WEBVTT - How to Beat the Thought Police

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey wasn't gonna suff up all your mind.

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Julie Douglas. Julie,

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>do you ever find yourself like thinking thoughts in a

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in one circumstance or another, and you you kind of

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>have that paranoia where you you you hope that nobody

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>can read your thoughts. Wall, I mean there's a thought

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>bubble over my head at all times? Right, Well, no,

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but I was kind of under that assumption. Well, yeah,

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>if you if you read enough comics, I guess you'd

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>fall into the thing. But but there are times where

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you kind of feel like there's a thought bubble. And

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent, we all have tells, we all

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>have their various subtle and not so subtle cues regarding

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>what we're thinking about. Um. But but I have at

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>times found myself in situations where I like, I'll think

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of something and I'll be and I'll do like, oh,

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope nobody could hear hear my thoughts. Like in reaction,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I actually know exactly you're talking about it those intense

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>moments and you're thinking really really just very intensely about

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>something and it seems as though whatever is going on

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in your head is just booming out there. Yeah, and

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you look up and I know it's that brief moment

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>where you think, did they hear inside my head? Yeah?

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Or like sometimes like my brain anyway, I'll I'll find

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>myself in a situation and I'll think, what is the

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>worst possible thing I could think at this this moment,

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And then I'll think it, and that would be like, brain,

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? There could be people listening or

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>watching in or or reading you. So your concern is

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that it's not an although in the future we're talking

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>with twenty years, perhaps even those thoughts, those dark thoughts,

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>might be revealed. Yeah, exactly to everyone. Yeah, because the

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>thought police do not exist as a you know and

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in its sci fi sense yet, But the police, law

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>enforcement employers, um family members are of course there are

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>interested in what people are thinking. And we continue to

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>roll out scientific and pseudoscientific ways to uh to guess

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>at what is going on inside someone else's mind. Yeah,

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, the big mystery for all of us

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is whether or not someone is telling the truth or

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>telling a lie. And we want to scratch at that

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>as much as possible and genome Sciences and Policy. Laura

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Nita Farrene says that neuroscience is already influencing the courtroom,

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>at least with terminology. She had brought up some examples

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>at the World Science Festival in the panel on euro

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Science in Law that you attended Brains on Trial. That

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>one was hosted by Alan Alda, and it was it

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was quite excellent, And she says that people say things

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>like I didn't consciously choose to do the thing that

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm accused of. My brain made me do it. My

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>brain made me do it, or I have a predisposition

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to addiction and therefore when this occurred, it wasn't my brain,

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it was the brain of another person under different circumstances.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Is so we already see sort of the leaking of

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>neuroscience into the courtroom, into law. So now it's just

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a matter of looking at both the past and the

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>present future to try to figure out how all this

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to settle in what sort of technology is

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>going to shape it. Yeah, that you mentioned of the

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>whole my brain made me do it, or there's something

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in my in my brain that may be responsible for

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>this and I didn't have a say in it. It's

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting because that all gets into this whole the mind

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>body problem, the the idea that a brain is a

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>physical thing and a mind is a non physical thing.

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Our consciousness is a is a is a creation of mind,

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and our mind is a creation of brain. And uh,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and we find ourselves saying, hey, I'm a mind. Don't

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>don't try the mind based on what the brain is doing. Person,

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Keep the brain, not the mind. Like it gets quickly.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>It is complex as any pondering we may have about

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the nature of consciousness and then the nature of self. Yeah,

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of pointing of fingers because you could

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>even say, well wait, wait, wait, is the brain messing

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>up my mind my concept of reality? Yeah? Um yeah.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's why all this becomes incredibly interesting when you

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>start to look at fm r I technology, um and

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and some other technologies that we will discuss today. But

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to do that, we have to, of course

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.119
<v Speaker 1>travel back to the past, and actually not even the past,

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>because some of these things are already in use. Yeah. Now,

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of course we're talking about science. We're talking about science,

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>the use of science in investigations, in interviews and interrogations

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and in criminal investigations and in trials, and we've always

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>used science for these means. I mean it's uh, you

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>can find examples where we would use phrenology of the

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>measuring of skulls, you know, totally bogus, But for a

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>brief time, this seemed like a logical way to scientifically

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>study what would make one person a criminal and in

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>another person not UM fingerprinting. We did a whole episode

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>on this. If you want to really get into the

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>history of fingerprinting and that the the validity of fingerprinting

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to criminal investigation, do check that episode out, because,

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed there, a lot of the fingerprinting science

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't as as solid as we used to think it

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it is and UM and a lot of its power

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in the courtroom had to do with the fact that

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it was presented as powerful information. Yeah, it's just the

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>cell of it. Also, you've seen you know, truth terums

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>have had their day psychotherapy, UM polygraphs, which will discuss

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>here momentarily. And now we're increasingly in the age of

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>DNA evidence and UH, and certainly DNA events has done

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good. It is it has been able

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to to reverse decisions that were made based on faulty evidence.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.799
<v Speaker 1>In the past, we seen to be the the Innocence

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Project and uh, and then we're we're already in this

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>age and of neuroimaging in the courtroom in criminal investigations,

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 1>and we're only going to see more and more of

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it over the next ten years. I did want to

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>point out that truth Sorum is actually used in some

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world, and truth Sirum is part of

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>something called narco analysis, and this is administering psycho active

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>drugs for those interrogation purposes. Um. Most people are probably

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the term sodium pentathal and this is the

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote truth serum. However, it doesn't exactly extract truthful

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>statements from people. In fact, there's this idea that it

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>might make people talk, but people are still really responsive

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to suggestions, so they're still going to tell you, um,

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>what they think that you're trying to chease out of them,

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>or they're still conscious that they're expected to deliver something

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to someone. Yeah, I mean, in that regard, it's not

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>much different from torture. The idea that if you inflict

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>physical pain on somebody, they will tell you anything you

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>want to hear to make the pain stop. And therefore

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a largely unreliable form of interrogation. And

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem that we're going to discuss two with

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>all these different technologies is that at some point there

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is a margin of error and there's a problem here

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>interpreting the results. And so polygraphs are a great example

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of this. Yeah, let's let's get into into polygraphs. Now, polygraphs,

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of course the lie detection tests. Most people are familiar

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>with this from TV, where it has been just used

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to death and every television show imaginable um. And even

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>when it's used in a more realistic fashion, we still

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>are bringing in all these preconceived notions about what it

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>consists of and how reliable it may or may not be.

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So a polygraph is essentially a seismograph for the nervous

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>system and measures of physiological responses such as heart rate,

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>blood pressure, sweatiness, um, breathing. Uh So, when you're anxious,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you're angry, you're in pain, you're emotionally aroused, these measures

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>spike automatically. Generally it's four to six censers. They're attached

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to the body um and uh. And again it's breathing rate, pulse,

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>blood pressure, perspiration, and sometimes they'll also record things like

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>arm and the leg movements. And this is being used

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in the CIA as well as n s A, so

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there various agencies that actually used this. The problem with

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the polygraph is that you can actually beat it. And

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>if you can train yourself to think in a certain

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>manner or to do a couple of tricks, it's not

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a problem actually to pass one of these. So if

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they're testing you with this polygraph device, uh, they of

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>course need to have a baseline reading. They need to

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>ask you stuff like, hey, is your name Julie Douglas

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and you say yes, and they see what that reading is.

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>They say are you wearing a striped shirt today? And

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you say yes, yes, And then they say are you

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the Queen of Mars And you would say no, thanks

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>lgar yes, So whichever the case may be, um and

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and this would tell let them know, okay, these are

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>what our readings are when she is not lying to us.

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And then they would also ask you, you know, they

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>would ask you some things too that you're expected to lie,

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like have you ever killed a bug? Well? I don't

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>know that's not a good one. Well, have you ever stolen?

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Have your money stolen money? Yes? Have you ever lied

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to your parents? No? No? So they yeah, they begin

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to these universal questions that they know eventually you'll lie

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>on just to get again that baseline of what is

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a lilakla? What does all I look like with this person?

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>What does the truth look like with this person? And

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>now let's ask him the stuff we want to know.

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen the inside of the house? Stuff

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>work safe, you know, things like that, and and see

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that would be something yeah, they would test for and

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>they would compare that reading to these other baseline readings. Yeah,

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 1>so what's cool about that line baseline is that is

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the one that you can gain so that it scrambles

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>everything else. Right now, technically it is possible for someone

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to to simply not have a strong physical response to line.

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>People have been light detection tests before with this kind

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of effect, but it's it's more difficult. This is the

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing you would expect Hannibal Elector to do,

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, more advanced control or or or lack of

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>physical involvement with like it's coming out of your mouth.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, the baseline is is an much easier

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>thing to screw up. And that's where say the thumb

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tac method comes into place. So you would put a

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>thumb tack in your shoe and then when or asked

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>one of these baseline questions, you jab that sucker into

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>your toe, which causes some distress, and then it messes

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>up their baseline. It looks like you're getting this high

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>reading for something that is a known truth or aknown lie. Okay,

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>so the first time you lie, you you just name

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>yourself so that your physiological response is just so active

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that it just that seismograph goes nuts. So the next

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>time that you lie, yeah, it's not gonna be there

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is strong. They're like, oh, well that they that didn't

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>mess them up at all. It'll just look at the readings.

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Now that one of the problems with with this method

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is that some polygraph tests will testers will make you

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>take your shoes off. So uh, it's it's become that

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>common of of of a method. But who's to say

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't bite your tongue exactly. So there are other

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>means of causing yourself a little bit of physical discomfort

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>um to to allow you to mess with those baselines. Um. Now,

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>there are other bits of folklore that are out there.

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>For instance, some people say that you can take certain drugs,

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you can rub any perst print on your fingertips, or

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you can use hypnosis. You can are just wiggling your

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>toes or flexing your arms, coughing. But these these cannot

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>not to work that well. Oh, I see, So the

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>anti perseprint is so that it reduced the galvanic response,

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that sweating response. Right. Yeah, But but what I've been

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>reading is that that really doesn't help you any and

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that's just only one of the things that it's testing

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>for anyway, So you still can't help it if your

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>heart goes nets. Another thing that I have read is that, um,

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>just it's a mind over matter issue, and that if

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you can try to um I think really warm and

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>cozy thoughts, calming thoughts while you're lying, is that you

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>may still get a little bit of a you know,

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>some action on that seismograph, but it may not be

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>nearly as pronounced if you weren't trying to essentially meditate

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>during this process. Yes, so it's still used in a

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>number of agencies. It's used by by employers, but in

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>most states you don't actually see it in courts anymore

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't pass scientific standards of admission in the courtroom.

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at a particular website anti polygraph dot org,

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>which is which is generally aimed at its use by

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>employers and by by these agencies, and they point out

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a number of interesting things about polygraph tests about how

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>so much of it isn't even about the looking at

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>readings and comparing them, comparing these baseline results to the

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>results of these questions there, but they're bringing in all

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the other aspects of interrogation. So for instance, they're looking

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>for things like, oh, did the did the individuals show

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>up late? Do they seem hesitant? What does their voice

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>sound like when they answer no to this question or

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>answer yes to this one? So, and then they're also

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to get subtle admissions out of out of the

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>subject as well during the course of the test. So

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in a in a sense, it's still a straight up interrogation,

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like a straight up police uh you know, bright light

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in the eyes kind of a thing, except they have

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this uh, this pseudo scientific method on the table that's

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>legitimizing and all. Okay, So the readings that they're taking.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a bit of a sham, right, The whole thing

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is a sham. The idea is that it's a psychological

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>tool that they can use on their employees. So if

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that employee knows although I might get tested this month,

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>then maybe he or she is going to mind their

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 1>p's and ques a bit more. That's the idea by

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the agents that that's that's what detractors argue, and that's

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly what antipolographed or argue. So they have a lot

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of materials on the website, including a more detailed information

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>about how it works and how to beat it and

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>when when I and I say how to beat it again,

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>not just talking about the physical test, but the the

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the overall testing environment that is used by various agents.

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Uh, interesting stuff to check out. Let's take

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a quick break, and when we get back, we are

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about the role of f M R

0:13:49.160 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I and lie detection. All Right, we're back, and we've

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>been talking about the thought police. We've been talking about

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>methods of telling whether a person is lying or telling

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the truth. Uh, and when. Just as an aside, one

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>individual who famously passed the polygraph test, Gary Ridgeway, the

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Green River Killer. And of course, now we were in

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>the age of the of m R I S and

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>f m RI I S talking about magnetic residence imaging

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and functional magnetic residence imaging. Now we've just we've talked

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>about f m R S a lot on this show

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>because anytime we're talking about the brain and current brain research,

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we're we're interested in knowing what's going on inside the mind,

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what parts of the brain are being used to process

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>various things. UH and fm RI I. UH measures brain

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>activity by detecting the changes in blood oxidation and flow

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that occurs in response to neural activity. So when a

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>brain area is more active, it consumes more oxygen and

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to meet this increased demand, blood flow increases to the

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>active area. And the difference between an m R I

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and f m r I m R I is a

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>snapshot of the brain. F m r I is more

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of a moving p sure of the brain, so you

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>can see where things are flowing and how the activity

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is occurring. Yeah, m R I is more revealing of

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>anatomy as opposed to brain activity with f m R I.

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>So it turns out, of course, fm r I is

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>really really helpful in trying to pinpoint the parts of

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the brain that are processing information. So if you're looking

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>at a picture, you know that your visual cortex is

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>going to light up. Um, you know that if you're

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to make a judgment call about something that you're

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing or listening to, then you know that your prefrontal

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>cortex is going to be very busy trying to weigh

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>its options and its judgments. Now, not everything, of course,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is that um stupid simple if you will, Because because

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed before a lot of times, it's a it's

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of a puzzle figuring out. We'll have multiple parts

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of the brain that are involved in a particular task,

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and then you have to sort of piece together what

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that means. It's it's not always a situation where it's

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>like you can you can't look at an fMRI I

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>result and be like, oh, well, the part of his brain,

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the brain associated with lying to your grandma

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>about a cookie jar is lighting up. So we know

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>what it actually occurred. But we do know that a

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of our memory has to do with UH spatial

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>elements dimensions, and so if someone committed a murder inside

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of a home and UH you were to put say

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>some photos in front of this person of this house,

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and you could see that their brain was going a

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit crazy to hit the campus and showing that

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it recognized this room. It already had this blueprint inside

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of this person's brain. Then you could begin to make

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the case that there are some unique identifiers of certain

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>criminal situations that you could mark against an fm R

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I scan of the brain. Right and and likewise, in

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the same way you could show evidence pictures, you could

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>also show pictures of suspects faces if you were, say, um,

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>if someone thought that you might have been an accomplished

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to a crime, if someone thought you might have, say,

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>driven the car that a bank robber used, and then

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you were shown four different faces of four different bank

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of suspected bank robbers, and then you can measure their

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.120
<v Speaker 1>response to that, is there some sort of a familiarity

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's popping up here? Um. And then also

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>apparently there are three parts of the brain that work

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>harder during a lie. And that's according to the Steve

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Laken of a Cephos Corp. Which is a company that's

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>very involved in the development and then the use of

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>f m R I lie detection and so the idea

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>here is that you put somebody in an f M

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>R I and then you give them basic guess and

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>no questions based on whatever you're you're quizzing them about

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and you can put all that info through

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>an algorithm and determine what is actually going on in

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>their mind. At the World Science Festival, Alan Alda aired

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a video from an upcoming PPS

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>documentary that he's done about neuroscience and law, in which

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>he goes into this machine, uh and into Steva Lincoln's machine,

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're trying to figure out whether he took a

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>ring or a or a wrist watch out of a

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>drawer prior to the experiment. Because he's a big cleft

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>o Allan all the well, well he was he was

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.719
<v Speaker 1>asked to steal one or the other um and he

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and he says he was very tempted to steal them

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>both to screw with their results. But but he he

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>went with the ring and they were able to determine, uh,

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, not looking in his pockets, but but quizzing

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>him basically during the whole the Hobbit and Gollum thing,

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's in your pockets? Is I guess and uh,

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and in the machine was able to determine he's definitely

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely has the ring in his pocket because he responded

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>this way to questions about the ring and or pictures

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>about the ring. Okay, so there are a couple of

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>problems though with fm R I right, And one is that, uh,

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the problem is our brains in our memory. Recall we've

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about this a thousand times that memory is fallible,

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that when you take a memory out you can sometimes

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>change it, or you have false memories of things. Yeah. There,

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we discussed seven key ways that

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>memories can be made false and uh. And so even

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're even if you're just going into a room,

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've in case efter case of people who

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>who either by their own fault, by their own formation

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of a faulty memory, or by um, you know, slight

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>coercion on the part of the police investigators, end up

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>making a false I D in the lineup, you know,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you end up seeing a face and you're like, that's

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the one. Or in that one case we were

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about where an assault occurred while the TV was

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>playing and the victim ended up identifying the individual on

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the television as the individual in her apartment assaulting her,

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>right because she happened to be staring at that person

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>while something traumatic was happening to her, and that was

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>coded as the face who was perpetrating this act against her. Yeah,

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I mean that the memory is just it's

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 1>a very dicey thing. And yes, as you, as you

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>had pointed out, eye witnesses are notoriously bad at I

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.719
<v Speaker 1>being the right person. So if you see an image

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>in your an fm R I and you see an

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>image of a person and you think it looks like

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>that could be a familiar person or someone you know,

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>then it may not be. It may just be someone

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>who resembles another person right now. So so there's that

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>whole the whole issue of memory itself has to be

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>taken into account. Yeah, you can't tease out is this

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a false memory or a true memory? Now. Now, there

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>have been a lot of tests though with the f

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>R Allie detection somewhere the neighborhood of forty different ones

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>with subjects given stimuli and they're questioned about about the

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>something that that maybe a truth or maybe a falsehood,

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh, supposedly the results are anywhere been nine effective.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But but then you get into into this weird area

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>what is it actually detecting. Is it really detecting a lie,

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>or is it detecting emotional importance UM or or some

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>of their kind of you know, mental process about the

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>stimuli for instance, the ring um all that ends up

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>going with this ring and present I believe they were

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>both his optics. So so it's like a wristwatch and

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>his wedding ring. So the wedding ring has a lot

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of value to him. It's it's, you know, like anybody's

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>wedding ring. There are a lot of ideas wrapped up

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>into that object. And so uh, to what extent of

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the fireworks in his head that the fMRI I detects,

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to what extent of those more um tied into the

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>meaning of the object than to whether he stole it.

