WEBVTT - How quarks were discovered?

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, tell me a good physics story. Oh you

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>came to the right place. Okay, but don't tell me

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you said a story about amazing physics. I want something

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>with drama, because like the universe isn't dramatic enough for you.

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean I want a story with like intrigue and

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>sabotage and conflict and you know, people fighting and you know, revolutions. Oh,

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I see you want like Jason Bourne in a lab coat. Yeah,

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't you look like Matt Damon or Tom Cruise.

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>You can make a movie called Thesis Impossible. All right,

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you asked for it. I have got a juicy story

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>for you. Hi, I am more handmad cartoonist and the

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>creator of PhD comment. Hi, I'm Daniel Whitson. I'm a

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>particle physicist, and I like to imagine that my dramatic

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>life would be well adapted to a telenovelt with a

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of twists and turns and evil twins. Twin particles.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess there are twin particles and physics, there are

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>twin that we don't know which ones are good and

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>which ones we could be the evil twins, that's right,

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And lots of dramatic revelations that your advisor has other

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>grad students you didn't even know about. Well, Welcome to

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>our podcast Daniel and Jorge Explained the Universe, a production

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio, in which we take you on

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>a tour of all the drama in the universe, the

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>black holes, the neutron stars, that tiny particles, the discovery

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>of those particles, and try to make you understand what

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>scientists are thinking about, what people on the very forefront

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of human understanding are puzzling over today. Yeah, because we

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>like to talk about all the amazing things out there

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to discover and all the things that we have discovered,

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes we like to talk about how we discovered

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>these things, because you know, sometimes the store is pretty

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>dramatic or you know, interesting, or tells us a little

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>bit about how signs were. That's right, because you can

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>look back at history and say, oh, if I had

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>been around, I would have discovered the electron. Or it's

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple actually to figure out what the photon is,

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's a quantum mechanical object. But when you're standing there,

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you might be alone there, then yeah, I

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>would sit around thinking, you know, I could have discovered

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the electronic Hey, Einstein when the Nobel Prize for interpreting

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>other people's experiments that were already published. It's like, you know,

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>sit around for an afternoon, read some papers, boom, Nobel Prize,

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>Noel change the course of history. So if you know

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>how to do it, if you know where to go,

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty straightforward. But when you're standing at the forefront

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of human ignorance and you don't know what the solution is,

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it's much more complicated. So I think it's really worthwhile

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>rewinding our understanding and remembering, like what were people thinking

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, What were the questions they were asking,

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>what was confusing, what was simple? What were the ideas

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of the time. I think what you're saying, Daniel, is

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's a fine line between a thought experiment and

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just making stuff that's right. And that's why I prefer

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to do real experiments in the collider and actually ask

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>nature questions. All right, Well, today on the program will

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>be continuing our series about how particles weren't discovered? You know,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>particles and things that matter and all the things in

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe are made out of How did we actually

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>discover these things and know that they existed and know

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>what they look like, and know how much they weigh

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and what they would like to wear in the morning.

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know how to respond to did that.

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm imagining a photon getting dressed or something. But but

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I think this is really fascinating because currently we have

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>fantastic theoretical understanding of all the particles, how they fit together,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>what they are, and of course lots of outstanding questions.

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>But there's a wonderful history there. Each particle is like

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a hard fought victory. Each one was like, how do

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we figure out that this particle is also there? And

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the end, our theory has to describe experiments.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>We've developed a theory in order to describe all the

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy experiments that we've seen that review of the existence

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of those partners. So it's a lot of fun to

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to sort of reimagine and understand how each one was discovered,

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I think that looking at history now

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and looking at it science now, it's kind of hard

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to believe sometimes that there was a time where we

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't know anything. We didn't know any of these things.

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>We didn't know that electronic existed, or protons existent, or

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>protons existed, or what they wore in the morning, and

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's kind of interesting to kind of put

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>yourself in the mindset of the people who didn't know anything,

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>but they discovered what actually reality is like absolutely, And

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it gives you another fun exercise, which is to imagine

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody in a hundred years, how would they look back

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>at what we know now. They will have hopefully a

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 1>grasp of, you know, the shape, the size of the

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>universe and why it's accelerating, and maybe what the smallest

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>particles are, and they'll look back at us and they'll

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh my gosh, those guys knew nothing about

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the universe. How did they even go to work? They

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>were making stuff off on podcasts? And I like to

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>think of, you know, human knowledge is one of these

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>exponentially growing graphs, and at every point it seems like,

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>why we know a hundred times what we knew fifty

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and then in fifty years we will again

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>dwarf human knowledge. So I'm looking forward to that. Yeah,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to being dwarfed. There are positive exponential graphs,

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>not just negative ones. So we've done this podcast episode

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>on electrons and positrons and photons and muons, and so

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>did they. On the program, we'll be asking the question

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>our quarks discovered. Is this a quirky story, Daniel? You know,

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the most dramatic stories in all

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of particle physics. There really are crazy things in these stories.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>You know. There is sabotage, There are competing public announcements,

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>There are arguments about how to name particles. There are

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>stories about leaked information being slipped from one experiment to

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the other. Yeah, it's pretty crazy. No, there is real drama.

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm waiting for the six episode mini series

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix about this. Said of the murder explosions, Now

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we didn't get that far. That's right, Tiger Kings becomes

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>particle kings. Oh, I see, like the true crime. That

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>could be the new genre of Netflix true physics. But

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>as usually, we were wondering how many people out there

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>know the story of how courts were invented because you know,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>quarks and just a quick recap, there are the mini particles, Dad,

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>everything else is kind of made out of most of

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>everything else, protons and neutrons are made out of quarks,

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and so these are pretty fundamental particles, right, Daniel. They're

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>not just like you know some novelty butts, right, They're

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>not just some random thing you pick up in the

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>store on the way home and then throw away unused.

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>There are the things that make up me and you.

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I am made out of atoms, and those atoms have

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>neutrons and protons at the center, and all those neutrons

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and protons are made of quarks. And all the matter

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that you've ever tasted and touched and tripped over or

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>thrown at each other is made of quarks and electrons.

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So they're pretty important. So, as Daniel does, he went

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out into the streets and ask people if they knew

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>how corks were discovered. Now, as usually, we'll think about

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it for a second, then put yourself a hundred years ago,

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and as yourself if you know how corks were discovered.

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's what people had to say. Some scientists in the

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>colder found it. Uh. I don't actually don't know how

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>they were discovered. You know, I've been learned about that.

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Was it m colectron cloud chamber or something. No, that's

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>not the quirks. That's for something else, that's like positrons

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>or something using a particle accelerator. I don't know all right,

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.679
<v Speaker 1>that's cool. I don't even know what they are, so

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I just discovered by the inclusion of items. I mean much,

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't remember the name of the machine,

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>but this clusion of particles, all right. Not a lot

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of deep knowledge of history of physics in the public, No,

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>not so much. There's some pretty good answers here, like

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy who knows how positive arms were discus were

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in cloud chambers. And you know, people giving credit to

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the Hadron collider, which is, you know, not too far

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>off the certainly we're discovered in collisions. Interesting, so you know,

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>some knowledges. It seems like some people thought of courts

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>were discovered recently, like the LHC. You know, this thing

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is twenty years old, tops and the quarks we've known

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>about since the sixties and seventies, so it definitely was

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>not the large Hadron Collider responsible for discovering corks. And

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious here, how did you get these questions?

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Did you go out into the street before the pandemic

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>or or during the pandemic? Do you have now like

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a six foot selfie stick with a microphone? I, shockingly,

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I actually work on these things kind of far in

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>advance so that I'm prepared for a PANDAMA. I have

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a stockpile of questions. I have asked people on the street.

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I see you have a federal stockpile, the National Strategic Reserve,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>A random questions. All right, good, So people were still

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>feeling optimistic about signs. All right, it seems like not

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people know the stories, and you're saying

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's full of drama and interesting twist and turns.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So tell us story, Daniel said the scene. What was

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it like back then? And what year are we talking about?

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So let me take you back to seven, A dramatic world,

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>A cold winter blew into Chicago. Now you have to

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of rewind back to before the clues were found

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>for quarks, and back in seven, we actually had a

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear picture we thought of how the universe looked.

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>We felt like we knew things were mandat of Adams

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and Adams were manat of some bits inside. Yeah, we

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>knew there were atoms, and we knew those atoms had

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>protons and neutrons and electrons. We also knew they were photons.

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And we felt like, hey, that's a pretty good picture

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. And I think a lot of people

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in physics felt like that might be it, Like maybe

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're coming up to the last end of

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the road and we're gonna answer all the questions, and

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>that's going to give us a sort of last sense

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>for what the universe has meant. There can't be anything

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>smaller than these particles. These are it. These are the

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>basic building blocks of life, the universe and everything in it.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right, But of course there were a few lo threads, right,

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>There are a few things which didn't quite fit into

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that picture. And that's a lesson. Right, every time there's

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a little loose thread, one thing that doesn't quite fit

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>into the hole you wanted to, you should pull on

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that thread, you should mix that. Metaphor, until you figure

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>out the secret of the universe, you should just ignore it,

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>repress it. And some of those those threads were things

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>like muans. Like remember we talked about how muans were discovered,

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and when they were first found, people were like, what, who,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>what are that? We don't need those muans. They're not

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the atoms. They're just particles that seemed to

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>have been there, but they weren't part of regular matter exactly.

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>That was the kind of clue we're talking about. And

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>there were other particles like pions that were found in

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>cosmic rays and people are like, hum, what are these

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>particles about? We don't need them to build matter. Interesting,

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but they can't exist. Why do they even exist? What's

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea? And so you see them, but they're they're

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>not part of most of things. So I guess that's

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a weird thing, right, It's a pretty weird thing, but

0:10:58.280 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it also gives you a clue. It gives you a

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>clue for like what kind of particles can be out there?

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And in the end, remember, what you're looking for is

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>an answer to the deepest question right to understand, like

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the nature of reality. So you want the full menu.

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And those few little threads then turned into I don't

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>know what's the metaphor here, a whole rug, I suppose,

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>or a whole pile of yarm, giant haystack, the giant

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>haystack because originally we had these weird, unstable particles muans

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>and pions just from looking them come down from the

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>sky and cosmic rays. But then people built particle accelerators.

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>They weren't satisfied just to sort of look at high

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>energy particles that we already found in nature. They wanted

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to create their own collisions to explore these things with

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>more control. So people build particle accept smash things in

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>front of them, not just wait wait till they come

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>reigining down. Yeah, you want to do it on your terms.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, you want to have control. I want to say,

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to turn up the energy, I want to

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>turn down the energy. I want to call this kind

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of particle that kind of particle, right, I want to

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>see what it feels like when I stick my hand

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>into it. I mean, that's a basic reiosity, right. Um.

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And so what they found when they built these accelerators

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was a whole lot of new particles. They found kaons

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and strange particles and all sorts of stuff. We talked

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about strange matter on the program recently.

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>And this is an era we call the particle zoo

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>because basically, every time they turned on the accelerator they

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>found some new party. Did you guys have a theme

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>song jingle like particles particle zoo ra Welcome to our

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>particles Zoo. Yeah, so I guess you didn't have particle accelerators.

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>But he thought, hey, let's see what else happened when

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>things smashed together, because that's I guess that's what you

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>knew was happening in the atmosphere. Yeah, we had a

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>sense that these things needed more energy. Right, These unstable

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>particles were heavier, meaning that they contained more energy, and

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.719
<v Speaker 1>then they decayed down to lighter particles. To to try

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to create new heavy particles, you want to create localized

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 1>energy density. You want to smash two particles together, so

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got a little like blob of energy right there,

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe enough to create something new. And so that's what

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>these first particle accelerators did was create these high energy

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>density situations where you could create these new particles. And

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we found zillions and zillions of these because at this

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>point you sort of new about equals mc square and

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>then you knew that you know, things can matter can

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>come from pure energy. That's right, you can create new matter.

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>It's I mean, it's alchemy, right. People have been trying

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to do this for thousands of years, and we actually

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>were able to do it. By smashing particles together at

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>high energy. You can create new kinds of matter and

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that's exciting, right, like wow, Look, every time you turn

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it on, you create a new particle and then you

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>get to name it after your puppy or whatever. But

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it's also continge name it after their puppy. I don't

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:43.839
<v Speaker 1>have a record of that. No, Back in that day,

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they were mostly naming them after Greek letters, so you

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>got lots of you know, sigmas and theatas and upsilons

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and this kind of stuff. But it was also confusing.

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they named their puppies after it's probably lots of

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>puppies named upsilon and data. But you know, once you're

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>once you sort of your even satisfied you've created all

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>these new particles, then you're looking at it and you're

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for patterns. You're like, Okay, why are there these

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>particles and not other particles? What does this mean about

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the universe? Like how are they related? Yeah,

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>because we don't want an answer that says, oh, there's

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety two different kind of fundamental particles, right, we suspect

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that the answer is a small number of particles. We

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>want to explain the whole universe using a small set

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of pieces, right, like the legos. We want to build

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>everything out of a small number of basic blocks seventy

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>four And we often talk about how we had the

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>periodic table of elements, and how that was kind of

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>something that told us that when you have a lot

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of these things out there in the universe, there's probably

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>some kind of pattern or some kind of underlying building

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>block to them. Yeah, every time you see unexplained phenomena,

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>weird patterns, trends you don't understand, it's probably an emergent

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon from the arrangement of smaller bits. Just like in

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the periodic table. You see all these patterns, and that

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>tells you that there's something else go going on, And

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. Every feature of the periodic table comes

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>from how the electrons sit in their orbitals around the nucleus,

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and so people suspected They're like, well, maybe all these

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>new crazy particles we found are reflective of something smaller,

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>something tinier, and all these patterns that masters these particles

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in the way they interact come from how those little

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>bits are fit together. That was sort of the nugget

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of the idea. And so they found a pattern, right,

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and all of these particles in the particle zoo, They're like,

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, the lions are sort of like smaller

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>versions of the elephants, and the zeros are sort of

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>have four legs, just like the lines kind of thing. Yeah,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>so we had a decade of discovering new particles and

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>then in nineteen sixty one, a theorist came up with

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>an idea. He said, well, I noticed that if I

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>categorize the particles in two ways, one by their electric

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>charge and the other way by their strangeness. And remember,

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>some of these particles are strange in the sense that

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they last a lot longer than you would expect. And

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you can listen to our whole podcast episode about strangeness.

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And so people postulated this new property of particles strangeness,

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and they give particles strangeness zero like the proton and

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the neutron, or strangeness one, or strangeness too, And then

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they just made a table and meaning like, it's strange

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>because given how massive it is, how munched ways, it

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be around this lng like kNs last a lot

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>longer than you would expect, and the reason is that

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they have strangeness. Then the universe likes to preserve strangeness,

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>so it tries to find a way for the kon

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to dec to keep the strangeness into the products, and

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that takes longer. It's a weaker interaction. But protons are

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty stable, and they're supposed to be stable, so they

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>have zero strange protons have no Now we know that

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>strangeness actually reflects the strange quarks inside of it, but

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>at the time they didn't know. They were just like,

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a property, these particles, and a lot of

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>particle physics, it's just like writing down properties we observe

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and wondering where they come from, and wondering if we

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>can see patterns and then explain those patterns in terms

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of something deeper. And so at the time, you know,

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.239
<v Speaker 1>they knew the charge of these particles, they could measure that,

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and they had sort of invented this idea of strangeness

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>just by observing how the particles decayed and labeling them

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>strangeness one, strangeness zero. And then they noticed this pattern.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>They called it the eightfold way because they noticed that

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>if you arrange the particles according to strangeness versus charge,

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that they formed these octagons, right, and they formed these

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>triangles and all these really interesting geometric patterns. All right,

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So they found a bunch of particles and they found

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a pattern maybe a clue to what all these particles. Yeah,

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>and they found these geometric patterns and that suggested to

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>them that, like, you know, maybe there's something going on here,

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a reason for all these patterns. And the

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>theorist that came up with this eightfold way found a

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>hole in those patterns, like there was one triangle that

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>was missing a corner and said, okay, well, maybe there's

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>a particle there. You would have to have this strangeness

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>and this charge to be in that corner, and he

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>predicted its existence and then they found it, like, oh,

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>you were right, this new particle does exist. So that

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>was the first clue that maybe this pattern really reflected

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>something because it wasn't just imaginary, like they weren't just

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 1>imagining things. You could actually find particles using these patterns. Yeah,

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>just like with the periodic table. We started putting it

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>together and we noticed some holes and we're like, where's

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this element number or whatever that we don't see in nature.

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It turns out, you know, it does exist. You can

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>create it. It's just very unstable. In the same way,

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they were able to fill out these triangles and these

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>octagons of the eightfold way. All right, Well, let's get

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>into what this pattern actually meant or means and how

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>it helped them make sense of the particle zoo as

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>far as let's take a quick break, all right. You know,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>so they found a bunch of particles and they saw

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that there was some kind of pattern to the meaning

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that there is something going on here. Yeah. Yeah. Every

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>time you see a pattern, that's your first clue because

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it lets you sort of play games with what's going

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 1>on underneath. Right, you want to find some way to

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>explain a very complicated set of things. You've observed ninety

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>two different particles with all weird masses and behaviors in

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of a smaller set of objects, And so finding

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that pattern gave them a clue as to how to

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>put that together. And so they came up with the

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that maybe there are even smaller particles that kind

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of put together to make these bigger parties. Yes, exactly,

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of the idea that particle physicists are

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>always looking to write, like everything is made of smaller bits.

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>That's like the oldest idea in particle physics. And so

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they thought, well, we have all these particles, can we

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>explain them in terms of smaller bits, right, They're like,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 1>we're particle physics. You only have particles, right, that's right,

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>that's our hands. Like when you have a particle, everything

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>looks like a particle. T that's our hammers. So everything's

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the nail exactly. And this idea actually came up independently

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>by two different theorists, and they came up with the

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>same idea that there could be these three little particles that,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>if you put them together in different combinations, explain all

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the particles that we see, but not all of them, right,

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Like some of them like the muan. Isn't the muon

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of like an electron, it can't be split. Yeah,

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they don't explain all those particles, like the muan is

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>not made of quarks. But all those particles discovered, the

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>particle zoo, the pions, the chons, the sigma particles, all

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>those kind of particles. They could explain all these new

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>ones in terms of these little basic particles. And so

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Murray Gelman came up with this idea and he called

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>them quarks based on a word that he saw in

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a James Joyce novel. And at the same time another

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>theorist named Zwag came up with exactly the same idea

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>mathematically and published it. But he called them seeming mathematically

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>like the mass predicted there would be three of these. Well,

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>at the time, all these particles were only made out

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of these three quarks. Now we know that there were

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>up quarks, down quirks, and strange corks. Right up and

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>down is what you need to make the proton and

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the neutron. You add in strange to make all these

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>other strange particles like the kon and the omega and

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the sigma particles. And so at the time they only

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>needed three, and the particles they were creating only used

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>those three lego pieces I see. But now we know

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>there are more. Now we know there are more. Yeah,

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the stories was on and on sort of mathematically to

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>explain the ones they had. They thought they were three,

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And they discovered that if you postulate the

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>existence of these three particles, that you could put them

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>together in pairs and triplets to explain all the particles

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>that they were seeing. So it's like peeling back a

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>layer of reality and saying, oh, all these things are

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just different ways to combine these basic building blocks. And

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>not only could they explain all the particles that we

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>had seen. They could show which particles we hadn't yet seen, Like, oh,

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>nobody's tried this combination that would give you this particle

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and predicting it, and then we find it. And that's

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>exactly what happened with this omega minus particle that we

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier. That's what they've They've found particles that were

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>predicted by these acism quirks. Yeah, exactly, And so that's

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty convincing. And you know, if you ask me, I

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>would have believed it. Like at that point, I would

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>have been sold on this quirk idea. I would have

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>been like, well, this, this explains it. It describes all

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the particles we see. It simplifies things and old together.

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But you hadn't seen them. I guess they were just

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of like an idea that seems to predict things,

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>but you hadn't directly seen them. Yeah, and so most

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>physicists were like, all right, that's a cute idea, but

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is it an idea or is it real? Right? Is

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that what's actually happening inside these particles or is it

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>just a nice thing you can calculate in your mind.

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And the sort of deep philosophical question there about whether

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>any of our theories are more than just ideas we

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>calculate in our mind, and whether we actually see anything directly.

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But physicists were skeptical. I guess they're like aces. I'm

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not sure I would call that a name. Yeah,

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know the history of why quarks took

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>off instead of aces. Actually like aces better than quarks works.

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a weird Quirks sounds like yogurt, you know,

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I think yogurt sounds like quarks. There is a yogurt

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>called corks that I guess why would you call them as?

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's it's a positive thing, you know,

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it's celebratory in some way, or it's like, hey, look

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>we found a little list bit. It's like the number

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>one particle. I don't know, it's it's in a nice

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>spot somewhere in my brain, I see. But maybe Gilman

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>was barely thinking like, hey, these are weird odd and

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you let's find an award that's kind of weird odd

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps perhaps and I guess the field liked his

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>idea better because quarks is what we call them. Really,

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it was totally just a name popularity. Con I don't

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I've done something really try to figure out, like why

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Quirks took off. It might not just be a name popularity.

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Gelmont had a larger personality and was more

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>famous and influential, and so, you know, it's a bit

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of a political thing. Doesn't it depend on who published first? Yeah,

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>but you know it was just about the same time.

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes like the second counts, right, the minute counts.

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's ridiculous. But we'll hear a story later

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 1>on in this program about two discoveries announced on the

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>same day. All right, so they were theoretical and some

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>people didn't believe them. But then what happened? How did

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we say, hey, look, quarts are real. So then we

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 1>got some actual evidence because they did some experiments, and

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>experimentalist said, well, if these things are real, we should

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to see them, meaning we should be able

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to like take a proton and shoot particles at it

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and see this internal structure. I mean, if protons are

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>not just like tiny perfect dots or perfectly smooth, if

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.959
<v Speaker 1>they're actually made of three like hard nuggets bound together,

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we should be able to see them. If we shoot

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>electrons adament with high enough internet and what made them

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>think that the proton was deconstructible or breakable but not

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the electron. Oh boy, that's a good question. Um, we

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if the electron is deconstructible. We are doing

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>experiments to try to figure that. We had a podcast

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>episode about whether the electron has stuffed inside it. I

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>guess the short answer is, we don't know, and we're

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>trying to see if the electron has stuff inside of it.

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>We've never seen any evidence. They're just like, hey, let's

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>match these two things together and see what happened. Yeah,

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>but the theory went that the proton was built out

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of quirks, and so that's what they were testing. The

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>suggestion was you could maybe see these things inside protons.

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Nobody suspected that electrons were made out of quirks, And

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we know today that the electron doesn't feel a strong

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>force and so it can't be made out of quarks.

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>We don't know why and what the difference is not

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole other podcast episode, But anyway, they used electrons

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>because they're cheap and fast and small to shoot at

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>protons to try to see what was inside. Because, like

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess, protons are heavier. Protons are much heavier than

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the electrons, and the idea was that maybe they had

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this structure. And so you shoot electrons at a proton,

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it will bounce off. But if you shoot it high

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>enough energy, then it can get to break it. They

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>have to break it. It can get between those bonds. Right.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>A proton we now know is made it of quarks

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that are held together by really strong bonds. But if

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you shoot at it with electrons that have energy more

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>than the energy those bonds, then those bonds are sort

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of irrelevant and you can bounce off the individual corks, right,

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And and so they did that. They shot the proton

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>with the revolver in the library, and they found that

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the proton split into three. Yeah, they found not necessarily

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's split into three, because remember these corks can't

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>be alone, and so if you break up a proton,

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>it just the corks inside of it just form a

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>new proton and new other particles. But what they found

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>was that there were three sort of hard centers in

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the proton, three places where if you hit it just right,

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you would bounce back at a great angle rather than

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>passing through. Oh, they were looking at the bounce rate. Yeah,

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>they were looking at the bounce rate and the bounce

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>angles essentially, And so if the proton is a totally

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>solid sphere, then you'll always sort of get the same angles.

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if the proton is mostly transparent with three hard

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>nuggets in it, then often you'll just go your electron

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>will go right through it, and sometimes it'll bounce. But

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>how did they know there was three of them? Like,

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>can you could they actually aim electrons with the You

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>can't aim, it's all statistical. You can't aim an individual

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a cork, but you can count how many hard centers

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>there are by how often you get a hard bounce back.

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this is very similar to the way

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the nucleus of the atom was discovered back in the

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>day or in the turn of the century, before we

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>even knew that the atom had an electron with the

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>nucleus in it. Rutherford discovered the nucleus in this exact

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 1>same way. He shot particles at nuclei and found that

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>mostly they went through, but occasionally they bounced right back,

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's how he discovered the nucleus. Is we're still

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>not convinced they saw these hard centers nucod centers and

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>physics are still like, yeah, I don't know if that's

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>those are Its amazing with me. I don't understand what

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>physicists were thinking at the time, Like you had this

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>beautiful idea of these tiny particles that explained this big

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>mystery that had been going on for twenty years about

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the particle zoo, and then you have this evidence that

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>these particles really were made out of smaller particles, and

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>still physicists were like, I don't know, And I think

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>part of it is that they couldn't see the corks

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on their own, right, They couldn't like create independent, standalone

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>corks and study them, like with all the other parts.

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 1>They're only looking at X rays and not at you know,

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>holding the bones in their hands. Yeah, and you know, quarks,

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't see them by themselves. They can never be

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>on their own. They're always tightly bound into these in

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>combinations of other corks, into other particles. So maybe that's

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>what motivated this skepticism. But you know, I would have

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>been I would have been on that train long before this.

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>He would have been wearing the cork hat. Yeah, all right,

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like it was still sort of an idea,

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little unproven. People were unconvinced. But then something

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>amazing happened, and so let's get into that. But first

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break, all right, Daniel, tell me

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>about the November Revolution. It sounds like the October Revolution.

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.719
<v Speaker 1>This happened a month later, or this is a totally

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>different thing. I know, it sounds like something that should

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>have happened at you know, at the Alamo or some thing.

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.959
<v Speaker 1>But this is a revolution with stars and you know,

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and as far as i'm where, nobody died on this revolution.

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But this is sort of the day that physics changed

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>its mind. We went from like, corks are an idea,

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>two corks are a real thing, and there's an actual date.

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>There's an actual date. Yeah, and that's because that's the

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>date of the dueling press conferences that are the end

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of this story. Yeah. And the idea was, if corks

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are real, maybe there are more of them, Like we

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>only needed three up, down and strange to explain all

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the particles that we've seen before. But how do we

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>know there aren't more corks like a fourth cork? Or

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>now we know there are six corks and there are

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>actually some theorists that said, you know, it's weird to

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have three because the up and down are sort of

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a pair. They go together. What about the strange cork? Like,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>where is its partner? And you can associate the down

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>cork and the strange cork they have the same electric charge.

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Where's the partner of the upcord? Right? Where is the

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>version of the upcork that has its electric m You

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>mean the Catholics weren't like, three sounds good to me.

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a trinity to me. Yeah, there there

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>are reasons three seems nice. But also if you have

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>corks at pair off, it's weird to have an odd number.

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And so they predicted this fourth cork. They said, well,

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we predicted another cork out there, and they called it Charm,

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and this cork would be a heavy version of the

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>up cork. So the way the up and the down

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>are a pair, this cork, the Charm and the strange

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>would be a pair. So this pair, the Charm and

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Strange are like the heavy version of the up and down.

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>There was a fourth beatle missing there, like, yeah, there

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>was a fourth needle. And this sold some complicated theoretical problems,

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like people are trying to do some calculations, and the

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>calculations didn't work unless you had this other cork also

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>in the calculations. So sort of the first clue maybe

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the universe made more sense mad if you had another

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>one yes math and so then then people went off

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to look for it. So then November tenth, nineteen four,

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.040
<v Speaker 1>people were like, I didn't know what was coming. And

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:01.719
<v Speaker 1>then people went off to look for it, and there

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>was a guide and my team named Sam Ting. He

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>had an idea for how to look for it. It

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was a very nice experiment, very clean. He was shooting

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>protons at a target and he was hoping to create

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially this cork and its anti cork. He was hoping

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>if you smash protons into his target, then occasionally you

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>create a charm cork and an anti charm cork into

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>this new particle, and then he could see that new party.

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was a very nice experiment, except it had

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>one weakness, which is that it was sort of slow,

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>like it wasn't making a lot of these every day.

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>It was going to take him like a year, year

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half to get enough of these things where

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>he could claim discovery. Because in particle physics you have

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to do things a lot, and then from the sort

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of the statistics, then you say, hey, look that bump

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in the data looks is probably a particle exactly. And

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.479
<v Speaker 1>so he ran his experiment and he was cranking it up,

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and his bump was building up and up and up

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and up. Now, meanwhile, on the other side of the

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.239
<v Speaker 1>country at Stanford, there's a guy named Bert Richter, and

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Bert Richter had access to a much more powerful machine.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>This is a collider that would smash electrons and positrons

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>against each other. And this thing was capable of discovering

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a new particle in like an hour. But the problem

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>was he'd have to tune it to exactly the right energy.

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Like if you knew exactly the energy you needed to

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>create this new particle and you tuned the beams, boom,

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you could produce like a hundred of them in an

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hour and be done. But you had to know how

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to tune the beams. If you didn't know where to look,

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it could be you know, you could be searching forever.

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Like Stanford had a huge microscope, but they just didn't

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>know where to look. Yeah, had a huge microscope, but

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>they were searching a beach, right and they had to

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like put here, put it here, put it here. If

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they knew where to look for this new particle, they

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>could prove it existed right away. Something maybe had a

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>giant sifter which was slow, but you know, it would

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>cover a wider ring exactly. And so they were racing

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and bert Richter and his team did these scans. They

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>started low energies and they scanned up and they didn't

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>see anything. And then they scanned down and they scanned

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>back up and they didn't see anything. They didn't see anything.

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And meanwhile, Sam Ting is accumulating this data and he

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>knows exactly where Bert Richter needs to look, but he

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to tell him because if bert Richter finds

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>out this one piece of information, then he can scoop

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>him in just a day. So these two guys across

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the United States, they knew what each of them were

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>doing and what they could do. They knew what the

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>other one could do. There's a lot of controversy about

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they knew about each other's experiments and with

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the connections between them. And there's also lots of crazy

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>stories here, Like I've heard stories that Sam Ting was

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>so desperate to get time to run his experiment, that

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>he actually sabotaged other experiments that were using the same word.

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>They had to share time with them, and there are

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>stories that the other experiments kept having these weird electronics

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>problems and every time they would come in after a night,

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>their electronics were fried. So finally installed a video camera

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, what's going on? And the story goes

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that Sam tinge would come in every evening and piss on.

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the story. Their story is. There's video evidence.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I have never seen this video. This is pre internet.

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I do not know if this story is true. What

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>do you smell it? Would would they be able to

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.760
<v Speaker 1>tell that somebody was doing this. It's an interesting story

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and it actually reveals something I think about the time

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>because at the time field of particle physics was dominated

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>by white American dudes mostly, and Sam ting is a

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese guy. He's at M I T, but he's sort

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of an outsider and so this, you know, maybe shades

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>of racism in this story. It's not clear whether this

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>story is true, but it's a story that exists and

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>is out there, and it sort of is the flavor

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of the time. Because Sam ting finally accumulated enough data.

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>He's planning to announce his result. He's, you know, calls

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the press conference for the next day, and this is

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 1>like November t right, And meanwhile at slack on November ten,

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 1>they figure out exactly where to look, and they figure

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it out or they figured from Sam. We don't know,

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Like there are stories that maybe there was a leak.

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Sam certainly didn't tell them, but somehow they knew exactly

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>where did they look? They turned, They turned the collider there,

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they ran the experiment, they got the plot, they wrote

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the paper the same day. It is all one day.

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Next day. They also call it press currently at the

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>same time, now November the same time, So you have

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to press conferences two parts of the country making announcements

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>of the same discovery at the same moment. But Sam

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>was in Eastern Times and he wins, I don't know,

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's down to the minute, a

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>suspicious you know, like they've been looking for years and

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly, the day before this guy is about to

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>go public, they find the right parameters. And so they

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't talk to each other, and so they gave the

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>particles different names, like Sam called it the j particle

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and the guys a slack called it the side particle

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is Greek letter. And so we had the same particle

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>discovery announced by two different groups on the same day,

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and so and you told me they called the official

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>name for this particle is the J side particle. Yeah,

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we never resolved this dispute, like people still argue about it.

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 1>There are people in the J camp, people in the

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>side camp, but the official name is J slash SI,

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>which is like such a cop out. And to this

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>day there are people bitter that it's not called the

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 1>SI slash J probably probably, and people who think it

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>should just be the J particle, and people who think

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it should just be the side particle. They should just

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>call it off and call it something. But they did

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>give them the Nobel Prize for this, the nineteen Nobel Prize,

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>and they shared it, all right. That's that's a good,

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>happy ending for everybody. They were all happy. Probably, No,

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I think there's still a lot of grumpiness in the

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>field over this. But the end of the story is

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that this is what really led people to believe that

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>corks are real, because we predicted a new one and

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>then found it, and that told us that corks are

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 1>not just like an idea for how to explain all

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the particles we've seen so far. They really are sort

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of a more basic fundamental building block of the universe.

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>And they saw it on its own, or they saw

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it kind of in the same way of hitting something

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>inside of something else. Can't see the charm cork by itself,

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>but they were able to create a particle which is

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.479
<v Speaker 1>made of just charm corks. So it's a charm cork

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and an anti charm cork put together. That's the jape

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>side park. I see that the should just end the

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>controversy and not call it a name. Just call it

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the charm the charm cork particle. Somebody else wanted to

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>call it ortho charmonium, like a yeah, seriously, that was

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the technical proposal. Charming, forget it, forget it. Let's not

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:44.240
<v Speaker 1>leave this up to physicists exactly exactly. That's what happens

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>when you leave it up to the physicist, right. But

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess that what you're saying is the point is

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 1>that course are real, and that's how they were discovered. Yeah,

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a sort of slow accumulation of evidence. People

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>were not convinced for a while, but then seeing them

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:59.919
<v Speaker 1>inside the proton discovering that there was a new one,

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>and finding it actually out there in reality, like it's real.

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>That's really what convinced people. And since then we've thought

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of corks as real and we've gone on to find

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 1>someone that's right. There are now six corks, that's right.

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Just after the charm cork was discovered, just a few

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>years later they discovered the bottom cork. That was the

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>fifth one. And you know, we don't like odd numbers

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>of quirks, and so then people thought, well, there must

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be another one that goes along with the bottom cork,

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and so they called it the top cork. And and

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>there was actually competing ames for those two. Also there's

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:32.399
<v Speaker 1>a whole camp of people who wanted to call them

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the truth and beauty corks instead of top and bottom. Wow,

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>even more confusing. But the top cork took a long

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>time to discover. We'll do a whole podcast episode about that.

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>They were also dueling press conferences for that discovery. Well,

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I guess you know, there's all sort of points to

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 1>how science has made you know, first it starts off

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>with just looking at what's out there, and then people

0:38:57.520 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>reading these papers and thinking about what it could be,

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and then it involves then more people than taking those

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>ideas and proving them right. Yeah, I think that's ah,

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a wonderful process. And I love how you can

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of see that happen many times in science. You

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>go from like all the stuff around us to the

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>periodic table, and then from the periodic table down to protons,

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>neutrons and electrons, and then you know, you get an

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>idea that there are other particles out there, and then

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you boil that list down to basic quirks and the

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>hope is the the the idea is that maybe we

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>can do that again. And now we have this new

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>list of particles, all these quirks and all these leptons.

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't understand what the patterns are there. We don't understand,

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, why we have all of them. Were sort

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of at the the new particle Zoo. It's like the

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 1>cork and lepton zoo. We don't understand it, and we're

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for that new idea, the one that will maybe

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>explain how these particles are made out of even smaller

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>ones and they have to subside the mini and farm.

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Maybe acens will come back, right, I guess, but we

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 1>should probably come deuces now smaller. I think that has

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>another meaning. Maybe we should avoid I don't think I

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:10.760
<v Speaker 1>want to drop a douce some particle physics, but you could, Daniel.

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>If you're the discoverer, you get to name it. Tell

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 1>me about your deepest scientific goals. Well, I want to

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>drop a deuce on the field. I want to call

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it the poop particle that I could finally align my

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>research with my wife's research. There you go, alright, family,

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>white sand unity, that's what size it's all about. Yeah,

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know we're far from that. We don't have

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>any ideas for what could be underlying the quarks. We

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know your question earlier. Our electrons also made out

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of smaller things. We know they're not made out of quarks.

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't know why. We don't know any connections are

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 1>The one thing we do know is that there are

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not more quarks out there. Really know that there are six.

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's it. That's it, that's it, that's the end

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 1>of the story. We don't know why six. You're for sure,

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 1>for real, for sure, for really because more would violate

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the laws of physics or what Because we have ways

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to tell how many quarks there are, and that's from

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>how they talk to the higgs boson. Interesting, the higgs

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>boson talks to all the particles that have mass. So

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:14.399
<v Speaker 1>if there were more quirks and there are no more

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>ways to talk to the higgs boson, well, if there

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>were more quirks, we would be making the higgs boson

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:22.439
<v Speaker 1>more often at colliders. So by the rate at which

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we make higgs boson is how often we make one,

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 1>we can tell how many quarks there are out there.

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>It's a really powerful, subtle argument. Well, you know, I

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't put it past nature to still have an ace. Obviously,

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe nature will drop a deuce on the field. I mean,

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 1>maill poop all over your theories as usually. All right, Well,

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that was a pretty interesting history, and it's almos exciting

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to put your head in the minds of these scientists

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 1>who were at the forefront, staring at the big unknown

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>and trying to make sense of all the weird things

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that we find in nature. That's right, and what seems

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>obvious to us now was confusing and bewildering at the time.

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And there were lots of other excellent nations and competing

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>ideas that we now no longer recall. And so while

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 1>history seems like a linear story, there are lots of

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>twists and turns and false starts, even inside quirks and quarks,

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 1>lots of aces indidios. All right, well, thank you for

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>joining us, see you next time. Thanks for tuning in

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>before you still have a question after listening to all

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>these explanations, please drop us a line. We'd love to

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. You can find us on Facebook, Twitter,

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram at Daniel and Jorge That's one word, or

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:41.720
<v Speaker 1>email us at Feedback at Daniel and Jorge dot com.

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the Universe is a production of I Heart Radio. For

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>more podcast from my Heart Radio, visit the i heart

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:42:54.280 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.