be able to pick up burger, chicken, fingers, ribs, whatever,

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 2>without having to worry about a plate and silverware and

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:53.799
<v Speaker 2>putting my drink down and then losing my beer or

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 2>losing my water or losing you know, my bourbon. Whatever

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 2>has to be handheld. Give me a breakfast brito, give

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 2>me a burger, give me a dog, give me a

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, a brisket sandwich. Whatever it is has to

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:07.280
<v Speaker 2>be handheld.

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Has to you disagree, not entirely, not entirely, Okay, what.

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Is the worst? No, I think that really isn't a

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 2>specific thing. That's when the only.

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Qualifier I would add is that a side, you know,

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like a good potato salad or macaroni salad, some other

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>side dish would be an exception where I think it's

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:36.840
<v Speaker 1>okay as a complimentary addition to the tailgating meal. But

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the meal depends.

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 2>It depends what your tailgate is actually like, how much

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 2>seating is available. But when I think about tailgate, I

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:45.399
<v Speaker 2>think about, you know, a spread of food being put

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 2>on a lot long card table or something like that.

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:51.799
<v Speaker 2>Everybody grabs something and you know, is wandering around with

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 2>a beer and talking to people and watching games on

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:56.360
<v Speaker 2>a giant screen on the side of somebody else's SUV

0:47:56.560 --> 0:48:02.440
<v Speaker 2>or whatever the RV. Yeah, anything. I don't want fish

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 2>at a tailgate. I just don't. I don't want.

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>The worst tailgate food that I've come across.

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you the best tailgate food I've come

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:17.440
<v Speaker 2>across was a steak sandwich in Nebraska. The worst one. Yeah,

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 2>we've had specific.

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:21.959
<v Speaker 1>We've had this question before, and we had a tremendous answer,

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 1>but I forget what it was. It was like three

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Okay, I forget what it was. On the

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 1>same lines here, let's go to our friend Peter, who

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:33.959
<v Speaker 1>asks a remarkable question. I would have thought for sure

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that we had we would have addressed it by now

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:39.360
<v Speaker 1>ten years into this podcast. But what is your favorite

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 1>grocery store smell? Oh smell? My answer is the bakery.

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>The bakery. He pausits a couple theories here. He says

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>his top five are the cheese section, the deli counter,

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the coffee aisle, food court, and he spikes out Chinese

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>food in particular, and the dog food asle smell is

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>very specific and he happens to love it now. I

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>would counter that a little bit. The cheese section sometimes, yes,

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:19.320
<v Speaker 1>does have a spell. I don't know about the deli counter.

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>The deli counter, to me, at least at Wegman's, where

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 1>they keep things nice and tidy, does not always have

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:29.759
<v Speaker 1>a smell. And I'm surprised here quite frankly, Cristmas a coolness.

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little offended he didn't go bakery. The bakery

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 1>isle has to be like Alabama in this question.

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.839
<v Speaker 2>I disagree. I think the prepared food, especially if there's

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 2>a fried chicken element, the fried chicken scent odor overwhelms

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:48.280
<v Speaker 2>the case, and that can smell enticing.

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:51.719
<v Speaker 1>The only answer here is the bakery, because the bakery

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>includes not only the fresh breads. Not everyone's lucky enough

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to have a fine institution like Wegman's nearby. I understand

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that in that category, that's so, it's through no fault

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of your own, really, right, But where they've got fresh

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:09.279
<v Speaker 1>baked breads, they've got fresh desserts, they've got all of

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:13.839
<v Speaker 1>those fine smells permeating the air that you breathe. The

0:50:13.920 --> 0:50:17.200
<v Speaker 1>only answer here is the is a bakery?

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Is there a pizza oven?

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:23.440
<v Speaker 1>There's all there is a pizza oven? Are is it an.

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Open pizza oven?

0:50:25.440 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh? Like?

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Are they bringing pizzas in? And out of like a

0:50:28.880 --> 0:50:29.880
<v Speaker 2>wood burning oven.

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:34.240
<v Speaker 1>They are, it's not always open, and there's like a

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's like a lid or a cover to it.

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Sure can't use my a door whatever the word ish,

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But no, it's bakery. The only answer here is bakery.

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:50.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, in a way, a pizza oven is a bakery, right, yeah,

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I would. I actually am going to change my answer

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:55.640
<v Speaker 2>from prepared foods too. If you go to a nicer supermarket,

0:50:55.719 --> 0:51:00.040
<v Speaker 2>your your Whole Foods, your Weagman's, your Gelson's, and and

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:03.600
<v Speaker 2>there is that open wood burning pizza oven. I think

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:04.360
<v Speaker 2>that's my answer.

0:51:04.760 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I sort of changed your mind for the

0:51:07.080 --> 0:51:08.840
<v Speaker 1>first time in the history of the podcast.

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 2>In the history of the show. This comes to us

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:14.400
<v Speaker 2>from Dennis. Since it's the off season, he's been watching

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot. I think this is no Dennis asked another question.

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:18.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to Dennis in a moment. I don't have

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 2>who asked this question, but it's a great question. Since

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:22.320
<v Speaker 2>it's the off season, I've been watching a lot of

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:24.719
<v Speaker 2>classic games. What is the best quarter a team has

0:51:24.760 --> 0:51:28.880
<v Speaker 2>played against a top five team in the last twenty years?

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 2>And you can think about Notre Dame games. If you

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 2>want because that's going to be the most emotionally relevant

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 2>to you. In my opinion, it's between between two different options.

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:42.879
<v Speaker 2>The two thousand and eight Oklahoma against Texas Tech game

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 2>when they outscore Tech thirty five to seven. I believe

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:48.960
<v Speaker 2>that would have been a Sam Bradford team or Alabama

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 2>versus Auburn in two thousand and nine when Alabama outscored

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Auburn twenty one to nothing and didn't let Cam and

0:51:55.160 --> 0:51:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Auburn gain a first down. I think that was the

0:51:56.880 --> 0:52:00.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty ten season. I'm almost positive it was there for

0:52:00.400 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 2>a year, and that year was twenty ten. That was

0:52:03.040 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 2>the camback game. Okay, do you have them? I have

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 2>I have an answer for Oregon against the top five

0:52:09.360 --> 0:52:12.280
<v Speaker 2>team because I was there and I remember the glee

0:52:12.320 --> 0:52:13.080
<v Speaker 2>that I felt.

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 1>He's saying the last twenty years, the last twenty years.

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 1>That's going a little too deep into the's till like

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight, a little too deep in the database for me.

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:26.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so in the last few years minus minus four

0:52:26.960 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 2>years ago.

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Last few years. I don't know if it was the

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>first or second quarter, but let's just say the whole

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>first half of I want to say the twenty sixteen. Okay,

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame Texas game with Maleague's air twenty fifteen. I

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:49.359
<v Speaker 1>guess it was twenty fifteen, the opening Stanza to that

0:52:49.440 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame Texas game where Maleague's air just went off

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and everyone kind of instantly dubbed him a Heisman front runner.

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 1>In that opening game against Texas, remember, no one, no

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:00.359
<v Speaker 1>one knew what to expect. People thought Texas might be

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 1>good Texas right, not good that year. No, that opening

0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:09.919
<v Speaker 1>first half for me was just mind blowing how good

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Notity looked and how good Movia Air looked.

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Sure, I think my answer is so for Oregon. As

0:53:16.760 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 2>relates to the Ducks the twenty fourteen Rose Bowl against

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Florida State. That third quarter they outscored them twenty seven

0:53:24.760 --> 0:53:27.200
<v Speaker 2>to seven. Florida State. It was eighteen thirteen at half time,

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:29.360
<v Speaker 2>and it was completely out of hand by the fourth quarter.

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 2>And that culminated with that, like Jameis Winston slip on

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 2>a banana peel rko Tony Washington scooping up the fumble

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:39.960
<v Speaker 2>and running it in from like sixty yards. That to

0:53:40.000 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 2>me was because Florida State at that point, I think

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 2>was the number three team in the country. That is

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:49.080
<v Speaker 2>my personal answer. I'll go with the big twelveth theme.

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to remember if this was twenty fifteen or

0:53:51.440 --> 0:53:56.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen. It was I'm looking at the schedule right now, Yeah,

0:53:56.239 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 2>it was twenty fifteen. The I want to say it

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:01.799
<v Speaker 2>was the opening quarter of TCU Texas. This was not

0:54:01.840 --> 0:54:03.800
<v Speaker 2>against a top five Texas team, mind you. It was

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 2>against a one in three or one in four Texas team.

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:10.000
<v Speaker 2>But in terms of like the blowout ability of a game,

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I think TCU went up thirty one nothing or thirty

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:13.880
<v Speaker 2>to nothing in the first quarter.

0:54:15.120 --> 0:54:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was.

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:18.799
<v Speaker 2>It was kind of magical. That was a Trevon Boycan team.

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:21.359
<v Speaker 2>That was a fun, fun horn Frogs team. All right,

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:23.880
<v Speaker 2>So that's my non top five answer.

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I have I have a question at the end of

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 1>this show that I that I really do need real

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>world advice on. I don't want to okay the waters here,

0:54:31.600 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>let's do Let's do like two more non football ones

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:36.920
<v Speaker 1>here before we get in quickly, Yeah, quickly.

0:54:36.960 --> 0:54:39.319
<v Speaker 2>Dennis wants to know the best pop punk albums for

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 2>a half hour on the treadmill. I'm gonna say no bummers,

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:46.239
<v Speaker 2>so we can't go too deeply Emo right, because we

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:48.359
<v Speaker 2>need that energy level high. We don't need you thinking

0:54:48.360 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 2>about past loves, past wrongdoings. I would say, take this

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:54.720
<v Speaker 2>to your grave is a great answer.

0:54:54.719 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good Fallout Boys, fall.

0:54:56.120 --> 0:54:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Out Boys original or at least their first big release.

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:04.960
<v Speaker 2>That is, it's high energy, it's it's mostly positive sounding.

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know remember all of the lyrics, but it

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 2>moves quickly. It'll get you to the place you need

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:12.160
<v Speaker 2>to be. I would make something on Spotify. I wouldn't

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:14.719
<v Speaker 2>say you need a specific band's album like I would

0:55:14.719 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 2>put Fat Lip on there by some forty one if

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I needed a half hour treadmill mix full of pop punk.

0:55:21.320 --> 0:55:23.160
<v Speaker 2>There's there's a lot of options I would pull, you know,

0:55:23.200 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 2>I'd pull some Yellow Card into there. I'd pull some

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Newfound Glory.

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, are we going to do a show with Bill

0:55:28.640 --> 0:55:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Barnwell this summer? Are is that gonna do late July? Yeah?

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we're gonna do an off topic show with Bill again.

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Of course, I'm very excited for that show. We've we've

0:55:37.920 --> 0:55:40.319
<v Speaker 2>kind of got a thing going with him now, these

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:43.759
<v Speaker 2>late July shows. Sure. So we've done EMO and we've

0:55:43.760 --> 0:55:45.160
<v Speaker 2>done nineties video games.

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's correct.

0:55:46.880 --> 0:55:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what other now starting line could be a little

0:55:51.000 --> 0:55:54.319
<v Speaker 2>bit bummery I'm trying to think of Uh could go

0:55:54.360 --> 0:55:59.000
<v Speaker 2>reliance that but royan little preachy, lill preachy, but it

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 2>do get a little preachy usually.

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Positive sunny with the high seventy five. Yeah, MxPx is

0:56:04.960 --> 0:56:05.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good for that.

0:56:05.680 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 2>If you're gonna go a little bit older. Damn, that's

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 2>a good question. You know who's a good band for this?

0:56:12.160 --> 0:56:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Cartel is a really good cartell rely pop punk band.

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's always underrated. Yeah, they had a good

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:21.319
<v Speaker 2>EP and then they released an album right out. I

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:25.440
<v Speaker 2>think that's the move it honestly yes that whatever album

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:29.840
<v Speaker 2>has honestly yeah, or say anything else whatever that's I

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:31.160
<v Speaker 2>think that's a good option as well.

0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:33.239
<v Speaker 1>All Right, one more non football and then I have

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:36.719
<v Speaker 1>a real question. I promise these are all real tie Yeah, no,

0:56:36.840 --> 0:56:39.400
<v Speaker 1>mine is real though. This is a real role question

0:56:39.480 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 1>where I need help.

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's so, we've got a good one from Kelly.

0:56:46.400 --> 0:56:47.800
<v Speaker 2>We've got you want non football?

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, non football? Give me non football?

0:56:51.160 --> 0:56:52.839
<v Speaker 2>Uh, let's scroll down.

0:56:52.880 --> 0:56:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's one. Here's one I got.

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:56.160
<v Speaker 2>You want to go Collin from Omaha, I want.

0:56:55.960 --> 0:56:58.759
<v Speaker 1>To go Nicholas okay, right underneath it. We can get

0:56:58.760 --> 0:57:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the colin quick too, we can get the Okay, Nicholas says,

0:57:02.760 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I just spent over one thousand dollars on five pairs

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of jeans. Uh huh, Am I a dumb ass or

0:57:09.960 --> 0:57:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy who appreciates quality clothing that fits right? How many?

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:16.600
<v Speaker 1>How many pairs of jeans are in your closet at

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the moment that you wear in my closet, in my rotation,

0:57:19.280 --> 0:57:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in your rotation? How many different pairs of gens do

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:22.959
<v Speaker 1>you own right now?

0:57:23.040 --> 0:57:29.400
<v Speaker 2>So just the denim material, different colors, I will rotate

0:57:30.200 --> 0:57:31.240
<v Speaker 2>two and a half.

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe I may own three total pairs of jeans.

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:39.479
<v Speaker 2>Over the last couple of years, I've gotten much more

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:40.920
<v Speaker 2>with with Chino's.

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I own three pairs of jeans at the moment. Okay,

0:57:46.720 --> 0:57:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm five. Five might be more than I'm now. Well,

0:57:52.240 --> 0:57:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what Nicholas. We don't know what Nicholas does.

0:57:55.240 --> 0:57:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's a cowboy. True cowboys gets there, They get

0:57:58.320 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>their jeans dirty time cowboys drop two hundred to pop

0:58:01.560 --> 0:58:04.440
<v Speaker 1>though on jeans.

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Super wealthy cowboys, Troy Aikman. Probably because the real cowboys,

0:58:07.880 --> 0:58:11.560
<v Speaker 2>the real cowboys. I would say that's probably excessive. But

0:58:12.280 --> 0:58:14.640
<v Speaker 2>if you have the money to spend, and you like,

0:58:15.200 --> 0:58:19.320
<v Speaker 2>by any like any shadow of a doubt, that these

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:23.480
<v Speaker 2>jeans fit your probably and possibly strange body better than

0:58:23.520 --> 0:58:27.280
<v Speaker 2>any other pairs of jeans right, and they're comfortable, have

0:58:27.320 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the cash right, and they make you look good, I

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:31.600
<v Speaker 2>say that's fine.

0:58:31.720 --> 0:58:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, I'm not judging if you want to spend your

0:58:34.200 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 1>hard earned cash on five pairs of jeans, but.

0:58:39.000 --> 0:58:42.320
<v Speaker 2>You could probably buy one hundred dollars pair of jeans

0:58:42.440 --> 0:58:48.320
<v Speaker 2>and spend twenty dollars getting them tailored perfectly, and you'll

0:58:48.360 --> 0:58:51.200
<v Speaker 2>save a good amount of cash. That's my guess. I

0:58:51.280 --> 0:58:53.080
<v Speaker 2>generally spend about fifty bucks on jeans.

0:58:53.080 --> 0:58:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I usually go about fifty bucks. Yeah, yeah, fifty bucks here.

0:58:56.880 --> 0:58:57.479
<v Speaker 2>That's my answer.

0:58:57.560 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You're not a dumb ass, and you clearly are guy

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:02.440
<v Speaker 1>who appreciates quality clothing that fits.

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Go gators is what he says.

0:59:04.280 --> 0:59:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Go Gatersgators.

0:59:05.960 --> 0:59:06.720
<v Speaker 2>So not a cowboy.

0:59:07.080 --> 0:59:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Now what was this from Colin? We'll go to.

0:59:09.040 --> 0:59:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Colin quickly wants to know a long time first time.

0:59:11.120 --> 0:59:14.240
<v Speaker 2>He's from Omaha, underrated city. I like Omaha. Yeah, I'm

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the best man in a wedding this summer. We met

0:59:16.360 --> 0:59:19.040
<v Speaker 2>in near Omaha for the first time. I'm a best

0:59:19.080 --> 0:59:21.600
<v Speaker 2>man in a wedding this summer and was curious if

0:59:21.600 --> 0:59:25.200
<v Speaker 2>you had some advice or strategies for being strategies for

0:59:25.280 --> 0:59:27.240
<v Speaker 2>being the best man. Also, what is a great joke

0:59:27.320 --> 0:59:30.000
<v Speaker 2>to start the speech off with? See to the speech?

0:59:30.120 --> 0:59:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Have you been a best man? I have. I'm not

0:59:33.720 --> 0:59:36.960
<v Speaker 1>big on the whole joke thing. I'm not big on

0:59:37.560 --> 0:59:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not big on the whole joke thing in the

0:59:39.680 --> 0:59:42.439
<v Speaker 1>best man's speech. I think you aim for center cut here.

0:59:43.080 --> 0:59:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Don't get over aggressive, don't get too cute. The best

0:59:46.760 --> 0:59:48.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of advice I ever got on giving a best

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:52.600
<v Speaker 1>man's speech was to compliment the bride early and be honest,

0:59:53.080 --> 0:59:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not about you.

0:59:54.360 --> 0:59:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I gave you that advice. Did you compliment

0:59:57.120 --> 0:59:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the bride early?

0:59:57.920 --> 1:00:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I feel like I read that on those like

1:00:00.480 --> 1:00:01.520
<v Speaker 1>self help posts.

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh it might be both, but yes, that is one

1:00:04.000 --> 1:00:05.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent of the move and I did at my

1:00:05.520 --> 1:00:07.600
<v Speaker 2>own wedding. I complimented the bride.

1:00:07.640 --> 1:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And how compliment the bride early win over the crowd.

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the best bit of advice. And don't get too cute.

1:00:14.680 --> 1:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Trying to come up with the best joke. Just be honest,

1:00:18.240 --> 1:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>be it, tug on some heartstrings if you have to.

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>What you don't want to do is be the guy

1:00:24.600 --> 1:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>who tells the joke and it bombs. It's very hard

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to be funny. Very few of our emailers are dead

1:00:30.840 --> 1:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on comedians exactly, so I would veer away from telling

1:00:35.040 --> 1:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a joke altogether. Compliment the bride early, be honest, tug

1:00:39.760 --> 1:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>on some heart strings, and you'll be fine.

1:00:41.800 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say, after complimenting the bride, make sure you're

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>as drunk as possible, like push past what you feel

1:00:51.400 --> 1:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>like is an appropriate level of drunkness.

1:00:55.600 --> 1:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I was at a wedding once, Dan, I'm not kidding.

1:00:59.120 --> 1:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>The best man gave a speech that was eighteen minutes long.

1:01:01.880 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>You can't do that. Do not do that, Colin, Please

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>give yourself. I wouldn't go over three minutes, honestly, because

1:01:11.640 --> 1:01:17.680
<v Speaker 2>being brief, being specific, being complimentary, you know, being able

1:01:17.720 --> 1:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>to edit. You don't need to tell three stories, tell

1:01:19.880 --> 1:01:22.800
<v Speaker 2>one great story. You don't need to go on and on.

1:01:23.200 --> 1:01:25.480
<v Speaker 2>You don't need to sort of make inside jokes. Inside

1:01:25.520 --> 1:01:27.480
<v Speaker 2>jokes the worst thing to listen to. You're not giving

1:01:27.480 --> 1:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>this speech for the groom. You're not giving the speech

1:01:29.920 --> 1:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>for you. You're giving the speech for an audience. So get

1:01:33.320 --> 1:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>up there, compliment the bride, and whatever you talk about,

1:01:36.840 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 2>make sure it's about the two of them.

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you, Mick.

1:01:40.840 --> 1:01:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Don't say like, oh, when we went to Cabo bra

1:01:43.600 --> 1:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>you remember the golf cart? No, yeah, you remember. That's

1:01:48.320 --> 1:01:51.840
<v Speaker 2>awful to listen to. Think about your audience, So compliment

1:01:51.840 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the bride. Get up there and talk about why they're

1:01:53.680 --> 1:01:56.520
<v Speaker 2>great for each other. Illustrate that with a story. If

1:01:56.560 --> 1:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>you really want to get a joke off, there's like

1:01:59.000 --> 1:02:01.800
<v Speaker 2>the tried and true. You know, Brent and Lisa are

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>getting married, and let me tell you something. Brent has

1:02:05.360 --> 1:02:08.400
<v Speaker 2>amazing tastes. Just look at Lisa. Clap clap, clap, clap,

1:02:08.600 --> 1:02:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and you know what else, Brent, you could not have

1:02:10.520 --> 1:02:13.320
<v Speaker 2>had better taste in selecting a best man. And then

1:02:13.400 --> 1:02:15.800
<v Speaker 2>something like that. Yeah yeah, then just like get past

1:02:15.840 --> 1:02:18.680
<v Speaker 2>it the cheap way, make it under three minutes, tell

1:02:18.720 --> 1:02:20.400
<v Speaker 2>everybody why they're great for each other, and while you

1:02:20.440 --> 1:02:22.600
<v Speaker 2>love your buddy and you love his new wife, and

1:02:22.640 --> 1:02:25.280
<v Speaker 2>then thanks everybody, see you on the dance floor.

1:02:25.280 --> 1:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>The other strategy, The other advice that I would give you, Colin.

1:02:29.200 --> 1:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say, for hypothetical purposes here that your wedding,

1:02:34.000 --> 1:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the wedding that you'll be speaking at as one hundred people.

1:02:37.640 --> 1:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, one hundred people. Keep it nice and round.

1:02:41.440 --> 1:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Of those hundred people, Dan, what percentage do you feel

1:02:47.320 --> 1:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>really care about what you're saying as the best man?

1:02:51.920 --> 1:02:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it is over fifty percent. Yeah, I think

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:58.200
<v Speaker 2>it's over fifty percent, but I think it goes down

1:02:58.320 --> 1:03:00.800
<v Speaker 2>every thirty seconds exactly.

1:03:01.720 --> 1:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So my point is, don't if you're the type that

1:03:04.840 --> 1:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>gets nervous in front of a group, but a lot

1:03:06.680 --> 1:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of people do, and that's totally normal. Don't don't put

1:03:11.640 --> 1:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>too much weight on how you think other people are

1:03:17.600 --> 1:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>going to feel about the speech, like it really does

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>go down into hurry, keep it short, don't worry about,

1:03:23.840 --> 1:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, being too heart stringy or anything like that. Like,

1:03:26.240 --> 1:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>just get it over with You'll be fine. Most of

1:03:28.960 --> 1:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the people there are more interested about when they can

1:03:31.800 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>go to the open bar.

1:03:34.360 --> 1:03:36.160
<v Speaker 2>This is true. And it never hurts to do a

1:03:36.200 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 2>callback during your toast. If you make some comment about

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Brent how he met Lisa because she was, you know,

1:03:45.640 --> 1:03:48.480
<v Speaker 2>her grocery bag broke and Brent stopped to talk to

1:03:48.520 --> 1:03:51.880
<v Speaker 2>her or whatever, and that's how they met. And they

1:03:51.880 --> 1:03:53.520
<v Speaker 2>met in a cute way. When it comes back to

1:03:53.560 --> 1:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the toast, and everybody raised a glass and you toast

1:03:56.880 --> 1:04:00.000
<v Speaker 2>their love and then to Lisa getting stronger grocery back.

1:04:00.360 --> 1:04:01.439
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's always good.

1:04:01.560 --> 1:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>That's always don't love that just basically don't be Rachel

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>McAdams and wedding crashers that. So, look, I have a

1:04:08.920 --> 1:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>question that I need to have answered.

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm ready.

1:04:12.280 --> 1:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to sell two couches in the next eight

1:04:18.320 --> 1:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>days or else, or else I probably have to pay

1:04:24.000 --> 1:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to have them removed. Okay, because my old house that

1:04:29.360 --> 1:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that least that agreement is coming due at the end

1:04:32.240 --> 1:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of the month. H I have two couches that I

1:04:35.280 --> 1:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>must sell. Why by the end of the month, because

1:04:38.160 --> 1:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't want them in the new house here. They're

1:04:41.040 --> 1:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of old, they're showing a little bit aware,

1:04:44.160 --> 1:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>still in relatively good shape. But we would rather sell

1:04:47.800 --> 1:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>them than either A have to pay to have them

1:04:50.920 --> 1:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>removed or b move them on our own in any capacity.

1:04:55.320 --> 1:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Because one of them is a sleeper sofa and it

1:04:57.440 --> 1:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is heavy as freaking hell. Ask you.

1:05:02.440 --> 1:05:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Is one or both of them are one or both

1:05:04.560 --> 1:05:08.680
<v Speaker 2>of them couches that pre date your relationship.

1:05:08.840 --> 1:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, is one of them or both of them yours? No? Okay, no,

1:05:15.240 --> 1:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>neither is mine. They're they're both. Yeah, they were solid,

1:05:19.040 --> 1:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>solid wife Kate brought these over. They were holdovers from

1:05:21.520 --> 1:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>her old apartment. Did you so your current couch is

1:05:26.080 --> 1:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>something that you bought together? Yes, okay, And so you

1:05:30.840 --> 1:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely don't need more couches in your house. No, we don't.

1:05:33.960 --> 1:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I I have we have no place to put these.

1:05:36.520 --> 1:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And I'm really struggling with trying to sell it because

1:05:38.400 --> 1:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it's an older model, older model couch, and I've tried

1:05:43.080 --> 1:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>posting it on various boards. I tried Craigslist. Someone tried

1:05:47.640 --> 1:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to scan me. That didn't work.

1:05:49.440 --> 1:05:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I don't.

1:05:50.640 --> 1:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Think I'm going to sell it on there, So I'm

1:05:52.320 --> 1:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm deliberating between actually having to call the one

1:05:55.960 --> 1:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred god junk people and paying to have it removed,

1:05:59.320 --> 1:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>or find some way that I can go all West

1:06:01.520 --> 1:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Virginia on it, and just said on I.

1:06:02.680 --> 1:06:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Would say Pennsylvania's next to West Virginia if my geography

1:06:06.120 --> 1:06:06.840
<v Speaker 2>is correct, right.

1:06:07.160 --> 1:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I know some people have gone the round of just

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ordering the state leaving it along the interstate. I don't

1:06:12.000 --> 1:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>think I want to go that route. It won't that's

1:06:13.680 --> 1:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a college tactic. Yeah, So I'm really at a loss here, Dan,

1:06:17.200 --> 1:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I could use some real advice here. What do I do?

1:06:20.680 --> 1:06:23.439
<v Speaker 2>So when Jody and Jody with and I and I

1:06:23.600 --> 1:06:27.400
<v Speaker 2>moved a couple months ago, I had a holdover couch

1:06:27.960 --> 1:06:31.080
<v Speaker 2>from both of my apartments that predated our last one,

1:06:31.760 --> 1:06:35.560
<v Speaker 2>affectionately called brown Beauty, very soft, excellent. Lot of memories

1:06:35.560 --> 1:06:36.080
<v Speaker 2>on that couch.

1:06:36.120 --> 1:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Tie.

1:06:36.360 --> 1:06:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know where this is going, sure, but it was.

1:06:40.320 --> 1:06:41.919
<v Speaker 2>And then we got a new couch at our last place,

1:06:41.920 --> 1:06:44.000
<v Speaker 2>and Brown Beauty was in like the side room that

1:06:44.080 --> 1:06:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I had, and at a certain point it was time

1:06:46.360 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>to get rid of Brown Beauty. But we lived in

1:06:48.400 --> 1:06:53.320
<v Speaker 2>an apartment complex, and the super we said, if you

1:06:53.360 --> 1:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>can take it, you can have it, because we didn't

1:06:56.120 --> 1:06:58.040
<v Speaker 2>want to deal with trying to sell it and deliver

1:06:58.080 --> 1:07:00.360
<v Speaker 2>it or whatever. So that's what we did with our couch.

1:07:00.800 --> 1:07:02.840
<v Speaker 2>He just took it. He had a dolly and brought

1:07:02.840 --> 1:07:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it out. So I assume there's nobody like that at

1:07:06.000 --> 1:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>your old place. I'm not really hmmm, Yeah, I would

1:07:11.440 --> 1:07:15.680
<v Speaker 2>just offer it up for free. I'm getting to that point, Dan, Yeah,

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:17.120
<v Speaker 2>you just have to offer it. You got to get

1:07:17.160 --> 1:07:17.840
<v Speaker 2>it off your hands.

1:07:18.640 --> 1:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>This is causing me undue stress more stress, can be

1:07:21.960 --> 1:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>more stressed than branded wimbush, Dan, getting rid of these

1:07:24.280 --> 1:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>damn couches.

1:07:25.560 --> 1:07:28.439
<v Speaker 2>Damn, I'm sorry. Well, color, it's like an off welight,

1:07:29.200 --> 1:07:31.920
<v Speaker 2>an off white sleeper. You've got a lot of old

1:07:31.920 --> 1:07:32.920
<v Speaker 2>people in your neighborhood.

1:07:32.920 --> 1:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Come on, not that many that you can get rid

1:07:35.840 --> 1:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of that?

1:07:36.360 --> 1:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Yeah, you just have to. I don't know what.

1:07:39.520 --> 1:07:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Like Facebook? Have you tried Facebook?

1:07:41.280 --> 1:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I haven't just put up free couch.

1:07:44.360 --> 1:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>If you can pick it up, it's yours, I guess,

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:51.280
<v Speaker 2>and somebody will tag some weird friend of theirs, probably

1:07:51.360 --> 1:07:54.640
<v Speaker 2>named Brendan, right, and Brendan will pick it up and

1:07:54.680 --> 1:07:57.560
<v Speaker 2>he'll be weird, but you'll deal with it and you'll

1:07:57.560 --> 1:07:58.120
<v Speaker 2>forget about them.

1:07:58.120 --> 1:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>If anybody is in the area and wants a couch,

1:08:00.280 --> 1:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>just let me know, give me a holler at T

1:08:02.920 --> 1:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and you.

1:08:03.080 --> 1:08:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Can meet Tie.

1:08:03.920 --> 1:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can meet me, and probably not Kate. I'll

1:08:06.600 --> 1:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>autograph it. Yeah, Kate will not be there.

1:08:08.960 --> 1:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>As part of the transaction. Kate will not be there.

1:08:11.080 --> 1:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Kate will not be there. Okay.

1:08:12.360 --> 1:08:15.040
<v Speaker 2>So if you are in Eastern PA and you want

1:08:15.040 --> 1:08:17.959
<v Speaker 2>a free couch and you want to meet Tye, I didn't.

1:08:17.760 --> 1:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Say free, you said free. I'd still like to try

1:08:20.120 --> 1:08:21.479
<v Speaker 1>and get a couple bones for this thing.

1:08:21.880 --> 1:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>If you want to bring Tie a sandwich and you

1:08:25.320 --> 1:08:30.240
<v Speaker 2>want a couch, Tie hilden Brandts are just solidverbal at

1:08:30.240 --> 1:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>gmail dot com, right sure, or it's Tie hilden Brandt

1:08:33.960 --> 1:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter or whatever.

1:08:35.000 --> 1:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I am desperate. This is a game used solid verbal.

1:08:39.040 --> 1:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Couch Ty will let you run your hands through his

1:08:42.640 --> 1:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>hair in like a non creepy way, but like you

1:08:46.439 --> 1:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>can experience it, and you get a couch. Like if

1:08:49.960 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I put your words verbatim on Craigslist, Yeah you know,

1:08:55.439 --> 1:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you get a couch and you could run your hands

1:08:57.320 --> 1:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>through my hair.

1:08:58.439 --> 1:09:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah you get responses would be.

1:09:00.400 --> 1:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>More successful than the scam message that I got this morning?

1:09:03.640 --> 1:09:04.880
<v Speaker 2>What is the scam message?

1:09:05.400 --> 1:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Will you take a cashier's check? How much you're trying

1:09:09.160 --> 1:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to sell an off white sleep used sleeper. There's two

1:09:12.120 --> 1:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of them. It's a it's a set like a queen

1:09:15.120 --> 1:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>size sleeper sofa and a love seat.

1:09:18.320 --> 1:09:21.040
<v Speaker 2>How much you're trying to get for a used couch set?

1:09:21.439 --> 1:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I start like four hundred or best off. Come on,

1:09:24.439 --> 1:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know we paid? She paid?

1:09:26.600 --> 1:09:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Your mind?

1:09:28.200 --> 1:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, what what's in approch? Maybe it's the dollar figure

1:09:31.520 --> 1:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you have eight days tie? I know, well the price

1:09:34.400 --> 1:09:37.599
<v Speaker 1>comes down every thirty seconds, But I know what? What

1:09:37.600 --> 1:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>what is a proper asking price here?

1:09:40.520 --> 1:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>I would just if you need to get rid of

1:09:42.120 --> 1:09:44.880
<v Speaker 2>them and you don't care about the money, it's free

1:09:45.360 --> 1:09:47.479
<v Speaker 2>if you want. If you want something that will give

1:09:47.520 --> 1:09:49.639
<v Speaker 2>you at least a couple of bucks, but will seem cheap.

1:09:49.920 --> 1:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, one hundred.

1:09:50.760 --> 1:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Bucks, two hundred bucks, price is right? One dollar?

1:09:54.640 --> 1:09:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:09:56.439 --> 1:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Just get rid of them.

1:09:57.680 --> 1:09:59.280
<v Speaker 2>You don't want them, don't have no value?

1:09:59.640 --> 1:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Really dressing me out, I'm not kidding.

1:10:03.000 --> 1:10:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Move beyond the off white tie, Move beyond all.

1:10:06.360 --> 1:10:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, fun show. Thank you to everyone who wrote

1:10:09.600 --> 1:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of weeks ago. As we address our

1:10:12.160 --> 1:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>backlog here of questions, soliverblare.

1:10:14.600 --> 1:10:16.280
<v Speaker 2>We're nose to tell with our questions.

1:10:16.400 --> 1:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we got a lot going on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram.

1:10:19.960 --> 1:10:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Can also find us on Reddit, iTunes, Spotify, Google, Stitcher,

1:10:24.800 --> 1:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>all the usual hotspots. What do we have in the

1:10:29.240 --> 1:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>housekeeping variety here? What are our housekeeping notes? Okay, do

1:10:32.960 --> 1:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you address before we move on.

1:10:34.800 --> 1:10:37.040
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to be locked in on designs for

1:10:37.280 --> 1:10:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I think we're settled on shirts, hats, and mugs. We're

1:10:41.840 --> 1:10:45.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be locked in on designs this Monday, which

1:10:45.000 --> 1:10:47.720
<v Speaker 2>means we're going to start speaking with the store we're

1:10:47.760 --> 1:10:51.439
<v Speaker 2>going to use right correct. We'll have those designs on Monday.

1:10:52.080 --> 1:10:54.000
<v Speaker 2>The hats will take a little bit longer because of

1:10:54.040 --> 1:10:58.000
<v Speaker 2>some embroidery, which is fine, yep. So we're hoping for

1:10:58.160 --> 1:11:00.880
<v Speaker 2>early to mid June that our store will be up

1:11:00.920 --> 1:11:03.479
<v Speaker 2>and ready and we'll be selling some items. I'm really excited.

1:11:03.520 --> 1:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I think you like what's in store. We have that

1:11:07.960 --> 1:11:12.040
<v Speaker 2>we have the Chicago show in mid August. We have

1:11:12.080 --> 1:11:14.280
<v Speaker 2>a very good idea of what the date will be.

1:11:14.640 --> 1:11:16.840
<v Speaker 2>We just do not have a confirmed place as of

1:11:16.880 --> 1:11:17.479
<v Speaker 2>this requit.

1:11:17.560 --> 1:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>We had some people asking about a date, and believe me,

1:11:21.240 --> 1:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to give that date. We've said time and

1:11:24.160 --> 1:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>time again, it's going to be early to mid August.

1:11:26.160 --> 1:11:28.799
<v Speaker 1>You could draw your own conclusions, probably on the weekend

1:11:28.960 --> 1:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>right more conclusions that you can I think probably draw

1:11:32.479 --> 1:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>as soon as we have a date. We will let

1:11:34.160 --> 1:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>you know. Cool absolutely, let you know. We're working on

1:11:37.520 --> 1:11:40.519
<v Speaker 1>venues right now. We're going to find a place before long.

1:11:40.520 --> 1:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>We're very excited about the show.

1:11:42.439 --> 1:11:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so we have that show. We'd like to do

1:11:45.080 --> 1:11:49.599
<v Speaker 2>one or two additional shows outside of Chicago, but that

1:11:49.680 --> 1:11:53.920
<v Speaker 2>means more venue selecting and we just need to we

1:11:53.960 --> 1:11:55.920
<v Speaker 2>need to get on it. But we have an idea

1:11:55.920 --> 1:11:58.200
<v Speaker 2>of the cities we'd like to be in, most likely

1:11:58.320 --> 1:12:02.760
<v Speaker 2>DC in Austin, Yes, I think so, maybe New York again,

1:12:02.840 --> 1:12:04.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. New York is very easy for us

1:12:04.600 --> 1:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>that has.

1:12:04.960 --> 1:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Anyone out there ever planned a live tour for either

1:12:08.000 --> 1:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a low level rock band or maybe another podcast, look

1:12:11.439 --> 1:12:14.519
<v Speaker 1>us upsolivermail dot com. That would be very helpful in our.

1:12:14.439 --> 1:12:18.120
<v Speaker 2>We're admitting to being I like the venues we've used

1:12:18.120 --> 1:12:22.760
<v Speaker 2>in the past. I haven't loved all of them, so

1:12:23.200 --> 1:12:24.720
<v Speaker 2>we are struggling with literally one.

1:12:25.120 --> 1:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

1:12:26.280 --> 1:12:29.320
<v Speaker 2>It should be easier, So we'll get that all situated.

1:12:29.439 --> 1:12:31.679
<v Speaker 2>Chicago's a done deal in terms of we are definitely

1:12:31.680 --> 1:12:34.400
<v Speaker 2>doing it when we want to do it, and that's

1:12:34.560 --> 1:12:36.040
<v Speaker 2>where we want to do it, and we will be

1:12:36.080 --> 1:12:39.160
<v Speaker 2>doing it there. Outside of that, nothing is locked in,

1:12:39.800 --> 1:12:42.879
<v Speaker 2>but we're learning. We're learning this process.

1:12:43.000 --> 1:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Trust the process, Dan, Yes, trust.

1:12:47.080 --> 1:12:49.360
<v Speaker 2>It'd be very easy to just book like a hundred seater,

1:12:49.720 --> 1:12:52.360
<v Speaker 2>but we're going to places where we know we have

1:12:52.640 --> 1:12:54.960
<v Speaker 2>a healthy number of listeners, so we want to make

1:12:54.960 --> 1:12:56.439
<v Speaker 2>sure everybody can get in and have fun.

1:12:57.120 --> 1:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, on that note, thank you to everyone

1:12:59.439 --> 1:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>who canntinues to interact with the show. We will be

1:13:02.840 --> 1:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>back in a week. I guess it'll still be May

1:13:06.479 --> 1:13:08.439
<v Speaker 1>when we record our next show. But as we get

1:13:08.479 --> 1:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>into June, as we get into July, and certainly as

1:13:11.240 --> 1:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we get into August, Dan and I we promise have

1:13:14.120 --> 1:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot more planned than just Q and A shows.

1:13:17.160 --> 1:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Not that anything's wrong with Q and A shows. People

1:13:19.080 --> 1:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>love the Q and A shows. Believe me. The survey

1:13:20.800 --> 1:13:24.519
<v Speaker 1>we learned about survey results bear out that people love

1:13:24.520 --> 1:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the Q and A shows. That's cool, We're cool with them.

1:13:27.040 --> 1:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>But we've got big, grand plans for the weeks and

1:13:30.840 --> 1:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>months ahead. Keep it locked in on the Facebook, on

1:13:35.600 --> 1:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter, on the Instagram accounts. We've got a lot

1:13:37.800 --> 1:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of fun stuff that is certainly on the way. Daniel,

1:13:41.240 --> 1:13:44.639
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy the rest of your weekend and weekend. Okay, hey,

1:13:44.800 --> 1:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks you too for that guy over there, my good

1:13:46.720 --> 1:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>friend Dan Rubenstein. For myself, Ty Hildebrand. We will catch

1:13:50.200 --> 1:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you all in a week. In the meantime, stay solid pace,