WEBVTT - Markets Haven't Reacted to the Shutdown, Lee Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm m keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Joining

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>us now, I'm pleased to say as a man whose

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>work has taken him from the Federal Reserve, to the

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>International Monetary Fund, to city and now to the Milken Institute,

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>where he joins us from it's Bill Lee, the chief

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>economist of the Milken Institute. Its great to catch up

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>with you, Mr Bill Lee. Um, can we just begin

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>with the government shutdown? And how much longer does this

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>need to go on before you start having to to

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>revise your first quarter GDP estimate in the United States? Well,

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a lot of noise, and I

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>think the mark It's treating it like a lot of noise.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think we'll do anything to our GDP

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers because, let's face it, the government workers get paid regardless,

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and and the thing that's disruptive right now is the

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>supply of government services, which on average really has been

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>relatively smooth so as far as our GDP forecast is concerned,

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no effect. One of the things that we should

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>be worried about is what this means for the prospect

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>of further policies like infrastructure and the rest of the

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump agenda. If we have children arguing about politics, the

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>best thing I think the president can do right now

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is get himself out of here, which is done. He's

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to dapost and talk about globalism and internationalism

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and how the world is going to have have this

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>world in transition, how we're going to manage policy in

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that world, and to be an adult in a playground

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of children in here in Washington. Well, let's some use

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>your phrasing the playground of children in Washington before we

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>get to Dabo, Swissland with Tom Kane bill Um, what

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>is this mean for the potential agreement if there could

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>be one around the dead sailing which is set to

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>come around in the next couple of months. Yeah, that's

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's key, Jonathan. I mean the act that we

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of months and and that we know

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the churchy can do something extraordinary measures to manage their

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. Uh markets as and as you know, just

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>have not reacted to this. And if you look at

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>past experience, the one thing that we always prioritize are

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the interest payments on the debt and and and not

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to go to technical default. So one of the things

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that that we should worry about then would be how

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it is that the politics starts to come into play

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>here and whether or not the political capital is being

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>used up on the part of the Republicans and Democrats,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>because neither side shows any sign of life. But then

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the policy, Remember the policy that worried about is immigration policy.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a global problem. That's why we had Brexit,

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>right because part of the reason is because the immigration

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>policy was was threatening a national sovereignty. So so this

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is a big issue of global issue and and I

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>think they have to address it. And I think right

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>now Congress has passed the book for so long, it's

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>about time the President says, look, do something about it.

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Building the Milk institu Chief Economists, you want to us

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to down Bloombecks advantage. I'm Jonathan Farall in New York City.

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Tom Kane over in Davos, Switzerland. Tom, good morning to you, sir.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Good morning John Farrell, a snowy DeVos record snow and DeVos,

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen a really detailed history of the January

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>snow here, but I am certain it is record back

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and even twenty five years, easily a hockey goal

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of snow on the ground all the way up and

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>down the mountain. And John, as you know, getting here

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>can be a challenge, and you know, I think there'll

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be some real challenges and getting the warm bodies up

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the mountain here in the next twenty four hours, warm

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 1>bodies not your south Tom, can you have to get

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the train all the way out the mountain. I suspect

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that the President the United States is going to take

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>around a different route up to the mountains that I'm

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that you took. Tom, Well, that's true. I think I

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>think the President's visit is clearly a high point here,

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>but of many high points. And William Lee, what was

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>so interesting this morning? And I guess it's not that

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I expected this, but it's the surprise of this Monday

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>folks at the at the meetings is the talk of

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Mr McCraw. He is Ben Billy on an international mission

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for France and for a certain McCraw macrown international economics

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>define that for our audience. What is the economics of

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the president of France. You know, Tom, we have both

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>joked in the past about how France is sort of

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>like the the hub of regulatory impass and policy impass,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>and how France really has seen it's better day in

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the past. Macrown is trying to change all that and

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to say our policies are gonna put France back

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>into the center of the dynamic of capitalism again. Now

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>I think we both are sort of chuckle and saying, well,

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>good luck on that, because you have a lot of

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy to overcome, a lot of historical regulation overcome. One

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of the things that that we need to make sure

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of is that the political leaders would come to Davos

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>talk a good story, but let's see the action. Last year,

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the president of jen Pain came from China and said,

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I am a globalist. And what's happened since then, One Belt,

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>one road is falling apart, trying to say TRYA is

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>just too dominant here and we just can't lease our

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>sovereignty to China. I think this this year, we need

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to watch out for what the political leaders say because

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it has to be backed by action. I've got to say, Bill,

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the point you make that, Tom, the idea that the

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>president of China was able to go to Davil Switzon

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and claimed to be a globalist is something that's still

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>still makes me shake my head to this day. I agree,

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and I will say this in folks, this is my

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth year up Happy Valley. I will say that this

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>valley came to a total stop when the President of

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>China spoke last year. I wonder if that's gonna happen

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on Friday with a scheduled speech of the President, Bill Ye,

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>what kind of economy is a president bringing with us

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>he wants to take a victory lab I'm now twenty

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>six thousand. Is it a three percent GDP economy? Tom?

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It took Nixon to go to China, is going to

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>take Trump to talk about globalism. And I think one

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we're gonna see is a new

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of globalism that includes national priorities. And I hope

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he makes that speech. I hope it makes that transition

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's so important. One of the things that we're

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>going to worry about in our own milk and conference

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in in later April early May is navigating a world

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in transition, and I think one of the things that

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that that differs from what you guys are addressing is

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>that you see, the world is fractured right now, and

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>how do you deal with that fractured nous? Navigating that

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>transition is part of that fractured nous, and I think

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that that that has to be

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>done is to have policies in place that take into

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>account the realities of the world. We have political fractured nous,

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>we have economic fracturedness, and financial fractured nous. But now

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>how do you navigate that? And I think that's one

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of the themes that we'll be discussing in Los Angeles.

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So come to the warm weather. It's on. But this

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be a difference between globalism and nationalism.

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>When the President the United States goes to DAVL. Switzer

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and I go back to the idea that the Chinese

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>president was able to go to Davos and claim to

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>be a globalist, why is this administration failing to deliver

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>what is quite a simple message that the current framework

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>for global trade is not there, It is not a

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>level playing field. The Chinese still have significant barriers to

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.559
<v Speaker 1>entry at the same time they are leveraging the open

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>door to markets in Europe and to markets in the

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>United States as well. Why is this administration really failing

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to deliver what is at his core quite a simple

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and basic message that I think many economists might agree

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>with that there needs to be a leveling of the

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>playing field here. Absolutely, And I think it's unfortunate that

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the election placed Trump in this in this box that

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>characterized him as some wild man who's gonna shut down

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>trade and shut down all the borders and shut down

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>all of the entry into the US and make it

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>an isolated or target economy. One that that is the

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>image that he's got to get rid of and say, look,

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we're part of the global economy and we're trying to

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>develop internationalism into a bilaber set of bilateral deals instead

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of this big, massive multilateral deal that nobody's happy with.

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And so so the essence is the new shaping of

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>policy initiatives has got to be to deal more with

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the reality is the world and how to address them. Finally, Bill,

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>can he do that? This week? Boy fingers crossed. I

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>think the talk among the globalists and internationalist is the

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>guy isn't smart enough to really pull this off. And

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I hope he's going to surprise him on the upside

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on that, because right now the British obleek crowd are

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>writing it off and say he's just going to make

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a fool of himself. Let's see if he does. Bill

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Ye Milkin Institute Chief Economist. He joins us to discuss

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the global economy. This is Bloomberg Surveillance with myself, Jonathan

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Pharaoh in New York City and Tom Keane in Davos, Switzerland,

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>all week on Bloomberg Radio. What better time to bring

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in a guest who has created and produced high profile

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>platforms including the World Economic Forum and You're meeting at Davos,

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the Clinton Global Initiative, and the Noble Laureates Conferences, just

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to name a few you. His name is Richard Attias

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of Richard Attias and Associates. Richard, it's always great to

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>have you with us on the program. Thank you for

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>having me. Let's imagine you're putting together a big event.

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It's in the Mountains of Devils, Switzerland, and then all

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, the President of the United States decides

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to attend just a couple of weeks

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>before it kicks off. How much trouble does that cause?

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh you know, it happened in two thousand when President

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Clinton decided to come. I think it was the last

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>one who came. Of course, it's a logistic nimer, usually

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Air Force one just landing Zurich when you have to

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>probably take helicopters to go to Davos, and we don't

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>know what would be the weather on Friday, which is

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the second potential nightmare with the snow, because if the

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>snow do not allow helicopters to land, if they have

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to take cars, which is another backstory. And then definitely

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the city is much looked than any any other day,

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and usually when the room is backed, everyone wants to

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>attend the station. Definitely, the president of your night state,

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>whoever he is, is by definition or rock star, so

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a nightmare, and the city is people are

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>making big lines, so you can guess how it is

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 1>when the President of the United States of America is

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>going somewhere. So it's even worse than a very small

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>ski resort with snow and and three thousand delegates, including

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>big global CEOs, who do not understand why they should

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>wait to to give room to the President of the

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>United States of American. Kane also hates waiting, Richard, And

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a group of big egos, so you have to

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 1>manage these egos, Rachel, I guess a big question and

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>logistical nightmare. But surely this is a pr dream. Yes, no, definitely.

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think President Trump if he goes, because,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, I would not be surprised depending on

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>what happened with the government shutdown, if we suddenly learned

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that he's not going anymore. But I think it doesn't care.

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, he wants to go there. He wants

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>to talk to this elite. I'm sure he wants to

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit provocative. And as you know better

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>than me, his way of communication is direct communication. He

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>cannot just continue to talk through Twitter. He doesn't want

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to make big interviews. So who will go and he

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>will be on stage. What will be interesting to see

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and to watch is which format the Print of the

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>United States will adopt, will be only a speech between

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>behind the lecturing with no questions, or if he will

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>accept to maybe take two three question, probably not from

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the floor from the audience, but president probably from the

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>founder of the World Economic Farm, which probably will be

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 1>with him on stage. I hope that this question, if

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>they happen, will be very direct and it will help

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to learn what is happening and what is in the

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>mind of the President Trump. That's a terrific summary. And

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, as comes from your your decades of experience

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>for chard, well, when I look at the options that

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the president has, which would you would I will do?

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely do both. Which is delivering a twenty

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>minute speech followed by probably a ten fifteen minute Q

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>n A station Why because people need to understand really

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>what President Trump has in mind, especially with all these reforms.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>We know that he would probably talk for twenty minutes

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>about how America is great, the best place to invest,

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>because he will be competing with many other destinations. You know,

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>each single world leaders who are in divorce from President

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Macrie of Argentina, President mccron France, and probably even Theresa

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>May in the big paradox of the Brexit, are going

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>to divorce to explain to world leaders that their country

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is the best place to invest today. And at the

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>time is now President mccron is hosting the minute We're

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>talking in Paris a pre divorce forum at Versailles in

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the Castle of Oversailles with one d and fifty global

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>CEO who accepted his invitation, which was sent on the

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>end of December. So this is showing you how world

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>leaders are in permanent now connection with global CEOs and

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>how global CEOs wants to be connected to world leaders.

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So back to President Trump, I think definitely he should

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>explain what he's doing. You know, everybody is watching the

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>great stock markets in America, so people have to understand

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 1>if it is a bubble or if it is solid,

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and why I should put my money in the American industries.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And when I look at the list of potential members

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of cabinet coming with him, definitely they will have bilateral

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>meetings talking about transportation, health, scare, energy. These are definitely

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the sectors where people wants to probably see opportunities in

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the country. Richards of Richard ass and Associates great catch

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 1>up with you to kind of lean on your experience

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 1>of putting up events like the World Economic Forum in

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Switzen together. As the President of the United States

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is sent to descend on Switzerland, John, the snow is

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so great here and it is not funny. It is

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>very serious in Switzerland, and that of course is avalanches.

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I have never seen the warnings out. There's Zermont I

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>believe is closed again, down to the south and um,

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just everywhere. It's here. Here's the report at five

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>pm last night. John, you'll love this site. Psalms to

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>go ben schnee gafallen as Edward teddy Off Montaugs invite

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>there Stark schniffal voras gagnd. That's very helpful. That's about it.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>That is about as clear as a government shutdown language Washington.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Which is a good way to migrate in German or

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>fractured German, I should say to the fractured nation and

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is shut down, Greg Valier, where this is German is

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is better than anybody's. German is better than mine. Greg,

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>good morning. You have seen you've seen many shutdowns. The

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>one that's so different here is this White House response.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>What will you listen for or look for from the

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>White House in the next forty eight hours? Well, Tom,

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>something explicit, something coherent from the President. I mean, so

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>far it's very unclear. Just what do you want? I

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I look at it, Greg, and I think all of

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>us have read the obligatory articles, and we've looked at

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the obligatory things and open question. What sticks out to

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg Valier about what went down? What? What? What made

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you scratch your head at two am? All beyond any question, Tom,

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Schumer put the wall on the tape. Boy,

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>he is willing to negotiate on the wall. Very unclear

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>as to how much money. They're talking about different versions,

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>but he did put that on the table, and I

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's important. Greg alone wants you a question about

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the term the white House. Tom asked you where the

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>White House stands on this issue. It's not clear to

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>me that the view of the say White House is

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the view of the President of the United States.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't seem to be one coherent view within the

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>White House. Is something that Tom's asked me about this morning.

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you see a coherent White House here? Greg, Well,

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>when you look at two important aids, the chief is

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>past John Kelly and this fellow Miller. I mean, they

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>both are very hard line on immigration. They don't want

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>consul citizenship, they want a wall, they don't want chain immigration,

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, so that they are taking a hard line.

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>The problem is when the president gets into a negotiating session,

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>he spens he wants to be conciliatory, and then these

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>advisors yanked him right back. So what leads to reconciliation

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>here is that the polls went against one party versus

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the other. What leads to a break here? That could

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>be it, But frankly, I think this is going to

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>go on for a very long time. Even if there's

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a deal today to keep the government open until February eight,

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that just means we have another crisis on February eighth,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and we could go that right back into a shutdown again.

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's the problem. Both parties have activists on the right

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and on the left who will not agree to a

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>centrist deal, and these activists could preclude a deal quite

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>a while. You do this, Greg, in your report this morning,

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you say the center may not hold. I get that,

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>but there has to be a catalyst to common sense.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>What's the catalyst? Well, I think Ms McConnell plays a

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>big role here. He he's very conscious that they could

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>have big losses in the November elections. I think he

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>also was a gas at this idea of changing the

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>filibuster rule. I think he feels that many people do.

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Schumer overplayed his hand. So I think McConnell could play

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>actually a very constructive role. Okay, So so he can

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>play a constructive role, and I guess we need leadership.

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Let me circle back to my first question. If we

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>all assume, whether we support Mr Trump or not, that

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>this president is a political neophyte, where's the person to

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>teach him what to do in these unusual circumstances. I

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I Lindsey Graham is clearly front and center, is a

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>unique kind of Southern always intriguing Republican. But where's the

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>helper of the president in this mess? It could be

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in McConnell. I think Graham is a bit tainted at

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the White House. You know another thing that could maybe

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>chasing this president, since he's so obsessed with the markets.

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>If the dollar in the market start to weaken based

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>on a seer of utter chaos in this city, that's

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>something that would get Trump's attention. Well, Greg, that's not

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna work because it's not happening yet. And I remember

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>when the president, not his states she used to be

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>called barracabam in President Obama came out and said things

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>like the market should be worried, and it was the

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>odd dead seating debate. And guess what, the market wasn't worried,

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>so it wouldn't be the first one that try to

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>lean on the market to move things along. Give framed

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>this as an activist Democrats versus activists Republican story, and

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>within the core of those parties, within the electorate remains

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>those activists on either side. But are those activists willing

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to shut down the government for their cause? Does that

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>support remain? Yes, I do. I think for now they are,

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and as we as we discussed earlier, maybe if the

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>polls turn, it would change attitudes, but right now they're

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>dug in pretty good. And again I would caution everyone

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>if there's a deal in the next day or two

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 1>or three, that does not mean we get anything by

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>February eight. And this we could go right back into

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>a crisis in two and a half week. So, Greg,

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>what does a crisis actually look like? It's a strong word.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>What's the crisis in the nation's council? Yeah, I think

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a crisis is eight or nine hundred thousand people out

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of work and that eventually have an impact on consumer spending. Uh,

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it certainly has an impact on defense contractors who already

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>are confused. We're four months into a new fiscal year

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 1>and they don't know what their budgets are going to be.

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So this does become a confidence issue. We're not there yet,

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>but at three or four or five weeks shutdown and

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I think confidence starts to erode. So correct, Let's get

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to the bigger issue. The markets looking the other way

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>as far as the governments shutdown is concerned, at least

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>for now, might change, but it isn't at the moment.

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the debt ceiling debate. What's the read

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>across from this to the debt ceiling debate and how

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>ugly that could be in the coming months. Yeah, this

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is just like the order. This is like the appetizer.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>The death failing story probably will peak in early April.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And here's here's the bottom line. There are not enough

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>votes to raise the death failing, certainly not enough votes

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>among Republicans who won't do it. Will Democrats go along

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>and cooperate? I'm not so sure. Oh yeah, thank you

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>so much. Greatly appreciate the briefing. After what has been

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and exhausted, we can we can. It's say enough about

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>his Horizon investment effort to greet our morning with his

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>perspective on capital. I have really been looking forward to

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>this discussion. It's away from Davos, I guess, it's away

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>from economics, I guess, And maybe it's just about where

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we're all heading in our homes. Yes, in our businesses,

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>but in our homes with this thing called media. Craig

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Moffatt and Michael Nathanson have a shingle out of excellence

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>on media and telephonic analysis at Moffatt Nathanson. They worked

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>for years at Sanford Bernstein, and Michael Nathanson joins us

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. Michael, I could start with eight topics, but

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give you an open question of the

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>cliche of a decade ago, which is content is king?

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Is content still king? The morning? Tom Um? I think

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're moving to something called platform is king.

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's about getting massive aggregation, scale and content.

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Your Your content doesn't have to be the best content

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>in the world, but if you have enough connected homes,

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>enough subscribers, it's good enough. And I think that's what

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Netflix has proven. They've got some good content, but they

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>also have a hundred million subscribers. So better content maybe

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>squeezed out on smaller platforms. So I think we're now

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>moving into an era where scale, maybe it's astitution scale,

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a platform scale. Scales are gonna matter, Michael.

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>For a moment, we thought that could be only one winner,

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>and many people identified that one winner as Netflix. We're

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>now seeing Netflix become less dependent compared to where they were,

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>say a couple of years ago, on other people's content.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Can there be more than one winner in this space? Oh, John,

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt. And since they've last seen you about

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>a month ago, we've had that Fox Disney merger. Right,

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the content that they're going to

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a mass, they're in pretty good shade. Now they have

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>to build their platform. But I think what the market

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>to maybe missing here is that it is not a

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>winner take all business. You see it in broadcasts with

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>three or four networks, to see it on premium channels

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>with HBO Showtime, you're gonna have more than one s

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>FOD winner. Netflix is definitely one. Disney Fox could be

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the second. Amazon is going to be a third. Uh

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think it'll be a much more competitive landscape.

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And finally, Disney has woken up and said, you know,

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>we should be in this business. Am I buying Fox?

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 1>They've bought more long tail library content to put on

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that platform, so that's where they're moving towards. So it's

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be interesting, Michael, to see what they do with

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the content they have acquired from Fox and how they

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>treat Netflix with some of the content that runs on Netflix.

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>They've already said on the Disney side of things that

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>they're going to sever any license agreement with Netflix going forward.

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to do the same thing with the

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Century Fox assets? Do you think? Michael? Oh, without a

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>doubt that we did a note about this a couple

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.239
<v Speaker 1>of months ago, and we went through Netflix's catalog and

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>we said that Fox very quietly had supplied Netflix with

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>some of their best shows a Family Guy or the

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>f X shows, Um, It's always sunny in phil They

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>basically gave them a lot of great content. They've been

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>saying very quietly that they're pulling content off on Netflix

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and they've gotta put it on Hulu, which is now

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>owned by Disney. So I think both Fox and Disney's

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 1>content will not be on Netflix a year and a

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>year and a half from now. I mean all this

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>copyrighted material in the argument over writes it, does it

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>make the valuations just go up up up? If there's

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's too much stuff, Michael for me to

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>watch or anybody in my family to watch. But does

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the glut of content just continue? Tom, It's funny. I

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>was talking to my wife bat this morning. There's five

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>dred new scripted shows on the air in in Countyr seventeen.

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Five scripted shows. There's no way that any family can

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>stay on top of that, right, So you default to

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>a couple of shows that you've heard of, But you

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>also go back to cattle, you know, for comedies, you

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>watch Scifel, Friends, Family Guy, it's you know, big bang theory.

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's definitely gonna be more and more content produced,

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but you'll have less time to consider that content. You'll

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>stick to some of the long tail, big, big name content,

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and then you will probably go back to things that

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>you're comproble with. So buying a library is gonna go

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 1>up in value, you know, it really will be. It's

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be. You don't want to be in the business

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of having small, you know, unknown shows like some of

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>our cable networks, where you basically don't get traction. You

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>keep investing in more and more shows, being you're getting

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>no attraction. So that's a tough place to be. And

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we think a lot of cable networks are going to

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have to consolidate or basically stop spending because they can't

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>make the money work anymore. So, Michael is a Giants fan.

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I won't ask you about the Super Bowl. Tom Kane might,

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that's up to him, but since we're sitting across from

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>each other, I'll protect myself and will avoid that topic.

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>But I do want to talk to you about the

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>price of sports content. It's getting more and more expensive,

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it's over the Premier league rights in the United

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom and soccer rights there, or whether it's in the

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>United States and in the NFL, etcetera. The price of

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>sport and the content is getting more expensive. But as

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>an asset, the eyes on that particular asset falling away,

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not increasing. So I don't see the growth in

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the viewership alongside the growth in the value that people

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>are paying for these assets. That doesn't make sense to me. Michael,

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>why are we still doing this? Okay, great question. We're

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>doing this job because when when you turn on the

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>TV set on a given night and there's a sporting event,

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you want that game to be on to last night's

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>let's say last night's first game, because the second game

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>is not good. But the first game Patriots, right, Pagriot Jacksonville.

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a game that you want to watch. And if

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you're distributor, if you're a cable operator, doesn't have that game,

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna switch cable operators. So I think what we're

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 1>missing is the rate. Yes, ratings are coming down, with

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a passion for the people who remain to watch that

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly high. And therefore, if you don't have that

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>as a strict you'll lose a customer. So unfortunately it's

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a shrinking contributor to the ecosystem, But as a

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>as a passion play, it's nothing better, you know, to

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>dry people. What's your passion for? By hold cell? I mean,

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>what's where's the value in this crazy bowl market and

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the Michael Nathan's and space? Yeah, Tom, you know it's interesting.

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>The past couple of months have been really um surprising.

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 1>We've seen we've seen it. So we have buys on

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Disney and Fox that's been consistently our buys because both

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>those companies own a ton of life sports proprietary, proprietary content.

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So we're always been Disney Bowls, as you know, and

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we've been Fox Bowls absent that. In traditional media, we

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.959
<v Speaker 1>have a really hard time with all the changing um,

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the changing landscape. And again we come back

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to we're a fang. We cover the fangs. Facebook and

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Google get seem to us as the place to go,

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and they are not that expensive relative to the growth

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they deliver, So our remain pretty barished on tradial media.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You and I can't help but look at those fangs

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know, two of the three recover a

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>really good value for the growth they deliver. We're gonna

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>come back on that, I know, John Farrow and I

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about Facebook and the video. John one

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>more question squeezing and when Mr Nations thank you. So

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that, Micho, this conversation based on the assumption

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that the actual Disney Folksdale closes um could take a while,

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>It might not happen. It's so where do you stand

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>on that right now? What's the vice case for you? Guys? Well,

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>let's say our our base our base case here is

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we were surprised that Disney, you know, that this deal

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>included all the regional sports networks, because when Disney is

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>going to own, if this deal goes through, will be ESPN,

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>ABC and your local regional sports network. That seems like

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>too much concentration or power. We're assuming that they're gonna

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>have to divest the rs NS, the regional sports network.

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So we assume the deal goes through, but that Disney

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to have to divest an asset to get

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it through. And I don't think that that's not out

0:28:56.240 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of mainstream thinking. So that's not why they're buying Fox,

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and buying Fox for that TV and a film library

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and for FX, which is those three properties have a

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of content for the long, long run. Michael Nathanson

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>with US thrilled, Davin with us with Mofatt Nathanson. Thanks

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast.

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio