WEBVTT - Israel, UAW, Apple, and a   Soft Landing

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 3>Check in with her. Next, I guess Mick Molroy.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>He's a co founder of the Lobo Institute, former paramilitary

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>operations officer at the CIA, and former US Marine Infantry

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>officer for sixteen years, so we thank him for his service.

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Mick, it is bad.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>In the Middle East, and it looks like it's gonna

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>get worse. What do you believe Israel should do at

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this point?

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think I heard that every day when

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 4>I came into my office when I was responsible for

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 4>the Middle Least, and it's not always that bad.

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 5>But you're right.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 6>I agree with you.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 4>It is bad right now in two ways. Obviously, Israel

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 4>has to go and destroy the enemy that attack them

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 4>on October seven, but the people of the Gods of

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 4>the Palestinian also need to be allowed basic necessities such

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 4>as food, water and medicine, and it looks like that

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 4>is two things that we're going to do everything we can.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 4>We'd be in the United States to make happen. Very

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 4>difficult in a situation like this, but necessary, and I

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 4>think we're going to do it.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I wonder about the actual tools and technology that modern

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 2>armies use because we see so much reporting about Hamas

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 2>having this underground tunnel network, which sounds terrifying, but of

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 2>course there were such underground tunnel networks in previous wars,

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, decades and decades ago. So do we have

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 2>ordinance that can reach deep underground and destroy a network

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>of tunnels?

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 4>So yes, The problem is when those tunnels are under buildings,

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 4>there is ordinance that has the ability. It's time delayed

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 4>so it penetrates into the ground before it detonates and

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 4>then causes this concussion that can collapse tunnels. Now, if

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 4>there are some of the tunnels in Gaza are up

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 4>to two hundred feet underground, it won't work for them.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 4>And then on top of that, so subterranean fighting to

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 4>your point of your question, yes, we've been doing that

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 4>for a while. But the complicated factor in here is

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 4>normally you could just use combat engineers, seal them up,

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 4>explode ordinance above them, collapse them. But now we have

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 4>up to two hundred and twenty plus hostages that might

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 4>be in those tunnels, and you can't do any of

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 4>those tactics that we've done in the past or that

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 4>has been done in the past. When it comes to

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 4>subterranean warfare, you have to go mile by mile, and

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 4>there's over three hundred miles to try to recover these

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 4>hostages at the same time you're fighting the enemy.

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 2>This brings up another interesting point, and it's like, I

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>guess a moral battle that any army is going to

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 2>have internally, At what point do you say, we do

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 2>not negotiate with terrorists and we're going to move ahead

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 2>with our main aim, which is destroyed hamas you know. Essentially,

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is it even possible to say we will

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 2>sacrifice these hostages in order to achieve our goal.

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 4>So it is possible to do that, I don't think

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 4>it should be done or will be done. Ultimately, militaries

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 4>are there to protect their civilians, just like our military

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 4>is to protect the United States and everybody in it. So,

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 4>although it makes it much more complicated and quite frankly,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 4>it brings a lot more risk to the force to

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 4>try to recover hostages. That's that's part of what we do,

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 4>and I think they will focus on doing both. It

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 4>would have been much better.

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the problem is obviously in order to you know,

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>in order to try and get those two hundred and

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty hostages back, you could risk losing exponentially more soldiers.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 4>That's you could you will risk losing more soldiers. Yes,

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.839
<v Speaker 4>there's no easy decision here, but every time you send

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 4>in a hostage rescue force, you are risking the force

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 4>to rescue in most cases one individual and it's a

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 4>mission failure if the hostage taker just turns and shoots

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 4>a person at the last second. But you're still risking

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 4>the entire force in the process, and sometimes they use

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 4>it as a way to lure end forces to attack them.

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 4>That happens all not all the time, but certainly in

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 4>most hostage rescue situations here it could happen up to

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 4>two hundred and twenty times. So because they could be separated,

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 4>they're not going to be in the same place, and

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be extraordinarily difficult, and it's something that

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 4>the IDF is grasping right now, I think and hopefully,

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 4>and I think we do have members of JASOK and

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 4>the CIA on the ground helping them, but they have

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 4>very effective special operations and this is just a very

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 4>complicated military problem.

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 3>Mick.

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you believe at this time is the risk

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>of this becoming a more regional conflict? You know, whether

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Siri or lebanonwear are we in that regard?

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 4>So listening to I thought it was high, and then

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 4>listening to the Iranian statements yesterday, I think it's higher.

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 4>So that is one of the reasons why I think

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 4>the United States has been so proactive at moving now

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 4>a second aircraft carry strike group to the eastern Mediterranean,

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 4>something that's unprecedented. Now there's a the twenty six MEW,

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 4>the Marine Expeditionary Unit is being retasked there, and I

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 4>think you're going to see more and more resources coming

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 4>to the region because I believe, we think Iran wants

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 4>this to expand let's hope it doesn't. Let's hope the

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 4>United States doesn't have to get involved, but it looks

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 4>like it's heading that way, and Iran can easily make

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 4>this go from a one front war if you will,

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 4>to a three to four front war. And if they

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 4>get involved directly, then this is going to be a

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 4>regional war.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 7>So where did the other countries align?

0:05:55.080 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 2>If the US is drawn in to a broader regional conflict,

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 2>what happens?

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 7>What do the Saudis do? You know? What are the Turks?

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 4>Do?

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 7>They're in NATO? Are they are they on our side

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 7>against Iran?

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 4>So when it turns into a war against Iran, if

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 4>that's what happens a little bit, let's hope it does not.

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 4>That would not be good for anybody the region or

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 4>the United States, and certainly not Iran. Then the Saudis

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 4>and all these Gulf states who do have some political

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 4>ties and sympathies, certainly to the Palestinians, it could shift

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 4>quite a bit because they are no friends of the Iranians.

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 4>In fact, most of the Iranian efforts have been targeted

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 4>toward them. If you think about the Huthis and Yemen

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 4>toward Saudi Arabia and the uae I. Don't think they'll

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 4>become actively involved, but certainly that'll change the calculus for them.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 4>If this becomes a Israel, Iran and US conflict that

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 4>goes well beyond Gaza. That said, it is not going

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 4>to be in anybody's interests. This is going to be

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 4>very destabilizing, its ruin economies, and it could be very

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 4>substantial if you think about it. There's several nuclear powered

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 4>countries that would be involved in that, and Iran is

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 4>on the precipice of getting their own nuclear weapon, and

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what that status is now out of

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 4>the government, but it could be very close and that's

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 4>something they could be racing toward right now.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>McK prime Minister net Yale, who had an interesting weekend

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>over social media seemingly putting the blame on the intelligence

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>apparatus of Israel for the October seventh attack, how do

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you put all of that into context with what the

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>military is trying to achieve here.

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 4>So I believe in the old adage, you know the

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 4>buck stops here concept. You know, you're a charge, you're

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 4>in charge for everything that happens or fails to happen.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 4>It was obviously an intelligence failure, but more than that,

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 4>it was a security failure because even if you did

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 4>not know that they were coming, the reaction times, quite

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 4>frankly from what I've seen, are unacceptable, especially in a

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 4>country the size of Israel and that's and that's that's

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 4>saying something. But it's also important to point out that

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 4>we had a pretty massive intelligence failure and I think

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 4>we have the best intelligence services in the world on

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 4>nine to eleven. So it's less about poking fingers and

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 4>more about you know, that needs to be addressed by Israel.

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 4>I know they know this, it's not the thing that

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's a surprise to them. After that. I

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 4>think they will. They just don't have time to do

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 4>it now. It's going to have to be on their

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 4>to do list right after this. Uh, this current conflict

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 4>is over.

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So Mick, just as observers here, should we set in

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>for a long grinding type of action here or is

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>there any scenario where there could be something quick, decisive,

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>measured in days not months.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 4>So there could be, but I think that would require

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 4>the Israelis changing their objective. If they want to destroy

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 4>which is a military term, destroy Hamas, that makes them

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 4>essentially completely ineffective in carrying out their military although in

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 4>their case terroraced mission, unless they reconstitute themselves. If that

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 4>is still their objective, it's going to take months and

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 4>months to do that. In Gaza. If you look at

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 4>MOSL in twenty sixteen, it took nine months and there's

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 4>only nine thousand fighters. Gaza has forty thousand fighters. And

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 4>then if they want them to prevent them from reconstituting themselves,

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 4>they're going to have some kind of occupation. They can't

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 4>just leave and let it go because Aron will move

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 4>right in, pick up the pieces and start harming them

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 4>and all that immediately. So they're going to have to

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 4>be some kind of force. Maybe it's not Israelis. Maybe

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 4>there's an international force, peacekeeping force that can move in

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 4>to help with the rebuilding of the area and of

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 4>course humanitarian assistants, but also to ensure that Hamas does

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 4>not reconstitute itself. That's something that's actively being discussed. Much

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 4>easier said than done, that's something that I think should

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 4>be looked at all.

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, Mick, thank you so much for joining us.

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate getting your perspective, your analysis. Mick mulroy, he's

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a co founder of the Lobo Institute. Lots of experience

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in that part of the world. Former Power Military operations

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>officer at CIA, former US Marine Infantry officer, senior fellow

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Middle East Institute, So a lot of experience

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in that part of the world and with those types

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of geopolitical challenges.

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.959
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the Team ken'shur Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 5>iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 5>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, it looks like we are moving towards labor

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>piece in the auto industry. GM reach is tenant of

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>agreement today with UAW ending a six week strike. Let's

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>break it down with a Gabby Coppola, auto industry reporter

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. Gabby, this seems like I guess the

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>last deal to get done here. Anything unusual in this

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>deal relative to what we saw from four to INSTALLANTUS.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 8>Not yet.

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 9>We don't have enough details to say if there is big,

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 9>you know, differences, I don't. I mean, I think obviously

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 9>they followed the pattern and on wages, you know, twenty

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 9>five percent over four years and eight months, plus inflation

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 9>protection or inflation adjustments. I think that money for retirees

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 9>had been one of the big sticking points towards the

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 9>end for GM, and that's why you saw I THEK

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 9>UAW actually expanding their strike this weekend against GM before

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 9>it got done. But I think I think temps and

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 9>retiree you know, money for pensioneers and retirees with the

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 9>sticking points, and we don't We'll see what that extras

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 9>little strike did if that bug GM up to be

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 9>in the same place as Fordham, stillant.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Is or not right, because walk us through the differences

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 2>between these three auto manufacturers. They're all big, right, but

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 2>GM has a lot more I think retirees to consider.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 2>GM has, for example, more temp workers than than Ford,

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe a little fewer than Stillanis.

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 7>So there are differences between these three companies.

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 8>That's exactly right.

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I think once Ford set the pattern on wages,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 9>that was the pattern, you know, But then you get

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 9>into some of these other issues exactly what you mentioned.

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 9>JAM has much bigger pool of retirees than say Stilantis does,

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 9>but Stilantis, you know, has fewer plants in the US

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 9>than Ford and GM.

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 8>Ford has the most.

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 9>And the temp worker issue, that was an interesting one

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 9>because Ford has always kind of been the boy scout

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 9>here of the D three, like they always like to

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 9>brag that they have more American you know, workers and

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, full time workers in their counterparts. And that's true.

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 9>So it was kind of less painful for them to

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 9>bring up the temps than it would have been for

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 9>a GM in Stilantis. So they were Yeah, I think

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 9>they're probably happy to see GM and Bland is getting

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 9>pushed to where they are in that.

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Regard because Ford had what a GM has like ten

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 2>percent of its workers at any given time or temps

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 2>right right, so that a little more and Ford far fewer.

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 9>Ford was like around what we reported going to the

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 9>strike was Ford was around three percent. I think JAM

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 9>was around nine or ten percent, and Silantis was.

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 8>Like twelve percent. And I think one of the things

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:12.479
<v Speaker 8>that really strikes.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 9>Me mat just looking at this what the contract they got,

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 9>it is like complete.

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 8>They completely turned the tables.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 9>You know, the companies were really used to going into

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 9>these things and squeezing the union.

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 8>Harder and harder.

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 9>Silantis wanted even more flexibility to use more temp workers.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 9>They wanted to eliminate, you know, thousands of jobs. They

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 9>wanted to close this engine and complex in Trenton, Michigan,

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 9>Toledo Machining, and.

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 8>None of that happened.

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean, they put it price Delanta's put a vehicle

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 9>back in Velvedere or Illinois. That was a huge deal

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 9>because that was a major issue for the UAW. That

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 9>was you know, thirteen hundred people got laid off the

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 9>spring when Silantis idled that plant, and it really did

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 9>not look like it was coming back. So I think

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 9>what really strikes me is just how much the union

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 9>really turned the tables on the companies. It went from

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 9>the union, you know, really getting pretty concessionary, you know,

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 9>modest wage increases, things like that, ever since the bankruptcy,

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 9>you know, ever since two thousand and seven, really even

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 9>before the bankruptcy when they started making cuts to kind

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 9>of help the automakers survive what was coming.

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 8>And this, I mean, this is what May said he

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 8>was going to do, and you know he did do it.

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 9>Like they really I'm not saying they got everything they wanted,

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 9>but they got a lot and they definitely be back

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 9>to aut of the confessions that companies were looking for.

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So what what did turn the tables there, Gabby? Was

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it just simply catching up and trying to get back

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>what they had conceided over the last twelve to fourteen years,

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>or is something fundamentally changed within that relationship.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 8>I think it was a few different factors.

