WEBVTT - This Is China's Plan To Be A Technology Powerhouse By The Year 2025

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joel and I'm Tracy Alloway. So, Tracy, I think, um,

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're obviously in the midst of this ongoing

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>trade dispute between US and China. Lots of big questions

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>about what's going to happen there. We talked with Brad

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Setser a few weeks ago about this topic, but it's

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.319
<v Speaker 1>such a big topic. I feel like there's a lot

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>more to cover. Yeah, I I totally agree with you.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I remember when we spoke to Brad, there was one

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>section in particular of US China trade relations that you

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>were quite interested in, which was the intellectual property proportion.

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>And the US is always accusing China of trying to

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>steal its technological expertise or it's intellectual property. Meanwhile, China

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is always saying that it's trying to cultivate its own

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>home grown expertise. Yeah, and I think that this trade

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>dispute is probably one of the first times that the

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>American public, to the extent that the American public is

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to trade disputes, is really learning about the

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>full extent of China's ambitions to be a real global

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>leader in many high tech industries, and that there is

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>a very extensive plan in place to really get ahead

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>from at least where they are right now. Well, I guess,

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, you wouldn't expect much else from a

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>centrally planned economy, right, I mean, people talk about China liberalizing,

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but at its heart it's still very much a sort

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of command economy with a huge degree of power coming

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>from the ruling class. I guess, yeah, And I think

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. And of course there're gonna be a

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who question whether a centrally planned economy

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>really can be an innovative leader. I think in technologies

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we often sort of I think we sort of associate

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>innovation with free market capitalism quite a bit, and China

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>is perhaps trying to show that there is another model

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>for how you can get there, well, not just free

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>market capitalism. You think of technological innovation, you think sort

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Silicon Valley model, right, A bunch of guys

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of sat in a garage somewhere coming up with

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>brilliant ideas, and because of the way our economy is structured,

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they're allowed to act on those ideas and eventually build

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>successful businesses. So it's almost a cultural difference. I guess yeah.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's well put. So anyway, today we're going

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>to be talking to someone who is actually one of

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the first people to introduce me to this idea, and

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>so I'm very excited to talk to him. He's Dan Wong.

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>He is a analyst at gav quel Dragon Omics. He's

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a technology analyst based in Hong Kong there and he

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>has been following China's ambitions to really grow its own

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>homegrown technology sector for a while and he joined us. Now, hey, damn,

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.679
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us. Hey guys, thanks for having me on.

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with the big picture. What is the

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Made in China initiatives? Sure thing so Made in China

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is a comprehensive industrial upgrading plan that the government unfailed

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>three years ago. Its targets about twenty different technologies for

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>broad technological leadership. These include things like semiconductors, telecom equipment, robotics,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles, medical devices and pharmaceuticals, aviation equipment, and a

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of other things. To make it happen, that

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government is offering an enormous amount of credit,

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>subsidies and policy support to make it all work. So,

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear, we think of a lot of

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>high tech manufacturing already happening in China. US tech giants

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>like Apple obviously work with big Chinese tech companies to

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>assemble their iPhones. But I guess the idea is that

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that is sort of still pretty low

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on the value chain labor type stuff, and that the

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>real innovative stuff on things like semiconductors that you mentioned,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>that's still not really happening in China. Yeah, that's right.

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>So basically, the further downstream you go, the more that

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>China looks pretty innovative. So Chinese companies have become pretty

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>good at making consumer goods and offering fun our retail experiences.

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>China is also the only country aside from the US

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to have built big internet companies, namely ten Cent and

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba. I used to work in Silicon Valley, and

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>the level of dynamism I observed in the tech scenes

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of Beijing and Shinjen our justice and pressive as what

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw when I worked in California. But basically, if

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you look a little bit more upstream at what the

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>at the more upstream segments of China's technology foundations, it's

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>really quite weak. So China is pretty heavily dependent on

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>other countries for semiconductors, airplanes, machinery goods, and many other things.

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad you brought up the iPhone. So the

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>full value of an iPhone is booked as a Chinese export,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but only about ten percent of the value added was

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>actually generated in China. So that means it's the value

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of the labor used in assembling the phone and a

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>few of the components. But the most important technologies are

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>not actually Chinese. The processor for the phone is coming

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>from Taiwan, the memory chips are coming from Korea, the

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>screen from Korea, and so on. So China would be

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>much happier if the value added generated in the country

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>actually approaches little closer to the full value of the

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>iPhone export. And so I think that's a good way

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of seeing what is about So jan why are they

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>focused on these particular technologies, because I guess the law

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of comparative advantage in economics would suggest that they should

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>keep doing what they've been doing, what they're good at

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>um and instead they're they're clearly trying to branch out

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>into things that they haven't done before, So why is

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>that sure? So I think there are three big reasons

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that China is trying to do made in China. First

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of all, the GDP per capita is now close to

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>about ten thousand dollars and at that level it's close

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 1>to middle income status defined by the World Bank. And

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the World Bank has also come up with this concept

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>called the middle income trap, which is a fairly common

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>term that you can see in the domestic media, and

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the middle income trap in the original World Bank formulation

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>outlines the problem in industrializing country faces when it gets

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>squeezed tween poorer countries which have cheap labor and richer

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>countries which have advanced technologies. So only a small handful

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of countries have managed to pull out of the middle

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>income trap, and China is really obsessed with leaving it. Japan,

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>South Korea, and Taiwan each managed to escape the middle

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>income trap by climbing various technological pinnacles, almost always with

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the help of the state, and is the Chinese government's

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>plan to climb a bunch of related or different technological pinnacles.

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's one reason that China wants to do this.

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>A second element is there's this bit of economic security

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and its concerns. So a fairly salient data point that

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>shows how dependent China is on foreign technologies is that

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>every year it imports more semiconductors by value than it

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>does crude oil. Now, some countries go to pretty great

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>lens to secure their supply of oil, and China wants

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to secure its supply of semiconductors by creating strong domestic companies.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And third, there's this national security element to it as well.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>When I talk to Chinese, a name keeps coming up Snowden.

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So the Snowden documents revealed that, you know, the US

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>tech companies have been fairly cozy with the US government. Uh,

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And China's importing hundreds of billions of dollars worth of

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>American semiconductors every year, and it doesn't want to be

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>spied on because it has to import these things. It's

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>funny because obviously a big source of anxiety here these

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>days is the fear of being spied on with goods

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that the US imports from China or Russia. So interesting

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that it the anxiety goes in both directions, though, I

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>guess that's just sort of perhaps to be expected. All right,

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the mechanics that the government is actually

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>using to foster this technological leap forward. How does it

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>allocate resources or know how much to invest and say,

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors versus medical equipment versus wide body planes. What does

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>it do specifically and how does it make those decisions? Sure,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's trying to catch up to the technological frontier, UH,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and to do so, I think you need at least

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>three things. One of that is money, another is I

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>P the technology, and the third is this process knowledge

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>or what we can also call tacit knowledge managerial expertise

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>or no. How So, if we look at each of

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>these segments, we can pretty much assume that money is

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a problem. The state is going

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to be UH is going to provide a lot of

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>credit subsidies to build up these industries. There's a lot

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>of figures we see floating around, some as high as

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>three hundred billion US dollars that the that the government

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is willing to spend on this and about hundred thirty

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. So that is e R MAR for semiconductors alone,

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's just from the government. There will be private

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>funds that will invest too. The second element when you

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>look at technology of China trying to acquire I P.

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the best thing to read on this is

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the U s TRS Section three or one report. It

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>prepares a pretty comprehensive case of all the ways that

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>China tries to obtain technology UH. These include trying to

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>venture requirements for foreign firms, compulsory licensing schemes, administrative demands

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for technology transfer, strategic overseas investments, and what the U

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>s TR calls unauthorized cyber intrusions. And finally, in terms

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of know how, which is the knowledge that exists in

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>people's heads that are hard to write down and actually

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>give as instructions. China has been fairly active in trying

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to recruit people from overseas to share expertise. A lot

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>of this involves trying to get overseas Chinese to move

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to China, but they also try to hire foreigners from

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>all parts of the world. So is it easier or

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is it better to be able to sort of buy

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a tech industry like that or create a tech industry

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like that with this sort of centralized planning versus what

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in Western countries where the tech industry sort

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of grows up in some cases relatively natural, Like what

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>are the differences between those two industries. So I think

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the big thing to keep in mind is that China

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is trying to catch up to the technological frontier for

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>most of these things. There are a few of its

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>technologies which seem to be at the technological frontier, and

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>so these things would include I would say solar panels,

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 1>telecom equipment, high speed rail, and wind turbines. China seems

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to be already fairly advanced in all of these before

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>all the rest things like semiconductors, aviation equipment, pharmaceuticals. China

0:11:55.640 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>is trying to follow a path that another country or

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>company has already plazed. So in terms of trying to

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:09.839
<v Speaker 1>just basically reach what the what the what the technological

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>front here is today, I think that's that that that

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a almost a qualitative difference with UH,

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this sustained innovation that we see UH in in the

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>US of just incrementally pushing that technological frontier forward. I'm

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>so curious about the specifics of the resource allocation. So

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned a hundred and thirty billion dollars to invest

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in UH semiconductor development, But who gets the money other

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>startups that apply for grants? Are there existing state owned

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>companies that then launched semiconductor units, how do they actually

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>go and go about allocating it? And then you know,

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I assume it goes to multiple companies. Who decides who's

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>leading the way and then gets further allocation, and then

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>who decides you know, you're not cutting it. This project

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't going anywhere because I think in a lot of

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>people's minds, this is where they see the free market

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>doing a good job of, in theory, figuring out the

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 1>winners and losers and allocating more to the winners. So

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>how does China solve that problem? So pretty much this

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>is um pretty much entirely decided by the state. So

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>China has a bunch of money available. Some of it

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it will allocate to some of the existing semiconductor foundries

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>fabs that have already been around, and then some of

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it will go towards just totally fresh efforts. So, for example,

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>China basically has not done UH, does not have much

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of a position in making memory chips at all, and

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>so the government basically decided to put something like UH

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>thirty to forty billion dollars between these UH four different

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor fabs in Central China, So these were fresh efforts.

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 1>The process of which city would get a memory fab

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>was not entirely transparent. They're dispersed across a couple of

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>big cities in central China, and they were they were

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>given this money from the central government, from the from

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the local government, from the provincial government, and also from

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>other state owned companies. So these things are not super transparent,

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably correct to suspect that a lot of

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this is driven by political connections. And that's just in

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the case of semiconductors. So if in seven years time

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we wake up and China has built a world class

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor industry, is that going to discredit the sort of

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>western um pre economy way of doing things. Does that

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>suggest that maybe the Chinese model is correct. I'm not

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>sure that it does. I think that if China manages

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to catch up, basically, UH, this be another case of

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>there is some success of protectionism. Basically, if you look

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>at every country that has industrialized after Britain, did the US, Germany, Meiji, Japan,

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>uh and UH. More recently, the East Asian countries. They

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>each built their industries with some level of teriff protections,

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>teriff protections, some level of government support, some level of

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to acquire technologies from overseas and plowing state subsidies,

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>especially in more recent times, plowing state subsidies into trying

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to build to try to catch up to the technological

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>front here. And that's pretty much what China is doing.

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>China has taken a look at basically the memory industry

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is pretty interesting. Actually, uh memory was in d RAM

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>was invented by this small American company named Intel. The

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>US got pretty good at making d RAM. Japan took

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a look at memory, thought that it could do it

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>as well, built up its memory industry, turned out to

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>be pretty successful, mostly drove US players out of business.

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And then the Koreans did pretty much exactly the same

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>things to Japan, and Taiwan also tried to do this

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to Korea. So at least in memory chips, at least

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we see that there is this progression of leadership helped

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>by different countries. Right now, it's been Korea has continued

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the leader in making memory chips, and China

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is trying to unseat to Korea as Korea and seated Japan. Yeah.

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to follow up a little further and push

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the question about the U S model. You mentioned you

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>used to work in Silicon Valley. Is there a myth

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that we have about Silicon Valley that's incorrect where we

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>imagine all these people toiling away and their garages, raising

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>money from friends and family and then building the next

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Hewlett Packard or Intel, We're Google, and that we end

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>up downplaying the all that federal subsidies and federal industrial

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>planning or military planning played in the fostering of U

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 1>S technology. I think that's a great question, and to

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>some extent, Silicon Valley itself downplaced this story. I think, UH,

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors were initially bootstrapped by a lot of government spending,

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>including for for the space program and also for the military.

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 1>So Silicon Valley, you know, silicon is in the name,

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>comes from semiconductors, and that was significantly bootstrapped by federal

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>funding UH and UH federal subsidies. UM, if we wanted

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to think about, you know, what is the opposite model

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of innovation UH from from Silicon Valley, I would say

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>something like what we see in Germany Germany has basically

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong culture of engineering that it's kept through

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>many decades, arguably many centuries. And I was in Germany

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>for a research trip a couple of weeks ago and

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>listening to some of them explained basically, the German model

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of innovation is that they've built these systems of quality

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>improvement to incrementally improve their technologies. UH. They have these

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>systems of corporate encouragement, of vocational training, bridge between academia

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 1>and companies. UH, this very strong sense that older people

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>have to transfer their knowledge to the younger people. That

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.719
<v Speaker 1>is kind of what we see the opposite of what

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>we see in Silicon Valley. Both of these places I

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>think are fairly innovative, but in different ways. So should

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the world be at all concerned over China's plans? Here?

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Over the plans, is there any reason to worry if

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>if they're essentially just pursuing protectionist measures that other countries

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>at one time or another seemed to do themselves, I

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think there is a pretty good reason and to worry.

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So Chinese industrial policy has created a lot of overcapacity,

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for example in UH, in sectors like steel and solar panels,

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>over capacity crushes everyone's profits, so that might reduce aggregate

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>R and D spending and thereby slowing overall innovation around

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the world. And I think if we take a look

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more closely at the experience of high

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>speed rail companies, that's also another cause for concern. So UM.

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>When China was trying to build its high speed rail network,

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>there were four companies that were around to basically supply

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it for high speed rail. It was Seamens of Germany,

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Kawasaki Heavy Industries of Japan, Bombardier of Canada, and Austam

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of France. UH. They brought their technologies to China, and

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>China basically was in a pretty strong negotiating position at

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the time. There weren't that many other countries building high

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>speed rail systems, and so ch ask these companies to

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>transfer their technologies as a condition for accessing the Chinese market,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and these four companies basically decided that they had to

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>agree to transfer these technologies to domestic joint venture partners.

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>The domestic joint venture partners digested their technology uh the

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Chinese term for for absorbing foreign technologies, and then they

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:27.959
<v Speaker 1>out computed these companies in the Chinese domestic market. So

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>these foreign firms gave their technologies to um Chinese firms. Uh,

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>they first lost the China market, and then they had

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to compete with Chinese companies in the global market. So

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that's another cautionary tale that makes people nervous about the

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>success of And then there is this other aspect that

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the US is concerned about. China's doesn't allow much reciprocity.

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So China can invest in important companies of other countries,

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't allow foreign companies to really invest in

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>important domestic projects. It's a fairly protectionist place, and it's

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>not a level playing field. You mentioned the overcapacity issue.

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>The flip side is that for many of the things

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that China is building, there could be tremendous benefit to

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the consumers of those good So one area that comes

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to mind in recent years is the incredible collapse we've

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>seen in the cost of solar panels all around the world.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>The estimate for when solar would reach price parity with

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>other energy technologies have all proven to be way too pessimistic,

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and solar prices continue to plunge much faster than people expect.

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's a theoretically benefit too many people around the world.

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>And uh sort of Chinese industrial policy has played a

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>big role in that. Yeah, I think that's a pretty

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>good example. If solar panels are really good for the environment,

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>then this could be something that people can be glad about.

0:21:56.400 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's also possible that can be good

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>for the world more broadly because downstream businesses can benefit

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. So capital goods industries tend to be

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty consolidated. If you want to buy memory chips, basically

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you only have three companies making d ram It's Samsun, SKA,

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>high Nes, Micron, and that's it. So I've spoken to

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a smart phonemaker who told me that, you know, if

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government is willing to spend billions and subsidies

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to lift Samsung's thumb from his business, uh, they're not

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>going to complain about that. UM aviation is famously a

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>duopoly between Boeing and Airbus, and many of these capital

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 1>goods industries tend to be pretty consolidated. So if Chinese

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>competition comes in and UH introduces a little bit more competition, Uh,

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that could be good for downstream users of these technologies.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, so looking at the list of different industries

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>We've talked a lot about semi conductors, but there's obviously

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>others include a wide body aircraft, advanced medical devices. Is

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>there anything that you've seen so far in how the

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>different industries or the different technologies have progressed that suggests

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 1>that some of this is working better than others, or

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that this particular Chinese model of technological innovation might work

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>really well in some areas, but it has more obvious

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>limitations in the development of other areas. Sure, that's a

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>great question. UM so China has already succeeded in reaching

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the technological front here in a few industries UH and

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I cited solar panels, telecom equipment, high speed rail, and

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>wind turbans. And I think a couple of the things

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>that unite UH these together is one is UH the

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>UM nature of the buyers. So for basically all of

0:23:54.640 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>these midstream products, government is an important procure of these

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>UH different technology segments. And if government is a big procure,

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you can basically have UM provinces competing amongst themselves to

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>get the best telecom equipment or solar panel offering from

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>from these different companies, and then UH, basically these companies

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>can get pretty good at making these technologies because there's

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of government procurement of their products. Another is

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that these usually tend to have fairly long product cycles.

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So the longer the product cycle, the easier it is

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>for Chinese firms to catch up to the frontier before

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it moves away again. So that's another characteristic of these

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>different technologies. And China has had much less success trying

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to build through industrial policy more downstream goods, so things

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>like automobiles is something that the leadership concedes has been

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>a fairly big earlier in terms of trying to build

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>homegrown companies that are making really excellent cars that are

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>exportable as well. So the nature of the buyers, the

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 1>product cycle, these are all factors that play into how

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>successful industrial policy can be. Dan, that was a fascinating conversation.

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is a going to be well

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously a huge story for the years ahead, and regardless

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>of what happens with the trade talks right now, it

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just seems inevitable that there's going to be so much

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>more interest in the progression of China on these various

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>technological fronts in the years ahead. So thank you very

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>much for joining well, thank you back. Thanks for having

0:25:42.960 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>me on, Tracy. I really like that conversation, and why

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I liked it so much is the degree of specificity

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that Dan brought to the table in terms of this stuff.

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think we sort of lots of people

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe understand the sort of real broad strokes here about

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>China trying to acquire its own technology and the complaints

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that other countries have about how they're forced to hand

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>over technology in order to compete in the market. But

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to get in the weeds and learn about

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the specifics of how each industry operates in where they are. Yes,

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we know all about China's ambitious plans for advanced medical equipment.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Now I feel good about that. I think you're right.

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>It's an important conversation. It also throws up a lot

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of ideological questions around different economic models and also how

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>they develop, which I find really fascinating. And you know,

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the notion that China is being criticized for doing something

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>now that a lot of developed economies had done a

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred years ago or so. It's not really new, but

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you can see it's sort of an ongoing tension in

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the world economy. Yeah, and it is also a good

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>reminder that, yeah, as you say, it's not really new.

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Every country has had its own model that is some

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>combination of markets and private enterprise plus state directed R

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and D and subsidies. So there is a fair amount

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of double standard I think in this idea that suddenly

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>China is doing something really terrible or really really flouting

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the rules of development. Yeah, that's right. But one other

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>good thing about this conversation is it's only seven years until,

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of fascinating. So I guess we'll get

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to see the results of China's initiative here relatively soon.

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we'll still be doing odd lots in yeah,

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>seven years from now, and so let's schedule one for

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>seven years from now, and then we will will grade

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>them on how they did in each category. All right,

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting it in my diary right now, Joe. Okay,

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this has been another edition of the Odd Thoughts podcast.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allowaite. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Allowhite, and I'm Joe wisn'hal. You can follow me

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at the Stalwart, and you could follow Dan

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Dan w Wong. And you should follow

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>our producer top foreheads at for Hest, as well as

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Levy at Francesca Today.

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.