WEBVTT - 3/25, Part 2: Spring Training, Turner bases, Jose Ramirez injury, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guessed Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Let me just

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>become best friends. Fantasy best Friends forever, our number two

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever. Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Long long signed,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Frank standfile two more guest instudio. Hi, Frank, going on

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a little close to you right now, just like a

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>lot closer than We're weird. That's okay. We have two

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>guests in studio, which makes it and it makes it.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>It makes it all the more, It makes it all

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the more easy. You can pound. They're not gonna see you,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Pat because for the camera's on us. But that's cool.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt Striker and Mike the rohto Cop are here to

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about what's going on in their fantasy baseball world

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and break down all the latest news with us. So, gentlemen,

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the show. Thanks for coming in, thanks for

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>having us. Really appreciate it absolutely. But first and foremost,

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>where can people listen to your podcast? Let him know's

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>on pod. On Twitter, you could follow me at Mike

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the Rhoto Cop, follow Matt at Matt Underscore, Riker Underscore

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Underscore Striker Underscore, as well as on rasball

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. There you go, and they can also follow

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you from sure a bunch of wrestling stuff as well. Yeah,

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>but we're here to talk about fantasy baseball. Baseball is real.

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>That is I look at that. Look at that, not

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>implying anything, but there you go. Absolutely, So the biggest

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>news in fantasy baseball came. There's a lot of news yesterday,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>right with the biggest stuff being that Josie Ramirez in

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the first inning leaves the game after taking a ball

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>off the knee, and you're just like a crap, And

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we did the same thing, Frank, We drafted them fourth overall.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you guys have him somewhere. And it wasn't

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>like he just limped off. It wasn't like he crawled off.

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>It was he was taking on a golf cart and

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>immediately taking him to the X ray machine and thankfully

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>everything comes back negative. But Matt, you're you're an athlete.

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that is that enough to kind of kualda worries

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>for you? Yeah? Absolutely. When you find out what the

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:25.679
<v Speaker 1>results were and you realize that it's just gonna be

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a bruise or things like that, you do hold your

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>breath for a second, but then after a while you

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>realize he's a quality athlete. He's going to be just fine.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But as from a fantasy perspective, you go exactly and

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I know in an hour draft that we had last night, Frank,

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>he didn't really drop right. He still went in the

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>middle of that first round where he's been going. And

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>I was looking on Twitter right after the injury and

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.839
<v Speaker 1>people were talking about taking him in the middle round,

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:55.679
<v Speaker 1>like this is like overreaction, like fantasy twitters that something

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is a thing. Well, you know what, I think it's

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a reaction to metals because we didn't know what

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>was happening with Matt Olsen, and there were a lot

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of drafts going on, you know, Thursday, even Friday before

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we had information. I think, you know, people who might

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>have drafted matt Olsen, it might have got burned, you know,

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>by having like injury optimism there. So you see this

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>happen to Josier mirrors yesterday and the fact that he

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was harded off and he was riding rolling around in pain.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it worried a lot of people because you know,

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about potential shin breaks, something wrong with his knee there.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So especially for a guy we expect to steal bases,

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's what worries me the most. Is

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>just gonna affect his ability to run, you know, his

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>lower legs. You know, that's kind of why I've pivoted

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>off of Francisco Lindor, which kind of scared me because

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you want Landor to steal twenty five basses.

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Now he's dealing with a cash train. So I understand

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>people might worry about Hosier mirrors, but I mean for

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the initial reaction to be let's drop him down into

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the middle rounds, I thought that was a little too much.

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, fantasy Twitter is just is something is

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>completely something else. Now speak of Cleveland, Mike, we've been

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at their infield with Josierramires hurt and

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>indure her, and it's like this team is terrible, Like

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't realize that the Cleveland team that has been

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so good for the last few years isn't It's not

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the same team anymore. The pitchings outstanding, but Lindore, Josie Ramirez,

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Santana's back, but the rest of it's not good.

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, you have Jake Bowers in the off field,

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>but the infielders filling in, you have Brad Miller there

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>and some other guys you haven't heard of. So Frank

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of led us to Hanley Ramirez and Hanley Ramirez

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>being a part of this Indians team. He was somebody

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that Frank was interested in picking up in leagues, picked

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>up in a league. What do you think, Mike about

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Hanley Ramirez? This is the best case scenario for Himley

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and all the options coming into the season where he

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>could land. He actually found himself in the fifth spot

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>on the roster. Resource to have him in the fifth

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>spot in an Indians line up? Do you think a

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>roster ressearch? By the way, what why do we have

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it here? Is there like an inside roster researchs a

0:04:53.400 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of an inside I think roster resarch. Honestly, I

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know the people for Rossal Resource, so I hate

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to just like destroy them. It's terrible. It's terrible, but

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not act. It's not accurate, educated, similar to what

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we do. Okay, so what do I need them for?

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think Hanley Mirrors is gonna bat in

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the line up? Greg? I don't know if he's gonna

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>play every day. You're the one that's community can play

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>every day. Who's gonna take his spot? That's what? Is

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it gonna be Jordan's Lapwell, I don't make so. I

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know. He got him at d H here onst Source,

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but one guy they also have Eric Stammit's is playing shortstop,

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think it's gonna be the case. So

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>there you go. It's like an extreme on each side.

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't sleep on you, Chang Chang, Who I change you guys?

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>You're not really my guy. I don't want to go

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>on air about Chang saying if he gets that baths

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and for Mirrors does hit the I l might find

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>his way into some at bats in the infield. He

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>had twenty four homers in the minors two seasons ago.

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I kind of slowed down a little bit, but he

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>could provide extreme, extreme cheap pop someone's middle field position.

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I got him for two dollars yesterday's bab and uh

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>T j FPI I probably could have gotten from one dollar.

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't check to see if anyone else been on him.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I highly doubt it. I don't sleep on you Chang.

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>That's another option for for the Indians. And he's got

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a great name to say, yes, you don't you think

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>this is actually perfect time to bring up Yeah, so

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>what I do? So? I am very into the um

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>cool name theory, and I think prospects are hyped up

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>when they have cooler names. Actually looks back to Alexander

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Bogart's Trevor Bauer when with popular Corvin Burns right like

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Skaggs, like these guys have to ben to say right.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So you Chang right in there. It's the cool name

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of theory. But I will say this, as far as

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Lindora and Ramirez, I've been off of them for a

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>while now. Ramirez won me in ten leagues. Last year

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>he won me seven out of my ten leagues. So

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>this year I was saying to myself, I want to

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>deviate and I want to go somewhere else. So I've

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>been off of those guys, which has allowed me to

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>look at guys that could replace them. Maybe sometimes I

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>can build Ramirez orl Indoor out of two different guys.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So when I see these things happen, I kind of say,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>not cool, but cool off the worry. I agree, these

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>guys were kind. They're not on an avoid list by

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>any means. I would never put it as on avoid list.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>The fact that they lost so much protection in the

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>off season between Edwin Brantley, Donaldson injury, wind Or injury,

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So Jose Aramirez, where is his protection to the lineup

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>going That's just something you think about drafting. Kind of

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>not an avoid but just something to think about. It

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>was a bad day for Second Basement all around over

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the weekend with Josie ramire Is going down, after Scooter

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Janette goes down, and Scooter Jeannette was a guy that

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I I've been part of. Like there's two sides of

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Twitter when it comes to Scooter Jeannette, and that

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>was the fact that those that don't understand it and

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>those that just don't care that they don't understand it,

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but they buy into it. Because he's really good. He

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>gets hurt, changes growing very significantly out eight to twelve weeks,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and the obvious idea would be that, hey, r Nick Senzel,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>He's played second he's played up, played second base throughout

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>his miner's career, and they're like, no, he's a center fielder. Now, Okay,

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's all b asked to hold him down until

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>April fifteenth, which is the date that he can come up,

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and it probably is, but nevertheless, for our purposes, he's

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>not coming up, which means Josie LaSIE is going to

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be the starting short stop from this team, and whose

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Pa slides over the second base, which could Frank open

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>up more an opportunity or more position eligibility for whose Peraza,

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>giving him second base and shortstop eligibility depending on how

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>many games he plays there. Yeah, I think he'll gain

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the second base eligibility, and it's a position he's played

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Does jos actually someone that's been pretty

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>hyped up here during during the uh the draft season

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>because of stolen bases? Right, everyone's trying to find stolen bases,

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and I did it last night. I think they look,

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, they look back at what he did in

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the minors. I don't know that he has like this

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>crazy stolen base upside like we're expecting, you know, maybe

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>he steals twenty to thirty. I think he's that you

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>know that range, tend a fifteen home runs something like that.

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>But my biggest worry with Paza at this point was

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>where is he going to batten the lineup? So this

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>might actually help him now if he's able to move

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>up in the line up a little bit, obviously helps

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>him score more runs. So we'll see what happens with there.

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>As of now, they say Jose Glaze is gonna fill

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 1>in at shortstop. He's a fine defensive player, but I'm

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>not really expecting much from him offensively or for for

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy purposes. I'll say you, I don't really love the

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Reds sent down Scooter Genet because uh

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>sent down Nick Senzel, because they've been talking about fielding

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>their best team. Clearly they're not you know, abiding by

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that or listening to their you know, what they're telling people.

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But if they really do want to just play him

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>at center and have him focus on center field, I

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have a problem with that, because they've been trying

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to transition him into that. It's like you don't want

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>him to go back and forth between outfield and second base.

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>He's right kind of mess with a young prospect. So

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>at least like, if you're gonna make me a center

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>fielder or an outfielder, just stick to that, all right.

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Let him get his reps in the minors. Hopefully he's

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>up by mid April. Uh. You know a lot of

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>people excited about him, and rightfully so I don't have

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a problem with them keeping him in the outfield. And

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike and I talk about this on our show on

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the strike Zone pot that I own shares of Senseil

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and now he has the n A next to him,

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>so I have to But on the flip, I think

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the Reds are gonna be good and I like the

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>options that it gives for that outfield. I'm a big,

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>yassy guy uses a birdman bat, and I'm friends with

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys over bird man bats. But I

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>think guys like Jesse Winker and scotch But now become

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>even more interesting. If you are looking for some kind

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>of something in the middle or late rounds, a guy

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>like Chad even a guy like Winker. There you you

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>go right there. So if Senzel stays down, I don't

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>like it because I own shares of him, But at

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the same time, it may give people out there an

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>option in late rounds. For me, the reason I jumped

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like on Josie Perrazza was because not only is not

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that his playtime wasn't secure, it was he's gonna move

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>on the order a little bit. And I know they're

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>planning on leading off Jesse Winker and having Joey Vato

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that second, But ifs Parazza could run a little bit

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>more and so now get towards the top about that lineup,

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity for him to score more runs are going

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to be there. Uh there? Certainly with twe and you,

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 1>any of Suarez and kept behind him, I think the

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>possibilities are endless. So that's why I was really excited

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>last night to jump in on Josie Prazza, and that's

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>what I did, Like, I need a little bit of

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>speed and knowing this this lineup and there are a

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>team that's trying to win. I was in on Perrazza.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Who else in the lit up are you? And all?

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Make um pretty much in on everybody honestly, Jesse Winker.

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>If he gets the bats that they're promising, he's gonna

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>be a real good value in fantasy Joey Votto, everybody's

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on always. Suarez is gonna coming off the great year week,

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess is the name to talk about here, because

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>like everyone else, I think Pa is gonna see as

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>long as he stays on the field. There's it's a

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>little worried about his injury history, But as long as

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>he stays, I think I think Queek will be the

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 1>guy to own in Cincinnati. Fair enough. Please your your

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>guy too, Frank. We've had a discussion a lot of

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the ASTI Puig versus David dal versus George Springer versus

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Tommy fam and I have Queen ranked higher than all

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>those guys. So so really aggressive here. But if there's

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's gonna show up, and I've continuously said this

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>about Peek, if there's anyone that's gonna show up in

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>a contract year who wants to get paid more than

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>we all want to get paid, But nobody wants to

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>get paid more than He's got a lot of money. Look,

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>he's in a great ballpark from beginning to the end

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>of the season. It's the best ballpark that he's played,

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to be right in the middle of everything.

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're seriously thirty home run you know, fifteen

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to twenty based upside here. I just gotta keep his

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>head on straight. And I like the point that you

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>made about Scott Schebler too. While we lost Nick Senzel

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for the early portion of the season, you know, for

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the first month, Scotch Cobbler might see every day at bats,

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and if that happens, it's likely going to be in

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the middle of this lineup. So there's cheap production to

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>be had there too, your fifth outfielder in a fifteen

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>team league or and only for sure. Yeah, the only

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>problem to concern for me is going to be the pitching.

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not on Sunny Gray. Alex would will be

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>hurt maybe by the time we go off the air.

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 1>So I'm really glad you said that because last night

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to I'm in a league with Frank and

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>our old co host Mike. I don't call my bff

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>anymore after I'm just kidding anyway, So Florio, so we

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 1>own Alex would and he was one of our last

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>picks in the league. And I'm just like we were

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.719
<v Speaker 1>going over waivers for last night and I go, well,

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we can probably drop Alex would and Frank's like, honestly sure,

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's Mike's guy. You gotta talk to Mike. And

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike just sends me back some snarky quality greater sign quantity,

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, I gotta be a dick about this, like,

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>just tell just tell me really feel I mean, just

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>tell me, like, yeah, you don't give me some cliche line.

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>If you like him, it's fine, but quality of a

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>quantity That's how I won all my leagues last year.

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, come on, dude, we're friends. Like, don't treat

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>me like i'm your Patreons subscribe. Everybody can subscribe to

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Patriot right now, but like, tell me why. And his

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>theory is just that, especially in rodal leagues, it doesn't

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>matter how many innings you get out of these guys,

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>as long as the innings that you do or quality not.

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>You're kind of like because I mean, and first of all,

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in Queens. I think I know fifteen

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Florio's and I played hockey with eight of themselves.

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>He's probably the same guy, but I get that but

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're in these Rhoda leagues, and I understand what

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, but so I love the waiver wire. I

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>worked the waiver wire like it's my job, and I

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>love pitching. So I would much rather go out and

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and find this type of guy every other third or

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>fourth day then have to sit and worry about about

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Alex Wood or I mean, I mean, there's there's other

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 1>options there, tender row Ark. I think even Molly is

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>going to make the rotation. There's this other options there. Well,

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>what's also dealing with the lower back tightness, So he's

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>already hurt, That's what I say, not even off the

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>area that's the star with him. So like like Matt said,

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's other options to be at every third

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>or fourth day, a guy like Alex Wood, who knows

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>how many can we just send Florio this? I don't

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with it. I will say this. At

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>least he's staying on brand because he loves rich Hill too.

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>So I kind of love alex Wood. You might as

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>well love rich Hill and she how many other guys

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>he could get back? He wanted us to draft Kershaw

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>at that point, it was like the eighth round. So

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>if you would have got him, I would have been

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it right with you know, I will mention Sonny Gray

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>does have my attention. I know he was really bad

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Yankees, but the home road splits were drafting.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>He was much better on the road, and I think

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it was an organizational thing. I do kind of buy

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it with what Sonny Gray said about, you know, the

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Yankees wanting him to use his slider and throw it

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>strikes and it's just something he wasn't able to do.

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So if he goes over to Cincinnati where they actually

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>have the pitching coach that came over from the wakee uh,

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know he did great work with with the

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Brewers rotation. Obviously what he did with Josh Hayter. Sonny

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Gray has my attention. So you know, I want to

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>see what he can do here early on in the season.

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe in some shallower leagues. I put him,

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like on my scout team. I obvious see what he

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>does early on in the year. I don't know if

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>he's worth rostering in like twelve team leagues Greg, but

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>anything deeper than that, I would say, Yeah, I'm intrigued

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>here by Sonny Gray. I want to see what he

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>can do. I just think the high fly bowl tendency,

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>especially in that park. I think, Mike, you agree with that.

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, he's never really been a strikeout guy. And

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I like to see my guys create the whiffs that

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>are generate the whiffs, and he's never really done that.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So maybe Cincinnati's a turning point for him and he

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>gets to pitch the way he wants to pitch, because

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>like in New York, he wasn't pitching the way he wants.

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Before we hit the break, it was a weekend full

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of closers, right Hunter Strickland. We know, we saw what

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>he did in Japan last week. He's the bodified closer.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>We talked about that last hour. We talked a lot

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>about Greg Holland and how he's now very much on

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy radar because he was named the closer, and

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that was a big talk last hour. I want to

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>get into Jordan Hicks as well, because on Friday, Brian

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Schilt was like, you know what, we don't have a closer,

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's gonna be Jordan Hicks that gets the majority

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of the sieves. And that's all us fantasy owners want

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear. If that is the case, Mike. I want

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to go in to you here and that's the case, Mike.

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>How high on all these lists of relievers would you

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>put Jordan Hicks. He's on his way to the top.

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>This is uh, this is great for my Hicks share.

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I have a share of Jordan Hicks, and I'm very

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>happy to hear this news. This is the guy who

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>woluped the slider last year. So his Synker at a

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>pitch value attend is Slider at a pitch value of five.

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>And now he redeveloped his changeup, which I don't know

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>if you've seen the gifts from either Picture List or

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Rob Friedman change up looks filthy too. So if he

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>could have to change up to his repertoire, he's gonna

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>be right up there with I don't want to go

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>as far to say the Josala Clarks of the world.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>That's that's reasonable, though, I think I think right under

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>right under him. If he could get those strikeouts his

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>cape or nine to go up to either probably around

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the ten, he's gonna be in a league closer going

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>into two thousand twenties and for the rest of the season, obviously,

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that makes a lot of sense given

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>given how good he is in those pitch and there's

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers that you said. The look issart I had was

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the other guys. They're right edge Miller. Is there Alex

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Rays in the bullpen? That's scary. Yeah, But on top

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of all of this, I'm a Cardinal fan. Hicks throws

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>one five, So let me leave it at back. Yeah,

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that will work. We're gonna take a break here.

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>When we come back. I want to get into your

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>guys teams. Who do you have the most shares of? Why?

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Who have you avoided? Why? We'll break that out, tuck

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>your parents out what we've done when we come back.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Best Friends Forever. Fantasy Sports Radio network Daily Rhodo

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players. We

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>don't just give you premier advice. We play every day,

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot Com optimized in minutes, building optimized line up

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>for cast games and turneys. Learned from the game's best

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>DFS players joined Daily Rodo dot com. What's your I

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>R S problem? Do you go back to xas. Is

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>there a lean placed on your property? Have your bank

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>accounts been frozen or seized? Have your wages been garnished?

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you being audited by the I R S? Are

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>they sending you letters that demand actions and have urgent

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>due dates? Well, Solving your tax problems is as easy

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 1>as calling Taxes three to one. The I R S

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is the largest collection agency in the world. You need

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the best representation to give you peace of mind. You

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>need experienced professionals that can cut through the red tape

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and stop the collection process. If you have a serious

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>problem with the I R S, called the Taxes three

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to one network Today we'll get them off your back.

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Eight hundred nine six one thirty six thirty one, eight

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred nine six one thirty six thirty one, eight hundred

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>nine six one thirty six thirty one, eight hundred nine

0:18:54.400 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>six one three six three one We get fitness the update.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, it bothers me that March Madness ends in April.

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, this just bothers me. I think she

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>probably started, yeah, like at the starter March, and ended

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>in March, right, March Madness. I've also wondered why they

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>want to end it generally, and I don't think it'll

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>be the case this season. But Jenny, they ended on

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the opening weekend of baseball once. I think that's bad timing.

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>As you just said, en didn starting two weeks earlier

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and ended before Baseball start to we think you'd get

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>more eyeballs on it Saturday and Sunday eleven a m.

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on your popular podcast,

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>providers joined the experts live on the air every day

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>by calling in at April four, Take Safe seven nine

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>to join the Fantasy Sports Network. Back with you on

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Best Friends Forever. We're here with Mike the

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Rhodo account, Matt Striker as well. Where can everyone listen

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to your podcast? Matt? You can check us out. We're

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify, were on iTunes on the Long Island Podcast Network.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Also on Twitter at strike Zone Pod. You can also

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>find me on Twitter at ma Underscore Striker Underscore, as

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>well as on rasball dot Com. Mikey like the Rhodo

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>cop on Twitter, you can find me a picture list

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com, Friends of Fantasy Benefits dot com and Mets

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Morised online Duck. So it's interesting. So Stryker closes his

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>eyes when you can read and just run like this

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're like reading your computer like, I just gonna

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure you get the Twitter. It has so much

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>going on. I gotta this is as far as if

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>we're a tag team. I'm the Marty Janettie and he's

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the shot. Michaels. Absolutely, man, Mike is the man that

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is there. You go, I'm just gonna at this point

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>just be the Paul Haman's in it to him as

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a nice Jewish point from Scars, exactly so perfect me.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>The fantasy season is about to start where the MV

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>season has started. It's really gonna kick off Thursday. Everybody

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.479
<v Speaker 1>plays on Thursday. Your draft done. I have one tonight,

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>one tomorrow. When one Wednesday from I'll do nine This year,

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I did tend see I'm insane. My girlfriend's ready to

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>leave me, and I basically really just sit at home

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and I just have all these little pieces of paper everywhere.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Going to the kitchen it's X fit, going to the bathroom,

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>this it's just everywhere. I Mean, I'm nuts, but I

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>love it, and I think you have to love it

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to be successful. At like how many of these are doing.

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>On the contrary, I like my girlfriend, and I don't.

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm only in four, but my four is probably equal

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to somebody else's funny with the amount of with thee

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>I pay attention to the four. You know what I mean.

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to get in my old I don't want

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to just set a lineup, not check guards. So I'm

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>more like you. I think I'm in four or five,

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's a lot for me because I can't. I

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>can't do. I've been at least of Frank where I

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have too many leagues. I just lose it and Frank

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>gets piste off of in. It's fine, but our partnership's

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>gotten better now before Fantasy Basketball champions today, so excited. Um.

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>The point is, I can't. I can't do what you do,

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>and I can't do what you do in the amount

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of leagues that you guys are in. And Frank will

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>have his sticky pad on this computer by this time

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>next week. I put the sticky pad up in the house.

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to. I just got this computer. I'm

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>not ready to put the sticky notes on the computer.

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I couldn't pay attention to all nine of those leagues,

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>knowing who's out there, knowing how much to bid, especially

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday nights. If if your fabs running overnight, I

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't do it. It's much more manageable to do

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the four leagues, in my opinion, so you could really

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>dive in and really know what's going on in every

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>single league and make the trade offers and so on

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.239
<v Speaker 1>and so forth in those four leagues. Who's been your

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 1>guy this year or guys? I am very happy to

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>say this, my guy has been Chris Paddock. With cread

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of four leagues, I have Chris Paddock. So the follow

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>up question to that your first draft, your first draft

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>was winning, your last draft was, well, that's where it

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>gets interesting. My first draft was in February and I

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>got Chris Paddock or towards the n February was actually

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the tj FBI. I got him at two seventy eight

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>in round nineteen. And fast forward two weeks later, I

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>did a main event qualifier on NFBC. I got him

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>at two nineteens. So that's the difference of whatever it

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is fifty picks right there, I was around fifteen four rounds.

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Fast forward again too, more recently, I did a Yahoo

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Pro A thousand and I got him at two oh three.

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I got him at two or three was funny. I

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know the guys in the draft because it's yeahoo league.

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>The guy went insane when I took him at in

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the seventeenth round. But now his main event a DP

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is one seventy from all the main eventurey hafts that

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>have been going on. My deal with Paddock, I don't know.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>If you guys are familiar on Baseball Reference, you could, uh,

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a metrical the pointing quality, and you can really

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>gauge gouges how um in spring training what kind of

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>level of competition you're facing. So you know, everyone says

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>spring training it doesn't matter. You could begade it from

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a one to ten and being major league level competition,

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:23.959
<v Speaker 1>one being rookie ball competition. So Chris Paddock has an

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>eight point two, which is sitting there between probably like

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>a low lower major league hitter, but it's still a

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>high triple a lower major league hitterer. So what he's

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>done in spring is pretty impressive to have a two

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>point one three year right against that kind of a

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>point in quality. You check some other guys there pointing

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>qualities like four or five, and they're having good springs.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>That's something to keep an eye on with with Paddock spring.

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>If anyone tells you it's just spring training, it's not

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>just spring training. He's facing major league talent, be it

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>lower league, major league talent, but it's still major league

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>talent to do what he's doing. The twenty strikeouts in

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the twelve and two thirds kids insane. He's got a

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>plus change up plus fastball average, curveball plus command, and

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>he's lining up to start against San Francisco. I don't

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>know any Giant fans out to be ready for it,

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>because Chris Paddock's gonna dominate San Francisco that first start

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Right when we were an NBC, we

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>consistently saw Chris paddickill in the thirteenth to the fifteenth round,

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>depending on what draft you're watching or what auction you

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.959
<v Speaker 1>were in, and he went for him Lazaro before Lazardo

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>got hurt, all in that same in that same range.

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And now it's been very consistent. And what I like

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>about it, Frankie, is not that he's going so high,

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:23.479
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think it's so high. I still think

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a spot where the return on investment will be

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>good enough. It's not like we we talked about this

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>all the time. A guy like ever Shade Biber and

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>my Clevinger, they have to come through for you now.

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Even where they're drafted, Chris Paddock doesn't still getting him

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>where you're getting him in the fourteenth round. It's still

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a lottery ticket, which I like, I couldn't agree more. Yeah,

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paddock. Over the weekend there was a a ton

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>more NPC made of Vegas in Vegas and his ADP

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>from this weekend specifically one sixty six point five. So

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>he's all the way up there. He's being drafted as

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>a top forty starting pitcher now now, but again he

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>has the top had to be a top thirty guy,

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>top twenty five at season's end. And it's very obvious

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>at least at this point, that the Padres are going

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to be aggressive with him. So maybe he'll you know,

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he'll he'll miss a few starts throughout the season. They'll

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>try and limit the endings. But I still think, you know,

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he could get one fifty one sixty and if he

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>gives you one sixty of a sub three six e

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>r A and a good whip because he doesn't walk anyone,

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and he gets a ton of ground balls and he

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>gives you, you know, let's say eight case per nine. Again,

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that's legitimately like a top thirty, top five starting pitchers.

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>So I don't have any problems with him. You know,

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we share a lite together. We do the the g

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>ST fifteen team Roto. We got him last week, and

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 1>I believe like the fifteen or sixteenth round as our

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 1>SP five or SP six. I love it, man, I

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 1>have no problems with it. And you say that eight

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>k and nine, I'd be disappointed if it's Kata nine.

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Is an eight be a little bit more conservative, but

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>he has the stuff to get it to strikeout per ny.

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>You know that's just me like conservatively protecting, but he

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>could be even better than that. Does anyone have a

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>concern though, that the Padres may shut him down at

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>some point and then or you've already gotten you value

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>out of him. That's the thing I don't think care.

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I think if we seriously you can miss a start

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>like here there towards the end of the the season, a

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of it comes down to you, Okay, are the

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Padres playing for a wild card spot? Because I think

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>at that point like they have to put out their

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>best product. They got to try and win games, so

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that will pay a lot into it. If they're not,

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, I could see them maybe taking it easy

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on him. But for the most part, I would say,

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe he'll skip a start here there, they'll try and

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>limit some of the innings. But I still think that

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he can get to that one six mark by the

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>end of the season. One caveat with all this is

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Rodo here. But if you're in the

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>head to head league like Yahoo Pro and thousand, don't

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>expect them to be there when you're in the playoffs.

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Those starts might not be there. Sure, But again but

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>again again, where you are, where you're drafting, it doesn't matter. Yeah, exactly,

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and and I don't I don't really care personally. I

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>draft the pad again our yeah who head to head

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>last night does not bother me in the least. I'll

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>drop them. Figure it out come August and September. Matt,

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>who's a guy that you do in your nine leagues

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>or somewhere seven that you've drafted the far drafted six

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>so far, have three more left. And I was looking

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>at it, and this wasn't by design but it just

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>happened to be this way in every league. I owned

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Hanson, I owned V GJ, Vladimirgold, and I owned

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Joe Musgrove. And I'm fine with all of that, to

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, And that's where I'm right now.

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 1>As well as Jack Flaherty is another guy that I've

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>been just all over because I'm a Cardinal fan and

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I really like the stuff that's your fandom, your Cardinal fan.

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you're talking about. We all love

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Jack Flaherty too, and I want to getting to Garrett Hampson.

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you nervous about him not playing every day? I mean,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Mike and I talked about this on the show. We

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>do think that Ryan McMahon could be pushing back against him,

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But I just think with Hampson's defense and speed is

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>such a commodity in fantasy baseball this year, So I

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>just I am hopeful that when he does play, and

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>he plays himself into the lineup, that they'll find another

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.959
<v Speaker 1>place for McMahon. You mentioned David Dods, China Doll. He's

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna break at some point. Ian Desmond, you can have him.

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want him. There's gonna be somewhe where from

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>McMahon and Hampson to both play, so it doesn't concern

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>me that much. We got a lot of questions about

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>these two, specifically over the weekend. Everyone wants exposure to

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>cors Field and Colorado. Obviously, I do think that Ryan

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>McMahon is gonna be on the strong side of the platoon,

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>playing at second base most times against right handed pitching.

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But I still do think that Hampson could find playing

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>time around because they could give someone a day off

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>here and there. They've been using him in the outfield

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and spring training, so I mean he could play against lefties.

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>If they want to sit Ryan McMahon, he could play

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in the outfield they want to give Desmon a day off,

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>or they want to give Dollar a day off, or

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's one injury away. Remember there's Daniel Murphy

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>on this team who is playing with like bone on

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>bone on his knee. You mentioned David dal who has

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>been injury prone. So we're not rooting for these injuries.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>But if something were to happen, Garrett Hampson is going

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to be the primary beneficiary because he's a super utility

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>bat at this point for the Colorado Rockies, Garrett Hampson,

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Ryan McMahon, really anybody in Colorado or on our radar.

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And I was stuck drafting Garrett Hampson's by starting a shortstop.

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if he is in Colorado, I mean

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you and I could go to Colorado and probably hate you.

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't say I can, but you probably Daniel Murphy

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>bone On Mury. He can conceivably hit like way over

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>his head in Yeah, I was afraid to say it,

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'm glad you did. Frankie Monty could three fifty

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you're the big winner if you drafted him. Absolutely. Now,

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Acunia Frankie is a name that we drafted. We

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we draft him in our g D D league. He

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>was our first pick. And I know you and I

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>had a debate of a Kunia versus Yello, and we

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>ultimately decided on yelled. He went for too much. We

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>stuck with a Kuna. Cuna is betting clean up against

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>right handers. He's probably clean up against left handers. He's

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>going to stay at the cleaning spot. How much does

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.959
<v Speaker 1>that hurt his value? Similar to what Matt said about this,

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I think obviously you lose some stolen bases, and that's

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what people were most excited about for

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a Kunia. He could hit thirty plus home runs with

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe potentially thirty steels. Right, he has the

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>upside to be a thirty thirty hitter here. Uh, the

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>speed is legit absolutely, but you know, batting clean up,

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that might slow him down a little bit.

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Here maybe we're closer to like fifteen eighteen stolen basis.

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, as a result, if he were hitting leadoff,

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>his RBIs might be capped maybe eighty. Now, hitting clean

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>up with Freddie Freeman ahead of you, and Josh Donaldson

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead of you, and you know entran c RTE and

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>uh and Ozzie, I'll be splitting the leadoff duties here.

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>We're talking. You can drive a D ten seriously in

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>this lineup. So you lose some stolen bases, but obviously

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you gain you gain some more county stats when it

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to the r BIS. I think the runs are

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be good regardless because I expect a lot from

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this Braves lineup, So it's it depends what you needed.

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I think people would have wanted the stolen bases more,

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>but you gain r BIS. You lose something, you gain

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>something else. It's tough to put a put a specific

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>number on it. Um he missed a month last year,

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>which a lot of people don't really talk about too much,

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but fourteen of the stolen basis came from leadoff and

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>then when he hit second the line up, which is

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>really the only thing we have to compare it to,

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he only ran three times. He was one for three,

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's something just to keep an eye on with him.

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you're drafting around with the Kuna, you're gonna

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>get everything no matter where he has on lineup. And

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>now what you lacking stolen bases? What's he gonna steal

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>ten less bases? If that's gonna make up in RBS

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and home runs and runs and everything else. So the

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunities will be there for him in a in a

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>really good Atlanta lineup, I gotta say I am off,

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'm also off yell at two. I mean, call

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>me crazy crazy, but I am. I'm just off of

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>these guys because I just I see a regression coming.

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I will be amazed if they can match or surpass

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>what they each did respectively this season. Before I'll say

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing, A Kuna did have a three fifty something BABIT,

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>which so expect a little bit of aggression in his

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in his average and his overall average this year, but

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>he's still an absolutely. I think he's easily no question

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the first round there. I actually disagree with you. Oh

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, you could still you could still hit two eighty.

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Even if the batting average comes down from town was high.

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>He still strikes out around a quarter of the time.

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And what I've said about Yellows, I don't disagree that

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>he's going to regress, but I think even if he regresses,

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he could still be a top ten player for fantasy,

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>because you know, if he hits three ten with home

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>runs instead of thirty six and a hundred runs and

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred RBIs and still steals twenty bases, I mean

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the top ten player for fantasy. So I do

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>agree like regression is gonna come, but I still do

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>think that he could pay off value regardless. So just

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at some numbers, and Mike and I are big

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers guys, So Yellows his home run fly ball rate

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>was thirty that's a full fifteen points higher than his

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.719
<v Speaker 1>career average. So let's just assume a rate this year,

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's being generous. He loses a third of his

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>home runs right away. He had a three seventy three

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>babbit his career is three fifty nine, So let's assume

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a drop an average as well. If he hits ten

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>less home runs and loses twenty to twenty five points

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>off his average, yes he's still valuable, but he might

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>even be dipping into like a second round kind of guy.

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>The reason I say I'm off him is that in

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the first round I want to throw my draft into

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a frenzy when everyone thinks I'm supposed to take Christian Yellos,

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and I swoop in and take I don't know, Mike

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the roodocop, so who so who are you taking over

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Yellow and un or who have you been taking if

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you have one of these like top six or seven picks,

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it depends. I'm a big pitching guy, and a lot

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of my league's guys don't touch pitching in all the

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>six or seventh round. So I'm jumping in and I'm

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>grabbing Jacob de Grand before anybody, and I'm grabbing Aaron

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Nola before anybody. Mike, and I love Trevor Bauer and

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>what it does is it sets everyone off of their

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>game plan. And I love that because I'm just I'm

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a villain and I love to watch people go crazy.

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll take Trade turnover both those guys over yellow.

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.959
<v Speaker 1>In the NFC, we saw Trade Turner going, let's get

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>three and because I know there's an overall in violve

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and you need to speed, but Trade Turner, I was surprised,

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>right how just how high he was going, And Mike,

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.239
<v Speaker 1>you're right on it. A hundred sixty two games last year,

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>he does that again, He's gonna have another great season.

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>He he has a better year than last year. It's

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an unbelievable season. So I expect a lot

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>from Trade Turner this year. People people saw the report

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>about eight stolen basic attempts, and look if they actually

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>legitimately let him do that. I personally would love him

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to hit leadoff, because if you look at his career,

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>hitting leadoff versus is like hitting second or anywhere else

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup. He's much more aggressive stealing basis hitting leadoff.

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So I know, as of now it's like Adam Eating

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to lead off, and and Trede Turner bad second.

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>But they've already come out and said that they want

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>trade Turner to attempt this many stolen bases. Does it happen?

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I still think that you get hit

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>towny home runs and steal fifty basses. If that's the case,

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you know he'll perform like a top five hitter for

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>fantasy purpose. They still stole seventeen basses last year from

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>hitting seconds, so I'm not worried about worried about his

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>storm basis at all. Like the question that I had

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in my draft last night was myself on my second

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher, and that was between Patrick Corban and Stephen Strassburg.

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Would you have taken You've said neither, neither. Um you

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>mean Patrick Corbyn. I mean Patrick Orban, the new Patrick Orban,

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>not the old Patrick Orban. The new Patrick Corbyn, and

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll take him over Strasburg's injury history between the two,

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like you said, I would go neither. So I'm actually

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>working on an article right now for as Ball, and

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that Patrick Corbin is destined for an i

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>L stint because of the increased use of the slider,

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and I should look at what that slider does to

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of game. Just look at Michael Panada, right,

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and he's actually coming back this year and it's gonna

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 1>be intriguing to see. But if you take Patrick Corban

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>as your SP two and in May his arm falls off,

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>he becomes Dave Dravecky, what are you gonna do? That's

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 1>why so neither for me as well, But if I

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>had to, it would be Corbin awesome. You know how

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>all draft season I've been saying I'm off Corbin. I

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>don't really have a reason why. I was just waiting

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>till any reason. I was just like because last year

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I was all over for Corbin and I love like

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the profit that he returned at his value. And now

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this is fair that we when

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>we do this to players, because in years past, like

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>when you get a player and then they severely outperformed

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>where they were drafted, then the next year, you know

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going as like a fourth round pick, and now

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>you're just off that player because I've had them last year.

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to pay that price because I already

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>like got my profit on that player, and I can't

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 1>really see them being much better than they were last year.

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, like he's that fair everybody's last year like

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:50.760
<v Speaker 1>he was the greatest thing in the world he produced.

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Now everyone's off because he's going so high. That's a

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>similar situation, Greg, Was there a third person that you

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>could have picked outside of Corn? So it's funny because

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I would say both pictures that I ended up within

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the fourth and fifth round. Greg over both, So I did.

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I took in the fifth round. That was that. That

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>was the thing. So I I waited and played a

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 1>little picture chicken because there weren't guys that I loved there,

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And of course they all went in between my two pigs.

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course in between the fourth and the fifth like

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>where um I want up taking Tommy fam when tie

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>on Clevinger packed in? Um Wheeler, were all Wheeler Grinky

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>or all in the boards? All right, I get any

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of these guys from back? I got none of them.

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So at my spot it was Corbyn or Shosberg and

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that was the end of the tier and I need

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.359
<v Speaker 1>to reach five though it's pretty good value team league

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in round five. Yeah, so I don't have a problem

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 1>with it. At that point you're deciding between the end

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of this year. Correct off the board? Probably not? I

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>but I hate you even in the eighth round. I'm

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so awful and her mom him or hate him? Hate him?

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, I love him, alright, I love him. I

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>hated him, now I love him. Maybe tomorrow I hate

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>him again. But let's see what happens. He's got an

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>easy schedule the first month, so to me, it's just

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>like I don't want I don't need to buy the Colorado.

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of other places to go. I don't need

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to buy in the Colorado for fishing. Even as good

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>as her Moan and Marquez Freeling, who were last year.

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, we heard who Matt and Mike really liked

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and drafting all our teams. I'm excited to find out

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>who they don't. Other than Patrick Corman, who just keep

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 1>that to the side and shut that up. We'll find

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 1>out who Matt Mike did not like it did not

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>draft this year when we come back Fantasy best Friends forever.

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Ye College basketball has reached the climax of the two

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen season, and the Fantasy Sports Network as you

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>covered for all the news and betting information for the

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>conference tournaments leading up to the Big Dance. Get the

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 1>latest wagering and propbad advice every day from V and

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 1>T s Wise top experts in analysts as they prepare

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you with the best advice in bracketology. Download the Fantasy

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio app in iTunes and Google Play, and watched

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.280
<v Speaker 1>select programming in the F and T s y YouTube channel.

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Sports Network your home for winning big in

0:37:55.400 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the month of Madness, Make it rain and SU was

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.240
<v Speaker 1>mucky to be able to get that last second bucket

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to be able to advance. But did anybody see L

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>s U being this good without their head coach? And

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>do they have enough athleticism? Do they have enough talent

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>on that team to advance? And whoever is left, I

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 1>think L s U is probably at the bottom of

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the teams that remain in the sweet sixteen. I think

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>they got the best shot of getting bounced. Weekdays six

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and nine am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>your popular podcast providers. Maurice Allan two thousand and fifteen,

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousands and sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion two

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen World number one Me personally, I keep my

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>with the bucker leaving the range or even leaving the courts.

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Go to game face grooming dot com

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs.

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Good morning after. It's not as if fell this Duke

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>team like murders people. Their numbers are over inflated. They're

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>not as good overall as a team as they are

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>overall as a team of NBA prospects. Where are the

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty two point blowout wins. We're like god, they can't

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>be beating all plus two twenties. The Duke number is

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>one million percent, a public number. I think it's a

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 1>sucker's bet. Duke can get knocked off here along the way,

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Man sweet, he's not ami story on F and T

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>s Y Radio, on your popular podcast providers. I was

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>telling these guys off the air about my buddy MJF.

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 1>True story, true story. I'll tell another story off there,

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but true story. When I went back to visit, he

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>just jumped on me on my back and gave me

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what he determined as the mad Max clutch, and he

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 1>choke me right out. Then you really like out. You

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>went out out, and you know, next thing you know,

0:39:57.239 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you wake up and there's just a thousand people around

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 1>you like you okay, I like what just happened? And

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Mac's like you didn't taf. I was just like what

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they actually choked me out? Now I make sure to

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:10.720
<v Speaker 1>get to get back for you, don't you worry? I afree,

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. But yeah, so there you go. M JF.

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 1>You can check them out a whole bunch of places,

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>as well as Matt Striker and Microroto cop on their podcast,

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>which you could listen to where Mike strikes on some

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 1>pot on Twitter. You could listen to it on Spotify, iTunes,

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Long Old Podcast Network, and a couple other places. Right absolutely,

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever wherever you using the podcast, I'm sure you can

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>listen to under podcast. It's well worth it. Excited you

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>sent me the first episode, which I have not gotten

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 1>back to you yet. But I don't need I don't

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>need to do that. I don't need to do that

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>because you guys are here and I'm doing it live

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in person and it's awesome. I think what's cool about

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this is like there's a clear chemistry and it makes

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it really easy to listen to and really fun. And

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the numbers like the Baseball reference, spring Train, anything that

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you referenced no idea, and I am very I wish

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I told that that two weeks ago. Drafts like that's awesome,

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Just an interesting way to see who players are competing against,

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>what their competition levels like, because some of these guys

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>pusted up these insane spring training stats and they're really

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>not facing major league level talent. So it's definitely an interesting,

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting metric that baseball offense has. So have you used

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that to not draft certain players? I want to know.

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You're about four leagues, who have you actively stayed away from?

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Obviously a you certain guys that just don't fall into

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:19.760
<v Speaker 1>your range, and that's okay, But who have you actively

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>stayed away from? I feel a little bad discussing this guy.

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Um everyone card and everyone's staying away from. Now it's

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna everybody's staying away from. But Clayton Kershaw, first

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the back, now the shoulder. So when this when the

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 1>draft season started, he was the first round pickers, one

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of the first pitchers going off the board, and now

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:35.359
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of fell down to like a fifth round

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>pick or whatever it is. The last year's case per

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>nine were the worst that's ever been at the eight

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>point six five his swinging strike right was the worst

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's ever been at an eleven, So there were signs

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 1>before the shoulder injury. His his fastball VELO dropped from

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 1>ninety three to nine point one to ninety one point four.

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>His pitch value on his fastball in two thousand six

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>team was twenty two. Now we're approaching negative. I think

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>it was a zero point two. It's almost a negative pitch,

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:58.760
<v Speaker 1>one of his best pitches his whole career is almost

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:00.839
<v Speaker 1>a negative pitch now. So I think the narrative would

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>be different if his name wasn't Clayton Kershal. I think

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 1>that's what's keeping him at that fifth round or like

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you said, the eighth round you brought up before that

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Floria wanted to draft him. I think that's what's keeping

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>him in that range. And honestly, I'm staying as far

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>away from Clayton Kershaw as I can. First to back, Now,

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the shoulder, who knows when the back's gonna flare up again,

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Who knows what's gonna go on with the shoulder. I

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>just really don't don't trust him at all, Frank So,

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the important thing that too many people

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 1>are forgetting and You're totally right, Mike, play Kershal is injured.

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 1>He's got this back injury that's kept him out year

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 1>after year after year. Now it's a shoulder, and it's

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>probably all related in some way because you're overcompensating. And

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 1>we talked to a guy that has herniated disk. He's like, Hey,

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 1>somebodys I feel greatat which Kersha I feels great, but

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>other times I can't feel my fingers, I can't I

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>can't feel my r I can't feel my shoulder, and

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of all related there. So you have that

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can take that and put that on one side.

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 1>But as you just pointed out, Hershel has been declining

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years now, and his best pitch

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is no longer his best pitch. It's not even above

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>average pitch. And I think, Frank, we've forgotten that to

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>extend that it's not just Clayton Kershaw is hurt because

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>he's declining in other ways, which is a little scary. Yeah,

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I mean this has been someone that I've

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 1>been avoiding as well. It's like strip the name off

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the back of the jersey here. If this is another

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>player whose skills declined this far from I mean he

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>he would be goings even later than Clayton Kershaw is.

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think the fact that his name is Clayton

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Kershaw kind of keeps him in this fifth sixth round

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 1>relevant range. But I can't disagree with anything that you

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned about Kersha. Look, the velocity on his fastball was

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the lowest of his career, not just dating back to

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the rookie year, it was the lowest of his career.

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.760
<v Speaker 1>The skills are declining, He's not getting as many swinging strikes,

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>he's walking more guys, he's not getting as many strikeouts.

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's just there's too much in play here. And

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the fact that now he's dealing with the shoulder and

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>he has the back injury. It's like, what more do

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to see from some from from a situation

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to tell you do not draft me. I mean, everything

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>is there when it comes to Clayton Kershaw. Would you

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:50.840
<v Speaker 1>rather have Clayton Kersha? This is a question we ask everybody,

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Clayton Kershaw or Louis Sabrina. I'll take Saborrina at this

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:59.280
<v Speaker 1>point a day, even even though one is seemingly healthier

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>than the other. I wouldn't say he's he's he's seemingly

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>healthy literally not literally healthier. I'll go Severino his upside

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and where you could get him now, because you could

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>still get him a couple of rounds after you could

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 1>you would have to pay for Krishaw. So I think

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Severina would be uh would be the more value play

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 1>out of it too. You know draft last night, Frank Surprise,

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>he went in the six rounds and not all that

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>much value. Kershaw. I actually considered taking Kersha last night. Also,

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Saverno actually goes a lot higher than Kershawe. I have

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>these guys rank back to back and twenty nine to

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 1>my starting pitcher ranks, so I mean I'm still pretty

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:34.280
<v Speaker 1>low on all of them. I have guys like Tanaka, Archer,

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Mikolas Sto Granky all ranked ahead of these players, and

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I should probably drop them even lower because realistically, when

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm in drafts, I just skip over their names, and

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just I can find someone later on I

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 1>would rather have added more of a value. Edwardo Rodriguez

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:52.360
<v Speaker 1>goes later. I'll grab him. Joe Muskro if you mentioned,

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I grab him, you know, three four rounds later. Nick Pavetta,

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>take someone like that Paddock goes. You know, I have

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 1>six rounds later, So to me, I just skip over

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>these guys and I'll wait, you know, a couple of

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>rounds and find a picture I like even more. Matt

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>who's the guy that you've actively avoided during draft season?

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 1>So staying with the pitching, I have avoided John Lester,

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and uh so Mike is a big numbers guy, as am.

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I I like to back it up, not just because

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't like him or whatever. So I'm gonna back

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it up. So let's star at a nineteen point six

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:24.399
<v Speaker 1>percent k rate last year, and that was forty three

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>out of fifty seven qualifying pictures. Just to put it

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in perspective, that's worse than guys like Matthew Boyd or

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Jake Odorees. Also, his swinging strike rate was eight point

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>five percent. That was forty nine, behind guys like Jose

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Uren and Mike Fires. Now, this is great if you

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>have great control. Lester does not. He has a walk

0:45:43.080 --> 0:45:45.800
<v Speaker 1>rate of eight point five percent. That's the sixteenth highest

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in the league. These are all the reasons why you

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 1>can keep you some John Lester. John Lester, I somehow

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 1>drafted him, so I see I'm just talking to myself

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>out of out of the studio. So here's the thing.

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So I draft. I drafted him, and I literally I said,

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you're aft in my whispers, I'll take John. I was like,

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I tried to trade him, like before my next pick

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was up. I was like, I'll just keep you John,

0:46:09.120 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 1>lust for anybody. And then I came in the next day.

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like, embarrassed to face Frank, I'm like, I

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 1>don't I can't left. He did, Should we all just

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 1>point and laugh at you on? I would laugh myself

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:24.840
<v Speaker 1>like I don't get it, Like I don't even know

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>why I did it. And it was one of those

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:31.799
<v Speaker 1>things times running down was like, oh right, pretty much

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I have I can't defend myself. I can defend myself

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a Corbyn because the round was right. He's the last

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>guy that's year, Like, I get it, and the numbers

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 1>were good. You're absolutely right that slider's gonna cause me

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>get injured at some point. Again, I can't do it

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 1>last and I don't know why. You just can't deal

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>with I tried to trade him for anybody. I asked

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the guy three times this week training for Paul de Young.

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>He said no, what ever, he said no every time offer.

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:56.959
<v Speaker 1>But I'm going I'm going to keep asking. Maybe he'll

0:46:57.040 --> 0:46:58.920
<v Speaker 1>change his mind. That actually, Paul Paul Young is a

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>guy like that. I will throw out my buddies, the

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Young Bucks and Cody Rhodes. Paul Young is a guy

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that I'm all in on. I would not trade. We

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>put double or nothing on him as well. Look at

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 1>us an American nightmare. Are we done? I know you

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>guys want to Cody, I'll play you in Hangman before

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:19.879
<v Speaker 1>we've done. Okay, I appreciate it. Back to Uh, Back

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to Lester. Here's a question. Would you rather take Frank

0:47:25.080 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Greg would you rather take or beIN Burns to

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>mingle Herman or would you rather take John Lester? So,

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's no question you rather Burns than her

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>mom because the upside she's higher and that and that's

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 1>where it is, and that's with all, that's with all

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the guys that Frank was just mentioning when Severino and

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in Kershaw especially go for the upside. There's the worst

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:42.799
<v Speaker 1>that the literal worst that could happen with the guy

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that Corbyn Burns is that he sucks. And if he sucks,

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you drop him and it didn't cost you anything. And

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the same really goes for Lester. If that first week,

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:50.359
<v Speaker 1>when Lester makes his opening day start and a lot

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of six cern runs or a weekly if sathing happens,

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to play by the name and the

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>guy on the back of the jersey. I'm gonna drop

0:47:56.600 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>him and I'm gonna treat him like Corbyn Burns. And

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:00.879
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case, it's fine. It's a lottery ticket.

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing. See, that's a great thing that

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you say, and I tell it to anyone that will listen.

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to approach this type of fantasy like that.

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You can't get hung up on the name on the

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>back of the jersey. You have to close your eyes

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and look what you can't do. Just look at the

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>numbers and be okay to drop a guy. And it's

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 1>really hard to do that. As easy as it is

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for us to say this on March, it's really hard

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to pull that trigger. And Frank knows that I have

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a very issuy trigger finger when it comes to fantasy

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:33.879
<v Speaker 1>sports Baseball, basketball, football. It doesn't matter who wasn't last

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>year that had a bad first day first day. I

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 1>was right for the record, I was right, it was,

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and I was right, was right, but it's but I

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 1>was like, I don't want to do this anymore. And

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:51.800
<v Speaker 1>come on, you drafted him for a reason, and I go,

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 1>you're right, but e've been over four or four kgs.

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>What are we doing here? Yeah, it's much easier to

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:57.799
<v Speaker 1>do with players you get late. I'm assuming you got

0:48:57.880 --> 0:48:59.880
<v Speaker 1>John Lesser super late in your draft. So if you

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and perform early on, you could just cut bait. I

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 1>will say, I agree with what you said to a

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:07.760
<v Speaker 1>certain extent. Right, Like, if if a player I drafted

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:10.240
<v Speaker 1>early on, like a foundation on my team isn't performing,

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 1>obviously you have to have more patience. So I think

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's worth reiterating that. But you know, some of these

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>guys that you get later on your drafts, if if

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not performing two three weeks in, and there's obviously

0:49:19.200 --> 0:49:21.399
<v Speaker 1>someone who has upside on the waiver wire. Do Mingo

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Hormon probably wasn't drafted in a lot of leagues. Uh,

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you know it was the Brewers guy deep, but the

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>entire Brewers staff, well, all these Brewers guys have a

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>ton of upside. Brandon Woodard of Corbin Burns, Freddy Peralta.

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:37.920
<v Speaker 1>We spoke about the Marlins in the first hour, Pablo

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Lopez getting a lot of high Trevor Richards getting so, look,

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:43.319
<v Speaker 1>if John Lesser's performing, some of those guys are playing

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:45.879
<v Speaker 1>well early on, you know, don't don't don't worry about

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the name John Lesser is. I think we're I think

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:50.279
<v Speaker 1>we're past that point when it comes to Lesser. I

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>completely agree with you. It actually doesn't matter. Another guy

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I did, Gregory Planca, who you actually did? It was

0:49:56.560 --> 0:50:01.279
<v Speaker 1>a weird role reversal there, Oh, Gregory PoCA last year? Yeah, yeah,

0:50:01.600 --> 0:50:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I dropped into early man and then he and then

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:04.759
<v Speaker 1>he turned it around and say he did have a

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 1>good second half. What do you expect for Polanco this year?

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's say, I guess a really fair question, and

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for me, I guess that's why you've asked it. But

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 1>um so I'm staying away from Polanco. The shoulder injuries

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 1>scare me. Shoulders and wrists injuries from hitters really really

0:50:20.640 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>scare me. And as Frank knows, I'd rather take a

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 1>shot on the guy Glaniy chisen Hall. Who's gonna start

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 1>for Polanco? Chisenhle whenever you we're both laughing at that.

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 1>For you, whenever it choosen, Hall take has an opportunity

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to an opportunity to Cleveland. He flourished and he can't

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:37.279
<v Speaker 1>hit a lefty. That's fine, you may you mainly face right,

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>He's I We never had an opportunity. Like I said,

0:50:39.239 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 1>he did really really well. And I think in that

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:43.800
<v Speaker 1>small chance he has without Gregory Planco in there, I

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:45.879
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to do fine. When Polanco comes back,

0:50:46.680 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be And I think we all

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:49.879
<v Speaker 1>forget this. It's not all but a lot of people

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>forget when you start. It's not like you're just you're

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:54.920
<v Speaker 1>back and you're the Gregory Polanco of old. You. You

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:57.319
<v Speaker 1>need time to get back to feel healthy, to feel

0:50:57.440 --> 0:50:59.839
<v Speaker 1>what it is to play every day, to get hit

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 1>with a baseball again, to run in the stool wall again.

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Especially in the National League where there is no d

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 1>H It's not like he's already taking batting practice. There's

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot mentally as well that has to come back

0:51:09.840 --> 0:51:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in order for him to be good again. So for me,

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not drafted Gregory Planco. I'm not drafting you and

0:51:13.840 --> 0:51:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a Cesspicius. The one guy that I am drafting at

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:18.319
<v Speaker 1>the end of drafts is the Greglorious because I think

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:20.400
<v Speaker 1>um in the middle of field, it makes sense. And

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I also think that we've seen Glabor Torres, for instance,

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Yankees come back and be totally fine coming

0:51:25.160 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>back from Tommy John surgery. Where are you, Mike on

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:31.239
<v Speaker 1>on the injured guys like cesspicous planco Indeed, I have

0:51:31.360 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a confession. I did drop the Gregorious in my tj

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:38.320
<v Speaker 1>FBI league yesterday for purposes. I got um Quota Hudson

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for eleven dollars. Like there's no d in the in

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the t g FBI either. Yeah, So I drafted him

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:45.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking maybe I could get something out of this eventually,

0:51:46.000 --> 0:51:47.440
<v Speaker 1>but I decided to go the other way with it.

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Polanco. He did show better play discipline in

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the second half of last year. Good. He had the

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:55.359
<v Speaker 1>moment I think the highest walk percentage of his career

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 1>last year, which is like an eleven, which isn't isn't uh,

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it's actually far off from his usual six percent or

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. So I do like Polanco a little bit,

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 1>just because Steels will always play. If he comes back

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and runs, that's always gonna play. Chisen Hall, I don't

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:09.799
<v Speaker 1>think it's a bad hitter, though I don't think that's

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:12.239
<v Speaker 1>a bad uh bad suggestion if you're looking somewhere else

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 1>beside Polanco, certainly, and only leads as well. But if

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking Pittsburgh, we're talking besides Polanco. The one ning

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:18.440
<v Speaker 1>we have to bring up is Adam Fraser. And Adam

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Fraser is somebody that he's got a bit overlooked. And

0:52:21.800 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 1>we've all fallen in love with Ramon Loriano and we've

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:28.840
<v Speaker 1>fallen in love with Cedric Mullins. Adam Fraser is a

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>guy that is like these players that potentially can give

0:52:31.600 --> 0:52:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you fifteen and fifteen, But nobody's talking about Matt how come?

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:37.359
<v Speaker 1>So I love that. It's because so it's what I say.

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not sexy, right, he didn't put on his lipstick

0:52:39.719 --> 0:52:41.479
<v Speaker 1>and do his hair, and I don't notice him walking

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in the bar, and if my girlfriend's listening, I don't

0:52:43.200 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>notice any girls are walk in the bar. Only have

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:46.680
<v Speaker 1>eyes for you. But the point is that he's he's

0:52:46.719 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not sexy. Raman Loriano, I'm all over him. I love him.

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 1>His name is fun to say. No, So I think

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:53.839
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things. And if you're you're level

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 1>headed and wise like you obviously are. Then you're gonna

0:52:57.239 --> 0:52:59.319
<v Speaker 1>be able to see don't tell your girlfriend, you're telling

0:52:59.360 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 1>him beyond the name, and you're just gonna be able

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to look at the numbers. And to me, that's what

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this is all about, looking at numbers. So that's why

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:09.200
<v Speaker 1>guys like that go go overlooked. In my opinion, it's sexy,

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think Fraser and specifically players like him and

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Cedric Mullins are all right. It's not a great lineup.

0:53:16.640 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 1>It's Pittsburgh, it's Baltimore, but they're projected to lead off rejected,

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:22.719
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens, but there's not like where else

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:25.160
<v Speaker 1>are the Pittsburgh Pirates gonna go in terms of leadoff better?

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:28.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's value to be had there. They're

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna score runs. I don't not gonna light the world

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>on fire in terms of stealing basis, but can you

0:53:32.239 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 1>give me ten to fifteen ten to fifteen home runs

0:53:34.280 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 1>as well? He's gonna score runs because he's gonna get

0:53:36.520 --> 0:53:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on base in Pittsburgh, and same thing goes for a

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 1>player like Cedric Mullins. The Orioles lineup is not good.

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>We all understand that he's still gonna lead off, he

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 1>still might steal fifteen and twenty bases, and because of that,

0:53:46.600 --> 0:53:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe he'll score seventy five runs. I mean,

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:51.880
<v Speaker 1>there's value to be had with that. I agree. You know,

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:55.399
<v Speaker 1>we got Adam Fraser as our middle infielder in one league.

0:53:55.400 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I ended up with him in the main

0:53:57.320 --> 0:53:59.640
<v Speaker 1>event or something else too. So I'm not opposed to

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, eight in your drafts, you get a measurr

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:03.959
<v Speaker 1>middle endfielder and and he has dual eligibility to Adam

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Fraser second base and outfield. There there's there's a lot

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of value there. The only thing with Fraser is he

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:10.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't run last year. He only attempted to four stall

0:54:10.320 --> 0:54:12.160
<v Speaker 1>on bases. The year before that he attempted fourteen. So

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the what the reason was for

0:54:13.880 --> 0:54:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the difference. So that's the only thing to keep an

0:54:15.480 --> 0:54:17.479
<v Speaker 1>eye on if you if you're expecting tenstall on basis.

0:54:17.840 --> 0:54:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of stolen bases, the guy that we liked early

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 1>on the draft season was Jean Sigarura in Philadelphia. New

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 1>line up like he's gonna run, but gave Kafler, I

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 1>was concerned new Age New analytics. He would literally run

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:30.279
<v Speaker 1>We looked this up and he ran lee average last year.

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:32.640
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't that, it wasn't anything to scare us away.

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So Philly playing Tampa Bay, and Jim Salisbury, who was

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:38.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the beat reporters, said, here's the starting lineup

0:54:38.600 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a k a. Their opening day line up, and I

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>wanted to read it to you guys because Philly is

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a place that we were looking at. Right, McCutcheon is

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:46.719
<v Speaker 1>leading off, then Jean Sigura, Harper, Hoskins back in the

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:48.799
<v Speaker 1>line up. There's an injury concerned there, Reese Houses back

0:54:48.800 --> 0:54:50.439
<v Speaker 1>in the line at that and clean up real MutS

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so five, and then that was what the question was, right,

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:57.480
<v Speaker 1>who would be next? It's o'double at six, sayzar Hernand

0:54:57.560 --> 0:54:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is at seven, and mikel Franco at eight, which is

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a big of a disaster for us. Frank that's ad Yeah,

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I worried Franco was gonna hit. I

0:55:05.080 --> 0:55:06.359
<v Speaker 1>knew it was going to be in the lower third.

0:55:07.040 --> 0:55:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I could see o'dooble being six, just so you break

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 1>up some of the right e's there because they have

0:55:12.280 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Hoskins in real Muto obviously four and five, so I

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:18.279
<v Speaker 1>could have I could have seen o'doble being seven, six,

0:55:18.360 --> 0:55:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and then we get Franco at seven. But man, I

0:55:20.520 --> 0:55:23.359
<v Speaker 1>mean eighths. It's not great for Franco. He's not gonna

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:25.279
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of pitches to hit there, obviously with

0:55:25.320 --> 0:55:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the with the picture coming up next to so that's

0:55:27.800 --> 0:55:29.719
<v Speaker 1>not great. He was a corner and fielder that I

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:32.360
<v Speaker 1>like just because it's great lineup and you know, I

0:55:32.360 --> 0:55:35.719
<v Speaker 1>can hit twenty five runs. It's sneaky, but and in

0:55:35.760 --> 0:55:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the lineup, the accounting stats are not going to be good.

0:55:38.000 --> 0:55:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Whither you guys, you know, sneaky mcil Franco play. I

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:43.719
<v Speaker 1>actually have them monthly. Again, I'm so sure that he's

0:55:43.760 --> 0:55:45.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna be hit an eighth for too long. I think

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the way Kapler runs that show it's gonna be a

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:49.880
<v Speaker 1>different line up out there until he gets the right one.

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:52.279
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's like you said, with Franco, I

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:54.759
<v Speaker 1>could I'd like to see him seven and hit says

0:55:54.760 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 1>here Hernanda's eight. I think that's more more realistic. Yeah,

0:55:57.800 --> 0:55:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree to. And there was some talk early in

0:55:59.360 --> 0:56:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the spring about he says her under is leading off,

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and then I just wondered where would cauch go. But

0:56:02.800 --> 0:56:04.239
<v Speaker 1>to me, I'd rather see says her end is at

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of that order, cause then the lineup turns

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 1>back over and that gives her nanda Is some opportunity

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for counting stats. So I wouldn't be that concern with Franco.

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:14.080
<v Speaker 1>If that lineup turns over and does what it's supposed

0:56:14.120 --> 0:56:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to do, he may get some numbers. Guys, one last time,

0:56:16.560 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 1>where coul everyone find your podcast and listen to you, guys.

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Mike the Rhodo Cop on Twitter. You can find me

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a picture list dot com, Friends of Fantasy Benefits dot com,

0:56:24.520 --> 0:56:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and Mets Morizes online dot com First and Fantasy Benefits

0:56:27.560 --> 0:56:31.799
<v Speaker 1>f BFF has the same. Were all together now? Where

0:56:31.800 --> 0:56:34.160
<v Speaker 1>can everybody out with no friends? What else is new?

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:36.920
<v Speaker 1>At Matt Underscore Striker Underscore. You can also read me

0:56:37.040 --> 0:56:38.839
<v Speaker 1>on razball dot com and you can listen to Mike

0:56:38.880 --> 0:56:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and I at strike Zone Pod and guys, I gotta

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 1>tell you man, I'm big fan and it's I'm kind

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of marking out being here. Thank you so much for

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:47.360
<v Speaker 1>having me. It's been a it's been a last for us.

0:56:47.400 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Always good to talk baseball people that kind of know

0:56:49.040 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what they're talking about and it makes our lives a

0:56:50.640 --> 0:56:53.600
<v Speaker 1>lot easier, So can we appreciate it orrows podcast. I

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know which camera to look at Ryan Spillboards on

0:56:55.760 --> 0:57:00.160
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow's podcast. There you good. I want to think, Matt, Mike,

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to think, of course, Frankie, everybody downstairs, Matt

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Modica from our one Tomorrow adventure will be back and

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:06.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll do it all again. Thank you so much for

0:57:06.440 --> 0:57:09.600
<v Speaker 1>watching listening to fantasy BFFs. We'll see tomorrow, we hope