1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,960 Speaker 1: If you love iPhone, you'll love Apple Card. It's the 2 00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:06,920 Speaker 1: credit card designed for iPhone. It gives you unlimited daily 3 00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:10,000 Speaker 1: cash back that can earn four point four zero percent 4 00:00:10,160 --> 00:00:12,960 Speaker 1: annual percentage yield. When you open a high Yield savings 5 00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:16,280 Speaker 1: account through Apple Card, apply for Applecard in the wallet 6 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:19,520 Speaker 1: app subject to credit approval. Savings is available to Apple 7 00:00:19,560 --> 00:00:22,800 Speaker 1: Card owners subject to eligibility. Apple Card and Savings by 8 00:00:22,840 --> 00:00:26,120 Speaker 1: Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City Branch Member FDIC 9 00:00:26,520 --> 00:00:29,280 Speaker 1: terms and more at applecard dot com. When you pop 10 00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:31,240 Speaker 1: a piece of cheese into your mouth, you're probably not 11 00:00:31,360 --> 00:00:34,280 Speaker 1: thinking about the environmental impact. But the people in the 12 00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:37,680 Speaker 1: dairy industry are. That's why they're working hard every day 13 00:00:37,720 --> 00:00:40,760 Speaker 1: to find new ways to reduce waste, conserve natural resources, 14 00:00:40,800 --> 00:00:44,360 Speaker 1: and drive down greenhouse gas emissions. How is US Dairy 15 00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:48,520 Speaker 1: tackling greenhouse gases? Many farms use anaerobic digesters to turn 16 00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:53,080 Speaker 1: the methane from manure into renewable energy that can power farms, towns, 17 00:00:53,120 --> 00:00:57,240 Speaker 1: and electric cars. Visit us Dairy dot COM's Last Sustainability 18 00:00:57,280 --> 00:00:58,000 Speaker 1: to learn more. 19 00:00:58,960 --> 00:01:02,600 Speaker 2: Here's a little secret. Most smartphone deals aren't that exciting. 20 00:01:02,920 --> 00:01:06,560 Speaker 2: To be honest, they're barely worth mentioning. But then there's 21 00:01:06,600 --> 00:01:09,920 Speaker 2: AT and T and their best deals. Those are quite exciting. 22 00:01:10,319 --> 00:01:13,039 Speaker 2: They're the kind of deals that are really worth talking about, 23 00:01:13,560 --> 00:01:16,360 Speaker 2: like their deal in the new Samsung Galaxy Z flip six. 24 00:01:16,760 --> 00:01:19,600 Speaker 2: With this deal, you can trade in your eligible smartphone, 25 00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:22,960 Speaker 2: any year, any condition for a new Samsung Galaxy Z 26 00:01:23,080 --> 00:01:23,680 Speaker 2: flip six. 27 00:01:24,120 --> 00:01:26,160 Speaker 3: It's so good, in fact, it will have. 28 00:01:26,280 --> 00:01:30,640 Speaker 2: You shouting from the rooftops. So get yourself down a 29 00:01:30,640 --> 00:01:33,360 Speaker 2: street level and learn how to snag the new Samsung 30 00:01:33,400 --> 00:01:36,880 Speaker 2: Galaxy Z flip six on AT and T and maybe 31 00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:39,320 Speaker 2: grab a ladder on the way home. AT and T 32 00:01:39,720 --> 00:01:44,119 Speaker 2: connecting changes everything requires trade in a Galaxy s Note 33 00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:46,960 Speaker 2: or Z series smartphone. Limited time offer two hundred and 34 00:01:46,959 --> 00:01:49,880 Speaker 2: fifty six gigabytes for zero dollars. Additional fees, terms and 35 00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:53,360 Speaker 2: restrictions apply. See att dot com, slash Samsung or visit 36 00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:54,920 Speaker 2: an AT and T store for details. 37 00:01:57,840 --> 00:02:00,400 Speaker 4: As a United Explorer Card member, you can earn fifty 38 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:04,320 Speaker 4: thousand bonus miles plus look forward to extraordinary travel rewards, 39 00:02:04,440 --> 00:02:06,960 Speaker 4: including a free checked bag, two times the miles on 40 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:09,720 Speaker 4: United purchases and two times the miles on dining and 41 00:02:09,760 --> 00:02:13,079 Speaker 4: at hotels. Become an explorer and seek out unforgettable places 42 00:02:13,080 --> 00:02:16,520 Speaker 4: while enjoying rewards everywhere you travel. Cards issued by JP 43 00:02:16,600 --> 00:02:20,600 Speaker 4: Morgan Chase Bank NA Member FDIC subject to credit approval Offer, 44 00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:22,480 Speaker 4: subject to change terms apply. 45 00:02:31,320 --> 00:02:34,480 Speaker 1: Hey Jorge, what is your go to snack these days? 46 00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:35,040 Speaker 5: Uh? 47 00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:37,120 Speaker 3: Have you met me? Bananas? Of course? 48 00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:39,400 Speaker 1: I knew you were going to say that. 49 00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:42,639 Speaker 3: I knew I was predictable, so I kind of thought 50 00:02:42,639 --> 00:02:44,880 Speaker 3: about saying something else, but you didn't. Yeah, then I 51 00:02:44,919 --> 00:02:47,079 Speaker 3: figured you were expecting me to say something else, so 52 00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:49,480 Speaker 3: I was saying banana was maybe the real surprise. 53 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:52,440 Speaker 1: Well that's very clever, but I actually predicted that too. 54 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:56,320 Speaker 3: What impossible? Did you also predict what I'm gonna say next? 55 00:02:56,440 --> 00:02:58,600 Speaker 3: Like weasel or yeah, my lama and ding dong? 56 00:02:59,480 --> 00:03:03,640 Speaker 1: Totally, that's exactly what I predicted. What how is that possible? Well, 57 00:03:03,760 --> 00:03:05,480 Speaker 1: I wrote the script for this gold. 58 00:03:05,280 --> 00:03:07,239 Speaker 3: Open, Yes, but I always go off script. 59 00:03:07,480 --> 00:03:09,320 Speaker 1: Yes, but you do so very predictably. 60 00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:26,800 Speaker 3: Hi. I am Jorham, a cartoonist and the co author 61 00:03:26,840 --> 00:03:29,120 Speaker 3: of Frequently Asked Questions about the Universe. 62 00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:32,240 Speaker 1: Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor 63 00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:35,440 Speaker 1: at UC Irvine, and I am also quite predictable. 64 00:03:35,440 --> 00:03:37,600 Speaker 3: Oh yeah, do you have a regular routine that you 65 00:03:37,640 --> 00:03:38,320 Speaker 3: always stick to. 66 00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:42,000 Speaker 1: I do two podcast episodes a week with my friend Jorge. 67 00:03:42,160 --> 00:03:45,480 Speaker 3: Oh my goodness, that's a surprise that you're still friends 68 00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:47,200 Speaker 3: with this horney. 69 00:03:46,920 --> 00:03:49,040 Speaker 1: Guy and that people are still listening. 70 00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:51,240 Speaker 3: But what do you mean do you do not like surprises? 71 00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:53,240 Speaker 1: I am a creature of habit. I like to lay 72 00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:55,320 Speaker 1: out my schedule and follow it. My wife, on the 73 00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:58,800 Speaker 1: other hand, likes spontaneous adventure, so you know, at least 74 00:03:58,800 --> 00:03:59,880 Speaker 1: to some interesting conversation. 75 00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:01,680 Speaker 3: What about like lunch, Do you know what you're gonna 76 00:04:01,680 --> 00:04:02,800 Speaker 3: eat for lunch every day? 77 00:04:03,080 --> 00:04:06,000 Speaker 1: I do? Yeah, I eat exactly nothing for lunch every day, 78 00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:07,240 Speaker 1: so it's quite predictable. 79 00:04:07,320 --> 00:04:11,600 Speaker 3: So that makes choosing easy. You don't have to think 80 00:04:11,640 --> 00:04:13,840 Speaker 3: about it because there's nothing to think about exactly. 81 00:04:13,960 --> 00:04:15,960 Speaker 1: And you know, in our family, we used to argue 82 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:17,600 Speaker 1: a lot about what to eat for dinner, and then 83 00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:20,080 Speaker 1: we hammered it out into a weekly schedule, so we have, 84 00:04:20,160 --> 00:04:23,080 Speaker 1: you know, pasta on Mondays and tacos on Tuesdays, et cetera, 85 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:23,559 Speaker 1: et cetera. 86 00:04:23,839 --> 00:04:28,039 Speaker 3: Oh my goodness, completely predictable then until the end of time. 87 00:04:31,720 --> 00:04:34,240 Speaker 3: But what kind of tacos see, that's a big question. 88 00:04:34,480 --> 00:04:37,360 Speaker 3: You know, there's always room for improversation. 89 00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:39,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, we have to taco about it every time. 90 00:04:42,160 --> 00:04:45,320 Speaker 3: Do you have corn tortillas or flower tortillas? Is that 91 00:04:45,320 --> 00:04:46,159 Speaker 3: in your schedule too? 92 00:04:46,279 --> 00:04:47,560 Speaker 1: Oh, we make our own tortillas. 93 00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:50,599 Speaker 3: Yeah, corner flower combination, corn and flour. 94 00:04:50,400 --> 00:04:52,000 Speaker 1: Corner and flower. Yeah, a little bit of each. 95 00:04:52,120 --> 00:04:53,440 Speaker 3: It's like a quantum taco. 96 00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:56,520 Speaker 1: It's a superposition. 97 00:04:57,400 --> 00:05:01,200 Speaker 3: Yes, it's super taco and flower. Oh man, that's crazy. 98 00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:03,000 Speaker 3: Is it also chicken and carnitas? 99 00:05:05,440 --> 00:05:07,560 Speaker 1: It's one hundred percent delicious is what it is. 100 00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:10,200 Speaker 3: But anyways, welcome to our podcast Daniel lan Jorge Explain 101 00:05:10,279 --> 00:05:12,960 Speaker 3: the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio. 102 00:05:12,480 --> 00:05:15,360 Speaker 1: In which we roll up all the deliciousness of the 103 00:05:15,480 --> 00:05:20,080 Speaker 1: universe into a corn and flour and talk tortilla and 104 00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:23,159 Speaker 1: serve it all up to you. We fill that taco 105 00:05:23,279 --> 00:05:26,520 Speaker 1: up with the incredible mysteries that are the universe, the 106 00:05:26,560 --> 00:05:30,640 Speaker 1: weird quantum effects that seem to govern the microscopic nature 107 00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:35,159 Speaker 1: of reality, and the incredible emergent phenomena that we enjoy 108 00:05:35,360 --> 00:05:38,200 Speaker 1: and gaze at every night when we look at the stars. 109 00:05:38,360 --> 00:05:40,320 Speaker 1: We wonder about all of it, We talk about all 110 00:05:40,320 --> 00:05:42,440 Speaker 1: of it. We explain all of it, and we take 111 00:05:42,440 --> 00:05:44,320 Speaker 1: a big bite out of all of it with you. 112 00:05:44,480 --> 00:05:47,120 Speaker 3: That's right, we talk about it with you because it 113 00:05:47,200 --> 00:05:49,919 Speaker 3: is a pretty delicious and amazing universe ready to be 114 00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:54,360 Speaker 3: rolled up and sandwich between amazing conversation and dad jokes. 115 00:05:54,400 --> 00:05:56,560 Speaker 1: Hold on, do we just move from tacos to sandwiches, 116 00:05:56,600 --> 00:05:58,080 Speaker 1: because like, not the same thing? Man? 117 00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:01,400 Speaker 3: Well kind of? I think traditional timecos have two tortillas 118 00:06:01,480 --> 00:06:03,520 Speaker 3: and then you roll them up what or fold them? 119 00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:05,160 Speaker 1: What are you talking about? Seriously? 120 00:06:06,160 --> 00:06:07,800 Speaker 3: You not had taco from a taco truck? 121 00:06:07,880 --> 00:06:10,880 Speaker 1: Yeah, but that's two tortillas underneath the filling, right, That's 122 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:12,720 Speaker 1: not the same as a sandwich. 123 00:06:12,320 --> 00:06:14,960 Speaker 3: And then you fold them over right. Gosh, so you're 124 00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:16,880 Speaker 3: sandwiching kind of things between them, right. 125 00:06:17,200 --> 00:06:19,920 Speaker 1: You're seeing a sandwich and a taco or topologically equivalent. 126 00:06:19,960 --> 00:06:22,840 Speaker 1: We are wading into a big question here. Pretty soon 127 00:06:22,839 --> 00:06:24,400 Speaker 1: you're going to be saying a hot dog is a taco? 128 00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:28,120 Speaker 3: Mathematical food science, Yeah. 129 00:06:27,640 --> 00:06:30,240 Speaker 1: Well, I think that pizzas and tacos and sandwiches are 130 00:06:30,279 --> 00:06:32,159 Speaker 1: topologically non identical. 131 00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:36,120 Speaker 3: Well, here's a question. Is a cauzone a pizza taco 132 00:06:36,279 --> 00:06:42,080 Speaker 3: really or a pizza sandwich? That's like second derivative food 133 00:06:42,680 --> 00:06:43,400 Speaker 3: caculas there. 134 00:06:43,400 --> 00:06:44,880 Speaker 1: I think I have to go ask my friends in 135 00:06:44,920 --> 00:06:46,120 Speaker 1: the math department about that one. 136 00:06:46,640 --> 00:06:48,479 Speaker 3: Yes, I knew you were going to say that. But 137 00:06:48,560 --> 00:06:51,200 Speaker 3: it is a wonderful universe full of amazing and incredible 138 00:06:51,200 --> 00:06:54,720 Speaker 3: things that sometimes seem kind of unpredictable and random and chaotic. 139 00:06:54,839 --> 00:06:57,360 Speaker 3: But it's amazing that we've sort of looked out into 140 00:06:57,400 --> 00:06:59,480 Speaker 3: the universe and figured out that there is a little 141 00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:01,719 Speaker 3: bit of order to all of that. There are laws 142 00:07:01,800 --> 00:07:02,560 Speaker 3: to the universe. 143 00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:05,839 Speaker 1: Yeah. The great sweep of philosophy and science is to 144 00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:07,960 Speaker 1: try to look out in the universe and to wonder 145 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:11,640 Speaker 1: are their laws that describe the incredible complexity that we 146 00:07:11,720 --> 00:07:14,760 Speaker 1: see in the universe. Is that lightning striking that tree 147 00:07:14,880 --> 00:07:17,760 Speaker 1: because it's determined by some physical law or is it 148 00:07:17,880 --> 00:07:20,960 Speaker 1: just some god up there getting angry and deciding to 149 00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:24,320 Speaker 1: smite that tree. Can the universe actually be described in 150 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:28,200 Speaker 1: a compact set of mathematical rules which determine everything that happened, 151 00:07:28,600 --> 00:07:30,800 Speaker 1: or is there still a little bit of fuzz left 152 00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:31,760 Speaker 1: in those rules? 153 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:34,440 Speaker 3: Yeah? And if there are laws that govern how the 154 00:07:34,560 --> 00:07:37,960 Speaker 3: universe works down to the atomic and particle level, does 155 00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:41,520 Speaker 3: that mean that the universe is totally predictable because if 156 00:07:41,520 --> 00:07:44,000 Speaker 3: it follows laws, then you know what it's going to do. 157 00:07:44,080 --> 00:07:46,560 Speaker 1: Right, that's exactly right. And a few hundred years ago 158 00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:50,160 Speaker 1: there was this growing realization that, Wow, the universe does 159 00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:53,040 Speaker 1: seem to be kind of explainable. And if the universe 160 00:07:53,120 --> 00:07:56,400 Speaker 1: is explainable even on a microscopic scale, doesn't that mean 161 00:07:56,400 --> 00:07:59,720 Speaker 1: it's explainable on a macroscopic scale if everything is made 162 00:07:59,720 --> 00:08:02,760 Speaker 1: out of tiny little billiard balls and you can describe 163 00:08:02,760 --> 00:08:05,280 Speaker 1: and predict what happens when two billiard balls bump into 164 00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:08,320 Speaker 1: each other, and in principle, can't you describe and predict 165 00:08:08,360 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 1: what happens when ten to the twenty six billiard balls 166 00:08:11,320 --> 00:08:14,240 Speaker 1: bump into each other? Or even if you can't describe 167 00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:17,880 Speaker 1: it computationally, doesn't that mean that it is determined? It's 168 00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:19,240 Speaker 1: decided in advance. 169 00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:21,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's kind of this idea that we sort of 170 00:08:21,440 --> 00:08:24,560 Speaker 3: started to realize as we came to understand science and 171 00:08:24,600 --> 00:08:27,119 Speaker 3: physics a little bit more. It's kind of this idea 172 00:08:27,160 --> 00:08:29,880 Speaker 3: that maybe the universe was kind of like a giant clock, right, 173 00:08:29,920 --> 00:08:32,600 Speaker 3: that everything was like clockwork, and that you could totally 174 00:08:32,679 --> 00:08:35,640 Speaker 3: maybe predict or at least it seemed possible to predict 175 00:08:35,720 --> 00:08:37,920 Speaker 3: what the universe was going to do in the long term. 176 00:08:37,960 --> 00:08:40,559 Speaker 1: And it's sort of mind blowing, right to imagine that 177 00:08:40,600 --> 00:08:43,000 Speaker 1: these tiny little brains on this little rock in the 178 00:08:43,040 --> 00:08:46,880 Speaker 1: corner of the universe could like derive physical laws, could 179 00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:51,600 Speaker 1: like get the universe to reveal its actual underlying mechanism, 180 00:08:52,080 --> 00:08:54,840 Speaker 1: and that might determine the whole future of the universe. 181 00:08:54,880 --> 00:08:58,080 Speaker 1: I mean, like what Hubris, right, what incredible ego to 182 00:08:58,160 --> 00:09:01,040 Speaker 1: imagine that we could understand the universe and predict its 183 00:09:01,080 --> 00:09:04,960 Speaker 1: future becaulse like reveal its deepest mechanism, the rules that 184 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:08,000 Speaker 1: like force it to operate in a certain way. That 185 00:09:08,120 --> 00:09:11,119 Speaker 1: must have been a mind blowing sort of moment for physicists. 186 00:09:11,320 --> 00:09:13,840 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's pretty crazy. It's like a crazy plot, twis. 187 00:09:14,200 --> 00:09:16,160 Speaker 3: I wonder if the universe predicted that too. 188 00:09:16,040 --> 00:09:19,400 Speaker 1: And it's sort of terrifying and also a relief, you know, 189 00:09:19,600 --> 00:09:22,680 Speaker 1: Like it's terrifying to imagine that the universe is totally 190 00:09:22,679 --> 00:09:25,080 Speaker 1: predictable and that we are all sort of like locked 191 00:09:25,200 --> 00:09:28,400 Speaker 1: into a future that's determined by the past. But it's 192 00:09:28,440 --> 00:09:31,000 Speaker 1: also sort of terrifying to think that the universe like 193 00:09:31,320 --> 00:09:34,120 Speaker 1: doesn't make sense or doesn't follow laws that there are 194 00:09:34,160 --> 00:09:37,079 Speaker 1: like capricious beings up there that could just like decide 195 00:09:37,160 --> 00:09:39,880 Speaker 1: what gets zapp by lightning instead of, you know, following 196 00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:42,840 Speaker 1: some rules. I don't know which universe is more terrifying. 197 00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:44,960 Speaker 3: I mean, I guess the one that's unpredictable it's more 198 00:09:45,040 --> 00:09:45,679 Speaker 3: terrifying to. 199 00:09:45,640 --> 00:09:49,120 Speaker 1: You, Denny, all right, Yeah, exactly. 200 00:09:50,480 --> 00:09:51,440 Speaker 3: That was a hard question. 201 00:09:52,920 --> 00:09:55,240 Speaker 1: But emotionally it's sort of fascinating, you know, to think 202 00:09:55,280 --> 00:09:58,280 Speaker 1: about being locked into these physical laws. Of course, as 203 00:09:58,280 --> 00:10:00,240 Speaker 1: a person, as an individual, I want to know what 204 00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:02,600 Speaker 1: those laws are and how they work and spend my 205 00:10:02,679 --> 00:10:06,320 Speaker 1: life unraveling that mystery. But to imagine that the universe 206 00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:08,760 Speaker 1: is locked in, that everything that you do and that 207 00:10:08,880 --> 00:10:11,520 Speaker 1: happens to you is determined by what happened in the past, 208 00:10:11,559 --> 00:10:12,559 Speaker 1: that is sort of scary. 209 00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:15,960 Speaker 3: Yeah. I feel like this is getting a little psychological here, Daniel. 210 00:10:16,040 --> 00:10:18,320 Speaker 3: Is is physics for you? Just one big quest to 211 00:10:18,360 --> 00:10:20,760 Speaker 3: find order in the universe and predictability. 212 00:10:20,840 --> 00:10:22,480 Speaker 1: I do this instead of going to therapy. 213 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:24,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a lot cheaper too. 214 00:10:25,440 --> 00:10:29,120 Speaker 1: Probably I get paid to do this instead. 215 00:10:29,400 --> 00:10:32,800 Speaker 3: Instead of paying someone to do that to you. 216 00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:35,840 Speaker 1: No, I think it's psychological because it's philosophical and the 217 00:10:35,920 --> 00:10:38,839 Speaker 1: reason that we do physics is because there are big 218 00:10:38,920 --> 00:10:41,600 Speaker 1: consequences to the answers that we reveal. When we learn 219 00:10:41,679 --> 00:10:44,040 Speaker 1: the nature of the universe, it tells us something about 220 00:10:44,040 --> 00:10:45,880 Speaker 1: what it's like to be human and what the rules 221 00:10:45,920 --> 00:10:48,400 Speaker 1: are and what the boundaries are for our lives. And 222 00:10:48,440 --> 00:10:51,680 Speaker 1: so I think, yeah, there are big psychological implications to 223 00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:54,080 Speaker 1: understanding how the universe works. 224 00:10:54,040 --> 00:10:56,240 Speaker 3: And so open to maybe about one hundred years ago, 225 00:10:56,280 --> 00:10:58,560 Speaker 3: we thought that maybe the universe was like a big 226 00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:00,560 Speaker 3: clog and that you could predict what it was going 227 00:11:00,640 --> 00:11:03,439 Speaker 3: to do like a giant seat of a clockwork gears 228 00:11:03,520 --> 00:11:08,160 Speaker 3: following Newton's laws. But then somebody learned that things aren't 229 00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:11,320 Speaker 3: quite that way at the molecular level, at the atomic level. 230 00:11:11,360 --> 00:11:13,440 Speaker 1: That's right. You might be puzzling over why we're talking 231 00:11:13,440 --> 00:11:16,960 Speaker 1: about the universe as deterministic, because quantum mechanics paints a 232 00:11:17,120 --> 00:11:20,640 Speaker 1: different picture of the universe at its very smallest scale. 233 00:11:20,679 --> 00:11:22,600 Speaker 1: Even though you're made out of ten to the twenty 234 00:11:22,640 --> 00:11:26,199 Speaker 1: six little objects, those objects are quantum objects, and they 235 00:11:26,240 --> 00:11:29,040 Speaker 1: don't follow the same rules as billiard balls or base 236 00:11:29,080 --> 00:11:31,280 Speaker 1: balls or any other kind of balls. They might not 237 00:11:31,400 --> 00:11:35,240 Speaker 1: even be balls. They follow very strange rules, and their 238 00:11:35,280 --> 00:11:38,160 Speaker 1: futures are not necessarily determined by their past. 239 00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:41,360 Speaker 3: Are we talking about strange balls in this episode of that? 240 00:11:43,840 --> 00:11:45,840 Speaker 3: I feel like this might be going into not safer 241 00:11:45,880 --> 00:11:49,559 Speaker 3: work territory. But as you said, we learned that quantum 242 00:11:49,600 --> 00:11:51,319 Speaker 3: mechanic cells is that there is sort of like an 243 00:11:51,320 --> 00:11:55,920 Speaker 3: inherent randomness in the universe at the very smallest levels, 244 00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:58,680 Speaker 3: Like there are things we can't possibly ever know, Like 245 00:11:58,720 --> 00:12:02,760 Speaker 3: there's a certain uncertain tea at the very smallest levels 246 00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:04,040 Speaker 3: of velocity and position. 247 00:12:04,200 --> 00:12:06,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, it gives you a really different view of how 248 00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:10,600 Speaker 1: the universe works, right, like the fundamental mechanism for how 249 00:12:10,640 --> 00:12:14,120 Speaker 1: things operate at the smallest level and really fascinating twist. 250 00:12:14,160 --> 00:12:16,360 Speaker 1: Of course, it doesn't change how things work at the 251 00:12:16,480 --> 00:12:19,320 Speaker 1: large level, right like you and me and baseballs and 252 00:12:19,360 --> 00:12:22,920 Speaker 1: billiard balls can all still be deterministic even if we're 253 00:12:22,960 --> 00:12:26,600 Speaker 1: made out of tiny little things which are fundamentally fuzzy. 254 00:12:26,640 --> 00:12:28,720 Speaker 3: I guess you can still predict what strange balls are 255 00:12:28,720 --> 00:12:29,120 Speaker 3: going to do. 256 00:12:31,240 --> 00:12:33,160 Speaker 1: You can still predict that they will make Daniel giggle 257 00:12:33,240 --> 00:12:33,920 Speaker 1: on the podcast. 258 00:12:36,080 --> 00:12:38,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, so that was a big revolution in our thinking, 259 00:12:38,240 --> 00:12:40,760 Speaker 3: going from like things are like clockwork in the universe too. 260 00:12:40,880 --> 00:12:44,240 Speaker 3: Maybe there is an inherent unpredictability or randomness to the 261 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:46,360 Speaker 3: universe that we can never ever predict, right. 262 00:12:46,440 --> 00:12:48,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, it was a big shift and also maybe a 263 00:12:48,800 --> 00:12:51,160 Speaker 1: bit of a relief, right, Like, who it turns out 264 00:12:51,200 --> 00:12:53,880 Speaker 1: that maybe I'm not locked into a set of consequences 265 00:12:54,000 --> 00:12:56,920 Speaker 1: that were determined by everything that happened in my childhood, 266 00:12:56,960 --> 00:12:59,959 Speaker 1: you know, And there's philosophical consequences there. People wonder if 267 00:13:00,040 --> 00:13:02,600 Speaker 1: it means there might be free will because our actions 268 00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:06,359 Speaker 1: are not predetermined. So this question of quantum mechanical randomness 269 00:13:06,360 --> 00:13:10,240 Speaker 1: and free will and like human autonomy and the soul 270 00:13:10,360 --> 00:13:12,199 Speaker 1: and all this kind of stuff, There's been a lot 271 00:13:12,240 --> 00:13:14,720 Speaker 1: of discussion about what it means for the universe to 272 00:13:14,720 --> 00:13:16,120 Speaker 1: be fundamentally random. 273 00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:18,560 Speaker 3: Right, because I guess if tiny little particles are sort 274 00:13:18,559 --> 00:13:21,600 Speaker 3: of random, right, or they act in random ways, then 275 00:13:21,679 --> 00:13:24,240 Speaker 3: that means that as you add them up, then maybe 276 00:13:24,280 --> 00:13:26,760 Speaker 3: like people are random too, or like unpredictable. 277 00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:29,000 Speaker 1: At least there's the whole field of people trying to 278 00:13:29,040 --> 00:13:32,880 Speaker 1: understand whether quantum particles and their randomness actually do add 279 00:13:32,960 --> 00:13:36,520 Speaker 1: up to unpredictability for larger objects like me and you 280 00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:39,319 Speaker 1: and hippos, or if it's more like baseball's where the 281 00:13:39,400 --> 00:13:42,360 Speaker 1: quantum randomness sort of like averages out and doesn't affect 282 00:13:42,400 --> 00:13:43,480 Speaker 1: the path of a baseball. 283 00:13:43,679 --> 00:13:45,360 Speaker 3: So that's been kind of our thinking for the last 284 00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:48,920 Speaker 3: one hundred years, and things are random at a fundamental level, 285 00:13:49,200 --> 00:13:52,880 Speaker 3: But maybe things are starting to come back around from 286 00:13:52,920 --> 00:13:53,760 Speaker 3: that today. 287 00:13:53,840 --> 00:13:55,800 Speaker 1: That's right. There are a series of experiments in last 288 00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:59,880 Speaker 1: few decades which seem to conclusively prove that the universe 289 00:13:59,920 --> 00:14:03,600 Speaker 1: is fundamentally quantum mechanical, that it is not deterministic at 290 00:14:03,600 --> 00:14:06,520 Speaker 1: the smallest scale. But there's a lot of controversy about 291 00:14:06,520 --> 00:14:09,480 Speaker 1: those experiments and exactly what they mean and what the 292 00:14:09,559 --> 00:14:13,439 Speaker 1: loopholes are in those experiments, and there's some really fun 293 00:14:13,520 --> 00:14:17,959 Speaker 1: ideas that might be able to recover deterministic thinking about 294 00:14:17,960 --> 00:14:18,680 Speaker 1: our universe. 295 00:14:18,880 --> 00:14:21,200 Speaker 3: So today on the podcast, we'll be asking the question 296 00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:28,920 Speaker 3: what is super determinism. 297 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:30,120 Speaker 1: I thought you were going to say that in a 298 00:14:30,200 --> 00:14:31,680 Speaker 1: sort of like a Superman voice. 299 00:14:31,920 --> 00:14:37,840 Speaker 3: Super determinism is that like the alter ego of mild manner. 300 00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:42,000 Speaker 1: Determinism exactly, determinism just works in the local newspaper and 301 00:14:42,040 --> 00:14:42,880 Speaker 1: wears glasses. 302 00:14:43,680 --> 00:14:46,560 Speaker 3: Did it escape from a dying planet in a pod? 303 00:14:48,040 --> 00:14:50,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, it must have a fatal flaw. So what is 304 00:14:50,200 --> 00:14:51,840 Speaker 1: the fatal flaw of superdeterminism. 305 00:14:51,960 --> 00:14:56,080 Speaker 3: I think it's quantum mechanics reaps, it's physic site kryptonite 306 00:14:56,160 --> 00:14:58,760 Speaker 3: quantum mechanics. But this is an interesting idea. I feel 307 00:14:58,760 --> 00:15:01,240 Speaker 3: like we're sort of swinging back and forth like a pendulum. 308 00:15:01,280 --> 00:15:04,080 Speaker 3: Like we thought we were like clockwork and deterministic, but 309 00:15:04,160 --> 00:15:07,120 Speaker 3: then then quantum mechanics came around and we realized things 310 00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:09,400 Speaker 3: were actually kind of random. But now it's kind of 311 00:15:09,400 --> 00:15:12,040 Speaker 3: swinging all the other way around. That says that maybe 312 00:15:12,080 --> 00:15:13,960 Speaker 3: quantum mechanics is not totally random. 313 00:15:14,040 --> 00:15:16,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I think it's because it's hard to grapple 314 00:15:16,560 --> 00:15:19,520 Speaker 1: with the consequences of these experiments. If you accept that 315 00:15:19,520 --> 00:15:22,840 Speaker 1: the universe is fundamentally random, like that is weird, man, 316 00:15:23,120 --> 00:15:24,920 Speaker 1: even if it gives you an opportunity to not be 317 00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:28,160 Speaker 1: predictable and you like that, it is strange to think 318 00:15:28,160 --> 00:15:32,640 Speaker 1: about the universe picking numbers at random, deciding for every electron, 319 00:15:32,640 --> 00:15:34,000 Speaker 1: oh it's going to go left, or oh it's going 320 00:15:34,080 --> 00:15:36,760 Speaker 1: to go right. That is really funky and it really 321 00:15:36,840 --> 00:15:40,400 Speaker 1: counter to our intuitive understanding of how the universe works. 322 00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:43,760 Speaker 1: And so that's been very difficult for people, including physicists, right, 323 00:15:43,800 --> 00:15:47,120 Speaker 1: like Einstein to swallow, and so it makes people think 324 00:15:47,160 --> 00:15:49,520 Speaker 1: creatively and try to like find ways around it, like 325 00:15:49,600 --> 00:15:52,040 Speaker 1: are you really sure that it has to be that way? 326 00:15:52,120 --> 00:15:54,800 Speaker 1: Couldn't it possibly actually still be deterministic? 327 00:15:54,880 --> 00:15:57,000 Speaker 3: Yep. It's always good to ask these questions because you 328 00:15:57,040 --> 00:15:58,880 Speaker 3: never know. Maybe what do you think is true is 329 00:15:58,920 --> 00:16:01,440 Speaker 3: actually not true. You just have to ask the question 330 00:16:01,480 --> 00:16:02,560 Speaker 3: and come up with the experiment. 331 00:16:02,600 --> 00:16:04,760 Speaker 1: And remember, it's the experiments that really tell us what 332 00:16:04,840 --> 00:16:08,000 Speaker 1: we know. It's not about these theoretical constructs. It's about 333 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:11,160 Speaker 1: what the experiments have said, and so it's really crucial 334 00:16:11,200 --> 00:16:14,120 Speaker 1: to understand what are the loopholes in those experiments, what 335 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:16,920 Speaker 1: do they really measure, and what does that actually tell 336 00:16:17,000 --> 00:16:20,880 Speaker 1: us about the universe, because sometimes all the interesting stuff 337 00:16:20,920 --> 00:16:21,880 Speaker 1: is in the loopholes. 338 00:16:21,960 --> 00:16:23,920 Speaker 3: So, as usual, we were wondering how many people out 339 00:16:23,920 --> 00:16:27,200 Speaker 3: there had heard of this theory of super determinism, So 340 00:16:27,280 --> 00:16:29,760 Speaker 3: Daniel went out there into the wild of the internet. 341 00:16:29,800 --> 00:16:30,800 Speaker 3: I think right, yep. 342 00:16:30,840 --> 00:16:33,640 Speaker 1: These come from our cadre of Internet volunteers who are 343 00:16:33,680 --> 00:16:37,880 Speaker 1: willing to answer weird philosophical questions about tricky physics topics 344 00:16:37,920 --> 00:16:40,520 Speaker 1: without any chance to look things up. So thank you 345 00:16:40,600 --> 00:16:43,360 Speaker 1: very much to everybody who participated. If you enjoy hearing 346 00:16:43,360 --> 00:16:45,960 Speaker 1: these and you'd like to hear your voice on the podcast, 347 00:16:46,040 --> 00:16:48,520 Speaker 1: please don't be shy. Write to us to questions at 348 00:16:48,560 --> 00:16:50,160 Speaker 1: Danielandjorge dot com. 349 00:16:50,200 --> 00:16:51,680 Speaker 3: So think about it for a second. What do you 350 00:16:51,720 --> 00:16:55,680 Speaker 3: think super determinism is. Here's what people had to say. 351 00:16:55,840 --> 00:16:57,000 Speaker 2: Sounds like a made up word. 352 00:16:58,160 --> 00:16:59,960 Speaker 6: So I'm going to say it's the kind of intense 353 00:17:00,120 --> 00:17:03,600 Speaker 6: determination thanus exhibited when obtaining the infinity stones. 354 00:17:04,160 --> 00:17:05,960 Speaker 7: I have absolutely no idea. I'm going to say it 355 00:17:06,000 --> 00:17:10,880 Speaker 7: has something to do with the fact that I've heard 356 00:17:10,880 --> 00:17:13,520 Speaker 7: it said we actually have no free will, and cause 357 00:17:13,520 --> 00:17:15,960 Speaker 7: and effect stems from entropy or something like that. I 358 00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:16,320 Speaker 7: don't know. 359 00:17:16,560 --> 00:17:20,080 Speaker 8: I guess that super determinism means that the universe at 360 00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:23,840 Speaker 8: the macroscopic level is predictable. It does indeed act like 361 00:17:23,880 --> 00:17:28,160 Speaker 8: clockwork because of the quantum effects being statistically averaged away 362 00:17:28,640 --> 00:17:31,840 Speaker 8: on a large scale. So perhaps at the macroscopic level, 363 00:17:32,000 --> 00:17:33,160 Speaker 8: God doesn't play dice. 364 00:17:33,440 --> 00:17:33,760 Speaker 3: Well. 365 00:17:34,080 --> 00:17:40,000 Speaker 1: I don't know exactly, but it must be something, something 366 00:17:40,080 --> 00:17:42,720 Speaker 1: interesting because starts with super I think it. 367 00:17:42,680 --> 00:17:45,879 Speaker 9: Has to do with determinism, with the fact that knowing 368 00:17:47,200 --> 00:17:50,760 Speaker 9: a particle's position and velocity at any given time you 369 00:17:50,800 --> 00:17:55,760 Speaker 9: could determine the position and velocity of that particle any 370 00:17:55,800 --> 00:18:00,040 Speaker 9: other point in time, so you could say that the 371 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:01,960 Speaker 9: future is fixed. 372 00:18:02,720 --> 00:18:05,240 Speaker 1: I say it has something to do with that. 373 00:18:05,440 --> 00:18:10,359 Speaker 6: Super determinism is something that only philosophers worry about at 374 00:18:10,440 --> 00:18:13,679 Speaker 6: night or particle physicists, and it must have to do 375 00:18:13,800 --> 00:18:15,639 Speaker 6: with fate destiny. 376 00:18:15,920 --> 00:18:21,080 Speaker 10: If determinism is just things being very determined, superdeterminism would 377 00:18:21,119 --> 00:18:25,199 Speaker 10: be things being very much so very determined. So I 378 00:18:25,200 --> 00:18:30,480 Speaker 10: guess like that everything is very much predetermined, so like 379 00:18:31,200 --> 00:18:34,480 Speaker 10: extreme cause and effect of things and particles. 380 00:18:34,560 --> 00:18:34,959 Speaker 4: I don't know. 381 00:18:35,080 --> 00:18:39,119 Speaker 11: I'm just gonna guess on this one. Also, I think, 382 00:18:39,359 --> 00:18:41,800 Speaker 11: you know, determinism is the fact that there's no such 383 00:18:41,840 --> 00:18:46,280 Speaker 11: thing as free will, So maybe super determinism is the 384 00:18:46,280 --> 00:18:50,400 Speaker 11: opposite that there is a way to find free will 385 00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:52,000 Speaker 11: in the world. 386 00:18:52,240 --> 00:19:00,000 Speaker 3: All right, very determined answers, very very determined, a little predictable. 387 00:19:00,040 --> 00:19:02,880 Speaker 3: So I knew that we're going to say this, Yeah, exactly. 388 00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:06,000 Speaker 3: Some people here confused with the idea of being determined, 389 00:19:06,240 --> 00:19:09,080 Speaker 3: like having a lot of purpose and willpower. 390 00:19:09,160 --> 00:19:11,359 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think my teenagers are super deterministic. 391 00:19:11,440 --> 00:19:16,000 Speaker 3: Sometimes they're determined to be undetermined. 392 00:19:15,760 --> 00:19:18,200 Speaker 1: Exactly, They're determined not to listen. 393 00:19:17,960 --> 00:19:20,960 Speaker 3: To me, So let's dive into this Daniels superdeterminism. I 394 00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:23,440 Speaker 3: guess determinism wasn't doing it, so they had to call 395 00:19:23,480 --> 00:19:27,760 Speaker 3: in superdeterminism, you know as reinforcements. But then, who knows, 396 00:19:27,760 --> 00:19:32,320 Speaker 3: maybe the next episode will cover ultra quantum mechanics, ubermin 397 00:19:32,920 --> 00:19:33,920 Speaker 3: quantum mechanics. 398 00:19:34,560 --> 00:19:36,960 Speaker 1: You knock it down, we just come back with something stronger. 399 00:19:37,040 --> 00:19:38,919 Speaker 3: So maybe it's start with the basics here. Is there 400 00:19:38,960 --> 00:19:42,680 Speaker 3: sort of like a physical or mathematical definition of determinism. 401 00:19:42,760 --> 00:19:45,359 Speaker 1: Yes, So a deterministic view of the universe is one 402 00:19:45,480 --> 00:19:49,199 Speaker 1: in which the future is completely determined by the past. 403 00:19:49,560 --> 00:19:51,840 Speaker 1: So you have a set of initial conditions, meaning like 404 00:19:52,080 --> 00:19:55,000 Speaker 1: you know the location and the velocity of every object 405 00:19:55,080 --> 00:19:57,600 Speaker 1: in the universe, and you have rules for what's going 406 00:19:57,640 --> 00:20:01,000 Speaker 1: to happen to those next, including like collision or near misses. 407 00:20:01,400 --> 00:20:04,479 Speaker 1: Then you can predict exactly what's going to happen. So 408 00:20:04,520 --> 00:20:08,320 Speaker 1: the future is determined by the past. The initial conditions 409 00:20:08,320 --> 00:20:11,520 Speaker 1: and the rules of the universe determine exactly what will happen. 410 00:20:11,560 --> 00:20:13,560 Speaker 1: That's a deterministic set of laws. 411 00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:15,600 Speaker 3: Right, Like if you have a little ball strange or not, 412 00:20:15,720 --> 00:20:17,000 Speaker 3: and you have a little ball, and you know where 413 00:20:17,000 --> 00:20:19,320 Speaker 3: it is and what velocity is going at. You can 414 00:20:19,359 --> 00:20:21,760 Speaker 3: sort of know the future, right, Like you know the 415 00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:23,680 Speaker 3: trajectory that ball is going to take through the air, 416 00:20:23,720 --> 00:20:25,200 Speaker 3: and you know where it's going to land, and so 417 00:20:25,320 --> 00:20:27,199 Speaker 3: you can go there and catch it. That's really like 418 00:20:27,280 --> 00:20:28,360 Speaker 3: predicting the future, right. 419 00:20:28,400 --> 00:20:30,520 Speaker 1: It really is predicting the future. And when I was 420 00:20:30,520 --> 00:20:32,840 Speaker 1: a high schooler first taking physics, that's the thing that 421 00:20:33,080 --> 00:20:34,960 Speaker 1: attracted me to it the most. I was like, oh 422 00:20:34,960 --> 00:20:38,360 Speaker 1: my gosh, you can actually predict the future with physics. 423 00:20:38,359 --> 00:20:41,119 Speaker 1: It's sort of incredible. It's an amazing power, and it's 424 00:20:41,160 --> 00:20:44,479 Speaker 1: something that you also sort of know intuitively, right, if 425 00:20:44,520 --> 00:20:47,159 Speaker 1: you are throwing the ball to somebody who's running really fast, 426 00:20:47,200 --> 00:20:49,159 Speaker 1: you know sort of how to throw it so that 427 00:20:49,200 --> 00:20:51,040 Speaker 1: it gets to them at the right moment. You know, 428 00:20:51,080 --> 00:20:53,359 Speaker 1: you factor in their velocity and their direction and all 429 00:20:53,400 --> 00:20:55,359 Speaker 1: this kind of stuff. You don't expect that when you 430 00:20:55,359 --> 00:20:57,320 Speaker 1: throw the ball it's going to take like a random 431 00:20:57,400 --> 00:20:59,800 Speaker 1: left turn or a random right turn. You think that 432 00:21:00,040 --> 00:21:02,080 Speaker 1: mostly it follows the same rules. And that's why we 433 00:21:02,160 --> 00:21:05,800 Speaker 1: practice sports, right. Pictures practice pitching because they can throw 434 00:21:05,840 --> 00:21:07,680 Speaker 1: them ball the same way over and over again and 435 00:21:07,800 --> 00:21:09,160 Speaker 1: get it into the catcher's mid. 436 00:21:09,200 --> 00:21:12,120 Speaker 3: Right, right, Unless you're using strange balls, then who knows 437 00:21:12,119 --> 00:21:13,680 Speaker 3: what they thought? 438 00:21:13,680 --> 00:21:17,080 Speaker 1: We were staying away from that joke man. 439 00:21:18,280 --> 00:21:19,920 Speaker 3: Predictably, I cannot. 440 00:21:19,800 --> 00:21:22,160 Speaker 1: Strange balls and strange strikes in this case. 441 00:21:22,320 --> 00:21:25,119 Speaker 3: So that's the deterministic university idea that like, you know, 442 00:21:25,119 --> 00:21:26,720 Speaker 3: if you can predict where a ball is going to land, me, 443 00:21:26,880 --> 00:21:29,960 Speaker 3: you can predict everything down to like planets and galaxies, 444 00:21:29,960 --> 00:21:32,359 Speaker 3: and also down to the small levels, like you know, 445 00:21:33,000 --> 00:21:36,200 Speaker 3: tiny little particles if they move like little balls, and 446 00:21:36,280 --> 00:21:37,720 Speaker 3: you can sort of predict what they're going to do, 447 00:21:37,840 --> 00:21:40,720 Speaker 3: and you can maybe predict the entire universe exactly. 448 00:21:41,359 --> 00:21:44,040 Speaker 1: So that's fascinating. But then, of course quantum mechanics sort 449 00:21:44,080 --> 00:21:45,119 Speaker 1: of upends that, right. 450 00:21:45,240 --> 00:21:49,359 Speaker 3: Quantum mechanics says that things are not determined. Things are 451 00:21:49,400 --> 00:21:51,720 Speaker 3: sort of random at a very basic level, like you 452 00:21:51,800 --> 00:21:54,600 Speaker 3: can't know something's position of velocity perfectly. 453 00:21:55,640 --> 00:21:57,879 Speaker 1: And it's important to understand what quantum mechanics sort of 454 00:21:57,960 --> 00:22:00,680 Speaker 1: does and doesn't say about the universe. It doesn't say 455 00:22:00,680 --> 00:22:03,280 Speaker 1: that like things are totally random, that electrons just like 456 00:22:03,359 --> 00:22:05,960 Speaker 1: do whatever they want. You know, there's no like brain 457 00:22:06,040 --> 00:22:08,359 Speaker 1: in there deciding that's just going to cruise over here 458 00:22:08,400 --> 00:22:11,880 Speaker 1: and cruise over there. Right, Quantum mechanics is still deterministic 459 00:22:11,920 --> 00:22:15,760 Speaker 1: in one way, it's just not deterministic about specific outcomes. Instead, 460 00:22:15,800 --> 00:22:19,440 Speaker 1: it's deterministic about probabilities. So, like quantum mechanics, there are 461 00:22:19,560 --> 00:22:22,400 Speaker 1: laws and it says the electron has a certain probability 462 00:22:22,400 --> 00:22:24,480 Speaker 1: to be here and a certain probability to be there. 463 00:22:24,760 --> 00:22:27,840 Speaker 1: That's fixed based on the previous data, Like what happened 464 00:22:27,840 --> 00:22:30,520 Speaker 1: to the electron in the past determines the probabilities for 465 00:22:30,600 --> 00:22:34,240 Speaker 1: its future. It just doesn't determine the actual outcome. When 466 00:22:34,240 --> 00:22:36,960 Speaker 1: it comes to like measuring where the electron is, the 467 00:22:37,080 --> 00:22:39,919 Speaker 1: universe then decides, well, is it actually over here or 468 00:22:40,000 --> 00:22:42,159 Speaker 1: is it actually over there? Is it spin up or 469 00:22:42,240 --> 00:22:45,560 Speaker 1: is it spin down? So the actual specific outcome for 470 00:22:45,600 --> 00:22:48,639 Speaker 1: a quantum object isn't determined until you measure it, but 471 00:22:48,720 --> 00:22:51,240 Speaker 1: the probabilities are determined in advance. 472 00:22:51,440 --> 00:22:51,600 Speaker 12: Right. 473 00:22:51,640 --> 00:22:54,159 Speaker 3: Although in quantum mechanics, isn't it sort of impossible to 474 00:22:54,240 --> 00:22:57,200 Speaker 3: know the initial conditions of something of like an electron 475 00:22:57,280 --> 00:22:59,439 Speaker 3: or a particle that you can't ever know where it 476 00:22:59,480 --> 00:23:01,240 Speaker 3: is and where it's going, Right. 477 00:23:01,040 --> 00:23:03,480 Speaker 1: You're exactly right. You can't know all of the information 478 00:23:03,520 --> 00:23:06,359 Speaker 1: about its specific location and its velocity. Here. What we 479 00:23:06,440 --> 00:23:09,680 Speaker 1: mean is you know it's quantum state, which includes all 480 00:23:09,720 --> 00:23:12,160 Speaker 1: of that fuzz. So if you know the quantum state 481 00:23:12,200 --> 00:23:14,880 Speaker 1: of the electron, it's probability for where it is right now, 482 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:17,359 Speaker 1: then you can predict its quantum state in the future. 483 00:23:17,520 --> 00:23:20,240 Speaker 1: It's probabilities for where it's going to be in the future. 484 00:23:20,280 --> 00:23:22,400 Speaker 1: So you have an electron over here and it's doing something. 485 00:23:22,400 --> 00:23:24,320 Speaker 1: You don't know exactly where it is, but it has 486 00:23:24,359 --> 00:23:26,760 Speaker 1: some probabilities to be here or there, and you do 487 00:23:26,840 --> 00:23:28,720 Speaker 1: something out of it, like you fire a photon at it, 488 00:23:28,760 --> 00:23:32,199 Speaker 1: then you can predict what its new probabilities are. So 489 00:23:32,240 --> 00:23:34,199 Speaker 1: you don't have to know exactly where it was, but 490 00:23:34,240 --> 00:23:37,760 Speaker 1: you can predict how its probabilities will evolve with time. 491 00:23:38,000 --> 00:23:40,159 Speaker 3: Right, it's almost like if you throw a ball, you 492 00:23:40,200 --> 00:23:41,920 Speaker 3: don't know if it's going to be a right or left, 493 00:23:41,920 --> 00:23:44,080 Speaker 3: but you know that half of the time maybe it's 494 00:23:44,119 --> 00:23:45,800 Speaker 3: going to vir right and half of the time it's 495 00:23:45,840 --> 00:23:47,119 Speaker 3: going to bear to the left, but you know you 496 00:23:47,160 --> 00:23:49,760 Speaker 3: don't know any particular throw which way it's going. 497 00:23:49,760 --> 00:23:52,440 Speaker 1: To hear exactly. Or if you roll to dice, then 498 00:23:52,480 --> 00:23:55,160 Speaker 1: you know what the distribution of outcomes are, even though 499 00:23:55,160 --> 00:23:58,000 Speaker 1: you don't know what any individual outcome are. Now that's 500 00:23:58,000 --> 00:24:00,439 Speaker 1: a little bit of a tricky analogy because dice actually 501 00:24:00,480 --> 00:24:03,200 Speaker 1: are deterministic, and the reason you don't know the outcome 502 00:24:03,280 --> 00:24:06,000 Speaker 1: is not because they're truly quantum mechanical and random. They're 503 00:24:06,000 --> 00:24:09,679 Speaker 1: actually just chaotic. So it's approximately random. The universe, we 504 00:24:09,680 --> 00:24:11,960 Speaker 1: think is actually random, but it's sort of in the 505 00:24:12,000 --> 00:24:16,120 Speaker 1: same way that it describes the probabilities of various outcomes 506 00:24:16,240 --> 00:24:19,280 Speaker 1: very specifically, but doesn't actually pick which outcome until you 507 00:24:19,320 --> 00:24:21,800 Speaker 1: collapse the wave function. For those of you who wonder, like, well, 508 00:24:21,800 --> 00:24:23,760 Speaker 1: how does that happen? What does it mean to collapse 509 00:24:23,760 --> 00:24:25,879 Speaker 1: the wave function? What's going on there? Check out our 510 00:24:25,920 --> 00:24:28,960 Speaker 1: episode about wave functions and collapse with Adam Becker. 511 00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:31,399 Speaker 3: Cool. So that's kind of the prevailing view of the universe, 512 00:24:31,400 --> 00:24:33,760 Speaker 3: that it's quantum mechanical and that it's random at a 513 00:24:33,840 --> 00:24:37,360 Speaker 3: very fundamental level, that it's not deterministic. But maybe there's 514 00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:40,640 Speaker 3: something wrong with the experiments that nat us think that way. 515 00:24:41,119 --> 00:24:43,720 Speaker 3: So let's get into what those experiments are and what 516 00:24:43,880 --> 00:24:46,960 Speaker 3: is superdeterminism. But first, let's take a quick break. 517 00:24:50,560 --> 00:24:53,480 Speaker 1: With big wireless providers. What you see is never what 518 00:24:53,600 --> 00:24:56,280 Speaker 1: you get somewhere between the store and your first month's bill. 519 00:24:56,320 --> 00:24:59,399 Speaker 1: The price you thoughts you we're paying magically skyrockets With 520 00:24:59,480 --> 00:25:02,240 Speaker 1: mint Mobile, Well you'll never have to worry about gotcha's 521 00:25:02,280 --> 00:25:05,040 Speaker 1: ever again. When Mint Mobile says fifteen dollars a month 522 00:25:05,080 --> 00:25:07,560 Speaker 1: for a three month plan, they really mean it. I've 523 00:25:07,640 --> 00:25:09,879 Speaker 1: used mint Mobile and the call quality is always so 524 00:25:10,040 --> 00:25:12,399 Speaker 1: crisp and so clear. I can recommend it to you. 525 00:25:12,680 --> 00:25:15,400 Speaker 1: So say bye bye to your overpriced wireless plans, jaw 526 00:25:15,520 --> 00:25:18,800 Speaker 1: dropping monthly bills and unexpected overages. You can use your 527 00:25:18,880 --> 00:25:21,480 Speaker 1: own phone with any Mint Mobile plan and bring your 528 00:25:21,520 --> 00:25:24,600 Speaker 1: phone number along with your existing contacts. So dit your 529 00:25:24,600 --> 00:25:27,240 Speaker 1: overpriced wireless with mint Mobiles deal and get three months 530 00:25:27,240 --> 00:25:30,040 Speaker 1: a premium wireless service for fifteen bucks a month. To 531 00:25:30,080 --> 00:25:32,040 Speaker 1: get this new customer offer and your new three month 532 00:25:32,080 --> 00:25:34,199 Speaker 1: premium wireless plan for just fifteen bucks a month, go 533 00:25:34,200 --> 00:25:37,560 Speaker 1: to mintmobile dot com slash universe. That's mintmobile dot com 534 00:25:37,600 --> 00:25:40,040 Speaker 1: slash universe. Cut your wireless bill to fifteen bucks a 535 00:25:40,040 --> 00:25:42,880 Speaker 1: month At mintmobile dot com slash universe. Forty five dollars 536 00:25:42,960 --> 00:25:45,679 Speaker 1: upfront payment required equivalent to fifteen dollars per month. New 537 00:25:45,680 --> 00:25:48,440 Speaker 1: customers on first three month plan only speeds slower about 538 00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:51,639 Speaker 1: forty gigabytes on unlimited plan. Additional taxi speed and restrictions apply. 539 00:25:51,720 --> 00:25:53,119 Speaker 1: See mint Mobile for details. 540 00:25:53,320 --> 00:25:56,359 Speaker 13: AI might be the most important new computer technology ever. 541 00:25:56,600 --> 00:25:59,760 Speaker 13: It's storming every industry and literally billions of dollars are 542 00:25:59,800 --> 00:26:04,080 Speaker 13: being invested, so buckle up. The problem is that AI 543 00:26:04,200 --> 00:26:07,040 Speaker 13: needs a lot of speed and processing power, So how 544 00:26:07,040 --> 00:26:10,200 Speaker 13: do you compete without cost spiraling out of control. It's 545 00:26:10,240 --> 00:26:12,560 Speaker 13: time to upgrade to the next generation of the cloud. 546 00:26:12,880 --> 00:26:18,040 Speaker 13: Oracle Cloud Infrastructure or OCI. OCI is a single platform 547 00:26:18,080 --> 00:26:22,960 Speaker 13: for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs. OCI 548 00:26:23,119 --> 00:26:25,480 Speaker 13: has four to eight times the bandwidth of other clouds, 549 00:26:25,840 --> 00:26:29,399 Speaker 13: offers one consistent price instead of variable regional pricing, and 550 00:26:29,480 --> 00:26:32,600 Speaker 13: of course nobody does data better than Oracle. So now 551 00:26:32,640 --> 00:26:34,840 Speaker 13: you can train your AI models at twice the speed 552 00:26:35,040 --> 00:26:37,359 Speaker 13: and less than half the cost of other clouds. If 553 00:26:37,400 --> 00:26:39,600 Speaker 13: you want to do more and spend less, like Uber 554 00:26:39,760 --> 00:26:42,400 Speaker 13: eight y eight and Data Bricks Mosaic, take a free 555 00:26:42,400 --> 00:26:46,320 Speaker 13: test drive of OCI at Oracle dot com slash strategic. 556 00:26:46,640 --> 00:26:51,880 Speaker 13: That's Oracle dot com slash Strategic Oracle dot com slash strategic. 557 00:26:52,160 --> 00:26:55,080 Speaker 1: If you love iPhone, you'll love Apple Card. It's the 558 00:26:55,160 --> 00:26:59,000 Speaker 1: credit card designed for iPhone. It gives you unlimited daily 559 00:26:59,119 --> 00:27:02,120 Speaker 1: cash back that can earn four point four zero percent 560 00:27:02,240 --> 00:27:05,040 Speaker 1: annual percentage yield. When you open a high yield savings 561 00:27:05,080 --> 00:27:07,919 Speaker 1: account through Apple Card, apply for Apple Card in the 562 00:27:08,000 --> 00:27:11,200 Speaker 1: wallet app. Subject to credit approval. Savings is available to 563 00:27:11,320 --> 00:27:14,760 Speaker 1: Apple Card owners subject to eligibility. Apple Card and Savings 564 00:27:14,760 --> 00:27:17,639 Speaker 1: by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City Branch Member, 565 00:27:17,760 --> 00:27:21,119 Speaker 1: FDIC terms and more at applecard dot com. When you 566 00:27:21,160 --> 00:27:23,160 Speaker 1: pop a piece of cheese into your mouth or enjoy 567 00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:26,439 Speaker 1: a rich spoonful of Greek yogurt, you're probably not thinking 568 00:27:26,520 --> 00:27:30,040 Speaker 1: about the environmental impact of each and every bite, But 569 00:27:30,119 --> 00:27:32,800 Speaker 1: the people in the dairy industry are US. Dairy has 570 00:27:32,800 --> 00:27:37,240 Speaker 1: set themselves some ambitious sustainability goals, including being greenhouse gas 571 00:27:37,280 --> 00:27:40,080 Speaker 1: neutral by twenty fifty. That's why they're working hard every 572 00:27:40,160 --> 00:27:43,240 Speaker 1: day to find new ways to reduce waste, conserve natural resources, 573 00:27:43,280 --> 00:27:46,800 Speaker 1: and drive down greenhouse gas emissions. Take water, for example, 574 00:27:46,880 --> 00:27:49,960 Speaker 1: most dairy farms reuse water up to four times. The 575 00:27:50,000 --> 00:27:53,240 Speaker 1: same water cools the milk, cleans equipment, washes the barn, 576 00:27:53,359 --> 00:27:57,080 Speaker 1: and irrigates the crops. How is us dairy Tackling greenhouse gases, 577 00:27:57,080 --> 00:28:00,160 Speaker 1: Many farms use anaerobic digestors that turn the methane from 578 00:28:00,160 --> 00:28:03,520 Speaker 1: maneuver into renewable energy that can power farms, towns, and 579 00:28:03,560 --> 00:28:05,800 Speaker 1: electric cars. So the next time you grab a slice 580 00:28:05,800 --> 00:28:07,680 Speaker 1: of pizza or lick an ice cream cone, know that 581 00:28:07,760 --> 00:28:10,439 Speaker 1: dairy farmers and processors around the country are using the 582 00:28:10,520 --> 00:28:14,240 Speaker 1: latest practices and innovations to provide the nutrient intense dairy 583 00:28:14,280 --> 00:28:16,960 Speaker 1: products we love with less of an impact. Visit us 584 00:28:17,040 --> 00:28:19,560 Speaker 1: dairy dot com slash sustainability to learn more. 585 00:28:28,359 --> 00:28:31,280 Speaker 3: All right, we're talking about superdeterminism, which is I guess 586 00:28:31,320 --> 00:28:35,840 Speaker 3: it's superpowered determinism, Like it can run faster than a 587 00:28:35,880 --> 00:28:36,680 Speaker 3: speeding prediction. 588 00:28:36,760 --> 00:28:38,959 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. It's a soup up version. It's got like, 589 00:28:39,000 --> 00:28:41,320 Speaker 1: you know, extra exhausts, and it's a low rider and 590 00:28:41,320 --> 00:28:42,280 Speaker 1: it's got shiny paint. 591 00:28:42,480 --> 00:28:44,480 Speaker 3: I see. You should have gone with turbo determinism. That 592 00:28:44,480 --> 00:28:47,120 Speaker 3: would have been a more fun name. So there's this 593 00:28:47,240 --> 00:28:50,440 Speaker 3: idea that quantum mechanics tells us that the universe is 594 00:28:51,120 --> 00:28:53,560 Speaker 3: random and unpredictable, and you can actually sort of test 595 00:28:53,600 --> 00:28:55,920 Speaker 3: this right, like you can do an experiment that tells 596 00:28:55,960 --> 00:28:59,280 Speaker 3: you if something truly is random or not, or maybe 597 00:28:59,280 --> 00:29:02,000 Speaker 3: like it's actually not random, but you just think it's random. 598 00:29:02,080 --> 00:29:04,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, Because when this whole idea came out, people were 599 00:29:04,560 --> 00:29:07,080 Speaker 1: skeptical because you don't see this process, right. You can 600 00:29:07,120 --> 00:29:10,640 Speaker 1: never like see the universe going from fuzzy to specific, 601 00:29:10,760 --> 00:29:13,040 Speaker 1: going from like oh, the electron has a probability to 602 00:29:13,080 --> 00:29:15,960 Speaker 1: do this, to the electron is actually here. You can't 603 00:29:16,000 --> 00:29:19,200 Speaker 1: observe that process because of course any observation collapses the 604 00:29:19,240 --> 00:29:21,560 Speaker 1: wave function. So people were wondering, like, how do we 605 00:29:21,640 --> 00:29:23,840 Speaker 1: know this is real? How do we know that the 606 00:29:23,880 --> 00:29:27,080 Speaker 1: path of the electron isn't actually just determined, but there's 607 00:29:27,120 --> 00:29:29,760 Speaker 1: some information we're missing, you know, like the electron was 608 00:29:29,800 --> 00:29:32,400 Speaker 1: going to go that way the whole time, we just 609 00:29:32,440 --> 00:29:35,280 Speaker 1: didn't know it. You're not comfortable thinking about electrons, you know. 610 00:29:35,320 --> 00:29:38,360 Speaker 1: Think about a scenario where you have, for example, two balls, 611 00:29:38,640 --> 00:29:40,520 Speaker 1: a red one and a blue one, and you put 612 00:29:40,560 --> 00:29:42,160 Speaker 1: one red ball in a bag and the blue ball 613 00:29:42,200 --> 00:29:44,200 Speaker 1: in another bag so you can't see them, and then 614 00:29:44,240 --> 00:29:46,720 Speaker 1: you and your friend just like randomly picked bags. You 615 00:29:46,800 --> 00:29:48,880 Speaker 1: look in your bag, You're going to have either a 616 00:29:48,920 --> 00:29:51,720 Speaker 1: red ball or a blue ball, right, and you might say, oh, 617 00:29:51,720 --> 00:29:54,200 Speaker 1: well it was determined the whole time, Like the ball 618 00:29:54,320 --> 00:29:57,240 Speaker 1: is either red or blue the whole time. Right, It's 619 00:29:57,240 --> 00:29:59,240 Speaker 1: not like magic that I have a red ball or 620 00:29:59,280 --> 00:30:01,360 Speaker 1: a blue ball. And so people are wondering, like if 621 00:30:01,360 --> 00:30:04,160 Speaker 1: the same thing holds for quantum particles, like are they 622 00:30:04,200 --> 00:30:07,320 Speaker 1: actually determined in advance? How can we tell the difference 623 00:30:07,680 --> 00:30:10,440 Speaker 1: between there being really random until the moment you check, 624 00:30:10,560 --> 00:30:12,680 Speaker 1: or them having been determined the whole time. 625 00:30:12,920 --> 00:30:15,400 Speaker 3: Right, that's kind of the basis of this famous experiment 626 00:30:15,480 --> 00:30:18,720 Speaker 3: that sort of proves the randomness of quantum mechanics called 627 00:30:18,840 --> 00:30:21,240 Speaker 3: Bell's experiment. Right, It's sort of like if you take 628 00:30:21,280 --> 00:30:23,440 Speaker 3: a as you said, a red ball and a blue ball, 629 00:30:23,480 --> 00:30:25,240 Speaker 3: and you put them each in two bags so you 630 00:30:25,280 --> 00:30:27,520 Speaker 3: can't see their color, and then I guess what do 631 00:30:27,560 --> 00:30:29,880 Speaker 3: you do? You like hide them behind your back and 632 00:30:30,000 --> 00:30:31,640 Speaker 3: make them up, and then you give one to one 633 00:30:31,680 --> 00:30:33,600 Speaker 3: person and they know they want to the other person. 634 00:30:33,680 --> 00:30:36,160 Speaker 3: It's not like the balls suddenly loser color or they're 635 00:30:36,160 --> 00:30:38,120 Speaker 3: both colors at the same time. It's like, you know, 636 00:30:38,200 --> 00:30:39,760 Speaker 3: one of them clearly has the red ball and the 637 00:30:39,800 --> 00:30:41,680 Speaker 3: other one clearly has the blue wall. We just don't 638 00:30:41,680 --> 00:30:43,080 Speaker 3: know what it is. And so that's kind of the 639 00:30:43,120 --> 00:30:46,960 Speaker 3: alternative to the idea of randomness and quantum mechanics. It's like, well, 640 00:30:47,120 --> 00:30:49,400 Speaker 3: it's not like the balls like do something magical. We 641 00:30:49,520 --> 00:30:52,320 Speaker 3: just don't know which balls and which bag exactly. And 642 00:30:52,360 --> 00:30:55,400 Speaker 3: the philosophically that goes by the name of hidden variables. 643 00:30:55,640 --> 00:30:58,280 Speaker 3: People think, well, maybe there's just some information we don't 644 00:30:58,280 --> 00:31:01,000 Speaker 3: have access to, so it seems random to us. But 645 00:31:01,040 --> 00:31:04,240 Speaker 3: it's not actually random, right, there's some hidden variable, some details, 646 00:31:04,280 --> 00:31:07,400 Speaker 3: some information that's being carried along with the ball or 647 00:31:07,440 --> 00:31:10,640 Speaker 3: the electron whatever that's determining the actual outcome, and you 648 00:31:10,640 --> 00:31:12,840 Speaker 3: can't actually change it. The quantum mechanics is a very 649 00:31:12,880 --> 00:31:14,920 Speaker 3: different view. Right in the analogy of the balls, it 650 00:31:14,920 --> 00:31:16,880 Speaker 3: would be like, you know, the ball has not always 651 00:31:16,920 --> 00:31:19,160 Speaker 3: been red or always been blue the whole time. It 652 00:31:19,200 --> 00:31:21,400 Speaker 3: has a probability to be either, and it's in some 653 00:31:21,520 --> 00:31:25,040 Speaker 3: weird quantum mechanical mixture state that you can never see. 654 00:31:25,080 --> 00:31:27,440 Speaker 3: But once you look at it, boom, it collapses into 655 00:31:27,520 --> 00:31:30,480 Speaker 3: red or blue. And the craziest thing about the quantum 656 00:31:30,480 --> 00:31:33,680 Speaker 3: mechanical interpretation is that this can happen even if you're 657 00:31:33,720 --> 00:31:35,920 Speaker 3: really far apart, Like you know, if I take one 658 00:31:35,960 --> 00:31:37,440 Speaker 3: bag and you take the other, bag, and we get 659 00:31:37,480 --> 00:31:40,760 Speaker 3: on spaceships and go ten light years in opposite directions 660 00:31:41,080 --> 00:31:44,920 Speaker 3: and then look at our bags simultaneously. Quantum mechanics says 661 00:31:45,040 --> 00:31:47,960 Speaker 3: that those balls are not determined until one of us looks. 662 00:31:48,000 --> 00:31:49,680 Speaker 3: If I look in my bag and I see red, 663 00:31:50,000 --> 00:31:54,280 Speaker 3: then your bag instantaneously goes from undetermined to blue, even 664 00:31:54,320 --> 00:31:56,640 Speaker 3: if you're ten light years away from me. So that's 665 00:31:56,680 --> 00:31:59,400 Speaker 3: the part that really got people confused, especially Einstein and 666 00:31:59,440 --> 00:32:02,840 Speaker 3: his collaboration, and made them think, like, this can't be true, 667 00:32:02,920 --> 00:32:05,720 Speaker 3: because it would mean that the universe is like non local, 668 00:32:06,000 --> 00:32:10,080 Speaker 3: that there's this like instantaneous effect that happens across space time, 669 00:32:10,240 --> 00:32:13,000 Speaker 3: which really bothered folks like Einstein, right, because as soon 670 00:32:13,040 --> 00:32:15,080 Speaker 3: as you open one bag, you're sort of like you're 671 00:32:15,120 --> 00:32:18,320 Speaker 3: determining what the other bag's gonna be, even though it's 672 00:32:18,360 --> 00:32:21,200 Speaker 3: really far away, exactly right, And I guess the interesting 673 00:32:21,240 --> 00:32:24,000 Speaker 3: thing is that the universe, or quantum mechanics, seems to 674 00:32:24,040 --> 00:32:27,480 Speaker 3: have these bags in them, right, Like there's something about 675 00:32:27,840 --> 00:32:30,800 Speaker 3: the universe sort of obscures things or hides them from 676 00:32:30,880 --> 00:32:33,360 Speaker 3: us until we actually look at them. Right. That's a 677 00:32:33,360 --> 00:32:34,640 Speaker 3: weird thing about the universe, right. 678 00:32:34,560 --> 00:32:36,880 Speaker 1: As a very weird thing about the universe, and it 679 00:32:36,920 --> 00:32:40,720 Speaker 1: relies on this interpretation or quantum mechanics called the Copenhagen interpretation. 680 00:32:40,920 --> 00:32:43,200 Speaker 1: It says, the quantum objects are quantum objects, and they 681 00:32:43,280 --> 00:32:46,480 Speaker 1: like have weird fuzziness to them, and that's cool, except 682 00:32:46,480 --> 00:32:49,400 Speaker 1: when a classical object like a person, looks at them, 683 00:32:49,520 --> 00:32:51,400 Speaker 1: then all of a sudden they collapse and they can 684 00:32:51,480 --> 00:32:54,680 Speaker 1: only have one possible result instead of having probabilities of 685 00:32:54,760 --> 00:32:57,120 Speaker 1: multiple results. And as we've talked about the podcast a lot, 686 00:32:57,120 --> 00:32:59,520 Speaker 1: that's really problematic because we don't know what we mean 687 00:32:59,560 --> 00:33:02,560 Speaker 1: by classical object. We talked about this in the quantum 688 00:33:02,560 --> 00:33:05,680 Speaker 1: eraser experiment. It's really weird and fuzzy. And so there 689 00:33:05,680 --> 00:33:08,200 Speaker 1: are other views of quantum mechanics that try to avoid this, 690 00:33:08,320 --> 00:33:11,400 Speaker 1: like Boonemyan mechanics that says that there are these weird 691 00:33:11,440 --> 00:33:14,960 Speaker 1: initial conditions. But all this weird quantum behavior was described 692 00:33:14,960 --> 00:33:18,320 Speaker 1: by Einstein as spooky action at a distance, Like he 693 00:33:18,320 --> 00:33:21,000 Speaker 1: couldn't imagine a way for the universe to do that. 694 00:33:21,080 --> 00:33:22,800 Speaker 1: If I look at my ball and it goes from 695 00:33:22,840 --> 00:33:26,440 Speaker 1: like undetermined to red, that somehow that's going to make 696 00:33:26,480 --> 00:33:29,000 Speaker 1: your ball go from undetermined to blue. He couldn't imagine 697 00:33:29,000 --> 00:33:31,200 Speaker 1: that happening. He proposed this as a thought experiment. He 698 00:33:31,280 --> 00:33:34,680 Speaker 1: was like, isn't this ridiculous. Here's an example of what 699 00:33:34,760 --> 00:33:37,840 Speaker 1: your quantum mechanics would have to do for it to work. 700 00:33:37,920 --> 00:33:40,400 Speaker 1: So then John Bell came up with a series of experiments, 701 00:33:40,520 --> 00:33:42,720 Speaker 1: try to see if we could tell the difference. Can 702 00:33:42,760 --> 00:33:45,960 Speaker 1: you tell the difference between those balls being actually determined 703 00:33:46,000 --> 00:33:49,480 Speaker 1: the whole time or them being undetermined until the moment 704 00:33:49,520 --> 00:33:51,680 Speaker 1: you look at them and those wave functions sort of 705 00:33:51,720 --> 00:33:54,760 Speaker 1: simultaneously collapsing across space time, right. 706 00:33:54,960 --> 00:33:57,200 Speaker 3: And I think the idea is that, you know, if 707 00:33:57,200 --> 00:33:59,520 Speaker 3: you do this experiment or this like hiding balls and 708 00:33:59,520 --> 00:34:02,200 Speaker 3: put them in and take them far apart with like 709 00:34:02,280 --> 00:34:05,240 Speaker 3: actual physical billiard balls, like a red billiard ball and 710 00:34:05,280 --> 00:34:07,920 Speaker 3: a blue biller ball, then there's no question, like, there's 711 00:34:07,920 --> 00:34:10,239 Speaker 3: no randomness that in there, right, Like there is an 712 00:34:10,280 --> 00:34:13,239 Speaker 3: actual blue ball in my bag and the actual red 713 00:34:13,280 --> 00:34:15,840 Speaker 3: ball in your bag. There's no randomness there. But I 714 00:34:15,840 --> 00:34:17,440 Speaker 3: think the idea is that if you do it with 715 00:34:17,520 --> 00:34:20,440 Speaker 3: electrons or something really really small, where you maybe have 716 00:34:20,520 --> 00:34:23,200 Speaker 3: with some experiment that takes an electron and splits it 717 00:34:23,239 --> 00:34:26,040 Speaker 3: into two, like a red electron and a blue electron, 718 00:34:26,239 --> 00:34:29,320 Speaker 3: and it's a quantum mechanical process. Then that's when things 719 00:34:29,680 --> 00:34:32,080 Speaker 3: start to get weird, right, that's when things sort of 720 00:34:32,120 --> 00:34:33,160 Speaker 3: become spooky. 721 00:34:33,239 --> 00:34:36,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. Nobody thinks that the ball is actually red 722 00:34:36,360 --> 00:34:39,399 Speaker 1: and blue simultaneously, because it's not a quantum object. We're 723 00:34:39,400 --> 00:34:40,759 Speaker 1: just using that as a way for you to sort 724 00:34:40,760 --> 00:34:42,920 Speaker 1: of grapple with these things because it's hard to think 725 00:34:42,920 --> 00:34:45,680 Speaker 1: about electrons. But now let's think about electrons. Let's think 726 00:34:45,680 --> 00:34:48,160 Speaker 1: about a quantum object. As you say, electrons have these 727 00:34:48,160 --> 00:34:50,399 Speaker 1: weird properties, and so the key is that those two 728 00:34:50,440 --> 00:34:52,840 Speaker 1: things are somehow constrained. Right. We used red ball and 729 00:34:52,840 --> 00:34:55,799 Speaker 1: blue ball because implicitly we were saying there could only 730 00:34:55,800 --> 00:34:58,040 Speaker 1: be one red ball and only one blue ball. So 731 00:34:58,080 --> 00:35:00,480 Speaker 1: if mine is red, yours has to be blue. The 732 00:35:00,560 --> 00:35:03,400 Speaker 1: constraints for the quantum objects is things like spin. You 733 00:35:03,480 --> 00:35:06,799 Speaker 1: create two electrons together or electron depositron or whatever so 734 00:35:06,840 --> 00:35:09,360 Speaker 1: that their total spin is zero, and if I measure 735 00:35:09,400 --> 00:35:11,080 Speaker 1: mine to be spin up, then yours has to be 736 00:35:11,120 --> 00:35:13,839 Speaker 1: spinned down, even if you are ten light years away 737 00:35:13,840 --> 00:35:15,719 Speaker 1: from each other. Now, the cool thing about this, the 738 00:35:15,760 --> 00:35:18,960 Speaker 1: reason that it's different for electrons and for balls is 739 00:35:19,000 --> 00:35:22,040 Speaker 1: not just because they're tiny. Quantum objects, but because they 740 00:35:22,120 --> 00:35:25,000 Speaker 1: can have multiple versions of these properties. Like when I 741 00:35:25,000 --> 00:35:27,840 Speaker 1: measure the spin of the electron, I can choose what 742 00:35:28,080 --> 00:35:31,440 Speaker 1: direction to measure the spin around right like the top 743 00:35:31,640 --> 00:35:34,839 Speaker 1: when you spin it, it spins around in axis. So 744 00:35:34,880 --> 00:35:36,799 Speaker 1: when I measured the spin of the electron, I can 745 00:35:36,880 --> 00:35:40,360 Speaker 1: choose like some direction and measure the electron spin, and 746 00:35:40,400 --> 00:35:43,279 Speaker 1: the other electron ten light years away has to have 747 00:35:43,320 --> 00:35:46,880 Speaker 1: the opposite spin along the same axis. The crazy thing 748 00:35:46,880 --> 00:35:49,319 Speaker 1: about electron spin is that you can't measure it spin 749 00:35:49,440 --> 00:35:53,040 Speaker 1: simultaneously multiple directions. You measure it in one direction that 750 00:35:53,120 --> 00:35:55,400 Speaker 1: fuzzes the spin in the other direction. It's sort of 751 00:35:55,400 --> 00:35:58,279 Speaker 1: like momentum and position. John Bell was able to take 752 00:35:58,320 --> 00:36:00,520 Speaker 1: advantage of this and came up with this easye set 753 00:36:00,560 --> 00:36:03,960 Speaker 1: of experiments. We take our electrons far apart, we agree 754 00:36:04,239 --> 00:36:07,560 Speaker 1: randomly on three directions that we can measure the electron 755 00:36:07,640 --> 00:36:10,680 Speaker 1: on three axes, and then we do a bunch of measurements. 756 00:36:10,920 --> 00:36:13,759 Speaker 1: And he showed that in the quantum mechanical case, where 757 00:36:13,760 --> 00:36:15,640 Speaker 1: these things are not determined and they sort of like 758 00:36:15,760 --> 00:36:19,000 Speaker 1: measurement along one axis fuzzes the measurement along the other axis, 759 00:36:19,200 --> 00:36:21,160 Speaker 1: then in that case you'll get a different set of 760 00:36:21,160 --> 00:36:24,680 Speaker 1: statistical correlations between your measurement than in the classical case 761 00:36:24,719 --> 00:36:27,840 Speaker 1: where it's hidden variables, where things are like determined in advance. 762 00:36:28,200 --> 00:36:30,160 Speaker 1: So sort of mind blowing that he came up with 763 00:36:30,200 --> 00:36:34,319 Speaker 1: this crazy, beautiful, elegant set of experiments to force the 764 00:36:34,400 --> 00:36:37,399 Speaker 1: universe to reveal the fact that it was making these 765 00:36:37,440 --> 00:36:40,840 Speaker 1: decisions on the fly, that these things were really collapsing 766 00:36:40,840 --> 00:36:43,440 Speaker 1: at the last moment, not in advance. That there's no 767 00:36:43,560 --> 00:36:47,640 Speaker 1: information going with these electrons that's helping you determine where 768 00:36:47,640 --> 00:36:48,440 Speaker 1: their spin is. 769 00:36:48,800 --> 00:36:52,520 Speaker 3: Right, because I guess you know, the counter theory or 770 00:36:52,560 --> 00:36:55,600 Speaker 3: the counter proposition is that you know, you took this 771 00:36:55,680 --> 00:36:57,640 Speaker 3: electron and you split it into a spin up and 772 00:36:57,640 --> 00:36:59,719 Speaker 3: a spin down, you put them into different bags. He 773 00:36:59,760 --> 00:37:02,200 Speaker 3: took and far apart, and so you could say that, well, 774 00:37:02,320 --> 00:37:04,759 Speaker 3: you know, we don't know whether the electrons are spin 775 00:37:04,880 --> 00:37:06,960 Speaker 3: up and down, but the electrons sort of know, like 776 00:37:07,239 --> 00:37:08,799 Speaker 3: just like the red ball and the blue ball, like 777 00:37:08,840 --> 00:37:10,480 Speaker 3: obviously one of them has spin up and the other 778 00:37:10,520 --> 00:37:12,359 Speaker 3: one's spin down. We just don't know what it is. 779 00:37:12,480 --> 00:37:14,759 Speaker 3: And then when you open it you might be surprised. 780 00:37:14,800 --> 00:37:17,520 Speaker 3: But you know, somebody who is tracking these electrons all 781 00:37:17,560 --> 00:37:20,160 Speaker 3: along totally knew which one was up and which one's down. 782 00:37:20,239 --> 00:37:22,440 Speaker 3: But I think the kind of the power of the 783 00:37:22,640 --> 00:37:26,000 Speaker 3: Bell's experiment is that it's somehow, through you know, complicated 784 00:37:26,040 --> 00:37:29,120 Speaker 3: probabilities and scenarios, it sort of proves that no, like 785 00:37:29,239 --> 00:37:33,040 Speaker 3: not nobody knows what these electrons were the whole time, 786 00:37:33,160 --> 00:37:36,960 Speaker 3: like nobody, not even like whoever's making the universe or 787 00:37:37,000 --> 00:37:37,319 Speaker 3: running the. 788 00:37:37,880 --> 00:37:41,279 Speaker 1: Universe exactly, it's not determined. And the important thing to 789 00:37:41,360 --> 00:37:43,920 Speaker 1: understand here is that it's not a single measurement. It's 790 00:37:43,960 --> 00:37:46,319 Speaker 1: not like I measure spin up and you measure spin 791 00:37:46,440 --> 00:37:48,920 Speaker 1: down and then we say, Aha, it wasn't determined. You 792 00:37:48,960 --> 00:37:51,759 Speaker 1: can't decide that from one measurement, right because that could 793 00:37:51,800 --> 00:37:54,560 Speaker 1: have been determined. And if we're measuring along the same axis, 794 00:37:54,600 --> 00:37:56,719 Speaker 1: like I'm always going to get the opposite answer as you. 795 00:37:57,160 --> 00:38:00,400 Speaker 1: The genius of Bell's experiment is that it's statistical is 796 00:38:00,400 --> 00:38:02,880 Speaker 1: that I'm measuring a bunch of different directions. You're measuring 797 00:38:02,880 --> 00:38:05,480 Speaker 1: a bunch of different directions, and the quantum mechanics comes 798 00:38:05,520 --> 00:38:09,000 Speaker 1: in with a correlation of our multiple measurements. It's very 799 00:38:09,040 --> 00:38:11,400 Speaker 1: subtle effect. You can't see it from just one measurement. 800 00:38:11,440 --> 00:38:14,520 Speaker 1: You have to do multiple measurements and study their correlations. 801 00:38:14,719 --> 00:38:17,719 Speaker 1: So it's not like super smoking gun, but it is 802 00:38:17,840 --> 00:38:20,200 Speaker 1: very clear evidence because the correlations you get from quantum 803 00:38:20,200 --> 00:38:23,279 Speaker 1: mechanics are very different from the correlations you expect in 804 00:38:23,320 --> 00:38:26,000 Speaker 1: the case you describe where it's like all secretly determined 805 00:38:26,000 --> 00:38:28,640 Speaker 1: in advance. And when we do these measurements and people 806 00:38:28,680 --> 00:38:31,360 Speaker 1: have actually done these experiments, they get the numbers that 807 00:38:31,400 --> 00:38:35,040 Speaker 1: agree with the quantum mechanical prediction, not the hidden variable prediction. 808 00:38:35,360 --> 00:38:35,520 Speaker 13: Right. 809 00:38:35,560 --> 00:38:37,400 Speaker 3: It's kind of like you can't tell of a coin 810 00:38:37,640 --> 00:38:40,520 Speaker 3: is like a fake coin or a bias coin, but 811 00:38:40,680 --> 00:38:42,600 Speaker 3: with one flip of the coin, you need to like 812 00:38:42,640 --> 00:38:44,960 Speaker 3: flip it a lot of times, you know, like, oh wait, 813 00:38:45,120 --> 00:38:47,960 Speaker 3: well actually it's heads. You know, fifty one percent of 814 00:38:48,000 --> 00:38:51,080 Speaker 3: the time. This is a teeter's coin. Right. That's kind 815 00:38:51,120 --> 00:38:53,279 Speaker 3: of like the idea behind Bill's experiment is that you 816 00:38:53,640 --> 00:38:56,439 Speaker 3: run this experiment where you split the electrons a whole 817 00:38:56,480 --> 00:38:59,320 Speaker 3: bunch of times, and somehow you know the probabilities the 818 00:38:59,360 --> 00:39:01,520 Speaker 3: way you set up experiment. It tells you that the 819 00:39:01,600 --> 00:39:02,880 Speaker 3: universe is actually random. 820 00:39:03,040 --> 00:39:05,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, And it's more than just that it's random, right, 821 00:39:05,160 --> 00:39:07,880 Speaker 1: It's more than just that it's not determined until the 822 00:39:07,960 --> 00:39:10,560 Speaker 1: moment you look at the electron. It's also that it's 823 00:39:10,600 --> 00:39:15,560 Speaker 1: weirdly non local, right. These effects are somehow happening across 824 00:39:15,680 --> 00:39:19,080 Speaker 1: great distances in space time. And they've done these experiments, 825 00:39:19,160 --> 00:39:20,759 Speaker 1: you know, where things are close to each other because 826 00:39:20,760 --> 00:39:23,400 Speaker 1: they're complicated, and then they've managed to do them further apart, 827 00:39:23,440 --> 00:39:26,319 Speaker 1: and further apart and further apart. And now we've done 828 00:39:26,360 --> 00:39:29,600 Speaker 1: them so far apart that there's no possible way information 829 00:39:29,719 --> 00:39:31,879 Speaker 1: can travel from one of the electrons to the other. 830 00:39:31,960 --> 00:39:34,040 Speaker 1: It's not like you're looking at one electron and then 831 00:39:34,200 --> 00:39:35,960 Speaker 1: zoom at the speed of light. It tells the other 832 00:39:35,960 --> 00:39:39,160 Speaker 1: electron what to be. You know, I'm red, quick be blue? Right, 833 00:39:39,200 --> 00:39:41,400 Speaker 1: there's no time for that to happen. These experiments have 834 00:39:41,400 --> 00:39:44,480 Speaker 1: been done so far apart with synchronized clocks and everything, 835 00:39:44,760 --> 00:39:46,759 Speaker 1: so there's no time for that to happen. And yet 836 00:39:46,760 --> 00:39:49,120 Speaker 1: they still see these results, which means that the universe 837 00:39:49,200 --> 00:39:52,520 Speaker 1: must be non local, right, that like things happening in 838 00:39:52,520 --> 00:39:56,239 Speaker 1: one place can instantaneously affect things happening somewhere else. That's 839 00:39:56,280 --> 00:39:58,320 Speaker 1: like really hard to swallow. 840 00:39:58,040 --> 00:39:59,640 Speaker 3: Right, And here I thought we were supposed to shop 841 00:39:59,680 --> 00:40:03,040 Speaker 3: local for the environment. Well, I think the point is that, 842 00:40:03,160 --> 00:40:05,680 Speaker 3: you know, we thought that maybe quantum mechanics meant that 843 00:40:05,719 --> 00:40:08,120 Speaker 3: the universe was random, and we've actually proved it with 844 00:40:08,200 --> 00:40:11,400 Speaker 3: Bell's experiments, and we're actually going to dive into or 845 00:40:11,440 --> 00:40:13,719 Speaker 3: at least trying to dive into Bell's experiment in a 846 00:40:13,800 --> 00:40:15,920 Speaker 3: later episode. But I think the main point is that, 847 00:40:16,000 --> 00:40:18,640 Speaker 3: you know, at least until a few years ago, Bell's 848 00:40:18,640 --> 00:40:20,640 Speaker 3: experiment sort of put the nail on the coffin that 849 00:40:20,719 --> 00:40:23,440 Speaker 3: said that quantum mechanics is right, things are sort of 850 00:40:23,520 --> 00:40:25,839 Speaker 3: unknowable and truly random at their core. 851 00:40:26,400 --> 00:40:29,280 Speaker 1: And so Bell's experiment shows that there can't be any 852 00:40:29,520 --> 00:40:32,800 Speaker 1: local hidden variables, right, that there's no information being carried 853 00:40:32,840 --> 00:40:36,319 Speaker 1: along with the electron that secretly determines in advance the 854 00:40:36,360 --> 00:40:38,040 Speaker 1: outcome of all of those experiments. 855 00:40:38,080 --> 00:40:40,640 Speaker 3: And so now there's a theory that says that maybe 856 00:40:40,960 --> 00:40:43,560 Speaker 3: Bell's experiments are not all they are supposed to be, 857 00:40:43,640 --> 00:40:45,319 Speaker 3: or may they're not set up right, or may there 858 00:40:45,320 --> 00:40:47,840 Speaker 3: are things actually in the universe that we're not seeing 859 00:40:47,880 --> 00:40:51,120 Speaker 3: that maybe do make the universe totally deterministic or at 860 00:40:51,200 --> 00:40:54,080 Speaker 3: least super deterministic. So let's get into that. But first 861 00:40:54,160 --> 00:40:55,479 Speaker 3: let's take another quick break. 862 00:40:59,600 --> 00:41:01,399 Speaker 1: When you pop a piece of cheese into your mouth 863 00:41:01,520 --> 00:41:04,640 Speaker 1: or enjoy a rich spoonful of Greek yogurt, you're probably 864 00:41:04,719 --> 00:41:08,760 Speaker 1: not thinking about the environmental impact of each and every bite, 865 00:41:08,800 --> 00:41:11,400 Speaker 1: But the people in the dairy industry are. US Dairy 866 00:41:11,440 --> 00:41:15,719 Speaker 1: has set themselves some ambitious sustainability goals, including being greenhouse 867 00:41:15,760 --> 00:41:18,600 Speaker 1: gas neutral by twenty fifty. That's why they're working hard 868 00:41:18,680 --> 00:41:21,120 Speaker 1: every day to find new ways to reduce waste, conserve 869 00:41:21,239 --> 00:41:25,000 Speaker 1: natural resources, and drive down greenhouse gas emissions. Take water, 870 00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:28,120 Speaker 1: for example, most dairy farms reuse water up to four 871 00:41:28,200 --> 00:41:31,640 Speaker 1: times the same water cools the milk, cleans equipment, washes 872 00:41:31,680 --> 00:41:34,480 Speaker 1: the barn, and irrigates the crops. How is US dairy 873 00:41:34,520 --> 00:41:38,279 Speaker 1: tackling greenhouse gases? Many farms use anaerobic digestors that turn 874 00:41:38,320 --> 00:41:42,240 Speaker 1: the methane from maneuver into renewable energy that can power farms, towns, 875 00:41:42,239 --> 00:41:44,320 Speaker 1: and electric cars. So the next time you grab a 876 00:41:44,360 --> 00:41:46,360 Speaker 1: slice of pizza or lick an ice cream cone, know 877 00:41:46,440 --> 00:41:49,120 Speaker 1: that dairy farmers and processors around the country are using 878 00:41:49,160 --> 00:41:52,640 Speaker 1: the latest practices and innovations to provide the nutrient dense 879 00:41:52,760 --> 00:41:55,479 Speaker 1: dairy products we love with less of an impact. Visit 880 00:41:55,600 --> 00:41:58,600 Speaker 1: US Dairy dot com slash sustainability to learn more. 881 00:41:58,560 --> 00:42:02,200 Speaker 4: With the United Explorer car, earn fifty thousand bonus miles, 882 00:42:02,400 --> 00:42:05,759 Speaker 4: then head for places unseen and destinations unknown. Wherever your 883 00:42:05,840 --> 00:42:09,439 Speaker 4: journey takes you, you'll enjoy remarkable rewards, including a free 884 00:42:09,520 --> 00:42:12,360 Speaker 4: checked bag and two times the miles on every United purchase. 885 00:42:12,480 --> 00:42:14,840 Speaker 4: You'll also receive two times the miles on dining and 886 00:42:14,880 --> 00:42:18,680 Speaker 4: at hotels, so every experience is even more rewarding. Plus, 887 00:42:18,800 --> 00:42:21,280 Speaker 4: when you fly United, you can look forward to United 888 00:42:21,280 --> 00:42:24,560 Speaker 4: Club Access with two United Club one time passes per year. 889 00:42:24,760 --> 00:42:27,799 Speaker 4: Become a United Explorer Card member today and take off 890 00:42:27,840 --> 00:42:29,600 Speaker 4: on more trips so you can take in once in 891 00:42:29,600 --> 00:42:33,279 Speaker 4: a lifetime experiences everywhere you travel. Visit the Explorer Card 892 00:42:33,320 --> 00:42:36,640 Speaker 4: dot com to apply today. Cards issued by JP Morgan 893 00:42:36,719 --> 00:42:40,319 Speaker 4: Chase Bank NA Member FDIC subject to credit approval offer 894 00:42:40,440 --> 00:42:42,240 Speaker 4: subject to change. Terms apply. 895 00:42:43,520 --> 00:42:46,959 Speaker 14: There are children, friends, and families walking, riding on paths 896 00:42:47,000 --> 00:42:49,479 Speaker 14: and roads every day. Remember they're real people with loved 897 00:42:49,480 --> 00:42:51,680 Speaker 14: ones who need them to get home safely. Protect our 898 00:42:51,680 --> 00:42:55,239 Speaker 14: cyclists and pedestrians because they're people too, Go safely. California 899 00:42:55,239 --> 00:42:58,080 Speaker 14: from the California Office of Traffic Safety and Caltrans. 900 00:42:58,640 --> 00:43:02,399 Speaker 5: When you walk through our door, your world expands. Your 901 00:43:02,440 --> 00:43:06,840 Speaker 5: adventure begins with a spectacle of violuminescent light, a symphony 902 00:43:06,920 --> 00:43:10,239 Speaker 5: of shore bird sounds, or a touch of wonder as 903 00:43:10,239 --> 00:43:13,160 Speaker 5: you hold a hermit crab in your palm. Every moment 904 00:43:13,320 --> 00:43:16,480 Speaker 5: is filled with the promise of discovery as you become 905 00:43:16,520 --> 00:43:20,520 Speaker 5: an advocate for the ocean. Book your tickets today Monterey 906 00:43:20,560 --> 00:43:25,080 Speaker 5: Bay Aquarium, Inspiring Conservation of the Ocean. Visit Monterey Bay 907 00:43:25,160 --> 00:43:27,080 Speaker 5: Aquarium dot org slash together. 908 00:43:36,160 --> 00:43:40,800 Speaker 3: All Right, we're talking about superdeterminism, which is pretty super 909 00:43:40,840 --> 00:43:44,040 Speaker 3: I guess at least super recent. Right, it's sort of 910 00:43:44,080 --> 00:43:46,880 Speaker 3: a new idea that maybe Bell's experiments are not quite 911 00:43:46,920 --> 00:43:47,759 Speaker 3: properly set up. 912 00:43:47,760 --> 00:43:50,719 Speaker 1: Right, Why the superdeterminism maybe over sells it. You know, 913 00:43:50,800 --> 00:43:55,400 Speaker 1: I would call it like bonkers determinism. It's like deterministic determinism. 914 00:43:55,400 --> 00:43:59,040 Speaker 1: It's like people who are really determined to find deterministic loopholes. 915 00:43:59,120 --> 00:44:01,240 Speaker 1: You know, I think most people are convinced by Bell's 916 00:44:01,280 --> 00:44:03,600 Speaker 1: experiments and the way that they've been done. It's really 917 00:44:03,640 --> 00:44:06,840 Speaker 1: impressive tour to force Experimentally, I think people are pushing 918 00:44:06,880 --> 00:44:09,760 Speaker 1: hard to find loopholes to say, like, are we absolutely 919 00:44:09,840 --> 00:44:12,759 Speaker 1: sure is there a way you could interpret these experiments 920 00:44:13,000 --> 00:44:15,840 Speaker 1: and still have the universe be deterministic. Not like we 921 00:44:15,960 --> 00:44:18,280 Speaker 1: want to reject Bell or anything. It's just like, let's 922 00:44:18,320 --> 00:44:22,400 Speaker 1: just make absolutely sure there's no other interpretation. So this 923 00:44:22,480 --> 00:44:26,240 Speaker 1: is sort of like an exercise in philosophical thoroughness. 924 00:44:27,160 --> 00:44:30,160 Speaker 3: So it's more philosophical, it's not physics. Do you know 925 00:44:30,200 --> 00:44:31,920 Speaker 3: what I mean? Like, are you looking for loopholes in 926 00:44:32,040 --> 00:44:35,920 Speaker 3: like the arguments of Bell's experiment, or looking for loopholes 927 00:44:35,920 --> 00:44:38,440 Speaker 3: in like the mechanics, or like the details of how 928 00:44:38,440 --> 00:44:39,200 Speaker 3: it's carried out? 929 00:44:39,280 --> 00:44:41,480 Speaker 1: Well, I think it's all connected, right. The details of 930 00:44:41,480 --> 00:44:44,160 Speaker 1: how it's carried out tell us exactly what we can 931 00:44:44,239 --> 00:44:47,480 Speaker 1: and can't conclude. The first iterations of Bell's experiments, they 932 00:44:47,480 --> 00:44:50,239 Speaker 1: did them sort of close by, because it's hard to 933 00:44:50,320 --> 00:44:54,560 Speaker 1: have quantum particles that are entangled survive travels long distances 934 00:44:54,719 --> 00:44:57,680 Speaker 1: without getting perturbed by other stuff. To preserve that entanglement 935 00:44:57,719 --> 00:45:01,120 Speaker 1: over distances is challenging. So the first iteration of Bell's experiments, 936 00:45:01,280 --> 00:45:04,680 Speaker 1: we're sort of nearby, and there weren't that precise. People thought, well, 937 00:45:04,719 --> 00:45:07,919 Speaker 1: you know, these electrons could still be communicating. There's still 938 00:45:07,920 --> 00:45:10,280 Speaker 1: time for them to send messages. Back and forth somehow, 939 00:45:10,360 --> 00:45:12,399 Speaker 1: So then they did them further and further apart, which 940 00:45:12,440 --> 00:45:14,759 Speaker 1: is harder and harder, and now we're sure that they 941 00:45:14,800 --> 00:45:17,279 Speaker 1: can't be communicating. So that's the kind of thing we're doing, 942 00:45:17,360 --> 00:45:19,680 Speaker 1: is like looking for those loopholes and then trying to 943 00:45:19,719 --> 00:45:22,080 Speaker 1: close them, wondering is there a way we could do 944 00:45:22,160 --> 00:45:25,360 Speaker 1: this experiment in a way that proves that that crazy 945 00:45:25,400 --> 00:45:29,600 Speaker 1: alternative interpretation of Bell's experiment can't be the case. So 946 00:45:29,680 --> 00:45:32,680 Speaker 1: superdeterminism is in that category. It's like, well, are you 947 00:45:32,760 --> 00:45:35,400 Speaker 1: sure it's not this crazy other Bonker's idea? How do 948 00:45:35,440 --> 00:45:36,160 Speaker 1: you actually know? 949 00:45:36,280 --> 00:45:38,160 Speaker 3: All right, Well, then what are the sort of the 950 00:45:38,280 --> 00:45:41,600 Speaker 3: arguments of superdeterminism. What are they saying about Bell's experiments? 951 00:45:41,640 --> 00:45:44,120 Speaker 1: So superdeterminism and this is going to sound sort of 952 00:45:44,200 --> 00:45:47,200 Speaker 1: nutty says that, like, the whole universe has basically been 953 00:45:47,400 --> 00:45:52,480 Speaker 1: contrived to trick us into thinking that the universe is 954 00:45:52,600 --> 00:45:55,160 Speaker 1: random and quantum mechanical, but actually the whole thing is 955 00:45:55,200 --> 00:45:55,960 Speaker 1: just like a setup. 956 00:45:57,280 --> 00:46:01,360 Speaker 3: You're right, it does sound Bunkers saying the idea is 957 00:46:01,400 --> 00:46:04,200 Speaker 3: that the universe is not random, it is just sort 958 00:46:04,200 --> 00:46:06,880 Speaker 3: of built in a way to make it look random. 959 00:46:07,040 --> 00:46:10,160 Speaker 1: Mm hmm. Maybe everything really is determined, and it's like 960 00:46:10,200 --> 00:46:13,080 Speaker 1: determined all the way back to the Big Bang. You know, 961 00:46:13,200 --> 00:46:16,040 Speaker 1: like things back in the very early times in the universe, 962 00:46:16,120 --> 00:46:19,680 Speaker 1: determine things that happen now, including things that seem to 963 00:46:19,680 --> 00:46:22,920 Speaker 1: be spatially separated in a way that you couldn't coordinate them. 964 00:46:23,080 --> 00:46:24,920 Speaker 1: Maybe if you just go like far enough back in 965 00:46:25,040 --> 00:46:28,719 Speaker 1: time and hatch your plot, you can arrange things so 966 00:46:28,760 --> 00:46:31,840 Speaker 1: that they look random, but they're actually determined. 967 00:46:31,920 --> 00:46:34,640 Speaker 3: I guess, how do you make something look random? And 968 00:46:34,680 --> 00:46:37,840 Speaker 3: what's the difference between something looking random and actually being random. 969 00:46:37,880 --> 00:46:39,920 Speaker 1: Well, let's take your example of the coin. Right Let's 970 00:46:39,960 --> 00:46:41,520 Speaker 1: say I give you a coin and I want you 971 00:46:41,600 --> 00:46:43,279 Speaker 1: to test to see if it's fair. What are you 972 00:46:43,280 --> 00:46:45,640 Speaker 1: gonna do. You're gonna flip it a thousand times or 973 00:46:45,640 --> 00:46:48,359 Speaker 1: a million times. You'll measure the fraction of times that 974 00:46:48,400 --> 00:46:51,000 Speaker 1: you get heads or tails. Right now, what if I 975 00:46:51,080 --> 00:46:54,000 Speaker 1: give you a biased coin, one that gives you heads 976 00:46:54,000 --> 00:46:56,760 Speaker 1: seventy five percent of the time. But I somehow arrange 977 00:46:56,840 --> 00:46:59,960 Speaker 1: to influence you and the way that you do your experiment. 978 00:47:00,200 --> 00:47:02,560 Speaker 1: I distract you with bananas, or you know, I do 979 00:47:02,600 --> 00:47:05,160 Speaker 1: a silly dance because I know how you flip the coin, 980 00:47:05,280 --> 00:47:07,440 Speaker 1: and I know how to affect you and bias your 981 00:47:07,480 --> 00:47:09,560 Speaker 1: experiments so that it looks like it's fifty percent of 982 00:47:09,600 --> 00:47:11,640 Speaker 1: the time. Then you're going to measure the coin to 983 00:47:11,680 --> 00:47:13,520 Speaker 1: be fifty percent of the time heads. You're going to 984 00:47:13,600 --> 00:47:16,040 Speaker 1: declare that it's a fair coin even though it's not. 985 00:47:16,480 --> 00:47:18,680 Speaker 1: So if I can somehow interfere with the way you 986 00:47:18,800 --> 00:47:21,360 Speaker 1: do your experiment because I know you and I know 987 00:47:21,400 --> 00:47:24,480 Speaker 1: how to manipulate you, then maybe I can affect your 988 00:47:24,520 --> 00:47:26,400 Speaker 1: conclusions of that experiment. 989 00:47:26,600 --> 00:47:29,080 Speaker 3: Whoa, whoa wa wait a minute, Okay, So here's the setup. 990 00:47:29,239 --> 00:47:31,920 Speaker 3: The setup is you gave me a bias coin, like 991 00:47:31,960 --> 00:47:34,280 Speaker 3: a cheaters coin that's actually going to give me heads 992 00:47:34,440 --> 00:47:37,080 Speaker 3: seventy five percent of the time. But you're saying that somehow, 993 00:47:37,160 --> 00:47:39,760 Speaker 3: when I go to flip my coin a thousand times, 994 00:47:39,920 --> 00:47:43,480 Speaker 3: you're somehow going to you know, blow some air or 995 00:47:43,480 --> 00:47:46,840 Speaker 3: something so that it lands heads fifty percent of the 996 00:47:46,840 --> 00:47:49,799 Speaker 3: time during my experiments. But then when I go place 997 00:47:49,840 --> 00:47:53,480 Speaker 3: a big bed, then you don't do that. Is that 998 00:47:53,480 --> 00:47:54,040 Speaker 3: what you're saying? 999 00:47:54,200 --> 00:47:57,239 Speaker 1: Yeah, something like that, And it's not even as involved 1000 00:47:57,280 --> 00:47:58,719 Speaker 1: as I'm going to blow some air. I'm going to 1001 00:47:58,800 --> 00:48:01,360 Speaker 1: specifically interfere with the experiment. I'm gonna let you do 1002 00:48:01,400 --> 00:48:04,880 Speaker 1: your experiment, but I'm going to manipulate you somehow into 1003 00:48:05,239 --> 00:48:07,759 Speaker 1: thinking you've done it randomly, because when you flip a coin, 1004 00:48:07,800 --> 00:48:10,120 Speaker 1: you know it's not actually truly random, right, Like you 1005 00:48:10,120 --> 00:48:12,160 Speaker 1: flip a coin the same way twice, you're going to 1006 00:48:12,200 --> 00:48:14,520 Speaker 1: get the same answer. It's just sort of very difficult 1007 00:48:14,600 --> 00:48:17,400 Speaker 1: to do that. So imagine I'm some super powerful demon 1008 00:48:17,640 --> 00:48:19,640 Speaker 1: and I know exactly how to make you flip the 1009 00:48:19,680 --> 00:48:22,920 Speaker 1: coin in just the right way to get heads or tails. 1010 00:48:23,280 --> 00:48:26,200 Speaker 1: And I'm some super powerful mind controller guy, and I 1011 00:48:26,200 --> 00:48:29,440 Speaker 1: can make you do that somehow. This is all very ridiculous, obviously, 1012 00:48:29,719 --> 00:48:33,160 Speaker 1: but it is a possible interpretation of the experiment, right, 1013 00:48:33,239 --> 00:48:36,360 Speaker 1: I mean, it's absurd and outlandish, but it's sort of possible. 1014 00:48:36,480 --> 00:48:38,480 Speaker 3: But I guess my question is how exactly are you 1015 00:48:38,520 --> 00:48:42,200 Speaker 3: manipulating me? Like somehow you know how I'm holding the coin, 1016 00:48:42,440 --> 00:48:44,799 Speaker 3: or somehow you know, like if I start with my 1017 00:48:44,920 --> 00:48:47,360 Speaker 3: coin one way in my palm before I toss it, 1018 00:48:47,400 --> 00:48:49,800 Speaker 3: then you're going to do something so that it actually 1019 00:48:50,320 --> 00:48:53,080 Speaker 3: I read it as heads or tails later on? Is 1020 00:48:53,080 --> 00:48:53,560 Speaker 3: that what you mean? 1021 00:48:53,719 --> 00:48:55,040 Speaker 1: I'm not going to change how you read the coin. 1022 00:48:55,080 --> 00:48:56,640 Speaker 1: I'm not going to change how the coin flies through 1023 00:48:56,640 --> 00:48:58,760 Speaker 1: the air. I'm just going to change how you throw 1024 00:48:58,800 --> 00:49:01,960 Speaker 1: the coin, because how you throw the coin determines actually 1025 00:49:01,960 --> 00:49:03,919 Speaker 1: what happens. So if I can get you to throw 1026 00:49:03,960 --> 00:49:05,719 Speaker 1: it in a certain way, then I can change the 1027 00:49:05,719 --> 00:49:06,760 Speaker 1: outcome of the experiment. 1028 00:49:07,000 --> 00:49:09,000 Speaker 3: Oh, I see, like somehow this cheater's goin. If you 1029 00:49:09,160 --> 00:49:11,759 Speaker 3: throw it a certain way, you'll get fifty percent heads 1030 00:49:11,760 --> 00:49:14,200 Speaker 3: fifty percent tails. But if you throw it maybe a 1031 00:49:14,239 --> 00:49:18,280 Speaker 3: regular way, then you get seventy percent heads thirty percent tails. 1032 00:49:18,320 --> 00:49:20,799 Speaker 3: You're sort of controlling how I throw it either way 1033 00:49:21,200 --> 00:49:23,759 Speaker 3: exactly the fifty percent way or the seventy percent way. 1034 00:49:24,040 --> 00:49:26,880 Speaker 3: When I do the experiments, you're controlling me to toss 1035 00:49:26,920 --> 00:49:28,680 Speaker 3: it to fifty percent way. But when you when I 1036 00:49:28,719 --> 00:49:32,040 Speaker 3: go to place of bed, like for reals, then you 1037 00:49:32,040 --> 00:49:34,120 Speaker 3: you have me throw it the other way, the seventy 1038 00:49:34,160 --> 00:49:34,640 Speaker 3: percent way. 1039 00:49:35,440 --> 00:49:38,600 Speaker 1: And so if that sounds ridiculous and contrived and implausible 1040 00:49:38,600 --> 00:49:41,840 Speaker 1: to you, then get ready for Bell's experiment and the 1041 00:49:41,840 --> 00:49:45,840 Speaker 1: effects of superdeterminism. That says that maybe the whole universe 1042 00:49:45,920 --> 00:49:48,360 Speaker 1: is set up in a way such that the people 1043 00:49:48,360 --> 00:49:52,160 Speaker 1: who have been doing these experiments, which requires some randomness, right, 1044 00:49:52,200 --> 00:49:54,520 Speaker 1: because they're choosing these axes on which to make these 1045 00:49:54,560 --> 00:49:58,200 Speaker 1: electron spin measurements. What if those aren't actually random? What 1046 00:49:58,239 --> 00:50:01,600 Speaker 1: if that's been sort of like contral throughout the history 1047 00:50:01,640 --> 00:50:04,040 Speaker 1: of the universe, including like how these people grew up, 1048 00:50:04,040 --> 00:50:06,600 Speaker 1: how they designed their experiments, how they chose to try 1049 00:50:06,640 --> 00:50:10,160 Speaker 1: to find random information to conduct their experiments. All of 1050 00:50:10,200 --> 00:50:13,359 Speaker 1: that has been controlled since the beginning of time such 1051 00:50:13,400 --> 00:50:16,120 Speaker 1: that these experiments would look like they're random even though 1052 00:50:16,120 --> 00:50:18,440 Speaker 1: they're not. That's super determinism. 1053 00:50:18,719 --> 00:50:22,839 Speaker 3: You're saying that, Like in Bell's experiments, you know, it's 1054 00:50:22,840 --> 00:50:25,800 Speaker 3: an experiment and it's random, and so even if you 1055 00:50:25,880 --> 00:50:29,400 Speaker 3: like do the experiment perfectly, there is a possibility, because 1056 00:50:29,400 --> 00:50:32,680 Speaker 3: it is sort of an experiment, that it might tell 1057 00:50:32,719 --> 00:50:36,319 Speaker 3: you that the coin is fifty percent fair even though 1058 00:50:36,320 --> 00:50:38,560 Speaker 3: it's not right, because it's still a coin. Like even 1059 00:50:38,560 --> 00:50:41,400 Speaker 3: if I take a fake bias coin, you know, and 1060 00:50:41,480 --> 00:50:43,880 Speaker 3: I tossed it a thousand times, it's still technically possible 1061 00:50:43,920 --> 00:50:46,600 Speaker 3: for me to get fifty percent head fifty percent tail. 1062 00:50:46,680 --> 00:50:50,759 Speaker 3: And so I think you're saying that some my coincidence, 1063 00:50:51,120 --> 00:50:53,640 Speaker 3: the universe since the beginning of time has been set 1064 00:50:53,719 --> 00:50:56,120 Speaker 3: up in a way so that every time somebody runs 1065 00:50:56,120 --> 00:50:59,200 Speaker 3: Bell's experiments, somehow they always picked the direction that tells 1066 00:50:59,239 --> 00:51:01,399 Speaker 3: me that the coin is two percent, when actually it's 1067 00:51:01,400 --> 00:51:02,640 Speaker 3: seventy percent exactly. 1068 00:51:02,640 --> 00:51:05,440 Speaker 1: Because there's this step in these experiments when you have 1069 00:51:05,480 --> 00:51:07,600 Speaker 1: to pick what axis am I going to measure my 1070 00:51:07,680 --> 00:51:09,960 Speaker 1: electron on. You have one electron over here and one 1071 00:51:09,960 --> 00:51:12,520 Speaker 1: electron over there, and each electron you need to pick 1072 00:51:12,600 --> 00:51:15,160 Speaker 1: one of three axis, and then Bell's experiment tells you 1073 00:51:15,480 --> 00:51:17,719 Speaker 1: how often you'll get the same result and how often 1074 00:51:17,719 --> 00:51:19,680 Speaker 1: you'll get opposite spins. But you need to pick the 1075 00:51:19,719 --> 00:51:22,680 Speaker 1: axis randomly so that you add up to the right correlations. 1076 00:51:22,920 --> 00:51:25,319 Speaker 1: And so if you're not picking those randomly, if you're 1077 00:51:25,320 --> 00:51:28,440 Speaker 1: like contriving those to always be the same direction, for example, 1078 00:51:28,600 --> 00:51:30,239 Speaker 1: then you're not going to get one third, you're going 1079 00:51:30,320 --> 00:51:32,960 Speaker 1: to get fifty percent. This kind of stuff, And so 1080 00:51:33,160 --> 00:51:37,919 Speaker 1: it's possible to manipulate these experiments in theory to make 1081 00:51:37,960 --> 00:51:41,480 Speaker 1: that happen. Now in practice, the folks that do these experiments, 1082 00:51:41,480 --> 00:51:44,319 Speaker 1: they're very careful about this. They don't just like use 1083 00:51:44,320 --> 00:51:47,200 Speaker 1: some random number generator off the internet, like. They have 1084 00:51:47,320 --> 00:51:51,520 Speaker 1: developed these hilarious efforts to make their experiments like really 1085 00:51:51,640 --> 00:51:54,680 Speaker 1: random and impossible to manipulate. And in the case of 1086 00:51:54,719 --> 00:51:57,239 Speaker 1: these experiments I was reading about in twenty fifteen, the 1087 00:51:57,280 --> 00:52:01,520 Speaker 1: measurement decisions were determined by applying some operation to three 1088 00:52:01,640 --> 00:52:05,400 Speaker 1: bits of information from three independent sources, one of which 1089 00:52:05,600 --> 00:52:10,800 Speaker 1: was random digits of pie. Another was binary strings derived 1090 00:52:10,800 --> 00:52:14,360 Speaker 1: from Monty Python and the Holy Grail transformed into a 1091 00:52:14,400 --> 00:52:18,560 Speaker 1: bit sequence. Another from episodes of Saved by the Bell, 1092 00:52:21,200 --> 00:52:23,600 Speaker 1: which I love because you know, this is Bell's experiment, 1093 00:52:23,640 --> 00:52:26,000 Speaker 1: and so they're using episodes of Saved by the Bell, 1094 00:52:26,480 --> 00:52:29,520 Speaker 1: converting that script into a series of numbers and using 1095 00:52:29,600 --> 00:52:31,680 Speaker 1: that to generate part of their input. 1096 00:52:31,880 --> 00:52:34,040 Speaker 3: I'm not sure this is making the experiment more legit, 1097 00:52:34,160 --> 00:52:35,759 Speaker 3: you know what I'm saying, Like, I'm listening to this 1098 00:52:35,840 --> 00:52:39,960 Speaker 3: and I'm thinking it's less legit because of these crazy antics. 1099 00:52:40,120 --> 00:52:42,680 Speaker 1: No, you know how television production works. In order to 1100 00:52:42,719 --> 00:52:45,120 Speaker 1: manipulate Bell's experiment, Not only do you have to manipulate 1101 00:52:45,120 --> 00:52:47,680 Speaker 1: all these experiments across space and time, you also have 1102 00:52:47,719 --> 00:52:50,319 Speaker 1: to somehow manipulate these meetings where they talk about the 1103 00:52:50,360 --> 00:52:54,000 Speaker 1: script for these television episodes in a way that determines 1104 00:52:54,040 --> 00:52:56,759 Speaker 1: the outcome of these experiments. Like it's ridiculous. You know 1105 00:52:57,040 --> 00:52:59,640 Speaker 1: how impossible it is to get that through network executives. 1106 00:53:00,560 --> 00:53:02,120 Speaker 3: Well, I think the idea is that, you know, when 1107 00:53:02,160 --> 00:53:04,440 Speaker 3: you run Bell's experiment, and again we'll get into more 1108 00:53:04,480 --> 00:53:06,480 Speaker 3: details of it in a later episode, but I think 1109 00:53:06,520 --> 00:53:08,960 Speaker 3: the idea is that there's some choice in the experiments, 1110 00:53:08,960 --> 00:53:11,560 Speaker 3: Like you say, okay, we'll measure along this axis, and 1111 00:53:11,680 --> 00:53:14,600 Speaker 3: it is technically possible to pick an axis that tells 1112 00:53:14,719 --> 00:53:18,400 Speaker 3: you that the coin is fifty percent fair, right, Like, 1113 00:53:18,560 --> 00:53:21,120 Speaker 3: technically it's possible. And so the idea is that, you know, 1114 00:53:21,280 --> 00:53:24,919 Speaker 3: maybe every time they've run this experiment and they've picked 1115 00:53:24,920 --> 00:53:28,680 Speaker 3: a random direction, they've somehow picked the direction that tells 1116 00:53:28,680 --> 00:53:31,680 Speaker 3: you that the coin is fair, meaning like it's some strange, 1117 00:53:31,760 --> 00:53:35,160 Speaker 3: super weird coincidence that someone We think the universe is random, 1118 00:53:35,200 --> 00:53:38,200 Speaker 3: but really we just live in this crazy universe where 1119 00:53:38,440 --> 00:53:41,240 Speaker 3: every time we run Bell's experiments, we've always somehow chosen 1120 00:53:41,320 --> 00:53:44,040 Speaker 3: the direction that makes it look fifty percent fair. 1121 00:53:44,160 --> 00:53:48,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, maybe these electrons really are determined by local information 1122 00:53:48,480 --> 00:53:51,600 Speaker 1: that's not available to us, and we do these experiments 1123 00:53:51,600 --> 00:53:53,960 Speaker 1: to try to suss that out. But the experiments have 1124 00:53:54,000 --> 00:53:56,040 Speaker 1: a bit of a random element to them, and if 1125 00:53:56,040 --> 00:53:58,840 Speaker 1: it's not actually random, and we think it's random, but 1126 00:53:59,040 --> 00:54:01,680 Speaker 1: we're being tricked them in manipulated. Then we could conclude 1127 00:54:01,680 --> 00:54:04,640 Speaker 1: that the universe has this random element, that there is 1128 00:54:04,719 --> 00:54:08,279 Speaker 1: this non local random thing happening, when in reality it's not. 1129 00:54:08,960 --> 00:54:12,120 Speaker 1: And so that sounds ridiculous and unlikely, and it is. 1130 00:54:12,680 --> 00:54:14,640 Speaker 1: But you know, it's the state we're at where we're 1131 00:54:14,640 --> 00:54:17,799 Speaker 1: like trying to swallow the weirdness of quantum mechanics and 1132 00:54:17,920 --> 00:54:20,000 Speaker 1: just trying to make sure before we accept that the 1133 00:54:20,080 --> 00:54:22,799 Speaker 1: universe is this weird way, that there is no other 1134 00:54:22,920 --> 00:54:26,080 Speaker 1: possible explanation. And so again this is like an exercise 1135 00:54:26,120 --> 00:54:28,560 Speaker 1: and philosophical thorough in this just to make sure we've 1136 00:54:28,560 --> 00:54:30,320 Speaker 1: thought about all the other possibilities. 1137 00:54:30,680 --> 00:54:34,320 Speaker 3: Well, I guess you know, it could be like maybe 1138 00:54:34,320 --> 00:54:36,319 Speaker 3: we live in some kind of multiverse and we just 1139 00:54:36,360 --> 00:54:38,520 Speaker 3: happen to live in the multiverse where every time we 1140 00:54:38,600 --> 00:54:41,319 Speaker 3: run Bell's experiments, we think it's a fair coin, but 1141 00:54:41,520 --> 00:54:44,759 Speaker 3: really we're just somehow fooling ourselves into thinking the coin 1142 00:54:44,840 --> 00:54:45,160 Speaker 3: is fair. 1143 00:54:45,480 --> 00:54:48,839 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's possible, right, it seems really unlikely because there's 1144 00:54:48,880 --> 00:54:52,040 Speaker 1: been so many iterations in these experiments in different conditions, 1145 00:54:52,320 --> 00:54:54,839 Speaker 1: and so it just gets more and more implausible. The 1146 00:54:54,880 --> 00:54:56,560 Speaker 1: more times we test it, and the more times it 1147 00:54:56,600 --> 00:55:00,000 Speaker 1: comes out like bang on, exactly what quantum mechanics predict. 1148 00:55:00,440 --> 00:55:02,920 Speaker 1: So it's not something anybody should take seriously as anything 1149 00:55:03,000 --> 00:55:05,719 Speaker 1: other than like an interesting thought experiment, like how far 1150 00:55:05,840 --> 00:55:09,560 Speaker 1: do you have to go to rescue determinism? How ridiculous 1151 00:55:09,600 --> 00:55:12,200 Speaker 1: do you have to imagine the universe is in order 1152 00:55:12,200 --> 00:55:14,479 Speaker 1: for it to not be quantum mechanical in this way 1153 00:55:14,480 --> 00:55:16,480 Speaker 1: that we are slowly coming to grips with. 1154 00:55:17,440 --> 00:55:20,080 Speaker 3: I see, so when you say superdeterminism, it's really more 1155 00:55:20,120 --> 00:55:25,439 Speaker 3: like super stubborn determinism. Like it's not actually like likely 1156 00:55:25,520 --> 00:55:28,920 Speaker 3: that it's true, but it's you're still clinging to the 1157 00:55:28,960 --> 00:55:32,000 Speaker 3: idea that maybe the universe is determined. 1158 00:55:32,120 --> 00:55:35,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's like super desperatism. People are desperate not to 1159 00:55:35,400 --> 00:55:36,920 Speaker 1: give up on determinism. 1160 00:55:37,440 --> 00:55:42,000 Speaker 3: Super desperate determinism. Yeah, it's like the bizarro Superman. All right, Well, 1161 00:55:42,040 --> 00:55:44,960 Speaker 3: what does it all mean? Doesn't mean that that we're 1162 00:55:45,000 --> 00:55:48,960 Speaker 3: increasingly thinking that there is free will or unpredictability in 1163 00:55:49,000 --> 00:55:52,720 Speaker 3: the universe, right, that we now maybe are getting closer 1164 00:55:52,760 --> 00:55:56,760 Speaker 3: to leaving behind this idea that the universe is determined. 1165 00:55:56,880 --> 00:55:59,200 Speaker 1: Well, we are definitely coming to grips with and accepting 1166 00:55:59,200 --> 00:56:02,560 Speaker 1: this consequence that the universe is non local, that it 1167 00:56:02,680 --> 00:56:06,160 Speaker 1: has to somehow make this collapse decision across space in 1168 00:56:06,520 --> 00:56:09,239 Speaker 1: no time, which is sort of amazing. And you know, 1169 00:56:09,320 --> 00:56:12,560 Speaker 1: another interesting loophole or wrinkle to this interpretation of Bell's 1170 00:56:12,560 --> 00:56:14,800 Speaker 1: experiment is that we have to remember that Bell's experiment 1171 00:56:14,880 --> 00:56:17,560 Speaker 1: just tells us that there are no local hidden variables. 1172 00:56:17,760 --> 00:56:21,520 Speaker 1: It's possible for there to be global hidden variables. Maybe 1173 00:56:21,520 --> 00:56:24,840 Speaker 1: there's like some bank somewhere that keeps all this information 1174 00:56:25,160 --> 00:56:27,680 Speaker 1: and is arranging all of this stuff and can transmit 1175 00:56:27,760 --> 00:56:31,360 Speaker 1: it across space and time instantaneously. That's basically Bomian mechanics. 1176 00:56:31,360 --> 00:56:33,680 Speaker 1: We had an episode about that last year, so check 1177 00:56:33,680 --> 00:56:37,080 Speaker 1: that out if you're curious about that interpretation of Bell's experiment, 1178 00:56:37,160 --> 00:56:40,719 Speaker 1: which is actually one of Bell himself's favorite interpretations. But 1179 00:56:40,760 --> 00:56:42,920 Speaker 1: I think that most people understand it to mean that 1180 00:56:42,960 --> 00:56:46,319 Speaker 1: the universe is fundamentally random, that there are these decisions 1181 00:56:46,480 --> 00:56:48,880 Speaker 1: being made sort of at the last minute by the 1182 00:56:49,000 --> 00:56:52,120 Speaker 1: universe when the wave function collapses. What that means for 1183 00:56:52,200 --> 00:56:54,239 Speaker 1: free will is a question for philosophers. 1184 00:56:54,400 --> 00:56:57,440 Speaker 3: All right, well, I guess maybe we should change it 1185 00:56:57,480 --> 00:57:01,600 Speaker 3: into sad determinism. But do you know. I thought maybe 1186 00:57:01,640 --> 00:57:04,120 Speaker 3: in our last episode we talked about how there is 1187 00:57:04,160 --> 00:57:07,560 Speaker 3: no simultaneity in the universe, right, this idea that there's 1188 00:57:07,600 --> 00:57:10,040 Speaker 3: no real sort of like fixed time in the universe. 1189 00:57:10,160 --> 00:57:11,960 Speaker 3: Could there be some sort of loophole there? 1190 00:57:12,080 --> 00:57:13,600 Speaker 1: Oh no, that's a good point, right, How can you 1191 00:57:13,640 --> 00:57:16,240 Speaker 1: even talk about simultan ady across space and time? There 1192 00:57:16,280 --> 00:57:18,800 Speaker 1: isn't a loophole there because they've separated them so far 1193 00:57:18,840 --> 00:57:21,800 Speaker 1: apart that we know that these things cannot be cousantly 1194 00:57:21,840 --> 00:57:24,600 Speaker 1: linked to each other. So while we can't say exactly 1195 00:57:24,640 --> 00:57:28,320 Speaker 1: which one happens first, this electron measurement or that electron measurement, 1196 00:57:28,440 --> 00:57:30,800 Speaker 1: we do know that they can't be costantly linked because 1197 00:57:30,800 --> 00:57:32,320 Speaker 1: they're so far apart in space. 1198 00:57:32,600 --> 00:57:35,720 Speaker 3: All right, Well, then I guess maybe the universe really 1199 00:57:35,800 --> 00:57:39,360 Speaker 3: is random and unpredictable. Let's test this right now, Daniel, 1200 00:57:39,400 --> 00:57:40,400 Speaker 3: what am I going to say next? 1201 00:57:41,680 --> 00:57:46,440 Speaker 1: It's going to be some joke about strange balls. Wrong. 1202 00:57:49,600 --> 00:57:51,680 Speaker 3: I was going to say, thanks for joining us. We 1203 00:57:51,760 --> 00:57:53,560 Speaker 3: hope you enjoyed that. See you next time. 1204 00:58:01,440 --> 00:58:04,240 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening, and remember that. Daniel and Jorge Explain 1205 00:58:04,280 --> 00:58:08,280 Speaker 1: the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts 1206 00:58:08,280 --> 00:58:12,960 Speaker 1: from iHeartRadio Visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever 1207 00:58:13,040 --> 00:58:26,680 Speaker 1: you listen to your favorite shows. When you pop a 1208 00:58:26,680 --> 00:58:29,000 Speaker 1: piece of cheese into your mouth, you're probably not thinking 1209 00:58:29,000 --> 00:58:31,920 Speaker 1: about the environmental impact. But the people in the dairy 1210 00:58:31,920 --> 00:58:35,080 Speaker 1: industry are. That's why they're working hard every day to 1211 00:58:35,120 --> 00:58:38,160 Speaker 1: find new ways to reduce waste, conserve natural resources, and 1212 00:58:38,280 --> 00:58:43,080 Speaker 1: drive down greenhouse gas emissions. House US Dairy tackling greenhouse gases. 1213 00:58:43,400 --> 00:58:46,480 Speaker 1: Many farms use anaerobic digestors to turn the methane from 1214 00:58:46,520 --> 00:58:50,480 Speaker 1: manure into renewable energy that can power farms, towns, and 1215 00:58:50,640 --> 00:58:54,640 Speaker 1: electric cars. Visit us dairy dot COM's Last Sustainability to 1216 00:58:54,760 --> 00:58:55,320 Speaker 1: learn more. 1217 00:58:56,080 --> 00:58:59,720 Speaker 12: The all electric Chevy Equinoxy EVA combines everything you need 1218 00:59:00,000 --> 00:59:02,240 Speaker 12: you are ready to go EV starting at thirty four 1219 00:59:02,360 --> 00:59:05,840 Speaker 12: nine ninety five. That twenty twenty five Equinox evlt gives 1220 00:59:05,840 --> 00:59:09,120 Speaker 12: you an impressive balance of all electric range, safety features 1221 00:59:09,120 --> 00:59:12,520 Speaker 12: for peace of mind, and effortless technology, including the seventeen 1222 00:59:12,560 --> 00:59:14,600 Speaker 12: point seven inch diagonal display. 1223 00:59:14,200 --> 00:59:15,919 Speaker 1: Screen, all at a price you'll love. 1224 00:59:16,080 --> 00:59:18,520 Speaker 12: The Chevy Equinox EV is the fund to drive all 1225 00:59:18,560 --> 00:59:21,160 Speaker 12: electric SUV that gives you what you need to do 1226 00:59:21,240 --> 00:59:24,680 Speaker 12: exactly what you want. The manufacturer suggested retail price excludes tax, 1227 00:59:24,720 --> 00:59:27,320 Speaker 12: title licensed dealer fees at optional equipment dealer sets final price. 1228 00:59:27,400 --> 00:59:30,400 Speaker 12: To learn more, visit Chevy dot com slash equinox EV. 1229 00:59:32,480 --> 00:59:34,920 Speaker 1: This episode is brought to you by FX Is the 1230 00:59:34,960 --> 00:59:35,520 Speaker 1: Old Man. 1231 00:59:35,760 --> 00:59:39,120 Speaker 13: The hit show returns starring Jeff Bridges and John Lithgow. 1232 00:59:39,400 --> 00:59:42,800 Speaker 12: The former CIA agent sets off on his most important 1233 00:59:42,840 --> 00:59:46,400 Speaker 12: mission to date to recover his daughter after she's kidnapped. 1234 00:59:46,640 --> 00:59:50,200 Speaker 1: The stakes get higher and more secrets are uncovered. FX 1235 00:59:50,280 --> 00:59:53,840 Speaker 1: Is the Old Man All new Thursdays on FX, Stream 1236 00:59:53,920 --> 00:59:54,480 Speaker 1: on Hulu