Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom Hudge. The digital tyranny is here,
Speaker 1: parlor purged by Internet giants, Trump officials appearing on blacklists,
Speaker 1: and Pelosi tries to remove the President from office. Again,
Speaker 1: this is the Buck Sexon Show, or the mission or
Speaker 1: mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake America, you're a great American. Again, the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexon Show begins. He's a great guy. No, it's
Speaker 1: only gonna get worse. I wish I could say otherwise,
Speaker 1: but we are not at the at the end of this.
Speaker 1: If anything, we're just in the opening phases of the
Speaker 1: left attempts to completely silence conservatism online. I think it's
Speaker 1: important that we all establish some rules here, some principles,
Speaker 1: like the following. Everything is now political. Your enemies do
Speaker 1: not seek to convert you, but to destroy you. Your
Speaker 1: basic freedoms are under assault, and we're losing winning matters
Speaker 1: a lot. This is an ideological street fight, and you
Speaker 1: should act with honor, but expect none in return. Those
Speaker 1: are principles that I've put out that you will need
Speaker 1: to remember in the days and weeks ahead, because the
Speaker 1: Left is now unleashed and they're using their most powerful companies.
Speaker 1: They're most influential and wealthy corporations. To do it at
Speaker 1: a time when you've already seen a Democrat consolidation of
Speaker 1: government power. What are the issues that we've had here
Speaker 1: for a while? I think is that in the media
Speaker 1: we talk a lot about social media, and people who
Speaker 1: are just trying to go about their lives think that
Speaker 1: there's some exaggeration, Oh, how powerful can Facebook and Google
Speaker 1: really be? Well, we're seeing now they are more powerful
Speaker 1: than really any government. They have more influence, certainly than
Speaker 1: any media corporation. They're among the wealthiest companies in the world,
Speaker 1: and they are oligopolists. There are a handful of companies that,
Speaker 1: for all intents and purposes, control the Internet, and they
Speaker 1: have decided openly. I mean, it's been going on for
Speaker 1: a while, but now they're just saying that this is
Speaker 1: what's gonna this is what's happening. They're not hiding it anymore.
Speaker 1: They're not pretending, oh, it's just the algorithm, Oh it
Speaker 1: was a mistake. No, they're saying, we are purging you.
Speaker 1: If you are a Trump supporter who is too vocal
Speaker 1: about your concerns about the election, or if you're somebody
Speaker 1: who wants to battle against lockdowns and mask Madia, we
Speaker 1: will get rid of you. We will erase you from
Speaker 1: the Internet, destroy your business, and also si lence you
Speaker 1: in the process. This is a level of censorship, my friends.
Speaker 1: This is a level of control over the flow of
Speaker 1: information that until recently would have been unthinkable. How could
Speaker 1: anyone do this? How could they be so effective in
Speaker 1: deciding what the boundaries of acceptable political debate and conversation are.
Speaker 1: That's what's happening here. We have been talking about creating,
Speaker 1: as I've said, unsinkable aircraft carriers or free speech. And
Speaker 1: before any of you pointed out, I'll just admit it,
Speaker 1: I didn't realize how easily they'd they'd be sunk, or
Speaker 1: at least they would try to do it. Parlor Rumble
Speaker 1: and other sites out there that have tried to take
Speaker 1: a free speech perspective. They're not right wing sites by mission.
Speaker 1: That's not true. You keep hearing this in the media.
Speaker 1: They're places where people on the right, where conservatives have
Speaker 1: been growing in number because we're not allowed to disagree
Speaker 1: with the Democrat left consensus. On the other big social
Speaker 1: media sites, I mean, they may very well have delivered
Speaker 1: the election to Joe Biden just by suppressing the Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden story. The way that they did will never know.
Speaker 1: But then when you add on top of that the
Speaker 1: way that they adjust the algorithms, you add on top
Speaker 1: of the way that they try to tilt the playing
Speaker 1: field in the favor of Democrats all the time. We
Speaker 1: can't really account for this because people believe, because we've
Speaker 1: been led to believe by these companies that they are
Speaker 1: free and fair and that they are just trying to
Speaker 1: provide services to people. They're not pursuing an agenda beyond
Speaker 1: profit and growing their user base. And profit is fine,
Speaker 1: growing users is great, but no, they're evangelists for the left. Google, Facebook, Twitter,
Speaker 1: Amazon evangelists for the left, and those companies put together
Speaker 1: are such a huge portion of what is even possible
Speaker 1: on the Internet. If you don't have a single social
Speaker 1: media account, you understand how much this affects you. Google
Speaker 1: can cut off if it wants to, all adds to
Speaker 1: any website that it chooses to do so, it can
Speaker 1: make your website go bankrupt in a matter of weeks.
Speaker 1: So if you're saying, well, buck, I don't I don't
Speaker 1: use social media, I don't really care as long as
Speaker 1: I can still get my favorite authors and writers and
Speaker 1: commentators and support their content. What I'm telling you is
Speaker 1: no that they won't be able to either. They won't
Speaker 1: be able to do there. I mean, thankfully I'm on
Speaker 1: terrestrial radio as well as having a podcast and a website.
Speaker 1: You know, you can go to bucksex and dot com
Speaker 1: and please do so because my ability to tell you
Speaker 1: all I've been saying for I'll please bookmark it, you know,
Speaker 1: make bucksex and dot com a site that you're checking
Speaker 1: in to see. You can always listen to the show
Speaker 1: there too, on demand. It's very easy. There's a pop up,
Speaker 1: just click the play button. You can do it from
Speaker 1: your smartphone. I'm telling you this because it's really a
Speaker 1: matter of time right now. Before my what was almost
Speaker 1: five hundred and I was getting getting close to five fifty.
Speaker 1: I think fouls in Twitter, and anyone tells you they
Speaker 1: don't pay attention to their Twitter following. Who's on Twitter
Speaker 1: and as a blue check is a liar? A liar? Okay,
Speaker 1: that's that's ridiculous. I've seen some people who even cares,
Speaker 1: please lets see and then that's all they care about.
Speaker 1: It's all just one big vanity project for them anyway.
Speaker 1: But but I've I've been losing I think at this point,
Speaker 1: I'll be close to one hundred thousand Twitter followers down
Speaker 1: in a week. In a week, there's a lot of
Speaker 1: people to no longer be able to reach in any capacity.
Speaker 1: And I know some of them are bots, and there's
Speaker 1: all these theories out there, But if they weren't doing
Speaker 1: a purge of conservatives, explaining me why it's only happening
Speaker 1: to conservatives at that, I would like to know if
Speaker 1: it were just Russian bots they were, they were taking
Speaker 1: off the off the Internet, and the way that Amazon
Speaker 1: can go after people now is even in some ways
Speaker 1: more frightening. You need servers. There's an actual technological infrastructure
Speaker 1: that has to be in place for you to have
Speaker 1: any kind of website, for you to do any of
Speaker 1: these any of this conservative content that I'm talking to
Speaker 1: you about. If you don't if you don't have the servers,
Speaker 1: you can't do anything. They are now denying people access
Speaker 1: to servers, right, And that's what's happened to Parlor, for example.
Speaker 1: It wasn't just Amazon and Google and Twitter all effectively
Speaker 1: saying you know, they're they're going to be targeting. This
Speaker 1: is a competitor. I mean, there are rules. There are
Speaker 1: laws about collusion and about monopoly for a reason because
Speaker 1: ultimately the consolidation can be anti competitive, so it can
Speaker 1: produce an outcome that is the opposite of what you want,
Speaker 1: a free and competitive market. They all came together, but
Speaker 1: it's even worse than that, because not only did you
Speaker 1: have these tech bands come together against against Parlor in
Speaker 1: the way that they did, but they also they're the
Speaker 1: secondary order effects or that your lawyers, your accountants, you know,
Speaker 1: other people that work for your company. Once you're targeted
Speaker 1: and targeted by Amazon and Google and Facebook, you're radioactive.
Speaker 1: Nobody wants to go near you. And that's also why
Speaker 1: you've seen all these other corporations like Marriott is suspending
Speaker 1: donations to Republican senators who voted against certifying President, like
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, for example. I mean, you know, Marriott Hotels,
Speaker 1: City Group, the huge financial services company, right, City Group,
Speaker 1: the huge bank. They've decided they're going to cut off
Speaker 1: donations from City Group also to a number these senators.
Speaker 1: This is this is all out purge. That's what we're
Speaker 1: going through right now. And it's the beginning of it.
Speaker 1: How is this going to make things better in the country?
Speaker 1: Ask yourself that question, how will this bring us together?
Speaker 1: Where is the spirit of unity that we were told
Speaker 1: was going to come about when Joe Biden wins. You know,
Speaker 1: the eighty to ninety percent and that's what the polls
Speaker 1: are showing of Republicans who condemn who just outright condemned,
Speaker 1: and you should know that's what the number is. It's
Speaker 1: eighty to ninety percent of Republicans condemn the Capitol Hill riot,
Speaker 1: separate from the protest. But the riot on Capitol Hill.
Speaker 1: That's not going to save them though, meaning they're still
Speaker 1: going to be consequences. They're still going to be targeting
Speaker 1: of anybody on the right as part of this. This
Speaker 1: is why I've been warning for years about how the
Speaker 1: left has expanded the term white supremacy, for example, to
Speaker 1: be if you oppose a firm of action, I mean,
Speaker 1: that's that's a white supremacist position. If you oppose racial
Speaker 1: preferences in hiring or in admissions for schools or whatever,
Speaker 1: that's white supremacists. They expand this. It used to be
Speaker 1: for neo Nazis, Now it's for anybody that has a
Speaker 1: position touching on a whole range of issues that the
Speaker 1: left that the Democrats don't share. They smear everybody. And
Speaker 1: what's really concerning are these early stage move I mean,
Speaker 1: there's so much here, these early stage moves to make
Speaker 1: a big push on domestic terrorism. And by that, you
Speaker 1: know they're going to be going after people on the
Speaker 1: right who aren't really engaged in a terroristic activity. But
Speaker 1: they'll abuse this. They'll be a tremendous mission creep. There's
Speaker 1: already laws against all terrorism, there's no legal terrorism. But
Speaker 1: what they want to do is increase the surveillance state
Speaker 1: and make harsher penalties for people that don't even do
Speaker 1: anything illegal, let's say, but who are running their mouths
Speaker 1: about something and they want to increase surveillance. They want
Speaker 1: to have a chilling effect on the opposition to the
Speaker 1: Biden administration. That's really what this is. They will abuse
Speaker 1: this tool. And I was somebody who was working in
Speaker 1: the war on terror, and yeah, there were abuses. So
Speaker 1: this happened under the Bush administration, but it wasn't abuses
Speaker 1: against Democrats. It was abuses around the world and the
Speaker 1: international arena. Right, That's what we've all seen democrats, you know,
Speaker 1: we were so upset and we learned all these stories
Speaker 1: about about black sites and water boarding and the masts
Speaker 1: surveillance state, which did affect all Americans. Democrats now are
Speaker 1: planning to do to use that same overreach playbook, but
Speaker 1: they're planning to do it for domestic political purposes against
Speaker 1: their fellow Americans. That's really the plan here. This is
Speaker 1: going down a very dark and dangerous path, and I
Speaker 1: think it's it's really necessary if you'd understand, we complain
Speaker 1: about this, We appeal the principle. We say, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, guys, this is reckless, this is bad, this
Speaker 1: is unfair, your enalizing a lot of people under false pretenses.
Speaker 1: And you know what their response is good, you deserve it.
Speaker 1: They don't care. They think your ideas. The Democrats the
Speaker 1: left have convinced themselves that your ideas that they want
Speaker 1: to suppress are not just wrong, they are a danger
Speaker 1: and they need to be destroyed and you need to
Speaker 1: be punished for them. That's the prevailing mentality, that's the
Speaker 1: overwhelming sentiment of the left falls into that category. It's
Speaker 1: not I don't like what you say, but I understand
Speaker 1: that you have a right to say it, and you
Speaker 1: should not face concerted consequences to ruin your business, your life,
Speaker 1: your reputation around it. No, they've moved into the destruction
Speaker 1: of anybody who stands in their way, and they feel
Speaker 1: good about it. And if there are people that get
Speaker 1: caught up in this, that are ruined or that go
Speaker 1: bankrupt to have their reputations destroyed, that's collateral damage they're
Speaker 1: absolutely willing willing to pay. Because if you're on the
Speaker 1: right there is no such thing as collateral damage. You're
Speaker 1: on the wrong team, you should suffer. I'm telling you
Speaker 1: this is the attitude. That is how they feel. I
Speaker 1: also want to talk about what we what can we
Speaker 1: do about this? What is the path forward? People keep
Speaker 1: saying to me, Well, buck, you you're telling us about
Speaker 1: the problems, what about the solutions? First me, you don't
Speaker 1: understand the full scope of the problem, because the mobilization
Speaker 1: that is required on our side to tackle these issues
Speaker 1: is massive, and we are now out of power, and
Speaker 1: it is only fair to point out that Republicans didn't
Speaker 1: do a damn thing about this for four years and
Speaker 1: now we are exactly where some of us were warning
Speaker 1: we'd be where you have political power and private sector
Speaker 1: tech power colluding and consolidating to eradicate right wing views.
Speaker 1: That is what is happening right now, and we are
Speaker 1: finally seeing it at a time when we're in the
Speaker 1: worst position we've been in four years to do something
Speaker 1: about it. So I want to be clear on that
Speaker 1: there are people in positions of power who are supposed
Speaker 1: to be on our team who let us down. Here
Speaker 1: this is the truth. I told you all, speak the truth.
Speaker 1: The Trump administration did not do a damn thing about this,
Speaker 1: and here we are. How many times did we talk
Speaker 1: about it? Section two thirty. What's going to happen next?
