1 00:00:04,800 --> 00:00:07,680 Speaker 1: On this episode of Newsworld. In his twenty years in 2 00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:11,360 Speaker 1: the Northern District of West Virginia, first as an assistant 3 00:00:11,720 --> 00:00:16,840 Speaker 1: and then as the sitting US Attorney, William Calabash prosecuted 4 00:00:16,960 --> 00:00:21,400 Speaker 1: all manner of crimes and criminals, ranging from old school 5 00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:26,880 Speaker 1: moonshiners who operated a massive marijuanaing, to sex traffickers to 6 00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:31,560 Speaker 1: violent Jamaican posses to major drug dealers at the forefront 7 00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:36,320 Speaker 1: of the cocaine wave. He also convicted the notorious godfather 8 00:00:36,520 --> 00:00:40,920 Speaker 1: of Midwestern crime, Paul Hankish, and finished his career by 9 00:00:40,920 --> 00:00:44,360 Speaker 1: bringing down the murderous and corrupt Swami of the Hari 10 00:00:44,440 --> 00:00:47,880 Speaker 1: Krishna Movement. He pioneered the use of the Rico Statute 11 00:00:48,120 --> 00:00:51,200 Speaker 1: to bring criminals to justice and became the first US 12 00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:55,480 Speaker 1: attorney ever to make use of multi jurisdictional task forces 13 00:00:55,520 --> 00:00:59,840 Speaker 1: and investigated granjuries. I'm really pleased to welcome my guest, 14 00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:03,600 Speaker 1: former US Attorney William Calabash, and he's here to talk 15 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:07,880 Speaker 1: about his new book, Justice Never Rests, a US Attorney's 16 00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:24,600 Speaker 1: battle against murderers, drug lords, mob kingpins, and colts. Bill, Welcome, 17 00:01:24,680 --> 00:01:26,440 Speaker 1: and thank you for joining me in news World. 18 00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:30,039 Speaker 2: Thank you for giving me the opportunity to do this. 19 00:01:31,000 --> 00:01:33,320 Speaker 1: I mean, you've had a career that sounds like a 20 00:01:33,360 --> 00:01:35,680 Speaker 1: series of movies. It's pretty wild. 21 00:01:35,959 --> 00:01:38,399 Speaker 3: Yeah, I've heard that several people who have read the 22 00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:41,240 Speaker 3: book indicated that this should be a movie, And in fact, 23 00:01:41,319 --> 00:01:43,959 Speaker 3: I have a call later in this evening with producer 24 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:47,240 Speaker 3: out in Hollywood who's read the book, so we may 25 00:01:47,240 --> 00:01:48,240 Speaker 3: be going in that direction. 26 00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:52,160 Speaker 1: Sir, that would be great. I'm very curious because you 27 00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:55,560 Speaker 1: didn't start out to be a lawyer. What made you 28 00:01:55,600 --> 00:01:57,880 Speaker 1: decide to go to law school and pursue this as 29 00:01:57,920 --> 00:01:58,400 Speaker 1: a career. 30 00:01:59,200 --> 00:01:59,520 Speaker 2: Okay. 31 00:01:59,560 --> 00:02:03,560 Speaker 3: I graduated from Brown University in nineteen sixty six, and 32 00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:05,880 Speaker 3: that was at the height of the Vietnam War, and 33 00:02:06,080 --> 00:02:08,440 Speaker 3: you had two options. Of course, they were using the 34 00:02:08,720 --> 00:02:11,720 Speaker 3: draft number system, and I had a draft number where 35 00:02:11,720 --> 00:02:13,239 Speaker 3: I would have been drafted. 36 00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:16,200 Speaker 2: And so the two options that you had. 37 00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:18,440 Speaker 3: At the end of the year to get a deferment 38 00:02:18,600 --> 00:02:21,760 Speaker 3: would be to become a teacher and teach in a 39 00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:24,720 Speaker 3: certain designated area, or you could get a deferment to 40 00:02:24,720 --> 00:02:25,040 Speaker 3: go to. 41 00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:26,520 Speaker 2: Law school for three years. 42 00:02:26,880 --> 00:02:30,000 Speaker 3: So I was not interested in teaching, and several of 43 00:02:30,000 --> 00:02:34,520 Speaker 3: my classmates were interested in law school. My fraternity brothers 44 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:37,600 Speaker 3: and so I applied to law school as an alternative 45 00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:41,040 Speaker 3: to being drafted or taking another course. 46 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:44,680 Speaker 1: I'm kind of curious about the story about why you 47 00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:50,360 Speaker 1: dropped out of physics and transferred over to history, because 48 00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:51,640 Speaker 1: it's a very human story. 49 00:02:52,120 --> 00:02:55,480 Speaker 3: Yes, I went to a private military school in Wheeling, 50 00:02:55,520 --> 00:02:59,280 Speaker 3: which has excellent academic credentials, and I did very well. 51 00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:01,720 Speaker 3: Was the second my class, and I did extremely well 52 00:03:01,760 --> 00:03:03,720 Speaker 3: in math and physics, and I thought I was really 53 00:03:03,760 --> 00:03:07,120 Speaker 3: smart and could go in that direction in my career. 54 00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:10,400 Speaker 3: And that was my first year at Brown. My second 55 00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:14,160 Speaker 3: year when things really got complicated in physics courses, in 56 00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:17,840 Speaker 3: chemistry courses, and all those types of courses required not 57 00:03:17,880 --> 00:03:20,800 Speaker 3: only classroom work but a lab. And I think the 58 00:03:20,840 --> 00:03:23,200 Speaker 3: physics course was maybe three hours with a three or 59 00:03:23,240 --> 00:03:26,519 Speaker 3: four hour lab. And I was walking across campus with 60 00:03:26,560 --> 00:03:29,280 Speaker 3: a stack of books for the physics course, and I 61 00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:32,320 Speaker 3: saw one of my fraternity brothers carrying a paperback book 62 00:03:32,760 --> 00:03:33,040 Speaker 3: and I. 63 00:03:33,040 --> 00:03:35,840 Speaker 2: Said, well, what's that. He says, that's his textbook for history. 64 00:03:36,240 --> 00:03:38,760 Speaker 3: I balanced the way of each books and I says, 65 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:41,440 Speaker 3: maybe I may be interested in that. I was interested 66 00:03:41,440 --> 00:03:43,640 Speaker 3: in history when I was in high school too, So 67 00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:46,800 Speaker 3: that's how it came about that I became a history major. 68 00:03:47,640 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 1: So when you decided to go to law school, how 69 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:50,880 Speaker 1: did you end up a West Virginia. 70 00:03:51,640 --> 00:03:54,600 Speaker 3: I applied to several schools, but West Virginia was probably 71 00:03:54,600 --> 00:03:57,120 Speaker 3: the one I thought I could get accepted to. I 72 00:03:57,160 --> 00:04:00,920 Speaker 3: didn't have exactly a stellar academic background Brown. I was 73 00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:05,400 Speaker 3: kind of a gentleman see type student and probably had 74 00:04:05,440 --> 00:04:09,440 Speaker 3: a better average and other critter activity. And I thought 75 00:04:09,480 --> 00:04:12,000 Speaker 3: that would give me a good opportunity there. And with 76 00:04:12,120 --> 00:04:14,840 Speaker 3: my lsat scores, I thought that would give me an 77 00:04:14,840 --> 00:04:18,520 Speaker 3: opportunity with the background going to, you know, a prestigious 78 00:04:18,520 --> 00:04:20,800 Speaker 3: school like Brown, but I would have an opportunity to 79 00:04:20,839 --> 00:04:23,599 Speaker 3: go there. And my family was back in West Virginia 80 00:04:23,640 --> 00:04:25,400 Speaker 3: and so forth we wanted to get back home. 81 00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:29,000 Speaker 1: So when you graduated from law school and you were 82 00:04:29,040 --> 00:04:32,160 Speaker 1: admitted to the West Virginia State Bar, you were then 83 00:04:32,160 --> 00:04:35,360 Speaker 1: offered a commission as a captain in the US Army. 84 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:36,640 Speaker 1: Why did you accept? 85 00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:40,040 Speaker 3: Oh, it was an excellent opportunity, and that would give 86 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:43,200 Speaker 3: me an opportunity to do two things. One to really 87 00:04:43,560 --> 00:04:45,760 Speaker 3: gain a lot of experience in practice of law, and 88 00:04:45,800 --> 00:04:46,680 Speaker 3: then also to. 89 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:50,160 Speaker 2: Serve my country. In West Virginia, it's a very prominent 90 00:04:50,560 --> 00:04:53,760 Speaker 2: serving your country and things like that. So that's the reason. 91 00:04:54,120 --> 00:04:57,839 Speaker 1: When you're in the Judge Advocate General Corps, you've actually 92 00:04:57,880 --> 00:05:06,200 Speaker 1: had opportunities to experience trials in court much greater than 93 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:08,560 Speaker 1: the same opportunity if you were, like in a big 94 00:05:08,640 --> 00:05:12,120 Speaker 1: law firm. What was that like to be in your 95 00:05:12,120 --> 00:05:16,040 Speaker 1: mid twenties in a military court in Fort Hood trying 96 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:18,080 Speaker 1: cases that went all the way to capital. 97 00:05:19,040 --> 00:05:23,520 Speaker 3: Very great experience. It's a tremendous opportunity. And at that 98 00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:26,320 Speaker 3: time the speaker of what happened is the Military Justice 99 00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:28,760 Speaker 3: Actor I think was nineteen sixty eight was passed and 100 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:31,200 Speaker 3: that required that there'd be lawyers on both sides, on 101 00:05:31,279 --> 00:05:32,920 Speaker 3: prosecutor on defense. 102 00:05:33,360 --> 00:05:35,239 Speaker 2: Previous to that, they leaded the line. 103 00:05:35,080 --> 00:05:38,680 Speaker 3: Officers as prosecutors and they weren't that effective. So there 104 00:05:38,720 --> 00:05:41,960 Speaker 3: was an opportunity to really get into the courtroom because 105 00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:46,240 Speaker 3: you would have people with law degrees on both sides. 106 00:05:46,279 --> 00:05:48,200 Speaker 3: And I did both sides, and it was a tremendous 107 00:05:48,279 --> 00:05:51,560 Speaker 3: learning experience where you would study the law. One day, 108 00:05:51,600 --> 00:05:54,160 Speaker 3: you may be trying to get a piece of evidence 109 00:05:54,200 --> 00:05:56,200 Speaker 3: on a search and caesar. Next day you would maybe 110 00:05:56,279 --> 00:06:00,479 Speaker 3: trying to keep that out. So from an academic experience point, 111 00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:03,880 Speaker 3: you couldn't get that experience into private practice. 112 00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:07,240 Speaker 1: You have to switch your psychology. I mean, half a 113 00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:11,000 Speaker 1: day you're prosecutor half a day you're a defense attorney. 114 00:06:11,600 --> 00:06:17,000 Speaker 1: Those are really dramatically different attitudes and dramatically different arguments, 115 00:06:17,040 --> 00:06:17,440 Speaker 1: aren't they. 116 00:06:17,839 --> 00:06:21,120 Speaker 3: Yes, it was challenging legal wise, and of course the 117 00:06:21,200 --> 00:06:24,039 Speaker 3: law was consistent what change would be the facts of 118 00:06:24,040 --> 00:06:27,200 Speaker 3: a particular case. And then I also became a chief 119 00:06:27,200 --> 00:06:30,120 Speaker 3: of Military Justice, which meant that I reviewed all the 120 00:06:30,160 --> 00:06:33,320 Speaker 3: court martial transcripts and did a review for the commanding 121 00:06:33,400 --> 00:06:36,119 Speaker 3: General on what action authentity it would take on those. 122 00:06:36,400 --> 00:06:38,719 Speaker 3: And that was a very good experience for what later 123 00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:40,960 Speaker 3: became a pellic practice when I went into the US 124 00:06:41,000 --> 00:06:42,120 Speaker 3: Attorney's office. 125 00:06:42,480 --> 00:06:46,800 Speaker 1: So you really we're getting a remarkable volume of experience 126 00:06:46,880 --> 00:06:50,360 Speaker 1: compared to what would have happened if you'd gone into 127 00:06:50,360 --> 00:06:52,680 Speaker 1: a normal, big civilian law firm. 128 00:06:52,680 --> 00:06:53,360 Speaker 2: Oh correct. 129 00:06:53,680 --> 00:06:58,160 Speaker 3: Fort Hood was a pretty active anti war installation. Jane 130 00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:00,760 Speaker 3: Fonda would come down there, So we had a lot 131 00:07:00,760 --> 00:07:04,080 Speaker 3: of difficult cases involving disobeying orders and things of. 132 00:07:04,080 --> 00:07:05,000 Speaker 2: That particular case. 133 00:07:05,040 --> 00:07:07,479 Speaker 3: And I mentioned one particular one in the book where 134 00:07:07,520 --> 00:07:10,960 Speaker 3: I was a defense attorney for an individual who was 135 00:07:11,080 --> 00:07:13,720 Speaker 3: charged with disobeying orders, and I had to go into 136 00:07:13,840 --> 00:07:16,720 Speaker 3: the Olio Strut coffee house, which was the hotbed of 137 00:07:16,840 --> 00:07:20,760 Speaker 3: the scent, to meet my client in full uniform. So 138 00:07:21,080 --> 00:07:24,080 Speaker 3: that's another interesting experience. I don't think you could match 139 00:07:24,120 --> 00:07:26,000 Speaker 3: the experience that I got at ford Hood. 140 00:07:26,080 --> 00:07:28,520 Speaker 2: Both militarily and practically speaking. 141 00:07:29,400 --> 00:07:33,760 Speaker 1: You get a I think remarkable opportunity. First of all, 142 00:07:34,640 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 1: you're approached by the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force, 143 00:07:40,080 --> 00:07:43,560 Speaker 1: but that would take you to Detroit. But then luckily 144 00:07:44,200 --> 00:07:46,960 Speaker 1: an opening came up in the US Attorney's Office in 145 00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:50,040 Speaker 1: the Northern District of West Virginia, which would take you 146 00:07:50,120 --> 00:07:52,720 Speaker 1: back home. I mean, was that a pretty easy yes 147 00:07:52,840 --> 00:07:55,440 Speaker 1: to decide to be an assistant US Attorney? 148 00:07:56,320 --> 00:07:56,960 Speaker 2: Yes, it was. 149 00:07:57,080 --> 00:07:59,680 Speaker 3: It was pretty easy, and my background really fit in 150 00:08:00,160 --> 00:08:04,000 Speaker 3: perfectly with what the US Attorney's Office was. The Organized 151 00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:08,080 Speaker 3: Crime Drug Task Force was obviously more focused on organized 152 00:08:08,120 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 3: crime criminal prosecution, but the US Attorney's Office, and at 153 00:08:11,160 --> 00:08:13,760 Speaker 3: that time, there were only two assistants, and you had 154 00:08:13,880 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 3: really a broad range of legal actions, not only criminal 155 00:08:17,760 --> 00:08:20,520 Speaker 3: but civil action. And that gave me an opportunity to 156 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:24,520 Speaker 3: be familiarized with the full practice of law. But basically 157 00:08:24,520 --> 00:08:27,560 Speaker 3: before that, my focus was primarily on criminal cases and 158 00:08:27,640 --> 00:08:28,480 Speaker 3: criminal appeals. 159 00:08:28,920 --> 00:08:34,000 Speaker 1: How much do you think that experience made you sort 160 00:08:34,040 --> 00:08:38,560 Speaker 1: of approach the courtroom differently than you would have done 161 00:08:38,559 --> 00:08:39,000 Speaker 1: without that. 162 00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:42,520 Speaker 3: I don't know what I would have done without that, 163 00:08:42,640 --> 00:08:45,360 Speaker 3: because when you're trying a case, you can look at 164 00:08:45,400 --> 00:08:47,480 Speaker 3: the law, you can look at the books, but you 165 00:08:47,559 --> 00:08:51,760 Speaker 3: also have to develop that sixth sense when a person 166 00:08:51,960 --> 00:08:53,920 Speaker 3: is a witness, how to handle a witness, how to 167 00:08:53,920 --> 00:08:57,400 Speaker 3: do cross examination actually, how to respond to a judge, 168 00:08:57,400 --> 00:09:01,040 Speaker 3: and more importantly, how to respond to a jury. And 169 00:09:01,080 --> 00:09:04,520 Speaker 3: that's the imasurable experience that I got starting with trying cases. 170 00:09:04,559 --> 00:09:07,320 Speaker 3: Even though the military court is a panel of officers, 171 00:09:07,559 --> 00:09:09,959 Speaker 3: it's a jury and you're talking to people and you're 172 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:11,920 Speaker 3: trying to convince people one way or the other of 173 00:09:11,960 --> 00:09:14,360 Speaker 3: what your position is. So that's the kind of experience 174 00:09:14,360 --> 00:09:16,960 Speaker 3: that you cannot get unless you're actually in the courtroom. 175 00:09:17,920 --> 00:09:22,239 Speaker 1: When you become the assistant US attorney, what are your responsibilities? 176 00:09:22,280 --> 00:09:25,080 Speaker 1: What does an assistant US attorney do well? 177 00:09:25,160 --> 00:09:27,920 Speaker 3: In our office, I would handle some criminal cases, and 178 00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:31,040 Speaker 3: back in the seventies, what we were focusing on pretty 179 00:09:31,120 --> 00:09:34,560 Speaker 3: much is the property crimes, bank robberies, stolen cars with 180 00:09:34,600 --> 00:09:38,240 Speaker 3: the FBI, some tax cases and things of that nature. Civilly, 181 00:09:38,640 --> 00:09:42,400 Speaker 3: we would be doing social Security appeal cases, some Federal 182 00:09:42,440 --> 00:09:46,679 Speaker 3: Torque Claim Act cases representing some of the agencies if 183 00:09:46,679 --> 00:09:49,640 Speaker 3: they had to go into court, and in civil cases, 184 00:09:49,640 --> 00:09:52,160 Speaker 3: we did not have a real heavy civil case load. 185 00:09:52,679 --> 00:09:55,280 Speaker 2: Another area was condemnation cases. 186 00:09:54,920 --> 00:09:57,280 Speaker 3: Because there was a lot of condemnation cases at the 187 00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:00,760 Speaker 3: time because there was dams being built on a high river, 188 00:10:00,920 --> 00:10:03,880 Speaker 3: property being taken, and that was a pretty heavy part 189 00:10:03,880 --> 00:10:05,440 Speaker 3: of the civil doc and I did not do a 190 00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:06,000 Speaker 3: lot of that. 191 00:10:06,000 --> 00:10:07,680 Speaker 2: That was assigned to another attorney. 192 00:10:07,679 --> 00:10:10,400 Speaker 3: But that's the kind of broad kind of cases that 193 00:10:10,440 --> 00:10:12,400 Speaker 3: we had in the US Attorney's office. 194 00:10:13,520 --> 00:10:16,080 Speaker 1: You're now out of the army, and the army had 195 00:10:16,080 --> 00:10:18,880 Speaker 1: a pretty good rule about not being politically active. But 196 00:10:19,040 --> 00:10:22,559 Speaker 1: you have an interesting career as a Democrat and a Republican. 197 00:10:23,120 --> 00:10:24,319 Speaker 1: Explain that just a little bit. 198 00:10:25,160 --> 00:10:25,480 Speaker 2: Well. 199 00:10:25,520 --> 00:10:28,160 Speaker 3: Growing up in West Virginia at that time, as you 200 00:10:28,200 --> 00:10:31,960 Speaker 3: would be where West Virginia was a very strong Democratic state. 201 00:10:32,040 --> 00:10:36,559 Speaker 3: Senator Berg, Senator Randolph, later on Senator Rockefeller, and also 202 00:10:36,679 --> 00:10:40,960 Speaker 3: the state government was controlled. I was not interested in politics, 203 00:10:41,120 --> 00:10:44,240 Speaker 3: nor did anybody in my family interested in politics. So 204 00:10:44,280 --> 00:10:47,800 Speaker 3: when we become the register, you as a Democrat because 205 00:10:47,800 --> 00:10:50,360 Speaker 3: that's the only party that was around, and of course 206 00:10:50,400 --> 00:10:53,400 Speaker 3: you couldn't be active in politics in the army, and 207 00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:56,560 Speaker 3: I never was really active politically. When I would read 208 00:10:56,640 --> 00:11:01,120 Speaker 3: the appointment assistant US Attorney in a Democratic or Republican administration, 209 00:11:01,640 --> 00:11:04,880 Speaker 3: as a courtesy to the US Attorney, I changed registration 210 00:11:04,960 --> 00:11:07,520 Speaker 3: as a Republican. It really didn't have anything to do 211 00:11:07,600 --> 00:11:21,439 Speaker 3: with any political activity, of course, which I couldn't do anyway. 212 00:11:28,440 --> 00:11:32,760 Speaker 1: Then life changes in you end up as a Republican 213 00:11:34,440 --> 00:11:37,600 Speaker 1: and Ronald Reagan nominates you to be US attorney. 214 00:11:38,480 --> 00:11:42,800 Speaker 3: Yes, what happened there is in the Democratic administration there 215 00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:46,400 Speaker 3: the federal judge, there's a chapter on how he would 216 00:11:46,440 --> 00:11:52,520 Speaker 3: try to manipulate things. Never permitted the presidentially appointed US attorney. 217 00:11:53,080 --> 00:11:55,599 Speaker 3: He had a court appointed the US Attorney for I 218 00:11:55,640 --> 00:11:58,200 Speaker 3: think it was four years whatever it was there. And 219 00:11:58,240 --> 00:12:01,600 Speaker 3: then the Justice Department, the executive director at that time 220 00:12:01,720 --> 00:12:04,800 Speaker 3: was Bill Tyson. He said, the administration is not going 221 00:12:04,840 --> 00:12:06,960 Speaker 3: to permit a courter point an attorney. We're going to 222 00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:10,439 Speaker 3: have a presidentially appointed US attorney. And there were some 223 00:12:10,520 --> 00:12:14,000 Speaker 3: candidates that were submitted who for one reason or another, 224 00:12:14,040 --> 00:12:16,120 Speaker 3: were not acceptable, but they. 225 00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:18,000 Speaker 2: Did not want to take a side one way or 226 00:12:18,040 --> 00:12:18,320 Speaker 2: the other. 227 00:12:18,640 --> 00:12:21,000 Speaker 3: So Bill Tyson said, what we're going to do instead 228 00:12:21,040 --> 00:12:23,319 Speaker 3: of having the state submit a name, We're going to 229 00:12:23,320 --> 00:12:26,160 Speaker 3: submit your name over into the White House and see 230 00:12:26,160 --> 00:12:30,280 Speaker 3: what happens. And again, Governor Moore, who was the powerbroker 231 00:12:30,320 --> 00:12:33,480 Speaker 3: at the time, was kind of skeptical of me because 232 00:12:33,520 --> 00:12:36,400 Speaker 3: I had been a Democrat at one time for reasons 233 00:12:36,640 --> 00:12:39,480 Speaker 3: unknown to me why he would think that way. But 234 00:12:39,559 --> 00:12:42,280 Speaker 3: then there was the Prizer, Stanley Prizer, who was very 235 00:12:42,320 --> 00:12:45,560 Speaker 3: influential in my career. He was one of the big 236 00:12:45,559 --> 00:12:48,360 Speaker 3: defense attorneys in some of the corruption cases when I 237 00:12:48,400 --> 00:12:52,440 Speaker 3: was a US assistant. He convinced Governor Moore not to 238 00:12:52,480 --> 00:12:55,960 Speaker 3: oppose the appointment, and so with no opposition, the appointment 239 00:12:56,040 --> 00:12:59,120 Speaker 3: then went to the Congress and I was appointed, confirmed, 240 00:12:59,120 --> 00:13:00,840 Speaker 3: and pointed by a president. 241 00:13:00,559 --> 00:13:04,520 Speaker 1: Record, Now you are in charge. Hasn't it sort of 242 00:13:04,559 --> 00:13:09,040 Speaker 1: surprised you how much West Virginia has shifted from the 243 00:13:09,080 --> 00:13:11,880 Speaker 1: most democratic state in the country to the most republican 244 00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:12,680 Speaker 1: in our. 245 00:13:12,559 --> 00:13:14,520 Speaker 2: Lifetime, Yes, definitely. 246 00:13:14,920 --> 00:13:18,040 Speaker 3: As I say, I grew up with Senator Bird, Senator 247 00:13:18,160 --> 00:13:21,320 Speaker 3: Randolph and of course, I'm sure you're very familiar with 248 00:13:21,360 --> 00:13:24,240 Speaker 3: the power that they've had. That was very surprising, But 249 00:13:24,559 --> 00:13:27,160 Speaker 3: I wasn't really active in politics, and I couldn't be 250 00:13:27,160 --> 00:13:30,160 Speaker 3: active being in the US Attorney's office. But it was 251 00:13:30,240 --> 00:13:33,040 Speaker 3: really surprising to see the shift and see how it 252 00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:33,760 Speaker 3: continues on. 253 00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:36,280 Speaker 2: It's been really much better for the state. 254 00:13:36,559 --> 00:13:39,600 Speaker 3: I think the Republican administrations have done an excellent job 255 00:13:39,640 --> 00:13:40,600 Speaker 3: in promoting the state. 256 00:13:41,280 --> 00:13:42,920 Speaker 1: Now we get down to the sort of the heart 257 00:13:42,960 --> 00:13:46,199 Speaker 1: of the book, and you begin your book with a really, 258 00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:51,040 Speaker 1: i think incredibly dangerous account of receiving a mail bomb 259 00:13:51,040 --> 00:13:51,720 Speaker 1: from an inmate. 260 00:13:51,920 --> 00:13:54,480 Speaker 3: Well, some of these inmates who were doing time in 261 00:13:54,600 --> 00:13:58,160 Speaker 3: state prisons, and state prisons were at least in their view, 262 00:13:58,440 --> 00:14:01,000 Speaker 3: were not a very nice place to be and in fact, 263 00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:03,520 Speaker 3: a very bad place to be, and they for some 264 00:14:03,600 --> 00:14:06,560 Speaker 3: reason thought that during time in a federal installation would 265 00:14:06,600 --> 00:14:09,760 Speaker 3: be much easier. So what they would do is they 266 00:14:09,760 --> 00:14:12,599 Speaker 3: would commit a crime, a federal crime, and hoped that 267 00:14:12,640 --> 00:14:15,319 Speaker 3: they would be prosecuted, and then once they were convicted 268 00:14:15,800 --> 00:14:20,280 Speaker 3: and sentence, they would be transferred to a federal institution. Well, 269 00:14:20,320 --> 00:14:23,640 Speaker 3: mister Hamrick threatened the jodge, and we prosecuted him, but 270 00:14:23,720 --> 00:14:25,160 Speaker 3: he found out that he was going to have to 271 00:14:25,160 --> 00:14:28,080 Speaker 3: finish his state sentence before he started his federal sentence, 272 00:14:28,080 --> 00:14:31,160 Speaker 3: and he was very upset with that and said he 273 00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:33,320 Speaker 3: wanted to do something to make sure he could get. 274 00:14:33,240 --> 00:14:34,400 Speaker 2: Out of state custody. 275 00:14:34,480 --> 00:14:37,120 Speaker 3: So he ended up creating this bomb and sending it 276 00:14:37,120 --> 00:14:37,440 Speaker 3: to me. 277 00:14:38,120 --> 00:14:42,000 Speaker 1: Luckily, for you, the bomb didn't quite work. This must 278 00:14:42,040 --> 00:14:43,480 Speaker 1: have been an unbelievable moment. 279 00:14:44,520 --> 00:14:44,920 Speaker 2: It was. 280 00:14:45,200 --> 00:14:48,200 Speaker 3: I walked into the offices right after New Year's and 281 00:14:48,560 --> 00:14:51,360 Speaker 3: normally my secretary would bring the mail back, but she 282 00:14:51,520 --> 00:14:53,840 Speaker 3: wasn't present that particular day, and we didn't have at 283 00:14:53,840 --> 00:14:56,400 Speaker 3: that time. There was no running the mail through any 284 00:14:56,440 --> 00:14:59,280 Speaker 3: type of device or anything like that, and so I 285 00:14:59,320 --> 00:15:00,920 Speaker 3: saw it on her day and I picked it up. 286 00:15:00,960 --> 00:15:03,840 Speaker 3: It was in a legal size envelope. It had an 287 00:15:03,840 --> 00:15:06,800 Speaker 3: Oak Street address is where the county jail was located, 288 00:15:07,240 --> 00:15:10,480 Speaker 3: and we would get petitions from prisoners all the time, 289 00:15:10,520 --> 00:15:13,000 Speaker 3: so I didn't think anything of it looking at the address, 290 00:15:13,040 --> 00:15:15,520 Speaker 3: and I opened it up. When I saw the bu 291 00:15:15,640 --> 00:15:19,440 Speaker 3: teante lighters in there, sew some strapnel fly out of there, 292 00:15:19,480 --> 00:15:22,720 Speaker 3: I knew exactly what it was, and I immediately put 293 00:15:22,760 --> 00:15:24,400 Speaker 3: it on the desk and left and there was a 294 00:15:24,440 --> 00:15:27,160 Speaker 3: long hallway between my office and the Secretary's office, and 295 00:15:27,200 --> 00:15:30,520 Speaker 3: went down that hallway and immediately called the ATF in 296 00:15:30,560 --> 00:15:31,080 Speaker 3: the FBI. 297 00:15:31,480 --> 00:15:35,440 Speaker 1: How does a criminal in prison make abomb. 298 00:15:36,040 --> 00:15:38,600 Speaker 3: This guy was very inventive and there's a description in 299 00:15:38,640 --> 00:15:41,280 Speaker 3: the book about all his activities. He did a lot 300 00:15:41,320 --> 00:15:44,600 Speaker 3: of nasty things that he was a white supremacist, and 301 00:15:44,640 --> 00:15:46,640 Speaker 3: he was one guy in the speaker that I think 302 00:15:46,840 --> 00:15:51,440 Speaker 3: was capable of assassinating a public official, high level public official, 303 00:15:51,480 --> 00:15:54,360 Speaker 3: even bus up the president. And he got these items 304 00:15:54,600 --> 00:15:57,960 Speaker 3: in the commissary and a bututane lighter, he got a 305 00:15:58,080 --> 00:16:01,160 Speaker 3: legal pad, he got the shrap there. The way the 306 00:16:01,160 --> 00:16:03,960 Speaker 3: bomb was constructed, he was shaved down the utane lighters, 307 00:16:04,360 --> 00:16:06,320 Speaker 3: and then he would have a wire connected to a 308 00:16:06,440 --> 00:16:10,160 Speaker 3: nine volt battery and he would put a celerant on 309 00:16:10,360 --> 00:16:13,360 Speaker 3: the lightyers and then when the bomb opened up that 310 00:16:13,400 --> 00:16:15,760 Speaker 3: a celiant would melt the propane and. 311 00:16:15,720 --> 00:16:16,280 Speaker 2: Blow it up. 312 00:16:16,560 --> 00:16:18,800 Speaker 3: Well, he didn't use an a celerant that would do that, 313 00:16:19,000 --> 00:16:21,480 Speaker 3: and that's what saved me. There were other things that 314 00:16:21,520 --> 00:16:23,840 Speaker 3: he could have used as the commissary with which probably 315 00:16:23,880 --> 00:16:26,320 Speaker 3: able work, but fortunately he did not do that. 316 00:16:26,720 --> 00:16:29,840 Speaker 1: Well that's a close shave though, but I gathered that 317 00:16:30,120 --> 00:16:32,080 Speaker 1: you had a number of these kind of threats over 318 00:16:32,120 --> 00:16:32,520 Speaker 1: the years. 319 00:16:33,840 --> 00:16:36,600 Speaker 3: Yes, but I don't think any of them were serious 320 00:16:36,680 --> 00:16:39,960 Speaker 3: as that. And what my concern was that I think 321 00:16:40,120 --> 00:16:43,240 Speaker 3: in these organized crime cases, if they're going to do 322 00:16:43,320 --> 00:16:46,120 Speaker 3: some damage to the case, they're not going to assassinate 323 00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:47,200 Speaker 3: the prosecutor. 324 00:16:47,240 --> 00:16:49,280 Speaker 2: For the most part, They're going to go after witnesses. 325 00:16:49,760 --> 00:16:52,400 Speaker 3: What concerned me most was when we started doing the 326 00:16:52,400 --> 00:16:55,800 Speaker 3: crack cocaine cases, that somebody would say, somebody who had 327 00:16:55,840 --> 00:16:58,800 Speaker 3: a vendetta against us or me would say, here's you know, 328 00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:02,320 Speaker 3: eight ball crack and shoot that guy. That kind of 329 00:17:02,560 --> 00:17:06,560 Speaker 3: random type person was a concern. Most of the threats 330 00:17:06,600 --> 00:17:09,639 Speaker 3: from the organized crime people, I don't think there are 331 00:17:09,640 --> 00:17:12,040 Speaker 3: any of those materialized where we acts and were able 332 00:17:12,040 --> 00:17:13,919 Speaker 3: to take some action and do a prosecution. 333 00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:17,760 Speaker 1: Do you think that if you're an organized crime it's 334 00:17:17,800 --> 00:17:21,040 Speaker 1: just not worth the risk of taking on a federal 335 00:17:21,320 --> 00:17:22,399 Speaker 1: law enforcement person. 336 00:17:23,040 --> 00:17:25,920 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think so, especially in West Virginia. I don't 337 00:17:25,920 --> 00:17:28,600 Speaker 3: think that any of those individuals would want to risk 338 00:17:28,720 --> 00:17:31,399 Speaker 3: the repercussions that would come from something of that nature. 339 00:17:47,480 --> 00:17:49,960 Speaker 1: One of the things that makes your career unique is 340 00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:54,280 Speaker 1: that you were a genuine pioneer in using the Rico statute. 341 00:17:54,520 --> 00:17:56,679 Speaker 1: First of all, for the rest of us, what is 342 00:17:56,720 --> 00:17:57,879 Speaker 1: a Rico statute. 343 00:17:58,600 --> 00:18:01,720 Speaker 3: Ricos statue was passed in the seventies and was designed 344 00:18:01,720 --> 00:18:05,560 Speaker 3: to combat organized crime. And basically what it does is 345 00:18:06,240 --> 00:18:09,720 Speaker 3: that permits you to put a group of different types 346 00:18:09,720 --> 00:18:11,720 Speaker 3: of individuals who are. 347 00:18:11,600 --> 00:18:14,280 Speaker 2: Maybe running a group or a formal group. 348 00:18:14,160 --> 00:18:16,639 Speaker 3: Such as maybe a corporation of business something like that, 349 00:18:16,960 --> 00:18:20,320 Speaker 3: put those all together, and if those individuals are committing 350 00:18:20,440 --> 00:18:23,560 Speaker 3: different types of crimes, which they're called predicats under the 351 00:18:23,640 --> 00:18:26,760 Speaker 3: Rico statute, and that establishes what is a pattern of 352 00:18:26,840 --> 00:18:30,800 Speaker 3: racketeering activity, you can put that all in one particular case. 353 00:18:30,840 --> 00:18:32,879 Speaker 3: You can put all the individuals in one case and 354 00:18:32,920 --> 00:18:35,920 Speaker 3: all the crimes in one case. So you have a bribery, 355 00:18:35,960 --> 00:18:39,520 Speaker 3: you have extortion, you have murder, all those crimes committed 356 00:18:39,720 --> 00:18:42,600 Speaker 3: and then comes under a Rico conspiracy. And there's also 357 00:18:42,640 --> 00:18:46,680 Speaker 3: a Rico substantive statute. All the individuals can be tied together, 358 00:18:46,760 --> 00:18:49,320 Speaker 3: and all the crimes could be tied together if they 359 00:18:49,480 --> 00:18:53,320 Speaker 3: established the pattern of racketeering activity before you'd have to 360 00:18:53,359 --> 00:18:57,439 Speaker 3: prosecute those like a murder case individually, a bribery case individually, 361 00:18:57,480 --> 00:19:01,479 Speaker 3: with individual defendants, and you could not do that effectively. 362 00:19:01,480 --> 00:19:03,760 Speaker 1: Rico in that sense, Was it an important tool for 363 00:19:03,840 --> 00:19:06,200 Speaker 1: you in going after organized crime? 364 00:19:06,680 --> 00:19:09,320 Speaker 3: Certainly it was the tool because it gave us the 365 00:19:09,480 --> 00:19:14,240 Speaker 3: statutory authority to pursue these groups and to combine them 366 00:19:14,280 --> 00:19:16,240 Speaker 3: all in one large prosecution. 367 00:19:17,560 --> 00:19:21,440 Speaker 1: Your book talks about a lot of interesting, very different prosecutions. 368 00:19:21,960 --> 00:19:23,760 Speaker 1: When you look back on it, which case is the 369 00:19:23,760 --> 00:19:28,200 Speaker 1: most challenging and what did you learn from it? 370 00:19:28,200 --> 00:19:31,960 Speaker 3: It's hard to single out a particular case. Of course, 371 00:19:32,040 --> 00:19:34,920 Speaker 3: Paul Hanke's case in Wheeling had a lot of different 372 00:19:35,119 --> 00:19:36,000 Speaker 3: tangents to it. 373 00:19:36,560 --> 00:19:38,840 Speaker 2: The hare Christna case was another one. 374 00:19:39,160 --> 00:19:44,040 Speaker 3: Those two prosecutions were probably the most challenging from an 375 00:19:44,040 --> 00:19:48,280 Speaker 3: investigative standpoint. And I think the Jamaican case is over 376 00:19:48,320 --> 00:19:51,840 Speaker 3: in Martinsburg and what was done when we cleaned all 377 00:19:51,880 --> 00:19:54,800 Speaker 3: that out of there and how the community went back 378 00:19:54,800 --> 00:19:57,880 Speaker 3: to being the nice sleeping community in the eastern Pananda, 379 00:19:58,040 --> 00:19:59,480 Speaker 3: West Virginia. 380 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:03,880 Speaker 1: Emphasized that if you're a US attorney, it's really important 381 00:20:03,920 --> 00:20:07,240 Speaker 1: to collaborate with law enforcement, and the law enforcement really 382 00:20:07,280 --> 00:20:10,200 Speaker 1: plays sort of an essential role. Can you just talk 383 00:20:10,240 --> 00:20:13,200 Speaker 1: briefly about the role of law enforcement from the standpoint 384 00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:13,720 Speaker 1: of the US. 385 00:20:13,640 --> 00:20:16,200 Speaker 3: Attorney Yeah, one of the good things in the Reagan 386 00:20:16,200 --> 00:20:19,240 Speaker 3: administration and Attorney General Meese is what they did. 387 00:20:19,320 --> 00:20:21,159 Speaker 2: They asked us to form what is called law. 388 00:20:21,040 --> 00:20:24,720 Speaker 3: Enforcement coordinating committees and to bring in all the different 389 00:20:25,080 --> 00:20:30,840 Speaker 3: law enforcement agencies. Before that concept was being brought about. 390 00:20:31,760 --> 00:20:34,320 Speaker 3: I won't say this trust, but one of the examples 391 00:20:34,440 --> 00:20:36,800 Speaker 3: was nobody wanted to work with the IRS because the 392 00:20:36,880 --> 00:20:39,480 Speaker 3: IRS has all the red tape and stuff like that. 393 00:20:39,800 --> 00:20:42,320 Speaker 2: Nobody wanted to work with the FBI because. 394 00:20:42,040 --> 00:20:44,040 Speaker 3: If we gave them a case, the FBI would take 395 00:20:44,080 --> 00:20:46,560 Speaker 3: credit for it and things like that. We dispelled all 396 00:20:46,600 --> 00:20:49,800 Speaker 3: those rumors and stuff when we had the first grand jury. 397 00:20:49,840 --> 00:20:52,159 Speaker 3: We had the IRS working. Of course they would do 398 00:20:52,200 --> 00:20:54,959 Speaker 3: the financial part. We had the state police, and then 399 00:20:55,000 --> 00:20:58,359 Speaker 3: we had the federal investigative agencies doing the other types 400 00:20:58,400 --> 00:21:01,840 Speaker 3: of crimes. The first case we'd was the marijuana Moonshiner case, 401 00:21:01,880 --> 00:21:05,439 Speaker 3: and it worked. We had support from the supervisors of 402 00:21:05,520 --> 00:21:09,480 Speaker 3: the RS, the SAC of the FBI, the superintendent of 403 00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:12,560 Speaker 3: the West Virginia State Police, and then some local law 404 00:21:12,600 --> 00:21:16,520 Speaker 3: enforcement and once they saw the concept that worked, they say, 405 00:21:16,600 --> 00:21:19,600 Speaker 3: this is great, we now can trust one another. We 406 00:21:19,720 --> 00:21:23,080 Speaker 3: dispelled all those rumors and everything, and we've been successful. 407 00:21:23,440 --> 00:21:26,600 Speaker 3: And the other thing the speaker was, when forfeitures came 408 00:21:26,960 --> 00:21:30,040 Speaker 3: into play back in the seventies, there wasn't a lot 409 00:21:30,080 --> 00:21:33,200 Speaker 3: of forfeiture law. There was a federal what it's called 410 00:21:33,280 --> 00:21:36,000 Speaker 3: drug law continuing to throw an enterprise law which was 411 00:21:36,040 --> 00:21:39,040 Speaker 3: similar to the Rico Statute, but limited drugs. It did 412 00:21:39,080 --> 00:21:41,359 Speaker 3: have a forfeiture provision and we used that in some 413 00:21:41,400 --> 00:21:44,720 Speaker 3: of the earlier cases. Then Congress passed a lot of 414 00:21:44,720 --> 00:21:47,960 Speaker 3: good forfeiture laws and money monitoring laws, and that permitted 415 00:21:48,040 --> 00:21:51,760 Speaker 3: us to do forfeitures. And of course those proceeds were 416 00:21:51,800 --> 00:21:55,080 Speaker 3: distributed to the agencies who worked in the case, so 417 00:21:55,119 --> 00:21:57,960 Speaker 3: there was a little extra incentive from that aspect. 418 00:21:58,480 --> 00:22:00,480 Speaker 1: When you look at all of the efforts time we 419 00:22:00,560 --> 00:22:04,960 Speaker 1: put into trying to protect Americans from drug cartels and 420 00:22:05,000 --> 00:22:07,160 Speaker 1: what have you, and you look at the fact that 421 00:22:07,600 --> 00:22:10,280 Speaker 1: in the last couple of years we've had more than 422 00:22:10,320 --> 00:22:14,760 Speaker 1: twice as many young people die every year from things 423 00:22:14,800 --> 00:22:18,399 Speaker 1: like fentanyl has died in the entire eight years of 424 00:22:18,440 --> 00:22:22,560 Speaker 1: the Vietnam War. From your perspective, with your extraordinary experience, 425 00:22:22,920 --> 00:22:25,480 Speaker 1: what do you think we have to do to defeat 426 00:22:25,520 --> 00:22:26,480 Speaker 1: drugs in America. 427 00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:30,920 Speaker 3: I think we have to form effective task forces. Once 428 00:22:30,960 --> 00:22:34,600 Speaker 3: this concept was made prominent, there were everybody the local. 429 00:22:34,520 --> 00:22:35,560 Speaker 2: Form of task force. Here. 430 00:22:36,040 --> 00:22:38,280 Speaker 3: What you need is a strong leader to put all 431 00:22:38,320 --> 00:22:41,480 Speaker 3: this together. You have to have one person making a decision. 432 00:22:41,560 --> 00:22:44,120 Speaker 3: And I always told my agents that you can tell 433 00:22:44,119 --> 00:22:46,360 Speaker 3: me anything you want, I'll consider it. But I got 434 00:22:46,359 --> 00:22:48,480 Speaker 3: one more vote than you do. And you've got to 435 00:22:48,520 --> 00:22:51,480 Speaker 3: have that cooperation. If you don't have the cooperation, you're 436 00:22:51,520 --> 00:22:53,720 Speaker 3: not going to be successful. And I think we cite 437 00:22:53,760 --> 00:22:56,760 Speaker 3: a couple cases in the book there where that cooperation 438 00:22:57,040 --> 00:22:57,560 Speaker 3: was not there. 439 00:22:57,560 --> 00:23:00,040 Speaker 2: I think one of the gaudy case. And that's what 440 00:23:00,160 --> 00:23:00,640 Speaker 2: you need now. 441 00:23:00,680 --> 00:23:04,800 Speaker 3: In the international situation, there are other interests involved, I guess. 442 00:23:04,840 --> 00:23:06,440 Speaker 2: I mean we got into that a little. 443 00:23:06,240 --> 00:23:10,320 Speaker 3: Bit with prosecuting the Jamaicans. There were some politics involved 444 00:23:10,320 --> 00:23:13,320 Speaker 3: down in Jamaica, and the Department of State came in, 445 00:23:13,600 --> 00:23:14,080 Speaker 3: so on. 446 00:23:14,040 --> 00:23:14,800 Speaker 2: And so forth. 447 00:23:15,080 --> 00:23:17,320 Speaker 3: You know, I don't know how, and you're much more 448 00:23:17,359 --> 00:23:21,119 Speaker 3: experience than I am, how you remedy those types of conflicts. 449 00:23:21,400 --> 00:23:23,080 Speaker 3: You've got to take me a hard charger and you 450 00:23:23,200 --> 00:23:25,560 Speaker 3: just got to keep going and knocking things down. That's 451 00:23:25,600 --> 00:23:28,440 Speaker 3: what President Trump appears to be doing and hopefully he'll 452 00:23:28,640 --> 00:23:32,200 Speaker 3: apply that to the cartels and ag Bondi also, I think. 453 00:23:32,160 --> 00:23:33,360 Speaker 2: Is going to be very effective. 454 00:23:33,920 --> 00:23:37,000 Speaker 1: When you think about your experience and you see what's 455 00:23:37,000 --> 00:23:41,120 Speaker 1: happening today. Are there any kind of major changes you'd 456 00:23:41,160 --> 00:23:44,480 Speaker 1: like to see in the way law enforcement and US 457 00:23:44,520 --> 00:23:45,240 Speaker 1: attorneys work. 458 00:23:46,000 --> 00:23:47,760 Speaker 2: Yes, I'd like to see more cooperation. 459 00:23:48,240 --> 00:23:50,520 Speaker 3: You know, we've got to have that cooperation between the 460 00:23:50,640 --> 00:23:53,840 Speaker 3: Justice Department and the local US attorneys. And I say 461 00:23:53,880 --> 00:23:56,560 Speaker 3: the prime example of that is Attorney General mess He 462 00:23:56,720 --> 00:23:59,439 Speaker 3: let the US attorneys do their jobs. We didn't get 463 00:23:59,480 --> 00:24:01,719 Speaker 3: a lot of inner afferent from a Department of Justice, 464 00:24:01,960 --> 00:24:04,560 Speaker 3: and you can't have that oversight from the people sitting 465 00:24:04,600 --> 00:24:07,160 Speaker 3: in the apartment in DC try to second guest US 466 00:24:07,240 --> 00:24:08,320 Speaker 3: attorneys out there. 467 00:24:08,600 --> 00:24:11,439 Speaker 2: So I think that's going to common with saj Bondi. 468 00:24:11,560 --> 00:24:14,680 Speaker 3: She's got all the experience and she certainly has President 469 00:24:14,720 --> 00:24:16,160 Speaker 3: Trump's support behind her. 470 00:24:16,480 --> 00:24:19,640 Speaker 1: I think that's absolutely right. And Bondi is a very tough, 471 00:24:19,840 --> 00:24:22,520 Speaker 1: very smart person. Bill. I want to thank you for 472 00:24:22,640 --> 00:24:26,880 Speaker 1: joining me. Your new book, Justice Never Rests, A US 473 00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:31,840 Speaker 1: Attorney's battle against murderers, drug lords, mob kingpins, and colls, 474 00:24:32,200 --> 00:24:35,760 Speaker 1: is available now on Amazon and in bookstores everywhere. And 475 00:24:35,800 --> 00:24:37,479 Speaker 1: we're going to feature a link to buy it on 476 00:24:37,520 --> 00:24:38,400 Speaker 1: our show page. 477 00:24:38,640 --> 00:24:40,280 Speaker 2: Thank you, I really appreciate that. 478 00:24:44,240 --> 00:24:46,680 Speaker 1: Thank you. To my guest, William Klabash, you can get 479 00:24:46,680 --> 00:24:49,840 Speaker 1: a link to buy his new book, Justice Never Rests 480 00:24:50,200 --> 00:24:53,840 Speaker 1: on our show page at neutraorld dot com. NEUTRALD is 481 00:24:53,840 --> 00:24:58,160 Speaker 1: produced by Gangwi three sixty and iHeartMedia. Our executive producer 482 00:24:58,600 --> 00:25:03,320 Speaker 1: is Guernsey Sloan. Our researcher is Rachel Peterson. The artwork 483 00:25:03,359 --> 00:25:07,240 Speaker 1: for the show was created by Steve Penley. Special thanks 484 00:25:07,359 --> 00:25:10,040 Speaker 1: to the team at gingridh thwreet sixty. If you've been 485 00:25:10,080 --> 00:25:12,960 Speaker 1: enjoying news World, I hope you'll go to Apple Podcasts 486 00:25:13,280 --> 00:25:16,119 Speaker 1: and both rate us with five stars and give us 487 00:25:16,119 --> 00:25:19,400 Speaker 1: a review so others can learn what it's all about. 488 00:25:19,760 --> 00:25:23,040 Speaker 1: Right now, listeners of newt World concerned for my three 489 00:25:23,280 --> 00:25:28,880 Speaker 1: freeweekly columns at ginglishtree sixty dot com slash newsletter, I'm 490 00:25:28,960 --> 00:25:31,120 Speaker 1: new Gingrich. This is newts World