WEBVTT - How Wine Fraud Works

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from the house stuff

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Josh Clark. There's Child's w Chuck Bryant, and No little

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Bit even is stuff you should Know. Man, that coffee

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>smells good? You want something? Have a sip? No, I'm fine,

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>but it's just I just love that smells so nice,

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>even though I don't drink much coffee. Oh yeah, I'm

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>with you. You know, it's just a delicious smell. Sometimes

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to a department store and just walk through

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the fragrant aisle and just smell the coffee samples they have. Well,

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were gonna say you got through the

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>lingerie and just brush up against things after the coffee.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So after the coffee sniffing is done and I can't

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>smell anything anymore, right, How are you? Thanks for outing me? Man?

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>It's creepy. Yeah, you know, I'm sure there's weirdos out

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>there who do that. Are you kidding me? There's probably

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>websites dedicated to it. Yeah, I'm fine. Good. Good? Do

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you like wine? I love wine? How do you know,

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Chuck that the wine you're drinking, it's actually the wine

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking is because nobody bothers to fraudently rip off

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>bottle of one. Not true. Yeah, there's a famous issue

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>in the world of wine fraud. Watch people okay um

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>from Tesco, which is I think it's just a straight

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>up like supermarket Kim in Britain, I saw that. Actually, yeah,

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you're right, And there was a louis Ja dough which

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>normally goes for about fifteen pounds. It was selling on

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>sale for five pounds. That's a good deal. But one

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of the guys who purchased it contacted some people who

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>are into wine and said, I think this is phony

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>because the label looks like it's a photo copy. So

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody was doing knock off louis Ja dough which normally

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>goes for not that much, and old at t Tesco,

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>who was in turn selling it. And this is a

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>huge thing. Man. There's a big, big debate even still

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and just how widespread wine fraud is. And it's really

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>difficult to get to the bottom of because there's so

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.239
<v Speaker 1>many people who have their fingers in this fraudulent pot,

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>whether wittingly or unwittingly, in either way, are unwilling to

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>admit that it's as extensive as it is, or the

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>people who are burned are making a bigger deal out

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of it than they are than it really is, because

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>they have the money in the context to get CBS

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to do a story on how they got burned by

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>buying some fake wine. So it's not entirely clear how

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>widespread it is. But there have been some really great,

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>very famous but almost proven stories of outright wine fraud.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's a pretty new phenomenon. Uh. Well, if you

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think ancient Roman is pretty new, let's hear it man.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Well that's I mean there ever since there was wine,

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>people were making fake wine or trumping it up as

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>something other than it was. So the newer practice, like

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you can divide it into two things. There was an

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>ancient room they were doing stuff like this and adding

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>like lead to wine to sweeten it while they were

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:22.279
<v Speaker 1>killing people. Uh. But then there's the new practice of like, hey,

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a Thomas Jefferson bottle of wine and you

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>con bided a Christie's auction for a hundred thousand dollars

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's really not that at all. Do you remember

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>back in the eighties, Um, I think reu Needy was

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>adding like when you wipe a fluid or something. Yeah,

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it was at the very least an urban legend. More recently,

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there was something added to wine to make it sweeter

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that was really bad for you. But I don't know,

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't confirm if it was that case or not.

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>This was specifically reu Needy in the eighties. And it again,

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it could have just been an urban legend because at

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the same time that there were spiders eggs in bubble yum.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah, there was a lot of like a

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>consumer uh panic. I think yeah, it was a golden

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>age for urban legends. Yeah, agreed. Uh. And you know what,

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to do one on wine period. Yes, this

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is so us. Yeah, we'll do episodes on everything but

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the actual thing, and then we'll finally get to the thing. Uh.

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And we could also probably do a completely separate podcast

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>on wine tasting, because man, that's a really bitter pill,

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>because there are some people who say there really is

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>no difference in these wines, and there have been numerous

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>occasions over the years where jerks have set up wine

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>tasters to fail by just switching out wines and saying

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a really nice bot or what's really crappy,

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and they say whoa, this is lovely. The tannons are

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>really coming in. It's jammie and full, and they're like,

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you're drinking too buck chuck um stuff that. It's a

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>big bone of contention with wine drinkers and also people

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>who like to poop poo that and say it's all

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>subjective and you're all just snooty and either really is

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>no difference, but there really is a difference. Well, okay,

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>so there is a like you say, there's there's a

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>big debate over that, right, um, But if you if

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you dive into the world of high end vintage wine collecting,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it is very um. It's like an aura borus, right,

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that snake that eats its own tail, in that the

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>people who are in charge of judging whether something's real

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>or not are basing that on their previous experiences, which

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>may or may not have been an experience with a

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>fraudulent wine. So even if you can tell the difference,

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>if you've only been exposed to, say, fraudulent eighteen century wine,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>then when you are asked to judge a bottle of

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>like eighteenth century wine, you're gonna compare it to that,

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And if it's ultimately coming from the same counterfeitter. You

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>will be like, yes, this is the real thing, because

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I've had that before and it tastes like that. Well yeah,

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and here's the other thing. Is there there is vintage,

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>uh appropriately aged wine that is tastes great because it

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>has aged in such a way. And then there are

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>these super old bottles that apparently it tastes like canned

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>asparagus is the note that it brings out, And these

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>don't even taste that good. It's just the fact that

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you can own it and show people. You don't even

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>drink it. In most cases, you don't drink at Jefferson wine.

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>You have it in your collection. So some say, look

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>at my collection. Exactly. That's the whole point a lot

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of people are. For a lot of people, that's the

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.679
<v Speaker 1>whole point. It's just own this bottle. It's like owning

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a piece of Thomas Jefferson and you get to show

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>off and and tell people how great you are. Right exactly. So, Um,

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that's how a lot of wine counterfeiting has gotten away

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with because the people are never going to open the wine.

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So whatever tampering you did with the the seal is

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>never going to be discovered. Um, they're never gonna taste

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the wine inside, so it could be two buck chalk

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Won't see the cork. Yeah. Um, and they're

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>just they're just happy to have this thing and their

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>status to be elevated to the point where they don't

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>really want to know if it's a counterfeit, so long

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>as they can walk around and tell people. This is

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Jefferson. Right, Well, we should go ahead and start

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about Bill Coke. He is uh, one of the

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>other brothers. He is not Charles or David Coke of

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the famous uh Republican Coke brothers, fame billionaire supporters of

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party. Yeah. Yeah, sure, she's saying that's like

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the nicest way to describe them. Yeah, it is. Uh.

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>He is the brother, one of the brothers who got

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>out along with another brother. Um, but not another brother

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>from another mother. No, they are the same mother, right right, Okay, Yeah,

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>he got out of the family business and said, you

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>know what, um, a billionaire, I'm gonna what I'm gonna

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>do is I'm gonna start collecting really rare and expensive things. Um.

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>One thing he has is a gun collection. He owns

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Custer's rifle, Billy the Kid's pistol. Does he he owns

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the gun that killed Jesse James. Oh, I'm sorry, is

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Jesse James Pistol? And that gun and that what was

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>his name? Robert Ford? Yeah? And that was a good movie.

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Boy was it really good? Beautifully shot as well Wide

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Rupe's rifle, Doc Holiday's rifle. He has a lot of

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>vintage guns. He has a lot of very famous works

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of art like original Picassos and monaise As exactly. He

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a big sucker to me. And he also

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>owns uh as this article says several hundred bottles of

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>what he calls moose piss. Yeah, that's what he calls it.

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>He said. He Well, he's saying that for all he knows.

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what's inside. He got duped very famously, many many times. Yeah,

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and he has had many many lawsuits over the years

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that have come out. This guy loves suing people. He

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>does what he calls dropping subpoena is on people. Yeah,

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 1>he sues people almost recreationally. He drops the subpoena on

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>their head. Yeah, what a guy. So he um he

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill Coke again very famously, he's probably the most famous

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>victim of wine fraud. M because he sues everybody he

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.839
<v Speaker 1>possibly can who may or may not have sold them

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a fake. Really takes it personally, and he really goes

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>after people. UM. And he did a lot of media

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>about this too, so he's very famous for this. UM.

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And he brought in some wine experts and said, here

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>are thirty thousand, forty thousand bottles of wine that I

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>have in my sellers. How many are fake? And they

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just took a random sample of three tho bottles. He

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>kidding me, No, they said exactly, They're like, we'll bill

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you for this. UM. They took a random sample of

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>three thousand bottles and it yielded a hundred and thirty fakes.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So I mean he has hundreds and hundreds and hundreds

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>by by extension of fake bottles of wine in his cellar.

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And that was actually, that's about on par with what

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the average not necessarily uninitiated or uneducated wine buyer, but

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>fervent vintage wine buyer would have that about four million

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars seller, about a million of it will be on fakes. Yeah,

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and he supposedly spent close to five million dollars on

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>fake wine over the past quarter century, UM, including some

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of those Jefferson's that we'll talk about. Uh and a

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of this wine came from a man named Rudy

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh crnia Oh that's good stuff. It's even better than

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I had in my head, you crniawan. I like that,

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I think. And this guy was one of the most

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>famous um really alongside another guy that we'll talk about,

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the most famous wine fraud discs, fraudster, fraudster, counterfeitters,

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>counterfeitters of all time um And he was sentenced to

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>ten years in prison and supposedly was to pay close

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to fifty million dollars in damages, which is easily what

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>he made by selling fake wine. In two sales in

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six, he made thirty six million dollars

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>selling fake wine. What a jerk. And it's easy to

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>sit back. And the fence team even used this in

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>court to say, ah, these are rich guys, like no harm,

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>no foul, who cares very if you're ripping off the rich.

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And I even found myself kind of thinking that. But

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, who it's wrong, it's wrong,

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it's wrong. Sure, I mean, like I wouldn't do it.

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't sell a counterfeit bottle of wine. Yeah, it's wrong,

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>it's illegal, and it's it's gross. And just because you're

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>ripping off the rich, it's not like he's Robin Hood

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and giving that then to the poor. You know he was.

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have the idea that he was doing that.

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Plus Um, Dave Rugs, who wrote this, made this point,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but I take issue with it that ultimately vintage counterfeit

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>wine fraud affects all wine drinkers because that stuff trickles down.

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's true because from reading this um.

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>There were two really great long form articles that this

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>article was partially based on. One was in The New

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Yorker and one was on Vanity Fair, and both of

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>them were totally worth reading. UM. But just from reading

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>those you get the impression that those are two very

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>different worlds. That the world of like just regular wine

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>appreciation and vintage wine collection form of ven diagram that

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>just barely overlaps, and that one really does not affect

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the economy the economics of the other. So if there's

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of counterfeit stuff going on in the vintage

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>wine world, it probably wouldn't drive up prices for the

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>wine that you're buying that's you know, ten years old tops.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that that's necessarily true. His point

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that we all shoulder the burden that counterfeiters do because

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>these two worlds are so divorced. But even still, like

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>if you were a people are losing money and reputations

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>are being built up and lost. You know, I get that.

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, let's take a little break and we'll

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>come back and uh, we'll talk about the two ways

0:13:39.520 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>that you can generally go about trying to fake a wine.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back, We're drunk on wine. I wish

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what's your favorite wine? Uh? My favorite wines are big

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>bodied California cabernets generally, like not a specific like wine maker.

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>If that's what you're asking, I'm not gonna like, yeah,

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no wrong answer. Yeah no, Well that was that

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>funny because it made me think of fat bottom girls,

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that Queen song big bodied California Ca. Yeah, it just

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>potts in my head and I laughed like a goon. Yeah,

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm like really full bodied wines, zimpandels and cabernets. Yeah,

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I think California is just they're doing it right. You know,

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they say petitzeras the Rodney danger field of the wine world.

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I've heard that. So if you're gonna go about faking

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a wine, um, you uh, there are two things you

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>can do. You can either fake the wine inside a

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>real bottle or you can fake the bottle real wine. Yeah,

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's all real wine. You know, it's different vintage

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe yeah, but like it could be like a really

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>nice seven wine that you say it's actually from nineteen

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>fourteen or even one. I mean, like it could be

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>within a couple of years. It just depends on on

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it was a good year or if the if

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a scarcity of it, that kind of stuff. And

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>actually Bill Cook makes a pretty good point. His whole

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>thing is he wants to have I think a hundred

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and fifty years of Lafitte or some some house, like

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:39.479
<v Speaker 1>every single vintage that they released of every single variety

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>over the course of a hundred and fifty years, which

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>is extremely ambitious. And he said it's easy to get

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the really prized ones because those are the ones that

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>like people saved in all that. He said, it's the

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>mediocre years that are old that nobody bothered to say

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this drank and threw away the bottle or just didn't

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>keep it. Those are the ones that he has the

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>most trouble. Fine, or they did skeet shooting. They just

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>had the servants stowed up in the air and they

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>shot him with shotguns. That's what they do. Richie Riches, Uh, well,

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you make a good point too, because Colonie Allen, although

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>he dealt in the super high echelon, he would also

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>take a two bottle of wine and fake it to

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>be like a thousand dollar bottle. Yeah, he did it

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>both ways. He would he would take out, he would

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>take an old bottle, legitimate real bottle, put in his

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>own mix of wine and cork it again and and

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>make it look like it had never been open. Or

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>like you said, he would take just say, a forty

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>seven Lafitte and mess with the label to make it

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>look like a forty one Lafitte, which would be worth

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>ten times that what the forty seven Lafitte would be worth. Right,

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And clearly, I also want to point out Lafitte is

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously the only fancy wine that I'm familiar with, because

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that's my go too. So if you guys are out

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>there and you're getting the impression that I know what

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about as far as wine goes, you have

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>been duped. Well, you're not a big wine guy. You're

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on sortis such, I like wine. I'm I'm definitely not

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a wine guy exactly. Yeah. Uh, and I'm that wine

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>guy either. I'm I'm at the very I'm wine guy

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in the brest sense of the word. I like really

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>good wines. I like going to wineries. But I'm certainly

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>no like. I'm not saying I have some amazing palette.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't pick out vanilla notes and things like that.

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, man, this tastes really good for up

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>bottle of it. And I tend to fall into that

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>camp where I'm certain that there are people out there,

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>literal tastemakers who can tell the difference between wine and

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I've had wine that I didn't like before, I've had

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>wine that I do like. Um, But I fall into

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the camp where I'm ultimately like, it's it's whatever you appreciate.

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.479
<v Speaker 1>It's no hierarchy, there doesn't need to be. Um. You know,

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand dollar bottle is not necessarily going to

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>taste as good as a twenty dollar bottle. That that

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>you the whole thing is just about individual enjoyment, and

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>he kind of snobbery associated with it to me just

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>misses the point. Yeah, here's my deal is, I can

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>really tell the difference between what I would consider cheap

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>wine and like a decent bottle or a good bottle.

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's where my taste level max is out. I

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>can't tell the difference between a two bottle and at bottle,

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>But if you gave me like a six dollar bottle,

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you can. You can taste the difference. It's between that

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and like bottle. Yeah, but even then, if that's what

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you like, that's what you like. I'm not poo, It's

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>just not what I want, you know. Oh man, a

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of caveats there. So um, we were talking about

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Rudy kay yeah, and how to how to he faked

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>wines and he was He got real bottles correct in general,

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and made his own wine concoctions. Here's what this dude

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>did right to get to the point where he could

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>even counterfeit. Yes, he got his hands on real stuff

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and he ran up some serious, serious bar tabs while

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he was doing it. There's a very um legendary story

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of him hooking up with this guy who was the

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>head of wine sales at a um a an auction

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>house called Acker Meryll. They factor in big time into

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this guy's ascent and Rudy Kay's counterfeit ascent, not weddingly necessarily,

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>but they they let him use their reputation to build

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>his own. But he did it by duping them by

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>throwing like these crazy parties at like um at um

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>restaurants and having like two fifty thousand dollar tabs, picking

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>up the tab himself. But then after everybody left, going

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to the staff at the restaurant being like, mail me

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>every single one of those bottles, and they go, well, okay,

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's your wine, but that's weird. Not enough to make

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 1>mention of it, but it was odd to them. His

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>big thing was that he did it at the same

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>place over and over again, so they did start to notice.

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>But while he was doing this, he was also collecting wine,

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to really expensive vintage wine, and there was already a

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>market for it, but it didn't look anything like the

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:19.959
<v Speaker 1>market that he built almost himself. He drove the value

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of vintage wine up almost singlehandedly by buying up as

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>many bottles of old stuff as he could um And

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>while he was doing that, he was building his reputation.

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>He was making connections and he was getting his hands

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>on legitimate wine that he could use to resell now

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that the market was up at a higher price after

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>he had already consumed it. It say like a party. Yeah.

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And one thing he was doing that tipped off some

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>people early on was um. Like you were saying, he

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>was buying off years of good vintages, great vintages, to

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>where there was one guy who thinks Jeffrey Troy was

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>his name. He was a wine merchant and he said

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>he was buying these good bottles for French Burgundy, but

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>they weren't great, they were off years, and it was

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>just if he was a collector, it was just weird

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to buy these, uh, and to be adamant about buying

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>these because he could get him for cheaper and fake

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>them easier exactly, like he could just kind of smudge

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the year and all of a sudden it's a much

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>more expensive vintage. Um. So he's he's driving the market up.

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>He's buying legitimate wine. Apparently he's taking out loans that

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>he defaulted on to to build this reputation of his UM.

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And so when the market hits he starts counterfeiting, And

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>there was one story that actually was pretty prominent in

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the Vanity Fair article where he was apparently confused. He thought,

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and there's no way that any of us would have

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>ever thought this, but he thought that a Ponceau close St.

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Denis was the same thing as the Christine Ponceau close St. Denis. Right,

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>he was way off. So it turns out that he

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>figured that ponce Uh made this wine in Burgundy in

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the forties because Christine ponce so close end and he's

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>made this wine in the forties. Turns out that the

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>regular Ponceo, the very famous Ponceau family made their close

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>end any starting in the eighties, so that he actually

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>got found out because of this one mistake. This led

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to his unraveling, and he was going to auction or

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>sell about like nine bottles of this stuff that was

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>overtly counterfeit. It had never existed, which also said a

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>lot about the collectors at the time too, because they

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>were covening and paying for wine that they never even

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>heard of it strictly because these these people were attached

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to it. It's pretty amazing, it really is. And that's

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>how he was able to get away with it. For

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>so long because that dinner, the guy Ponceau himself, um,

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy who was the proprietor of the vineyard, showed

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>up at that dinner, flew from Paris to I think

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>New York to be at the dinner to make sure

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't auction off those things because he knew

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>they were counterfeit. And Rudy Kay still was left to

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>just keep going for years after that because because of reputations. Well,

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and like you said, he had built up this reputation,

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a big part of it. Um, you have

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a true con artist. You can't just go

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>in there, uh and say, I've got all these Jefferson wines.

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm chuck. You know, you have to be known in

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the community, and it takes a long time, and they

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have to think that right, Yeah, I have to think

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you have money, real money. What he did, No, he

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>borrowed it all. Well, I thought he came for money.

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>That was well, he had money at one point. He

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>borrowed oh no, but then he made a lot, right,

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So think about this. I think he defaulted on a

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>three or four million dollar loan and then another one

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>or two million dollar loan, and then he also borrowed

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>privately from other like wine collectors that he knew. But

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>even still, let's say he borrowed ten million dollars that

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>he defaulted, he may tens intens intens more millions thirty

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>four million dollars in one year just from two sales. Yeah,

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and he currently is appealing his conviction UM on the

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>grounds that uh that when when he was arrested, he

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was arrested on his front porch. Then they searched his

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>house and they said you can't do that. That That they

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>got the the search warrant afterward, and he said, well

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that. There should I should have never

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>been searched. And it's looking like they're saying, now you

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>know what they had reasonable uh doubt. Uh said yeah exactly.

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think the appeal is going to go anywhere.

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>But this is as recently as like this year. I

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>think he's still appealing. But he got ten years, right, yeah,

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>ten years man, Um, So he got caught and he

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>got caught red hand, red handed. It sounds like UM

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and the people who were attached to him that helped

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>built up this market definitely suffered uh some dings to

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>their reputation. But are saying like, we had no idea,

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we trusted this guy, we were duped too, and UM

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to their to their merit acker, meryll Um offered like, uh,

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>money back guarantees on anything that was considered found to

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 1>be fake and and paid up on it after one auction. Well,

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the guys Coke is suing is uh. I

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>can't remember his name, but he supposed supposedly. He's like,

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know I was selling you fake wine, like

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I got duped, and he's saying, no, you knew. So

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to prove whether or not this guy

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>actually knew. And so that's that's another part of that

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>debate where how widespread is this, who knows what um?

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And who's like how far do you go back before

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you find the person who did it? Right, So we'll

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about one other person who allegedly did it right

0:25:47.520 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>after this break. So, Chuck, there's another man, very famous

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>man in the wine world. His name is Hardy Hardy

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>roden Stock, but I don't believe that's his real name.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>His real name is what mine heart, that's right, what

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>a name, that's his given name, But he goes by

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Hardy roden Stock and has since the seventies and he

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to be a truly great wine counterfeitter, not only do

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to build up a reputation as rich and

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>um willing to crack bottles of ridiculously expensive, um historically

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>valuable wine at parties where there's wine critics and auctioneers

0:26:56.160 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and wine experts, um. But you also have to have

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a certain love for wine. I think Rudy kay definitely

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>loved wine. Yes, they but they all have. But yeah,

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and Hardy Rodenbach definitely does too. And apparently there's there's

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a big question about whether he is one of the

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>better wine mixers on the planet. Yeah, because that's that's

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.239
<v Speaker 1>a real job, where like like someone will work at

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a winery and they'll take a little bit of this

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit of that, and then all of

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a sudden you've got there. Yeah, they're they're they're blend.

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Some blends are better than others. Apparently Rodenstock is a

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>master blender if he is in fact a counterfeiter. This

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>article on how stuff works make it makes it sound

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>like Bill Coke's hired FBI gun closed the book and

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's done. But it's never been proven in a

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>court of law. That Rodenstock actually um was this counterfeiter

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and he still denies the allegations. Well, the circumstantial evidence

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>is pretty pretty substantial. Yeah, I mean I think the

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>only reason is because he refuses to come to America

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to go to court, you know. But there's no criminal

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Prosecution's all civil as far as I understand. Yeah, I

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's the case. So he was a former music

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>manager and um, he I think they're making him. There's

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a book called The Billionaires Vinegar about this about the

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson wines that they're making into a movie with McConaughey.

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Of course, does he play Bill Coke or Hardy roden Stock.

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who he's playing, or does he just

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like wander around days in the background he's

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the wine maker man. Uh yeah, I'm not sure who

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>he's playing actually, But it was a big book and

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it was about the famous Jefferson wines and basically the

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>deal is Thomas Jefferson, as we all know, was way

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>into wine, way into France. UM, a big francophile and

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>he had either bottles in his collection or he had

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>his own vintage as well. Um, Thomas Jefferson wines and

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>very famously, Hardens stock was rooted out allegedly. I guess

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>do we have to say that as faking these Jefferson bottles. Yeah? Um,

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>he would force you know, you're supposed to spit out

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>when you're drinking wine tasting. He would. He would I

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know about force, but highly encourage his guests to swallow,

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>so they would be drunker by the time they got

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to the real good stuff at the end, which is

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and again, so it's unusual to force your guests to

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>drink rather than spit out the wine at a tasting party.

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And then it's also unusual to bring out your best

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff at the end because everybody knows your palette is

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>saturated and you can't really tell the difference anyway. Well,

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever been on a wine tour and go

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to like several wineries, you definitely at the last winery

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.239
<v Speaker 1>you're like, give me a case. Is great. Yeah. So

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>when he's throwing these parties in these tastings, again, he's invited,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're very smart to invite wine experts, wine critics,

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>wine journalists. It's an event. It is an event. And

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>again all these people think that this dude, it is

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>just this eccentric, extraordinarily rich dude who is literally opening

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to drink and share with them. He's wonderful, these these

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>people who are peons compared to this man. He's such

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a great man because he's opened a seventeen eighties seven

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>bottle of Thomas Jefferson's wine and he's given me a glass.

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got to go right about it. I got to

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about how great Hardy roden Stock is. So it's

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>very smart to have surrounded himself with the people he did. Yeah.

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So his story was that he said, um, he claimed

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that he found a batch of Jefferson bottles behind a

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>brick wall in a Paris Parisian basement that he still

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>hasn't revealed where this is a little suspicious. Uh. And

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>then if you already got all the wine out of there, yeah, exactly. Uh.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And then he and uh, he went and sold a

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of these two people like Coke and Christopher Forbes

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and other billionaires for um, hundreds of thousands of dollars

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>per bottle. And I think they were like about a

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty bottle. Yeah, it's a ton of money.

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And um, they were fakes and it was all it

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>all came down to a little matter of punctuation, which

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is hysterical to me that Thomas Jefferson bottles. Um. Well,

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>first of all, he kept really meticulous records because he

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was so into wine. Jefferson. Yeah, so on the bottles,

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>chuck it said, and it was engraved t H period

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>capital J period. Right. Supposedly, Jefferson, when he wrote his initials,

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it would be t H colon capital J period. So

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that fatal flaw of the matter of punctuation is what

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>gave him away. Basically, Yeah, well there's a larger question too.

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that Thomas Jefferson would have his bottles

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>engraved was based on a letter, a verified letter. Um.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>It was an order that Jefferson placed for French wine

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of himself and George Washington, Which makes these

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>bottles even more amazingly awesome because they think, well, these

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>came from an order that Jefferson placed, that we're also

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in George Washington's shipment as well, and that they they

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they needed to be separated out by initials. But if

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you step back and you think they wouldn't go in

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.479
<v Speaker 1>and grave all the bottles, they just marked the crates

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that the bottles came in. This create goes to George,

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this crate goes to Jefferson because he was ordering it

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>by the case, not by the bottle. So the idea

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that the bottles would be engraved is also dubious in

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and of itself. But Monticello historians are like, number one,

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>he this is wrong the way that this is engraved,

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not how he would have done it. And secondly,

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no records in all of we have the records

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for this era, and there's nothing in there about these

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>vintages being in Monicello or being ordered by Jefferson. And

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>then also, um, once Bill Coke put his FBI dude

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on the on the case, it turns out that it's

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>likely that this this engraving was done by modern instruments. Yeah,

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>he hired a guy named an ex fed named Jim

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>McElroy or I'm sorry, Jim Elroy and Royal, I guess,

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>because so he hired this guy, paid him a lot

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of money, I imagine, to try and do some digging

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>on this. And one of their first lines of defense

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>was there's something called uh cesium dash one seven, and

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that is UH a radioactive isotope that exists because it's

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a product of nuclear fission of uranium. So it didn't

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>exist until we started doing that, before we started launching

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>nuclear bomb explosion tests. Yeah, exactly. Uh, now it exists,

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and you can actually test for this stuff, so if

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you find you know it basically can date something back

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to However, in the case of harden Stock, he was

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>smart enough at least to use wine older than so

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that didn't really help him much. Yeah, and I wonder

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>if he just surely he is lucked out because I

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>wonder if that Caeson test was around when he did this,

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>because this he supposedly found him in eighty five and

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.479
<v Speaker 1>started selling him immediately. Yeah, who knows, maybe got lucky

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>or maybe he just was like, I need to use

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>some really old, nice wine, yeah, to at least try

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and get away with it. So again there's like and

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>then there. One other part of the case against him

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>was that he had a tenant once at his family's

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>house who had an apartment near his. In the house

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and in the basement, the tenant said that he saw

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 1>like basically tons of empty bottles and um stacks of

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>labels and all this stuff, which to the tenant meant, well,

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this guy's forging wine. Right, that's a little more. That's

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 1>probably what I would think. I hope he doesn't go

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:51.760
<v Speaker 1>by my recycling every Wednesday here wine counterfeitter, it could be. Uh,

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So there are a lot of there's nothing you can

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>do about these these old um, I mean, you can

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>have people inspect them and try and verify them, but

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>there's really nothing you can do as a like a

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.919
<v Speaker 1>full proof method. But really nice wineries now arguing there

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of methods you can do now for

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>future generations of wine fraud. Yeah, for the vintage stuff

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you're s o l Basically, you just have to really

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>trust where it's coming from. Probably hire an expert and

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>um maybe stay away from rodent stock if you're Bill Coke. Right,

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that's right. But there Yeah, like you said, the modern

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>guys are using things like um R f I D tags,

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>um QR codes that you scan and it takes you

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to a website or something. Microchips like you have in

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:40.240
<v Speaker 1>your dog. Yeah, so you can track the actual bottle.

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>There's also like tamper proof um capsules, the that the

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:50.439
<v Speaker 1>wine is encased in the bottle's neck that when that's

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>open it changes color. If it's ever been opened and

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 1>some actually alert the internet or I guess back home

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>at head Court the Internet once it's been open. And

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>there's another one that's pretty cool. There's this company that

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 1>inserts a specific DNA marker into like the ink on

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the label that can't be counterfeit, and that they can

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:17.879
<v Speaker 1>go back and later and be like, no, this is real.

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>At the very least, we know the labels real. And

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 1>rudy case case, he had a bunch of credit card

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>charges for glue and labels and ink, and he, I

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>mean he had a pretty nice trail of evidence behind him. Yeah,

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I was not very smart with it. Well, I mean,

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 1>if his apartment was just a counterfeiting factor. And then

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>lastly checked the one of the pieces of evidence that

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people point to when they say that

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:47.919
<v Speaker 1>um wine fraud is a big deal um is eBay. Yeah.

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>You can go on eBay and spend a hundred bucks

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>on a empty bottle that, if it weren't empty, would

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>go for a thousand or ten thousand or whatever. And

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the idea behind it, of course, is that somebody's alling

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it up and putting it back on the market as

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a counterfeit. Why would someone sell that that reason to

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>make a hundred bucks on a ten dollar bottle of wine.

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Some people love money. I don't know. It just seems

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of just people who buy that kind

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of wine. I don't picture them going on eBay and

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>running auctions over It makes you wonder also if like

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>those are people who they're like, they're just working at

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant and well, that's what it sounds like to me,

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and take that home and put it on anybay. The

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>servant throws the uh you know, cleans up after the

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>dinner party. Yeah, that's what I figure what's going on?

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>And apparently a lot of restaurants now because of guys

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like Rudy Kay and uh Hardy Roads Road and stock

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>now um smash vintage bottles once the wine has been

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>ordered and drunk with. Well with the shotgun in the

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>skeet shooting, I got one last thing. Supposedly there were

0:37:55.680 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>only five Magnums Fleur produced. Uh. Between two thousand five

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand seven, eighteen magnums of seven La Fleur

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>were sold at auction. That's so easy to How can

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that happen? That's so easy to check when there's only

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>five of something. The argument is that either the guy

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>who works at La Fleur and did in seven and says, no,

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>there was only five magnums doesn't remember because the record

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 1>keeping in like Burgundy is terrible back in the day.

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Um or that the there's just no will. There's so

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>much of a market for counterfeit wine, and there's not

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>enough pressure being put on the people who are actually

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>selling it or allowing it to happen, that it's just whatever.

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And supposedly now that America has gotten more and more savvy,

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>this counterfeit market is moving over to China, so where

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>there's like a lot of wealth coming up and not

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wine education, and people are just getting

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 1>taken for rides. Man, good stuff. Yeah, this is a

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>good one man, good pick. If you want to know

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>more about wine fraud, you can type those words in

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the search bar how stu works dot com? And I

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>said the search bar, Chuck, what is it? Time for

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook questions? All right? Sometimes we pool questions from Facebook

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 1>to answer them. That's what we're doing now. This is

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>from Diane Martin. Diane F. Martin, uh cent, your podcasts

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.919
<v Speaker 1>are essentially what would be called literature reviews and research lingo.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you decide which references to include an exclude.

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Use any kind of quality indicators to decide what you

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 1>will and will include, especially when they're deeply debated. This

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is a good question. Um, we've talked about our research process.

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I think we tried to use peer review journals and

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, if we find something on the internet,

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we try and double and triple check that information. I know,

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a big giveaway. You always talk about as if it's

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the same exa thing printed a bunch. That's usually a

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>sign that it could be bogus, like Rodney danger Field

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>being in the Scout in the movie The Scout, but

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it still bears mentioning. You just have to mention it

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 1>with the caveat you don't find it credible, but it's

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>out there because it doesn't. It exists in some form

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of fashion. Uh, scientific journals, medical journals, I mean, pure

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of you. It's just a great way to go if

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you can get your hands on it. I remember this

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>great article called like why is Science behind a Paywall?

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>About the basically the cart the science publishing cartel. But

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>if you can't get your hands on on perio of stuff,

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the best stuff to work with. Agreed, go ahead.

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Another question. Yeah, Chuck for me, this is from Shane Elliott.

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I knew I think you meant no. This question will

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.399
<v Speaker 1>find a special place in Chuck's heart. What are your

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite types and kinds of beers? And why do you

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>brew your own beer? And so body he else said

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>recently on Twitter that you said in the beer episode

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 1>that you're gonna get into homebrewing. Did you ever? So

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a two part question for you, Chuck from Twitter

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook. Well, you're a beer guy too. I like,

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I do not brew my beer, but on the record,

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 1>is really liking I p a s. I know there's

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a backlash going on now because there's so many of

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>them and people are like, there's other kinds of beers

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world. I PAS tastes like soap I love.

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I love anything that's super hoppy. Yeah, I do. I

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 1>just that's what I like. Our friend Dave dropped by

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>yeah Sweetwater, sweetwater and brought us some hot hash. I

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't tried it yet, have you, no, but his all

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that stuff is good. Sweetwater does a great job. And

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we've always both kind of agreed that, uh, Sierra Nevada

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Palele is one of the great all time, but there's

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>so many great ones. Bells too hearted, I love oh man,

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that might be the best ever. Yeah, and that plenty

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of the elder we got sent some of that. That

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was delicious. Um Oh here in Athens, Georgia, Creature comforts tropically,

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I've not had that one delicious um orfe Is Brewing

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is here in Atlanta, and they make a sour that

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I tried that was really really good. I'm not into

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the sours. Have you tried it sours? Yeah? Yeah, I

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 1>loved it. I don't get it weird that I was like,

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of good. Yeah. It was weird in

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a good way, because sometimes weird can just be novel

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, Okay, I tried that, it's done. This

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is I mean, I like it. Yeah. I don't like

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>wheat beers, Belgian whites. Not a fan. All right, there's

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 1>your answer, fish Bowl. Now I'm thirsty, Jackson Blig. Other

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>than Atlanta, what are your top five favorite cities each? Geez,

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>New York, San Francisco, Seattle? Do they have to be

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:59.839
<v Speaker 1>American cities? Serious? Uh? In that case, then I'll throw

0:42:59.880 --> 0:43:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in Paris and uh London, look at me, Well, fancy,

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I know. Uh let's see. I love Hiroshima, Japan is

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a really neat city, so it's Kyoto. I'm gonna make

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>those tied for one though. Of course. New York, Um,

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>let's see you where I like d see a lot too. Yeah,

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a great town. Um, Rome, Italy is surprisingly neat. Surprisingly,

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 1>what are you getting? I mean it's a major cities, yeah,

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's packed with people, so you would think like

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a city, but it also has I mean like

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you're just walking along the street and all of a

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.319
<v Speaker 1>sudden you're walking next to like a three thousand year

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>old wall that's not even part of a museum. You

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 1>just built up around it. Did There'd be like a

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>fountain on a corner, like somebody's peeing in that's a

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand years old. It's it's a very neat city in

0:43:55.719 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that regard. Um, I like, uh where else? Um, that's

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 1>all I can come up with right now. Oh you

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.320
<v Speaker 1>know what, I don't have to go all fancy pants

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>like Charleston, South Carolina one of my favorite, but it's

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a great place for food. Savannah, Yeah, I like Charlestoniana. Yeah. Yeah,

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:21.319
<v Speaker 1>they're similar to me. Yeah, Charleston is a little more

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:26.359
<v Speaker 1>refined but also a little more modern. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't. It's not fancy pants to like cities overseas, No,

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I know. But when it's once his Paris, you're like, yeah,

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:35.399
<v Speaker 1>but Paris is awesome. It is. It's a great time

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in London. When's the last time you're in London, like

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:42.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago? Okay, you should go back because London

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is like a brand new city. There's something to do

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>at all times. Now they have cabs, which is apparently

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>like the big thing that changed there. Um, and it's

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just an awesome little town, beautiful. Well maybe we can

0:44:56.040 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 1>go there on a tour. Yes. Uh, well that's your

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>turn with a question. Uh, this is from Gus M. Parker.

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Why did Josh grow his hair? Gus, there's a simple

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>answer that that's a good question because I can't because

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I realized that I have hair, and I'm going to

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 1>live it up while I got it. I'm gonna go

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>with Gary Rickleman, what is the best flavor of pop tart? Hint?

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 1>There was only one correct answer. That's not true, Gary.

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:28.919
<v Speaker 1>I think what the answer you're looking for is brown

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>sugar and cinnamon. It's a good one. There's nothing wrong

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 1>with blueberry or strawberry. Strawberries really good as frosted straws

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.359
<v Speaker 1>as long as its frosted. That's the key. Well, here's

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:40.919
<v Speaker 1>another key, And here's a tip for you that don't

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 1>mind clogging your arteries. Pop it out of the toaster.

0:45:44.200 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I know you don't want to get a stick of

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:48.880
<v Speaker 1>butter and rub it on the back the dry side

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and then around the edges of the other side and

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 1>just thank me later. I have not tried that. And

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 1>I actually heard that before from Jessica Simpson when she

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>was pregnant. Oh really, apparently is went berserk on the

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.839
<v Speaker 1>buttered pop tarts. I've never heard of that. You've got

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>time for one more? Yeah, we got time for a

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of mornings. This uh an unusual one from Michael

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Snively or Snoopiley, one of the two, probably Snively. If

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bryant and Clark were units of measure, what would

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:20.840
<v Speaker 1>they measure? Oh? Man, mine would probably Oh I know

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 1>what mine would be is some uh sweat level, like

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>units of sweat per square inch or something. That's a

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:34.359
<v Speaker 1>good one. Mine would measure the distance between any one

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>place and awesome, Oh wow, whoa how is that? That's good,

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you, all right. I got one more, Chelsea Hamilton.

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 1>What's the most rewarding thing that Stuff you Should Know

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 1>has brought to you or allowed you to do. We've

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>done a lot of really neat things that were very

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:52.360
<v Speaker 1>thankful for. But I'm gonna just say the live shows

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 1>because they're so much fun, fun, and it's fun to

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:56.879
<v Speaker 1>go to cities I've never been to, and it's fun

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to meet people and get out of this little room. Uh,

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 1>very rewarding and very fun. I'm going with Chuck's answers. Welcome,

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>all right. Uh, well, thanks everybody for those Facebook questions. UM,

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>if you ever want to get in touch with us

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, you can go to Facebook dot com slash

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know. You can also tweet to us

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:18.320
<v Speaker 1>at s y s K podcast let's our handle. You

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:20.800
<v Speaker 1>can send us a good old fashioned email to stuff

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Podcast at house touff works dot com, and as always,

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:26.360
<v Speaker 1>join us at our home on the web. Stuff you

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Should Know dot com For more on this and thousands

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>of other topics, is a house Stuff Works dot com