Speaker 1: Nothing was done? And now we the people have to
Speaker 1: figure out a plan of action to return this country
Speaker 1: to some sense of political equilibrium because this this can
Speaker 1: deteriorate very rapidly. And I do not get worried easily
Speaker 1: about the future of this country if this trend continues
Speaker 1: of really punishing political enemies in the way that they're
Speaker 1: already doing, and it's gonna get much worse trend continues.
Speaker 1: I don't know what happens this country, but I am worried.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hud This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. What do I think is coming next?
Speaker 1: I want to talk to you about what we should do,
Speaker 1: but I want you to also understand where this is
Speaker 1: all heading. You're going to see an escalation until we submit.
Speaker 1: It used to be build your own app, and it
Speaker 1: took us too long on the right to do it,
Speaker 1: but but we did. We have an app that's just
Speaker 1: it's free speech. It's not actually even conservative or right wing.
Speaker 1: But build a place, you know, it's the private business
Speaker 1: is build a place that you know you can have
Speaker 1: the free speech you want. So we did and then
Speaker 1: they shut that. They shut that down. And if we say, okay,
Speaker 1: well we're going to have our own you know, we're
Speaker 1: going to create our own ad sales company, they're going
Speaker 1: to go after not only they're going to try to
Speaker 1: boycott companies that that partake in conservative ad sales to
Speaker 1: support media and voices out there like mine. They're also
Speaker 1: going to then say, well, we're going to cut off
Speaker 1: your servers, which has already happened. I mean is essentially
Speaker 1: we're heading toward The left has so much dominance of
Speaker 1: the Internet that the answer is going to be too bad,
Speaker 1: build your own Internet. That's unacceptable in society. All of
Speaker 1: a sudden, you'll notice the left or a bunch of
Speaker 1: free market absolutists. Right, Oh, there's no no need for regulation,
Speaker 1: no need for government intervention. Isn't that so convenient? The
Speaker 1: people that tell you bake that cake Christian put you know,
Speaker 1: a satanic phallic symbol on some cupcakes or something, because
Speaker 1: because we say so, you have to, right. I mean,
Speaker 1: they made the guy at Masterpiece Cake Shop actually write
Speaker 1: satanic messages. I mean you've been told that he denied
Speaker 1: service to a gay couple. That's actually not true, that's
Speaker 1: a lie. He didn't want to write messages like there
Speaker 1: is no God, or you know, to do something that's
Speaker 1: contrary to his faith. And they want to make you submit.
Speaker 1: You know, it's not baked that cake. It's baked that cake,
Speaker 1: and write what we say as part of your business
Speaker 1: or else the government comes down on you, right, or
Speaker 1: else the government attacks you. And then beyond that you
Speaker 1: have the left telling us, oh, but now we want
Speaker 1: free market absolutism. Now, now we want there to be
Speaker 1: the destruction, the destruction of conservatism through the principle that
Speaker 1: we've established power, we have an effective monopoly and that's
Speaker 1: what's gonna end up happening. That's where they want to
Speaker 1: take this. So I would just say to you all,
Speaker 1: this is they're going to escalate. They don't they don't
Speaker 1: care that this attacks very fundamental free speech principles in
Speaker 1: this country. There's free speech as an issue of law,
Speaker 1: and then there's free speech as a cold ural issue.
Speaker 1: There's free speech as something that we have in in society.
Speaker 1: And sure enough, what they're doing is the eradication of
Speaker 1: that culture. And they're they're open about that. They're going
Speaker 1: for it. They are not held back at all by
Speaker 1: shared principle on this. So just understand that their plan
Speaker 1: is to make this much much worse. Understand that their
Speaker 1: next steps and all of this are going to be
Speaker 1: to punish anyone who does not come to heal, and
Speaker 1: that's going to be a lot of us that could
Speaker 1: be that could be me among them. And that's why
Speaker 1: you need to get ready for this and find ways
Speaker 1: to support the content and the voices out there that
Speaker 1: you like directly and not to rely on social media
Speaker 1: to find what people are saying and what they're up to.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening. To remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts.
Speaker 1: The radio app or wherever you get your podcasts. What
Speaker 1: can we do about it? I understand that's that's a
Speaker 1: question that we should all be asking right now, and
Speaker 1: I've been getting it a lot recently, Pasket, what can
Speaker 1: we do about this? The answer is, for one, I
Speaker 1: think we have to take stock of the fact that
Speaker 1: on one of our big problems with the Trump administration
Speaker 1: on the right. And people may not really enjoy hearing this,
Speaker 1: but everyone listening to this knows it's true. There was
Speaker 1: no internal criticism allowed of Trump from within the team.
Speaker 1: I don't mean never Trumper, oh I hate Trump stuff.
Speaker 1: I mean, hey, I really want the MAGA agenda to succeed.
Speaker 1: I want Trump to be a very effective president while
Speaker 1: in the oval office, to follow through on the promises
Speaker 1: that he made to his voters. It would be better
Speaker 1: to that end if he did more of this, or
Speaker 1: if he focused on this, or if he stopped listening
Speaker 1: to and fill in a couple of very obvious blanks
Speaker 1: there that was shut down. People who were the run
Speaker 1: of the mill Trump supporter generally did not want to
Speaker 1: hear that stuff. And if you did that, and I
Speaker 1: can tell you from personal experience, you got people saying, why,
Speaker 1: why don't you really support our president? So what do
Speaker 1: you mean, of course I support our president. If a
Speaker 1: coach tells you you're throwing into double coverage too much,
Speaker 1: hite your tight end, you know, running across the middle.
Speaker 1: Is he playing for the other team or your team?
Speaker 1: You know, if he sees a couple of interceptions that
Speaker 1: happened and he tells the team we got to go
Speaker 1: to the time, is he playing for the other team
Speaker 1: or your team? We forgot this. There was it was
Speaker 1: a lack of willingness to push Trump in the right
Speaker 1: And I'm gonna tell you I got I got tired
Speaker 1: of trying a few times, and I probably should have
Speaker 1: kept pushing, but a lot of people would have just
Speaker 1: tuned it out, would have been mad at me. And
Speaker 1: I figured, okay, well, I'll focus on what I think
Speaker 1: is going well about the administration and try to try
Speaker 1: to hammer home those gains instead of looking at what's
Speaker 1: not going well and say that we need more of
Speaker 1: a focus on this. But now here we are in
Speaker 1: a place where we've got nobody, nobody who is really
Speaker 1: in much of a position of authority in the political
Speaker 1: sense to do much about this. At the federal level
Speaker 1: and the Biden administration. Remember you're just seeing the private
Speaker 1: sector action right now, which is which is very powerful.
Speaker 1: But soon we'll be in a place where the actual
Speaker 1: political apparatus is taking this same approach. Soon we'll be
Speaker 1: in a place where the Biden administration is leveraging openly
Speaker 1: the big tech oligopolists and federal law to shut you down.
Speaker 1: What do we do about this? Well, going back to
Speaker 1: what I mentioned before about bake that cake or else,
Speaker 1: and remember it's not it wasn't bake the cake. It
Speaker 1: wasn't about not selling to people. It was about the
Speaker 1: message on a cake that is contrary to one's religious beliefs.
Speaker 1: That was that was really the heart of the issue.
Speaker 1: And the left and the same people, and I don't
Speaker 1: have to keep going with that analogy, the same people
Speaker 1: that want to make nuns pay for birth control. Right, Sorry, nuns,
Speaker 1: you gotta pay for birth control. That's not a free market.
Speaker 1: So under what under what auspice is? Well, what is
Speaker 1: the justification for making nuns by birth controls? Public good?
Speaker 1: That's what democrats say, it's it's public good, public health. Sorry,
Speaker 1: so you have to do it? Well, isn't it for
Speaker 1: the public good to be able to have free and
Speaker 1: open political debate. He's in it for the public good
Speaker 1: to have the Internet like the phone lines. And imagine
Speaker 1: if the phone company was privately owned in such a
Speaker 1: way that the Democrat owners in the weeks before an
Speaker 1: election could just shut off all shut off all phone
Speaker 1: service to every GOP outreach effort, every GOP campaign all
Speaker 1: across the country. That would theoretically be private sector action, right,
Speaker 1: But no, we've established that there are utilities. It's necessary
Speaker 1: for society to have phone lines as a source of
Speaker 1: a free, open communication for people to use. Right the
Speaker 1: same way that you know we've done that, We're going
Speaker 1: to have to approach more aspects of the Internet this way.
Speaker 1: And the only answer, friends is regulation. If you think
Speaker 1: the answer is free market, we'll get ready for the Democrats.
Speaker 1: And when I say free market, a kind of free
Speaker 1: market absolutism, you'll see the Left use they're built in
Speaker 1: advantage right now to destroy the Republican Party. But we're
Speaker 1: not even gonna be able to get our pants on
Speaker 1: and get out the door before they'll have complete online
Speaker 1: dominance that has been used to destroy the voices of
Speaker 1: opposition to the Biden administration, it's going to be all over.
Speaker 1: We're not gonna be able to build our own internet
Speaker 1: in the next you know, the next two years. So
Speaker 1: there needs to be for one, just the kind of
Speaker 1: public outrage and at least put the Democrats on notice.
Speaker 1: We see what they're doing and it's disgusting. Beyond that, though,
Speaker 1: if you're looking for for action, you need to have
Speaker 1: at the state level. You need to have state governments
Speaker 1: that start to add in state legislatures, have to add
Speaker 1: Republicans as a protected status under law for things like
Speaker 1: you know, doing doing transactions for and with banks and
Speaker 1: online servers. And this is what what Democrats have done
Speaker 1: it They've created this whole extra this whole all these
Speaker 1: extra layers of law that say that because for the
Speaker 1: good of society, you can't discriminate on the basis of
Speaker 1: race in public accommodations, for the good of society, you
Speaker 1: can't discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and public accommodations.
Speaker 1: So what I'm saying is the only legal pathway that
Speaker 1: I can see here. And I'm not a lawyer, but
Speaker 1: I am somebody who reads all this stuff constantly and
Speaker 1: tries to understand what the options are in Layman's terms,
Speaker 1: but the only the only pathway that I can see
Speaker 1: would be to start to add Republicans as at the
Speaker 1: state level, because I know we can't do we're not
Speaker 1: going to be able to do this the federal level
Speaker 1: because we didn't take action on this for four years
Speaker 1: under Trump. Would be to add so in the state
Speaker 1: of Texas, for example, in the state of Florida, you
Speaker 1: could have you are not allowed to and then and
Speaker 1: then that would lead to lawsuits, right, it would lead
Speaker 1: to lawsuits and more. But this is it. This is
Speaker 1: our only this is our only shot. As I see it,
Speaker 1: They're gonna have to force people to think twice at least,
Speaker 1: because right now they don't think twice at all. They
Speaker 1: don't care what we think. There's no sense whatsoever that
Speaker 1: we have to be that they have to be careful
Speaker 1: about what they're doing. They can go around YouTube and
Speaker 1: Facebook and Twitter and just Google, which is of course
Speaker 1: the owner of YouTube, an Amazon, which has a tremendous
Speaker 1: amount of cloud computing services that they that they do
Speaker 1: and servers. They can crush you without consequence because they
Speaker 1: don't like what you say. All this stuff about terms
Speaker 1: of service violations and Trump and violence at the Capitol.
Speaker 1: That's why we're shutting people down. That's not true. Okay,
Speaker 1: they're not shutting Parlor down because it was a place
Speaker 1: where violence was planned anymore so than violence has been
Speaker 1: planned by Antifa and BLM and many others on Twitter,
Speaker 1: on Facebook. These are communication platforms. Parlor doesn't advocate for
Speaker 1: the violent overthrow of the government. Parlor is not is
Speaker 1: not doing anything other than refusing to play the game
Speaker 1: the way the left wants it to, which means suppressing
Speaker 1: conservative speech at every opportunity. You know, I mean, I've
Speaker 1: been dealing with this. These companies are a nightmare and
Speaker 1: they don't care what you think. Facebook, YouTube, they suspend you,
Speaker 1: Instagram suspends you. Good luck, good luck getting your count back.
Speaker 1: If you do, it'll be after, you know, dozens of
Speaker 1: hours of time filling out forms and on the phone
Speaker 1: and trying to reach a rap and all this other stuff.
Speaker 1: And meanwhile, the left they got no problems. They're run
Speaker 1: any ads, they want, do anything they want, say whatever
Speaker 1: they want. They're not getting suspended, they're not getting they're
Speaker 1: not getting booted off. These places you can have right now,
Speaker 1: you go, you can go and check it out for yourself. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there are Iranian pro genocide against the Jewish state. People
Speaker 1: in the Iranian government who they have their Twitter know,
Speaker 1: the Aetola, I mean they or you know, the the
Speaker 1: Guardian Council, they have their Twitter account. The Iranian revol
Speaker 1: Revolutionary regime, they have their Twitter account. Uh so that's okay.
Speaker 1: You know Putin I mean the Russians. There are the
Speaker 1: Chinese with their with putting wagers in concentration camps in
Speaker 1: in uh you know, Shenjang Province in western China. They
Speaker 1: they have their Twitter accounts. So this isn't about stopping
Speaker 1: human rights violations or violence. This is about suppressing conservatives
Speaker 1: and this is uh in a huge problem. And then
Speaker 1: they're the blacklists. You're already starting to see it. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, the Lincoln Project, which is really a bunch
Speaker 1: of sociopaths who are doing unbelievable damage to the country
Speaker 1: with the nonsense that they put forward. But they're they're
Speaker 1: now circulating lists. What they want to do is put
Speaker 1: out a very easy to read public shaming lists of
Speaker 1: anybody who work for the Trump administration so that they
Speaker 1: will not get jobs in corporate America. They will not
Speaker 1: be they will effectively be unhireable. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: the most vicious kind of political retribution you can find.
Speaker 1: Sort of advocating for violence, it's there. They're not necessarily
Speaker 1: targeting you for violence yet if you work for Trump,
Speaker 1: although that has also happened as we know, but they're
Speaker 1: going to make sure that you can't pay your bills,
Speaker 1: feed your family, have a career, pay your mortgage. You know,
Speaker 1: that's that's what you deserve if you work for Trump.
Speaker 1: That's what they really believe, and this is increasing widespread.
Speaker 1: There are these lists that are circulating. They don't care.
Speaker 1: They really believe that if you support Trump, you've been
Speaker 1: a part of a coup attempt, and that you must
Speaker 1: be supportive of white supremacist ideology. And the fact that
Speaker 1: seventy five million Americans, including a lot of as we know,
Speaker 1: an unprecedentedly high number of Latino and black voters compared
Speaker 1: to GOP norms, voted for Trump, none of that matters.
Speaker 1: Not to the left. It's white supremacist support, it's a coup,
Speaker 1: it's fascism, it's the worst kinds of the worst kinds
Speaker 1: of political malfeasance. And whatever they have to do to
Speaker 1: stop it. They feel entirely justified in doing. And if
Speaker 1: you and your livelihood and your freedom is a casualty
Speaker 1: of that, great. They don't to say they don't care
Speaker 1: is even correct. They celebrate it. They're happy when conservatives
Speaker 1: get booted off the internet. They're happy when their opposition
Speaker 1: is You know, this would be like if we were
Speaker 1: playing in a sports league and we think that they
Speaker 1: would want to they would want to meet us, let's
Speaker 1: say on the actual playing field. No, what they want
Speaker 1: is to slash the tires of the bus for the
Speaker 1: opposing team so they can't even get to the match.
Speaker 1: That's how they're playing this. That's what they're doing now.
Speaker 1: They're slashing our tires. They're you know, setting up actual
Speaker 1: roadblocks and saying, sorry, we win by forfeit. We're in charge. Now.
Speaker 1: What this does to America if it continues, I I
Speaker 1: can't say. I don't know. I just know that it's
Speaker 1: terrible and that the left is that this is a psychosis.
Speaker 1: It's disgusting, and there is no good faith. They're operating
Speaker 1: with no good faith whatsoever. They have decided that the
Speaker 1: worst elements of Trump support, which are a tiny, tiny
Speaker 1: fraction of those who actually voted for trumpets support President
Speaker 1: Trump the absolute worst for ingelements. You know, the q
Speaker 1: Anon behind Trump, that's representative of all of us. Therefore,
Speaker 1: we all have to be we all have to be purged.
Speaker 1: And this is the mentality. So be aware of it,
Speaker 1: understand it, and get ready for it. We are in
Speaker 1: this together, but it is going to be rough. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Articles of impeachment have been introduced in the
Speaker 1: House by Pelosi and the Democrats. They're charging Trump with
Speaker 1: incitement of insurrection. Now based on the Senate schedule, this
Speaker 1: is this is all unlikely to result in the President's
Speaker 1: removal from office. But understand that what this is, what
Speaker 1: this is doing is trying to get on the record
Speaker 1: and that's it is getting it on the record that
Speaker 1: President Trump tried to incite a mob to overturn the
Speaker 1: election results. Now, the people who are comparing that Capitol
Speaker 1: Hill ride, and I just wonder also if anyone out
Speaker 1: there who when I immediately condemned this thing, which I
Speaker 1: think was an obvious move, I don't think there was
Speaker 1: any question that that was the right move, and I
Speaker 1: don't care. If anyone's welcome to disagree with me I
Speaker 1: think they're wrong, I do not. I will not be
Speaker 1: swayed on this. I wonder if anybody, though, who disagree
Speaker 1: with me that this was going to result in a
Speaker 1: terrible backlash and that it was entirely counterproductive, they'll admit
Speaker 1: that I was right about that too, which was also
Speaker 1: I think obvious. Now you have Pelosi and the Democrats
Speaker 1: getting on the record that they're they're alleging the president
Speaker 1: tried to steal an election using a mob and inciting
Speaker 1: a mob to violence at the US Capitol. And if
Speaker 1: you see the video, and I'm not going to pretend
Speaker 1: like it's not there because people don't want to hear it,
Speaker 1: if you see the video at the Capitol of what
Speaker 1: was done to some of these police officers, every bit
Speaker 1: is grotesque and awful as what you've seen from the
Speaker 1: worst of Antifa. You know, every bit as awful as
Speaker 1: what you've seen from many of these BLM mobs. Now,
Speaker 1: there weren't assassins on behalf of BLM killing cops, which
Speaker 1: we've seen in other cases, but that's usually loan. That's
Speaker 1: usually a lone wolf actor, separate from the actual BLM
Speaker 1: mob that tends to have been the case. Anyway. The
Speaker 1: point here is that you see the video of the
Speaker 1: way the mob was treating these cops, and it's a disgrace.
Speaker 1: There was nothing. Those cops were doing their jobs. They
Speaker 1: weren't posing it, they weren't posing some illegal threat to
Speaker 1: law abiding citizens. Shouldn't have happened. And now Pelosi and
Speaker 1: the Democrats are going to leverage this whole thing to
Speaker 1: the hilt. They want a totally open pathway to Democrat
Speaker 1: to the Democrat agenda in twenty twenty one, and they
Speaker 1: want to make it to the Republican Party is a
Speaker 1: party that is wounded beyond repair. And this is their
Speaker 1: biggest opening for this. If Trump, if this had not happened,
Speaker 1: if we had not had the Capitol Hill riot, they
Speaker 1: still would have been doing don't don't make don't misunderstand me.
Speaker 1: They're not. It's not like a Democrats. We're going to
Speaker 1: be good and fair minded. And but we would have
Speaker 1: been a much stronger position. I mean, Trump would have
Speaker 1: been out of office and been able to mobilize people
Speaker 1: from you know, from private life essentially in order to
Speaker 1: be an opposition a Biden, and we would have had
Speaker 1: a mid term in two years, would have been here
Speaker 1: before you know it. There was a lot that could
Speaker 1: have happened. This makes all of that much more difficult.
Speaker 1: And that's what Pelosi understands, which is why she's going
Speaker 1: forward these articles of impeachment. How could anyone think that
Speaker 1: this would help the country, as if the way we
Speaker 1: are at a particularly tense moment, a truly concerning moment,
Speaker 1: and we're we're to believe, we're to believe that the
Speaker 1: Democrats think this will make things better somehow. That's that's
Speaker 1: just nonsensical. Removing President Trump through this kind of mechanism
Speaker 1: will only result in in further exacerbation of engines, will
Speaker 1: only result in even more sense of outrage that the
Speaker 1: votes of Trump supporters don't count. And they really want
Speaker 1: to do this to erase the twenty sixteen election. The
Speaker 1: whole thing was a mistake. None of it matter, It
Speaker 1: didn't count. That's why Pelosi and the rest of the
Speaker 1: Democrats want this so badly. Gay view this as a
Speaker 1: way to completely repudiate all things Trump, and I'm honest
Speaker 1: with you, a lot of other people aren't. The Trump
Speaker 1: brand is greatly damaged right now that that is just
Speaker 1: a fact. The political power that it would have had
Speaker 1: as opposition to Biden right now is substantially less than
Speaker 1: it would have been because of what we have seen,
Speaker 1: but because of what has happened. But this would just
Speaker 1: tear the country apart. Trump is going to be gone
Speaker 1: in what is it nine days or so? Yeah? Nine days.
Speaker 1: Trump is going to be gone pretty soon from office.
Speaker 1: You're gonna try to kill you know, if he's already
Speaker 1: walking out the door, why kick him in the behind?
Speaker 1: You know? Why? Why do that? Because it's spiteful and
Speaker 1: it's vindictive, and that's what Pelosi and the Democrats want.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bust. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Where do we go from here? What do we do
Speaker 1: next to fight back against the purge? And what is
Speaker 1: also the next step for MAGA in all of this?
Speaker 1: Is that even a phrase we're going to be hearing
Speaker 1: in the months ahead. We got our friend John Cardillo
Speaker 1: back with us, formerly of the NYPD, now a conservative commentator,
Speaker 1: radio host, and a TV guy. John. Great to have
Speaker 1: you back. Always good to be with you. Buck Crazy
Speaker 1: week though, so So, John, I've been saying that we
Speaker 1: were facing a purge, and I knew that they would
Speaker 1: eventually come after these conservative platforms, I didn't know that
Speaker 1: it would happen. I'll say this, they've They've exceeded my expectations.
Speaker 1: The Democrats have for concerted vindictiveness. What do you see
Speaker 1: going on here? Oh? Oh, this is they want us
Speaker 1: eradicate it. I mean, they're not going to accept anything
Speaker 1: less than than total subservience, and they're vocal about it.
Speaker 1: All you gotta do is read their social media postings.
Speaker 1: They want us to either surrender and in some cases
Speaker 1: they are using words like a cleansing. Others are being extreme.
Speaker 1: They're calling for death to conservatives. And then, so, I
Speaker 1: don't I don't see this getting better anytime soon. And
Speaker 1: I just wish Donald Trump would have used some of
Speaker 1: his presidential power and prosecuted some of these people over
Speaker 1: the last four years or installed an attorney general that
Speaker 1: would have These are dark days ahead for the right.
Speaker 1: What do you think we can do about this? I
Speaker 1: mean people are asking me that question, and I come
Speaker 1: up with state level adding conservatives as a protected category,
Speaker 1: the same way you'd have people with people with disabilities
Speaker 1: and gender discrimination or things like that. I don't. I
Speaker 1: don't see another way because I know the mentality, as
Speaker 1: do you of the left, and especially at these Silicon
Speaker 1: Valley companies where they know how much power they have,
Speaker 1: and the people when you talk to them on the inside,
Speaker 1: they'll tell you. You know, some of them will sort
Speaker 1: of whisper to you because they're terrified too. They'll say,
Speaker 1: we can do whatever we want. Right. They've got armies
Speaker 1: of the of the best lawyers, endless capital and funds
Speaker 1: to do what they want, and anyone who stands against
Speaker 1: them they can crush before they even get any momentum.
Speaker 1: So do you think do you think that state level action?
Speaker 1: And when I say it's the answer, is that a
Speaker 1: necessary step? What are the steps that we have? Yeah,
Speaker 1: it absolutely is. I remember they've also got government affairs
Speaker 1: people everywhere, a federal, state, local. But here's the one
Speaker 1: thing that everybody's missing in the discourse on shows social media.
Speaker 1: Rather when they're saying, oh my god, what's freud? As conservatives,
Speaker 1: they took our social media platform away. Local elections and
Speaker 1: state legislative elections haven't worked around the electoral process for years,
Speaker 1: going back to tag or knocking on doors still tend
Speaker 1: to be grassroots. They're not as dependent on social media.
Speaker 1: We need strong America first candidates running for district attorney,
Speaker 1: running for Supervisor of Elections, running for secretary of State,
Speaker 1: running for state legislature, because they have so much power,
Speaker 1: and most of those are grassroots campaigns. They're not dependent
Speaker 1: on social media. Yeah, Facebook to a point, but Facebook's
Speaker 1: really not going to crack down. It's too hard on
Speaker 1: what they perceive right now to be insignificant state legislative races,
Speaker 1: which if we put the right candidates in, we run
Speaker 1: them correctly, we win, and we weaponize those offices like
Speaker 1: Democrats do well. When Facebook finally catches on and the
Speaker 1: other platforms, it'll be too late because we'll at least
Speaker 1: have some bills, some laws in these states with teeth.
Speaker 1: So right now we should not be focusing on twenty two. Federally,
Speaker 1: then we should be focusing on it, but our real
Speaker 1: effort needs to be at the state, local level to
Speaker 1: call these people a task and also to secure that
Speaker 1: federal vote in twenty two. We can do all these
Speaker 1: things culturally, and we can shift ideologies, and you can
Speaker 1: drive people to the polls, but if you can't protect
Speaker 1: the vote because you have the Secretary of State, the
Speaker 1: DA or the Supervisor of Elections, what good is it all?
Speaker 1: So that's where we need to focus find the right candidates. John,
Speaker 1: What do you think is going to happen here? Over
Speaker 1: the next week and a couple of days, Pelosi has
Speaker 1: introduced articles of impeachment against the president. There are's a
Speaker 1: lot of stories and I'll tell you they're not They're
Speaker 1: not making up the twenty fifth Amendment stuff, because I've
Speaker 1: heard it from other people that at least there are
Speaker 1: that that has been discussed by different people at high
Speaker 1: levels in DC, whether they're forward or against it, it is.
Speaker 1: I know it is being talked about by some people.
Speaker 1: What do you think happens here? And what would what
Speaker 1: would it mean if they were able to remove this
Speaker 1: president before he left? Well, it's very real because of
Speaker 1: verified political account. I forget who it was. I just
Speaker 1: retweeted having saying it was said they're giving Mike Pence
Speaker 1: until Wednesday. They've given my thing about this Congress has
Speaker 1: breached separation of powers and is now threatening the Vice
Speaker 1: president of the United States. They're giving him an ultimatum
Speaker 1: that if he doesn't invoke the twenty fifth Amendment by Wednesday,
Speaker 1: they're moving forward with articles and impeachment. This is disgraceable.
Speaker 1: So that talk is very real. Now your congressional far
Speaker 1: left blue check Twitter accounts are tweeting, yup, we are
Speaker 1: giving the ultimatum. Speaker Pelosi's doing it. I think they
Speaker 1: removed Donald Trump before. And I was very critical of
Speaker 1: the President this morning for not fighting, very frustrated with him.
Speaker 1: So I'm not being a Trump cheerleader today. Did you
Speaker 1: remove Donald Trump before his term? Because let's face it,
Speaker 1: the twenty fifth Amendment, you and I have spoken about
Speaker 1: this just the president can't discharge his duties. There's no
Speaker 1: indication that Trump said unable to discharge the duties in
Speaker 1: the office. There's no grounds for the twenty fifth. So
Speaker 1: Pelosi's throwing a tantrum, saying, well, Mike Pence, if you
Speaker 1: don't want to violate the Constitution and do this, I'm
Speaker 1: going to violate the Constitution with a sham impeachment and
Speaker 1: do that and getting a complete pass on it from
Speaker 1: the media. I think if they do that, it's got
Speaker 1: to make What happened at the Capitol Wednesday looked like
Speaker 1: Child's play. There's a lot of upset people in this country,
Speaker 1: and the Democrats aren't just pushing him mart This is
Speaker 1: what really we're speaking of. John Cardillo, former NYPD and
Speaker 1: he's a conservative commentator. You'll know him from this show
Speaker 1: as well as others. H John, you know, I people
Speaker 1: are starting to I see some pretty bleak stuff circulating
Speaker 1: on the internet these days about what you know. I'm
Speaker 1: hoping that it's just it's just bluster, I really do.
Speaker 1: I hope that it's people that are just venting and
Speaker 1: saying stuff. But if the president is removed at this stage,
Speaker 1: it does seem it does seem like that crosses an
Speaker 1: additional line. He's going there's no one that I know
Speaker 1: and think and has has any credibility is saying other
Speaker 1: anything other than in nine days, Donald Trump will not
Speaker 1: be the president of the United States anymore. To get
Speaker 1: rid of him now, for a lot of people would
Speaker 1: seem like a crossing of a line that shows what's
Speaker 1: coming beyond right. So I think people may almost view
Speaker 1: whatever they do next as preemptive action, because look, the
Speaker 1: Democrats have been talking about treason and sedition and a
Speaker 1: stolen election for four years and help create this climate
Speaker 1: of quite honestly, a climate of political hysteria that I'm
Speaker 1: I'm worried about right now and I'm not somebody who are.
Speaker 1: You know, when when Trump initially lost the election, I
Speaker 1: was saying, all right, we got we got to find
Speaker 1: out I mean, the silks, fishy, we got to find
Speaker 1: out about if there's any voter fraud or whatever. But
Speaker 1: and now I know we've lost the Senate, so it's
Speaker 1: even worse than it was at that time. But I
Speaker 1: was thinking, Okay, we rally, we come together, we do
Speaker 1: what we can. If they pulled Trump out of office
Speaker 1: with nine days left to go, I just feel like
Speaker 1: I don't know what happens. I just know that it's
Speaker 1: really bad. Yeah, I mean, look all of these crazy
Speaker 1: conspiracy theories, but that there are some you know, Intel
Speaker 1: nuke dropping and there these mass arrests, and the kracking
Speaker 1: is popping out of the Potomac the rescue. It's all crazy.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is going to be leaving the White House
Speaker 1: on the twentieth of January. Joe Biden's going to be
Speaker 1: entering after his inauguration. So it is mind blowingly dumb, petty,
Speaker 1: and vindictive that the Democrats are even going down this road. Meanwhile, meanwhile,
Speaker 1: they don't even mention that additional fourteen hundred bucks and
Speaker 1: stimulus money the struggling Americans that was so important before
Speaker 1: the Georgia runoff. They're not even talking about that fourteen
Speaker 1: hundred bucks. They are now solely focused on the final
Speaker 1: nails in Trump's political coffin. It just shows you where
Speaker 1: the Democrats priorities lie. It's not with the American people. John,
Speaker 1: I want to switch gears to the vaccine rollout of
Speaker 1: I know you're you're a New York guy, but you've
Speaker 1: made the very bright move of going down to sunny
Speaker 1: Florida years and years ago, and now that looks certainly
Speaker 1: very prescient that I a matter of time I may
Speaker 1: be joining you down there. But the I mean, just
Speaker 1: because flight New York and San Francisco. Right now, I
Speaker 1: keep saying this to everybody as cities to live in.
Speaker 1: The value proposition is not good. It's just not good.
Speaker 1: And that's it's getting worse the more people see the
Speaker 1: leadership failures here, I mean, Governor Cuomo. It has taken.
Speaker 1: The vaccine rollout has been abominable, and people want to
Speaker 1: blame the federal government this was a state and local
Speaker 1: issue that it was handed to state and local. They
Speaker 1: are given vaccine and told get this to your people.
Speaker 1: That's the way this has happened. State and local should
Speaker 1: be the you know, the tip of the spear on this.
Speaker 1: They have not been able to get it done. Interestingly enough,
Speaker 1: West Virginia has done a really good job. Maryland, by contrast,
Speaker 1: has been has been awful at this. I mean, like
Speaker 1: twenty five percent of their vaccine was actually distributed until recently.
Speaker 1: And in New York they threw out vaccine in cases
Speaker 1: this has been established instead of giving it to people
Speaker 1: because of the Cuomo rule, which rules which he's now adjusting.
Speaker 1: But how is it possible to be so dumb, John,
Speaker 1: and being such a such a prominent position in a
Speaker 1: large and serious state like New York. I'm almost running
Speaker 1: out of ways to describe this guy's buffoonery. No, I
Speaker 1: think I think he loves power. I think he's a
Speaker 1: guy who loves power, and he gets off on more
Speaker 1: rules on top of more rules, on top of more
Speaker 1: bureaucracy on top of more layers, the most inefficient way
Speaker 1: to run anything. Look, you've got people that are conspiratorial.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying this is all planned right there. They're
Speaker 1: going to start releasing this vaccine and mass the second
Speaker 1: after Biden's inaugurated and credit him with it. So I
Speaker 1: think that's the case. No, And I'll tell you why,
Speaker 1: having worked for the New York City Police Department, having
Speaker 1: lived in New York, having seen how New York politics
Speaker 1: and government operates. It really is that inefficient that staff
Speaker 1: with civil servant bureaucrats who can't lose their jobs, who
Speaker 1: are completely incompetent and ignorant. And I think we're just
Speaker 1: seeing a byproduct to that. Almo grew that incompetent, ignorant,
Speaker 1: inefficient government even larger. This is the end result. John.
Speaker 1: I also am seeing that that people are finally recognizing
Speaker 1: the same government officials, the same government health experts and
Speaker 1: everything else, who are the ones determining the duration of
Speaker 1: lockdowns are the ones who have been unable to figure
Speaker 1: out how to distribute this vaccine. And it's interesting to
Speaker 1: me because you know, Cuomo tweeted out, because you know
Speaker 1: he still has his Twitter account tweeted out this morning.
Speaker 1: We simply cannot stay closed until the vaccine hits critical masks.
Speaker 1: The cost is too a high, we will have nothing
Speaker 1: left to open. People like you and me have been
Speaker 1: saying this four months, and we were always shouted down
Speaker 1: with you just want grandma to die so you can
Speaker 1: get a haircut. You're putting profit over lives. And now
Speaker 1: we're look around saying, okay, jackasses, we've done the lockdowns.
Speaker 1: The mask maniacs and the lockdowners have gotten their way.
Speaker 1: It's clearly not working in California, in New York and
Speaker 1: a number of states, even the most extreme lockdowns we've
Speaker 1: gone to. And so now all of a sudden, it's yeah,
Speaker 1: maybe destroying millions of people's livelihoods for an untested and
Speaker 1: reckless plan of lockdown wasn't such a good idea, John.
Speaker 1: Now even the Democrats are started, but they'll never admit
Speaker 1: that that's how they came to this, Right, they're gonna say, oh, no,
Speaker 1: the data has changed now, No, it actually hasn't. We
Speaker 1: just know they were wrong. Yeah, yeah. My favorite was
Speaker 1: when I put up a picture of me having dinner
Speaker 1: with a martini in Florida, saying how it was open.
Speaker 1: Somebody responded, your martini killed my grandmother. Later found out
Speaker 1: the guy's grandparents are alive and well God bless them.
Speaker 1: But anyway, look look up in New York, in California
Speaker 1: did bug They locked down, their cases skyrocketed, commerce and
Speaker 1: industry was devastated. They locked down more. They destroyed more businesses,
Speaker 1: more lives both from locking down. But in terms of
Speaker 1: COVID and businesses that went out of business were you
Speaker 1: haven't even talied. You haven't even tallied yet the true
Speaker 1: cost in terms of opioid addiction, other drug addiction, suicide,
Speaker 1: and people who lost everything. We haven't even looked at
Speaker 1: those numbers yet. They're gonna make the COVID numbers I
Speaker 1: believe pale in comparison. But you nailed it. This was
Speaker 1: all about hatred of conservatives, hatred of Trump, hatred of
Speaker 1: public figures like you and I who all contradicted their narrative.
Speaker 1: They couldn't bring themselves to say, hey, you're wrong, let's
Speaker 1: do what's best for everybody. Nope, they had to be
Speaker 1: proven right at the expense. It is so infuriating what
Speaker 1: they did. I hear from the business owners. All you
Speaker 1: gotta do is watch the Barstool Sports videos when he
Speaker 1: gives these people those grants, and how these people were
Speaker 1: so desperate they were losing everything. The politicians who watched
Speaker 1: that and aren't moved to act, especially on the left,
Speaker 1: they're disgraceful. Every last one of them needs to be
Speaker 1: primaried and voted out of office. John Cardilla, everybody follow
Speaker 1: him on social media while you still ken, John, we
Speaker 1: got to start talking about creating lifeboats, my man. So
Speaker 1: this audience good. Unfortunately we got we got radio, we
Speaker 1: got podcasts still for now, but we got to make
Speaker 1: sure that there's a lot of ways to reach this audience.
Speaker 1: So follow John Cardillo, folks, if you're not already, Facebook
Speaker 1: and Twitter and John, thanks, thanks as always. You got it,
Speaker 1: my man. Thanks, Buck, You're in the Freedom. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. He broke all that
Speaker 1: we know that I'm saying, Q tells the stuff in
Speaker 1: all of its lives is what I'm saying. You keep
Speaker 1: interrupting me because you're lying, because you're full of That's why,
Speaker 1: because every God, thank God, hanging out of your people's
Speaker 1: mouth doesn't come true. And it's always, oh there's energy,
Speaker 1: and oh now we're done with Trump. You said he
Speaker 1: was the messiah, you said he was invincible, you said
Speaker 1: it was all over that we're all going to get
Speaker 1: more now he's part of a larger thing of Q.
Speaker 1: I will not suffer your QUE people after this. I
Speaker 1: knew what you were day one. I know what you
Speaker 1: are now, and I'm sick of it. I'm sick of
Speaker 1: all these witches and warlocks and pumpkin pop sums and everything.
Speaker 1: Oh God, sorry, Biebacks you I can't talk to anymore. Jesus,
Speaker 1: word help me. I mean, when Alex Jones has had enough,
Speaker 1: there's really people have really gone too far. Let's just
Speaker 1: say it. Let's just tell it like it is. He
Speaker 1: doesn't want to hear any of the Q stuff anymore.
Speaker 1: And I don't follow that guy's work, but we all
Speaker 1: know a bit about who he is book six, and
Speaker 1: I don't follow his work. I hate that guy. He's worse,
Speaker 1: He's terrible, the bad guy. See, I hate playing taking
Speaker 1: over conservative media. Yeah, well he's right about about the
Speaker 1: Q stuff, so at least in that and that sound bite.
Speaker 1: I don't know about it in general. So there it
Speaker 1: is Fox, It's enough, enough is enough. There is no plan,
Speaker 1: there is no cracking, there is no there is no
Speaker 1: grand the conspiracy. There is a grand conspiracy, and it's
Speaker 1: to keep using people that believe in these nonsense conspiracies
Speaker 1: as the justification for social media companies to deep platform,
Speaker 1: cancel and destroy conservatives. That's the conspiracy. Forget all this
Speaker 1: other stuff. There's no lizard people, there's no crack in,
Speaker 1: there's there's not some international you know, Builderberg with the
Speaker 1: Queen of England, Nuto. It's the conspiracy is Google and
Speaker 1: Facebook and Twitter and Amazon looking at the lunatics who
Speaker 1: either attack cops in the name of the right or
Speaker 1: who believe in in all this insane stuff as a
Speaker 1: justification to shut down people like you and me who
Speaker 1: just want a constitutional rule of law government that respects Americans'
Speaker 1: rights and puts the interest of the American people ahead
Speaker 1: of you know, international conglomerates and the and the the globalists.
Speaker 1: And that's it. We want to be left alone. Want
Speaker 1: to be a live our lives, be safe, you know,
Speaker 1: live and safe neighborhoods, you know, not not have the
Speaker 1: government forcing us into into near penury. I mean that
Speaker 1: that would be nice, but no, and you know, we
Speaker 1: have lockdowns, we have real destruction of rights and freedoms.
Speaker 1: But people were also focused, way too focused on Trump
Speaker 1: was going to save the day. Friends, I respect you,
Speaker 1: and that's why I tell you he did not and
Speaker 1: he will not. And that's where we are now. We
Speaker 1: need to understand that. So it's on It's on you
Speaker 1: and me now, all those of you, the the huge
Speaker 1: numbers of you listening all across the country right now,
Speaker 1: it's on us to fix all of this. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to the Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Dan
Speaker 1: Bongino has been a leader in trying to help build
Speaker 1: conservative platforms that people like me and and pretty much
Speaker 1: every other conservative voice out there that all of you
Speaker 1: listening or are familiar with want to hear more from.
Speaker 1: Is because of people like Dan who are leading the
Speaker 1: charge on this that we've had those opportunities and trying
Speaker 1: to build and trying to make a conservative media where
Speaker 1: we're not just all looking at each other fighting over
Speaker 1: a tiny island, we're actually expanding and building out well.
Speaker 1: As you know, Parlor has come under direct assault by
Speaker 1: the tech titans, the tech oligarchs, and Dan Bongino is
Speaker 1: with us now to explain exactly what's going on. He
Speaker 1: is well. Dan, first of all, thank you for joining
Speaker 1: you all know he's the host of the Dan Bongino show, Dan,
Speaker 1: what's your relationship with Parlor? So everybody understands this. I'm
Speaker 1: an investor, so I own roughly eight percent of the
Speaker 1: company with three others. And listen, we're under a withering assault.
Speaker 1: You know, what's happening in front of the media, in
Speaker 1: front of everyone else is about a quarter of the story.
Speaker 1: And you may say to yourself, well, what's happening. I
Speaker 1: don't know what you know, maybe people have been busiest
Speaker 1: week and are missed it. It It certainly possible, I doubt,
Speaker 1: but we are a social media alternative to Twitter. We
Speaker 1: were the fastest growing and I believe largest free market
Speaker 1: competitor to Twitter, something that was before the free market dissipated.
Speaker 1: This weekend, we had about twenty million users. We were exploding.
Speaker 1: We were adding about five hundred thousand new users a day.
Speaker 1: In Amazon, Apple, and Google, in what appears to be
Speaker 1: a coordinated effort, effectively wiped out Parlor dot Com, wiped
Speaker 1: out our servers, took us down off the web, took
Speaker 1: us down off the app stores and everything else. Now
Speaker 1: we'll be back. I want to be crystal clear, we'll
Speaker 1: be back up hopefully by tomorrow, maybe the next day
Speaker 1: at the worst, by the end of the week at
Speaker 1: Parlor dot com. But it's they basically wiped the company
Speaker 1: off the face of the earth because they felt like it.
Speaker 1: There were no principles behind this at all, and behind
Speaker 1: the scenes it was even worse. We had basically every
Speaker 1: significant vendor we have just canceled on us at the
Speaker 1: same time, some of them leaving really damaging conditions that
Speaker 1: they're going to have to answer for in their wake.
Speaker 1: What what what do you mean give us skid to
Speaker 1: the specifics to degree you can, Dan. I know there's
Speaker 1: probably some you know, sensitivities and limitations here, But when
Speaker 1: you say other vendors, because we've all we all know
Speaker 1: about the tech oligarchs, But I mean you have legal
Speaker 1: you have other people that are that are you're you're
Speaker 1: working with on a professional basis. You just said we
Speaker 1: won't take the heat. Um, Yes, lawyers quit. We've had
Speaker 1: under pressure, of course, we've had lawyers quit. We've had
Speaker 1: tech companies quit that are smaller than Amazon at Google
Speaker 1: but significant into them themselves. M One of them was
Speaker 1: an SMS provider. One of the benefits of being on parlors.
Speaker 1: We don't mind your data, so we don't sell you.
Speaker 1: You're not commodity on parlor. We don't mind your data.
Speaker 1: We have no way to mind your data on parlor.
Speaker 1: So buck Sexton post something and in the keywords are
Speaker 1: whatever you know, medication for blood pressure, and you say, hey,
Speaker 1: I'm blood buck Sexton, I'm on medication for blood plait,
Speaker 1: which you're not. But I'm just saying we don't sell that.
Speaker 1: This companies and sell blood pressure medication. We don't. We
Speaker 1: don't mind your data. One of the casualties of that
Speaker 1: business wise, which is fine, that's our business model. It's
Speaker 1: what we choose. Is you know, we have no way
Speaker 1: to authenticate you because we don't have a data mind
Speaker 1: to see if you are in fact a real person.
Speaker 1: So we ask for a phone number, that's why. And
Speaker 1: some people don't like that, but we ask for a
Speaker 1: phone number to authenticate who you are, or an email
Speaker 1: address in some circumstances. Well, one of the companies involved
Speaker 1: with the authentication of the phone number, which ironically would
Speaker 1: have made it easier, just abruptly canceled on us and
Speaker 1: left the horror show in their way again. So I
Speaker 1: say it like behind the scenes of stories ten times
Speaker 1: worse than it even is in front of the cameras
Speaker 1: about what happened in parlor. And I want to be
Speaker 1: crystal clear and anybody thinks and any other social media
Speaker 1: companies out there who think this can happen to them,
Speaker 1: not only can it happen, it will happen to you.
Speaker 1: And if you think it's just a matter of all, well,
Speaker 1: I've got my own servers and everything else. I'm sorry
Speaker 1: to break your delusion, but the Left is already preparing
Speaker 1: to come after ISPs Internet service providers to make sure
Speaker 1: your website's block. It doesn't. You be on your own server,
Speaker 1: that's the only place you're going to be. So yet
Speaker 1: all these companies out there, you know, are good, good
Speaker 1: for you. I mean, we're all about the competition and everything,
Speaker 1: but everybody's celebrating the fact that they think they've built
Speaker 1: a fortress. If you think you're going to somehow fortress
Speaker 1: your way out of this and not fight back legally
Speaker 1: and get these companies sued and broken up and get
Speaker 1: Section two thirty rewritten in a wayfair to everyone, you're insane,
Speaker 1: You're out of your mind. There's no way to fortress
Speaker 1: yourself all from the totalitarians ever, and there's never been
Speaker 1: a way to do that throughout human history. We're speaking
Speaker 1: of Dan Bongino. He's the host of The Dan Bongino Show,
Speaker 1: and he is a partial owner of Parlor. And I
Speaker 1: hope everybody, especially when Parlor dot Com is back up
Speaker 1: on the web at least. I know there's going to
Speaker 1: be other hurdles to this, but on Parlor dot com
Speaker 1: on the web, people should sign up, get an account
Speaker 1: and be able to follow Dan, follow me Dan. What
Speaker 1: is the explanation? I mean, are you in contact or
Speaker 1: are Parlor representatives in contact with Amazon, with with you know,
Speaker 1: Facebook and these companies about what's their justification for this
Speaker 1: or is it just a fiat They don't even try
Speaker 1: to justify it. Well, they they do try to justify it,
Speaker 1: but their justification is laughable because they're pretending to apply
Speaker 1: a standard, and the standards is what they're basically saying is, hey, listen,
Speaker 1: we don't like the fact that some content on your
Speaker 1: website we deem violent, which by the way, we don't
Speaker 1: like either, and we have terms of service against that.
Speaker 1: So what's happening is companies that specialize in boycotts on
Speaker 1: Twitter and else where. Leftists, companies or people I shouldn't
Speaker 1: say companies, but people specialize in boycosts are screenshotting every
Speaker 1: piece of material you see on Parlor that may violate
Speaker 1: our terms of service or rules. That's violent, and they're
Speaker 1: sending it to Apple and elsewhere. And you may say, well,
Speaker 1: that sounds fair. Violent contents appearing on your site, then you,
Speaker 1: in fact should be taken down. You sure about that?
Speaker 1: You sure you want listen? Violent content is against their
Speaker 1: terms as service. But that same violent content appears on
Speaker 1: Twitter and Facebook. You want to know why, because they're
Speaker 1: deemed platforms by the government, platforms, not publishers. If you
Speaker 1: open the Advocate for Violence in the New York Times,
Speaker 1: they are, in fact a publisher. New York Times can
Speaker 1: be sued. They surveil their material before it goes out,
Speaker 1: edited and put into paper. We are not a publisher.
Speaker 1: We are a platform. We do not surveil our users.
Speaker 1: There is simply no way humanly possible that Twitter, Facebook, Parlor,
Speaker 1: or anyone else on a platform, not a publication, can
Speaker 1: possibly remove preemptively before it makes it onto the website
Speaker 1: any content that violates their terms of service it is
Speaker 1: not possible. It is possible to remove it after it's reported,
Speaker 1: and it's possible to remove it after some of our jurors.
Speaker 1: We have a jury system in parlor, but it is
Speaker 1: absolutely impossible. On anyone telling you otherwise, it is simply
Speaker 1: lying to The rules have not been applied evenly the Facebook,
Speaker 1: Twitter and US. They just came after us because they
Speaker 1: think it's a conservative company. That's the only reason, Dan,
Speaker 1: what can and people listening to there, we're all asking
Speaker 1: this question because you know, I've been I've been advocating
Speaker 1: for a long time, especially this year for because I
Speaker 1: saw this coming, not that the way it's happened, but
Speaker 1: I knew that the big tech censorship was getting worse
Speaker 1: and worse. I'm sure you've been dealing with, you know,
Speaker 1: demonetization on YouTube and deep you know they do they
Speaker 1: play these these nonsense games, these tech companies all the time,
Speaker 1: and it's always against conservatives and it's always just meant
Speaker 1: to hurt our side. And they pretend that, as you said,
Speaker 1: they're applying rules, but the rules are totally uneven. What
Speaker 1: do we do now? Right? I mean, the Democrats are
Speaker 1: about to take power across the board in the federal government.
Speaker 1: What can we do? There's an excellent article I read,
Speaker 1: and forgive me, I can't remember there was about a
Speaker 1: week ago. Every has been a rough weekend going to
Speaker 1: a medical thing right now, and there's just a lot
Speaker 1: going on in my life. But I don't know if
Speaker 1: it was that American mind or American greatness or whatever.
Speaker 1: But the article is asking exactly this question, buck Well,
Speaker 1: how do we fight back? The time for you know,
Speaker 1: chatting about fighting back or it is over. We actually
Speaker 1: have to take process oriented, sound, legal and other mechanisms,
Speaker 1: strategic mechanisms forward to preserve the right to speak freely. Well,
Speaker 1: one of the things we can do that the left
Speaker 1: has been doing to us in death for decades is
Speaker 1: we have to start imposing actual financial losses on the left.
Speaker 1: Something you just mentioned. Whether you knew it or not,
Speaker 1: they're implied by your comment. They've learned to demonetize people
Speaker 1: on YouTube, in other words, to impose financial losses on you,
Speaker 1: me and everyone else. Boycott people do whatever they may do. Well,
Speaker 1: it's time for us to return the favor. Keep in mind,
Speaker 1: I'm suggesting process, not chaos. Why are you on Amazon anymore?
Speaker 1: You have to ask yourself that Amazon, which randomly just
Speaker 1: decided to wipe us off the internet this weekend. Watch
Speaker 1: it's not about us. I've asked myself this question. To
Speaker 1: be fair, I was on Amazon up the last week.
Speaker 1: I would use a prime account once you on buy stuff?
Speaker 1: Why are we doing that? Why are we on why
Speaker 1: are we posting on Twitter? And then listen, I get it,
Speaker 1: this is not for everyone. But pick a platform, either
Speaker 1: Facebook or Twitter, and stop posting. I'm not even asking
Speaker 1: you to de active your account. Just stop posting. Pick
Speaker 1: one or the other because you may say, well, I
Speaker 1: don't want my voice to be silenced. I've got a show. Fine,
Speaker 1: pick one. I'm off Twitter. I mean, pick one or
Speaker 1: the other and just stop posting. Just stop. Watch their
Speaker 1: daily active users collapse and them have to answer to
Speaker 1: their shareholders or answer they're publicly traded companies. We have
Speaker 1: to impose real financial was why are we buying Apple products?
Speaker 1: I have an iPhone, it's my last one. Why are
Speaker 1: we doing this? These companies hate us. They're using the
Speaker 1: proceeds from our wallets to finance attacks against our ability
Speaker 1: to speak, and we're financing it. Why are we watching
Speaker 1: videos on YouTube? Just go to Rumble and disclosure. I
Speaker 1: have a financial stake and I'm an investor there too.
Speaker 1: That has nothing to do what I'm telling you. Watch
Speaker 1: it on Rumble, watch it anywhere else other than YouTube.
Speaker 1: I don't care. That doesn't discriminate. But we have to
Speaker 1: impose real financial losses. And until we do that, this
Speaker 1: argument is entirely bs and academic. Damn. We also want
Speaker 1: to say thoughts and prayers to you. Man. We know
Speaker 1: you've been in a fight for your health recently, and
Speaker 1: we know you're gonna win. But I know it's a
Speaker 1: struggle and you're going through a lot, and you're carrying
Speaker 1: a heavy burden. But everybody listening this appreciates, and me
Speaker 1: at the top of the list, appreciates what you're doing
Speaker 1: and backs you up one hundred percent. And we want
Speaker 1: to help however we can. Well can I said one
Speaker 1: more thing? Please? Parlor will be back up by the
Speaker 1: end of the week, maybe in a couple of days. Please,
Speaker 1: I'm begging you. Go to Parlor dot com. It's PA
Speaker 1: R L E R O R, please and just open
Speaker 1: up an account. We need your help. It's not if
Speaker 1: we go down. Everybody's going down and we can't do
Speaker 1: it alone. I can't be a man on an island here.
Speaker 1: We need help. Parlor dot com. Everybody p a r
Speaker 1: ler dot com. Set up an account. You can follow people.
Speaker 1: You don't have to post, but a lot of your
Speaker 1: favorite people are already there, Dan and me among them. Dan,
Speaker 1: God bless man. Thanks for your time today and good
Speaker 1: luck in this fight. Thanks Buck, I appreciate it. Thanks
Speaker 1: a lot. You're in the freedom Huh. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. We came close to half of
Speaker 1: the House nearly ying on Wednesday. And if a foreign
Speaker 1: head of state, if another head of state came in
Speaker 1: and ordered an attack on the United States Congress, would
Speaker 1: we say that that should not be prosecuted. Should we
Speaker 1: would we say that there should be absolutely no response
Speaker 1: to that. No, it is an active insurrection. It's an
Speaker 1: act of hostility, and we must have accountability because without it,
Speaker 1: it will happen again. I've got to say, as much
Speaker 1: as I'm willing to and have very strongly condemned the
Speaker 1: Capitol Rye. And this is not I'm not pretending this
Speaker 1: is a hard or brave call. It's an obvious call. Okay.
Speaker 1: The Capital Ryot was was a was an awful disaster
Speaker 1: top to bottom. It should not have happened. It was
Speaker 1: a bad thing and by the people. If that makes
Speaker 1: people angry that they don't want to listen to me anymore,
Speaker 1: that I mean, that's that's fine, that's that's that's their choice.
Speaker 1: But what AOC is saying here is also just it's
Speaker 1: just outrageous. I mean that they were They did not
Speaker 1: come close to half of the people, half of the members,
Speaker 1: like she means the Democrats. There was no mass slaughter
Speaker 1: of Democrats planned by by this this angry mob. There
Speaker 1: was very very stupid and reckless and illegal stuff done.
Speaker 1: But understand they're going to use this now in every
Speaker 1: way that they can for a much broader campaign of suppression,
Speaker 1: which is what while this was happening, I shared on Twitter,
Speaker 1: I said, if you do, If anyone who doesn't see
Speaker 1: how this is going to backfire on the entirety of
Speaker 1: the right, including people who were law abiding and have
Speaker 1: done nothing wrong, is just is just not paying attention,
Speaker 1: just doesn't know what the heck they're talking about. This
Speaker 1: is this is disastrous for us, and people like AOC.
Speaker 1: You're gonna have a lot of a lot of demagogues
Speaker 1: on the left who are going to take this position
Speaker 1: that it was you know that Trump directly ordered it.
Speaker 1: I know he did not, he said peacefully. He said
Speaker 1: peacefully in the speech. But they're going to try to
Speaker 1: They're already trying to rewrite this history in a way
Speaker 1: that's going to make it very difficult for us to
Speaker 1: win this argument. They don't care that they they think
Speaker 1: that lying about this, They think that exaggerating what happened,
Speaker 1: which is not to say it's exaggerating they're exaggerating. Doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that it wasn't it wasn't bad, or wasn't something
Speaker 1: that should be condemned. But the way that they're going
Speaker 1: to exploit this by making it even worse than it was,
Speaker 1: something we all need to be prepared for and fight
Speaker 1: back against. Here we have Schwarzenegger comparing this to crystal knock.
Speaker 1: This is a crystal knock. This is Arnold Schwarzenegger Place six.
Speaker 1: There's an immigrant to this country. I would like to
Speaker 1: say a few words to my fellow Americans, to our
Speaker 1: friends around the world about the events of recent days.
Speaker 1: I grew up in Austria and very aware of Crystal
Speaker 1: Knoch or the Knight of Broken glass. He was a
Speaker 1: knight of rampage against the Jews, carried out in nineteen
Speaker 1: thirty eight that the Nazi equivalent of the Proud Boys.
Speaker 1: Wednesday was the day of broken glass right here in
Speaker 1: the United States. The broken glass was in the windows
Speaker 1: of the United States Capital. But the mop did not
Speaker 1: just shattered the windows of the Capital. They shattered the
Speaker 1: ideals we took for granted. They did not just break
Speaker 1: down the doors of the building that housed the American democracy.
Speaker 1: They trampled the very principles in which our country was founded.
Speaker 1: Now it was bad, it was not Crystal knocked, and
Speaker 1: it's it's really a stupid comparison. It's also a stupid
Speaker 1: comparison to say that the Proud Boys are like the
Speaker 1: I assume it's refer to the brown Shirts of the Nazis,
Speaker 1: who were involved in large scale violence against innocence, concert
Speaker 1: with concerted power from the state of course as well.
Speaker 1: Crystal Knock, you had hundreds of people killed, you had
Speaker 1: a mass destruction of property and businesses. I mean, christ
Speaker 1: Krystal Knock was the beginning of the great Nazi terror.
Speaker 1: And to say that people running into the Capitol building
Speaker 1: and doing what they did is equivalent to that. Again,
Speaker 1: this is a false equivalency. It's not it's not there.
Speaker 1: It's not as as serious an issue, and it's also
Speaker 1: not the not a similar they're not a similar ideology.
Speaker 1: But I'm playing this for you. I know it's frustrating
Speaker 1: to hear it because you understand that these are these
Speaker 1: are exaggerated and intentionally sloppy comparisons. This is what is
Speaker 1: being said all across America by the corporate media right now.
Speaker 1: This is the narrative, is not okay. It was a
Speaker 1: protest that got out of hand, and there were some
Speaker 1: you know, idiots that did something really bad. And if
Speaker 1: you attacked a copy should you know, if you attacked
Speaker 1: a copper, broke the law? Here, people should the price.
Speaker 1: We either believe in laws or we don't. They're taking
Speaker 1: this as we knew they would, and going even further
Speaker 1: with it. They're saying that this was an attempted coup
Speaker 1: and insurrection, that this is essentially an effort to overthrow
Speaker 1: our very system of government and seize power like the Nazis.
Speaker 1: And now remember the Nazis. All the Nazis, as they
Speaker 1: would also point out, were there was one democratic election
Speaker 1: that involved the Nazis, but they were using brown shirts
Speaker 1: to intimidate people and all these other things. Has Schwarzenegger
Speaker 1: speaking of brown shirts. Schwarzenegger ever condemned Antifa as the
Speaker 1: action arm of the DNC and the Democrat Party because
Speaker 1: they were in New York City over the weekend dressed
Speaker 1: for battle this weekend, looking like they were they were
Speaker 1: trying to intimidate people ready for a fight. But that
Speaker 1: somehow is not you know, they're oh because they call
Speaker 1: themselves anti fascist. No, they are actually fascist. But Schwarzenegger
Speaker 1: will never speak out against them. Willie the double standards,
Speaker 1: You're a mind blowing Thanks for listening to the bus
Speaker 1: second Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio Apple or wherever you get your podcasts. And I
Speaker 1: think for him not to come is he is an
Speaker 1: ultimate insult. You know, there are a lot of people
Speaker 1: who are gonna be glad he's not there because he
Speaker 1: would distract a lot of attention. They would be a
Speaker 1: lot about the Biden Trump dynamic on stage, and we'll
Speaker 1: be spared that at least. But nonetheless, this is wrong.
Speaker 1: And if we're going to heal the country, we have
Speaker 1: to Trump has to play a part in that and
Speaker 1: bring his base around and to say we're going to
Speaker 1: be part of the normal politics. And when we lose,
Speaker 1: we lose, but we'll try to take it back next time.
Speaker 1: I just it will be so much better for the country.
Speaker 1: I think, you know, he's just so insulting in so
Speaker 1: many ways, and such a cry baby. It's just disgusting.
Speaker 1: We're Gurgle and Grog, I'm sure. And you're an houre
Speaker 1: N Reagan, Ford, you know, presidents. All right, we get it,
Speaker 1: you guys, don't we You really don't want Trump to
Speaker 1: be around anymore. And he's not going to the inauguration.
Speaker 1: You're happy about that, but you're still gonna bash him.
Speaker 1: So they're happy he's not going to the inauguration, but
Speaker 1: they're still going to bash him or breaking pressure and
Speaker 1: Reagan and Ford and we haven't done. I just I
Speaker 1: haven't heard from Gurgling Gurgan in a while there, so
Speaker 1: I figured we'd we'd bring him on, bring him into
Speaker 1: the mixture. For listening to me and talking about all
Speaker 1: of them. That's good, that's great stuff, Okay, Um, but
Speaker 1: I understand that one of the big things you're gonna
Speaker 1: see from now on is who they can make an
Speaker 1: example of that worked for Trump. They're gonna go after,
Speaker 1: not just Trump, with the people around him who until
Speaker 1: this Capitol Hill incident, I think we're gonna be in
Speaker 1: a pretty good position to yes, to get get jobs
Speaker 1: in corporate America and you know, strategic communications roles in
Speaker 1: these kinds of things. It is going to be harder
Speaker 1: for them after this. Now. I know there are other
Speaker 1: bigger problems the country faces, but they do things like this.
Speaker 1: They take action against people that affects them professionally because
Speaker 1: of the force multiplier effect it has for their messaging.
Speaker 1: What this is meant to do is, if you work
Speaker 1: for somebody like a Trump going forward, you two will
Speaker 1: be blocked from corporate level jobs or corporate jobs that
Speaker 1: pay you well. You two will suffer financial consequences for
Speaker 1: the crime of working in a Republican administration, or at
Speaker 1: least a Republican administration that challenges the establishment and goes
Speaker 1: against the conventional wisdom of the elites and the left
Speaker 1: wing apparatus around them that they control. So that's important.
Speaker 1: And they're also going to do this usual thing of
Speaker 1: oh my god, look at some of the Republicans who
Speaker 1: are no longer Republicans. That's why they're putting forward Colin Powell.
Speaker 1: Now where else was Oh no, we've lost Colan Powell.
Speaker 1: What are we going to do if he's not if
Speaker 1: he doesn't like Trump and he doesn't like the Republicans anymore?
Speaker 1: Oh no, play sixteen. I would hope that the Republican Party,
Speaker 1: as they're moving away from this fellow who's no longer
Speaker 1: than president, I hope they would not let him back
Speaker 1: into the camp so he can demonstrate or say that, Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm still here, I'm going to do it all. No
Speaker 1: you're not. You're out, and act like you're out. Go
Speaker 1: to Florida, go wherever else you want to go. But
Speaker 1: Joe Briden is the President of the United States, and
Speaker 1: the party has to follow his lead and the lead
Speaker 1: of the Vice President and get moving on and restore
Speaker 1: ourselves and not go down a bad tube. And what
Speaker 1: we have to do is persuade mister Trump and those
Speaker 1: who have followed him all these years that you need
Speaker 1: to take another luck. You need to really start working
Speaker 1: in terms of what's best for our country, not what's
Speaker 1: best for mister Trump. He's been serving himself for all
Speaker 1: these years, the four years and before that, and this
Speaker 1: is the time for us to move away and get
Speaker 1: back to being good Republicans, but more importantly, just good Republicans,
Speaker 1: good citizens that work with other citizens of other agents
Speaker 1: of other presidential and other ambitions. Colin pall I can
Speaker 1: no longer call myself a Republican Geope. Officials need to
Speaker 1: act like real Americans. That's what he says there. Colin
Speaker 1: Pale voted for Obama twice and Hillary in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: So holding him up as the Republican that we're all
Speaker 1: supposed to pay attention to. That, Yeah, that I don't
Speaker 1: think is going to get all that far. I don't
Speaker 1: think that's really gonna make a whole lot of difference.
Speaker 1: What about some of the other people You've had resignations,
Speaker 1: You've had Betsy Devas resigned, You've had others who are leaving.
Speaker 1: Chris Wallace, for example, is out there and he's he's
Speaker 1: not a Trump person, of course, he's a Democrat who
Speaker 1: has the perch of a platform at Fox News. And
Speaker 1: he sat down with Mick mulvaney, who had been the
Speaker 1: acting chief of staff and was omb or budget director,
Speaker 1: and he posed this day You're gonna have a lot
Speaker 1: of this now, you know. Do you feel responsible for
Speaker 1: the bad things that we said that that Trump did
Speaker 1: play twenty three? Do you feel any responsibility? You were
Speaker 1: chief of staff for more than a year. Do you
Speaker 1: feel any responsibility for enabling Donald Trump? I feel a
Speaker 1: lot of emotions this week. I was shocked. I was angered,
Speaker 1: I was sad, I was embarrassed. I was frustrated, and
Speaker 1: I still am trying to figure out what I could
Speaker 1: have done differently, if anything. I've been out of the
Speaker 1: White House now for eight months. What I do know,
Speaker 1: Chris is there are things that are different when when
Speaker 1: we saw the president. I wrote a piece in the
Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal six weeks ago saying that I thought
Speaker 1: the President would leave in a presidential manner. I really
Speaker 1: did believe that at the time. The stories I told
Speaker 1: to back that up were true. I've seen the president
Speaker 1: be presidential before, and I know that he has the
Speaker 1: ability to do it. He did it every single day.
Speaker 1: I don't know what's different. If it's different about him now,
Speaker 1: if it's different about his advisors. So he's basically taking
Speaker 1: the Oh Trump changed approach. Now, I can tell you this,
Speaker 1: maybe Mick mulveny really thinks that's what happened. Maybe Mick
Speaker 1: Wolveny really believes that that's not going to be enough
Speaker 1: to play kate the the Democrats. Let's just understand it.
Speaker 1: Let's all be very clear about this. Oh but they
Speaker 1: you know, Oh but they they don't understand Trump is
Speaker 1: a different guy now or you know. Nope, that is
Speaker 1: absolutely not going to be sufficient to avoid the same
Speaker 1: kind of punishment and repudiation and ostracization. Ostracizing his word.
Speaker 1: I think ostracization might be a word, but being ostracized,
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, is ostracization in a word? Did I just
Speaker 1: it sounds like I'm talking about the bird or something
Speaker 1: like making someone. You know what I'm talking It is ostracization.
Speaker 1: Let me let me see, I'll check. Okay, I know
Speaker 1: ostracism is Oh yes, it is ostracization. Look at that
Speaker 1: it is, yeah, Producer Mark. Isn't it fun? We learn
Speaker 1: new things together every day, like you learn something new
Speaker 1: every day, but you know, you live and knowing is
Speaker 1: half the battle. Do you even know what that's from?
Speaker 1: By the way, you young whipper snappers like Producer Mark,
Speaker 1: do you know what knowing is half the battle? Comes
Speaker 1: from I've definitely heard the phrase, but I don't know
Speaker 1: its origin. It's what they said at the end of
Speaker 1: the g I. Joe cartoons. And you know, America was
Speaker 1: America when kids grew up watching Gi Joe cartoons. I
Speaker 1: don't know what's even happened now. We're all watching like
Speaker 1: Little you know, Hello Kitty and Teletubbies and stuff. It's crazy.
Speaker 1: What's happening out there? Producer Mark's crazy. Yeah. I couldn't
Speaker 1: name a current cartoon unless some of the ones I
Speaker 1: used to watch are still around, but who knows. You
Speaker 1: know what I just found out recently too. You know
Speaker 1: what the single most watched music video on YouTube of
Speaker 1: all time is, with billions of views. It is not Desposito,
Speaker 1: which I thought one might be the one. It's not Desposito.
Speaker 1: It's something quite different from Desposito. Do you know what
Speaker 1: it is? It's either Taylor Swift or Biebers Good Good guesses.
Speaker 1: They're both like top ten. I think Baby Shark. That's
Speaker 1: even worse. You know what. I was actually gonna start
Speaker 1: doing my version of singing it, but I don't want
Speaker 1: I don't want to hurt the team right now by
Speaker 1: getting that stuck in their heads, because if I sing
Speaker 1: it one time, even talking about it may get the
Speaker 1: Baby Sharks song stuck in their head. All you had
Speaker 1: to do was say the name of the song, and
Speaker 1: it's already stuck in my head. It's already stuck in
Speaker 1: my head. So I feel like maybe I should make
Speaker 1: everybody else have to go through the same nonsense that
Speaker 1: I am right now. But that it's almost like that
Speaker 1: was scientifically designed in a lab to bounce around inside
Speaker 1: your brain no matter how much you want it to stop.
Speaker 1: So that is the single most watched YouTube video of
Speaker 1: all times. So there we go. All right, we're gonna
Speaker 1: we're gonna get into a roll call coming up here
Speaker 1: in a second. It's gonna be an extended roll call session.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast,
Speaker 1: Team buck It's time for roll call. Roll call if
Speaker 1: rip Buddy, Facebook dot com, Slashbuck Sexton. While we still
Speaker 1: have access to our Facebook, Team Bucket, iHeartMedia dot com
Speaker 1: and yes I'm still on these platforms. I do have
Speaker 1: a Parlor account, so you can follow me at parlor
Speaker 1: dot com. I have a parlor account and by all
Speaker 1: means love to love to have following there as well,
Speaker 1: and please box Sexton dot com. I keep telling you
Speaker 1: Boxxton dot Com because we you know that they can
Speaker 1: come after us there, but it's harder than just booting
Speaker 1: us off these other platforms and this other stuff. So
Speaker 1: that's that's where we're at with all that. And now
Speaker 1: let us get into the latest on all the buck
Speaker 1: Sexton things on the roll call. Let's get to it. Well,
Speaker 1: I actually no, wait before I do that, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: keep everybody in suspense for second. Producer, Mark, did you
Speaker 1: watch anything worthwhile this weekend? Anything you want to share
Speaker 1: with the team. Well, it was an NFL wildcard weekend,
Speaker 1: so that's what I was locked into most of the weekend. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Did the Buffalo Bills win? I thought you were at
Speaker 1: a Buffalo Bills watch party. Now didn't end up happening.
Speaker 1: Did the Buffalo Bills win? Yes, they did. M So
Speaker 1: we're what happens to them now. I believe they face
Speaker 1: the Browns. They face the lowest remaining seeds, so it
Speaker 1: might actually I think the I have to pull up
Speaker 1: these schedule, but um, the Chiefs may play the Browns Buffalo,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure off the top of my head where
Speaker 1: they play very nice, very nice, very nice. Indeed, yeah,
Speaker 1: I tried to watch a by the way, sorry, I
Speaker 1: wanted to correct myself. It's the race for everyone yelled
Speaker 1: at very radio stuff, right, I tried to watch a
Speaker 1: new show. I watched The Ripper on Netflix, which was
Speaker 1: like a documentary about some guy in the seventies. I
Speaker 1: fell It was like just so bad and boring. I
Speaker 1: fell asleep ten minutes into it. But I did have
Speaker 1: a couple of fun things I want to tell everybody about. Well,
Speaker 1: one very nice thing, which is that I am on now.
Speaker 1: I am l Padrino. I am a godfather. My little
Speaker 1: nephew Ryan got baptized over the weekend, so we had
Speaker 1: to do a masked and socially distanced baptism at at
Speaker 1: my church here in New York, and so I got
Speaker 1: to be a part of the baptizing of the baby,
Speaker 1: which was so that's very nice. That was very you know,
Speaker 1: a milestone. And then also the snow Princess, aptly named
Speaker 1: because she is from Buffalo, where it is cold and snowy.
Speaker 1: She she wanted to go out to dinner, so we
Speaker 1: actually did. We went out on a date night in
Speaker 1: New York City on Saturday night outdoor dining. It was
Speaker 1: thirty degrees outside. Producer Mark sitting out on a table
Speaker 1: in the street. They had this thing above. They had
Speaker 1: like a little heater above us. But I gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: you better be right under that heater, because we were
Speaker 1: sort of one table removed from the heater. You better
Speaker 1: be right under that heater or else. About an hour
Speaker 1: into the meal, and I was wearing thick wool socks.
Speaker 1: The old your feet start to get a little numb.
Speaker 1: So I did. I had, I had a little tequila,
Speaker 1: We had a whole we had We actually went to
Speaker 1: a Ukrainian restaurant. Believe it was excellent. The food was great,
Speaker 1: and we had a really really nice meal and a
Speaker 1: little bit of kind of continued belated birthday celebration for
Speaker 1: the Snow Princess because it's really tough to find a
Speaker 1: restaurant to go to in New York. So we finally
Speaker 1: found one that we wanted to go to that was outside.
Speaker 1: Her birthday was on jan worry fourth, So we did
Speaker 1: all this and yeah, man, it was I gotta say,
Speaker 1: you gotta really want to do outdoor dining in New
Speaker 1: York right now too, you know, that's that's a you
Speaker 1: got to prepare it. She just went through the tunnel,
Speaker 1: would you and the Oh we could go to New Jersey. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you guys have indoor dining. I believe. I don't know
Speaker 1: about Jersey City, Hoboken, but yes, I think everywhere we do. Yeah, oh, man,
Speaker 1: indoor dining. I haven't had that since Florida. I'd be
Speaker 1: so nice. I gotta get back down to Miami. It's
Speaker 1: just it's just too nice to actually live life to
Speaker 1: be stuck up here in New York. And now you've
Speaker 1: got Cuomo. You've got Cuomo essentially saying, oh, yeah, we
Speaker 1: can't just stay locked down to the vaccine reaches critical masks.
Speaker 1: We can't do that, which people like me have been
Speaker 1: saying all along. I was right. I think it's important.
Speaker 1: I was right. Okay, I'm not saying I was alone
Speaker 1: on this one. But the people who were saying lockdown
Speaker 1: until vaccine is too damaging, it's crazy. We were right.
Speaker 1: They were wrong, and now they're having to admit it
Speaker 1: because the damage is just piling up and piling up
Speaker 1: and piling up, and it's not stopping cases. The lockdowns
Speaker 1: have not been stopping the cases by the way. I'm
Speaker 1: very pleased to see. I meant to mention this before
Speaker 1: that there is now a lawsuit. Parlor has sued Amazon
Speaker 1: for anty trust violation, breach of contract, and unlawful business
Speaker 1: interference and asking a federal judge. Now they're asking a
Speaker 1: federal judge to order Amazon to reinstate the platform. So
Speaker 1: this is going legal, which is a good thing. There
Speaker 1: is a legal fight under way here. We got to
Speaker 1: see what kind of judge we get for the folks
Speaker 1: over at Parlor. That's gonna make a big difference here.
Speaker 1: All right, now we'll actually get into roll call and
Speaker 1: thank you so much all for writing. We had a
Speaker 1: lot of role call recently, so I want to take
Speaker 1: some extra time with the today. Here we go, Dave.
Speaker 1: I used to see stories on Drudge of people looking
Speaker 1: to leave the country and didn't really think much about it.
Speaker 1: I deleted the Drudge app a few days ago because
Speaker 1: it's worthless. Now I have friends of mine making five
Speaker 1: ten year plans of leaving the country. Unfortunately, it's becoming
Speaker 1: more and more real. Well, Dave, I'm I'm leaving a
Speaker 1: blue state dystopia. So I am going to be getting
Speaker 1: out of New York I don't know how soon, because
Speaker 1: I have some obligations here and I have family here,
Speaker 1: but I'm done. I'm done with New York City. I
Speaker 1: don't want to do this anymore. It's too expensive, too difficult,
Speaker 1: and you're in the hands of these lunatic democrats like
Speaker 1: Deblasio and Cuomo, who really just all they care about
Speaker 1: is their their social justice standing and everything else, you know,
Speaker 1: prosperity and crime levels, and that that stuff doesn't matter
Speaker 1: to them, not enough, doesn't matter enough, And they're handling
Speaker 1: of a lockdown has been absolutely atrocious, absolutely horrific. So
Speaker 1: I think I think New York City's in big trouble.
Speaker 1: I think San Francisco's in being trouble. I think La
Speaker 1: is in big trouble. These are places where people are
Speaker 1: gonna say, what am I doing here? Why am I
Speaker 1: choosing to live here? And now you're talking, I know,
Speaker 1: Dave about people leaving the country. Where are you going
Speaker 1: to go? Is the question that people would have to ask,
Speaker 1: where are you going to go? If you think that
Speaker 1: Australia or New Zealand or the UK, just think of
Speaker 1: English speaking countries right off the bat Canada, you think
Speaker 1: of any of these countries where there's a lot of
Speaker 1: cultural similarities and obviously linguistic similarity to America. If you
Speaker 1: think that they're going to be a much better place
Speaker 1: in terms of government, government overreach and things like that,
Speaker 1: I gotta I got news for you. It's even worse.
Speaker 1: So where do you go? I mean, do you want
Speaker 1: to move to a country where you don't speak the language?
Speaker 1: Probably right, You're gonna move to a country where you're
Speaker 1: gonna have to learn a foreign language and deal with
Speaker 1: all those cultural shifts. It's not an easy thing to do.
Speaker 1: You know. I don't know where you're planning on going.
Speaker 1: But it's also fascinating all these liberals, you know, they
Speaker 1: always talk about how bad it is an America will
Speaker 1: just let people come here illegally. Every other country in
Speaker 1: the world, you find out if you want to immigrate
Speaker 1: to other developed countries, they have very strict rules about immigration.
Speaker 1: You know, try to become a Japanese citizen as an American.
Speaker 1: Good luck with that one, right, There are a lot
Speaker 1: of countries that are very strict rules about this. But
Speaker 1: we're the only country that's a racist country because we
Speaker 1: don't let anyone come here who wants to illegally. We're
Speaker 1: the only country that's so bad because of that. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Next up here, we've got Mary who
Speaker 1: rides Buck. I want you to know that I'm with
Speaker 1: you to the end. I haven't given up on the fight.
Speaker 1: I so very much appreciate all that you do for
Speaker 1: us the team. While I'm frustrated as hell, I'm not
Speaker 1: surprised by the recent defeats conservatism has sustained. I mean,
Speaker 1: we transform our righteous anger into a passion for future battles.
Speaker 1: There most certainly will be many more. I leave you
Speaker 1: and mark with this. The Lord bless you and keep you.
Speaker 1: The Lord make his face shine upon you, and be
Speaker 1: gracious to you. The Lord lift up his countenance upon
Speaker 1: you and give you peace. Numbers six, twenty four, twenty six. Mary,
Speaker 1: thank you so much. I appreciate that you feel a
Speaker 1: loyalty to what we do here into the show. It
Speaker 1: is very meaningful, especially these days where you know the
Speaker 1: only reason I'm optimistic for the future of say conservatism
Speaker 1: and conservative medium more specifically is because of I know
Speaker 1: the people who listen to this show, and I know
Speaker 1: that they care about what we do, and they are
Speaker 1: loyal to those that they think deserve it. And people
Speaker 1: listen to the show understand what I do, what we
Speaker 1: do here, and they care about it and they support us.
Speaker 1: So that is as long as we have that, as
Speaker 1: long as this tribe of Team Bucks stays intact, will
Speaker 1: always be able to do what we do here and
Speaker 1: have a voice in the conversation. So we'll make whatever adjustments,
Speaker 1: whatever maneuvers are necessary as the you know, the tech
Speaker 1: oligarchs come after us. Will make those adjustments as we
Speaker 1: have to, and we will stay in this fight. Don't
Speaker 1: don't think that we're going to give up or not. Chris, Hello,
Speaker 1: mister Sex, and thank you for your work. You mentioned
Speaker 1: on your show today that we conservatives need to continue
Speaker 1: to fight. I don't think we can win anymore. I
Speaker 1: think the Democrats have won. Either they found a way
Speaker 1: to win elections, be a fraud without repercussions, or there
Speaker 1: is a plurality of voters in the USA that desire
Speaker 1: socialist society. In Georgia, they voted in an avowed socialist
Speaker 1: and someone who has clear ties to China. Either it
Speaker 1: was by the first method or by the second. New reality,
Speaker 1: conservatism looks like it's toast. Thank you for listening well, Chris.
Speaker 1: I understand your feelings of frustration and certainly your sense
Speaker 1: of a very challenge future for conservatism in this country,
Speaker 1: given the direction of the electorate right now and what
Speaker 1: we've just seen. But I remember this in two thousand
Speaker 1: and eight, when Obama won and the Democrats had control
Speaker 1: of the House and the Senate, there was a lot
Speaker 1: of Conservatism is finished sentiment, and then it did take
Speaker 1: eight years, but we came back with the presidency of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. And before that though, even in twenty ten,
Speaker 1: we had massive victories thanks to the Tea Party. And
Speaker 1: I really believe that we're going to see a mobilization,
Speaker 1: a peaceful, law abiding mobilization of people, something similar to
Speaker 1: the Tea Party, but under a different a different moniker,
Speaker 1: with a different central mobilization theme. I believe that that
Speaker 1: is going to happen, and I want to be a
Speaker 1: part of it, and if I can, I want to
Speaker 1: be a leader in it. I want to help create
Speaker 1: this and I'm thinking all the time about what that
Speaker 1: could be and how we could get people to really
Speaker 1: believe in a message of constitutional opposition to what we're
Speaker 1: going to be subjected to under a Bide administration. I
Speaker 1: would also know one of the complexities I think in
Speaker 1: this right now, one of the reasons this is more
Speaker 1: difficult is we don't really know what a Biden administration
Speaker 1: is going to do yet. I don't think Joe Biden
Speaker 1: knows because he hasn't been told what he's supposed to do.
Speaker 1: So there's a lot that remains. There's a lot that's
Speaker 1: out there, and we got to see where all this goes, right.
Speaker 1: You got to know what your opponents are trying to
Speaker 1: do to stop them from doing it. We have a
Speaker 1: lot of ideas, and I talk to you about what
Speaker 1: I think the Bide administration is going to be up to.
Speaker 1: I talked to you about what I think the left
Speaker 1: is going to be able to push Biden into doing
Speaker 1: as the next occupant of the Oval Office. But we're
Speaker 1: gonna have to see. There's a little bit of a
Speaker 1: wait and see aspect to all of this. I know
Speaker 1: that that can be frustrating, But is Biden going to
Speaker 1: try to, you know, dramatically. First of all, there's the
Speaker 1: crackdown on conservatism, which is a private sector and soon
Speaker 1: to be public sector meaning government partnership. I mean, the
Speaker 1: Biden administration is absolutely going to back up these social
Speaker 1: media tech titans in every way they can because they're
Speaker 1: attacking us. They're primary political opponents. So Biden, remember that
Speaker 1: the Democrats don't see this as bad at all. The
Speaker 1: Democrats in power, they think this is great. They want
Speaker 1: more of this. I mean, if they can have their way,
Speaker 1: there'll be nothing but suppression of conservative content. There'll be
Speaker 1: nothing but suppression of conservatism going forward. So they're they're
Speaker 1: all about it. Don't don't think they're not. Let's see
Speaker 1: here next, we've got Chris Oh no, sorry, Kyle Buck.
Speaker 1: After what happened in DC, the only opinion show I
Speaker 1: wanted to listen to was yours on Thursday. Thank you
Speaker 1: for saying what you said about those events and how
Speaker 1: you said them. I told my wife that I was
Speaker 1: glad to hear somebody expressing the same feelings I have
Speaker 1: about what went down, so I could feel a bit
Speaker 1: less isolated in my views. I hate what I saw
Speaker 1: on Wednesday as much as what I saw over the summer.
Speaker 1: It was depressing to see people I would otherwise sympathize
Speaker 1: with acting in a way that was so destructive and
Speaker 1: serve only to embold those who seek to bury the
Speaker 1: conservative movement. Shields high now more than ever. Well, Kyle,
Speaker 1: good to know that I'm not alone, because I got
Speaker 1: a lot of a lot of heat, a lot of
Speaker 1: blowback and anger from people for saying what I did
Speaker 1: about what happened at the Capitol. But I would always
Speaker 1: hope that everyone who listens to the show knows that
Speaker 1: I approach what I do with principles, and I approach
Speaker 1: what I do with honor and dignity, and I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna I'm not going to play into the hands of
Speaker 1: deceit in order to chase ratings. I leave that to
Speaker 1: other people. I'll leave that to other folks out there.
Speaker 1: And I understand a lot of them have been have
Speaker 1: been doing so so far at least eat with you know,
Speaker 1: it benefits them. They they've been successful in their ratings
Speaker 1: at any cost, gambit. But I believe that there are
Speaker 1: things that are more important than that. I think there
Speaker 1: are things that are more important than just getting additional
Speaker 1: listeners or additional or not losing listeners. Even so, I
Speaker 1: take a different I take a different approach than some
Speaker 1: other people out there. And you know, we we have
Speaker 1: to deal with a very real possibility here, friends, that
Speaker 1: that the Donald Trump movement is is damaged in a
Speaker 1: way that I don't know if it can I don't
Speaker 1: know if he can continue to be a part of
Speaker 1: it going forward. That's that's a real question right now,
Speaker 1: and I think that's very hard for a lot of
Speaker 1: people to handle. But we need to start thinking about that.
Speaker 1: And what would that mean. That doesn't say that you
Speaker 1: abandon the principles, the ideals. It doesn't mean that you
Speaker 1: don't want, you know, secure borders or standing up the
Speaker 1: China on trade and some of these other and that
Speaker 1: we take the fight to the media with words in
Speaker 1: a way that shows that we won't back down. I
Speaker 1: won't be cowed by their their constant efforts against us
Speaker 1: to silence us and undermine us. But it does mean
Speaker 1: that we we've been off balanced her friends, a lot,
Speaker 1: We've been We've been hit on our heels, and that's
Speaker 1: something we have to come back from. Dustin Buck, I
Speaker 1: know you're taking heat for how you feel about the
Speaker 1: events of the Capitol, but I'm with you those who
Speaker 1: were outside and marching peacefully, absolutely were right, but those
Speaker 1: who went in the building were acting in a disgraceful way.
Speaker 1: Their actions made me sick. We cannot stoop to the
Speaker 1: level of the left. It must be within the law.
Speaker 1: Stay strong on shield Tide, my friend Dustin, I appreciate
Speaker 1: another voice in solidarity in this one. I want to
Speaker 1: be clear. We picked a fair amount today of people
Speaker 1: that agree with me, but there's a lot of people
Speaker 1: in the inbox and a lot of people writing into
Speaker 1: roll Call who are who are really angry at me.
Speaker 1: And I'm fine with them being angry. I just I
Speaker 1: hope that they understand that I'm gonna tell you what
Speaker 1: I think is true about this, and that includes what
Speaker 1: happened on Capitol Hill for sure. And even if a
Speaker 1: majority of the people listen to this show disagreed with
Speaker 1: me in the condemnation of the Capitol, I feel the
Speaker 1: way I do about it. I'm telling you why I
Speaker 1: feel that way, and I hope that there can be
Speaker 1: a respect for the difference of opinion on this because
Speaker 1: I'm not changing. I'm not changing the way I feel
Speaker 1: just based upon the numbers, you know. But I also
Speaker 1: think everybody should know that according to the polls that
Speaker 1: are out there, at least over eighty percent of Republicans
Speaker 1: absolutely condemn the attack on Capitol Hill. The riot, you know,
Speaker 1: the riot, let's just call use that proper term. Chuck, right,
Speaker 1: Bucking Mark, great show today. I needed it. I'm still listening,
Speaker 1: so you may get to it. But we need a
Speaker 1: special counsel on election integrity. I sent a letter to
Speaker 1: the President. Still needs to happen. It's the only way
Speaker 1: the rage of MAGA will be extinguished. We need three councils,
Speaker 1: including the Hunter Biden one a repeat. I will never
Speaker 1: think this election was legitimate till all of America gets
Speaker 1: to hear all the evidence and the debate that goes
Speaker 1: with it. Well, Chuck, I agree that we should get
Speaker 1: answers on this, but I do have to say that
Speaker 1: we have to be open to the possibility that, Look,
Speaker 1: it's inevitable that there is some degree of fraud in
Speaker 1: every election. That's just a true statement. There's always some
Speaker 1: and they've already found a couple of dead people who voted.
Speaker 1: The question here all along was was there enough intentional
Speaker 1: fraud that it would have changed the election outcome? Now
Speaker 1: you're talking about eight states. I believe that the president
Speaker 1: would have had to or eight states the President lost
Speaker 1: to Biden that he thought he could have won. And
Speaker 1: that's a lot of places for there to be substantial
Speaker 1: enough fraud that was not caught or not provable. And
Speaker 1: there has to be an open mindedness here. Friends, I
Speaker 1: know that no one's gonna want to hear this. It
Speaker 1: is possible that Joe Biden just won this election. Outright,
Speaker 1: it is possible. I mean, he's the president. He won
Speaker 1: in terms of what goes on on the scoreboard. But
Speaker 1: it may in fact be the case that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: just managed to get a lot more votes than Donald
Speaker 1: Trump in the key states that matter. Look what just
Speaker 1: happened in Georgia. We just lost two Senate seats in Georgia.
Speaker 1: So clearly it wasn't a one off that Trump would
Speaker 1: have lost Georgia to Joe Biden. Now, I'm not saying
Speaker 1: I don't believe there was fraud, and I'm not saying
Speaker 1: I don't believe that there was substantial fraud. Was it
Speaker 1: substantial enough to change the outcome of the election. We cannot.
Speaker 1: We do not have proof of that right now. And
Speaker 1: there's there's a chance that even when we get all
Speaker 1: the information in Joe Biden may well have. I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna do what Democrat did and just knowingly lie about
Speaker 1: the election result as they did in twenty sixteen. For
Speaker 1: four years they lied this Russia collusion stuff. Oh, Russia
Speaker 1: gave Trump the election. That was a lie. I'm not
Speaker 1: going to do that, not gonna lie. I want to
Speaker 1: fight using the tactics that they use within the process.
Speaker 1: I'm not willing to go around being a party to
Speaker 1: a lie because it upsets Democrats. So this is this
Speaker 1: comes down to principles and do we have them, do
Speaker 1: we maintain them, do we defend them. Joe Biden may
Speaker 1: well have beaten Donald Trump head to head in this election.
Speaker 1: That's now I know that he won. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: he clearly won the election as he's gonna be the
Speaker 1: next president. But I mean, even if we were to
Speaker 1: look at all the votes and all the recounts and
Speaker 1: everything else, you may still have Joe Biden as the
Speaker 1: victor at that point. Friends, So don't hold out hope
Speaker 1: that if we do get greater transparency and accountability, it'll
Speaker 1: show that Donald Trump clearly and Trump did not win
Speaker 1: in a landslide. Now that is that much is to
Speaker 1: you know, I guess it would depend on how you
Speaker 1: would to find a landslide. But I mean, that's just
Speaker 1: it's it's not true. It's just not true. It was
Speaker 1: a pretty close election in some key states. But you know, friends,
Speaker 1: Trump did not win you know, forty eight states or
Speaker 1: something here. But there was not a landslide for Trump.
Speaker 1: That's not what happened. And when you look at the
Speaker 1: year we were in in twenty twenty and what happened
Speaker 1: with the pandemic and the way the media was all
Speaker 1: in for Biden against Trump, you know, we we have
Speaker 1: to face unpleasant facts when they're facts. That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: We have to face unpleasant truths, and that's what we'll
Speaker 1: continue to do. Here. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast, continuing on with the
Speaker 1: roll Call here June right. I cannot join any political
Speaker 1: movement at the moment because I'm still active duty. But
Speaker 1: we need to start the groundwork preparing for the next
Speaker 1: election at the local level. The Democrats are starting their
Speaker 1: work are already. We cannot get complacent again. Sorry if
Speaker 1: this is not the place to be, but I'm just
Speaker 1: angry for our so called Republicans in office that didn't
Speaker 1: do much but take money from the lobbyists. Yeah, June,
Speaker 1: I hear you. And that is that people ask me,
Speaker 1: what do we gotta do. We gotta gear up for
Speaker 1: the next election, and it starts now. We gotta get
Speaker 1: ready to take back the House, take back the Senate,
Speaker 1: and then, you know, be in a real position for
Speaker 1: a trans a transformation away from the Democrats transformative efforts
Speaker 1: of the country. We need to be the counter revolution
Speaker 1: coming into power in twenty twenty four. I know that
Speaker 1: feels like it's forever away, but it's really not. It's
Speaker 1: really not. It's going to come before you know it.
Speaker 1: And the work starts now. The fights over our culture,
Speaker 1: the struggle to have our voices heard, the state and
Speaker 1: local use of power to try to protect constitutional individual rights,
Speaker 1: all of that should should already be underway. And remember
Speaker 1: there will be I believe, massive blunders for the Biden
Speaker 1: administration that will cause slowdowns in their agenda. Don't assume it.
Speaker 1: You know they are going to execute on their plans,
Speaker 1: even if you disagree with what their plans are and
Speaker 1: the goals are. Don't assume they'll be able to execute
Speaker 1: on them. Well, I think there will be major blunders
Speaker 1: from a buying team, and that will be that will
Speaker 1: provide an opening for the rest of us to be
Speaker 1: able to You know that that litt'll probade an opening
Speaker 1: for us to have more effective opposition. I believe That's
Speaker 1: what I'm thinking right now. I'm hopeful, friends, I'm prepared
Speaker 1: for big challenges ahead, but I am hopeful about the future. Jake.
Speaker 1: At this juncture, Buck, it seems as though the Libs
Speaker 1: have effectively removed the ballot box and jury box from
Speaker 1: those of us on Team Freedom. Considering the incoming administration,
Speaker 1: I anticipate further assaults on our civil rights, speech, press, assembly, religion, petition,
Speaker 1: bearing arms, etc. I agree with you the breaching of
Speaker 1: the Capitol was not helpful to our cause. However, if
Speaker 1: we continue to play their game by their rules, we
Speaker 1: cannot win. I believe that many of us are growing
Speaker 1: tired of the Libs getting away with murders, sometimes literally,
Speaker 1: while we are constantly under a legal microscope. I think
Speaker 1: a new game and a new set of rules need
Speaker 1: to be created, giving Team Freedom away to fight the
Speaker 1: Libs that does not involve taking to the streets with rifles.
Speaker 1: I don't know what that new game is, but the
Speaker 1: time to create it is dwindling rapidly. I gotta say, Jake,
Speaker 1: you know, I understand these these feelings, the sentiments right
Speaker 1: now that we have no mechanism to push back or
Speaker 1: fight back. But I would just I would try to
Speaker 1: remind you. I don't think that's true. I don't think
Speaker 1: that's really where we are right now. I think that
Speaker 1: we've suffered some very disconcerting losses, no question about it.
Speaker 1: But if we stick together and stick to our principles
Speaker 1: and get active, there are ways that we can make
Speaker 1: gains here and at the state and local level. For example,
Speaker 1: think of all the freedom that we could have restored
Speaker 1: if we just had state and local governments. Understand that
Speaker 1: lockdowns are a terrible idea, which now everyone I think
Speaker 1: is starting to figure out the Buster was right on
Speaker 1: that lockdowns are a terrible idea that do not provide
Speaker 1: the benefits that they say they will, and make everything
Speaker 1: much much worse economically than they would otherwise. Be more
Speaker 1: on this tomorrow. Friends. We are in this together. I
Speaker 1: am with you in this fight until the end, and
Speaker 1: that is why we keep our shields high