WEBVTT - Smart Talks with IBM: Combatting Hiring Bias: Recruiting a Diverse Workforce with Intelligent Automation

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey everyone, it's Robert and Joe here. Today we've got

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>something a little bit different to share with you. It

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is a new edition of the Smart Talks podcast series,

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.319
<v Speaker 1>which is produced in partnership with IBM. This season of

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM is all about new creators, the developers,

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>data scientists, c t o s, and other visionaries creatively

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>applying technology and business to drive change. They use their

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>knowledge and creativity to develop better ways of working, no

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>matter the industry. Join hosts from your favorite Pushkin Industries

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast as they use their expertise to deepen these conversations.

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Gladwell will guide you through this season as your

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>host to provide his thoughts and analysis along the way.

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Look out for new episodes of Smart Talks with IBM

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>every month on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. And learn more at

0:00:55.520 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>IBM dot com slash smart Talks. Hello, Hello, Welcome to

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM, a podcast from Pushkin Industries, I

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio and IBM. I'm Malcolm Gladwell. This season we're

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:17.199
<v Speaker 1>talking to new creators, the developers, data scientists, ct os,

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and other visionaries who are creatively applying technology in business

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to drive change. Channeling their knowledge and expertise, they're developing

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>more creative and effective solutions, no matter the industry. Our

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Angela Hood, founder and CEO of This

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Way Global. Angela's mission is to eliminate discrimination in the

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>hiring process. Angela is a serial entrepreneur who saw the

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>potential to use automation technology as a way to combat

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the human biases that lead to unfair hiring practices and

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a less diverse, less competitive workforce. On today's show, you'll

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>hear how automation makes it easier than ever to connect

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses with the right candidates, why automation is such a

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>powerful tool to mitigate bias, and how Angela's own experiences

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>with discriminatory hiring inspired her to take action. Angela spoke

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>with Jacob Goldstein, host of the pushkin podcast What's Your

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Problem and former host of nprs Planet Money. Jacob has

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>been a business journalist for over a decade, reporting for NPR,

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street Journal, the Miami Herald, and is the

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>author of the book Money, The True Story of a

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 1>Made Up Thing. Okay, let's get to the interview. Can

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you tell me just you know we're gonna get into

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it a lot, but very briefly, what is this way global?

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So our technology is built specifically to match all people

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to all jobs without bias. And the last part is

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the hardest part and also the most important. And where

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>did the idea for the company come from? So I'm

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>a female engineer, and um, you know, I'm going out

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>into the workforce after graduating, and I think that just

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like everyone else, I can just put my name up

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>at the top of my resume and submit this to

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>companies and they'll know entertain me for an interview. And

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>what I found was because of the type of engineering

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>role I was looking for, which is in the construction industry,

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that was not the case. The recruiters and also the

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 1>hiring managers at these companies would see my name and think, well,

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that we want a woman, or we

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think that she really understands the job because it's

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>out in the field. And so a mentor of mine said,

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>why don't you use your initials, which are conveniently a L.

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I would submit my resume as a L

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>hood and people thought I was a man. And so

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>then at the same company, for the same job, I

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>would get interviews, and that was the first moment where

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I realized there was a lot of bias in the market.

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Turns out that there's a lot more biases, and we

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>work to correct for all of them. It's funny that

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of story shouldn't be shocking, right, Like I know

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that I shouldn't be shocked by it, and yet I

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>still kind of am. So clearly there's a tremendous amount

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of bias in the world, and bias in recruiting. And

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're familiar with these kind of stories of

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>human bias, but but now there's this new problem, right,

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>which is algorithmic bias. What is that tell me about

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>algorithmic bias? A lot of algorithms are underpinned by machine learning,

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and machine learning very simply can happen kind of two

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>different ways. You study what has happened in the past,

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and you try to duplicate that faster and more efficiently,

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and so that in this context would be called supervised learning.

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And that seemed like the logical place for nearly every

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>recruiting technology to start the problem with that is that

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>there's been so much historical bias that all you would

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>really be doing is capturing that company or that hiring

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>manager recruiters bias and duplicating it really fast, very efficiently,

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So you would just be expanding bias much much faster

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>than a human could. The flip side is something that's

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>called unsupervised. So this is where you build a system

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>essentially a black box. It's doing all types of calculations

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and decisions internally, and then it's not biased in theory,

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>but you have no idea what it's basing its opinions on,

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>so it can kind of create bizarre results. Also, it's

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not explainable, and so then you get caught in this

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>catch twenty two of I don't want to do bias

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>at scale, but I need to be explainable. So what

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>do you do? After thirteen failures, we finally figured out

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>a way to do this. The methodology that we finally

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>found that generated the results that runbiased was not ever

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>allowing the math model or the computer to see the

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>information that causes bias. So we had to not let

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>gender enter into the system, ethnicity couldnot enter into the system,

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>things like that, and so then the logical question is, okay, well,

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>so if you don't allow those pieces of information to

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>come in. How can you then enable qualified people that

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>are also diverse to surface without bias? And the answer is,

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>when you remove these factors, it happens naturally. And we

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>learned this by testing. We've had fifteen and a half

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>trillion matching events go through our system and almost it's

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>been now almost a decade, and through this we've learned

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot people are very diverse. If you will just

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>remove your own bias, you'll start seeing them. So it's

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a it's an automated version of what you as an

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>individual did, uh before you started the company, when you

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>switch from putting your full name on your applications to

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>just your initials, effectively hiding your gender. Yeah, it started

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>with that. What we also learned though, is even if

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you conceal your name, there are words where maybe someone

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is a waitress in a previous job, and so then

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the persons like, oh, that's a female, right, So then

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we had to go one step further. We had to say,

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>now we have to neutralize these gender specific words inside

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>resume so that a person cannot look at the document

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and still sus out ethnicity, gender and other biasing attributes.

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>It's remarkable that after hiding prejudicial information from the computer,

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>like a candidate's gender or ethnicity. A qualified, diverse workforce

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>assembled naturally as a result for the overburdened recruiter. That

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>means there are huge advantages to using intelligent automation. That's

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a win win. As the conversation continues, Angela explains how

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>IBMS technology enabled her to simplify her customers hiring processes,

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and she also shed some light on how far intelligent

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>automation has come in the past few years. How does

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>intelligent automation look different today than it did, say, five

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:39.719
<v Speaker 1>years ago, it actually works as the first thing. The

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:45.359
<v Speaker 1>The level of innovation that has taken place is absolutely incredible.

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 1>And here's the thing about it is people have had

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>some negative interactions with things that said that they were automated,

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 1>and they're now they're like, I don't want to use it.

0:08:55.720 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>The level of innovation that has happened is absolutely incredible,

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and for them to not try something because they tried

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>something a decade ago and it didn't work, that's just

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>completely the wrong approach. We're going to see massive innovation

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>over the next five to ten years too, and you

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want to miss that. You don't want to say,

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>oh I said on the sidelines because I had a

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>bad experience a decade ago. So I think, if you know,

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're anywhere involved in technology or business growth, you

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>need to be part of this. This is your economy

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in play a role. So what is a digital employee? Right?

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So our partnership with IBM, Watson Orchestrate is around the

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>dig So D I, G. E. Y is a diggy

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>who's a digital employee. And I always think of it honestly,

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is more of a concierge. You can have all of

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>your job descriptions living inside a box, for instance, and

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>so there's all the job descriptions and you're like, oh,

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I need to find someone for this job. Watson goes

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>into box, grabs the job description, and then sends that

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>into this way system and this way automatically surfaces up

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to three hundred qualified people from diverse organizations. Right, So

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>now the recruiter has not had to figure out where

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>are they going to source these people from. They haven't

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>had to sort out how they're going to reach out

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to diverse organizations because we have partners and so now

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that part has been taken care of, and then Watson

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Organistrate does the next step, which is sends out communication

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to the candidates that you are interested in automatically, and

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>then you get to sit and wait for these people

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to respond back to you of their interest in discussing

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>something with you. Now all of this has been automated,

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and essentially what I just described could easily take a

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>person in three weeks to go and identify all the talent.

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>So you take three weeks and you put this down

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to roughly three or four minutes. Now it's absolutely incredible,

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think it gives recruiters the time to do

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>what they really want to do, which is talked to people.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>How did you decide that automation was the right tool

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to fight bias? That was a journey, as I think

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of entrepreneurship is an innovation. When we hire technology,

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we're hiring technology to do a job for us. So

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>what is the job to be done here? It is

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to identify qualified talent without bias. So when you start

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>breaking this down, you realize that if humans could do it,

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we would have already done it. There's been a desire

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 1>to have this happen for many, many years, and we

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>were not successful at it. And the reason why is

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Bias is not discrimination. These things get confused all the time.

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Bias is a product of our survival mechanism. We are

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>always going to survive as humans, and so we we

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>need these survival skills. That's part of bias. So we're

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to get rid of it. And it's not

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a character flaw. Bias is just inherently human and we

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>are human. And the best purpose that I think technology

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 1>can serve is the fact that it can do some

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>things that we can't do. We have to be very

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>careful about how we engineer it. Our own technology was

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>engineered with removing bias is the priority. But we can

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>really have technology make us better humans because it can

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>do things we can't do. Despite the potential to vastly

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>improve the way we hire, most companies still think automation

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>is inaccessible, perhaps a luxury to aspire to in the future,

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>but we live in a time when companies are hungrier

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>than ever to fill positions quickly. Jacob asked Angela what

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>automation can deliver for businesses today and how a company's

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>creativity is linked with its diversity. How prevalent is intelligent

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>automation in talent acquisition workflows today? So our data says

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that in enterprise that roughly seven percent have adopted some

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>level of truly automated technology. But when you look at

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the job market in toll like, you know, if you

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the millions of employers we have, it's you know,

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>less than three percent have adopted automation. These are companies

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that have a smaller workforce to do a great amount

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of work. They're recovering from a pandemic, they need help,

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and they think that automation is expensive, and it's actually

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.599
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. It's not expensive at all. And so I

0:13:55.800 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>would encourage businesses that are mid market and small businesses

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to embrace technology in a way that they haven't done. So,

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's one more piece of sort of what's

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>going on now that seems really interesting in the context

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of what you do, and that is the incredible demand

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>for workers right now. Right there's I don't know, ten

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>million plus job openings, there's the great resignation, and so

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how automation is helping both companies and workers

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>through this process. Now, there's never been a job market

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>like we are living in right now, and so we

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>have to think of as employers. We have to think

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of how do I attract this talent. The other thing

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>about the volume of jobs that are open is, if

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you just do the simple math, there's two jobs for

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone person looking for a job. Okay, so that is

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>astounding to begin with. But of the jobs that we

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>have available in the market, most people do not have

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the skill set required to fill those jobs. Inside the

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>talent pool that is actively looking for a job. So

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>now you have to go out and you need to

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>be looking for passive talent. You need to be cultivating

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a relationship with the people that do have the skills

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you need. When you go to them, you need to

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to say two things. You need to be

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>able to say, we use the best technology to identify

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you because you were special, and we really want you

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to come to work for us. That's number one. Two

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you need to say. And when you get here, we're

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>going to help you automate those parts of your job

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that you've never really enjoyed before, because we want you

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to be able to dig in in the areas you're

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>passionate about, because you're going to be happier and you're

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>going to have a better work life balance. That is

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>how you win talent in this market. Yeah, what have

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you heard back from recruiters about about this? You know,

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>increased integration of technology. So one of the things that

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I think has been maybe the most prizing is that

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really opened up the communication between hiring managers and

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>recruiters inside the same company. And there has long been

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a silo of hiring managers putting out job descriptions and

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>saying recruiters, you know, go find people that make this,

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the recruiter needs additional support because they're getting

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>questions from the candidates or there's some questions around what

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>are the real job specific requirements and they have trouble

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>getting those answers from the hiring manager. Hire managers very

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>busy and they have their own job to do. So

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>by making this more efficient, you start getting much better

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>interactions between the entire company. And in this current market,

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>companies are truly desperate to find the talent that they need.

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>The people want to be found, and now the technology

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is there to help make this seamless. So that's the

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>automation piece. Let's talk about the day city piece sort

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>of you know, landing here right. So on the diversity side,

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>how does how does a diverse workforce help make a

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>business more creative. A lot of the big consulting firms

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>have dug in for the last decade and said, is

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>there really an R o I around diversity, And uniformly

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the answer has been yes. There is increased profits, a

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>more consistent workforce, meaning people don't want to leave. There's

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>not the same level of attrition when the workforce is

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>more diverse, and better recruiting numbers. So all of that

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is like the outcome. But I think the key thing

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to understand is the why behind this. The why is

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that when you're diverse, you come to solutions, and you

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>come to questions and challenges from a different perspective. And

0:17:55.640 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>when you have a diverse workforce that is collaborating and

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>bringing their creativity to the market and you are using

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>their insight to develop better solutions, You're going to create

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>better solutions. You're gonna going to get those solutions to

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>market faster. You're going to understand positioning of your value

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>proposition inside the market. All of these things happened with

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:24.959
<v Speaker 1>far more clarity when you have a diverse workforce. You

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier that you failed was it thirteen times? And

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious if sort of getting through those failures and

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>working your way to success was a place where you

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>did some creative problem solving. I would say that would

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>be an understatement at moments. Uh, there are times where

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just say, like thirteen failures kind of

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in passing. But there were times where I felt like

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>I was close to breaking as an innovator. And the

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>fact that was like, there's just non solution for this,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that our team failures is incredibly gut wrening. But I

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>was fortunate I had very supportive investors and so we

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>got through it. Uh, And I'm very proud of the

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 1>company we are today because of those failures. So just

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>to to wrap up, let's let's talk a little bit

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>about the future. We've done the past, we've done the present.

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about the future. I mean,

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>how do you think the hiring process will look in

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the future, whatever, five years, ten years, And in particular,

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>what role will will automation, intelligent automation, augmented intelligence, what

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>role will will all that play? Well, if you look

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>back in decades ago, there were people that would work

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>for the same company for ten twenty years, and that was,

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, not that unusual. Now, very uncommon, and in

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the future, I think it will be absolutely rare. I

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think we're looking more likely at people that will work

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>for multiple companies. We're seeing that with the rise of

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the economy, we obviously are seeing people love to work remote.

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I know when we have an active job that goes

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>out into our marketplace, and if it is remote and

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>also prioritize diversity, you will have twenty to thirty times

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>more applicants. So I think that we're going to start

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing companies really investing in those two attributes, trying to

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>keep as many jobs remote as possible, just because it

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>attracts talent that companies are really struggling to find right now.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think the level of automation is going to

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to increase, that will continue to increase an investment

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>over the next five to ten years. In twenty years,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we will all look back and say, why

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>did we all do these crazy parts of our job?

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't we automate those It's because we were waiting

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>for technology like Orchestrate provides. Do you have any specific

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>advice for businesses that want to incorporate technology and automation

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in their in their business and their work. I would say,

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>realize that you use automation every day. You use AI

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>every day, So when you're using Google Maps or something

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>like that, you're you're using your smartphone, you're accessing this

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of technology as a consumer, as an individual, There's

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 1>no reason why you should worry about adopting it as

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a business, and don't feel intimidated by it. You are

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ready to use it and your business is ready

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to benefit from it. Just don't have that fear. We

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly is a company work with companies of all sizes.

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>We have companies that have five to tend employees only,

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>and we have some that have hundreds of thousands employees.

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the great thing about automation is it doesn't care

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the size of your company. It will work for you.

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Angela's fun to talk to you. Thank you for your time,

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>congratulations and making it through to thirty And if you

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>really think about that, that's a It's a really impressive

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>level of persistence. Like I could imagine failing a few times,

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>but I would have given up at nine or something.

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>It's seven. At seven, I was like, I'm a crazy person.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It is vitally important to get hiring right. What could

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>be more essential to an organization's success than deciding which

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>human beings make up that organization. If we let our

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>biases go unchecked, we end up excluding qualified candidates, leaving

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>our workforce is less diverse and therefore less competitive because

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. Angela made an interesting point earlier that I

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to. She said that bias is

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not a character flaw, it's a survival instinct, and that

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the best purpose technology can serve is to make us

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>better humans by doing things for us that we can't.

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Bias is in human nature and we'll never truly get

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>rid of it, but the first step to minimizing its

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>impact is to acknowledge it's a problem we need help with.

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Intelligent automation can make hiring more efficient. When we allow

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>computers to mitigate our biases, better hiring is the result.

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes to build the best team possible, we have to

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>know when to listen to our human instincts and when

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>to set them aside. On the next episode of Smart

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Talks with IBM, how to use data creatively in order

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to solve novel problems, we talk with YouTube content creator

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and IBM's senior Data science and AI technical specialist Nicholas

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Renaud smart Talks with IBM is produced by Matt Romano,

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>David jaw, Royston Deserve and Edith Russelo with Jacob Goldstein.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Were edited by Sophie crane Are. Engineers are Jason Gambrel,

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Brugare and Ben Holliday. Theme song by Granmasco. Special

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Carli Migliori, Andy Kelly, Kathy Callaghan and the

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Eight Bar and IBM teams, as well as the Pushkin

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>marketing team. Smart Talks with IBM is a production of

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries and i Heeart Media. To find more Pushkin podcasts,

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>listen on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to podcasts. I'm Malcolm Gladwell. This is

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a paid advertisement from IBM.