WEBVTT - Maintaining The Magic

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>This crowd rises to its being.

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 2>What Carl slammed it out?

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 3>Carl left wing, three ball, perfect.

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Pop, the hell of block?

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>The shot in the rim? How in the left hand

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>head of fowl.

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Chase Down Podcast, part of the Caves Media

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 2>fam Me. I'm your Hostjessein Rowan. The Chase Town is

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 2>presented by Fubo, the official streaming partner of the Calves.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Watch over three hundred and fifty channels of live sports

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>and TV, including Van Duel Sports Network without cable is

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 2>no cost and no commitment. Try for free at FuboTV

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 2>dot com Slash Calves.

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 2>Last night's game against the Orlando Magic looked nothing like

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>the playoff series we had last season. The Cavs were

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>dominant from start to finish. The starters got to rest early.

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 2>It was another fun night to be a fan of

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the Cleveland Cavaliers, who are now one win shy of

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>last year's win total. Joining me today is my co host,

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Carter Rodriguez. Carter, how you doing, Buddy.

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing well? And they matched last year's win total.

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>B They won forty eight last year.

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was forty nine.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, some would argue it should have been, but I wasn't.

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 3>And yet they have indeed matched and they are they're

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 3>half a game off from with their wind total end

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 3>of that. But I gotta tell you, buddy, I'm not

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>in a basketball mood because I just got finished putting

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 3>my kids to bead okay, and my daughter is reading

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 3>her first ever like real chapter book right like it's

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>a big moment and it's a mystery and we've been

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 3>like just ramping up every chapter and we get to

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 3>the end and they don't solve the mystery, and she

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 3>was pissed. I'm like trying to explain to her how

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 3>like there's the ambiguous ass ending for this kid's mystery book.

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, what are we doing now?

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Is this a cliffhanger or is this just how it's

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>being left?

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 3>No, they just literally just don't solve it, and that's

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 3>the end of the book. They end up just deciding

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 3>to play something else instead of playing detective. And Milly

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 3>was like, well, I wanted to know what happened.

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I don't know, man.

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 2>This is just preparing her for watching the Sopranos, which

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think we can figure out what happened

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 2>in the sopranos. If anyone wants to get after me

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 2>with that, I have strong, strong opinions on what happened

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and why.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I get it for adult media, But what are we doing?

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 2>You got to work them in. You have to, you know,

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 2>start introducing it slowly, you know.

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 3>And the deep end, right, I'm unsatisfied. I wanted to

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 3>know who was tying that rope all through the neighborhood.

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, It's not a very compelling mystery, but still

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 3>for a kid, it was pretty compelling. Okay, so the

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 3>game last night wasn't very compelling. The Calves completely smoked

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 3>the Orlando Magic. Because of that, I want to ask you,

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 3>what was your first disappointment and you really remember with media,

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 3>whether it be a movie or a book.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, that's a really good question.

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Because I remember the first time I realized the movie

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 2>could suck. I went to the theater and I saw

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Master of Disguise. It was my first time ever being

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 2>disappointed with a movie.

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I was so easy, you know.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I remember I asked my dad once, like, what's the

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 3>worst thing you I ever made you take me to?

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 3>And he said spy kids. He hated spy kids.

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>That's fair but I see, I love that.

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I just do.

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 3>As a kid, I was, I was easy to please

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 3>as a kid, so I don't I can't remember it was.

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 3>I was definitely older, I feel than others. But Master

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 3>of Disguise truly was an awful.

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Movie, just truly, truly awful and a really fun fact

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>that exists there and I'm pretty sure everyone knows it.

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Calves were easy on the eyes. Though

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 2>it was not disappointing. It was a fun, fun performance

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 2>against the Orlando Magic. Obviously Orlando missing some key players

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Suggs. His absence has really been felt by them,

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 2>but they did have battle Bank Cao, Franz Wagner, Wendell

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Carter Junior called it a must win game for them,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>and you know, you were spec Orlando to put for

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 2>their best shot, right. I think we talked about this

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 2>coming out of the All Star Break, that there's going

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 2>to be teams looking to set the tone heading for

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the postseason. The Calves are going to be that litmus

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 2>test team for so many opponents and for Cleveland to

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 2>come out have you know, a start to the game

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 2>where neither team was really hitting a ton of shots,

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 2>but just kind of keep going at it, keep going

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>at it, getting quality looks against Orlando, and eventually, once

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 2>those floodgates open, DeAndre Hunter helped kick those in, by

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>the way, but once they opened up, they just didn't

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 2>close for the rest of the evening.

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Kind of felt like Hunter's first like I don't know,

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 3>like marquee moment with the team, Like he had a

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 3>couple big threes in other games, but it was like

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 3>he took like I felt like that was the line

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 3>of demarcation for the game, where it was like, this

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 3>is close, this is close, this is close. Let me

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 3>hit three straight threes and open this game up in

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>a way that Orlando never kind of regained contact.

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it really was. And you know, Max Strus

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.559
<v Speaker 2>got them going early. I said in our game threads

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and the discord that hey, when Struce hits his first one,

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 2>he's probably going to heat up.

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And he did a really nice shooting night from him.

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 2>And you know, it's funny to look back and reflect

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 2>on last year's series against Orlando because obviously how you play,

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 2>like when you play a team during the season matters

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot, right, teams naturally go through ebbs and flows,

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 2>They have peaks, and valleys. So you can't look at

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 2>this win over Orlando and say, yeah, that's you know,

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 2>that's last year's team. They're they're playing well, they're not

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>playing well, Like you can't take too too much away

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 2>from it, But I still couldn't help but feel how

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 2>stark the contrast was from last year where last year

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 2>Donovan Mitchell playing through an injury, was everything like he

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 2>was the one that needed to get everything going offensively.

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't him scoring. They just struggled to generate consistent offense.

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Darius wasn't contributing how he wanted to it. At that point,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 2>it was gone, like just up and down the roster,

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 2>they had so much trouble generating offense against this defense.

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 2>And for all of Orlando's struggles, they are still the

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 2>number two defense in the league. So on a night

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 2>where Donovan only gets eleven and five, and not because

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's shooting poorly and they're locking him up

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 2>or anything like that, he just didn't need to generate

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 2>offense in that way. But for a night where he

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 2>contributed so little from a box score perspective, no Darius

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 2>in the lineup for them to score as comfortably as

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 2>they did against this good of a defense. I think

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 2>it just goes to show you how the evolution of

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 2>this team has really taken place where there is so

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 2>much depth and there is so many guys that can

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 2>contribute in a variety of ways.

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it wasn't he wasn't really even playing

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 3>making that much like he led the team upside. But

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 3>but like at the end of the day, like I

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 3>just felt like they were running their stuff, and their

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 3>stuff was yielding really really good looks. And Struce was phenomenal,

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 3>absolutely phenomenal. I thought one of his best games of

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 3>the year, especially as a shooter. And you know, between Struce,

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Hunter and Jerome plus just a dash of Isaac Okoro,

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Like you got all the scoring you needed for the

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 3>entire game, and you know, those those four or five

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 3>guys are really all you needed. And that's not including

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, Jarrett or Evan who had seventeen on nine shots.

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Like it was a real testament to the depth of

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 3>the roster, real testament to like, you know, in a way,

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of what this week has been about. You

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 3>go go up against the Knicks and you go, oh,

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 3>we ain't the same team anymore, you know, we don't.

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 3>We can kill you in a hundred different ways, thank

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 3>you very much. And then you go against the magic

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 3>and you say we ain't the same team. You ain't either,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 3>but we definitely have gone up several notches. So if

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 3>you were hoping tonight was a night to prove that

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 3>you were you know what you were last year, you're

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 3>sorely mistaken. I mean, how many crises of confidence have

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 3>the Cavs caused this year?

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it's.

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Just been that's been their home mark trade is sending

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 3>teams into absolute shambles. And then you know, you go,

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 3>you look towards Friday, and the same thing presents. Are

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 3>you ready to prove to Boston that you ain't the

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 3>same team that is one and two against them in

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the regular season, that lost for to one in the

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 3>playoffs last year, that has struggled to get your offense

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 3>going this year the only team really they've struggled against. Yeah,

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 3>their offense going. And it's such an opportunity in front

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 3>of them, and such a reflection of the fact that

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 3>they are different. They are meaningfully better. They are growing

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:19.599
<v Speaker 3>and getting stronger and stronger every you know, month by month.

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 2>It's it's what I find really interesting. Right, Like, Matt

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Moore had a conversation about how he like firmly believes

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 2>that there's such thing in the regular seasons peaking too early, right,

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think that there is something to that. My

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 2>argument would be, at least when it comes to the

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland Cavaliers, you cannot make an argument that they've peaked

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 2>in the regular season because when your starters aren't playing

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 2>more than thirty minutes and you're experimenting and you're giving

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 2>guys run, Like I understand the net team results have

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 2>been phenomenal, but you're not throwing your fastball. You're not

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 2>doing that on a consistent basis. So unless you're artificially

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 2>like trying to hold down the success of guys like

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 2>a DeAndre Hunter or Ty Jerome so that the net

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 2>rating doesn't spike too soon, like, you can't make an

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 2>argument that they're peaking too early. And I just I

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 2>really really find it interesting because on the way up

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 2>throughout this kind of team building process with the Calves,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>we kept looking at markers around the NBA, right, Like,

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>You're always going to think you're special, because that's just

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 2>human nature. You're always going to think you're the main

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 2>character of the universe that that's.

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Just the way that it is.

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 2>So you think that your guys are going to achieve

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 2>their ceiling and you're going to reach these heights. But

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 2>when we were interviewing people from Orlando and Atlanta and

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Toronto and all these other young teams that were on

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the rise, it was it was an open question of

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 2>which of these kind of young cores was going to

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 2>take that step forward, right. There was debates around the

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>draft of Evan Mobley or Jalen Suggs, and you know,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 2>when Mobile was picked, people said, hey, we're going to

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 2>see what happens in a few years. It's going to

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 2>be interesting to track these two teams. And you know,

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I think once again, Evan Mobley had a phenomenal performance.

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 2>He's been a big, big part of this team's success.

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I think we've won in his career at a fifty

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 2>four win pace when Evan Mobley's in the lineup, So like,

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 2>obviously he's a big part of it. But it's just

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 2>amazing to me that this Calves team has really put

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 2>themselves forward in comparison to teams like it, you know, Orlando,

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>and not to mention the other teams, that we interviewed,

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 2>like Atlanta and Toronto and some of the other young

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 2>cores that we thought might be growing alongside the Calves

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 2>and bro This is where I just keep going back

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 2>to the fact that they made the right choices on

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the road. They didn't miss they didn't bail on anyone

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 2>too early, they didn't hang on to anyone too long. Really,

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 2>with the only exception you could really make is the

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 2>JB argument. But you know, at the end of the day,

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 2>like that, their roster construction has held firm, and you know,

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 2>I still fundamentally believe that giving him another year.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Was the right call.

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Like that's but that's certainly I felt like it was

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 2>a defensible call and one I think both of us

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 2>wanted them to make, so we certainly aren't going to

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 2>play you know, hindsight is twenty twenty here, But you know,

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 2>they've just made the right calls. And I forget who

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 2>it was, it was either s or Matt Moore that

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 2>was like, man, I just feel.

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 3>So bad for the Kings. You know, they had one

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 3>year being fun and on the rise, and now everything's

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of a mess again. And that just kind of

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 3>goes to like making the right calls investing in the

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 3>right players getting lucky in the right ways. Like I

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>tweeted during that during last night's game, with four minutes

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 3>and seventeen seconds left in Game seven of the first

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 3>round against the Magic, the Calves were down eighteen points.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And sure you.

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Can credit organizational philosophy and fortitude, but also how much

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 3>credit do you have to give to the players make

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 3>for gritting up making that comeback. Thank you Donovan for

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 3>going absolutely ballistic in the second half of that game

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 3>and getting us to the second round. Because I don't

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 3>know if any of this happens, I don't know the math,

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.359
<v Speaker 3>the whole math changes if you lose again to a

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 3>less talented, more physical team in the first round, like

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 3>and so like some of this stuff does just exist

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 3>on a knife's edge at the end of the day,

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>and you just I just keep going back to the

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 3>word grateful for the season they're having, because there's a

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>trillion roads, a trillion outcomes. You know, not to go

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, full doctor strange on you, but like you know,

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of outcomes where this isn't happening. So

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 3>the fact that we're in the timeline that it is,

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm very happy. Yeah, Well, you know, I think, as

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 3>you corrected me, that we have already matched last year's

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 3>win total and we've exceeded our Vegas over under for

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the season at least the initial line already. Like I

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 3>think it's a good time to kind of reflect on that, because,

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 3>let's be honest, forty eight wins is a pretty successful season.

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Like that's that's better than a lot of teams get to.

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 3>I forget how long it's been since the Washington Wizards

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 3>have had a fifty win season, but like a lot

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 3>of fan bases don't get up to forty eight, right, Like,

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 3>there were so many years that we've been podcasting and

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 3>covering this team where just getting to five hundred seemed

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 3>like a tall, tall kind of hill to climb, And

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 3>just reflected on last year of everything that the team

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 3>went through and just you know how difficult some of

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 3>those stretches were. Like this, rocks Man, like, this has

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 3>been a lot of fun, and I think it's a

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 3>big part of why, at least for myself, I've always

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 3>tried to compartmentalize both the regular season and the playoffs.

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 3>I can have an eye towards the postseason and kind

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 3>of view it as a separate entity that we're working towards,

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 3>while still really enjoying the fact that for eighty two nights,

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 3>I get to live and die with my team. I

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 3>get to talk about it with other cast fans, I

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 3>get to talk about it with you, like to me

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 3>that this is just such a big important part of

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 3>the fan experience. And as much as like my sights

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 3>are one hundred percent on what this team could accomplish

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 3>this season, and I'm like insanely excited about the opportunity

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 3>for this team to potentially win a championship this year.

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm I'm thoroughly thoroughly enjoying the ride. And I

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 2>don't think how I look back on this season is

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 2>going to be impacted a whole lot by the postseason,

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 2>at least when it comes to like regular season fondness.

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Of course, if they underachieve in the postseason, that's going

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>to put a sour taste in your mouth. But like,

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 2>this has just been such a fun run in and

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>when you have this kind of well founded hope, like

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 2>it's not a long shot that this team can contend

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>they are or can tender, that's a really really special

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 2>spot to be in.

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, You're absolutely right. And by the way, uh, isn't

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 3>it so interesting that Orlando is just basically on our

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 3>curve right now? You know, they have they have the

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 3>come up, they address some roster some you know, immediate

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 3>roster concerns, and they have a year where everything goes wrong,

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 3>and like, I'll be interested to see what lessons they

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 3>take away in their front office, which I think is

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 3>built a very good team, because I feel like they're

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 3>they're going to have to make some hard calls at

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the end of this year where they go, Okay, is

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 3>it that our roster is incompatible? You know, is there

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 3>not enough shooting in the front's Palo duo and not

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 3>enough like playmaking to like build a good offense or

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 3>are we just having a bad year.

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm really happy to add a space.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm really happy to add cap space last off season

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and sign Ksep instead of this because they might throw

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 2>a max contract at Tidrow after what.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>He did to them. Yes, you're not wrong about that.

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 3>So, you know, it is just interesting to see all

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 3>these teams that kind of ebb and flow and figure

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 3>out how they're going to deal with the kind of

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 3>because like when you're in it last year, it's you're

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 3>forgiven for being woe is me? Right of like, oh man,

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 3>can we just catch a break? Like, oh, this is

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 3>going to mess up our whole team building process, and uh,

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe our guys are just injury prone and

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 3>you're having all these kind of thoughts in your head.

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 3>And then at the end of the day, it's like

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 3>you look at Orlando, who are you know, generally sturdy

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 3>as hell, Like they were really really healthy all last

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 3>year and they're having the year from hell this year.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 3>And sometimes you just have to remember you like I

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 3>almost want to like go counsel their front offs and

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 3>be like, chill, guys, like you have a really good team.

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 3>It's just been a weird year for you.

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I would advise fans not to write them off,

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Like I think that that's a team that's going to

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 2>hang around. I wouldn't be surprised to see them give

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>a team hell in the postseason. I think that they

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>are going to have longevity. I think that's a team

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be someone that we're going to have to,

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, measure ourselves against still in the future in

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 2>the Eastern Conference, and is going to be coming for

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the Cavs. But I just I really think, you know,

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 2>kind of that key takeaway of we have so many

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 2>more guys that can contribute, that can initiate offense, that

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 2>can finish plays offensively. That's that's one of the biggest differences,

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 2>because you know, getting another good offensive performance against an

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 2>elite defense. That's an important thing for us to see.

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 2>The Calves still have the number one offense in the league.

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to how they play against top ten defenses,

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 2>they have a one to twenty one offensive rating in

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 2>those games. The next closest is the Knicks, and they're

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 2>almost two points worse. That's a pretty big gap when

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about how you perform against the best teams.

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 2>But you brought this up to me recently in a conversation,

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 2>and it's something that I've been meaning to touch on.

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Is back in twenty two to twenty three, when the

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 2>Caves lost to the Knicks, they had the number one

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 2>offense against top ten defenses in the league. That was

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 2>something that was true back then. It wasn't just that

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 2>they were beating up on the worst teams in the league.

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 2>And I think, you know, we did a good job

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 2>in the lead up to that series of highlighting, Hey,

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 2>there's been some struggles against the Knicks, even though overall

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the Cavs have quality wins. We have the twenty fourth

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 2>best offense against the Knicks. Like, when you look at

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 2>how teams perform, they struggle on that end. They really

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 2>struggle to end possessions with defensive rebounds, even though their

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 2>overall defense is good and all of that remained true

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 2>when you get to the playoffs. But the thing that

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 2>jumps out to me is when you just look at

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 2>the depth of that team, And I think that was

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 2>why coming out of that series where we were saying,

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 2>just got to improve the supporting cast, Like the core

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 2>needs to be better. We know Evan needs to take

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 2>a step forward, we know Darius, Donovan, Jarrett all need

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 2>to be better.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of.

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the supporting cast. Because when the Corps four

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 2>played with Isaac Okorro in that series, they had a

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 2>plus thirteen net rating. When they played with Caras, they

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 2>had a plus four net rating. But when you look

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 2>at the minutes leaders outside of that, it was Caris,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 2>then it was Jetty, then it was o'corl, Danny Green

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 2>and Ricky Rubio. We are in a much much different

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 2>scenario this season. And that goes beyond just you know,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 2>recognizing how much better every member of the core four

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 2>is now than they were back then.

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, that really does set up my point

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 3>that the calves are We've talked a lot about the

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 3>calves death. We've talked a lot about forty eight minutes

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 3>of how about them not having to play any lineups

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 3>that just kill them and no one else gets to

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 3>do that. Really, and I went ahead and just looked

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 3>at the twenty five most played.

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Five man lineups this year.

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Only six of those twenty five And by the way,

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 3>like the twenty fifth is like they've played thirty minutes together,

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 3>So this is like these are some of these liners

0:20:56.320 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 3>have barely played, even down at the bottom, so it

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 3>certainly is top heavy. And only of the top twenty five,

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 3>only six of them have a negative net rating, and

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 3>only one of them does not feature players who are

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 3>not longer who are no longer on this team, and

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.479
<v Speaker 3>that one lineup is like the eighth most played lineup,

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 3>and it's like minus two. It's not like they don't

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 3>have any like, well, we play this at a four

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 3>to five minutes every game, and it always gets schlected

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 3>like they don't have that. Every single lineup they play

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 3>is consistently good against every opponent, and that is such strength,

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 3>and that's not strength at the bottom of your roster

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.479
<v Speaker 3>in terms of your depth. While I think the Cavs

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 3>have that, I think the fact that there the middle

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 3>class of their roster it works so well in so

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 3>many different ways.

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>With the upper.

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Class of its roster that you just don't play. There's

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 3>no lineups that can't succeed, and that stuff vodes so

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 3>well given that the core four in the playoffs has

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 3>always performed well.

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>That's not to say.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 3>They've always performed well on offense well, which will remain

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 3>my angst. I was really really hoping that when you

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 3>mentioned me looking up their offensive rating two years ago

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 3>against top teams, I was like, I was almost hoping

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 3>it was bad so we could be like, well, look

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 3>at it now. So you know, at the end of

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 3>the day, we're not gonna find the silver bullet that

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 3>makes us feel like the offense is gonna still put

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 3>up one twenty per one hundred possessions in the in

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.479
<v Speaker 3>the postseason, but like, so we have to find all

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 3>these other anecdotal things to try to piece together the

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 3>case for why it will be different this time.

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's why, you know, we've consistently said, even

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 2>though we both firmly believe that this team is a contender,

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 2>we've said that there is nothing that can happen in

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 2>the regular season at this point. Even even if we

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 2>went out and we blew Boston out by forty on

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Friday in Boston, there's nothing that's going to make you say, Okay,

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 2>the Calves should be the favorite in this series. I

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 2>firmly believe that they can win that series, but you're

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 2>going to give that nod to the team with experience.

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 2>You are going to need to see the Calves offense

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>translate to the postseason. You're going to need to see

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 2>these guys step up. And I think you know, the

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 2>important distinction in what you're saying about how we haven't

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 2>seen the court not work in the playoffs is we've

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 2>seen them individually struggle. But even through their struggles, even

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, mobilely averaging or scoring one point as a

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 2>role man in the entire Knick series, Darius a shell

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 2>of himself last postseason. Despite all of that, you know,

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 2>positive net rating against the next positive net rating against

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 2>Boston even with no Jared Allen there, right, Like, it

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 2>still has worked and there was room for growth with them,

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 2>but so frequently that the question has been okay, is

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 2>there enough from a supporting cast standpoint? Is this going

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 2>to translate? Can our stars be stars in the series?

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 2>And that's going to be the biggest question, right, Like

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about looking forward to Friday and whatnot,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 2>you want to have some film of Evan Mobley having

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 2>success so offensively, I'm gonna want to see Darius playwell,

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 2>and you know, if they don't, that's going to be

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 2>a question heading into the series. It's going to be

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a question even if it goes well, but if they don't,

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 2>it's okay, Like this is going to be something.

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to see what they can do.

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 2>To close that gap between now and late May.

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's uh, I'm pretty uh. I'm pretty hype for

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 3>this Celtics game, justin I think it's important. I don't

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 3>think I don't know how many important like quote capital

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 3>I important games the Cavs have left in the regular season.

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Is this by far?

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 3>Is this the most Is this the only one left?

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 3>In terms of like, we don't we don't play.

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, see again, Like, I don't think that there's a

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 2>whole lot that can happen in the two remaining games

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 2>against the Knicks that would make me feel different about

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 2>those series. Like, barring injury, I feel pretty confident about

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 2>what the Cavs are capable of doing. If they came

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 2>out and laid an egg, you know that could happen.

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 2>But I'm my feelings on that series in that matchup

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 2>are not going to change, And even though that is

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 2>true against Boston, I still want to see success there.

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 2>I want to continue to learn more about that individual matchup.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 2>I want to see what does Evan Mobley have a

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 2>different approach, even if let's say he misses some of

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>those kind of in between shots. Let's say, okay, he's

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 2>just attacking porzingis a little differently than he did in

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 2>the last matchup. He looks a little more under control

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 2>and the jumper didn't fall. Like that kind of stuff

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 2>to me would be really really interesting. That's the kind

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 2>of stuff that I'm really looking forward to in that game.

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 2>And I'm also really interested assuming Darius Garland plays, which

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I forget who reported it, but apparently it was a

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 2>full participant in practice. Prior to the Magic game, it

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 2>was a I think you're I think you're.

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it was him because he's an unusual Cavs

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 3>report guy.

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that I think you're.

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 2>You're correct there, so full participant two days off before

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 2>this game in Boston. What the first thing that I'm

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 2>really looking forward to is how deep does Ken he

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 2>go with everybody available versus Boston. We know kind of

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 2>in our mind who we think the top nine is

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 2>going to be. Is that actually going to occur? Is

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, are the core going to play really well

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 2>against them? With Max Struce again? Like that that worked

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 2>really well in the last game. But it's a small

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 2>sample size, Like all these kind of little things that

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to learn about the matchup. I hate that

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>we have to wait until matchup four to see the

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 2>team fully healthy against Boston and kind of get an

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 2>idea for how Ken He's going to deploy them. But

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm really interested to kind of keep an eye on

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 2>that in that game.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Uh, and by the way, do we know their

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>top nine? Do we?

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Justin I said, we have an idea in our head

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 2>of who we think the top nine should be. But

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I still think Kenny's going ten in this game, Like,

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's going to trim it down to nine,

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 2>but I think we know who the top ten at

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 2>least is going to be.

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think that's certainly fair. And that's what I'm

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 3>actually most interested to see is will he trim it down?

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is a tough matchup for Sam Merril.

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 3>They switch like crazy, They don't give him any airspace.

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 3>They attack him on the other end of the floor. Like,

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 3>does he just go, Hey, we're bigger, we have the

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 3>ability to play bigger lineups than we did last time around.

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're not starting him as small forward like

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 3>we did in one of these matchups, Like, we have

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 3>the tools to play the way we want to play

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 3>without giving up all this size in this particular matchup.

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Because I do think there are matchups where Sam is

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 3>going to be super valuable, super helpful in terms of

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 3>just you know, using his gravity to to destabilize the

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 3>defense and places where maybe you can hide him a

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 3>little easier, either in a zone or you know, or

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 3>just in your switching scheme. But I'm interested to see

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 3>does he how bad? Does can he want to win this?

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 3>And will he you know, challenge some of his own

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 3>principles on the road to doing so.

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Like I expect Sam and to play. I think Sam's

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 2>been playing very well defensively.

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He's playing unbelievably well just period right now.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Like I think that he's probably going to go ten.

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 2>But just how he uses these guys who he pairs

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 2>them with, right like I think probably like it goes

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 2>to show you just how deep this team is on

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the defensive end of the floor. But like our worst

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 2>defender might be ty Jerome and even he's got active

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 2>hands and can be, you know, an event defender at times.

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm interested to see kind of what combinations can

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 2>he use and kind of what pairings he feels helps

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 2>him do his best work, just like Zuomei Companion helps

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.479
<v Speaker 2>us do our best work harder because only you can

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 2>do your best work, zoo Ai Companion can help you

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 2>do the rest, like automatically taking notes, answering meeting questions,

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 2>and helping you respond to your coworker. Available at no

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 2>additional cost with eligible pay plans. We're happy with Zuomei Companion.

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I am really excited for this game, man. I hope

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 2>you know obviously that Darius is going to be available.

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 2>I hope everyone from Boston is. I saw Porzingis was

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 2>dealing with a bit of a flu and Brown was

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 2>dealing with some knee soreness.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Brown is not playing against Detroit tonight. They're down by

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 3>sixteen in the fourth in Detroit as they go for

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 3>their eighth straight win. Which how about JB. Bickerstaff got

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 3>to give him a lot of love there. I have

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 3>a rotational question for you, brother man. Okay, so I

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 3>know you have been on team Start DeAndre Hunter, as

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 3>you know I'm on team star Max s trus Yep.

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Though I think you've made some very compelling arguments. Does

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 3>watching some of these games play out over the last

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 3>couple last couple of days. The Memphis game, I think,

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 3>in particular, really flew out at me. Where the ability

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 3>with Hunter off the bench, just to put him in

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 3>any with any combination, so easily being able to say, Okay,

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 3>we're actually gonna have you come get Mobiley to start

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to play you know, uh okoro ocoro,

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 3>struce Hunter on the wings, or have him come in

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 3>with Dean and then you play him at the three

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 3>and and maybe shift Strus down to the two. It's

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 3>felt really easy for Kenny to land with massive lineups

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 3>that feel really really good against other teams second units,

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 3>which I knew theoretically, which is part of the reason

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 3>I liked it. But has the feel of it changed

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 3>your opinion at all?

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 2>No, I think it's I've been completely validated in my take,

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 2>which is that I was totally fine with Max Threw's starting.

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a terrific lineup. It's been great this year.

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 2>But my entire point was if DeAndre Hunter is not starting,

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 2>he is not going to get minutes with the Core

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 2>four because teams can't keep it competitive long enough against

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>the Cavs. The way that Kenny goes deep in his

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 2>rotation is going to make it so that he's not

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 2>going to get those opportunities. And he has not played

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 2>a minute with the Core since his last start with

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the Core, which I believe was his first game with

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 2>the Cleveland Cavaliers. So like, I really like, I'm totally

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 2>fine with starting Max. I'm fine with starting Max going

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 2>into the playoffs. I just think that DeAndre Hunter is

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 2>a potential closing lineup with those guys. When you look

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 2>at how the Core with DeAndre Hunter lines up against

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 2>the Boston Celtics. That's a spot where the Calves have

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 2>more length at almost every position on the court. Donovan

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Mitchell is a longer player than Derek White, DeAndre Hunter

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 2>is longer than Jalen Brown. Evan Mobley is longer than

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Jason Tatum Porzingis, and Jared Allen. Porzingis has an edge there,

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 2>but you know it's at least throughout the guts of

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 2>both of those lineups, the Calves have a length advantage,

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 2>and I just don't think that that is something that

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 2>you are going to frequently have. And as much as

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 2>people have those conversations on the defensive end, I think

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 2>with what Boston does from a scrambling offense standpoint, from

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>an ability to make it harder for them to really

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 2>take away the guards, having that long rangey shooter that

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 2>is comfortable rising up over defenders and is almost as important,

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 2>not as like from a play initiation standpoint, but I

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 2>think from a keeping the defense on a standpoint, I

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 2>think that's almost as important as.

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Evan Mobley as of front coal Hub.

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 3>I hear you, and I think all this is good,

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 3>and this I think makes it such a good argument

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 3>because I really do think that I don't know if

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 3>there's an objectively right side to it, because where I

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of go is, Yeah, maybe he's not going to

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 3>get a tremendous amount of minutes with the Core four,

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 3>and that does seem to be a bit of a

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 3>seems a little scary, But he's gonna get a ton

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 3>of menace with three of them at a time.

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Ye, Like, it's the whole of my argument. No, you

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 2>know you're correct in pointing that out. And the other

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 2>like counter to that is DeAndre Hunter since he's joined

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 2>the Cavs has looked like a seamless pitch no matter

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 2>what the lineup is. He just knows how to play

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 2>off of guys. It's not like he needs to get

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 2>some feel for oh where does Donovan like to get

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 2>this kind of pass? Because know what, DeAndre and here

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 2>for passing. He's there to finish plays, get stops, be

0:33:56.360 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 2>active like this is this is I think the rucks

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 2>of it, you know, like he's there to finsh place.

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Like I understand your point.

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 3>I think his job is simple enough in both contexts,

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, compared to others. It's funny the people what

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually if I'm Kenny, what I'm most interested in

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 3>is him playing with the two bigs at the same time,

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 3>because that's the hardest thing to do for them if

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't start, because those guys really mostly start the

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 3>first quarter, start the third quarter, and close the game.

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 3>So like, even though I think he's gonna get plenty

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:36.959
<v Speaker 3>of time with Darius and Donovan at the same time,

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 3>and even if it's just one of them, I don't

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 3>think the Cavs meaningfully changed the way they play that

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 3>much when Ty comes out there, Like, I think they're

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 3>pretty much playing the same style of ball. So like,

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 3>while there's some something to be said about like playing

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 3>with a guy and knowing his idiosyncrasy is up close, Like,

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't think stylistically his job changes that much. I

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 3>do think his job a little bit with Mobile and

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Allen together, you know, he goes from being a small

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:09.479
<v Speaker 3>ball four or you know, being a very switchy three

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 3>next to Dean Wade and those lineups too, Like, oh,

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I need to go be like a bulldog at the

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.280
<v Speaker 3>point of attack, and I need to play defensively, differently

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 3>and offensively. I need to occupy different parts of the

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 3>floor to make sure I'm apprope because of your space.

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 3>It's just becomes more crucial to space appropriately when you

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 3>have less shooting on the floor. So that is the

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 3>one caveat that I would say is if I'm kidny,

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 3>I am trying, I would like to tweak things just

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 3>a little bit to get him time with the two bigs.

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 3>But again, I don't think he has to start to

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 3>do that. But going back to your point, if he's

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 3>not going to tweak things, then maybe he should start.

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, man, it's a tough question to solve

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 3>for and I know you also.

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I completely agree with you. I think that as a

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 2>front court trio is more important than playing with the

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 2>guards like Darius and Donovan, They're going to figure it out.

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I like, their job initiating the offense isn't going to

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 2>be that different. I still like, I do believe that

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 2>DeAndre Hunter in that spot at small forward alongside the

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 2>two bigs, it's going to be a pretty easy role

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 2>for him, right Like, just because it's two bigs. The

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 2>way that they play is very similar to how they

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:26.760
<v Speaker 2>play even when they are going four out right, because

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.879
<v Speaker 2>you're going to see you know, Jared Allen and Evan

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Mobley up at the three point line. Even when they're

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 2>both there right, like, just from a screaming screening standpoint

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 2>and just the variety of offense they run. The spacing

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 2>is there because you have to account for them defensively.

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 2>As a screener. You can't just say, oh, you know,

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 2>it's Jared Allen saying the screen, I can sit back

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 2>in the paint. No, Donovan and Darius are going to

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 2>kill you. The second and third actions here are going

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 2>to kill you. So you're going to have spacing from

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 2>that standpoint, But I just like, I just want to

0:36:56.800 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 2>get the reps in man like I and going into

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 2>this game, I'm a little uncomfortable that if they do

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 2>play minutes together, it's the first time they've played together

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 2>since they played the Toronto Raptors, and the Boston Celtics

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 2>are not the Toronto Raptors. Like it's I just I

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 2>want to see I want to see it.

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 3>I think, really what it comes down to is, I'm

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 3>not worried about the starters against Boston. I'm worried about

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 3>second units. I think our starters can and should be

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 3>able to hang with their starters who don't even have

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 3>a positive net rating on the season. Shouts to you

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 3>for that stat unbelievable. So if there is so like

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 3>where we've lost is in those second quarters where they

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 3>make a run with in We've got you know, Darius

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 3>or Donovan getting caught on Chris Stap's hip and George

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Niang trying to protect the rim while Evan is guarding

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Derek White on the other side of the floor because

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 3>you can't leave him. Like, that's the stuff that kills us,

0:37:56.480 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 3>That's the stuff that killed us last year. And until

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm proven that that's not what kills us, I'm going

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 3>to roll with the thing that has empirically made this

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 3>matchup hard for us.

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 2>And you know, one game where Max started against Boston,

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 2>they had a plus nineteen net rating if you look

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 2>at so take that first match up against Boston where

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Sam Merril was starting at the three and Ty Jerome

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 2>played a bunch of three and we didn't have a

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.879
<v Speaker 2>single wing available. If you look at the two kind

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 2>of subsequent games, Core four when they're on the court,

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 2>no matter who they were with, had a one on

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 2>one defensive rating. That like, that's going to hold how

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 2>we play against them defensively. I'm interested to see how

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 2>it changes now that when we go to these you know,

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 2>second unit lineups. You're able to have Dean Wade out there.

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 2>This is going to be the first time that he's

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 2>played against Boston this season. You're going to have DeAndre

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Hunter out there. You're going to have more length than

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 2>you had in the past. But it is even with

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:58.760
<v Speaker 2>that length, I'm not interested in changing up the scheme

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 2>of how we played against I'm I'm okay with you know,

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 2>them continuing even with the length. If they want to

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 2>take Jason Tatum mid range jumpers against Darius Garland, he

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 2>can take nineteen of those for all I care, like,

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 2>even if he hit sixty percent of them in this game,

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 2>I Am going to live with that trade off, and

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 2>that would be an outlier because he is a bad

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 2>mid range shooter. He is like a thirtieth percentile mid

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 2>range shooter, and he is shooting terribly us Darius this season.

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's where the length helps.

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.800
<v Speaker 3>It's not that you have It's not that it allows

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 3>you to execute the scheme you already have better because

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Darius is still gonna get caught on Tatum and every

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 3>now and again, Tatum's gonna be Darius and you're gonna

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 3>need to help. Okay, That's fine. And every now and again,

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Darius or Donovan is gonna get caught on Porzingis on

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 3>the nail, which is the scariest. I think that's the

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 3>number one thing that has made the Cavs look like

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 3>crap against Boston is when one of the guards gets

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 3>caught with Perzingis on the nail, he can throw it anywhere.

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 3>All those passing lanes and angles are super easy. He attacks.

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 3>They have to put two on the ball game blouses.

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 3>That is the worst thing that happens against the Celtics

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 3>for this Cavs team and this Caves scheme. However, what

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 3>this length allows you to do is tag people that

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 3>f out. That's what you need to be able to

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 3>do is when they run an off ball action to

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:35.959
<v Speaker 3>go get Darius on Porzingis, someone like Hunter can tag

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 3>him out and close and then they can use all

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 3>that length to close those cross court passes for open

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 3>threes that otherwise they can't close out. Yeah they can.

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 3>And then once you get that, once you get Wade

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 3>or Hunter on Porzingis, yeah he's still a really good

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 3>post scorer. Yeah, every now and again he's gonna kill you.

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 3>But like there are certain things with a team as

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 3>good as Boston. You just have to step might happen defensively,

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 3>which is, by the way, why I remain most worried

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 3>about our offense, because I think we can control that better. Yeah,

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.439
<v Speaker 3>but like those are those are the kinds of sacrifices

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm willing to live with. I'm not really willing to

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 3>live with Darius Garland in a post up on an

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 3>island against Christaps Porzingos, and by the way, neither is

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Kenny Atkinson because they've had to put two on the

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 3>ball and two on the ball against Boston is death.

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Yep, yep, I totally agree.

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:30.919
<v Speaker 2>Like it's that that's the one spot where I don't

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 2>think you can just guard them straight up right like

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.839
<v Speaker 2>everywhere else, I am fine with guarding them straight up.

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 2>And like, wait, when Tatum gets onto Garland, it reminds

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:41.720
<v Speaker 2>me a lot of when the Spurs put Bores Dil

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 2>on Lebron, where it's like, all right, this is going

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 2>to bait him into his worst habits. He is going

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 2>to take a pull up jumper, a mid range jumper

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 2>every single time, and we're going to live with that.

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 2>If he decides to go to the rim, which this

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 2>is the same thing with Tatum and Garland. When he

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 2>goes to the rim, we are going to have help

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 2>defenders there. We're going to have Evan Mobley and Jared Allen,

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 2>just like they had Tim Duncan Antiago Splitter out there.

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 2>They able to you know, disrupt some of those shots

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 2>at the rim. The porzingis thing that's going to be interesting.

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be really really interested to see who

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 2>ends up on him, how they're able to you know,

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:21.359
<v Speaker 2>tag out and get the length there. DeAndre Hunter and

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:23.919
<v Speaker 2>Dean Wade I think can both Like I will live

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:26.879
<v Speaker 2>with porzingis shooting over DeAndre Hunter or Dean Wade, even

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:31.720
<v Speaker 2>if he's hitting those shots. That is a almost every

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 2>single player on the Boston Celtics, if they are shooting

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 2>over a cow's defender and you're not bringing to the

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 2>ball and you're not giving up these wide open looks

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:43.800
<v Speaker 2>and opportunities.

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I will live with that.

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 2>The one exception is porzingis on Garland or on Mitchell,

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 2>or on Ty Jerome or on Sam Marris.

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 3>Just not getting contested at that point. He's just not no, no.

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:58.399
<v Speaker 2>That That is like the extreme example where I'm like, well,

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:00.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, I hate the whole shoot for guys kind

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 2>of talking about he's seven to three. Yeah, yeah, No,

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 2>that guy is massive. When it's a what difference? It's

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 2>a difference?

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:09.439
<v Speaker 3>Can we talk about the other side of the ball,

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 3>because that's where I'm again, I remain the most focused.

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 3>It's where the Calves have had the biggest drop off.

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:17.720
<v Speaker 3>They have a one twenty two point like one offensive

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 3>rating on the season. They're like one thirteen point eight

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 3>against Boston. They're not losing these games on the defensive

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 3>end of the floor. They are losing them on the

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:27.880
<v Speaker 3>offensive end of the floor when they've lost.

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And.

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what it's not like the Calves don't

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 3>face other teams who are pretty good at switching, or

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 3>that are physical or have good guards that can guard

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 3>up like other teams can do that. What is the

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 3>difference to with the Celtics team that makes it so

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 3>hard for them to get their offensive because it.

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Feels like.

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Even on the games they've scored well, it's been Donovan's

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 3>playing really well and scoring really well. It doesn't feel

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 3>like they've been able to engage the Cavaliers death.

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Machine on offense against Boston so far.

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't know if it's ever going to feel

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 2>that way just because Boston is able to keep pace,

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, in most matchups. I think what has felt

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of the most consistent in the three matchups against

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Boston this season is that it has taken them a

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 2>quarter to get going, and they press and they rush it.

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 2>And whether it's the matchup, whether it's you know that

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 2>the games have been nationally televised and knowing that there's

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:37.359
<v Speaker 2>a focus on it, whatever kind of the cause is,

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:42.280
<v Speaker 2>they are taking themselves out of how they traditionally play.

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think everyone is so excited to kind

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 2>of make the play that they are just getting out

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 2>of their game a little bit. And that's one of

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:51.399
<v Speaker 2>those spots where you know.

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 3>The rest, like every jumper is rushed and stressful for

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 3>the offensive player and they.

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:01.959
<v Speaker 2>Get you know, can systemly good looks like they are

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:05.320
<v Speaker 2>going to get, you know, wide open shot attempts versus Boston.

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not too worried about that. Boston gives up a

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:11.839
<v Speaker 2>lot of those, particularly since Kristaps Porzingis has come back

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 2>and they play a little differently defensively than they do

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 2>without Horford.

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's.

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:19.959
<v Speaker 2>Going to come down to do they play under control,

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 2>I think if they play under control and the results

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 2>are similar, Like you know, Evan Mobley is not forcing

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 2>it at the rim against Porzingis and Al Horford. You know,

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Garland is getting to his floater rather than trying to

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 2>get all the way to the rim, which you know,

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 2>I think sometimes he's tried to do a little bit

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:42.240
<v Speaker 2>too much inside the paint. If the process is better,

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I care about that more than the results, as much

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 2>as I really, like, deeply want to see the results

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 2>validate that process. I want to see do we approach

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 2>this game with a little more maturity than we did

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:56.479
<v Speaker 2>in those other games? Because I feel like in those

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 2>other games, once the Cavs have settled in, they have

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 2>managed to orwell, they have managed to come back and

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 2>win a game. They have managed to come back and

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 2>contest to the other ones right where it is within

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 2>five points in the last five minutes, right, They have

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:14.319
<v Speaker 2>been able to do that in every single one of

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:17.399
<v Speaker 2>these matchups. Can they put their best foot forward at

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 2>the start in a hostile environment, one of you know,

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 2>one of the tougher road arenas to go into and win.

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Are they able to get it done in that setting?

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Are they able to show that composure that to me

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 2>is the number one thing that I'm looking for Friday.

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 3>If the Celtics are a whole, would this be the

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 3>best win of the season.

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 2>I am going to say okay See was still the

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:48.879
<v Speaker 2>best win the home game against Oka See because Oka

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 2>See has been a better regular season team. I think

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Boston okay See is still on the kind of cash

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 2>trajectory of we have something to prove every single game

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a stay in the matchup. I

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 2>think the Caves could come out and punch Boston in

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:07.920
<v Speaker 2>the mouth and it wouldn't change how the Celtics feel

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:12.720
<v Speaker 2>about themselves going into that series. You know, they've already

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.400
<v Speaker 2>got their wins against Cleveland this season. If they split

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:17.839
<v Speaker 2>the season series, I don't think it means as much

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 2>to them. And like, honestly, okay So should probably be

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the title favorite. Like if there's a series against Boston,

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that they can get Boston, Like I don't.

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>They will, they would get Boston, Yeah, Like I.

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Would pick them in a series. I don't believe Boston

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 2>has beat them this season.

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Like again, the Calves are having a historically good year

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:40.720
<v Speaker 3>and okay See, by the metrics, is a lot better.

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's you know, I think that that was the

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 2>best one that we had, particularly, you know, it being

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 2>at the time where it's like, okay, can the Calves

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 2>get a statement win? So much build up, like a

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:57.240
<v Speaker 2>week worth of build up by you know, the NBA,

0:47:57.520 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 2>NBA partners, You get all these kind of interviews and

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 2>all that kind of stuff that could add pressure to

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 2>that matchup. I just don't think that this Friday game

0:48:06.920 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 2>is going to be kind of felt the same way.

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:14.480
<v Speaker 2>And our buddy Anthony Lima brought up a terrifying possibility

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:17.799
<v Speaker 2>on the radio that I think it was today where

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 2>he was saying, Joe Missoula is a big mind games guy.

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:23.879
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't be surprised if he rests some guys don't don't

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:26.400
<v Speaker 2>let the Cavs get the tape take some air out.

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Of this matchup. That would be infuriating.

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be resentful if they're not, you know,

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:34.400
<v Speaker 2>full I'm going to blame him too, you know what.

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And we know that he is a listener and supporter

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 2>of this year podcast and we love you, Tony, but

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 2>you know I'm going to blame you for speaking that

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 2>in existence if it does occur.

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that would be disgusting and unethical and couldn't possibly

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:52.399
<v Speaker 3>be me. Uh yeah, it's uh. I will say that

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 3>the Thunder game probably is the best win of the season.

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 3>I think this would this would be the most important

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 3>win of the season because right now, right this very second,

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:08.799
<v Speaker 3>I still probably would pick Boston in a series. I

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 3>just think I think I haven't seen us solve the

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 3>problems they pose for us consistently enough. If they go

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:22.880
<v Speaker 3>out and Boston goes out fully healthy in the garden

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 3>and we show something we put up a one to

0:49:27.040 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty five offensive rating, I do think there is a

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 3>meaningful that's meaningful to me to see the offensive engine

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 3>get going. So I think it could be our most

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 3>important game of the season ben one way or the other,

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 3>because if they come out and put up another you know,

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:46.320
<v Speaker 3>they followed down fourteen and get it back to four

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 3>and ultimately lose again, you know, I think I think

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 3>we're past moral victory season with Boston. Yeah, I think

0:49:57.000 --> 0:49:59.360
<v Speaker 3>they got to go win. They got to go show

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:04.200
<v Speaker 3>that are that they have solved the problems that this

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Boston team poses for them, or at least have solutions

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 3>for them. I think that's probably a better framing than solved,

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:13.919
<v Speaker 3>because you don't really solve a team that's good. No, No,

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:17.279
<v Speaker 3>It's going to come down to, you know, execution. You

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 3>play the series over ten times, you might get different

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 3>results every single time. I'm a live chat is booing

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:26.320
<v Speaker 3>me right now for saying that I'm in trouble.

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Good good.

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say, there's two things I want

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 2>to add to what you said, and the first, I

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 2>think is just an honest assessment of who I am

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 2>as a person. Even though I've said, you know, there's

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 2>nothing the Cavs can do to make themselves the favorite

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 2>in that series. If I'm being honest with myself, if

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:46.919
<v Speaker 2>we were doing a season series preview, if I feel

0:50:46.960 --> 0:50:48.799
<v Speaker 2>there's even a ten percent chance the Caves are going

0:50:48.800 --> 0:50:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to win the series, I'm going to pick them in that. Seriously,

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 2>the most unfair thing about our podcast dynamic because if

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:59.839
<v Speaker 2>I if I think there's a forty five percent chance

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:02.479
<v Speaker 2>the Calves will win, I would pick the other team.

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:05.240
<v Speaker 2>And if you think there's a forty five percent chance,

0:51:05.440 --> 0:51:07.919
<v Speaker 2>because I'm just literally saying what I think is most

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 2>likely to happen, I'm being an honest, objective statistician, and

0:51:13.040 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 2>you're sitting here, you know, play into the crowd and

0:51:19.719 --> 0:51:22.319
<v Speaker 2>literally saying that you think that they have a ten

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 2>percent chance of winning, and yet you get the bonus

0:51:25.080 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 2>points for picking the Calves. I I this is this

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 2>is sickening. Look behind me, Carter, there's a little plaque

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 2>there getting I'm getting destroyed right now. There's a lot

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 2>that's horrible for me. There's a little plaque right behind me.

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 2>It has a piece of the floor. When the Calves

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 2>came back from down three to one, don't tell me

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the odds. Don't tell me that the Calves can't overcome

0:51:45.880 --> 0:51:47.240
<v Speaker 2>the percentages of the odds.

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't.

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, don't do you that you know I

0:51:52.400 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 2>have faith.

0:51:53.000 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I have belief. I bleed wine and gold here. Man,

0:51:56.000 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>This this is what I do.

0:51:58.160 --> 0:51:59.879
<v Speaker 2>I also have a caveat for you where I will

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 2>change my mind and say that this is the most

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 2>important win. If oh, yeah, we go into this game

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:09.880
<v Speaker 2>and Evan Mobley looks like the best player on the court.

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:12.719
<v Speaker 2>If Evan Mobley comes out and he has, you know,

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:16.840
<v Speaker 2>a twenty eight ten or a twenty eight fifteen to

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:20.319
<v Speaker 2>eight game against the Boston Celtics, I will say that

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:23.400
<v Speaker 2>this is the most important win because I still firmly

0:52:23.440 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 2>believe Evan Mobley, how far he is able to elevate

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 2>himself is going to dictate how far this team can go,

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:34.399
<v Speaker 2>how far they whether or not they can win a championship.

0:52:34.640 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Evan Mobley needs to be at that level. As much

0:52:37.520 --> 0:52:39.439
<v Speaker 2>as I want to see Darius and Donovan play well,

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I know that they are capable of it. I know

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:44.279
<v Speaker 2>they're also capable of struggling in the matchup against two

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:48.240
<v Speaker 2>elite defensive guards. Evan Mobley needs to be that game breaker.

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 2>So if he comes out and he looks like he

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 2>did against the Knicks, where he looked like the best

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 2>player on the court, that is going to be a

0:52:54.640 --> 0:52:55.759
<v Speaker 2>very meaningful thing for.

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Me, and I will amend my stance.

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I will say though he did have twenty one to

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:02.839
<v Speaker 2>ten and seven in that game against Okay, see, he's

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:03.839
<v Speaker 2>pretty goddamn good.

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:04.839
<v Speaker 1>He was pretty good.

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 3>But again, I just think Boston has there's some uh

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, Jordan against the Bad Boy Pistons, Yep, you know,

0:53:13.160 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 3>like like some you have to come over over Timers

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 3>against the Lake, the Showtime Lakers, like Ron early on. Yeah,

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 3>there are certain teams that just you know, they've got

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.520
<v Speaker 3>certain they know, they think they own you. I think

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:33.279
<v Speaker 3>this Boston team has no fear of this Cavs team,

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:37.880
<v Speaker 3>and I want to show I want the Calves to

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:41.399
<v Speaker 3>put that bear into them at the end of the day.

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:44.080
<v Speaker 3>And that's why this game I think matters so much.

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's you know, that's really like what's on

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 2>the line, right It's the opportunity, the final opportunity of

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 2>this season to play a contender. You know, all due

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:58.640
<v Speaker 2>respect to the New York Knicks and some of the

0:53:58.680 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 2>other teams that are kind on that bubble that you know,

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 2>can potentially win any series, but when it comes to

0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:07.960
<v Speaker 2>the true blue contenders, this is the last matchup that

0:54:08.000 --> 0:54:09.680
<v Speaker 2>we have against one we do not play.

0:54:09.719 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, see again this.

0:54:10.719 --> 0:54:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Year it's it's really really going to be an interesting game.

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:18.520
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be able to learn more from the

0:54:19.440 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, the rest of the regular season, but this

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:24.919
<v Speaker 2>is our last chance to play Boston and no whether

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:26.280
<v Speaker 2>or not we get the one seed.

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:30.839
<v Speaker 3>Val arrested by the way, come on, it's the time

0:54:30.960 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 3>is now, bro, like they could they this is the

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 3>time to make that statement, the last big statement.

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Here's here's the thing, Like the one seed isn't up

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 2>in the air anymore.

0:54:43.400 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it's I.

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Believe Boston lost and night is that correct?

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 1>They did? They did?

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So with that loss, if the Calves go five

0:54:52.640 --> 0:54:55.359
<v Speaker 2>hundred the rest of the way, I think Boston would

0:54:55.440 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 2>have to go like eighteen and five to tithe if

0:54:59.520 --> 0:55:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the Calves when eighteen and the correct. If the Cavs

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:06.239
<v Speaker 2>went eighteen and six, which is, you know, worse than

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:10.200
<v Speaker 2>their season long pace, Boston could not catch them. If

0:55:10.200 --> 0:55:15.319
<v Speaker 2>they go undefeated. Yep, Like the one seed is not

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:18.319
<v Speaker 2>up for grabs here, man, Like that is.

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Long something absolutely disastrous, Yes, and perfect play out of Boston.

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, It's just too hard of a hill to climb.

0:55:28.920 --> 0:55:30.960
<v Speaker 2>It was funny to see, you know. We came out

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:33.320
<v Speaker 2>of the All Star Break with I think the fourteenth

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 2>toughest strength of schedule, and then after that weekend where

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:38.880
<v Speaker 2>we smoked the Necks and you know, got that win

0:55:38.920 --> 0:55:42.520
<v Speaker 2>against Memphis, it dropped all the way down to twenty first.

0:55:42.960 --> 0:55:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen.

0:55:43.680 --> 0:55:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Where it went after the mass Now, okay, so nineteenth,

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 2>like it's already fallen off a whole lot. So I'm

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:54.920
<v Speaker 2>really really looking for this game. I'm hoping that Darius

0:55:55.000 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 2>is going to play. I think, you know, the signs

0:55:57.000 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 2>are at least positive in that direction. And you know,

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:02.839
<v Speaker 2>let's hope that there's no Joe Miziula mind games here.

0:56:03.480 --> 0:56:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, I hope not. I mean, I'm too hyped.

0:56:08.200 --> 0:56:09.920
<v Speaker 3>One thing that plays in our favor is it's a

0:56:10.040 --> 0:56:13.640
<v Speaker 3>national TV game. Yea, So the Point does care about

0:56:13.719 --> 0:56:17.239
<v Speaker 3>about that kind of stuff. What a run of I

0:56:17.239 --> 0:56:19.399
<v Speaker 3>don't know if we ever had this many national games

0:56:19.440 --> 0:56:19.919
<v Speaker 3>in a row.

0:56:19.840 --> 0:56:24.400
<v Speaker 1>In the Lebron era. Bro, this is bananas, and we

0:56:24.560 --> 0:56:25.839
<v Speaker 1>keep handling a lot of them.

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Particularly got another one they just flexed the Sunday Night

0:56:29.680 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 3>against in Milwaukee up to ESPN.

0:56:32.320 --> 0:56:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, it's like seven out of nine games.

0:56:35.880 --> 0:56:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Milwaukee's not a true blue contender, but anytime you're playing

0:56:38.200 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Giannis and Dam that's going to be a fun one

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 2>as well. But the Calves have done such a good

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:45.359
<v Speaker 2>job in these National TV games so far this year,

0:56:45.400 --> 0:56:48.040
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like all the Friday ones that we've

0:56:48.080 --> 0:56:51.080
<v Speaker 2>really anticipated, I think Lakers Warriors, some of the other

0:56:51.120 --> 0:56:53.920
<v Speaker 2>ones that we've had this season have all kind of

0:56:53.920 --> 0:56:56.920
<v Speaker 2>turned up. They've all turned out to be these really

0:56:57.000 --> 0:57:00.880
<v Speaker 2>comfortable wins for the Calves and I because when it

0:57:00.920 --> 0:57:04.040
<v Speaker 2>happens on a Friday, the NBA national podcasters get to

0:57:04.080 --> 0:57:05.840
<v Speaker 2>ignore it, and I really don't.

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Want that to be the case. But I will live

0:57:07.760 --> 0:57:08.240
<v Speaker 1>with them.

0:57:08.120 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Ignoring it if it means the Cavs get a win

0:57:10.200 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 2>on Friday, Because, unlike you, Carter, I'm here rooting for

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:14.360
<v Speaker 2>the Cleveland Cavaliers.

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I hate you.

0:57:15.640 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I hate you too, buddy, but I love our listeners.

0:57:17.840 --> 0:57:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to everyone tuning in on YouTube for putting Carter.

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:21.240
<v Speaker 1>In his place.

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:23.720
<v Speaker 2>He really needs that from time and time again. Appreciate

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:25.800
<v Speaker 2>you guys hanging out with us. Make sure you like

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and subscribe. Click that notification, Belsie No when we're going live.

0:57:29.040 --> 0:57:30.600
<v Speaker 2>If you're listening to your podcast and you want to

0:57:30.600 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 2>support us, leave us a rating they review, subscribe unsubscribed,

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:35.240
<v Speaker 2>resubscribe and help cook those books. If you want to

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:37.360
<v Speaker 2>be part of the Chase Down's exclusive discord chat, Sidney

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:39.840
<v Speaker 2>screenshow our view to Chase downpotd at gmail dot com.

0:57:39.920 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 2>However you choose to support us, we really do appreciate it.

0:57:42.400 --> 0:57:44.240
<v Speaker 2>For sure, you guys are staying safe out there until

0:57:44.240 --> 0:58:07.440
<v Speaker 2>next time. Joki Stimann Sada san Se