1
00:00:02,160 --> 00:00:05,400
Speaker 1: Welcome to the solid verbal ull that for.

2
00:00:05,480 --> 00:00:08,719
Speaker 2: Me, I'm a man, I'm for it. I've heard so

3
00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:10,880
Speaker 2: many players say, well I want to be happy. You

4
00:00:10,920 --> 00:00:12,080
Speaker 2: want to be happy for a day?

5
00:00:12,520 --> 00:00:17,800
Speaker 1: Edo steak? Is that woo woom? And then and tie

6
00:00:18,680 --> 00:00:23,800
Speaker 1: Daniel go. It is a weekend filled with home dogs,

7
00:00:24,480 --> 00:00:28,120
Speaker 1: but also with a lot of fluff, pleasing to the eye,

8
00:00:28,200 --> 00:00:31,479
Speaker 1: but certain to have a fair amount of bark. What

9
00:00:31,640 --> 00:00:33,120
Speaker 1: is our nickname for this Saturday?

10
00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:36,920
Speaker 2: Uh? You really set that up nicely for me. This

11
00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:40,640
Speaker 2: is a Stockton maybe a Stockton hornisex situation, orny check.

12
00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:43,040
Speaker 2: I don't know, we'll see. Uh. Well, look it's I

13
00:00:43,400 --> 00:00:46,600
Speaker 2: originally went sink your teeth Saturday, right, because there's enough

14
00:00:46,680 --> 00:00:49,239
Speaker 2: meat here that I get excited. And I thought to myself, well,

15
00:00:49,240 --> 00:00:52,479
Speaker 2: who does the best job of sinking their teeth?

16
00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:52,960
Speaker 1: Tie?

17
00:00:53,400 --> 00:00:55,360
Speaker 2: And that would be our our furry friends. I have

18
00:00:55,440 --> 00:00:58,720
Speaker 2: this as a samoyed Saturday, as a nice little tribute

19
00:00:59,080 --> 00:01:02,200
Speaker 2: to your fluffy dog Bera. How about that time?

20
00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:04,920
Speaker 1: I love it? That was all me. This is all you.

21
00:01:05,040 --> 00:01:08,280
Speaker 1: I love it. I am all about paying sweet homage

22
00:01:08,319 --> 00:01:13,039
Speaker 1: to my dear pup ms Beira. Yeah, it's a beautiful

23
00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:16,240
Speaker 1: weekend of games. Is it not week one? Week one

24
00:01:16,400 --> 00:01:19,840
Speaker 1: was exciting just to kind of break the ice, crack

25
00:01:19,959 --> 00:01:23,399
Speaker 1: the neck, get us down this pathway, this journey that

26
00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:25,959
Speaker 1: will encompass us for the next couple of months. But

27
00:01:26,280 --> 00:01:29,039
Speaker 1: Week two is where the rubber really meets the road.

28
00:01:29,120 --> 00:01:31,720
Speaker 1: We are chock full of all sorts of awesome action.

29
00:01:31,800 --> 00:01:35,120
Speaker 1: We appreciate folks who are watching this stream live on

30
00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:39,080
Speaker 1: YouTube again. We do it every Wednesday twelve noon Eastern time.

31
00:01:39,120 --> 00:01:40,679
Speaker 1: If you can't make it this time, make sure you

32
00:01:40,720 --> 00:01:42,840
Speaker 1: make it next time. You're also going to be able

33
00:01:42,880 --> 00:01:46,559
Speaker 1: to listen to this podcast immediately thereafter on our public

34
00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:49,440
Speaker 1: podcast feed. Just going out to our website soliverbal dot

35
00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:52,480
Speaker 1: com wherever you get your podcasts if you want to

36
00:01:52,680 --> 00:01:56,440
Speaker 1: listen and find out more about our brand of unique

37
00:01:56,480 --> 00:01:58,200
Speaker 1: content Here on show.

38
00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:02,840
Speaker 2: Dan, should we stay on theme and talk big dogs?

39
00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:05,160
Speaker 1: I would love to. Let's just jump in? Should we?

40
00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:06,840
Speaker 2: Let's do it again?

41
00:02:07,680 --> 00:02:12,239
Speaker 1: Time to help the week. Don't forget for Ballers dot

42
00:02:12,280 --> 00:02:14,920
Speaker 1: com is where you can go play run the Board.

43
00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:17,800
Speaker 1: That is the name of our Week two pick them game.

44
00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:21,480
Speaker 1: We went out. We purchased with our hard earned caseh

45
00:02:21,720 --> 00:02:25,079
Speaker 1: a one hundred dollars gift card to home field, where

46
00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:27,480
Speaker 1: you can go out and buy college themes shirts of

47
00:02:27,520 --> 00:02:29,800
Speaker 1: all makes and models. We're going to give that away

48
00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:33,440
Speaker 1: to the winner. Again. You can only play at verballers

49
00:02:33,480 --> 00:02:35,440
Speaker 1: dot Com. You also get access to all of our

50
00:02:35,480 --> 00:02:38,560
Speaker 1: bonus perks, which we'll talk a little bit more about

51
00:02:38,720 --> 00:02:41,440
Speaker 1: as we go through the course of the next sixty

52
00:02:41,680 --> 00:02:48,919
Speaker 1: minutes or so. But you mentioned big dogs. Big dogs,

53
00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:52,640
Speaker 1: My turn to pick this week the three dog games

54
00:02:53,200 --> 00:02:56,440
Speaker 1: of the week. And look, we'd be remiss if we

55
00:02:56,440 --> 00:03:01,760
Speaker 1: didn't bring up the Colorado story again. Man, Yeah, that's true.

56
00:03:02,360 --> 00:03:07,720
Speaker 1: Twelve noon Eastern time on Fox. It is the Nebraska Cornhuskers.

57
00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:11,960
Speaker 1: It is the Colorado Buffaloes. Colorado is a home favorite

58
00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:16,640
Speaker 1: of three points. This is the latest installment of a

59
00:03:16,960 --> 00:03:21,200
Speaker 1: historic rivalry. Look, Nebraska, Colorado. We have talked about this

60
00:03:21,320 --> 00:03:26,959
Speaker 1: matchup at nauseum for years on end. And the fact

61
00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:30,280
Speaker 1: that we get it now amid everything going on with

62
00:03:30,680 --> 00:03:33,919
Speaker 1: Nebraska having a new coach with Colorado, in the midst

63
00:03:33,919 --> 00:03:37,480
Speaker 1: of this huge wave of enthusiasm, I was getting text

64
00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:40,360
Speaker 1: messages from people that I don't normally talk to, friends

65
00:03:40,360 --> 00:03:43,680
Speaker 1: of mine who know that I do this, who just

66
00:03:44,600 --> 00:03:47,640
Speaker 1: took it upon themselves on Saturday afternoon to message me

67
00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:48,800
Speaker 1: and say, hey man, what do you think of this

68
00:03:48,840 --> 00:03:50,760
Speaker 1: Colorado deal? Wait? Ada, Colorado.

69
00:03:50,800 --> 00:03:52,560
Speaker 2: I've gotten a ton of that. I've gotten a ton

70
00:03:52,600 --> 00:03:53,320
Speaker 2: of that myself.

71
00:03:53,560 --> 00:03:56,160
Speaker 1: Yeah, what is the key to this game if we

72
00:03:56,200 --> 00:04:00,480
Speaker 1: can evaluate it objectively given all of the subjectivity that

73
00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:02,360
Speaker 1: is out there in the college football ether.

74
00:04:03,080 --> 00:04:05,920
Speaker 2: In terms of it being competitive, in terms of getting

75
00:04:05,960 --> 00:04:08,720
Speaker 2: an entertaining back and forth. Is that what you're looking

76
00:04:09,040 --> 00:04:10,760
Speaker 2: in terms of that or in terms of how you

77
00:04:10,800 --> 00:04:13,040
Speaker 2: are going to pick this game again Colorado minus three

78
00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:16,919
Speaker 2: at home? Yeah, the fascinating thing will be sort of

79
00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:20,719
Speaker 2: growth of Colorado along its lines to become a more

80
00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:23,240
Speaker 2: complete team, because I think any question about whether or

81
00:04:23,279 --> 00:04:26,920
Speaker 2: not Colorado had the speed or the talent, even though

82
00:04:26,960 --> 00:04:29,239
Speaker 2: guys had come from all over the place. You obviously

83
00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:31,960
Speaker 2: Travis Hunter, but Joe Horn junior a freshman, and Dylan

84
00:04:32,080 --> 00:04:34,440
Speaker 2: Edwards who flipped from Notre Dame. Sorry about that. I

85
00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:36,600
Speaker 2: didn't have to add that to the end of that thought,

86
00:04:36,640 --> 00:04:38,400
Speaker 2: but I did. I don't know, you know, that's just

87
00:04:38,440 --> 00:04:41,040
Speaker 2: who I am. I suppose any of those questions, I

88
00:04:41,080 --> 00:04:43,640
Speaker 2: feel like we're immediately answered last week, So I think

89
00:04:43,800 --> 00:04:47,239
Speaker 2: right now it's how quickly. Can the Colorado offensive line

90
00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:49,839
Speaker 2: improve to the point where they are I don't know,

91
00:04:49,839 --> 00:04:54,080
Speaker 2: a strength, but not a liability necessarily? How can Colorado

92
00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:58,200
Speaker 2: learn to win in multiple ways as they go because

93
00:04:58,240 --> 00:04:59,520
Speaker 2: right now, I don't think a lot of people have

94
00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:02,640
Speaker 2: a ton of fit in Nebraska's offense this year the

95
00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:04,800
Speaker 2: way it's constructed. We saw that maybe improve a little

96
00:05:04,839 --> 00:05:06,760
Speaker 2: bit when I think it was Marcus Washington came back

97
00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:11,719
Speaker 2: from suspension against Minnesota, their best receiver. But for me,

98
00:05:11,839 --> 00:05:15,080
Speaker 2: the question and the competitive nature in this game, I

99
00:05:15,080 --> 00:05:18,800
Speaker 2: think is going to rely on Nebraska's ability to be

100
00:05:19,160 --> 00:05:22,400
Speaker 2: something that they really couldn't or didn't show on offense

101
00:05:22,480 --> 00:05:26,920
Speaker 2: last week against Minnesota on the road in a crazy atmosphere.

102
00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:31,000
Speaker 2: What big noon Saturday is going to be there? I

103
00:05:31,120 --> 00:05:36,520
Speaker 2: worry that maybe we're going to get not as entertaining

104
00:05:36,560 --> 00:05:38,240
Speaker 2: of a back and forth as what we saw between

105
00:05:38,279 --> 00:05:40,720
Speaker 2: Colorado and TCU last week, because I don't think Nebraska's

106
00:05:40,720 --> 00:05:42,440
Speaker 2: going to hold up its end of the bargain. But

107
00:05:42,480 --> 00:05:46,400
Speaker 2: I think there is a chance that Nebraska can show

108
00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:49,760
Speaker 2: more on defense now that they have actual tape on

109
00:05:49,800 --> 00:05:53,800
Speaker 2: what Colorado and Sean Lewis's intentions are on offense.

110
00:05:54,080 --> 00:05:56,000
Speaker 1: And that brings me to my point. I think the

111
00:05:56,000 --> 00:05:57,800
Speaker 1: biggest key to this game is the fact that Matt

112
00:05:57,839 --> 00:06:02,160
Speaker 1: Rule now has tape Colorado one game. It's one game,

113
00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:04,360
Speaker 1: one game, but it's still something, and I think that

114
00:06:04,400 --> 00:06:06,760
Speaker 1: does make a difference in this football game because when

115
00:06:06,760 --> 00:06:10,520
Speaker 1: he pops it in the VCR, yeah, that's he's using,

116
00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:15,680
Speaker 1: He's immediately going to notice that Shador Sanders and Travis

117
00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:18,720
Speaker 1: Hunter and what they did and what Dylan Edwards did

118
00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:22,040
Speaker 1: in week one is super impressive. And then he's also

119
00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:23,960
Speaker 1: going to have to notice. I think he's going to

120
00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:25,840
Speaker 1: have to notice because this is what Matt Rule does,

121
00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:31,080
Speaker 1: that Colorado had to overcompensate for a defense that mostly

122
00:06:31,200 --> 00:06:35,640
Speaker 1: was a sieve against TCU. Sure those are the headliners,

123
00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:38,600
Speaker 1: but what actually makes a difference now is we get

124
00:06:38,640 --> 00:06:42,160
Speaker 1: deeper into the season against other competition now with tape

125
00:06:42,680 --> 00:06:44,920
Speaker 1: is the fact that the defense was bad. I believe

126
00:06:44,920 --> 00:06:47,920
Speaker 1: in Colorado's skill talent. I think they're elite. I don't

127
00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:50,960
Speaker 1: believe in them almost anywhere else, not yet anyway, And

128
00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:53,080
Speaker 1: Matt Ruhle's going to pick up on that. He made

129
00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:55,719
Speaker 1: a career of picking up on that, at least in

130
00:06:55,800 --> 00:06:58,320
Speaker 1: his couple stints on the college level.

131
00:06:58,839 --> 00:07:03,440
Speaker 2: Well, Phil snow, did Sir Phil snow? The points stands? Yeah, whoever.

132
00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:05,920
Speaker 2: But he's made a habit of building the boring stuff

133
00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:10,160
Speaker 2: first and winning boring, winning boring before he wins shiny,

134
00:07:10,920 --> 00:07:14,480
Speaker 2: and he's gonna see that Colorado's lines are suspect. I

135
00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:17,120
Speaker 2: think Nebraska can and will take advantage of that to

136
00:07:17,160 --> 00:07:21,120
Speaker 2: some extent. You're gonna see heavier sets on offense than

137
00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:24,960
Speaker 2: what TCU ran last week, probably more emphasis on taking

138
00:07:25,040 --> 00:07:28,680
Speaker 2: their time and keeping that Colorado offense off the field.

139
00:07:29,040 --> 00:07:31,920
Speaker 2: TCU plays very up tempo, and they had the ball

140
00:07:31,960 --> 00:07:33,960
Speaker 2: for something like twenty five minutes last week, and that's

141
00:07:33,960 --> 00:07:35,240
Speaker 2: gonna change with Nebraska.

142
00:07:35,840 --> 00:07:37,760
Speaker 1: I am buying the hype for this game. I think

143
00:07:37,800 --> 00:07:39,680
Speaker 1: it will be a good game. I think it'll be

144
00:07:39,720 --> 00:07:42,320
Speaker 1: great for both programs to be in the limelight again,

145
00:07:42,360 --> 00:07:48,080
Speaker 1: for Colorado and Nebraska again getting a matchup of this high,

146
00:07:48,160 --> 00:07:51,080
Speaker 1: high caliber. I don't know alse to put it, but

147
00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:53,520
Speaker 1: I don't think it's as high scoring a game. I've

148
00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:56,160
Speaker 1: got it something like thirty one to thirty in that range.

149
00:07:56,640 --> 00:07:57,960
Speaker 2: Nebraska scoring thirty points.

150
00:07:58,040 --> 00:08:01,239
Speaker 1: Okay, yeah, I don't believe in Colorado's defense, not yet.

151
00:08:01,480 --> 00:08:02,560
Speaker 1: I think Colorado wins.

152
00:08:02,920 --> 00:08:05,480
Speaker 2: Okay, so I think Colorado wins but doesn't cover.

153
00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:07,200
Speaker 1: I think it's a close game. I think it's a

154
00:08:07,200 --> 00:08:09,600
Speaker 1: good game, and we would all be better college football

155
00:08:09,640 --> 00:08:11,720
Speaker 1: fans for it if it goes that route, that'd be awesome.

156
00:08:12,200 --> 00:08:15,360
Speaker 2: Man, I do not buy Nebraska scoring that many points,

157
00:08:15,160 --> 00:08:18,720
Speaker 2: as questionable as Colorado's defense at times might be. I

158
00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:22,400
Speaker 2: think TCU has really talented skill dudes as well that

159
00:08:22,520 --> 00:08:24,880
Speaker 2: Nebraska just doesn't, and so I don't think it's going

160
00:08:24,920 --> 00:08:26,640
Speaker 2: to go the exact same way. I think I have

161
00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:29,080
Speaker 2: Colorado winning this one. Maybe it's a little bit of

162
00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:31,600
Speaker 2: a back and forth early, but I just I don't know.

163
00:08:31,680 --> 00:08:34,440
Speaker 2: I think they're a more talented team playing at home.

164
00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:37,559
Speaker 2: I don't think Colorado is exactly what they were last week,

165
00:08:37,679 --> 00:08:39,800
Speaker 2: and honestly, if that game is played, and this is

166
00:08:40,080 --> 00:08:42,520
Speaker 2: taking zero away from the Buffaloes because what they did

167
00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:44,760
Speaker 2: last week and what they showed last week was pretty incredible.

168
00:08:45,080 --> 00:08:48,720
Speaker 2: But to get those two specific turnovers in the end

169
00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:51,000
Speaker 2: zone like they did, one, it means that they're really

170
00:08:51,040 --> 00:08:54,040
Speaker 2: good at clamping down in a big situational moment. But two,

171
00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:57,880
Speaker 2: I don't know how often you can win needing absolutely

172
00:08:57,960 --> 00:09:00,959
Speaker 2: needing those two things to occur. Now, Travis Hunter should

173
00:09:00,960 --> 00:09:03,360
Speaker 2: be playing every single game and probably every single snap

174
00:09:03,400 --> 00:09:05,880
Speaker 2: for Colorado until he camp this year, and so to

175
00:09:05,920 --> 00:09:08,040
Speaker 2: write that off as a freak occurrence, it's not. That's

176
00:09:08,040 --> 00:09:10,480
Speaker 2: a normal thing that he can do because he's incredible.

177
00:09:11,000 --> 00:09:13,440
Speaker 2: I wonder what he looks like in terms of snap

178
00:09:13,480 --> 00:09:16,760
Speaker 2: count this week if Nebraska, if they're not confident Nebraska

179
00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:18,640
Speaker 2: moving the ball through the air, do they give him

180
00:09:18,679 --> 00:09:21,000
Speaker 2: a series or two off at corner right if there's

181
00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:23,599
Speaker 2: nobody that truly needs to be covered like there was

182
00:09:23,640 --> 00:09:26,120
Speaker 2: in a passing offense, like what TCU had to offer,

183
00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:29,719
Speaker 2: What does his rest situation look like? Because I can

184
00:09:29,760 --> 00:09:32,480
Speaker 2: tell you this, ty Travis Hunter, whatever you want to

185
00:09:32,480 --> 00:09:35,280
Speaker 2: call him, the Heisman favorite at this point front runner

186
00:09:35,559 --> 00:09:39,360
Speaker 2: doing a player who's doing the unthinkable. The unthinkable is

187
00:09:39,360 --> 00:09:42,679
Speaker 2: playing one hundred and eighteen snaps a game. That's unthinkable,

188
00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:46,120
Speaker 2: and so they're going to need to be those designated

189
00:09:47,280 --> 00:09:50,080
Speaker 2: drives off on one side of the ball or the other,

190
00:09:50,280 --> 00:09:54,600
Speaker 2: because it's a long, long season to be playing that much.

191
00:09:54,640 --> 00:09:56,679
Speaker 2: I get the excitement and I get that he's different,

192
00:09:57,200 --> 00:09:59,679
Speaker 2: but that's just more opportunity for injury. Which would be

193
00:09:59,720 --> 00:10:02,400
Speaker 2: pretty catastrophic for what Colorado does on both sides of

194
00:10:02,400 --> 00:10:04,040
Speaker 2: the ball. That to me is going to be interesting

195
00:10:04,320 --> 00:10:05,840
Speaker 2: to track as this game goes on.

196
00:10:06,480 --> 00:10:10,240
Speaker 1: So we agree on the victor. Yeah, you're not taking

197
00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:12,160
Speaker 1: Nebraska plus the points. You're going called No.

198
00:10:12,520 --> 00:10:14,760
Speaker 2: I twenty eight to seventeen Colorado.

199
00:10:15,320 --> 00:10:17,920
Speaker 1: Okay, we disagree. Off to a hot start here. Yep,

200
00:10:18,200 --> 00:10:23,200
Speaker 1: let's go to our second big Dog of the weekend. Yes,

201
00:10:25,240 --> 00:10:28,719
Speaker 1: from our friend Brett McMurphy. Miami is offering a buy one,

202
00:10:28,760 --> 00:10:33,080
Speaker 1: get one ticket special for this weekend's game. Fans who

203
00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:36,560
Speaker 1: purchase tickets for Saturday's Texas A and M game, which

204
00:10:36,559 --> 00:10:38,240
Speaker 1: is one hundred and twenty five bucks of the upper

205
00:10:38,280 --> 00:10:40,320
Speaker 1: deck and two oh five for the lower end zone

206
00:10:40,600 --> 00:10:44,080
Speaker 1: or three ten for the club corner. Hey yeah, why not?

207
00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:47,360
Speaker 1: You will receive a free ticket for the Georgia Tech

208
00:10:47,400 --> 00:10:49,400
Speaker 1: game on October the second.

209
00:10:49,400 --> 00:10:51,120
Speaker 2: I don't know to go buy one, get one. Is

210
00:10:51,120 --> 00:10:52,400
Speaker 2: that what they call it? The kids are calling it

211
00:10:52,440 --> 00:10:53,000
Speaker 2: little Bogo?

212
00:10:53,080 --> 00:10:55,160
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I don't know if that says more about

213
00:10:55,160 --> 00:10:58,839
Speaker 1: the Miami fan base not being present for a really

214
00:10:58,880 --> 00:11:01,080
Speaker 1: big game like this one big dog as it were,

215
00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:03,200
Speaker 1: or if it says more about Georgia Tech that they're

216
00:11:03,200 --> 00:11:06,720
Speaker 1: giving that game away for free. But nonetheless, nonetheless, this

217
00:11:06,760 --> 00:11:08,680
Speaker 1: is where we are in week two. Well, it also

218
00:11:08,679 --> 00:11:12,600
Speaker 1: says a lot about enthusiasm after last season. Yes, like

219
00:11:12,720 --> 00:11:15,160
Speaker 1: it's kind of smart marketing, Like you can make fun

220
00:11:15,200 --> 00:11:16,599
Speaker 1: of Miami for not being able to sell out a

221
00:11:16,640 --> 00:11:19,920
Speaker 1: bunch of games, but like, if you're not obviously winning,

222
00:11:20,720 --> 00:11:23,560
Speaker 1: do things to incentivize a more electric atmosphere. I don't

223
00:11:23,559 --> 00:11:26,079
Speaker 1: blame them for this. That's good games. At three point thirty,

224
00:11:26,960 --> 00:11:29,520
Speaker 1: it's on ABC. It's Texas A and M coming to town.

225
00:11:29,520 --> 00:11:31,920
Speaker 1: They're a four and a half point favorite, squaring off

226
00:11:31,960 --> 00:11:35,000
Speaker 1: against the Miami Hurricanes. Did this line surprise you at all?

227
00:11:35,400 --> 00:11:38,840
Speaker 2: It did surprise me. The note I wrote down was

228
00:11:39,200 --> 00:11:42,559
Speaker 2: what exactly did Texas A and M do to earn this? Right?

229
00:11:42,720 --> 00:11:45,280
Speaker 2: And obviously it's not Texas A and M calling up

230
00:11:45,480 --> 00:11:47,760
Speaker 2: the Blagio and saying this is where we feel we are.

231
00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:51,040
Speaker 2: It's an interesting line to say, what has Texas A

232
00:11:51,080 --> 00:11:54,640
Speaker 2: and M done on the road? What have they proven offensively?

233
00:11:54,720 --> 00:11:58,079
Speaker 2: What have they proven in terms of being together as

234
00:11:58,080 --> 00:11:59,800
Speaker 2: a team? Enough to the point if we think Miami

235
00:11:59,840 --> 00:12:03,280
Speaker 2: is at least quality to say four four and a

236
00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:06,200
Speaker 2: half five points on the road as a favorite. That's

237
00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:09,400
Speaker 2: my note because I still favorite teams, especially early on,

238
00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:12,840
Speaker 2: that are playing at home, that are as healthy as

239
00:12:12,880 --> 00:12:15,320
Speaker 2: they will be all season long, early on in September,

240
00:12:15,840 --> 00:12:19,600
Speaker 2: and there's still open questions to be as impressive as

241
00:12:19,640 --> 00:12:22,319
Speaker 2: A and M and granted Miami were last week, there's

242
00:12:22,360 --> 00:12:25,920
Speaker 2: open questions about A and M stopping the run, which

243
00:12:25,920 --> 00:12:28,680
Speaker 2: we saw Miami at least, is that's going to be

244
00:12:28,760 --> 00:12:31,840
Speaker 2: the intention that Miami playing big old Mario guerrilla ball,

245
00:12:31,880 --> 00:12:34,400
Speaker 2: Say what you will, that's still going to be a priority.

246
00:12:34,440 --> 00:12:37,880
Speaker 2: They did it nicely last week with what Henry Parrish

247
00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:41,880
Speaker 2: and god who was the other was Walton I don't remember,

248
00:12:43,080 --> 00:12:45,760
Speaker 2: but they did it impressively last week against Miami of Ohio.

249
00:12:46,720 --> 00:12:49,720
Speaker 2: Super curious about Miami's offensive line holding up against Texas

250
00:12:49,720 --> 00:12:52,640
Speaker 2: A and M's pass rush, but with a healthy TVD

251
00:12:52,800 --> 00:12:55,840
Speaker 2: with Colby Young emerging as a number one receiver, it's

252
00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:58,640
Speaker 2: a secretly a very good receiver game. For having Evan

253
00:12:58,679 --> 00:13:02,079
Speaker 2: Stewart and Colby Young on the same field. I'm fascinated

254
00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:05,160
Speaker 2: by this matchup. I am happily going to take the

255
00:13:05,240 --> 00:13:08,800
Speaker 2: points because I think Miami's defense is in a decent enough,

256
00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:12,160
Speaker 2: decent enough place, they take care of business in Week.

257
00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:13,280
Speaker 1: One that.

258
00:13:14,760 --> 00:13:17,240
Speaker 2: I'm a believer. We both were believers coming into the

259
00:13:17,240 --> 00:13:21,640
Speaker 2: season that Miami would be noticeably improved. And so I

260
00:13:21,760 --> 00:13:24,200
Speaker 2: just don't have anything. I don't have meat on that

261
00:13:24,320 --> 00:13:27,120
Speaker 2: bone to feel confident about Texas A and m as

262
00:13:27,160 --> 00:13:30,040
Speaker 2: a road favorite. So I'm going with home dog. Wow.

263
00:13:32,960 --> 00:13:36,480
Speaker 1: Look, I did the Miami preview, yeah, and I was

264
00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:41,560
Speaker 1: all in on Miami over seven and a half. I

265
00:13:41,559 --> 00:13:44,240
Speaker 1: forget what the lineups. Officially, I think they're like an

266
00:13:44,280 --> 00:13:44,960
Speaker 1: eight and four team.

267
00:13:45,679 --> 00:13:46,600
Speaker 2: Okay, I think.

268
00:13:46,440 --> 00:13:49,320
Speaker 1: They're much improved. That would be a three win improvement.

269
00:13:50,280 --> 00:13:52,680
Speaker 1: To your point, that would be an improved Miami team.

270
00:13:53,280 --> 00:13:55,400
Speaker 1: I thought they were good in balanced on offense in

271
00:13:55,480 --> 00:13:58,880
Speaker 1: Week one. Ultimately, not much to take away from a

272
00:13:58,880 --> 00:14:02,680
Speaker 1: big win over Miami Ohio though, And no, none of

273
00:14:02,679 --> 00:14:06,360
Speaker 1: that's going to give us any inside angle on what

274
00:14:06,480 --> 00:14:09,480
Speaker 1: happens in this game against Texas A and m I'm

275
00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:12,439
Speaker 1: going to hold on to what I said in the preseason.

276
00:14:13,160 --> 00:14:15,880
Speaker 1: I like Tyler Van Dyk. I like the way that

277
00:14:16,280 --> 00:14:19,920
Speaker 1: your boy Mario has built up the trenches. In theory,

278
00:14:19,960 --> 00:14:23,280
Speaker 1: this defense should be solid, should be improved. I like

279
00:14:23,360 --> 00:14:26,880
Speaker 1: Shannon Dawson, the new offensive coordinator. You're right, it should

280
00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:29,920
Speaker 1: be a very receiver friendly system, whether it's Colby Young

281
00:14:30,000 --> 00:14:30,680
Speaker 1: or whoever else.

282
00:14:31,360 --> 00:14:31,920
Speaker 2: It's just.

283
00:14:33,720 --> 00:14:36,680
Speaker 1: I need to see more. Of course, I need to

284
00:14:36,720 --> 00:14:39,480
Speaker 1: see more before I'm willing to go there, especially with

285
00:14:39,520 --> 00:14:42,640
Speaker 1: a game like this against Texas A and M Like,

286
00:14:43,240 --> 00:14:46,880
Speaker 1: who truly are the gravitational players, the proving gravitational players

287
00:14:46,920 --> 00:14:49,440
Speaker 1: that we can point to in a game like this

288
00:14:49,560 --> 00:14:51,600
Speaker 1: against a team that I think is way more talent.

289
00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:54,040
Speaker 1: Who are those guys that we can point to and

290
00:14:54,080 --> 00:14:55,280
Speaker 1: say those are the ones that are going to beat

291
00:14:55,280 --> 00:14:56,400
Speaker 1: A and M.

292
00:14:57,240 --> 00:14:59,600
Speaker 2: I think the safeties for Miami. I think they've built

293
00:14:59,640 --> 00:15:02,160
Speaker 2: up depth on the defensive line with dudes who can

294
00:15:02,160 --> 00:15:02,800
Speaker 2: be game breaker.

295
00:15:03,040 --> 00:15:05,720
Speaker 1: The safety in the defensive lineman going to score points.

296
00:15:06,480 --> 00:15:09,720
Speaker 2: They can prevent points, they can change complexion of games.

297
00:15:09,720 --> 00:15:15,400
Speaker 2: And look, I'm is the gravitational more Connor Wegman or TVD?

298
00:15:15,760 --> 00:15:16,760
Speaker 1: I think it's Connor Wegman.

299
00:15:17,080 --> 00:15:18,640
Speaker 2: You think Connor Wegman's better than TVD.

300
00:15:18,960 --> 00:15:20,240
Speaker 1: I don't know if he's better, but I think in

301
00:15:20,240 --> 00:15:22,280
Speaker 1: this game, with the talent around him, it's Connor Wegman.

302
00:15:22,480 --> 00:15:24,320
Speaker 2: Okay, see I think TVD is the better quarterback, and

303
00:15:24,320 --> 00:15:26,320
Speaker 2: he's playing at home. Like if I'm going to oversimplify

304
00:15:26,360 --> 00:15:29,880
Speaker 2: it and reduce it down to the core, Look, you

305
00:15:29,960 --> 00:15:34,520
Speaker 2: have to figure out which coach will infuriate his own

306
00:15:34,560 --> 00:15:38,400
Speaker 2: fan base less and so Mario at home, Jimbo on

307
00:15:38,440 --> 00:15:41,920
Speaker 2: the road, a more experienced quarterback, a nice fresh start

308
00:15:41,960 --> 00:15:45,440
Speaker 2: for Miami. Look, I'm obviously painting a rosy picture of

309
00:15:45,480 --> 00:15:47,920
Speaker 2: the Canes, but I am still a believer in a

310
00:15:47,920 --> 00:15:50,640
Speaker 2: home team early on in the season that texts A

311
00:15:50,680 --> 00:15:54,360
Speaker 2: and M has not fully been formed to go about

312
00:15:54,400 --> 00:15:57,280
Speaker 2: the country barnstorming as favorites against quality teams.

313
00:15:57,560 --> 00:16:00,320
Speaker 1: That's fair, That's totally fair. And I think what we're

314
00:16:00,320 --> 00:16:02,640
Speaker 1: both saying is we don't know what we're betting on here. Totally.

315
00:16:02,640 --> 00:16:05,560
Speaker 1: There's no way we could. It's week two, I don't

316
00:16:05,640 --> 00:16:08,680
Speaker 1: I am schemed out a little bit by the fact

317
00:16:08,720 --> 00:16:10,560
Speaker 1: that I still don't really know what I'm getting for

318
00:16:10,600 --> 00:16:13,240
Speaker 1: the Miami offense. And I think it'll be I think

319
00:16:13,240 --> 00:16:16,000
Speaker 1: it'll be better, but I would like to see, or

320
00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:19,160
Speaker 1: like to have at this point, more of a proven

321
00:16:20,840 --> 00:16:24,440
Speaker 1: concept out wide. Know that know that TVD is throwing

322
00:16:24,480 --> 00:16:27,680
Speaker 1: two reliable targets that can test what I think is

323
00:16:27,720 --> 00:16:30,760
Speaker 1: a really reliable and shouldn't prove in secondary.

324
00:16:31,120 --> 00:16:32,560
Speaker 2: Yeah for Texas A and M.

325
00:16:32,720 --> 00:16:35,600
Speaker 1: So for me because that scares me, because A and

326
00:16:35,760 --> 00:16:40,240
Speaker 1: M is is crazy deep yep. Along the defensive line,

327
00:16:40,280 --> 00:16:42,560
Speaker 1: I've got something like twenty seven to twenty Texas A

328
00:16:42,600 --> 00:16:44,240
Speaker 1: and M in a good game. Another good game.

329
00:16:44,400 --> 00:16:46,640
Speaker 2: Okay, So you if you are believe you're you're planting

330
00:16:46,680 --> 00:16:48,240
Speaker 2: your flag right now that you believe Texas A and

331
00:16:48,320 --> 00:16:49,680
Speaker 2: M is like a nine to ten win team.

332
00:16:49,760 --> 00:16:55,120
Speaker 1: I am okay, fair nhem were we disagree? That's two

333
00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:57,640
Speaker 1: in a row. Let's get to our final, big dog.

334
00:16:57,720 --> 00:17:04,520
Speaker 1: You know what's coming seven pm. Texas at Alabama. Alabama

335
00:17:04,560 --> 00:17:08,600
Speaker 1: a seven and a half point home favorite. The vibe

336
00:17:08,600 --> 00:17:11,919
Speaker 1: I got from reading Texas people, from talking to the

337
00:17:11,960 --> 00:17:15,960
Speaker 1: Texas people in our verball or discord was that last

338
00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:19,000
Speaker 1: week was kind of lumpy. The win over Rice thirty

339
00:17:19,040 --> 00:17:22,840
Speaker 1: seven to ten. First half was blas, second half was better.

340
00:17:23,040 --> 00:17:27,439
Speaker 1: The line wasn't great when viewers didn't look sharp. The

341
00:17:27,480 --> 00:17:30,439
Speaker 1: defense was pretty good. Yeah, it was very good defense,

342
00:17:30,560 --> 00:17:33,000
Speaker 1: very good. JT. Dan Every time I looked up and

343
00:17:33,040 --> 00:17:35,639
Speaker 1: every time I watched highlights. JT. Daniels seemed to be

344
00:17:35,720 --> 00:17:38,720
Speaker 1: running for his life the whole game, and Rice had

345
00:17:39,040 --> 00:17:42,679
Speaker 1: I don't know, twenty seven yards rushing something something crazy

346
00:17:42,800 --> 00:17:45,000
Speaker 1: like that. So I look, I don't know what you

347
00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:47,080
Speaker 1: can take from that, because it is not apples to

348
00:17:47,080 --> 00:17:49,720
Speaker 1: apples to say Rice ran for twenty seven yards and

349
00:17:49,760 --> 00:17:52,119
Speaker 1: we know Alabama wants to run for twenty seven yards.

350
00:17:52,160 --> 00:17:55,119
Speaker 1: So therefore I'm not gonna draw that conclusion. But it

351
00:17:55,200 --> 00:17:57,800
Speaker 1: is interesting that Texas again looked good on defense. They

352
00:17:57,840 --> 00:17:59,960
Speaker 1: were good on defense a year ago, especially against the run.

353
00:18:01,720 --> 00:18:04,040
Speaker 1: To what end do we kind of draw any conclusions

354
00:18:04,040 --> 00:18:06,119
Speaker 1: from that? To what end are you looking at what

355
00:18:06,160 --> 00:18:09,119
Speaker 1: you saw from the Texas defense last year projecting forward

356
00:18:09,160 --> 00:18:11,560
Speaker 1: now in two this big game. This was a one

357
00:18:11,560 --> 00:18:13,920
Speaker 1: point game a year ago twenty to nineteen that Alabama

358
00:18:14,000 --> 00:18:14,919
Speaker 1: almost lost.

359
00:18:15,119 --> 00:18:17,240
Speaker 2: With a much better quarterback, and I think Jalen Milro

360
00:18:17,320 --> 00:18:19,400
Speaker 2: is very good. But in terms of where Bryce Young

361
00:18:19,560 --> 00:18:22,199
Speaker 2: was as a Heisman caliber quarterback and the seasoning he

362
00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:26,840
Speaker 2: had national championship obvious national championship ceiling as a quarterback,

363
00:18:26,880 --> 00:18:29,480
Speaker 2: where we don't know that with where Alabama currently stands

364
00:18:30,119 --> 00:18:33,840
Speaker 2: the games in Tuscaloosa, that's a difference. The game should

365
00:18:33,920 --> 00:18:36,440
Speaker 2: feature a better Texas defense, although they played pretty well

366
00:18:36,520 --> 00:18:39,480
Speaker 2: last year and just until those last couple drives, and

367
00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:43,199
Speaker 2: you have the obvious knowledge that Steve Sarkisian has of

368
00:18:43,280 --> 00:18:47,560
Speaker 2: Nick Saban and the internal operations and game planning that

369
00:18:47,640 --> 00:18:50,040
Speaker 2: Alabama has, and so I thought that played a role

370
00:18:50,440 --> 00:18:53,399
Speaker 2: in how Texas was successful last year. It was the

371
00:18:53,400 --> 00:18:55,920
Speaker 2: game that everybody still points to in terms of Quinn

372
00:18:55,960 --> 00:18:58,600
Speaker 2: Yours looking very strong until the injury he suffered with

373
00:18:58,680 --> 00:19:02,000
Speaker 2: Hudson card coming in, and really in terms of this

374
00:19:02,119 --> 00:19:05,160
Speaker 2: year's matchup, I think it's close. I think it's close

375
00:19:05,200 --> 00:19:08,720
Speaker 2: because of the Texas defense, because of that, the internal

376
00:19:08,760 --> 00:19:14,000
Speaker 2: knowledge that Steve Sarcasian has, because Jalen Molroe is incredible,

377
00:19:14,040 --> 00:19:16,320
Speaker 2: but I think the Texas defense can do enough to

378
00:19:16,440 --> 00:19:19,359
Speaker 2: force him to be a pocket quarterback more often than not,

379
00:19:19,800 --> 00:19:24,080
Speaker 2: and maybe he completely shreds them and makes them pay for,

380
00:19:24,320 --> 00:19:27,200
Speaker 2: you know, picking their poison like that, because you saw

381
00:19:27,520 --> 00:19:29,960
Speaker 2: the connection I think was Isaiah Bond last week. Yeah,

382
00:19:29,960 --> 00:19:32,720
Speaker 2: a couple of really nice passes, So maybe that's developing there.

383
00:19:33,400 --> 00:19:35,359
Speaker 2: I like Alabama to win this game, but I like

384
00:19:35,400 --> 00:19:37,639
Speaker 2: it a little bit closer than what the line is

385
00:19:37,720 --> 00:19:39,320
Speaker 2: at the time of recording. So I had it at

386
00:19:39,320 --> 00:19:42,240
Speaker 2: twenty seven to twenty one, So that's Texas barely covering

387
00:19:42,600 --> 00:19:47,080
Speaker 2: Alabama again winning late. The emerging young defensive stars at

388
00:19:47,080 --> 00:19:50,800
Speaker 2: Alabama have has might make a difference in this one,

389
00:19:51,080 --> 00:19:53,840
Speaker 2: and can't wait to watch Texas a little bit beat

390
00:19:53,920 --> 00:19:56,840
Speaker 2: up on offense. I worry a little bit about the

391
00:19:56,880 --> 00:19:59,960
Speaker 2: Winter Wonder quality. I think Texas has very good receivers,

392
00:20:00,359 --> 00:20:03,800
Speaker 2: but star power at receivers z Abi are worthy. Sometimes

393
00:20:04,480 --> 00:20:06,719
Speaker 2: you can count me in the category of what exactly

394
00:20:06,800 --> 00:20:11,119
Speaker 2: has Quinn you Wers done to garner the attention in

395
00:20:11,200 --> 00:20:14,520
Speaker 2: spotlight that obviously being the starting quarterback for Texas gives you.

396
00:20:14,600 --> 00:20:18,800
Speaker 2: But I'm call me a yours skeptic until proven otherwise.

397
00:20:21,040 --> 00:20:24,040
Speaker 1: You may recall that I've got Texas in my playoff. Yeah,

398
00:20:24,600 --> 00:20:27,360
Speaker 1: one of my ill still make the playoff losing this game, though,

399
00:20:27,520 --> 00:20:30,479
Speaker 1: could still make the playoff losing this game. Yeah, but

400
00:20:30,760 --> 00:20:34,160
Speaker 1: it is not lost on me that if ever there

401
00:20:34,200 --> 00:20:37,440
Speaker 1: were a moment, if ever there were a moment for Sark,

402
00:20:38,640 --> 00:20:42,119
Speaker 1: he knows what to expect in Tuscaloosa of Nick Saban

403
00:20:42,600 --> 00:20:44,919
Speaker 1: of a number of players on the team because he

404
00:20:44,920 --> 00:20:50,000
Speaker 1: helped recruit them. The game last year was way closer

405
00:20:50,000 --> 00:20:53,720
Speaker 1: than anybody ever dreamt possible twenty to nineteen. Mm hm,

406
00:20:54,400 --> 00:20:56,680
Speaker 1: And I stand by the fact, and I know you're

407
00:20:56,680 --> 00:20:58,439
Speaker 1: gonna make fun of me for this, but I don't please.

408
00:20:58,880 --> 00:21:00,800
Speaker 1: I stand by the fact that if quin viewers does

409
00:21:00,840 --> 00:21:02,720
Speaker 1: not get hurt in that game, Texas wins.

410
00:21:03,880 --> 00:21:08,040
Speaker 2: Okay, stand by it. How many points had Texas scored

411
00:21:08,080 --> 00:21:08,840
Speaker 2: when he got hurt?

412
00:21:09,160 --> 00:21:12,119
Speaker 1: I don't remember. Don't ask me specifics. Okay, this is

413
00:21:12,240 --> 00:21:15,200
Speaker 1: just a raw reaction emotional from ty Hildon Brandt.

414
00:21:15,320 --> 00:21:16,520
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's okay.

415
00:21:16,560 --> 00:21:21,280
Speaker 1: That is how I feel deep into my marrow this year.

416
00:21:21,600 --> 00:21:23,880
Speaker 1: I think Texas is good enough to keep the Alabama

417
00:21:23,920 --> 00:21:26,800
Speaker 1: offense in check. I think they're good enough on offense

418
00:21:26,880 --> 00:21:30,600
Speaker 1: to score. I think Texas goes to Tuscaloos and wins. Outright,

419
00:21:31,400 --> 00:21:33,560
Speaker 1: I've got it. Twenty eight to twenty four. Texas pulls

420
00:21:33,560 --> 00:21:34,840
Speaker 1: the upset of the weekend.

421
00:21:35,160 --> 00:21:39,480
Speaker 2: Wow. Okay, So we agree on the line and taking

422
00:21:39,520 --> 00:21:41,359
Speaker 2: the dog here that it's probably a little bit too

423
00:21:41,400 --> 00:21:44,359
Speaker 2: much that you have it out right outright, Okay, So

424
00:21:44,560 --> 00:21:46,600
Speaker 2: what we're going to have to see is a second

425
00:21:46,600 --> 00:21:50,520
Speaker 2: half offense from Texas, which is not something we're super

426
00:21:50,640 --> 00:21:54,040
Speaker 2: used to as college football observers, and to do it

427
00:21:54,080 --> 00:21:56,720
Speaker 2: in Tuscalusa. Okay, Okay, I.

428
00:21:56,800 --> 00:22:03,960
Speaker 1: Think this could be one of those Resis games where

429
00:22:04,000 --> 00:22:06,600
Speaker 1: you're watching the play calling on the Alabama side and wondering,

430
00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:08,679
Speaker 1: why are they why are they doing this? Why are

431
00:22:08,680 --> 00:22:09,880
Speaker 1: they running this? I don't.

432
00:22:09,880 --> 00:22:13,560
Speaker 2: Okay, Well, now that you can downgrade his shining moment

433
00:22:13,640 --> 00:22:16,160
Speaker 2: last year and beating Clemson with Notre Dame.

434
00:22:16,640 --> 00:22:18,720
Speaker 1: I have priors. Okay, I have priors.

435
00:22:18,800 --> 00:22:20,080
Speaker 2: Are we going to talk about that? I mean, we

436
00:22:20,119 --> 00:22:22,480
Speaker 2: did a video, we put something out there. I don't

437
00:22:22,480 --> 00:22:24,680
Speaker 2: know if you want to have the morning Window brought

438
00:22:24,680 --> 00:22:30,000
Speaker 2: to you by a quick Clemson du recap. But man, okay,

439
00:22:30,040 --> 00:22:33,000
Speaker 2: any any concluding thoughts on Texas Alabama? You have this

440
00:22:33,200 --> 00:22:36,480
Speaker 2: as a mental block of a game for Tommy Reese,

441
00:22:36,520 --> 00:22:42,159
Speaker 2: the Alabama offense, Sark in a big game on the road. Okay,

442
00:22:43,080 --> 00:22:44,879
Speaker 2: let me let me write this down real quick. So

443
00:22:44,920 --> 00:22:47,679
Speaker 2: we sort of agree, Sark against the greatest coach of

444
00:22:47,680 --> 00:22:50,280
Speaker 2: all time on the road. Okay, and we sort of agree,

445
00:22:50,280 --> 00:22:51,919
Speaker 2: but not an outcome.

446
00:22:51,720 --> 00:22:54,840
Speaker 1: Next should we get to our early games, let's please

447
00:22:58,920 --> 00:23:05,880
Speaker 1: Interestingly enough, I think this is also the window of opportunity. Yeah,

448
00:23:06,119 --> 00:23:09,800
Speaker 1: the later you go this weekend, the harder it gets

449
00:23:09,840 --> 00:23:12,359
Speaker 1: to find a real window where you can miss the

450
00:23:12,400 --> 00:23:15,480
Speaker 1: action and not feel guilty about it. Right, that's my opinion.

451
00:23:15,480 --> 00:23:16,600
Speaker 1: I don't know if you feel differently.

452
00:23:18,320 --> 00:23:24,679
Speaker 2: I yeah, I just I've got the crazy curiosity about Colorado,

453
00:23:25,280 --> 00:23:28,399
Speaker 2: and there's enough in the early window. I'm looking at

454
00:23:28,400 --> 00:23:33,320
Speaker 2: the afternoon and the games you have down here to

455
00:23:33,359 --> 00:23:36,560
Speaker 2: talk about. I think I'd rather watch the early games.

456
00:23:36,680 --> 00:23:40,280
Speaker 1: Okay, but sometime in the afternoon, not at night. We

457
00:23:40,320 --> 00:23:42,239
Speaker 1: agree on that the window of opportunity is not at

458
00:23:42,359 --> 00:23:44,080
Speaker 1: nice of course on Saturday.

459
00:23:44,320 --> 00:23:45,400
Speaker 2: Yes, I agree.

460
00:23:46,240 --> 00:23:49,280
Speaker 1: We can talk about Clemson and Duke a little bit later,

461
00:23:49,440 --> 00:23:52,880
Speaker 1: but I want to There's not much to talk about.

462
00:23:52,920 --> 00:23:55,000
Speaker 1: But there's not much talk about except there is. But

463
00:23:55,040 --> 00:23:57,960
Speaker 1: we'll get to that, I promise you. Yeah, let's stay

464
00:23:58,000 --> 00:24:02,919
Speaker 1: on topic here and talk about twelve ESPN Utah minus

465
00:24:02,920 --> 00:24:05,800
Speaker 1: seven and a half on the road at Baylor. Yeah.

466
00:24:05,960 --> 00:24:09,000
Speaker 1: This may be the battle of the backups. Cam Rising

467
00:24:09,040 --> 00:24:13,160
Speaker 1: did not play last week for Utah against Florida, reportedly

468
00:24:13,200 --> 00:24:17,159
Speaker 1: making progress in his rehab from an ACL injury. But

469
00:24:17,320 --> 00:24:19,360
Speaker 1: if he can't go, it's gonna be Bryson Barnes again.

470
00:24:19,440 --> 00:24:21,640
Speaker 1: Bryson Barnes seemed fine last week against Florida.

471
00:24:22,000 --> 00:24:24,879
Speaker 2: Yeah, fam practice participant is what I saw for Cam Rising,

472
00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:27,320
Speaker 2: but not necessarily starting this game.

473
00:24:27,440 --> 00:24:29,680
Speaker 1: Still lisited as first on the depth chart. I believe

474
00:24:29,720 --> 00:24:31,800
Speaker 1: it was last week as well. That doesn't matter. And

475
00:24:31,880 --> 00:24:34,040
Speaker 1: on the Baylor front, they're gonna be without Blake shape In.

476
00:24:34,119 --> 00:24:36,520
Speaker 1: He's got a sprained MCL. He's gonna be down two

477
00:24:36,560 --> 00:24:40,320
Speaker 1: to three weeks, which means Sawyer Robertson excuse me, the

478
00:24:40,359 --> 00:24:44,880
Speaker 1: transfer is gonna get the go as well. Look, as

479
00:24:44,920 --> 00:24:49,679
Speaker 1: with all things Baylor, I get my news from the Pope. Okay,

480
00:24:50,240 --> 00:24:51,919
Speaker 1: I text a little bit with Peter Pope of our

481
00:24:52,000 --> 00:24:54,800
Speaker 1: Daily Bears this week. Great Baylor psite, good podcast. Check

482
00:24:54,800 --> 00:24:57,399
Speaker 1: it out if you're a Baylor fan. His concern is

483
00:24:57,440 --> 00:25:00,560
Speaker 1: not the quarterback. His concern is the lines. Watch any

484
00:25:00,600 --> 00:25:03,320
Speaker 1: of the highlights from the Baylor game last weekend. There

485
00:25:03,400 --> 00:25:05,960
Speaker 1: was a lot of Swish cheese there can against Texas State.

486
00:25:06,080 --> 00:25:10,199
Speaker 1: They lost to Texas State. Of all teams, I believe

487
00:25:10,240 --> 00:25:12,560
Speaker 1: if you're Utah, if you're looking at that tape, you're

488
00:25:12,560 --> 00:25:15,240
Speaker 1: licking your chops because that's what that's what Utah does.

489
00:25:15,400 --> 00:25:17,600
Speaker 1: Utah eats you up along both lines and that's how

490
00:25:17,600 --> 00:25:20,240
Speaker 1: they win their games. So minus seven and a half,

491
00:25:20,280 --> 00:25:23,080
Speaker 1: I'm on. I'm on Utah here, even on the road.

492
00:25:24,600 --> 00:25:28,320
Speaker 2: I disagree. Really, I don't like Baylor enough to call

493
00:25:28,359 --> 00:25:33,119
Speaker 2: them a winner. But wow, there's a letdown element, yes

494
00:25:33,240 --> 00:25:34,440
Speaker 2: for Utah is there?

495
00:25:34,560 --> 00:25:37,040
Speaker 1: I mean that game was over pretty early on that

496
00:25:37,160 --> 00:25:37,840
Speaker 1: Florida game.

497
00:25:38,119 --> 00:25:42,000
Speaker 2: Florida might be real bad. Okay, all right, Florida might

498
00:25:42,040 --> 00:25:45,359
Speaker 2: not be so hot, especially with Grammertz and there at quarterback.

499
00:25:46,160 --> 00:25:48,880
Speaker 2: I didn't think the Utah offense was incredible. They didn't

500
00:25:48,920 --> 00:25:51,399
Speaker 2: need to be against Florida, but as that game wore on,

501
00:25:51,560 --> 00:25:54,960
Speaker 2: its slowed down considerably. Right. Sure, the Utah offensive Bryce

502
00:25:54,960 --> 00:25:56,760
Speaker 2: and Barnes, and they have the packages for Nate Johnson.

503
00:25:56,800 --> 00:25:59,359
Speaker 2: It's quite impressive. I think the defense is extremely impressive

504
00:25:59,600 --> 00:26:03,439
Speaker 2: for Youah and should cause a lot of havoc for Baylor.

505
00:26:04,800 --> 00:26:10,160
Speaker 2: I think we are potentially in a magic little elixir

506
00:26:10,240 --> 00:26:16,040
Speaker 2: moment of Utah being super high literally and figuratively off

507
00:26:16,080 --> 00:26:19,359
Speaker 2: of that win high because of altitude. Tie calm yourself, sure,

508
00:26:19,400 --> 00:26:21,840
Speaker 2: and Baylor having its worst day, perhaps in a look

509
00:26:21,880 --> 00:26:25,440
Speaker 2: ahead spot against Texas State. Now, that's an awful worst

510
00:26:25,520 --> 00:26:28,560
Speaker 2: day to lose to the Bobcats. All due respect to GJ. Kinney,

511
00:26:29,400 --> 00:26:36,280
Speaker 2: h Utah typically doesn't win these games on the road

512
00:26:36,280 --> 00:26:40,320
Speaker 2: against Power five opponents. Baylor's possibly average to below average.

513
00:26:40,800 --> 00:26:44,399
Speaker 2: I concede you this, but in terms of that specific line,

514
00:26:45,200 --> 00:26:47,160
Speaker 2: I think it's a little much. I really do think

515
00:26:47,200 --> 00:26:49,359
Speaker 2: it's a little much. I'm not ready to write Baylor

516
00:26:49,400 --> 00:26:52,199
Speaker 2: off as a three to nine team or something. I

517
00:26:52,200 --> 00:26:53,280
Speaker 2: am despite the loss.

518
00:26:54,200 --> 00:26:55,959
Speaker 1: I am throwing up a red flag here at your

519
00:26:56,040 --> 00:26:58,520
Speaker 1: level of confidence because.

520
00:26:58,960 --> 00:27:00,800
Speaker 2: It's I love Week two. So this is arguably my

521
00:27:00,880 --> 00:27:01,840
Speaker 2: favorite week of the year.

522
00:27:02,000 --> 00:27:04,640
Speaker 1: This is the best week in a bet because everyone overreacts.

523
00:27:05,640 --> 00:27:08,159
Speaker 1: I don't like that you are this confident about Utah

524
00:27:08,200 --> 00:27:10,800
Speaker 1: that you know you're Pack twelve pretty well.

525
00:27:11,320 --> 00:27:12,680
Speaker 2: Oh, I think Utah is a very good team and

526
00:27:12,720 --> 00:27:16,040
Speaker 2: could win this conference. There is but there is nervous

527
00:27:16,040 --> 00:27:18,520
Speaker 2: about my pick, is what I'm saying. There is something

528
00:27:18,520 --> 00:27:21,560
Speaker 2: about the number that feels a little suckery. Okay that

529
00:27:22,160 --> 00:27:24,760
Speaker 2: I don't know that. I think Baylor can have a

530
00:27:24,800 --> 00:27:28,200
Speaker 2: better day than what they showed with line concerns whatever.

531
00:27:28,240 --> 00:27:30,440
Speaker 2: I still like some of their offensive skill talent. There

532
00:27:30,480 --> 00:27:32,199
Speaker 2: was a lot of Baylor people who were clamoring for

533
00:27:32,240 --> 00:27:34,960
Speaker 2: Sawyer Robertson over Blake shape and until he was named

534
00:27:35,000 --> 00:27:36,439
Speaker 2: the starter I think in the spring, but they were

535
00:27:36,480 --> 00:27:41,080
Speaker 2: disappointed with that naming. So I'm just treading carefully and

536
00:27:41,119 --> 00:27:45,359
Speaker 2: taking the points because this falls into that sweet spot

537
00:27:45,600 --> 00:27:48,080
Speaker 2: of a little bit high low coming into the middle

538
00:27:48,080 --> 00:27:50,120
Speaker 2: and Utah going on the road for it. If we're

539
00:27:50,119 --> 00:27:52,040
Speaker 2: in salt like, I'd feel a lot better. But I

540
00:27:52,040 --> 00:27:53,960
Speaker 2: don't know. Something throws me about this one.

541
00:27:54,040 --> 00:27:55,679
Speaker 1: Well, this is one of the games to pick and

542
00:27:55,760 --> 00:27:59,199
Speaker 1: run the board. We two and already we've seen an

543
00:27:59,240 --> 00:28:01,800
Speaker 1: interesting spread of picks again. For ballers dot Com is

544
00:28:01,800 --> 00:28:03,320
Speaker 1: where you can go to play that you can get

545
00:28:03,320 --> 00:28:05,479
Speaker 1: in for week two. You can get in whenever you want.

546
00:28:05,480 --> 00:28:07,040
Speaker 1: All you gotta do is sign up for any Patreon

547
00:28:07,080 --> 00:28:10,560
Speaker 1: tier everballers dot com sign it for five bucks if

548
00:28:10,560 --> 00:28:11,960
Speaker 1: you want to sign it for five bucks and play

549
00:28:12,040 --> 00:28:14,400
Speaker 1: for one hundred dollars gift card this week. We're gonna

550
00:28:14,400 --> 00:28:17,639
Speaker 1: have cool prizes every week, literally every week throughout the

551
00:28:17,680 --> 00:28:20,840
Speaker 1: span of this whole season long contest. At the end,

552
00:28:21,320 --> 00:28:24,600
Speaker 1: the winner, the overall winner, gets a seat on our board.

553
00:28:25,200 --> 00:28:27,840
Speaker 1: If you go out there and really go pedal to

554
00:28:27,840 --> 00:28:31,240
Speaker 1: the medal and go you know, something crazy like eight

555
00:28:31,280 --> 00:28:35,040
Speaker 1: and four, nine and three, even seven and five probably

556
00:28:35,080 --> 00:28:37,480
Speaker 1: gets you a chance still to be part of that

557
00:28:37,560 --> 00:28:40,040
Speaker 1: board of trustees. So for ballers, dot com is where

558
00:28:40,040 --> 00:28:42,160
Speaker 1: you can find out more. But I expect this game

559
00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:43,760
Speaker 1: is going to be one that's split down the middle.

560
00:28:44,240 --> 00:28:46,560
Speaker 2: How you do, I'm I'm right there with you. I

561
00:28:46,560 --> 00:28:48,000
Speaker 2: went back and forth on this because I do think

562
00:28:48,040 --> 00:28:50,320
Speaker 2: Utah is clearly the better team. It just it threw

563
00:28:50,400 --> 00:28:52,920
Speaker 2: me being in week two and yeah, I agree, play

564
00:28:52,960 --> 00:28:54,960
Speaker 2: run the board. The home field thing will be great

565
00:28:54,960 --> 00:28:58,600
Speaker 2: week eight. By the way, week seven or eight, Tie

566
00:28:58,600 --> 00:29:01,680
Speaker 2: has agreed, I can't believe agreed to do this. But

567
00:29:02,080 --> 00:29:06,240
Speaker 2: Ty gives a life changing Shiatsu massage the winner of

568
00:29:06,280 --> 00:29:08,400
Speaker 2: week eight's run the Board if you can get to

569
00:29:08,440 --> 00:29:12,240
Speaker 2: Eastern Pa. Uh huh okay, Ty Go's premium with the Oils.

570
00:29:12,360 --> 00:29:17,000
Speaker 2: The soundtrack is exquisite. But that's for week eight. That's

571
00:29:17,000 --> 00:29:19,560
Speaker 2: down the line. We'll get We'll circle back continue.

572
00:29:19,160 --> 00:29:22,760
Speaker 1: Ty twelve, Noon ABC. It's Notre Dame minus seven and

573
00:29:22,800 --> 00:29:27,040
Speaker 1: a half at NC State. Yeah, interesting line here, This

574
00:29:27,120 --> 00:29:30,280
Speaker 1: is a weird line. Speaking the sucker lines, this one

575
00:29:30,080 --> 00:29:33,080
Speaker 1: feels off to me. It is a step up in

576
00:29:33,120 --> 00:29:35,720
Speaker 1: competition for Notre Dame. You know, we're getting to some

577
00:29:35,800 --> 00:29:39,200
Speaker 1: teams now that Sam Hartman has seen before. The stat

578
00:29:39,280 --> 00:29:42,320
Speaker 1: that I found that you found. Yeah, we both are

579
00:29:42,440 --> 00:29:46,040
Speaker 1: fixated on this stat. Sam Hartman has thrown three interceptions

580
00:29:46,520 --> 00:29:48,960
Speaker 1: in each of the last two matchups against NC State.

581
00:29:49,000 --> 00:29:51,680
Speaker 1: If you take it in totality over his career, he's

582
00:29:51,720 --> 00:29:55,840
Speaker 1: thrown more interceptions against this defense than he has against

583
00:29:55,920 --> 00:29:58,360
Speaker 1: any other defense he's played in the span of time

584
00:29:58,360 --> 00:30:00,720
Speaker 1: that he's been a starting quarterback or play quarterback at

585
00:30:00,760 --> 00:30:03,520
Speaker 1: all at wake Forest. He does not like this three

586
00:30:03,600 --> 00:30:06,400
Speaker 1: three five that he's gonna play Tony Gibson, he does

587
00:30:06,440 --> 00:30:08,479
Speaker 1: not like it. He has not done well against this

588
00:30:08,960 --> 00:30:10,560
Speaker 1: How many wolf picks will he throw?

589
00:30:10,600 --> 00:30:12,760
Speaker 2: You like that? Wolf Pick's not bad? I was right there, Yeah,

590
00:30:12,800 --> 00:30:13,840
Speaker 2: that's not bad.

591
00:30:15,120 --> 00:30:17,080
Speaker 1: I also think you can make the case, though, if

592
00:30:17,080 --> 00:30:21,480
Speaker 1: I'm being honest, that this is a much different offense now.

593
00:30:21,640 --> 00:30:23,840
Speaker 1: He was being asked to throw the ball forty five

594
00:30:23,880 --> 00:30:27,280
Speaker 1: plus times when he was at Wake Forest to basically

595
00:30:27,320 --> 00:30:30,200
Speaker 1: win the game, probably with a better receiving corps at

596
00:30:30,200 --> 00:30:32,080
Speaker 1: wake Forest than he's got right now at Notre Dame,

597
00:30:32,160 --> 00:30:34,680
Speaker 1: or at least a more proven receiving corps. Then than

598
00:30:34,680 --> 00:30:35,240
Speaker 1: he has now.

599
00:30:35,400 --> 00:30:38,000
Speaker 2: Yeah, guys like at Perry, Yeah, they were really strong

600
00:30:38,080 --> 00:30:38,960
Speaker 2: dudes out wide.

601
00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:41,120
Speaker 1: Really good receiving corps. But it's just different now. He's

602
00:30:41,160 --> 00:30:43,400
Speaker 1: not gonna have to throw the ball forty five times.

603
00:30:43,400 --> 00:30:46,360
Speaker 1: If he throws at thirty, there's probably an issue for

604
00:30:46,480 --> 00:30:49,920
Speaker 1: Notre Dame. It's much more built around the run and physicality,

605
00:30:51,880 --> 00:30:54,400
Speaker 1: and it's got a defense behind it. Frankly, that helps

606
00:30:54,440 --> 00:30:56,120
Speaker 1: more than it hurts. He just he didn't have any

607
00:30:56,160 --> 00:30:59,520
Speaker 1: of that at Wake Forest, So that is I think

608
00:30:59,520 --> 00:31:02,960
Speaker 1: the dyna here. The line is weird. We know the priors,

609
00:31:03,120 --> 00:31:05,400
Speaker 1: but it's a different setup all together at Notre Dame

610
00:31:05,400 --> 00:31:07,080
Speaker 1: than it was Wake Forest. Where are you at here?

611
00:31:07,160 --> 00:31:11,280
Speaker 2: Right? Have Brendan Armstrong and Sam Hartman played against each

612
00:31:11,320 --> 00:31:14,760
Speaker 2: other thirteen times for fifteen different teams. I feel that

613
00:31:14,800 --> 00:31:17,080
Speaker 2: way Robert and I is somehow involved in this one.

614
00:31:17,160 --> 00:31:20,000
Speaker 2: He's been all over the ACC Man. This is the

615
00:31:20,000 --> 00:31:27,080
Speaker 2: most all Costco Conference matchup offociated Notre Dame games in Raleigh.

616
00:31:27,120 --> 00:31:30,360
Speaker 2: You're I think that the point that's well taken from

617
00:31:30,400 --> 00:31:32,160
Speaker 2: you and that I sort of sat on a little

618
00:31:32,160 --> 00:31:34,640
Speaker 2: bit too, is that Sam Hartman has the luxury of

619
00:31:34,680 --> 00:31:37,800
Speaker 2: a power rushing attack that should make his life easier

620
00:31:37,880 --> 00:31:41,720
Speaker 2: against NC State, which NC State's pretty strong corners. There's

621
00:31:41,960 --> 00:31:45,560
Speaker 2: I think considerable ACC all ACC level star power on

622
00:31:45,600 --> 00:31:49,360
Speaker 2: this defense. They didn't look super together and awesome on

623
00:31:49,440 --> 00:31:53,360
Speaker 2: offense last week. Brendan Armstrong at any time could put

624
00:31:53,400 --> 00:31:55,280
Speaker 2: up like a three hundred and one hundred game and

625
00:31:55,320 --> 00:31:57,800
Speaker 2: at any time could put up a one hundred and

626
00:31:57,840 --> 00:32:02,520
Speaker 2: fourteen and twenty eight game. And so your belief has

627
00:32:02,560 --> 00:32:05,600
Speaker 2: to be in Notre Dame on the road, the confidence

628
00:32:05,680 --> 00:32:08,440
Speaker 2: in playing what you consider to be bully ball, not

629
00:32:08,480 --> 00:32:10,400
Speaker 2: what you consider be it is bully ball, that Notre

630
00:32:10,480 --> 00:32:12,360
Speaker 2: Dame has that ability with a power rushing attack and

631
00:32:12,480 --> 00:32:17,040
Speaker 2: improve line. I think I'm taking points here in the

632
00:32:17,120 --> 00:32:21,280
Speaker 2: same way that I took the points with with Baylor

633
00:32:21,400 --> 00:32:23,680
Speaker 2: with Miami, where it's like, what is what is Notre

634
00:32:23,720 --> 00:32:27,880
Speaker 2: Dame earned this year? Right? They've taken care of business underrated,

635
00:32:27,880 --> 00:32:31,120
Speaker 2: as I like to say, probably too much, But there

636
00:32:31,200 --> 00:32:35,280
Speaker 2: is that the interception thing. There is the baggage there

637
00:32:36,000 --> 00:32:40,120
Speaker 2: that I don't know. I have to see something like

638
00:32:40,200 --> 00:32:44,240
Speaker 2: this roll out, you know, Notre Dame winning by you

639
00:32:44,280 --> 00:32:46,360
Speaker 2: know thirty four to twenty or something like that in

640
00:32:46,400 --> 00:32:47,960
Speaker 2: a matchup like this I think aainst the State's a

641
00:32:48,000 --> 00:32:51,400
Speaker 2: quality team, no more Tim Beck. That's something that's something

642
00:32:52,520 --> 00:32:54,560
Speaker 2: I'm taking these points here. Yeah, yeah, I think Notre

643
00:32:54,600 --> 00:32:56,680
Speaker 2: Dame is a better team. I have them at winning

644
00:32:56,680 --> 00:32:59,959
Speaker 2: this one, something like I don't know, twenty eight, twenty five,

645
00:33:00,520 --> 00:33:02,480
Speaker 2: eight twenty two, I don't know, something weird like that.

646
00:33:02,600 --> 00:33:05,600
Speaker 2: But no, I'm happy to take the points where we

647
00:33:05,640 --> 00:33:07,600
Speaker 2: don't know a ton about Notre Dame against the quality

648
00:33:07,640 --> 00:33:10,200
Speaker 2: team and we have a little bit of scar tissue

649
00:33:10,200 --> 00:33:12,480
Speaker 2: for Sam hartin and NC State and the game is

650
00:33:12,520 --> 00:33:15,600
Speaker 2: in Raleigh, Sol. Yeah, that's my reasoning there. I'm taking points.

651
00:33:15,640 --> 00:33:19,480
Speaker 1: I like Brennan Armstrong and I like the reunion between

652
00:33:19,560 --> 00:33:21,400
Speaker 1: him and Robert and I. I think that's fine. But

653
00:33:21,600 --> 00:33:24,240
Speaker 1: I don't really like NSTY State. I think they're like

654
00:33:24,240 --> 00:33:26,960
Speaker 1: the eighth or ninth best team in the ACC, and

655
00:33:27,040 --> 00:33:28,680
Speaker 1: I think Notre Dame is going to beat him up

656
00:33:28,720 --> 00:33:31,840
Speaker 1: on the ground. Okay, I'm also not sure who else

657
00:33:31,840 --> 00:33:33,840
Speaker 1: I'm supposed to worry about with the NC State offense.

658
00:33:34,640 --> 00:33:36,360
Speaker 1: I think it's going to be a lot of Brennan Armstrong,

659
00:33:36,600 --> 00:33:38,320
Speaker 1: and he's good at that. He was good at that

660
00:33:38,320 --> 00:33:41,240
Speaker 1: in Virginia. That was kind of his mo not last year,

661
00:33:41,280 --> 00:33:44,480
Speaker 1: but you know, I mean, I think this is who

662
00:33:44,520 --> 00:33:45,760
Speaker 1: he is and what they're going to try to do

663
00:33:45,800 --> 00:33:48,080
Speaker 1: with the offense. I'm just not sure that there's a compliment,

664
00:33:48,800 --> 00:33:50,680
Speaker 1: so I would not bet this game. To your point,

665
00:33:50,720 --> 00:33:52,440
Speaker 1: I wouldn't touch this game with a ten foot pole

666
00:33:52,480 --> 00:33:56,680
Speaker 1: because the line feels suckery to me. I could easily

667
00:33:56,760 --> 00:33:59,000
Speaker 1: see the style of play in this game making the

668
00:33:59,040 --> 00:34:03,040
Speaker 1: score lower closer than meets the eye. I think it's

669
00:34:03,080 --> 00:34:05,480
Speaker 1: Notre Dame something like twenty seven to seventeen. I'm not

670
00:34:05,480 --> 00:34:08,120
Speaker 1: sure NC State can score on Notre Dame, but it's

671
00:34:08,320 --> 00:34:10,560
Speaker 1: it's going to be flirting with that seven and a half,

672
00:34:10,560 --> 00:34:11,680
Speaker 1: which is why I wouldn't touch it.

673
00:34:12,600 --> 00:34:15,840
Speaker 2: NC State last year last year, different team, different guys, whatever,

674
00:34:15,920 --> 00:34:19,240
Speaker 2: but same coordinator, same philosophy. Finished fourth in the country

675
00:34:19,280 --> 00:34:22,520
Speaker 2: against the run, fourteenth in terms of forcing three and out,

676
00:34:22,560 --> 00:34:24,120
Speaker 2: which I think is going to be crucial against a

677
00:34:24,200 --> 00:34:27,600
Speaker 2: team that has a first priority still to me, of

678
00:34:27,840 --> 00:34:30,200
Speaker 2: establishing the run, unless you think.

679
00:34:30,080 --> 00:34:32,000
Speaker 1: Otherwise, no, no, that's one hundred percent.

680
00:34:32,520 --> 00:34:35,879
Speaker 2: That's fascinating philosophically. They have succeeded even when their team

681
00:34:35,880 --> 00:34:38,719
Speaker 2: has been not week to week Excellence next.

682
00:34:38,840 --> 00:34:40,840
Speaker 1: Four other very quick games. I'm gonna mention here in

683
00:34:40,840 --> 00:34:43,320
Speaker 1: the early window and they'll get to the afternoon twelve

684
00:34:43,320 --> 00:34:46,719
Speaker 1: o'clock ESPN two. Purdue at Virginia Tech minus three. We

685
00:34:46,800 --> 00:34:49,840
Speaker 1: both like Tech minus three. I mean we're like, it

686
00:34:49,920 --> 00:34:52,439
Speaker 1: might be a strong word, we're both willing. We're both

687
00:34:52,480 --> 00:34:55,640
Speaker 1: willing to go Virginia Tech minus three because, at least

688
00:34:55,640 --> 00:34:59,320
Speaker 1: in my case, I'm not crazy about Tech. Yeah, after

689
00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:01,600
Speaker 1: I'm not crazy about Tech, but after what I saw

690
00:35:01,640 --> 00:35:03,719
Speaker 1: on the Purdue side, it feels like a full rebuild

691
00:35:03,920 --> 00:35:07,439
Speaker 1: might be in progress there. And I never would bet

692
00:35:07,440 --> 00:35:10,480
Speaker 1: real currency on this game either, but I'll take Tech

693
00:35:10,520 --> 00:35:14,640
Speaker 1: minus three. Purdue's defense minus Fresno wasn't very good, so

694
00:35:15,000 --> 00:35:19,080
Speaker 1: I'm in on Tech. I'm in on Troy plus sixteen

695
00:35:19,120 --> 00:35:21,040
Speaker 1: and a half against k State because that's a lot

696
00:35:21,040 --> 00:35:23,520
Speaker 1: of points in Troy's Really Troy still got a pretty

697
00:35:23,560 --> 00:35:26,520
Speaker 1: good defense. OK, So I'm in on Troy. I'm in

698
00:35:26,600 --> 00:35:29,719
Speaker 1: on Vandy plus ten against Wake Forests. This is an

699
00:35:29,760 --> 00:35:33,280
Speaker 1: early kickoff at eleven am Eastern time on ACC Network.

700
00:35:33,880 --> 00:35:38,000
Speaker 1: And I'm also in on James Madison minus six against Virginia.

701
00:35:38,360 --> 00:35:40,759
Speaker 1: It's a road game, it's at Virginia. I think it's

702
00:35:40,800 --> 00:35:44,560
Speaker 1: probably very meaningful for JMU to play an in state opponent. Sure,

703
00:35:44,840 --> 00:35:48,240
Speaker 1: and I also think Virginia might be catastrophically bad again,

704
00:35:48,440 --> 00:35:52,720
Speaker 1: at least on offense. So those are my four other picks.

705
00:35:52,719 --> 00:35:55,200
Speaker 1: I don't know if you agree, disagree, want a spar

706
00:35:55,320 --> 00:35:56,919
Speaker 1: about any of those, But that's where I'm at.

707
00:35:57,600 --> 00:36:00,359
Speaker 2: Okay, I disagree on a chunk of that. Okay, I

708
00:36:00,440 --> 00:36:02,520
Speaker 2: like Wake minus ten because I don't think Vandy is

709
00:36:02,560 --> 00:36:04,279
Speaker 2: all that good. I don't think their past defense is

710
00:36:04,280 --> 00:36:05,799
Speaker 2: all that good, and we know Wake is going to

711
00:36:05,880 --> 00:36:07,719
Speaker 2: just throw the ball repeatedly. I think it's a bad

712
00:36:07,760 --> 00:36:10,320
Speaker 2: matchup for Vandy. I don't think the Vandy offense was

713
00:36:10,400 --> 00:36:12,840
Speaker 2: especially good last week. Ken Seals came in and was

714
00:36:12,920 --> 00:36:17,239
Speaker 2: better than aj Swan against was it Alabama? A and M?

715
00:36:17,360 --> 00:36:19,879
Speaker 2: Is that who Vandy beat last Like, I don't think

716
00:36:19,920 --> 00:36:23,000
Speaker 2: Vandy was that impressive. Now, I still want them to

717
00:36:23,040 --> 00:36:25,160
Speaker 2: go to a bowl game. I want them to go

718
00:36:25,200 --> 00:36:27,080
Speaker 2: to a ball game because I made the spicy prediction.

719
00:36:27,760 --> 00:36:30,080
Speaker 2: But I am more down on Vandy than I thought

720
00:36:30,080 --> 00:36:31,440
Speaker 2: I would be. I thought the defense would be in

721
00:36:31,480 --> 00:36:34,320
Speaker 2: a better place and it's just not. At the moment.

722
00:36:34,320 --> 00:36:36,239
Speaker 2: I think it's a bad matchup, I'm happy to give

723
00:36:36,280 --> 00:36:38,080
Speaker 2: those points. I think Wake is better as much as

724
00:36:38,080 --> 00:36:42,160
Speaker 2: you doubt Mitch Griffis. Give me Wake there. I think

725
00:36:42,200 --> 00:36:45,640
Speaker 2: Kansas State's way better than Troy. I do. I think

726
00:36:45,640 --> 00:36:48,920
Speaker 2: Troy is a very good defense. When they played teams

727
00:36:48,960 --> 00:36:49,919
Speaker 2: in their conference.

728
00:36:49,640 --> 00:36:51,720
Speaker 1: Kansas State always has a game like this. They always

729
00:36:51,719 --> 00:36:53,320
Speaker 1: have a random clunker.

730
00:36:53,480 --> 00:36:57,440
Speaker 2: With Adrian Martinez. Last year they had the random clunker.

731
00:36:58,320 --> 00:37:01,000
Speaker 2: This we're talking about the Will Howard and Avery Johnson

732
00:37:01,520 --> 00:37:06,680
Speaker 2: ed k State a very Johnson, a very Johnson. Okay,

733
00:37:06,840 --> 00:37:08,480
Speaker 2: so I'm going with k State big here. I think

734
00:37:08,480 --> 00:37:10,280
Speaker 2: they run all over Troy. And I don't think Troy's

735
00:37:10,280 --> 00:37:12,480
Speaker 2: offense is in anywhere near a place to keep up

736
00:37:12,480 --> 00:37:16,280
Speaker 2: with k State on offense. And I have Virginia against

737
00:37:16,360 --> 00:37:21,239
Speaker 2: James Madison, and I'm gonna tell you why. I don't know.

738
00:37:21,280 --> 00:37:23,359
Speaker 2: Somebody has to win this game, and Virginia's playing at.

739
00:37:23,239 --> 00:37:24,920
Speaker 1: Home, and say, why don't you tell me?

740
00:37:25,280 --> 00:37:27,680
Speaker 2: It's scared me a little bit that last year JMU

741
00:37:27,800 --> 00:37:29,480
Speaker 2: was beating up on a bunch of Sun Belt teams,

742
00:37:29,520 --> 00:37:32,840
Speaker 2: then played against a average to maybe above average Louisville

743
00:37:32,840 --> 00:37:35,319
Speaker 2: team and just got shelled on the road like it

744
00:37:35,400 --> 00:37:38,440
Speaker 2: is a different level ACC players. Say what you about Virginia.

745
00:37:38,800 --> 00:37:41,560
Speaker 2: I don't think what they are against Tennessee in Week

746
00:37:41,560 --> 00:37:45,040
Speaker 2: one is necessarily representative, not high on the who's think

747
00:37:45,080 --> 00:37:48,000
Speaker 2: it could certainly be a long season. Do I think

748
00:37:48,040 --> 00:37:54,759
Speaker 2: they're upper tier Sun Belt quality? Not yet. I'm not

749
00:37:54,840 --> 00:37:57,440
Speaker 2: willing to go there yet, So I'm taking Virginia. I

750
00:37:57,520 --> 00:37:59,600
Speaker 2: think they still have enough guys on defense even after

751
00:37:59,640 --> 00:38:04,320
Speaker 2: losing dudes the portal that I just I'm I'm maybe

752
00:38:04,320 --> 00:38:06,400
Speaker 2: this is a hopeful, Maybe this is wish casting that

753
00:38:06,520 --> 00:38:10,319
Speaker 2: Virginia is an actual ACC team. But yeah, that big

754
00:38:10,360 --> 00:38:11,840
Speaker 2: of a dog at home to JM you, No, I

755
00:38:11,840 --> 00:38:13,920
Speaker 2: think it's kind of a fool's Errand.

756
00:38:13,920 --> 00:38:19,360
Speaker 1: Let's get to the afternoon block. Okay, you said you

757
00:38:19,400 --> 00:38:20,720
Speaker 1: were excited about this block.

758
00:38:22,040 --> 00:38:24,879
Speaker 2: You say yeah when you said when you said the

759
00:38:24,880 --> 00:38:27,040
Speaker 2: the window is the after or you said the early

760
00:38:27,080 --> 00:38:30,839
Speaker 2: window was the one you'd skip as the window of opportunity.

761
00:38:31,320 --> 00:38:33,439
Speaker 1: Well, which of these games excites you the most. We've

762
00:38:33,440 --> 00:38:35,399
Speaker 1: got four listed here in our sheet. We've got old

763
00:38:35,400 --> 00:38:39,360
Speaker 1: Miss Tulane Io, Iowa State, I put Texas State, Utah

764
00:38:39,560 --> 00:38:43,359
Speaker 1: or Utah uts excuse me, also a four letter team,

765
00:38:43,440 --> 00:38:47,799
Speaker 1: starting with ut and app State at North Carolina as

766
00:38:47,880 --> 00:38:50,640
Speaker 1: the four that we'll do a quick mention of here,

767
00:38:50,680 --> 00:38:54,200
Speaker 1: which which of those four are you most excited to watch?

768
00:38:54,200 --> 00:38:58,719
Speaker 2: If you're picking oh, easily Syhawk, no question, in my mind, you're.

769
00:38:58,440 --> 00:39:01,440
Speaker 1: Thirty on Fox. It is Iowa minus four on the

770
00:39:01,480 --> 00:39:06,239
Speaker 1: road at Iowa State. Here is my question, Never mind

771
00:39:06,239 --> 00:39:09,000
Speaker 1: who you think is gonna win. Does the winner of

772
00:39:09,000 --> 00:39:11,399
Speaker 1: this game get to twenty five points? No?

773
00:39:11,560 --> 00:39:12,120
Speaker 2: Definitely not.

774
00:39:12,200 --> 00:39:13,920
Speaker 1: Does the winner get to twenty points?

775
00:39:15,160 --> 00:39:15,480
Speaker 2: Sure?

776
00:39:16,480 --> 00:39:16,640
Speaker 1: Sure?

777
00:39:16,640 --> 00:39:18,239
Speaker 2: Were you picking Iowa State?

778
00:39:18,920 --> 00:39:19,160
Speaker 1: Why?

779
00:39:20,360 --> 00:39:23,359
Speaker 2: I think we're gonna have two good defenses and one

780
00:39:23,400 --> 00:39:26,239
Speaker 2: of them is playing at home in a rivalry matchup.

781
00:39:26,719 --> 00:39:31,279
Speaker 2: The other offense, like Kate McNamara's Iowa offense last week,

782
00:39:31,400 --> 00:39:35,280
Speaker 2: screeched to a halt quickly against Utah State and missed

783
00:39:35,320 --> 00:39:39,279
Speaker 2: opportunities deep in Utah State. Tear like, I just I

784
00:39:39,320 --> 00:39:41,719
Speaker 2: don't love Iowa here. If they're gonna win this game

785
00:39:41,840 --> 00:39:45,279
Speaker 2: by double digits or seven to ten points, whatever, it's

786
00:39:45,320 --> 00:39:48,399
Speaker 2: gonna come off turnovers, and that's very much an Iowa thing.

787
00:39:48,960 --> 00:39:53,440
Speaker 2: But I don't know. I'm still gonna roll with Philosophically speaking,

788
00:39:54,160 --> 00:39:56,640
Speaker 2: a home dog with a good defense in a rivalry,

789
00:39:56,880 --> 00:40:00,759
Speaker 2: tough place to play. I'm going with you know, the

790
00:40:01,280 --> 00:40:04,280
Speaker 2: central tenets of my belief system here, and I believe

791
00:40:04,320 --> 00:40:08,799
Speaker 2: Iowa has a higher ceiling. But situationally, I'm going Iowa

792
00:40:08,840 --> 00:40:10,839
Speaker 2: State here, even though they very rarely win this game.

793
00:40:11,200 --> 00:40:12,920
Speaker 2: I'm going to Iowa State. Wow.

794
00:40:14,480 --> 00:40:19,400
Speaker 1: I've been thinking about something a lot here. Okay, we

795
00:40:19,520 --> 00:40:22,719
Speaker 1: tested the Farence fluff up theory. Yeah, we tested it

796
00:40:22,760 --> 00:40:24,960
Speaker 1: out a little bit last week, and the theory was

797
00:40:25,040 --> 00:40:29,000
Speaker 1: because they've got this ridiculous KPI. Now for Brian Farrence,

798
00:40:29,040 --> 00:40:31,280
Speaker 1: I agree with it, by the way, but the circumstances

799
00:40:31,280 --> 00:40:34,120
Speaker 1: are just ridiculous that this would be public. He's got

800
00:40:34,160 --> 00:40:37,000
Speaker 1: to average twenty five points per game to avoid getting fired.

801
00:40:38,400 --> 00:40:43,000
Speaker 1: We tested the Farence fluff up theory last week, and

802
00:40:43,080 --> 00:40:44,640
Speaker 1: that is that they're going to run it up against

803
00:40:44,640 --> 00:40:47,080
Speaker 1: weaker competitions so that when they play better teams and

804
00:40:47,080 --> 00:40:48,480
Speaker 1: are gonna worry about it, and he just played the

805
00:40:48,520 --> 00:40:51,320
Speaker 1: style of football they want to play. They win sixteen

806
00:40:51,320 --> 00:40:53,600
Speaker 1: to fourteen, and he'll be fine, He'll be in the clear.

807
00:40:53,640 --> 00:40:56,960
Speaker 1: It'll all average out and he can live to coach

808
00:40:57,000 --> 00:41:02,720
Speaker 1: another year. Yeah, what if what if we thought about

809
00:41:03,120 --> 00:41:08,960
Speaker 1: a reverse Farence fluff up theory, a reverse theory. Okay

810
00:41:09,520 --> 00:41:13,560
Speaker 1: with me, my attention, a reverse Farence fluff up. Perhaps

811
00:41:13,640 --> 00:41:18,239
Speaker 1: the opposite is true. What if behind Kate McNamara, Kate

812
00:41:18,320 --> 00:41:20,400
Speaker 1: snack namara, if they throw four yards per attempt? I

813
00:41:20,440 --> 00:41:20,719
Speaker 1: don't know.

814
00:41:20,760 --> 00:41:22,520
Speaker 2: Oh, I remember that. What if?

815
00:41:23,120 --> 00:41:25,840
Speaker 1: What if they go on the road they win the

816
00:41:25,880 --> 00:41:29,759
Speaker 1: Syhawk Trophy thirty eight seventeen. It's just an explosion of

817
00:41:29,800 --> 00:41:32,680
Speaker 1: Iowa points, a reverse Farence fluff up.

818
00:41:33,600 --> 00:41:39,000
Speaker 2: Wow, what if man, the Peter northification of Iowa football.

819
00:41:39,040 --> 00:41:41,560
Speaker 1: That's what I'm saying. What if man?

820
00:41:42,160 --> 00:41:45,960
Speaker 2: Okay, I'm agreeing with this zag like I'm agreeing with

821
00:41:46,000 --> 00:41:47,400
Speaker 2: the spirit of this zag tie.

822
00:41:47,680 --> 00:41:50,560
Speaker 1: Sometimes you gotta think outside the box. You gotta be different.

823
00:41:50,560 --> 00:41:54,200
Speaker 1: We wouldn't be America's college football podcast. It's two thousand

824
00:41:54,239 --> 00:41:54,520
Speaker 1: and eight.

825
00:41:54,840 --> 00:41:55,560
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's true.

826
00:41:55,719 --> 00:41:58,080
Speaker 1: If not for zags like this every now and again.

827
00:41:58,360 --> 00:42:00,440
Speaker 2: Yeah, the people of Verballers dot Com do enjoy a

828
00:42:00,440 --> 00:42:04,080
Speaker 2: good zag um. Okay, I respect it. I absolutely respect it.

829
00:42:04,120 --> 00:42:07,680
Speaker 2: I stick to my belief system. But I like the

830
00:42:07,719 --> 00:42:09,719
Speaker 2: way your your brain is moving. It's good bye me.

831
00:42:09,880 --> 00:42:11,759
Speaker 1: Thirty eight seventeen. Iowall win the.

832
00:42:11,760 --> 00:42:14,880
Speaker 2: Syhawk Okay, what is the next game.

833
00:42:14,920 --> 00:42:18,480
Speaker 1: Old Miss Tulane also three thirty ESPN two Ole Miss

834
00:42:18,640 --> 00:42:23,320
Speaker 1: seven point road favorite. Now this is intriguing to me. Yeah,

835
00:42:23,560 --> 00:42:26,280
Speaker 1: this is intriguing as we start looking at home dogs

836
00:42:26,280 --> 00:42:28,080
Speaker 1: and where might where might the home dog of the

837
00:42:28,080 --> 00:42:32,160
Speaker 1: week beat Tulane was a popular a popular option in

838
00:42:32,200 --> 00:42:34,920
Speaker 1: my mind, I am taking twu Lane plus the points.

839
00:42:35,480 --> 00:42:38,560
Speaker 1: Ole Miss one really big last week and as a result,

840
00:42:38,680 --> 00:42:41,680
Speaker 1: seventy seven percent of the bets, ninety three percent of

841
00:42:41,719 --> 00:42:45,200
Speaker 1: the public money is on Old Miss. Okay Tulane. Though

842
00:42:45,760 --> 00:42:49,600
Speaker 1: Tulane has slowly gotten better almost every year under Will Fritz,

843
00:42:49,640 --> 00:42:52,359
Speaker 1: They've gotten better. They put up thirty seven last week

844
00:42:52,400 --> 00:42:55,680
Speaker 1: against a decent defense in South Alabama. I think they

845
00:42:55,719 --> 00:42:57,760
Speaker 1: will hold their own. I don't think they're beating Ole Miss,

846
00:42:58,280 --> 00:43:02,239
Speaker 1: but we have seen Tulane perform admirably against competition that

847
00:43:02,320 --> 00:43:05,600
Speaker 1: is perceived to be better than them. Seven points at

848
00:43:05,600 --> 00:43:09,080
Speaker 1: home is a very attainable line. That's a very attainable number,

849
00:43:09,120 --> 00:43:11,160
Speaker 1: and that is Vegas basically saying, like an these teams

850
00:43:11,200 --> 00:43:13,880
Speaker 1: are pretty close. So I'm in on Tulane here not

851
00:43:13,960 --> 00:43:15,520
Speaker 1: to win, but to cover the spread.

852
00:43:17,600 --> 00:43:21,279
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think so too. The games in New Orleans

853
00:43:21,560 --> 00:43:25,480
Speaker 2: it's a decent number. My problem is I think ole

854
00:43:25,560 --> 00:43:28,400
Speaker 2: Miss could just hand the ball off fifty three times

855
00:43:28,600 --> 00:43:31,520
Speaker 2: and probably slowly. In Shirley crock Pot Tulane like it

856
00:43:31,600 --> 00:43:34,239
Speaker 2: seems like, ooh, you see the scroll at halftime and

857
00:43:34,280 --> 00:43:36,040
Speaker 2: it's fourteen to ten ole Miss or something like that,

858
00:43:36,120 --> 00:43:38,040
Speaker 2: and then you look up again in thirty eight minutes

859
00:43:38,080 --> 00:43:40,720
Speaker 2: and it's thirty five to thirteen. You're like, oh, Okay,

860
00:43:40,760 --> 00:43:44,160
Speaker 2: that got out of hand. I'm going with Tulane here.

861
00:43:44,239 --> 00:43:46,120
Speaker 2: I don't love the pick, but I like having a

862
00:43:46,160 --> 00:43:48,920
Speaker 2: good home team with a good quarterback and Michael Pratt,

863
00:43:49,280 --> 00:43:52,520
Speaker 2: and would like to see more from the ole Miss defense. Again,

864
00:43:52,560 --> 00:43:54,440
Speaker 2: this is the similar line of thinking on the go

865
00:43:54,520 --> 00:43:57,399
Speaker 2: on the road against quality team where I don't think

866
00:43:57,400 --> 00:43:59,440
Speaker 2: we have a good sense of where ole Miss's defense

867
00:43:59,480 --> 00:44:00,880
Speaker 2: truly is it the moment I think they're going to

868
00:44:00,920 --> 00:44:03,920
Speaker 2: score points. But yeah, I'm going to say thirty to

869
00:44:03,960 --> 00:44:08,000
Speaker 2: twenty seven ole Miss, thirty to twenty seven. I Yeah,

870
00:44:08,360 --> 00:44:10,800
Speaker 2: feel like that's about right. Could see a crock potting,

871
00:44:10,840 --> 00:44:12,400
Speaker 2: but I'm going to bring it closer.

872
00:44:14,080 --> 00:44:15,879
Speaker 1: The two other games that I mentioned at the top

873
00:44:15,920 --> 00:44:19,560
Speaker 1: of this block that I'll round out with. I've got

874
00:44:19,600 --> 00:44:23,560
Speaker 1: Texas State plus twelve and a half against UTSA. I

875
00:44:23,560 --> 00:44:25,600
Speaker 1: didn't think UTSA looked all that good last week.

876
00:44:25,680 --> 00:44:27,160
Speaker 2: I have Texas State in the points. I think it's

877
00:44:27,160 --> 00:44:27,759
Speaker 2: a shootout.

878
00:44:27,920 --> 00:44:30,399
Speaker 1: Yeah, I didn't think UTSA looked that good at all,

879
00:44:30,840 --> 00:44:33,719
Speaker 1: and it was disheartening because we've been so big on

880
00:44:33,719 --> 00:44:36,880
Speaker 1: Big Frank Harris, but they didn't look good. And Texas

881
00:44:36,880 --> 00:44:38,880
Speaker 1: State one and they're kind of in the midst of

882
00:44:38,920 --> 00:44:43,680
Speaker 1: their own Coloradoing type move with transfers and whatnot.

883
00:44:43,719 --> 00:44:44,000
Speaker 2: GJ.

884
00:44:44,080 --> 00:44:47,480
Speaker 1: Kinney, Yeah, so give me the Bobcats. And then five

885
00:44:47,520 --> 00:44:51,200
Speaker 1: point fifteen ACC Network app State at North Carolina. I

886
00:44:51,239 --> 00:44:53,120
Speaker 1: put this one on here because this game was crazy

887
00:44:53,160 --> 00:44:55,879
Speaker 1: as hell last year. Yeah, this was a Week one

888
00:44:55,960 --> 00:44:59,839
Speaker 1: game that North Carolina won sixty three sixty one. It

889
00:44:59,880 --> 00:45:01,600
Speaker 1: was kind of the coming out party for Drake May

890
00:45:01,640 --> 00:45:03,880
Speaker 1: where we're looking at the numbers like they might have

891
00:45:03,960 --> 00:45:07,880
Speaker 1: something here, they might have something here. Are you buying

892
00:45:07,880 --> 00:45:10,560
Speaker 1: in on the North Carolina defense? Oh?

893
00:45:10,840 --> 00:45:14,399
Speaker 2: Yeah, fully I can. I can buy improvement here and there.

894
00:45:14,400 --> 00:45:16,600
Speaker 2: I don't think it's going to have the same rhythm

895
00:45:16,600 --> 00:45:20,560
Speaker 2: of last year's matchup. APP State loses their offensive coordinator

896
00:45:20,600 --> 00:45:25,399
Speaker 2: of course, to what Mississippi State. I don't buy North

897
00:45:25,440 --> 00:45:28,120
Speaker 2: Carolina's defense, but I'm not sure I'm buying app State's offense.

898
00:45:28,360 --> 00:45:31,040
Speaker 2: I think North Carolina might look a bit sluggish in

899
00:45:31,080 --> 00:45:35,480
Speaker 2: this one. It's I don't have a good reason for

900
00:45:35,480 --> 00:45:38,840
Speaker 2: app State to hang around. I don't think they're terrific

901
00:45:38,880 --> 00:45:42,360
Speaker 2: this year. So man, I went back and forth with

902
00:45:42,400 --> 00:45:45,280
Speaker 2: this one. I think I'm going to give the points.

903
00:45:45,719 --> 00:45:47,600
Speaker 2: I think it might be a somewhat close game, but

904
00:45:47,640 --> 00:45:50,680
Speaker 2: I think ultimately and look, the new clock rules sort

905
00:45:50,719 --> 00:45:53,640
Speaker 2: of change bigger spreads that you're uncomfortable with in terms

906
00:45:53,640 --> 00:45:57,319
Speaker 2: of limiting possessions, drives, whatever. But I still think North

907
00:45:57,320 --> 00:45:59,600
Speaker 2: Carolina win this game by three touchdowns. So I'm going

908
00:45:59,680 --> 00:46:01,680
Speaker 2: to say forty two to twenty.

909
00:46:01,719 --> 00:46:03,200
Speaker 1: I have forty two to twenty one written down. And

910
00:46:03,239 --> 00:46:05,360
Speaker 1: we didn't repair we didn't compare notes before this. We

911
00:46:05,440 --> 00:46:09,400
Speaker 1: never all right, shall we get to the night window.

912
00:46:09,840 --> 00:46:15,440
Speaker 1: Let's all right, there are some games in this night

913
00:46:15,480 --> 00:46:17,840
Speaker 1: window that we need to talk to me. Great night, Yeah,

914
00:46:18,160 --> 00:46:22,200
Speaker 1: get ready, get back in time from you know, junior

915
00:46:22,320 --> 00:46:26,360
Speaker 1: soccer match or the baseball fields, or playing flag football,

916
00:46:26,719 --> 00:46:29,920
Speaker 1: the orchard, whatever, whatever the family men and women out

917
00:46:29,960 --> 00:46:33,319
Speaker 1: there are doing. Just get back in front of the

918
00:46:33,360 --> 00:46:35,319
Speaker 1: TV in time for seven o'clock, because this is when

919
00:46:35,360 --> 00:46:37,920
Speaker 1: this thing really starts to heat up on Savoy. It's Saturday, right,

920
00:46:38,320 --> 00:46:41,560
Speaker 1: is when you're starting to hear the barks seven pm

921
00:46:41,640 --> 00:46:44,680
Speaker 1: on Fox your Oregon Ducks minus six and a half

922
00:46:44,719 --> 00:46:48,480
Speaker 1: on the road at Texas Tech. Yeah, a strange line,

923
00:46:48,560 --> 00:46:52,719
Speaker 1: Dan explain, strange line. I saw this. This is a

924
00:46:52,719 --> 00:46:56,000
Speaker 1: flashing red leg that little police light emoji that we

925
00:46:56,120 --> 00:46:58,160
Speaker 1: use all the time. That's what this is. This line.

926
00:46:58,360 --> 00:46:58,759
Speaker 2: Mm hmm.

927
00:46:59,360 --> 00:47:01,880
Speaker 1: Oregon wall on eighty one to seven last week against

928
00:47:01,920 --> 00:47:05,560
Speaker 1: Portland State, and Texas Tech lost in double ot on

929
00:47:05,600 --> 00:47:11,120
Speaker 1: the road in Laramie against Wyoming. Naturally, that means Texas

930
00:47:11,200 --> 00:47:16,120
Speaker 1: Tech is less than a touchdown home dog against the Ducks.

931
00:47:17,760 --> 00:47:19,919
Speaker 1: What am I missing here? What am I missing here?

932
00:47:19,920 --> 00:47:22,520
Speaker 1: You did the preview on both these teams in the preseason.

933
00:47:22,760 --> 00:47:24,120
Speaker 1: What am I missing here with this one?

934
00:47:24,320 --> 00:47:28,160
Speaker 2: The case for being relatively close is that was starting

935
00:47:28,160 --> 00:47:30,720
Speaker 2: your season off in Laramie. As I pointed out before

936
00:47:30,840 --> 00:47:33,680
Speaker 2: last week's matchup, that's a tall task. It was tall.

937
00:47:34,000 --> 00:47:34,880
Speaker 1: It was stupid.

938
00:47:34,880 --> 00:47:36,880
Speaker 2: I don't know why they did it anyway, continued Definitely

939
00:47:36,880 --> 00:47:42,960
Speaker 2: somebody Texas Tech at times mainly. The first quarter looked

940
00:47:43,239 --> 00:47:46,239
Speaker 2: opportunistic and taking advantage of short fields, scored a bunch

941
00:47:46,280 --> 00:47:49,719
Speaker 2: of points. Tyler Schuck looked good connecting downfield. And then

942
00:47:50,080 --> 00:47:52,239
Speaker 2: it wasn't even like a back and forth game. It

943
00:47:52,280 --> 00:47:55,759
Speaker 2: was Texas Tech holding on to get to overtime and

944
00:47:55,800 --> 00:48:01,120
Speaker 2: losing in double overtime. So I'm struggle with this because

945
00:48:01,760 --> 00:48:05,080
Speaker 2: Texas Tech is not as bad as they were last week,

946
00:48:05,120 --> 00:48:07,839
Speaker 2: because I like to give teams week one passes that

947
00:48:07,880 --> 00:48:09,759
Speaker 2: you're sorting things out in week one, and sorting things

948
00:48:09,800 --> 00:48:13,319
Speaker 2: out in Laramie can be tricky, and so you want

949
00:48:13,320 --> 00:48:16,520
Speaker 2: to pencil in some improvement correcting the correctible. They have

950
00:48:16,560 --> 00:48:19,080
Speaker 2: a quality quarterback, they're playing at home in a difficult

951
00:48:19,080 --> 00:48:22,919
Speaker 2: place to play. Oregon really hasn't obviously been tested. Only

952
00:48:22,920 --> 00:48:28,440
Speaker 2: taking on Portland State took care business. I don't know, man,

953
00:48:28,440 --> 00:48:31,200
Speaker 2: Texas Tech just lost a very important linebacker for at

954
00:48:31,239 --> 00:48:33,520
Speaker 2: least a month or so, four to six weeks, and

955
00:48:34,120 --> 00:48:35,640
Speaker 2: I don't think that was a position group they could

956
00:48:35,680 --> 00:48:40,920
Speaker 2: afford to lose a guy. No, So I'm very hesitant

957
00:48:41,000 --> 00:48:45,359
Speaker 2: to do this, But man, I just there's too much

958
00:48:45,480 --> 00:48:49,680
Speaker 2: Tyler Schuck's scar tissue for me not to organ's my

959
00:48:49,760 --> 00:48:50,359
Speaker 2: lock of the week.

960
00:48:50,840 --> 00:48:58,680
Speaker 1: Wow, your own team WK of the week. Wow, this

961
00:48:58,719 --> 00:49:01,239
Speaker 1: is gonna make you feel even worse. I'm on the

962
00:49:01,320 --> 00:49:02,640
Speaker 1: Ducks too, not as a lock.

963
00:49:02,800 --> 00:49:05,120
Speaker 2: Now, not as a lock, not a double barrel. But

964
00:49:05,160 --> 00:49:08,200
Speaker 2: there is something about like Oregon just has too many ways.

965
00:49:08,280 --> 00:49:12,640
Speaker 2: They've got the much the much superior. I don't know

966
00:49:12,640 --> 00:49:15,560
Speaker 2: what they've got the clearly superior quarterback to me, the

967
00:49:15,560 --> 00:49:18,480
Speaker 2: offensive line answered, I mean, it's Portland State, but I

968
00:49:18,480 --> 00:49:20,920
Speaker 2: think the offensive line looks very good. They're rotating in

969
00:49:21,000 --> 00:49:24,399
Speaker 2: a ton of youth. On defense. I have a couple

970
00:49:24,520 --> 00:49:27,600
Speaker 2: questions about the secondary, but not at safety that sort

971
00:49:27,640 --> 00:49:30,480
Speaker 2: of answered for me last week. Just the instincts and

972
00:49:30,520 --> 00:49:33,520
Speaker 2: the tackling ability. I don't know. I have this one

973
00:49:33,560 --> 00:49:36,680
Speaker 2: as like thirty eight seventeen Oregon. I think it's a

974
00:49:36,800 --> 00:49:38,160
Speaker 2: very comfortable win in Lubbock.

975
00:49:38,320 --> 00:49:41,239
Speaker 1: Well, we both like Texa Tech this year. Yeah, we

976
00:49:41,320 --> 00:49:44,879
Speaker 1: both like Tech this year. That moving forward in future years,

977
00:49:44,920 --> 00:49:47,680
Speaker 1: we think it's a program that's on the rise. Yeah,

978
00:49:47,920 --> 00:49:51,480
Speaker 1: but Oregon giving less than a touchdown, I don't know.

979
00:49:51,560 --> 00:49:53,960
Speaker 1: I'm on the Ducks. Even in a weird road spot

980
00:49:54,000 --> 00:49:57,200
Speaker 1: at night. I'm sure the crowd's gonna be raucus, sure,

981
00:49:57,760 --> 00:49:59,839
Speaker 1: but I just kept coming back to the fact that

982
00:50:00,080 --> 00:50:02,839
Speaker 1: both of us believe Oregon is good enough to win

983
00:50:02,880 --> 00:50:06,800
Speaker 1: the Conference PAC twelve and be a playoff contender.

984
00:50:07,920 --> 00:50:09,440
Speaker 2: I think I think the pass rush is going to

985
00:50:09,480 --> 00:50:11,520
Speaker 2: be a lot better against Texas Tech than it was

986
00:50:11,880 --> 00:50:13,759
Speaker 2: last season. And then you can just sort of sit

987
00:50:13,800 --> 00:50:18,000
Speaker 2: and coverage if we believe both those things would be true. Yeah,

988
00:50:18,040 --> 00:50:19,960
Speaker 2: which we saw they won by seventy four points.

989
00:50:20,440 --> 00:50:23,279
Speaker 1: If nothing changes my mind on that, If we still

990
00:50:23,320 --> 00:50:25,000
Speaker 1: believe that both those things are true, then they win

991
00:50:25,040 --> 00:50:27,719
Speaker 1: this game by ten to fourteen points and they covered

992
00:50:27,760 --> 00:50:28,240
Speaker 1: the front.

993
00:50:28,480 --> 00:50:31,319
Speaker 2: I think it could be ugly, honestly, so we agree.

994
00:50:31,360 --> 00:50:33,960
Speaker 2: I'm trying to find a reason because I hate loving

995
00:50:34,080 --> 00:50:37,160
Speaker 2: my own team this much against the quality opponent. But

996
00:50:37,760 --> 00:50:40,480
Speaker 2: I don't know. Last week really set me back a

997
00:50:40,520 --> 00:50:43,720
Speaker 2: little bit in my Texas Tech optimism. The specific way

998
00:50:43,760 --> 00:50:46,279
Speaker 2: that they lost, I don't know. I'm not with it,

999
00:50:46,360 --> 00:50:47,480
Speaker 2: So I'm worried.

1000
00:50:48,000 --> 00:50:52,600
Speaker 1: Texas Tech thirty ABC Wisconsin minus six at Wazoo. This

1001
00:50:52,680 --> 00:50:54,359
Speaker 1: is my home dog of the week. By the way,

1002
00:50:54,480 --> 00:50:56,520
Speaker 1: I like that this is my home dog of the week.

1003
00:50:56,560 --> 00:51:04,000
Speaker 1: Where's my sound id? It is the Yakos home Dog

1004
00:51:04,040 --> 00:51:07,560
Speaker 1: of the week. Yeah, we didn't even mention cam Ward

1005
00:51:07,640 --> 00:51:10,000
Speaker 1: last week, but he threw from over four point fifty

1006
00:51:10,040 --> 00:51:13,320
Speaker 1: at three touchdowns. Probably should have gotten a DOOD alert

1007
00:51:13,360 --> 00:51:17,280
Speaker 1: for that performance. Lincoln Victor his star wide out eleven

1008
00:51:17,360 --> 00:51:21,280
Speaker 1: catches for one sixty eight. Remember this is a different

1009
00:51:21,320 --> 00:51:24,359
Speaker 1: offense this year. This has Ben Rbuckle, the savant who

1010
00:51:24,400 --> 00:51:27,439
Speaker 1: comes up the young Savannah. He's like fourteen years old.

1011
00:51:27,880 --> 00:51:31,160
Speaker 1: He comes up from Western Kentucky. It's a faster paced offense.

1012
00:51:31,200 --> 00:51:34,040
Speaker 1: It's more vertical. I think this is a fun game,

1013
00:51:34,640 --> 00:51:36,520
Speaker 1: is a fun game to watch. It's on late. It's

1014
00:51:36,560 --> 00:51:38,560
Speaker 1: not going to get the hype because there are other

1015
00:51:38,680 --> 00:51:42,839
Speaker 1: bigger games in this window. Yeah, either way, WAZU can

1016
00:51:42,880 --> 00:51:47,759
Speaker 1: hang with Wisconsin. Wazoo can hang with Wisconsin. Wisconsin might

1017
00:51:47,880 --> 00:51:50,880
Speaker 1: run it fifty times and cam Ward might have to

1018
00:51:51,239 --> 00:51:54,919
Speaker 1: try and claw out of a hole with limited time

1019
00:51:54,960 --> 00:51:59,319
Speaker 1: at his disposal. But I am just very very wary

1020
00:51:59,400 --> 00:52:03,680
Speaker 1: of a score Wazoo, a scorned Wazoo that got left

1021
00:52:03,680 --> 00:52:07,320
Speaker 1: out of all the conference hubbub. It gives Jake dickerd

1022
00:52:07,440 --> 00:52:11,200
Speaker 1: some bulletin board material. This is a matchup, right, They

1023
00:52:11,200 --> 00:52:14,000
Speaker 1: can kind of indirectly get back at the Big Ten

1024
00:52:14,800 --> 00:52:17,320
Speaker 1: for stealing Oregon for slin Washington.

1025
00:52:17,480 --> 00:52:20,120
Speaker 2: Batt'll show them. Yeah, I got.

1026
00:52:19,920 --> 00:52:25,200
Speaker 1: Wisconsin winning, but close, winning twenty eight to twenty four.

1027
00:52:25,800 --> 00:52:26,000
Speaker 2: Right.

1028
00:52:26,080 --> 00:52:28,960
Speaker 1: I think this is a really good matchup. That Wazoo

1029
00:52:29,000 --> 00:52:32,319
Speaker 1: at home shows that they are a solid opponent this

1030
00:52:32,440 --> 00:52:35,960
Speaker 1: year with a revitalized offense and a good enough defense

1031
00:52:35,960 --> 00:52:36,839
Speaker 1: to keep this one tight.

1032
00:52:37,680 --> 00:52:40,400
Speaker 2: So we saw last year Big Ten team heading to

1033
00:52:40,440 --> 00:52:43,239
Speaker 2: the Pacific Northwest early on in the season trying to

1034
00:52:43,239 --> 00:52:46,319
Speaker 2: get that sleep bank right and just not quite getting it.

1035
00:52:46,360 --> 00:52:49,799
Speaker 2: With Michigan State traveling to Washington, I'm with Wazoo here

1036
00:52:49,840 --> 00:52:53,839
Speaker 2: to win outright out tuy. I don't love Wazoo as

1037
00:52:53,880 --> 00:52:57,160
Speaker 2: a team, but I'm not sure Wisconsin is there yet.

1038
00:52:57,200 --> 00:52:59,480
Speaker 2: They lost this game last year, and of course Wisconsin

1039
00:52:59,520 --> 00:53:00,920
Speaker 2: fans a point to the fact they're like, oh, we

1040
00:53:00,960 --> 00:53:03,280
Speaker 2: outgained them, We had turnose. That means you're bad at winning.

1041
00:53:03,600 --> 00:53:06,239
Speaker 2: You're bad at winning. You out if you outgain a team.

1042
00:53:06,239 --> 00:53:09,160
Speaker 2: This this review brought to you by the Clemson Tigers.

1043
00:53:09,960 --> 00:53:17,360
Speaker 2: Clemson pretty good at football Scoreboards TVD. I think it

1044
00:53:17,440 --> 00:53:20,800
Speaker 2: was better at home in the strange environment, in an

1045
00:53:20,960 --> 00:53:25,000
Speaker 2: unlikely environment for for Wisconsin football. I'm going with Wazoo

1046
00:53:25,080 --> 00:53:30,400
Speaker 2: outright to test Wisconsin downfield a good amount and give

1047
00:53:30,560 --> 00:53:34,239
Speaker 2: Wisconsin some growing pains. How about that We're going with

1048
00:53:34,280 --> 00:53:39,120
Speaker 2: the strange nature of Pullman, Washington and the Polouse.

1049
00:53:39,800 --> 00:53:44,399
Speaker 1: Seven PM the UCF. Yeah, new member of the Power five.

1050
00:53:44,520 --> 00:53:46,879
Speaker 1: Now UCF minus three and a half on the road

1051
00:53:46,880 --> 00:53:50,359
Speaker 1: at Boise Boise comes back home now this week they

1052
00:53:50,400 --> 00:53:54,560
Speaker 1: have to deal with another offense UCF that's really good.

1053
00:53:55,040 --> 00:53:57,320
Speaker 1: So no rest for the for the weary on that front.

1054
00:53:58,080 --> 00:54:00,680
Speaker 1: I don't want to read too deep into what UCF

1055
00:54:00,719 --> 00:54:03,399
Speaker 1: did last week over Kent State, but they did seem

1056
00:54:03,440 --> 00:54:07,000
Speaker 1: pretty together and pretty organized. Now Kent State might be like,

1057
00:54:07,120 --> 00:54:08,600
Speaker 1: you can make a case for Kent State as a

1058
00:54:08,640 --> 00:54:11,680
Speaker 1: worst team in college football, all of college football this year.

1059
00:54:12,600 --> 00:54:15,840
Speaker 1: But give me UCF here again. I don't like the

1060
00:54:15,840 --> 00:54:18,719
Speaker 1: fact that I'm taking road favorites a lot on this

1061
00:54:18,840 --> 00:54:19,279
Speaker 1: year's show.

1062
00:54:19,640 --> 00:54:19,920
Speaker 2: M H.

1063
00:54:20,560 --> 00:54:23,480
Speaker 1: I really like UCF in the preseason. I really liked

1064
00:54:23,480 --> 00:54:25,759
Speaker 1: what I saw from them in Week one, and I

1065
00:54:25,760 --> 00:54:27,959
Speaker 1: think boys could be able to score. It's not gonna

1066
00:54:27,960 --> 00:54:29,399
Speaker 1: be the same deal as it was a week ago

1067
00:54:29,440 --> 00:54:32,960
Speaker 1: against Washington, and UCS offense is certainly not that good, right,

1068
00:54:32,960 --> 00:54:34,480
Speaker 1: But I like UCF to win and cover here.

1069
00:54:35,239 --> 00:54:37,520
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm gonna go Boise here. I don't love the

1070
00:54:37,520 --> 00:54:40,480
Speaker 2: Boise defense in this very moment, but I don't think

1071
00:54:40,560 --> 00:54:43,560
Speaker 2: UCF has the same amount of firepower on offense as Washington,

1072
00:54:43,560 --> 00:54:47,200
Speaker 2: because basically four teams in the nation might when Washington

1073
00:54:47,280 --> 00:54:50,279
Speaker 2: is operating at its best. So I'm going with Bois here.

1074
00:54:50,280 --> 00:54:53,239
Speaker 2: I'm buying low a little bit here, and as a

1075
00:54:53,280 --> 00:54:57,040
Speaker 2: home dog, I think Taylor Green will improve. I just

1076
00:54:57,440 --> 00:55:00,120
Speaker 2: I think it's a nice overreaction spot for boys see

1077
00:55:00,200 --> 00:55:03,719
Speaker 2: as a home dog at altitude weird blue field. Let's

1078
00:55:03,719 --> 00:55:05,239
Speaker 2: just I don't know. Give me the Broncos here.

1079
00:55:05,960 --> 00:55:10,320
Speaker 1: Arizona at Mississippi State minus nine in favor of Mississippi State.

1080
00:55:11,200 --> 00:55:12,879
Speaker 1: I love Arizona here.

1081
00:55:13,200 --> 00:55:16,200
Speaker 2: Oh man, that's worries some to me. Continue I love.

1082
00:55:16,239 --> 00:55:18,919
Speaker 1: I've been watching this line like a hawk man, and

1083
00:55:18,960 --> 00:55:21,680
Speaker 1: for a minute yesterday, for a minute yesterday, it jumped

1084
00:55:21,719 --> 00:55:23,920
Speaker 1: up to ten and I couldn't I couldn't get it

1085
00:55:23,960 --> 00:55:25,520
Speaker 1: in time before it went back down to nine and

1086
00:55:25,520 --> 00:55:28,759
Speaker 1: a half. But this is a great barometer game for

1087
00:55:28,800 --> 00:55:32,680
Speaker 1: both teams, like Mississippi State's in transition with the offense,

1088
00:55:32,840 --> 00:55:34,879
Speaker 1: the defense is good. I think the defense will be good.

1089
00:55:34,880 --> 00:55:37,759
Speaker 1: The secondary is a complete rebuild, which is actually why

1090
00:55:37,760 --> 00:55:40,200
Speaker 1: I think I like Arizona here, Okay, because I think

1091
00:55:40,200 --> 00:55:42,719
Speaker 1: Arizona can throw on them. And on the Arizona side,

1092
00:55:42,760 --> 00:55:46,879
Speaker 1: if you're jedfish, you're going into SEC territory at night

1093
00:55:46,920 --> 00:55:49,320
Speaker 1: in a game that people can watch on their TVs.

1094
00:55:50,080 --> 00:55:50,800
Speaker 2: That's true.

1095
00:55:51,040 --> 00:55:54,360
Speaker 1: That's that's kind of a dub Inn farm. Their defense

1096
00:55:54,480 --> 00:55:55,440
Speaker 1: very much work in progress.

1097
00:55:55,440 --> 00:55:55,799
Speaker 2: We won't talk.

1098
00:55:55,800 --> 00:55:57,680
Speaker 1: We don't got to talk about the defense. But the

1099
00:55:57,719 --> 00:56:00,239
Speaker 1: offense I think will be very very good. I think

1100
00:56:00,239 --> 00:56:03,160
Speaker 1: Arizona wins it out right. I got him out right here.

1101
00:56:03,520 --> 00:56:05,400
Speaker 1: I think this is a good time to catch Mississippi

1102
00:56:05,400 --> 00:56:09,839
Speaker 1: State because Mississippi State had the feel good win last week, right,

1103
00:56:10,000 --> 00:56:13,799
Speaker 1: get one out of their system, and now they've got

1104
00:56:13,920 --> 00:56:16,399
Speaker 1: LSU on deck. LSU comes to town next week. Maybe

1105
00:56:16,440 --> 00:56:18,600
Speaker 1: a bit of a look ahead spot. So I think

1106
00:56:18,680 --> 00:56:21,319
Speaker 1: good game. I think Zona wins thirty four to thirty one.

1107
00:56:22,040 --> 00:56:23,960
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm taking Mississippi State to win this game, but

1108
00:56:24,000 --> 00:56:25,279
Speaker 2: I think it's too many points. I think they win

1109
00:56:25,320 --> 00:56:28,280
Speaker 2: by a touchdown. It's a bit shootout e but ultimately

1110
00:56:28,320 --> 00:56:31,680
Speaker 2: I think the Mississippi State front wears down the Arizona

1111
00:56:31,719 --> 00:56:35,160
Speaker 2: front on, so the Arizona offensive line and swarms. Jayden

1112
00:56:35,200 --> 00:56:37,360
Speaker 2: to Laura a little bit too much in terms of

1113
00:56:37,400 --> 00:56:40,560
Speaker 2: what he'd like. So I'm going with Missisippi State to win,

1114
00:56:40,600 --> 00:56:42,080
Speaker 2: but I'm going to take the points. I'm with you

1115
00:56:42,120 --> 00:56:45,359
Speaker 2: that the number feels pretty high given all that's new

1116
00:56:45,480 --> 00:56:49,920
Speaker 2: in Starkville and the look ahead factor with LSU. So yeah, I'm.

1117
00:56:49,760 --> 00:56:52,960
Speaker 1: Going on this scheme a little bit later. Oh, I

1118
00:56:53,040 --> 00:56:56,040
Speaker 1: like that Continua three other ones real quickly that I'll mention.

1119
00:56:56,640 --> 00:56:57,960
Speaker 1: You can tell me if you have a lean one

1120
00:56:57,960 --> 00:57:01,720
Speaker 1: way or the other. I like Pitt Minusvan over Cincinnati.

1121
00:57:02,040 --> 00:57:05,560
Speaker 1: I like Oklahoma minus fifteen and a half over SMU.

1122
00:57:05,840 --> 00:57:09,200
Speaker 1: I like San Diego State to cover ever so slightly

1123
00:57:09,360 --> 00:57:12,279
Speaker 1: a fourteen and a half point spread as a home

1124
00:57:12,320 --> 00:57:13,560
Speaker 1: dog against UCLA.

1125
00:57:15,640 --> 00:57:18,720
Speaker 2: I have Pitt to win by ten to fourteen points

1126
00:57:18,720 --> 00:57:21,240
Speaker 2: in cover. I have Oklahoma big against SMU. I have

1127
00:57:21,400 --> 00:57:24,800
Speaker 2: Ucla barely covering against San Diego State because I hate

1128
00:57:25,320 --> 00:57:28,200
Speaker 2: the as Tech offense. And I have Jacksonville State covering

1129
00:57:28,280 --> 00:57:31,120
Speaker 2: too many points against Coastal Carolina. I think I will

1130
00:57:31,160 --> 00:57:34,840
Speaker 2: be able to run on the Chanta clears Chanta clears.

1131
00:57:34,920 --> 00:57:38,920
Speaker 1: Yeah, Coastal's offense did not look very special against UCLA,

1132
00:57:39,320 --> 00:57:43,600
Speaker 1: and now they're coming back home against the Jacksonville State team. Okay,

1133
00:57:43,600 --> 00:57:45,840
Speaker 1: that's two and oh in their first FBS games. The

1134
00:57:45,920 --> 00:57:47,320
Speaker 1: first two FBS games.

1135
00:57:47,040 --> 00:57:50,040
Speaker 2: A Pride of Conference USA.

1136
00:57:49,360 --> 00:57:51,720
Speaker 1: Also two and oh against the spread. Now, and you

1137
00:57:51,760 --> 00:57:53,800
Speaker 1: always wonder with some of these teams that jump up,

1138
00:57:53,840 --> 00:57:55,640
Speaker 1: how long it's going to take for the odds makers

1139
00:57:55,640 --> 00:57:57,800
Speaker 1: to figure out what the line should be. Yep, this

1140
00:57:57,840 --> 00:57:59,240
Speaker 1: could be another one that I agree with you. I

1141
00:57:59,240 --> 00:58:00,560
Speaker 1: think it's like thirty twenty four.

1142
00:58:01,040 --> 00:58:02,680
Speaker 2: Well, by the way, I think the wins I want

1143
00:58:02,720 --> 00:58:06,320
Speaker 2: to say was Logan's Smothers, the guy who came in

1144
00:58:06,440 --> 00:58:11,400
Speaker 2: last week, Nebraska transfer Logan Smothers for Jacksonville State. Zion

1145
00:58:11,440 --> 00:58:14,240
Speaker 2: Web starting quarterback for Jacksonville State, was like sick. The

1146
00:58:14,280 --> 00:58:16,600
Speaker 2: morning of Logan's mother stepped in was very good.

1147
00:58:17,320 --> 00:58:19,400
Speaker 1: Yeah, we also have a second night window. If I

1148
00:58:19,440 --> 00:58:23,600
Speaker 1: could play it again, this is like the PAC twelve

1149
00:58:23,680 --> 00:58:27,600
Speaker 1: after dark window. Oklahoma State minus three and a half

1150
00:58:27,640 --> 00:58:30,720
Speaker 1: at Arizona State. We've got Auburn minus six and a

1151
00:58:30,760 --> 00:58:34,480
Speaker 1: half on the road at cal and Stanford plus twenty

1152
00:58:34,560 --> 00:58:38,560
Speaker 1: nine and a half on the road at USC My

1153
00:58:38,720 --> 00:58:46,320
Speaker 1: lock of the week is Oklahoma State. Wow lock that week? Yeah,

1154
00:58:46,600 --> 00:58:49,040
Speaker 1: the battle of two teams that I've said nothing nice

1155
00:58:49,080 --> 00:58:53,560
Speaker 1: about for about two years running. A couple things that

1156
00:58:54,000 --> 00:58:56,280
Speaker 1: come to mind, so ASU one last week was it

1157
00:58:56,320 --> 00:59:00,440
Speaker 1: twenty four to twenty one. Yeah, and jadensh I got

1158
00:59:00,480 --> 00:59:03,720
Speaker 1: the start, showed flashes, nice wet half, but it was

1159
00:59:03,760 --> 00:59:07,080
Speaker 1: a sloppy game, especially in the second half, both literally

1160
00:59:07,120 --> 00:59:10,960
Speaker 1: and figuratively against Southern Utah. Not as close as the

1161
00:59:10,960 --> 00:59:13,640
Speaker 1: final score would indicate, but as has got a lot

1162
00:59:13,640 --> 00:59:16,000
Speaker 1: of cleanup to do. They had a ton of penalties.

1163
00:59:18,480 --> 00:59:20,600
Speaker 1: They're just not a good football team yet and they

1164
00:59:20,640 --> 00:59:24,880
Speaker 1: could get there in due time. But you combine that

1165
00:59:24,960 --> 00:59:28,520
Speaker 1: with the fact that I think they are going up

1166
00:59:28,520 --> 00:59:32,200
Speaker 1: against a better team in Oklahoma State, whom I'm also

1167
00:59:32,320 --> 00:59:34,800
Speaker 1: not crazy about. But I've still give them the benefit

1168
00:59:34,800 --> 00:59:37,880
Speaker 1: of the doubt here. And they won last week twenty

1169
00:59:37,960 --> 00:59:41,640
Speaker 1: seven thirteen against Central Arkansas, which doesn't look great on paper,

1170
00:59:41,680 --> 00:59:43,520
Speaker 1: but the game was never really close because they were

1171
00:59:43,600 --> 00:59:44,840
Speaker 1: juggling quarterbacks and.

1172
00:59:45,480 --> 00:59:48,720
Speaker 2: The beat ann Arkansas, though it beat not the Arkansas

1173
00:59:48,800 --> 00:59:50,600
Speaker 2: but an Arkansas and Arkansas.

1174
00:59:50,720 --> 00:59:52,760
Speaker 1: Yeah, minus three and a half is the line here.

1175
00:59:52,800 --> 00:59:55,680
Speaker 1: I think that is not nearly enough here. So I've

1176
00:59:55,680 --> 00:59:58,880
Speaker 1: got Oklahoma State winning by seven to ten points.

1177
00:59:59,440 --> 01:00:01,600
Speaker 2: Oh, I think. I disagree. I don't even like Arizona

1178
01:00:01,640 --> 01:00:04,080
Speaker 2: State at all. But I don't like either of these teams,

1179
01:00:04,120 --> 01:00:06,520
Speaker 2: and one of them is playing at home, so I'm

1180
01:00:06,520 --> 01:00:09,080
Speaker 2: going with ASU. I don't think they're good. I think

1181
01:00:09,080 --> 01:00:12,320
Speaker 2: Oklahoma State, though, on the road, is a tea who's

1182
01:00:12,360 --> 01:00:14,840
Speaker 2: starting at quarterback? By the way, do we know for

1183
01:00:14,840 --> 01:00:15,600
Speaker 2: Okahoma State?

1184
01:00:16,640 --> 01:00:20,600
Speaker 1: I believe. I believe it is still going to be

1185
01:00:20,880 --> 01:00:25,360
Speaker 1: Garrett Wrangel or Alan Bowman. Okay, cool? I believe that

1186
01:00:25,480 --> 01:00:28,120
Speaker 1: is the official line from Mike Brandon Pressley.

1187
01:00:28,280 --> 01:00:30,840
Speaker 2: They've got a couple of good players. But no, I'm

1188
01:00:30,840 --> 01:00:33,560
Speaker 2: going to ASU here. I think some PAC twelve after

1189
01:00:33,640 --> 01:00:34,960
Speaker 2: dark magic here in the desert.

1190
01:00:35,640 --> 01:00:37,600
Speaker 1: All right, how about that fair enough? Do you have

1191
01:00:37,600 --> 01:00:38,600
Speaker 1: a lean on Auburn Cal?

1192
01:00:38,960 --> 01:00:41,680
Speaker 2: Yeah, we're going with Cal, going with Cal. I told

1193
01:00:41,680 --> 01:00:44,120
Speaker 2: you this in the offseason. I'm going with Cal. I

1194
01:00:44,160 --> 01:00:47,439
Speaker 2: don't know why, but we have seen early season justin

1195
01:00:47,480 --> 01:00:52,440
Speaker 2: Wilcox and Cal against Power five opponents, against non conference opponents,

1196
01:00:52,640 --> 01:00:55,960
Speaker 2: somehow pull it out. I don't trust Auburn at the moment.

1197
01:00:56,480 --> 01:00:59,560
Speaker 2: Peyton Thorne on the road. We all know that Cal

1198
01:00:59,640 --> 01:01:01,560
Speaker 2: is a hornet's nest of a stating out it's not

1199
01:01:01,560 --> 01:01:08,000
Speaker 2: at all. But with this new offense with Auburn, I

1200
01:01:08,040 --> 01:01:10,240
Speaker 2: didn't even think Peyton Thorn at times looked great last

1201
01:01:10,280 --> 01:01:14,240
Speaker 2: week against U mess So I don't know. I'm I'm

1202
01:01:14,280 --> 01:01:17,000
Speaker 2: going with some Cal magic here. I know Sam Jackson

1203
01:01:17,040 --> 01:01:19,800
Speaker 2: practiced after he got hurt, but Ben Finley's a quality option.

1204
01:01:20,760 --> 01:01:22,320
Speaker 2: I think Cal might be able to run a little

1205
01:01:22,360 --> 01:01:25,520
Speaker 2: bit here. Okay, I'm going I'm going with the magic here,

1206
01:01:25,560 --> 01:01:30,120
Speaker 2: traveling far distance, playing in a weird place. I don't know.

1207
01:01:30,400 --> 01:01:32,880
Speaker 2: I'm going Cal here outright, outright, by the way.

1208
01:01:32,960 --> 01:01:35,160
Speaker 1: Wow, that's ballsy. This is an odd game. Is an

1209
01:01:35,160 --> 01:01:37,080
Speaker 1: odd game anyway you shake, it's an odd game. I

1210
01:01:37,120 --> 01:01:39,960
Speaker 1: think the line's probably gonna go higher at campoff. Right now,

1211
01:01:39,960 --> 01:01:42,800
Speaker 1: it's six and a half seventy two of the bets

1212
01:01:42,840 --> 01:01:46,000
Speaker 1: eighty nine percent of the money on Auburn. I agree

1213
01:01:46,040 --> 01:01:51,800
Speaker 1: that Cal's offense could be interesting, especially with Sam Jackson, but.

1214
01:01:53,520 --> 01:01:55,200
Speaker 2: Good nice if he plays.

1215
01:01:55,520 --> 01:01:57,400
Speaker 1: If he plays, he's back, he's back at practice.

1216
01:01:57,440 --> 01:01:59,600
Speaker 2: But day to day, I'm you know what, I'm very

1217
01:01:59,600 --> 01:02:03,200
Speaker 2: easily seduced, Tye. That's something about me, just big picture

1218
01:02:03,240 --> 01:02:05,920
Speaker 2: as a human and in terms of college football, right,

1219
01:02:05,960 --> 01:02:08,440
Speaker 2: I see Cal suddenly show an offense. I'm like, I

1220
01:02:08,480 --> 01:02:11,400
Speaker 2: think she winked at me. Was that what happened? Are

1221
01:02:11,400 --> 01:02:12,360
Speaker 2: we gonna get married?

1222
01:02:13,240 --> 01:02:13,320
Speaker 1: So?

1223
01:02:13,520 --> 01:02:18,320
Speaker 2: Will you give me one week of quality football unexpectedly

1224
01:02:18,880 --> 01:02:22,360
Speaker 2: on the road at North Texas? I'm taking that. I

1225
01:02:22,360 --> 01:02:25,920
Speaker 2: think she wants three kids. What Oh, it turns out

1226
01:02:25,960 --> 01:02:28,120
Speaker 2: she was winking at somebody else. I'm still going with Cal.

1227
01:02:28,720 --> 01:02:33,560
Speaker 1: All right. Ten thirty on Fox, Stanford USC USC fear

1228
01:02:33,640 --> 01:02:35,320
Speaker 1: by twenty nine and a half. That feels like a

1229
01:02:35,360 --> 01:02:35,720
Speaker 1: lot to me.

1230
01:02:36,440 --> 01:02:38,240
Speaker 2: I think it's a lot of points with the clock rules.

1231
01:02:38,280 --> 01:02:40,160
Speaker 2: I think Stanford is going to be efficient enough with

1232
01:02:40,280 --> 01:02:44,360
Speaker 2: the ball to hold to possess enough to merely lose

1233
01:02:44,400 --> 01:02:45,880
Speaker 2: by twenty one or something like that.

1234
01:02:46,720 --> 01:02:51,040
Speaker 1: And finally, if we travel back in time bitter Doo

1235
01:02:51,680 --> 01:02:55,000
Speaker 1: to Friday, it's Illinois minus three against Kansas. Well, Friday

1236
01:02:55,080 --> 01:02:57,960
Speaker 1: night action here at seven thirty. You gotta leaning scheme,

1237
01:02:58,200 --> 01:03:00,760
Speaker 1: Yeah Kansas, Yeah, I think I'm going Kansas.

1238
01:03:00,880 --> 01:03:03,320
Speaker 2: I think I just early on in seasons, I just

1239
01:03:03,840 --> 01:03:07,520
Speaker 2: enjoy home teams in what appears to be a decent

1240
01:03:07,600 --> 01:03:11,120
Speaker 2: enough matchup and Illinois bringing some sloppiness with the penalties

1241
01:03:11,160 --> 01:03:13,200
Speaker 2: on the road to Lawrence, Kansas. You don't go to

1242
01:03:13,280 --> 01:03:16,680
Speaker 2: Lawrence Kansas bringing that on the team charter. No, absolutely

1243
01:03:16,680 --> 01:03:18,040
Speaker 2: not give me the Jayhawks.

1244
01:03:18,360 --> 01:03:20,040
Speaker 1: I think I agree. I think I agree with that.

1245
01:03:21,280 --> 01:03:23,240
Speaker 1: Did we want to mention the cal duke or the

1246
01:03:23,480 --> 01:03:24,920
Speaker 1: Clemson duke thing? Real quick?

1247
01:03:25,520 --> 01:03:27,560
Speaker 2: Please? I think it's pretty simple. And I gave my

1248
01:03:27,600 --> 01:03:31,480
Speaker 2: forty five second evaluation on what Instagram and YouTube shorts

1249
01:03:31,560 --> 01:03:36,040
Speaker 2: right after the fact. Someson's bad at winning and you

1250
01:03:36,080 --> 01:03:38,000
Speaker 2: can outgain a team, you can get to the red zone,

1251
01:03:38,040 --> 01:03:40,360
Speaker 2: but then you have field goals blocked and you fumble

1252
01:03:40,400 --> 01:03:44,360
Speaker 2: it and you're not showing a ton in terms of

1253
01:03:44,880 --> 01:03:48,160
Speaker 2: an ability to close out drives. I don't think you're

1254
01:03:48,200 --> 01:03:51,600
Speaker 2: all that good. And doesn't go for Clemson exclusively, but

1255
01:03:52,280 --> 01:03:56,080
Speaker 2: the way that Duke defense played opportunistic ben but don't

1256
01:03:56,120 --> 01:04:00,000
Speaker 2: break in that game gave you know the club level

1257
01:04:00,360 --> 01:04:03,320
Speaker 2: CAD club n TO level is closed.

1258
01:04:02,920 --> 01:04:04,160
Speaker 1: For health code violations.

1259
01:04:04,160 --> 01:04:09,400
Speaker 2: Currently the level of receivers at Clemson is scary unfamiliar

1260
01:04:09,480 --> 01:04:13,160
Speaker 2: to me. I just I don't know. I'm still on

1261
01:04:13,200 --> 01:04:15,080
Speaker 2: Clemson as a good team. They can beat Florida State.

1262
01:04:15,640 --> 01:04:18,720
Speaker 2: I guess maybe sort of if they figure things out pretty.

1263
01:04:18,560 --> 01:04:21,200
Speaker 1: Quick that Clemson team's not beating Florida.

1264
01:04:20,880 --> 01:04:24,560
Speaker 2: That Clemson doesn't. But it was very foreign to see.

1265
01:04:24,640 --> 01:04:26,840
Speaker 2: And I'd like to put a lot more respect on

1266
01:04:26,920 --> 01:04:30,560
Speaker 2: especially the Duke defense in Mike Elcho's name, because they

1267
01:04:30,600 --> 01:04:33,440
Speaker 2: played really, really well. I don't know how else to

1268
01:04:33,480 --> 01:04:36,680
Speaker 2: put it. Well, Duke's a better football team than Clemson.

1269
01:04:36,960 --> 01:04:40,040
Speaker 1: Clemson's offense looked exactly the same as year ago. Yeah,

1270
01:04:40,240 --> 01:04:42,880
Speaker 1: it didn't look any different, and everything a lot more

1271
01:04:43,080 --> 01:04:45,480
Speaker 1: side to side. They weren't really going down the field.

1272
01:04:45,600 --> 01:04:47,920
Speaker 1: They were having trouble with receivers finding space.

1273
01:04:48,000 --> 01:04:50,680
Speaker 2: It just wasn't good. They weren't And on defense they

1274
01:04:50,680 --> 01:04:53,440
Speaker 2: didn't even look back like they didn't look good on that. Well, no,

1275
01:04:53,560 --> 01:04:56,800
Speaker 2: they gave up scrambling. Yeah, they gave up big plays.

1276
01:04:56,800 --> 01:05:00,320
Speaker 1: It just it felt like some sort of if that

1277
01:05:00,480 --> 01:05:02,600
Speaker 1: was Week one, you don't want to read too deeply

1278
01:05:02,640 --> 01:05:05,280
Speaker 1: into it, but I don't know that was That was

1279
01:05:05,320 --> 01:05:07,600
Speaker 1: a flashing red light to me that maybe something is

1280
01:05:07,680 --> 01:05:12,120
Speaker 1: up at at Clemson. I went so far as to

1281
01:05:12,160 --> 01:05:14,440
Speaker 1: say that clemsoning is back. I brought it out of retirement.

1282
01:05:14,800 --> 01:05:16,439
Speaker 2: That's you. I do not bring that out.

1283
01:05:16,920 --> 01:05:19,200
Speaker 1: This might be one of the few things we disagree on,

1284
01:05:19,560 --> 01:05:21,720
Speaker 1: but I brought it back. I feel like it was

1285
01:05:21,760 --> 01:05:22,400
Speaker 1: warranted here.

1286
01:05:22,680 --> 01:05:25,480
Speaker 2: The only the only issue I take from a definition

1287
01:05:25,560 --> 01:05:29,120
Speaker 2: standpoint is Clemson had done nothing this season to give

1288
01:05:29,240 --> 01:05:32,080
Speaker 2: people hope that they were a really good team or

1289
01:05:32,120 --> 01:05:35,080
Speaker 2: a top ten team, a top five team, whatever. And

1290
01:05:35,160 --> 01:05:38,160
Speaker 2: so I don't think they had increased expectations based on

1291
01:05:38,200 --> 01:05:40,920
Speaker 2: their own play other than you know, winning the ACC

1292
01:05:41,080 --> 01:05:42,400
Speaker 2: last year and getting a lot of attention.

1293
01:05:42,520 --> 01:05:45,400
Speaker 1: Yeah, they had done and the previous ten years. Now

1294
01:05:45,480 --> 01:05:47,120
Speaker 1: what I'm saying they hadn't done with it, Dan, nothing

1295
01:05:47,120 --> 01:05:49,400
Speaker 1: at all. They didn't do anything on the field to

1296
01:05:49,640 --> 01:05:55,320
Speaker 1: confirm optimism this year. Are you you're a Dabbo apologist? Now?

1297
01:05:55,640 --> 01:05:58,640
Speaker 2: No, I am absolutely not a Dabo apologist. And I

1298
01:05:58,680 --> 01:06:02,920
Speaker 2: giggled a little bit during that game, but I I

1299
01:06:03,000 --> 01:06:05,560
Speaker 2: have retired that term. I think it's it's it's a

1300
01:06:05,640 --> 01:06:06,479
Speaker 2: done thing, dude.

1301
01:06:06,480 --> 01:06:09,640
Speaker 1: He needs to grow the go tee. Absolutely, Dabbo needs

1302
01:06:09,680 --> 01:06:11,600
Speaker 1: the evil go te to turn this thing around. That's

1303
01:06:11,600 --> 01:06:12,280
Speaker 1: what's gonna take.

1304
01:06:12,440 --> 01:06:13,360
Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree.

1305
01:06:14,360 --> 01:06:17,000
Speaker 1: I think that's all we got for for Week two?

1306
01:06:17,040 --> 01:06:17,360
Speaker 1: Is it not?

1307
01:06:18,120 --> 01:06:21,240
Speaker 2: Uh? It is unless you count the ability to drop

1308
01:06:21,280 --> 01:06:26,560
Speaker 2: that big, stanky, wivering Drummond five times.

1309
01:06:28,240 --> 01:06:30,720
Speaker 1: Oh maybe baby, a baby, baby, baby baby, maybe a

1310
01:06:30,720 --> 01:06:36,000
Speaker 1: baby baby. Okay, hi Dune, Yeah, big noon. Patriot League,

1311
01:06:36,000 --> 01:06:39,560
Speaker 1: holy Cross at Boston College. I'm gonna go holy Cross here?

1312
01:06:39,560 --> 01:06:39,840
Speaker 1: Why not?

1313
01:06:40,080 --> 01:06:43,040
Speaker 2: Why the hell not the nail in Jeff Hapley's coffin.

1314
01:06:43,400 --> 01:06:44,840
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, this would be the.

1315
01:06:45,040 --> 01:06:46,840
Speaker 2: Secutive non Power five losses.

1316
01:06:47,400 --> 01:06:50,640
Speaker 1: Sacred Heart at Georgetown going to the Hornets nest. It

1317
01:06:50,680 --> 01:06:52,760
Speaker 1: is multi sport field. We go Georgetown at home.

1318
01:06:52,840 --> 01:06:55,240
Speaker 2: Of course, far be it for us to select against them.

1319
01:06:55,800 --> 01:07:01,720
Speaker 1: Lehigh at Merrimac, the team, not the ship going Paynsman.

1320
01:07:01,440 --> 01:07:05,240
Speaker 2: Where is where is Merrimack College located? And over Massachusetts?

1321
01:07:05,280 --> 01:07:07,520
Speaker 2: You spend a lot of time in andover never never

1322
01:07:07,600 --> 01:07:09,880
Speaker 2: not me either, I'm going uh, I'm going Lehigh here

1323
01:07:09,960 --> 01:07:11,520
Speaker 2: for solid wife, Kate. How about that.

1324
01:07:11,800 --> 01:07:15,280
Speaker 1: Lafayette at Duke Dukie's perhaps a bit of a letdown

1325
01:07:15,320 --> 01:07:16,640
Speaker 1: spot when the coming.

1326
01:07:16,520 --> 01:07:20,560
Speaker 2: To town, Man, I would not want to be Duke

1327
01:07:20,640 --> 01:07:23,200
Speaker 2: in this spot because they are going to be very

1328
01:07:23,320 --> 01:07:28,120
Speaker 2: tired from trampling. Lafayette can meet some extra oxygen. Still

1329
01:07:28,160 --> 01:07:29,880
Speaker 2: going with Lafayette here to pull the upset, because that's

1330
01:07:29,880 --> 01:07:30,240
Speaker 2: who I am.

1331
01:07:30,280 --> 01:07:35,840
Speaker 1: Yeah, we gotta go Yeti's Forida, Matt, Buffalo, give me Buffalo,

1332
01:07:35,960 --> 01:07:36,560
Speaker 1: Take Buffalo.

1333
01:07:36,640 --> 01:07:37,760
Speaker 2: Yea, I'm gonna go Buffalo here.

1334
01:07:37,720 --> 01:07:39,800
Speaker 1: As well, vm I at Bucknell.

1335
01:07:41,920 --> 01:07:45,360
Speaker 2: Look if it were like a national military, yeah sure,

1336
01:07:45,640 --> 01:07:48,440
Speaker 2: the Virginia Military. Just absolutely not.

1337
01:07:49,240 --> 01:07:54,440
Speaker 1: Finally we got Colgate the Gators on the road at Villanova.

1338
01:07:54,040 --> 01:07:57,080
Speaker 2: Dan, Yeah, I'm going Nova here. As much as I

1339
01:07:57,120 --> 01:08:00,920
Speaker 2: respect Colgates and Hamilton, New York. If memory serves ye,

1340
01:08:02,480 --> 01:08:07,160
Speaker 2: Villanova just is the It's located in a superior pizza area.

1341
01:08:08,000 --> 01:08:10,640
Speaker 2: So that's how I'm deciding this, and I'm still trying.

1342
01:08:10,760 --> 01:08:12,600
Speaker 2: I want to do a Philly pizza tour with you.

1343
01:08:12,880 --> 01:08:16,599
Speaker 2: That's a dream of mine. Come on over, well, bring listen,

1344
01:08:16,840 --> 01:08:19,559
Speaker 2: you and I will go to Philly with whoever wins

1345
01:08:19,560 --> 01:08:22,040
Speaker 2: Week eight and gets the signature ty Hild and branch

1346
01:08:22,080 --> 01:08:29,800
Speaker 2: Shiatsu Massage deal. I'll do the pizza tour Hiatsu Massage.

1347
01:08:30,800 --> 01:08:33,320
Speaker 2: Oh man, that's fair. Okay, what else do we have, Ty?

1348
01:08:33,400 --> 01:08:36,559
Speaker 2: Do we have something that we can give confidence in?

1349
01:08:37,080 --> 01:08:38,200
Speaker 1: Tie versus the World?

1350
01:08:43,240 --> 01:08:46,840
Speaker 2: Tis the world presented by Draft Kings.

1351
01:08:46,840 --> 01:08:50,479
Speaker 1: Sports Folk finally won a bit last weekend, Dan, just one,

1352
01:08:51,520 --> 01:08:52,120
Speaker 1: just one.

1353
01:08:52,240 --> 01:08:53,400
Speaker 2: But I'll take it.

1354
01:08:53,600 --> 01:08:57,160
Speaker 1: We're on the road to recovery. We're starting off with

1355
01:08:57,320 --> 01:09:01,519
Speaker 1: Iowa minus four at Iowa State. You know where I

1356
01:09:01,520 --> 01:09:04,760
Speaker 1: stand on this. I do the reverse fluff up coming

1357
01:09:04,800 --> 01:09:09,880
Speaker 1: into effect. Thirty eight to seventeen. Big win, big win

1358
01:09:10,000 --> 01:09:13,599
Speaker 1: coming for the Iowahawk gyes. I'm also on Virginia Tech

1359
01:09:13,680 --> 01:09:18,160
Speaker 1: minus three, willing to go Virginia Tech minus three at

1360
01:09:18,160 --> 01:09:20,880
Speaker 1: home against the Purdue Boilermakers, who again I think are

1361
01:09:20,880 --> 01:09:24,240
Speaker 1: in a full rebuild. I am all in on Arizona

1362
01:09:25,479 --> 01:09:29,760
Speaker 1: plus the number on the road at Mississippi State. And

1363
01:09:30,120 --> 01:09:32,479
Speaker 1: my lock of the week, of course was Oklahoma State

1364
01:09:33,080 --> 01:09:36,439
Speaker 1: minus three and a half on the road at Arizona State.

1365
01:09:37,320 --> 01:09:40,080
Speaker 1: Those are my straight up sort of against the spread picks.

1366
01:09:40,560 --> 01:09:42,840
Speaker 2: Sure, do you know where the Iowa player money is

1367
01:09:42,880 --> 01:09:44,320
Speaker 2: going in that Sihawk game.

1368
01:09:44,960 --> 01:09:45,519
Speaker 1: I don't know.

1369
01:09:45,920 --> 01:09:48,920
Speaker 2: That's a joke, everybody. That's a joke, Yeah, because if you.

1370
01:09:48,880 --> 01:09:52,519
Speaker 1: Did, you're probably look you're probably look at it. Look

1371
01:09:52,560 --> 01:09:57,360
Speaker 1: at that over or under h My double Desert parlay though,

1372
01:09:57,400 --> 01:10:00,400
Speaker 1: the special tie versus the world parla. I bet this

1373
01:10:00,720 --> 01:10:05,200
Speaker 1: double Desert We've got a combo of Arizona plus nine,

1374
01:10:06,000 --> 01:10:09,800
Speaker 1: Arizona over twenty and a half team points, which if

1375
01:10:10,000 --> 01:10:12,320
Speaker 1: they go over nine, they're going to hit over twenty

1376
01:10:12,320 --> 01:10:16,040
Speaker 1: and a half teen points. I've also got that combined

1377
01:10:16,320 --> 01:10:20,240
Speaker 1: with Utah minus seven on the road at Baylor.

1378
01:10:20,320 --> 01:10:21,480
Speaker 2: Sad Kalachiville.

1379
01:10:21,600 --> 01:10:25,360
Speaker 1: Okay, and Utah scoring more than twenty three and a

1380
01:10:25,400 --> 01:10:31,960
Speaker 1: half points. Okay, okay, double desert parlay, double desert parlay.

1381
01:10:32,560 --> 01:10:35,439
Speaker 2: Okay, you like spending time in the desert. Love it is.

1382
01:10:35,479 --> 01:10:37,720
Speaker 2: That is the thing you love? Love the out there

1383
01:10:37,800 --> 01:10:40,920
Speaker 2: golf and in the winter time. Yeah, okay, fair enough.

1384
01:10:41,080 --> 01:10:44,760
Speaker 2: I like the Arizona picks on that side of that.

1385
01:10:45,400 --> 01:10:48,040
Speaker 2: That's my single desert preference more than the Utah one.

1386
01:10:48,040 --> 01:10:49,559
Speaker 2: But I like it. I hope they hit.

1387
01:10:50,160 --> 01:10:54,679
Speaker 1: Download the Draft Kings Sportsbook app now use the code

1388
01:10:54,840 --> 01:10:58,639
Speaker 1: solid at sign up. New customers can take home two

1389
01:10:58,960 --> 01:11:04,439
Speaker 1: hundred dollars bonus bets instantly just for betting five bucks.

1390
01:11:04,520 --> 01:11:08,519
Speaker 1: That is code SOLID only on DraftKings Sportsbook and official

1391
01:11:08,520 --> 01:11:13,360
Speaker 1: betting partner of the NFL. The Crown is yours.

1392
01:11:15,439 --> 01:11:18,120
Speaker 2: That's all we got. That's all we have. That is okay,

1393
01:11:18,160 --> 01:11:21,840
Speaker 2: so all weatsu. It's a form of massage that utilizes hands, thumb,

1394
01:11:21,880 --> 01:11:24,519
Speaker 2: or other body parts to apply direct pressure on various

1395
01:11:24,520 --> 01:11:27,880
Speaker 2: points or channels in the body. All right, it's performed

1396
01:11:27,920 --> 01:11:30,560
Speaker 2: through loose clothing tie or does not use oils. I

1397
01:11:30,760 --> 01:11:33,640
Speaker 2: was wrong in the oils department. Tie, I apologize.

1398
01:11:34,000 --> 01:11:36,760
Speaker 1: Call our reverblind. If you're watching the games this week,

1399
01:11:36,800 --> 01:11:40,439
Speaker 1: the new number is eight five five verbal three. Go

1400
01:11:40,520 --> 01:11:44,840
Speaker 1: on out to verbalers dot com and sign up so

1401
01:11:44,880 --> 01:11:46,800
Speaker 1: that you can play in our week two pick Them game.

1402
01:11:46,840 --> 01:11:48,680
Speaker 1: We'd love to have you. You also get access to

1403
01:11:48,720 --> 01:11:52,439
Speaker 1: all sorts of other bonus perks scheme videos that we're

1404
01:11:52,520 --> 01:11:56,360
Speaker 1: dropping on Thursday. You also can take an unofficial visit

1405
01:11:56,400 --> 01:12:01,519
Speaker 1: to our discord at solid dot com slash discord. Can't

1406
01:12:01,560 --> 01:12:04,679
Speaker 1: believe I said that out loud for barers dot com

1407
01:12:04,680 --> 01:12:06,320
Speaker 1: is where it's at. If you're listening to the podcast,

1408
01:12:06,360 --> 01:12:09,360
Speaker 1: make sure you hit follow or subscribe and tell your

1409
01:12:09,479 --> 01:12:13,360
Speaker 1: friends for that guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein,

1410
01:12:13,439 --> 01:12:18,040
Speaker 1: form myself, Tie Hildenbrand. Enjoy the weekend. It'samoid Saturday and

1411
01:12:18,080 --> 01:12:18,719
Speaker 1: stay solid.

1412
01:12:19,600 --> 01:12:19,960
Speaker 2: Peace.

1413
01:12:25,360 --> 01:12:29,440
Speaker 1: Gambling problem call one eight hundred gambler or visit www

1414
01:12:29,600 --> 01:12:32,719
Speaker 1: dot one eight hundred gambler dot net In New York

1415
01:12:32,880 --> 01:12:37,080
Speaker 1: call eight seven seven eight Hope and Why or text

1416
01:12:37,280 --> 01:12:41,120
Speaker 1: Hope and Why at four six seven three sixty nine.

1417
01:12:41,479 --> 01:12:45,040
Speaker 1: In Connecticut, help is available for problem gambling call eight

1418
01:12:45,040 --> 01:12:48,800
Speaker 1: eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or

1419
01:12:48,920 --> 01:12:53,959
Speaker 1: visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill,

1420
01:12:54,000 --> 01:12:57,880
Speaker 1: casino and resort twenty one plus age varies by jurisdiction

1421
01:12:58,320 --> 01:13:03,120
Speaker 1: void in Ontario. See dkang dot co slash football for

1422
01:13:03,240 --> 01:13:07,920
Speaker 1: eligibility terms and responsible gaming resources. Bonus bets expire seven

1423
01:13:08,000 --> 01:13:11,880
Speaker 1: days after issuance. Eligibility and deposit restrictions apply