WEBVTT - Surveillance: We Have Reached Peak Globalization, Bremmer Says

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Daily

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg When

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we start strong with Ian Bremer of Eurasia Group. His

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>TOMP Risk just released always timely, and he releases it

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>this year with America front and center, and of course

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>part of that is our coverage of the president. And

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>then we we'll hear from the Senate impeachment trial. That

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>will be twelve pm New York time, tenderly scheduled for

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.639
<v Speaker 1>their We're thrilled that Dr Bremmer begins our Tuesday here

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in Dabba's Ian. Wonderful to have you here today. Why

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>did you make the US a top risk for this year? Well, size,

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the market's massive, and the precedented nature of the election

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>coming up, where half of the population is going to

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>think that it is rigged, is going to think it's delegitimized.

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is important. You're gonna have, you know,

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 1>a period of time, whether it's weeks and months when

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>we've had the election, but all likelihood, we haven't agreed

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>on who the next president is. I haven't had that

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>since Bush Gore and Bush Core. At least both sides

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.559
<v Speaker 1>were prepared to see what the Supreme Court was gonna

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>rule that this is more unprecedented. People are prepared to

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Who was the president going to speak to here roughly

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty thirty five minutes. Who's he talking to as he

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to Davos? Oh no, he Look, he loves it

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>here right when he Remember he was here three years

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>ago and everyone thought it was going to be a

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>disaster and he had a great time and the c

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>e O s were extremely nice to him. And the

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>lunch remember the lunch were absolutely And I mean, so

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>did you go to the ch I did it, But

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>actually I remember, like you know, billionaires trying to fight

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to go and listen to the president. Absolutely. Look, I

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>mean you gotta understand, first of all, the delegates here

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>may not like Trump. They like his policies, um, they

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like the regulatory rollback, they like his cabinet, um, they

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>like his tax policy. I did informal poll last night

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>about delegates on balance. I would say they think he's

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna win a second term. And there was a zero

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>panic about the prospect that might happen. So, I mean,

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>you can have Greta here, and you can have a

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people talking about climate sustainability. But the reality

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is that Trump doesn't drive people crazy at Davos the

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>way he does in the United States. And people should

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>hear that, they should know what the power brokers in

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the room in the closed door actually thinking. And in

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>President Trump does his you know, the inaugural address for

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the World Economic from on the day where his impeachment

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>trial starts. Is he going to be fighting and he's

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>he going to say, look, Europeans, you're not doing enough.

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to post Harroffs because he needs an adversary

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to distract. Or is he going to try and keep

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone on side. I'd be very surprised, Um, if he's

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>adversarial with this group. I expect this is gonna be

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump saying victory lap I'm the greatest ever. My economy

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is doing well, my markets are taking off. Look how

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>much money I'm making you guys. I got rid of Sulimani,

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm killing ice in al Quaeda. He may go off

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>script and talk about how bad and how unfair the

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>impeachment is but this is going to be a triumphal

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>list unilateralist president. Do people in the state's care? So

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>does the voter care about what President Trump says in donals?

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean they care for a day, sure, and then

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they move on to the next thing. I mean, did

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we care when neuron crisis hit? We did? You're not

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>asking me about it now. I mean, these these cycles

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>are incredibly short, but it's interesting to see how the

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>global markets, in the global investor community actually orient. You've

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>got Steve Schwartzman coming up. You know how close he's

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>been to Trump over the course of the last couple

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of years. I mean generally speaking as a group that

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>wants access, they pay for access, and please when that happened,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And we'll talk to Steven Schwartzman about that, about the

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>fundraisers and all his support of the president, which just

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>been somewhat controversial. Say I, and you've been studying this

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for decades. How alone is America right now because of

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>this president and this president's policies? Is it an America

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>or not only a Davos, but just generally worldwide in

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the Eurasian world? How alone are we? It's more alone

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>because of this president. Certainly he doesn't care as much

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>for traditional alliances or multilateral institutions the Americans have created.

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's be clear, the United States is in decline

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>visa East China. The Chinese are spending a lot of

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>money internet China on a per capita basis, and they've

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.799
<v Speaker 1>got what is one, They've got a major health scare

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>going on in China. Worldly it is very clear that

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Belton Road is a bigger event than Dabos. It attracts

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>more heads of state, it dispenses more cash. But America's

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>relationship visa these American allies, the US is not only

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>not in decline, it's increasing in power in the role

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>of the dollar in military expenditure and its strength in

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>production of oil and gas and food. And and if

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump's not president next year, that's still gonna be true.

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And allies don't want to deal with that reality. But

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it is the case. And He's figured out what kind

0:04:55.440 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism China will have in five ten years from now. Uh.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>The fact that the Chinese are not in any way

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>aligning with or integrating with Western style capitalism is something

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that these CEOs are having a hard time coming to terms.

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>With This is the fiftieth year anniversary of Davos, and

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>for fifty years the message that has come from this

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>platform has been winning globally globalization and free market capitalism.

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not anymore, and the reason for that is because

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese are not aligned with that. What are we

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>peak globalization? So it's just going to be declined from now.

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>It's not the end of globalization, but we're peak globalization.

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean the decision of the United States and the

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Chinese to decouple from each other in terms of technology.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>It's the single biggest step away from globalization we've seen

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in the fifty years since Davos has been created. Absolutely,

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the Edleman Trust Barometer on Richard Edelman's schedule to join us,

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't say enough about this important document, the Edelman

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Trust Barometer. I was stunned at the separateness on capitalism

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of general society and the elites. Does that surprise you

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in what's the solution for the anointed up this happy valley?

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>To reattach to the rest of American frankly, to the

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>rest of the developed economies. It's hard to claim that

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the average American as capitalists when the average American doesn't

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>have capital I mean, certainly that's the way I was raised, right,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my my mom said, they're not taking care

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>of you. Only they're all gonna lie and they being

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>governed a single sense for Richard Edelman, where he says

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>CEOs have to become much more activist about explaining how

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody gets inclusive. Do we need Jamie Diamond, Michael Corbett,

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and the others to be more assertive about distributing the

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>benefits of capitalism to American No, no, we don't. We

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>don't need them to explain. We need the problem to

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>start being resolved. We need less inequality in the United States.

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>We need people that are being left behind and feel

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the system is riged to feel less that way. And

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing that CEOs can say. There is no document

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they can sign, there is no advertisement they can take

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>out in the paper that is going to change that

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>reality if the reality doesn't change. And let's keep in mind,

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>not only is global inequality and American inequality increased over

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the last several years, but also now we have an

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>economy that's starting to soften globally. The i m F

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>just yesterday exactly. So, I mean, one has to think

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that in that environment, ceo is are gonna be more

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>laser like focused on returns irrespective of what they're saying.

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Agree with that. I know, I know that a loss

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>can happen from now until November in the U S election.

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>But the popularity of President Trump, I think is plateauing

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>at it's not there it is that Is that enough

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to to win? I mean it's first of all, depends

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>on who the Democratic nominee is That Bernie Sanders worth

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the nominee. I don't think that's gonna happen. I think

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it's enough to win. UM, if it's you know, Joe Biden,

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it it might not be. But let's keep in mind

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>this is an unprecedented election, not only because it's about

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump and turnout is likely to be very high, also

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>because there's massive amounts of money that Bloomberg is planning

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>on spending irrespective of who the Democratic nominee is. Apt

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to say that um, And because the role that Trump

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is likely to play in terms of his willingness to

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>abuse power when impeachment has been broken, is also going

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to be new. So it's hard to make that call.

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>One more questionnaire with Dr Breimer before we move on.

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Through this important Now in the president Michael Bloomberg is

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>for a president. We're fighting over who's going to do

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the disclaimer. Well, I want to do it. No, I

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>could do it. Michael Bloomberg is running for president. There's

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a undertime we should be. He's a founder of Bloomberg

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>LP and also uh this TV and radio operation as well. Bremer,

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>this is so important. You say, CEOs cannot affect an

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>attachment to the American public with words and with lip service.

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.599
<v Speaker 1>What is the prescriptive policy that is going to reattach

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>America to capitalism. What's the to do list for Washington

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to get this done? Well, I mean I would say

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that almost every American CEO I know tells me in

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the next five ten years that they can make more

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>money with fewer people. Um, that reality somehow is going

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to need to be changed by coming up with jobs

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>for more people. They're going to have to invest much

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>more in training. They're going to have to hire more,

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>not less. They're gonna have to raise wages for the

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>working in the middle class. They have to do that

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>as a reality when the government is not stepping in,

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't again, it doesn't really matter what they say,

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're gonna be fighting upstream member the fourth

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Industrial Revolution that has come up with here by claud

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Schwab a few years ago. But for the average worker

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that says capitalism doesn't work, it's not fourth Industrial Revolution,

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a post industrial revolution because they are not part

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of it. Ian Bremer, thank you so much for starting

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>us off in this important hour. Here's with Eraser group.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't say enough about their top ross. Dr Bremer

0:09:50.920 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>here where this all this week as well? Steve Schwartzman

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of Blackstone, who was that speech too? Was it for

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the U. S Citizens back home so they get him

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>reelected or was it for the participants of devils? I

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>think it was for several different constituencies. I think here

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>here's somebody who is having the impeachment process start with

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the trial today. And I think this was a speech

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to basically say, I think we need some perspective, uh,

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and let's look at what's happened under this administration. And

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's not just for domestic consumption. I think

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's meant to be heard in a broader context.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Could the US China Phase one deal have been signed

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve months ago. Um, it would have been if it

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>could have been, but that it couldn't have been done. Uh.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, part of the issue on the trade

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>agreement Fran saying is is that you know, you need

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>two countries, and each country has its own politics and

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and China is not a monolithic country in that sense.

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>They have their hardliners, they have their reformers, and and

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>what's happened over the last it's actually been three years

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that the the US and China have been discussing changes

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>uh in trade. That it takes a while, uh for

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a country that's got a very particular system like China

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to basically make a decision to start changing the system

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that's been very successful for them. So so I think

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that the fact that a phase one deal was done

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>meant that both parts in China have come together, along

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with the U. S side itself had ambitions uh that

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>ranged from from exceptionally comprehensive uh to not so much

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>so uh. And so everybody met in the middle. C

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Shrunkesman with us with Blackstone, our chief executive officer. And

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I might point out author the Belvedere Hotel was the

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>ancient hotel here. It's where you came years ago, if

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you were to have for the tuperculosis treatment and all,

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a wonderful photograph of Robert Louis Stevenson in the

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>background of that. And to get to the rub the

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Magic mount the Thomas Man, the Magic Mountain, and to

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>get to uh, those photographs of Robert Louis Stevenson, you've

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>got to walk through the lobby and the bookstore. Notice

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the Steven Schwartzman bookstore is well, how are book sales

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>here in Davos. Well, you know, actually, uh, we're giving

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>them away. That sounds like private equity is just your

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>idea over here. You let him give away books. There

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>goes a profit margin, is what they wouldn't let us

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>sell them, And I wanted people to read them. So

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting Tom. This morning I always said something. At

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>seven o'clock, four or five people walked up, said could

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you please sign my book? Uh, you know, I just

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>picked it up. I'm excited to read it. Just Tim

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Cooker's Bezos read your book. If you're run into Tim

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Cooker Jeff Bezos about the Schwartzman theme, Well, it's interesting. Um.

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I saw Jeff before the book was published, and I said,

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Jeff here's what I'm doing, here's the theme. Could you

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>be helpful with Amazon? And he said, sure, send it

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to me h and we'll take care of it. This

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is so important, Steven, I want to make this point.

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I went down to the offices of Jeff wins LinkedIn

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the other day at the Empire State Building and you're

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>stuck in traffic and you look over and you're right

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>as you go down Fifth Avenue is a Schwartzman Library,

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the New York Public Library. You, more than anybody in

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>America know the new technology of cook in Bezos versus

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the old technology of what you've donated millions of dollars to.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>What is what is the focus of technology that you

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>see right now? Is it a benefit to Americans or

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>all of the tension of the selection and all. Is

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it because they're technological halves and there are too many

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>technological have nots. Well, we've got to get everybody to

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>be a technological have. Technologies is benefiting American enormous number

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of ways. For example, you know, you take your smartphone.

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>You know YouTube would be lost without that, as would I,

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>uh and uh we're also lost with it. But that's

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the whole of your state you want to go back.

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>There's that track photo of you running around doing a

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>three minute mile a few years ago. I want to

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>go back long agoing far away. You supported this president

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>because the Republicans had the vision with Democrats to build

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the interstate highway system in the fifties. Can't you help

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the president support an interstate highway of technology in America

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>where we take the whole country and get all this fixed.

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're is enormous need and it's bipartisan, uh,

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Tom that you know, Chuck Schumer, for example, along with

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>many people in Congress, want to make a major step forward,

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>as does the administration UM in terms of providing money

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for AI UH and UH what made me even more

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>consequential quantum UH in the future. UH. And and you know,

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the universities that are doing this advanced research, the companies

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>who are who are sort of the American flagship carriers

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>UH in technology all want more research funds UH to

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>increase competitiveness. Now, this really will end up benefiting regular people,

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's with diagnoses of illnesses with much more reliability, UH,

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>development of drugs which could end up being half the

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>cost as a result of it. UH. Huge breakthroughs in

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>education where you'll be able to to instruct students of

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>all different types of backgrounds. So so technology uh has

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>gotten some enormous benefits. What's the biggest unknown for the markets?

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it the U S election? Is it global growth

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>or is it geopolitics? Well, it's not global growth. I

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think global growth will continue. The biggest risk uh. You know,

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>for for markets are are two types of things. One

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is US domestic politics and the second is the black

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>swan effects that can happen. I mean, we just had

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>an incident for example, Uh in in Iraq, I was

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>watching television. Almost everyone who's declaring World War three starting.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>They all happened to be wrong. But if they were right, uh,

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and the straits of hormones were closed, and we ended

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>up uh. You know, with a huge dislocation. You could

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>get thrown accidentally into a slow growth to recession. But

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it's quite amazing how the market quickly discounted once there

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there was no immediate threat of war. They kind of

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>moved on. We have asset prises really priced to perfection.

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So how do the two kind of match up? Well,

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>usually perfection doesn't last. Uh. And you know this has

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>been an amazing run. Usually you expect some type of adjustment. Uh.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But but if if, if, if we don't have a

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>really um discontinuest event with US politics and we avoid

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>um the kinds of major international type of of risks,

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical risks. I think we'll go on with variability up

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and down over today's levels. Do you think out what

0:17:57.840 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>time for one more question? Because I know you're going

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>off to go skiing on this perfect day, and I'm

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>going to ask you the same question I would ask

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Mr Rubinstein and the others. Richard Edelman's come out with

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a study that that would be the president leading right now.

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Those sirens you here in the background. Richard Edelman's come

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>out with a study of how capitalism is removed from

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>so many people in America. Is it time for private equity,

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Time for private equity to change its text treatment that's

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>been in place over the years. Like I leave that

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>one tom to uh uh to to the political people, uh,

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>every one of whom has their own unique solution uh

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>for the ills of the world. What I'd say is

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>part of the Edelman's study also had to do with

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>overall trust in institutions, And I think there's a real

0:18:55.080 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>need to address what's going wrong with our society where

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>so many people question almost every every institution in society.

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>How much pressure are you feeling? One final question, because

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't hear Tom's questions, it was the last question.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't count. How much pressure are you feeling from

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>investors to put cash to use? We don't have that

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of pressure. They don't They don't want to go

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in now. We've We've invested a lot of money over

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the years. When when when prices are high, you're trying

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and invest less um, when they're low, you try to

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>invest more. We we sell a lot of things. When

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>prices are high, we try and find things. It's harder.

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>So I got to make some sty Are you buying

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>or selling right now? I mean the market watch we

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>got we gotta go. The ski lift is waiting for

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Mr Schwartzman, But quickly, are you buying or selling? We

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>do both, Tom, we do Bothett have the stage. I'm

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>unplugged him and throwing a money right now. What is

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the an economist on the one hand and on the

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>other hand, ste thank you so much. We'll go sell

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a book with Blackstone. This morning City Group at the

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 1>most original path is arguably our most international bank. We

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>begin our banking coverage here, John and I of Michael Corbett.

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>He's the chief executive officer of City Group, and we

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>need a most timely update. Now give me an international

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>view from our most international bank. What is the state

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of City Group globally? Stated? City Group, Tom, is that

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're coming off of a strong year and

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a strong close to the year. And if you look

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>at both at a product level, at a geography level,

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>solid performance across our consumer and institutional businesses. And as

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you go to Latin America, as you go to Europe, Asia,

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>around the globe, strong uniform performance. The happy talk of

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Davos is best practices. What is the worst practice you're

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to avoid? Now as you look back at the

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>heritage of OH seven from a Davos perspective or from

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a city from a City Group perspective, what's the worst

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.719
<v Speaker 1>practice you're trying to avoid each and every day is

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>to we You know, we don't come to work. We

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>can't be No one can be everything to everybody. So

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the financial supermarket mentality, I think that permeated the first

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the two thousand to two thousand seven era,

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and to come to work to do the things that

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we can do best. And as you say, we are

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the most international, certainly of the U S. And we're

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in fact probably the most international of really any list

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of banks in the world. And as we think about

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that today, around the things the President discussed,

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the trade deals and things that have gone on, our

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>clients need just more than every well, let's talk about that.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>You hear it from the President this morning through the afternoon, optimism,

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>I hear it from you Upbate optimism. I don't feel

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that walking around the wholes of this particular event at

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the moment, there is some real pessimism that despite the

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>fact unemployments of multi decade lowest, despite the fact we

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>have the longest recovery on record, why not, what are

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>we missing here? Well, if we were here, and we

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>were here a year ago, there was pessimists of them.

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>If you remember the way that ended. I talked about

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a real fundamental disconnect between what the consumers behaviors were

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>saying and what the markets were saying. The markets as

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we were here, we're giving pretty strong shigns of forthcoming downturn,

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and in fact we didn't see it. We're here a

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>year later, UM, the smps up, city stocks up, the

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>markets had pretty broad based good performance, and by the way,

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the consumers still in good shape. The consumer has been

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the backbone of this recovery. He's standing up for capitalism

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this week. I think, I think all the firms, do

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you get that sense? I don't get that sense at

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the moment. I get a sense that things are changing,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>that the guardians of the States has quite realized they

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>can't protect it anymore and they need to change before

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>someone changes them. Do you not get that feeling? Mike, Well,

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>you know again, I think we get we were We

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>get in this nuance between capitalism and what's responsible. And

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I think today what you're hearing from companies around stakeholders

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>right is something I think in many cases that's been

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>embraced for years. It just wasn't necessarily talked about. You

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>think in today's age is coming to work as a company, UM,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>one of your stakeholders, your employees. If your employees don't

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>feel good about who you are and what you do,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to keep him. If your customers and

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>clients don't feel good about what you do, you're not

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna come, Michael. I want to go back to a

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Harvard discussion your folks, and I've been told Corbette will

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>walk off the set if I bring up Harvard Yale football,

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>which is beyond ugly, uh this past November. I want

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to go back to Michael Porter one on one. I'm

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>sure you've been in many classrooms of the wonderful Michael

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Porter over the years, and that is too many Americans

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>feel a barrier to entry to prosperity. They feel a

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>barrier of entry to society. People are looking. Richard Edelman

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly sees that people are looking to elites and are

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>too big to fail banks to assist those people to

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>get through those barriers. How do you affect that, Well,

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a real problem and in there when you think

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that we're eleven twelve years into quantitative easing,

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing adds to queie is for the elite. Ben

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Bernanke said, we had to save the banks. We saved

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the banks. You were advantaged by that. Every bank was different.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I get that. What do we do for the people

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>out there that there's at City Group retail they're worried

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>about fees and that what do we do to help

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>them get to within society Now, well, I think all

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the pieces that not just City but the industry is

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>working on in terms of inclusive finance. Right if you

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the programs were out there, we're getting ready

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to launch a program probably in the springtime with Google

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>goal in terms of being able to bring more people

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in the digitization of banking, compression, removal of fees, frictions

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in people's lives. And by the way, it's the mindset

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in the mantra of being able to create for people

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>best in life experiences. And that's not best in banking,

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but that's how do we create that best in life

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>experience and bring more people in to have the access.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at what's going on at City,

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>not just in the US, but around the world, we're

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>bringing people, were bringing business, We're bringing small business, we're

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>bringing women, were bringing all of those things to bear

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of inclusive finance. I'm gonna ask the question

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that I know really winds up. CEO is on Wall

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Street at the moment, so forgive me for doing it.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Eighteen billion that's how much was saved by the six

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 1>biggest banks on Wall Street for last year. Because of

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the tax cut, and people keep passing the same question.

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure that big banks on Wall Street

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>have done a great job of telling us where the

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>money's gone. Where's it gone? Well, one is we are

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a taxpayer, in a significant taxpayer off of our twenty

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of net income that we earned in it's

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>gone into our infrastructure, it's gone into technology, it's gone

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>into people, it's gone into lending. Yep, it's gone into investing.

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>We just announced a initiative where we're going to be

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>actually investing around clean and green technology. Uh. And you know,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we just announced launched a hundred and fifty million dollar

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>program over the next few years in terms of putting

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>some of those money's back returns to shareholders. Last year,

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>what were the point three billion. I'm not sitting here

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a post to buy backs. That's not my position. It's

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 1>not my job to have a position. I'm just wondering

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>how we reconcile some of the things we hear at

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>an event like this from CEOs on Wall Street about

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>moving away from shareholder primacy. When we see record profits

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and monster returns to shareholders year after year, how do

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we reconcile those two things in the years to come.

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.719
<v Speaker 1>One as I think the holders accountable for what we do.

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>And in there, yes, we did return twenty two billion

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>dollars to shareholders, but we also grew our loan at

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>four LEO at a pace faster than Global GDP, and

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we did it systemically responsible. You know, if

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>you were to take that twenty two billion dollars and

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>be forced to reinvest it. Tommy asked the question about

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>what you do different. You've got to be you've got

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to be scaled to serve your market. And if you're

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>putting all those moneys back in, I would argue that

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it's tough to keep your responsibility in that. We

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>welcome all over your here for the meetings of the

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>World Economic Forum. I'm Bloomberg Radio and I'm Bloomberg Television

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>or with Michael Corbett. He's the chief executive officer of

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>City Group. Within City Group, and you mentioned earlier technology

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 1>you just brought in dragged in, I should say, a

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>new head of retail. What a challenge five and ten

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 1>years forward is you and every other bank, regional banks,

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the small banks survived the technological demands of retail. What's

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the Corbette strategy for retail. What are the marching orders

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to your new guy running retail banking. Well, we've got

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a new gal running retail, excuse me, And the marching

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>orders are to make sure that we are pushing ourselves

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to be offering tom that best in life experience. It's

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>not about being best in bank, but if you can

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>match the ride hailing app, the retail app, whatever is

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly take frictions out of people's lives and reimagine what

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>banking can bes. Frictions mean job cuts, No, not at all.

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna do with all those bodies and

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>retraditional retail banking? Um One is that the pace of

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>change is probably slower than people think, meaning that we

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>cover a continuum of people and we are today running

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>an analog any digital bank. That will change over time.

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>But um we have a large cohort of people that

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>actually want there, I want it now mentality in terms

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of their digital banking on their app. They want to

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>come in our branch. They want to speak to people,

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and when you can provide that and segment that in

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the right way, it's very powerful. So it's not necessarily

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>using less people, it's being smarter about how and where

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and the ways that you use. How proud would you

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be to hand over the reins to Jane Fraser and

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>be the first bank on wall straight to break the

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>glass the link? How proud would you be to do that?

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course I'd be very proud. But you know two

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>things is that you know, One is that that decision

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is not mine. It's the boards, my job and my

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>responsibilities to make sure that we're preparing people. And you know,

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jane has had a phenomenal career with us,

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know we continue that that role of making

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>sure that if and when the time comes, she's ready

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and and it might be in your hands. Mike, you

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.239
<v Speaker 1>felt good now the five years So we hear from

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Diamond all the time it's a five year rolling Well,

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? Just keep just keep going? Mind is mine?

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Is is that I'm a I'm a believer in term

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>limits and I did every every horse has its course?

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Is the term limit? Um? What do you think? Again?

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's dictated by the environment and the strengths

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and skill sets of the person in the job and

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the applicability. And at some point my course will have

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>run and then it's somebody else's turned to grab the

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Briton and go. This day, we had President Trump speaking.

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>You and I did a panel two or three years

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>ago here. It was hugely invigorating about global banking and

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>global finance. Do you need a Trumpian unilateral America or

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>do you need to get back to a more multilateral

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>global system? Does that assist you for which way do

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you cut on that? Well, one is I would I

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't necessarily describe it as Trumpian, But you know, any

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>time that we can move towards across the aisle bipartisanship

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to get things done, I think that's healthy because when

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you think of the business community, the business community just

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:40.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want lower rates like certainty, likes clarity, and I

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>think the more divide you have, not just in the

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>US but around the world and political parties, the more

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty you have. Just got an email in from New York, John,

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to apologize for the brain freeze on Miss Fraser.

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>It's sitting room that was Can I explain why that occurred?

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Folks had a little bit to do with the sequence

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of one Am and the piano party, you know, but

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it looks I got a text from Tom Kine last

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>night at about one I am I think just said

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Ballavadere and I woke up and I replied, one of

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>us is in bed. I've done the reading. You're gonna

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>get an early night. No, no, it's exciting. Thank you.

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>If you say Tom on the streets, please look after

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it might go about that. And I'm to show you

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>know from the Harvard game it was a spectacular fifty

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>eight minutes and thirty Was it wonderful? Truly one of

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the greatest games for those of you globally Harvard and

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Yale in November? Was it everything sport needs to be

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>about in America? Michael, thank you, Thank you very much.

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>As always talking about commercial bankers and central bankers, there's

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>other people in investment. Why don't you bring in the

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>steam guest any place to say, we can bring in

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Marty Flanagan, the investo. See mighty great to see you.

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to read out a quote from you at

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of last year because it really jumped out

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to me. We're going through a once in a generation change.

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Every single client we deal with around the world is

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>using fewer and fewer money managers. What does that mean

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to you, Well, yeah, I've been in the industry. There's

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>been a discussion that is going to consolidate since that period.

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It just hasn't until right now. And I'd say this

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is really a post crisis phenomena driving it. Just the

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>cost for money managers through technology regulation is much higher.

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>But also clients are demanding much more from their money managers.

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>They want a broad range investment, keep it at least,

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but also more, they want thought leadership, they want support

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in anything that they might be doing, and ultimates. A

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>good news story for those managers that can deliver that,

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's a great news story for the clients. They

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>get more, they'll get economies to scale a lot of it.

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:53.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a win win story. It's been tough for you.

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Last year was tough, stock cut in half, bleeding money,

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a u M sliding. What can you do this year

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to start to stabilize things. Yeah, so we're on that

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>track right now. It's early into the year, but we're

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to a very good year right now. Much

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of that is we talked a minute ago. We went

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>through the third largest combination in the industry, and typically

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens is that when you're going through that combination

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the the clients. Until the combination is done, they step

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>back so mighty for our audience, just so they can

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>follow if they're not familiar with the story. Integrated Oppenheimer

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>around about two billion dollars of the sets. Traditionally, what

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we see when you start to absorb that size, you

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>start to get some money, go out swhere. Things stopped

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>for a little while. It's exactly does this remind you

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of what happened with the company at the tournament the

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>millennium when you absorb perpetual it took a couple of

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>years just to get things going. Will this be the

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>same story? There's no question about it. So what's the measure?

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>So who are you talking to? The clients that we

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>talked to, they're very supportive the transaction. They say, what

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you all are doing is exactly what should be happening

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in the industry. And you know, very much supportive of us.

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And we completed in a very short period of time

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>with yesterday. We're really on January one. We're off to

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the races. I want to go to those moments in

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a year where you just stop. One of them was,

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>of course, the headline of the ECB saying that they're

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna stay on hold forever. Another one was sitting on

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the set in New York and opening one newspaper. The

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>first ad we're giving it away for free. I turned

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the page. It was another discount broker, we're giving it

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>away for free. And then there was a third ad,

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>three ads in a row in the in that retail

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>space saying we're gonna give it away for free. Is

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>a bond house of your great distinction? And frankly with

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the Oppenheimer equity management internationally, how are you going to

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>make profit knowing you're gonna give it away for free? Industry? Yeah,

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>so nothings for free. First of all, I think that's

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>one point to make. But when we look at the

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 1>range of capabilities and we're they were those focuses were

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 1>on were CAPUITD indexes, and uh, they've grown enormously post

0:34:57.480 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>the crisis. And when you look at the spectrum of

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 1>how people build portfolios, cap waited indexcess earn it, they're

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>very cheap. But as you keep goin up to factors

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>active alternatives, you get better returns, excess returns, you get

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 1>downside protection. You're going to pay more for that. So

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 1>clients are literally using the spectrum of assets classes like

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they've never had before to get the outcome. Are you

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>going to affect this with a close approach, we said

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence Fincon from black Rock. Are you gonna do with

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>so called our squared folks, which is a statistic on

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this tight up against what the indexes are doing? Are

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you going to bring that our square down and really differentiate?

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's really been what's been going on here, and

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>this also was really coming out of i'd say regulation

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and really the focus on there were active managers that

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>really index huggers, right, So you're paying an active fee

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>for not much I did. That's the surveillance by exclusive folks.

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I did not know that occurred. Okay, there you go.

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So the point is, you know you're seeing a lot

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of you know, this movement of money away from that

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to those people that can generate excess returns and and

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>you can, but you really want the full range of

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>capabilities when you're building those portfolios. Might we want to

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the problems that you have as

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.760
<v Speaker 1>an index provider as well. There's a lot of concern

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that paper start to think there's liquidity and set in

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>indexes that the underlying securities that they track aren't very

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 1>liquid at all. Leverage Alliance, big leverage alone house, you've

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>got the A t F. Does that not concern you? Yeah,

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so when you talk about at that level, you would.

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But when you have to look into the portfolio, what

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>happens in the in the bank loan portfolio, there is

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>probably liquidity and there's backstops to it. So it is

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>not an illiquid portfolio that is open ended in the market.

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>But John went right where I wanted to go. Is

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:41.800
<v Speaker 1>your true expertise and overslones I should point out, folks

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>that the investor has been a huge support of what

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I've done for years and has been a supporter of

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg surveillance in the old days. I go back to

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>David Gouldan at Bank of America. It wasn't the garbage

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>trenches that god us in trouble, it was the quality trunch.

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Just coming from nine two down to an eighty nine

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>or an eighty five. Are we setting ourselves up for

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.959
<v Speaker 1>that same risk? Again, it's hard for me to answer

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that question. But again that's the world of the portfolio managers, right,

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>And if you have high quality portfolio managers, they're the

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>ones that are making that assessment. Don't you worry, though,

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Marty that those portfolio managers at the moment are being

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>forced into quite a liquid parts of the markets into

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>private markets. Wood Foot former colleague, if your South got

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>cota out of early legendary investor pushed into the wrong stuff. So, uh,

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that is probably one of the current concerns. When I

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>look at the market, all the money is going into uh,

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>private credit at the moment, it is sort of it's

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody's answered to the question. And I've been in the

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>industry long enough now too. When everybody's going the same way,

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.240
<v Speaker 1>good things don't happen with that. That's a sweeping comment.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>The reality is you have to look at a manager

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>by manager, the quality of the managers, their expertise, the

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>ones have been doing it for a long time that

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>are thoughtful and highly talented, they'll do okay. John and

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I are humbled by the success of our podcast. Folks

0:37:56.800 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>were targeting a million downloads a month. We're not theory trying,

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:02.760
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to get there. If I look at them,

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>invest next do a shameless plugs plug us go to

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>sponsor podcast so we can get home. Is it free?

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>But it won't be free if you help us. With

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the people that listen to the podcast, there's an intellectual

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>group that want to be in your business, but they

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>want to know. Is there a future to the cif

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>A institute. Is there a future to active managers? Is

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>there a future to security research? What do you see?

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for saying happiness. So all people talk about

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 1>is a change in the industry now and they look

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>at the downside, right, So there's no absolutely this industry

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is gonna thrive. What's happening. It continues to grow, It's

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna be It's almost a hundred trillion dollar industry right now.

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Who's talked about that. It is not going away. And

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the need for cf as and smart people who do

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:53.959
<v Speaker 1>the work, it's always going to exist. Okay, it's gonna

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be there with the Nappenheimer combination. How do you meld

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>those two cultures together? Because I'm sorry, I remember the

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>open I'm a target fund from a few years ago, folks,

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like decades old and their international excellence. How do

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you culturally mild all those egos together? Yeah, so that's

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a very good question. So I've been through a number

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of transactions in my career and the first conversation. Everything

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>looks good on a piece of paper, that's not what matters.

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>It's spending time with the people understanding the culture in

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 1>our you cultural a line, that's the If you don't

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>get that right, you have a problem. I don't when

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you do, but you will. Each team is separate and distinct.

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>They continue to do do exactly what they did when they

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>came to invest go and that will not change. Our

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 1>whole goal has given greater resources to do what they've

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:37.799
<v Speaker 1>done in the past, is to make them even better

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>than Let's get some targets if we can aum how

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>much of that is passive about a quarter? Yeah, it's

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>two billion of it in and around any targets to

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 1>get that up to a certain level. What's the ultimate

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>balance for an asset manager at the moment? So I

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>get asked that all the all the time. So the

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>answers clients determine that. Okay. So at the other hand,

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>we have amost two hundred billion dollars in alternatives, and

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it really is your expertise and where the clients are

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 1>are moving in. So I feel really good about the

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>talent that we have, and it's really us spending time

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 1>with our clients and making that drift different. What about

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the international mix? What are you seeing in flows of

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>fun Q four was finally an Oppenheimer and Invesco Oppenheimer quarter.

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that from where you sit with your knowledge base,

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is the international joy of the last quarter are going

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 1>to continue? So it's a fundamental strength of the firm

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.359
<v Speaker 1>right now. You talk about emerging markets, are expertise in China, uh,

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, staying on China loan. Just the growth in

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>China for the money management industry and the interest in

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>China is at peak level as you would imagine, and

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we see that. It's again it's early in the year.

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 1>That's what's going on right now. Well, it's gonna going

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>on right now. But the strategy forward here to compete

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in you you're you're in Everybody likes to talk about

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 1>scale and we do touchy philia Davos. You're in a

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>brutal industry right now. What's gonna be your best practice forward?

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>So international pus this one E merchant markets, very very

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>talented China for us, you know, just a fundamental strength

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of us. We managed seventy billion dollars in Chinese securities.

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>We have fifty billion dollars of money that we managed

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.720
<v Speaker 1>for local Chinese. Uh. The alternative business, the factor business

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>where the second largest factor provider in the world. These

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:20.919
<v Speaker 1>are all areas that are going to continue to grow.

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>And you talk to the issue about active management, those

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that generate ALFAR can do very fine and it's going

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to be an asset classes like a merchant markets and global.

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and six, everybody was running around trying

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to make fourteen basis points on every transaction. Are we

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 1>back to that right now? Within the traditional investco bunch up?

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Are we back to oh six where everybody's getting stupid

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 1>about fourteen point one four percentage points? Itsy bitsy amounts.

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, I succeeded. Are we back to this? I

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 1>hope not? And look, I think you know when you

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.800
<v Speaker 1>put on the business. At first of all, we're legal fiduciaries,

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>So you've got to be responsible your clients in the

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:00.439
<v Speaker 1>first place if you're not game over at some point

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in time. So it's literally making sure that you know

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>your your in line with your clients when you have

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:08.359
<v Speaker 1>those conversations. Flag. Thank you so much for joining us

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:28.479
<v Speaker 1>today Investco as well. What a perfect time to bring

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Director General of the w c O, Robertto

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 1>as a Vedo. Great to see Robetto. It's a pleasure.

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk about phase one? Absolutely? I want to

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 1>understand whether there's going to be any complaints sent to

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the w t O about the agreement between the United

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>States and China that was secured in the last couple

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. What's your first take on that, Well, there

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is that first take is good. I think it's good

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that you see some degree of they don't between the two.

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>It's about time that we see some of those tensions,

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least contained and hopefully rolled back. I

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:09.359
<v Speaker 1>think this is a kind of agreement that is going

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to be looked into by all do W two members

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>with very very carefully, with magnifying lenses and checking whether

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 1>everything is in accordance with the two disciplines and multilateral agreements. UM.

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>They will be watching very closely. So if there's something

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that is a miss, will know, well, you're the DJ,

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about it. Some of the content and

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the agreement. The optics might be encouraging that we settle

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the issues between the two biggest economies in

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the world. The detail agreeing to increase trade by two

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 1>billions and basically targeting a fixed amount of agricultural product

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>imports out of the United States into China at a

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>level of forty billions. What's Brazil going to say to that?

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>What do what the suppliants of Soy being city, You'll

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>have to you have to ask Brazil. But I would

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>suppose that to the extent that some of those tariffs

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>are rolled back and some of the impedments are taken away,

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it is natural that those imports are going to go on.

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's the Director General I'm asking you, how do

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you reconcile everything that w t O stands for and

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:18.439
<v Speaker 1>a deal between the United States and China that has

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:22.399
<v Speaker 1>socialist style central planning elements to it between the United

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:25.359
<v Speaker 1>States and China depends on how you implement that as

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Director General. I'm not going to be pointing fingers, so

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that. But I suppose that, for example, if

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you're buying food or products under state contracts, that's okay.

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not governed by w t rules. They have a

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:47.240
<v Speaker 1>special agreement that is valid only to the signatories. China

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 1>is not part of that, but the other double two

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:54.800
<v Speaker 1>members cannot complain with what happens in terms of government purchases, however,

0:44:55.280 --> 0:45:00.120
<v Speaker 1>UM most Favored Nation UH, tariff supply and nondiscrimination and

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>applies UM. So people will be looking at that very carefully. Now,

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the agreement is very general, Uh, it doesn't specify how

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>those purchases are going to happen, what mechanisms are going

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to use, what kind of preference is going to be

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>granted to US products of US origin vis a vis

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:21.839
<v Speaker 1>the others. I suppose Brazili and the others are going

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 1>to be looking very closely at all that. But we're

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 1>pretty familiar with the enforcement mechanism. If the Chinese don't

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>reached those targets, the tariffs gut back on don Night. Well,

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that's very unusual mechanism actually, because it's normal that in

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>these agreements to have some kind of dispute settlement vision,

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 1>something that looks at whether the two sides are complying

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:49.440
<v Speaker 1>with what has been agreed. This one, however, doesn't have

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>any kind of arbitration or any kind of third party oversight.

0:45:54.560 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It is about, you know, directly dealing with perceived shortcomings.

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>So if one side is not happy happy with what

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the other is doing, it will complain, they will have consultations,

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of the day, unilaterally, the party

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that is complaining if it if it's not satisfied with

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the actions of the other side corrective actions of the

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:21.720
<v Speaker 1>other side, it may, you know, impose sanctions of whatever

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's very Um, it's not very usual to

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 1>see something like that. I can see that it hasitant

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>taken if you wanted at the moment you did mention

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>dispute resolution. Now, let's talk about the dispute resolution mechanism

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:37.400
<v Speaker 1>at the w t O. For our audience right now,

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 1>who maybe haven't been following this very carefully, walk us

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>through what's happened and what's happening with the dispute resolution

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>mechanism at the w t R. Well, they're two things

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 1>are separate. I think what's happening between the US and China,

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it's US that doesn't affect the W two dispute settlement

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 1>mechanism at all. Um. What is happening now is that

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 1>clearly the US um that has been complaining for quite

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:04.760
<v Speaker 1>some time. So this is not a Trump administration complaint.

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 1>This has been there before about the appellate body and

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that the appelloate body has been conducting itself.

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Whether you agree or not with those complaints, that's a

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>different conversation. But they have been complaining for quite some

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 1>time that in this administration that said enough, it's enough,

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:20.719
<v Speaker 1>we need to change this. I think that's where we

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>are now. We are now sitting in Geneva with others

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and say, okay, so we need to change the system.

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>How is it doable? Do do the changes that the

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:33.280
<v Speaker 1>US want to see? Would the others live with it

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:35.279
<v Speaker 1>or not? I mean, this is this is where we

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:37.319
<v Speaker 1>are at this point in time. We cannot take too

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>long though we talk about some of the issues. They

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 1>think that some of the people on that Dispute Resolution

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Body that WUS have a paid too much there what

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they are paid too much? They are too much money.

0:47:48.160 --> 0:47:50.959
<v Speaker 1>They're incentivized to drag on some of the disputes because

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they can earn more money. That's one of the issues

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>out there. And so you're aware if it's an important issue,

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:56.799
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's a small Do you think they

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 1>paid too much? I think it was agreed by members.

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I didn't decide that the United States pushback

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:06.399
<v Speaker 1>at the United States agreed to that the United States

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:08.760
<v Speaker 1>agreed to that. The EU and all the other members

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 1>one and sixty four of them decided these are the

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of the payments. But over time inefficiencies were introduced.

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean those spots were supposed to be taken care

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>of in ninety days. Now the Appealate Body has been

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>taking six months sometimes more to to to finalize it's appreciation.

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:29.240
<v Speaker 1>My understanding is that only ap Palate body at the moment.

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think they're doing that because of the money.

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they're doing the money. The money is a

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:36.840
<v Speaker 1>feature of this administration. The US administration under President Donald Trump,

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 1>as you know, have been very unhappy about the way

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 1>some of these bodies have been run. And as I

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 1>understand that you can earn north of three thousand Swiss

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Franks sitting on the Appaliate body, you can, can't you

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Now for the US administration, they're looking at that situation

0:48:51.120 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>right now and saying that's too much. We need a

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 1>more efficient mechanism, and we need to incentivize it to

0:48:57.280 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>be more efficient as well. What's your thoughts as the

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>director and along that particular issue, what if if that

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:04.280
<v Speaker 1>were the only issue, we could do it like that

0:49:04.280 --> 0:49:07.359
<v Speaker 1>that's easy, not a problem. That is not a problem.

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the bigger issue is. The bigger

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>issue is how to make it run faster, how to

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:16.799
<v Speaker 1>make it more efficient, how to make it responsive to

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:20.239
<v Speaker 1>those disputes in a way that they're not setting precedents

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or they're not according to the US, for example, they

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:25.759
<v Speaker 1>do not behave as a court where you have five

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:28.319
<v Speaker 1>or seven seven guys there who believe that they are

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.799
<v Speaker 1>international judges. They're above you know, they above right or wrong,

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>whatever they decide, it's it's the divine rule or something

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:38.439
<v Speaker 1>that that's the way the US sees it um. So

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to change that kind of perception.

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:43.600
<v Speaker 1>That's that's for me. Is is the trickiest part. Let's

0:49:43.680 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 1>run things up by into one of the disputes the

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:50.799
<v Speaker 1>United States getting together with the European Union, the Japanese

0:49:51.560 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to complain to you guys that China is subsidizing its

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>industries unfairly. Can you deal with these kind of issues? Absolutely?

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>How easy make the rules? One of the one of

0:50:03.160 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the problems we have is that the US and Japan

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and the EU claim, and rightly so, by the way,

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that the rules are not perfect. That for example, the

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:17.200
<v Speaker 1>exports subsidies or prohibited subsidies rules, they don't capture many

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that are happening out there, and therefore

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to update the rules to begin to be

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 1>more responsive to today's reality. Now, the problem with that

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is that why do we not have that. We do

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>not have those rules as as perfect as they wish

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they were, because in the past, before China even got

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:42.920
<v Speaker 1>into the scene, the big powers, the US, the EU, Japan, Canada,

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Australian and the other they could not agree amongst themselves

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>on those rules. So they said, you know what, put

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the put that aside for the moment. Let's let's go

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:54.520
<v Speaker 1>on and do other stuff. China came in the two

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:57.399
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one and since then they have been

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>doing things that others are saying, well, that's not what

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 1>what the what we were expecting before? We need to

0:51:05.040 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I think if members are unhappy with that, they have

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it. And I don't think that China

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is against having this conversation. I think they already told

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:16.680
<v Speaker 1>me directly that they're fine with negotiations. If the people

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:19.120
<v Speaker 1>want to change the rules, exchange the rules, but let's

0:51:19.120 --> 0:51:21.440
<v Speaker 1>sit down and have a conversation about that. As your

0:51:21.440 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>experience has been, as many people's experience has been over

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years. The Chinese often talk about getting

0:51:26.239 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>around the table to do things. We don't get the

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 1>follow up. Are you really confident that the Chinese would

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>agree to the pressure that the US, EU and China

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is putting on them right now to pull back from

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 1>subsidizing their industries when they've been pretty clear over the

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:41.360
<v Speaker 1>last few years that they've got a plan dominate certain

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:45.920
<v Speaker 1>interest industries by it doesn't matter to the expense of

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:48.560
<v Speaker 1>any expense of anyone else, and we're going to subsidize

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 1>those industries until it happens. Why would they sign up

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to any rules at the w t O when we

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 1>know that's their mission. We've got things change, and I

0:51:55.360 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 1>think that the degree of of rejection that you see today,

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:06.960
<v Speaker 1>uh in the international community, for you know, against certain

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 1>practices that are happening in China, whether they are true

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 1>accusations or not, that's a different conversation. Uh, those are

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 1>real and I don't think China can close their eyes

0:52:17.080 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on this, and they realize that it's better to have

0:52:20.480 --> 0:52:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a negotiated solution and deal than to be subject to

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:27.399
<v Speaker 1>unilateral you know, terroriffs the way that they have been

0:52:27.480 --> 0:52:29.799
<v Speaker 1>in the recent past. It's been great to catch up

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>with you. A lot of topics to get fress and

0:52:31.600 --> 0:52:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I know you've got a busy way ahead better. Thank

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you very much. That was Rebetta as a data they

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:39.360
<v Speaker 1>will Tried Organization director General. Thanks for listening to the

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:52:46.239 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:52:55.200 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.