WEBVTT - We Have All The Elements Of EM Contagion: Bill Rhodes

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud and Bloomberg dot com. Well,

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the story may be the same across the emerging markets,

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>that debts are owed in dollars while revenue for a

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>variety of companies is actually received in devalued emerging markets currencies.

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us more about the situation and its

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>potential ramifications is Bill Rhodes. He's the president and the

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>chief executive of William R. Rhodes Global Advisors. He is

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>also the author of Banker to the World, Leadership Lessons

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in Global Finance. Bill Rhodes, thank you very much for

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>coming into the studio. This issue of debts odin dollars

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but companies earn in local currency. How bad is it

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>going to get? Well? As you know, you have my

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>oup ed that I did for Reuters on June twenty two,

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>where I forecast the situation getting worse in Argentina, although

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>people at that point we're optimistic because they had just

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>gotten a loan from the I m F, a record

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>loan of fifty billion dollars. And also predicted at that

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>point because the election hadn't taken place yet in UH

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in Turkey that Van would win and it was going

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a disaster. I went into his interest rate

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>policy because he thinks the best way to fight inflation

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is to drop interest rates. Its unique vision of the world,

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and he put his son in law in his Ministry

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of Treasury and Finance to implement his program. So what

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>are we saying in the case of Turkey UH In

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>addiction into the Argentine problem, UH, we see a country

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>like Argentina who has tremendous indebtedness in dollars UH. And

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>also the banking system in Turkey is having problems because

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of the build up in nonperforming because the companies in

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>UH in Turkey have barred very heavily in dollars. And

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you have now a depreciation of the currency of some

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>forty three percent since the beginning of the year, inflation

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>reaching eighteen percent, and it's not clear what Turkey is

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>going to do at least in the case of Argentina,

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>they say they finally will get away from their gradual

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>list program, which they call gradualismo UH and put in

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of a shock program. And the I m F

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>says that they will be dispersing additional money from the

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty billions. So that's going on, but you have problems elsewhere.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>South Africa also has heavy borrowings in foreign currencies, both

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars and euros, and they're in the first recession in

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>nine years UH, and their currency is also reaching record lows.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And then we go back to Indonesia shades of the

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Asian financial crisis, and and the value of the ruby

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is UH has reached visa e the dollar, the lowest

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>rates in the Asian financial crisis. So we see a

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of spreading problems. And then of course we have

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 1>the big elections in Brazil UH, you know, which is

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the biggest economy of all the ones I've mentioned, And

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.399
<v Speaker 1>there you have an absolute mess as to who will

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>emerge as a winner. The extreme right Bosonaro x army

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>captain who says that he's really going to basically put

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the troops on the streets there permanently, or the extreme

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>left UH, the successor to Lula and the People's Party

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Workers Party, and so it's very unclear what

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the situation is in Brazil. So you have all the

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>elements of contagion. Now I'm not saying that we're looking

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>at two thousand seven UH or we're looking at the

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Asian financial crisis, but I think we have to remember

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that emerging markets can drag developed markets into the tank.

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think the markets here in the United States,

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>with all this liquidity still slashing around, have not taken

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>into consideration that our friend Powell at the FED is

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>going to raise interest rates two more times this year

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and we'll continue next year, and this of course puts

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>more pressure on the currencies and the ability of these

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>countries to pay. That was the origin of the eighty

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>two Latin American debt crisis, the Asian financial crisis. And

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>so I'm saying, we've seen this movie each time it's different,

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>but we ought to take it seriously. At what point

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>will it kind of hit a crucial point where there's

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of a denue mall of some of these pressures.

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that as you see the FED raising interest

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>rates and remember the running down your quantitative easing uh

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in uh in your up. Uh. Droggy is restated he's

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>going to stop the quantitative easing by the end of

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the year. So I think that people will start reflecting

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're nine years going into ten years since the

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Great Recession, and I think that maybe you might see

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>people starting to pull back somewhat by the end of

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the year. Now. Uh. You know, the Trump administration says

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Fagett about that we're onto nirvana for the next four

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>at least till two thousand twenty when the presidential election

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 1>will go on. But they're not taking into account some

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of the the the the events and actions which I'm

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about. So people are still out there buying stocks,

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a record high of the doo, the dollars, a record high.

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Unemployments a record low, could go lower. But we have

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to remember that that was a similar situation at the

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>time of the Asian financial crisis, and it was a

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>similar situation. Of course, we had runaway inflation of the

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Latin American debt crisis and were inflation so

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>far is very very tame. But I don't think that

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the Powell Chairman Powell is going to take into consideration

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the emerging markets because his primary

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>responsibilities the United States of America. Yeah, this could be

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a warning shot that we have much more with Bill

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Rhodes coming up. Stick with us. Bill Rhodes, President, chief

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>executive of William R. Rhodes Global Advisors, author of the

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>book Banker to the World. It's a wonderful read. I

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>recommend you get it. He has a former senior advisor

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>for City Current and he helped restructure the debt of

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a number of sovereign entities over the years. So fantastic insight.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna head to China next. We're waiting, uh, the

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>potential tariffs that could come out this week. It is

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the opinion piece heard around the worlds in New York

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Times op ed that was penned by an anonymous author

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>titled I Am part of the Resistance inside the Trump Administration.

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Here to talk about the potential fallout from this is

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Al Hunt, columnist with Bloomberg Opinion. Well, thank you so

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. You know, this is seemingly

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a bombshell in terms of the potential effects and the

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>potential crisis within the White House, in terms of being

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>able to trust one another. What's your big takeaway, And

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think that we're going to find out who

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>authored this piece? I think here's a bombshell almost every hour, Lisa,

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So we've almost debased the term. But you're right, it's huge.

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I've never I've been in Washington, I will confess to

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you for almost half a century, I've never seen anything

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>quite like this these last couple of weeks. I think

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it was an extraordinary column. One can argue about whether

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it should have been written or not, but I have

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>no doubt in the New York Times editorial page editor

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that it was. It was modified, But it's also not surprising. Uh.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It conforms with what Bob Woodward has written, has come

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>out this week. It conforms that what's been reported by

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>major news organization. It conforms that what we know about

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. And the other point I would make me

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>say is it's hard to imagine these series of inside

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>revelations from any other president. For a simple reason, they

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>commanded some loyalty. Trump commands no loyalty. For a very

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>simple reason. He gives no loyalty. Al Hunt. All right,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you've been at it for, as you said, almost half

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a century. I was going to ask you what it

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>was like to cover the administration of Woodrow Wilson. Uh. Well,

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the McKinley years were the best, Yeah, weren't they. The

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>reason I bring up Woodrow Wilson is because the substance

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of the op ED makes it clear that there's a

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>cadre of officials who are working behind the scenes in

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>order to restrain the president or guide the president, whoever

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to describe it. But we've had situations like

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this before, haven't we. Yeah, we have. When Wilson was incapacitated,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that was the case. Um. But but that was in

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineteen twenty. It was before the nuclear age. It

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>was easier to do that in those times. There was

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.479
<v Speaker 1>a sense that the people that we're doing it were

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>generally reflecting Wilson's policies wishes. He also was very much

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of a of a lame duck president. He couldn't get

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the Liga Nations through or any of that. I think

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this is different and it's more serious because I think

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you have you know a man who is um I

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>want to say, psychologically unsuited for the job. That's not

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>my expertise, but certainly he is substantially in temperamentally and

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>emotionally unfit for the job, and that makes him dangerous

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think people around him know that. And secondly,

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>with a couple exceptions, and I would point out Jim

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Mattis certainly as one. There aren't a whole lot of

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>really good people around me, So I have to wonder.

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, markets have treated what you're describing. Uh, They've

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>simply shrugged it off. And any turmoil seen in the

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>White House hasn't necessarily bled out into the markets at all.

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>That might change when it comes to the mid term elections,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and that is where the focus is right now, and

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>especially as we see these contentious hearings going on in

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the Senate right now with Brett kavanaught to become the

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>next Supreme Court member. Do you think that pieces like

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>what we saw in the New York Times weaken Republican

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>power more generally or just go after President Trump himself

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and his leadership. Well, I think it's hard to divorce

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the popularity in the standing of a present from that

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of his party in the mid term elections. There are

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>other factors, but I would be I would be stunned

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>if the Democrats don't have a pretty big night in November.

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll take back the half. Probably not the Senate,

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but the Republicans won't make the kind of games they

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>once expected in the Senate. Democrats probably win. I don't

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>know seven eight ten governorships, including some big ones. I

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know how the market will react to that. I

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>do have a feeling that Trump won't react well to

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that al hunt. We've been monitoring the hearings that are

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>currently taking place before the Senate Judiciary Committee. The hearings

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to speak to an illicit information from Judge Brett Kavanaugh,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>appointed to the U. S. Supreme Court. The senators that

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>are on the committee, they've been in the Senate a

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>long time. So does the argument that O G. It

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>used to be collegial in the past, does that really

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>hold any water. It's exaggerated. I think it's worse today,

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's exaggerated. Don't forget the board hearings. Uh, you know,

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>don't forget that there was a time back in the

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>sixties where Republicans were trying to impeach a Supreme Court

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Justice William O. Douglas. So the idea that it was

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>all these come by I moments before and now it's

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>really nasty and ugly is exaggerated, but it certainly there

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>was more comedy. Uh, there was more collegiality than there

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>was less, less bitterness than there was before. I think

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>there really the Democrats know they're almost certainly going to

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>lose this one. I think what really embitters them though,

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is how really unconsciably h Merrick Garland was treated in

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>two thousand sixteen by Mitch McConnell and the Republicans. He

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>should said, the should have been a vote on Judge Garland,

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>just as there should be a vote on Judge Kavanall.

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that bitterness is carried over and they're fighting

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a losing battle, but they really feel aggrieved. Do you

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 1>think that there will be any blowback when Mitch McConnell

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe takes the Senate floor, if indeed the Democrats are

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in the majority in the House after the midterm elections,

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.599
<v Speaker 1>as you describe, well, he's got a he's got a

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>very difficult act because he's going to have to deal

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>with Trump, he's going to have to deal with his caucuss,

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna have to deal with the likelihood of

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a Democratic speaker and majority leader. And he's up for

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>reelection in two thousand and twenty. And as we say,

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>he ain't a spring chicken, so he's got he You know,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell is going to have a lot of conflicts

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>come next January. All right, we're gonna leave it there,

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>but thanks very much. Bloomberg opinion columnist Al Hunt on

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the ins and outs and ups and downs in Washington,

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>d C. Ostensibly the tech hearings on Capitol Hill this week,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>or to assess the national security concerns, especially given the

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>foreign interference in domestic elections. What we got wasn't necessarily

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that joining us now to talk about what that means

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>going forward in terms of oversight and NASH security. As

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Clint Watts, Senior Fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute,

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>also a Senior Fellow at the Center for Cyber and

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Homeland Security at the George Washington University, UH he has

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>served in the U. S. Army, the FBI, the Joint

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Terrorism Task Force, as well as a number of other agencies. Clint,

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. So what's

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the big takeaway from these hearings. The big takeaway, I

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>think is that social media is in trouble, but it's

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily with the government meaning that. I think what

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the Senate yesterday was the social media

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>companies have moved faster than the regulators. I'll give you

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>one example, the Honest Ads Act, which was essentially the

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>way we have political advertising on print, radio, and television

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>should be in social media as well. Social media companies

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>have already kind of done that on their own, you know,

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>they've moved to match these and yet Congress hasn't passed

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>these very simple laws from two years ago. At the

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>same point, when we saw in the House as this

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of bickering around politics, it was like a politics show,

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and the social media companies were there. It was rather

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>silly to watch. So I I think the regulation is

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to come from the US. With the social

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>media company sphere is the EU. They have moved much

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>more aggressively about data privacy, and I think there was

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a pure research report that talked about how young people

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>have marched away from Facebook, you know, deleting the app,

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>not willing to be on the platform anymore. That is

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the big fear I think for social media. It's going

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to come from outside the government. Now do we all

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>need to go and rewatch the movie with Scarlett Johansson

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and Joaquin Phoenix called her and which she has he

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>has a relationship with what is ostensibly an artificially intelligence

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>powered personality. Yeah, I I worry about three audiences for

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>different reasons. In foreign influence, I'm most worried about the

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Third world countries that are coming online. They've never really

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>been on newspapers. Their first experience with the Internet is

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>through a social media app. They don't say let's Google something,

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they say let's Facebook something. You are in a bubble.

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>The second one is actually the older generation in America.

0:15:58.160 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the people that have stayed on

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the plant forms it, they are inexperience with it. They

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know when they're getting duped. They're not used to

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>these digital communications, and they're the most aggressive about their

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>political views and kind of corrodes the environment. The third

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>one is young people who are marching away in some

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>respects from social media and moving to what you talked about,

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>these apps or artificial intelligence. And I like to say,

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>were we were worried about the matrix overtaking our young

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>people are young people will enlist in the matrix, They

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>will love it. They want to be in the matrix

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's more satisfying than the real world. That's what

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm really concerned about for the next generation that moves up. So, Clint,

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>given what we saw from the Senate yesterday and given

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we didn't get a lot of hard

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>questioning on the actual national security aspects of this, what's

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>your feeling about how we're going to address this, especially

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in light of the discord that we're seeing in the

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>White House right now. I mean, is this concerning to you? Yeah?

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Well, we'll see over time as a fragmentation

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of social media into apps that is similar to the

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>way we saw a television sort of breakdown in cable

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>TV news, meaning that people will start to move to

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>platforms based on whether they satisfy their political views, and

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>this will harden us into I call them preference bubbles.

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>It's part the algorithm which feeds you things you want

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and part your own choices. You continue to choose things

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>you like and you get more of what you like.

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And so this sort of breakdown is troubling for democracy

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't agree on facts, which is critical

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you can have in foreign policy debate, you get gridlock

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in Congress, much like we've already seen. You see sort

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of see flip flopping back and forth between political parties

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>around the world, in democracies where it's right then left,

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and right and left and you really can't secure the country.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>It becomes uh for those that can manipulate the platforms,

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>those that can manipulate people's minds. I really think we're

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>entering an area where authoritarians have figured out, after open media,

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>how to control it and and really how to dominate it.

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Messing with the enemy surviving in a social media world

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.479
<v Speaker 1>of hackers, terrorists, Russians and fake news. This is your

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>latest book, What do you recommend people do? I think

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the big thing we can do is get back to

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>picking good filters. We have gone through this era over

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty years that unfiltered is better and that

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>goes for everything. If you remember movies, the unrated, the

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>un conversion, and that we actually know what's good for

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>no brokers, no middlemen, middle women, and this raw reporting,

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>raw feeds. If I see the actual emails, I'll be

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>able to know the context of everything. Actually is a

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>true know when you're an expert, and know when you're not.

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>We believe that if we have a connection to the Internet.

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>We're just as smart as everybody else. And there's a

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>guy named Tom Nichols. It talks about the death of expertise.

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>We need to recognize when we are strong and when

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we're not, and when we're not what filters to gravitate towards.

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>And I think ultimately moving back to having responsible journalism,

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>responsible news outlets, going to information sources that have an

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>editorial process is a good thing, not a bad thing,

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and that people need to realize sometimes they are misleading

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>themselves and they have no one else to blame but

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>themselves for doing that. Clint, we just have about a

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>minute here, but I'd love to get your thoughts on

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the anonymous op ed that was published the New York Times.

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 1>I We'm wondering, you know, President Trump said that this

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>is a national security concern. Is it? I think he

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 1>has a a small part of truth possibly in it,

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>which is consistent with his rhetoric. But what if we

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>have officials in the executive branch that aren't following orders,

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>are not following procedures, are not following laws, and that

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is a soft revolt in some ways, it can be

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>viewed that way. At the same point, we're seeing someone

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>who's leading the White House in many ways, breaking political

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>norms and testing things that our Constitution really did never

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>think would happen. Right, We we have gaps in our

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>laws essentially. So yeah, I'm concerned. You know, if everybody

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>does their job and follows the constitution. I like to

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>look at Rod Rosenstein. I think that's a great example

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>over the last year. Someone who follows procedure, knows the

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>roles in regardless of political parties, stands as the ground.

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>If we have people like that, I think the country

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>is fine. But if we don't, if we start breaking

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>into this separate competing polls, then I'm going to get

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit concerned. Thanks very much for being with us.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Clint Watts is a senior Fellow at the Foreign Policy

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Research Institute. He's also a senior Fellow at the Center

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>for Cyber and Homeland Security at the George Washington University.

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>You can follow him on Twitter at Selected Wisdom. His

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>new book, Messing with the Enemy. You know, so when

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you think of biotechnology companies, you think of Cambridge, Massachusetts.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>You think of Silicon Valley San Diego in California, of course,

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but you don't necessarily think of China, and that is changing.

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons that's changing is that Chinese authorities,

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the government there has actually stipulated that the biotechnology sector

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 1>should account for in excess of four percent of gross

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 1>domestic product by twenty twenty and that there should be

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>between ten to twenty life science parks that are dedicated

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for bio medicine. And here to tell us more about

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>this particular aspect of the industry is Brad long Car.

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>He is the chief executive of Long Car Investments. They're

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>based in Lenexa, Kansas. He's also the index provider for

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a new E t F. It is called the Long

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Car China bio Pharma E t F. The symbolist C

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>H and A and he joins us here in studio. Brad,

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for being here. Did I describe

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that correctly visa v. The Chinese government and what their

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>plans are for the biotech sector in China. Absolutely, thanks

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>for having me. You hit the nail right on the head.

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 1>There's four or five elements that are making this happen.

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>In the government is a big one. They have a

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:06.479
<v Speaker 1>program called Made in China and the goal behind that

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>program is to upgrade their economy to hire value sectors.

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Everyone of course thinks of China is a manufacturing based economy.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>They want to be leaders in tech and biotech, and

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>so they're putting a lot of effort behind that. But

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that's really just one element. It's obviously an important one,

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>but you know, until today, China didn't really even have

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a biotech sector. For example, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>had a rule that said, if you don't earn revenue,

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't list on our exchange. And so if you

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>think about it, most biotech companies are conducting science and

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>developing new things and don't earn revenue. And so the

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>exchange realized that innovation is what drives a global economy,

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>just like the government, and on April thirty, they instituted

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a new rule specifically for biotech companies that allow biotech

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>companies to list there for the very first time. Already

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>ten have signed up to I p O and two

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>have happened, a company called ask Leidas and another one

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>by jen which already trades here on the NASTAC. And

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we think there may be dozens and dozens over the

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>coming year, and so I think this is an exciting

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.479
<v Speaker 1>moment because it may be just the very start of

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>their biotech sector. I'm struck by the concept of trying

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to craft an index select stocks on Chinese indexes to

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>put into your e t F for the the index

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that that sort of creates the benchmark for the e

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>t F. How concerned are you about transparency and a

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>lack of it that is traditionally endemic in China, especially

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to the incredible, already volatile industry of biotechnology. Yeah,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that's an excellent question. So that's certainly an issue that

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>you have to be very aware of, and in terms

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of our thinking on that, when we crafted the index, UM,

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we only allow companies that are listed in Hong Kong

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>or here on naz back. We don't allow companies that

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>are only listed in mainly in China, and the reason

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>for that is those are global exchanges, and we're not

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>just looking for companies that want to be leaders in

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>China domestically. We're looking for Chinese companies that want to

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>be global leaders in this industry. And we think those

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>types of companies are signing up for those two exchanges

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>because they're outward facing and UM they have a higher

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>degree of investor sophistication and scrutiny, and in terms of

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the actual selection, we're not picking our favorite stocks or anything.

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>We're just trying to represent the entire industry. So if

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you're a true biotech or pharmaceutical company listed on those

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>two exchanges, you're included. And then we give extra waiting

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>for larger companies to give them credit for their size

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and stability. Now you need to make the distinction between

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>companies that are offering biotechnology solutions in China and they

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>be foreign based as opposed to those that are domestically based. Correct,

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right, that's right. We have two criteria. You either

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 1>have to have your headquarters in China or you have

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to drive fifty one percent of either your revenue or

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>your pipeline value. So if it's just like the US

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>company that's dabbling in the region, it wouldn't be included

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in this. We only want companies that are focused or

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>based in um in that geography. One thing that I'm

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>struck by is if you're targeting companies with global ambitions,

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>how do the recent trade tensions factor in, if at all?

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Given the fact that the U S and China appear

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to be in an escalating spat. It's affected the valuations

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot. So, um the stocks are down about thirty

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>percent over the last two months for that reason. And

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>also there's a vaccine scandal issue that's going on there

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um, so it's affected sentiment a lot. But

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't think it will hurt this industry fundamentally.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I think both the United States and China see this

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>sector something that affects hugh and health and they don't

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>want to use that as a bartering tool. So, for example,

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks before the trade war started, China

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>completely eliminated tariffs on cancer medicines to zero, and they

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>said they want to do that for other types of

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>innovative medicines. And I don't think the timing of that

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>was accidental. I think they did that as a message

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 1>to say, we don't really want to, you know, do

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to affect the you know, the health

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and well being of the citizens. And so it's affected

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>stocks from a sentiment standpoint, and will you know, while

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>this is still an issue, but fundamentally, at least I

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>hope it won't you know, affect actual investment or drug development.

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Hutchinson China Meditech The company is listed both in London

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and in New York. Tell us about this company and

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 1>how it helped China celebrate a landmark Yeah, so this

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>just happened yesterday. So this company, their executive offices are

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>based in Hong Kong and all their R and D

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>takes place in Shanghai. People might be familiar with a

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>billionaire named Lee Ka Shing. He's kind of the Warren

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Buffet of that region. This company was founded, it's part

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Hutchinson one POA group, and they developed a

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>correctal cancer drug called threw quittin eb um that was

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>approved yesterday, and we view it as a landmark watershed

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>event because it's the first innovative cancer medicine to be

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>entirely discovered and developed and approved within China. For example,

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it succeeded in a large phase three trial and the

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 1>results of that were published in the Journal of American

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Medical Association. That was the first um. So this is

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>as high quality as it gets. And that's the whole

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.719
<v Speaker 1>idea here is that their companies there now conducting world

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>class science and developing drugs that are at the cutting edge,

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and this was just the first of that happening. Specifically

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in cancer, and we hope that you know it's gonna

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>be a recurring story over the coming years. There's more

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>companies like that developed drugs, not just for the China region.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>You may see that drug here on the market in

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States one day. It's in trials right now.

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Brad Lon Card, thank you so much for being with us.

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Brad Loncard, chief executive of Lon Car Investments, based in Lenexa, Kansas.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.