1 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:06,800 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:14,600 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Brian Curtis 3 00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:17,400 Speaker 2: along with Doug Krisner join us each day for the 4 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:20,800 Speaker 2: stories making news and moving markets in the Asia Pacific. 5 00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:23,440 Speaker 2: You can subscribe to the show anywhere you get your 6 00:00:23,480 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 2: podcasts and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and 7 00:00:27,480 --> 00:00:31,639 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Business App. Yeah. Greg Cordy joins us now 8 00:00:31,760 --> 00:00:36,040 Speaker 2: on the program Bloomberg Senior White House and Politics Correspondent. 9 00:00:36,640 --> 00:00:39,320 Speaker 2: And you know that when the gaff s draw gasps, 10 00:00:39,440 --> 00:00:43,040 Speaker 2: you're in trouble. He had some stumbles. President Biden had 11 00:00:43,040 --> 00:00:45,279 Speaker 2: some stumbles there right at the outset, in particular when 12 00:00:45,320 --> 00:00:48,520 Speaker 2: he referred to Vice President Trump, and Trump has joked 13 00:00:48,520 --> 00:00:52,080 Speaker 2: about that. But there were plenty of moments, normal moments, 14 00:00:52,280 --> 00:00:55,960 Speaker 2: normal clarity as well. But you wonder whether it's enough 15 00:00:56,200 --> 00:00:57,960 Speaker 2: for the democratic. 16 00:00:59,280 --> 00:01:04,479 Speaker 3: You know people. So yeah, my sort of take on 17 00:01:04,520 --> 00:01:07,280 Speaker 3: this was that it was sort of a betwixt and 18 00:01:07,360 --> 00:01:10,039 Speaker 3: between right, it was not going to modify by all 19 00:01:10,120 --> 00:01:13,560 Speaker 3: the critics that have been, you know, amplifying this drumbeat 20 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:17,560 Speaker 3: in recent days, you know, drip drip drip, one Democrat 21 00:01:17,600 --> 00:01:21,560 Speaker 3: after another, calling on the president to resign. It's still 22 00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:26,040 Speaker 3: a very small minority of his party. I should say 23 00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:28,040 Speaker 3: that they are calling on the president to step aside 24 00:01:28,040 --> 00:01:31,039 Speaker 3: and let somebody else run for office. He would presumably 25 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:34,600 Speaker 3: remain as president. But then, you know, on the other side, 26 00:01:34,680 --> 00:01:37,520 Speaker 3: it wasn't so bad that there was nothing that happened 27 00:01:37,640 --> 00:01:40,679 Speaker 3: today that I think it would change President Biden's calculation 28 00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:43,039 Speaker 3: of the people around him to say that maybe it 29 00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 3: is the time to sort of think about passing the torch. 30 00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:49,200 Speaker 3: So I don't know that this press conference helped him 31 00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:50,440 Speaker 3: all that much. I don't know that to hurt him 32 00:01:50,440 --> 00:01:51,000 Speaker 3: all that much either. 33 00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:54,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, when asked about you know what might make him 34 00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:57,000 Speaker 2: pass the torch, the only thing that he would cite 35 00:01:57,080 --> 00:02:00,440 Speaker 2: was if if his advisors told him that he could win. 36 00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:04,120 Speaker 2: You know, what sort of process would that be? And 37 00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:07,880 Speaker 2: how would you know what you even if you cited polls, 38 00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:09,760 Speaker 2: I mean, that's not going to convince the president that 39 00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:11,560 Speaker 2: the polls know all. 40 00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 3: Yeah, especially since this particular president, and to be fair 41 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:21,440 Speaker 3: to him, most politicians tend to take very rosy optimistic 42 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:24,080 Speaker 3: views of the polls even when they're behind, and he 43 00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:26,840 Speaker 3: is behind in all the polls. He tends to cherry 44 00:02:26,840 --> 00:02:29,360 Speaker 3: pick the polls that he's doing better in. He is 45 00:02:29,400 --> 00:02:31,960 Speaker 3: doing better, we should say, in the Bloomberg News Morning 46 00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:35,600 Speaker 3: Console poll of seven swing states. He's only down by 47 00:02:35,680 --> 00:02:38,960 Speaker 3: two percentage points across those seven states, but he still 48 00:02:38,960 --> 00:02:41,160 Speaker 3: loses the electoral college even in that poll, which is 49 00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:45,600 Speaker 3: one of his better polls. So he's also correct though, 50 00:02:45,760 --> 00:02:48,520 Speaker 3: that we have four months to go until the election. 51 00:02:49,160 --> 00:02:52,440 Speaker 3: It's still summer, it's early July, we haven't had the conventions. 52 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:55,959 Speaker 3: A lot of people aren't as focused on this race 53 00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:59,320 Speaker 3: as you and I are, and so he still thinks 54 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:01,680 Speaker 3: that they're there's a lot of time to play catchup, 55 00:03:01,720 --> 00:03:03,600 Speaker 3: and historically he's probably right. 56 00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:09,840 Speaker 2: How rigorous is his schedule over the next two weeks. 57 00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:14,560 Speaker 3: Well, he has an interview with NBC's Lester Holt on Monday, 58 00:03:14,639 --> 00:03:16,919 Speaker 3: and he's going to be making some campaign visits to 59 00:03:17,760 --> 00:03:20,560 Speaker 3: a number of key swing states now. Next week, of course, 60 00:03:20,639 --> 00:03:26,280 Speaker 3: is the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, and traditionally campaigns 61 00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:29,680 Speaker 3: tend to go dark when the other party is having 62 00:03:29,680 --> 00:03:32,040 Speaker 3: their convention. There's been historically a little bit of a 63 00:03:33,320 --> 00:03:37,200 Speaker 3: gentleman's agreement to let them have their say, given that 64 00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:39,440 Speaker 3: mostly the attention of the political world is going to 65 00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:42,880 Speaker 3: be on the Republican convention anyway. But maybe it looks 66 00:03:42,960 --> 00:03:45,000 Speaker 3: like Biden might be doing a little bit more aggressive 67 00:03:45,000 --> 00:03:49,080 Speaker 3: counter program and getting out on the road. And look, 68 00:03:49,280 --> 00:03:51,920 Speaker 3: I think he knows that he can't run the basement 69 00:03:52,000 --> 00:03:56,760 Speaker 3: campaign of twenty twenty that he ran during the coronavirus pandemic. 70 00:03:57,080 --> 00:03:58,960 Speaker 3: He's going to have to visit all these states and 71 00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:00,840 Speaker 3: he promised to do that today In the pres conference. 72 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:05,760 Speaker 2: Earlier, Ed and I were having a discussion about the process. 73 00:04:05,880 --> 00:04:08,680 Speaker 2: What would come next if for some reason President Biden 74 00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:12,440 Speaker 2: decided that he did need to step aside. What do 75 00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:13,720 Speaker 2: we know about that process? 76 00:04:15,160 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 3: Yeah, so the easiest way for this to happen is 77 00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:22,640 Speaker 3: for him to step aside and tap a successor. That 78 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:26,000 Speaker 3: successor would have to be ratified at the Democratic National 79 00:04:26,040 --> 00:04:32,440 Speaker 3: Convention in Chicago next month. And as it is right now, 80 00:04:32,600 --> 00:04:35,760 Speaker 3: Biden has ninety nine percent of delegates of the pledge delegates, 81 00:04:35,760 --> 00:04:38,920 Speaker 3: I should say to that convention. He said tonight that 82 00:04:39,440 --> 00:04:42,200 Speaker 3: all of those delegates, regardless of whether he drops out 83 00:04:42,279 --> 00:04:44,680 Speaker 3: or stays in, are free to vote their conscience. That's 84 00:04:44,720 --> 00:04:47,239 Speaker 3: just a restatement of the rules as they exist anyway, 85 00:04:47,760 --> 00:04:50,719 Speaker 3: But it would take then six hundred of those delegates 86 00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:53,279 Speaker 3: out of four thousand and five thousand or so to 87 00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:59,400 Speaker 3: place other names into nomination and have the party decide 88 00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:03,320 Speaker 3: zumptive person who would take over in that case would 89 00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:05,360 Speaker 3: be Kamala Harris. He's the vice president, she's been his 90 00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:08,200 Speaker 3: understudy for the past three and a half years, and 91 00:05:08,240 --> 00:05:11,640 Speaker 3: she would inherit their campaign war chest that they have together. 92 00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:15,120 Speaker 3: But there's always the possibility there could be other names 93 00:05:15,120 --> 00:05:18,039 Speaker 3: as well. But still we're still talking in the realm 94 00:05:18,080 --> 00:05:21,279 Speaker 3: of hypotheticals here, because what we saw tonight, what we've 95 00:05:21,320 --> 00:05:24,279 Speaker 3: seen in the two weeks CINCEUS debate, is that President 96 00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:27,839 Speaker 3: Biden has shown no sign that he's considering doing that. 97 00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:30,640 Speaker 2: Well, let's say he's weakened, but he's not weakened enough 98 00:05:30,680 --> 00:05:33,640 Speaker 2: to step aside and he runs. Are we entering a 99 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:38,240 Speaker 2: period here where voters will vote for him even though 100 00:05:38,279 --> 00:05:43,120 Speaker 2: he knows he's not quite his old self in that 101 00:05:43,279 --> 00:05:45,960 Speaker 2: they just like the brand of the Democratic Party more 102 00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:48,560 Speaker 2: than let's say, the Republican Party and the same thing 103 00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:49,599 Speaker 2: on the other side. 104 00:05:50,520 --> 00:05:52,120 Speaker 3: Oh, I think that's absolutely true. And I think we 105 00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:55,120 Speaker 3: in this very sort of polarized political age that we 106 00:05:55,160 --> 00:05:58,520 Speaker 3: are in. People are voting for those brand names to 107 00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:02,160 Speaker 3: a large extent. We haven't seen for all of the 108 00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:05,640 Speaker 3: talk about this terrible debate that the president had and 109 00:06:05,680 --> 00:06:08,679 Speaker 3: nobody thinks he had a good debate, right, the polls 110 00:06:08,720 --> 00:06:12,400 Speaker 3: have not shown considerable slippage that people are locked in 111 00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:16,320 Speaker 3: and this campaign is going to be fought on those 112 00:06:16,400 --> 00:06:17,839 Speaker 3: last two yards of the field. 113 00:06:18,240 --> 00:06:21,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, and we haven't seen a huge impact on markets either, Gregory, 114 00:06:21,800 --> 00:06:24,040 Speaker 2: thank you very much for being with us. Gregory Corti, 115 00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:36,000 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Senior White House and Politics correspondent, joining us for 116 00:06:36,040 --> 00:06:40,480 Speaker 2: some discussion of Marcus Is Jitania Kandari, PM, multi asset 117 00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:45,200 Speaker 2: strategist at Morgan Stanley Investment Management. Well, it's very good 118 00:06:45,200 --> 00:06:46,159 Speaker 2: to have you on the program. 119 00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:46,400 Speaker 3: Here. 120 00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:48,880 Speaker 2: We are seeing a lot of churn with strengthen the end, 121 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:52,440 Speaker 2: weakness in Japanese equities, weakness in SOEUL, and we had 122 00:06:52,440 --> 00:06:54,240 Speaker 2: a churn on Wall Street as well, where there was 123 00:06:54,279 --> 00:06:58,000 Speaker 2: this huge rotation. Interested in your thoughts whether this is 124 00:06:58,080 --> 00:07:01,080 Speaker 2: kind of one day development, why this continues. 125 00:07:02,960 --> 00:07:05,320 Speaker 1: Hi, Thanks for having me on the show. Well, I 126 00:07:05,360 --> 00:07:09,200 Speaker 1: think you know, the concentration in the US market specifically 127 00:07:10,120 --> 00:07:13,280 Speaker 1: was very extended and as you know, the top ten stocks, 128 00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:17,440 Speaker 1: if you look at just a contribution to overall returns, 129 00:07:17,480 --> 00:07:21,240 Speaker 1: their contribution to overall returns was as high as fifty descent, 130 00:07:21,360 --> 00:07:24,080 Speaker 1: and the US if you compare that to say, in 131 00:07:24,160 --> 00:07:28,520 Speaker 1: Emerging Market Index, a third of that return comes from 132 00:07:28,600 --> 00:07:31,680 Speaker 1: the top ten. So I think with the interest rate 133 00:07:31,800 --> 00:07:36,440 Speaker 1: expectations getting reset, uh, the other parts of the economy 134 00:07:36,840 --> 00:07:40,920 Speaker 1: that have been that haven't been performing because, for example, 135 00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:44,480 Speaker 1: the small caps, more floating rate debt, both in the 136 00:07:44,560 --> 00:07:48,960 Speaker 1: US and even globally, they should see a catalyst here 137 00:07:49,200 --> 00:07:52,600 Speaker 1: given that if interest rates would to come down or 138 00:07:52,640 --> 00:07:56,560 Speaker 1: not increase further, uh, then you know that provides a 139 00:07:56,640 --> 00:08:02,880 Speaker 1: nice buffer for these these earnings. And specifically on the currency, 140 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:07,400 Speaker 1: Zen shows up as the most competitive and very very 141 00:08:07,480 --> 00:08:13,280 Speaker 1: cheap based on historical measures. So I would expect the 142 00:08:13,320 --> 00:08:16,520 Speaker 1: interest rate differentials and the growth differentials that worked for 143 00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:20,080 Speaker 1: the dollars so far should now turn in favor of 144 00:08:20,120 --> 00:08:23,600 Speaker 1: the non US and non dollar kind of currencies and 145 00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:24,640 Speaker 1: countries as well. 146 00:08:25,240 --> 00:08:27,560 Speaker 2: Since we had the long news conference and delayed start 147 00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:29,120 Speaker 2: the program, we didn't get a chance to talk too 148 00:08:29,200 --> 00:08:31,320 Speaker 2: much about the United States and the market there, So 149 00:08:31,360 --> 00:08:33,480 Speaker 2: I just maybe pop in one more question. We can 150 00:08:33,520 --> 00:08:35,360 Speaker 2: take close to look at emerging markets, which I know 151 00:08:35,520 --> 00:08:38,559 Speaker 2: is one of your specialties. In terms of this rotation 152 00:08:38,600 --> 00:08:40,400 Speaker 2: that we did see today, I would imagine that the 153 00:08:40,400 --> 00:08:43,680 Speaker 2: bulls are not too happy by it. They'd like to 154 00:08:43,720 --> 00:08:47,800 Speaker 2: see not rotation, but a broadening. In other words, they'd 155 00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:50,960 Speaker 2: probably like to see those stocks, those cyclical and value 156 00:08:51,040 --> 00:08:54,360 Speaker 2: names that have lagged catch up a little bit rather 157 00:08:54,440 --> 00:08:57,840 Speaker 2: than selling from one and moving into the other. Is 158 00:08:57,880 --> 00:09:00,800 Speaker 2: that something that the ship might get right once we 159 00:09:00,880 --> 00:09:03,959 Speaker 2: start getting the tech earnings or again, you know it 160 00:09:04,120 --> 00:09:07,080 Speaker 2: is it really just something that we have to watch closely. 161 00:09:08,800 --> 00:09:11,680 Speaker 1: You know. I think what's really interesting, as we saw today, 162 00:09:11,720 --> 00:09:15,720 Speaker 1: the equal cap weighted index really had a nice run 163 00:09:15,800 --> 00:09:19,520 Speaker 1: even you know, not just the small cap. So I 164 00:09:19,559 --> 00:09:23,959 Speaker 1: think this even within the Mega seven, if you see, 165 00:09:24,240 --> 00:09:27,240 Speaker 1: it's basically been the three out of the Mega four 166 00:09:27,400 --> 00:09:30,720 Speaker 1: that have driven US. So US has for the first 167 00:09:30,800 --> 00:09:34,200 Speaker 1: half till June thirtieth, the first half of the year 168 00:09:34,920 --> 00:09:38,480 Speaker 1: or is up fifteen percent twenty three percent Mega seven 169 00:09:38,520 --> 00:09:42,079 Speaker 1: out of which only three actually really outperformed, but the 170 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:45,040 Speaker 1: rest of the US was up only sixty six percent. 171 00:09:45,679 --> 00:09:49,520 Speaker 1: So if you excelt these megacap performance so I think 172 00:09:49,920 --> 00:09:53,959 Speaker 1: that our clearly earnings are going to be critical and 173 00:09:54,000 --> 00:09:57,880 Speaker 1: there will be a lot of discerning in the numbers 174 00:09:58,240 --> 00:10:01,120 Speaker 1: that is required, even for the men US seven, and 175 00:10:01,160 --> 00:10:06,199 Speaker 1: we're already beginning to see that. But I do expect 176 00:10:07,160 --> 00:10:11,920 Speaker 1: breadth to improve. But we are also seeing, you know, 177 00:10:12,040 --> 00:10:16,439 Speaker 1: some of the technical indicators for the US reaching levels 178 00:10:16,440 --> 00:10:19,960 Speaker 1: that suggest a draw down. An annual draw down of 179 00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:23,800 Speaker 1: ten to fifteen percent is very normal in any past year. 180 00:10:24,280 --> 00:10:26,280 Speaker 1: So something to keep in mind as well. 181 00:10:26,640 --> 00:10:28,760 Speaker 2: If we get that, if we get a ten to 182 00:10:28,800 --> 00:10:33,360 Speaker 2: fifteen percent pullback in US, doocs, will emerging markets benefit 183 00:10:33,400 --> 00:10:36,240 Speaker 2: from that or will they fall in sympathy? 184 00:10:38,160 --> 00:10:41,480 Speaker 1: So it's you know, if you look at past corrections 185 00:10:41,840 --> 00:10:46,160 Speaker 1: in the US, it's been mixed. Emerging markets have sometimes 186 00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:50,760 Speaker 1: outperformed as well. Even in the two thousand correction. Initially 187 00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:55,040 Speaker 1: emerging markets underperform, but towards the second half of the 188 00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:59,920 Speaker 1: US draw down they had started out performing the US. 189 00:11:00,160 --> 00:11:04,520 Speaker 1: So I do think I mean emerging markets is heterogeneous 190 00:11:04,600 --> 00:11:08,080 Speaker 1: acid class. China is the eight hundred pound gorilla, and 191 00:11:08,960 --> 00:11:12,920 Speaker 1: I'm not very bullish there on the market. So some 192 00:11:13,160 --> 00:11:17,000 Speaker 1: markets may do well even year to date, markets like 193 00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:20,040 Speaker 1: India Taiwan and some of the frontier markets have done 194 00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:23,640 Speaker 1: even better than the US, So I would think that 195 00:11:23,760 --> 00:11:27,880 Speaker 1: some could do well. But as an acid class, initially 196 00:11:27,920 --> 00:11:32,040 Speaker 1: you could see a Nijuk reaction, but over time I 197 00:11:32,240 --> 00:11:35,760 Speaker 1: do expect our performance in select countries. 198 00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:38,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, we saw yields down in the US and the 199 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:42,199 Speaker 2: dollar down. That's led to strength in Asian currencies. So 200 00:11:42,280 --> 00:11:46,920 Speaker 2: I'm curious some where you see that as working in 201 00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:51,240 Speaker 2: tandem and benefiting risk assets versus a place like Tokyo, 202 00:11:51,320 --> 00:11:53,600 Speaker 2: or at least in the short term, we see strength 203 00:11:53,600 --> 00:11:56,520 Speaker 2: in the end means a lot of weakness in the 204 00:11:56,559 --> 00:11:58,080 Speaker 2: topics and the nick. 205 00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:04,960 Speaker 1: If you go by past relationships, Emerging Europe and Latin 206 00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:08,160 Speaker 1: tend to have the highest beta to the dollar. So 207 00:12:08,200 --> 00:12:12,760 Speaker 1: if the dollar were to finally weaken, some of these currencies, 208 00:12:13,400 --> 00:12:17,360 Speaker 1: whether it's Eastern Europe or the Latin American commodity kind 209 00:12:17,360 --> 00:12:19,840 Speaker 1: of currencies see a higher beta. 210 00:12:20,280 --> 00:12:20,400 Speaker 2: UH. 211 00:12:21,280 --> 00:12:27,600 Speaker 1: Asia is less UH beta driven with respect to the US, 212 00:12:27,840 --> 00:12:32,960 Speaker 1: but more recently, given the yend depreciation UH which has 213 00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:38,800 Speaker 1: been so significant, the countries like the one have seen 214 00:12:38,840 --> 00:12:42,880 Speaker 1: a high correlation because of the exports similarity with Japan. 215 00:12:43,240 --> 00:12:46,360 Speaker 1: So I would think that some of those currencies get 216 00:12:46,400 --> 00:12:50,560 Speaker 1: some respite if the yen were to find a bid here. 217 00:12:50,920 --> 00:12:54,199 Speaker 1: Our positioning is also pretty short in the end, so 218 00:12:54,240 --> 00:12:56,960 Speaker 1: it would be an interesting uh move here. 219 00:12:57,679 --> 00:13:01,720 Speaker 2: You touched on India briefly earlier. Is India the most 220 00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:06,400 Speaker 2: interesting idiosyncratic story and perhaps would run a little out 221 00:13:06,400 --> 00:13:09,439 Speaker 2: of sync with some of the Western markets. 222 00:13:11,280 --> 00:13:15,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, it has been displaying its own characteristics given the 223 00:13:15,679 --> 00:13:22,760 Speaker 1: economic reform momentum and just the interesting geopolitical position it's 224 00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:27,120 Speaker 1: carved out for itself in this multipolar world. I do 225 00:13:27,160 --> 00:13:33,480 Speaker 1: think that the Indian currencypers particularly also looks stable and 226 00:13:33,520 --> 00:13:39,160 Speaker 1: it's been pretty resilient despite the run the correction down 227 00:13:39,240 --> 00:13:42,960 Speaker 1: in some of the emerging markets recently. Given the service 228 00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:47,040 Speaker 1: side of the economy, which is driven by consulting services, 229 00:13:47,080 --> 00:13:52,600 Speaker 1: and those exports have held up pretty well. I do 230 00:13:52,679 --> 00:13:56,240 Speaker 1: think as under five thousand g peoper capita, it is 231 00:13:56,320 --> 00:14:00,320 Speaker 1: one country with low hanging fruit as it evolves into 232 00:14:00,400 --> 00:14:03,800 Speaker 1: its next phase of growth, given all the momentum behind it. 233 00:14:04,160 --> 00:14:07,040 Speaker 2: And finally from China, we've got the Third Plan coming up. 234 00:14:07,080 --> 00:14:09,400 Speaker 2: A lot of people are kind of waiting with bated 235 00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:12,280 Speaker 2: breath on what we might get out of it. Are 236 00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:14,920 Speaker 2: you expecting shakanawe or steady as she goes. 237 00:14:16,720 --> 00:14:21,120 Speaker 1: I'm not expecting shokan aw I think China the government 238 00:14:22,320 --> 00:14:25,320 Speaker 1: was meant to be stimulating consumption, but it has been 239 00:14:25,440 --> 00:14:32,280 Speaker 1: stimulating industrial production. And because I think there are limitations 240 00:14:32,320 --> 00:14:35,400 Speaker 1: to what the government can do and stimulate, so I 241 00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:39,400 Speaker 1: think it will be a lot of localization, a lot 242 00:14:39,400 --> 00:14:47,800 Speaker 1: of indigenization of technology, of the overall local sourcing of 243 00:14:46,840 --> 00:14:52,000 Speaker 1: all the all the economic actors. So I don't really 244 00:14:52,040 --> 00:14:53,240 Speaker 1: expect a whole lot. 245 00:14:53,880 --> 00:14:58,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that that seems to be what we're hearing. Jaitanya, 246 00:14:58,080 --> 00:15:01,640 Speaker 2: thank you so much for joining us. Tanya Kandhari there 247 00:15:01,800 --> 00:15:07,480 Speaker 2: portfolio manager for multi asset Strategists at Morgan Stanley Investment Management. 248 00:15:10,560 --> 00:15:14,480 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast, bringing the stories, 249 00:15:14,560 --> 00:15:18,000 Speaker 2: making news and moving markets in the Asia Pacific. Visit 250 00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:21,520 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to get more episodes 251 00:15:21,560 --> 00:15:24,880 Speaker 2: of this and other shows from Bloomberg. Subscribe to the 252 00:15:24,920 --> 00:15:28,960 Speaker 2: podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen, and 253 00:15:29,080 --> 00:15:32,640 Speaker 2: always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg 254 00:15:32,680 --> 00:15:33,320 Speaker 2: Business App.