WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2021 NFL MegaPod Week 7 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Check it down man Now down Many On Thursday, October

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty one one is the Beating of the Book podcast

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Megapod live from the D in downtown Las Vegas. Kill Alexander,

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening as always, appreciate it every week this year.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Great feedback on every show, including every guest, some to

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the good, some of the you know, indifferent, some to

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the hey, we didn't like that guy. Hey it's all right.

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Ace Triumphant return to the pod last week. Uh, super

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>well received. Loved having Ace back here. Today we have

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>another esteem guest. First of the staples of the show

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>though to my left at the D, Vice President Operations

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>at Circuit Sports, Derek Stephen's conciliary and also co host,

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>although he might consider himself a host one I don't know.

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Co host of the Lead of Lead Lead Lead Lead

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Hosts of Odds on at Visa in weekdays at eleven

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>am Pacific two pm Eastern is Michael Palm. You know, Mikey,

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great. Hello James, how are you good? To

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>hear from you again. Todd is always in the Gillionaire

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. By the way, I didn't hear this, Mikey,

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>but somebody told me that a mam was arguing they

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have gone for it on fourth down when Josh

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Allen's slipped. That's correct? Correct? Is that right? What was

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>what was his reasoning? His reasoning was you go to

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>overtime with the better team. Yeah, but you have a

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>much better chance of winning the game then, and if

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't make it and kicked the field book, it's

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>still gonna have the same Derrick Henry's killing you too.

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>They had struggled in the red zone. They don't look

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I I moved on, wasn't it you moved on? Todd

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>wishing it from his mom's cork attic in Pittsburgh, PA.

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, somebody on Twitter got really mad at

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>me for continually saying that you're from your mom's cork Addy,

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't that. They were mad at the mom's

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>cork attic park. They're like, why do you have to

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>keep saying where he's from? I was like, oh, I'm

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>sorry about that. I didn't know you're really upset. I mean,

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is it's it's it's a bit much.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I said, no, it's not. We say

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we're from the d Why is it any different? Okay,

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what, You're right. Thank you. By the way,

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that's Todd's way of saying, I don't think you're right,

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but actually I am right. Thanks Todd. Gentleman. James Salinas,

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got a real job, Dodd. Stop talking. James Salinas,

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>everybody co host of it now? What is the name

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of your show on the Weekend's James James a former

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Super Contest winner. He won over nine hundred thousand dollars

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>taking home the Super Contest prize. Then he had the

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>audacity to finish third the following year. Let he finished

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty six two years after that. What's the name of

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the new show, James, A great to have you. It

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>is the Pro Football Blitz and I do it with

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Brady Cannon, another former Super Contest winner from back in

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the day. And so we're we do both Saturday and Sunday.

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And obviously it's just like it sounds pro football. That's it.

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the whole focus. We narrow the focus. We know

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we got so many other sports going on right now.

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you guys were talking about where we

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>were for Monday Night football. Should they have went forward

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>on fourth down with the Buffalo bills, and I've am

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>right they should have done, especially with the leverage that

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I had on the bills, just to win on the money.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And so but we're not we're moving past week six

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>because weeks Week six was a shitty week for me

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>last week, and now I'm also have to move past

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking baseball here right because we don't want

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to get otherwise I'm gonna get a little salty kill

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I have, but it this way. I was on the

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox unders the last two games, so we say

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>how those played out. And then unfortunately I was very

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>sober yesterday and didn't decide to go chase, and so

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't chase a couple of winners that would have

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>had late last night. So anyhow, we've moved on. We're

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>moving on to week seven for the NFL. So great

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to be on with all you gentlemen. As always each

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and every year, fellas, We're really appreciative because I know

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a day job, very very important day job

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>there in Colorado at Denver that you making time to

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>do this, So I am super thankful. Um. Those unders.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the last two games that series were brutal,

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely brutal. Especially the one you were in. I'm

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>still getting over the Giants. So and now my Dodgers

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>future from March looks very precarious. So it's the uh,

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just not going well. James. Is it true

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that your co host on the Blitz actually legally changed

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>his name to former Super Contest champion Brady Cannon? Because

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and every and every time I hear it, and every

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>piece of Vista copy it says that. I mean, so

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought maybe it was illegal name change? Brady? What

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>ye were you? James? Brady one? There was like seven

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>other guys in it, and I mean it was James.

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And I feel bad that the the under in the

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Astros game that is as bad as they come.

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Well and and and so I don't know how much

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>our time constraints are here, but ultimately see that's the

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>problem is. Yeah, it was leaning right up to and

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to jump on the braves probably braves. I

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>found him out here like plus one ninety plus one

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>before it started, but they were kind of overlapping and

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to roll it over, like okay, maybe I'll

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>just I'll be I'll the square, the sober square, betting

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>conscious of Ward Cleaver came out like, new, we won't

0:04:59.920 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>be chasing any bets, we won't have any of that,

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and so just wait and we'll see how it plays out.

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And then obviously they dumped it, and then they even

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>got more square. I was like, well, I'm not gonna

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>chase it. No, did I chase that last night with

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the Braves? And then I didn't chase the Nuggets last

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>night and the Revenge spot going into Phoenix and they

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>win the freaking game, right, So we move on to

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>week seven on Thursday. Yes, I did not know Ward

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Clever used to bet. I missed that episode. I just

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>have that. Well, it's just this square better voice that

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>comes in that just says, no, James, we won't be

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>chasing any bets this evening. You're just gonna play and

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll go on move on to the next day. Now.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, I know you guys don't do it.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I know you guys don't drink. But usually when I

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>bet and I drink, that's when I get pretty froggy

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>with it. And I'm not afraid to get jiggy and

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the fire away at it. And I was very sober

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>last night, and so I did not do. I did

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>not chase anything, and now I wish that I would

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>have because they both came in and think about how

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the Braves just completely dominated that game. I don't know

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>what the hell where the Dodgers are messing with their

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>pitching staff, and I don't want to. I don't want

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to get off on a tangent here where we're moving

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to now be if you don't want to make square bets, Mike,

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you like I got, I got it possibly lucky in

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that game last night, I bet over nine and a

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>half flo and after two winnings of Framber Valdez, I said,

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a loser. Let me bet first five under

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. We got there both. Well, I

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>mean I've written the nine and a half of her.

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm just trying to get off the bet.

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>You you bet the Braves already bet the Braves plus

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>one thirty and I haven't for the series plus one ninety.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Normally I wouldn't bet them because I'm piling onto my bet,

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think this numbers. I think the Braves should

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>be favored today. No no Turner, no Muncy, no Turner,

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>no month getting overused and misused bullpen What do you

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and and this is the point needs to be made.

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>This is not armchair quarterbacking with Davy Roberts. This is

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>at the moment you're like, what are you doing? As

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>far back as Game five against the Giants, I said

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in Game five, why are you hitting for Jensen? Let

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Jensen close this game? You'd only thrown eleven pitches. If

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you go down with your clothes, you go down with them.

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Screwed up shuts or for Game two now he needs

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 1>extra rest. Screwed up Game two with your and screwed

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>up game it up. Game four with Orius, Mark Borcherd

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>had the best line. If you're going to be the

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Rays, be the Tampa Bay Rays all season,

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.559
<v Speaker 1>don't show up in the postseason and become the Tampa

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Bay Race. Why why did they decide to play it

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.559
<v Speaker 1>this way? It was so dumb. You know our guys,

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Josh Towers has banged this drum for years. You don't

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>make a starter reliever. It's totally out of his prep

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of what he's doing to go in and relieve. You

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>can't just flip flop him all right, circumillions, there's a

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>guy that's twenty six and four in the circumedions. I

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>think if this Todd, if you went one and four

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the first week and you were perfect the next five weeks,

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you'd be tied. And here's the other thing. The guy

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is twenty six and four. You only has a one

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>game lead. He's a one game leader. I'm Ted seven

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and one and I have a game and a half.

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Leat on, Todd, I've got more air than this count.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you guys a question. And I'm talking

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to super content winner and James Lenis when I say this,

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>so I better be careful how I say this. This

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>year in particular, though, but NFL in general, the size

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of the pool of players is going to mathematically randomly

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>produce someone who does that. Right now, That's not to

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>take anything away from the guy who did it, because

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>he said, and they go, well, it's me, it's me,

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it. But come on and four, like, what

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>percentage of that is skill? And what is just a squirrel? Fine?

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And nut after nut, there's a school people are out

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>there saying, faith this guy the rest of the way

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's got to regret Scot to right. Good for him, though,

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know he's probably gonna regress to fifty fifty, that's

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>what will happen. But the somebody has to get lucky. Gil.

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So this guy, so, this guy is going to be

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the one who you know, I mean he might he

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>might be playing at a rate you know, in basic

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>but still you know, obviously he's not gonna be twenty

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>six and four in the next thirty picks. I'll take

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the actor on that. How about how well? And and

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>here's the other thing Gil and fellas with this is

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so I think about the year I won the Super Contest.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I was twenty four five and one after week six,

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so same spot here, obviously not quite as good. But

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>then the gravity of where you stand after you weeks,

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>like all the dust is settled. You look at the standings,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you're like when you when you enter the contests. Yeah,

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>there's two thousand people in it. I'll take a shot,

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>see where it happens. Why not me? And realistically, you've

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you have expectations, but you also have realistic expectations like

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it's hard as hell to try to beat the NFL

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and then win a big contest like this, and then

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, after six weeks, you're sitting at

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the top of the standards. You look at the top.

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like, damn, I am up there, sweet, and then

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like, holy crap, I still got eleven more weeks

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>to play. And in this case, here what we got

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>twelve more weeks to play? Right a long way and

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>so then the gravity starts to hit you where you

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>stand exactly right, and so you have and for me,

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I was able to sustain, sustain, sustain, each and every week,

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't keep the hard and it's right, what

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>was the rest of your I finished? I finished fifth?

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I finished? It was like fifty nine some three and five.

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, does that? Does that math work? Whatever

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that was? You were probably around the way or something

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>like that. Maybe maybe something like that. Yeah, and yeah,

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't gonna continue on that same pace for the

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>next twelve eight eleven weeks. But it's just the mental

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>piece to it, because it's such a long season, and

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden you're like, why not me?

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>When you enter the contest and now I was at

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.239
<v Speaker 1>your top of the the top dog on the contest

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>after six weeks. It's a lot of pressure each other

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>week that at least you start to put on yourself

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>knowing you have a bad week, and there's so many

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's so condensed, right, It's the compression is so close.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>You talked about Mike said, how close. Everybody else is

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>right there. And because the field is so huge, you

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>have a bad week, you're gonna see yourself tumble. So

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of pressure before Sunday comes making the picks,

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to be very decisive. You can't doubt

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>yourself going forward. Let me just ask you one question, though,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So at what point, because you had not one great season,

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>but you had two, maybe even three great seasons, like

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>when you have that kind of run, And maybe this

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is a question for now more than then, but I

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>was going to couch it as a then question, like

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>at what point do you acknowledge you're getting the good

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>bounces in addition to good handicapping or now maybe even

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>more more more interesting Lee, as you look back on

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that run because you can't sustain it forever, what do

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you think of now? Like what if it was you?

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>What if it was just of that middle games that

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 1>just they all went your way? Like how do you

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>view it now? I think each the first two seasons

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>when it was first and third were different. First season

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>not having any expectations getting in when I wanted was

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the first year that I played, and then being on

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 1>top all right, just focus one week at a time

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and then reflecting back. It was really what I was doing.

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>I didn't take a lot of really didn't take a

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of typically don't take a lot of favorites, but

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't taking those big underdogs. I was finding those

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers that were anywhere between pick them and three, just

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to let me just find the winner. And any of

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>those that I was taking three, where was the favorite

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of the underdog? They recovering? And that was really the

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>big difference for me is all those games that were

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of coin flip games, they were land if I'm

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 1>calling tales, they're landing tails each week. Those were coming through.

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I think in the second year. It was really the

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing Gill is each and every year, my worst

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>month is always October. I don't know what the hell

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it is about October, but these lines get sharper, and

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>then we saw last week the favorites just killed it.

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But then things start to regress stores and they come

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>back to the mean come November, and where you were

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in October and teams were in September and October, a

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of them fade back, and you see that happen

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>with contestants in the Super Contest tour and then circum millions.

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Now that this third year going, so I think for me,

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 1>it was different in that second year in the Super

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Contest when I came in third, it was all about

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the season really getting dialed in

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>on teams and whether it was favorites underdogs, it didn't

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>really matter. It wasn't numbers. I was playing teams as

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>opposed to numbers in the second half of the season

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>and went on a great run to be in that spot.

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of different each and every year when

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I've had good success. All right, well I have invited

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you in October, so maybe that was the uh, what's

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>with October and people associated with Denver that's so big? Yeah,

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>all right? And then and then Survivor well, so once

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>again the No Pick was second instead of third. This

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>week amazing nineteen Broncos ten, No Pick, seven, Dolphin, four Brown,

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>two Lion, only one points and to build only one

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of the two percent of the pool out we

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>lost forty four going from twenty four, I said, make

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a number. Yes, know that the no pick will be

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the most eliminations this week? Oh wow, this week. No,

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>this week it's gonna be you'd get a lot of

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>plus money for this way, because there's this week it's splintered.

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I think. So, somebody, do you think one of these

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>big favorites will lose? There's six games that about the

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>biggest favorites, but somebody's gonna lose. Um. We had a

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Joe Pete and I had a little exchange off air,

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get to our picksure. Joe Peter and I

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>had to exchange how many people do you think will

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be how many entrance do you think will be left

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and survivor after week twenty week twenty of your contest.

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>He had a buddy he said two hundred and something.

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>He had a buddy who said one hundred and not

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>even on I said nineties six. I think there's gonna

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of eliminations coming um Thanksgiving and Christmas

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>with um and a half. Well, there's three times as

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>many interests thirty five last year, right, I mean I'll

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>take under. I'll take under both of you. I say

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>under because of that Thanksgiving in Christmas, he's going to

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>really hurt. Yeah, so I'm going under nineties. So you

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>know you're saying there's gonna be ninety six winners at

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of this year. I went below the other

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>two guesses. Yeah, I said nineties. I'm going under even

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>one can make a real bed. Let's make a real hunt.

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Remember making a prices right reference, Not that you know

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you're a small bat. All right? Uh, Todd, As much

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>as I hate to ask you to go through it,

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>how do we do last week? Well, the records they

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't They're not exactly tennis. Let's put it that way.

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's set it that way. It's not tennis. It's not tennis.

0:14:54.280 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Siva Ventra No Nova did not cover. Uh. I

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>am making a reference to the fact that Gilly Ice

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>continues to be red hot with the tennis picks, and

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>uh not as hot here in the National Football League.

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>He went oh in three last week to fall to

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>five and thirteen against the spread, but his teasers are

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>still at four, one and one after he finally lost

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>his first teaser last week, Mikey with a strong two

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and one with the luckiest cover in the history of

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League when the Dallas cow Girls decided

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to throw it deep and he got him the minus

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>three and a half, which he certainly did not deserve.

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>He goes to ten seven and one, but he is

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>four and two in teasers, which is the important category.

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I am was two in one last week, including beating

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>eight straight up on that over forty nine and a

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>half in the Cleveland, Arizona game to go to nine

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and nine, and I am still the leader even after

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I lost my teaser at five and one on teasers.

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's where we are. Gilly Ice about to turn

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it around because he's gonna take the Kansas City Andrew

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Nova's this week. How do you have what my magic

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>number over guilt is? Right now? By the way, I'll

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>still say it. I'll say it again. There is no

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>question I'm the man to beat on teasers, none whatsoever. Well,

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>look now, I just made up a game on Todd

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to teaser since I got to go last, and he

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to copy my pick every week. Tod's not

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>The guys just loves it. There you go. You can

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>get the guy a popcorn. You'll be like, oh it's

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>not big, big one, you know. You get him of

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>glass of wine. I don't like this line. There's always

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>some problem, alright, Best bets, Best bets time now now, James,

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Not only have I invited you in October, which you said,

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>for some reason is your worst month historically. You know,

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's any any basis for that,

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>but I've invited you on week seven. I did not

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>look ahead when I invited you a week seven and say, hey,

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is week seven a fun week? It is not a

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>fun Week six buys only thirteen games, and of the

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>thirteen game you have one tonight Thursday Night Football. By

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, before we get to our best bets, we

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>should talk about Thursday Night Thursday Night, where there's all

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>kinds of Michigus on the brown side in terms of injuries,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>so that game is all also for COCTA. And then

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you have the other remaining twelve games, three which are

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>massive double digits, one that's teetering on double digits to

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>others that are around a touchdown. So that leaves six

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>games that really have shorter spread. So it's a it's

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a rough week man. Well, Thursday Night Football thoughts before

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we get the best bets, James, do you have any

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.239
<v Speaker 1>play on tonight's game? No, Baker Mayfield, no Nick Chubb, uh,

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>No Kareem Hunt, no Odell Beckham Jr. It appears Jarvis

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Landry will play in that Jedrick Wills will play, but

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't know about Jadeveon Clowney and others either. So

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the Browns are Bridgewater is playing well and no. So

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a play on this. I typically try to.

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>We already know Thursdays are kind of quirky, and I

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>don't play them in any of the contest for sureks

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to put an all five plays on Thursday.

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But also I rarely played these Thursday games a lot

0:17:57.840 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of time. If I'm gonna play, it's end game. But

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about you talked about all the injuries to

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland side, Well, Denver, I mean they're down to

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>seats and stems at the linebacker position, and we know

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that the strength of the Browns is gonna be running

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the football. Denver Broncos have eight linebackers on injured reserve,

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>including all four starters. That's where Vic Fangio, That's where

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>his defense starts. He doesn't start up front and move back.

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>He starts on the back end. Those back seven and

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It starts at the linebacker position. This is not the

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Dome Patrol going into this game for the Denver Broncos,

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's gonna be the struggle here is

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>at least you know what the identity of the Cleveland

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Browns are. Regardless of where they're banged up on the

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage with the offensive line and who's gonna

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>be running the football for Cleveland, They're gonna be able

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to attack in between the hashes against the Denver Broncos

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>based on all the injuries that they have at the

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>linebacker spot. And I think that's where you can attack

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>him running the football. You can also attack him in

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the ball throwing the football. It is

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>case Keenum out there. So in a sense, we've got

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>two backup quarterbacks. I mean, that's ultimately what Teddy Bridgewater

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>is for the Denver Broncos. He's a journeyman banging around

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>as a backup for the last handful of years since

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>his injury in Minnesota. If anything, I'd probably be leaning

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>towards the Browns playing at home. I think for Denver

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, I think there's disconnect within that franchise. We

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't see any leadership out of that team last week,

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>nor on from the sideline or on the field for

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Broncos playing against talking about it that where

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the heads were for the Raiders are clearly the better team,

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>The more focused team was the was the Las Vegas

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Raiders coming into Mile High. Then the Broncos take the

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>day off, you have a short week. They didn't practice

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, so no practice going into this game. I

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 1>just think that this this team right now is aside

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>from the first three games we saw, it was a

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>really soft schedule for the Denver Broncos. They've had to

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>play some They've actually had to play some teams the

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks and got it handed to them, two

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of which were at home. I don't like the spot

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Broncos going on road in this spot. That

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>line has been teetering. I see it now a lot

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>of one and a half short number in favor of

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the Browns. Probably just if I get involved, fellas would

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be in game. But right now, my initial lean, even

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>though they're beat up, would be the Cleveland Browns at home. Yeah,

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Broncos played the Giants, Jaguars, and Jets to start the

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>season three and oh then they played Baltimore Pittsburgh in

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas three and three, Mikey or Todd any any

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plays on tonight's game total at forty one. By the way,

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Todd DoD, I mean, if there was ever a game

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>that was ripe for end game, which I think should

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>be done in all games, this is the game, of course,

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>because what you're gonna see is if Keith Keenham turns around,

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>hands the ball or whoever's the running back. Remember, Cleveland

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Brown's offensive line is just blasting open holes and if

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>they can run the football, and you see that early,

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>then I say you got to take the Browns because

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>at that point you'll know that the Browns can move

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball at least on the ground. And who knows

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going to be with the Broncos. So I have

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no uh pre game play, but this is certainly

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 1>a game you can get involved with in game if

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>you if you see what's happening with all the you know,

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>with all the differences that are gonna be on the

0:20:54.960 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>field today, Mikey, Mike, I debate using this game um

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>as one of my three best bets really well, yes,

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think that I think the line has

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>overmoved here. I still think two and a half or

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>three is the right line, not one and a half

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of them. Although I lowered them after that that disjointed

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>performance at home against Arizona. They look very undisciplined. Look,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest thing that that's hurt them so

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>far as Landry being out, Actually he's and he's back,

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and this becomes a you know, a teaser lake for

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos to go through the three and the seven now.

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not I'm gonna I'm gonna take down. I'm

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna let me lay the one. Let me lay the

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one year. Give me a Kevin Sumlin quarterback, all right,

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>get me case Keenom. The last time I looked, he

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>was leading the Minnesota Vikings to the NFC Championship game

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and going right down the field to go up seven

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>nothing on the Eagles. You have the coach, you have

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to you have to say you have the coach edge,

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>because I'd much rather have the Browns coach than Vic Fangio.

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>So you have to have coaching edge, Mike. He's referring

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to case Keendom's on the evable twenty seventeen season for

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings that the Vikings are still trying to chase

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the author of the Minnesota miracle in the playoffs to

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Stefon digs against the Saints. But since then he had

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>he had a year with Denver where he was pretty

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.959
<v Speaker 1>good through for actually through from more yards that year

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>than he did with Minnesota. In twenty nineteen, he played

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>eight games, started eight games for Washington. They went one

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in seven. He was I Since then he has thrown

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a grand total love thirteen passes. So three years, no, well,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>actually two years thirteen passes. This is my number three.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Play put that down for my number number. There's things

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>on the Twitter and the Facebook. They tracked on our right,

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, James the number one best bet sir, either

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>side or total? What he got? I think the best

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>bet for me on the board is gonna be, well,

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We're picking three, right, so I think

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a flat bet all three and not choose one over

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the other. As far as the best bet out of

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the three. Let's go to the Let's go to the

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a f C North and let's talk about this big

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>matchup with the Bengals going on the road. Catching six

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half against the Baltimore Ravens, now Baltimore. Is

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>there a more galvinized team right now? Is there a

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>team that's had to deal with more injuries prior to

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the season coming in, we knew all the injuries that

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>hit the running back position. The offensive line took a

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to I mean, I don't even know who's left on

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line. We know Staley has done for the year,

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>really didn't play much. The center went down. I know

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>they had another guy go down against the Colts on

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>that Monday night, So they're really beat up at the

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage. But I think the thing for the

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Ravens is those kind of things have motivated them each

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and every week. With all the injuries and everybody casting stones,

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this team is not gonna be They're gonna be regression

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for the bal Baltimore Ravens going into this season, and

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>then all the injuries piled up on top of it,

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and they continue to pile up. Yet they play high

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>level game after high level game, high intensity game, crazy comebacks.

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>We saw that a few weeks back against Detroit and

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Justin Tucker, who's the best weapon on that team, really

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>uh for best kicker and probably best kicker in the

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>history of the NFL. Being able to knock in that

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty six yarder. Like each and every week they're playing

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>these high level, high intensity games. Same thing. Last week,

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>all the talking is about the Chargers rolling in there

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna beat the Ravens, and there now the

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>charge of the new contender in the a f C. Now,

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the Ravens are. They don't have

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that chip on their shoulder to play here to say

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we are the we're the underdog going and nobody gives

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>us the shot here. This is where I think this

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is the gravity of the the thinking about the energy

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and the emotion expended each and every week for this

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Ravens team. I think it kind of catches up here.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Not that I'm saying that they're gonna lose this game

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>out right, but the Bengals coming in I was kind

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of impressed, not with the performance and not beating the

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions on the road, but I thought that was

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the perfect sandwich spot right there for the Cincinnati Bengals.

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Think about the week before, huge huge hype around the

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Bengals playing at home against Aaron Rodgers, rolling in the

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers, crazy game, wild game, Wild finished terrible

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>kicking for both sides. We should just a live and

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>eight football kickers. We should just eliminate place kickers from

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL entirely, let him play four downs like we

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>did playing pee wee football here. I think now for

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals rolling in, they were able to keep their

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>focus coming in. It was a total sandwich spot. You know,

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a big game against the a f C

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>North leading Baltimore Evans who handled you last year. They

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>kicked your ass last year. Sixty five to six in

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>those two games was the collective score. I think you

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>might see a little, uh, the Ravens being a little

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>overconfident in this situation. They have the bye week on

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>deck next week as well. You know, they're really banged up,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wounds to be licked, and I think

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna come in a little a little overconfident in

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>this spot. I like the Bengals catching the six and

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a half points. I was pretty impressed with just their

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>mental focus last week and go in and handle business

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the way that they did in Detroit in lieu of

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>this game on deck here, it's an earlier start here.

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Not as much hype around this game, definitely not as

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>much hype for the Ravens, a little fat and happy

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore rolling in this spot. I'll take the Bengals plus

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. It's my number three too, Bang

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>was plus six and a half. Just I think says

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that we did the power rankings. Uh, Matt Brown, Kelly

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Bilin and I did it on prime time actution, Jeff

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Parlay and I did it on a numbers game. By

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, all four of us independently came up with

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the same ten teams reshuffled as our top ten, so

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that the notion that four of us matched on ten

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>teams reshuffled or not, it is pretty unbelievable. Actually, I

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, because I think there's five teams in

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>each conference, I could win the conference right after that.

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty precipitous drop. But Cincinnati did end up

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>being my eleven team. Uh so that's the one where

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it starts to fall. But I like the Kansas City

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs was ten. Oh you want the whole ten? No? No,

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I was curious as who the who made the where

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the nine, ten, eleven, twelve line was, Yeah, there's a

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>cliff is so Chiefs ten, Bengals eleven? And then I

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>think it was Raiders twelve or something. Basically the cliff

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>after that after eleven is pretty precipitous. Raiders, Panthers, Saints.

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the ilk of teams you get to

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>at that point. Who was your ninth Cowboys are the charge?

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, neither ninth was. I had Baltimore out

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of the top ten. There my ninth. Now Cleveland left

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the top ten. How are you having the Cowboys? Six? Six? Um?

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with James. I think the Bengals have a

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>really sneaky good defense. I think Jamore, I think the

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Borrow Jamore Chase thing is is really awesome. It's a

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>solid offense. And I'm not I'm like I said, I

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>have Baltimore nine. I'm not this massive believer in them

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>yet six and hals a lot of points. I'm taking

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals. That's my three though, Mikey, your next number one, Well, no, Mike,

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.479
<v Speaker 1>you already has a pick. I have done zero. Okay,

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, you're to get I have to give my

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>number two right now because it's the same game they have. Okay,

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>there you go. It's the under in this game. You know,

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>why don't you just give you and then and then

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>and then I go last in the in and teaser.

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>I like the under forty seven here. Odd remember this

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>game last year was twenty seven nothing. I think, James,

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you referenced the composite square that games and in the

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter that they kept mixing in there, just kept slamming,

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>mixing into the line, running, mixing over and over with

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the running clock down twenty seven. I don't know if

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>they kicked the field or whatever on the end, but

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>they like they were trying to get a score, but

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they weren't gonna let Burrow get hit anymore. They just

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>kept killing this kid. It was like he got killed

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago and Soldier Field and in week two, I

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>think I like the Cincinnati defense though. Yeah and a

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>half and a half or forty seven, it's forty seven.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm just telling you right now, I don't care what

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>your baiting game board says you have. What do you

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>have more more of six and a halfs or forty seven?

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking at the certain games. You know what

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>this is more? Well, I have four, I have forty

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>six out here, so we'll go. Let's go with I mean,

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we should go with the circle lines. He's

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>right there isn't Mike Mike garantew in front of the

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>board right there, we just go off the live line

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and circuit. Well, no, I don't want to go off

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the live line by by a circus the worst forty

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>five and a half here, all right, I'll give you

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>forty six and a half time. But anyhow, I think

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>both these teams are Look, you have to be impressed

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that the Ravens totally shutdown Mike Williams

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>last week. Look, Martindale said, you're not gonna beat us

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>over the top. You're gonna have to drive the ball.

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to take ten place, twelve place, four

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>team play, and the Chargers couldn't sustain the drives. They

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>were the first team that really foiled the Church. Remember

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. It was penalties, false starts, turnovers that stopped

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the charges, not the defense. The Ravens defensive. I think

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a good defensive matchup. I think this game

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is in the thirties. Actually, so that's my second place

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>under forty six and a half. Yeah, we don't want

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>those people will say, oh, it's affirmative action for mediocre

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>radio guys. We don't want to Christians ufermative action for

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the Christians Baltimore. By the way, Baltimore held the Chargers

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to season low's last week in points, passing yards, and

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards six points a hundred an two passing yards

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty six rushing yards. Um. Just a comprehensive win. People

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>aren to make a lot about those Brandon Stailey fourth

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>downs that he went for in risky fashion, but those

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>only resulted in six Baltimore points. That was a comprehensive

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>win for the Ravens. As far as the Bengals, four

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>wins and as many is as many wins as they

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>had all of the last season. Zach Taylor had six

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>wins in four years. Now he has four wins in

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>six weeks. Why don't you give a couple of picks,

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Give a couple of Todd Snaked, give a cup? Why not?

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Why not? Um? Okay, I'm gonna go with my first

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>pick being the Arizona Houston game. I'd like to take

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it under forty seven and a half. Um. If you

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the score of the Houston football team scored,

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>take out the Tyrod Taylor game. Because with Tyrod Taylor,

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>they were actually not bad. Um, we actually won with

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>them early on in the season against Jacksonville and covered

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that Cleveland game as well. But since then, they've scored

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>nine points at home against Carolina, they scored a grand

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>total of zero point zero at the Buffalo Bills, and

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a game they were down forty nothing, which means they

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't even get backdoor touchdowns when they were down a million.

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>In the New England game they got twenty two. Lost

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five to twenty two. Okay, you know, I'll give

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>him credit for that. And then last week at Indianapolis

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they lose thirty one to three, a grand total of

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>three points on the road. Now, Arizona defensively, to me,

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>has been playing well. I was really impressed with how

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>they played last week again on the road at Cleveland,

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>made a whole bunch of turnovers, played very well defensively,

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>played very well defensively the week before against San Francisco,

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>only giving up ten points. The week before that, they

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>only gave up the Rams twenty and one of those

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>was a backdoor touchdown to Stafford, who used to be

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a backdoor touchdown machine in Detroit. So they've been playing

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>very well defensively. Really. The only game they didn't play

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>well defensively was the Minnesota game where they gave up

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty three. Other than that, they gave up only thirteen

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>on the road at Tennessee. This Arizona defense is pretty

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>decent in my opinion. So I don't see how Houston's

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>getting more than ten points this week. So if Houston

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>gets ten and Arizona gets thirty seven, Mike, according to

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>my math, that's forty seven and a half under. So

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll take under forty seven and a half with a

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>final score of Arizona winning at thirty seven to ten.

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Gil Am I doing anything wrong here? Or is this correct? Uh?

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>That sounds sounds Southern math sounds correct. Arizona has scored

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty plus points in five of six games this season. Um,

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>just you know, sighting facts here, what has happened? And

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>then they pulled the plug in those games if you

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>notice they were they were up thirty eight thirteen going

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to the fourth quarter. The final score was thirteen in

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that game. In the Rams game, they got the thirty

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>seven and pulled the plug as well. And they you know,

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried about that. They'll just run it and

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>will say this about Houston last week and defeat against

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the Colts for those of us who have the Colts

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and survivor and lost on Houston plus the point, so

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I was playing in both sides there. That game was

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>really close early in the third quarter, was ten to three,

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and then the Davis Mills picked at Darius Leonard made

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it seventeen to three. The Colts had the one big

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor run that led to it being seventeen to three.

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I'm saying is, um, that the interception

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>really changed that game and that I could see you

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>getting torpedoed by that more than anything. Right, if Davis

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Mills but offense, but their offense wasn't playing good, their

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>defense was playing good. Right, But what I'm saying, you

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>got you took the under in this game, right under. Yes,

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm saying is if Davis Mills has another

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.239
<v Speaker 1>terrible pick in their own territory, that kind of thing,

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that's how it's happening. Okay, now, what's another one? Top? Okay,

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you another one. My My next one is

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be another under under forty seven and a

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>half again, this time with the Miami Dolls. Miami Dolphins.

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>This team's offense thinks so bad you can't smell. You

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>gotta watch the game with the smell turned down because

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it smells so bad. They're the worst offensive team I've

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>ever seen. Watching the guests react to it, James is

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>just like, I can't leave this guy, James. I haven't

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>signed that. I haven't golphin song in four weeks, and

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they complain on Twitter that I don't sing the song.

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So I had to give it to them this week

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>because I was in the Miami game. Miami under forty

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.280
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half against Atlanta. I am not impressed

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Ryan and his five yard check checkdown throws. Uh.

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>They take a long time moving the ball down the field, Miami.

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Do we really need to talk about what Miami does

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>offensively because it's not good. I don't care who the

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback is. I don't care if it's two A Tagavaloa

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or whoever else they decided to play a quarterback. I'm

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not impressed. I watched the Jacksonville game. I was up

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>nice and bright and early to watch the live from London.

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see anything. Yeah, East Coast nine thirty. I

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>was up bright and early. I was up till two

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>o'clock in the morning watching West Coast college football. Where

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are you, Gilly? That's only six hours later we wake

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>up at six thirty to watch it here. That's all

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. It's anyways. My point is the Atlanta Falcons

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>don't don't impress me that much on offense. Miami Dolphins

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't impressed me much on offense. So if I'm

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>going to get a number like forty seven and a

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>half in a game like this, give me the under

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>forty seven and a half. I think you know, Miami's

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>defense is better than their offense too, so you know,

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>just get me more under. I don't mind the tune,

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 1>but he's no Alan Lerner was a Learner again Learner

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and Low the lyrics system the Learner and Low. He

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>wrote the lyrics to Low's music. Oh you didn't like

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>my my lyrics that I came up with on the flight,

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>he said, smell like eight times the right A little.

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I was a little overly, Uh, but I do. He's

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on the fly, Mike, he said, it's very difficent, just

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like the picks by the way, doing the Power rankings.

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>He just got it. He got it to be late.

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I like the doing the Power rankings. So Texans ended

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>up thirty two, and then you know some mix of

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville and the Giants and the Jets and all these

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>facata teams. If I may say that word again, but

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that the most surprising team from a preseason standpoint in

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that bottom group is the Dolphins, Like they are just awful,

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:01.280
<v Speaker 1>so bad, and urban Mire did everything in his power

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 1>to lose that game, and the Dolphins still couldn't take

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it from him. Brian flora Is, who I used to

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>really like me here, has really late a gigantic I

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 1>am shocked with how poorly this guy's coach. You remember,

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the season, I was like, look at Brian

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>floor Is doing it with mirrors last year, and now

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, it's just like real garbage. The

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>thing about smoking mirrors. Are there smoking mirrors? That's the thing,

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 1>James E. What's number two for you? Number two? We're gonna, uh,

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.360
<v Speaker 1>We're We're going back to that Arizona Cardinal game in

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the Texans, and I'm gonna go with the I'm taking

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the seventeen. I'm playing the number here and I'm playing

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the spot. This isn't about the team. We will give

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you seventeen and a half because it's about five places

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that are seventeen and a half. If i'll if we

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>get the hook on it, I'll take the hook on it.

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So thinking about I just playing the playing the number

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>for one. Obviously it's the NFL, and I know the

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Texans have been huge dogs going in these games that

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 1>they can't score. Just like you said, to the offense

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>under David Mills, they're struggling that not running the foot.

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just the complete the Bugeye. We knew it was

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be that for the Texans. The Texans, I

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>think outside of Week one where they handed it to

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the Jacksonville Jaguars, who are a road favorite in Week one,

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the Texans have lived up to all the

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>low expectations coming into this season and and we knew

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it was gonna be a bad season for them, not

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>only from the coaching perspective, all the stuff going on

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>with Deshaun Watson off the field, and then just the

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 1>depleted roster that really and just sort of such a

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 1>short time that O'Brien just completely uh just decimated that roster.

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But thinking here with I just look at the scheduling

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>spot for the Arizona Cardinals. Now, the first six weeks

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of the they're they're the only undefeated team in the league.

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>We know that. And the first six weeks competing each

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and every week obviously to be six and oh but four.

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Those four of those six games were on the road,

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>so there's been a lot of travel. We know, all

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the rolling in to what to Cleveland last week, the

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>COVID situation going on with the coaching staff, some of

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the injuries that they had going into that role. Everybody,

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>well at least a lot of folks loved leveland in

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that spot, and that was where the underdog role is

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>for the Cardinals. Again, I think these are teams that

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>find a way to find motivation to put a chip

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on their shoulder. Nobody thinks we can win. Let's go

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.720
<v Speaker 1>into Cleveland and put a looking on him, and obviously

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>they did. Now they're gonna come back home play one

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of the worst teams in the NFL, and what's looming

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 1>on deck. This is the ultimate sandwich spot here where

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got the Green Bay Packers coming in on a

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>short week on Thursday. So it's a tight week for

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona Cardinals. You're playing a bad football team to

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>where you. This is one of those games where you

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>just let's just do it. Let's get through it, let's

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy, and let's compete, keep playing for that number

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 1>one seed in the NFC. Let's make ourselves now that

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>not only the Cardinals made themselves a contender in the

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>NFC West, they've actually made themselves a contender for the

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 1>NFC and continue to move on. You got a big

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>game with green Bay looming on that short week here.

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see the energy, the intensity in this game,

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in this matchup for the Arizona Cardinals to come out

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and be ready to be fired up. They just got

0:38:57.840 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to get through this game as healthy as they can

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and take on the Green Bay Packers come Thursday night.

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.399
<v Speaker 1>So I love the scheduling spot here. That's what I'm playing.

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing the number, so of Todd, you're gonna give

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>me seventeen and a half, love it. I'll take the

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>hook playing the number and I'm playing against the scheduling

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>spot here for the Arizona Cardinals. So make mine the

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Houston Texans plus seventeen and a half. I'm gonna have

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to go before James on my on my first pick

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:22.879
<v Speaker 1>because I like if you're giving me seventeen and a half.

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the Texans too, and I'll go back to

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>what everything you said, James, the scheduling spot. Uh, the Texans,

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>they've really only gotten Yes, they are the worst team

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in football, a power ranked thirty two. They've really only

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 1>gotten blown out legit once by the Buffalo Bills last

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:40.439
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. Again, two weeks ago there should have beaten

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots, Patriots miraculously one for all survivor players.

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 1>But this past week thirty one to three on the scoreboard.

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.959
<v Speaker 1>But again that's a that was ten to three after

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>halftime at Indianapolis in Indianapolis. I mean that was a

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>must win. If we don't win this game, our season

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is done. Kind of win for Indianapolis on their home field.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 1>And the Texans hung until he threw that bad pick

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Darius Leonard, until they gave up that one play that

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>game got out of hand. But it was really a

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>much closer ball game than that. The other the games

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>before that Buffalo blow out. We're pretty competitive too, So

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and a half, it's just in order to get

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>back into this little contest of ours. Every time a

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.359
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and a half appears on an NFL slate, it's

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>almost incumbent upon me to take it. You have to

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>take it. You have to take it. And I'm taking

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the Texans. By the way, the Texans are gonna cover

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>six or seven games at the end of the year.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>The NFL teams are gonna very almost all of them

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 1>are gonna get near eight or nine covers. So you

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:37.919
<v Speaker 1>gotta come up with some covers. Here's the one to cover.

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>There's one to cover. Uh, Mikey your second. I've already

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 1>given two. You have, all right? Can I give? Can

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I give my a third? One? There to give? You

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:46.879
<v Speaker 1>to give your third? Yeah, let me give by which

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is my first? I am actually gonna roll and I

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>this is my uh go against a potential survivor pick play. Um,

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the New England Patriots and uh and

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>lay the points. This one is actually four for a

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>potential survivor play. And I say this somewhat precariously because

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the Jets have extra rest here. They're one in four

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>coming off a bye week. The Patriots and the most

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>heartbreaking of fashion, lose to the Dallas Cowboys last week.

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Should never have lost that game. Dallas though there is

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a case to be made that Dallas could have blown

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>him off the field. Dallas ended up with three points

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 1>on three first and goal situations, with three red zone

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>situations I should say, I should say in the first

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>half of that game, So there is a there's a

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>case to be made that New England could have gotten

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>blown off the field. You know, how was he not

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in on third? His whole his whole body is over

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the Dak Preston. But why didn't they review that? Because

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it was just happening too fast? Is that what happened?

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who has to do? It was under

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>two minutes. Why didn't they failed? But they needed to

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:48.879
<v Speaker 1>review DJ metcalf to see if he caught it. DK

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 1>metca But the d K mccalf, I was picking up

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 1>tennis money. I was in the casino walking and watching

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and looking at the screens, so I didn't have audio,

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 1>but I'm watching he was phenomenal. So the the what

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a match, by the way, the the so that that

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks review was on a screen, I didn't have a

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>benefit of audio. So the whole time I'm thinking they're reviewing,

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>did the spike happen before the gun or whatever they'd

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>use now to end the game. At no point without

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of audio, did I think to myself, Oh,

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>they're reviewing the catch? What what were the reviewers? Were

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>not a bounds? Why is he running down the field?

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 1>He thought he was going to crash in and get

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple more yards and then be knocked out. But

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>he didn't eat any more yards, just jump out of bounds.

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>He was Channon Sharp agrees with you, Todd. Did you

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:42.280
<v Speaker 1>see that Twitter battle? It made? It made no hyper

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:46.359
<v Speaker 1>ball metcalf decision to stay in bounce. Yes. By the way, Gil,

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:48.800
<v Speaker 1>have you ever heard no Hyperball? It's a mediocre radio

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 1>show host steals a segment from a great guest and

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 1>comes up with his own thing and never ever attributes

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it to that great guest. Shocker for a Christian who

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:06.280
<v Speaker 1>believes eaves in treating others nicely. Grievances, grievances, grievances, grievances

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>with Todd's olds. By the way I asked to I

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just want to explain to the audience because we're too

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:12.360
<v Speaker 1>much inside those who don't there's there's a huge portion

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast audience that doesn't listen to Visa Grievances

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was a segment that the Great Todd Wishnev once did

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game My show on Visa Wish Wednesday

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 1>WISH Wednesdays, and then Mike Palm alleged by Todd Wishnev

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe I can agreed with the with the allegation,

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 1>uh took his segment, renamed it, repackaged it as as

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>something called and I still don't understand the name no

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 1>hyperbole and we as as as members of the tribe,

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:41.760
<v Speaker 1>call it goyam grievances. You had like a David Letterman

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>cadence there as you were just you were. I'm not

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 1>really a member of the tribe. I'm a renounced member.

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>But still the point still is the point. You know what, Pa,

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know what Hashem just did he froze your

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>screen because of that blasphemy right there? But can you

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>hear me? Still? I want to ask Todd, but why

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>was tom one so upset? Why the ball with two seconds?

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Why is he upset? They reviewed and make him spike

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it again? I had absolutely no idea, But by that

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>point I had eaten so much and not and I

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>want you to know because remember I went over two

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 1>years without eating any delicious thing, any kind of carbohydrate,

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>any bagel, and any chips, and he pizza, any anything,

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and he tater talks. I've actually slipped over the last

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>month or so and eaten some horrible stuff, and that's

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>why I'm in Disasterville area. But I had some nachos

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 1>at the game and was delicious. Anyway, it's Belichick against Salah,

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm taking Belichick of the Patriots. I think after

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that loss, they recognize if this season is going to

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be anything, they must beat the New York Jets. The

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>spread is seven. I'm willing to lay the points. They

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>crushed him the first time they played this year, but

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 1>there's the first rematch of any game this year between

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:55.800
<v Speaker 1>two teams. I think, uh, I trust Belichick to duplicate

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that more than I do solid to overcome. This may

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 1>be a controversial statement, but I think the Patriots are

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly the survivor played this week. I think they're my survivors.

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they're clearly People said, well, but they're gonna

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>play Jacksonville late. It might be a lot better by

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 1>then two with Trevor Lawrence your way in. Yeah, they're

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the Mikey palm show. Uh goham grievances. No, but I

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 1>think that I think that that's we'll get a survivor.

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:23.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's my play. I think it is

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 1>your number three. I'm gonna this is actually my number one.

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That was my number one. People will be surprised by this,

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna take the Chicago I am surprised by this.

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not typically a big take a lot of points

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>guy Bears. I'm just not impressed with the Stampa Bay

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 1>defense now really now it fields because the secondary they

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have a secondary. Now maybe you can argue the

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Bears don't have the quarterback to take advantage, and would

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>argue that. You would argue, but this Bears defense is

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 1>not bad. And I don't know. And look, Brady's got

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>extra rest, right they played on Thursday night. I think

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the Bears are live to win this game. Well, I

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 1>think that if the Bears are within the Bears are

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 1>within a score at halftime, they're live to win this game. Now,

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.320
<v Speaker 1>they beat Tampa Bay last year. Remember on a Thursday

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 1>night in Chicago. They made that when you know, right,

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:16.399
<v Speaker 1>that was that game. But they made him look silly

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in that it's funny of the big favorites, and we're

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about Cardinals minus seventeen and a half, the Rams

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>or what fifteen or whatever they are? Um and then

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>this one, this is the one that actually feel more

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>confident about the favorite at all. But you've seen my record,

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:32.760
<v Speaker 1>so you should agree to this. You shouldn't be so deterred.

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I won't go ahead to head with Todd, but I

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>had faded with you this one. You can am I

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>getting here with you. I actually like your pick on Bears,

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and I like the Texans plus seventeen and a half. Two?

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:46.399
<v Speaker 1>What are you listening this? Twelve and a half? Todd? Half?

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>James up for his third pick? James, what do you got? No? Three? Well,

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I've scratched my number three and I've changed my mind,

0:46:57.440 --> 0:46:59.879
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to roll with tonight's game. I'm gonna

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Cleveland Browns. Whatever number we're getting, one and

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:05.879
<v Speaker 1>a half, it's less than a field one. What made

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys? Name the number as long as long as

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>as long as it's less than three. Just thinking about it.

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And I've been thinking about where where Denver's head is.

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is more so the fact that we've talked

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 1>about the linebackers. We know they're against season stems in

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the linebacker. I don't know who's gonna play. They're looking

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:21.760
<v Speaker 1>at Jefferson Park to try to pick up some players

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 1>over there. That's where I used to play football when

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid. It's two blocks north of Mile

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>High Stadium, right there, and there there's no linebackers, and

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I just think of Dick Fangio. You know, we we

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot about these coaches in the NFL, and

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we have the changes in the guard and we've given

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of at least, you know, not a lot

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:40.759
<v Speaker 1>of with with the analytics that have come into the game.

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>We talked about Brandon Staley constantly going forward on fourth down?

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Are these the right moves? And when it works, you're

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.399
<v Speaker 1>a genius. When it doesn't, you're you gotta go old school. Well,

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:50.799
<v Speaker 1>nobody's more old school in this in this league than

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Vic Fangio when it comes to preparation for one and

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the other pieces in game management and not the Stefanski

0:47:57.840 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is one of these new millennials taken over the NFL.

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>But I love the identity of what the Cleveland Browns are.

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I know they're beat up in the in the backfield

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of running the football. But I just can't get bactive.

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 1>They way that they run the football, in the way

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that they take advantage of the middle of the field.

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 1>That's where Denver's biggest weaknesses right now with all those

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 1>linebackers being out and the fact that Denver, Where's where

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is this Broncos football team's head? The first three weeks

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't play anybody, but got a lot of high because

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they came and won those first three games. Are they

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 1>contender in the a f C West, can they compete

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with Kansas City Chargers, etcetera? And then we've seen the

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks, especially last week playing the Raiders, where

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of question marks. Where were the Raiders heads

0:48:36.080 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 1>coming into that game? While the Raiders were the focus team,

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>not the Denver Broncos. The Denver I just don't think

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:43.800
<v Speaker 1>there's any leadership going on on the sideline right and

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 1>well for the Denver Broncos nor on the field. And

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>then offensively, Teddy Bridgewater, he just looks so frail back there.

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 1>He looks looks like he's just smaller and smaller over

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the course of the years, and now he's starting to

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:57.920
<v Speaker 1>curl up. You see this pass rush getting to him.

0:48:57.960 --> 0:49:00.240
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders were all over him last week at there

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:03.360
<v Speaker 1>was four turnovers at a Teddy Bridgewater, three interceptions, and

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he put one ball on the ground. All of a sudden,

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna change, and you're gonna go on the road

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 1>on a short week again into Cleveland tonight Thursday night

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:13.960
<v Speaker 1>football game. Yes they're banged up, but their identity is

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>still intact, and whether it's running the football or that

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:19.759
<v Speaker 1>play action against all these newfound linebackers with the Denver Broncos.

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I like Cleveland in this spot, even though they're beat up.

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Denver's beat up as well. I'll take the Brown's lane

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>less than a field go at home. That's pick number three. Alright,

0:49:27.840 --> 0:49:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you've given three monkeys to one. Okay, here's my last one.

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I am going to go. I'm gonna go back to

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the well with a team that burned me last week.

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going over in the Kansas City, Tennessee game. I

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:44.840
<v Speaker 1>know the number is ridiculously high. I know it's fifty

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half and that seems like a ridiculous

0:49:48.320 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 1>college football total, not at pro football total. But I

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>don't care, because have you seen these teams play defense?

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:58.799
<v Speaker 1>The Kansas City Chiefs. They could have scored even more

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 1>against Washington. They had in reception at the five yard

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:03.280
<v Speaker 1>line at one point, and I think there was another

0:50:04.000 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 1>problem inside the ten But obviously the Chiefs are great

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on offense. Obviously the Tennessee Titans are horrendous defensively. We

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>saw the Bills go up and down the field against Tennessee.

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 1>We saw every team go up and down the field.

0:50:17.280 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Who hasn't gone up and down the field easily against Tennessee,

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>No one. So we know Kansas City is gonna score

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of points against Tennessee. And you know what,

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I like what the Tennessee offense is coming back into

0:50:28.880 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>form from last year. Kansas City doesn't play any defense,

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna stop Derrick Henry. Give me a break.

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 1>This game is going over a college number fifty seven

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half because these teams are both the ultimate

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and overs. And I know they make it so high

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 1>because they want you, They want you to say, oh

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>my god, I can't go over fifty seven and a half.

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It's too crazy, you know what I'm doing it anyways,

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 1>give me over fifty seven and a half because these

0:50:53.760 --> 0:50:56.959
<v Speaker 1>teams are the ultimate over, teams in the National Football League.

0:50:57.160 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 1>That was gonna be my third pick if I didn't

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 1>use the Yeah Browns tonight. Okay, so you're with me

0:51:05.040 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>half okay, which brings us to teaser before sever Yes,

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and I go, I go, you go left until I

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>take a clear lead over Todd that he can go last. Bro,

0:51:17.000 --> 0:51:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm the dude debat. I hate to tell you under

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Gilly I won. You have your little battle with Todd

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 1>while I destroy That's fine, I'm sorry. What is your record?

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So we're so Todd has a half game lead over

0:51:29.680 --> 0:51:32.839
<v Speaker 1>me and the teasers five, you have a half game

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lead over me? Yeah, what's that? I'm the defending champion

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on teasers I won last year, did you well? Yes?

0:51:42.320 --> 0:51:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know what's that same about the sun

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:47.840
<v Speaker 1>shining and a dog's behind? What is that? Okay? Alright,

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 1>your teaser of the week, James, let us start with

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:54.359
<v Speaker 1>you to six point six point teaser of the week.

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Two teams, six point teaser. Let's go the first half

0:51:58.719 --> 0:52:01.000
<v Speaker 1>with We'll take the as the City Chiefs and we'll

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:03.359
<v Speaker 1>drop it to basically a pickup, right or a plus

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a half whatever their four and a half? Okay, then

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>give me the one and a half, I have five

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half out here. That's the beauty. We got

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:13.280
<v Speaker 1>numbers all over the place, especially out of here in Colorado,

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we got twenty different operators. I could choose from four

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half probably up to six, but I'll put

0:52:18.080 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefe. Kansas City Chiefs in that teaser

0:52:22.160 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about the defenses on both sides. Absolutely nobody can

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 1>stop either side. But I think about the Titans here

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>now apparently well I thought Taylor the one was on

0:52:31.520 --> 0:52:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bills are on the Titans. Apar plates for the Bills.

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:37.120
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that you don't have your left tackle there,

0:52:37.120 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's crucial for that offensive line. We

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:41.879
<v Speaker 1>know Derrick Henry is going to be pounding the football again,

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>but it is a short week and he had a

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>great h hated get in front of Derrick Henry, just

0:52:46.239 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>like most of defensive players in the National Football League.

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:51.880
<v Speaker 1>But I just don't think the Titans can match score

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 1>for score with the Kansas City Chiefs. And and I

0:52:54.480 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 1>know this is not the Kansas City Chiefs offense where

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Mahomes has been making a lot of bad

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:03.239
<v Speaker 1>decisions because he feels like I have to make big

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:06.719
<v Speaker 1>plays because defensively, my guy, my our our guys are

0:53:06.840 --> 0:53:08.920
<v Speaker 1>there are the unit can't get off the field. So

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:11.239
<v Speaker 1>it is on Mahomes to have to play hero ball

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>week in and week out. But it's not just him.

0:53:13.600 --> 0:53:16.080
<v Speaker 1>They got plenty of offensive weapons to play against here.

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And thinking about the the hype and the energy that

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 1>was expended on Monday Night Football for the Titans, especially

0:53:22.600 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the way that they got to close out and win

0:53:24.400 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that football game, I'll take the Kansas City Chiefs at

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a pick them or plus the one and a half

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:32.759
<v Speaker 1>in the teaser as the first leg here. I think

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City continues offensively where Mahomes they can even recover

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:39.279
<v Speaker 1>from a bad plays, and defensively, you can't get any

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:41.359
<v Speaker 1>worse than where they're at right now. So I think

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:45.160
<v Speaker 1>they'll make enough plays defensively to hold the Tennessee Titans offense.

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I know the the there's the injury book too. I

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:49.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think Julio Jones is going to play this week

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Tennessee Titans. And then I looked at the

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:54.400
<v Speaker 1>injury report as well, A j Brown out with an illness.

0:53:54.719 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Anytime we see illness on these injury reports earlier in

0:53:57.239 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 1>the week. Always pause for concern in this day and

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:01.920
<v Speaker 1>age of COVID. So I'll go with Casey dropping that

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:03.920
<v Speaker 1>down to basically win the football game. And then the

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:06.399
<v Speaker 1>other side, I'm gonna take the home dog here. I'll

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>take it up to ten. And what's our number on

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks is a four and a half or five?

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks are getting four and a half. I have

0:54:15.160 --> 0:54:16.800
<v Speaker 1>four and a half, So to move them through the

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll move them through the seven, eight, nine, and ten

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to get ten and a half at home with the

0:54:23.040 --> 0:54:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks at home playing on Monday Night football against the

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:29.760
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints. Uh I. The Saints team is probably

0:54:29.920 --> 0:54:31.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a number of teams that I've been struggling to

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:33.839
<v Speaker 1>figure out this year and put in New Orleans at

0:54:33.920 --> 0:54:36.399
<v Speaker 1>one of the as one of those top teams. Such

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 1>an up and down season each and every week, when

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you think they're gonna show up, like I thought they

0:54:40.440 --> 0:54:43.480
<v Speaker 1>were gonna show up, and they're they're technically their home

0:54:43.600 --> 0:54:46.600
<v Speaker 1>opener against the Giants because of everything that happened with

0:54:46.680 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the hurricane rolling through there. They had their home opener

0:54:49.320 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 1>so late in the season playing the Giants and played

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 1>well for three quarters, couldn't finish up twenty one to

0:54:53.719 --> 0:54:55.879
<v Speaker 1>ten lose to the Giants. And that's the only when

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the Giants have so far the season is winning that

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter in overtime. I just don't know which team

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:03.279
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get week in and week out from the

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints. This just smells like a close game

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of defensive game. I think we saw the Seattle Seahawks

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in the at halftime figure out, you know what, we

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:12.400
<v Speaker 1>probably don't want to put the ball in Geno smith

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:15.440
<v Speaker 1>hands constantly slinging the ball down the field like they

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 1>did in that first half against Pittsburgh. Went back to

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the running game. And not that New Orleans has a

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 1>bad defense here, but ten and a half points at

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:25.680
<v Speaker 1>home with Jamis Winston have to go and cover double

0:55:25.719 --> 0:55:28.040
<v Speaker 1>digits on the road. I don't like their opportunity that.

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a close game. It could be a

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:31.120
<v Speaker 1>field goal game. I kind of like the Seahawks plus

0:55:31.200 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the number, but I'll put them and go through that

0:55:33.120 --> 0:55:34.839
<v Speaker 1>ten sitting at ten and a half the second leg

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of that, let's go with the Seahawks plus then and

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a half. Russell Wilson eligible return week ten at the

0:55:40.560 --> 0:55:45.399
<v Speaker 1>earliest for the Seahawks. All Right, Todd By h by

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:48.960
<v Speaker 1>request you go first on the teasers. Okay, I'm gonna

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:53.840
<v Speaker 1>go with the New England Patriots. I just saw the

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 1>first game that the Patriots played against the Jets with

0:55:56.920 --> 0:55:59.800
<v Speaker 1>uh with going against that rookie quarterback from b y

0:55:59.840 --> 0:56:02.719
<v Speaker 1>U and Bill Belichick made his life miserable. I believe

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 1>he threw four picks that game. I'm not positive he did,

0:56:05.239 --> 0:56:08.160
<v Speaker 1>but I believe it was four interceptions that game. I

0:56:08.280 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 1>think the Pats are slowly getting better. They were competitive

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:14.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Alice last week, which was kind of a

0:56:14.480 --> 0:56:17.719
<v Speaker 1>surprise to me at least uh And I think that

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Jets are just they're just not ready to go

0:56:20.080 --> 0:56:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on the road and beat the Patriots. So I don't

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:24.800
<v Speaker 1>want the Patriots minus the seven, but I will definitely

0:56:24.880 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>take him as the first leg in my part in

0:56:27.640 --> 0:56:32.200
<v Speaker 1>my UM two team teaser, Patriots minus one as the

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 1>first team and the second team. I'm just gonna go

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 1>with the old Green Bay Packers, the Green Bay Packers

0:56:39.600 --> 0:56:43.320
<v Speaker 1>minus the two because it's the Washington football team. And

0:56:43.440 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 1>are they catching up with Taylor Heineke? What's going on here?

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this Washington team is really starting to

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:52.919
<v Speaker 1>hit the skids, and I just don't see them going

0:56:53.000 --> 0:56:55.880
<v Speaker 1>into Green Bay and you know, keeping it close against

0:56:55.960 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 1>green Bay. So if I can have green Bay minus two, um,

0:56:59.360 --> 0:57:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll take green Bay minus two with the

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Pats and I'll just take another teaser win. To me,

0:57:04.040 --> 0:57:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it is the obvious teaser play of the week New England.

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I already have him against the number. I'm teasing him

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:11.440
<v Speaker 1>down to basically just have to win and exactly the

0:57:11.480 --> 0:57:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers against my Washington football team, which honestly

0:57:15.120 --> 0:57:20.600
<v Speaker 1>scored one touchdown last week against the Chiefs with yes,

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that's real bad. And by the way, they only touched

0:57:22.560 --> 0:57:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that was because the Chiefs let to Washington receivers go

0:57:25.960 --> 0:57:28.520
<v Speaker 1>clear past the defense. Taylor Honekey could have had his

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:30.400
<v Speaker 1>choice of who to throw it too. So that was

0:57:30.480 --> 0:57:33.360
<v Speaker 1>just one big gaff and Kansas City tried everything in

0:57:33.400 --> 0:57:35.000
<v Speaker 1>their power in the first half to give that game

0:57:35.040 --> 0:57:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to Washington. Washington couldn't take it from I think, uh,

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:41.000
<v Speaker 1>asking Green Bay and Aaron Rodgers to beat that defense

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:43.600
<v Speaker 1>by less than a field goal is not much of ask.

0:57:43.760 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 1>It is New England and Green Bay for me as well.

0:57:47.120 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Same time. There it is. We all had it. What

0:57:50.600 --> 0:57:56.440
<v Speaker 1>happened we had when you said green Bay. When you

0:57:56.480 --> 0:58:00.080
<v Speaker 1>said green Bay, we gasped. We thought your make you

0:58:00.360 --> 0:58:02.920
<v Speaker 1>week to go do something similar he did with no

0:58:03.080 --> 0:58:08.160
<v Speaker 1>hyper bolly and copy me with one in Green Bay

0:58:08.280 --> 0:58:11.240
<v Speaker 1>minus two. All right, Survivor. So here's the deal. This,

0:58:11.360 --> 0:58:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I think is the first week of Survivor. Here now

0:58:13.400 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in recent weeks where it's going to be much more

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 1>splintered in terms of the distribution of picks. Here are

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the bigger favorites on the board. New England against seven

0:58:22.040 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at home against the Jets at Baltimore, six

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites at home against in Senata,

0:58:27.000 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay eight and a half point favorites at home

0:58:28.760 --> 0:58:32.040
<v Speaker 1>against Washington UH and then the big ones Rams fifteen

0:58:32.120 --> 0:58:35.120
<v Speaker 1>at home against Detroit, Tampa twelve and a half at

0:58:35.160 --> 0:58:39.480
<v Speaker 1>home against Chicago, Arizona seventeen and a half at home

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:43.560
<v Speaker 1>against Houston. For me, I have already used Green Band,

0:58:43.600 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay, so I throw those out. Arizona has a

0:58:46.760 --> 0:58:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Christmas consideration. I am saving them, I believe. For then

0:58:50.480 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 1>either way I do not want to use them. Then

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:54.440
<v Speaker 1>for me it comes down to the Rams of the

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Ravens and the Bengals. I already have the Bengals against

0:58:57.280 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the spread. I don't entirely trust Baltimore in this situation.

0:59:00.320 --> 0:59:02.320
<v Speaker 1>The Rams, I would like to say for later. So

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:04.880
<v Speaker 1>for me, it will be the New England Patriots. What

0:59:05.040 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 1>did you use one on this ticket? Tampa Bay and

0:59:08.920 --> 0:59:12.000
<v Speaker 1>then Green Bay week two? Okay, yeah, you're all over

0:59:12.080 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. This week, I'm all over the Patriots. Todd,

0:59:15.600 --> 0:59:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you're no longer in survivor. Who would you have played?

0:59:19.800 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 1>This was the week I was going to use Tampa

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Bay because I would have was saving him for this week,

0:59:24.080 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 1>so I was going to use Tampa Bay. This you, Mikey,

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you agree with I agree that the I think the

0:59:27.920 --> 0:59:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Patriots we'll actually get the most pis. I think, so

0:59:33.120 --> 0:59:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we can't use if if more than fifty people use Arizone,

0:59:37.560 --> 0:59:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll just do. They're not paying attention to the rules.

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And if I get through this week, I think I'm

0:59:41.680 --> 0:59:43.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna try to I'm gonna start to mute my survivor

0:59:44.000 --> 0:59:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of thinking because now it's gonna get serious after this point.

0:59:46.760 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>But that the reason that I'm talking also in New

0:59:48.440 --> 0:59:50.480
<v Speaker 1>England is after having used Tampa Bay and Green Bay

0:59:50.480 --> 0:59:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and my one remaining entry. For me, it's sort of

0:59:52.760 --> 0:59:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a pot pourri of really mediocre teams after that, so

0:59:55.280 --> 0:59:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that the entry is actually building itself pretty nicely. Caroline,

0:59:58.960 --> 1:00:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the Carolinas in the Minnesota's of the world and the

1:00:01.960 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis is of the world, that kind of thing. So, uh,

1:00:05.200 --> 1:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll probably go New England here, James. You don't play Survivor,

1:00:07.800 --> 1:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>do you? I do play Survivor. I'm so salty of

1:00:12.000 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the damn New Orleans Saints because half of my half

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of my uh, half of my Survivor picks went with

1:00:17.000 --> 1:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans and that loss at home to the Giants

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that week. So I didn't. I didn't. I haven't made

1:00:23.400 --> 1:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>my Survivor pick. Usually I don't pick, you know, we're

1:00:25.240 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about best best. Normally I don't make any plays

1:00:27.320 --> 1:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in any decisions until we get through Friday night into Saturday.

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, that's the challenge with Survivor now is

1:00:33.200 --> 1:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>because of not only with the Thanksgiving but also with

1:00:35.360 --> 1:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the Christmas games on deck, and I can't use you know,

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe I thought about maybe using the Packers here, but

1:00:42.920 --> 1:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking I might want to save the packers for later

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>with thinking about where the Browns are right now and

1:00:47.400 --> 1:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>all those injuries, that was clearly do I want to

1:00:50.000 --> 1:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>play the Browns or the paper Packers on that Christmas night?

1:00:52.640 --> 1:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I probably want to stay away from that one. I

1:00:54.360 --> 1:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>gotta keep the Cardinals live for Christmas as well, so

1:00:56.960 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't play them this week. And I'm saying with you, Gill,

1:00:59.760 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think with the Rams, there's plenty of other spots

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in the schedule for the Rams that I'd rather use.

1:01:05.440 --> 1:01:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Is it the Patriots this week for me? Or maybe

1:01:07.480 --> 1:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's Tampa Bay and it's either Tampa Bay this week,

1:01:11.120 --> 1:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>or it's gonna be Tampa Bay on Week eleven when

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they host the Giants on Monday Night Football, or even

1:01:17.840 --> 1:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>going into there's there's so many other spots with Tampa.

1:01:20.440 --> 1:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I can't give it depended a pick right now.

1:01:22.400 --> 1:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Gil Sary, gentlemen, I just I'm not there right now

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with Survivor because I think it is there's so many

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>factors in. I love all these little quick twerks that

1:01:29.720 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the tweaks that we have with having

1:01:31.760 --> 1:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep teams alive. So I've got to do some

1:01:33.480 --> 1:01:35.439
<v Speaker 1>more digging before I really actually I know there's there's

1:01:35.440 --> 1:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>some people who who think that, you know, it made

1:01:37.840 --> 1:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the game, have too much luck involved in it. Okay,

1:01:41.680 --> 1:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I understand that thinking. On the other hand, it's also

1:01:45.160 --> 1:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool to have to suffer with that, you know.

1:01:50.080 --> 1:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, I like it, Yeah, I like it.

1:01:52.480 --> 1:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>There's it's a challenge there otherwise, I mean, we've if

1:01:55.280 --> 1:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just otherwise, we're just going against the Houston Texans

1:01:58.120 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Jacksonville Jaguars. Are those types of team each

1:02:00.360 --> 1:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and every week. You're gonna have to take some bad

1:02:02.240 --> 1:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>football teams out there too. But I don't think this

1:02:04.240 --> 1:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is the week that I'm gonna take one of those

1:02:05.600 --> 1:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>mediocre to bad football teams just to get one of

1:02:08.000 --> 1:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>those twenty picks out of the way. I'm on a

1:02:09.520 --> 1:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>mediocre streak right now picking mediocre teams. So final two questions,

1:02:14.080 --> 1:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the first of which is which are the big favorites

1:02:15.640 --> 1:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is most likely to lose out right, same candidates. I

1:02:17.880 --> 1:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>just gave a survivor including the six and a half

1:02:20.520 --> 1:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and the seven point favorite. I would obviously go Baltimore

1:02:24.240 --> 1:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>as the most likely to lose, But Mikey, you you're

1:02:26.240 --> 1:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>going Tampaka. I think Cincinnati is more likely to beat.

1:02:30.080 --> 1:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying it. It wouldn't shock me if

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, like if if they can stay in it

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in the first half, Baltimore Gentlemen most likely to lose

1:02:37.920 --> 1:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>all those Yeah, I'll go with that. What if I

1:02:41.200 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>reduced it? What if I took out Baltimore and New

1:02:43.280 --> 1:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>England and just made it and just made it the

1:02:45.880 --> 1:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>uh the double digit favorites, including Green Bay Lions could

1:02:50.160 --> 1:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>win against the Rams. I mean, the Rams have had

1:02:53.040 --> 1:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>many games where they barely show up, and they just

1:02:55.600 --> 1:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>showed up big time against the Giants, So they're probably

1:02:57.920 --> 1:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna come in this week. And I almost took the

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>lines plus the fifteen and a half because of that. Um.

1:03:02.960 --> 1:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>But I could see that, you know, the Rams laying

1:03:05.280 --> 1:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>an egg this week? What are they? We're there five

1:03:07.920 --> 1:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and one. It lost to the Cardinals where the many

1:03:10.520 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>games they didn't show up Jared Golf last year against Oh,

1:03:14.920 --> 1:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the path before they got Matthew Stafford. No,

1:03:18.320 --> 1:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you Rams what you want me to tell you,

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>where where games were running they didn't show up, and

1:03:22.800 --> 1:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're five and one and they lost to the

1:03:24.400 --> 1:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>only six and Arizona they didn't show up just right.

1:03:28.440 --> 1:03:32.479
<v Speaker 1>They lost to six and okay, okay, well that wasn't

1:03:32.560 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>very good at Indianapolis. At Indianapolis, I was not impressed

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with their performance that day at all. And uh, okay,

1:03:41.320 --> 1:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>granted the best of the I'm just saying that Stafford

1:03:46.080 --> 1:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is still Stafford before he went from he went from

1:03:49.160 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>five to one for m v P. Now he's like

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to one. It'll look until he proves otherwise. He's

1:03:55.320 --> 1:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>still not a winner winner yet. Okay, he might be

1:04:00.120 --> 1:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>very talented player and everything like that, but there's also

1:04:03.040 --> 1:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to give him some of the blame for

1:04:05.760 --> 1:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>for having Detroit be so mediocre for year after year

1:04:08.600 --> 1:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>after year. I agree with that, Todd, and and he's

1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>excused from all of it with everybody's saying he's going

1:04:13.280 --> 1:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to be the savior in l a right, And that's

1:04:15.600 --> 1:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>what I don't like. The nighting of him all of

1:04:17.760 --> 1:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a sudden and all of a sudden, Oh, Stafford is fantastic.

1:04:20.200 --> 1:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>He's oh, he's a good player, and he's got a

1:04:22.160 --> 1:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>good supporting cast. But until he wins something, give me

1:04:25.600 --> 1:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a break. The only time I remember him in the

1:04:27.160 --> 1:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>playoffs was against Dallas one year, and there was a

1:04:29.480 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>controversial call. Right, but that was the only game he

1:04:31.840 --> 1:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>was ever in the playoffs? Right? Was he ever in

1:04:33.640 --> 1:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs? Alright? Final question? Thirteen games, six byes this week,

1:04:38.560 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>thirteen games on the slate. You get to uh, you

1:04:41.840 --> 1:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>have to play a side on every one of them,

1:04:43.400 --> 1:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>but you get one pass on an already jacked up

1:04:46.440 --> 1:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>week with massive spreads. What would be the one game, James,

1:04:49.960 --> 1:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>if you had to play twelve of the thirteen, would

1:04:52.120 --> 1:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>be the one game on the side you would take

1:04:53.760 --> 1:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a pass on? Giants Panthers. I don't want any part

1:04:57.320 --> 1:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of this. The Panthers going on the road as a favorite.

1:04:59.520 --> 1:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>What have we? This is Sam Donald going back to

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>This is like Buckner going back to Shay. He's going

1:05:05.080 --> 1:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>back to the house of horrors of MetLife state name

1:05:07.520 --> 1:05:09.959
<v Speaker 1>or Giants State or whatever you call it. He's gonna

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>go back there. I don't want to hear while he's

1:05:11.960 --> 1:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>motivated to go back there, he's reverted back. He's seeing

1:05:15.440 --> 1:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>look what happened last week, the last few weeks. Yeah,

1:05:19.080 --> 1:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I know it. Now he's does see and now he's

1:05:23.520 --> 1:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna go back and it's I'm sure he's having nightmares

1:05:26.360 --> 1:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>having to go back to MetLife Stadium, and then think

1:05:28.680 --> 1:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>about the Giants. The Giants are just awful. This is

1:05:31.320 --> 1:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>just a bad football team. It's a from top down

1:05:34.920 --> 1:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>onto the field. I think the only thing that's live

1:05:37.680 --> 1:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in MetLife Stadium at the Giants games is uh said,

1:05:41.320 --> 1:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is squirming around in those catchup dispensers. And there's nothing

1:05:45.160 --> 1:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on the field going on with the Giants right now

1:05:47.880 --> 1:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that compels me to say, I like the home dog

1:05:50.320 --> 1:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Giants here, even though it's typically

1:05:53.520 --> 1:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>they're the Carolina Panthers with coming back into this spot here.

1:05:57.240 --> 1:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>But the Giants at home, they've scored four touch ounds

1:06:00.320 --> 1:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in three home games. They just gotta handed to them

1:06:02.560 --> 1:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>by the Rams. And I know Joe Judge giving him

1:06:04.600 --> 1:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>another tongue lashing. He does it seems like he does

1:06:06.720 --> 1:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it every single week, whether it's publicly or or inside

1:06:09.880 --> 1:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the locker room. He guess he did the same thing

1:06:11.440 --> 1:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>this week. They're not here in his message. This is

1:06:13.720 --> 1:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>not a team that's even competitive. They scored four touchdowns

1:06:17.440 --> 1:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in their three games and those three losses, and two

1:06:20.440 --> 1:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of them were in garbage time, one of which was

1:06:22.240 --> 1:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>last week as well. This is just a team that

1:06:23.880 --> 1:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>can't score I don't like either game. Maybe if I

1:06:26.040 --> 1:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>was gonna play it, I played the under but I

1:06:27.440 --> 1:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want anything to do with that. But I hate

1:06:30.240 --> 1:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to pa, I hate to pair with James on this,

1:06:32.080 --> 1:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>but that is exactly the game there's because there's so

1:06:35.080 --> 1:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>many different possibilities, right, Carolina could actually show up and

1:06:38.320 --> 1:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>blow them out, and the Giants again against the Rams.

1:06:41.280 --> 1:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I know the Rams ended up blowing him out, but

1:06:43.640 --> 1:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>we're never really honest about NFL outcomes, like if if

1:06:46.240 --> 1:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones doesn't throw the ball around the yard or

1:06:48.800 --> 1:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is loose with the football, you just never know. Like

1:06:51.520 --> 1:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that game got out of hand so quickly, so I

1:06:53.280 --> 1:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be shocked if the Giants came out and won

1:06:55.480 --> 1:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that game. So that's that's my play as well. Carolina

1:06:57.680 --> 1:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. But by the way, can we just say

1:06:59.240 --> 1:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>something Mikey got so lucky in that game? Sam Donald

1:07:03.120 --> 1:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>found a way. Sam Donald found a way to lose

1:07:07.560 --> 1:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a game where his team blocked the punt in the

1:07:09.600 --> 1:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter, had the entire crowd into the game, and

1:07:12.440 --> 1:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they were ahead and lost the Kirk Cousins. How is

1:07:15.400 --> 1:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that possible? Because Mikey had the vikings and God likes

1:07:19.040 --> 1:07:22.959
<v Speaker 1>Christians and not Juice. The Viking's totally dominated the game.

1:07:23.120 --> 1:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>He totally Mike Zimmer got to the thirty two and

1:07:25.640 --> 1:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>stopped coaching. I mean he went he watched the throw

1:07:28.480 --> 1:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>cookers at North South Runner. He throws a toss sweep

1:07:31.040 --> 1:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>blues of three yards and rushes the punt team out

1:07:33.080 --> 1:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of the field. Zimmers at Joe. Zimmer's a joke, Todd.

1:07:36.560 --> 1:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>The game I don't want to have any part of

1:07:38.520 --> 1:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is the game that Gil had guess the wrong favorite

1:07:40.680 --> 1:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>on with Christie on Monday. Dolphins Falcons, I want zero.

1:07:44.200 --> 1:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what's going. I don't know if

1:07:45.840 --> 1:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>two was even on the team anymore. He's not listed

1:07:48.320 --> 1:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>on the depth charge one day, then he's lifted it,

1:07:50.640 --> 1:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know. Let me ask you one question.

1:07:52.560 --> 1:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I was watching his Jets Falcons game a couple of

1:07:55.520 --> 1:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, the second half in Linne. Yeah, the quarterback,

1:07:58.280 --> 1:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Wilson in the running back looked like they were like

1:08:00.120 --> 1:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a foot and a half shorter than every other player

1:08:01.960 --> 1:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on the failing They're very small. But that was when

1:08:05.480 --> 1:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I went this will take you back when I went

1:08:06.880 --> 1:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to a training camp for Washington years and years ago

1:08:10.400 --> 1:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>after they drafted Heath Shuler from Tennessee from Tennessee and

1:08:15.840 --> 1:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Washington was a couple of years removed from a Super Bowl,

1:08:17.920 --> 1:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but they had had a bad year. That's why they

1:08:19.240 --> 1:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>got the third he just it was North Turners first

1:08:22.280 --> 1:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>year or second or whatever it was, but they had

1:08:24.320 --> 1:08:25.799
<v Speaker 1>the third pick of the drift. They dried he Schuler.

1:08:25.880 --> 1:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>You took one look at he's Schuler behind center and

1:08:28.479 --> 1:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I turned to my buddy, I swear, I go, he's

1:08:30.920 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback. And you could tell when they were interviewed

1:08:33.320 --> 1:08:35.519
<v Speaker 1>with Gus Varatt, who was the seventh round pick that year.

1:08:36.080 --> 1:08:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Gus they interviewed Gusts like, oh, so you're you know,

1:08:38.560 --> 1:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you're you're vying for the for the starting quarterback. Goes no,

1:08:41.520 --> 1:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know we can tell he was smiling. He's

1:08:43.280 --> 1:08:45.759
<v Speaker 1>like you no, it's Heath's team. He was he already

1:08:45.800 --> 1:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>knew anyway. To your point, Zach Wilson looks like that too.

1:08:49.000 --> 1:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>To some Todd what do you want no part of?

1:08:53.280 --> 1:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean I agree with with James on Caroline and

1:08:55.680 --> 1:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>New York York Giants, but also the Colts Niners game.

1:08:58.160 --> 1:09:00.639
<v Speaker 1>You know who's the quarterback it and then you get

1:09:00.720 --> 1:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Carson wins on the other side, I don't want any

1:09:02.760 --> 1:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of that. Colt Snyders is why you can't grid this

1:09:04.960 --> 1:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff out and survivor from the beginning of the year,

1:09:06.760 --> 1:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>because after week two, if you gritted it out, gritted

1:09:09.760 --> 1:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that would have been one of your picks.

1:09:11.840 --> 1:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You'd been like San Francisco over Indy for sure. Anyway,

1:09:14.880 --> 1:09:16.479
<v Speaker 1>we gotta run because Mike he's got a show to do.

1:09:16.520 --> 1:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It's called odds On with a mall Shaw Visa, so

1:09:19.960 --> 1:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>he's going to do that. James, I'm gonna right now

1:09:22.479 --> 1:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>quickly turn tune to Visa dot com not to miss

1:09:25.439 --> 1:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>that because it's a fantastic show. No hyper Bowl, agreed, James, James,

1:09:29.560 --> 1:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you for doing this. I know you're busy. I

1:09:31.160 --> 1:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you doing this. Super Contest Champion for Life, James Selinus,

1:09:34.880 --> 1:09:38.519
<v Speaker 1>thank you, James. Thanks going to be on with you gentlemen,

1:09:38.760 --> 1:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely good. Good luck with your bests this weekend, everybody.

1:09:41.320 --> 1:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>And the name of the show that you do with

1:09:42.640 --> 1:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Brady on the weekend of Visa is called the Pro

1:09:46.120 --> 1:09:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Football Blitz. Pro Football Blitz alright, with former Super Contest

1:09:51.840 --> 1:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>winner Brady Can't Brady Cannon officially changed the name. With

1:09:55.000 --> 1:09:57.599
<v Speaker 1>the name change, with the legal name change, I think

1:09:57.640 --> 1:09:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I'll bring that up. I'll bring that up on Saturday.

1:09:59.680 --> 1:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it mad or is it Brady? Cannon? Comma and oh,

1:10:02.040 --> 1:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I want a super contest. No, they

1:10:03.800 --> 1:10:06.759
<v Speaker 1>listed in front of it now in all copies. Okay,

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>we love Brady. Brady's always our leadoff man here. Thank

1:10:11.479 --> 1:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you James for Mike Palm for Todd a wishnev from

1:10:14.320 --> 1:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>his mom's cork Addict because we want to locate him.

1:10:17.360 --> 1:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Gill Alexander, thanks for listening to the megapod. Good luck

1:10:19.760 --> 1:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>with all your picks this weekend. I'm the man of

1:10:21.920 --> 1:10:22.599
<v Speaker 1>beaten Teasers.