WEBVTT - A Look At China's Tech Crackdown, Consumer Sentiment 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Now we have with

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>us one of the most respected names on the street

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to analyzing companies in terms of I

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>guess um future cash flows, and he's done the pretty

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>much the best as far as I can see across

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the industry in terms of his returns. Dan Ives joins

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>us from web Bush Securities, where he's managing director of

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Equity Research. Dan, I'm gonna kind of rip up the

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>script here because I know we want to talk about

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the China tech crackdown, and I definitely want to hit

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>on Tesla as well in a moment, because Elon Musk

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is here with me, not with me personally and physically,

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, within a twenty mile radius in Berlin

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>at his Big A factory. But we just got a

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>consumer sentiment number that um the U miss Director Richard

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>curtain called stunning. The loss of confidence, he said, was stunning.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>He said over the past half century, the sentiment index

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>has only recorded larger losses in six other surveys, and

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it's dropped the most since two thousand eleven. What is

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>going on in the U S economy? OK, I think

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're starting to see really coming down of COVID,

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it's very uneven in terms of this recovery and and

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it really is cause almost more and more

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of a move to some of these safety blanket names,

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>especially in tech by the large cab names, because investors

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>right now they almost have a flashlight in a dark

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>tunnel that they're still trying to figure out what the

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>fundamental stories look like consumer as well as enterprised second

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>half of the year, and and we continue weave this

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to be uneven, but you have to focus

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>on the secular winners, and we've we've tech. It's still

0:01:57.800 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a risk on train a green light to intact and

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to your end. Dan, on that note, we're taking look

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>at shares of Microsoft right some of the big tech

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>companies that you cover that are trading at record highs,

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and I am curious how much of this is a

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>defensive move wherewith yields falling, we like the discount cash

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>flows or these valuations really justified in your opinion, Yeah,

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question. I think there's definitely a bit

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>defensive on some of these tech names, like a Microsoft,

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of it really comes down to we

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>are in the midst of a fourth in DSHA revolution.

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean two trillion of digital transformations spend on the

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>enterprise and on consumer. When you look at what they're

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>doing in Redmond, when the Delawad and the Charge, Microsoft

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to gain more and more share in the cloud,

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and that what we're seeing is just a further rereading

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of the stock from Microsoft, but you're seeing across the

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>whole tech sphere in terms of names like Apple, names

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>across cybersecurity and cloud because in so just starting realized

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:02.839
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't just to pull forward we've seen the last

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months. It's called first second inning of what really

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>what's going to be a transformation in terms of the

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>tech sector. You have a thousand dollar price target. I

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>believe on Tesla you have as an outperform. You've done

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>much better than your peers in terms of rating the

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>stock with a nine percent return. Your peers average return

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>is down. What is happening though, in terms of boosting production,

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of getting out the solar cell business, in

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of you know, achieving all that he's promised, Like

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the mack truck, I guess it's an eighteen wheeler that

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>he that he wants to bring out. I mean, can

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you really do all this stuff? Or does that not

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>matter to you know, it's this kind of cashlow is

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>also not matter to Tesla. Yeah, I think for right

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>now in Tesla they almost have a high class problem

0:03:55.960 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>because every car that they meet they sell. It's really

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>more of a supply capacity issues, which is why he's

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in Berlin right now, and which is why there's such

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a focus on the build out of Berlin, having that

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>flagpole in Europe instead of just shipping cars from China,

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>which is a logistical disaster, as well as Austin. Because

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>right now we're in the green title leave, we're just

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in the early stages of it. And Tesla when Musk

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is looking out, of course, we have cyber Truck talking

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>about long haul talking as well. These are aspirations. I

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't think they're just aspirations. I think these

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>are models that we will continue to see come out,

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But for now, for the street, it's about Model three,

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Model Y and of course the rebound in China for Tesla,

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that is what will continue driving stock A part of

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the overrang on Testa this year after Cinderella Story last year.

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>It's more competition from GMS two v ws to the

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>pure place and that's been I want to see the

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>cyber truck what I want to see on the street, Dan,

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, speaking of China, go out there for us,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>but but go broader. I think what is fascinating is

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the rewriting that you've had to see on change it,

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, with a stroke of a pen. Beijing has

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>told us in the last month that they can entirely

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>change the rules. How do you evaluate that on a

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>fundamental basis? With all the headline risk of China tech

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>crackdown well right now and for investors not just in

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>the US but globally, you really can't go in China

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>tech here. I mean, the rules continue get changed, and

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 1>it's really been a horror movie. You know, for investors

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 1>in China tax factor more and more that money is

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>routine to US tech, even though there's regulatory risk of

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>course within the Beltway, this just doesn't compare the scale

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>and scope of what Beijing is doing with this crackdown.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's something where you know, if you own these

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>names on Friday, you don't know what's going to happen

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning. And it's really the risk off in the

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>China sectors. One. It's hard for us to look someone

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>in the mirror and own some of these broader themes

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>have regulatory risk, like to Baba's, the d d S

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and others. All right, thanks so much for joining us.

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Dan is always a pleasure to get you on and uh,

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you had a lot of insight for our investors,

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>also for our listeners. Also point out to people that

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>they can check out the A and our page for

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Dan Ives and just see um how he has crushed

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of picking stocks and setting targets. So

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>always good to talk to web Bush Securities Managing Director

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Dan Ives. We're gonna continue to cover this massive drop

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in consumer sentiment for you. The you Miss index falling

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to a reading of seventy. We were looking for more

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>than eighty. This is Bloomberg. Now. There is a lot

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>going on in Washington. Despite the fact that I believe

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they're currently in recess. Um. They need to figure out

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>if they're gonna pass this one point two trillion dollar

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>spending bill before they look at the three and a

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>half trillion dollar resolution moves or reconciliation moves or um.

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>If they're gonna, I guess hold hostage is a bad term,

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but basically, um make sure they can get the reconciliation

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>passed before they agree on the bipartisan bill. Nonetheless, it

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>looks like we're gonna get a lot more money spent

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>on infrastructure eventually, she tell Prasade Joins, a small and

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>MidCap growth portfolio manager, as well as equity research analyst

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Jennison Associates to talk to us about where investors can

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>take advantage if we do, and she tall this is

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>an interesting market because it does look like there's gonna

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more money spent, at least for now.

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>We do face the possibility of a fiscal cliff in

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the future, and there are supply chain issues that are

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>really jamming things up a little bit. How do you

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:58.239
<v Speaker 1>see the investment environment? Well, it's great to be heroris

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to thanks for having me, so I guess what I

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>would say on the Infrastructure Bill specifically, is I think

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it's meaningful that for the first time as you as

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you talked about things in DC, that we're actually able

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to get something done. Uh. It does show that we've

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>got bipartisan support for investing in our own infrastructure. And

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some parts of that bill that are bipartisan.

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned that, you know, whether it's UM investing

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in bridges and roads, high speed internet for rural communities,

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle charging stations, etcetera. Having said that, you know,

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>on our team, UM and even I think the markets

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>are not really assuming that this will go through. There's

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of wood to chop UM from the

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>House in terms of getting this passed. And we've maybe

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>been burned once before on the promise of an infrastructure package.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think we are getting in over our

0:08:56.000 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>skis on this spending specifically. Having said that, so UM,

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a pandemic and just what we've seen

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the supply chain clunches that you mentioned,

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>UM companies want to have their supply chains closer, and

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're about to embark on a real onshoring, reshoring,

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>capital investment renaissance. In this country. I hate to try

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to bring a a contrary opinion here, though it was

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>interesting yesterday one of them was one of the first

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>times I finally heard someone say, uh, except taxes have

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to go up if we're going to pay for all

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of this, and the markets haven't yet priced that in well,

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>or growth could pay for it. Yes, if we can

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>grow our way out of our debt. But if we can,

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, how are we are there are the markets

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>prepared for potentially higher taxes in order to pay for this.

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that the markets are ready for higher

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 1>taxes now. Certainly the Biden and Is station is saying

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that there is enough pay force for the infrastructure bill

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>by you know, some of the COVID relief funds and

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>unused you know, assistance to the states, etcetera. But I

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>think we know from I think the CBO scoring that's

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to cost a lot of money. Um, And

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think and you know, and I think that

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>certainly some members of Congress are really resistant to increase

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in taxes, whether it's gas taxes, usage taxes, etcetera. So

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that almost seems like a non starter quite frankly, to

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>pay for it. But um, you know, again, even without

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the one point two trillion UM, I think that the

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the doors open, the gates are open,

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're just going to see a lot more investment

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in the country, regardless of what happens in the US.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, from from the government standpoint, you know, the

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.839
<v Speaker 1>the best way that the government throughout history you found

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to get out of debt is inflating their way out.

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>As someone who looks at you know, especially small and

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>MidCap stocks, what's your take on inflation. I so we've

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>just come off of a second quarter earning season, and

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you almost universally, every single company is

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about inflation, and that inflation is are there in

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the form of raw materials, it's in the form of wages,

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it's in the form of freight and logistics, and and

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>for some companies they can you know, pass it through

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to customers and whether that's consumers or whether that's you know,

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 1>business to business customers. And so I do think that

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>inflation is real. And you know what I'm perhaps a

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more concerned about is that the alleviation that many

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>companies were hoping for in the back half of this

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>year and into two seems to be maybe being pushed

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>off to the right. And the reason I say that is,

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the delta variant um. You know, for for

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>certain companies that have supply chains still in Southeast Asia

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>where plants are being shut down for weeks. Uh, you know,

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they're just not yet seeing the looseness in the supply

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>chains that we would hope for. So I do think

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that inflation is there. I do believe that companies are

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>going to price it through as much as possible, and

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it could, as you said, inflate the economy higher. All right,

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all we have time for unfortunately, but

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we can get you back Schtel, because it's fascinating,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>um to get your take on this, especially as you know,

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>typically people come on here and talk only about the

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>big cap stocks. UM. I guess in this market it's

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>all about Mega tex, right, So it's great to hear

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>from a small and MidCap growth portfolio manager. Sheetile Prasad

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>from Jennison Associates talking to us about the expected impact

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of the infrastructure deal, the possibility of more taxes. I think, sadly,

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 1>that's always almost an inevitability, um, right. So I mean

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 1>sadly for those of us who don't like to pay taxes. Well,

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and with the evaluations, I think she had a good

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>point of the markets might not be ready for and

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>she had a good point. With the five fifty billion

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>dollar bill, we're not looking at it, but with the

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>three and a half trilling dollar bill, we could be

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at higher taxes. And it's just all a matter

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of how the markets can be prepared for that. Mad

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely um, and I think that's one of the problems

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of Congress people have with it. Like

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>James Rosst Joins, a ce IO and founding partner of

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Coast Capital and James Bitcoin. You know, everyone is calling

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>for a crash at thirty grand and now we're back

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>up at forty six thousand, three thirteen. What's going on?

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I nice to do, nice to be with you. Look,

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I really wouldn't call myself an expert on bitcoin. We

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>really are focused on gold and gold miners where we

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>have some very specific thoughts journey and so far as

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>inflation is concerned. The problem we have with bitcoin is

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>um It's adopted by a lot of people who really

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>want to see go up, but there really are no

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>natural buyers for it. I don't think over and above

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>financial speculators, um. And there seems to be a lot

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of financial speculators, more than ever before, and the amount

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of capital in the hand of speculators is much greater

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>than ever before. And you can probably blame very low

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>interest rates for that. The problem with with Bitcoin rather

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>than things like etherium or other coins is it's just flawed.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>It seems to us destined to be worth if not

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>worth less, then worth certainly a lot less than where

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it is today, simply because you know, it's a very

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>inefficient still mechanism for for the transfer of value from

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>one person to another, which is what you need as

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a currency, and that is the store of value. You know.

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that Bitcoin is the best blockchain

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>based cryptocurrency will ever come up with. You know, Etherium

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is already a superior um platform um. And so why

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>would I want to buy bitcoin when I know that,

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and also at the point with a better

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>technology is guaranteed to be developed, already has been developed,

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and let's all that bitcoin too or ethereum, and I

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>know that something even better will be developed. Why does

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>anybody want to buy gold? Uh? Well, people look a

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>number of reasons. First of all, have you ever, you know,

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>gone to a really nice dinner with you know, like

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>like like you know, someone who were very nice jewelry

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and that makes a certain impact. Have you ever gone

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to Paris and marvel that how beautiful it is? And

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>have you noticed how the rooftops are guilded? Have you

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you got married? What did you you know?

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>If you if you are married, and and and anyone

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>who's married has my sympathies man or woman. By the way,

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>when you got married, what is the how did you

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>convey your love? You know, gold is and has been

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and will doubtless remain the one that commodity that has

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>been a store of value that has been chair is

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>by people around the world for millennia and will continue

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to be. And guess what Central bankers who know a

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>whole lot more about um um financing stores of value

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>than than I do. Certainly you know, are not buying bitcoins.

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>They're buying goal and they're maybe they're they're doing their

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>best to outlaw bitcoin, you know. And I think that

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>from never mind uhum the concerns that I just expressed,

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but from environmental concerns perspective, and also because central banks

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>want to have an ever tight equip on their local economies.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>From that perspective as well, I think that they will

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>want to see people certainly not adopt bitcoin or not

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>adopt you know, these blockchain based currencies with which to

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>conduct transactions in the countries. I mean and just yeah,

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>there are so many hurdles that bitcoin, blockchain based currencies, uh,

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies face. Um, but tas you know, you know, Matt's

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to be happy. I'm going to digress a

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit from bitcoin and blockchain. You mentioned inflation when

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you're talking talking about gold. We've had a lot of

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>moves in the commodities as of late. You had lumber

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>up and lumber down, copper up and copper down. What

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>are the moves and commodities telling you about that inflation? Well,

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>inflation is upon us and it's real. I have I

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of land in upstate New York that

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>I bought a long time ago, and I have a

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of trees. And the prices that I'm getting for

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the offered, Um, I'm fancy myself and environmentally, so I'm

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not selling my trees, but the prices that I'm getting offered.

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, are are are getting to be very attractive.

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Um So, even now with lumber prices having come down,

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>they're so meaningfully above stating what I'm getting offered is

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>meaningfully above where where I was maybe about two years ago. Um.

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that inflation is upon us. You

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>come up, have the most important injection of money into

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>global systems and not have it impact the prices of

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>goods that are limited and supplying limited and production you

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>just cannot. And here's where I think that gold, if

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I may have just finished up on that topic, is

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>specifically interesting. Gold has been the barometer often creation for

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a long time. It certainly isn't acting like it now.

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's because one of the main

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms of that clock currently is out of order. That

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>mechanism being industry of demand for gold and consumer demands

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for gold. Seventy percent of the gold that is produced

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>around the world goes into the jewelry market. People. Um uh,

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know I would, I mean give me I'm

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>from you know, but like mostly women by gold, you know,

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>to to as as as part of the way that

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you know to to basically in the form of jewelry

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>which they like to wear, and you buy jewels and

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>you wear jewelry when you're interacting with others. Um uh.

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>And because of lockdowns still in effect. Um if not

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.719
<v Speaker 1>formally then at least personally around the world. You know,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>jewelry sales are down up to you know, depending on

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the geography year over year, right, And so I think

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that when we come out of this and people begin

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to circulate, you have a double whammy of It's it's

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a stounding if you think about it, that the gold

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>price hasn't crashed, given the fact that like over fifty

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of sales going to a sector where demand is down

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.479
<v Speaker 1>like year over year. So we've been thinking about I've

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about getting a grill myself, but I wasn't

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>able to get out and I might do it now.

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>It's not just the women, you know, sometimes I like

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>some big gold chains. You could pull it off, you know,

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe in Jesus with the ruby eyes. That's always a

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>good look that never goes out of stop. But all

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>joking aside, I mean, it's astounding to me. You can

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>buy you can go to Subby's or Christy's or auction

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.479
<v Speaker 1>houses and you can buy big admittedly gaudy you know,

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>gold jewelry or whatever, for like less than the cost

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of the actual medal um. And so I think that

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>there's anyway with cold. I do think that the one

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>part there are two things people don't think about. A

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>jewelry demand down has been weighing, and we'll continue to

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>weigh until we basically come out of this and decide,

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and have her the immunity, or basically get

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>to a point where we at to full circulation, whatever

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>it is. I think they will get there over the

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years, and I'm not on the hurry

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>for us to get there, because the longest gold prices

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the press that happier I am becau I'm buying amazing

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>companies that I'm buying at two times cash you're buying

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the I'm buying miners at two times cash flow. But

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming that I only get fifteen hundred pounds of coal.

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>We're at eighteen hundred now at fifteen hundred, I'm buying

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>them at two times cash flow. So but the other

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>thing that people don't understand about gold is, you know,

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>quite like bitcoin, although in the case of bitcoin it's artificial.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>In the case of goal. It's it's it's got made

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>um if you believe in God. That's a whole lot

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of discussion perhaps for as getting dangerous. We're getting dangerous here. Look,

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>by the time you talk about grills and heavy chains,

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you've already already waked right on tread on. Davis there soory,

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just following your cues. But with gold, what

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>people don't understand is production of gold is declining around

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the world, is declined by fifty over the next ten years.

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>For every ounce of gold that we're taking out of

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Were only discovering your point two ounces. So

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the companies that have long reserves, long mine life and

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>safe jurisdictions, these are ever more precious assets whose prices

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and valuations have never been as low as they are today.

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a you know, so we're huper excited about

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the work we're doing in the space. It's a it's

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a technically very difficult space to get your hands around,

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking about five years to put together our internal due

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>diligence competencies. But but avoid it's it's super attractive sector. James,

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>go cross asset with me, and let's get away from

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the gold in the commodities and take a

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>look at Europe. I think what always stands out to

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>me is the lower valuations in Europe. And people come

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>on the program and they say, yeah, but valuations are

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>lower there for a reason. Some of that is the

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>tilt towards cycle goals and value. As we know in

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the US you have more of a growth weaiting with

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>this delta variant sort of creeping up. Do you buy

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Europe just because it's value cheaper or is it cheaper

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>for reason? Well be the important question, you know, some

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of the most look we I've been investing in Europe

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>for most of my for twenty five years now, um

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>um uh, and that's what I live in even breathe.

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And here's one sort of unofficial answer to the reason

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>why you buy Europe. So much more fun to business

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>companies in Italy than in Idaho or Iowa. And no

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>offense to my friends and Idaho and Iowa. But I

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>think everybody aprees that it least just a much more

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>fun part of the world to go to. But there

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>are a lot here are a couple of things. So

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the most sophistically investors we point the fact is European

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>markets have never treated at this kind of discount to

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the US markets. Right, since the American New York Stock

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Exchange was was created in seventeen two, valuation discrepancy has

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>never been as high as it is today. It was

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher earlier this year. I think you

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>peaked in January, but it's declined by five percent since.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And so some of the most thoughtful people will come

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>back and say, well, that's just because America is just

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>much more greatly weighted towards technology and faster world and companies. Right,

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>But in fact, if you look at cross industry analysis,

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>but we've done, you look at there is there isn't

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a single industry where the average company in Europe is

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>trading at a tent or lower discount compared with its

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>peers in North America. And by the way, margins, tax rates,

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>cash flow profiles very comparable at this point. So I

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's from that perspective in the world that like

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it or not, as ever more uh integrated globally. We're

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>buying some of the biggest waste management companies in the

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>world that happened to be based in Europe at like,

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, single digit multiples of EBITA here in North

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>In the US, we're buying the same companies at twenty

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 1>times plus. You know. It's it's just so there's a

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>valuation arbitrage that is impossible to ignore. And I think

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that for us, there are so many ways to answer

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>your question, but for us, the answer ends up being

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a micro one. It depends on the company are there

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and to release value back to investors. Maybe the company

0:23:58.080 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>is just kind of you know, we're buying tech companies

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in like re baring some of the leading software companies

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world and fields that are going a year

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>wind them at three times revenues, ten times mortalized arts.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, these companies, if they just dealist in Europe

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and read US in North America, you could see theoretically

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 1>a tenfold increase in evaluation. So it's it's just it's

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty nutty, and it's as nutty as it's ever been, James,

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's been nutty having you on, but fantastic, Thank

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. It's want of the

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 1>point out that I once interviewed Mr T on Bloomberg

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Television and that guy was wearing like forty pounds of

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>gold chains. So news you can use man now let's

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>get over to Bloomberg Intelligence senior US retail analyst Pooam Goyle.

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>She joins us on the phone from the Garden State Punham.

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's talk about the consumer sentiment number. I mean,

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>was it a shocker to you to see consumer sentiment

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>fall by this much? Yeah, I mean it was definitely

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a surprise, But if you put thing thanto perspective, we

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:05.479
<v Speaker 1>are dealing with high inflation right now and the delta

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>variant is rising, so it's not too much of a

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>surprise to see that the consumers are getting worried what's

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>coming next? You know, do they have to worry about

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 1>not having things and stuff again? Because shipment delays around

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the globe are dealing deliveries of some essential some non

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>essential items, So there's a lot still moving that the

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer is not sure about. That said, we do think

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that the consumer is still spending. I mean, we're seeing

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>people travel more, We're seeing people eat out more. We

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>are seeing people spend more, whether it's in stores or

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>even online. You know, it was interesting this week when

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we had Disney earnings come out, we were thinking of

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>how well that portrays where the consumer is right now.

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Whether we're staying home or literally going out in to

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>theme parks. How are you taking that as we push

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>forward to t J Max, Walmart, Ross, Target, Lows, Home

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Depot next week. I know, of course in your coverage

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you're keenly focused on t J Max and Amazon and others.

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Where is the health of the consumers? We think about

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>retail sales and where they are shopping and what that

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is telling us. Sure, So I think there's two things

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to think about as these retailers report next week. One

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is the tougher comparisons that they're all up against from

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>last year, because last year and two Q was when

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>online shopping surge, especially for retailers like Home Depot and

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Lows where you did a lot of do it yourself

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of home renovation. So they're up against

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a very tough comparison. In light of that, though still

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we do see spending being robust and that people are

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>still continuing to spend on their home So while things

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>may dip a little on a relative basis, there is

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>still strengthened that's space, partly driven by inflation also, where

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>we have seen prices go up. So when you move

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>forward and you look at like a Walmart and a Target.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit of a mixed situation

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>where online sales will be pressured because of the tougher

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>comparisons that they have from last year, but we do

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>still expect to see sales um rise and that's predominantly

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>driven by increased trafficking stores and also as consumers go

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>out and spend more on discretionary items, which is a

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>parallel home toys, etcetera, and back to school, all categories

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that have a higher margin element to it. So it

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>will be interesting to see the dynamics and how they

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>play out between a wal Mart and the Target UM.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But we do think that you will still see underlying

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>consumer strength on an overall basis. And then when you

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>look at TJ Max and Ross there it's not a

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>story of tougher comparisons because last year in two Q

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>their stores were actually closed, so they're expected to post

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>some very robust, robust numbers, not just over but even

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>over For example, at t j X, we're actually expecting

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.959
<v Speaker 1>to see an acceleration in the pace of games versus

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:01.479
<v Speaker 1>one Q in two Q. TJ Max here in Europe

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is actually called t K max. That is correct, It's

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird until you get used to it. I

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know why, because I think t J max works well.

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like someone's name t J max, but t K max.

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>What's that? I guess you don't spend as much time

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it as I do. In any case, Um, Punam,

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us, Punam going out

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>senior US retail analysts covering those companies as we await

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a slew of retail earnings and we see what consumer sentiment,

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what what inflation expectations? Due to consumer sentiment, I will

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>point out that, you know three, I feel like that's

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>still bang in line with the historical average, right, so

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we're just used to such low inflation of the past

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>decade til I'm still trying to get over the hard

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>questions you asked, Punam, t k X t those questions,

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>why is it t K max? Anyway, I'll find out.

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple podcasts or whatever

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller three pt On Fall Sweeney, I'm on

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast. You can always

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio