WEBVTT - All About the Apple iPad

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello, everyone,

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Pollette, and

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I am the tech editor here at how stuff works

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com. And across from me sitting in his usual

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>seat sipping some tea as senior writer Jonathan Strickland, Welcome

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Technology podcast that's out of this world. Okay,

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>then that's gonna make no sense to you because you

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't hear what we were talking about immediately before we

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>hit record. At least I hope you didn't. Yeah, I

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>hope that's really up to Liz. Let's start this this

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>appolicious episode with a little listener mail list. Listener mail

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>comes from Chris k r I s Chris says, I

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to see you what you would say about

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>at Jason pranking the Twitter world about the iPad just

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>to get an extra twenty thou followers. Is it immoral

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>or against some code of the Internet? Also, do you

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>still think the iPad is too awkward a form factor

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>or worth buying? Chris? Well, Chris, um, we'll get into

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>what Jason calicanas, which is that's the person behind at

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Jason what he did a little bit later. But first

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about the iPad, something that everyone has

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>been talking about ever since Apple first unveiled it on Well,

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 1>it was just two days before we started recording this podcast.

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>That's true. That's true. Um, that would be January A

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday and Wednesday. And Apple has a tendency to not

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you what's coming up at their announcements, but making

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>this sort of veiled reference with graphics and and you know,

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort of tagline tagline. Basically, they see our latest

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>creation was the tagline and had lots of splashy colors

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>on the hand of the invite. And uh, but everybody

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of knew what was going to go on because

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 1>for weeks beforehand, if you're tuning in very late, and uh,

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>this is all old news to you. Uh, we've been

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about the possibility that Apple was going to come

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>out with a tablet computer of some sort. Now you

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>say weeks, but in reality we're talking years. Well, it's true, yeah,

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is something that's been going on for

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>many years. Okay, So I remember last year that nine

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that there were rumors when Steve Jobs was going to

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>return to Apple, because he took a medical leave starting

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in in the beginning of the year. Uh, there were

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>rumors that when he would return, he would return also

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>with the announcement of this tablet device, which had already

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>been in the the rumor mill for quite some time

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>at that point. Oh so this is more than six

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>months ago. And the first of all, Steve Jobs did

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>not appear at the press release that everyone thought he

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>was gonna appear in back in June. Um, he remained

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>off stage. And then second of all, Uh, there was

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 1>no mention of the tablet. And then there was another

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple event mentioned announced for September of two thousand nine.

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Again everyone went bonkers, thinking that the tablet. This has

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>got to be it. This is when they're going to

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>finally announce this tablet thing, whatever it may be. Uh.

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>But of course that was an iPod event. It was

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>all about their ipodline and updates to it, had nothing

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to do with the tablet. They made no mention of it.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And uh, there were rumors coming out that Okay, well,

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna announce it sometime in February of two thousand

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>TENU at the beginning of two thousand ten Apple there

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>were rumors that Apple is going to hold an event

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>at the end of January and that that would finally

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>be when we hear about the tablet. And as the

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>end of January neared, first it was confirmed that yes,

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>indeed they were going to hold an event, and then

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it became pretty much a certainty among most people on

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Internet that they were, in fact, and I mentioned

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>some sort of tablet device, and uh, I was kind

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of hoping that they wouldn't, just to see what would happen. Yeah.

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>That that that there is sort of a almost like thing. Yeah,

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of a letdown that they actually announced what they

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone thought that they were announced, But it was the

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>iPad that they announced, which uh, some people have referred

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to as an oversized iPod Touch. I think, even even

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>though I am personally skeptical of this device and the

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>usefulness of this device, I think that's not entirely fair. Actually,

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that it is unfair to classify it as

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a giant iPod Touch is definitely more than that. But

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I can see why people would be tempted to call

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it that, because after two years of speculation, I'm pretty

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>sure that any device Apple unveiled, no matter how amazing

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>it was, was bound to disappoint people because after two years,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how can you live up to that kind

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of anticipation. Un Us it had a direct line to

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>heaven and could make you milkshakes, I'm pretty sure that

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be disappointed and on some level, no

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>matter what it did. Okay, Well, since I actually wrote

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a blog post about this a few days ago, the

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>day of the it's released, And uh, before we go further,

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>one don't I since since I, since I'm the writer,

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I can plagiarize myself, why don't I just tell you

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>what it is and what it can do? Hit me

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and then we can actually talk about what it means.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Sounds okay. So it's it's half an inch thin and

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>weighs one point five pounds. UM. It's got a nine

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>point seven inch in plane switching ips backlit led display. UM.

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It's got a proprietary Apple design one gigga Hurts processor

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that runs a version of the iPhone OS, and it

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>can run i've Touch and iPhone applications without modifying them,

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>although developers can write new versions of those applications that

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of the larger screen size. Um. You can

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>watch movies on it. You can watch TV shows on it. YouTube.

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>It's got the YouTube app, so you can watch videos

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>from YouTube on it. You can listen to music. Hey,

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that's a giant iPod touch. Um has an

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>iTunes app on it. Yep. Uh, so that means you

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>can download and listen to music on i Tunes. You

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and other content podcasts. Um. You can read e books

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on it. There's an application that they put on there

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>called e Books that will allow you to read books

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>from a number of different publishers. It's got a very

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>slick in our face. Yes. Yes, it looks sort of

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.799
<v Speaker 1>like Bookshow. Actually it looks a little bit like Delicious

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Library for the Mac. You've ever seen that application? Um?

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And Apple has time deals with publishers including Hashett, HarperCollins, McMillan, Penguin,

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and Simon and Schuster. Um. It has built in WiFi

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but uh and Bluetooth, but if you want three G

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>connectivity you have to pay on it and thirty dollars

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>extra for that. And it's uh it's a O two

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>dot eleven in Yeah, that's what said on the okay Yeah,

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>which is actually a a faster and uh has longer

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>range than the previous versions. Um, and let's see, there

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is a doc If you want it, you can dock

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it and attach it to your your you know, basically

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>set it up so that it functions like a laptop

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>screen in front of you. And you can buy a keyboard.

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Although it doesn't come with a keyboard, it's it inform factory.

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>It actually does look very much like the iPod Touch

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's got a virtual keyword on the screen. Button

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is the one, you know, the round button and I

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>guess the power on off. But I do maintain that

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the on screen keyboard is awkward if you're going to

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>do extensive data entry. If you're just typing a couple

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of notes in or whatever, it's not so bad. Um. Otherwise, Uh,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if I were to own this device, I would probably

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>want the the keyboard accessory. If I were ever planning on, say,

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>composing an email longer than two sentences, I would probably

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>want that, just because, uh, it's I find it very

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>irritating to use on screen keyboards. I'm just I'm a

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>very fast type and it's frustrating to get slowed down

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to that level. Well, speaking of productivity, In addition to

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>App Store apps, Apple is offering a version of its

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I work software which includes Pages which is the word

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>process or Keynote, which is a you know, presentation software,

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and numbers, a spreadsheet program. Uh. For each um and

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>UM there are three different versions sixteen gigabytes, thirty two gigabytes,

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and sixty four gigabytes of space. Uh, they go four

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's for the WiFi only. If you want the

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>three g ad hundred and thirty dollars each. On top

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of that, now the three g's only gonna that's you

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>have to wait an extra month, and you also have

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to pay for an a T and T contract for

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars a month for not at it's a non

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>contract paid, so you prepay however many months you want.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it's fifteen dollars or we're up to two

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and fifty megaby it's of data for a month, or

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars for what they're calling unlimited. I'm saying what

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>they're calling unlimited because in in many of these cases

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you later find out that what is referred to as

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>unlimited ends up being very very limited, or at least

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>there's a cap, which means that it's not really unlimited, UM,

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know the details behind that. At any rate,

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it's thirty dollars a month and you do prepay, and

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not a contract. And I also found out today

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that I Books uses UM the accelerometer built in to

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the device, so that you can read books in landscape

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>or portrait mode. UM. But if you were interested in

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>buying books through the online bookstore that Apple has set

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>up with all these publishers, you have to be in

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States, because currently the licensing agreements do not

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>permit you to buy stuff outside the United States at

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>this time. Well, and we knew that Apple had been

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>really pushing to make deals with publishers leading up to

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>this announcement. So this is still early days yet. And

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe that by the time these these devices launch that

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>there will be much more comprehensive deals in place. So

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>by the time you buy one of these things, or

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you're able to buy one of these things, that that

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>problem may be solved. We don't know yet, right right, UM,

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And I have a quote for you, Jonathan, because I'm

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just waiting to see what you say. I probably take

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a good ten minute break after this. UM, You're you're

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>familiar with Nicholas Carr, the technology writer. Yes, he actually

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote the blog post and inspired are the article that

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I wrote for the site called way are how the

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple Google uh Cloud computer will work? Um. He wrote

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a post for NPR National Public Radio on the website,

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and here's a quote from him. I'm just explaining in

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>case no one else is right, especially for people who

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>who are outside the United States. I'm trying to brace myself.

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>The PC era ended yesterday morning at ten o'clock Pacific time,

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>when Steve Jobs stepped onto a stand in Francisco stage

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to unveil the iPad, Apple's version of a tablet computer. Alright, folks,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>dress yourselves in. I want to have a little bit

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of discussion with Mr Carr here. Mr Carr, I greatly

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>respect you. You You are a very intelligent person, probably more

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>intelligent than I am. I'm gonna go take a break.

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Could you give me some sandwich? Um, So, before I

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>get into it and and explain exactly how much I

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that statement, which is completely I'll just go

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and say that I completely disagree with that statement. Well,

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>he actually softens it. I just wanted to quote him

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>on that one. Excellent, but actually go read the post

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>because it really is kind of interesting. Okay, So so

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't just judge the whole thing by that one quote,

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>but I but I wanted to an example of what

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are saying. Yeah, because it's there's

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>so much hype behind it, I think it's I think

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely too premature to say that. Um So, here

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 1>here a couple of other things we should add before

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>we I really get into it. One, the battery life

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>around ten hours. And that's even if you're watching video.

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>According to what they said at the press release it

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you could get ten hours of video on this thing,

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>which is a video is a is a very demanding applications.

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So if that's true, that's pretty impressive. I'm be very

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>surprised to see that. Now we have to remember that

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>often the actual battery life tends to be a little

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>different from what the advertised battery life is. But let's

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>just go ahead and assume that that's that's true. Um

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>here are some things that does not have right now

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>as of the recording of this podcast. Now, this could

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>all change by the time it launches, well not all

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of it, but some of it. Um it does not

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:45.359
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to multitask, you can't run multiple applications

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. I would argue that alone invalidates

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Mr Carr's statement. Well, I I okay, before we go

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and you um jump, since you haven't actually read this,

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I will. I will tell you why he said this.

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>He said that the tablet, and in launching the iPad,

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Apple has created the missing piece of the non PC

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>segment that's basically shattered it into all the little pieces now,

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>such as on the smaller end smartphones, smart books, netbooks,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and now the tablet in between. He said, basically, people

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>don't really necessarily need a PC. You will find a

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a kind. You will find something in that spectrum that

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>if you want to take your laptop with you, you

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>no longer need something that large. You have something in

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>between a desktop and a smartphone occurring to use that

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>still has me Okay, cool, excellent. I just want to

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>declare I understand his reasoning. Uh. First of all, I

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>would argue that one, the tablet form factor is not new.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>It's been around for years, more than two decades really,

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>or around two decades, I would say, And so therefore,

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>if something has been around for twenty years and it

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>has not revolutionized the technology industry. It may very well

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>be that it's not. You know, it's a it's an

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>also ran anyway, um, because the tablet is neither fish

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>nor foul. It is not a smartphone. It is not

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a computer. The tablet, the iPad specifically, cannot really exist

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>as its own standalone computing device. Uh. You can run

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a little cool apps on it, which

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>are great. And I don't mean to dismiss the apps

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>when I say little cool apps. They do generally tend

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to be less complex and less demanding than full computer programs,

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but many of them are incredibly innovative and very useful.

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I have apps on my smartphone and I love them. Um.

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, I don't confuse them with fully

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>fledged computer applications, so you can't run those. You essentially

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>need a computer to sink your iPad too on occasion,

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so you can't just get away with having the iPad

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>as your primary computing device. You can't use it to

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>make calls like you can with a smartphone, so you

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>can't have it replaced that what Well, now that they've

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>unblocked using v I P on three G networks, you

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>could make that just happened yesterday. You can use some

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>vope technology, this is true, but if they don't want

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>using the Skype application, if you used a plugable, you know,

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a third party microphone, I'm I'm wondering, why would you

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>do it? Why? Why would you do it? That's a

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a better question. Yeah, because it doesn't like if

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you happen to have it sitting around, then sure you

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>can pick it up and make a phone call. But otherwise,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're not going to carry this thing around

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>with you to to make It's not going to replace

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a smartphone. And then there's the quality of voipe calls,

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>which and as Chris makes his point, uh, I will continue. Um,

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>so there's no camera yet that might come out on

0:15:56.200 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a future edition of the iPad. Bet that will happen.

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>But with no camera you can't do things like video conferencing,

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>which to me was seemed crazy because they showed him

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the press release a really cool use of it as

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a presentation device, where they showed how how the presentation

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the Keynote presentation software works on the iPad, and it

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>was legitimately impressive. It looked slick, it was intuitive. I

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>thought it was really well done. But if you're going

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to create something that does something that well, you're suggesting

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>essentially to your audience, Hey, this is a great business tool.

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>If you don't put a camera in there where you

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>can do video conferencing, it's not really a great business tool.

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>It's an incomplete business tool, just as I would argue

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it's an incomplete everything tool. I called it earlier while

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I was in the office, and I think this this

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>holds water. I think the iPad is the perfect tool

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to browse the web. If we were talking about web

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>one point oh web one point out. What I mean

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>by that is it doesn't really ultimately mean anything and

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>some marketing term, but but in general, what I mean

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is the old style websites where you consumed the content

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that was there, but you didn't contribute to it. You

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>would go to a website, you would read what was there,

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and then you would leave, and that's all there was

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to it. You might go to websites now and watch

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of videos and leave, and that's all there

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is to it. But a lot of the websites out

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>there today are what we would refer to as web

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>two point oh sites where contribution and participation is a

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>major factor of browsing, and I argue that the iPad

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's on screen keyboard device is not the most

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>useful if you want to do a lot of contributing

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>while you're on the web. And I don't know about

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>anyone else. I mean, there are probably plenty of people

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>out there who all they do is consume stuff on

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the web. They don't necessarily participate in discussions or anything

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>like that. For them, this device might be perfect, and

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I won't argue against that. I think if it works

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>for your lifestyle, great by one, by as many as

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you like. But for people who do lots of participation

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>across the web, I think trying to use this as

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>your your main device, or even as a supplemental device

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that you're using while you're like sitting on the couch

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, will ultimately be frustrating, just because it's too

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to input data and into something that kind of

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>requires two hands. And uh, I mean, when you think

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>about it, you're typing on the same surface that you're

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at. So you're either typing on it by holding

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>it in one hand and using the other hand to

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>peck out words, or you're gonna have to put it

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>on your lap or on a tabletop or something and

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>try and type with two hands, uh that way, which

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>is why I argue that you can't really do extensive

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>data entry. That's why I call it the web. One

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>point of a web browser jobs when he got up there,

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>said that netbooks don't do anything well. They do lots

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, but they don't do anything well, including web browsing.

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I argue that netbooks are superior to the tablet in

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the web browsing experience simply because it's easier to type

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff in. It may not be as slick and interface,

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but they're going to be able to do things that

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you can't do with the tablet or the iPad. I

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>should say, I keep calling it the tablet because that's

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>what we've been calling it for years, but the iPad. Um.

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:18.719
<v Speaker 1>That's not to say the iPad is a bad device.

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it looks beautiful. I think the stuff it

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>does it does pretty well. Um, I think the stuff

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't do is pretty damning because there are other

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>devices out on the market that do those things. There's

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>an Android tablet that's in the works that does all

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that you think the tablet. The iPad should

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to do. Um. Will it be successful? Probably not.

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I think the iPad, despite all

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the things that I find wrong with it, is going

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to be incredibly successful. I also think that the people

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 1>who buy one three months after they buy it are

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna set it down and forget that they have it,

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's just not gonna be instrumental in their daily lives,

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and it'll just be a cool piece of technology that

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get used very much. All right, now, what I

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>also want to say, kid kidding, you've heard me rant

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for like seven eight minutes straight. Chris actually left he Um,

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>he's brought back Arby's so rosecuef Tyler, nothing says Nothing

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>says iPad like a cartoner Curly fries. Um. Well, I

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>think I think the funny thing about the iPad is

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's actually about tablet computers in general. It's it's

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>more of a niche thing, and I think that Apple's

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>loaning Apple's name and interface to it suddenly makes it

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a consumer thing where it really probably should have been before,

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but nobody really wanted to mess with it. I've seen

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>them used in a lot of cases. Um, you know,

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>there are lots and lots of tablets used in the

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>medical industry right because they're really handy for artists use

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>various kinds of tablets, and architects use various kinds of tablets.

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of many good reasons to use them.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Um And like you said, it hasn't really broken into

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the consumer market. I think partly because as convenient as

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>a tablet is, it's really convenient if you keep it

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in your house. You know, it's not necessarily the convenient

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>device that you take with you on the go because

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it's about the same size as a netbook. It's it's

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>not as thick as a netbook, it's not as heavy

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>as a netbook. But you're gonna need a bag about

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the size of a netbook bag to carry this thing

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>around it and the protective case so that you don't

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>get any scratches on that screen, that gorgeous screen. You

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want that to get all scratched up. So, yeah,

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the the it's it's just not as portable as what

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not portable enough to be a big enough draw

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>compared to a netbook. In my opinion, Now, I do

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>think there is a market for this. I think there

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>are people who will think this is really cool and

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll buy one and they'll be very pleased with it. UM.

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I think people along my line of thought just don't

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>see a place like if I want to watch a movie,

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>then I'm gonna either watch it on my computer on

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>my DVD player or through Roku on my television, um,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>or I'll hook up a computer to my TV and

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>watch it that way. But for people who don't have

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of level of comfort with technology, this is

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>this thing makes sense. So it might be that the

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>reason why I have so many problems with this is

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>because I am not the target market for this device,

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and and people who are the target market they may

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>have nothing but great things to say about it, which

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, you know well, and UM, but I think

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there are other groups that might latch onto

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the iPad that might not have been in that that

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>other segments of the population. UM. For example, education, it

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>might be an opportunity for UH schools to get a

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a computer that they can use in that case, um,

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>because they're they're less expend of than other forms of

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of laptops. Now maybe not netbooks. Um. And there are

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who will argue with me on

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that and say, well, you can get um, you know,

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a very cheap notebook for under four hundred dollars. Um. Well,

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>that's probably true, but I think that there are people

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that might try to adopt it, and you know, I

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>would I want to say to that, I'm not necessarily

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>in the market to run out and buy an I

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>have had as soon as they hit store shelves, but

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>I would like to mess with it because, um, you know,

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I personally like the OS ten interface and I would

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like to buy something that I could carry with me

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to uh, you know on on the rare occasions when

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I do travel. Um, but I don't really want to

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>fork over the money for a whole notebook, and I

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>mostly I'm basically going to try to get on the

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>web and do email now, as you pointed out, without

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>any flash right now at the moment, there is if

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>there are some limitations to you, but I'm I'm interested

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in looking at it and messing around with it to

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>see if I could use it for that purpose, because

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>it is less expensive than a full fledged Apple notebook. Um.

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:09.719
<v Speaker 1>And there are the people who would tell me, why

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>don't you just you know, get a netbook and make

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it a Hackintosh. Well I could probably do that too,

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>except for the whole them walking out the atom processor thing. Well,

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean I think that they It'll be

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see how far Apple's marketing can take this,

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>because there there's a limit to the market for this,

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I think literally, but whether or not there's a desire

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the desire site of the market, well, uh, how far

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they will take it. So the tablet doesn't really compete

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 1>against netbooks other than the fact that Jobs came out

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and said netbooks suck. Uh yeah, essentially jobs kind of

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>through the gauntlet down. But really, the tablets not in

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the same space as the netbook in my opinion. It's

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>also not really in the same space as e readers,

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>which is the other device that people have said is

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the tablet and e reader killer? Is it a Kindle killer? Um?

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I would kind of argue that it's not even really

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in the same space as the tablets that have gone

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>before it and are being marketed alongside it. Well, no,

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of the tablets that are marketed beside it,

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and Go and and came before it are more of

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>us stand alone computing device. They don't they aren't necessarily

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>as slick and easy to use. They don't have all

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the features that the iPad has, but they do have

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the ability to to run multiple processes and they can

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>run more more fully fledged programs in the iPad can't.

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, let's getting back to the whole

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Kindle thing. Yeah, I was asked about that, like, do

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I think it's uh trouble for the Kindle And I

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>think that all depends upon what you're in the market for.

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>If people are in the market or an e reader,

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>then I think if you compare the two devices and

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the experience you get between the two devices, things like

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the battery life and the ease of the ink display

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on your eyes in comparison to a backlet display, those

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of things will end the price because it's the

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Kindles cheaper. Will kind of helped the Kindle went out. Also,

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the massive Amazon library helps Barnes and Noble Nook same

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. You've got the Barnes and Noble store

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>behind that than the e ink display, then it's cheaper

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>than the than the iPad. If, however, you're looking for

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a device that does more than just e books, then

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the iPad wins out because even though it's

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>more expensive. It's not prohibitively expensive, you know, it's it's

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe it's less than twice the amount of the

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Kindle and the nook, but uh, and it does weigh

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>more than the Kindle or nook do. So if you're

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 1>in the market for something that does more than just

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>displays books, and you don't really care about the battery

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>life issue, uh, then the iPad wins out. So I

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>think I think it will probably take a bite out

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>of e book readers sales, But for people who are

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>specifically looking for that e reader experience, I don't think

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna dissuade them from buying a Nook or a Kindle. Okay,

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>three things, Uh. Number one, the the advantage that the

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.239
<v Speaker 1>iPad has as an e book reader strictly as an

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>e book reader over the Kindle and other eating screens

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is its color interface. And people who were who really

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>actually need stuff like graphs, charts, um color illustrations, or

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.719
<v Speaker 1>really really want that, you're not going to get that

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>in the anything with an eating interface. Of course, if

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to read a novel that doesn't require illustrations,

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the you know you're gonna be using a lot of

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>power to light that with a an iPad where you

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't with a kindle. The kindle is probably going to

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>be the better bet. UM number two, UM the Kindle

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>as their Amazon has also started offering to open up

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the Kindle to third party applications in development, So there

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is a possibility that uh, Amazon is already anticipating Apple's

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>move into this and and starting to uh to plan

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>for their next move. It's gonna have to be a

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>limited suite of applications though, just because they display technology

0:27:59.880 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't designed to show things like animation, so it's gonna

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>have to be stuff that has lots of different static screens.

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Really yeah, unless they have other plans, I think that

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see things like UM text based adventures. Zorike

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is making a big comeback. Why not, UM, I don't know.

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And then the third thing, UM, one thing that I

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>saw people complain about about the Eye books thing is

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that the cost of the books is going back up. Well, yeah,

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>because Amazon. Amazon is buying the books from the publishers

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:39.959
<v Speaker 1>and they're doing what they're doing with it. But Apple

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>made a deal directly with the publishers, which is to

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the publisher's advantage and now that and and I think

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that's going to change the kindle experience too, because their agreements.

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Once these things settle in, now that it's public knowledge

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that Apple is working with these publishers, that's gonna force

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Barnes and Noble and Amazon into a bit of a

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>pricing struggle because well, possibly there's no there's no guarantee

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of that, but I have the feeling it's gonna put

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>some pressure on them if the iPad is successful, and

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I have no doubts that it will be. But if

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the iPad is successful, then it's gonna then the publishers

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>will have the leverage because they'll say, hey, we can

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>just move over here to this, and then it'll become

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the standard and everybody will use that. They can play

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple off of everybody else. But if no one buys

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the iPad, or if the iPad is just kind of

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a uh, you know, if it gets some popularity but

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't hit the mainstream consciousness, and if people aren't

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>don't start buying books on the iPad, then the publishers

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>are stuck with a model where, yeah, they can price

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>books the way they want and they get the deal

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the way they want. But no one's buying the books,

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>so then they end up having to crawl back to

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Amazon or Barnes and Noble. Oh, by the way, publishers

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>don't crawl. Um, well I have people to do that

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for them. Well, I'm also interested to see, I mean,

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>since it's still early daysa I'm interested to see if

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>there's an eye Books app for the iPhone and iPod Touch. Yeah,

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that'll be interesting. They've got the Kindle app for the iPhone,

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>so now you're wondering if that's gonna presume it would

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>come to the iPad. One thing I wanted to point

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>out that I thought was kind of cool. You mentioned

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it earlier about how being able to use iPod UH

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>applications on the iPad. It has has two different modes.

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You can view it in a smaller windows, so essentially

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at it as if it were on an

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>iPod Touch or on an iPhone, which I'm sure it'll

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>be very strange. Or you can increase its size so

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's looking more natural On the iPad. It doubles

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the pixels. It's gonna look Yeah, it's gonna look a

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>little blocky. The resolution is not going to be as

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>good but it does does increase the size so that

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you can view it in a in a larger frame.

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>So I thought that was kind of neat. Um, But

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we had a question in that email, okay, Jason Callicannis.

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>So what Calicanis did was he claimed that he got

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>hold of the iPad early on, and in that claim,

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>he said that the device had two cameras, an hd

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>TV tuner, thumb pad, user interface on either side, had

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>fingerprint recognitions for security measures. Um. It connected through other

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to other devices through WiFi, so you could have like

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a networked gaming session with a whole bunch of people.

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He said that the gaming would be huge. Um. He

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>said it had a solar panel on the back to

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>recharge because it only had like four hours worth of

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>gaming life in it, but the solar panel had unprecedented

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>charging capabilities. Turns out he was just joking. I mean,

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it was all just a joke. And people have claimed otherwise,

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>saying that it was a ploy for him to get

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>lots and lots of Twitter followers and that this was

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>really just kind of a dirty, underhanded way of trying

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to to boost his popularity. I don't know Mr Calicanus personally.

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I have corresponded with him in the past, and I've

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>listened to a lot of his discussions on various shows.

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm fairly confident in saying that, uh, that this was

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>probably just a joke. It wasn't necessarily meant as a

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>publicity stunt to get him his name over because his

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>publicity stunts are far more transparent. He has done them

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in the past by doing lots of giveaways and things

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>like that, so Calicanus is not above doing that sort

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of thing. But I think I think in this case,

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it was just him being silly. He was just trying

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to create the most ridiculously uh lavish tablet idea possible

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and then see if anyone would would buy it. And

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>he gave people lots of outs, lots of clues that

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this was just a joke, and a lot of people

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>bought it anyway, and then we're upset when they found

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>out later that it wasn't true. But yeah, I don't

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>think this was I don't think he broke any kind

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of code of ethics or unwritten code of the Internet.

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>The unwritten code of the internet's very serious and if

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you break it, we will find you. But Internet, yeah, um,

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and we can't tell you what the rules are, but

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we can tell you you don't want to break them.

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, but yeah, I think this was just a

0:32:56.320 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>case of a joke gone kind of too far. Um.

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I read the original post and I just like,

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how anyone necessarily believe this, except for

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that after two years of waiting, you kind

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of believe anything. Yeah. So, um, well, that's that's our

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.239
<v Speaker 1>our initial discussion of the iPad. Of course, we have

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>neither of us have had the chance to get one

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in our hands yet. Actually, very very few people have

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point. And uh, you know, people ask us

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>all the time on Twitter and an email and on

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the blogs what we think is this means, and we

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>can honestly, we can really only conjecture at this point,

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>where it's gonna take some time before the public can

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>really get their hands on it and developers can develop

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>for it. Some Apple stores might have some demo models

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>out now, but I haven't tried to check it out yet,

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just because it's been a crazy week. But uh, maybe

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>when I get my hands on it, I will Maybe

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll get it, you know, maybe I'll see And I

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>think that I think it's really, really aggressively for an

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple product it is, and so I think that's gonna

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>help it out a lot too. And as I said,

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a market out there that I just don't

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>understand that will eat this up and maybe they'll use

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it forever. But I just see it as a flash

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in the pan ultimately. And there's all there's also an

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>anti Apple market, and they've been very vocal in saying

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just a piece of junk. Right. I don't think

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a piece sure, And maybe, like I said, maybe

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>when I hold it, maybe I'll say that, you know what,

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I was totally wrong. I want one, and I can

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 1>see why I would use it, and that could still happen. Uh,

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So don't write me and say that I hate Apple.

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate Apple. I own Apple products and uh

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and and I'm willing to be proven wrong. But the

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>tablet format for me has never really made sense. And

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that goes beyond Apple that I'm talking about across manufacturers.

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.479
<v Speaker 1>The only tablet like device I've been tempted to get

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is the Lenovo you won. Because it's also a netbook

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for notebook, I shouldn't call it a netbook because Lenovo

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>will say I broke one of those rules, and then

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Neilson someone after that. That is a very nifty device.

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, that wraps up our very long discussion

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 1>about the iPad and leads us to a little more

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>listener mail. This listener mail comes from Kate, and Kate says, Hey, guys,

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention one of my favorite Easter eggs

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 1>of days past. It's changed now, but a few years

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>ago you could type the word failure into Google and

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 1>click I'm feeling lucky, and it would take you directly

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to the official white House dot gov bio of George W. Bush.

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It always made me giggle. Kate. The reason why I

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 1>did this was to correct a little bit. Really, that's

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>not an Easter egg. That's not an Easter egg. No. No.

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>The way it worked was that people essentially gained the

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>system so that when you typed in failure the top,

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the top link would come up as white House dot gov,

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and people would click on that right to make it

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a higher search rank, or they would link to it,

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that. So it was it was not necessarily

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Google making a political statement. When you click the I'm

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 1>feeling lucky, it essentially takes you to the top the

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>other top search result for whatever the term is. So

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that was not necessarily Google putting something into the the

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>algorithm specifically as a political statement. And it wasn't anybody

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>messing with the White House website, right, It was third

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 1>party people. I mean, I guess theoretically could have been

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 1>someone in Google who did it, but as far as

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I've read, no one is willing to cop to it,

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:24.720
<v Speaker 1>so it may just have been a bunch of people

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>who very diligently worked so that failure would lead to

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 1>that bio. So I don't think that necessarily counts as

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>an Easter egg. So if you guys want to send

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>us some comments, questions you want to yell at me

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 1>because you think I hate Apple, rite us our addresses

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff at how stuff works dot com. Check out

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>our blogs, check out our live show, check out the

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>website because we got tons of cool articles on their trust.

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>This will have an iPad article up as soon as

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it is possible to do so, and Chris and I

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you again really soon. For more on

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics, visit how stuff works

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com and be sure to check out the new

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff blog now on the house Stuff, Works homepage

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:14.720
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>It's ready, are you