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So you've got memory, you have a motion to deal with.

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And Uh. The other part of f m R I

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>and it being not so full proof is that you

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>can game it much like you would polygraph. Yes. In fact,

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>on the panel we we were we were talking about

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>earlier um Nito of Fara honey actually UH was was

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>given this slide detection test and was told come up

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>with ways to beat it, and she actually got got

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty good at it pretty fast, and she had she

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of different ways that she was that

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>she recommends beating an fMRI I lie detection test. Uh.

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So she's so, for instance, you're shown a picture of

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>familiar faces to see if you know who the bank

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>robber is, for instance, do you recognize this face? And

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>she said that she could instead of focusing on the face,

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>focus on a detail of the picture. You know. It's

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, um, we've talked about before, if you

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>stare something long enough, it starts looking weird. So so

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>she would look at dots, you know, and she would

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>just sort of zone out on those dots and say say, no,

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't recognize this at all. She's being asked about

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the face, but she's looking and thinking about just a

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>collection of dots that looked totally new to her, indifferent

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and she's able to fool it that way. And then

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>she recommends you could you could probably do the same

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>thing by sort of blinking out your mind and trying

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to think about nothing. All U Ghostbusters where they're told

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to that whatever their next sigh is will be the

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>form of the destroyer, and then dan Ackroyd's character accidentally

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>as this childhood memory of the state Puff marshmallow Man

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>um or you could basically take the take the route

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of just thinking of the state Puff Puff marshmallow Man.

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>If they're saying, you know, here's a question about this

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>crime or or where you were when this crime occurred,

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and you just fill your thought with marshmallow Man and

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.239
<v Speaker 1>you may pass well. And she also says that you

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 1>have to will your self again to see this in

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a fresh new way and to think to yourself, wow,

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 1>that's amazing. I've never seen that before. That array of

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>dots fascinating, completely new to me. And yeah, she did that,

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and she was able to beat the machine. And of course,

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>one more thing to mention on f m r I

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>s is that currently it would be exceedingly different to

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>get difficult to give somebody an f m R I

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>against their will, because there's a certain you have to

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>be still, you have to cooperate and and and therefore,

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in its current form, it's not going to be one

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of these situations where someone's brought in and chains and said,

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're scanning that brain of years However, if

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you were trying to prove your innocence, then you could

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>spit yourself or if you're going to try if you

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>were guilty and you were going to try to game

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the machine, you could certainly submit yourself. Yeah, and uh

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>and you know the experts that on this panel, including

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>fair Honey and also Anthony do you the Wagner psychologist

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and neuroscientists than they said, you know, the next two years,

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna see more and more on this. We're

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna see uh C F M R eyes used in

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>or attempted to be used to clear people of crimes

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>or to or to you know, see about tough persecution.

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And there was a judge on that panel too, and

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they talked a lot about how judges are trying to

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>get up to speed with neuroscience because they realized that

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>this is seeping into the courtroom and they need to yeah,

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, fluent in the technology and to understand and

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>began to actually sort of craft some of some the

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>laws around that actually, and also the importance they also

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>mentioned of manature juries are are educated about it because

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned the fingerprinting thing, but before about how juries

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>could be won over just by a fancy presentation where

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, that has a chart that is a

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>picture of a fingerprint and all the swirls. It looks

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>very impressive. You're making an impressive looking case, so I'm

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy it. Likewise, you don't want a jury that

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>just because they're rolling out a bunch of neuroscience at

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you and just you know, hitting you over the head

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>with it. You're thinking they have the science on their side,

0:24:58.119 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so I guess they're right. Well, and then you also

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>have of the instance of when DNA was introduced to courtrooms,

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and that was very difficult at first because people didn't

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have a shorthand way to discuss how to determine d

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>N A if. Now we take it for granted because

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we have a baseline understanding of it, but back then

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that was sort of crazy pants to be like, hey,

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to match these things off these markers

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and the following ways, and it was sort of scrambling

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>people's brains. Right, So that's the f m R I.

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>That's one way that we have it, looking in at

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the brain and seeing what's happening. But then there's some

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>other interesting areas as well that the use of using

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>this kind of mind scanning technology to see what we're thinking,

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to to peek inside those little mental movies that we create,

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>be they memories or fabricated uh fantasies or or or

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>things that we would like to do, and actually taking

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>them out of the brain and putting them on on

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a TV screen for the judge and jury to look at,

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>printing them out and distributing them to the jury. Right. Yeah, Now,

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>this is something we've we've talked about this before. I

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>think maybe we did it in our wrap up of

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Big Science for um where and it made a lot

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of press. And this is the This

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>was a particularly a University of California, Berkeley experiment where

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>researchers a fed a computer with eighteen million one second

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube clips that the participants in the study of the

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>human participants had never seen, and then they asked the

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>computer to predict what brain activity each of those clips

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>would evoke. Then they asked it to reconstruct the movie

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.239
<v Speaker 1>clips using the best matches it could find based on

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this this enormous volume of YouTube data that it had.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>You know what I like it that this study is

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that the it was the co authors who actually volunteered

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>to be scanned, because it took hours and hours of

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>them looking at this one point, looking at movie clips

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>while their brains were being scanned. And if I understand

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>this correctly, the machine was then fed those YouTube clips

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>so that it could create a separate database to then

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 1>compare the images of the movie clips that the volunteers saw, right,

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is where the images were reconstructed. Yes, it's

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of basically the idea is attempting to view these

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube clips through the human mind alone, based on based

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>on the scans, and uh, the the results were were

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>blurry but astonishing. For instance, I have a human figure

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>appeared in the original clip, then a human form would

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>generally show you. It's not like you'd see the face

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>or anything, but you would see a general representation of

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a human kind of shadowy looking, yeah, and just very

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>low resolution looking stuff. Yeah. Now, what was really cool

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is that one of the clips showed elephants walking right

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to left. And since there weren't elephants in the YouTube

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>clips that formed the computer's um you know, visual information,

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it had no idea what to represent. It is just

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>like a blurry, dark form, so it did not have

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it in its World Brain Dictionary. So you would have

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to you would have to establish a pretty rich show

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>world brain Dictionary for this kind of technology for it

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to really be able to to take those images out

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of the mind and put them on the screen. But

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I think what is so fascinating about this and and

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>has such far reaching implications, is that all it was

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>just eighteen million YouTube clips fed into this machine. If

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you were too and presumably they're doing this building up

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that database, then they could get a pretty rich world

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Brain Dictionary going. If they were able to make this

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>technology mobile. See where I'm going with this, then you could,

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>unbeknownst to someone I'm talking future talk, uh, you know,

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>beam a light at this person into their their visual cortex,

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>get a reflection back and start to read off what

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this person is thinking of or dreaming of. Well, what

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>one thought that comes to mind here is that would

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it mean that criminals would have to make sure that

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they perpetrated their acts with as many elements outside of

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the World Brain Dictionary as possible? Would we see like

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the Rise of U and I think Gret Morrison used

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this in Doom Patrol a little bit um like DODA

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>criminals where they would have to use like absurdist costumes

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and tactics, so that nothing that you saw would match up.

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Nothing that was that that was maybe the basic aspects

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of the crime would match up, because stealing money, stealing money,

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.239
<v Speaker 1>or you know, or or murder is murder. But if

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>enough of the elements were absurd and didn't match up

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>with the World Brain Dictionary, then that would perhaps flaw

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the visions of it that we could get out of

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the human mind with this machine. That's intriguing because what

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what you're saying is that you would train

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>your brain to begin to We know, the brain can

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>bifurcate itself anyway, right, it can sort of split its tasks.

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>So and we've seen this with with ventrilo quests. So

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>if someone was committing a crime, they would begin to

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>think of their gun as a marshmallow, refer to it,

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>see it as a marshmallow, and therefore disassociate gun with

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the crime and associate marshmallow with and that would be

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like quantum code. It's key code, not quantum,

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>but that would be it's key code, right, and you

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>would have to know the key code. But you this

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>person who is putting someone through the fm R I

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>scanner or this machine uh that that's whetted with the

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>World Brain Dictionary, wouldn't know that you didn't have the key.

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible? I don't know, surely. Yeah. Now another

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that that that you have to take into account here,

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is something that that Anthony Wagner pointed out

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in the World Science Festival talk, is that another potential

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>issue is how close imagination is to experience. Imagination, as

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed in previous episodes, very close to the real

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>experience as a mental event. There is some distinction in

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>scans between memories of experience and pure imagination, but they're

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>very similar, very similar brain activity. So you might find

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>yourself in a situation where you're using some of this

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>technology we're talking about to scan the brain and see

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>what your reactions are or see what your what kind

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of mental images mental movies are playing in your head.

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>But then you have to ask yourself, is this a

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>mental image? Is this is this person remembering a murder

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they committed. Are they thinking about a murder that they

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>fantasized about committing that they that they they thinking about

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a murder they saw on TV? Are they thinking about

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a murder that they read about in the newspaper and

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>just via pure old fashioned human empathy, couldn't help but

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>imagine themselves in that murderer shoes. You know. Well, you

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>know what's interesting about that is that there's, um, there's

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that case of I believe it was a police officer

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>who was in a bunch of chat rooms, um concerning

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>basically eating another human. Do you remember this the cannibal cop. Yeah. Yeah,

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>he actually never killed anybody or ate them as far

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>as we know. Um, But there was this whole debate about, well,

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>if this person actually sort of going to lunch, having

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>these lunch dates with potential victims, and if he left

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this trail behind him, this this memory trace essentially this

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>even if it was just his imagination for his fantasy,

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is he capable of doing it? Capable of stepping over

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that threshold? So in a way, it's the same sort

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of thing. I mean, how do you how do you

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>determine whether or not someone actually did the deed or

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>was about to do the deed. Yeah, when we get

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>into the whole area of the thought crime, is it

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is it because like, for instance, take take murder. Okay,

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>so murder, so like There's a huge difference between me, say,

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 1>hearing a story about a husband murdering his wife and

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>then thinking of that and being like, oh, my god,

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>would that be horrible if I did that, that would

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>be the worst, and then I but I imagine myself

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>doing it in some more circumstances. Maybe a huge difference

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>between that and fantasizing about killing my wife. You know,

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you know is this is an interesting conversation because I

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>tried to explain to my mom once that, um, growing up,

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I used to have these awful thoughts and what I

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>did not realize when I was too young to realize

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that I was just trying to uh, embodying someone else's

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>mind and imagine what something might be like and just

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of take that thought experiment to its degree, to

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>just to see what it felt like to be in

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>those in that person's shoes. And it used to disturb

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>me because I thought that I was a dark person,

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>not realizing that's part of the creative process or the imagination,

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's, you know, part in person why I am

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>interested in writing room. I'm a writer because I like

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to put myself into those other situations. So you bring

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>up a really good point you know, just just occupying

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that that frame of mind, I mean that you're culpable. Yeah,

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you end up. Yeah, you have to worry about where

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>about actors? You have to worry about about writers? And

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>then to what extent could you actually plan to murder

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody and carry out a murder by masking it with

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>all of this art, Like say, what if you just

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>simply wrote the short story first and then committed the crime,

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>or you you acted in the one act play, or

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>what if you made sure that the murder perfectly mirrored

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a murder that occurs in Shakespeare, Because

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>then it's kind of twofold, because you can say, oh,

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of course I have that murder in my mind because

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I saw it on stage like eight times. Or and

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>also that would have that would prevent them from One

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of the things we've talked about here is say like

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>showing them the image of a ring and seeing it

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>lights up. Inevitably with any kind of homicide investigation or

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of an investigation, they're gonna be you want to

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>keep the details out of the press because you want

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>new information you can so you can surprise um suspects

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>with and be like, do you recognize this watch. Do

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you recognize this footprint? Um? So, and certainly do you

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>recognize this murder weapon. But if the murder weapon is

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is something iconic, like I said, to what, to whatever

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 1>degree the crime matches up with something publicly known, uh,

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>then there's less stuff that you could shock them with

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and and anything you show them with. Or of course

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm familiar with that murder weapon because that is the

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>murder weapon that was used in this movie. You know

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. Yeah, So, I mean it is

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting if I were a defense attorney out with probably

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.399
<v Speaker 1>take the tact of saying, we are human beings. We

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>have theory of mind, um, and this is what allows

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>us to imagine ourselves in other situations. And therefore my

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>client is you know, just putting her himself into this situation.

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Or what if you were to say, imagine yourself in

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>my clients um shoes, and then everyone does, and then

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:23.919
<v Speaker 1>you would just arrest them all because there's ultimated thought

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>crimes now all right? So, um, you know, on the

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on the panel about neuroscience and law, they did bring

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 1>up the Fourth Amendment guarding against unreasonable searches and seizures,

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and so you know they're extrapolating this to fm R

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I scans because in a sense you are invading someone's privacy.

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 1>So then of course it does bring up this whole

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:52.280
<v Speaker 1>raft of of topics like what is privacy? To what extent?

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Do we have access to privacy anymore when you live

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 1>within society? Right? And this is especially a big topic

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's all over the wondering about N S

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 1>A and our and are the contents of our our

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>emails and our our our phone calls, etcetera. But yeah,

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Farahani brought up some interesting points. She said that there

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>is nothing clear cut that would that could protect us

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>against this sort of thing if we were a legitimate

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 1>suspect in a crime. She says that all warrant is

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is a right to the search. Now do we need

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>what we need new language added to our to our warrants?

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You know? Perhaps, But she says, right now, the Fourth

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Amendment protects us against unreasonable searches and seizures based on

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>how physically invasive the search. It protects against physical body

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and space intrugience, but not intrusions into your secret. So

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>she said, think of a diary, all right, the all

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the all that the Fourth Amendment protects is the door

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that stands between the investigators and the diary, not the

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>contents of the diary itself. And an f m R

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I is minimally invasive in the physical sense, though it's

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, uh potentially very penetrating in the larger sense.

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So to make parallel to the Fourth Amendment, than in

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>order to access the door, then you would have to

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 1>be served the search warrant so that you would be

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>able to at least I suppose prepare yourself. Yeah, I guess.

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's we're entering entering a new age here.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 1>We have new new issues that are coming up. Uh

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and certainly we're gonna have to change the

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 1>language of warrants and language of laws and the language

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of rights. Interesting territory. All right, Well, on on on

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.879
<v Speaker 1>that thought, let's let's call over the robot and see

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>if we have any listener. Man. All right, So we

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:41.760
<v Speaker 1>recently did an episode on sensory deprivation uh tanks isolation chambers.

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.359
<v Speaker 1>So we did two episodes on them, actually, and we said, hey,

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we know that some of our listeners have entered the

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>wounded tune wet box as well, So let's find out

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>what they had to say about it. Um, here's one

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 1>from Taylor Taylor wrights In and says, Hi, Robert and Julie.

0:37:57.880 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>My mind was blown by the fact that Robert did

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 1>not mention the movie Altered States during your podcast on

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Century Deprivation Chamber. He is usually very eager to mention

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>when your topics are featured in books or films, but

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 1>he never mentioned it. It's a great movie starring William

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Hurt and has everything to do with what you are

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about, Robert, I view, I haven't seen it. I

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>think you'd really dig it. It's about a scientist who

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>gets carried away with his own research into SDCS and

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>pul cybin. The movie gets very strange and far out

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>with what happens to him. Just watch Annual see Uh. Indeed,

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I've I've been familiar with Altered States for a long time,

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>but have never actually watched. I thought I would find

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>time when we were researching these, but the two hours

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 1>did not present itself. And you know, um, we actually

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>discussed it. Uh. In are sort of like, hey, let's

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>do this topic. Oh yeah, yeah, They're like, oh we

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>should do this, there's Altered States. But yeah, William hurt

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:50.240
<v Speaker 1>um and brain scans actually would corroborate this. Yeah. Cool,

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll pull out the brain scans later undatory here yeah,

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and here's another one on the censory deprivation chambers from Lisa.

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Lisa writes in and says, Hi, Julie Robert, I was

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so surprised to hear your podcast on sensory deprivation chambers,

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>literally a few days after I tried it for the

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>first time myself. My first float was on. It was

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 1>last Sunday, June ninth, and I'm going back for repeat

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>experiences coming Sunday. Um. A new facility for this called

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 1>float House opened up in Vancouver a month ago, and

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I was both excited and a little scared to try

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it out. I was excited because I've been practicing meditation

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:23.800
<v Speaker 1>for a little while now, and I've heard that floating

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is a way to deepen the meditative experience. I was

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a little scared because the whole thing seems a little weird,

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>with reports of hallucinary experiences. I wasn't quite sure what

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 1>to expect. The facility itself was very clean and spot like.

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Each tank was in a private room with a shower, towels, robes, slippers,

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>shampoo and conditioners, etcetera. Were all provided. While I did

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>not experience any hallucinations or anything I would call transcendental,

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I did really enjoy the experience. It was extremely relaxing

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to lie in the warm water and meditate for ninety minutes.

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I was a bit worried that the time would be

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>too long, but it was just right. I could have

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>stayed in there longer. Actually, it was a challenge not

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to fall off to sleep, as I was so comfortable.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>When I got out, all the muscular aches and pains

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in my shoulder and back had melted away. I can't

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>wait to float again this coming Sunday. I hope you

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>both enjoy your upcoming floats. Lisa, Vancouver, all right, very cool.

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, you know we have more mail on

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this topic that we will get to in the future episodes,

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>but we thank everybody for writing in about them and

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>continued right in with your experience with with any topic

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about. For instance, if you have something

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you would like to share about the science of lie detection.

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever taken up or administered a polygraph test?

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:34.919
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear about that, and certainly if you've

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>if you've undergone FM or I or any of the

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>anything of this nature, we'd love to hear about that

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. And what are your thoughts about the future

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.479
<v Speaker 1>of the thought police? Are you a little paranoid about

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 1>all this so you feel okay with it? How? What

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:49.359
<v Speaker 1>do you think the world will be like in ten

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty years regarding our ability to peer inside a

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 1>human mind and our legal authority to do so. You

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>can find us a various places to interact with us

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on these topics. Uh Whorse. The Mothership is Stuff to

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind dot com, but we're also on Tumbler,

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 1>We are on Facebook Stuff to Blow your Mind on

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>both of those, and our Twitter handle is below the Mind.

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>You can also check out our YouTube channel, stuff to

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind and make sure to drop us a

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>line at below the Mind at Discovery dot com for

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics. Is it

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works dot com