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 9>I mean, one, I think the automakers knew they needed

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 9>to pay more because of inflation, right, I mean I

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 9>always remind people of this that, you know, we saw

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 9>during the pandemic, the labor market's been very tight. Ever

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 9>since then, inflation has been really you know, the highest,

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 9>and you know interest rates are high. That was really

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 9>squeezing people. I mean, don't forget a temp worker. You

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 9>know it takes landing for instance. You know, they had

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 9>the biggest number of temp workers. Those people made fifteen

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 9>dollars and seventy eight cents an hour. And then you

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 9>think about all the inflation that happened over the past

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 9>couple of years, you know, the non union employers, the Amazon, Starbucks,

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 9>everybody was raising wages to respond to the tight labor

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 9>market and inflation. And the company, the car companies kind

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 9>of hadn't done that. They hadn't paid the bill, right,

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 9>the bill was coming. So I think for sure part

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 9>of it was like they legitimately knew they had to

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 9>pay more. I think part of it was, yes, you know,

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 9>after two thousand and eight, people really feel like they

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 9>deserved the mentality of the Union is that we gave

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 9>these concessions to you guys to get you through. They

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 9>weren't supposed to be permanent, right, And the car companies

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 9>were like, no, this is our new business model, this

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 9>is our new labor costs, this is our new operating.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 2>The forget, by the way, Gabby is it is some

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 2>of this also, for example Stilantis. It's easier for them

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 2>to agree because, as you say, they don't really make

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 2>that much stuff in this country.

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 7>And if they're gonna if somehow.

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Magically Dodge and Chrysler become brands where they're gonna produce

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>more cars.

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean, that doesn't seem like it's gonna happen.

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 2>They'll make them in Canada, or they'll make them in Mexico.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is essentially the Union sealing its fate

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 2>in terms of uh, not not going to add any

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>extra capacity in the US for a few years.

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 7>Are we well?

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 9>I think you know that is certainly a concern, I think,

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 9>and I've even heard that concern express from some people

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 9>in the labor movement, like, oh, I hope we didn't

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 9>do so much that we're now going to shield ourselves

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 9>from future investment. I'm not, you know, I am. I

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 9>am not going to rush to judgment. I'm gonna wait

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 9>and see what happens. I look forward to doing a

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 9>lot more reporting in the coming weeks, talking to people

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 9>on the executive side to say, wow, what are you.

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 8>Guys gonna do here?

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, it's not It's true people want what flavor costs.

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 9>On the other hand, you've got the Inflation Reduction Act,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 9>You've got all these incentives, you know. And I didn't mention,

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 9>but obviously I think the biggest thing was Sean Fain

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 9>and new leadership at the UAW.

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 8>This is very.

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 9>Different, more hard left, more you know, just really more radical,

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 9>more just more militant.

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, and I wouldn't I wouldn't want to.

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't use the term unbribeable Gabby, because I would

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 2>want wouldn't want to make that allegation, you know. But

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 2>but past union leaders that are in prison, right, Yeah.

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, I mean I think that, you know, I would

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 9>say that some things that were great that the Sean

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 9>pain and the leadership did was they brought this level

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 9>of transparency to the union and to the process of negotiation.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 9>I mean, Fain was on there every week doing these

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 9>Facebook live you know, updates speaking directly to the membership.

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 8>You know, in the past, this was something that happened behind.

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 9>Closed doors with a few group of men, you know,

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 9>and that would come out and be like here's the deal,

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 9>you know, and there was a lot of a lot

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 9>of mistrust between the leadership and the membership, especially once

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 9>the you know, corruption scandal started. So in some ways

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 9>you kind of had to have this like clean break

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 9>with the past and do things really different. And I

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 9>think that Spain just really won the trust of people,

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 9>and it feels like a much more democratic union and

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 9>honestly like a healthier union just from like an engagement standpoint.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 9>And I think that gave them.

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 8>A lot of power.

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 9>You know. I don't think they could have gone on forever, right,

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 9>Like people were starting to hurt, especially people have been

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 9>on strike since September fifteenth, like at the g plant,

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 9>you know, the you know, stuff like truck Plant and

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 9>Michigan Ford.

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 8>You know, people were getting tired, right Sure.

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Gabby, do you think d UAW takes these wins

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it goes down south to some of these

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>non unionized plan that's definitely.

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 9>They're one hundred percent that's the plan. I mean last

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 9>night Sean Fain, when who was going over the Ford details,

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 9>he said, just going to be the big three. It's

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 9>going to be the Big four, five six, meaning they

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 9>have did the whole of these contracts. Was this is

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 9>our calling card to the non union plans?

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 7>Fascinating.

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 2>I wonder when we get more details, if we're going

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 2>to find out cool stuff like, uh, what cars is

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Dodge going to build?

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 7>What cars?

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is Chrysler only going to have the PACIFICA

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 2>or are we going to find out plans.

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 9>For the future Productler has shown a lot of Chrysler

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 9>is really trying to go beyond you know, the minivan. Well,

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 9>I mean, we'll see what the actual industrialization plan is.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 9>But I mean they brought out a lot of really

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 9>sleek looking kind of crossovers kind of you know, I've

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 9>been a very kind of post hopefully like your more

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 9>affordable kind of stylish that would kind of appeel to,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 9>I think to like younger people, you know, that kind

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 9>of you don't necessarily have kids twenties and thirties.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 7>Crossfire after the crossfire was pretty cool at the TI time.

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Yep, all right, all right, Gabby, thank you so much

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 3>for joining us.

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Gabby Coppola, auto industry reporter for Bloomberg News and Journeys

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>on this gym reaching a tentative agreement with the UIW

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>ending a six week strike. So your dollge Challenger with

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the scatpack was actually made in Canada, right, Yeah, whereas

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>my BMW was made in Tennessee.

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 3>That's right. So I bought an American all.

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 2>The BMW X cars, so all the SUVs are made

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 2>here in America, all right, So I bought Americans.

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 8>About that.

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape Cansur Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 5>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's get back to Israel.

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>We want to broaden our discussion out to kind of

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>a geopolitical discussion of that region of the world, and

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we can do that with Ambassador Adam Early. He is

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a principal at American Consultants. He was a former US

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador to the Kingdom of Bahrain from two thousand and

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>seven to twenty eleven, so he knows that part of

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the world. Ambassador, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's a million ways to go here. It

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>seems like Israel is really ramping up its attacks in Gaza.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the concerns, obviously for you know, the United

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>States and others, is what is the risk right now?

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe of this kind of regional conflict kind

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of and focused on Gaza expanding into a more of

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a regional conflict bringing in other players. Where are we

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>on that risk spectrum right now?

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's already started. Frankly, over the last two weeks,

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 10>you've seen pretty constant exchange of fire between Hesbela in

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 10>the south of Lebanon and Israeli forces in the north

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 10>of Israel. It hasn't gotten as much attention as obviously

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 10>the hostilities in Gaza, but both sides have suffered dozens

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 10>of casualties in that on that front. And then States

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 10>has been attacked dozens of times in the last couple

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 10>of weeks in its forces in Iraq and Syria have

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 10>been attacked by drones and missiles.

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 6>Fired by groups controlled by Iran in those territories.

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 10>So you know, I would call it a not even

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 10>a boil, but a kind of simmering of the pot,

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 10>which we see as the heat rises.

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 6>The question is will it will it reach a high boil?

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 10>And frankly, that's what the Biden administration is spending a

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 10>lot of its time tending to.

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 2>I wonder first, I want to say that nothing justifies

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 2>the attacks that we saw on October seventh from Hamas

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>into Israel. And I don't want anyone to think that

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I that I'm going there. But did this did this

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 2>whole tragedy evolve in a sense from the attempt of

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 2>the US to normalize relations between the Saudis and Israeli's

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I only ask because I saw who's the New York

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Times columnist that you loved pretty much, Tom Friedman, I think,

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 2>wrote a piece saying, you know, when when we saw

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 2>a picture of an Israeli like defense minister getting all

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 2>suited up to pray in Jetta, that it was sure

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 2>to outrage the Arabic world.

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, the short answer, in my opinion is no. But

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 10>remember everything is connected, right. But the reason I'll explain

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 10>why I say no, But at the same time, there's

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 10>a connection. You know, this attack which involved thousands of

0:23:53.400 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 10>Palestinians invading Israel on by air, through paragliding, land and sea, right,

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 10>was and seizing pre determined targets, right, was a complex

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 10>operation that that book.

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 6>Israel totally by surprise.

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 10>Now, you don't do something like that without years of

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 10>careful planning and preparation.

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 10>Okay, So the rock Prochemont between Israel and Saudi Arabia,

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 10>it's only been the last couple of months, right, So clearly.

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 6>Hamas has been planning this for a while, right.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:42.360
<v Speaker 10>And and one cannot say that the.

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 6>Provocation or the what set this in motion was Israel

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 6>stauding normalization. However, however, and this is where the connection

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 6>comes in. Hamas uh Is.

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 10>Is competing for political power among the Palestinian and Arab

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 10>street let's say, so you know, they saw themselves as

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 10>maybe getting out maneuvered a little bit by Israel in

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 10>its rapprochemot with the Arab states like Bahrain, like Uae,

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 10>like Morocco, who were all signatories of the Abraham Accords,

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 10>which is where we were trying to bring Saudi Arabia.

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 10>So again it's not unconnected, But at the same time,

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 10>it's not Saudi related.

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 6>It is basically peace related.

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 10>In other words, Hamas, which is a military terrorist organization,

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 10>doesn't benefit from peace, right, they only benefit from continued conflict.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Adam or I want to get your thoughts here on

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>these hostages, because that is just a difficult, difficult situation

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>for Israel. What is the role that Qatar is playing

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in this? And is there any scenario where this ends?

0:25:53.359 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know, there's been a lot of how should

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 10>I put it, there's been a lot of esteem being

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 10>let off in the media and about Katar, And you know,

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 10>Katar is a country that I know very well, I've

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 10>worked in, and it's again, it's very complicated.

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 6>But here's the here's the bottom line. The bottom line

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 6>is that Cutter's relationships with Hamas have come about at

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 6>the request of and with the cooperation.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 10>Of the United States and Israel over the last twenty

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 10>years fifteen twenty years. Why because Hamas is a terrorist organization,

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 10>we can't deal with them.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 6>We need somebody who can, and we've.

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 10>Chosen we, meaning the United States in Israel, have chosen

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 10>Cutter as our preferred intermediary. So when people say Cutter

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 10>supports Hamas. That's really not fair because Cutter is kind

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.239
<v Speaker 10>of doing us a favor in terms of being a

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 10>channel to Hamas to help stop hostilities, help release hostage,

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 10>which is, help get money and supplies to God to

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 10>Palestinian civilians. Now, what's different in the present conflict really

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 10>is that, you know, the United States and Israel has decided,

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 10>have decided right rightfully, So I believe, you know, no

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 10>more negotiations, no more business at all with Hamas.

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 6>That's over. We've gone from you know.

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 10>Tolerating an inconvenience to needing to eliminate a serious threat

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 10>that puts Kutar in a difficult position. What they're trying

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 10>to do, I think again, with US and Israeli cooperation

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 10>is negotiate the release of these hostages so that Israel

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 10>can then go in and flatten Hamas.

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 6>Will they succeed I doubt it.

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 10>Why because Hamas recognizes that the only thing standing between

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 10>it and the full force of Israeli military are two

0:27:58.760 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 10>hundred hostages.

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 2>So I wonder you know that's problematic in Gaza, and

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 2>then on the northern border with Lebanon, you've got Iran

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 2>lobbing missiles in via its proxy has Belah right, And

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 2>it looks like from the rhetoric. You know, Mick Malroy

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 2>just told us from the Lobo instuot he thinks Iran

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 2>wants this conflict to broaden out.

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 7>Is that inevitable as well?

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 10>I think that's a little simplistic that Iran wants this

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 10>conflict to broaden out? What does Iran want?

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 6>Iran wants two things.

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 10>It wants the United States out of the Middle East,

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 10>and it wants Israel to be eliminated, right at least

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 10>if you believe what the Iranian leaders have been saying

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:50.719
<v Speaker 10>for the past forty years. So the question for Iran

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 10>is how to best achieve those objectives, right, is it

0:28:54.880 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 10>by launching a full scale war between Lebanon Throughsbaula and Israel,

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 10>which Israel, by the way, which if it happened, Israel

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 10>would by the way, destroy Beirute, I mean destroy it,

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 10>right yep?

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Or does it?

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 8>You know?

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 11>So?

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 10>I think I think frankly, Iran is kind of figuring

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 10>its way, feeling its way through to see what's the

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 10>best use of its exact courses.

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Us unfortunately, just leave it there because of time up

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>against the time Costramper really appreciate getting your time. Admiral

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Adam Early, he's a principal at a Barrow American Consultants,

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>giving us his perspective on the developing situation in it.

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the Team Ken's Are Live program Bloomberg

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 5>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 5>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 3>All right, I am, I'm gonna be honest with the people.

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not looking forward to talking to our next guest

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>here because our guest wrote this. The last time the

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate and held it

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>there for a considerable period of time was in two

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six. In two thousand and seven, that episode

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and in calamity. This time maybe different, after all, with

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of hindsight, policymakers can do better, but you

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.479
<v Speaker 1>can't count on that outcome. Ed Harrison Joints says he's

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a senior editor for Bloomberg News. He joints us here

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Ed Boy, I remember

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that time period really well, and it was scary for everybody,

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And I was a seasoned Wall Street veteran.

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know what was gonna happen.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the parallels you see maybe from

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>today back to two thousand and six, two thousand and seven.

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, a great set up there. I have to say

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 12>that I do remember it well in terms of the

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 12>housing bubble. But the thing that people don't really remember

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 12>as well in retrospect is that everything looked pretty good

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 12>by and large right up until the very end. Was

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 12>that holding interest rates at a high level over a

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 12>considerable period of time that ended up hurting the economy.

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 12>You know, BERNANKI, he raised the interest rates up to

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 12>a certain level and then they were They stayed there

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 12>for more than a year, and it was in that

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 12>period of time that things started to fall apart. And

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 12>so that's the thing to be worried about. We're not

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 12>in that period yet. We're still in the hiking period.

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 12>We're still getting to that level. But once we get

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 12>there and stay there, that's when we have to be worried.

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Of course, it's not just rates that are interesting right now,

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>it's growth. Right five point four percent in Q three

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 2>was the Atlanta now GDP forecast. We saw a reading

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the other day at four point nine percent, so just huge.

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 2>But how much of that is fueled by deficit spending?

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 2>And how is that different than our situation in two

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 2>thousand and six because we're running now two trillion deficit

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 2>and pushing out total government debt to over thirty three

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollars.

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you know, I don't think that that number, that

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 12>two trillion number in the deficit from this past year

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 12>is sustainable for the longer period of time. And so

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 12>just from a pure growth trajectory perspective, it would suggest

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 12>that in twenty twenty four we're gonna come down from

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 12>those levels that you can't consume. The way that I

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 12>was putting it in the piece that I wrote that

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 12>you were flagging is that it's almost like the cash

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 12>out mortgages people had. They had that little extra bit

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 12>of money in their pockets as a result of the

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 12>appreciation and their home values. We have that little bit

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 12>extra of money in our pockets because of the transfer

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 12>from the deficits. But once that goes away, then I

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 12>think you will see people start to spend incrementally less

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 12>money than they were before, and so then that growth

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 12>number is gonna come.

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Down, all right, any reason to believe our Federal Reserve

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>has learned its lesson, internalized the lesson back from the

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Great Financial Crisis, and maybe how it acts going forward.

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Meaning by the way, meaning what Paul, Because I sense

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 2>that you think the Fed needs to start cutting rates,

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe in a preemptive thing.

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that No, No, I think they need to

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>just hang for a little while. But yes, in twenty

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. I do believe a rate cut at some

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>point next year. But do you think the Feds kind

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of internalize what happened back in the day.

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 12>I think they have, like on multiple levels. I mean,

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 12>I'll give you three different points. One is, in terms

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 12>of eighteen nineteen, you know, when bad things happened in

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 12>the leverage loan and in the high yield market, that

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 12>you saw that the Fed stopped their rate hikes at

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 12>two point five percent. The second thing is the fact

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 12>that when we saw bad things happen in March with

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 12>Silicon Valley Bank, they came in there and they, you know,

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 12>in sort of almost a precise way, they created a

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 12>liquidity vision just for that specific part of the economy,

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 12>without like you know, flooding the entire economy with money.

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 12>And then the third thing I would say is is

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 12>that the FED is much more focused now on making

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 12>sure that the you know, the people who are the

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 12>last on the employment ladders I still have a chance

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 12>to get in there. They don't want to go to

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.919
<v Speaker 12>the days where you know, people get hired and then

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 12>like you know, three months later they're the first to

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 12>be let go. They want the cycle to last, and

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 12>Jerome Palace talked about that.

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 2>So but I mean, if we're focused on growth, if

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 2>we're focused on unemployment, are we still watching what's going

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 2>on with inflation? Because that is the other part of

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.720
<v Speaker 2>the dual mandate that they've been talking about for two years,

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 2>right and promising us that they're going to get it

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 2>back down to two percent.

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 7>We're still more than fifty percent above that. So do

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 7>they just give up on that?

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 6>No?

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 12>And you know, I think that's the tricky part, and

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 12>that's the scary part in the sense that really, if

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 12>we're three percent now on almost all levels, there's no way,

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 12>especially with unemployment where it is, you know, which is

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 12>below four percent, that they can do anything but hold.

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 12>There's no way they can cut with inflation at those levels.

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 12>So that almost guarantees a repeat of the hike and

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 12>hold for a long period of time that we saw

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 12>that caused so much pain fifteen years ago. So I

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 12>think that it's very unlikely that we're gonna get out

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 12>of this cycle without something breaking. The question is is

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 12>what is it gonna be and when it's gonna happen,

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 12>and what's their reaction gonna be once that does happen.

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 2>So if we get I mean, we say two trillion

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 2>dollar budget deficits are unsustainable, but who's gonna change that?

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it doesn't look like we're gonna have a

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 2>much smaller deficit. I mean maybe if it's a trillion

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 2>dollars that's much smaller, but still too much. Right, Are

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 2>we gonna see the budget deficits continue to run at

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 2>this level? And if we don't, the FED has to

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 2>cut in order to pad the economy.

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 12>Well, you know, I would look at it in terms

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 12>of what I would call the monetary offset. You know,

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 12>we know from the past, when the fiscal policy is

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 12>pumping money in, the FED feels compelled to do something

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 12>about it. And so everyone's talking about rate cuts in

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 12>twenty twenty four. If we still have these deficits, adding spending,

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 12>keeping the GDP growth high, we could be talking about

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 12>rate hikes in twenty twenty four. I think that that

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 12>is a potential that we actually get another rate hike,

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 12>not in December, but in December and then again later,

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 12>or you know, even multiple rate hikes in twenty twenty four.

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm trying to refinance the mortgage. My man, I

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>need rates to come down a little bit, so work.

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 3>With me here. Labor market.

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I tell you what, I haven't understood this labor market

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 1>really at all. I'm just so shocked that it remains

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>so robust here. And some people tell me it's the

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.320
<v Speaker 1>hoarding of workers. I don't know what that means.

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 7>I don't know how that robust I think is a question.

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people are starting to ask, yeah, what

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 3>are you thinking.

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think that it is. It's bifurcated in the

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 12>sense that it isn't as robust as we think, right,

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 12>because when you look at continuing claims, they're very high,

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 12>and they remain high. But at the same time, when

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 12>you ask businesses, how do you feel, they're like, you know,

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.439
<v Speaker 12>we're not getting enough workers. There aren't enough workers out there.

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 12>I think that there's people. When people talk about the

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 12>skills mismatch, it really is there. So the people who

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 12>are not getting employed are remaining on the unemployment rules

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 12>for considerably longer than we would like. But at the

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:41.800
<v Speaker 12>same time, there's still that dearth. I think it's because

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 12>we're in the baby bust period. That's those people who

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:49.399
<v Speaker 12>were born after sixty four coming into the prime. All

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 12>of the baby boomers are leaving, and that's leaving us,

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 12>you know, with a shortage of workers. And as a

0:37:56.520 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 12>result of that, it's putting upward pressure on on wage

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 12>games and that's helping bolster the economy in some ways.

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I'm still here.

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>You think the Fed's can make a mistake, and I

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know what a mistake is raising I would think

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it would be a mistake. But do you think the

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>FED makes a mistake because I'm not sure what's going

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to break out there, like the housing market back in

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the day.

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 12>Well, you know, the question is is it is it

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 12>a mistake for them to take the punch bowl away?

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 12>I mean, if you look at any chart of the

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 12>S and P five hundred over the last fifteen years,

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 12>it looks pretty astonishing.

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Taking the punch bowl away in this sense would mean holding, right, No,

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 2>taking the punch bowl away would mean raising holding. Is

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 2>the punch bowl still there, which is crazy to think

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 2>about because they've gone up five hundred and fifty basis

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 2>points in less than two years. But at the same time,

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the fiscal span is just like a machine, right yeah.

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 12>I mean you have these two forces going against one another,

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 12>and so they're thinking, Okay, once this machine starts to dwindle,

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 12>then we can we can sort of passively tighten. You know,

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:05.919
<v Speaker 12>they haven't said those words exactly, but if.

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.720
<v Speaker 2>You listen to lots pretty much said that right, right, Yeah,

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 2>we're passively tightening because real interest rates are going up.

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 12>And moreover, when you have all of this money being

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:19.839
<v Speaker 12>pumped out in terms of deficit spending, that means that you,

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 12>as a result, need more higher rates to absorb all

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 12>of that.

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 3>All Right, that wasn't so bad.

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Ed Harrison, thanks so much for joining us. Ed Harrison's

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the senior editor Bloomberg News.

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape can'cher live program Bloomberg Markets

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 5>in app Bloomberg Dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.839
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Kaylee linestings and she's host a Bloomberg sound on and

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Crypto. And we also are joined today by Amy

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Lee Copeland. She is a partner at Rouse and Copeland.

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a law firm based in Georgia.

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 3>So we want to check out with both of these folks. Katie.

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with you on the Republican front Lots of

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>movement there in the list of potential nominees here, Mike

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Pence dropping out, Nicky Haley rising in the polls. What's

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:15.959
<v Speaker 1>the feeling in DC these days?

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 13>Well, at least the field pole is narrowing. We've had

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 13>a number of candidates competing for the Republican nomination, and

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 13>slowly we've start to see them trickling out of the

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 13>race as it becomes abundantly clear that Donald Trump is

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 13>still far and away the front runner. That said, there

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 13>are some people on the upswing. Mike Pence is now out.

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 13>He has not actually endorsed any one of the remaining

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 13>candidates yet, so we'll see if he throws his support

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.439
<v Speaker 13>behind someone else, of course's former boss. In Iowa, which

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 13>is really where a lot of these races are now focusing,

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 13>is still leading by dozens of points at forty three percent,

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 13>but Nicki Haley at sixteen percent, which now ties her

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 13>with Ron DeSantis. He actually has moved from nineteen percent

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 13>in Iowa and August down to sixteen, whereas she's jumped

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 13>from about six percent in the polls up to sixteen.

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 13>So she's really one that is ascendant right now exactly.

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Well as it relates to former President Donald Trump, obviously,

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>one of the big big issues for his candidacy would

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>be his legal challenges, particularly well, there's one big one

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 1>down in Georgia. Amy Lee Copeland, thanks so much for

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Talk to us about what's the lay of

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the land down in Georgia these days for the former

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:23.720
<v Speaker 1>president and he's illegal woes there.

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 14>Hey, good afternoon. Right now, nineteen defendants have been indicted

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 14>in this massive Georgia Rico indictment. Four people have entered

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 14>please of guilty, including three of Trump's legal advisors and

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 14>a bail bondsman's with connection to the Trump campaign. The

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 14>DA's office has approached six other defendants to try to

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 14>solicit please or to at least engage in plea negotiations,

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 14>without any success. And they have confirmed to CNN at

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 14>least that Trump and Giuliani and Eastman and Meadows have

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 14>not been offered pleased. So the case continues to go

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 14>along with the documentary evidence. And now the attorneys who

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 14>are pleading guilty and agreeing to testify truthfully er in

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 14>Jenna Elicu's case, cooperate fully against the former president.

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:11.760
<v Speaker 2>So Amy Lee, what's the worst case scenario for Donald Trump?

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 14>Well, the worst case scenario is that he goes to

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 14>trial and gets convicted. There are documents that the DA

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 14>has encountered. Remember there was not just a grand jury

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 14>in this case, but a special purpose grand jury then

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:28.280
<v Speaker 14>investigated for over a year. It hurt testimony from seventy

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 14>five witnesses, including election deniers, and this special purpose grand

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:36.320
<v Speaker 14>jury issued recommendations that people being guided, and a regular

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 14>grand jury didn't indict. So the case is moving along.

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 14>It should go to trial probably after the January sixth

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 14>trial in DC, and that looks like it might be

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 14>even in summer of twenty twenty four.

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm just wondering because you know, we have an election

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:55.359
<v Speaker 2>denier now as Speaker of the House, and that after

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 2>January sixth, So and then if Donald Trump becomes the

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 2>US president, he would I guess, have the power to

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 2>pardon himself.

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 14>Right, So, not in Georgia. Not in Georgia, I see,

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 14>not for state interesting, not for stay condition.

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, but it's not imaginable.

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:17.879
<v Speaker 2>That he would be jailed in Georgia and elected US

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 2>president and not be you know, let out to go

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:21.879
<v Speaker 2>to Washington, DC.

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, I don't know, Kaylee. We kind of talk

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>about this, Kayley. But let's be honest. The polls are

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 1>telling you that his voters don't care. How does a

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>party kind of deal with all his legal challenges here.

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:37.760
<v Speaker 13>Well, there's still contending with it, Paul. But to your point,

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:41.320
<v Speaker 13>his base of support, that core base of Trump voters,

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 13>always Trump voters, don't seem to have been rattled at

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 13>all by each and every case that has brought against him,

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 13>both civil and criminal. In fact, it really only seems

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 13>to cement it as he kind of tries to frame

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 13>this as a narrative in which the Justice Department is

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 13>being weaponized against him. You look at the gag order

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 13>that was just reinstated here in Washington in the case

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 13>that Judge Chutkin is precise. That's the Jacksmith election interference

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:04.360
<v Speaker 13>case that was brought here in Washington, d C. The

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 13>federal one that gag Orger reinstated as his team tries

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 13>to appeal it. And he said, that's another example of

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 13>the Biden administration being weaponized against him, even though this

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 13>is a separate branch of government that we're talking about here,

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 13>But it's that narrative that this persecution of a political

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 13>opponent is what Trump is experiencing right now, seems to

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 13>make those people who are supportive of him even more so.

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:29.000
<v Speaker 13>And that's something that the other Republican contenders for the

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:31.240
<v Speaker 13>nomination are having to wrestle with. How do you avoid

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 13>alienating that base of support while also trying to go

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 13>on the attack against a front runner. It's very difficult,

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 13>as we've seen proven time and again.

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Amy, If President Trump were your client, what would you

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:45.280
<v Speaker 1>advise him at this point? Is a plea deal even possible?

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it?

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Just what would you say to him?

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 14>Well, what I would say to him? And the advice

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 14>that he takes seems to be dramatically different if you

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 14>read about his other legal travails in the news right now,

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:01.320
<v Speaker 14>I suspect that he is going to go to trial.

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 14>I cannot imagine that this former president would come forward

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:06.839
<v Speaker 14>and enter a guilty plea or even seek a guilty plea.

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 14>And Steve Sadal, his attorney, has basically said as much

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:14.760
<v Speaker 14>that the Trump position is that these witnesses are actually

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 14>going to help them and that it's not going to

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 14>be a problem for him. I fully anticipate that he

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 14>will go to trial. I suspect though, that they are

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:26.240
<v Speaker 14>relying on a principle called jury nullification, that one person

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 14>is just going to hold out and say there's no

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 14>way we're going to convict the former president, which would

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 14>launched the case into a mistrial and the DA could

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:34.440
<v Speaker 14>try it again or not.

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 2>It's fascinating and unprecedented, right, We've never dealt with anything

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 2>like this. What's the chances, Amy Lee, that this that

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 2>this ends up going to the Supreme Court.

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 14>Well, to get to the Supreme Court, it would first

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:53.319
<v Speaker 14>have to go through the Georgia Court of Appeals, the

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 14>Georgia Supreme Court, and then the US Supreme Court can

0:45:56.120 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 14>only hear it is the Georgia Supreme Court. Yeah, yeah,

0:45:58.480 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 14>it could take a bath in it.

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>So Kaylee, what's the what's the feeling in Washington, d C?

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>The Republican National Committee. I mean, it just seems like

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign, the Trump presence, the Trump positioning with

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the voters is so strong that he is the presumptive

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 1>front runner.

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Now, is that kind of the feeling?

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 7>It is?

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 13>It feels not necessarily like a solidified inevitability, but at

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 13>the moment, it seems highly likely that Trump would be

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 13>the Republican nominee barring something really unforeseen happening. That is

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 13>kind of the feeling. And then it becomes one of

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 13>general election politics, because just because the former president can

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 13>lead in the Republican primary and win primary elections, that

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 13>doesn't necessarily translate come or November twenty twenty four in

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 13>the general election. That said, we have started to see

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:48.319
<v Speaker 13>the gap between Trump and Biden closing. I believe the

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 13>real kill of politics, average of polling, if it's a

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 13>Trump and Biden rematch in twenty twenty four, which by

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 13>the way, polling indicates voters do not want to happen.

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:58.920
<v Speaker 13>But if that happens, they're effectively tied within the margin

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 13>of error, so it would be a very close one.

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Amy.

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>As you look at all of the legal issues that

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the former president Trump is dealing with, which ones would

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>present the most peril do you think.

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think they all do. I think probably the

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 14>easiest one is for the government to prove is the

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:18.480
<v Speaker 14>classified documents case. That seems like a real red light

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 14>green light sort of issue. Georgia's, though, cannot be underestimated

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 14>in the peril it poses to the former president. With

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 14>the attorney advisors who've already pleaded guilty, they have admitted

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.720
<v Speaker 14>that some statements were false statements like the bals electors

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 14>were the duly certified and electors duly certified and elected

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 14>electors of the state of Georgia. Jenna Ellis's guilty plea

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 14>admits that it was false that dead people in Georgia

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:43.760
<v Speaker 14>voted or that felons voted, and some of those claims

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:46.279
<v Speaker 14>were the ones that mister Trump repeated in his call

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 14>to Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger to find seven and

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 14>eighty votes, even with other pleas. With Miss Powell's plea too,

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:58.400
<v Speaker 14>with the voting machines that those were breached and the

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:02.720
<v Speaker 14>voter data was taken, so everything presents a unique peril

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:06.840
<v Speaker 14>to the former president. But I think probably the classified

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 14>documents would be the easiest for the government to prove,

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 14>followed shortly and closely by the Georgia case.

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, Amily Copeland, thank you so much for joining us.

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Emily Copeland. She's a partner at Rouse and Copeland in Georgia,

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and she is all in the state of Georgia. Undergraduate

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>degree from the University of Georgia and then a law

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:28.319
<v Speaker 1>degree from the University of Georgia as well. So all

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in there on the Georgia and Kaylee Lines, host of

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Sound On and Bloomberg's Crypto, just giving us a

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>little sense of the lay of the land. Boy, the

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>next twelve plus months are going to be absolutely crazy

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>from a political perspective. Not only do you have a

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>presidential election, but you've got one of the former president

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 1>who presumably.

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape Catcher live program Bloomberg Markets

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 5>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:59.359
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:03.760
<v Speaker 5>flagship York station. Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's stock Apple Computer Apple?

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 3>Why not? I mean, you know, it's not even called

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Apple Computer more. Apple Inc. I guess is the new one.

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's stock. Let's just refresh our memories here. Two

0:49:14.640 --> 0:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>point sixty five trillion dollar market cap for Apple. The

0:49:18.160 --> 0:49:20.959
<v Speaker 1>stock's up thirty percent this year. It's up about seven

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>tenths today. They're goind have a product launch today. Kind

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:27.359
<v Speaker 1>of unusual timing. It seems like to me maybe they'll

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>unveil some new Imax, MacBook pros, all that kind of stuff.

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:31.640
<v Speaker 3>So let's break it down with Mark German.

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 1>He's a chief corresponding covering technology and Apple for Bloomberg News.

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:38.799
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea where he is, but he's joining

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>us somewhere via zoom.

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Mark, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>What are they calling this product launch tonight?

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Something halloweenish?

0:49:47.200 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 11>I think maybe they should call it Apple Computer Inc. Again.

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 14>Right.

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:53.960
<v Speaker 11>They changed the name to Apple Ink in two thousand

0:49:54.000 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 11>and seven when they started selling the iPhone and some

0:49:56.719 --> 0:49:58.759
<v Speaker 11>of the other mobile products. But today is all going

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 11>to be about computers. The answer your question, they're dubbing

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 11>the event tonight Scary Fast. Right, that's a flick at

0:50:05.120 --> 0:50:09.360
<v Speaker 11>Halloween right in the US and elsewhere Tuesday evening, October

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 11>thirty first. But they're also going to be holding their

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 11>keynote tonight on Monday evening, which is a first, a

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 11>nighttime event. Usually their keynotes would start about fifteen minutes

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:20.880
<v Speaker 11>from now, but instead it's not going to start in

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:24.280
<v Speaker 11>for several hours. Now. The scary Fast is a double

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:27.359
<v Speaker 11>meaning because they're referring to their new chips and like

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:29.759
<v Speaker 11>you said, these new processors will be going into the

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 11>MacBook Pro as well as the iMac, so.

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Is you know, it's we don't really talk about the

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 1>computers as much as you know, the Imax and the

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>MacBook pros and that kind of stuff. It's all about

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the phone and the wearables and all that kind of stuff.

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Just refresh our memories.

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>What the you know, the computer part of their business

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 1>means to them.

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:53.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, the computer part of the business means a lot

0:50:54.000 --> 0:50:57.479
<v Speaker 11>more than the revenue it generates. It generates between let's

0:50:57.520 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 11>say six and ten billion dollars a quarter, right, it

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 11>generates about ten to eleven percent of their annual revenue

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:06.399
<v Speaker 11>each year. But it means so much more than that.

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 11>Their most vocal consumers are the ones who are Mac loyalists.

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:13.479
<v Speaker 11>These are the people who tell their friends to buy

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 11>a Mac, to tell their friends to buy other Apple products,

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 11>to tell their friends to buy iPhones, right, to tell

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 11>their friends to buy iPads. Now, the other thing Apple's

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:24.360
<v Speaker 11>trying to do is they're trying to get people to

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 11>buy multiple products, right, They're trying to get people to

0:51:27.640 --> 0:51:30.359
<v Speaker 11>buy not only a Mac, but buy an iPhone, buy

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:33.360
<v Speaker 11>an iPad as well, and create that full ecosystem. And

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:35.120
<v Speaker 11>in many ways, the Mac sits at the center of

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 11>the ecosystem. So it generates only about ten percent of revenue,

0:51:38.080 --> 0:51:39.919
<v Speaker 11>but it's so much more important than that.

0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Mark, talk to us about kind of the chips that

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:45.239
<v Speaker 1>are going into these things these days. Where are they

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:49.399
<v Speaker 1>getting their chips and where's Apple And I know there's

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:51.920
<v Speaker 1>been talk time to time producing their own chips. Just

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:53.320
<v Speaker 1>give us a kind of an update of what's happening

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:54.680
<v Speaker 1>on the chip side of the business.

0:51:56.400 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So today they're geting introduced three new chips, the

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:01.319
<v Speaker 11>M three pro and the threemacs, and these are their

0:52:01.320 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 11>next generation versions of their in house Mac processors. These

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:09.040
<v Speaker 11>are chips designed and developed entirely by Apple using what's

0:52:09.080 --> 0:52:13.440
<v Speaker 11>known as an instruction set or a core framework license

0:52:13.480 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 11>from ARM. Right, We've been talking about ARM a lot lately,

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 11>and they're actually manufactured in Taiwan by a company called TSMC,

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 11>So these are in house designs. And to make it

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:25.360
<v Speaker 11>very clear, this is the same exact chip technology that

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:27.360
<v Speaker 11>they've been using in the iPhone and the iPad and

0:52:27.360 --> 0:52:30.920
<v Speaker 11>the Apple Watch for many years now. And the benefits

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 11>for a computer are tremendous battery life, speed, efficiency, the

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:39.600
<v Speaker 11>ability to sort of customize the processor and the software

0:52:39.640 --> 0:52:42.760
<v Speaker 11>to work together to create a better user experience. Before

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:46.200
<v Speaker 11>this transition, they were using Intel, which meant Intel was

0:52:46.360 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 11>developing and producing the hardware the components. Apple was producing

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:54.720
<v Speaker 11>the software, and so that necessitated a mix. Right, Apple

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 11>is doing one thing, Intel's doing another thing, and sometimes

0:52:57.680 --> 0:52:59.560
<v Speaker 11>the hardware and the software can integrate as well as

0:52:59.560 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 11>it does today as it does today because they have

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 11>one company now developing everything. So it's actually a pretty

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 11>unique thing in the industry and that has led to

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 11>big revenue jumps, usability as well as customer satisfaction on

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 11>the company's computers.

0:53:13.880 --> 0:53:14.200
<v Speaker 9>Lately.

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Mark Let's switch gears and talk about China. It's obviously

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:21.879
<v Speaker 1>such a huge part of the Apple investment story, both

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:25.200
<v Speaker 1>as a supply chain issue in terms of sourcing product

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:28.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as being an end market for its products.

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So arguably there aren't too many companies more exposed to

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>China than Apple. What's the concern there on the demand side,

0:53:35.680 --> 0:53:38.400
<v Speaker 1>on the customer sales side, it just feels like there

0:53:38.480 --> 0:53:42.319
<v Speaker 1>might be a growth in nationalism within China that may

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:43.880
<v Speaker 1>affect Apple product sales.

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 3>What do we know right now?

0:53:47.280 --> 0:53:49.840
<v Speaker 11>We really won't know for sure until the very end

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:52.759
<v Speaker 11>of January or early February when Apple announces it's Q

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 11>one results. That's going to be the first full quarter

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:59.399
<v Speaker 11>of iPhone fifteen sales, and really the first full quarter

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 11>until we start to catch win that maybe there's an

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 11>issue with Apple and China related to government bands, increased nationalism,

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 11>and the new Huawei Mate phone, right, and so we

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:10.400
<v Speaker 11>really have to wait to know for sure. But the

0:54:10.440 --> 0:54:13.960
<v Speaker 11>tea leads, we're reading the demand, we're seeing the anecdotal evidence,

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 11>some of the reports, the research reports were seen from

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:18.640
<v Speaker 11>there is indicative that there may be a little bit

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:20.880
<v Speaker 11>of a slowdown in China. Now, if you were to

0:54:20.880 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 11>look at Apple's website, if you were to look at

0:54:22.719 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 11>the lines at the retail stores in China, You're not

0:54:25.160 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 11>really going to see the full picture. Right, Those are

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:31.239
<v Speaker 11>going pretty positive evidence of good things happening there. But

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 11>as you know, the majority of people don't buy their

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 11>iPhones through Apple, they buy them through carrier stores and such, right,

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:38.400
<v Speaker 11>and so we really got to wait to see the

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:40.120
<v Speaker 11>full numbers to get the full picture. But if the

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:42.600
<v Speaker 11>latest reporting out of the region is to believe, there's

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:45.120
<v Speaker 11>a bit of a slow down there, which obviously, given

0:54:45.160 --> 0:54:47.600
<v Speaker 11>that Greater China is about a fifth of Apple sales

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:51.080
<v Speaker 11>and is where the majority of products are produced, anything

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 11>going on negatively in China is something that we and

0:54:53.560 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 11>investors and analysts very much need to pay attention to,

0:54:56.040 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 11>so our eyes are glued to that situation.

0:54:58.440 --> 0:54:59.000
<v Speaker 3>How much of a.

0:55:00.480 --> 0:55:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess is the Apple brand valued in China?

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 11>Among Yeah, the Apple brand is extremely strong in China.

0:55:09.040 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 11>It's known as a very applent brand. It's one of

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:13.360
<v Speaker 11>the top tier brands. You can put it in the

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:16.920
<v Speaker 11>same category of things like Chanelle and Louis Baton and

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:20.480
<v Speaker 11>YSL potentially right right up there with fashion brands and

0:55:20.520 --> 0:55:23.000
<v Speaker 11>so in China, many people consider it a mix of

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:26.279
<v Speaker 11>technology and fashion. That's why the Apple Watch is so

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:29.280
<v Speaker 11>popular there. That's why the high priced Max are gaining

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:32.520
<v Speaker 11>in popularity there. That's why people in China are springing

0:55:32.520 --> 0:55:35.879
<v Speaker 11>for the highest tier iPhones right these fifteen hundred dollars

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:40.440
<v Speaker 11>US equivalent plus devices. But clearly the brand is taking

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:42.799
<v Speaker 11>a little bit of It's on a little bit of

0:55:42.800 --> 0:55:45.919
<v Speaker 11>shaky ground right now. I wouldn't call it a three

0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:48.960
<v Speaker 11>alarmed fire, but it's something we're watching and once we

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:51.120
<v Speaker 11>get the numbers in the next few months, we'll really

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:52.799
<v Speaker 11>know how bad the situation is there.

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:54.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, Mark, thanks so much for joining us. Always

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:57.320
<v Speaker 1>appreciate getting a few minutes of your time. Mark German.

0:55:57.360 --> 0:56:01.160
<v Speaker 1>He's the chief correspondent Technology and of course that means

0:56:01.200 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple for Bloomberg News. He is based out in our

0:56:04.120 --> 0:56:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles bureau, which is an awesome office there.

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:16.600
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:56:16.680 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer.

0:56:18.520 --> 0:56:19.360
<v Speaker 7>I'm Matt Miller.

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three, and

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm fall.

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney I'm on Twitter at Ptsweeney Before the podcast. You

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:29.879
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio