WEBVTT - Comey Says Trump `Morally Unfit’ in First Interview

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>day we bring you insight and analysis into the most

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>important legal news of the day. You can find more

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. President Donald Trump

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>litten to former FBI Director James Comey in tweets today,

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 1>saying he drafted his exoneration of Hillary Clinton based on

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>political polls that showed her winning the election. It's the

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 1>latest swap of Twitter allegations between the two following Comey's

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>first television interview to promote his book last night on

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>ABC Comy seemed to hold nothing back in the interview.

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's medically unfit to be president. I

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>think he's morally unfit to be president. Joining me is

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gavin, former assistant director of the FBI. Bill, what

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>part of the interview surprised you most or concerned you most? June.

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that anybody that makes those kinds of statements

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on the moral fitness of an individual, that kind of

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>concerns me a bit more than anything I think, and

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the moral sitness of a sitting president does his public

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>assault sometimes crosses into the salacious. Does that undermine the

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>status of the FBI. I think that what both individuals

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>are doing on both sides of the fence, throwing rocks

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>at each other and and and making statements that to

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>me a kind of unprofessional. The bottom line is it

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>tends to when when the comments made against the director

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of the FBI and they made from the President, they

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>tend to be believed by the American public and in

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the cast an aspersion upon all FBI employees. And I

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>can guarantee June that that of the bureau people, men

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and women go to work every single day and do

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>an outstanding job and give their lives and limbs for

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>for the organization of the country. This uh is uh,

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not. It's more than just static in the background.

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>It is a diversion from what the FBI is all about.

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And I really believe that maybe this auto stop, and

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we saw the stop, both sides auto start acting as

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>adults rather than the kids in a school yard. Does

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>this book Weekend call me his credibility as a potential

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>witness against the president in the Muller investigation or elsewhere.

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I haven't read the book, and um, Um, no doubt will,

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know whether or not it will. It'll

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>uh diminish his ability to be a witness any place.

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>It all depends upon what he has to say in

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>how the facts support what he has to say, and

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>whether or not the facts that he talks about are

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>classified or not. And I think that's being looked at

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in great depth right now looking at his interview and

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>at the excerpts from his book, since we haven't had

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>a chance to read it yet. Um, do you see

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a concern, a growing concern or uh sort of underpinning

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of a concern that the president might be open to

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of risks because of his connections that were

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>described in the book. Then all remains to be seen.

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that with Bob Mueller's investigation, we have to

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>wait to see how that how that unfolds. I know

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that everybody wants it to end immediately. The President wanted

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to end months ago. Uh. It's something that's going to

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>go on until Bob Mueller arrives at a conclusion and

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>addresses all effects that are presented to him. The other

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>important thing, Joan, is going to be the report of

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the Inspector General and I think that will be a

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>real um in the event that will be on the

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>forefront for quite a while and present some difficulties for

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>both the for both the Bureau and in the Department

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of Justice. Bill. How does the timing of this book

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>tour and the publication of the book play here with

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Muller's investigation and with that Inspector General report you just mentioned.

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be coming at at a really sort

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of critical time. Sometimes we release a book like that

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in our own interest rather than the overall interest, and

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably what's happened in this particular case

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to June Um. It's it's it's a very difficult set

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of circumstances right now. And I think the other two

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>things the i S report in the Bob Mullin's report

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>will be important reports. Comy stood by his handling of

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's email server, and you

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>know the way he he brought it out on several occasions,

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>one right before the election. Did you agree with his

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 1>explanation for his rather unusual actions for an FBI director.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I totally disagreed with Bob when when

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the director came out with the conclusion that he reached. UM.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Jim Comey said that, Uh, he really painted a picture

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of Hillary Clinton, UM, getting ready to be indicted and

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>then said, you know, there's no way he could do that.

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>My biggest concern and and the biggest fault that I find,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Jim Comey rendered a prosecutive opinion when he

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>was the head of the arguably the best investigative organization

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and being the head of the investigation

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>investigative organization does not permit you to render a prosecutive opinion.

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where he crossed the line, and he

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>does not to this day. He doesn't think that he

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>crossed the line at that point. I happened to think

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that he did. Should have put that whole thing right

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>back into the Department of Justice and let the Attorney

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>General handle whatever it is that ensued from that. If

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>she didn't want to handle it, Uh, it's on her,

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not on the Bureau. And this is what really

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>started this whole catastrophe that's going on right now. Bill,

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we have about forty five seconds here. Could you just

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>explain what impact all this has had in your opinion

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>on the standing and credibility of the FBI. I well, June,

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>I think it all depends when how you how you

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>look at it. My own personal opinion is that there

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>are a number of people six seven people who betrayed

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the trust that was given to them in the FBI.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>That's my own opinion, and I just based it on

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>what I know, as the rest of the public knows

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of the men and women in the FBI do an

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>outstanding job every single day, go to work. Their badges

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>are not tarnished by this event. The only badges that

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>are tarnished are the individuals who betrayed their trust in

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in what they were supposed to do. Thank you, Bill,

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>We have to leave it there. Everyone certainly agrees with that.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Bill Gavin. That's he's a former assistant director of

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the FBI. The Supreme Court is back in session today.

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>The Justice has rejected an appeal from former Illinois Governor

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Rod Bloyevitch, who went to prison in twelve joining us

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>as Bloomberg New Supreme Court reporter Greg's store. Greg tell

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>us about the latest Blogoyevitch appeal and the Justice is

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>refusal to take it. Hi June, Yes, Former Illinois Governor

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Rob Bligoyevitch for the second time, tried to get his conviction,

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>his corruption conviction overturned by the Supreme Court. Uh. Both

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>times the court rejected Bolgoievitch. His argument was essentially that

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>so he was convicted of of things like um promising

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a Senate seat in exchange for campaign contributions, and he

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>argued that the jury in his case wasn't required to

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>find that he explicitly promised the Senate seat in exchange

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>for those campaign contributions. The Justice Department told the court

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>not to hear the case and and they said, look,

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing magical about the word explicit. Here. The jury

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>found there really was a quid pro quo one thing,

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the contributions in exchange for the Senate seat. And that's enough.

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And the Supreme Court decided it didn't need to interview

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in the case and did need to reconsider his conviction. Alright,

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.239
<v Speaker 1>So let's turn to something that a lot of people

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:09.679
<v Speaker 1>are watching, and that's arguments tomorrow. What's at stake billions

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in the Supreme Court case with a battle

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>over online sales tax. Tell us more about that. Yeah,

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>this this is something that's familiar to almost anybody who

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>shops online. Which is that if you buy something online,

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>depending on where you are and who you're buying it from,

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you might have to pay sales taxes and you might

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not have to pay pay sales taxes. And the reason

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is that back in the Supreme Court, dealing with a

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>case involving catalog Sales said, Sales said that, Uh, if

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the retailer does not have a physical presence in the state,

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>so in other words, doesn't have a store, doesn't have

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a warehouse, doesn't have an office, they can't be forced

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to collect sales taxes. So a retailer like Overstock, for example,

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:59.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any physical presence in the state of Maryland, Uh,

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they're for Overstock doesn't have to And if I'm in

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Maryland buying something to be for shipment to Maryland, Overstock

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't Overstock doesn't have to charge me the six percent

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>sales tax that would otherwise we do. So, Greg, this

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is a really unusual case because the state of South

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Dakota enacted the law that's that issue here so that

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it would be challenged at the Supreme Court. Explain a

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about that. Yeah, in fact, the state

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of South Dakota knew that its law, which which imposes

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>taxes on any retailer that are requires and neglect sales

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>taxes if they meet a certain threshold of sales. H

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>South Dakota knew that that law would be struck down

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>under that Supreme Court decision, which is called quill, So

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>they actually um passed the law and and said to

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the lower courts, look, we know you're gonna have to

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>strike down our law. Go ahead and do it because

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>we want to get up to the Supreme Court and

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to ask them to overturn that decisions so

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we can tax all these out of state retailers. And

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly where we're are right now. So the states

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>are trying to overturn a twenty six year old Supreme

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Court ruling. What is the response of the retailers? So

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the um depends on which retailers you're talking because it's

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the online it's it's a totally different world

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>than it was six years ago as far as online. Yes, so,

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>so traditional retailers, UM, the ones that are have brick

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and mortar stores are saying, look, it is time to

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>overturn that could decision because it's an unfair advantage to

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the wayfarers and the overstocks of the world that they

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have to charge taxes, but the department store down

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the street has to. And for that matter, although this

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 1>is kind of complicated, a company like Amazon sometimes has

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to collect taxes and generally generally does um. And they

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>say that distinction in this day and age where economic

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>presence in the state is really what matters, not whether

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>they have you know, a physical building there. Uh, And

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that's why they say that in this modern age it

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>should be overturned. And what about the online retailers, that's

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I should have I should have narrowed the focus there. Yeah,

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the online retailers say, look, we have set up this world.

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Everybody has come to rely on this notion that if

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a physical presence, you don't have to

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>collect the sales taxes. And they say that the burden

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on them, and particular very small retailers could be immense.

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>They talk about their being more than twelve thousand taxing

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictions out there, and you have to figure out the

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>taxes for each of those, and sometimes it's hard to

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>figure out what your product actually is with a particular

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictions tax code. So you know, is uh, you know,

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a piece of clothing you create, is it is it

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a coat or is it a shirt? Maybe it's not clear,

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and maybe those are tax differently in a particular particular state.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So they are basically saying to the court, Um, you

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 1>don't you should be the ones to put this burden

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 1>on us. If anymoy is going to do it, Congress

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>ought to be the one to do it. So Greg,

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>just to conclude, we have less than a minute here,

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But there are three justices Clarence Thomas, Anthony Kennedy, and

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Neil Gorc a sort of surprising trio who have already

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>expressed doubts about the president. Yeah, and they did it

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in different contexts. So so, Uh, Justice Kennedy basically convited

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>South the South Dakota to do what it did here

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of years ago. In the case he

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>really called into question whether the Quill ruling makes any

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>sense in this modern age. Uh. Justice course has said

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>something similar when he was an Appeals Court judge, and

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Justice Thomas essentially thanks this entire constitutional doctrine, which is

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>known as they don't fall asleep here the dormant commerce clause.

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>He thinks that's an entirely illegitimate doctrine, and the Court

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be in the business of striking down state laws

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>on those grounds. Well, I'm sure a lot of law

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>students would be happy to see the dormant clad commerce

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>clause go away. Thanks so much, Greg, and of course

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you'll be reporting on this tomorrow from the Supreme Court.

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>That's Bloomberg New Supreme Court reporter Greg's store. Thanks for

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Lizz listening to the Bloomberg Law podcast. You can subscribe

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and listen to the show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. This

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg