WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off June 3rd, 2022 (Ep. 524)

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Philly firing, Let's play ball. Welcome in everybody to fantasy pros.

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>This is leading off, brought to you by Bet MGM,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the King of sportsbooks. It's me, Joey p with me.

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Today is the Welsh and it's you and we got

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a big story to start the show. Oh a lot

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of people watching live today because the Phillies fired their manager.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe Girardi is gone. It is sayonara, mister Girardi. The

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Phillies have gone one hundred and thirty two and one

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>for one under Joe Girardi, including a twenty two and

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine stretch so far this season. Rob Thompson is

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>going to take over as their interim manager now. Welsh

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Joe Girardi certainly has a lot of experience as a manager,

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>has also had a lot of moments in his managerial

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>career where he has rubbed a lot of people the

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>wrong way. I remember in the Marlins situation, run a

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people the wrong way, had a lot of

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>success in New York, but still rubbed a lot of

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>people the wrong way. I remember when the Mets were

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>looking for a manager, it was not the guy as

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a fan that I wanted. Having lived the Joe Girardi

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>cycle in New York already. But the Phillies, look, at

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, they struggled mightily. Last year.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>They made a run in the second half, it was

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>not enough. This year off to the same dismal start.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And look, they made investments in this team. They brought

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>in Schwarber, they brought in Castillanos, they made moves that

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we all thought were really good in the offseason. So

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're not performing, eventually somebody's got a swing, and

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the swing is going to be Joe Girardi.

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes for these guys, those incredible, awesome roster moves

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 2>are the death of them because you can't waste the years,

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's obviously what the team looks at.

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 2>You cannot waste these years of Bryce Harper and what

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 2>was it, twelve or fifteen loss. You can't do that.

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 2>There's also you could question the under development of some

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 2>of the young players. BOMs kind of gone up and down.

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Stott didn't quite work out so far. What I'm curious

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 2>about though, because I find this still odd. I find

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 2>it odd June third, that you're going and firing a

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, well respected manager, regardless of all of this

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 2>stuff that what's the what's the plan? What was what

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>was Joe Girardi holding this team back on? I would

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 2>love to hear that conversation what's the thing with him gone?

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 2>Because managers in baseball alone are kind of it's such

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>a different situation than NFL coaching. Yet you get team

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 2>philosophies of stolen bases. Diamondbacks, Astros do not want to

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>steal bases, which can be a little bit of a

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 2>whole back. But what is what's the move going to

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>change for this team now? Unless he was hated across

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the organization and players wanted him out, what will actually

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 2>change with a baseball manager being fired in June?

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think something that has been Look, it's been

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the Achilles heal. This Phillies team is that bullpen for

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>quite some time. And his men of the Yankee bullpen

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>when he was Yankee manager also was not very well

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thought of or well received. I remember that very well

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and very vividly. And they won sometimes despite that because

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the payroll of the Yankee you know, the payroll of

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees cures a lot of ills and can make

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>up for a lot of mistakes that managers make, and

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>he made a lot of in game ones that were

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>magnified in the playoffs. But again, I'm not saying he's

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>not a good baseball man. I'm not saying Joe Girardi

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>hasn't earned his opportunities. He absolutely has. But the Phillies

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>bullpen continues to be mismanaged. I think over the years,

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that you look at probably how the

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>bullpen folks feel. I think it's got to come from

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the stars on the team too. I can

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>only again, it's it's not fair to speculate, but I

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>think you can only look at when you have hard

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>nosed players like Bryce Harper. Schwarber is kind of a

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>tough guy. Castiana is kind of a tough guy. If

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a manager is grating on those guys who are grinding

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tough guys, I think that says a lot. And I

0:03:58.080 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>can only it's got to be part of the equation.

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 2>And you're right, And you know what, someone just put

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 2>it in the chat, the truth posted what Harper wants

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Harper gets. I agree with that statement. And if that

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>is the case, if Harper didn't like the managing style

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>and wanted him out, okay, as stupid as it is,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense. You know, we don't need to lie

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 2>to ourselves that star players in sports don't make these decisions.

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Lebron James coaching joke that's always been

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>out there. I get that little mismanaging. I would just

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 2>love to hear because what will be the philosophical change?

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 2>And that's actually why this the most sense makes that

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Bryce Harper did not defend him. You know, if Bryce

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Harper wanted him to stay, there's no way you make

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 2>this move in June because relatively short clip that's kind

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>of been out because I don't see what the philosophical

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 2>change in this team is going to be. Are they

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 2>going to run more? Are they going to have a

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 2>different rotation of what they do in their bullpen? Their

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 2>starters Kyle Gibson had been playing. We define like they've

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>been relatively fine. What is a philosophical change outside of

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 2>just saying screw it, he's done, he sucks, we don't

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 2>like him. Buy and Bryce Harper does not give the

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 2>stamp of approval to keep him, and we get our

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 2>first big big move of baseball managers kicking rocks.

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and and the ripple effect here is that you know,

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty clear now that the Phillies may

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>respond to this. Sometimes this typically happens, or the short

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>term sometimes you get a little boost from this. It

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>happens in the NFL every year, but sometimes the Major

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball happens too. We're just a little change. So

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>monitor of the Phillies very closely in the wagering market

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 1>and in the fantasy market. This might be a great

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>time to buy some Phillies on the cheap to see

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>if maybe a different voice or maybe just not Joe

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Girardi's presence changes the tone of the locker room or

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the the interesting you know, of the clubhouse. Because I

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's there's always a short term Typically there's at

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>least the opportunity for a short term boost.

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, the support you would hope, you would hope, but.

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It might be a guy you you would hope, so,

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>but again it might not be long sustained.

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 2>And well, I'll tell you this, they've been so bad

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 2>that everybody's gonna instantly be like, what a great move

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 2>this is when they start winning a couple games. That's

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 2>what's so stupid and weird about that situation.

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, they'll go in five and two, and they'll think, oh,

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>look it's a complexer.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Joe Girardi, what a disaster he was. What a great

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>move this is for? Who'd you say? Was this? The

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 2>lead singer of Matchbox twenty became the new manager, Rob Thomas.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to push you around? Were live?

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Where we where? Will?

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I love? Nineties guys? Singer voice? Sing any song from

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the nineties in that voice, you know, our hair'll become cumbersome.

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>It's the same ass. It's three am, almost beloadly. It's

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the same voice, same voys, same things. It's awesome, cake

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>enough of it, you know what I'm saying?

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 2>What do nineties singing Fridays?

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll just do that.

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 2>We'll do a singing segment.

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Of our Oh let just talk about that heroes. Yeah,

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we're losing viewers the more we sing, so we should sie.

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's go to Trey Turner extending his hit

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>straight to t five games, Paul Goldschmidt right behind it,

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>with twenty four of those guys stayed red hot. Craig

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Kimbrel notches the save on Thursday against the mess. Tony

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Gonsolin continues to be unbelievable six inning gym against the Mets,

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Travis Darnault hitting two bombs. The Royals made a move

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>acquiring Alberta Brew in a trade with the Rangers. Jameson

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>tai On takes the perfect game into the eighth gets

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a w Cetie. Al Kontrac continues to be a maze

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>balls blanking the Giants over seven innings. Now wel al

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Contra right now over on FanDuel is plus eight hundred

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>for the cy Young. I think this is a fascinating

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>time to start investing in al Contra. For this market.

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Eight to one is great odds. You could throw ten

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>bucks there and win eighty and just sit and watch it.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And again, if he continues to be great over the

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>next six weeks, that number will probably get cut in

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>half and then you can put another twenty on that.

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to invest a lot to enjoy wagering

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>on baseball and to enjoy the futures market here when

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it comes to awards, but our Contra, I think has

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>really put himself now into the national consciousness for this award.

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Musk Grove, I think is in that conversation he's also

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>at that same eight to one, And of course CORYN.

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Burns is still at the top. But now what sures

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>as out of the equation to proms out of the

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>equation completely. We knew that all of a sudden some

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of these other guys are gonna start to get more publicity.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 2>What do you think I really like Sandy. I've actually

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 2>watched Sandy directly his last three starts, because I've done

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>pitching props on him, and I believe, if I'm correct,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 2>he's at least hit hit the over on his strikeout

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 2>props in his last three did yesterday that was one

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>that I played as well. He looks phenomenal, He goes

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 2>deep into games, he does not get bogged down. So

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>many pitchers man so many pitchers this year, especially whenever

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 2>I bet on them. We'll have these twenty twenty five

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>in pitch innings, and Santo Contra is efficient, that change

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 2>up phenomenal controls the zone he just had. It's actually

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of like Nestor Cortez in that when you watch

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Nestor Cortez sometimes you're just like, I can't believe we're

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 2>not even talking about him too completely outdeeling.

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, a, oh, we got a hold Nestor coret tes second.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 2>But Nester sometimes he does things where you're just like,

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 2>how are these pitchers so fooled? And you know he

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 2>likes to play off of messing with timing. I saw

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 2>some quick pitches in the first inning of yesterday's game.

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 2>He does. His pitches don't seem like they are so

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 2>wildly incredible, yet you will get guys completely fooled out

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 2>of their brain, so sometimes they can pitch from behind.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Sanuel Contrac kind of has the same thing. Stuff is awesome,

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 2>but he fulfills it to the very very top where

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 2>he looks like one of the best pictures. You trust

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 2>he's going to go seven every game. You trust he's

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 2>going to strike out six plus every game, and he

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 2>will dominate every game on a Marlins team that you

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 2>know would probably give you a little bit of pause.

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I agree. I think if you want to

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 2>have some fun, if you like doing the cy Young

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 2>the award stuff in mid season, put a couple bucks

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>on it. Sandy is a killer choice for the nl sion.

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>A couple of injury notes. Real quick wi Leah Damas

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>making his way back one for three in the rehab start,

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>so he should come back probably. I would think early

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>next week. I would imagine maybe sooner we shall see

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>on exact days off for him. But Lindor was out

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>yesterday because of the finger injury too. Slammed his finger

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>yeah into a Lindor and unfortunately was unable to play.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So also shout out to James Geary who won the

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Wander Franco autographed bat. Here again we just giveaway free

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff just for hanging out with us. So if you're

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>that we had that, we had that last month. It

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>was last month in May we had the Gander francl

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>bad we gave it away.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Who won May?

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 1>We had a three way We had a three way

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>win for May for the T shirts. Uh those three

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 1>names I do have. Let me just pull that up here.

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 1>But while I'm looking for that, Uh, let's talk about

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>this because Nessor Cortes once again was unbelievable. Lois whips

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in Major League Baseball. Right now is Verlander a point

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>eight Burns at point a two, Nessor Cortes at point

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>eight three. Jeff Passing tweeted this, Cortez is down to

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>one point five after seven shutout innings. Thirty sixth round

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>pick by the Yankees returned to them as a rule

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>five pick in Baltimore and then traded the Seattle, got

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>released back to New York. Is there a better story

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 1>than Nestor Cortez right now? No?

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean Nestor Cortez looks like one of the

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 2>best pitchers in baseball. He shouldn't, but he does.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>He looks.

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 2>It's those guys, man, I fall in love with those

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 2>guys that screw it timing. That's one thing I've always

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 2>loved about Hazus Lozardo. Johnny Quato is the most famous

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 2>for it, for just being just kind of crazy and

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 2>messing with timing. It is peak efficiency and Nestor comes

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 2>out there and you know, I to be fair, I

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>always kind of talk about his stuff feeling average. It

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>was ninety four, and he just moves it all around.

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 2>He is He is incredibly, incredibly fun to watch, and

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 2>it is an incredible story too. I always love those

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 2>like what was it like, Johann Santana, wasn't he like

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 2>a rule five? He was? Yeah? Yeah, those are always

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 2>like really uniquely fun stories. And he's kind of got

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:09.599
<v Speaker 2>he's got that path. He's got that path where he

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 2>was just couldn't do anything. Also, just side note, if

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 2>you think about the New York Yankees and how they developed,

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, really great minor league prospect systems. They have

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 2>had great pitching prospects for quite some time. To think

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>that Nestor Cortez is maybe the most valuable outside of

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Cole pitcher on this team when they've had guys

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.359
<v Speaker 2>like Davey Garcia, Luis Medina and the miners Luis Severino

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 2>has developed, and you know, just a handful more, it

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 2>is relatively incredible. Even beyond just that story of you know,

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Rule five and changing teams and being bought back. Also

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.599
<v Speaker 2>that that is not Yankees are not an organization that

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 2>have like, you know, minor leaguers or minor league pitching. No,

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 2>it's really good, huge names, big names.

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, definitely. And also to answer your question, there were

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>three people, the three way tie who won the t

0:12:56.520 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Shirts de Blom title. Chaser ninety and Drew all called

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve home runs in the month of May, and two

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.839
<v Speaker 1>of the three got multiple homers from Johanno Suarez on

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>May six, the greatest Yahoo player that ever lived.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, the greatest Yahoo player. Yeah, it didn't work out yesterday.

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Fred, which again now somebody counteracted that on Twitter. And

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and also said, I don't know what the hell Mayor

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>was pulling up. But this is not true, So I

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know what Mayor was looking at. What stat things?

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, they had an all timeline too. They called Mayor

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 2>the Thief of Joy, which was Joy timeline.

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is the greatest title for Mike Mayer. Ever,

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have the overlay change next time he's on

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the show. So underneath, you know, we're Welsh's face on

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube channel where it says Chris Welsh. Instead it's

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna say Thief of Joy. Oh that's gonna be you

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>have to.

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>But just want to point out that is four four

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 2>cool things that were given away in the month of

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 2>May to listeners of the show. It's amazing.

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Wander Franco autographed bat and three T shirts

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>for leading off. I mean, unbelievable stuff. Also, it wasn't

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>all roses for Nestor Cortez because Jim Cott once again

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>put his foot in his mouth. Jim Cott is a

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>great announcer, but Jim Cott needs to step aside. I

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's time for him to or at least be

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>more careful. I know he called him Nestor the molester,

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>it's just not a good look, and we all have

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>tes doesn't help.

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't help. We all have those moments where we

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 2>say things and you kind of catch yourself in the

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 2>moment you're like, oh, that was stupid, and you could

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of laugh at it. He definitely should have immediately

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 2>been like, my bad, because it's not just a horrific name,

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, nessor Cortes. The look also doesn't it's not great.

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Why Grandpa?

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Why did grandpa? Announcers and play by play why do

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 2>they say so many stupid things? Is it because there's

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 2>such a large number of them that are talking so much,

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the amount of dumb things where they start to talk

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 2>about players, money in their chains and things.

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>We say, yes, there is a bit of a there

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of that old guard in Major League

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Baseball announcing that has You got to realize these guys

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>work more than one hundred and sixty two games a

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>year because they're also working spring training. That's a lot

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of talking. Three hours straight a day. I mean I

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>do more than that in the day typically, but I

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>don't do it continuous. I'll do two hours here and

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>then an hour later in the afternoon, an hour later

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>then it's a lot and eventually, yes, sometimes you go

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a little cross eyed, you say stupid things, but man alive,

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>like it's and it's you can get away because you're old.

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you're like, oh, don't you know, just ignore a ground.

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>That's it.

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 2>That's it's just the oldest. Your brain just starts to fry.

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you, let me tell you about my

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>opinions on the economy like that. Just stop, like stop

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 2>with those things. And these old guys really need nothing.

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brenneman and uh, you know, the fly ball to

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>left field and I think I've lost my job and

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a ball, there's a fly ball left all you

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>know what?

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 2>You know what now that I think about it, let's

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 2>not get rid of these guys. What would we be

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 2>without these types of moments. We need levity, we need

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 2>stupidity in baseball.

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody deserves second chances, and I think everybody

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>has to understand these jobs are hard. And sometimes you

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>say things and you know, oops, you know it, just yeah,

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not great.

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Hey, sometimes you call someone need to get over themselves too.

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>They need to realize that this is not nineteen eighty

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>five anymore. And the game has changed and the people

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in it have changed, and you've got to be a

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more aware of your surroundings too. They they've

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>got to it. The problem is they don't work to

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>improve because they've already established themselves. So there's no incentive

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for them to establish themselves and to improve unless it's

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>do not lose your job.

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>That's the only problem with I appreciate you. I appreciate

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>you that you are alike how you are. You're very

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 2>optimistic about the whole thing, and you kind of have

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I love the attitude of like, hey, sometimes we call

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 2>people molesters and stuff. That's totally normal, right.

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>No, but he didn't mean it like you know, he

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't mean it like that. He like he meant it

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to be like, hey, it rhymes. He was too excited

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that it rhyme. Did even think about

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the repercussions of of what he was rhyming it with.

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 2>That rap music. Make got to make sure I get

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 2>a rhyme in here.

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, let's let's quit this before we say something stupid.

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Sandy al Contra fun facts. Here we go. He writes,

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>first in era in the National League, first in x ERA,

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>first in innings pitch first UH in wins, he's tied

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>for six. UH with six I should say eleven starts first,

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>one point nine to one opponent's batting average he is second.

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>He is plus eight hundred right now on FanDuel to bet.

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I would go ahead and bet that he's probably probably

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred on bet MGM and a couple other places

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>as well. Eight quality starts seventy one strikeouts is third,

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the eight quality starts is tied for second, and the

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>whip is tied for third a point nine to eight unbelievable.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Also fun fact, yesterday was the first time since nineteen

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>forty five that a player served as a starting pitcher

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in a matinee before starting the second game of a

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>doubleheader as a non pitcher. Of course, shoe Otani once

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>again making baseball history. Here you go, Welsh, I know

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you love the trivia. Tony Gonsolin yesterday led National League

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>leads the National League in era at one point five nine.

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Who was the last Dodgers pitcher to finish as the

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>n L e r A leader? And it is not

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Clayton Kershaw, for all your peanuts and cracker check, So

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>who's the last Dodger to lead the league in uh

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>e r A drop your potential voices right there?

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 2>You know what, It's funny. I was looking at the

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 2>next thing. I was looking at the next thing, and

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, I guess not a Dodger, Like how is

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 2>this the answer? Like you don't have this answer in there?

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I was like, these do not.

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't put the answer because you keep yelling at me.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I put in the answer and you want.

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So again it's Tony. Who's the last Dodgers picture

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 2>to finish as the n L E R. Clayton Kershaw.

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not Clayton Kershaw, the last Love, the last one.

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>It's oh was it?

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Wait? Wait? Wait was it you? Every hour?

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>No, it wasn't yet or anyone who rhymes with that.

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>This day in baseball history in nineteen ninety five, the

0:18:56.119 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Expos pitcher Pedro Martinez, Yes, the Expos picture is perfect

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>for nine innings in San Diego, but loses a no

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>hitter when bit Roberts, a name from the past, doubles

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>delete off the tenth. Montreal eventually comes away with a

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>one nothing win, but he lost the no hitter in

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>ten innings. Stat Heroes Yesterday ty On was great. Eight innings,

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>five k's one earned. Al Contra and Cortez talked about them.

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Gonsolin five k's no earned six innings. I still say

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the wheels have gotta come off eventually. Gonsoly can't be

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>this good this long. I just I can't buy it, can't.

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't. Graham ash Ashcraft, Now I screwed it up.

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 2>Watch out the innings.

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Five k's for Ashcraft, you know Ashcraft. Sean Manyah, that's

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a great Tony Danzel. The word is that Ishcrift Craft's

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a great pitcher. Mona Samita Jenetine Edhcrift Sean Mania one

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>earned six innings, eight ks, and Alec Manoa five k's

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>over seven to two thirds, three earned. Travis Darnau two dingers. Yesterday,

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Schwindell hit a home run sort of Jorge Alfaro. It

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.239
<v Speaker 1>was the catchers going yard. Joey Vado, who was our

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>cheap lineup guy of the night last night. Oh look,

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>another home run for Joey Vado. To ask Hernandez, last

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>week's by low candidate starting to show signs of life.

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Two for five with the dinger, Harrison Bader with a

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>home run, Kyle Farmer hit a home run, Connor Joe

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>two for three, and Charlie Blackman.

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 2>All the guys you hire, all the guys you put

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 2>your hopes in yesterday, of course, the Kyle Farmers, the

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 2>Jason Peterson's and the Connor Joe's, everybody that you wanted

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 2>to succeed yesterday. Thank you so much, Jason Connor.

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>The answer is here, by the way, and I believe,

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>if I'm correctly, Jesse was the first one. Reu that's

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the last guy to do it. There you have it.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Lead the National League all right before his arm's falling off,

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>which it is right now. Stat zero's Austin Gomer nine

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>earned runs in five innings, Ian Anderson five earned runs

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and six innings, boy and Anderson not going the right direction.

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Lebator was disappointing. I'll take the l on that one.

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Rogers four earned run, did not get an out

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>last three outings, three losses, two blown saves. Trush is

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the Padres ownership to do here with Taylor Rogers? What

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>do we do?

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Get get more armed, to get all the arms? Yeah,

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean I thought you were I thought you were

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 2>being retorted.

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean they made this move that April. Now

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>we're sitting here and all of a sudden it doesn't

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>look so great. So I guess the question is is

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>this a blip on the radar here these last few outings.

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>This is a mechanical issue. Craig Kimberl just had a

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>mechanical issue. He fixed it. If you're the padres, what

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>do you do here? Do you take him out of

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the role or do you look for more help? What's

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the deal?

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean? The problem is is, like, you know, they

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 2>had Suarez, who was like a you know, a far

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 2>off thought who can throw one hundred but can't throw

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 2>a strike. They just don't have the other arms to

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 2>go to unless, you know, obviously, unless they were to

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 2>start taking all those starting pitchers and put someone back there.

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I think you got to stick through it unless it

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 2>gets too bad. I mean, it's like the Phillies and

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, oh you lost ten and you fire him

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 2>like you're already. I think you got to stick through it.

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 2>He's been phenomenal all season. It's fallen off a little bit.

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>This happens with these relievers, but you can't you don't

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 2>want to kill confidence. Give him a couple days off.

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Put someone else in there. You don't p Peter Johnson

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 2>right now, give someone else a shot, bring him back,

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.959
<v Speaker 2>see if you can get it. And if if this continues,

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 2>then obviously what will they do. What would Peller do?

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Go buy, go trade, go make moves. That's what he'll do.

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Mike Trout oh for six, three K Showyotani won for

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>eight with three k's Joey Gallo won for seven, three

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>k's pet A Lonzo four, three k's Christian Yelich oh

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for four to three k's Christian Yelich hitting a buck

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty over his last seven games and Randiro's arena over five.

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with Yelich. Look, you know, Yelich and Bellinger

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.239
<v Speaker 1>was like the hot discussion in preseason. One of these

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>guys get bounced back. Who's that guy gonna be? I

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>want nothing to do with either one of them. And

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad I got zero share as well, because

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been a hot mess. And I thought there was

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>this little glimmer of hope there when Yellick hit that

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>cycle and he had a good week, when like, okay,

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>he was gonna turn things around. But look, I understand

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Willia Donalds getting hurt didn't help. I understand there's not

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a ton of lineup protection, but geez man, I mean,

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>like this Yelich window, he's because gona be We're gonna

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>look back at Yelich as one of these guys that

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>was like remember that two year window that was awesome.

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like that Chris Farley interview on SNL when you say, remember, hey,

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>when you're in the Beatles. Remember remember You're in the Beatles.

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, that's good, But we're gonna look back at

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 2>that Marlin's team. I do that all the time, where

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 2>it's like, can you believe they had Ozuna, Yellich and

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Stanton at one time and Yelich looks like the worst

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Fernandez we just did. We were just talking with Frank

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Sample from CBS on IL about this exact thing that

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 2>it's so it is this exact thing you're saying Gellich

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 2>and Bellinger because it's so funny because what's ended up

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 2>happening is it's all irrelevant. It doesn't matter at this point,

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 2>there is no winner. Everybody loses, and the bigger part

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 2>of the conversation is these guys are no longer in

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 2>that space where we're like, hey, this is kind of

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 2>a value. Could we get back to this? No, this

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 2>is who they actually are, and that's what we have

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 2>to come to terms with. Bellinger's not good and I

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know if it's a change of scenery or whatever

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 2>it is. He's an eight or nine hitter at best.

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 2>On the Dodgers. She hits two thirty. The best you're

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna get out of Yelich, it looks like is a

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 2>two forty ish hitter who could have better counting stats

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 2>because of the stolen bases and whatnot. But there is

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 2>no more building the upside on these players. We draft

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 2>them because hey, we could get this. It's like, No,

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 2>we have to come to terms with. This is who

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 2>those players are, and if you want to play upside,

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 2>there's probably gonna be one hundred, one hundred and fifty

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>better names come next year than diving into either one

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 2>of those guys.

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>You want to call them, comebine, you want to call

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>them Bellich or Yellinger. What's the Belle.

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:35.479
<v Speaker 2>Bellich?

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>For sure?

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it sounds more like aggressive like Bellich.

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of aggressive, it's time to get a aggressive on

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that prop market. It's time for bet MGM, the King

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of sportsbooks. Bet ten dollars win two hundred no matter

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>what the outcome of the game. When you sign up

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>today using the promo code leading off for bet mgm,

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>download the app or go to betmgm dot com. Bet responsibly,

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and when you do, is that promo code leading off again?

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Ten bucks wins you two hundred thanks to us here

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>at leading off. That's one word leading off. That's the

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>promo code. Go put some money on Sandy al Contra

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.239
<v Speaker 1>for nl Cy Young and Nester Qrtez for al Cy

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Young at eight hundred to one because it's a it's

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a good spot right now or not? Are eight to

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>one plus eight hundred and one give it to me

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>please plus eight hundred. Please See, there you go. I

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>said something stupid. Now someone's gonna Jim caught me, So

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>there you go.

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 2>All right, totally the same thing to totally the same thing.

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber on DraftKings tonight. The strikeout total number is

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. We have him over on Fantasy

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Pros against Baltimore at eight and a half minus one

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty is the juice that looks like a really good

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>investment over on bet MGM. Jose Ramirez total bases one

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half. The juice is minus one o six.

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not bad for a guy of that nature. Also,

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Pete Alonso after a rough night, maybe bouncing back tonight

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>against Anderson, the lefty for the Dodgers, plus one ten,

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>one and a half total bases Welsh anything strike your

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>fancy on the prompt market today?

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, how about that three and oh day yesterday for

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 2>me too? Ian Anderson? Three and a half was my number.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 2>I took that. That was plus money. I think it

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 2>was even or plus money. He hit nine and I

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 2>hit my two total base over, So three and oh yesterday. Friend,

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 2>does I don't know if I love. I haven't dug

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 2>through every single thing. I might tweet out a couple.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't love the options you have this this week.

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 2>And here's part of the problem is there's such big names,

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 2>and the big names are getting tougher. You're not getting

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 2>a whole bunch of advantages on players like Sandy's strikeout

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 2>yesterday was five and a half, that will be six

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 2>and a half next week. There's no way they're gonna

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 2>let you play at anything lower. And that's what's happening

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 2>to the rest of these guys. I do have two

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 2>bigger names. I still like to play Logan Gilbert. Logan

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Gilbert at five and a half strikeouts, it's a little dicey.

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 2>I think he's hit that number five. He's five and

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 2>four essentially on that number. But I like the matchup

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 2>and this one. I really don't play these a whole lot,

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 2>but I think I might hear Shane McClanahan strikeouts is

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 2>a seven and a half. I think I would take

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 2>the under on that. He absolutely can go over. But

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 2>White Sox strike out the fourth least in baseball per game,

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 2>and they're not on any you know. That was something

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I took advantage of with Ian Anderson that the Rockies

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 2>didn't strike out necessarily as much, but they had currently

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.479
<v Speaker 2>been striking out a decent amount. White Sox are kind

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 2>of in that same role in that same period of

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 2>time that I don't know if I love this matchup

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 2>for McClanahan, especially with how patient they are and hitting

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 2>eight strikeouts. So I actually think I might hit the

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 2>under on that. And I think it's juice though at

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 2>one forty, so maybe I put two together. There's a

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 2>couple of total base ones out there, but I'm not

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 2>in love like I was yesterday, but those are two that.

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I kind of did. All right, let's look to the

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>slates tonight and looking ahead over on DraftKings for TFS.

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber at nine point eight, good investment, Merrill Kelly

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Rural Merle six point eight, super cheap as a secondary arm.

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Cole is going to be the chalk tonight, and

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that's fine at ten point nine. Uh shame m Klina

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>at nine point six. My only problem with McClanahan tonight

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>also is without Wonder Franco in that lineup, I just

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>have very little faith. I know it's Velaskiez they're going against,

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and I should have more faith, but still it's just

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I worry about the win. I worry about them scoring

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>runs like he get brilliant and get a no decision,

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and that I'm staying away from tonight. He's six point five.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>He's super cheap too.

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 2>And I just want to point out like he is nasty.

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 2>I think from a Dynasty perspective, it's number one pitcher.

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>This is the guy that you go with. It's just

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 2>white Sox. They can run counts, they can run his

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 2>pitch count up. There's not a lot of offensive support.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I kind of agree with you, like, I'm not sure

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 2>that like the wins are going to be there for

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 2>a time, but I hate this offense without Wander Franco

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 2>right now, and mcclan don't like.

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, if you want to be a little

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>different tonight, you can go with Logan Gilbert and Chris

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Bassett together and kind of fade the top guys. Eight

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>point six for Gilbert, eight point one for Bassett. Musgrove

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and Burns are going against each other, so you're gonna

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have to pick a side here now. If I'm gonna

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>pick a side, I'm gonna pick the mus Grove side.

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But once again, both these sides have problems, and I

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>think if you're gonna spend up, you might as well

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>just go all the way to the top and try

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to get Garrett Cole because the path to the win

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is just much clearer there for him because Burns right now,

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the offense of the Brewers isn't great, and we just

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about the Padres blowing saves. So again, these guys

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>could both be awesome at the end of the day

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>not get the w and that could cost you. On

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel Garrett Cole at ten point eight he's cheaper than

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Jane McClanahan. I would take it safer, pass to the win,

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Musgrove and Burn, same thing. You could pick a side.

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>The nice thing is that, like all these big pictures

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>tonight on FanDuel are all pretty much in that same range.

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>So you could just make a good lineup that you

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>like offensively and then look around for some of the

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>pictures and switch around. You know, hopefully if you're gonna

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>play multi entry tonight and tonight it's a good night.

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 2>To do it.

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>In tournaments, just one of those lineups hopefully will really

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>come through. The good names tonight. In terms of BVP

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at, Honestly, there's not a whole lot, but

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the one guy that kind of sticks out to me

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is Caesar Hernandez, who has been very quietly good at

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the top of that Nationals lineup, and it's not a

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>good lineup. Nelson Cruz also has good numbers against minor

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>so keep that in mind. Tonight, home run call Welsh,

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually forgot to put mine in there. This morning

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>when I was doing all the show sheets, I remembered finally,

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>oh wait, I forgot to put my guy in. I'm

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>going with Aaron Judge for the weekend against the Tigers.

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take the fish in the barrel because

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to be on that board we come back

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>here on Monday. I want to see that name of

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Joey p Up on that board. Welsh, who's your home

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>run call for the weekend Friday, Saturday and Sunday. I

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>like it?

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's the play, my friend. That's a smart thing

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 2>to do here. My home run call. I'm going to

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 2>go with Vladdie Junior to get it going some good

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 2>over numbers two on the Minnesota and Blue Jays, just

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 2>like even today's line is like nine and a half

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 2>right now, and I'm going to be looking for him

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 2>to pick it back up, get me a couple homers

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 2>and get me back into this race a little bit.

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>So Laddie Junior Friday through Sunday for wah, Hey, I.

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Got Matt Olson going. You should get Lattie going. Let's go,

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody gets going. Mike Mayer, the Thief of Joy is

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna take Bryce Harper. So he expected an immediate response

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>from Joe Girardi's firing of now I'm free and running

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in a meadow. We'll see what other shoes are gonna

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>drop here over the weekend. Certainly, the injuries are starting

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to pile up a wee bit. It's been a little frustrating.

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Grayson Rodriguez did indeed get the lat strain diagnosis yesterday.

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Not fun.

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I assume in the month of June we are going

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to get some team to make a move off for

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a picture. I don't know who's gonna blink first, but

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like somebody's gonna be aggressive on that market

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>sooner than later. Castillo, montass Perez, one of these guys

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is gonna get moved. Also Welsh. Anything you're looking for

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this weekend to keep an eye on for everybody, you know.

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 2>One guy I would take a look at if he

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 2>got back out on the wire just throwing it out

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 2>there is being a lookout for cj Abrams if you

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 2>want to look at the prospect market. C j Abrams

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>has been absolutely dominating. Triple A made one of the

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 2>most insane plays. Go back and just do a type

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter where I mean it was Jeter esque but better.

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean just one handing in the outfield from shortstop

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 2>and throwing it to first Great Defensively, he's been playing

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 2>center and short, he's been hitting like crazy, and I

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 2>think that offense could use a little boost here coming soon,

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know, I think I would be premptively

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 2>getting CJ. Abrams back as I think a call should

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 2>be coming here pretty soon for the padres.

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>There you go, all right, that'll do it for us. Reminder,

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.239
<v Speaker 1>make sure you use that promo code leading off when

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you go to bet MGM, the Keg of sportsbooks. And

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>also don't forget to subscribe to our YouTube channel, Fantasy

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Pros MLB, because we just dropped the latest Waiver Wire

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>ad article. The by low Sell High videos have come out.

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>The Waiver Wire video is out. Everything's out for you

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and your consumption. So go check it out and be

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a peanut or a crackerjack or both and join our

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>little club here. We love having all of you. I

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>love all you guys. Have a great weekend, enjoy some

0:32:58.080 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>nice weather. It looks like, at least in Jersey, we're

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna had some nice weather finally after rained all morning.

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And we hope you guys come back again Monday and

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>join us again because we're here every single Monday through Friday,

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>live neon Eastern right here on Fantasy pros MLB. That'll

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>do it for us, but the story of the game

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>goes on for the Welsh. I'm Joey P. We'll see

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you next time, kids, Bye bye.