WEBVTT -  Bitcoin Hits $100,000 

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Easter on Apple, card Playing and

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 2>Broyd Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Malex del alongside Paul Sweeney.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 3>We bring you all the top news and business, economics

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 3>and finance. There are a lens of Bloomberg Intelligence folks.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 3>They cover two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 3>industries all around the world. So, in case you didn't know,

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 3>bitcoins now up over one hundred thousand dollars. This comes

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 3>a day after President Trump picked a pro crypto pick

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 3>for the SEC.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 4>That was a hard thing to say. Pro pro crypto pick. Yeah,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 4>try to be that fast. More so than Gary Gensler,

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 4>I guess much more so. This is Paul Atkins.

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Apparently he is a crypto proponent, but also very much

0:00:58.040 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 3>in favor of.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Less regulation et cetera. Broadly, Yes, I'm.

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 5>In an upgrade on the Newark closing. Oh okay, okay,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 5>just real quick, the FAA says Newark Airport closed to

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 5>general aviation aircraft, so not commercial, not the big jets,

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 5>the smaller planes. That's the rinking planes that I flowed.

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 6>That's what That's why we have titoborough going too there

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 6>for their ranking, the smaller private craft.

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 4>Right, Okay, Okay, well I'm glad. I'm gonna be sure.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 6>About to find them Marshtown.

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 3>So we bring you weather updates and air updates as

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>well as talking to our Bloomberg Intelligence guys, and for

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 3>that we have go to Michael mcgloan. He is Bloomberg

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence senior commodity strategist and he's in Florida, so he

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have any win weather issues right now. All right, Mike,

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 3>I know a lot of hayes being made about one

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand dollars, does it?

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Do we need to retrace here though at some point.

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 7>That seems a bit elusive at the moment, Alex, it's

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 7>it's it's fouled the money. It's been since this year started,

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 7>about thirty two billion dollars of ETF inflows. Since President

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 7>Trump was elected, about eight billion dollars of ETF inflows.

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 7>And to put that in context, there's been on the

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 7>year about almost six billion dollars of outflows in gold

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 7>ETF Now they've picked up recently, but yeah, so me

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 7>to me, that's from a commander standpoint, this is what's happening,

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 7>I think is one hundred thousand. It's pretty good resistance.

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 7>It's a milestone. I think it really brings into the forefront.

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 7>But it's also showing the major paradigm shift. Of holding

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 7>gold without bitcoin in that space is just for miss.

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 7>You have to have some bitcoin in there or your

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 7>miss risk of missing out. So to the key thing

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 7>I've been watching today is the ounces of gold per

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 7>one bitcoin may a new high up to thirty nine.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 8>Right now it's about thirty eight.

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 7>And questions what stops that trajectory from going higher?

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 6>Mike, give us a sense of how you think it

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 6>might be reasonable to try to value a commodity or

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 6>a currency like bitcoin. Do I look at a relative

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 6>to I don't know, pork bellies or gold?

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Laughing at you right now, yeah what do I do?

0:02:58.560 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 9>Paul?

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 7>I enjoyed the question bit snickering because it's like, right now,

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 7>it's animal spirits.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 2>It's it's the way I always look at.

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 7>Commandis supplying demand. Now that's one thing about bitcoin has

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 7>definable diminishing supply. Basically on the mount you can only

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 7>mine a day is four hundred and fifty bitcoins, and

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 7>that's going to cut and be cut in half in

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty eight. And it's just the way it's set up.

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 7>And there's increasing demand and adoption, so price must go

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 7>all over time, and it's just going to have these nuances.

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 7>But right now it's about the major shift in this

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 7>country from being really pushing against cryptos, as we saw

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 7>with Gary Gensler, now shifting over to a whole government

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 7>that's so much positive cryptos, and you see things like

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 7>the potential for us to be in the USA if

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 7>you actually sell gold and buy bitcoin, which I think

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 7>is a bit wild, but that was a bloomberg story

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 7>that really hit this tape. The tape this weekend. So

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 7>and then quotes from Chairman Powell pointing out that it's

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 7>digital gold, and even from President Putin, there's nothing that

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 7>can really stop it.

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 8>It's it's the animal.

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 7>Spirits right now. But it's the key thing I'm worried

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 7>about is now that we have it into the mainstream

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 7>and all the ETF people are buying and adding to

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 7>the portfolio. We still haven't seen the big test of

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 7>how bitcoin responds after President and Trump has been elected,

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 7>when the stock market goes down, and you know at

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 7>some point it will, and it hasn't been through that

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 7>so right now, I think what you're seeing is a

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:20.559
<v Speaker 7>lot of people are adding it so that they're getting

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 7>off zero, but it's still a highly speculus digital asset

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 7>basically trains about three times voltuli of the S and

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 7>P five hundred and goal.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 4>Oh wow, I.

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Did not know that stat when we when we had

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 3>the optimism from Paul Atkins now being the nominee.

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 4>For SEC, What regulation what?

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 3>What do you think the crypto guys were so pumped

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.799
<v Speaker 3>about and that it was him versus a Gary Gens

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 3>or like what kind of regulation there needs to be

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 3>rolled back or needs to happen?

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 4>In general, I.

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 7>Think it's the the stop of the pushback. There was

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 7>significant pushback. Let look how I mean the crypto people

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 7>had to go to court to get ETF's launched and

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 7>these things have been in it works for a decade.

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 7>It was just kind of silly. I mean, those of

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 7>us who trade commodity ETFs so forever, so they're very

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 7>much more risky than a bitcoining death. So it was

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 7>just silly. Some of the extreme relation that pushed against it.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 7>In the bottom line that always really kind of flummecks

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 7>me was this space adopted the dollar as its space layer.

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 7>And that's one thing I always say, well, if you're

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 7>an American, why would you push back on that? And

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 7>I think that's what's happened. We've had no Zeldt like

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 7>a convert, mister Trump shifting over to being much more

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 7>of a convert. And the key thing I like to

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 7>point out is today, you know, we're all talking about bitcoin,

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 7>but if you look at the trading volume and crypto's

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 7>tether the dollar, the dollar token is trading almost three

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 7>times the volume of bitcoin, and it's market cap is

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 7>about one hundred and thirty billion. I remember first talking

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 7>about in twenty eighteen. There's only two billion. It's just

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 7>the technology is overwhelming, and it's really favorable for the

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 7>US and for the dollar.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 6>All right, Mike, always good stuff chatting with you. Mike mcglowan,

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 6>Senior commodity strategist. We'll talk port bellies next time.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 8>He's there.

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 6>With Bloomberg Intelligence based down in Miami, I went to

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 6>talking about oil because I'm watching the TV series Land Now.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 4>It's all the oil and history.

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 6>How is it awesome? And I'm learning all about the

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 6>oil and gas business.

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.559
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, card Play and

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 3>The top TiO political news of the last twenty four

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 3>hours is what's happening over in France. We are still

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 3>looking for President Emmanuel Macron to speak later on this afternoon.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 3>We're all waiting to see who he'll nominate as his

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 3>next our premiere. They're facing a political crisis over in France,

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 3>if you remember, the government lost a no confidence vote

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 3>in parliament. In an exclusive interview at Bloomberg's, Francine Lachwa

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Marine La Penn, leader of the National Rally the far Right,

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 3>discussed whether President Emmanuel Macross should resign. She said it

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 3>was a personal decision. Led di Mission in Prison Live.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 9>What I said was that the president's resignation is a

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 9>personal decision for him and can only take in my view,

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 9>when a political crisis happens or an institutional crisis, can

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 9>no longer have any other solution than the resignation of

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 9>the President of the Republic. What I do wish, on

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 9>the other hand, because for sure there will be new

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 9>legislative elections in the next few months, is that we

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 9>work on a voting system by then that enables us

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 9>to have a real majority, whatever that majority may be.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 9>But the country needs a majority. It can't live for

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 9>months and the years with three blocks, which in reality

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 9>can't implement a policy.

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.239
<v Speaker 6>That was marine A lepen, a, leader of the National

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 6>Rally Party of France along with Bloomberg's front Sine Lacroix.

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 6>Let's got the latest reporting from the French political situation.

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 6>Phil Serafino joints a senior markets editor for Bloomberg News.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 6>He is in France, Phil, can you give us the

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 6>latest reporting? What are the next steps here for French politics?

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 8>Well, as you mentioned, Macron is speaking on French TV

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 8>tonight Paris time, and the expectation is that, you know,

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 8>by rights, he should be naming a new prime minister

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 8>because because it's not good to have a caretaker government.

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 8>The other existing Prime minister, Michelle Barnier handled in his

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 8>resignation today after the no confidence vote. It's not clear

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 8>though that in fact he will have a name ready

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 8>to go tonight. It took him a couple of months

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 8>over the summer to come up with the name of

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 8>Michelle Barnier because he's trying to deal with a very

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 8>divided parliament, as you mentioned. So he's speaking tonight. Whether

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 8>he will have the name of a prime minister, we

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 8>do not know yet, but that's the thing people are

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 8>waiting for. Can he find someone who can bridge the

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 8>political divide in parliament?

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 3>So when Marie Lampenn comes out and says, I don't

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 3>think you should resign, it's up to him, And then

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Matcross says he has no intention of stepping down.

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Are people asking him to do that?

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Is that now in the zeitgeist?

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there has been much talk of that. It's been

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 8>kicking around for a few months since his party lost

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 8>badly in the European elections and then in the following

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 8>French parliamentary elections. That has been kicking around and he's

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 8>said he's not going to do that. His term runs

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 8>through twenty twenty seven. You get two five your terms

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 8>in France, he wants to serve out his second term,

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 8>so and it seems like a little bit of an

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 8>olive branch on her part to say she's not pushing

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 8>for that now there's still remains, there's there's a very

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 8>difficult situation politically to get a budget passed and get

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 8>it through parliament.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see.

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 6>Boy, I'm not sure i'd want to be prime minister

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 6>there because as I understand the kidding, as I understand,

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 6>it's almost like a no win situation here with the

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 6>right and the left seemingly having some level of you know,

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 6>being united here. Is there any room to govern here?

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 8>Well, it seems like it's a very difficult needle to

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 8>thread because the far right and the far left, you know,

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 8>both have demands that Macron does not want to meet.

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 8>He particularly does not want to deal with the far

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 8>left party, which sort of dominates this three party coalition

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 8>of left wing of left wing parties. So he's trying

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 8>to come up with a sort of centrist approach to

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 8>the budget. But they just tried that. They came up

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 8>with what they thought was a compromise and it got rejected.

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 8>So hard to see I mean, the math doesn't change

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 8>in parliament just because the prime minister has stepped down.

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 8>He still needs to come up with the budget that

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 8>he can get a majority vote for, and unclear how

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 8>that's going to happen.

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so on that here in the US, if you

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 3>can't approve a budget or an extension, the government shuts down.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 3>What happens in France.

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 8>I think they can do sort of an emergency budget.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 8>The problem is there are EU rules on the budget

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 8>deficit and France has far exceeded those, and France has

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:35.439
<v Speaker 8>made pledges to the European Union that they will get

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 8>that deficit under control with an emergency budget. I don't

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 8>know that that does what they need to do as

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 8>far as cutting spending and possibly raising taxes, And that's

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 8>the sticking point. You know that the budget needs to

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 8>cut spending and raise taxes. They're going to raise taxes

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 8>on companies and the wealthy. Marie Lapenn today was saying,

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 8>we're not going to do We're not going to go

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 8>as far as you want it to go. We'll let

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 8>the budget deficit run a little a little wider than

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 8>we otherwise would. So I think in short term they

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 8>can sort of paper things over. It's the medium term

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.359
<v Speaker 8>and the long term where they have a real problem.

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 6>All right, Phil, thank you so much for joining us.

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 6>Really appreciate it. Phil Sarafino, Senior market seditor for Bloomberg News.

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 6>He is located in our Paris bureau.

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Here.

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 6>Again, we'll hear from French President Macron at two pm

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 6>Wall Street time eight pm Paris local time, and we'll

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 6>see what he has to say about this government. Well,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 6>will he have a new prime minister to offer.

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 4>I think it was.

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 3>Carolyn Kannan yesterday who was talking to us about the

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 3>fact that Marie La Penn doesn't actually want to be

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 3>seen as an agent of chaos, like.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 4>That's not part of her goal.

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 3>So that is also quite interesting in terms of how

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 3>they will negotiate who will become the next premiere at

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day. I've also read some articles

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 3>that look, Macross should give an Olive brand.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 4>To say the right, etc. More than centrist right. So

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 4>it's gonna it's gonna be really quite complicated.

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Playing and

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Broyd Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Alex Steel here alongside Paul Sweeney and John Tucker. This

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. We are currently broadcasting to live

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 3>from Interactive Broker Studio right here in Midtown Manhattan.

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Also check us out on YouTube as well.

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 3>So for the markets, we hit the fifty six record

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 3>high of the year. Market's going nowhere fast today. So

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 3>what happens then if we get the Santa Claus Rally?

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 3>What happens after? In twenty twenty five, Carol Pepper, founder

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 3>and CEO at Pepper International, joins us. Now, Carol, that

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 3>was a great survey that came out today that talked

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 3>about our CEO confidence is smashing it. After the election,

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 3>CEOs feel so much more confident about the economy, etc.

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 4>Does this last?

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 3>And is that optimism reflected inequities and should be?

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 10>Yeah?

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they're confident for good reasons.

0:12:58.240 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 10>I think first of all, the fact that we have

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 10>peaceful election and there's not going to be any other

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 10>problems in January is making everybody very happy.

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>The new team is organizing, getting itself together.

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 10>There are checks and balances with the minority Democrats and

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 10>some of the other Republicans. So the political situation here

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 10>has become very calm.

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>That makes people very happy. There's also a commitment to

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>keeping regulation.

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 10>Low, not adding additional burdens on companies, so CEOs are

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 10>justified being happy. And on top of that, the economy

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 10>is humming along, inflation is under control. If you were

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 10>a CEO, what more could you ask for other than

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 10>a big bonus at Christmas, which a lot of them

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 10>are because they had a great year this year.

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 6>So what are some of the areas when you talk

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 6>to your clients, your private clients here, what are some

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 6>of the themes that you're bringing to bear on twenty

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 6>twenty five.

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Well, as you know, I run money for family

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 10>offices with over one hundred million dollars and basically we

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 10>look for long term try friends that will continue to

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 10>do well over the whole year and even twenty twenty

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 10>six and twenty seven going forward.

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So the big themes are.

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 10>Things like global data centers, continued rise of AI.

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Recovery of real estate.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 10>You know, there's a lot of positive themes here for

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 10>people to look at. So we're looking at things that

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 10>will continue to grow in frankly a risk on environment.

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Of course there will be consolidations.

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 10>Of course there will be down days and corrections, there

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 10>has to be, But it doesn't mean that the.

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Overall trajectory for the year will not be up. And

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the direction that we're going.

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 10>We're going to hire US markets for a whole bunch

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 10>of reasons, and for that reason, the clients are happy.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And they're not looking to pull back on their equity positions.

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 10>If anything, down days are good times to add to

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 10>positions that you know will do well over the long term.

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 3>So the counter to that is that the US makes

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 3>up so much now of the global markets that everyone

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 3>is just so heavily allocated to that also, can we

0:14:59.080 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 3>get all the things?

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Can we get lower.

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Inflation, a good jobs market, continued fed cuts, some kind

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 3>of fiscal stimulus from Washington, and higher equities?

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Is that all reality for us? How do you push

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 4>back against that?

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 10>Well, I don't see any headwinds. Nobody is telegraphing very loudly.

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 10>For example, Powell is not saying I'm stopping cutting. There

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 10>are no big inflation numbers that are zapping people and

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 10>warning the data is supporting that thesis.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now.

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 10>So obviously if the data changes drastically, if suddenly there's

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 10>a run on US workers and suddenly wages are shooting up,

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 10>we will hear about it. It will show up in

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 10>the numbers. So right now, there's not a lot of

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 10>evidence to counter the continued dominance of the US equity.

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Markets for that reason.

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 10>As you know, I work with also a lot of

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 10>non US families, and for them, this is the safe haven.

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 10>Come and put your money into US equities if you

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 10>wanted to grow. It used to also be US real estate,

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 10>but I think right now equities are equally attractive and

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 10>obviously much more liquid than US real estate.

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 6>So let's go to some names. That's your Amazon, what

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 6>are your thoughts there?

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 10>I love Amazon because again this is a company that

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 10>has many, many arms and many ways to make money,

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 10>lots of revenue sources.

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>They'll do well over the holidays.

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 10>There's always a bit of grumbling, you know, will consumers

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 10>shop online? And then every year we see the amount

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 10>of consumers shopping online increasing relative to in person shopping.

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 10>And Amazon's you know, next day delivery is fairly flawless.

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 10>They're also making you know, have the Amazon Web services

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 10>and have huge cloud computing capabilities they're pushing into AI.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 10>So I think Amazon is continuing to be a dominant player.

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And again, the big are going to get bigger. The

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>winners are going to win more. That's the kind of

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>market that we're in right now.

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 10>This is not a market, in my opinion, to bet

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 10>on the underdogs, take the stupid bet, take the momentum bet,

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 10>and bet on the big winners because they're going to

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 10>continue to win and certainly, you know, Amazon and Vidia,

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 10>names like this are going to continue to be the winners,

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 10>certainly for twenty twenty five.

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, and dip because Amazon closed it a record high yesterday,

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 3>so any dip you want to buy them?

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, I mean if you don't have them, I've been

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 10>telling people to buy them for a few years now,

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 10>so hopefully they did. But it's a great Christmas present.

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 10>Rather than buying Disney stock, although it's very nice. Disney

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 10>is a bit of a one trick, Tony. Go ahead

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 10>and buy Amazon for your kids trusts or when you're

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 10>doing your final gifting for the end of this year,

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 10>go ahead and put some Amazon stock in the trust

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 10>for all the kids and the charities, and you'll be

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 10>very glad you did.

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 4>So my daughter will be so excited Christmas morning. Here's

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 4>Amazon stock fairness exactly, so.

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>When she's going to college, trust me, yep, exactly.

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 6>Carol, talk to us real quickly. I know you've been

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 6>consistently bullish on it. In Vidia. What's your thoughts here?

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think that again they're the dominant player. I

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 10>don't think anybody's going to catch them in the near term.

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 10>And so again, think of if you had been smart

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 10>enough to buy Amazon when it.

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Came out, how wealthy you would be today.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 10>So again, buy Nvidia, hold your nose at the price

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 10>and put it away because it's going to be worth

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 10>ten to fifteen twenty one hundred times more five years

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 10>from now.

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>So hold on to that stock. Nvidia continues to be

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the best play out there.

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.959
<v Speaker 10>Of course, others will come along, but it doesn't mean

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 10>they won't continue to be the market leader, and they

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 10>have plenty of cash to keep innovating.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 6>All right, Carol, thank you so much. We appreciate getting

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 6>your thoughts. Carol Pepper, she's a founder and CEO of

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 6>Pepper International, joining us from New York City via the

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 6>zoom thing.

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's get to some oil talk here. You

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 3>got WTI up by two tenths of one percent. Sixty

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 3>eight is where we print the news. Widely expected, by

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the way, as it opec plus is delaying the revival

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 3>of its oil production by about three months. It's the

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 3>third time it's had to defer this move as crude

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 3>prices really struggle. So wanted to get a read on

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 3>that with Ellen Waald, president of Transversal Consulting and senior

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 3>fellow at Atlantic Council.

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Ellen, how unanimous was this? How what was it like

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 4>for them.

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 3>To get to this decision because opep plus is not

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 3>as harmonious as one may think.

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely, it does seem as though this decision was arrived at,

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 11>you know, by consensus.

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 12>It doesn't seem like it was all that controversial.

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Though.

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 11>Remember the meeting was actually supposed to happen last week

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 11>or earlier in the week, so clearly they needed a

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 11>couple more days to get all the ducks in a row,

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.479
<v Speaker 11>get everyone to agree. I would imagine that some of

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 11>the tougher parties to get online might have been the UAE,

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 11>because they're they've been waiting for this baseline quota increased

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 11>for a while, and now they're pushing it off again

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 11>by another three months.

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 12>So you know, that's what That's what I imagine.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 11>Because it was all done virtually, we didn't really get

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 11>a front row seat into, you know, how it all

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 11>happened and what was going on. But it does seem

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 11>like everyone is on board with all of these changes.

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 6>Ellen. I know when we talk, you know, global crude oil,

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 6>we have to have a sense of supply and demand.

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 6>Heary is a commodity, what's the what's the demand model?

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 6>Looking for a lot of folks out there these days.

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 6>I think hence, you know it's sixty eight dollars for

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 6>WTI crude, will I I just deduced it's not that great.

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think that that's probably lower than most OPAQ.

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 12>Members would want right now.

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 11>I think Saudi Arabia is really fine with it. I mean,

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 11>would they all like oil to be higher?

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 7>Sure?

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 12>Of course, they would, but you.

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 11>Know, we're not in like crisis territory at all right now.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 11>I do think that, you know, when we're looking at demand,

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 11>it's a very it's a very sketchy picture. For a while,

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.719
<v Speaker 11>OPEC was having forecasts that we're showing a lot higher demand,

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 11>and that was definitely what was fueling a lot of

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 11>the anticipated return of this.

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 12>Production to the market.

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 11>The OPAQ forecast, OPEX, you know, economic team was showing

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 11>a lot more demand growth that was going to be

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 11>happening in twenty twenty four and twenty twenty five. Then

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 11>I think materialized and I think that they see going forward,

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 11>and so this is definitely a.

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 12>Reflection of modifications in terms of what they think demand's

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 12>going to be.

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 11>I think the long term picture is still pretty strong,

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 11>but right now, you know, we're really not looking at

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 11>major increases in demand.

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Javier blast is a Bloomberg opinion columnist. He also writes

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 3>the book on OPEK as well, and he had a

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 3>really great column out earlier in the week that said

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 3>that the number two official in the Iranian delegation to

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 3>OPEC plus published commentary in his country's state run news

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 3>agency on November twenty six, it was since taken down,

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 3>it's taken down really fast. But he argued that OPEK

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 3>plus is facing a supply glut, largely of its own making,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 3>following several years of production cuts. As we can understand,

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 3>that strategy winds up supporting those that have lower input prices,

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 3>like say the US or offshore drillers, and encouraged higher

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 3>supply outside of the group.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Is that of view that is.

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Acknowledged at all in any way among the doors of

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 3>OPEC officials.

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 11>So I think that that's definitely kind of this ongoing

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 11>debate here. Is OPEK, by curbing their own production to

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 11>try to support prices, is that in effect basically opening

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 11>the door for all of this non OPEC production to flourish.

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 11>And that's been the case basically since OPEK got started.

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 11>I mean, this is not a new point that he's making.

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 11>This has always been, you know, an issue. This has

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 11>always been something that has been problematic, and I think

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 11>that you have to when you look at it in

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 11>the long you know, the kind of big picture you're

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 11>looking at. Look, there are cycles and oil prices.

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 12>It all goes through cycles.

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 11>There's boom and there's bust, and there's higher prices, and

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 11>there's lower prices, and there's always non OPEC production to

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 11>contend with. And unless OPEK has a real hold on

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 11>the most or the majority of the supply, they can't

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 11>control the market. And a period of very high prices

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 11>is going to lead to more production, you know, from

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 11>non OPEC sources, and then you have periods of low

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 11>prices and you're going to see some go go bust.

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 12>So I think that he's making a point.

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 11>He's saying that by curbing production for so long, we've

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 11>supported prices enabled these other guys to produce more, you know.

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 12>I think that's that's normal. They could have decided to

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 12>continue to take the Ali.

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 11>Naimi strategy, which was all out production, produce as much

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 11>as you can and try to get these higher cost

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 11>producers out of the market.

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 12>I don't think that worked as well as they thought

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 12>it would. It definitely has.

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 11>Potential, though, So it's it's definitely a tension within OPEC

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 11>that is ever present.

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 8>All right.

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 6>I told Alex, I'm watching the TV show Landman all

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 6>about the oil business down in like West Texas. I'm

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 6>learning all about this stuff. What are our friends in

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 6>Texas and Louisiana and Oklahoma. What are they doing in

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 6>terms of their drilling activity these days.

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 12>So it's nice that you're watching that.

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 11>I haven't haven't tuned in yet, but I've definitely got

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 11>it on my list.

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 12>I think that down in Tech it's.

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 11>A totally different picture now than it was, say, five

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 11>years ago, ten years ago. They're really looking at a

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 11>very different picture. We've got much larger producers running the

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 11>show now. We've had so many, you know, consolidations, not

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 11>just of the really little guys, but also even bigger acquisitions,

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 11>I mean, an excellent acquired pioneer, you know, we've got.

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 12>They're much bigger players.

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 11>Now, and they can afford to be more strategic about

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 11>their production.

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 12>So I think that in Texas now they're not.

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 11>Really all that concerned about what Opek is doing all

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 11>that much.

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 12>Production is at a record high in the United States

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 12>right now.

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 11>Apparently we're thirteen point five million parrels a day of production,

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 11>which makes the US.

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 12>The highest producer in the world right now.

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.719
<v Speaker 11>And so I think that they're really looking at it,

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, in a longer term situation now, because they

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 11>are larger producers and they're more established, and they can

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 11>afford to whether the lows more effectively than a lot

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 11>of the smaller producers could.

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 4>All right, Ellen really appreciate it. Thank you so very much.

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.439
<v Speaker 3>Ellen will called a president of Transversal Consulting and senior

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 3>fellow at the Atlantic Council, joining us there.

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 2>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 2>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 2>always on the Bloomberg terminal