WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: US CPI, Europe Summer, Japan GDP

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world. Straight Ahead on the program,

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>we look ahead to some key inflation data in the

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 2>US and how it could impact FED policy. I'm Tom

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Busby in New York.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hepgre in London. While we're examining the consequences

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 3>of Europe's sweltering summer.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Dog Prisner looking at Japan's role in recent market

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>volatility and where things may go from here.

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Eleve Them Free, Ow New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg one O six one, Boston, Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco,

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 4>DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius XM one nineteen and around

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 4>the world on Bloomberg Radio dot Com and via the

0:00:57.800 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.199
<v Speaker 2>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby. We begin today's

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 2>program with some key economic data here in the US

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>out this week, including the July Consumer price Index on Wednesday,

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 2>retail sales for that same month on Thursday. Well, after

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 2>some incredible volatility in the markets last week, how might

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>this affect the next actions by the Federal Reserve, a

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 2>policy meeting less than five weeks away. Now for more,

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 2>we're joined by Stuart paul, Us, economist with Bloomberg Economics. Well, Stuart,

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 2>let's start with inflation. What that July CPI number may bring.

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you expect to see.

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 5>We're expecting to see headline inflation slowing to an annual

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 5>pace of two point nine percent in July from three

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 5>percent in June. The core is going to slow a

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 5>little bit as well, to three point two percent from

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 5>three point three percent in June. Now, consumers are looking

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 5>for discounts, and they're finding them when they look online,

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 5>when they go to auto dealerships. But some of the

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 5>biggest ticket items, some of the items that take up

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 5>the most space in budgets, like shelter for example, it's

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 5>just going to be a slow disinflation process. And in fact,

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 5>we're expecting to see a little bit of an uptick

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 5>in the pace of rent and owner's equivalent of rent

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 5>inflation in the July data. And the big swing factor

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 5>when it comes to inflation has been hotels, surprisingly, which

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 5>created a lot of drag in June. We think it's

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 5>going to create a little bit less drag in the

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 5>July data, and that's going to booy the core just

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 5>a little bit.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, the housing market, I mean, what an uneven You

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know what to expect month to month, but one

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 2>thing is certain, it's more expensive than it's ever been.

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Rates are still elevated, although there's hope that they're going

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 2>to go down. So travel demand, which lays right into

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 2>what you said about hotels, I mean, we have seen

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 2>signs that people are pulling back now fewer trip Advisor

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 2>says fewer bookings, Airbnb says fewer bookings, so they're bracing

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 2>for a pullback.

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 5>That's right. So consumers are becoming quite a bit more

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 5>discerning in their spending habits. When we look at things

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 5>like you said Airbnb, or you look at some of

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 5>the online travel booking agencies, you're definitely seeing some of

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 5>the swings month to month. If you look at where

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 5>consumers are really starting to tighten their belt, it's in

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 5>things like food services also very similar to travel and accommodations.

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 5>Consumers are looking to rein in on some of those

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.119
<v Speaker 5>discretionary services categories in addition to some of the more

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.119
<v Speaker 5>interest sensitive spending categories like autos.

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 2>There's groceries, and there's food service, and there are all

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 2>kinds of restaurants from fast food, quick service, sit down,

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>white tablecloth. Where are you seeing the big changes in food?

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting. So when we listen into earnings calls, when

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 5>we look at earnings reports, we see a lot of

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 5>reports of dining services companies that are starting to offer

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 5>discount meals and that are starting to order discount opportunities

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 5>and they're actually seeing some more traction with consumers. When

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 5>we look on the higher end, those sort of re

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 5>tailers and those chains are facing a little bit more

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 5>headwinds and consumers are rotating a bit more back to

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 5>cooking at home, dining at home. We're expecting to see

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 5>about zero point one percent inflation when it comes to

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 5>groceries during the month. That might not sound like a lot,

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 5>but when consumers are really pinching pennies and they're raining

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 5>and they're spending on food services, that inflation in groceries

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 5>is going to is going to weigh on consumers.

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I want to go back to something you mentioned before,

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 2>just briefly, and that is autos again very uneven what

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 2>we've seen with used car prices, new car prices. Now

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 2>we have all the ads are out there, it's August, now,

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 2>all the twenty five models are coming in the twenty four.

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 2>They want to get rid of what's different now on

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 2>auto pricing.

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 5>There are a few factors at play here, and one

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 5>of them is still the cyber attack on auto dealers

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 5>that we saw in June, and so far in July,

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 5>we've seen a bit of a rebound, about a three

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 5>point five percent rebound in the pace of auto sales

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 5>in July. So as those computers, those computer systems came

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 5>back online, we saw auto dealers starting to sell more vehicles.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 5>But it also looks like they are offering discounts in

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 5>part to offset the effect of higher interest expense for

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 5>folks who are financing their cars. So we are expecting

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 5>to see about one and a half percent decline in

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 5>the price of autos, in the price of used autos

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 5>in particular in the CPI report, But again the increase

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 5>in sales volumes will probably buoy retail sales. Headline retail

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 5>sales in the July report.

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Also out this week. Retail sales for July, what do

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 2>you expect to see?

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 6>Overall?

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 5>The headline number is going to look pretty good again

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 5>because of that rebound in sales volumes of autos. We're

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 5>expecting to see zero point four percent increase in nominal

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 5>retail sales in July. That's up from zero growth in June.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 5>So the headline's going to look pretty good. When you

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 5>strip out some of the more voluable categories though, like autos,

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 5>like gasoline, like building materials and food services, I think

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 5>we're actually going to see a decline. So that's what

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 5>we call the control group for retail sales, and it's

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 5>a pretty good indicator of consumer spending on goods within GDP.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 5>So that control group for retail sales, we think is

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 5>going to decline about a quarter percentage point in the

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 5>July data. And that's a material decline when you consider

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 5>a June increase of nearly one percent. And that's because again,

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 5>people are relying on their credit cards a little bit less,

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 5>They have less access to credit. When they do look

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 5>to take out their credit card, they're starting to pinch

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 5>pennies quite a bit more, and again they're looking for

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 5>discounts where they can get it, So they're not going

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 5>to be spending lavishly on some big ticket items like

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 5>washing machines. Instead, they're going to be looking for discounts.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 5>We think that'll show up in the control group sales

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 5>boy our.

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Stuart Paul, us economists with Bloomberg Economics. We

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 2>continue with that discussion about the health of the US

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 2>consumer with a look at head to some key earnings

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 2>this Tuesday, second quarter earnings from the nation's biggest home

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 2>improvement chain, home Depot. On Thursday, Q two earnings from

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 2>the world's biggest retailer, Walmart. To help us break down

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 2>what those results could tell us, we're joined by Bloomberg

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 2>retail reporter Jaywon Kong. Jaywan, thank you for joining us.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 2>And Home Depot often seen as a proxy for the

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 2>US housing market. So what do you expect to see

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 2>from Home Depot's earnings.

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, with Home Depot, consumers just aren't buying dick ticket

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 7>home products or projects right now, and we expect to

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 7>see another challenging quarter. We also anticipate to hear that

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 7>the business will remain challenging in the coming months, even

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 7>if there are rate cuts, because there's typically a lag

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 7>in consumer spending. You know, as you said, the housing

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 7>market remains tough and people are staying on the sidelines

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 7>because of you know, high interest rates. They're just spending

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 7>less on larger descriptionary projects and instead spending on things

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 7>that cost less, like you know, gardens, lawns.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, So inflation, high borrowing costs a lot of

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>economic uncertainty. Well, I guess when you're hiring a contractor,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 2>it involves all of that, and so maybe you're not

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 2>going to redo the bathroom or the kitchen this year.

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's you know, spending you know, tens of thousands

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 7>of dollars on a kitchen. People are either holding off

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 7>or you know, they're choosing to do smaller at the

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 7>II projects. And it's something that the company has talked

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 7>about in recent quarters, and you know, we anticipate to

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 7>hear that narrative again this quarter. You know, I think

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 7>investors expect that there could be a pop in the

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 7>stock whenever the said you know, decides to cut race.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 7>But you know, it's not like people start spending immediately

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.719
<v Speaker 7>after the rate cuts. So I think this quarter and

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 7>the rest of the year it'll be pretty challenging.

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Now, combined with a lack of housing turnover. This you

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 2>expect to see a bit of a pullback in home

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 2>depot spending. What does it tell us about the housing market?

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>And I know you're not the housing expert, you're a

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 2>retail expert, but I mean with home depot with lows,

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 2>with target with you know, it's really got to impact

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 2>consumer spending overall.

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, what we've heard in recent quarters is that consumers

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 7>are being selective. You know, they're choosing to prioritize what

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 7>they need versus what they want. So that's you know,

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 7>translated to pullback on discretionary you know, products projects, and

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, generally low to middle income consumers have been

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 7>more stretched than under more pressure, and you know, upper

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 7>income consumers are still spending. So you know, that's sort

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 7>of the pick or that we've we've seen from these retailers,

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 7>and it'll be pretty similar this this quarter as well.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 7>And you know, of course we'll be on the lookout

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 7>for any youth signals about how people are spending. You know,

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 7>what they're buying and you know how they're choosing to prioritize.

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, then let's move on because that's a great segue

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 2>into Walmart, where it looks like it is all about

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 2>value for customers and Walmart is providing it. So what

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 2>do you expect to see from Walmart?

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah? With Walmart, you know right now is sort of

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, their time, it's you know, most of their

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 7>business is in essentials. You know, they are super focused

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 7>on low prices, and we expect them to deliver another good,

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 7>good quarter because of this. And with grocery at Walmart,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, it goes back to what we were talking

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 7>about a bit ago, which is that people are prioritizing

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 7>what they needed. So grocery has been a bright spot

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 7>for for Walmart on and you know in other categories,

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, like general merchandise have been have been softer,

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 7>and you know, we're seeing consumers search for value, you know,

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 7>buying things that are on sale or buying things that

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 7>they think are you know, good deal.

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Who is raining and their spending and what do we

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 2>continue to spend money on?

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so with consumers, you know, they have been resilient

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 7>in that they are still spending, you know, even with

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 7>years of inflation. That being said, you know, they are

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 7>being what a lot of these companies have called choiceful.

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 7>You know, they are being selective. You know they're looking

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 7>for areas to trade down, so to speak. So you know,

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 7>instead of buying if you buy chicken or you know

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 7>inspetifying name brands, you buy straw brands. So I think

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 7>consumers are looking for areas to save money. And you know,

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing that comes through in grocery shopping and you

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 7>know in other areas of merchandise.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, we should learn a lot earnings this week from

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 2>two of the biggies Home Depot and Walmart Our thanks

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 2>to Jaywan Kong, Bloomberg retail reporter. Coming up on Bloomberg

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 2>day Break weekend, we'll examine the consequences of Europe's sweltering summer.

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 2>day Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 2>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>in New York. Up later in our program, we'll look

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 2>ahead to the latest reading of Japan's GDP. But first,

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Europe is heating up with high tempts and excess of

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 2>forty degrees celsius this summer, a huge uptick from the norm,

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 2>with climate chains a likely culprit of the Mediterranean's tropical makeover.

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Can the insurance industry keep up for more? Let's go

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 2>to London and bring in Bloomberg daybreak, europe banker Caroline

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 2>hepgar Tom.

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Climate change is increasing the frequency and intensity of heat waves,

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 3>bringing extreme weather events from flooding to wildfires across Europe.

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Just last month, in Greece, wildfires were found by strong winds.

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 3>In the Balkans, you saw burning forests and homes, which

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 3>also forced the evacuation of a resort town in Albania.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 3>In North Macedonia, a blaze near the Greek border burned

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 3>five houses and led to evacuations, and the damage spread

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 3>to Croatia, a popular holiday destination, whilst in Bulgaria firefighters

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 3>had to stop fighting a wildfire in the mountains near

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the Greek border because of land mines dating back to

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 3>the Cold War era. The volatile weather condition in Europe

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 3>really show no sign of abating in the northwest of Europe,

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 3>in France, in Germany, in the UK we're expected to

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 3>see the hottest temperatures of the summer in the next

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 3>few days. Popular tourist destinations are on high alert for fires.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 3>The growing prevalence of extreme weather conditions is weighing heavily

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 3>also on the insurance sector, often charged with the clear up.

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Navigating the consequences is something that we've been discussing with

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the Munich RECFO Christophe Jureka. He says that the unexpected

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>conditions in Europe are affecting his company's bottom line.

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 8>Indeed, we have very pleasing results again this quarter, and

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 8>after six months we are now already at three point

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 8>eight billion euros of a net result, by the way,

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 8>the highest net result ever we had after six months,

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 8>so very well on twek to achieve all for your guidance. Indeed,

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 8>now the question is why didn't be increase it? Probably well,

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 8>I would say that's the typical Munich conservativism. We are

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 8>cautious until the very end, and you know, the third

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 8>and the fourth quarter are very cut heavy in our planning.

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 8>So therefore we thought, let's give it another quarter and

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 8>see how the development goes and keep the guidance unchanged

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 8>for now. But what is very clear, were likely good

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 8>of it of overachieving our target has significantly increased?

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 9>Okay, Well that's what it sounds like. Okay, so that's important.

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 9>The likelihood of overachieving on that five billion europrofits target

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 9>has increased. That's an important line I think for investors

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 9>and talk to us about some of these extreme weather events.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 9>Then there are higher payment claims coming through for insurers

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 9>and reinsurers. Are there some regions now that are becoming uninsurable?

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 8>Indeed, in the second quarter again we had a relatively

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 8>high share of cut losses, slightly above our budget or

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 8>average budget is fourteen percent per quarter this time, whilst

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 8>it was fourteen point four, so slightly higher. And what

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 8>actually happened was that there was not this one single

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 8>headline event, you know, affecting us to that extent, but

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 8>it was a number of smaller, mid sized events which

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 8>then added up to that overall amount. The most significant

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 8>fast disc quarter was a flood in southern Germany which

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 8>which all together cost us in reinsurance around two hundred

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 8>million euros. But then there were other events across the globe,

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 8>all of them rather mid sized, which then finally added

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 8>up to the to the number. So in a way

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 8>busy quarter with with not this single so significant event

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 8>that it would have made headline headlines in the in

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 8>the neuse.

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 9>Is it is it your assessment there is sufficient capacity

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 9>within the insurance sector to be able to make up

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 9>for what is expected to be the increased claims around

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 9>climate change.

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 8>So our clear answer is yes, there is enough capacity,

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 8>So we are very happy to deploy capacity into cut risks,

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 8>always under the precondition, of course that the prices in

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 8>the terms and conditions have to have to be reasonable

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 8>also from a rene insurance perspective. But under that precondition,

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 8>absolutely there is that there's sufficient capacity in the market

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 8>and and and we are very happy to deploying more cognacity.

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 9>Your business men, Ray has been a leader in terms

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 9>of cybersecurity solutions within the insurance space. How how big

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 9>an impact was the crowd strike event within the industry

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 9>and for.

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 8>You, that's a very good question. I would very I

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 8>would love to know myself, but it's very early days,

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 8>so I cannot give you any any internal insights in

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 8>any internal numbers. Yet we're still assessing what's was going on.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 8>I think the the the the industry estimates as for

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 8>example just shown in the media, they have come down

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 8>a bit recently. But any anyways, it's early days. We

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 8>have to you know, really assess it, wait for the

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 8>collect claim stotifications and from from our clients. And then

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 8>we'll see that was.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 3>The munich ree CFO Christopherjureka. So are Europe's soaring temperature

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 3>is here to stay? What does it mean for insurers

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 3>on the one hand, but also for local people, for businesses,

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 3>for holidaymakers, and so much more. I've been talking about

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 3>that question with Bloomberg's energy reporter Aiman Farhat.

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 6>I mean in the last few years, I mean definitely

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 6>last summer and the summer before, we've been seeing these

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 6>increasingly record temperatures. I mean, you know you talked about

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 6>in excess of foy degrees. We actually reached even forty

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 6>six degrees celsius in Spain. I think that was last week.

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 6>And I think the important thing is it's not just

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 6>the high temperatures, it's also the intense heat for longer periods,

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 6>affecting people's health, as you said, affecting wildfires. So it's

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 6>definitely getting more extreme, and we're seeing that that's kind

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 6>of summer period. Start earlier. We were already seeing heat

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 6>waves in Spain in April and finish even later. We're

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 6>expecting this heat evening continue into October for some places.

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so the scorching weather is back then for another summer.

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 3>How prepared are parts of Europe for this? I mean,

0:18:56.000 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 3>some places in Europe are fairly accustomed to wildfires, but

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 3>how ready are Greece and other places?

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean Greece has definitely been the center of

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 6>kind of our wildfire coverage this summer. You know, every

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 6>single day we have new blazers, you know, on very

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 6>popular tourist spots of popular islands as well, but also

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 6>on the mainland. I mean, on the worst days in

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 6>Greece you will have you know, maybe sixty new blazers,

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 6>but they are quite responsive. One thing that's quite interesting

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 6>is there's much more of a kind of shared approach

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 6>in Europe, where you know, planes will be sent from

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 6>France or Italy to Greece to help out with wildfires.

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 6>But at the same time, you know, it is quite

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 6>worrying when lots of countries in that area are under

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 6>extreme risk of wildfire. Says, you know, something very small

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 6>could tip it all over to the edge.

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So if it's a difficult wildfast season, then what

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of tactics have been developed? You say, sharing equipment

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 3>is one. How else can countries in Europe try to

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 3>curb the damage?

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean I think it's definitely though the shard

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 6>its equipment is a big factor, but also there's a

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 6>lot more monitoring now. I mean, we have very advanced forecasts,

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 6>you know. The one thing is that wildfires are kind

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 6>of driven by dry conditions, by specific kinds of wind,

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 6>and by quite advanced marching technique. You can really tell

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 6>almost exactly where they're going to take place, and then

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 6>using southline imagery, European kind of forecasters can also tell

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 6>where the wildfires actually are, how they're doing with kind

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 6>of controlling blazers, and especially for the bigger, bigger issues,

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 6>that can really help to just a market situation and

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 6>to make sure that races are being used efficiently.

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that there's a risk that wildfires could

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 3>spread further north? I mean, let's say to the UK.

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Would we be equipped to deal with them, and would

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 3>it get hot enough dry enough here for that to happen?

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So, I mean I'm kind of checking these wildfire

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 6>maps almost every single day to see what it's going

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 6>to look like, and actually into next week there was

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 6>an increased risk in the UK. We've seen that a

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 6>few times a season where you kind of have this

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 6>high or very high wildfire risk.

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 6>Back in twenty twenty two, you know, we had the

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 6>hotest day ever and on that day we had some

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 6>wildfires in London. About twenty homes are destroyed. And since

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 6>then there's definitely been a much bigger concern about wildfires

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 6>in London and in the UK, and there's been lots

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 6>of consultations. There was kind of a whole kind of

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 6>period this year where there was people from you know,

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 6>from fire agencies and Spain, in France and Greece coming

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 6>to London and giving their advice. In the end that

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 6>did lead to some changes, you know, lots of the

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 6>staff in ord and now being traded specifically for wildfires.

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 6>They're even giving recommendations to local council to really reduce

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 6>that kind of risk of you know, of having barbecues

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 6>and parks and trying to reduce all those things that

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 6>could create wildfires because it is increasingly becoming a problem

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 6>in the UK. We are seeing hot of summers. We

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 6>are seeing it's not just about hot of summer, it's

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 6>about having those specific days where the heat really spiked.

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 6>As you said, you know into next week there will

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 6>be some days where it could reach thirty three degrees

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 6>and although that doesn't seem too hot, that can be

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 6>enough to course some wildfires.

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 3>So then also the other big market that is involved

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 3>in this is insurance in you know, the homes you

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 3>talk about being destroyed, I mean, that's all of that

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 3>has huge insurance implications. How are they dealing with the

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 3>optic and the issues around climate change?

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean definitely when when you take a step back,

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 6>all of these kind of extreme weather events sometimes seem isolated,

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 6>but as you said, there is a general trend about

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 6>climate change making them more and more frequent, and insurers

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 6>are definitely very aware of this, definitely warned about the

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 6>risks of climate change. And although they're not kind of

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 6>there yet, there are many insurances have said that some regions,

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 6>some places will become unensurable in the future as these

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 6>claims are getting bigger and more frequent. I mean this

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 6>year that you know, the Costes event in Europe was

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 6>actually a flooding event in southern Germany which kind of

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 6>came to about five billion, of which two point two

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 6>billion the US dollars was an insured loss. But you know,

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 6>whether it's kind of you know, the rain, the fires,

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 6>or just the extreme temperatures, those losses are becoming more

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 6>and more and I said more and more frequent every year.

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 6>So insurers are definitely kind of very aware of this

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 6>this trend.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 3>And we have had warnings in recent years and numerous

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 3>warnings of the risks of under insuring for climate change.

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 3>That's been a real worry of the industry. I mean,

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 3>why do you think aiming in particular the fars A

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 3>spreading to such an extent this summer.

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 6>The thing that the kind of fires is that it

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 6>can even be a hangover from last year. You know,

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 6>it's about drying us and the soil, It's about different winds,

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 6>and you know, if you have multiple years of pretty

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 6>extreme temperatures that can kind of compound that effect. You know,

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 6>we've had about two three years of pretty hot summers,

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 6>so in Greece that's really a problem. And it's also

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 6>the fact that this can extend much later into the

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 6>year than it would have. Otherwise we'd have seen a

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 6>wildfire season really focused on July August this year, Earlie

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 6>Junior are already seeing those wildfires expanding in parts of Europe,

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 6>and it also puts countries on edge. I mean, Spain

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 6>has been the focus of it For the last few weeks.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 6>There haven't been any major places, but you know, everyone's

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 6>kind of unread alad it kind of causes some disruption

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 6>as locally, and yeah, we have to be ready because

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 6>it can expand. As I said, wildfires just in nature

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 6>of them can mean that very quickly they can just

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 6>kind of flare up and become a huge problem.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Are the far authorities in various countries are they concerned

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 3>about what may happen next summer? I mean, we have

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 3>had kind of an optic and more close monitoring of

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 3>these peak temperatures across different European countries over successive summers.

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Is a concern that this going to get worse next year?

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean when it comes to extreme summers, I

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 6>think it seems that different forecasters always say that you know,

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, they can't really tell the weather will be

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 6>like next summer. It's obviously a long way away, but

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, more and more likely each summer we'll see

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 6>records broken extreme heat and more and more kind of

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 6>heat waves, which then leads to those fires. So that's

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 6>kind of the general trend. I mean, we are having

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 6>kind of an El Nino La Nina effect. You know,

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 6>the Elino is kind of ending and Latini is coming in,

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 6>which actually kind of reverses like that trend slightly and

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 6>actually causes more increased risk of hurricanes in the Atlantic,

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 6>which is a whole other, you know, other issue for insurers.

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 6>But as far as temperatures go, you know, records are

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:22.959
<v Speaker 6>going to continue to be broken. I mean, that's one thing.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 6>We're kind of sure. We got the hottest day ever

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 6>globally in July. That was two days in a row

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 6>we got that. We've been having, you know, consecutive months

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 6>of record temperatures every on Earth, so it just seems

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 6>like things getting hot everywhere.

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 3>That was Bloomberg's aim and far hat there as London,

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Paris and Berlin our brace to see yet more soaring

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 3>temperatures and another summer of climate change impact. I'm Caroline

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Hepge here in London. You can catch us every weekday

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 3>morning for Bloomberg Daybreak you at beginning at six am

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 3>in London. That's one am on war Street, Tom.

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Caroline, And coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 2>we'll look ahead to the latest reading on GDP from

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 2>the world's third largest economy. I'm Tom Busby and this

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 2>look ahead at the top stories for investors in the

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 2>coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York. Last week,

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 2>global expectations for the Japanese economy and its markets were

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 2>completely upended, making the path for the Bank of Japan's

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 2>monetary policy less clear. Ahead of the latest reading of

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Japan's GDP out this week, let's get to Bloomberg Daybreak

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Asia co host Doug Krisner for a closer look Tom.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Before last week, the consensus view on Japan was that

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the economy was on the end. Wages were rising, prices

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:53.959
<v Speaker 1>were up, inflation had returned and was proving sustainable, and

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 1>after many months of being above its two percent inflation target,

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of Japan tightened at its aligned meeting. BOJ

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Governor Kazuo Uwaita said the decision was based on data

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>showing developments on the economy and inflation were in line

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>with previous expectations. Earlier, I spoke with Stephanie Leung, chief

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>investment officer at Stashaway based in Hong Kong, and I

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>asked for her view on the boj's recent move.

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 10>Given that Japan has gone through a deflation for the

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 10>last thirty years, it is prudent for the BOJ to

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 10>kind of be a bit more conservative in that move.

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 10>I think the problem with the recent move is perhaps

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 10>more in the timing of things. So they picked the summer.

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 10>I think when liquidity is actually quite thin and a

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 10>lot of people are on leave, they kind of wish

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 10>that they could move the currency with this kind of

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 10>thinner liquidity, and perhaps they got much more than what

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 10>they wished for, and it says that it moved the

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 10>currency in a very very valid way. At the same time,

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 10>they stopped ETF purchases as well, and that I mean,

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 10>let's remember the reason why BOJ is hiking is because,

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 10>I mean, they are actually quite confident of the way

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 10>the economy is going. So I think in terms of

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 10>fundamental story, there's still a lot of progress, but I

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 10>mean a lot of this is technical.

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie Leung there from Stashuay, Now, the point she made

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>about Japan being in deflation for thirty years is important

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and not to be underestimated. You know, there's an entire

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>generation in Japan that's known only deflation. Now, the other

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>thing to consider in all of this, especially in the

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>last several years, is the strength of the US dollar

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that has added to Japan's inflationary pressures. I also spoke

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>earlier with Carlos Casanova, he is senior Asia economist at UBP.

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 11>First half week yen triggering important inflation. As a result

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.920
<v Speaker 11>of that, you instigate changes in corporate behavior, including increasing wages.

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 11>That increase was the highest than thirty years, So definitely

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 11>that part of the cycle has materialized, and then down

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 11>the line that should translate into stronger domestic consumption and

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 11>endogenous inflation. The third part of that puzzle is what

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 11>we haven't quite seni yet. Although data did show real

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 11>wages increasing by one point one percent for the first

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 11>time since twenty twenty one, but in none of itself,

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 11>that is not sufficient to justify the hawkish piper.

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 9>So I think.

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 11>Inflation has been high, but it's predominantly driven by US

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 11>dollar strength. And so Bank of Japan really really has

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 11>taken a gamble here because the preliminary data does point

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 11>towards this virtual cycle sort of taking hold in the

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.959
<v Speaker 11>second half of the year, but they moved ahead of

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 11>having visibility on that front.

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Is Carlos Casanova, senior economist at UBP. Joining us now

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for some discussion on the Japanese economy and the BOJ

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is our own Paul Dobson. Paul is Bloomberg Executive editor

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>for Asia Markets. He joins us from Singapore. Paul, the

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>reaction in markets to the boj's tightening should really come

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>as no surprise, especially directionally in terms of yen strengthening.

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say that it was magnified

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>by that unwinding of the carry trade. To be sure,

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>how are you making sense of the ripple effects that

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>we have seen in markets?

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 12>So I think that the starting point has to be

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 12>to think about that carry trade and how much of

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 12>the world has been taking on these leveraged bets based

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 12>on the yen being the last kind of funding currency

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 12>at particularly low interest rates that's out there, and so

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 12>that really has snowballed in recent years and become a

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 12>very important theme. Now, on top of that, you've had

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 12>further depreciation in the end for much of this year,

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 12>and that's partly the boj's fault. So listening to some

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 12>of what you've been saying already, just now, you know

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 12>the Bank of Japan was very very slow and very

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 12>very careful about when it's going to choose to raise

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 12>interest rates. The market had been expecting it to come,

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, earlier in the year, and the BOJ chose

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 12>not to move on a couple of occasions when the

0:29:54.800 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 12>window was already open. It had kind of nurtured the market,

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 12>but to such an extent that people had gotten very

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 12>complacent about the idea that the BOJ wasn't going to

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 12>move aggressively. So for them then to do this hike

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 12>at a time when maybe the market wasn't quite so

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 12>well prepared, did really cause something of a shock and

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 12>start the sort of snowball rolling down the hill in

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 12>terms of yen appreciation. What they couldn't have foreseen, and

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 12>what was particularly bad luck was that two days later

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 12>we'd have that really weak payrolls data out of the US,

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 12>which led to a weaker dollar and increase beats that

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 12>the Federal Reserve will need to start cutting interest rates soon.

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 12>And that really was the second kind of push that

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 12>really ignited that big unwind in the carry trade and

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 12>then sent those ripples across the rest of the world's

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 12>financial markets.

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So what have these developments done to the thinking on

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>what the Bank of Japan may do next. Do you

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be much more cautious now that

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they've become I don't want to say scared, but very

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the way in which markets have been trading

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in this volatile fashion. Or are they going to lean

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.959
<v Speaker 1>into solving the inflation problem in Japan? Which is it?

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 12>So after two days are very volatile moves in financial markets.

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 12>We heard from the Deputy Governor ochidah and he seemed

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 12>to seek to calm those expectations somewhat. You might call

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 12>it activating the BOJ put He said, hey, you know,

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 12>if markets are very volatile like this, this isn't when

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 12>the BOJ is going to continue to be hiking interest rates.

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 12>That would be kind of counter productive. So he stilled

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 12>some of the worst fears in the market about how

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 12>fast the BOJ may move and what sort of circumstances

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 12>it would be looking at for those moves, and that

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 12>did do something to settle things down. The longer term

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 12>expectations aren't exactly for the BOJ to be moving aggressively.

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 12>A lot of the analysts are talking about December or

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 12>January for the next hike, and the market is not

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 12>pricing in a very aggressive part. What we'd had from

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 12>the BOJ when it raised interest rates was a discourse

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 12>that seemed to suggest that it could be moving much

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 12>more quickly than that. Now the market is back to

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 12>pricing a more gradual pace, and maybe there will be

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 12>enough to help to assuage some of the worst fears

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 12>in the market. But what we do know is that

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 12>the BOJ is determined to continue with its hiking path

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 12>or other things being equal, and so long the term,

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 12>those people that have those long leverage positions based on

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 12>the premise of very low interest rates in Japan will

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 12>need to think twice about whether they want to hold

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 12>onto them.

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned earlier in the week ahead, we'll be

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>getting the Japanese second quarter GDP print again. Here is

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Casanova, Senior Asia economist at UBP on what we

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>are likely to see.

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 11>It's a backward looking indicator, so I think it's going

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 11>to disappoint. And remember that the economy was in a

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 11>recession in the first quarter. Consumption and capital expenditure was

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 11>contraction ay as a result of high inflation, squeezing purchasing

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 11>power of households in Japan. Because all of their imports

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 11>net importer and all of their imports are more expensive.

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.959
<v Speaker 11>But also companies have been adjusting to higher nominal wages

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 11>by reducing the amount of that they spend on capital expenditures.

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 11>So I think that trend is going to continue into

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 11>the second quarter, and of course, if we see a

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 11>disappointing GDP reading, that is going to be quite negative

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 11>for markets.

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>That is Carlos Casanova from UBP back to my colleague

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Paul Dobson in Singapore. What are we expecting here in

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>quantitative terms on the GDP print? Do we have a number?

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 12>We do, and it's not an unfavorable number based on

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 12>analyst estimates. Expectations are the quarter on quarter GDP will

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 12>increase point six percent. That's after minus point seven percent

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 12>the previous quarter. So finally, some growth at least is

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 12>what the street is looking for. I think it's interesting

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 12>what what Carlos Ksenova was saying that I don't know

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 12>whether good news or bad news is worse for the

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 12>market right now. If the growth is too strong, then

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 12>you know, the market might start to reprice the BHA

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:15.439
<v Speaker 12>expectations again for a more aggressive stance, and that might

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 12>whip up the volatility that we've been seeing in recent days. Again,

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 12>whereas you know, obviously two weaker number and people will

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 12>be worried about the growth outlook and whether the BOJ

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 12>will be able to hike at all from here, So

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:31.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, it will certainly be a number that there

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:33.479
<v Speaker 12>will be a lot of focus on and could cause

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 12>quite a lot of volatility as well.

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to take a brief look at household spending

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in Japan because data that I looked at in the

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 1>most recent week indicated a second month of decline during

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the month of June. And as I understand it, Paul,

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>household spending in Japan accounts for more than half of

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>overall domestic GDP. When you look at the state of

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the consumer in Japan, what do we see?

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 12>So I think you know what we want to do

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 12>is go right back to the start what you were

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 12>saying earlier about how a whole generation has lived through

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 12>this kind of deflationary environment and how we're finally at

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 12>a point where we've got some wage growth coming through

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 12>the economy, We've got companies feeling like they do have

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 12>some ability to raise prices. We're getting back into an

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 12>inflationary mindset. That's really what the BOJ wants. It's what

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 12>the government has been pushing for as well for a

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 12>long time, and that's why they've been so very careful

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 12>to try to not disrupt things, to try to be

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 12>able to raise interest rates without causing too much disruption,

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 12>and probably why they're alarmed by what we've seen in

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 12>the markets in reaction to that rate hike. So they

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 12>will want to see continuing wage growth, and they will

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 12>want to see continuing confidence among consumers to keep on spending,

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 12>and they will want companies to be able to continue

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 12>to raise prices as well, to have that pricing power

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 12>which we hadn't seen for so long, and we have

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 12>been seeing in Japan in recent years. That said, you know,

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 12>we are seeing a little bit of a slow down,

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 12>a little bit less confidence among consumers at this moment

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 12>in time, and that will be troublesome for the BOJ,

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 12>you know. So what I think the next really big

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 12>kind of talking point will be for the policymakers comes

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 12>around October time, when we'll get more wage negotiations, when

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 12>we'll be able to see if pay growth continues, and

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 12>if that does, then hopefully that will give the consumer

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 12>the confidence to continue spending, and that will continue that

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 12>inflationary cycle that has just about kind of been established,

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 12>but it's still very fragile.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to point out at the same

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 1>time that the week Japanese currency has played a very

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>crucial role in supporting many major companies in Japan, especially

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 1>those exporters. The value of their earnings overseas is boosted

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>by that weakness. And if you look at a company,

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 1>let's say Toyota recently reporting record profits. So this cuts

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>both ways, does it not?

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 12>Yeah? Absolutely, I mean so on the one hand, you

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 12>do have the benefits for those exporters of a week yen.

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 12>On the other hand, if the end does strengthen, then

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.919
<v Speaker 12>it should make things a little bit better for importers

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 12>and therefore should make it a little bit easier for

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 12>the consumer as well. So it does cut both ways.

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 12>I think what we saw is that the yen weakness

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 12>was just so pronounced that even those companies that have

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 12>benefited from exporting in the past, even they were complaining

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 12>the yen was too weak and that they would rather

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.399
<v Speaker 12>see it stabilize or strengthen a little bit. So from

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 12>that perspective, at least, you know behind the idea that

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:32.320
<v Speaker 12>the boj should be hiking and should be pushing the

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 12>currency stronger again, just not please very add these humongous

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 12>the aggressive pace of change that we've seen over the

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 12>past few days.

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul, thank you so much for joining us and helping

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>us understand a little bit better what's been happening in

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Japan and where things may go from here. Paul Dobson

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Executive Editor for Asia Markets. I'm Doug Prisner,

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can join Brian Curtis and myself weekdays here

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, beginning at eight a m. In

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong eight pm on Wall Street.

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Tom our thanks to Doug, and that does it for

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 2>this edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Monday morning at five am Wall Street Time for the

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 2>latest on markets overseas and the news you need to

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 2>start your day. I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay with us. Top

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 2>stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.