WEBVTT - Puerto Rico Emergency Funds Are Protected: Rossello (Podcast)

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Puerto Rico has been the focus

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of attention from the United States, both

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of recovery from the devastating Hurricane Maria as

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>well as in its attempt to restructure it's dead. I

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>am very pleased to say that we have with US

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Governor card Rosseo. He is the twelfth governor of Puerto

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Rico and he joins us from our nitedal and studios

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C. Governor, I'm just wondering whether you

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have some particular item that you are hoping to hear

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>from President Trump to night at the State of the Union. Well,

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>there's uh, there's many items I would be very much

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>interested in hearing. But I would say that from our

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>vintage point, making sure that the recovery process in Puerto

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>ric and elsewhere in the nation. UH is one of

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the priorities that we can focus on getting the funding

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to the places that have a need to rebuild UH

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and to recover. And I I think that is UH

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>important to state that that is a priority and funds

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that are destined to those jurisdictions are not going to

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>be utilized to say, build a wall. I think it's

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a it's an important outcome. So, Governor, how much has

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico received in UH A recovery funding funder federal government?

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And compare that to what you had hoped for at

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this stage? Are you sure? I'm guess you're gonna say

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you're short and there's a deficit. Just give us a

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of the scale, yep. So, So to give you

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a sense of the scale, we've been working with FEMA

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and other stakeholders on what the transformation and rebuild plans

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>should be for Puerto Rico. The estimated cost at this

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>juncture is it's a hundred and thirty nine billion dollars UH.

0:01:55.120 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Last year, UH, we've we've received probably from FEMA UH

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from three to three and a half billion dollars.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And our expectation, of course is is to get that

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>pumped much higher. UM we UH. There there are some

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons why this process has been slow, and it's because

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.679
<v Speaker 1>it's different in Puerto Rico than in other jurisdictions in

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States. For example, in Florida or Texas or

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>any other state, the state controls the disimbursement process, whereas

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in Puerto Rico, FEMA controls it. And you might ask, well,

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>what would be that outcome? Well, a comparison should should

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>highlight what the order of magnitude differences. UH. Take Katrina

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 1>when uh it impacted Louisiana by the same time after

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the hurricane UH that that we're measuring against Maria passing

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:49.839
<v Speaker 1>through Puerto Rico, they had already UH nine thousand, five

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred projects that were being moved forward, whereas in Puerto

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Rico we only have forty four. So there you can

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of sense a scale of the magnitude difference of

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>what where we should be now in the recovery and

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>UH our sense for petitioning that these restraints UH that

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>are pre placed in Puerto Rico should be should be

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>taken away. You you you started off saying that you

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>want to see what President Trump has planned with respect

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to potentially diverting money away from Puerto Rico among other

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>places to pay for the wall. What recourse would you

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>potentially have if he goes ahead and does that, which

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is what he's threatened to do. So, so this is interesting.

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I've about four months ago. UH. You know, my job

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>as governors is not only to act but also to anticipate,

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and UH I had a sense that this might be

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a discussion where funding for recovery would be utilized to

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>build a wall. So we prepared our team, UH and

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we started studying all of the legal avenues that we have,

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and we have a very robust case. I mean some

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of the moneys that are coming to Puerto Rico, UH,

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the commu Unity Development blog rents that are used to

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>uh TO for disaster relief. Those were passed by Congress

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and they were signed by the president. So UH, those

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>are statute right now and we feel very comfortably confident

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that those moneys have to go to Puerto Rico. So

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>if there was any dipping there, um, we would certainly

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>battle it. So for most of the money's we have

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a strategy forward and of course we hope we don't

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>have to get there. We hope that the president would

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>see that. You know, rebuilding U s citizens lives is

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a priority. But if it gets to that point, we

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>are ready to battle. So covernor let's talk about the

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding process in Puerto Rico. I'm sure you have a

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>priority list. Give us a sense of given where you

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>are right now, you know, a year plus removed from

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the hurricane, you know what are the t one of

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you know the one or two or three critical things

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that Puerto Ricans need right now to be addressed. I

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>think in terms of projects, I would say the energy

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>grid UH is a top priority. We have a very

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>weak old energy grid that uses UH expensive fossil fuel,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and our objective is to use recovery funding and private

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>partners to leverage that and rebuild a modern energy grid

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that's more cost effective and that it is better for

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the environment and that frankly, can be a model towards

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the future. I think we're building roads in Puerto Rico

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and infrastructure is UH fundamental, fundamentally critical for our economy

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. And the other part is addressing our our

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>labor force and the labor participation rate. UH. You know,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>with these recovery funds that are coming to Puerto Rico,

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>with the incentives that are very competitive that we have

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>on the island, with the opportunity zones that will bring

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>about many investment opportunities to to the island, I think

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>we have a window of opportunity to enhance and grow

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that labor participation rate. Governor I meanwhile made all of

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the talk with President Trump. Meanwhile, Bankruptcy Court has approved

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.799
<v Speaker 1>a planned restructure some of the seventy four billion dollars

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of debt that the island has UH sales tax bonds

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>are rallying on this news. It has been this is

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this accounts for about seventeen billion dollars of bonds and

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>basically they were on according to my understanding, the sales

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>tax collected by the state would be split between the

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>bond holders and the state. How can you be sure

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>that you'll get enough revenues to be able to engage

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.239
<v Speaker 1>in some of these projects without just the benevolence of Washington,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>d C. Right, So, so you know, the rebuild of

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico has many UH many faces. One is on

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal front, one is on the economic front, and

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>of course now the Humanian, Humanitarian and Structural Fund UH.

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Once we devised. This is based on a fiscal plan

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that has been devised where implementing certain structural changes would

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>allow us to get avings in government while at the

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>same time enhance our our revenues because our economy is

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. We've implemented UH labor reform in Puerto Rico,

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>We've implemented permits reform in Puerto Rico, tax reform UH,

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>as well as other critical structural changes that we feel

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to help us enhance and UH Puerto Rico

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>UH moving forward. So with with all of those components inline, UH,

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we we see a path that once we clear away

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>restructuring of the debt, with the expected surplus or part

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of the expected surplus that there is, we're gonna have

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a nice runway forward to increase our economy and to

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>add significant value. Look, we're betting on nascent markets UM,

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>We're betting on medical cannabis in Puerto Rico. We're betting

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on cryptocurrency and UM and blood chain in Puerto Rico.

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>We are betting on HEMP as a as an open

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>market E gaming, sports booking. All of those are markets

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that are not readily available now in Puerto rican that

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we're pushing forward. So combined with a lot of the

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>things that we have going on in our island, it's

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an exciting time moving forward if we get

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>these debt process of governors. Thank you so much for

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>joining us and sharing your valuable time. Governor Ricardo ros Yo,

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Governor of Puerto Rico, from the Bloomberg Studios in Washington,

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>d C, Puerto Rico. We were just talking to the

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Governor Ricardo Rosseo about the situation on the island with

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>respect to its seventy four billion dollars in debt. We

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>do have an agreement with at least seventeen billion dollars

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of sales tax bonds joining us here in our Bloomberg

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Atta Active Brokers studios. Michelle Kaski, Puerto Rico, reporter for

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, as well as Dan Salander, partner and director.

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I was also head of municipal bonds at Lord Abbott

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>UH normally in Jersey City, but he joins us here

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Michell, I want to start with you.

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>There was an agreement reached and signed off on in

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy court. What was it yesterday? The bankruptcy judge she

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>approved this deal. It's it's the biggest deal so far

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>throughout this Puerto Rico bankruptcy process. And right now Puerto

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Rico has about more than seventeen billion of sales tax bonds.

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>This deal will cut that down to about twelve billion,

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and over the life of the debt, the government is

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>saying that they're going to save seventeen point five billion

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in debt service savings. So, Dan, this is I guess

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we could characterize this as a very good and very

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>welcome first step. Where do we go from here? Where

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:46.719
<v Speaker 1>does the Puerto Rico credit market go from here? In

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>your opinion? Sure, Well, you know it's a very interesting stage.

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you if you thought about where we

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 1>would be a couple of years ago. To reach the

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>stage is taking a lot to get here. It's a

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 1>very positive step that we have in agreement, um, but

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot more to do from here. You know.

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the big things in this whole process has

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>been to figure out who gets a sales tax money.

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>That's been the big first step. Now that that's been

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>agreed upon and we have a deal. Once we get

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>this finished, then the general Gation, shareholders and all the

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>difference constituents there need to figure out how to divide

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>up their sales tax and their money. So that's the

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>next step that we'll see soon. Well, but Dan, just

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to follow up there, another question is how feasible will

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Porto Rico's capital structure be once it emerges from bankruptcy,

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and if it's splitting the sales tax revenue between bond

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>holders uh and itself and its operations, how feasible is

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that with a shrinking population. Sure, the Portricos I was

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>not a booming economy, but they're doing much better than

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.719
<v Speaker 1>people realize. Uh. You know that the revenue is this

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>year away hundreds of millions, six hundred millions, something ahead

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of the forecast population drop and nowhere near what was expected.

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So things are doing much better than people might have expected.

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 1>So there, and they're getting a lot of money from

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>the federal government, so this helps them. It reduces their debt.

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Some of these bonds are zero coupons and don't want

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay interest or press went for a long time,

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>so they're putting themselves in a good state to turn

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>things around and really move towards the future. So, Michelle,

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>how good is this agreement for bond holders? What do

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 1>you think the recoveries will be for them. Um. Some

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>people think that bond holders did very very well on

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this deal. The there's two types of the Cofeinea bonds.

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>There's a senior tronch and a junior tron such subordinate.

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>The seniors will get cents on the dollar subordinate fifty

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>six cents on the dollar, and the bonds in the

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>secondary have been trading um close to that. They're getting

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>closer to that um and they've rallied in the past

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of days. The m so cents on the dollar

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good for seniors, all right, So Dan, would

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you be buying more Puerto Rico debt here? It's it's

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 1>tough at this stage to say whether whether to buy

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or so. I think we've all been through a lot

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>getting to this point. What's gonna be interesting is when

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.079
<v Speaker 1>the sales Tex deal comes to gets to agreed upon

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and issued, they're gonna be a lot of buyers out

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>there didn't known Puerto Rico through this, so they're gonna

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>have to make that decision. We would get the new

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 1>bonds of what to do, Yeah, well, is it a

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>net positive for you or not negative? That a lot

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of traditional mutual fund holders have gotten back into Puerto

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Rico debt, so we're at a traditional say through this time, UM,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and when they're getting back in right now, they're getting

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>back in through accrack and sewer bonds, things like that

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>that are paying and have never been in default. I

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>think it could be a big positive for us when

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this deal comes gets restructure. We have new bonds they're

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to buy and uh, you know, they're gonna

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>be interest paying bonds in Puerto Rico that they don't know,

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and so it could be a good thing for us.

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So Michelle, well, this has been a fairly long process.

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure if you're a bond holder, a very long process.

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>What do you think our next steps here as this

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>as Puerto rican continues to try to get out from

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>this financial crisis. Yeah, it's definitely important. Like Dan was

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 1>mentioning earlier, it's important that Puerto Rico keeps on with

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this and Rick structures the general obligation debt so there

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>can be some resolution to that, and then there will

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>be some smaller portions of debt that they'll still need

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 1>to work on. UM. And also the issue too of

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>their their unfunded pension liabilities as those are a big

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>issue for the island. Also the question of management, Dan,

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>what's your confidence right now in the management of the island.

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>The ability to take the money that they're receiving from

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the federal government and use it in an efficient way. Well,

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that's something they have to watch carefully. Obviously, the management

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 1>got them in this situation originally, and that's why we've

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>been working through this for so many years. The federal

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>r government has been giving them money. It's not all

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>been distributed to them yet, so we have to see

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>what they do with that money when they get it.

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So much do you have a sense of how much.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I saw some number like maybe sixty seventy eight billion

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>dollars of potentially they can get from the government in

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>different ways. So there is a lot of money going

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to them. And we had the governor on just earlier

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and he said quite emphatically that he's going to get

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that money. They they they've they've been granted it, so

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it has been already given to them,

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>or at least the expectations been given to them, and

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they've been planning for us. It would be very difficult

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>for them if they didn't get what was to they begetting.

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So from the bond market perspective, how does the bond

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>market view Puerto Rico now? I mean, you know, at

0:13:58.320 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>some point they're gonna have to come back to the market.

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>At some point they're going to have to you know,

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>refinance and and continue to invest. How do you think

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be received? That's the big challenge. I mean,

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>coming out of this, they're gonna have to do much better.

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the issues we've had over time

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>as they have not had audited state financials on time,

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>they have not presented information shows they need to bottles

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that need to provide. So coming out of this, they're

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on watch. I mean, they're gonna have to

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>do things much better than they did before to get

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the confidence in the market. And until they do, if

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they want to borrow, the rates are going to be very,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>very high compared to other similarly rated credits. So it's

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>something to watch. They it's hard. You know, everyone's gonna

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>remember this for a long period of time. We have

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>long memories. Dan Salinder, congratulations on being in the bonds

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>through this rocky period because the prices have way more

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>than double. Depending on what we're looking at, when you

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the Cofinea bonds. Dan Salinder is partner and

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>director as well as head of Municipal Bonds at Lord

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Abbott in Jersey City. Michelle Kaski's Puerto Rico reporter, dutifully

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>covering all things having to do with the saga as

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it drags out over the years. Uh. For us here

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News, well, it's been a widely held story

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and news that the newspaper business has been in a

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>secular decline for twenty to thirty years. No news, no

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>surprise there, but what we've seen over the last several

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>years as a growth of digital media companies, digital news

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>companies such as Vice and BuzzFeed and huff Posts. But

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>even it looks like they are facing their day of reckoning.

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll dig in a little bit there. So help us

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>dive into those details is Build. Drewelry Bills, a founding

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>partner of Pursuit Advisory based here in New York City.

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>He joins us in our Bloomberg eleven three oh Studios

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>builds a longtime investment banker and research channels following the

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>media sector. So so build these companies the vices of

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the world, these digital news companies. They were getting big valuations,

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>attracting a lot of money, and I think they were

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>perceived maybe as the future of news, maybe replace the newspapers.

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>What's going on on that space? Well, interesting, interesting times

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>for everybody in the media sector right now, Paul, I

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>think that you're correct. In the last five or six years,

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>there was a new sort of wave of of darling

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>companies Fist being one of them, BuzzFeed, Vox, etcetera, that

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>really rose up and and competed in the in the

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>digital arena in terms of news content and general entertainment content.

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>They were experiencing very rapid revenue growth and market share

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and as a result were accorded major valuations with a

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of investment from old line media strategics like NBC.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Universal invested in both BuzzFeed and Fox in the summer

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>at billion dollar valuations, and Disney invested in Vice twice

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and at the last round that Disney invested it was

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>over four billion dollars. And they also formed a joint

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>venture with Ice uh taking one of their A and

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>E cable networks and converting it into Viceland. So it

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>was the new media entering the arena to the old

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>traditional media, but they were getting valuations that were based

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on revenue multiples and not the traditional cash flow metrics.

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>And over the last two years, I think that what

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>we've seen is a lot of these companies now start

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to see growth rates recede and and not being able

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to reach profitability with you know, aggressive investment and not

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cost management, and as a result, all

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, they're starting to hit the wall. Okay,

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>so how much is this bad management on the part

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of these uh, these media companies, these digital media companies

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>or imprudent management And how much is this some sort

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of shift in the news business towards say the facebooks

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of the world and the apples of the world. Yeah,

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>well two questions there, and I think that on the

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>on the first one, you know, it's just a classic

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>case of of companies that are getting high valuations and

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of inflows of investment capital and then rapidly

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>deploying that to go after revenue growth with no real

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>fundamental cost management attached to it. We've seen this for

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>multiple cycles over the last twenty years with the rise

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of digital. Every cycle has been marked by companies unable

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to reach profitability and and the third time around it's

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the same story. So I think that, you know, it's

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very classic in that regard. On the other side,

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, you've seen this this this

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>rise of these new digital platforms up and they produce

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.959
<v Speaker 1>excellent news content, but they can't monetize it because Google, Facebook,

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and to some degree now Amazon have basically just sucked

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>all the oxygen out of the market. They are growing

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and basically taking over a hundred percent share of incremental opportunity,

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>and there's nothing left for the next generation. It's unique

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in that regard. So that sounds is like, you know,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>if you think about the profit challenges that you talked about,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you think about the competitive landscape, this looks like an

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>environment that might be right for some consolidation. Do you

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>think that we will see some of these companies merged

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to try to get some scale to compete against spoken

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like a true banker, like a true banker opportunity. Absolutely,

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that it's it's going to

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>be inevitable, and probably sooner rather than later. Paul. Part

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of the question is going to be how many of

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 1>these companies can even really survive just in the last

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve to eighteen months, we've seen several companies go bankrupt.

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>DeFi Media is one good example, a company that had

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred million of dollars of revenue just year

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>before last major investment from UM, large complexes like Wellington

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>and shareholders like Viacom, lions Gate and zell Nick Media,

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and the company basically just went out of business in

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the last six months exited UM and And we've also

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>seen several other smaller companies that had strategic shareholders sell

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>for valuations far less than where they last raised capital.

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's inevitable that they have to consolidate. The question

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>is who can survive through that? So content is king,

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 1>but only if it's content on Apple, Amazon, or Google.

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that's a good point. It

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>is virtually impossible to build scale now in this market,

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>revenue scale with a real profit margin attached to it,

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and compete against the three or four behemoths. Interesting times

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it is I have to wonder it is. It is

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>fascinating because I have to wonder what the competition will

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 1>end up looking like, what conglomerate of some of these

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>online media sources will look like. Because they were successful.

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not. You know, it's been of throwing the baby

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>out with about bathwaters and I'll tell you and builds

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a long time new newspaper animals. I'll tell you where

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole is that the digital world has not filled,

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is local news. We've got national, global news,

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>but we have no local news and that is a problem.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And whoever can figure about that model, I think we'll

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>have a real opportunity. Bill Drewy, if you're listening, you

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>are listening. Paul is giving some We'll have to have

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you back and you'll have to weigh in on the

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>local news. Bill Drewery, founding partner of Pursuit Advisors in

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>New York, joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios.

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>The Fed is patient and investors you that is all

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>clear to dive back into risk, fueling one of the

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>best rallies on record for it certainly high old bonds

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to start the year. Joining us now is Tom Kennedy,

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>had a fixed income strategy at JP Morgan Private Bank,

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>which has assets of more than five hundred billion dollars.

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Tom worked at the New York Fed for nearly a decade.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Knows how the Fed thanks so Tom what does the

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>FED mean when they say they are going to be

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>patient with raising rates? Yeah, I think the I think

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the markets interpreting it the right way. Least they're giving

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the Feds giving us a runway for risk. We're are

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to ask ourselves how long is that runway?

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>But that word patient means something to them. They've only

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>used it in the fform C statement a handful of

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>times in history. That's parsing language. Oh yeah, but that's

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>what watchers do. But so, so, how long is this runway?

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>I think the runway is at least three months. I

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>think the Fed is promising us that for at least

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>three months, we're not going to do anything. I think

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that word patient actually does mean too, that they're going

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to expect to hike again. But they're gonna see how

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the world evolves over those coming three months to make

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a decision what their next move is. And I took

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>those words very carefully. I want to see how the

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>world evolves. I think Powell has been telling us data

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>dependence is the most important piece. Financial conditions and how

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>those evolves are just as important. Alright, So a three

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>month runway is relatively short runway from my perspective, So

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>do I take that three months to not get too

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>far in my skis, but maybe to maybe improve the

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>quality of my portfolio. Is that should be preparing for

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>or what's beyond that runway? Yeah? I think that's the

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>right question, and I think that the answer to that

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>question is different for everyone. If you have been um

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>insulating your portfolio for the last six state months, adding

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>things that should perform well in a down economy, then

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I think you should take advantage of this risk one

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>runway and add a little bit of of of beta

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>or risk back to a portfolio. However, if you have

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>not been insulating your portfolio, use some of this rally

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to do so. Is it too late to get the

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>upside of this rally? No? I don't think so. I

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>think you what you need to do is look for

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>things that have lagged year to date, and those those

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>are maybe trades that have liquidity dynamics that are not

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>especially attractive, like what what are you talking about? Um,

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we can find such things in high yield, we can

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>find things in the preferred space. Looking for things that

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>year to date have lagged the broader ind to see rallies.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're focusing right now because that's where we

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>should see price appreciation in this short quote unquote runway

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>for risk. Was there anything in the jobs report last

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Friday that calls you are more importantly, calls the Fed

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to maybe rethink their doublish view. I think they're They've

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>been telling us they're gonna follow inflation as closely as possible. UM.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>In there, there's nothing that jumped out to me, and

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation is going to run away from them. I think

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we're still seeing the steady gradual increases in inflation. UM.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Powell's focusing very much on what the inflation universe is

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>going to tell him to do. I don't think that's

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a myopic view of what the world will look

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>like for the Fed. The financial conditions component is going

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to be just as important to decide what is next

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>rate hike, which I believe versus a rate cut. Basically,

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>if the markets rallied too much and people get too

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>excited about risk, the Fed hikes and puts an end

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to the party here in the end, absolutely, I think

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:49.479
<v Speaker 1>that's right, all right. So given that dynamic, how important

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is liquidity at this point? Liquidity is um I think

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in the investment universe is often only thought of as cash.

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Cash provides you liquidity, but there is in the investment spectrum.

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>You can think of this as callously as on the

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>run or off the run bonds, things that are actively

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>traded or not. We're trying to find ways to actively

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>add liquidity beyond just cash, because if we think the

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>FED is closer to the end of the cycle and

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>cuts are coming, cash is going to be a quote

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>unquote underperformer. The return will go down. I want to

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>add liquidity so people have flexibility in a in a

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>down draft economy. So are you talking about e T

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>f s derivatives or just bonds that are traded very

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>frequently because of the e T rate? I mean we

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>can we can take this this conversation for an hour

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and talk about market structure of what liquidity really is.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>You can do that in single name bonds, you can

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 1>do that in in passive versus active investing strategies. Um,

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>the places where I think you're going to find the

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>most liquidity are in names that are actively traded by

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>primary dealers, and the passive investing universe is going to

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>see some mark to market moves that don't make a

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of economic sense to them because you're seeing force

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>selling and force buying in those products. Just in this

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit off the FED speak. You talk

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>about finding liquidity, that's a theme that LEAs and I've

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>been hearing about from you know a lot of market

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>participants saying it's hard to find liquidity in the marketplace.

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>How how did your clients trade, How did they feel

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the trading market is and how do you where do

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you tell them to go to find that liquidity and

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>yet still find some value that I think the reason

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>it's coming up so much now is because December was

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a really challenging time for liquidity. The inability to offload

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>risk in some instances and in some products, whether it

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>be a floating rate product or in the preferred space,

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it took days to offload risk. That is not a

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>normal dynamic that people have felt for the better part

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of ten years. So that's regulatory changes at practice. And

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>when I look at what does the liquidity world look

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>like today versus what it looked like ten years ago,

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's about ten percent as liquid because of

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the the amount of supply that primary deals are holding,

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's only going to really feel that pain in

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>times of stress. December was an event study for that

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>that will be looking at for a long time. So

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>just real quick here about thirty seconds. Clear Channels selling

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>bonds today with triple C ratings to more than two

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of bonds. Would you be a buyer? Um,

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not able to talk about listening those to our

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>clients whatsoever. Uh, triple ceas don't offer to me from

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a strategic perspective much value at this level. Intering you

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>bring up Clear Channel. I've very intimately involved with clear Channe.

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I was there during the founding of that company and

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 1>the growth of that company and when it was had

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a very good capital structure. Unfortunately leveraged buy out in

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the peak of the market in two thousand and six

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and just put a capital structure on there and that

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't stand so bankruptcy. And here we are trying

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to bonds two billion dollars debt. So Tom Kennedy, thanks

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so much. Tom Kennedy is ahead of fixed income strategy

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>at JP Morgan Private Banking. Having passed through all things FED.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>He spent ten years of the Fed, five years with

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the former Fed New York Fed chairman um Uh Bill dully.

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you me who just had a great article out

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>at least and I've been talking about. Thanks for listening

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abram Woyds. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Abram woits one. Before the podcast, you can always

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio