WEBVTT - Surveillance: US Resiliency with Fillion

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Farrell and Lisa Brownowitz. Daily we bring you

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>To find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. I'm wearing blue

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>for frost this air MS tie. We wear that when

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Phillion shows up chief executive of BMP Parry bout,

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Lisa brownwits and time King John Farrell wishing it was here.

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's frankly too bad because John is

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>far more knowledgeable of this. But for the gentleman from

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>BMP parow, We're gonna get right into it. With futures

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 1>up thirt Lisa's got actually adult questions forget about it.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Explain the joy in two thousand eighteen when France pled

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this incredibly differ are called feed off. What was it

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>like for all of the BNP Perry pat family to

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>see France do this four years ago? Well, Tom, thank

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. By the way, Lisa as well,

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a real celebration for the whole country, including

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>at bmp PI. But obviously, and that was the second

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>time that France won the World Cup. Then there with

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of expectations for this upcoming World Cup viavly Blue, right,

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's always complex to be the defending country, right exactly.

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know today in this uh, in this soccer landscape,

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>there is no small teams anymore. Francis play Denmarks or

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Tunisia Australia, and you just never know. I will keep

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>an eye. I have the privilege of being French an American.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Then I have two teams, you know, to support and

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>because of John is not here with us today, but

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I would keep an eye on England, I promise. I

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>went to John and I said, give me a smart

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>question there, uh John even and he said, asked about

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a thirty six year old Olivier is getting a little old,

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>how an older French team do and the heat. Well,

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a combination. You know. The World Cup is a

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>long journey, it's a one months competition, and you're right,

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a combination of youth energy but experience. And I

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>think this French team is putty what equipped on on

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>both fronts. So you said that you're both us as

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>well as French, and you can vote for both teams,

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and you can read from both teams as the US

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>arm of the biggest European bank, how much is your

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>main company diverting money to you because it is so

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>much stronger here in the US. Well, this economy is

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>still the most basilient economy in the world. Uh. If

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we look at the status today in terms of tight

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>labor market, in terms of status of corporate balance sheets,

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>households are still spending and the capital markets are still functioning.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And uh, a US bank here has been benefiting from this.

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, our economists are pretty predicting a shallow

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>recession in because the US economy is still very quite

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>interconnected with the rest of the world, we expect to

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>rebound in. How much does that affect your willingness to

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>lend right? I mean, because if you basically you're tasked

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with trying to support other aspects of the bank, perhaps

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that are in other areas that aren't as optimistic, perhaps

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>as the US, but the US is also in a

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>difficult spot. How do you decide how loose to be

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>with your purse? You? Risk management is critical. You have

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to be quite selective with the sectors you cover with

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the clients you support. But I have to say, if

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I look at my client needs today, it's around three dimensions.

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Lending your right. Even the most frequent issuers in high grade,

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, because of the higher cost of funding, they

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>try to wait, and we're actually bridging significant number of

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>capital market transactions to optimize your capital raising. Hold on

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a second, So this is really important. Other words, you're

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>taking on your books that basically you're saying you'll lend

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>at a lower rate than the market rate to have

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>them wait until rates are lower. It's a combination of

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>lower rates or making sure they can pick the right

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>window high rate as remain open. But you have to

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>pick your windows if you want to optimize your capital rating.

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>The second important need I see from clients today is

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>waste management and hedging sprategies, and it's really across rates

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and communities and currencies and in equities. They took a

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>cup of coffee in Beijing decades ago with the senior

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>officer of BMP parabout with the decades of French experience

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in China, give us your perspective and our China is

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>going to extricate itself from this mess. Well, it's definity

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>another country. We have a lot of connection with the

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>bank as presidents there. Uh oh, you understate, come on

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the bed. It's huge traditional presence there. And still if

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you expect this economy in two any two eight three

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to go through a shadowy session, your bozone is already

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in my session. You still see to a China providing

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>some growth to the double economy which we expect to

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>be for two around two and it's a it's a downturn.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Uh in China. A lot of it will be around,

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting truly out of the pandemic and obviously

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>expecting some most ability there. The heritage of your shop

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is a wonderful reticence to speak about economic boom. Your economist,

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Carl Rico, donno, we've got a not in a quaince.

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>So thank you, sir for stealing him from Bloodboard. Will

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.119
<v Speaker 1>never forgive you. But Mr Rickodon and back to Dr

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Cornado has been dead on about g d P. What

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>does he say in this titanic battle we're having on recession?

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Calling by his way, it was my only way to

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>be to really continue to be part of the Bloomberog

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>family to have called on that. And we love to

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you for that, having trained in post so many

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>years college saying in three shadow accision as we've just discussed,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, minus one percent, but he's very confident done that.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>In four he sees is rebound because of the good

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>foundations of the resiliency of this economy and back to

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a more normalized g D pig voles around. You know. Two,

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>how concerned you as you are? You as you look

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>at some of the risk management you're talking about earlier,

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>as you decide how much to lend, how do you

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>factor in exogenous events? How do you factor in a

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>colder winter? How do you focus in how do you

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>fold in the prospect of a federal reserve that potentially

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>could go well beyond what people currently I wish we

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>had all the answers to your wonderful questions. So how

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>do you even model it out? I wait, well, definitely

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>in bring out. But you know the way it really

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>works in the real life, it's really about the sectors,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>about the clients, and honestly about the management you deal with,

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>because a big part of managing the companies between the

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>hands of the leaders um. You know, you you mentioned

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in flish and you mentioned energy. If I look at

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>back to comparison between Europe and US. I think you're

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>up as two main challenges in the in the months

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to come. It's obviously inflation and the e c B

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>is going exactly in the same direction as the FED.

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>You know they're gonna be okish, they're doing the job.

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And the second one is energy. And on the energy

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>side you start seeing with the good news is for

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>two for the winter three. I think the Eurozone has

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>managed to, you know, to to to navigate through this

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>energy crisis. And I think the second trend and I

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>can see this happening already there, it will happen here eventually.

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:35.119
<v Speaker 1>You see a real commitment to diversify sources of energy

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>renewable hydrogen, star wind, hydro when it works. But I

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>think the trainers left the station on this front. And

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in Europe there is a probably very favorable regulatory and

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>UH fiscal environment to support this trend toward s G

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and sustainability. Johnny Julian, thank you so much for joining

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>us here and we do accept your invitation to come

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to Paris and April. You got team surveillance at the

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>little cafe. There's a little cafe overlooking Dander Luxembourg effee

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>sweets and you know the three of us out there

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>remote on the street, but are you really that person?

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for inviting yours. I'll be going to bucket.

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I need a bugette great as with BMP Perry. Thank

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you so much for telling us France will do it

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>again at the World Cup as well. Right now. David Balan,

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Chief Investment Officer, Global Head of Investments, It's City Global Wealth. David,

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised to hear you say quality is in

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>order for two thousand twenty three. But color to the quality,

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what does it look like? Well, you know, we're gonna

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to earn money all the way through the next

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>year without a decline. Those stocks that pay dividends and

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>pay buybacks, well you and Lisa were just talking about

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly important because the Fed has raised rates and

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to raise rates more looking at the data

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on inflation that is behind it, the leading you know,

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the lagging indicators, that's what they're looking at, and as

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a result, they're gonna have rates go too high and

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they're going to keep them there for too long. And

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>if they do that, we are going to have not

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>only a recession, but potentially it's seriously you know, serious

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of its length, and potentially it's breadth. And

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that's really what's being set up here. And the market

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, looks at it somewhat sanguin, you know when

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the senguin lens, and I think that's a mistake because

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>really what we're dealing here is potentially with an earnings

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>decline that is not yet priced into the market. For

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the earnings decline assumes also revenue declined. Do you just assume,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>with the dearth of nominal GDP off the the oddities

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of the last twenty four months at revenue growth comes

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in as well as earnings, but actually is going to

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>come in tom is the is the is the profit margin? Right.

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Revenues will go up, of course with inflation, but costs

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to go up more than that. The ability

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>for people who produce goods to actually pass on pricing

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>creatures is going to go away. And the reason is

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>because inventories are extremely hot. And what inventories do is they,

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they drive prices down so we'll all be

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>able to buy, you know, things less expensively during this

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>coming in Black Friday, in Christmas season, but ultimately it's

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>going to make profits you know, go down next year,

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's going to cause you know, the

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>economy to slow more than people think, because you know,

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>once inventories build like this, then production, your future production

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>will be reducing disproportionately downward. David, I want to sit

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>on something that you said that potentially because if it's

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>going to raise rates far beyond people think, even in

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the face of weakness, that is happening more rapidly than

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps people realize. This is going to lead to a

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>long and potentially deep recession, right, I mean, that's essentially

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying, and then that's not being priced in.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking right now at NASDAC down this year. I'm

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at an SMP and down this year. Where is

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it not being priced stand well, Le, So you know,

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>if you actually take a look at recessions historically, you

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>know they could see markets down you know, easily between

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty But this is the most important single line that

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think people are missing. Markets have never

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>bottomed before a recession has begun. Look back at the

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>historical data and that's why you know, you see these

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>bear market rallies, you see shortcovering, you see the fact

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 1>that we're in the fourth quarter, and the fourth quarter

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is always a good quarter. You know, all of those

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>things are true too. But what we have to do

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is actually price in what is going what is going

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to happen in the future, and what you said earlier.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's take a look at housing as a

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>leading indicator right right now. You know, housing, how the

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:41.319
<v Speaker 1>houses that were started a year ago when interest rates

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a three percent needs to be completed, so the amount

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of housing unemployment that's taken place is virtually zero. We

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>think that there'll be four hundred thousand people unemployed in

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>housing next year, and about two million people who will

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>be unemployed across the economy, which is not especially deep recession,

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly not positive employment growth as we've almost

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>all year long. David, what does this mean in terms

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of what you're recommending to her clients? I mean, if

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about a long and deep recession, is this

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>hide out in tenure treasuries? Is this hiding out in

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 1>t bills until we have a better sense of what's

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. Yeah, we are deeply wave Lisa over

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>were deeply overweight bonds at the moment you know, we

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>think the bonds are going to be a terrific investment,

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>by the way, because you know, if you buy attaining

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>your bond today, let's say three a D right, and

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it happens to go to you know, three P and

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you hold it for a year and change, you know

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that total return on that bond could be because we

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>think interest rates are going to be down a year

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to a year and a half from now. You know,

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we hit the long term rate on the Tenure Committe

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>between two fifty and three. And that's because once our

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>recession begins, rage will of course, you know, come down,

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and once we have unemployment prints for a couple of months,

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>will finally realize as vocal, did they have to do

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>something about it? Well, your economics team, and good morning

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Holland Horse has been way out front on the slowdown,

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 1>called David Bale, and we've got a stagger to December

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>two and all of a sudden the jobs report, which

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 1>is of interest. Are we going to see the unemployment

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 1>rate move in December yet or does that all wait

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>till the first week of January? Well it certainly could,

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, Tom. The rders come down relatively little so far,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. But what we're seeing are you know, the

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>postings come down. We're seeing a lot of pre announcements

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 1>of layoffs all across the tech industry. Some of the

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>names you were talking about, you know, are are planning

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you know ten in fifteen thou uh, you know, layoffs

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>next you next year. But those haven't happened yet. And

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of course we haven't seen this sort of industrial company

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>off anybody at this point because of the hoarding of labor. David,

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you for the brief. David Balin City Group Global Wealth,

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>just thrilled to have them on. We are briefed by

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Amrita Sind of Energy Aspects this morning. A Marina help

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>me with a recent pullback in oil? Is it just

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a bat Demand won't be there now? I think there's

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confusion in the market right now, right

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and yes, demand in China is weak, and this is

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>something been saying for some time. Don't get too excited

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>by all the headlines coming out of China about reopening

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>because that reopening isn't happening until April of next year.

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So right here, right now, there are more locked down.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So absolutely demand in China will remain weak. Now the

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>thing is the rest of the world demand is actually

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent and the numbers coming in have actually surprised

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to the upside and not downside. So how does that

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>frame up for next year? Every you know, a hundred

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>page report I skimmed through says Pacific rim demand is

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the variable. If we get what Lisa talks about five

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>China GDP growth, does that reverse you out to a

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty a barrel? Absolutely, China, It's going to

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be critical for next year's balances. And I think again,

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>if you look at what has caused this year's kind

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of softness, it's been China. It's not that we were

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>expecting a reopening, but these renewed lockdowns have actually dental

0:14:56.720 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>demand quite substantially more than we all the market was expecting.

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's one of the biggest reasons why

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>China is not out buying crude right now. They are

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be the biggest variable for next year, especially

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>given all the uncertainties around Russian oil. With the EU

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and bargo ticking in on the fifth of December, we

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to lose some Russian barrels, but that is

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>again going to be after the products embargo on the

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>fifth of February, So the timing is going to be

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>critical that if China starts to reopen from April, the

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>real upside and the drill tightening and balances is going

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to be Then why is the bookcase for oil now

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>coming truition now given that we are getting a bit

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>colder now and that we do have a bit more

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>resilient of US economy. Yeah, I mean, look, there's a

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of your end positioning going on as well. But

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>what I and this gets a little bit technical to

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>bear with me, but I think what's been interesting is,

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I've seen a lot of kind of

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>narrative around this that Accruede has obviously sold off and

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that just means everything. It's very verish. If you look

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>at the products markets, pretty much every single products and

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>all of all of them in Asia are back dated.

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>That tells you that the underlying demand conditions are strong.

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Usually when the market is wobbling because of fundamentals, it

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>tends to come for the product site. But if you

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>look at gasoline, diesel, even fuel oil and after which

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>had been weaker, have all strengthened over the course of

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the month. So this is more of a macro thing

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that's driving crude stronger dollar obviously, worries about continuous rate highs.

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>We had even correlation with bitcoin, which is just insane

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and tells you that not that many specialists are trading

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>crude oil right now. And policy uncertainty, which we've talked

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>about on this show before as well, is just not helping.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>We don't know because of the amount of even media

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>reports constantly contradicting one another. You know, we have very

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>strong views about the EU embargo, but people are telling us,

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>clients are telling us, oh, do you think Europe is

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>going to go ahead with the embargo? And I think

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what's creating a lot of confusion in the market.

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So even putting aside all of that confusion, when you

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>hear from people who say they're actually Europe isn't a

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>much better position than they previously were, not just for

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this winter, but for next winter, do you pay credence

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to that? Do you feel like crisis averted regardless of

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>what happens in Russia and Ukraine and that there has

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>been immunization from the conflict. I'd say right now, sure,

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Europe is in a much more comfortable position because it's

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>been mild and we have a bunch of energy cargoes

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>sitting um waiting to be discharged. But if it does

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>get cold, and I really tread to think how people

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>can say that next year is going to be fine

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. We can get through this winter, assuming it's

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>a mild enough winter, no problem. Next year there's a

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>huge issue. And by the way, this is much more

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>a gas story than an old story um oil. We

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't lost Russian or to begin with, So I don't

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>understand why even if the talk of ceasefire again instruction

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>which we completely disagree with to begin with, but let's

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>say it does again credence, how does it affect oil

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>because oil wasn't impacted, So why should oils sell off now?

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>If you know, even if there is a ceasefire, And

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that's where I think the market is very fused and

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you're just selling getting like suits of just macro sell

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>off and oil getting caught in with that one final

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>unfair question and then all of a sudden, money costs something,

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the risk free rates legitimate, all of a sudden, the

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>investment calculation is like we remember, do you assume there

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>will be a boost in energy production? And what politicians

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of all ILK are calling for, which is more production?

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you optimistic hydrocarbon producers will produce more at the margin. No,

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And for two simple reasons. One, shareholders continue to tell

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>them not to do so and prioritize green energy. And too,

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>because interest rates are going up again, servicing debt just

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>gets a lot more expensive. This is the other problem

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing in the U S. U S. Production

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't rising particularly sharply, and I think the market will

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>realize this next year. But of course the problem for

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the US is that freight rates have skyrocketed so moving

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that oil has become extremely expensive. And I think that's

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>actually good to be a double whammy and way on

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>US production. Even Samrita sent thank you so much. Always

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a clinic she is with energy aspects just outstanding as well.

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Duck Cass now on the market's Duck. I loved your

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>note where you talked about old stock strategist named Voltaire

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's just a point where you have to learn

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to climb on board. How do you climb on board

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a bull market? No one believes in it's rough. I

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>mean this has been some year, um. Most investors have

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>been beaten up. Fortunately, we had a profitable year a

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>hedge run Sea Breeze partners UM. We started the year bearish,

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>But the real key to our success this year and

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>hopefully in the future is that we're a throwback. We're

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>throwback to the original hedge fund A. W. Jones, which

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>was formed actually the year I was born. And I

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>think the business media spent a lot of time in

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about market outlook Tom and Paul, not enough about process.

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>What's the process at Sea Breeze if you remember, Unlike

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>most investment funds of the day, Jones was created essentially

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>along and short long short hedge fund, or as Jones

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>called it, a hedged fund UM. So, like Jones, Sea

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Breeze strategy is to balance long positions or bets that

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the security is going to rise in price, with short

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>positions that bets security will fall UM. And they introduced

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>this approach in order to reduce exposure to market swings

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and create alpha, and certainly relevant today with all the

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>economic and market outcomes uncertain they introduced something called pairs trading,

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think it seems to be a continued ticket

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>or strategy in a period of very sluggish, uncertain and

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>uneven growth. And this direction we're taking. By the way,

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about Taylor Swift. My favorite pair of

0:20:53.880 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>strade is short Taylor Swift and long El Fitzgerald. People.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>If you think about it, if you think about the

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>last ten or fifteen years, guys come on ast traditional plane,

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>vanilla asset managers come on and they say they do

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>all the same thing. They buy the thirty favorite stocks,

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they hold them through hell or high water, they play

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of golf, they acquire more assets their at

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>there's not managers. And when the tide went out as

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it did this year, their exposed was swimming naked. Quote

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of the year not seeing teleb love him to death

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and he said gravity is back in physics and years

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in mind Paul's world, the risk free rate is back.

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>How does the risk free rate change? Naive long only

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>active investment? You know, risk free is a big issue.

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Um uh, this is the way I look at it, Tom.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>The S and P dividend yield today is one point

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>six The two year yield just broached four point five

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>percent UM. With the profit cycle turning down, it is

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>quite obvious with this relationship materially different than it was

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as little as eleven or twelve months ago that this

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>should be a fundamental part of one's core bearish view.

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And obviously there are other headwinds that we have political

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>partner partisanship, we have the lack of leadership in Washington.

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>We have a wayward central bank. We have rising geo

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>political risks, were weakening non US economic growth, most notably

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in China and Europe. And as you've talked all morning,

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we have curb and version, which typically pre sages recession.

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that that the profits cycle is turning down

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>much harder than most realized. In terms of market view, however,

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>I think we're basically model value. There's a tendency I

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>think to be hyperbolic and market views. It gets media

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>attention and gets celebrity. But I've observed that outlier forecasts,

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>both fulish and bearish, are rarely met. And as Buffett says,

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it tells you more about the four asked than the forecast. So, Doug,

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one of the many reasons we like chatting

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>with you is we come away knowing exactly what you're

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>doing in the market. Are you buying or selling this market?

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you waiting? Um? I have said that UM that

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>with the market decline over the last three months, I've

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>been able to buy great companies at good prices, but

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not great companies that great prices. As the markets rallied,

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm no longer being able to buy great companies at

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 1>good prices. I do see value. I see value in

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>several sectors. I think large cap technology has begun to

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>look very attractive. I'm back very large long in Amazon

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>as well as Alphabet and Microsoft. I think that their

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>competitive modes, if you think about it, have improved in

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the last three years, and all these less well capitalized

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>competitors are falling by the wayside as well. If you

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>look at the NASTAC one hundred UM, the index is

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.959
<v Speaker 1>selling at roughly four times sales and that's UH compared

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>to eight point five times at the peak in November December.

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying bank I'm buying the banks UM, which Bank

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of America, wells Fargo. As rates go higher and stay

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>higher for longer, the interest rates UH. The industry is

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rates sensitive and assets sensors. And finally, I'm very

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>high on cannabis stocks UM. I own Green Thumb Industries,

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>which is the Krem Della Kreme. I own a small

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>stock terrorist t R SSF, which is benefiting from the

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey exposure, is managed by the best executive in

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the business, Jason Wilde. And in terms of unfavorable sectors,

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd avoid all companies naturally. They are heavily indebted and

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>have large debt maturities coming up. And if you look

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>at companies like Carnival Cruise Lines and Carvana, they come

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>to mind, of course. And then there is f t X.

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to go, Doug, what do you? What do you?

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>You know? This is removed from Doug cast folks, but

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Doug cast on you and I have seen this a

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>million times before. And basically, to come on of this

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is whatever the bigcoin chat chat chat is, you can

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>make eight percent with us, or whatever the bigcoin chat

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>chat chat is, you can make ten percent. This is

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>like the annuities Doug in our ut. I mean, we

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>have we seen this before and we should learn a

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>lesson from all this. Pol Um. By the way, I'm

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to ft X, the movie starring Jonah Hill

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>as Sam Banquin. Fraud. But I've long been an outspoken

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>crypto bail bear, calling it a backslapping millennium fraud clear

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>many times with you in barrens and elsewhere. I like

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>what Charlie Munger said. He described bigcoin as stupid and evil,

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's an epic failure that has plumbed

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the depths of human investing. File Ali. It was a

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>monumental failure, failure accountability, transparency, filled with a numerous supporters

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>who possessed clear but often unexposed conflicts of interest and

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>driven by raudulent actions barring customer funds, creating FTX coins,

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>using them, showing them as reserves among the nonsensical and okay,

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>stupid and the other thing. The final thing is that

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we should always remind us elves that we, as Benjamin Disraeli,

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the Exchequer of England said, what we've learned from history

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>is that we haven't learned from history. And these things

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>endron ft X world Coom made off. They always occur

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in the lot of stages of a bull market. Okay,

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we gotta leave it there. Doug Cass, thank you so much.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Great to talk to you about Justin Verlander, his MVP.

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>us live weekdays from seven to ten ami Eastern on

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from six

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to nine am for insight from the best in economics,

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>finance and astment and international relations. And subscribe to the

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>of course, on the terminal. I'm Tom keene In. This

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg.