WEBVTT - Feeling A Bit Attacked with Maria Konnikova

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.396
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Hey Revisions History listeners, Malcolm here. Before we get started,

0:00:22.556 --> 0:00:25.196
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to update you on a few things. First thing,

0:00:25.796 --> 0:00:31.236
<v Speaker 1>this August twenty fourth, the Revisionist History season begins in earnest,

0:00:31.836 --> 0:00:35.356
<v Speaker 1>eight old school episodes in a row, the little narrative

0:00:35.476 --> 0:00:39.116
<v Speaker 1>jewel boxes you've come to love. We've been feeding you

0:00:39.196 --> 0:00:41.596
<v Speaker 1>a little bits and pieces so far this season, but

0:00:41.756 --> 0:00:44.556
<v Speaker 1>this is the main event. The heart of it is

0:00:44.556 --> 0:00:46.996
<v Speaker 1>a six part series on guns and violence that I

0:00:47.036 --> 0:00:52.076
<v Speaker 1>think is my favorite thing we've ever done. Weird, moving, funny, heartbreaking.

0:00:52.556 --> 0:00:56.236
<v Speaker 1>So mark your calendar's August twenty fourth is when it

0:00:56.276 --> 0:00:58.836
<v Speaker 1>all happens. And by the way, if you want to

0:00:58.876 --> 0:01:01.716
<v Speaker 1>get that whole mini series early and binge it all

0:01:01.756 --> 0:01:04.796
<v Speaker 1>at once without ads, you can just by becoming a

0:01:04.836 --> 0:01:08.596
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Plus subscriber. In fact, just six ninety nine a

0:01:08.636 --> 0:01:11.676
<v Speaker 1>month or thirty nine ninety nine a year gets you

0:01:11.956 --> 0:01:15.756
<v Speaker 1>every one of the Pushkin shows early and ad free.

0:01:16.236 --> 0:01:19.156
<v Speaker 1>Just go to the Revisionist History showpage in Apple Podcasts

0:01:19.556 --> 0:01:24.316
<v Speaker 1>or Pushkin dot fm, slash plus to sign up. And

0:01:24.356 --> 0:01:27.276
<v Speaker 1>one laice thing. Speaking of things you should binge, the

0:01:27.356 --> 0:01:31.956
<v Speaker 1>latest season of our true crime masterpiece Lost Hills has dropped.

0:01:32.116 --> 0:01:35.316
<v Speaker 1>The new season explores a legacy of Malibu's dark prints

0:01:35.716 --> 0:01:39.516
<v Speaker 1>Mickey Dora. Mickey was a surfer known for his style, grace,

0:01:39.556 --> 0:01:42.916
<v Speaker 1>and aggression who ruled the Malibu Beaches from the nineteen

0:01:42.956 --> 0:01:47.276
<v Speaker 1>fifties to the nineteen seventies. Celebrated for his rebellious spirit,

0:01:47.596 --> 0:01:50.156
<v Speaker 1>he was also a con man who led the FBI

0:01:50.196 --> 0:01:52.996
<v Speaker 1>on a seven year man hunt around the world. Believe me,

0:01:53.316 --> 0:01:55.836
<v Speaker 1>this is a show worth a listen, so sign up

0:01:55.876 --> 0:02:02.036
<v Speaker 1>for Pushkin Plus and you can binge this one too. Hello,

0:02:02.036 --> 0:02:05.636
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, Malcolm Babble here. I'm here in the studio

0:02:05.916 --> 0:02:10.996
<v Speaker 1>with Marya Konikova, the revisionist history ombusman who's come by

0:02:11.396 --> 0:02:15.556
<v Speaker 1>for the second time to do a little bit of

0:02:15.996 --> 0:02:19.556
<v Speaker 1>correction and instruction and tell me what's gone right and

0:02:19.636 --> 0:02:22.116
<v Speaker 1>wrong in her own mind with our season so far.

0:02:22.276 --> 0:02:23.236
<v Speaker 1>Were you welcome?

0:02:23.556 --> 0:02:25.996
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for having me, Malcolm. It is always

0:02:26.036 --> 0:02:28.516
<v Speaker 2>a pleasure, although I have to say that in your

0:02:28.596 --> 0:02:32.356
<v Speaker 2>last few episodes, I have felt a little bit personally

0:02:32.476 --> 0:02:35.956
<v Speaker 2>under attack. I mean, we had the Monk Debates, which

0:02:36.996 --> 0:02:40.196
<v Speaker 2>was an absolutely fascinating episode to me, and I'll say

0:02:40.196 --> 0:02:42.196
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about it in a second, but I

0:02:42.236 --> 0:02:43.756
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you know that. I used to be

0:02:43.796 --> 0:02:47.676
<v Speaker 2>a debater, and I debated for multiple years at a

0:02:47.716 --> 0:02:49.196
<v Speaker 2>pretty high level in high school.

0:02:49.196 --> 0:02:53.396
<v Speaker 1>In high school, yes, and wait and were you successful?

0:02:53.916 --> 0:02:57.196
<v Speaker 2>I was successful? But then I stopped debating, so I

0:02:57.236 --> 0:03:00.356
<v Speaker 2>did not debate in college, and I stopped debating at

0:03:00.356 --> 0:03:02.436
<v Speaker 2>the point where you would have gone to like nationals

0:03:02.596 --> 0:03:05.236
<v Speaker 2>and like really had to focus a lot of time

0:03:05.276 --> 0:03:07.836
<v Speaker 2>on it, because at first I got into it as

0:03:07.876 --> 0:03:12.516
<v Speaker 2>a way of clarifying my thinking, and I just thought

0:03:12.516 --> 0:03:16.196
<v Speaker 2>it was amazing when I watched people do this, like, Wow,

0:03:16.236 --> 0:03:18.756
<v Speaker 2>they can synthesize so much information, they can argue all

0:03:18.796 --> 0:03:22.676
<v Speaker 2>these points. And I'm someone who really loves to argue

0:03:22.676 --> 0:03:25.396
<v Speaker 2>out both sides of something to figure out, you know

0:03:26.556 --> 0:03:29.996
<v Speaker 2>what do I think you know what's important here? And

0:03:30.356 --> 0:03:32.076
<v Speaker 2>so I thought debate would help me with that, and

0:03:32.116 --> 0:03:35.756
<v Speaker 2>it did. But there came a point where it became formulaic,

0:03:35.756 --> 0:03:37.676
<v Speaker 2>where I figured out how to do it, and then

0:03:37.716 --> 0:03:40.756
<v Speaker 2>I lost interest in it because I realized that it

0:03:40.796 --> 0:03:44.796
<v Speaker 2>wasn't actually about thinking deeply. It was much more about

0:03:44.996 --> 0:03:48.836
<v Speaker 2>rhetorical defness technique technique exactly.

0:03:48.916 --> 0:03:51.036
<v Speaker 1>It is heavy. That's that was the great takeaway for

0:03:51.116 --> 0:03:54.436
<v Speaker 1>me in doing this because I never I debated very

0:03:54.476 --> 0:03:57.596
<v Speaker 1>casually in high school once or twice, and we did

0:03:57.676 --> 0:04:00.396
<v Speaker 1>parliamentary debating where hackling was allowed.

0:04:00.596 --> 0:04:02.636
<v Speaker 2>And so that's amazing. We did not have heckling.

0:04:02.716 --> 0:04:04.916
<v Speaker 1>We had hackling because you have hackling in parliament, real

0:04:04.956 --> 0:04:05.876
<v Speaker 1>parmentary systems.

0:04:06.356 --> 0:04:07.716
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Parliament's a shit show.

0:04:07.756 --> 0:04:10.196
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah. So when we did debating, we just were

0:04:10.196 --> 0:04:12.156
<v Speaker 1>focused on the hackling. That's what you know.

0:04:12.236 --> 0:04:14.196
<v Speaker 2>I mean, of course that sounds so fun. So I missed,

0:04:14.196 --> 0:04:16.756
<v Speaker 2>I'd probably still be debating, and that's that's what our

0:04:16.756 --> 0:04:19.716
<v Speaker 2>debate was. But your debate, the Monk Debates, was not

0:04:19.756 --> 0:04:20.436
<v Speaker 2>about heckling.

0:04:20.556 --> 0:04:21.916
<v Speaker 1>No, no, it was.

0:04:22.036 --> 0:04:24.316
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was a very different format. So for people

0:04:24.396 --> 0:04:26.836
<v Speaker 2>who didn't listen to the episode or need a little

0:04:26.836 --> 0:04:30.356
<v Speaker 2>bit of a refresher, you were arguing a resolution, and

0:04:30.396 --> 0:04:34.396
<v Speaker 2>the resolution was don't trust mainstream media, and you were

0:04:34.436 --> 0:04:37.316
<v Speaker 2>against this. You were on a team with Michelle Goldberg,

0:04:37.636 --> 0:04:42.796
<v Speaker 2>and you were debating against Matt Taibi and Douglas Murray.

0:04:43.116 --> 0:04:45.836
<v Speaker 2>And Douglas Murray, as I found out, and I saw

0:04:46.276 --> 0:04:49.556
<v Speaker 2>as did other people who you spoke with after that,

0:04:49.636 --> 0:04:54.356
<v Speaker 2>he's a debater and and so he's yeah, he's so

0:04:54.396 --> 0:04:56.716
<v Speaker 2>we're going to spoil it spoiler alert, how did you do?

0:04:56.836 --> 0:05:00.636
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm got destroyed? I mean it was humiliation on the

0:05:00.716 --> 0:05:04.036
<v Speaker 1>level to my social media to this day is just

0:05:04.036 --> 0:05:06.916
<v Speaker 1>filled people gloating about how I got my hat handed

0:05:06.916 --> 0:05:07.156
<v Speaker 1>to me.

0:05:07.796 --> 0:05:09.596
<v Speaker 2>You did, you did? But what I act act like?

0:05:09.716 --> 0:05:12.636
<v Speaker 2>I loved that after that happened, you went to learn

0:05:12.676 --> 0:05:15.356
<v Speaker 2>to figure out what you did wrong, and so I

0:05:15.396 --> 0:05:17.636
<v Speaker 2>loved kind of the second part of the episode where

0:05:17.636 --> 0:05:20.916
<v Speaker 2>we get to hear professionals talk about, you know, what

0:05:20.996 --> 0:05:24.436
<v Speaker 2>you could have done, what you didn't do, and you

0:05:24.476 --> 0:05:25.676
<v Speaker 2>went to learn how to debate.

0:05:26.076 --> 0:05:30.356
<v Speaker 1>My complete ignorance of this debating technique, yeah, is what

0:05:31.116 --> 0:05:34.236
<v Speaker 1>killed me. That and also the fact that you know,

0:05:34.876 --> 0:05:38.636
<v Speaker 1>I was excessively self confident going into the and not

0:05:38.796 --> 0:05:40.876
<v Speaker 1>self confident in my abilities to debate so much as

0:05:41.076 --> 0:05:44.036
<v Speaker 1>self confident in my in the position I was arguing.

0:05:44.276 --> 0:05:46.996
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't think that there were lots of people

0:05:47.036 --> 0:05:49.956
<v Speaker 1>out there, particularly in Canada, who would believe that you

0:05:49.956 --> 0:05:52.676
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't trust the mainstream media. I just couldn't get I

0:05:52.756 --> 0:05:53.676
<v Speaker 1>just thought we're going to win.

0:05:54.116 --> 0:05:57.876
<v Speaker 2>You know, I loved the excerpts that you chose for

0:05:57.916 --> 0:06:00.756
<v Speaker 2>the podcast, because you know, you really showed some of

0:06:00.796 --> 0:06:03.556
<v Speaker 2>the issues, which is I actually I don't think this

0:06:03.676 --> 0:06:06.316
<v Speaker 2>was a bad thing because you felt strongly about your topic, right,

0:06:06.516 --> 0:06:09.636
<v Speaker 2>you didn't even think that it was possible to argue

0:06:09.636 --> 0:06:12.596
<v Speaker 2>the other side because I mean, as you just said yourself,

0:06:12.636 --> 0:06:15.356
<v Speaker 2>like who you have to be insane to not trust

0:06:15.436 --> 0:06:18.156
<v Speaker 2>mainstream media to think that the alternative is better. And

0:06:18.196 --> 0:06:20.996
<v Speaker 2>so you brought a lot of emotion to it, which

0:06:21.276 --> 0:06:23.076
<v Speaker 2>I think is good from a human point of view,

0:06:23.076 --> 0:06:25.796
<v Speaker 2>but from a debating point of view is not necessarily

0:06:25.836 --> 0:06:29.996
<v Speaker 2>ideal and can cloud your ability to hear the other

0:06:30.036 --> 0:06:33.556
<v Speaker 2>side's arguments, what they're actually saying, whether they're twisting your words,

0:06:33.596 --> 0:06:38.436
<v Speaker 2>whether they're twisting the actual premise of the debate. Yeah,

0:06:38.476 --> 0:06:42.276
<v Speaker 2>and that's I think where you got got so to speak.

0:06:42.876 --> 0:06:46.316
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny because I'm not normally I'm not normally

0:06:46.316 --> 0:06:50.676
<v Speaker 1>someone who does rise to debate, and I'm not normally

0:06:50.676 --> 0:06:54.316
<v Speaker 1>someone who's terribly emotion I don't really get angry much

0:06:54.436 --> 0:06:57.556
<v Speaker 1>or but in that there was something about that context

0:06:57.636 --> 0:07:01.356
<v Speaker 1>that just like I got pissed off about halfway through, Yeah,

0:07:01.396 --> 0:07:03.156
<v Speaker 1>and I just couldn't keep it in.

0:07:03.556 --> 0:07:06.116
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you could tell that you were pissed.

0:07:06.956 --> 0:07:11.596
<v Speaker 1>I really think that Douglas Murray loathsome all right.

0:07:11.436 --> 0:07:14.116
<v Speaker 2>All right, well we'll just we'll have that on the record.

0:07:15.756 --> 0:07:19.956
<v Speaker 2>But that gets to kind of the psychological heart of it, though,

0:07:19.996 --> 0:07:21.876
<v Speaker 2>because what we know is as soon as he presses

0:07:21.876 --> 0:07:25.036
<v Speaker 2>that button and you actually become enraged and you become emotional,

0:07:25.716 --> 0:07:29.716
<v Speaker 2>your logic goes down a little bit, your ability to

0:07:29.756 --> 0:07:33.236
<v Speaker 2>process information goes down a little bit, and your ability

0:07:33.276 --> 0:07:36.916
<v Speaker 2>to listen goes down a little bit. That's why when

0:07:36.956 --> 0:07:38.676
<v Speaker 2>we're in an argument, we want to be the one

0:07:38.716 --> 0:07:40.636
<v Speaker 2>who does not get emotional, right. You want to be

0:07:40.636 --> 0:07:42.156
<v Speaker 2>the one who steps back. You want to be the

0:07:42.156 --> 0:07:44.916
<v Speaker 2>one who says, Okay, you know, let's take five minutes. Obviously,

0:07:44.956 --> 0:07:47.916
<v Speaker 2>when you're on stage in front of an audience with

0:07:47.956 --> 0:07:50.516
<v Speaker 2>someone you find loathsome, you can't say, okay, let's pause

0:07:50.556 --> 0:07:52.756
<v Speaker 2>this for five minutes and take a step back. But

0:07:52.836 --> 0:07:55.796
<v Speaker 2>it actually made me think some of the criticism that

0:07:56.236 --> 0:07:59.916
<v Speaker 2>you got was not listening well. And it made me think,

0:08:00.956 --> 0:08:02.916
<v Speaker 2>and this gets to the heart of why I quit

0:08:02.956 --> 0:08:06.876
<v Speaker 2>debate of something that I learned from con artists. So

0:08:07.036 --> 0:08:09.116
<v Speaker 2>a few books back, I wrote a book about con artists,

0:08:09.156 --> 0:08:11.236
<v Speaker 2>and I spent multiple years with con artists and I

0:08:11.316 --> 0:08:14.756
<v Speaker 2>learned all of these fascinating histories, and therefore and con

0:08:14.836 --> 0:08:19.916
<v Speaker 2>artist totally fascinating character. Victor Lustig. I don't know if

0:08:19.916 --> 0:08:22.596
<v Speaker 2>you've heard of him. He styled himself as Count Lustig,

0:08:22.636 --> 0:08:25.196
<v Speaker 2>even though he was not a count. This was early

0:08:25.276 --> 0:08:29.996
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century. So Victor Lustig is most famous for selling

0:08:30.156 --> 0:08:33.796
<v Speaker 2>the Eiffel Tower not once, but twice to two different

0:08:33.836 --> 0:08:35.916
<v Speaker 2>groups of investors. So he was very good at what

0:08:35.996 --> 0:08:38.516
<v Speaker 2>he did. And he wrote something called the Ten Commandments

0:08:38.556 --> 0:08:42.716
<v Speaker 2>of con Artists. And one of those commandments is something

0:08:42.756 --> 0:08:45.676
<v Speaker 2>that just came to mind immediately, which is that a

0:08:45.716 --> 0:08:48.156
<v Speaker 2>con artist isn't a good talker. A con artist is

0:08:48.196 --> 0:08:51.836
<v Speaker 2>a good listener. And if you think, if you think

0:08:51.876 --> 0:08:55.516
<v Speaker 2>about what that means, right, listening to the other person

0:08:55.796 --> 0:08:58.196
<v Speaker 2>is how you get them, and it's how you trick them,

0:08:58.436 --> 0:09:02.236
<v Speaker 2>is how you take advantage of them. And so it

0:09:02.396 --> 0:09:05.276
<v Speaker 2>actually that's what came to mind when I was listening

0:09:05.316 --> 0:09:08.116
<v Speaker 2>to this debate, and I thought, wait, a debate is

0:09:08.116 --> 0:09:10.556
<v Speaker 2>a con in lot of ways.

0:09:10.396 --> 0:09:10.996
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting.

0:09:11.076 --> 0:09:13.796
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of a way to you know, if you're

0:09:13.836 --> 0:09:16.756
<v Speaker 2>the better listener, you're actually going to be the better talker,

0:09:16.916 --> 0:09:19.716
<v Speaker 2>and you're going to be able to take advantage because

0:09:19.796 --> 0:09:22.956
<v Speaker 2>con artists are great talkers, right, they're silver tongued, but

0:09:23.116 --> 0:09:24.316
<v Speaker 2>listening is at the heart of it.

0:09:24.796 --> 0:09:26.876
<v Speaker 1>But here's the other thing I was thinking about, you know,

0:09:26.876 --> 0:09:30.996
<v Speaker 1>with respect to debating, the second way in which debating

0:09:31.116 --> 0:09:34.156
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a not a trick, but oh it's

0:09:34.156 --> 0:09:36.636
<v Speaker 1>a trick, well a version of a trick, and that

0:09:36.796 --> 0:09:42.716
<v Speaker 1>is that I realized that my my normal way of

0:09:42.756 --> 0:09:46.956
<v Speaker 1>going about the world is I take in information and

0:09:47.156 --> 0:09:51.276
<v Speaker 1>don't respond immediately. I tend to turn things over for

0:09:51.316 --> 0:09:54.076
<v Speaker 1>a long time and decide how I feel a long

0:09:54.836 --> 0:09:58.516
<v Speaker 1>time later, might be weeks later, might be months later.

0:09:58.636 --> 0:10:01.876
<v Speaker 1>I'm someone who kind of I'm a slow processor, and

0:10:02.476 --> 0:10:06.156
<v Speaker 1>so processing has been very useful for me. The debate

0:10:06.636 --> 0:10:11.076
<v Speaker 1>form does not advantage the slow processor. I was in

0:10:11.076 --> 0:10:13.116
<v Speaker 1>a situation orlves and I had to do in real

0:10:13.156 --> 0:10:15.316
<v Speaker 1>time respond to people. I can't do that. Yeah, I

0:10:15.596 --> 0:10:18.956
<v Speaker 1>have a kind of and Douglas Murray a great debater.

0:10:19.396 --> 0:10:23.036
<v Speaker 1>His great advantage is his fluidity. Right, It's just like

0:10:23.476 --> 0:10:27.636
<v Speaker 1>it comes in one ear and boomy as a response,

0:10:28.156 --> 0:10:30.596
<v Speaker 1>and I'm still thinking about it months later. I'm still

0:10:30.596 --> 0:10:32.236
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what should I have said?

0:10:32.236 --> 0:10:35.396
<v Speaker 2>You knowing that, yeah, and it's it's a skill. It's

0:10:35.396 --> 0:10:37.356
<v Speaker 2>a skill, and that's you know, at the end of

0:10:37.396 --> 0:10:40.676
<v Speaker 2>the day, that's what I came away with That debate

0:10:40.836 --> 0:10:45.316
<v Speaker 2>teaches you very useful skills of fluency and of conning.

0:10:45.876 --> 0:10:48.396
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I want to an additional point about this, least

0:10:48.476 --> 0:10:51.396
<v Speaker 1>yar when I went and hung out with the Brooklyn

0:10:51.476 --> 0:10:53.956
<v Speaker 1>Debate League the other there were my tutors and had

0:10:53.996 --> 0:10:57.436
<v Speaker 1>to be a better debater. The one transcendent value in

0:10:57.556 --> 0:11:01.596
<v Speaker 1>running to debate. Remember that the kids that they at

0:11:01.636 --> 0:11:05.036
<v Speaker 1>the Brooklyn Debate League, they they're most concerned with, many

0:11:05.076 --> 0:11:08.196
<v Speaker 1>of them are from less privileged backgrounds. Right, you're talking

0:11:08.196 --> 0:11:11.636
<v Speaker 1>about kids from poor areas of Brooklyn. You know what

0:11:11.916 --> 0:11:17.356
<v Speaker 1>debating allows is for these kids to be heard on

0:11:17.436 --> 0:11:20.316
<v Speaker 1>subjects where they would were normally no one would ever

0:11:20.356 --> 0:11:24.076
<v Speaker 1>pay them the suddest attention. So you tell a fifteen

0:11:24.116 --> 0:11:29.396
<v Speaker 1>year old kid from Bushwick, we're going to debate immigration policy,

0:11:29.756 --> 0:11:32.276
<v Speaker 1>and not only do they get to talk about immigration

0:11:32.276 --> 0:11:34.396
<v Speaker 1>policy and people have to listen, but it allows them

0:11:34.396 --> 0:11:39.036
<v Speaker 1>to almost have another identity. And these are kids who

0:11:39.036 --> 0:11:41.476
<v Speaker 1>never have a chance to have another identity. Yeah, right,

0:11:41.716 --> 0:11:45.036
<v Speaker 1>and that's what is an incredible gift. That's being given

0:11:45.036 --> 0:11:47.756
<v Speaker 1>to them by allowing them to stand up and inhabit

0:11:48.356 --> 0:11:51.636
<v Speaker 1>a way of thinking or a set of opinions that

0:11:52.076 --> 0:11:53.836
<v Speaker 1>would otherwise be denied to them.

0:11:54.076 --> 0:11:56.556
<v Speaker 2>Now that's amazing, and I think that that is something

0:11:56.596 --> 0:11:59.636
<v Speaker 2>that it's actually incredibly special about debates. So let's just

0:11:59.716 --> 0:12:02.796
<v Speaker 2>caveat and put that as an asterisk that it can

0:12:02.876 --> 0:12:06.396
<v Speaker 2>give you tremendous skills, It can give you confidence, and

0:12:06.476 --> 0:12:08.516
<v Speaker 2>especially you know, someone like me. You know, I didn't

0:12:08.556 --> 0:12:11.236
<v Speaker 2>speak English when I came here as an immigrant, didn't

0:12:11.276 --> 0:12:13.756
<v Speaker 2>fit in very well, and that was also a way

0:12:13.796 --> 0:12:14.916
<v Speaker 2>for me to fit in at first.

0:12:15.196 --> 0:12:15.716
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:12:16.316 --> 0:12:20.836
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So there was actually one listener email that came

0:12:20.876 --> 0:12:23.156
<v Speaker 2>in which actually raises some of the things we've been

0:12:23.156 --> 0:12:27.076
<v Speaker 2>talking about. So here's what Jonathan writes, So, what if

0:12:27.076 --> 0:12:29.436
<v Speaker 2>we learn to listen to each other in debates. I've

0:12:29.436 --> 0:12:32.356
<v Speaker 2>always struggled with the benefits of any debate. Does winning

0:12:32.396 --> 0:12:34.916
<v Speaker 2>a debate matter anymore to the well being of society

0:12:34.956 --> 0:12:38.436
<v Speaker 2>as your favorite NBA team winning a game matters? Does

0:12:38.476 --> 0:12:41.716
<v Speaker 2>a society full of expert debaters achieve something our current

0:12:41.796 --> 0:12:45.236
<v Speaker 2>society cannot? And I think this was actually, you know,

0:12:45.356 --> 0:12:48.316
<v Speaker 2>a really important question and something that we've been touching

0:12:48.316 --> 0:12:51.796
<v Speaker 2>on because while I think that you know, debate has

0:12:51.836 --> 0:12:54.036
<v Speaker 2>given me a lot of positives, and as you say,

0:12:54.116 --> 0:12:56.596
<v Speaker 2>kind of this group in Brooklyn, it's definitely giving them

0:12:56.636 --> 0:13:00.716
<v Speaker 2>a lot those skills of you know, fluidity and being

0:13:00.756 --> 0:13:04.276
<v Speaker 2>silver tongued are not necessarily I think beneficial.

0:13:05.716 --> 0:13:10.916
<v Speaker 1>Well, the questions are there sort of spillover effects, Like listening.

0:13:12.676 --> 0:13:15.676
<v Speaker 1>Being someone who learns to pay attention carefully to what

0:13:15.716 --> 0:13:18.956
<v Speaker 1>people are saying is a really important skill that you

0:13:18.996 --> 0:13:23.076
<v Speaker 1>can only gain through practice. And so to the extent

0:13:23.116 --> 0:13:26.596
<v Speaker 1>that debating is really listening practice, then I think it's

0:13:26.636 --> 0:13:31.116
<v Speaker 1>really useful. A lot of what's difficult about listening, and

0:13:31.196 --> 0:13:33.356
<v Speaker 1>why I think we think of it as an imperiled skill,

0:13:33.476 --> 0:13:38.156
<v Speaker 1>is that listening is about the negation of the self. Right,

0:13:38.556 --> 0:13:42.836
<v Speaker 1>I is not important. It's you who are important, And

0:13:43.476 --> 0:13:46.796
<v Speaker 1>there's so much privileging of I these days. I've always

0:13:46.836 --> 0:13:49.876
<v Speaker 1>wanted to, you know, I have a little alternate fantasy

0:13:49.916 --> 0:13:52.356
<v Speaker 1>where I teach an English class for a year, and

0:13:52.596 --> 0:13:56.316
<v Speaker 1>I would like in my English class. I don't know

0:13:56.316 --> 0:13:58.956
<v Speaker 1>if you'd want to, but one of the rules I

0:13:58.956 --> 0:14:00.436
<v Speaker 1>would have is we're going to write a series of

0:14:00.436 --> 0:14:02.836
<v Speaker 1>things over the course of the next year. And my

0:14:02.996 --> 0:14:07.676
<v Speaker 1>rule is you can never ever use the word I

0:14:07.756 --> 0:14:11.076
<v Speaker 1>in anything you write for me, right, No eyes. If

0:14:11.076 --> 0:14:14.356
<v Speaker 1>you if I see an eye referring to yourself in

0:14:14.396 --> 0:14:17.716
<v Speaker 1>anything you write, you fail. Right, And just that I

0:14:17.716 --> 0:14:21.276
<v Speaker 1>feel like the kind of the discipline of forcing someone

0:14:21.356 --> 0:14:25.796
<v Speaker 1>to always be talking about the other and to distance

0:14:25.836 --> 0:14:30.676
<v Speaker 1>themselves from their own perspective, it would just be incredibly useful.

0:14:30.876 --> 0:14:33.196
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the New Yorker would be very happy that

0:14:33.276 --> 0:14:35.836
<v Speaker 2>they have a whole generation of writers who don't use eye.

0:14:35.996 --> 0:14:37.756
<v Speaker 1>I tried so hard for so long when I was

0:14:37.796 --> 0:14:40.276
<v Speaker 1>a New York writer not to fall into the eye trap,

0:14:40.876 --> 0:14:44.476
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, eventually you're like, yive in he's.

0:14:44.396 --> 0:14:48.356
<v Speaker 2>Like speaking to this journalist. I know. It's so disingenuous.

0:14:48.436 --> 0:14:51.916
<v Speaker 1>I love and the English gout around this by saying one, yes,

0:14:52.036 --> 0:14:55.476
<v Speaker 1>one listens to one's perspective.

0:14:54.956 --> 0:14:57.236
<v Speaker 2>On my and what does one think about this?

0:14:57.396 --> 0:14:58.876
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that you get you get into the

0:14:58.956 --> 0:15:01.956
<v Speaker 1>multiple one then and you once you commit to using

0:15:01.956 --> 0:15:04.836
<v Speaker 1>one once you have to keep and you're like, oh, please,

0:15:05.036 --> 0:15:06.476
<v Speaker 1>just stop it. It's really annoying.

0:15:06.796 --> 0:15:08.636
<v Speaker 2>And it's not just annoying, it makes it difficult to

0:15:08.676 --> 0:15:11.636
<v Speaker 2>understand because it's actually unclear.

0:15:11.636 --> 0:15:15.996
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, let's take a quick break.

0:15:20.396 --> 0:15:22.396
<v Speaker 2>The second thing I wanted to talk to you about

0:15:22.396 --> 0:15:26.756
<v Speaker 2>today is the importance of precise language, even if that

0:15:26.836 --> 0:15:30.396
<v Speaker 2>language might make you uncomfortable, even if that language might

0:15:30.436 --> 0:15:34.236
<v Speaker 2>not be nice so to speak, but the importance of

0:15:34.276 --> 0:15:39.676
<v Speaker 2>saying precisely what you mean. And I actually started laughing

0:15:39.756 --> 0:15:43.836
<v Speaker 2>out loud at this listener email that we got. So

0:15:44.596 --> 0:15:47.196
<v Speaker 2>I'm taking the liberty of writing as an admirer of

0:15:47.236 --> 0:15:50.676
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm Gladwell's work to share my humble opinion on the

0:15:50.756 --> 0:15:54.516
<v Speaker 2>use of swear words and vulgar language in your content.

0:15:55.196 --> 0:15:57.636
<v Speaker 2>There is no doubt their use in proliferation has become

0:15:57.676 --> 0:16:00.516
<v Speaker 2>part of the zeitgeist. It seems people feel that, even

0:16:00.556 --> 0:16:04.116
<v Speaker 2>informal context, they lend an air of cool and nonchalance,

0:16:04.636 --> 0:16:07.716
<v Speaker 2>helping them avoid coming across as stuffy and staid in

0:16:07.756 --> 0:16:10.236
<v Speaker 2>a culture where everyone eques really wants to be hip.

0:16:10.796 --> 0:16:13.476
<v Speaker 2>What they don't realize is at the same time they

0:16:13.636 --> 0:16:16.596
<v Speaker 2>cheapen the language and give it an air of tawdriness.

0:16:16.956 --> 0:16:20.156
<v Speaker 2>It's the opposite of classy and also reflects laziness on

0:16:20.196 --> 0:16:23.676
<v Speaker 2>the part of the writer. I hardly doubt Pushkin would

0:16:23.716 --> 0:16:27.956
<v Speaker 2>have used such curse words in his writing. And this

0:16:28.036 --> 0:16:32.636
<v Speaker 2>is where I just lost my shit, because this is

0:16:32.676 --> 0:16:35.796
<v Speaker 2>someone who has never read a word of Pushkin. Pushkin

0:16:36.116 --> 0:16:40.356
<v Speaker 2>is the most foul mouthed poet just I think, in

0:16:40.436 --> 0:16:43.516
<v Speaker 2>Russian history, and this is among other foul mouthed poets.

0:16:43.636 --> 0:16:47.796
<v Speaker 2>There is profanity in Russian language, and it's not just profanity,

0:16:47.916 --> 0:16:51.996
<v Speaker 2>it is like it is profane profanity and your namesake company,

0:16:52.436 --> 0:16:55.356
<v Speaker 2>you know, Pushkin, Yeah, is named for someone who was

0:16:55.836 --> 0:17:01.476
<v Speaker 2>so enamored with precision in words, with using the right word,

0:17:01.996 --> 0:17:05.276
<v Speaker 2>and he would actually he has an entire poem that

0:17:05.396 --> 0:17:08.876
<v Speaker 2>laughs at censorship and at people being snooty about language.

0:17:09.116 --> 0:17:10.916
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to actually read that poem, but I

0:17:10.996 --> 0:17:15.276
<v Speaker 2>was going to read a few a few Pushkin lines.

0:17:15.956 --> 0:17:18.076
<v Speaker 2>So let me just give this gentleman a taste of

0:17:18.116 --> 0:17:23.236
<v Speaker 2>what Pushkin's writing is. Actually. Like, there's one from a

0:17:23.276 --> 0:17:27.036
<v Speaker 2>poem which is called the Wagon of Life Tide. So

0:17:27.076 --> 0:17:29.636
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually going to just read this lovely for just

0:17:29.676 --> 0:17:32.476
<v Speaker 2>four lines in Russian, and then we'll do a translation.

0:17:33.276 --> 0:17:44.036
<v Speaker 2>Soutra Sadamites, pashol youbon mites. Russian is such a beautiful

0:17:44.636 --> 0:17:47.836
<v Speaker 2>melodic language. Yes, So here's this is this is just

0:17:47.916 --> 0:17:50.916
<v Speaker 2>my rough translation, in the morning, we get into this car,

0:17:51.036 --> 0:17:54.556
<v Speaker 2>which is, you know, this wagon of life. We are

0:17:54.636 --> 0:17:58.076
<v Speaker 2>happy to challenge our brains. Literally it says break our heads,

0:17:58.116 --> 0:18:03.156
<v Speaker 2>but that's not idiomatic. So and detesting laziness and leisure.

0:18:03.676 --> 0:18:08.236
<v Speaker 2>We yell get moving. Fucking mother, but it's not fucking

0:18:08.276 --> 0:18:11.396
<v Speaker 2>mother is the literal translation, but that does not even

0:18:12.156 --> 0:18:16.796
<v Speaker 2>begin to describe it. So in Russian, the word to

0:18:16.956 --> 0:18:24.316
<v Speaker 2>fuck and all of its permutations is such an incredibly

0:18:24.356 --> 0:18:27.316
<v Speaker 2>powerful thing that So I was talking to my mom

0:18:27.716 --> 0:18:30.156
<v Speaker 2>in preparation for this episode and asked her, you know,

0:18:30.196 --> 0:18:32.316
<v Speaker 2>how would she describe it? She said, well, you could

0:18:32.356 --> 0:18:36.076
<v Speaker 2>say that saying fucking English would be like, you know,

0:18:36.356 --> 0:18:40.396
<v Speaker 2>a politician just giving a talk in front of an audience,

0:18:40.436 --> 0:18:42.836
<v Speaker 2>compared to what something like you be on the mind

0:18:42.916 --> 0:18:44.556
<v Speaker 2>sounds like in Russian.

0:18:44.596 --> 0:18:45.356
<v Speaker 1>I mean people can.

0:18:45.276 --> 0:18:47.636
<v Speaker 2>Get killed for saying that to someone else. It's a

0:18:47.756 --> 0:18:50.716
<v Speaker 2>very yeah, I mean you can. There's there's actually a

0:18:50.756 --> 0:18:54.996
<v Speaker 2>history of you know, people bringing fists to faces when

0:18:55.036 --> 0:18:57.796
<v Speaker 2>you when you use phrasing like that, because you know,

0:18:57.836 --> 0:19:00.516
<v Speaker 2>it's incredibly incredibly powerful.

0:19:00.516 --> 0:19:02.836
<v Speaker 1>But your voice changes when you speak Russian, and this

0:19:02.996 --> 0:19:05.756
<v Speaker 1>really interesting way. I'm falling in love with you speaking

0:19:05.796 --> 0:19:07.756
<v Speaker 1>Russian way.

0:19:06.476 --> 0:19:07.956
<v Speaker 2>That's very funny.

0:19:08.156 --> 0:19:10.436
<v Speaker 1>Can we do an episode where you just speaking Russian?

0:19:10.556 --> 0:19:10.716
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:19:10.716 --> 0:19:14.796
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, let's do it. Let's do it. It's not just me,

0:19:14.956 --> 0:19:18.116
<v Speaker 2>who's who thinks that? This is so incredibly important. If

0:19:18.116 --> 0:19:21.396
<v Speaker 2>you look at you know, Russian history, the use of

0:19:21.436 --> 0:19:25.676
<v Speaker 2>swearing is an incredibly important part of the language, part

0:19:25.676 --> 0:19:28.956
<v Speaker 2>of expression, part of kind of communicating clearly, and in fact,

0:19:28.996 --> 0:19:33.596
<v Speaker 2>Dostoyevsky wrote back in eighteen seventy three about how the

0:19:33.716 --> 0:19:39.196
<v Speaker 2>single word khui, which means prick, dick, but it's once

0:19:39.236 --> 0:19:42.356
<v Speaker 2>again it's you know, both prick and dick and cock like,

0:19:42.396 --> 0:19:46.716
<v Speaker 2>all of those words are not not quite right. But

0:19:47.196 --> 0:19:50.916
<v Speaker 2>the male sexual organ, how you could basically describe everything

0:19:50.996 --> 0:19:53.236
<v Speaker 2>and every single emotion in the Russian language with that

0:19:53.276 --> 0:19:56.116
<v Speaker 2>one word, and his permutations, and how he thought that

0:19:56.196 --> 0:20:00.636
<v Speaker 2>it was just awful that because of censorship he couldn't

0:20:00.756 --> 0:20:04.116
<v Speaker 2>actually use it, and so he has just this whole

0:20:04.276 --> 0:20:06.596
<v Speaker 2>big thing on it. And this is Dustoyevsky. Ye, so

0:20:06.676 --> 0:20:09.076
<v Speaker 2>if you had named your company Dustoyevsky instead of Pushkin,

0:20:09.596 --> 0:20:12.396
<v Speaker 2>he also would have been eyeboard.

0:20:12.516 --> 0:20:16.876
<v Speaker 1>Can I just venture a mild defense of our letter writer?

0:20:17.796 --> 0:20:18.556
<v Speaker 2>Yes, please go?

0:20:19.316 --> 0:20:23.396
<v Speaker 1>Which is I think that what the letter writer is

0:20:23.596 --> 0:20:30.996
<v Speaker 1>arguing against is sloppiness that sometimes people use profanity when

0:20:31.076 --> 0:20:37.316
<v Speaker 1>they can't be bothered to express themselves more articulately, more clearly,

0:20:37.356 --> 0:20:40.556
<v Speaker 1>more specifically, more and it was it becomes a kind

0:20:40.556 --> 0:20:46.836
<v Speaker 1>of crutch. But the careful and the choice use of profanity,

0:20:47.236 --> 0:20:50.956
<v Speaker 1>it can be very powerful and sometimes even beautiful. Absolutely,

0:20:51.556 --> 0:20:53.836
<v Speaker 1>And there are times I remember I had this conversation

0:20:53.916 --> 0:20:57.916
<v Speaker 1>with spending enough. A friend of my brothers is a

0:20:57.956 --> 0:21:00.516
<v Speaker 1>men and night pastor who is writing a book about

0:21:01.276 --> 0:21:04.156
<v Speaker 1>the use of profanity in the religious context, and he

0:21:04.236 --> 0:21:07.596
<v Speaker 1>told me the story about a woman whose sort of

0:21:07.596 --> 0:21:11.436
<v Speaker 1>life had called a series of incredible, terrible things had

0:21:11.436 --> 0:21:14.276
<v Speaker 1>happened to her, and she relates this to her friend,

0:21:14.436 --> 0:21:17.196
<v Speaker 1>and her friend, who was someone who would never in

0:21:17.196 --> 0:21:21.836
<v Speaker 1>a million years use a profanity, use of profanity, And

0:21:21.876 --> 0:21:27.236
<v Speaker 1>it was this incredibly emotionally important moment, because what the

0:21:27.276 --> 0:21:29.316
<v Speaker 1>woman who was suffering needed at that moment was someone

0:21:29.316 --> 0:21:32.876
<v Speaker 1>who understood the magnitude of what had happened to her.

0:21:33.156 --> 0:21:38.476
<v Speaker 1>And the only way for a very strict religious person

0:21:38.676 --> 0:21:43.276
<v Speaker 1>to express that was to swear, was to go into

0:21:43.316 --> 0:21:47.036
<v Speaker 1>forbidden territory, right, Like, that's really beautiful and I don't

0:21:47.076 --> 0:21:50.476
<v Speaker 1>think our letter writer would disagree with that kind of

0:21:50.916 --> 0:21:51.716
<v Speaker 1>use of profanity.

0:21:51.836 --> 0:21:54.116
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't know our letter writers seemed.

0:21:54.236 --> 0:21:55.596
<v Speaker 1>I'm just much more generous to her.

0:21:55.716 --> 0:21:58.996
<v Speaker 2>I'm not. I get so. One of the reasons I

0:21:59.036 --> 0:22:02.236
<v Speaker 2>get so riled up about this is the letter writer

0:22:02.356 --> 0:22:05.116
<v Speaker 2>has a lot in common with Latimer Putin, because back

0:22:05.156 --> 0:22:10.556
<v Speaker 2>in twenty fourteen putin an act a ban on using

0:22:10.636 --> 0:22:16.436
<v Speaker 2>the four base swear words in Russian in any sort

0:22:16.476 --> 0:22:19.676
<v Speaker 2>of cultural or artistic expression. So hui, which we already

0:22:19.716 --> 0:22:22.916
<v Speaker 2>talked about you butte, which was in the Pushkin poem,

0:22:23.036 --> 0:22:24.996
<v Speaker 2>so that poem would have been censored and would not

0:22:24.996 --> 0:22:26.956
<v Speaker 2>have been allowed to be published, and Pushkin could have

0:22:26.956 --> 0:22:30.356
<v Speaker 2>actually been put in jail. Pizdel, which is kind of

0:22:30.396 --> 0:22:34.276
<v Speaker 2>your female another regions.

0:22:34.476 --> 0:22:38.156
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, you are resorting to euphemism he

0:22:38.276 --> 0:22:39.996
<v Speaker 1>has stopped you in the previous ten.

0:22:39.876 --> 0:22:45.116
<v Speaker 2>Minutes, and which is slut, but normally you just use

0:22:45.156 --> 0:22:48.796
<v Speaker 2>it as you know, as a as a daily exclamation

0:22:49.036 --> 0:22:53.476
<v Speaker 2>in different permutations. So those four words are banned in

0:22:53.476 --> 0:22:55.676
<v Speaker 2>the Russian language. And this was around the same time

0:22:55.676 --> 0:22:58.676
<v Speaker 2>that he was, you know, enacting all the anti gay stuff,

0:22:59.556 --> 0:23:06.196
<v Speaker 2>and you know, it's a way of censoring expression ideas.

0:23:06.556 --> 0:23:08.836
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like taking a hammer to it, right,

0:23:08.836 --> 0:23:12.756
<v Speaker 2>because those words. Something that my mom also always says

0:23:12.836 --> 0:23:15.076
<v Speaker 2>is there are really no bad words. It's just bad people.

0:23:15.796 --> 0:23:18.196
<v Speaker 2>And so by banning these words, you know, he's showing

0:23:18.236 --> 0:23:20.116
<v Speaker 2>that he's one of the bad people, because you can

0:23:20.196 --> 0:23:22.956
<v Speaker 2>hurt someone much more. Just like you said that using

0:23:23.316 --> 0:23:27.716
<v Speaker 2>swears judiciously can be beautiful and can just be very powerful.

0:23:28.196 --> 0:23:31.596
<v Speaker 2>You can hurt someone without swearing. You can you can

0:23:31.796 --> 0:23:36.836
<v Speaker 2>really just skewer them and just be absolutely vicious without

0:23:36.916 --> 0:23:39.836
<v Speaker 2>using a single bad word. Yeah, And it's all in

0:23:39.876 --> 0:23:42.556
<v Speaker 2>the intention, it's all in the person. It's all so

0:23:42.756 --> 0:23:46.236
<v Speaker 2>I the moment I see any kind of censorship, it's

0:23:46.316 --> 0:23:48.236
<v Speaker 2>kind of like you and the Monk debates, My emotions

0:23:48.236 --> 0:23:51.876
<v Speaker 2>start getting riled up and I start wanting to say no.

0:23:52.396 --> 0:23:56.476
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm basically always against anyone who says you

0:23:56.516 --> 0:23:58.876
<v Speaker 2>should not use any some kind of language.

0:23:59.196 --> 0:24:03.476
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:04.076 --> 0:24:07.876
<v Speaker 2>So, Malcolm, now that we've established the parameters of precise

0:24:08.036 --> 0:24:09.796
<v Speaker 2>language use, let's take a quick break.

0:24:22.836 --> 0:24:25.996
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back now, Maria. As you know, we

0:24:26.116 --> 0:24:29.316
<v Speaker 1>gave Columbia University the first ever Pushkin Prize for the

0:24:29.356 --> 0:24:32.036
<v Speaker 1>way they screwed around with your data to get a

0:24:32.116 --> 0:24:35.036
<v Speaker 1>higher place on the US News rankings. We awarded them

0:24:35.036 --> 0:24:39.156
<v Speaker 1>the George Sandalis Memorial Pushkin Prize for egregiously deceptive self promotion,

0:24:40.076 --> 0:24:42.556
<v Speaker 1>and they were. It was all because a Columbia professor

0:24:42.636 --> 0:24:46.476
<v Speaker 1>named Michael Thaddeus found them out, and after he exposed

0:24:46.476 --> 0:24:50.636
<v Speaker 1>their shenanigans, they fell from number two to number eighteen.

0:24:50.756 --> 0:24:53.236
<v Speaker 2>It was a huge scandal, which is quite the fall

0:24:53.236 --> 0:24:53.756
<v Speaker 2>from grace.

0:24:53.876 --> 0:24:56.316
<v Speaker 1>It is quite the fall from grace. No one is

0:24:56.356 --> 0:24:58.836
<v Speaker 1>more obsessed with the US News rankings than me. No

0:24:58.876 --> 0:25:02.916
<v Speaker 1>one was more delighted to see Columbia tumble so far

0:25:02.956 --> 0:25:06.116
<v Speaker 1>and so fast. But I can see that for a

0:25:06.156 --> 0:25:08.356
<v Speaker 1>Columbia lum such as yourself, this could be a little

0:25:08.356 --> 0:25:10.596
<v Speaker 1>bit disconcerting. You didn't feel like your degree was in

0:25:10.636 --> 0:25:13.396
<v Speaker 1>some way devalued by learning that the school was eighteenth

0:25:13.396 --> 0:25:14.316
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to second.

0:25:14.596 --> 0:25:17.356
<v Speaker 2>No. No, because when I applied to Columbia, first of all,

0:25:17.356 --> 0:25:19.516
<v Speaker 2>it was grad school, so it's a little bit different.

0:25:20.676 --> 0:25:23.796
<v Speaker 2>But secondly, it was not number two because this was

0:25:23.876 --> 0:25:27.276
<v Speaker 2>pre manipulation. So I mean, I'm sure there was still manipulation,

0:25:27.596 --> 0:25:29.756
<v Speaker 2>but this was I started grad school in Columbia back

0:25:29.756 --> 0:25:31.396
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and eight, so this.

0:25:31.396 --> 0:25:33.596
<v Speaker 1>Was the Oh, I think the manipulation may have started

0:25:33.636 --> 0:25:35.756
<v Speaker 1>by then. Okay, it's one thing we don't know right now.

0:25:35.836 --> 0:25:40.516
<v Speaker 1>Columbia has not come clean. Well, they've given us no

0:25:40.796 --> 0:25:43.636
<v Speaker 1>knowledge at all about the extent, and this is strength

0:25:43.676 --> 0:25:46.956
<v Speaker 1>of this conspiracy. But I think it's reasonable to assume

0:25:46.956 --> 0:25:49.596
<v Speaker 1>that it may well have started maybe in the nineties.

0:25:49.876 --> 0:25:51.516
<v Speaker 2>That's actually probably accurate.

0:25:52.196 --> 0:25:55.236
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the show we just did about it, I

0:25:55.276 --> 0:26:00.236
<v Speaker 1>asked Revisionist History's resident data scientist Lauren Lavelle to reconstruct

0:26:00.236 --> 0:26:03.556
<v Speaker 1>what Columbia did. But I also wanted to know, and

0:26:03.596 --> 0:26:06.036
<v Speaker 1>this is crucial, is there a way they could have

0:26:06.156 --> 0:26:10.036
<v Speaker 1>cheated so they wouldn't have gotten caught? In other words,

0:26:10.276 --> 0:26:11.876
<v Speaker 1>is there a way they could have climbed into the

0:26:11.876 --> 0:26:17.076
<v Speaker 1>top ten without having run any risk of exposure? And

0:26:17.156 --> 0:26:19.996
<v Speaker 1>so Lauren sat down and went through the data and

0:26:20.516 --> 0:26:23.636
<v Speaker 1>figured out a strategy to make this happen.

0:26:24.756 --> 0:26:27.076
<v Speaker 3>So we're trying to do like a more sneaky route

0:26:27.116 --> 0:26:31.956
<v Speaker 3>of getting them into the top ten. So in twenty

0:26:31.996 --> 0:26:37.876
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, Duke and Northwestern tied for number ten, So

0:26:38.036 --> 0:26:40.556
<v Speaker 3>we're looking to get the same score as a Duke

0:26:40.636 --> 0:26:42.996
<v Speaker 3>or Northwestern, which is about a ninety two out of

0:26:42.996 --> 0:26:43.476
<v Speaker 3>one hundred.

0:26:44.436 --> 0:26:47.796
<v Speaker 1>Lauren says that for Columbia just to beat those schools

0:26:47.916 --> 0:26:50.396
<v Speaker 1>or tie them, they don't need to try goosing numbers

0:26:50.436 --> 0:26:53.756
<v Speaker 1>like their graduation rate or the student faculty ratio, or

0:26:53.756 --> 0:26:56.676
<v Speaker 1>even how much they spend on instruction. There's all kinds

0:26:56.676 --> 0:27:00.716
<v Speaker 1>of reasons they can just leave those particular metrics alone.

0:27:01.316 --> 0:27:04.556
<v Speaker 3>I want to specifically keep the expenditures per student figure

0:27:04.636 --> 0:27:07.756
<v Speaker 3>as close to reality as possible because those are publicly

0:27:07.796 --> 0:27:12.356
<v Speaker 3>available figures, they're in the consolidated financial statements. And also

0:27:12.396 --> 0:27:15.356
<v Speaker 3>since their spending is already so high, like blowing up

0:27:15.356 --> 0:27:19.156
<v Speaker 3>that number further doesn't actually do much as far as

0:27:19.236 --> 0:27:21.796
<v Speaker 3>ranking goes, because it's already in the top like ninety

0:27:21.836 --> 0:27:25.956
<v Speaker 3>eight percent of schools, Like they're already a top ranking there.

0:27:27.196 --> 0:27:31.076
<v Speaker 1>Instead, Lauren says, what Columbia could do if they want

0:27:31.076 --> 0:27:34.396
<v Speaker 1>to cheat without getting caught is just to play with

0:27:34.516 --> 0:27:39.276
<v Speaker 1>three variables. The percentage of class sizes under twenty students,

0:27:39.876 --> 0:27:44.116
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of class size is over fifty students, and

0:27:44.196 --> 0:27:48.396
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of faculty that are full time employees. So

0:27:48.636 --> 0:27:52.996
<v Speaker 1>three like totally off the radar statistics now, for each

0:27:52.996 --> 0:27:56.396
<v Speaker 1>of these categories, Columbia gave numbers to US News that

0:27:56.476 --> 0:27:59.796
<v Speaker 1>didn't line up with what Michael Thadyus found. The differences

0:27:59.796 --> 0:28:03.356
<v Speaker 1>were enormous, so Lauren says, secondly, Columbia should just pick

0:28:03.436 --> 0:28:06.956
<v Speaker 1>numbers that are about half as wrong, so somewhere in

0:28:07.036 --> 0:28:09.996
<v Speaker 1>the middle between what they sent US News and the truth.

0:28:10.556 --> 0:28:15.516
<v Speaker 1>And if all they'd done was those subtle tweaks, they

0:28:15.516 --> 0:28:16.676
<v Speaker 1>could have cracked the top ten.

0:28:17.516 --> 0:28:21.956
<v Speaker 3>And what I arrived at was the combination of those

0:28:22.076 --> 0:28:26.236
<v Speaker 3>values gives us a rounded score of ninety two, which

0:28:26.276 --> 0:28:29.436
<v Speaker 3>ties Columbia with Duke and Northwestern for tenth place, which

0:28:29.476 --> 0:28:30.796
<v Speaker 3>is kind of what we were aiming for.

0:28:31.396 --> 0:28:34.236
<v Speaker 1>But of course that's not what Columbia wanted. They wanted

0:28:34.236 --> 0:28:36.796
<v Speaker 1>to rule the rankings, and that's why they blew themselves

0:28:36.876 --> 0:28:41.036
<v Speaker 1>up because climbing higher in the top ten is really

0:28:41.356 --> 0:28:43.276
<v Speaker 1>really difficult.

0:28:43.476 --> 0:28:45.916
<v Speaker 3>So you know, we have to start making bigger and

0:28:45.956 --> 0:28:50.556
<v Speaker 3>bigger fabrications in order to keep climbing places, which lends

0:28:50.556 --> 0:28:54.996
<v Speaker 3>to that idea of the synergy between the ranking metrics, right, like,

0:28:55.036 --> 0:28:57.756
<v Speaker 3>we have to tweak many variables and in some cases

0:28:57.756 --> 0:29:01.836
<v Speaker 3>buy a lot to start seeing any appreciable change in score.

0:29:02.036 --> 0:29:04.796
<v Speaker 3>Like inflating one or two values just doesn't really do

0:29:04.916 --> 0:29:05.556
<v Speaker 3>much for us.

0:29:07.196 --> 0:29:10.156
<v Speaker 1>What Laura Novelle is saying is that if Colombia just

0:29:10.276 --> 0:29:17.836
<v Speaker 1>fiddled with three incredibly obscure metrics and just casually ease

0:29:17.876 --> 0:29:20.836
<v Speaker 1>their way into the top ten, no one's going after them.

0:29:21.076 --> 0:29:24.596
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's absolutely true. If they're cheated just by a

0:29:24.596 --> 0:29:28.316
<v Speaker 2>little bit less like who knows. And this goes back

0:29:28.316 --> 0:29:30.556
<v Speaker 2>to when did they start cheating, right, because I'm guessing

0:29:30.636 --> 0:29:33.956
<v Speaker 2>they did not start being so egregious right away, right.

0:29:33.956 --> 0:29:36.796
<v Speaker 2>They started small, and then they started climbing, and they

0:29:36.836 --> 0:29:40.236
<v Speaker 2>got more ambitious, and no one caught them. No one

0:29:40.276 --> 0:29:42.556
<v Speaker 2>took them by the hand and said, you know, bad boy,

0:29:43.036 --> 0:29:45.316
<v Speaker 2>you can't do this. And so they kept going and

0:29:45.356 --> 0:29:48.756
<v Speaker 2>they kept getting bigger and bigger and bigger. And that

0:29:49.076 --> 0:29:52.476
<v Speaker 2>to me is, you know, the hallmark of the cheaters

0:29:52.476 --> 0:29:53.116
<v Speaker 2>who get caught.

0:29:53.836 --> 0:29:56.916
<v Speaker 1>Columbia only gets caught as this guy, Michael Thaddeus, a

0:29:56.956 --> 0:29:59.876
<v Speaker 1>math professor, takes an interest and devotes an enormous amount

0:29:59.916 --> 0:30:02.436
<v Speaker 1>of time to figuring out how much to the extent

0:30:02.476 --> 0:30:05.916
<v Speaker 1>to which his institution cheats. Right, no one else is checking,

0:30:05.996 --> 0:30:08.516
<v Speaker 1>So right away we have a suspicion that maybe more

0:30:08.596 --> 0:30:12.796
<v Speaker 1>cheating goes on, because how many of these obsessive, devoted

0:30:13.036 --> 0:30:17.236
<v Speaker 1>math professors out there are there the motivation to look, right,

0:30:17.396 --> 0:30:19.556
<v Speaker 1>not that the goblin's looking or US News is certainly

0:30:19.556 --> 0:30:22.676
<v Speaker 1>not looking, because if US News the minute that they

0:30:23.876 --> 0:30:26.796
<v Speaker 1>claim to verify the validity of the data they collect,

0:30:27.076 --> 0:30:29.196
<v Speaker 1>then they're libel in the case of in the event

0:30:29.196 --> 0:30:31.836
<v Speaker 1>of a fraud. So they very clearly say, we don't

0:30:31.876 --> 0:30:34.916
<v Speaker 1>check anything. It's on you. So anyway, the reason I

0:30:34.916 --> 0:30:37.836
<v Speaker 1>bring us up is I'm walking down the street in

0:30:37.836 --> 0:30:42.156
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan about two weeks ago, down twenty second street. Guy

0:30:42.196 --> 0:30:46.276
<v Speaker 1>stops me, he goes, mister clapwell he goes, He goes, yeah, yeah,

0:30:46.516 --> 0:30:50.476
<v Speaker 1>big fan of Revision's history. I read that thing you

0:30:50.516 --> 0:30:53.236
<v Speaker 1>wrote about Columbia, and I got to think because it

0:30:53.236 --> 0:30:56.956
<v Speaker 1>brought me all kinds of clients uhh. And I was

0:30:56.996 --> 0:30:59.156
<v Speaker 1>like wait what. I was like, what do you do?

0:30:59.276 --> 0:31:03.996
<v Speaker 1>He goes, I'm a lawyer, he goes, what clients? He goes, Well,

0:31:04.036 --> 0:31:06.836
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine when other schools learned about what was

0:31:06.836 --> 0:31:11.076
<v Speaker 1>happening at Columbia, they realized they some legal exposure and

0:31:11.116 --> 0:31:13.396
<v Speaker 1>they called me. So all these clients. Now it was

0:31:13.436 --> 0:31:15.756
<v Speaker 1>like wait, wait, and then I said tell me more

0:31:15.796 --> 0:31:17.956
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, oh, I I can't any and he

0:31:17.996 --> 0:31:19.876
<v Speaker 1>walked away and I said, well, I gave him my email.

0:31:19.916 --> 0:31:21.196
<v Speaker 1>I was like, he didn't email me.

0:31:21.676 --> 0:31:22.396
<v Speaker 2>Of course he didn't.

0:31:22.876 --> 0:31:26.276
<v Speaker 1>So but that exchange makes you think, wait, so what

0:31:26.476 --> 0:31:28.756
<v Speaker 1>is he saying. Is he saying that lots of schools

0:31:28.796 --> 0:31:32.356
<v Speaker 1>are cheating They see that Columbia got busted and now

0:31:32.396 --> 0:31:34.636
<v Speaker 1>they're panicking and they're calling him to figure out whether

0:31:34.676 --> 0:31:36.436
<v Speaker 1>they have legal exposure. Is that what he's saying.

0:31:36.516 --> 0:31:38.836
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what he's saying, because the moment you

0:31:38.836 --> 0:31:41.636
<v Speaker 2>started telling the story and it didn't even occur to

0:31:41.676 --> 0:31:44.116
<v Speaker 2>me until this conversation. But of course everyone cheats on

0:31:44.156 --> 0:31:47.076
<v Speaker 2>the US News rankings, and in that case, right, if

0:31:47.076 --> 0:31:49.756
<v Speaker 2>everyone's cheating by a little bit, then the rankings are

0:31:49.756 --> 0:31:52.676
<v Speaker 2>actually probably still pretty accurate, because if every single school

0:31:52.716 --> 0:31:55.276
<v Speaker 2>is trying to bump themselves up a bit, then it

0:31:55.396 --> 0:31:58.796
<v Speaker 2>probably kind of all evens out. But they're no guessing,

0:32:01.636 --> 0:32:04.076
<v Speaker 2>not with Columbia, right, the people who are doing it egregiously,

0:32:04.116 --> 0:32:05.356
<v Speaker 2>Obviously it doesn't even out.

0:32:05.476 --> 0:32:08.356
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not. What a better more PLUSB explanation is

0:32:08.396 --> 0:32:12.396
<v Speaker 1>a is a cheating arms race that somebody fiddles a little,

0:32:12.876 --> 0:32:16.436
<v Speaker 1>someone else realizes that here is fiddling a little, and

0:32:16.436 --> 0:32:19.196
<v Speaker 1>they hiddle a little bit more, and then what you went,

0:32:19.356 --> 0:32:23.156
<v Speaker 1>Columbia is the culmination of a whole series of got it?

0:32:23.196 --> 0:32:24.676
<v Speaker 2>So Columbia is a nuclear explosion.

0:32:24.716 --> 0:32:24.996
<v Speaker 1>Got it?

0:32:25.916 --> 0:32:28.196
<v Speaker 2>But but yeah, it made me realize, you know, how

0:32:28.236 --> 0:32:31.036
<v Speaker 2>many people are cheating, how many schools are cheating on

0:32:31.076 --> 0:32:34.676
<v Speaker 2>the rankings, how many are actually being smarter and just

0:32:34.956 --> 0:32:39.396
<v Speaker 2>cheating smarter and not yet as cocky as Columbia became.

0:32:39.676 --> 0:32:41.836
<v Speaker 2>Because that's the other thing, right, The more you get

0:32:41.876 --> 0:32:44.636
<v Speaker 2>away with it, the longer you get away with it,

0:32:44.796 --> 0:32:47.636
<v Speaker 2>the more confidence you become that you will keep getting

0:32:47.716 --> 0:32:50.116
<v Speaker 2>away with it. And that's completely rational.

0:32:50.436 --> 0:32:52.876
<v Speaker 1>So, as someone who studies this, I'm curious in this question.

0:32:53.716 --> 0:32:56.596
<v Speaker 1>Is it so the longer you cheat and get away

0:32:56.636 --> 0:33:00.116
<v Speaker 1>with it, the more confident you become that you won't

0:33:00.156 --> 0:33:02.676
<v Speaker 1>get caught. But is it also the case that the

0:33:02.796 --> 0:33:05.756
<v Speaker 1>less aware you are that you're actually cheating.

0:33:06.276 --> 0:33:08.676
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think that's right. No think I think

0:33:08.716 --> 0:33:12.316
<v Speaker 2>that these people are not pathological. They are very well

0:33:12.716 --> 0:33:15.956
<v Speaker 2>aware of what they're doing, but they probably give themselves

0:33:15.956 --> 0:33:18.956
<v Speaker 2>excuses because they also don't think they're doing anything bad,

0:33:19.436 --> 0:33:22.116
<v Speaker 2>and people who cheat all the time, who lie all

0:33:22.156 --> 0:33:24.516
<v Speaker 2>the time, they want to justify that, no, I'm not

0:33:24.556 --> 0:33:27.156
<v Speaker 2>a bad person and I'm not really doing anything wrong.

0:33:27.356 --> 0:33:30.436
<v Speaker 2>So Columbia actually probably tells itself we're not doing anything bad.

0:33:30.476 --> 0:33:33.556
<v Speaker 2>We're just staying competitive, because if we're the only truly

0:33:33.596 --> 0:33:36.196
<v Speaker 2>honest school and everyone else is cheating, then we get

0:33:36.196 --> 0:33:38.836
<v Speaker 2>screwed and they all benefit. So you know, let's all

0:33:38.876 --> 0:33:39.596
<v Speaker 2>do it a little bit.

0:33:40.076 --> 0:33:44.356
<v Speaker 1>Lance armst argument for which at various times in my life,

0:33:44.396 --> 0:33:48.036
<v Speaker 1>I've had a lot of sympathy. So here's what Lance

0:33:48.036 --> 0:33:51.036
<v Speaker 1>would say. Lance would say in the era that I

0:33:51.196 --> 0:33:54.996
<v Speaker 1>was taking EPO and winning the Twitter fans every year,

0:33:56.036 --> 0:33:58.076
<v Speaker 1>not just EPO, lots of things. The only way you

0:33:58.116 --> 0:34:00.916
<v Speaker 1>competed at highest levels of cycling was if you were

0:34:01.316 --> 0:34:06.676
<v Speaker 1>using performance enhancing drugs. My problem is that I was

0:34:06.716 --> 0:34:10.036
<v Speaker 1>better at it than everybody else, and I think that

0:34:10.036 --> 0:34:14.236
<v Speaker 1>that's actually true, because you know, you can't just take

0:34:14.276 --> 0:34:18.996
<v Speaker 1>performance enhancing drugs and expect to be better overnight. They're

0:34:19.036 --> 0:34:21.796
<v Speaker 1>simply a tool that allow you to train in different

0:34:21.836 --> 0:34:26.796
<v Speaker 1>ways and to exploit your potential more efficiently. And he

0:34:27.076 --> 0:34:30.956
<v Speaker 1>was the most efficient exploiter of his own potential. Right, true,

0:34:30.676 --> 0:34:34.996
<v Speaker 1>he brought a considerable his considerable intelligence, and the man

0:34:35.476 --> 0:34:38.236
<v Speaker 1>and his group or these guys were like to bear

0:34:38.276 --> 0:34:40.876
<v Speaker 1>on the question of Okay, if we're going to take EPO,

0:34:41.036 --> 0:34:45.276
<v Speaker 1>how do we maximize its usefulness? So like he's sort

0:34:45.276 --> 0:34:49.756
<v Speaker 1>of right, like if Landsay is a less expert cheater,

0:34:50.236 --> 0:34:52.636
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't get caught. Most of those guys never got caught.

0:34:53.076 --> 0:34:56.476
<v Speaker 2>But it's also because he's so incredibly talented that people

0:34:56.516 --> 0:34:59.476
<v Speaker 2>are going to scrutinize him more. Yes, And so.

0:34:59.236 --> 0:35:01.676
<v Speaker 1>He's like Colombia in this respect. You know that the

0:35:01.756 --> 0:35:04.916
<v Speaker 1>reason we care that Columbia is cheating us, it's Colombia. Yeah, right,

0:35:04.916 --> 0:35:07.516
<v Speaker 1>we're not East Tennessee State. If they cheat on their

0:35:07.596 --> 0:35:10.556
<v Speaker 1>US news, we're not getting quite as upset. Right, we

0:35:10.556 --> 0:35:11.356
<v Speaker 1>don't feel the mistakes.

0:35:11.676 --> 0:35:16.156
<v Speaker 2>East Tennessee State, no offense place. But yes, point taken.

0:35:16.316 --> 0:35:18.796
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, any way, could I make a personal confession about

0:35:18.836 --> 0:35:20.356
<v Speaker 1>cheating on the weekend?

0:35:20.396 --> 0:35:21.516
<v Speaker 2>Welcome, What do you cheat on?

0:35:21.756 --> 0:35:23.356
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what I cheat it. On the weekend

0:35:23.796 --> 0:35:27.876
<v Speaker 1>I ran in the sharing Connecticut Classic five Mile Road Rays,

0:35:27.956 --> 0:35:28.876
<v Speaker 1>an annual road race.

0:35:29.316 --> 0:35:29.756
<v Speaker 2>How'd you do?

0:35:30.036 --> 0:35:33.996
<v Speaker 1>And I came in I think seventeenth I'm an old man.

0:35:34.636 --> 0:35:37.556
<v Speaker 1>It was a good but I cheated, and I cheated

0:35:37.596 --> 0:35:40.436
<v Speaker 1>because there were maybe other cheaters as well. I was

0:35:40.476 --> 0:35:43.636
<v Speaker 1>wearing what they call super shoes. Ah, you know, you

0:35:43.676 --> 0:35:45.636
<v Speaker 1>know about this. There's now running shoes you can buy

0:35:45.636 --> 0:35:48.916
<v Speaker 1>with carbon fiberplates, and there's a particular kind of running

0:35:48.916 --> 0:35:51.836
<v Speaker 1>shoe made by New Balance, which combines a carbon fiber

0:35:51.916 --> 0:35:55.316
<v Speaker 1>plate with what they call a high stack height, an

0:35:55.436 --> 0:35:58.356
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of cushion and you kind of bounce down

0:35:58.396 --> 0:36:01.796
<v Speaker 1>the road. And I heard that and in certain races,

0:36:02.276 --> 0:36:06.436
<v Speaker 1>these particular New Balances, you know, they're banned from formal competition.

0:36:06.556 --> 0:36:08.356
<v Speaker 1>I could not wear these if I was running an

0:36:08.356 --> 0:36:13.036
<v Speaker 1>Olympic marathon. But I'm like, it's the Sharing Classic five months, Like,

0:36:13.316 --> 0:36:15.596
<v Speaker 1>do you know there's like fifty people in the race.

0:36:15.716 --> 0:36:17.996
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's Saturday morning. Like, I'm an old dude.

0:36:17.996 --> 0:36:23.876
<v Speaker 1>Nobody cares. But technically it was cheating. Well was it?

0:36:23.956 --> 0:36:24.836
<v Speaker 2>Was it actually banned?

0:36:25.756 --> 0:36:27.116
<v Speaker 1>Well? Is it formless band?

0:36:27.236 --> 0:36:27.436
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:36:27.676 --> 0:36:29.596
<v Speaker 1>But he's cheating in the sense that is a violation

0:36:29.716 --> 0:36:32.436
<v Speaker 1>of the ethic of the sport, and it is an

0:36:32.516 --> 0:36:36.036
<v Speaker 1>unfair advantage over everyone who was in that race who

0:36:36.076 --> 0:36:40.236
<v Speaker 1>was not wearing carbon fiber carbon plate shoes with high

0:36:40.236 --> 0:36:40.876
<v Speaker 1>stock hites.

0:36:40.956 --> 0:36:43.556
<v Speaker 2>Well, if this was, if this were actually an important competition,

0:36:43.596 --> 0:36:44.516
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you would do that.

0:36:45.396 --> 0:36:47.516
<v Speaker 1>We are you saying that my race wasn't important to me?

0:36:48.796 --> 0:36:51.596
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I am saying that, Malcolm, that is exactly what

0:36:51.676 --> 0:36:52.236
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying.

0:36:52.836 --> 0:36:55.356
<v Speaker 1>No, I felt mildly guilty. Was that the start It

0:36:55.396 --> 0:36:58.556
<v Speaker 1>was the starting line, and I was looking at everyone's

0:36:58.596 --> 0:37:00.836
<v Speaker 1>shoes to see if anyone else had these shoes, and

0:37:00.876 --> 0:37:03.756
<v Speaker 1>I feel guilty. There was a conscious decision in the morning,

0:37:03.836 --> 0:37:06.076
<v Speaker 1>was like, because I have lots of legal shoes, but

0:37:06.156 --> 0:37:08.636
<v Speaker 1>everyone's virtually everyone who's serious is wearing some kind of

0:37:08.636 --> 0:37:11.956
<v Speaker 1>carbon yeah show, but this is the one that combines

0:37:11.996 --> 0:37:14.396
<v Speaker 1>it with the ice tackite. And so I was looking around,

0:37:14.436 --> 0:37:16.676
<v Speaker 1>was like, is anyone else wearing these new balances? And

0:37:16.716 --> 0:37:18.596
<v Speaker 1>I felt a little bit exposed, I have to say,

0:37:18.636 --> 0:37:21.596
<v Speaker 1>because but no one noticed and my if you look

0:37:21.636 --> 0:37:24.196
<v Speaker 1>on the website of the Sharing Classic five mile race,

0:37:24.556 --> 0:37:27.556
<v Speaker 1>there's no asterisk next to him next to my performance.

0:37:27.636 --> 0:37:29.796
<v Speaker 2>Right now now everyone knows, I mean, I did not

0:37:29.956 --> 0:37:33.076
<v Speaker 2>know that I was sitting across from a bona fide.

0:37:33.236 --> 0:37:35.196
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you can put that story in your.

0:37:35.636 --> 0:37:37.596
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe now you're going to make my cheating, but

0:37:38.356 --> 0:37:40.076
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be it's going to be an entire chapter.

0:37:40.516 --> 0:37:41.956
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm Glad, I just you.

0:37:41.916 --> 0:37:43.836
<v Speaker 1>Know, I just wouldn't very briefly go back. We're nearing

0:37:43.876 --> 0:37:45.876
<v Speaker 1>the end of our time. I have one last little

0:37:45.916 --> 0:37:47.996
<v Speaker 1>bit of business, which is, you know, I've been handing

0:37:47.996 --> 0:37:52.876
<v Speaker 1>out these prizes, Pushkin prizes, and we talked a little

0:37:52.876 --> 0:37:55.636
<v Speaker 1>bit about the first one, that George Santos Memorial Pushkin

0:37:55.676 --> 0:37:59.436
<v Speaker 1>Prize for egregiously deceptive self promotion and not that you.

0:37:59.396 --> 0:38:01.396
<v Speaker 2>Put memorial in there. That's hilarious.

0:38:01.436 --> 0:38:04.196
<v Speaker 1>Well, his career is essentially over, so I feel like, yeah, exactly.

0:38:04.476 --> 0:38:06.676
<v Speaker 1>But there was another one I did in a I

0:38:06.716 --> 0:38:10.996
<v Speaker 1>read the story by this student at Harvard, Harvard, your

0:38:11.116 --> 0:38:16.356
<v Speaker 1>school that you attended, the see that you.

0:38:16.236 --> 0:38:18.836
<v Speaker 2>Put a little barb in there without any swear words.

0:38:20.916 --> 0:38:22.556
<v Speaker 1>So my best friends went hard.

0:38:23.116 --> 0:38:25.836
<v Speaker 2>And and they're perfectly nice people.

0:38:26.876 --> 0:38:29.076
<v Speaker 1>So I found this this student named Brooks Anderson, who

0:38:29.116 --> 0:38:31.516
<v Speaker 1>wrote an article for the Harvard Crimson in which he

0:38:31.556 --> 0:38:34.356
<v Speaker 1>pointed out just how many administrators there were at Harvard,

0:38:34.636 --> 0:38:37.156
<v Speaker 1>and so I called him up and I said, Brooks,

0:38:37.316 --> 0:38:39.236
<v Speaker 1>can you do a little of work for me? I

0:38:39.276 --> 0:38:43.476
<v Speaker 1>want to know which school in America has the highest

0:38:43.596 --> 0:38:47.836
<v Speaker 1>ratio of administrators to students. You know, the perfect number

0:38:47.876 --> 0:38:51.036
<v Speaker 1>would be one, right, And I called that the ICU

0:38:51.116 --> 0:38:54.956
<v Speaker 1>staffing ratio and ice you in a hospital is characterized

0:38:54.956 --> 0:38:56.396
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that there was a one to one

0:38:56.516 --> 0:39:00.636
<v Speaker 1>ratio of staff to patients, right, That's yeah, it's the baseline.

0:39:00.916 --> 0:39:03.236
<v Speaker 1>Often there's more, but that's the baseline. So I said,

0:39:03.276 --> 0:39:06.316
<v Speaker 1>to what extent can we figure out if any college

0:39:06.356 --> 0:39:09.236
<v Speaker 1>is coming close to an ICU ratio? So this is

0:39:09.316 --> 0:39:12.356
<v Speaker 1>the second Pushkin Prize, the ICU Staffing Ratio Award. And

0:39:12.436 --> 0:39:15.916
<v Speaker 1>I deputized Brooks to go out in the world and

0:39:16.076 --> 0:39:19.836
<v Speaker 1>to do some research and figure out who is the

0:39:19.916 --> 0:39:22.716
<v Speaker 1>closest to the magic number of one, and so I

0:39:22.756 --> 0:39:27.556
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to run through his findings. I limited him

0:39:27.596 --> 0:39:30.756
<v Speaker 1>to the Ivy League plus MIT in Stanford, which seemed reasonable,

0:39:31.916 --> 0:39:34.636
<v Speaker 1>and so he has at the bottom was Brown point

0:39:34.676 --> 0:39:38.516
<v Speaker 1>one four, then Columbia point one five, Columbia.

0:39:38.916 --> 0:39:39.756
<v Speaker 2>There it is again.

0:39:39.596 --> 0:39:45.516
<v Speaker 1>Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, MIT, Harvard. And the highest, at a

0:39:45.596 --> 0:39:51.516
<v Speaker 1>staggering zero point three six administrative staff to student ratio.

0:39:51.756 --> 0:39:52.196
<v Speaker 3>Is he l.

0:39:54.916 --> 0:39:59.076
<v Speaker 1>The Bulldogs. They take on the prize which means, like

0:39:59.276 --> 0:40:02.236
<v Speaker 1>you walk around the Yale campus, chances are your one

0:40:02.316 --> 0:40:04.636
<v Speaker 1>third is likely to run into an administrator as you

0:40:04.676 --> 0:40:08.516
<v Speaker 1>are a student, which is I'm sorry, completely not only bananas,

0:40:10.476 --> 0:40:11.316
<v Speaker 1>it is bananas.

0:40:11.356 --> 0:40:13.236
<v Speaker 2>But but I will I will actually push back a

0:40:13.276 --> 0:40:16.876
<v Speaker 2>tiny bit on this because as someone who went to Harvard,

0:40:18.236 --> 0:40:20.996
<v Speaker 2>we always were a little bit jealous of the fact

0:40:21.076 --> 0:40:25.036
<v Speaker 2>that Yale's students had more support, more resources.

0:40:25.116 --> 0:40:28.756
<v Speaker 1>And wait, you were You're serious, You're serious. Actually you

0:40:28.756 --> 0:40:30.836
<v Speaker 1>went to Harvard and one of your complaints was a

0:40:30.916 --> 0:40:33.636
<v Speaker 1>lack of resources relative to other schools, not.

0:40:33.596 --> 0:40:36.876
<v Speaker 2>Relative to other schools, just relative to Yale. That Yale

0:40:37.156 --> 0:40:41.116
<v Speaker 2>was a much more personalized environment where students actually had

0:40:41.196 --> 0:40:43.516
<v Speaker 2>places to go, people to talk to, where there was

0:40:43.556 --> 0:40:46.876
<v Speaker 2>a very big support structure that was actually pretty absent

0:40:46.916 --> 0:40:48.956
<v Speaker 2>at Harvard. Like at Harvard's a big school where you

0:40:48.996 --> 0:40:50.516
<v Speaker 2>sink or swim. And I was fine with that. I

0:40:50.556 --> 0:40:52.916
<v Speaker 2>actually I loved it. Like I'm independent, I don't need it.

0:40:53.316 --> 0:40:55.556
<v Speaker 2>I understand. I see your face, I see your face.

0:40:55.796 --> 0:40:59.116
<v Speaker 2>But but all of these people, there.

0:40:58.916 --> 0:41:01.276
<v Speaker 1>Are no one's ever no one's ever sunk in the

0:41:01.316 --> 0:41:02.556
<v Speaker 1>history of Harvard University.

0:41:02.636 --> 0:41:03.636
<v Speaker 2>Oh, some people have sunk.

0:41:03.756 --> 0:41:06.916
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like yeah, nineteen thirty six, somebody dropped that.

0:41:07.676 --> 0:41:10.916
<v Speaker 2>But all I mean is that administrators do serve a

0:41:10.956 --> 0:41:14.436
<v Speaker 2>purpose for student support, student resources. I think that's important.

0:41:14.716 --> 0:41:17.236
<v Speaker 2>And all of these people have jobs, So these are

0:41:17.276 --> 0:41:19.956
<v Speaker 2>people who are getting paid money and making a living,

0:41:20.316 --> 0:41:23.276
<v Speaker 2>and they'd be fired if you had lower ratios. And

0:41:23.596 --> 0:41:26.756
<v Speaker 2>people are going hungry babies, starving babies, Malcolm starting.

0:41:26.996 --> 0:41:29.436
<v Speaker 1>No one is saying that anyone needs to be fired.

0:41:29.876 --> 0:41:32.436
<v Speaker 1>With the Pushkin Prize, we simply like to shine a

0:41:32.476 --> 0:41:36.836
<v Speaker 1>spotlight on, shall we say, anomalist behavior by elite institutions

0:41:36.836 --> 0:41:41.516
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Come on, well, I'm trying to

0:41:41.516 --> 0:41:44.436
<v Speaker 1>get a strator for every three students it's getting We're

0:41:44.476 --> 0:41:46.116
<v Speaker 1>not talking about academic staff.

0:41:46.916 --> 0:41:49.876
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So academic staff obviously is more.

0:41:49.716 --> 0:41:53.236
<v Speaker 1>Important, and for the parents who pay the tuition that

0:41:53.316 --> 0:41:59.436
<v Speaker 1>covers this enormous amount of administrative belowd fair enough. Yes, yes, Maria,

0:41:59.716 --> 0:42:04.676
<v Speaker 1>this has always been enormously fun. I will go home

0:42:04.756 --> 0:42:08.436
<v Speaker 1>just thinking about your transformation when you speak Russian and

0:42:08.516 --> 0:42:11.436
<v Speaker 1>how anyone with the privilege of hearing you speak Russian

0:42:11.476 --> 0:42:12.956
<v Speaker 1>gets a different Maria.

0:42:13.836 --> 0:42:16.556
<v Speaker 2>I love it, And Malcolm, I will go home thinking

0:42:16.596 --> 0:42:21.556
<v Speaker 2>about your seventeenth place finish in your race. That was

0:42:21.756 --> 0:42:22.876
<v Speaker 2>life changing.

0:42:22.516 --> 0:42:26.156
<v Speaker 1>For you, right, yes, it was, Gus, it was Thank you, Maria.

0:42:26.276 --> 0:42:29.076
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Malcolm.

0:42:29.236 --> 0:42:34.236
<v Speaker 1>Revisionist History Today was produced by Kiara Powell with Jacob Smith, Lemingistu,

0:42:34.316 --> 0:42:38.436
<v Speaker 1>ben at Af Haffrey and tali Emlin. Engineering by Flon Williams,

0:42:38.796 --> 0:42:42.276
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Bruguer and Kay Wang. Our music by Luis Garra,

0:42:42.556 --> 0:42:46.436
<v Speaker 1>fact checking by Kishew Williams and tali Emlin. Our showrunner

0:42:46.876 --> 0:42:49.396
<v Speaker 1>is Peter Clowney. I'm Malcolm Glawell.