WEBVTT - Ranking Every Hole at Augusta National

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my ball in a brid egg

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Friday Egg, the.

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Dreaded Frida Egg Friday fridagg Bride Egg.

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Lie, I'm about ready to run off of the.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, welcome back to another edition of the Friday

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Golf Podcast. I am here with my wonderful co host,

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Morrison. Garrett, how are you doing?

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Hello? We are in person.

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 2>We're at the Dratty House.

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 3>We're at the Drafty House in Augusta, Georgia, and it's

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 3>it's great to be in person.

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is wonderful. Garrett. You just wrapped up a

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 2>couple of days at Annwha. I just wrapped up getting

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>on site, checking in, getting a milling about Augusta National

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 2>for a day. We're here. So this is the beginning

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 2>of Master's week. This is Sunday afternoon recording, and we

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 2>got a fun little activity. I it was a hard activity.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 2>I have to say. We are going to rank. So

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I ranked one through eighteen the holes of Augustin National,

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 2>and you ranked one through eighteen the wholes of Augustin National.

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we set criteria you could. You know,

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 2>this is definitely not like I didn't. I didn't go

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>about it as a ranking of like holes with the

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>most drama or the greatest moments in Master's history. I

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of just looked at them whole by hole. So

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>I want to preface that here. You know, I'm sure

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 2>when we're talking about the holes, some you know, people

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>are going to be upset that maybe a certain certain

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>holes or places. You know, this was just opinion everybody.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I would urge everybody to try and do it themselves.

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 2>It's actually like really hard. I like got to a

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>point and I was like, wait, I can't believe this

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 2>hole is so far down, you know. And then I

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 2>was looking at what was ahead of it, and I

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 2>was like, I don't think there's really a spot. How

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>do you find that?

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of less good holes here? So if

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 3>a hole is in the bottom half of the ranking here,

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 3>we're not saying it's bad. This is one of the

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 3>great courses in the world. Obviously, it's great because a

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of the holes are really really good. So if

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 3>a whole place is fourteenth out of eighteen, that doesn't

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.839
<v Speaker 3>mean it's bad. It just means that we think other

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 3>holes are better. Yeah, criteria is a you know, that's

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 3>an interesting question here, because even if we're just ranking

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 3>them architecturally and not based on memories or moments or whatever,

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>there's still a lot of ways to rank holes architecturally.

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 3>You know. Should we be talking about them as competitive

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 3>elite golf holes, like what they do to the players

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 3>in the Masters, or should we be ranking them, you know,

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 3>from the perspective of amateurs or even just all golfers. Right,

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 3>should we be ranking them from the championship tees or

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 3>the member tees, because those are very different golf holes.

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 3>I ended up going kind of with the master's perspective, right,

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 3>how well did these holes function in the Masters? And

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 3>so right way, I think.

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I even thought about it that much, you know, I

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of just I just went off.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 3>You just went off feeling is this whole better than

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 3>that one?

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'll tell you what. I started trying to do

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 2>this in in Apple Notes. I use Apple Notes a

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 2>lot to write. It's become my new like word processor, actually,

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 2>but I started doing that with like a numbered list,

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>and then I was in the media center and one

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 2>of the coolest things in the Media Center. Brendan hates them,

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 2>but I think they're really neat. Is they have these

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 2>old notebooks that they you know, I don't think anybody

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 2>in the press uses it really now I haven't even

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 2>seen them, but they're these old notebooks. They're like they're

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 2>like an eight by eleven. They've got the master's logo across.

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 2>And it was like, clearly how like old journalists used

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 2>to chronicle rounds. It's got a player named Date Round

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 2>and you could track, like, you know what clubs they

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 2>were hitting, the number of putts, and there's a space

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 2>for notes, but it lists every hole, the yardage in

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 2>the bar. And so it created this awesome way to

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 2>rank them because I just filled in under the club

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 2>section all my rankings and it's it was an amazing

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 2>way to visualize it. I'll post a picture of it

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 2>with the pod.

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's really nice. And by the way, I wanted

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 3>to give some acknowledgment to where we got this idea.

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 3>This is a great account name Jean van de Veld

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Revenge account is the is the name of the account

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 3>that proposed to us back in February. You know, he says,

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 3>this is probably a very stupid theme. But I'd love

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 3>to hear a fry a golf podcast episode titled ranking

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 3>all eighteen holes at Augusta National. And you know, we

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 3>thought that was that was a pretty decent idea, something

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>fun to do kind of midweek Masters week.

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 2>As I mentioned at the top, we are at the

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Dratty House. B. Dratty is our great longtime apparel partner.

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 2>It's spring. I think this is a great time to

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 2>examine what you got going in your closet right now, Garrett,

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 2>you were out on like a crisp day at Agussa.

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 2>What what'd you rock? What was? What were what were

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:35.679
<v Speaker 2>your options from Dratty?

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Now? Already this ad read is going off the rails

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 3>because I don't know the exact term for it. But

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 3>I was wearing a B. Dratty hoodie, the.

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 2>One that you and I saw, the Proctor hoodie. The

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 2>Proctor hood is great.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I would wear that every day if I could, If

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 3>if people would like let me wear the same clothes

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 3>every day, I would wear that every day.

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 2>If you had like or five of them.

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just need four or five of them in

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 3>like different colors. I think even then my wife would

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 3>be like, why are you wearing the same style of

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 3>hoodie every day, but I think I would go for it.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 3>It's so comfortable. It's just the right kind of thickness,

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's it's great.

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 2>So that's the Procter hoodie. I you know, it made

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 2>me think of the you know, A related related item

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 2>that they make is the Russell Kru neck, which is

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>another great one. I remember I was getting I was

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 2>getting ready. We were going on like a casual date night,

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and I was I put on clothes and I was like,

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 2>what do you think about my outfit? My wife, you know,

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 2>she always asked me, and I was wearing like a

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 2>pair of pants and a Russell Kru neck and She's like,

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean you wear that like every day. So there's

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>this stuff. This is stuff I live in.

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 3>But she wasn't offended by it. She was like, Okay,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 3>you still look good. Fine, yeah, special, but it's fine.

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>So the crew dock, the Russell crew, the Proctor hoodie

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>great great items if you're in like a spring climate

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 2>where it's a little chili. I just got back from

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Northern Ireland, which was like I think, like peak spring,

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>like kind of gnarly spring golf weather in March I

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 2>wore every day there, I wore different jackpolo. So the

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 2>long sleeve Jackpolo, I'm not. I'm not gonna lie. Before

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>they sent me one of these, it was one. I

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>was like not into the long sleeve polo. Now I'm very,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 2>very like. I wear them a lot. I really like them.

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 2>They're like the perfect if it's gonna be fifty degrees

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 2>in the morning, item to wear it is. It's great.

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>If you throw a vest on with it, you are

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 2>like your Primetime You're like perfectly layered. So if you

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 2>use the promo code TFE thirty, that's TFE thirty at

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 2>b draddy dot com, you get thirty percent off. Big

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 2>thanks to them for uh supporting what we do, supporting

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 2>our week here down to Augusta National and the d House,

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 2>supporting the House, supporting the House.

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Got to have a roof over our heads.

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Exactly a lot of fun happens in this house this week.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 2>So all right, let's get to our holes. Garrett, you're

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the guest here. Do you want to go one through

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>eighteen or do you want to go eighteen through eighteen

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>through one? You want to oh god, we're going to

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 2>start with the negatives.

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but we got it in a positive note. We're

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 3>not going to hook people send people out on a

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 3>high right.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 2>We're hooking people in with the with what we think

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 2>is the worst hole at Augusta National Right.

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>We're going negative. I don't think we are the problem

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 3>with media.

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 2>I want to be clear here. I don't. I don't.

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anybody should be able to characterize this

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 2>as the worstule. This is my eighteenth favorite.

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the.

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Least good hole. Yeah, I think, what.

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you have?

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 3>You got seven?

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll get seven too, I thought, I mean I almost

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I I was doing this and I was like, I know,

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Garrett's gonna have seven as the worst. And I almost zigged,

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 2>just as zig just so we had something different. But

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't get myself to do that. Why why do

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 2>you have it here? It's probably the same reasoning as me.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it's just the ultimate example of what tigerproofing

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 3>has rot. Not every bad thing that has happened to

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 3>that hole is a result immediately of tigerproofing. There have

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 3>been a lot of trees on that hole for a

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 3>long time, but now it's just long. It's got trees

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 3>really close on both sides. The fairway is really narrow

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 3>until it opens up towards.

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 2>The can I tell you another little thing about that fairway.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 2>It's so hard to hit.

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because if you go off the right side.

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 2>It can't you can't really see it from TV, but

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 2>the fairway slopes pretty a pretty good click clip left

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 2>to right.

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So it's like it's.

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 2>So hard to hit, it's so narrow. Functionally, the ten

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the ten yards of the right half of the fairway

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 2>mean you're going to go in the rough and then

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>you're probably gonna be blocked out.

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, you've got tree trouble. And yeah, you've summed

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 3>it up right there. It's just it's not it's you

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 3>know when I say it's not the hole, it was

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 3>meant to be. Obviously, as soon as Perry Maxwell lengthened

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 3>that hole and put the green up on the hill

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 3>instead of having it down below in the valley where

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 3>it was originally, the hole kind of took on its identity.

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, It's it's not quirky. It has not been

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 3>a quirky hole for a long time. But I think

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 3>the narrowing and the lengthening have just kind of turned

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 3>it into a slog. It's a place where you know,

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 3>they're just trying to keep the scores a little bit higher.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 3>And I understand that, but you know that's why it's

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the least good.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Hole, all right. So my devil's advocate take on, like,

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 2>how you could you know if you love seven. I

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 2>think this is what people might say is listen, it's

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the most execution t shot out there, and maybe the

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 2>golf course from a sense of tea shot variety, should

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>have one hole where it's like you have to hit

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 2>it really straight. I think like Augusta has a lot

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>of like pretty generous corridors where the corridor space you

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 2>have every hole you want to be a certain spot,

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 2>but the corridor spaces are fairly wide. Now, they might say,

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 2>in terms of variety, this gives it one very narrow

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 2>hole that you have to execute on this narrow thing.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 2>It's a change up from the rest of the course.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 2>It's a different window. And then the other side is

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 2>there's been a lot of really exciting moments that have

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 2>happened from the trees approaching that green. There have been

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 2>some cool shots over the years.

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think the green itself is pretty interesting.

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 3>It is idiot. It slopes off pretty hard to the

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 3>left side. There's a number of different sections to it.

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 3>So again, this is a national There's gonna be a

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of cool things about any individual hole, but this

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 3>is just the one I think of when I think

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 3>of what has kind of gone the wrong direction for

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 3>me at Augusta in the past twenty five years or so.

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 2>And I think like every one of these holes, for

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the most part, has a really interesting green. And what's

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 2>cool about this green is it's the most it's really

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the most shallow green, and it it's just like you

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 2>have to hit a really really great second shot here,

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's cool green.

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.719
<v Speaker 3>So all right, why don't we go with your seventeenth

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 3>ranked hole?

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Is my seventeenth I have this in chronological or my computer,

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 2>but I'm using the list here. This is krock going

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 2>to be controversial. I have eighteen. It's my seventeenth ranked hole.

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 3>Okay, where is what on your list? Let me see.

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I was just numbering them because I have them in

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 3>order instead of like numbered. So eighteen, seventeen, sixteen, fifteen, fourteen, thirteen,

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I have it at thirteen. That was one that was

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 3>a little difficult for me to place. I do think

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 3>it has a pretty wonderful green.

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 2>It does, so every hole there has a wonderful green

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 2>for the most part.

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. I think the the other thing that I like

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 3>about it is that I just I like it at

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 3>the end of the tournament when you know, you finish

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 3>up this stretch of pretty gettable holes and you come

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 3>to eighteen and you've just got to hit a banana

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 3>slights around the corner and a you know, straight uphill

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 3>shot and find the right section of the green. For

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 3>some reason, over the years, I've I've gained some more

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 3>affection for it. But why is it seventeen?

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I just don't love like the outside bunkers in terms

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 2>of the golf hole. They weren't there originally. I don't.

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the hole really needs them.

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 3>That tea shot looks ridiculous. When you look down, all

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 3>you can see is the bunkers.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 2>It's you know. I think the thing about Augusta that

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I love the most is the t shots that have

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of dynamics to them, Like if you

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 2>play here you get this, but you could play over

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 2>here and it's like the shades of gray that that

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 2>It's like the golf course isn't it isn't like you're

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 2>not right or wrong when you hit a T shot.

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>On most holes, it's not like a true or false

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>and eighteen feels like it's true or false. Like it

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 2>feels like every T shot at Augusta's kind of like

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 2>an essay, and it's like, you know when you're writing

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 2>an essay, or when you used to write an essay

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and he've gotten off to a really bad start. You know,

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 2>like it's like familiar with this, It's gonna be very good,

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, Like but I could save it. I could.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 2>There's still time to save it. That's how every T

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 2>shot at Augusta feels like, like even if you hit

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>a bad one, you're like, Okay, I can redeem myself

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 2>here the eighteenth it just doesn't feel like it feels

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 2>more true false than like giving you the chance to

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 2>redeem yourself even if you get off to a bad start.

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 2>That being said, there are some really cool things I

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 2>like about the hole. A subtle thing that I really

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 2>love about the hole is I think like for a finisher,

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 2>having the approach shot, hitting an iron off an upslope

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 2>when you're uncomfortable when you're trying to get around to

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the house is really hard. Because like hitting irons from

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 2>an upslope, like if you're not feeling right, it's really

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 2>easy to tug them left. It's really easy to leave

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 2>them high out right, like you have to make a

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 2>really committed swing, and that upslope is like pretty severe.

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 2>It is like it is a not an easy shot.

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think that are like with all these holes, again,

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>is the least bad, Like this is just kind of

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>where I like, I was doing this exercise and I

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 2>just like there are things about every other hole that

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 2>I liked a little bit more. I like the green.

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I like a lot of other greens more though, So

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 2>it's here. I don't think this is right or wrong answer.

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 2>And again, this is isn't about like the moments that

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>happened here. It's more so about the hole. Obviously, if

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>we're going with like moments that happened on this hole,

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 2>it would be way higher because it's literally the last

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 2>hole determining championships. Yeah.

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So it has that position because it's the last hole,

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think that part of my view of it

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 3>is a little bit biased by that. But I also

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 3>had it in my bottom half of holes, so I'm

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 3>pretty much on board with everything. You're saying there you

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 3>want to hear my seventeenth ring hole sixteen.

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 2>I knew yours was going to be there. I'm bumped

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 2>it way up.

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I knew what did you What did you bump it to?

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I bumped it to thirteen.

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well that's where I had eighteen. So we're actually

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 3>in the same situation here. Now this is a bit

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 3>of admittedly a petulant take from me. Sixteen. I just

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 3>think that hole has a lot of potential even where

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 3>it's laid out now. Robert tren Jones re routed it

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 3>after World War Two, right, the old Mackenzie hole is

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 3>not coming back. It was in a different place. I

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 3>think there's still a lot of potential in that hole. Obviously,

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 3>it's created a number of wonderful moments during the Championship,

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.239
<v Speaker 3>like some of the roars that have happened there, some

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 3>of those hole in one opportunities. But people may be

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 3>surprised by my main objection here. It's not necessarily that

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 3>the funnel pin is silly. The funnel pin is what

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 3>it is. I think it is a little bit silly,

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 3>but you know, it's so exciting that I can almost

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 3>forgive it. The main thing that bothers me about the

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 3>hole is that the green is just totally out of

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 3>style with the rest of the greens at Augusta National.

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 3>There's not as much interesting shaping or ideas on or

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 3>around that green. It's pretty much a straight tier.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 2>I think, especially around the green.

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Around the green is the biggest tell that that's not

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.479
<v Speaker 3>an original green. If you look around the greens, at

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the exterior contours on pretty much every other hole at

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Augusta National, there's something really artful and clever going on.

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Look at the first green, look at the fifth green,

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 3>Look at the fourteenth green, look at the seventeenth green.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 3>If you walk around those greens, you can see some

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 3>artistry going on and some thought going into how the

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 3>green is built up. From the Grade sixteen, it just

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>the transition from the putting surface to the fringe is

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 3>pretty much flat, and I think that's a bit of

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 3>a miss at a course that is so identified with

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 3>its green contouring.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, I had it thirteen. I'm just you know,

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 2>we talked about not doing stuff on history or moments.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 2>I think I probably got it up there because I

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 2>was like, you know what, a lot of moments, lots

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 2>of moments and it's pretty. You know, I think that's

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 2>probably very pretty. And I think like.

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>It's so beautiful in that little valley there. That's why

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it has such potential because it's a great

0:18:59.000 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 3>place for the whole.

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I also will say, like I love watching golf at

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 2>a lot of places. Augusta National. The atmosphere there on

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 2>a weekend is like, if you know, okay, I say

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 2>this like every kind of pot or tip that I

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 2>give people when somebody asks me for tips for watching

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 2>it Augusta National. If you ever go, get the chance

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 2>to go on the weekend, which is like a very

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 2>rare ticket, this hole gets like loaded up. It's you know,

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 2>everybody's going to watch golf there because of the chances.

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Like one of the cool things about Augusta is the

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 2>policy on seats. It's very much a like shared thing.

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 2>So it is perfectly cool if you see an open

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 2>seat to go, sit in the seat, and if the

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 2>people that come, the people that put the chairs down come,

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 2>they're just going to tap you on the shoulder and say,

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 2>oh hey, this is my seat, and you just get

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 2>up and go and it's like a fine thing. So

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 2>if you see two open seats, your mill and about

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 2>you can go sit and like, I think I've moved

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 2>it up to thirteen mainly because like on a Saturday,

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 2>on a nice Saturday or Sunday at the Masters, it

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 2>is there is not like really a better place to

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 2>watch golf than right there.

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 3>It's great. And something that I noticed during this last

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:24.719
<v Speaker 3>anwah is how close that fifteen sixteen hub is amazing

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 3>to this central hub of the property, which is two Green,

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 3>three t seventeen Green, eighty seven Green. That whole area

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 3>is basically the center from which the routing kind of

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 3>radiates out. And the magical thing about it is that

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 3>you can just walk straight to it from the clubhouse

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 3>because there's a big thoroughfare down there to the side

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 3>of the eighteenth Fairway. You just cross a couple of

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 3>holes and you're there. From that point. From that central hub,

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 3>it's not very far at all to fifteen and sixteen,

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 3>so it's really kind of part of that whole complex.

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's so close to to like five Green, sixty

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 2>sixth Green, it is, like, I mean, it's right there.

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Because sixth Green is basically right on top of the

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 3>sixteenth hole.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 2>When you think about that hole, it's kind of like

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 2>almost the very center of the golf course from like

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 2>a you know, it's an oddly shaped golf course. It's not,

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and it's like one of the center points of the

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 2>golf course. Is that like that hole?

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, we're making a good argument for it, But

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 3>the fact is, I think it was just a kind

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 3>of obvious miss not to match that green to the rest.

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 3>In general style, you don't have to repeat ideas, but

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 3>general style should should be cohesive across this golf course.

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 3>What what do you have for ye? All right, I'll go,

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 3>should I go? Oh, yeah, it's my turn? All right,

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 3>my turn, I'll go. I'll go. Fourth hole. That's fine,

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 3>that's fine. Look at that agreement. I don't think this

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 3>is a bad hole me either, I really don't think so.

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a really hard hole.

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 3>It's very hard. It's very long. For what the green.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Is so shallow.

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 3>There is land the ball in this green with a

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 3>long club.

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 2>There is an amazing knob right in the middle of

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 2>it in the green, and it's a very subtle shelf

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 2>and it's terrifying. It is terrifying if you're on the

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 2>wrong side of it, like it is scary. Legit putting

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 2>from the back to the front of this green is scary. Yeah,

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I just think it doesn't have a ton of character.

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 3>It's just a little one dimensional and it's it's an edenhole,

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 3>right that that was the original idea, that this would

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 3>be an edenhole, and it just seems like there's there's

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 3>more that you could do with an edenhole. And of

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 3>course originally the green was different. They had this big

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 3>tongue coming down on the left. I think that central

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 3>bunker was smaller. It's really big now and it kind

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 3>of dominates the front of the green and it just

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of turned the hole into carry this bunker and

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 3>try to stop your ball on the other side of it,

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 3>instead of something more nuanced.

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I think the other aspect of this hole that makes

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 2>it feel a little bit. It's so siloed off from

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the course, and a lot of this

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>is like infrastructure that the club has, Like I think

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 2>one of the member restaurants is very close by. There's

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 2>a road that goes kind of like behind five T

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 2>and this hole just like kind of like it feels

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 2>if you were thinking of Augusta National as a house.

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 2>It feels like a weird off off the side of

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 2>the house room. It's like a mudroom and mud you know,

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 2>like it's like part of the house, but it's not

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 2>really in the house, if that makes.

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 3>Sense, totally makes sense. I love that analogy. Never I

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 3>think I've never heard that applied to golf before.

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's like one of the real the

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 2>one when I was thinking about the hole and why

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 2>because I do really like the green and again, this

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 2>is a really great golf course, so like all these

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 2>holes like this is great.

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Into like yeah, good holes. We're no longer talking about

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 3>holes that are kind of jacked up. These are these

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 3>are good holes.

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I just like, I think that's part of it. If

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 2>if you think about where it is, and this is

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 2>partly like infrastructure, like all the things that go into

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 2>staging this tournament. But if I looked from the tee

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 2>up five, if that was all open, I think I'd

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 2>feel a lot differently about this hole. If I could

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 2>just like see up five, if I could see down six,

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 2>like in down sixteen, and through fifteen, like through the valley,

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.959
<v Speaker 2>I think I'd stand on this tea and be like,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 2>what a cool hole. But because it's so walled off,

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 2>and because like what you said, I I think the

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 2>green and the bunker of have gotten a little bit

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 2>out of whack in terms of their interaction in scale,

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Like everything feels off because you have this like huge

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 2>bunker in this walled off room and a really cool

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 2>green this masked in it, and it kind of like,

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 2>of all the holes at Augusta National seven sixteen, it

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 2>feels the most ordinary. It feels like the hole that

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 2>you could see at any golf course in America the most.

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 3>It's a just a carry, you know. And in some

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 3>ways this is a comparison that doesn't do justice to

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 3>this hole or to Augusta National really, But in some

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 3>ways it reminds me of the twelfth hole at Pebble Beach.

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 3>You know. It's just a just a simple kind of

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 3>mid iron. But for these guys, mid iron.

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 2>Much better green than the twelfth at Pebble Bee.

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Much much better green. Obviously, I think that's a given

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to Augusta. But that's you know the

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 3>spirit of it. Just kind of carry the bunker and

0:25:57.960 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 3>make sure your ball stops on the other side of it.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of what it's becoming now. Players get into

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 3>interesting situations once they're on and around the green, and

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 3>that's that's the difference.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 2>So all right, my number fifteen, I'm sad. I'm like,

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 2>actually like extremely sad this is fifteen because I feel

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:21.239
<v Speaker 2>like it could be honestly a top five hole on

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the golf course. And it's kind of like the look

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 2>what they've done to the beautiful boy.

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Beautiful boy.

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like I when I think about this, because the

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 2>green is extra I think it's a top three green

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 2>on the golf course. The seventeenth hole is my fifteenth.

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 3>And it's probably because of what they've done to the fairway, right,

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 3>like what's happened with that?

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 2>So the reason the reason it's here is it's just

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 2>it's become super one dimensional with the with the tree planting,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 2>narrow fairway, and it just has kind of lost the

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 2>idea like when you have like truly extraordinary greens, you

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 2>want the ability to have shots come in to them

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 2>from different angles. What you're doing is you are you're

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 2>creating more outcomes for the way the play on the

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 2>hole can play out. The more space you allow players

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity to get to places that they could take

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 2>advantage of certain pins or be an extreme disadvantage for

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 2>other pins. And this green. God. I think I could

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>just sit and stare at it all day.

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 3>I would, especially the back of it and also the

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 3>well internal contouring.

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 2>The thing that's probably the most amazing aspect of it

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 2>is that it looks like it is it That back

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 2>right is a shelf that's higher. But the way the

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 2>ball rolls on the green, it runs from left to

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 2>right like it's downhill right, And that's the whole that's

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 2>that's sitting on the whole slope of the property that

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 2>goes left to right. So it's an optical illusion. I

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 2>mean the front, the back, left, little bowl, the front section,

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the pin just over the bunker. I could go there.

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 2>This green's amazing, amazing green, and it's being the brilliance

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 2>of the green is being kind of diminished by how

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 2>execution The t shot is similar to what we talked

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 2>about with seven. But this is just a out of

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 2>this world great green, and it's gotten itself to fifteen

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 2>despite you know, kind of the narrowing.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I have it at at twelve just because of

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 3>how much I love the green. But I can't go

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 3>much higher than that. One question I have that's not

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 3>answerable is how much of the green and which sections

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 3>of the green are original because the front of it

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 3>is not original. That's not what Mackenzie and Jones designed

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 3>in the early nineteen thirties. There were no bunkers in

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 3>front of that original green.

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 2>There's no bunkers on the whole hole.

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it had this big kind of mound to

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the left of the green. Now I suspect that the

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 3>back of the green and some of the internal contouring

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 3>is kind of still what they built. But I believe

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Perry Maxwell may have made some ana.

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Some fronting bunkers on the left and right side in

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 2>thirty and that's.

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Kind of what produced the modern green, which is still wonderful.

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, Perry Maxwell one of the great

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 3>builders of greens in the history of golf architecture, so

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 3>that there wasn't any kind of bad lineage coming into

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Augusta with those alterations. But yeah, one thing I noticed

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 3>this last time, when I was really looking at seventeen

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 3>is that the fairway kind of tilts against the general

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 3>tilt of the property. It goes from right to left,

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 3>but then there's this knoll to the right of the

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 3>current seventeenth fair way. Once you crest that, then you

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 3>start going left to right down toward Amen corner, and

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 3>that's where the fifteenth fairway is, which tilts left to

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 3>right from the perspective of the seventeenth tee. So these

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 3>two holes are kind of separated by a peak right

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 3>and there used to be no trees where there is

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 3>a grove of trees now pinching the fairway from the

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 3>right between the seventeenth and fifteenth holes. And so the

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 3>strategy here used to be. Mackenzie said in writing about

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 3>the hole that you want to come into this screen

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 3>from the right side of the fairway, but if you

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 3>get too far to the right, then you're rolling down

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 3>into the fifteenth fairway and you're probably blind into the

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 3>green from there. So you want to try to get

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 3>to the edge of this slope to find an angle

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 3>into the green. That was the original essence of the strategy.

0:30:55.080 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 3>But now there are trees all over what this fantageous

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 3>position used to be. And that's the problem. That's the problem.

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 3>It's an execution t shot into a wonderful green.

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 3>What was your fifteenth My fifteenth place hole is nine.

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I just think I had this twelve.

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 3>I think this is an entertaining hole to watch, especially

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 3>once you get up around the green, you never know

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 3>what's going to happen. I just think it's become a

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 3>little bit one dimensional. Off the tee. Obviously a draw

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 3>is preferred.

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I love the T shot. I actually think the T

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 2>SHOT's really good.

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And you can kind of position yourself nicely. Yeah, dude,

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 3>players kind of get in similar positions down at the

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 3>bottom of this valley somewhat. But when you stand on

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 3>that tee and watch players hit shots, you realize that

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 3>they really have to hit a good golf shot.

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 2>It's an unnerving T shot for the modern game, where

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 2>everybody hits a fade. You stand on that tee and

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 2>really like you feel like you have to make a

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 2>really good swing to like, at at the bare minimum,

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 2>you can't like just hit like the ball that like

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of like just slides right. You need to at

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 2>least hit it straight.

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Absolutely, And if you get out of.

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 2>This and I think, like the thing that I would

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 2>say versus like the other holes that we've talked about

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 2>is like they did this this hole. You stand on

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 2>the tee and feel that way without trees just all

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 2>over the place.

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, there's a tight line in a wide fair way yes,

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and so that's what really still works about this t shot.

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 3>I think now the green, I don't know if there's

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 3>necessarily anything wrong with it. It's just really really tilted

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 3>and it doesn't have as much putting surface as it

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 3>used to have, and so the pin positions are really limited.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 3>And I guess that's my issue with it.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I have it a little higher just because, like

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 2>I think like the I think, if you know, the

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:01.719
<v Speaker 2>thing is, I think nine for me would fall the

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 2>most with like tree removal. You know, it would tumble down,

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and it might be but like to me, the hole

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 2>is really it's hard for me to come up with

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 2>a reason I don't like the hole. And I know

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 2>what the old green used to like it look like,

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 2>and there's got there's a lot of romanticism around it.

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I think the current green works really well with how

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the golf hole lays out, like all the like, where

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 2>you have you're hitting a short iron from a downslope

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 2>to a green that you can't miss short and you

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 2>can't miss long left, and so you know you can't

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 2>miss short and so you naturally pull it long left,

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 2>and then long left is awful. So I just think

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 2>it's like a really cool hole. It's it requires like

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 2>it's super scorable, but it requires really good shots and

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 2>if you don't hit one of them, then all of

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>a sudden you're like, oh, I got hit do something

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 2>really good to make par, you know, And so I

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 2>like it. And again there's a great golf course. So like,

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 2>it's twelve, I'm talking about this and it's twelve on

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 2>my list.

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you're you're talking about a hole you like. Yeah,

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 3>all right, let's do fourteen. What is your fourteenth place?

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I think you're up again?

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Am I up again? Okay? Yeah?

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Only when we over This.

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 3>Is another slightly petulant take, but there's some feeling behind it.

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 3>And that's eleven. I was.

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I struggled.

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 3>This is a great area. This should be a great

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 3>golf hole. I did. The reason I've put it down

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:39.760
<v Speaker 3>here below eighteen and below seventeen where it doesn't belong.

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I have it ten.

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, And that that might make more sense is

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 3>that this should this should be a top four, top

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 3>three hole at Augusta National. But they've monkeyed with it

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 3>too much. Distance gains have had their effect. I don't

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 3>necessarily blame the club here, though. The execution of some

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 3>of the recent work on the whole has been pretty questionable,

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 3>not just the idea but the execution. I think really

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the story here is that this hole can't be what

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 3>it's supposed to be because the tea right now for

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 3>the pros is in the wrong place.

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I will say this, the worst moment in the round

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 2>at Augusta National if you were playing the back tees,

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 2>it's without a doubt. I mean, the worst moment spectating

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 2>at Augusta National if you're following a group is the

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 2>after the tenth green, Like do you do I walk

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.240
<v Speaker 2>back two hundred yards to the tee?

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Do I walk up that hill? And I can only

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 2>imagine what playing competitors like, what the what the participants feel,

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 2>you know they they it's like you it's like a

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 2>big uphill walk back to that tee and it's like

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 2>versus just walking right off the member tee sitting there.

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 2>It's just like kind of like a jarring thing.

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Right. So yeah, and I don't have a so here,

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm identifying a problem that might not have a practical

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 3>solution on the current footprint of the course. But I

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 3>really think that tee should be belongs way more to

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 3>the right, and obviously the walk from ten green to

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 3>eleven t is a problem in itself, but I think

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 3>the choice that you're making from that right tee that

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 3>used to exist there when the tenth hole was different.

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 3>The choice that you're making is between trying to cut

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the corner and maybe get yourself a shorter approach into

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 3>the green, or go to the left side of the

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 3>corridor and find that nice little angle to try to

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 3>run the ball up onto the green off of those

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 3>mounds short right of the gay.

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's one of the issues with the actually

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 2>you hit on the execution of the work, is that

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 2>the mound in the don't work anymore, the mounds and

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 2>like how the green's now like almost propped up from

0:36:57.760 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 2>the right side. They I think this was an effort

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 2>to make, you know. I think changes happen because they

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 2>watch how players and like and I think this is

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 2>a hard position to be in. There's a lot of

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 2>advantages to having a tournament at a course every year,

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Like there's fan familiarity, you know, understand infrastructure. I can

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 2>only imagine the difficulty of not making you know, of

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 2>making decisions and you watch players play and what had

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:29.439
<v Speaker 2>happened with this hole is that players just bailed out

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 2>right took the chip up, So they've made the area

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 2>on the right side the bailout more difficult. But in

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 2>doing this, they've like actually, like the original features of

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the hole don't work anymore because there's like a cut

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.720
<v Speaker 2>between the mounds that were originally on the short right side.

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think there is like a little bit of

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 2>a romanticism here. No modern player is going to use

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 2>these mounds to get the balls close to the hole

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 2>like they might have when they were hitting like a

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 2>fairway wood into this green. But it is fairly relevant

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 2>for like anwa it's very relevant for member play, it's

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 2>very nice, and it's very relevant for just like the

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 2>golf hole and how it functions. And again, this change

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 2>makes it less of a strategic hole more of an

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 2>execution hole. And I think if you were going to

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 2>like chart this podcast where like aspects of the holes are,

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 2>you know where we dock them, it's usually around that ground.

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, yes, the the green contouring has been changed

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 3>so much that it's a little bit hard to remember

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 3>what the original contouring was and what the rationale behind

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:55.919
<v Speaker 3>it was. And so would love to see them try

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.919
<v Speaker 3>to bring back small elements of that bit by bit.

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 3>And also I don't like the pond. I just don't

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 3>like that. I wish that it was still the creek.

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 3>But I know that's unreasonable, but I just to you know,

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 3>bring the creek back to fifteen, bring the creek back

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 3>to eleven. We don't need these ponds.

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Even if they made it, if it was like halfway

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 2>between the pond and the creek where it was like

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 2>a creek inlet you know, it made it like appear

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 2>a little like the creek got super wide.

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 3>You know, something connected to the landscape. Because the little

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 3>pond is just you know, that's that it screams mid

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 3>century golf architecture at this point, and we don't need it.

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I think, like the hard thing, if you were going

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 2>to like approach it, I think like the the question

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:41.879
<v Speaker 2>would be if we do this, if we make if

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:45.760
<v Speaker 2>we return to the green contours on the right side,

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 2>then people are just going to start bailing out again.

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 2>And we don't want that, like because now what they've

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 2>done is like if you miss right in the tournament,

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:59.440
<v Speaker 2>if you bail out right of one of those backpins,

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 2>your chip, like you have to hit a good chip,

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 2>and you can easily chip it into the water. Yeah,

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 2>if you don't hit a good chip. And I think

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 2>that's the thing that they wanted to do, was like,

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 2>all right, let's put a second thought so that people

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 2>just so people can will hit it into the water again.

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 3>And look, that makes sense because that gives tension back

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:24.439
<v Speaker 3>to the second shot, where you know, when the pros

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 3>are hitting that second shot, they have to challenge the

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 3>water a little bit. They need to, they're being forced to,

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 3>and so when that ball is in the air, it's

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 3>nerve wracking.

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 2>And so this is I think, like we just have

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 2>to put out there. This is a lot to do

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 2>with like modern hitting distances. It has to do with

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 2>what Anthony Kim said this week at Live where he said,

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I spent twelve years away. I can't believe the drivers

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:51.280
<v Speaker 2>how you don't have to hit it in the center.

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is one of the greatest quotes. And

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 2>like it was like, you know, Anthony Kim's effectively better

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 2>in a time machine.

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 3>And he thoughts and he didn't. He wasn't playing in

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 3>the late nineties. Yeah, he was playing in the late

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 3>as in early ties.

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 2>For those that didn't that might not have seen this.

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 2>He basically he talked about at the end of his

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 2>press conference how drivers how much they've changed, because he

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 2>didn't play golf for ten years, right, and he's like,

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe how you don't have to hit it

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 2>in the center anymore for it to go straight. Like

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 2>it seems like you can hit it anywhere on the

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 2>face and it goes just as far and just as straight.

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 2>So that was like effectively his quote. But like, this

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 2>is part of the reason. These are all reactions to

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 2>nothing happening. There was no equipment, there was a very

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 2>lenient equipment regulation, and this is all A lot of

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 2>these changes were forced because of this.

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And a key factor, a key determining factor for

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 3>where a hole is appearing on my list is how

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 3>affected it has been by distance gains. There are certain

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 3>holes at Augusta National, for whatever combination of reasons, haven't

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 3>been as affected. Those ones are more likely to be

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 3>higher on the list.

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's take a break from this rousing, rousing debate, Garrett.

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about our new coffee partnership. It's with Goodwalk Coffee.

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 2>We have some branded coffee. We've got the shotgun start

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 2>blend which is a little bit of a darker blend

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 2>and dark yeah, medium dark. And we've got the fried

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Egg Golf brand, which is a medium light blend medium light. Yeah,

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 2>they are two different blends. This is great coffee. So

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 2>the way it works is you go onto Goodwalkcoffee dot

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 2>com slash fried Egg and you can order our blends

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 2>there they come, they ship it directly. It's basically roasted

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 2>and shipped directly to your house. You can subscribe there

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 2>and you know you don't have to worry about if

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I ever run out of coffee. Like my honestly nightmare

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 2>feeling at ten PM is when I like realize I

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 2>don't have coffee the next morning, and it's like, oh,

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 2>like I don't like my growth. I don't like the

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 2>coffee shop in my town. I like actually loathe it.

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I've it's it's been a great thing because I like

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 2>don't like it, so I never go, so I never

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 2>waste any money there.

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 3>There you go.

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 2>But then it's like, well, I'm gonna have to go

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 2>at the grocery store before I get my coffee. I

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 2>I now with good Walk, I have coffee all the time,

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 2>so I don't have to wait for it. It's it's

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 2>delicious coffee. We picked them out ourselves, Uh, kind of

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 2>tried a bunch of different blends, and we have a

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:39.800
<v Speaker 2>bunch of different beans. Uh, these are the two we picked.

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Wanted to have a little variety. Which one do you like?

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I really like the fried Egg Blended because I like

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 3>a little bit lighter but still on kind of the

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:55.400
<v Speaker 3>medium spectrum. And you know, I'm I'm pretty persnickety about

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.399
<v Speaker 3>my coffee. I've gotten to that point in my life.

0:43:57.400 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 3>You know. I started off when early in my coffee life,

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 3>I would kind of drink anything. But gradually, over the years,

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 3>I've gotten more and more specific and discerning about what

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:09.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking for from coffee. I wanted to taste really

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 3>good and good Walk is great stuff. Everything I've had

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 3>from them, including the fried Egg Blend, has been absolutely delicious.

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Has met my standards, has met my wife's standards. Were

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:23.240
<v Speaker 3>very thrilled to be partnered.

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 2>With them, all right, And you know, not only does

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 2>this coffee help us, you know it supports us. When

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 2>you purchase this coffee, We're also going to give you

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent off if you use the promo code fried

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Egg at checkout. You get twenty percent off your order.

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 2>That's promo code fried Egg for twenty percent off. Let's

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:45.360
<v Speaker 2>get back to the whole debate. I can't wait to

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 2>keep going in on this.

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure whose turn it is. It's my point.

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh we're on fourteen still. I have whole one.

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 3>You have hole one. Okay, this is our first disagreement.

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 2>I love the green. I think it's one of the

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 2>best greens on the Gulf. Of course, I think that

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 2>I think there just isn't a lot of space off

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the tea. I think those bunkers are huge. I mean

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 2>they're a massive They are massive, and they just like

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 2>if you turn on ninety seven and watch Tiger and

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 2>look at the first hole, and turn on now and

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 2>look at the first hole, It's like this is like

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it is like a departure. It is insane.

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a great opening hole in terms of like, again,

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:34.839
<v Speaker 2>this is a great hole. I just I don't love

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.839
<v Speaker 2>like what's happened to it over the last you know,

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:39.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty years.

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think a lot of people who are

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 3>enthusiastic about golf architecture would agree with you here. But

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 3>I just really like this hole. I have it at

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 3>number six, and you know, I think that the reason

0:45:55.560 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 3>I like it now, not thinking about the hole's history,

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure that if I looked closely at what the

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 3>original design was, I would see a bunch of elements

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:08.360
<v Speaker 3>that I would want to bring back. I think the

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 3>trees have come in really close, but as a first

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 3>tee shot in a championship, I think it has a

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 3>unique tension and a strategic weight to it that is

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:27.319
<v Speaker 3>really compelling. And the reason is that you have that big,

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.319
<v Speaker 3>intimidating bunker on the right. Is it too big? Is

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 3>it too deep? It kind of looks ridiculous in a

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:39.879
<v Speaker 3>lot of ways, but it's there, and the only thing

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 3>you're thinking off the tee is I need to avoid this.

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:47.360
<v Speaker 3>But then the fair way tilts from right to left

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 3>quickly into the trees on the left, and you look

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 3>up at the green, which you can see perfectly from

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 3>the tee, perfectly, just kind of hovering above the lip

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:00.240
<v Speaker 3>of the bunker and the crest of the hill. There

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 3>you can see the green and another big bunker on

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:06.439
<v Speaker 3>the right side on the sorry on the left side

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 3>of that green, and the fairway bunker and the green

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 3>side bunker kind of line up visually, and so you

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 3>see that kind of line on the hole and you're like,

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 3>that's the line of danger right there. How am I

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 3>going to negotiate this? Well, I kind of got to

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 3>challenge the big fairway bunker off the tee or else

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to be able to hit driver on

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 3>this hole. Because if I don't challenge the bunker and

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 3>I hit driver, that tilt of the fairway is going

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 3>to kick me into the trees on the left, and

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to have that huge green side bunker in

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 3>front of me. I'm not going to be in a

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 3>good situation. So you have to take it on a

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 3>little bit. And I just I love that it's you know,

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 3>at a regular golf course, you know, gentle handshake concept

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 3>opening hole. This is definitely not that. Then you get

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.279
<v Speaker 3>to the green and it's obviously just like a work

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 3>of art and incredible. So that's why I like the

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.959
<v Speaker 3>first hole. But I reckon that there are many people

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 3>who know more than I do about golf architecture who

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:05.280
<v Speaker 3>really don't like what has become.

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 2>I love the I love the green. I think the

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:12.439
<v Speaker 2>green is amazing. I think and I listen like I think,

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 2>like The other feature of the hole is similar to eighteen,

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 2>like where people drive it to where people really used

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to drive it to too. It's you're uncomfortable at the

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 2>start of the round and you're hitting an iron from

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 2>an upslope. Again, it's just not a not something that's

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 2>not a nice spot to hit an iron from.

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 3>It's a really really hard hole.

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, super hard. I think both of us are thirteenth.

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 2>My thirteenth was sixteen and your thirteenth was eighteen. So

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 2>we've already talked about both those.

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 3>My twelfth is seventeen, which we've already talked about. What's

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:47.760
<v Speaker 3>your twelfth?

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 2>My twelfth is the ninth, which we've already talked about.

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:57.239
<v Speaker 3>Right, Okay, we're rocket We're getting through to the back nine.

0:48:58.040 --> 0:48:59.879
<v Speaker 3>My eleventh place hole is two.

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, I have five.

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:09.919
<v Speaker 3>You have this really high? Okay, so I'll start. It's

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 3>not that I don't like this hole too, yeah too,

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 3>I have it as I have it.

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't have it super high. I have an eighth.

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh oh, I thought you said, okay.

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I have I have the fifth hole of my eleven.

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 3>I got confused there, all right, So in any case.

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Two listeners probably were confused.

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was. Yeah, listeners, if you were confused, so

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 3>was I. But I probably shouldn't have been.

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:49:35.000 --> 0:49:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Number two I have is eleventh. They've just moved the

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 3>tea back into the left it. I understand why they

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 3>did it. Did it They did the same thing in

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 3>the past couple of years to thirteen and fifteen, and

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 3>restored some strategic value to the shots that you hit

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 3>on those holes.

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think everybody should be able to hit it

0:49:54.239 --> 0:49:55.839
<v Speaker 2>like way down the hill on too.

0:49:56.800 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 3>It's that's the thing, is that everybody's been getting down

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 3>there and now it's with three woods because they can

0:50:04.239 --> 0:50:06.319
<v Speaker 3>actually draw a three wood right. You need to hit

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 3>a draw to get down the hill and skirt that

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 3>big fairway bunker on the right.

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't love that big paraoy bunker on the right.

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 3>No, it's it's like it's kind of an eyesore, but

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 3>it's very visually intimidating. I mean, it's kind of like

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 3>the one on one.

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:23.040
<v Speaker 2>But I I again, I did this. I might move

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 2>it back, like I might move it back a little

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 2>when I think about that faarawoy bunker.

0:50:29.680 --> 0:50:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that fairway bunker is more of a factor

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:35.239
<v Speaker 3>this year because of where the tea is. They kind

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 3>of shoved the tee over to the left, moved it

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 3>back ten yards.

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.440
<v Speaker 2>I saw the picture they posted on Instagram, and it

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:43.880
<v Speaker 2>does like I mean, it looks like you're just staring

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:44.839
<v Speaker 2>at the bunker.

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 3>And there might be a little bit of an optical

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 3>illusion there with the camera. I'm not sure that the

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:52.200
<v Speaker 3>tee like points at the bunker like that picture on

0:50:52.280 --> 0:50:55.280
<v Speaker 3>the master's Twitter account made it look like it does.

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 3>But certainly the repositioning of the tee has brought the

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 3>bunker more into and so you have to hit this

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:04.919
<v Speaker 3>big sweeping draw to get down the hill. Again. Get

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:07.360
<v Speaker 3>why they did it. They wanted to restore some value

0:51:07.840 --> 0:51:12.240
<v Speaker 3>to hitting that great shot and earning the down slope

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 3>toward the green. But the result is a hole that

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:20.840
<v Speaker 3>just looks a touch absurd. Now I have this ranked

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:23.440
<v Speaker 3>fairly high, so I really like this hole. I think

0:51:23.480 --> 0:51:27.759
<v Speaker 3>it's exciting, especially as the second hole in a championship

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:29.880
<v Speaker 3>where you've had a really hard first hole and now

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:31.680
<v Speaker 3>you've got an opportunity on the second hole, but you

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 3>got to hit a proper golf shot.

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 2>One of the most fun shots on the course is

0:51:34.960 --> 0:51:36.239
<v Speaker 2>the second shot in this hole.

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:38.720
<v Speaker 3>If you're not just that big slope is a roller coaster.

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 3>It's just pure fun.

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's high on my list because it's honestly one

0:51:43.080 --> 0:51:45.840
<v Speaker 2>of the most fun. One of the most fun shots

0:51:45.880 --> 0:51:47.879
<v Speaker 2>on the hole is if you're going for that green

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 2>into it's like you're trying to plot out exactly where

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 2>you want it to go. You're running a ball in,

0:51:55.560 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 2>which I think is like super rare in modern golf,

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 2>is like a hole where you're really like chasing a

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 2>ball into if the pins on one of the back

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 2>areas like you're chasing the ball in I I just

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:14.360
<v Speaker 2>love that. And then I just love the you turn

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 2>the corner and it's this amazing reveal of you look

0:52:18.760 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 2>down like you know, one you're up on high on

0:52:21.360 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 2>the ridge, and two you turn down and you see

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the golf course just open up in front of your eyes,

0:52:26.400 --> 0:52:28.719
<v Speaker 2>and I think you get to that central Yeah, I

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:32.839
<v Speaker 2>think there's like an intrinsic value of that that makes it,

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:36.320
<v Speaker 2>like I move it way up in my list because

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 2>of that. It's like you're that second shot into the

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 2>on that hole is kind of like you're welcome to

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the to the real heart of the golf course. And

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I think I placed just a little bit of value

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 2>on that, and I love also, you know, there's a

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of different greens at Augusta National. This is one

0:52:53.200 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 2>of them that really sits down beautifully on the ground.

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:58.360
<v Speaker 3>I was just gonna say that I like the variety

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:00.840
<v Speaker 3>that that introduces because so many of the greens that

0:53:00.880 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Augusta are built up in these monumental, spectacular, eye opening ways.

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Now you have a green on a fairly severe slope

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 3>that just sits on it.

0:53:13.120 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, so there's a lot of green, and so there's

0:53:15.560 --> 0:53:17.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of I think there's like a couple different

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:21.720
<v Speaker 2>types of greens at Augusta for the most part when

0:53:22.000 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 2>they sit, when they're on flat land, they're all built up.

0:53:25.200 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 2>So think one, eight, five, I know I'm forgetting a few.

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Fourteen is that's more into a ridge. But then they

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:37.879
<v Speaker 2>have the holes that are set into bridges. Yes, and

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:44.200
<v Speaker 2>that you would think of, ten, you'd think of, you know, three,

0:53:44.400 --> 0:53:47.920
<v Speaker 2>you'd think of I mean you could go down the list,

0:53:48.239 --> 0:53:50.359
<v Speaker 2>and then you have other holes that are set on

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the ground, right and two would be one of them

0:53:53.200 --> 0:53:56.160
<v Speaker 2>that's set on the ground. Eleven used to be more

0:53:56.200 --> 0:53:57.000
<v Speaker 2>set on the ground.

0:53:57.160 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Seven is built into a ridge.

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:02.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now two. Now eleven's more set up. I think

0:54:02.320 --> 0:54:04.680
<v Speaker 2>that was our kind of talk about it. And then

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 2>you have the holes like twelve thirteen that have the

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 2>have the the creek as a hazard that run along them,

0:54:12.920 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 2>and those are set on angles.

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 3>With the creek.

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:18.319
<v Speaker 2>But two is one of the rare greens that's set

0:54:18.480 --> 0:54:22.800
<v Speaker 2>on the ground. Kind of sits it is. That's another

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 2>green that I really love sitting at. Again, use the

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 2>chair policy. If you're going to a tournament round, use

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:33.439
<v Speaker 2>the chair policy. Go snag a chair. It's really fun

0:54:33.480 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 2>place to watch golf. So that would be my eighth,

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 2>my eleventh. My eleventh ranked hole is five.

0:54:40.080 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, your eleventh ranked hole is five. Okay. I have

0:54:43.160 --> 0:54:46.080
<v Speaker 3>this tenth, so not that far apart. I think it's

0:54:46.120 --> 0:54:46.799
<v Speaker 3>a brilliant hole.

0:54:46.920 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I think this could be in my top four if

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 2>the bunkers shifted left and one of the things in

0:54:56.840 --> 0:55:01.200
<v Speaker 2>this could all be spectator flow. This again, these are

0:55:01.239 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 2>the decisions you make when you host a tournament. You

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 2>have to do things. And to me, the best part

0:55:09.239 --> 0:55:14.279
<v Speaker 2>of this hole is the left side. There's this unbelievable

0:55:14.400 --> 0:55:17.120
<v Speaker 2>land form. It kind of sits on the ridge right

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:20.120
<v Speaker 2>It sits on the ridge that and the spectator plays off.

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:24.040
<v Speaker 2>The spectators effectively walk on the ridge line, and I

0:55:24.080 --> 0:55:26.640
<v Speaker 2>always just think, like that's where you want to be

0:55:26.719 --> 0:55:30.959
<v Speaker 2>hitting your second shot from to open up this unbelievable green.

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 2>So to me, you know, I think probably a lot

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:38.719
<v Speaker 2>of this hole is partly spectator flow and and just

0:55:38.800 --> 0:55:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the means of getting people around it. It's not a

0:55:41.719 --> 0:55:45.760
<v Speaker 2>great hole to watch golf in general, like just because

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 2>like you're kind of back there and this has is isolating.

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:51.319
<v Speaker 2>You kind of get into no man's land when you

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:53.880
<v Speaker 2>go down to four green and then up through five.

0:55:54.400 --> 0:55:57.439
<v Speaker 2>But like because you've got to get people. I think

0:55:57.480 --> 0:55:59.880
<v Speaker 2>that this is part of the reason. But the best

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:02.720
<v Speaker 2>part of that hole the line of charm, the ideal

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:05.919
<v Speaker 2>line really, you know, Elister Mackenzie and Bobby Jones talked

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:08.840
<v Speaker 2>about this being the road hole. This is the line

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:12.920
<v Speaker 2>that they go on, and it's in trees, yeah yeah,

0:56:12.960 --> 0:56:16.279
<v Speaker 2>and the bunkers are pushed in and it pushes everybody

0:56:16.400 --> 0:56:20.719
<v Speaker 2>like you're hitting to the bad angle, like there is

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:23.759
<v Speaker 2>you aren't allowed to get to where you need to

0:56:23.800 --> 0:56:27.920
<v Speaker 2>get to to have like a really wide dynamic scoring range.

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it would necessarily change. But my

0:56:30.560 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 2>theory would be if you could get to the left side,

0:56:32.960 --> 0:56:36.000
<v Speaker 2>you'd see a lot more birdies from there than from

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:36.880
<v Speaker 2>the right side.

0:56:37.280 --> 0:56:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, now you.

0:56:38.719 --> 0:56:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, trying to get to the left side might yield

0:56:40.600 --> 0:56:44.000
<v Speaker 2>more doubles. And guess what, That's what makes golf really

0:56:44.000 --> 0:56:47.200
<v Speaker 2>interesting when you have the high variants of scoring. People

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:49.839
<v Speaker 2>knowing I have to get over there if I need to,

0:56:49.920 --> 0:56:51.799
<v Speaker 2>if I want to score, if I want to make

0:56:51.840 --> 0:56:52.360
<v Speaker 2>a three.

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:54.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure I have anything to add to that.

0:56:54.200 --> 0:56:57.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that's really good. I the green is obviously

0:56:57.960 --> 0:56:59.920
<v Speaker 3>one of my favorite favorites on the course, and I

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:02.239
<v Speaker 3>think that's why I have it this high. You know,

0:57:02.320 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 3>this is a hole with an interesting history. It's supposed

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:07.359
<v Speaker 3>to be their version of the road hole, but there's

0:57:07.400 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 3>not really a road bunker situation here. There are some

0:57:11.600 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 3>preferred angles and some complexities with the green. I think

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 3>initially Alistair mackenzie was sort of planning to put a

0:57:17.840 --> 0:57:20.440
<v Speaker 3>bunker kind of in front of the green that would

0:57:20.880 --> 0:57:24.480
<v Speaker 3>that would allow players to find an advantage along the

0:57:24.560 --> 0:57:27.360
<v Speaker 3>left side of the hole. It's really a reversed road hole.

0:57:28.040 --> 0:57:29.520
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know this is a hole I need

0:57:29.560 --> 0:57:32.920
<v Speaker 3>to find out more about its history and and think

0:57:33.000 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 3>about what they could reasonably do to restore some of

0:57:36.640 --> 0:57:40.720
<v Speaker 3>that strategy. But beautiful golf hole with an incredible green,

0:57:41.320 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 3>and uh and and you know, obviously some some things

0:57:44.560 --> 0:57:44.840
<v Speaker 3>to do.

0:57:45.160 --> 0:57:48.960
<v Speaker 2>So my tenth was the eleventh hole. What is your tenth?

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:53.040
<v Speaker 3>The fifth hole, my ninth, we're ahead to nine. My

0:57:53.240 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 3>ninth place hole is six.

0:57:56.640 --> 0:57:57.640
<v Speaker 2>I had this three.

0:57:58.080 --> 0:58:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you have Wow. I didn't expect this one. I'm

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:04.280
<v Speaker 3>excited to hear the explanation. Now. I love this green.

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it's I think it's great. I just can't

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:11.880
<v Speaker 3>quite get to putting it above the other eight holes

0:58:12.160 --> 0:58:16.000
<v Speaker 3>on the rest of my list. That big shelf back

0:58:16.080 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 3>right is really fantastic. And then what's underrated about the hole,

0:58:21.000 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 3>I think is how cool and subtle the rest of

0:58:24.680 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 3>the pin positions on the green are. There are these

0:58:27.080 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 3>little ripples, little shelves all over the green and then

0:58:31.360 --> 0:58:34.880
<v Speaker 3>that big one back right. So every pin I'm kind

0:58:34.880 --> 0:58:36.720
<v Speaker 3>of excited to watch. And that's why I like the hole.

0:58:37.600 --> 0:58:39.840
<v Speaker 2>You just explain why I put it three. I just

0:58:39.920 --> 0:58:44.440
<v Speaker 2>think it's like a super fun shot, really great to watch.

0:58:45.200 --> 0:58:47.600
<v Speaker 2>If you put this hole in place of sixteen, I

0:58:47.680 --> 0:58:49.680
<v Speaker 2>think everybody would say that might be the best part

0:58:49.760 --> 0:58:53.760
<v Speaker 2>three at Augusta National. I think just by the casualty

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:56.760
<v Speaker 2>of where it is in the routing hole six in

0:58:56.800 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the front nine, that it doesn't get

0:59:00.480 --> 0:59:04.280
<v Speaker 2>the love appreciation and do I think this is just

0:59:04.280 --> 0:59:07.640
<v Speaker 2>a magnificent golf hole. That's like, it's a pretty great

0:59:07.680 --> 0:59:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Part three. I can't think of like if you took

0:59:10.840 --> 0:59:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the six hole and put it on like almost any

0:59:13.000 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 2>other course, people will be like that six hole. Have

0:59:17.200 --> 0:59:21.280
<v Speaker 2>you seen the six hole there? And this golf hole

0:59:22.160 --> 0:59:25.480
<v Speaker 2>that nothing's really been monkeyed about that much.

0:59:25.680 --> 0:59:29.840
<v Speaker 3>And that's true. Well they just monkeyed a little bit. Yeah,

0:59:30.680 --> 0:59:33.680
<v Speaker 3>this is a Sean Martin reporting that they they put

0:59:33.720 --> 0:59:36.840
<v Speaker 3>some runoffs in back of that back tire which makes

0:59:36.880 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 3>it even more difficult to reach.

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:41.560
<v Speaker 2>So I haven't I haven't. I haven't seen the new changes.

0:59:42.240 --> 0:59:45.240
<v Speaker 2>But to me, this hole is great and I just

0:59:45.360 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 2>like kind of like I was think thinking about it,

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:49.800
<v Speaker 2>and I was just like, you know what, that's the

0:59:49.840 --> 0:59:52.320
<v Speaker 2>one that I like. I like, I just love the

0:59:52.360 --> 0:59:53.720
<v Speaker 2>golf shot. I love the hole.

0:59:54.320 --> 0:59:56.120
<v Speaker 3>So that's my that's it. That's the one you'll get

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:59.760
<v Speaker 3>behind more than most people might get behind six. Yeah,

0:59:59.800 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm I mean, I agree with your analysis. I just

1:00:01.760 --> 1:00:03.800
<v Speaker 3>couldn't find a way to put it up that high.

1:00:03.840 --> 1:00:07.560
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I guess if I if I were to,

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, find a critique.

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing. We're at the point where they're all good,

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:15.919
<v Speaker 2>they're all great, They're all like my ninth is fifteen, right.

1:00:16.240 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>I really love that hole. Yeah, I think it's an

1:00:18.560 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 2>amazing hole. You want to talk about moments. I think

1:00:21.200 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 2>it's like arguably been the most momentous hole and all

1:00:25.240 --> 1:00:27.600
<v Speaker 2>gone in all of the tournaments over the last like

1:00:27.640 --> 1:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>fifteen twenty years. That's been the hole that mattered. Real quick,

1:00:31.440 --> 1:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>you said you had one critique of six.

1:00:34.840 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 3>The bunker looks weird. That's that's it. Like it used

1:00:39.160 --> 1:00:42.720
<v Speaker 3>to be kind of like one of those big Mackenzie

1:00:42.720 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 3>bunkers with with some real character to it, and now

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 3>what does it look like? It kind of looks like

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 3>a middle finger.

1:00:48.760 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess, like a lot of the bunkers just look there.

1:00:50.960 --> 1:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>So that's it.

1:00:51.760 --> 1:00:54.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's not specific to six. I also would

1:00:54.680 --> 1:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>like to see the changes play out and see whether

1:00:57.360 --> 1:00:59.680
<v Speaker 3>players are attacking that back tier as much as they did.

1:00:59.840 --> 1:01:03.320
<v Speaker 3>You have to, yeah, because the putt is so hard.

1:01:03.720 --> 1:01:06.600
<v Speaker 3>But if you're threatened with if you're threatened more with

1:01:06.800 --> 1:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>going over the back, our player is going to back

1:01:09.000 --> 1:01:09.760
<v Speaker 3>off it a little bit.

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it's so hard to hit something long right,

1:01:14.920 --> 1:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>like that's yeah, that's the thing about it. It's so

1:01:18.640 --> 1:01:21.280
<v Speaker 2>hard to hit for a right handed player to hit

1:01:21.320 --> 1:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>it long right. Sure it comes up short right, yeah,

1:01:26.240 --> 1:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>so it's a right target. Your everybody's aiming ten feet left,

1:01:30.280 --> 1:01:34.360
<v Speaker 2>yeah to start, Like, I just don't think the balls

1:01:34.360 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>are going to get there easily. So yeah, I like

1:01:39.320 --> 1:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>that's one of the things I love about the hole

1:01:41.760 --> 1:01:45.400
<v Speaker 2>in general is that back right flag. You stand on

1:01:45.440 --> 1:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>the team and you kind of think, like I kind

1:01:47.240 --> 1:01:50.200
<v Speaker 2>of have to hit it there, and on so many

1:01:50.320 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 2>par threes, it's just like, oh, we'll just bail.

1:01:54.160 --> 1:01:57.840
<v Speaker 3>You'll hedge, Yeah, like you have, but.

1:01:57.880 --> 1:02:01.200
<v Speaker 2>You could like you don't want to edge. It's a

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:04.440
<v Speaker 2>I And then like I think the other parts. So

1:02:04.520 --> 1:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>you have this like extraordinarily hard pin the back right

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:11.120
<v Speaker 2>on six, and then when it's up front, it's like

1:02:11.280 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>super fun. It's like dynamic. Like I think about like

1:02:14.200 --> 1:02:16.880
<v Speaker 2>the way a hole can play, that hole can play

1:02:17.640 --> 1:02:20.680
<v Speaker 2>at super easy. One of the easiest holes on the course,

1:02:20.800 --> 1:02:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and then it could be feasibly the hardest hole on

1:02:23.400 --> 1:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>the course just by moving the flag. So that's my

1:02:27.840 --> 1:02:29.360
<v Speaker 2>really strong case for it.

1:02:29.480 --> 1:02:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, for number three, all right, you said that fifteen

1:02:32.600 --> 1:02:34.680
<v Speaker 3>is number nine for you, it's eight for me.

1:02:34.920 --> 1:02:35.280
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1:02:36.080 --> 1:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>It's that high only because it's the hole that I

1:02:40.840 --> 1:02:43.600
<v Speaker 3>most look forward to seeing in the final round of

1:02:43.600 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 3>any Masters. And it's kind of incredible that that's the case,

1:02:47.000 --> 1:02:49.720
<v Speaker 3>considering all the stuff that has kind of gone wrong

1:02:49.760 --> 1:02:52.960
<v Speaker 3>with that hole, all the trees and places where they

1:02:52.960 --> 1:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>don't really belong. The sheer severity of the green, the

1:02:57.920 --> 1:03:00.560
<v Speaker 3>pond in front, I mean, the severy the green is

1:03:00.640 --> 1:03:02.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of what creates the tension of the hole. But

1:03:02.600 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure that's that's really like what it should

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:10.000
<v Speaker 3>be necessarily. In any case, the main problem right now

1:03:10.000 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 3>with the hole is that the extreme narrowing of a

1:03:12.440 --> 1:03:15.240
<v Speaker 3>corridor where the whole point of it originally is that

1:03:15.280 --> 1:03:18.080
<v Speaker 3>it was enormously wide and you could kind of choose

1:03:18.120 --> 1:03:22.040
<v Speaker 3>to go low or high. Now it's like you got

1:03:22.080 --> 1:03:24.760
<v Speaker 3>to fit it between the trees in order to have

1:03:24.800 --> 1:03:28.640
<v Speaker 3>a chance to go for it. Nonetheless, there's some magic

1:03:28.680 --> 1:03:33.840
<v Speaker 3>about this hole where the definitive shot that a Master's

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:37.959
<v Speaker 3>champion has to face is that shot into the fifteenth green.

1:03:38.360 --> 1:03:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think the other thing that's great

1:03:41.080 --> 1:03:42.800
<v Speaker 2>is the layup is not easy.

1:03:43.080 --> 1:03:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Right then downhill lie on the layup that.

1:03:46.160 --> 1:03:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Was one of the hardest shots on the golf course.

1:03:48.840 --> 1:03:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Is what you lay up to.

1:03:50.160 --> 1:03:52.760
<v Speaker 3>And I was thinking when I was watching the hole

1:03:52.880 --> 1:03:55.959
<v Speaker 3>during Anwhah, I was watching Bailey Shoemaker, who was making

1:03:55.960 --> 1:03:58.480
<v Speaker 3>a big charge in the final round of Anwhah, and

1:03:58.520 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 3>I thought that she was trending towards being the winner.

1:04:01.600 --> 1:04:04.360
<v Speaker 3>But then Lotti Woad closed really hard and took it.

1:04:04.800 --> 1:04:08.560
<v Speaker 3>But Bailey Shoemaker, I was watching her play this hole

1:04:08.560 --> 1:04:11.040
<v Speaker 3>and she she got behind the trees on the left

1:04:11.160 --> 1:04:14.000
<v Speaker 3>and I had a moment of disappointment, like, oh, I'm

1:04:14.040 --> 1:04:16.000
<v Speaker 3>not going to see her try to go for the

1:04:16.040 --> 1:04:18.960
<v Speaker 3>screen in two. But then she chipped out and she

1:04:19.080 --> 1:04:22.800
<v Speaker 3>was on a downhill lie with that short iron or

1:04:22.880 --> 1:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>wedge whatever she had into the green and I thought

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:32.040
<v Speaker 3>to myself, all that tension is there still there anywhere

1:04:32.160 --> 1:04:33.840
<v Speaker 3>with this shot? And she hit a great shot and

1:04:33.880 --> 1:04:35.280
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was one of the best shots of

1:04:35.280 --> 1:04:39.200
<v Speaker 3>her final round that I saw, and it's because of

1:04:39.240 --> 1:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the way that that lay up zone tilts toward the water.

1:04:42.240 --> 1:04:44.960
<v Speaker 3>It's just so uncomfortable, and you feel it when a

1:04:45.000 --> 1:04:48.200
<v Speaker 3>player stands over that that third shot if they lay up.

1:04:48.480 --> 1:04:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's it's uh, I think you hit on everything.

1:04:52.280 --> 1:04:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to see the bunker on the right removed too,

1:04:54.640 --> 1:04:56.880
<v Speaker 2>because I think it's like actually like a bailout spot.

1:04:57.080 --> 1:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>It was once a mound yea, so it was once

1:04:59.400 --> 1:05:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the kind of opposite of what it is now.

1:05:02.160 --> 1:05:05.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, hole of the an eighth ranked hole. I

1:05:05.800 --> 1:05:08.320
<v Speaker 2>minds too. So we've already talked about that. What's your

1:05:08.560 --> 1:05:09.400
<v Speaker 2>eighth ranked hole?

1:05:09.840 --> 1:05:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Fifteen?

1:05:10.320 --> 1:05:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Fifteen? So we're on to seven? Uh seven, the seventh,

1:05:14.280 --> 1:05:17.600
<v Speaker 2>our seventh best hole at Augusta, Nashville. What's yours?

1:05:17.920 --> 1:05:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Ten?

1:05:18.840 --> 1:05:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay? I have eight here?

1:05:21.040 --> 1:05:23.720
<v Speaker 3>You have eight there? Okay, let's talk about ten first.

1:05:25.560 --> 1:05:27.360
<v Speaker 3>A specific thing that I love about this whole. I

1:05:27.360 --> 1:05:29.919
<v Speaker 3>think people are pretty familiar with the drive and how

1:05:29.960 --> 1:05:32.240
<v Speaker 3>downhill it is and how exciting that is.

1:05:32.440 --> 1:05:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh, are we on the seventh or we're on.

1:05:34.760 --> 1:05:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Number We're on the we're on the seventh place, okay hole, Yeah,

1:05:37.320 --> 1:05:41.720
<v Speaker 3>and that's ten for me. So I really like the

1:05:41.720 --> 1:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>fairway contouring and how that works with the strategy of

1:05:45.680 --> 1:05:48.640
<v Speaker 3>the hole. Obviously, there's the big speed slot that everybody

1:05:48.680 --> 1:05:52.560
<v Speaker 3>knows about on the left, but in kind of the

1:05:52.680 --> 1:05:54.920
<v Speaker 3>right center portion of the fairway and correct me here

1:05:54.920 --> 1:05:57.080
<v Speaker 3>if my memory is kind of faulty. But there's like

1:05:57.160 --> 1:06:01.440
<v Speaker 3>a little platform that gives you all level lie. Yeah,

1:06:01.480 --> 1:06:04.680
<v Speaker 3>and if you find that, then that's it's not really good.

1:06:04.800 --> 1:06:06.960
<v Speaker 2>It's not completely level, yeah.

1:06:07.720 --> 1:06:09.760
<v Speaker 3>But it's more level than the rest of it, because

1:06:09.800 --> 1:06:11.520
<v Speaker 3>one of the big difficulties on that whole is that

1:06:11.600 --> 1:06:15.400
<v Speaker 3>you're probably hitting off of some kind of a weird

1:06:15.480 --> 1:06:17.600
<v Speaker 3>lie to this green that's super propped up.

1:06:18.760 --> 1:06:22.400
<v Speaker 2>So this is my fourth yeah, and it's all because

1:06:22.400 --> 1:06:26.080
<v Speaker 2>of that second shot, right, I don't think I mean, like,

1:06:26.520 --> 1:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know of many shots in all of golf

1:06:30.640 --> 1:06:36.120
<v Speaker 2>that have as many variables and factors to them.

1:06:36.280 --> 1:06:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, it's amazing. And what what makes it

1:06:39.120 --> 1:06:44.840
<v Speaker 3>so cool is the combination of the visual intimidation and

1:06:44.880 --> 1:06:50.400
<v Speaker 3>the actual functional contouring and hazards around that green. So

1:06:50.880 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 3>it's propped up in the air, it's so intimidating to

1:06:53.320 --> 1:06:55.520
<v Speaker 3>look at. You're looking at it, and you're looking at

1:06:55.520 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 3>it and you're saying to yourself, like, I've got to

1:06:57.800 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 3>hit a shot into that, Like, is that really going

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:04.520
<v Speaker 3>to happen here? Then you've got the bunker on the

1:07:04.640 --> 1:07:08.760
<v Speaker 3>right and the big drop off on the left, and

1:07:08.840 --> 1:07:11.640
<v Speaker 3>so yeah, it's better to come in from the left

1:07:11.680 --> 1:07:13.560
<v Speaker 3>side of the fairway. So it's better if you manage

1:07:13.600 --> 1:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>to get around the trees and come in, so you're

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:19.280
<v Speaker 3>you're hitting against the tilt of the green to stop

1:07:19.320 --> 1:07:20.760
<v Speaker 3>your ball a little bit. If you're coming in from

1:07:20.800 --> 1:07:23.320
<v Speaker 3>the right, you know, just it's such an awkward shot

1:07:23.360 --> 1:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>from the right, but you know, even from the left,

1:07:27.680 --> 1:07:31.280
<v Speaker 3>you've got that huge drop off and you've just got

1:07:31.280 --> 1:07:33.919
<v Speaker 3>to hit such a precise shot in there.

1:07:34.240 --> 1:07:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So this is my fourth I love this hole.

1:07:39.800 --> 1:07:42.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, all of the holes at this point I

1:07:42.160 --> 1:07:45.800
<v Speaker 2>love so mine for the seventh was whole eight.

1:07:47.600 --> 1:07:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that this is a fantastic hole.

1:07:50.000 --> 1:07:51.920
<v Speaker 2>This was number four for me, all right, So we

1:07:51.960 --> 1:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>had those flipped.

1:07:52.880 --> 1:07:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I think the I think the strategy of this hole

1:07:55.280 --> 1:07:59.160
<v Speaker 3>really still works, where if you challenge that bunker on

1:07:59.200 --> 1:08:02.680
<v Speaker 3>the right, then you've got kind of a ticket and

1:08:02.720 --> 1:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>to try to reach the screen in two. Yeah.

1:08:05.280 --> 1:08:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's awesome. The green's amazing. It's one of

1:08:08.080 --> 1:08:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the coolest greens. I also think like one of the

1:08:10.960 --> 1:08:13.880
<v Speaker 2>recipes of a great par five is like the layup.

1:08:14.920 --> 1:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>I think this is probably one of the most compelling

1:08:17.520 --> 1:08:21.719
<v Speaker 2>layup holes where if you don't hit a good drive,

1:08:21.840 --> 1:08:24.200
<v Speaker 2>if you're in the bunker, if you're in the if

1:08:24.200 --> 1:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>you're in the pine straw or the trees, like, you

1:08:27.439 --> 1:08:30.800
<v Speaker 2>are just praying that you can get the ball up

1:08:30.880 --> 1:08:34.120
<v Speaker 2>to the flat, and it's very hard to do that.

1:08:35.240 --> 1:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>It's like extremely hard if you're in the bunker to

1:08:38.320 --> 1:08:41.360
<v Speaker 2>get it up to the flat, like if you're in

1:08:41.400 --> 1:08:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the trees, like you're just hoping for a little little

1:08:44.400 --> 1:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>space to get the ball to the flat because you

1:08:47.439 --> 1:08:50.720
<v Speaker 2>get such a huge advantage if you can get it

1:08:50.840 --> 1:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>up there and get it into the wedge area so

1:08:53.560 --> 1:08:57.680
<v Speaker 2>it puts. This is not the most demanding T shot,

1:08:57.800 --> 1:09:01.360
<v Speaker 2>but of all the holes in Augusta, like among on

1:09:01.439 --> 1:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the range of holes, this is one that if you

1:09:05.000 --> 1:09:06.880
<v Speaker 2>hit a great T shot, you can make a three

1:09:06.960 --> 1:09:09.840
<v Speaker 2>because it's so cool the way you can run it

1:09:09.880 --> 1:09:12.840
<v Speaker 2>in you're hitting into a bowl. If you don't hit

1:09:12.880 --> 1:09:15.559
<v Speaker 2>a good T shot and you can't get over the hill,

1:09:16.120 --> 1:09:19.960
<v Speaker 2>then you've got like a third shot that's blind from

1:09:20.200 --> 1:09:23.360
<v Speaker 2>an upslope lie and it's like, all of a sudden,

1:09:24.560 --> 1:09:27.720
<v Speaker 2>five is hard. It's not far gone conclusion that I'm

1:09:27.760 --> 1:09:30.160
<v Speaker 2>going to get out of here with five. So it's

1:09:30.160 --> 1:09:33.679
<v Speaker 2>a great example again in a similar vein to nine,

1:09:34.479 --> 1:09:38.240
<v Speaker 2>where it is not narrow. The corridor is not narrow.

1:09:39.479 --> 1:09:42.439
<v Speaker 2>It's to the eye. It's not particular demanding, but the

1:09:42.520 --> 1:09:45.479
<v Speaker 2>T shot is very demanding in the sense of if

1:09:45.520 --> 1:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't hit a good one, I'm not it's going

1:09:49.880 --> 1:09:52.000
<v Speaker 2>to be a very hard hole all of a sudden.

1:09:52.240 --> 1:09:54.600
<v Speaker 2>On a hole that you feel like you stand on

1:09:55.040 --> 1:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>and you think you should score really well on.

1:09:58.120 --> 1:10:01.400
<v Speaker 3>It's one of the holes that's true test to the

1:10:01.439 --> 1:10:05.680
<v Speaker 3>original spirit of the Mackenzie and Jones design in the

1:10:05.720 --> 1:10:09.120
<v Speaker 3>sense that it has one bunker, and the bunker is

1:10:09.160 --> 1:10:11.920
<v Speaker 3>in just the right place, and the rest of the

1:10:11.920 --> 1:10:18.200
<v Speaker 3>hole is about contour and slid topography. Yeah, hills and

1:10:18.200 --> 1:10:20.280
<v Speaker 3>and and then you know contour is both big and

1:10:20.320 --> 1:10:24.200
<v Speaker 3>small over that hill, the blindness, the sight lines that

1:10:24.200 --> 1:10:28.839
<v Speaker 3>that that obstructs and creates, and then the smaller scale

1:10:28.840 --> 1:10:33.600
<v Speaker 3>contouring around the green along the approach. It's all just

1:10:34.439 --> 1:10:38.160
<v Speaker 3>it's it's kind of still there, and and the that

1:10:38.280 --> 1:10:41.240
<v Speaker 3>the design in many ways is still intact there even

1:10:41.280 --> 1:10:44.400
<v Speaker 3>though it's been rebuilt various times of the year over

1:10:44.400 --> 1:10:46.920
<v Speaker 3>the years. I question whether there's there's kind of a

1:10:46.920 --> 1:10:48.680
<v Speaker 3>little drop off at the front of the green. I'm

1:10:48.720 --> 1:10:52.200
<v Speaker 3>not sure that should be there. But all in all,

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:57.040
<v Speaker 3>this is a hole that is significantly closer to its

1:10:57.120 --> 1:11:00.519
<v Speaker 3>original form than than many of the rest of the

1:11:00.520 --> 1:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>holes at Augusta National and it still works really well.

1:11:03.320 --> 1:11:04.439
<v Speaker 2>All right, what's your six?

1:11:05.760 --> 1:11:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Number six for me? Is the first hole?

1:11:08.760 --> 1:11:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Sure, we talked about that. Yeah, we talked about that.

1:11:13.080 --> 1:11:14.400
<v Speaker 3>We talked about the first hole. I'm not sure I

1:11:14.439 --> 1:11:17.519
<v Speaker 3>mentioned it's number six. I hope I have that right.

1:11:17.600 --> 1:11:19.840
<v Speaker 3>In any case, what about your six hole?

1:11:19.960 --> 1:11:21.519
<v Speaker 2>My six hole is the third hole?

1:11:22.120 --> 1:11:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, so I have three as number two. All right.

1:11:27.200 --> 1:11:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a hole that's gotten better with technology.

1:11:31.040 --> 1:11:34.599
<v Speaker 2>I think this is the thing. As CB McDonald had

1:11:34.600 --> 1:11:36.639
<v Speaker 2>a great quote in one of his books, I forgot

1:11:36.720 --> 1:11:41.080
<v Speaker 2>which book. It was in Scotland's Gift probably where he

1:11:41.160 --> 1:11:43.719
<v Speaker 2>talked about, like you know, obviously he lived through changes

1:11:43.760 --> 1:11:46.720
<v Speaker 2>in equipment, but he said, some holes get worse with technology,

1:11:46.760 --> 1:11:49.400
<v Speaker 2>some holes get better. I think this hole has gotten better.

1:11:49.600 --> 1:11:52.479
<v Speaker 2>It poses a super interesting question, you know, do you

1:11:52.520 --> 1:11:56.040
<v Speaker 2>want to lay it back onto the ridge or drive

1:11:56.080 --> 1:11:58.800
<v Speaker 2>it down into the gully. I think it's insane that

1:11:58.840 --> 1:12:01.800
<v Speaker 2>guys drive it down in the gullie. I mean, like

1:12:01.880 --> 1:12:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess the numbers maybe have buried it out, but

1:12:04.880 --> 1:12:09.040
<v Speaker 2>like I think that's an irrational decision. Yeah right there,

1:12:09.080 --> 1:12:12.760
<v Speaker 2>because down there it just seems like impossible, Like it is,

1:12:12.960 --> 1:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>you're hitting them like a blind target with like a

1:12:15.400 --> 1:12:18.960
<v Speaker 2>forty yard pitch with no green. But like they they

1:12:19.080 --> 1:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>they believe that. That being said, like you know, augusta National,

1:12:23.479 --> 1:12:26.479
<v Speaker 2>outside of the par threes, you are never afforded an

1:12:26.479 --> 1:12:28.880
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to hit a shot from a dead flat lie

1:12:28.880 --> 1:12:31.880
<v Speaker 2>with a wedge. The third hole, if you lay back,

1:12:32.400 --> 1:12:36.200
<v Speaker 2>affords you that exact situation, which is rare, and I

1:12:36.720 --> 1:12:40.120
<v Speaker 2>just I'm like actually surprised more people don't exercise this

1:12:40.200 --> 1:12:43.160
<v Speaker 2>decision because if you hit an iron or whatever these

1:12:43.160 --> 1:12:46.599
<v Speaker 2>guys need to hit to that that ridge, you have

1:12:46.720 --> 1:12:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the the you have one hundred yard wedge shot to

1:12:50.360 --> 1:12:54.320
<v Speaker 2>a green at level and the green's amazing, it runs

1:12:54.360 --> 1:12:56.880
<v Speaker 2>away super hard, which you would never be able to

1:12:56.880 --> 1:12:59.960
<v Speaker 2>tell from TV because it sits up high on a ridge.

1:13:01.800 --> 1:13:06.400
<v Speaker 3>And something that doesn't come through on TV is how

1:13:07.240 --> 1:13:11.439
<v Speaker 3>intricate the contouring is behind the green. I mean really

1:13:11.479 --> 1:13:14.120
<v Speaker 3>all around the green, but behind the green there's a

1:13:14.120 --> 1:13:17.360
<v Speaker 3>lot going on. There are these little hummocks and drop

1:13:17.400 --> 1:13:19.760
<v Speaker 3>offs and various things that can happen to you if

1:13:19.800 --> 1:13:23.840
<v Speaker 3>you send your short second shot long and yeah, I

1:13:23.840 --> 1:13:26.160
<v Speaker 3>mean I think that three is just a classic example

1:13:27.280 --> 1:13:31.320
<v Speaker 3>of a short part four that works because of this

1:13:31.439 --> 1:13:35.679
<v Speaker 3>kind of split fairway concept where you have the high

1:13:36.280 --> 1:13:41.120
<v Speaker 3>middle right fairway near the bunkers and you have the

1:13:41.360 --> 1:13:46.560
<v Speaker 3>low long left fairway, and that's the choice. It's a

1:13:46.600 --> 1:13:49.160
<v Speaker 3>pretty stark choice. It's really one or the other because

1:13:49.200 --> 1:13:51.920
<v Speaker 3>of the the or you can go for the green.

1:13:52.000 --> 1:13:53.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's it. I mean, some guys can do that,

1:13:53.960 --> 1:13:57.120
<v Speaker 3>but it's really really hard to make that shot work.

1:13:57.120 --> 1:13:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Even if you can hit it that far, it's got

1:13:59.439 --> 1:14:01.599
<v Speaker 3>to be the right, it's got to be really precise.

1:14:01.720 --> 1:14:05.719
<v Speaker 3>And so that's why you see relatively few modern players

1:14:05.880 --> 1:14:09.040
<v Speaker 3>reaching that green with driver, though we might see more

1:14:09.080 --> 1:14:12.439
<v Speaker 3>in the coming years, who knows. But that choice between

1:14:13.160 --> 1:14:15.960
<v Speaker 3>high middle but a little bit farther away from the

1:14:16.000 --> 1:14:20.479
<v Speaker 3>green and low left but the angle from there is

1:14:20.600 --> 1:14:24.599
<v Speaker 3>just so uncomfortable, you know. I think it's a classic

1:14:24.680 --> 1:14:29.519
<v Speaker 3>concept for a short part four that simply works, and

1:14:30.040 --> 1:14:34.120
<v Speaker 3>that's why it has been so durable, great whole. Yeah,

1:14:34.400 --> 1:14:36.360
<v Speaker 3>all right, So I had that as number two. You

1:14:36.479 --> 1:14:39.880
<v Speaker 3>had that as maybe number six or five. My six

1:14:40.040 --> 1:14:45.240
<v Speaker 3>is one, My fifth is fourteen. I had that five too, Yeah,

1:14:45.240 --> 1:14:47.679
<v Speaker 3>that five, okay, Yeah, I mean this is all about

1:14:47.680 --> 1:14:48.280
<v Speaker 3>the green here.

1:14:48.960 --> 1:14:52.639
<v Speaker 2>I think the land's great too, because the land works

1:14:52.680 --> 1:14:53.479
<v Speaker 2>against the green.

1:14:53.760 --> 1:14:55.599
<v Speaker 3>Yes, exactly what you're trying to.

1:14:55.560 --> 1:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Do with the green is completely counter to what the

1:14:58.840 --> 1:14:59.800
<v Speaker 2>land's doing to you.

1:14:59.840 --> 1:15:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, and then the angle of the tea accentuates what

1:15:02.880 --> 1:15:03.479
<v Speaker 3>the land is doing.

1:15:04.560 --> 1:15:07.880
<v Speaker 2>I love the t shot too, because like it's it's blind, right,

1:15:08.080 --> 1:15:11.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, like you're sitting way down low, you just

1:15:11.640 --> 1:15:14.160
<v Speaker 2>played thirteen and you're like, wait, now I gotta go

1:15:14.280 --> 1:15:14.639
<v Speaker 2>up there.

1:15:15.000 --> 1:15:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Do you wish they still had that huge bunker cut

1:15:17.320 --> 1:15:19.800
<v Speaker 3>into the upslope on that te shot?

1:15:19.880 --> 1:15:23.160
<v Speaker 2>I think, I mean I don't. I think it actually

1:15:23.240 --> 1:15:24.400
<v Speaker 2>might be better without it.

1:15:24.479 --> 1:15:26.879
<v Speaker 3>Interesting, Yeah, there have been I mean.

1:15:26.920 --> 1:15:31.200
<v Speaker 2>The bunker where the bunker was, it seems like would

1:15:31.280 --> 1:15:35.040
<v Speaker 2>be almost telling you to hit it the wrong place,

1:15:35.240 --> 1:15:38.560
<v Speaker 2>because like you usually think with a bunker set into foreground,

1:15:38.880 --> 1:15:41.280
<v Speaker 2>hit it right over it. But I think if it

1:15:41.360 --> 1:15:44.439
<v Speaker 2>was there, you'd end up in the right rough with

1:15:44.600 --> 1:15:50.080
<v Speaker 2>today's mowing lines. Right again, it's another hole that could

1:15:50.120 --> 1:15:50.960
<v Speaker 2>just get a little wide.

1:15:51.080 --> 1:15:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Trees are pretty thick on both sides of it. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

1:15:54.000 --> 1:15:58.320
<v Speaker 3>and yeah there should be you should have Because of

1:15:58.400 --> 1:16:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the difficulty, complexity, brilliance of the green. It feels like

1:16:04.200 --> 1:16:05.760
<v Speaker 3>a hole where you should just have a bunch of

1:16:05.800 --> 1:16:08.559
<v Speaker 3>different options. You should just have this field where you

1:16:08.600 --> 1:16:11.400
<v Speaker 3>can kind of pick and choose where you want to

1:16:11.439 --> 1:16:15.519
<v Speaker 3>attack it. Yeah, and so I think that's the idea

1:16:15.600 --> 1:16:17.559
<v Speaker 3>behind the design of the hole. I do want to mention.

1:16:17.640 --> 1:16:20.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean the way that I sometimes talk about augusta nastional,

1:16:20.439 --> 1:16:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I give the impression that I think everything about the

1:16:23.920 --> 1:16:26.280
<v Speaker 3>older version of the course, or the original version of

1:16:26.320 --> 1:16:28.640
<v Speaker 3>the course is better. I don't necessarily think that. I

1:16:28.720 --> 1:16:31.840
<v Speaker 3>think that some changes have been good, and I think

1:16:31.880 --> 1:16:35.120
<v Speaker 3>that eliminating that huge bunker that used to feature on

1:16:35.160 --> 1:16:38.839
<v Speaker 3>the t shot might have actually been a pretty reasonable change.

1:16:39.200 --> 1:16:42.519
<v Speaker 3>But you know, this whole, it all leads to this green.

1:16:42.600 --> 1:16:46.360
<v Speaker 3>It's one of those ultimate green backwards holes. Once you

1:16:46.439 --> 1:16:49.040
<v Speaker 3>look at the green. Then the rest of the hole

1:16:49.120 --> 1:16:52.840
<v Speaker 3>comes into focus and starts to make sense strategically. And

1:16:52.880 --> 1:16:55.840
<v Speaker 3>it's just hard to describe this green like it's got

1:16:55.840 --> 1:16:59.559
<v Speaker 3>these two huge humps in it. You know, it's basically

1:16:59.600 --> 1:17:03.080
<v Speaker 3>a big false front, but you know it's it seems

1:17:03.120 --> 1:17:05.400
<v Speaker 3>like more than that. It's it's a little bit farther

1:17:05.439 --> 1:17:09.479
<v Speaker 3>into the green and then all these little pockets and

1:17:09.560 --> 1:17:14.360
<v Speaker 3>sections in the back and so so much is dependent

1:17:14.439 --> 1:17:16.400
<v Speaker 3>on where the pin is, what you want to do

1:17:16.439 --> 1:17:20.599
<v Speaker 3>off the tea and yeah, just fantastic hole, bunkerless.

1:17:20.040 --> 1:17:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, yeahs an awesome hole. Amazing hole. I really really love.

1:17:25.640 --> 1:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>When I played last year, my most disappointing moment was

1:17:31.360 --> 1:17:35.200
<v Speaker 2>not hitting this fairway because I really wanted to hit

1:17:35.360 --> 1:17:39.679
<v Speaker 2>the proach shot from the fairway, Like, honestly, like probably

1:17:39.680 --> 1:17:41.559
<v Speaker 2>one of the shots that I most wanted to hit

1:17:41.640 --> 1:17:43.800
<v Speaker 2>at Augusta National. I ended up in the way and

1:17:43.880 --> 1:17:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the trees, right, I hit an amazing shot to make

1:17:47.280 --> 1:17:49.680
<v Speaker 2>to hit the green, like, I kind of had to

1:17:49.760 --> 1:17:52.920
<v Speaker 2>hit it up through trees, and but like I didn't

1:17:52.960 --> 1:17:55.040
<v Speaker 2>want I wanted to just hit a standard approach.

1:17:55.640 --> 1:17:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Would you have chipped out sideways? You know what it

1:17:58.439 --> 1:17:59.759
<v Speaker 3>was like just for the experience.

1:18:00.120 --> 1:18:05.120
<v Speaker 2>D a couple of verdies, I mean actually almost made.

1:18:05.320 --> 1:18:08.519
<v Speaker 2>I almost made a pot from down right to like

1:18:08.680 --> 1:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>where the Sunday pin was back left. I almost made

1:18:12.360 --> 1:18:15.400
<v Speaker 2>that pot. So I was pretty happy about. Like the

1:18:15.439 --> 1:18:18.160
<v Speaker 2>way the hole played out despite not hitting the fairway,

1:18:18.479 --> 1:18:19.760
<v Speaker 2>very memorable. All right.

1:18:19.840 --> 1:18:22.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's five for both of us. What's four for you?

1:18:22.720 --> 1:18:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Four for me is whole ten? We already talked about it.

1:18:25.320 --> 1:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>What's your four hole?

1:18:26.320 --> 1:18:28.599
<v Speaker 3>Eight? We already talked about it. What is number three

1:18:28.680 --> 1:18:29.000
<v Speaker 3>for you?

1:18:29.600 --> 1:18:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Six? We already talked about For me, it's thirteen. All right,

1:18:33.439 --> 1:18:34.640
<v Speaker 2>this was one for me.

1:18:35.320 --> 1:18:37.960
<v Speaker 3>This hole has been brutalized. That's why it's not one

1:18:38.000 --> 1:18:38.200
<v Speaker 3>for me.

1:18:38.479 --> 1:18:40.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, So let me let me make the case

1:18:40.760 --> 1:18:42.040
<v Speaker 2>of why it was one for me.

1:18:42.400 --> 1:18:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I thought, it's the greatest hole in the world, right,

1:18:45.640 --> 1:18:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it's this is the greatest designed hole in

1:18:48.080 --> 1:18:48.439
<v Speaker 3>the world.

1:18:49.360 --> 1:18:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I thought about what hole do I want to play

1:18:53.200 --> 1:18:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the most, over and over and over and over again.

1:18:57.000 --> 1:19:00.639
<v Speaker 2>Which hole If I took any hole from August National

1:19:01.000 --> 1:19:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and put it in my backyard, which one would I

1:19:04.720 --> 1:19:05.599
<v Speaker 2>most want to have?

1:19:06.439 --> 1:19:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Which one with you?

1:19:07.960 --> 1:19:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Which? Yes, even in this current state, which one do

1:19:11.400 --> 1:19:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I find the most endlessly compelling. Which one would would

1:19:17.360 --> 1:19:20.719
<v Speaker 2>I garner the most joy from playing a thousand times

1:19:21.280 --> 1:19:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and I came to this one. There is no hole

1:19:25.280 --> 1:19:29.240
<v Speaker 2>that is interesting from t to green than this hole.

1:19:31.600 --> 1:19:36.479
<v Speaker 2>Listen like they're like, I cannot believe. I'm gonna call bullshit.

1:19:36.880 --> 1:19:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I cannot believe that the third freaking hole is in

1:19:41.960 --> 1:19:46.440
<v Speaker 2>front of thirteen. For you, that is that is preposterous.

1:19:46.439 --> 1:19:49.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm sending a message. I'm sending a message. I know

1:19:49.360 --> 1:19:53.439
<v Speaker 3>what you're doing, but it's absolutely sends. It's insane. No,

1:19:53.560 --> 1:19:55.920
<v Speaker 3>I think we need to make a stand. We need

1:19:55.960 --> 1:20:00.760
<v Speaker 3>to make a stand against the wasp wasted fair way

1:20:00.960 --> 1:20:05.439
<v Speaker 3>on thirteen. It's an abomination how expensive it needs to go.

1:20:05.920 --> 1:20:09.000
<v Speaker 3>This is the greatest golf hole in the world, and

1:20:09.240 --> 1:20:13.639
<v Speaker 3>you're bringing the trees in so far that the drive

1:20:13.760 --> 1:20:16.200
<v Speaker 3>is no longer the drive. The shot is no longer

1:20:16.240 --> 1:20:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the shot. You know, this is a it's an interesting

1:20:20.040 --> 1:20:23.559
<v Speaker 3>hole to see pros try to negotiate, but it has

1:20:23.600 --> 1:20:26.640
<v Speaker 3>become a little bit ridiculous. Off the tee now the

1:20:26.680 --> 1:20:30.880
<v Speaker 3>second shot is intact, and it's such a great second shot,

1:20:30.920 --> 1:20:35.160
<v Speaker 3>whether you're laying up or going for the green and Obviously,

1:20:35.240 --> 1:20:38.200
<v Speaker 3>everybody knows that the way the land moves and the

1:20:38.200 --> 1:20:40.280
<v Speaker 3>way the green is and the way the creek is,

1:20:40.360 --> 1:20:44.599
<v Speaker 3>all that is very familiar to everybody. I wish they

1:20:44.600 --> 1:20:48.240
<v Speaker 3>would expand that green out to the left a bit,

1:20:48.520 --> 1:20:51.679
<v Speaker 3>recapture a section of that green that used to exist.

1:20:51.720 --> 1:20:54.519
<v Speaker 3>I think that would really enhance the hole overall. So

1:20:54.640 --> 1:20:57.439
<v Speaker 3>that's another point about the hole that I'm not super

1:20:57.439 --> 1:20:59.479
<v Speaker 3>happy with. But I mean, you could say that about

1:20:59.640 --> 1:21:02.759
<v Speaker 3>any umber of other holes Augusta. But the main thing

1:21:03.479 --> 1:21:08.320
<v Speaker 3>is turning that drive, which should be the ultimate kind

1:21:08.320 --> 1:21:15.639
<v Speaker 3>of optionality drive at Augusta, and making it a draw execution.

1:21:15.800 --> 1:21:17.280
<v Speaker 2>So you have twelve number one?

1:21:18.040 --> 1:21:18.559
<v Speaker 3>Yes? I do?

1:21:18.640 --> 1:21:19.479
<v Speaker 2>I have a number two?

1:21:19.720 --> 1:21:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? What do you?

1:21:21.880 --> 1:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So?

1:21:22.040 --> 1:21:24.720
<v Speaker 3>You have twelve? Is number two? Okay? Perfect? So we've

1:21:24.720 --> 1:21:27.240
<v Speaker 3>made we've made our argument about thirteen. You've registered your

1:21:27.240 --> 1:21:30.680
<v Speaker 3>displeasure with me putting three above it, and listen, I

1:21:30.760 --> 1:21:34.600
<v Speaker 3>understand that. Well, let me ask question make the decisions

1:21:35.320 --> 1:21:36.240
<v Speaker 3>on thirteen.

1:21:36.120 --> 1:21:39.599
<v Speaker 2>Would you rather have in your backyard? Thirteen? I didn't

1:21:39.680 --> 1:21:43.000
<v Speaker 2>use that you would you rather which hole would you

1:21:43.120 --> 1:21:45.559
<v Speaker 2>rather play one hundred times three or thirteen?

1:21:45.720 --> 1:21:49.519
<v Speaker 3>I didn't use that criterion in determining.

1:21:49.080 --> 1:21:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I just want to I've crossed examining the witness right now,

1:21:53.320 --> 1:21:54.759
<v Speaker 2>and I have a few questions.

1:21:55.000 --> 1:21:57.280
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I'm going to answer the backyard question.

1:21:57.720 --> 1:22:00.240
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't want to put thirteen in my back here

1:22:00.360 --> 1:22:02.280
<v Speaker 3>because every time I'd look at the trees, it would

1:22:02.320 --> 1:22:05.000
<v Speaker 3>make me sad and it would make me angry, and

1:22:05.120 --> 1:22:06.880
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be able to be a good father to

1:22:06.920 --> 1:22:10.040
<v Speaker 3>my children as a result. So that's that's all I

1:22:10.080 --> 1:22:11.000
<v Speaker 3>have to say about that.

1:22:11.640 --> 1:22:16.599
<v Speaker 2>All I'm gonna say. If thirteen in its current state

1:22:17.280 --> 1:22:20.400
<v Speaker 2>was what Alistair McKenzie designed, it'd be number one on

1:22:20.439 --> 1:22:20.880
<v Speaker 2>your list.

1:22:21.040 --> 1:22:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Of course it would be. It would be no contest.

1:22:25.080 --> 1:22:26.320
<v Speaker 3>It's the greatest hole in the worrule.

1:22:26.479 --> 1:22:26.559
<v Speaker 1>No.

1:22:26.640 --> 1:22:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, what if if thirteen today was what was

1:22:30.320 --> 1:22:32.800
<v Speaker 2>there in thirty four, if the trees were just there,

1:22:33.160 --> 1:22:36.760
<v Speaker 2>if they didn't clear it out, if that hole was

1:22:36.880 --> 1:22:39.840
<v Speaker 2>what it is today, Oh what they put in the

1:22:39.880 --> 1:22:43.360
<v Speaker 2>ground in thirty four, Okay, it'd be your number one.

1:22:45.280 --> 1:22:48.200
<v Speaker 3>This is a counterfactual. This is this is invented history.

1:22:48.240 --> 1:22:51.439
<v Speaker 3>I don't I don't. I don't accept the idea that

1:22:52.080 --> 1:22:55.439
<v Speaker 3>they would decide to design the hole as it's currently.

1:22:55.720 --> 1:22:56.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm just saying.

1:22:58.920 --> 1:23:00.880
<v Speaker 2>That this would be the case.

1:23:02.200 --> 1:23:06.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you can pretend that, but again counterfactual. That's

1:23:06.479 --> 1:23:09.280
<v Speaker 3>that's not how history unfolded. Why don't we talk about

1:23:09.280 --> 1:23:12.839
<v Speaker 3>twelve in a way. It's kind of number one by default.

1:23:13.280 --> 1:23:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I had to think about this a little bit because

1:23:15.080 --> 1:23:18.960
<v Speaker 3>I knew I wasn't gonna put thirteen number one. It

1:23:19.080 --> 1:23:22.000
<v Speaker 3>wasn't a case where I went straight to twelve and said,

1:23:22.800 --> 1:23:25.840
<v Speaker 3>that's clearly my number one. It was more like I

1:23:25.880 --> 1:23:28.560
<v Speaker 3>had to go through a process of elimination and realize

1:23:28.560 --> 1:23:30.960
<v Speaker 3>that twelve was the one that was left. But my

1:23:31.160 --> 1:23:36.880
<v Speaker 3>justification for it is that it's the greatest par three

1:23:36.960 --> 1:23:40.679
<v Speaker 3>t shot to watch in a golf tournament in the world,

1:23:41.000 --> 1:23:45.479
<v Speaker 3>bar none, by far. There's no contest. That's it.

1:23:46.920 --> 1:23:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the angle of the green's amazing.

1:23:49.400 --> 1:23:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Angle of the green's amazing.

1:23:50.640 --> 1:23:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Shallowness of the greens amazing.

1:23:52.439 --> 1:23:57.000
<v Speaker 3>The wind is amazing. The way the whole environment works

1:23:57.520 --> 1:24:03.160
<v Speaker 3>on that whole it is just incredible. And every time

1:24:03.560 --> 1:24:05.800
<v Speaker 3>players come to that hole in the final round of

1:24:05.800 --> 1:24:09.280
<v Speaker 3>the Masters, I can't believe how lucky I am to

1:24:09.360 --> 1:24:13.080
<v Speaker 3>get to watch another group of players hit that shot

1:24:13.160 --> 1:24:17.519
<v Speaker 3>into the green under such intense pressure. It's so wonderful,

1:24:17.560 --> 1:24:21.120
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of it is intangible. You know, you

1:24:21.120 --> 1:24:23.479
<v Speaker 3>could talk about the angle of the green and the

1:24:23.520 --> 1:24:25.799
<v Speaker 3>placement of the bunker and all that kind of stuff,

1:24:25.840 --> 1:24:28.760
<v Speaker 3>but there is there. You know, a lot of this

1:24:28.840 --> 1:24:31.880
<v Speaker 3>is mystique. A lot of this is history and memory,

1:24:31.920 --> 1:24:34.680
<v Speaker 3>the stuff that we said we would keep out of this,

1:24:34.800 --> 1:24:37.200
<v Speaker 3>But I think with the twelfth hole at Augusta, you

1:24:37.280 --> 1:24:40.360
<v Speaker 3>can't keep that out of it. I think all of

1:24:40.400 --> 1:24:43.360
<v Speaker 3>that affects the shot that players hit on that hole.

1:24:43.880 --> 1:24:46.160
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I just think there's nothing like it in

1:24:46.200 --> 1:24:50.160
<v Speaker 3>the world of golf, and it works every single time. Yeah.

1:24:50.280 --> 1:24:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I Hey, you know why it's number two for me?

1:24:53.240 --> 1:24:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Why so much of Augustin National is about the really

1:24:56.160 --> 1:24:59.200
<v Speaker 2>cool greens. We didn't even talk about how cool thirteenth

1:24:59.200 --> 1:25:01.640
<v Speaker 2>green is that. You know, I thought we were going

1:25:01.720 --> 1:25:03.880
<v Speaker 2>to spend I thought we were going to spend ten

1:25:03.960 --> 1:25:06.000
<v Speaker 2>minutes talking about why it's the greatest hole in the

1:25:06.040 --> 1:25:09.400
<v Speaker 2>world and why it's the number one, number one on

1:25:09.960 --> 1:25:14.920
<v Speaker 2>both our list, You're so sure enough. Instead we're talking

1:25:14.960 --> 1:25:18.920
<v Speaker 2>about how how it preposterously was behind the third hole

1:25:19.360 --> 1:25:20.120
<v Speaker 2>on your list.

1:25:21.120 --> 1:25:23.800
<v Speaker 3>You have six is number three? Yeah, should I have

1:25:23.800 --> 1:25:25.040
<v Speaker 3>shot it about that, Yeah.

1:25:24.840 --> 1:25:25.240
<v Speaker 2>You could have.

1:25:25.439 --> 1:25:28.799
<v Speaker 3>You could have this is right behind thirteen. You have six.

1:25:29.640 --> 1:25:32.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, so anyways, twelve, if I'm going to make a critique,

1:25:32.560 --> 1:25:37.280
<v Speaker 2>everything's about the cool green contours like thirteen green contour, amazing,

1:25:37.479 --> 1:25:41.120
<v Speaker 2>amazing contour and it and it fits with the land right.

1:25:41.160 --> 1:25:43.479
<v Speaker 2>If you're playing in from the left side, everything kind

1:25:43.479 --> 1:25:46.599
<v Speaker 2>of helps you there. If you're playing in from the right,

1:25:46.880 --> 1:25:51.360
<v Speaker 2>it's harder to use the bowl, you kind of and

1:25:51.439 --> 1:25:56.640
<v Speaker 2>so anyways, twelve, it's really flat. Absolutely, you kind of

1:25:56.640 --> 1:25:58.400
<v Speaker 2>get on the green and you're like, huh.

1:25:58.840 --> 1:26:00.880
<v Speaker 3>But you could argue that that's kind of a virtue

1:26:00.920 --> 1:26:01.360
<v Speaker 3>of it.

1:26:01.360 --> 1:26:02.280
<v Speaker 2>It is a virtue.

1:26:02.360 --> 1:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>It is.

1:26:02.920 --> 1:26:05.960
<v Speaker 3>It's variety, it's very it's variety in the round. But

1:26:06.000 --> 1:26:10.679
<v Speaker 3>it's also just like you hit the green, it's enough

1:26:11.080 --> 1:26:13.280
<v Speaker 3>as it is that what we have. You know, you

1:26:13.320 --> 1:26:17.160
<v Speaker 3>can you can almost recreate the thought process that went

1:26:17.240 --> 1:26:20.840
<v Speaker 3>behind making that green, unlike the rest of them making

1:26:20.880 --> 1:26:24.160
<v Speaker 3>it basically dead flat. And I think the thought process was,

1:26:24.320 --> 1:26:27.200
<v Speaker 3>look at what this hole is, we don't need to

1:26:27.280 --> 1:26:29.160
<v Speaker 3>introduce any more elements to it.

1:26:31.320 --> 1:26:34.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it's number two on my list. Absolutely.

1:26:36.360 --> 1:26:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to say why it wasn't number one. Yeah, absolutely,

1:26:40.200 --> 1:26:44.360
<v Speaker 2>all right, just a key takeaway I had, sure, I

1:26:44.400 --> 1:26:49.640
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of it's very hard to get to

1:26:49.840 --> 1:26:57.000
<v Speaker 2>design par fives in the modern era this golf course. Uh,

1:26:57.120 --> 1:27:00.519
<v Speaker 2>the par fives I had, Whole two was number eight,

1:27:01.680 --> 1:27:05.719
<v Speaker 2>holl eight was number seven, Whole thirteen was number one,

1:27:06.479 --> 1:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and whole fifteen was number nine. I would have a

1:27:10.120 --> 1:27:16.040
<v Speaker 2>hard time. I just I can't think of another course

1:27:16.120 --> 1:27:22.479
<v Speaker 2>with as many great par fives like every par five is.

1:27:22.479 --> 1:27:27.360
<v Speaker 3>It's great as a set, yes, you know, because there's

1:27:27.520 --> 1:27:30.640
<v Speaker 3>there's so much variety as to what makes each of

1:27:30.680 --> 1:27:36.759
<v Speaker 3>those holes interesting, right because on two it's the land,

1:27:37.479 --> 1:27:41.479
<v Speaker 3>it's all about that piece of land. On eight it's

1:27:41.840 --> 1:27:44.719
<v Speaker 3>kind of like that. That the strategy, that one bunker

1:27:45.280 --> 1:27:47.280
<v Speaker 3>and the green complex. So I could go through the

1:27:47.320 --> 1:27:50.120
<v Speaker 3>part fives like this, but each each one stands out

1:27:50.160 --> 1:27:51.799
<v Speaker 3>for a different reason.

1:27:53.360 --> 1:27:56.160
<v Speaker 2>It's stunning. It's a stunning set. I mean it goes

1:27:56.200 --> 1:27:58.679
<v Speaker 2>with the par threes. The par threes are really good.

1:27:58.920 --> 1:28:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, are there any holes where we were discussing them

1:28:03.120 --> 1:28:05.280
<v Speaker 3>and you thought to yourself, I wish I'd put this

1:28:05.320 --> 1:28:07.080
<v Speaker 3>in a different place where I could be argued into

1:28:07.080 --> 1:28:08.280
<v Speaker 3>putting it in a different place.

1:28:08.360 --> 1:28:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm going to turn the tables and ask

1:28:10.280 --> 1:28:11.479
<v Speaker 2>you that question.

1:28:11.640 --> 1:28:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Do I have to apologize for putting three above thirteen?

1:28:15.920 --> 1:28:18.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm gonna get ripped on you know, social

1:28:18.720 --> 1:28:22.200
<v Speaker 3>media for this anyway. Yeah, I acknowledge that that it

1:28:22.240 --> 1:28:25.040
<v Speaker 3>looks ridiculous. But guess why so does the drive on thirteen.

1:28:25.280 --> 1:28:27.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, when I look at it, I do think

1:28:27.439 --> 1:28:31.720
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of crazy. I put eighteen seventeen. Yeah, but

1:28:31.800 --> 1:28:34.559
<v Speaker 2>that's how the cookie crumbled. By first go listen.

1:28:34.960 --> 1:28:35.800
<v Speaker 3>This was not me.

1:28:35.920 --> 1:28:39.440
<v Speaker 2>I did not deliberate over this. This was a gut reaction.

1:28:39.720 --> 1:28:41.920
<v Speaker 2>This is what the numbers feelings based.

1:28:42.080 --> 1:28:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I could be, but we've had a discussion now,

1:28:44.880 --> 1:28:46.639
<v Speaker 3>and we've had some time to reflect. I think it's

1:28:46.640 --> 1:28:50.479
<v Speaker 3>interesting to look at and reflect ten. For me, I

1:28:50.520 --> 1:28:54.040
<v Speaker 3>had it at number seven. That could be higher. Yeah,

1:28:54.080 --> 1:28:55.800
<v Speaker 3>I think I feel like ten is better than one.

1:28:55.960 --> 1:28:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I had one above it. Yeah, I can see that

1:29:00.720 --> 1:29:04.280
<v Speaker 3>overall though fairly. I mean the spirit of our lists

1:29:04.840 --> 1:29:07.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of similar, which is not surprising because you and

1:29:07.760 --> 1:29:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I believe in in kind of similar architectural principles. But

1:29:12.000 --> 1:29:13.840
<v Speaker 3>but there were some similarities in the list.

1:29:14.000 --> 1:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>We should have We should have had someone like Rhys

1:29:16.360 --> 1:29:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Jones on to do this exercise.

1:29:18.360 --> 1:29:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe maybe different school.

1:29:21.520 --> 1:29:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the nextideration is we get somebody that just has

1:29:24.880 --> 1:29:29.960
<v Speaker 2>like completely different thoughts on golf courses and we put them,

1:29:30.160 --> 1:29:31.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the in the rating show.

1:29:31.680 --> 1:29:33.840
<v Speaker 3>I could think of a few people who would do

1:29:33.880 --> 1:29:34.439
<v Speaker 3>that pretty well.

1:29:34.680 --> 1:29:38.839
<v Speaker 2>All right, Garrett, thank you uh for coming on uh

1:29:38.880 --> 1:29:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and being a part of this podcast. Big Matt rusis

1:29:44.760 --> 1:29:45.920
<v Speaker 2>working hard this week.

1:29:46.840 --> 1:29:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, he's a hard working man.

1:29:49.160 --> 1:29:52.559
<v Speaker 2>He was he's uh now now he's back to doing production.

1:29:52.760 --> 1:29:55.160
<v Speaker 2>He was doing lots of shooting early in the week.

1:29:55.400 --> 1:29:57.400
<v Speaker 3>He produced this episode, right, he did what.

1:29:57.479 --> 1:29:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to What do you want to remind

1:29:59.240 --> 1:30:01.559
<v Speaker 2>people to do? What should they be doing this week?

1:30:01.600 --> 1:30:04.160
<v Speaker 2>It's a master's week. To the middle of the week,

1:30:04.400 --> 1:30:07.240
<v Speaker 2>there's probably been a content fawcet. I mean, we're at

1:30:07.240 --> 1:30:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the at the tip of the content faucet when we're

1:30:10.800 --> 1:30:13.200
<v Speaker 2>recording this. But what what do you think they should do?

1:30:13.240 --> 1:30:15.519
<v Speaker 2>What's the one thing they should do they enjoy the

1:30:15.560 --> 1:30:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Frida egg.

1:30:16.240 --> 1:30:19.639
<v Speaker 3>I think you should consider subscribing to Club TFE if

1:30:19.680 --> 1:30:20.440
<v Speaker 3>you enjoy.

1:30:20.280 --> 1:30:23.040
<v Speaker 2>What we're joining now joining, not subscribing.

1:30:23.040 --> 1:30:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Should not use the word subscribe.

1:30:24.439 --> 1:30:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I have a subscription.

1:30:25.400 --> 1:30:28.559
<v Speaker 3>It's a membership you're joining, You're joining the membership. Okay,

1:30:28.600 --> 1:30:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I was off brand there for a second. I apologize. Yeah,

1:30:32.240 --> 1:30:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Club TFI and you know, my usual pitch for Club

1:30:34.960 --> 1:30:38.280
<v Speaker 3>TFI is all the exclusive content that we offer there,

1:30:38.760 --> 1:30:42.639
<v Speaker 3>which I love, I love doing and when I see

1:30:43.120 --> 1:30:45.400
<v Speaker 3>other things that people are doing for Club TFE on

1:30:45.479 --> 1:30:48.599
<v Speaker 3>our team, I'm always super impressed and glad that we

1:30:48.680 --> 1:30:51.240
<v Speaker 3>can do this as part of our membership, as a

1:30:51.280 --> 1:30:53.960
<v Speaker 3>result of the support from our members. But I think

1:30:54.000 --> 1:30:56.200
<v Speaker 3>that if you're listening to this pod on Master's week

1:30:56.680 --> 1:31:00.320
<v Speaker 3>consider you know, whether you have had fun listening to

1:31:00.479 --> 1:31:05.360
<v Speaker 3>our podcasts or reading our articles and just see what

1:31:05.400 --> 1:31:10.000
<v Speaker 3>we're offering. That is at another level for Frida Egg.

1:31:10.120 --> 1:31:11.960
<v Speaker 3>So if you, if you, if you like what we're doing,

1:31:12.040 --> 1:31:14.439
<v Speaker 3>I think you would love what we're doing at Club TFI.

1:31:14.680 --> 1:31:17.720
<v Speaker 2>If you're at this point on this podcast, I think

1:31:17.720 --> 1:31:19.200
<v Speaker 2>you'd love Club TFI.

1:31:19.720 --> 1:31:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Be stuck with us so far?

1:31:21.000 --> 1:31:23.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, We'll be back next week with a with

1:31:23.360 --> 1:31:26.759
<v Speaker 2>a Master's recap. But thanks for listening. I hope everybody

1:31:26.840 --> 1:31:28.240
<v Speaker 2>has a great Master's Weekend.